Randomized comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double-bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID II Investigators

Human complement receptor type 1-directed loading of tissue plasminogen activator on circulating erythrocytes for prophylactic fibrinolysis

Plasminogen activators (PAs) are not used for thromboprophylaxis due to rapid clearance, bleeding, and extravascular toxicity. We describe a novel strategy that overcomes these limitations. We conjugated tissue-type PA (tPA) to a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against complement receptor type 1 (CR1) expressed primarily on human RBCs. Anti-CR1/tPA conjugate, but not control conjugate (mIgG/tPA), bound to human RBCs (1.2 x 10(3) tPA molecules/cell at saturation), endowing them with fibrinolytic activity. In vitro, RBC-bound anti-CR1/tPA caused 90% clot lysis versus 20% by naive RBCs. In vivo, more than 40% of anti-CR1/(125)I-tPA remained within the circulation ( approximately 90% bound to RBCs) 3 hours after injection in transgenic mice expressing human CR1 (TgN-hCR1) versus less than 10% in wild-type (WT) mice, without RBC damage; approximately 90% of mIgG/(125)I-tPA was cleared from the circulation within 30 minutes in both WT and TgN-hCR1 mice. Anti-CR1/tPA accelerated lysis of pulmonary emboli and prevented stable occlusive carotid arterial thrombi from forming after injection in TgN-hCR1 mice, but not in WT mice, whereas soluble tPA and mIgG/tPA were ineffective. Anti-CR1/tPA caused 20-fold less rebleeding in TgN-hCR1 mice than the same dose of tPA. CR1-directed immunotargeting of PAs to circulating RBCs provides a safe and practical means to deliver fibrinolytics for thromboprophylaxis in settings characterized by a high imminent risk of thrombosis.

Comparison of very early treatment with either fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention facilitated with abciximab with respect to ST recovery and infarct-related artery epicardial flow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Swedish Early Decision (SWEDES) reperfusion trial

BACKGROUND

Results from a number of studies indicate that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to fibrinolysis for treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Modern adjunctive antithrombotic treatment with systematic use of low-molecular-weight heparins, fibrin-specific thrombolysis, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors may improve the outcome compared with what was achieved in previous studies.

METHODS

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to receive enoxaparin followed by reteplase (group A; n = 104) or enoxaparin followed by abciximab and transfer to invasive center for optional PCI (group B; n = 101). Primary end points were ST-segment resolution 120 minutes and TIMI flow at coronary angiography 5 to 7 days after randomization.

RESULTS

Forty-two percent of the patients started therapy in the prehospital phase. Time from symptom to treatment was 114 minutes in group A and 202 minutes in group B. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Sixty-four percent in group A and 68% in group B had ST resolution of > 50% at 120 minutes (not significant). At control angiography, 54% in the fibrinolytic group and 71% in the invasive group had TIMI 3 flow (P = .04). At 30 days, the composite of death, stroke, or reinfarction occurred in 8% in the fibrinolytic group compared with 3% in the invasive group (not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite much shorter time delay to start of fibrinolysis than PCI, this did not result in signs of superior myocardial reperfusion. Epicardial flow in the infarct-related artery was better after invasive therapy, and there was a trend toward better clinical outcome after this treatment compared with after fibrinolysis.

Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Urokinase and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Peripheral Arterial Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in the efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusion.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective comparative trials.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed/MEDLINE database from 1966-October 2004.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The literature was systematically searched to identify prospective comparative trials of urokinase and rt-PA for the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusion. The primary outcome measure was successful complete lysis of the occlusion. Other outcome measures were hemorrhage (major, minor, or combined), intracranial hemorrhage, limb loss, and mortality. Six trials were identified, five of which were randomized. On meta-analysis, the rate of clot lysis was higher with rt-PA than with urokinase (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.10, p=0.007). However, urokinase was associated with lower rates of minor (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.97, p=0.04) and total (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.91, p=0.02) bleeding. Rates of major hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, limb loss, and mortality were similar between agents.

CONCLUSION

Urokinase was less effective than rt-PA in successfully lysing acute peripheral arterial occlusion, but it was associated with lower rates of total and minor bleeding. Overall, rt-PA was a reasonable substitute for urokinase, now that urokinase has been removed from the market in the United States. However, judicious monitoring for minor bleeding is necessary.

Acute reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction

The ECG classification of acute myocardial infarctions has had a profound influence on the treatment of patients with AMI. Deciding whether a patient has ST-segment elevations or a new left bundle branch block or neither of these findings on ECG launches the treating physician down two different treatment pathways: patients with ST-elevation MI need to be assessed for immediate re-perfusion therapy, whereas patients with non-ST-elevation MI are best treated with aggressive medical management without acute reperfusion.

Risk of Bleeding Complications Is Not Increased in Patients Undergoing Rescue versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Concern for major bleeding complications (MBC) may lead to withholding of anticoagulation and fibrinolytic therapy in preparation for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), potentially resulting in unacceptable delays in achieving reperfusion.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate MBC associated with primary and rescue PCI and how timing to revascularization affects this variable.

METHODS

We evaluated 659 consecutive patients presenting within 24 hours of an acute ST elevation myocardial infarctions (MI). One hundred and eighty-three patients presented for rescue PCI and 476 for primary PCI. Eighty-seven rescue PCI patients were treated within 6 hours of their first dose of fibrinolytic. Demographics, procedural variables, outcomes, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between the primary and rescue PCI groups and between early and late presenters in the rescue PCI group.

