51
|
Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, Oczkowski S, Levy MM, Derde L, Dzierba A, Du B, Aboodi M, Wunsch H, Cecconi M, Koh Y, Chertow DS, Maitland K, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, Greco M, Laundy M, Morgan JS, Kesecioglu J, McGeer A, Mermel L, Mammen MJ, Alexander PE, Arrington A, Centofanti JE, Citerio G, Baw B, Memish ZA, Hammond N, Hayden FG, Evans L, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:854-887. [PMID: 32222812 PMCID: PMC7101866 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1310] [Impact Index Per Article: 327.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting thousands of people around the world. Urgent guidance for clinicians caring for the sickest of these patients is needed. METHODS We formed a panel of 36 experts from 12 countries. All panel members completed the World Health Organization conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel proposed 53 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 in the ICU. We searched the literature for direct and indirect evidence on the management of COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the ICU. We identified relevant and recent systematic reviews on most questions relating to supportive care. We assessed the certainty in the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, then generated recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice recommendations. RESULTS The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued 54 statements, of which 4 are best practice statements, 9 are strong recommendations, and 35 are weak recommendations. No recommendation was provided for 6 questions. The topics were: (1) infection control, (2) laboratory diagnosis and specimens, (3) hemodynamic support, (4) ventilatory support, and (5) COVID-19 therapy. CONCLUSION The Surviving Sepsis Campaign COVID-19 panel issued several recommendations to help support healthcare workers caring for critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. When available, we will provide new recommendations in further releases of these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Morten Hylander Møller
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 4131, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yaseen M Arabi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mark Loeb
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Michelle Ng Gong
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Healthcare System/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simon Oczkowski
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Mitchell M Levy
- Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Lennie Derde
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Amy Dzierba
- Department of Pharmacy, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bin Du
- Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 1 Shuai Fu Yuan, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Michael Aboodi
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Healthcare System/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Hannah Wunsch
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Younsuck Koh
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel S Chertow
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - Fayez Alshamsi
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, PO Box 17666, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Emilie Belley-Cote
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Massimiliano Greco
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew Laundy
- Microbiology and Infection Control, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & St George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Jozef Kesecioglu
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Allison McGeer
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leonard Mermel
- Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Manoj J Mammen
- Department of Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
| | - Paul E Alexander
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- GUIDE Research Methods Group, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Amy Arrington
- Houston Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | | | - Giuseppe Citerio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Milan, Italy
- ASST-Monza, Desio and San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Bandar Baw
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ziad A Memish
- Director, Research and Innovation Centre, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Naomi Hammond
- Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health and UNSW, Sydney, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Frederick G Hayden
- Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University, of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Laura Evans
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Andrew Rhodes
- Adult Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & St George's University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Use of glucocorticoids in the critical care setting: Science and clinical evidence. Pharmacol Ther 2020; 206:107428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
53
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:10-67. [PMID: 32030529 PMCID: PMC7095013 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 283] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 49 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 52 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | | | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark E Nunnally
- New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raina M Paul