RESULTS

We observed that the incidence of MBC was 8% in patients undergoing rescue PCI and 6% in primary PCI (P=0.35). There were no significant differences in bleeding associated with GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist use, procedural success, or MACE. Similarly, in patients presenting for early or late rescue PCI there was no significant difference in MBC, procedural success, or MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that early or late rescue PCI and primary PCI have similar rates of MBC and overall in-hospital outcomes for patients presenting within 24 hours of acute MI. Delaying the timing of a rapid reperfusion strategy in an effort to decrease the incidence of MBC complications is generally not justified.

Effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin on tissue perfusion and coronary flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a new reperfusion strategy

BACKGROUND

Current reperfusion strategies may fail to achieve optimal tissue perfusion in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We investigated the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin on tissue perfusion and coronary flow in infarct patients treated with fibrinolytic agents.

METHODS

Consecutive 78 patients with STEMI were randomized to receive clopidogrel plus aspirin (clopidogrel group, n = 42) or placebo plus aspirin (placebo group, n = 36) before streptokinase. Maximum and total ST-segment resolutions (sumSTR) were calculated at 90 minutes after fibrinolysis. TIMI flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count in infarct-related artery were evaluated at predischarge. Inhospital ischemic and hemorrhagic events were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Both mean maximum ST-segment resolution (54.5 +/- 21.3% vs 44.6 +/- 22.0%, P = .047 ) and sumSTR (52.7 +/- 21.1% vs 42.8 +/- 20.7%, P = .041) were slightly higher in the clopidogrel group than placebo group. The rate of complete sumSTR 70% was significantly higher in the clopidogrel group compared with placebo group (31% vs 11%, P = .021). TIMI flows were similar in both groups, but corrected TIMI frame count was significantly lower in the clopidogrel group compared with placebo group (25.5 +/- 10.5 vs 33.5 +/- 11.8 frames, P = .027). Clinical events were comparable in 2 groups; however, there were 1 death caused by heart failure and moderate bleeding in the clopidogrel group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that clopidogrel plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone may improve myocardial tissue perfusion and coronary flow in STEMI patients receiving streptokinase.

Thrombolytic Therapy: Current Clinical Practice

Thrombolytic therapy is an essential tool in the array of therapies designed to reopen arteries and veins occluded with thrombus. As the use of thrombolytic agents has entered mainstream practice, their application has expanded to include a wide variety of indications and settings. Thrombolytic agents are used in patients who have thrombosis of coronary arteries, precerebral and cerebral arteries, the aorta, iliac and mesenteric arteries, and peripheral arteries. The use of thrombolysis in venous thrombosis has included deep venous thrombosis of the upper and lower extremities and vena cava, mesenteric veins, cerebral veins, and central access catheters. Guidelines are available from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association regarding thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and from the American Stroke Association regarding thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

Randomized comparison of intra-arterial and intravenous thrombolysis in a canine model of acute basilar artery thrombosis

We compared the rates of recanalization cerebral infarct and hemorrhage between intra-arterial (i.a.) reteplase and intravenous (i.v.) alteplase thrombolysis in a canine model of basilar artery thrombosis. Thrombosis was induced by injecting a clot in the basilar artery of 13 anesthetized dogs via superselective catheterization. The animals were randomized in a blinded fashion, 2 h after clot injection and verification of arterial occlusion, to receive i.v. alteplase 0.9 mg/kg over 60 min and i.a. placebo, or i.a. reteplase 0.09 units/kg over 20 min, equivalent to one-half the alteplase dose, and i.v. placebo. Recanalization was studied for 6 h after treatment with serial angiography; the images were later graded in a blinded fashion. Blinded interpretation of postmortem MRI was performed to assess the presence of brain infarcts and/or hemorrhage. At 3 h after initiation of treatment, partial or complete recanalization was observed in one of six dogs in the i.v. alteplase group and in five of seven in the i.a. reteplase group (P = 0.08). At 6 h, no significant difference in partial or complete recanalization was observed between the groups (two of six vs. five of seven; P = 0.20). Postmortem MRI revealed infarcts in four of six animals treated with i.v. alteplase and three of seven treated with i.a. reteplase (P = 0.4). Intracerebral hemorrhage was more common in the i.v. alteplase group (four of six vs. none of seven; P = 0.02). This study thus suggests that i.a. thrombolysis affords a recanalization rate similar to that of i.v. thrombolysis, but with a lower rate of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Early and aggressive treatment of patients with acute ST segment elevation and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction leads to improved clinical outcomes

Acute myocardial infarction remains a significant burden to our society. Despite being the number 1 cause of mortality, there remains no uniform approach to treatment, which is unlike that of the triage and care of trauma victims. It is now well documented that acute reperfusion therapy has a profound benefit; however, many current strategies take too long to be performed and thus those potential benefits are often reduced. The emergence of prehospital treatment as a means to reducing time to reperfusion provides a new avenue for earlier therapy. With a coordinated aggressive treatment strategy and the identification of primary cardiovascular centers dedicated to the treatment of ST segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), we believe the mortality of an STEMI can be significantly reduced. Similarly, the treatment of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction has shifted to an aggressive approach. Although thrombolytic therapy is not indicated, the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, as well as early interventional revascularization, is the current preferred treatment strategy. We review important current trials that shape the practice of treatment as well as introduce a novel concept of combined prehospital administration of thrombolytics with urgent culprit artery revascularization.

Thrombolysis and Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients with ischemic symptoms characteristic of acute MI of < 12 h in duration, and ST-segment elevation or left bundle-branch block (of unknown duration) on the ECG, we recommend administration of any approved fibrinolytic agent (Grade 1A). We recommend the use of streptokinase, anistreplase, alteplase, reteplase, or tenecteplase over placebo (all Grade 1A). For patients with symptom duration < 6 h, we recommend the administration of alteplase over streptokinase (Grade 1A). For patients with known allergy or sensitivity to streptokinase, we recommend alteplase, reteplase, or tenecteplase (Grade 1A). For patients with acute posterior MI of < 12 h duration, we suggest fibrinolytic therapy (Grade 2C). In patients with any history of intracranial hemorrhage, closed head trauma, or ischemic stroke within past 3 months, we recommend against administration of fibrinolytic therapy (Grade 1C+). For patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI whether or not they receive fibrinolytic therapy, we recommend aspirin, 160 to 325 mg p.o., at initial evaluation by health-care personnel followed by indefinite therapy, 75 to 162 mg/d p.o. (both Grade 1A). In patients allergic to aspirin, we suggest use of clopidogrel as an alternative therapy to aspirin (Grade 2C). For patients receiving streptokinase, we suggest administration of either i.v. unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 2C] or subcutaneous UFH (Grade 2A). For all patients at high risk of systemic or venous thromboembolism (anterior MI, pump failure, previous embolus, atrial fibrillation, or left ventricular thrombus), we recommend administration of IV UFH while receiving streptokinase (Grade 1C+).

Acute Myocardial Infarction: Fibrinolytic Therapy

Fibrinolytic therapy (also known as thrombolytic therapy) is an established, simple, widely available and cost-effective treatment option for acute myocardial infarction. Adjunctive use of antiplatelet and antithrombin therapies has been shown to reduce reinfarction rates by 30% to 40%. These agents may also improve reperfusion rates and facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Adjunctive use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and newer antithrombotic agents (eg, low molecular weight heparin, bivalirudin, or pentasaccharide) has not been shown to reduce 30-day mortality rates. Bolus administration of fibrinolytic agents enhances their acceptability for prehospital use, and dose adjustment of antithrombotic therapy may help to reduce the risk of bleeding, particularly in lighter-weight patients and the elderly. There is a need for trials comparing newer fibrinolytic regimens with primary PCI and facilitated PCI. The time from symptom onset to reperfusion is the most important factor affecting patient outcome.

A randomized trial comparing myocardial salvage achieved by coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction considered ineligible for reperfusion therapy

OBJECTIVES

We assessed myocardial salvage achieved by reperfusion with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and compared stenting with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) ineligible for thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of patients with AMI are currently considered ineligible for thrombolysis, and reperfusion treatment is frequently not recommended for them. It is not known whether these patients benefit from PCI.

METHODS

The Stent or PTCA for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Ineligible for Thrombolysis (STOPAMI-3) trial, a randomized, open-label study, included 611 patients with AMI who were ineligible for thrombolysis (lack of ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram, late presentation >12 h after symptom onset, and contraindications to thrombolysis). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either coronary artery stenting (n = 305) or PTCA (n = 306). Scintigraphic myocardial salvage index (proportion of the initial myocardial perfusion defect that was salvaged by reperfusion) was the primary end point of the study.

RESULTS

A considerable myocardial salvage was achieved with both stenting and PTCA. In patients assigned to receive stenting, the median size of the salvage index was 0.54 (25th and 75th percentiles, 0.29 and 0.87), as compared with a median of 0.50 (25th and 75th percentiles, 0.26 and 0.82) in the group assigned to receive PTCA (p = 0.20). Mortality at six months was 8.2% in the group of patients assigned to receive stenting and 9.2% in the group of patients assigned to receive PTCA (p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AMI who are currently considered ineligible for thrombolysis by conventional guidelines may greatly benefit from primary PCI. The benefit seems to be comparable when a strategy of stenting is compared with a strategy of PTCA in these patients.

Clot Lysis in a Primate Model of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease with Use of Systemic or Intraarterial Reteplase: Addition of Abciximab Results in Improved Vessel Reperfusion

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the ability of reteplase (a fibrinolytic agent) alone or in combination with abciximab (a monoclonal antibody antagonist of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) to achieve and sustain vessel patency in an acute model of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in cynomolgus monkeys.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total arterial occlusion was induced in the femoral arteries of 32 cynomolgus monkeys (eight groups of four) by endothelial injury and injection of thrombin-treated autologous blood. Reteplase was administered by intravenous bolus dose or by intraarterial infusion at the site of the clot. Abciximab was administered as a single weight-adjusted intravenous bolus dose. Platelet activity was measured by ex vivo platelet aggregation before and after abciximab treatment. Different groups of animals received sequential partial doses of reteplase with or without increasing doses of abciximab until either the weight-adjusted human dose equivalent of reteplase was reached or vessel recanalization was achieved.

RESULTS

Animals receiving reteplase-only regimens demonstrated variability in the times required for reperfusion and the permanence of the effect. The coadministration of abciximab at doses of the antibody that achieved near or full inhibition of platelet function generally decreased the time to reperfusion and resulted in more consistent and sustained vessel patency. In the case of systemic intravenous reteplase, the coadministration of abciximab resulted in effective reperfusion of thrombosed vessels at decreased doses of the lytic agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Reteplase administered systemically or at the site of thrombotic occlusion restored blood flow for periods of varying duration in monkeys with acute femoral artery thrombosis. The coadministration of systemic intravenous abciximab to intravenous or intraarterial reteplase allowed the use of lower doses of fibrinolytic agent with more accelerated and sustained reperfusion.