- Advocate Children's Hospital, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Lansbury LE, Rodrigo C, Leonardi-Bee J, Nguyen-Van-Tam J, Shen Lim W. Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Influenza: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e98-e106. [PMID: 31939808 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Corticosteroids may be beneficial in sepsis, but uncertainty remains over their effects in severe influenza. This systematic review updates the current evidence regarding corticosteroids in the treatment of influenza and examines the effect of dose on outcome. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, CENTRAL, and Web of Science) and trial registries were searched to October 2018 for randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and observational cohort studies reporting corticosteroid versus no corticosteroid treatment in individuals with influenza. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Two researchers independently assessed studies for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (randomized controlled trials) or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (observational studies). Where appropriate, we estimated the effect of corticosteroids by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the association of corticosteroid dose and mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified 30 eligible studies, all observational apart from one randomized controlled trial. Twenty-one observational studies were included in the meta-analysis of mortality, which suggested an adverse association with corticosteroid therapy (odds ratio, 3.90; 95% CI, 2.31-6.60; 15 studies; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.02; six studies). Risk of bias assessment was consistent with potential confounding by indication. Pooled analysis of seven studies showed increased odds of hospital-acquired infection in people treated with corticosteroids (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.51-4.95). Meta-regression of the effect of dose on mortality did not reveal an association, but reported doses of corticosteroids in included studies were high (mostly > 40 mg methylprednisolone [or equivalent] per day). CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroid treatment in influenza is associated with increased mortality and hospital-acquired infection, but the evidence relates mainly to high corticosteroid doses and is of low quality with potential confounding by indication a major concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise E Lansbury
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre NIHR, United Kingdom
| | - Chamira Rodrigo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Leonardi-Bee
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Nguyen-Van-Tam
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Shen Lim
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre NIHR, United Kingdom
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, Agus MSD, Flori HR, Inwald DP, Nadel S, Schlapbach LJ, Tasker RC, Argent AC, Brierley J, Carcillo J, Carrol ED, Carroll CL, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Cies JJ, Cruz AT, De Luca D, Deep A, Faust SN, De Oliveira CF, Hall MW, Ishimine P, Javouhey E, Joosten KFM, Joshi P, Karam O, Kneyber MCJ, Lemson J, MacLaren G, Mehta NM, Møller MH, Newth CJL, Nguyen TC, Nishisaki A, Nunnally ME, Parker MM, Paul RM, Randolph AG, Ranjit S, Romer LH, Scott HF, Tume LN, Verger JT, Williams EA, Wolf J, Wong HR, Zimmerman JJ, Kissoon N, Tissieres P. Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020; 21:e52-e106. [PMID: 32032273 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 497] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. DESIGN A panel of 49 international experts, representing 12 international organizations, as well as three methodologists and three public members was convened. Panel members assembled at key international meetings (for those panel members attending the conference), and a stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in November 2018. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and group heads, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS The panel consisted of six subgroups: recognition and management of infection, hemodynamics and resuscitation, ventilation, endocrine and metabolic therapies, adjunctive therapies, and research priorities. We conducted a systematic review for each Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes question to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or as a best practice statement. In addition, "in our practice" statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation, but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS The panel provided 77 statements on the management and resuscitation of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction. Overall, six were strong recommendations, 52 were weak recommendations, and nine were best-practice statements. For 13 questions, no recommendations could be made; but, for 10 of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. In addition, 49 research priorities were identified. CONCLUSIONS A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Despite this challenge, these recommendations regarding the management of children with septic shock and other sepsis-associated organ dysfunction provide a foundation for consistent care to improve outcomes and inform future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott L Weiss
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark J Peters
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S D Agus
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Luregn J Schlapbach
- Paediatric Critical Care Research Group, The University of Queensland and Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert C Tasker
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew C Argent
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Joe Brierley
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Karen Choong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffry J Cies