Prevention of distal embolization and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction and total occlusion in the infarct-related vessel: A subgroup analysis of the cohort of acute revascularization in myocardial infarction with excimer laser?CARMEL multicenter study

To overcome the adverse complications of percutaneous coronary interventions in thrombus laden lesions (i.e., distal embolization, platelet activation, no-reflow phenomenon), mechanical removal of the thrombus or distal embolization protection devices are frequently required. Pulsed-wave ultraviolet excimer laser light at 308 nm can vaporize thrombus, suppress platelet aggregation, and, unlike other thrombectomy devices, ablate the underlying plaque. The following multicenter registry was instituted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser ablation in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by persistent thrombotic occlusions. Patients with AMI and complete thrombotic occlusion of the infarct-related vessel were included in eight participating centers. Patients with further compromising conditions (i.e., cardiogenic shock, thrombolysis failures) were also included. Primary endpoint was procedural respective laser success; secondary combined endpoints were TIMI flow and % stenosis by quantitative coronary analysis and visual assessment at 1-month follow-up. Eighty-four percent of all patients enrolled (n = 56) had a very large thrombus burden (TIMI thrombus scale > or = 3), and 49% were compromised by complex clinical presentation, i.e., cardiogenic shock (21%), degenerated saphenous vein grafts (26%), or thrombolysis failures (5%). Laser success was achieved in 89%, angiographic success in 93%, and the overall procedural success rate was 86%. The angiographic prelaser total occlusion was reduced angiographically to 58% +/- 25% after laser treatment and to 4% +/- 13% final residual stenosis after adjunctive balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement. TIMI flow increased significantly from grade 0 to 2.7 +/- 0.5 following laser ablation (P < 0.001) and 3.0 +/- 0.2 upon completion of the angioplasty procedure (P > 0.001 vs. baseline). Distal embolizations occurred in 4%, no-reflow was observed in 2%, and perforations in 0.6% of cases. Laser-associated major dissections occurred in 4% of cases, and total MACE was 13%. The safety and efficacy of excimer laser for thrombus dissolution in a cohort of high-risk patients presenting with AMI and total thrombotic occlusion in the infarct-related vessel are encouraging and should lead to further investigation.

Door-to-balloon delays with PCI in acute myocardial infarction

In the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the length of time from symptom onset to revascularization is a crucial determinant of clinical outcomes such as mortality and reinfarction. Direct, or primary, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) produces higher rates of infarct-related artery patency and improved clinical outcomes compared to thrombolytic therapy. However, primary PTCA is associated with an increased time interval from hospital arrival to revascularization, the so-called door-to-balloon time. Numerous data support the theory that increased door-to-balloon time reduces the benefits of primary PTCA in the treatment of AMI. Therefore, institutions that offer PTCA must strive to decrease door-to-balloon delays through the use of established treatment protocols and frequent assessment of performance.

Current perspectives on reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: integrating pharmacologic and mechanical reperfusion strategies

The therapeutic approach to patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has advanced rapidly over the past decade. Intravenous fibrinolytic therapy remains the most common form of reperfusion therapy worldwide, since fibrinolytics are associated with a dramatic reduction in mortality rates. However, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved outcomes and less bleeding complications compared with fibrinolytic therapy, but it is not widely available. Adjunctive therapies with intracoronary stents, glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and more potent antithrombin agents have shown great promise for the initial treatment of STEMI and have stimulated further investigation of combined pharmacological/mechanical reperfusion strategies that may be synergistic. Although the optimal combination of fibrinolytics, antiplatelet agents, antithrombins, and mechanical reperfusion at hospitals with and without primary PCI facilities remains elusive, results from recent studies suggest that such a combined approach may facilitate transfer of patients with STEMI from a referral hospital to an invasive hospital for definitive primary PCI after administration of a potent pharmacologic regimen designed to enhance early infarct-related artery reperfusion. Thus, as the reperfusion era continues to evolve, the ideal treatment strategy for patients with STEMI is being redefined to integrate pharmacologic and mechanical approaches to reperfusion.

Safety, dose, and timing of reteplase in treating occluded central venous catheters in children with cancer

OBJECTIVES

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, alteplase, began to be commonly used to restore the patency of occluded central venous catheters (CVCs) as urokinase production was halted in the late 1990s. However, alteplase often requires an extended dwell time to restore patency to occluded CVCs. In adults, reteplase, a newer thrombolytic agent, has been reported to restore patency to CVCs in 30 minutes. The authors prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of reteplase in restoring patency to occluded CVCs in children with cancer.

METHODS

This was a dose escalation trial. The dose of reteplase was initiated at 0.1 units and increased by increments of 0.1 units to a maximum dose of 0.4 units. Each dose was tested on at least three participants. Time to patency after reteplase administration was recorded by nurses caring for the patients. Attempts to access the line occurred every 15 minutes for 1 hour. CVCs that remained occluded after 1 hour were treated with alteplase.

RESULTS

Reteplase was administered to 15 clotted CVCs. Twelve of the 15 were cleared with an average dwell time of 38 minutes. The time to patency did not appear to correlate with the dose. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Reteplase can restore patency to occluded CVCs in a pediatric population. Reteplase appears to have comparable efficacy with alteplase, but reteplase may require shorter dwell times. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial is warranted to determine whether reteplase is as effective as alteplase in restoring patency to occluded CVCs.