- St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Daniele De Luca
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, South Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Akash Deep
- King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saul N Faust
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | | | - Poonam Joshi
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Oliver Karam
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, VA
| | | | - Joris Lemson
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- National University Health System, Singapore, and Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nilesh M Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Akira Nishisaki
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Adrienne G Randolph
- Department of Pediatrics (to Dr. Agus), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain (to Drs. Mehta and Randolph), Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Lyvonne N Tume
- University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Judy T Verger
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.,College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Joshua Wolf
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | - Niranjan Kissoon
- British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre Tissieres
- Paris South University Hospitals-Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell-CNRS, CEA, Univ Paris Sud, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Masse MH, Ménard J, Sprague S, Battista MC, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Heyland DK, Kanji S, Pinto R, Day AG, Cohen D, Annane D, McGuinness S, Parke R, Carr A, Arabi Y, Vijayaraghavan BKT, D'Aragon F, Carbonneau É, Maslove D, Hunt M, Rochwerg B, Millen T, Chassé M, Lebrasseur M, Archambault P, Deblois E, Drouin C, Lellouche F, Lizotte P, Watpool I, Porteous R, Clarke F, Marinoff N, Belley-Côté É, Bolduc B, Walker S, Iazzetta J, Adhikari NKJ, Lamontagne F. Lessening Organ dysfunction with VITamin C (LOVIT): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:42. [PMID: 31915072 PMCID: PMC6950903 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3834-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sepsis is a health problem of global importance; treatments focus on controlling infection and supporting failing organs. Recent clinical research suggests that intravenous vitamin C may decrease mortality in sepsis. We have designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to ascertain the effect of vitamin C on the composite endpoint of death or persistent organ dysfunction at 28 days in patients with sepsis. Methods LOVIT (Lessening Organ dysfunction with VITamin C) is a multicenter, parallel-group, blinded (participants, clinicians, study personnel, Steering Committee members, data analysts), superiority RCT (minimum n = 800). Eligible patients have sepsis as the diagnosis for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and are receiving vasopressors. Those admitted to the ICU for more than 24 h are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized to high-dose intravenous vitamin C (50 mg/kg every 6 h for 96 h) or placebo. The primary outcome is a composite of death or persistent organ dysfunction (need for vasopressors, invasive mechanical ventilation, or new and persisting renal replacement therapy) at day 28. Secondary outcomes include persistent organ dysfunction-free days to day 28, mortality and health-related quality of life at 6 months, biomarkers of dysoxia, inflammation, infection, endothelial function, and adverse effects (hemolysis, acute kidney injury, and hypoglycemia). Six subgroup analyses are planned. Discussion This RCT will provide evidence of the effect of high-dose intravenous vitamin C on patient-important outcomes in patients with sepsis. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03680274, first posted 21 September 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Hélène Masse
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Ménard
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Sheila Sprague
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Battista
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke and Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Deborah J Cook
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Salmaan Kanji
- Departments of Pharmacy and Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital and Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ruxandra Pinto
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew G Day
- Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Dian Cohen
- No institutional affiliation, No institutional affiliation, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Djillali Annane
- General Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (AP-HP), Lab Inflammation & Infection, U1173 University Paris Saclay-UVSQ/INSERM, Garches, France
| | - Shay McGuinness
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular ICU, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Rachael Parke
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular ICU, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.,School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anitra Carr
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Yaseen Arabi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Frédérick D'Aragon
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke and Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Élaine Carbonneau
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David Maslove
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Miranda Hunt
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Michaël Chassé
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Martine Lebrasseur
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Archambault