Outcome of urgent and elective percutaneous coronary interventions after pharmacologic reperfusion with tenecteplase combined with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or abciximab

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of New Thrombolytic Regimens (ASSENT-3) trial.

BACKGROUND

In the ASSENT-3 trial, co-therapy with abciximab (ABC) or enoxaparin (ENOX) reduced ischemic complications after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with tenecteplase when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The effect of these new co-therapies on the results of PCI is unknown.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes in patients who received co-therapy with ABC, ENOX, or UFH and subsequently underwent an elective (n = 1,064) or urgent (n = 716) PCI in the ASSENT-3 trial were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences in clinical end points were observed in patients who underwent an elective PCI. A non-significant trend toward fewer in-hospital myocardial re-infarctions was seen with ABC and ENOX when compared with UFH (0.5% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.5%, respectively). The incidence of bleeding complications was similar in the three treatment arms. Significantly fewer ABC- and ENOX-treated patients needed urgent PCI compared with UFH (9.1% vs. 11.9% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.0001), but outcomes in these patients were in general less favorable (30-day mortality: 8.2% vs. 5.4% vs. 4.5%; 1-year mortality: 11.0% vs. 8.5% vs. 5.6%; in-hospital re-infarction: 3.9% vs. 2.5% vs. 2.7%; major bleeding complications: 8.8% vs. 7.0% vs. 3.4%). In pairwise comparisons with UFH, the higher one-year mortality and major bleeding rates after ABC were statistically significant (p = 0.045 and p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcomes after elective PCI were similar with the three antithrombotic co-therapies studied in ASSENT-3. Although fewer patients needed urgent PCI with ABC and ENOX, clinical outcomes were less favorable in this selected population, especially with ABC.

Collaborative Angiographic Patency Trial Of Recombinant Staphylokinase (CAPTORS II)

AIMS

A fibrinolytic agent more effective than streptokinase available for bolus injection with reasonable cost-effectiveness is a desirable goal. Pilot studies with bolus pegulated staphylokinase (PEG-Sak) have revealed excellent Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 60-minute flow.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 6 hours of chest pain onset to determine a dose of PEG-Sak that had at least equal efficacy to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. After the initial study of 38 patients, of whom 27 received PEG-Sak, enrollment was temporarily halted because 3 patients receiving PEG-Sak had intracranial hemorrhage: 1 at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg and 2 at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg. Overall, 378 patients were studied across a PEG-Sak dose range from 0.01 mg/kg to 0.015 mg/kg, and 122 patients received accelerated rt-PA. At the lowest dose of PEG-Sak studied, 0.01 mg/kg, there was suggestive evidence of attenuation of efficacy; the point estimate for TIMI 3 flow was 24% (95% CI 9%-38%). At doses of 0.01875 to 0.0375 mg/kg (n = 314), TIMI 3 flow rates were 33% (95% CI 27%-38%), whereas the TIMI 3 flow was 41% (95% CI 20%-61%) at the highest PEG-Sak dose studied, 0.05 mg/kg (n = 23), which was similar to that found with rt-PA, 41% (95% CI 32%-50%).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of PEG-Sak, coupled with its ease of administration, provide further impetus for further study in acute myocardial infarction.

Prehospital thrombolysis with reteplase: the Nijmegen/Rotterdam study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this observational study was to assess time from electrocardiogram diagnosis to treatment and time from pain onset to treatment with double bolus reteplase compared to current therapy with streptokinase or bolus anistreplase in 2 cities (Rotterdam and Nijmegen) in the Netherlands, where prehospital thrombolysis is an established way of treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Prehospital thrombolysis is performed using electrocardiogram diagnosis by the ambulance service as well as bolus anistreplase for treatment in Nijmegen, and streptokinase infusion in Rotterdam. Reteplase or anistreplase/streptokinase was assigned open label to patients according to order of presentation on a 1-to-1 basis. All patients were treated with nitrates sublingually and aspirin orally. Time intervals were recorded by the ambulance staff.

RESULTS

In total, 250 patients were treated between April 1, 1999 and August 1, 2000. Reteplase was used in 120 patients and anistreplase/streptokinase in 130 patients. Using double bolus reteplase resulted in a significantly shorter time to treatment: a median of 81 minutes compared to a median of 104 minutes with the established therapy (P <.0001). There were no differences in mortality, aborted myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic stroke or the need for rescue angioplasty between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In prehospital thrombolysis, double bolus reteplase is associated with a shorter time to treatment than bolus anistreplase or infusion of streptokinase.

Power thrombectomy in acute ischemic coronary syndromes

Intracoronary thrombi are commonly found in patients with acute coronary syndromes. A large thrombus burden or a platelet-rich thrombus frequently resists pharmacologic therapy ("thrombolytic ceiling"). In such cases restoration of adequate antegrade coronary flow necessitates application of a mechanical force. Power thrombectomy is a revascularization strategy incorporating a mechanical device for removal of occlusive coronary thrombi in conjunction with or following administration of either platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors or thrombolytic agents, or both. Mechanical devices for power thrombectomy include ultrasound sonication, rheolytic thrombectomy (Angiojet), laser, transluminal extraction catheter, aspiration catheter, and to a limited extent, balloon angioplasty. In acute coronary syndromes the strategy of power thrombectomy aims to achieve the clinical advantages of more nearly complete vessel patency, improved antegrade flow, and enhanced preservation of myocardial tissue.

Acute myocardial infarction complicated by early onset of heart failure: safety and feasibility of interhospital transfer for coronary angioplasty. Subanalysis of Killip II-IV patients from the PRAGUE-1 study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of interhospital transfer (within up to 60 minutes) for primary/rescue coronary angioplasty of patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by an early onset of acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to a community hospital without PCI facilities.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

From the multicenter randomized PRAGUE-1 study, a subgroup of 66 patients with AMI complicated by AHF on the first presentation to the community hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Group A patients (n = 21) were treated on site in community hospitals using thrombolysis (streptokinase), group B patients (n = 20) were transported with thrombolytic infusion to a PCI center for coronary angioplasty, and group C patients (n = 25) were immediately transported to a PCI center for primary angioplasty without thrombolysis.

RESULTS

No patient died during transportation. One group B patient developed ventricular fibrillation during transfer. The time delay from the onset of chest pain to reperfusion was > 142 minutes, and 253 and 251 minutes in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Hospital stay (16 vs 11 vs 10 days, P = NS) was shorter in the angioplasty groups. Transported patients (groups B, C) displayed a significant decrease in heart failure progression within the first 24 hours after treatment (48% vs 15% vs 8%, P < 0.05). The combined end point, i.e., mortality + nonfatal reinfarction (43% vs 25% vs 8%, P < 0.05), was significantly less frequent in the coronary angioplasty group.

CONCLUSIONS

Interhospital transfer for coronary angioplasty of patients with AMI complicated by an early onset of AHF is feasible and safe. Transport for angioplasty may even reduce the risk of heart failure progression and improve clinical outcome compared to immediate thrombolysis in the nearest community hospital.

Distinct dose-dependent effects of plasmin and TPA on coagulation and hemorrhage

All thrombolytic agents in current clinical usage are plasminogen activators. Although effective, plasminogen activators uniformly increase the risk of bleeding complications, especially intracranial hemorrhage, and no laboratory test is applicable to avoid such bleeding. We report results of a randomized, blinded, dose-ranging comparison of tissue-type plasminogen activator (TPA) with a direct-acting thrombolytic agent, plasmin, in an animal model of fibrinolytic hemorrhage. This study focuses on the role of plasma coagulation factors in hemostatic competence. Plasmin at 4-fold, 6-fold, and 8-fold the thrombolytic dose (1 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent effect on coagulation, depleting antiplasmin activity completely, then degrading fibrinogen and factor VIII. However, even with complete consumption of antiplasmin and decreases in fibrinogen and factor VIII to 20% of initial activity, excessive bleeding did not occur. Bleeding occurred only at 8-fold the thrombolytic dose, on complete depletion of fibrinogen and factor VIII, manifest as prolonged primary bleeding, but with minimal effect on stable hemostatic sites. Although TPA had minimal effect on coagulation, hemostasis was disrupted in a dose-dependent manner, even at 25% of the thrombolytic dose (1 mg/kg), manifest as rebleeding from hemostatically stable ear puncture sites. Plasmin degrades plasma fibrinogen and factor VIII in a dose-dependent manner, but it does not disrupt hemostasis until clotting factors are completely depleted, at an 8-fold higher dose than is needed for thrombolysis. Plasmin has a 6-fold margin of safety, in contrast with TPA, which causes hemorrhage at thrombolytic dosages.

The Level I Cardiovascular Center: Is It Time?

There is no uniform approach to treating the 1.5 million US citizens who have an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) each year. This contrasts with the trauma system developed to efficiently triage and treat the critically injured accident victim. Only two thirds of patients with ST-segment elevation AMI in the United States are treated with thrombolytic therapy or primary angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) which can reduce the 30-day mortality rate from approximately 15% to 6%-10%. The Early Retavase-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ER-TIMI) 19 trial demonstrated that AMI patients who received prehospital thrombolytic therapy and were brought to the nearest receiving hospital experienced a 32-minute reduction in the time to treatment and time to ST-elevation resolution compared with those treated at their time of hospital arrival. This expedited therapy was associated with a low in hospital mortality rate (4.7%). The potential benefit of facilitated PCI with partial-dose thrombolysis and abciximab administration was demonstrated by the Strategies for Patency Enhancement in the Emergency Department (SPEED) investigators who found that double bolus recombinant plasminogen activator (reteplase) (5 + 5 megaunits) and abciximab with the addition of early PCI, resulted in a final infarct-related artery TIMI 3 flow rate of 86% compared with 77% with combination therapy alone. The Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) investigators have shown that patients admitted with infarct-related artery TIMI 3 flow at the time of primary PCI had less than a 1% 6-month mortality. Treating AMI patients with prehospital, partial dose thrombolysis followed by immediate transport to a Level I cardiovascular center (bypassing the closest hospital if necessary) for facilitated infarct-related artery PCI has the potential to reduce the mortality in ST-elevation AMI patients from 6%-10% to less than 4% which could translate into saving approximately 500 lives per day in the United States. It is time to validate this strategy with a randomized clinical trial, the Prehospital Administration of Thrombolytic Therapy With Urgent Culprit Artery Revascularization trial (PATCAR).

Acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction is a common disease with serious consequences in mortality, morbidity, and cost to the society. Coronary atherosclerosis plays a pivotal part as the underlying substrate in many patients. In addition, a new definition of myocardial infarction has recently been introduced that has major implications from the epidemiological, societal, and patient points of view. The advent of coronary-care units and the results of randomised clinical trials on reperfusion therapy, lytic or percutaneous coronary intervention, and chronic medical treatment with various pharmacological agents have substantially changed the therapeutic approach, decreased in-hospital mortality, and improved the long-term outlook in survivors of the acute phase. New treatments will continue to emerge, but the greatest challenge will be to effectively implement preventive actions in all high-risk individuals and to expand delivery of acute treatment in a timely fashion for all eligible patients.

Thrombolytic therapy: clinical applications

The therapeutic use of thrombolytic agents is the result of the increasing understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying normal and deranged thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Plasminogen activators capable of increasing the production of plasmin exhibit considerable efficacy in the treatment of a variety of arterial and venous thrombotic disorders. The ideal thrombolytic agent has not been developed, but the desired clinical result of rapid opening of the thrombosed vessel without reocclusion, without activation of systemic fibrinogenolysis, and without a risk of hemorrhage are defined. Clinical studies clearly demonstrate that the addition of a variety of adjunctive agents to available thrombolytics enhances benefit without inordinate risk. The addition of intravascular angioplasty and stenting to thrombolysis increases the potential long-term benefit. Newer thrombolytic agents and new protocols for the use of existing therapies offer the promise of saving many who would otherwise succumb to coronary or cerebral arterial thrombosis or to venous thromboembolism.

Pharmacologic reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a significant problem in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Pharmacologic reperfusion therapies for MI are becoming increasingly complex. This review therefore places contemporary pharmacologic MI developments into perspective. An historical overview of pharmacologic reperfusion therapy for MI is provided, followed by an analysis of current limitations, treatment options, and present and likely future pharmacologic therapies. Adjunctive percutaneous and other treatments are also discussed, to clarify what is becoming a rapidly changing field.

Aggressive mechanical clot disruption and low-dose intra-arterial third-generation thrombolytic agent for ischemic stroke: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

We prospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of aggressive mechanical disruption of clot in conjunction with intra-arterial administration of a low-dose third-generation thrombolytic agent (reteplase) to treat ischemic stroke in patients who were considered poor candidates for intravenous alteplase therapy or who failed to improve after intravenous thrombolysis. Mechanical clot disruption was used if low-dose pharmacological thrombolysis was ineffective. This strategy was adopted to increase the recanalization rate without increasing the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage.

METHODS

Patients were considered poor candidates for intravenous therapy because of severity of neurological deficits, interval from symptom onset to presentation of at least 3 hours, or recent major surgery. We administered a maximum total dose of 4 U of reteplase intra-arterially in 1-U increments via superselective catheterization. After the initial doses were administered, we performed mechanical angioplasty (for proximal occlusion) or snare manipulation (for distal occlusion) at the occlusion site if recanalization had not occurred. The remaining doses of thrombolytics were subsequently administered if required for further recanalization. Angiographic responses were graded using modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria. Clinical evaluations were performed before and 24 hours, 7 to 10 days, and 1 to 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients were treated (mean age, 64.3 +/- 16.2 yr; 10 were men). Initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores ranged from 11 to 42. Time from onset to treatment ranged from 1 to 9 hours. Occlusion sites were in the following arteries: cervical internal carotid (n = 7), intracranial internal carotid (n = 1), middle cerebral (n = 9), and basilar (n = 2). Of the 19 patients, thrombolysis alone was used in 5 patients, angioplasty was performed in 11 patients, and snare maneuvers were used in 5 patients. Complete restoration of blood flow (modified TIMI Grade 4) was observed in 12 patients, near-complete restoration of flow (modified TIMI Grade 3) in 4 patients, minimal response (modified TIMI Grade 1) in 1 patient, and no response in 2 patients (modified TIMI Grade 0). Neurological improvement at 24 hours (decline of at least 4 points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score) was observed in seven patients. Five other patients experienced further improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 7 to 10 days. No vessel rupture, dissection, or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages were observed. At the time of follow-up evaluation, 7 of 19 patients were functionally independent.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of recanalization and clinical improvement can be observed in patients with ischemic stroke using low-dose thrombolytic agents with adjunctive mechanical disruption of clot. Moreover, this strategy may reduce the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage observed with thrombolytics.

Declining-dose study of reteplase treatment for lower extremity arterial occlusions

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine the technical success and complication rates of three different reteplase dosing regimens during catheter-directed arterial thrombolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective data were obtained from three groups of patients who underwent lower extremity arterial thrombolysis with three different regimens of reteplase: 0.5 U/h, 0.25 U/h, and 0.125 U/h. A total of 101 thrombosed lower extremity arterial occlusions in 87 patients were treated. A subtherapeutic intravenous heparin dose of 400-500 U/h was administered. All limbs were viable at presentation. Thrombolytic success was defined as 95% thrombolysis of the occluded artery or graft with restored distal antegrade flow. Thirty-day mortality and amputation rates were calculated. Bleeding complications and need for transfusions were recorded. Laboratory values recorded included fibrinogen level, platelet count, hematocrit level, hemoglobin level, and prothrombin time.