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.,Département des soins intensifs du Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins), Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Estel Deblois
- Département des soins intensifs du Centre intégré de santé et des services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins), Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Christine Drouin
- Department of Critical Care Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - François Lellouche
- Department of Medecine, Université Laval and Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Patricia Lizotte
- Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Irene Watpool
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - France Clarke
- Department of Critical Care Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Marinoff
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Émilie Belley-Côté
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Brigitte Bolduc
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Scott Walker
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada and Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Iazzetta
- Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Neill K J Adhikari
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - François Lamontagne
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke and Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Juneja D, Savio RD, Srinivasan S, Pandit RA, Ramasubban S, Reddy PK, Singh MK, Gopal PB, Chaudhry D, Govil D, Dixit SB, Samavedam S. Basic Critical Care for Management of COVID-19 Patients: Position Paper of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, Part II. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020; 24:S254-S262. [PMID: 33354049 PMCID: PMC7724927 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In a resource-limited country like India, rationing of scarce critical care resources might be required to ensure appropriate delivery of care to the critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19 infection. Most of these patients require critical care support because of respiratory failure or presence of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. As there is no pharmacological therapy available, respiratory support in the form of supplemental oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation remains mainstay of care in intensive care units. As there is still dearth of direct evidence, most of the data are extrapolated from the experience gained from the management of general critical care patients. How to cite this article: Juneja D, Savio RD, Srinivasan S, Pandit RA, Ramasubban S, Reddy PK, et al. Basic Critical Care for Management of COVID-19 Patients: Position Paper of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, Part II. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 5):S254–S262.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deven Juneja
- Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Raymond D Savio
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - Rahul A Pandit
- Department of Intensive Care, Fortis Hospital, Mulund, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suresh Ramasubban
- Department of Critical Care, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Pavan K Reddy
- Department of Critical Care, CARE-Banjara, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Manoj K Singh
- Department of Critical Care, Apollo Hospitals International Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Palepu Bn Gopal
- Department of Critical Care, Continental Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Dhruva Chaudhry
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Govil
- Institute of Critical Care and Anesthesia, Medanta: The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Subhal B Dixit
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sanjeevan and MJM Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Srinivas Samavedam
- Department of Critical Care, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, Briegel J, Keh D, Kupfer Y, Pirracchio R, Rochwerg B. Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD002243. [PMID: 31808551 PMCID: PMC6953403 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002243.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sepsis occurs when an infection is complicated by organ failure. Sepsis may be complicated by impaired corticosteroid metabolism. Thus, providing corticosteroids may benefit patients. The original review was published in 2004 and was updated in 2010 and 2015 prior to this update. OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of corticosteroids on death in children and adults with sepsis. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, and the WHO Clinical Trials Search Portal, on 25 July 2019. In addition, we conducted reference checking and citation searching, and contacted study authors, to identify additional studies as needed. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of corticosteroids versus placebo or usual care (antimicrobials, fluid replacement, and vasopressor therapy as needed) in children and adults with sepsis. We also included RCTs of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of corticosteroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS All review authors screened and selected studies for inclusion. One review author extracted data, which was checked by the others, and by the lead author of the primary study when possible. We obtained unpublished data from the authors of some trials. We assessed the methodological quality of trials and applied GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. Review authors did not contribute to assessment of eligibility and risk of bias, nor to data extraction, for trials they had participated in. MAIN RESULTS We included 61 trials (12,192 participants), of which six included only children, two included children and adults, and the remaining trials included only adults. Nine studies are ongoing and will be considered in future versions of this review. We judged 19 trials as being at low risk of bias. Corticosteroids versus placebo or usual care Compared to placebo or usual care, corticosteroids probably slightly reduce 28-day mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 0.99; 11,233 participants; 50 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids may result in little to no difference in long-term mortality (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03; 6236 participants; 7 studies; low-certainty evidence) and probably slightly reduce hospital mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99; 8183 participants; 26 trials; moderate-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids reduced length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay for all participants (mean difference (MD) -1.07 days, 95% CI -1.95 to -0.19; 7612 participants; 21 studies; high-certainty evidence) and resulted in a large reduction in length of hospital stay for all participants (MD -1.63 days, 95% CI -2.93 to -0.33; 8795 participants; 22 studies; high-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids increase the risk of muscle weakness (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.44; 6145 participants; 6 studies; high-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids probably do not increase the risk of superinfection (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.19; 5356 participants; 25 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Corticosteroids increase the risk of hypernatraemia (high-certainty evidence) and probably increase the risk of hyperglycaemia (moderate-certainty evidence). Moderate-certainty evidence shows that there is probably little or no difference in gastroduodenal bleeding, stroke, or cardiac events, and low-certainty evidence suggests that corticosteroids may result in little to no difference in neuropsychiatric events. Continuous infusion of corticosteroids versus intermittent bolus We are uncertain about the effects of continuous infusion of corticosteroids compared with intermittent bolus administration. Three studies reported data for this comparison, and the certainty of evidence for all outcomes was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that corticosteroids probably reduce 28-day and hospital mortality among patients with sepsis. Corticosteroids result in large reductions in ICU and hospital length of stay (high-certainty evidence). There may be little or no difference in the risk of major complications; however, corticosteroids increase the risk of muscle weakness and hypernatraemia, and probably increase the risk of hyperglycaemia. The effects of continuous versus intermittent bolus administration of corticosteroids are uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Djillali Annane
- Center for Neuromuscular Diseases; Raymond Poincaré Hospital (AP‐HP)Department of Critical Care, Hyperbaric Medicine and Home Respiratory UnitFaculty of Health Sciences Simone Veil, University of Versailles SQY‐ University of Paris Saclay104 Boulevard Raymond PoincaréGarchesFrance92380
| | - Eric Bellissant
- Hôpital PontchaillouCentre d'Investigation Clinique INSERM 0203RennesFrance35033
| | | | - Josef Briegel
- Klinikum der UniversitätKlinik fur AnästhesiologieMünchenGermany81377
| | - Didier Keh
- Charité‐Campus Virchow Clinic, Charité Universitätsmedizin BerlinUniversity Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine CCM/CVKAugustenburger Platz 1BerlinGermany13353
| | - Yizhak Kupfer
- Maimonides Medical CenterDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine4802 Tenth AvenueBrooklynNew YorkUSA11219
| | - Romain Pirracchio
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative MedicineSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- McMaster UniversityDivision of Critical Care, Department of MedicineBox 211, Juravinski Hospital711 Concession StHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
|
60
|
Mokra D, Mikolka P, Kosutova P, Mokry J. Corticosteroids in Acute Lung Injury: The Dilemma Continues. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20194765. [PMID: 31557974 PMCID: PMC6801694 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20194765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute lung injury (ALI) represents a serious heterogenous pulmonary disorder with high mortality. Despite improved understanding of the pathophysiology, the efficacy of standard therapies such as lung-protective mechanical ventilation, prone positioning and administration of neuromuscular blocking agents is limited. Recent studies have shown some benefits of corticosteroids (CS). Prolonged use of CS can shorten duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of hospitalization or improve oxygenation, probably because of a wide spectrum of potentially desired actions including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, pulmonary vasodilator and anti-oedematous effects. However, the results from experimental vs. clinical studies as well as among the clinical trials are often controversial, probably due to differences in the designs of the trials. Thus, before the use of CS in ARDS can be definitively confirmed or refused, the additional studies should be carried on to determine the most appropriate dosing, timing and choice of CS and to analyse the potential risks of CS administration in various groups of patients with ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Mokra
- Department of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia; (P.M.); (P.K.)
- Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +421-43-263-3454
| | - Pavol Mikolka
- Department of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia; (P.M.); (P.K.)
- Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia;
| | - Petra Kosutova
- Department of Physiology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia; (P.M.); (P.K.)
- Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia;
| | - Juraj Mokry
- Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia;
- Department of Pharmacology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, SK-03601 Martin, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Lin LL, Gu HY, Luo J, Wang L, Zhang C, Niu YM, Zuo HX. Impact and Beneficial Critical Points of Clinical Outcome in Corticosteroid Management of Adult Patients With Sepsis: Meta-Analysis and GRADE Assessment. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:1101. [PMID: 31607929 PMCID: PMC6771229 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: With new randomised pieces of evidence and the latest clinical practice guideline from the BMJ emerging in 2018, an updated analysis of best available evidence on the controversial effects of corticosteroids in sepsis is warranted. Objectives: To comprehensively evaluate whether corticosteroids are beneficial in reducing mortality and what cumulative dosage, daily dosage, and duration of corticosteroid treatment would enable adult patients with sepsis to reach the critical point of benefits. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMbase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS database were searched until March 22, 2019. Results: Thirty RCTs with 8,836 participants were identified. Long course low-dose corticosteroid therapy could improve 28-day mortality (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84-0.97; high quality), intensive care unit mortality (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.79-0.95; moderate quality), and in-hospital mortality (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.997; high quality). However, we found no benefits for 90-day, 180-day, and 1-year mortality. Subgroup results of long course corticosteroid treatment in a population with septic shock and vasopressor-dependent septic shock, corticosteroid regimen with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, corticosteroid dosing strategies including bolus dosing and infusion dosing, the strategies of abrupt discontinuation, timing of randomisation ≤24 h, impact factor of ≥10, and sample size ≥500 were associated with a marginally reduction in 28-day mortality. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found that the long course low-dose and not short course high-dose corticosteroid treatment could marginally improve short-term 28-day mortality with high quality, especially septic shock and vasopressor-dependent septic shock, and it is recommended that long course (about 7 days) low-dose (about 200-300mg per day) hydrocortisone (or equivalent) with cumulative dose (at least about 1,000mg) may be a viable management option for overall patients with sepsis, and it can be also adapted to patient with septic shock alone. Early hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone administration, via continuous infusion or bolus dosing, is also particularly important for the prognosis. Abrupt discontinuation of corticosteroids, as opposed to the conventional tapered discontinuation, may be considered as a desirable option in 28-day mortality. The safety profile of long course low-dose corticosteroid treatment, including adverse hyperglycaemia and hypernatraemia events, remains a concern, although these events could be easily treated. Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD 42018092849.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu-Lu Lin
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui-Yun Gu
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jie Luo
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Long Wang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Yu-Ming Niu
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Hong-Xia Zuo
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Møller MH, Alhazzani W, Shankar-Hari M. Focus on sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:1459-1461. [PMID: 31267195 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05680-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Hylander Møller
- Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Centre for Research in Intensive Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- School of Immunology and Microbial Science, Kings College London, London, SE1 9RT, UK.,Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, ICU Support Offices, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor, East Wing, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Téblick A, Peeters B, Langouche L, Van den Berghe G. Adrenal function and dysfunction in critically ill patients. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019; 15:417-427. [PMID: 30850749 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-019-0185-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Critical illnesses are characterized by increased systemic cortisol availability, which is a vital part of the stress response. Relative adrenal failure (later termed critical-illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI)) is a condition in which the systemic availability of cortisol is assumed to be insufficiently high to face the stress of the illness and is most typically thought to occur in the acute phase of septic shock. Researchers suggested that CIRCI could be diagnosed by a suppressed incremental cortisol response to an injection of adrenocorticotropic hormone, irrespective of the baseline plasma cortisol. This concept triggered several randomized clinical trials on the impact of large stress doses of hydrocortisone to treat CIRCI, which gave conflicting results. Recent novel insights into the response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis to acute and prolonged critical illnesses challenge the concept of CIRCI, as currently defined, as well as the current practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. In this Review, these novel insights are integrated within a novel conceptual framework that can be used to re-appreciate adrenocortical function and dysfunction in the context of critical illness. This framework opens new avenues for further research and for preventive and/or therapeutic innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arno Téblick
- Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bram Peeters
- Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lies Langouche
- Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greet Van den Berghe
- Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Lansbury L, Rodrigo C, Leonardi‐Bee J, Nguyen‐Van‐Tam J, Lim WS. Corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of influenza. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2:CD010406. [PMID: 30798570 PMCID: PMC6387789 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010406.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific treatments for influenza are limited to neuraminidase inhibitors and adamantanes. Corticosteroids show evidence of benefit in sepsis and related conditions, most likely due to their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Although commonly prescribed for severe influenza, there is uncertainty over their potential benefits or harms. This is an update of a review first published in 2016. OBJECTIVES To systematically assess the effectiveness and potential adverse effects of corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of influenza, taking into account differences in timing and doses of corticosteroids. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (2018, Issue 9), which includes the Cochrane Acute Respiratory infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1946 to October week 1, 2018), Embase (1980 to 3 October 2018), CINAHL (1981 to 3 October 2018), LILACS (1982 to 3 October 2018), Web of Science (1985 to 3 October 2018), abstracts from the last three years of major infectious disease and microbiology conferences, and references of included articles. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ISRCTN registry on 3 October 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and observational studies that compared corticosteroid treatment with no corticosteroid treatment for influenza or influenza-like illness. We did not restrict studies by language of publication, influenza subtypes, clinical setting, or age of participants. We selected eligible studies in two stages: sequential examination of title and abstract, followed by full text. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled estimates of effect using a random-effects model, where appropriate. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 30 studies (one RCT with two arms and 29 observational studies) with a total of 99,224 participants. We included 19 studies in the original review (n = 3459), all of which were observational, with 13 studies included in the meta-analysis for mortality. We included 12 new studies in this update (one RCT and 11 observational studies), and excluded one study in the original review as it has been superceded by a more recent analysis. Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis (9536 individuals), of which 15 studied people infected with 2009 influenza A H1N1 virus (H1N1pdm09). Data specific to mortality were of very low quality, based predominantly on observational studies, with inconsistent reporting of variables potentially associated with the outcomes of interest, differences between studies in the way in which they were conducted, and with the likelihood of potential confounding by indication. Reported doses of corticosteroids used were high, and indications for their use were not well reported. On meta-analysis, corticosteroid therapy was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio (OR) 3.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.31 to 6.60; I2 = 68%; 15 studies). A similar increase in risk of mortality was seen in a stratified analysis of studies reporting adjusted estimates (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.54 to 3.24; I2 = 0%; 5 studies). An association between corticosteroid therapy and increased mortality was also seen on pooled analysis of six studies which reported adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.02; I2 = 69%). Increased odds of hospital-acquired infection related to corticosteroid therapy were found on pooled analysis of seven studies (pooled OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.95; I2 = 90%); all were unadjusted estimates, and we graded the data as of very low certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found one RCT of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy for treating people with community-acquired pneumonia, but the number of people with laboratory-confirmed influenza in the treatment and placebo arms was too small to draw conclusions regarding the effect of corticosteroids in this group, and we did not include it in our meta-analyses of observational studies. The certainty of the available evidence from observational studies was very low, with confounding by indication a major potential concern. Although we found that adjunctive corticosteroid therapy is associated with increased mortality, this result should be interpreted with caution. In the context of clinical trials of adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in sepsis and pneumonia that report improved outcomes, including decreased mortality, more high-quality research is needed (both RCTs and observational studies that adjust for confounding by indication). The currently available evidence is insufficient to determine the effectiveness of corticosteroids for people with influenza.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Lansbury
- The University of NottinghamDepartment of Epidemiology and Public HealthCity Hospital CampusHucknall RoadNottinghamUKNG5 1PB
| | - Chamira Rodrigo
- Nottingham University Hospitals TrustDepartment of Respiratory MedicineCity CampusHucknall RoadNottinghamNottinghamshireUKNG5 1PB
| | - Jo Leonardi‐Bee
- The University of NottinghamDivision of Epidemiology and Public HealthClinical Sciences BuildingNottingham City Hospital NHS Trust Campus, Hucknall RoadNottinghamUKNG5 1PB
| | - Jonathan Nguyen‐Van‐Tam
- The University of NottinghamFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesRoom A40DClinical Sciences Building City Hospital Campus, Hucknall RoadNottinghamNottinghamshireUKNG5 1PB
| | - Wei Shen Lim
- Nottingham University Hospitals TrustDepartment of Respiratory MedicineCity CampusHucknall RoadNottinghamNottinghamshireUKNG5 1PB
| | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Defining the Role of Corticosteroids in Sepsis: Adjunctive Therapy for Shock Reversal. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:e157-e158. [PMID: 30653075 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
66
|
The authors reply. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:e158-e159. [PMID: 30653076 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|