RESULTS

Thrombolytic success was achieved in 86.7% of patients in the 0.5-U/h dose group, 83.8% of patients in the 0.25-U/h dose group, and 85.3% of patients in the 0.125-U/h dose group. The major bleeding and transfusion rates were 13.3% in the 0.5-U/h dose group, 5.4% in the 0.25-U/h dose group, and 2.9% in the 0.125-U/h dose group. The 30-day amputation-free survival rates were 90% in the 0.5-U/h dose group, 97.3% in the 0.25-U/h dose group, and 94.1% in the 0.125-U/h dose group. Pre- and postprocedural fibrinogen levels and the fibrinogen nadir were not statistically different between the groups. No differences in total infusion times were found between the 0.5-U/h dose and 0.25-U/h dose groups. However, the infusion time in the 0.125-U/h dose group was significantly longer than in the other two groups (42 h vs 30 h; P <.05).

CONCLUSION

All dosing regimens were equally effective in the treatment of acute lower extremity occlusions. The infusion times were longer with the 0.125-U/h dose. Significantly fewer major bleeding complications were encountered with the 0.25-U/h and 0.125-U/h dose regimens than with the 0.5-U/h dose regimen.

Thrombolytic therapy

The therapeutic use of thrombolytic agents is the natural result of the increasing understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying normal and deranged thrombosis and fibrinolysis. Plasminogen activators capable of increasing the production of plasmin exhibit considerable efficacy in the treatment of a variety of arterial and venous thrombotic disorders. The ideal thrombolytic agent has yet to be developed but the desired clinical result of rapid opening of the thrombosed vessel without reocclusion, without activation of systemic fibrinogenolysis, and without a risk of hemorrhage is well defined. Clinical studies clearly demonstrate that the addition of a variety of adjunctive agents to the available thrombolytics enhances benefit without inordinate risk. The addition of intravascular angioplasty and stenting to thrombolysis increases the potential long-term benefit. Newer thrombolytic agents and new protocols for the use of existing therapies offer the promise of saving many who would otherwise succumb to coronary or cerebral arterial thrombosis or to venous thromboembolism.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics of lanoteplase and alteplase during acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Lanoteplase is a rationally designed variant of tissue plasminogen activator. The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics and functional activity of a single intravenous bolus dose of lanoteplase with those of a bolus plus two-step infusion of alteplase.

DESIGN

Seven-centre substudy of the InTIME-I angiographic trial in patients presenting within 6 hours of onset of suspected acute myocardial infarction.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 31 patients (28 males, 3 females) enrolled in this substudy [mean age 59 (range 26 to 76) years].

METHODS

Twenty-three patients randomised to lanoteplase received single bolus doses of 15 kU/kg (n = 5), 30 kU/kg (n = 3), 60 kU/kg (n = 9), or 120 kU/kg (n = 6). Eight patients received alteplase <or=100mg as a bolus followed by a two-stage 90 min infusion. Blood samples were analysed for antigen concentration and plasminogen activator (PA) activity.

RESULTS

The distribution plasma half-life of approximately 35 min for lanoteplase was at least five times longer than that of alteplase. Lanoteplase plasma clearance averaged 3 L/h (50 ml/min), whereas the mean plasma clearance of approximately 24 L/h (400 ml/min) for alteplase approaches hepatic blood flow following acute myocardial infarction. PA activity after lanoteplase 120 kU/kg remained for 6 hours, compared with less than 4 hours after alteplase 100mg.

CONCLUSIONS

The longer antigen and activity half-lives, slower clearance and less complicated administration of lanoteplase compared with alteplase suggest that it may offer advantages for use as a single intravenous bolus to achieve reperfusion after myocardial infarction.

Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study

BACKGROUND

Although both prehospital fibrinolysis and primary angioplasty provide a clinical benefit over in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction, they have not been directly compared. Our aim was to find out whether primary angioplasty was better than prehospital fibrinolysis.

METHODS

We did a randomised multicentre trial of 840 patients (of 1200 planned) who presented within 6 h of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, initially managed by mobile emergency-care units. We assigned patients to prehospital fibrinolysis (n=419) with accelerated alteplase or primary angioplasty (n=421), and transferred all to a centre with access to emergency angioplasty. Our primary endpoint was a composite of death, non-fatal reinfarction, and non-fatal disabling stroke at 30 days. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

The median delay between onset of symptoms and treatment was 130 min in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 190 min (time to first balloon inflation) in the primary-angioplasty group. Rescue angioplasty was done in 26% of the patients in the fibrinolysis group. The rate of the primary endpoint was 8.2% (34 patients) in the prehospital-fibrinolysis group and 6.2% (26 patients) in the primary-angioplasty group (risk difference 1.96, 95% CI -1.53 to 5.46). 16 (3.8%) patients assigned prehospital fibrinolysis and 20 (4.8%) assigned primary angioplasty died (p=0.61).

INTERPRETATION

A strategy of primary angioplasty was not better than a strategy of prehospital fibrinolysis (with transfer to an interventional facility for possible rescue angioplasty) in patients presenting with early myocardial infarction.

How long is too long? Association of time delay to successful reperfusion and ventricular function outcome in acute myocardial infarction: the case for thrombolytic therapy before planned angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of time delays to reperfusion on ventricular function after myocardial infarction. This allows one to identify a group of patients in whom a strategy using antecedent pharmacologic reperfusion therapy before planned direct angioplasty may offer significant benefit.

BACKGROUND

Direct angioplasty for myocardial infarction is associated with a high rate of successful reperfusion compared with pharmacologic reperfusion. However, there is an inherent time delay to treatment with angioplasty compared with pharmacologic therapy. There currently are insufficient data to determine the consequences of incremental time delays to reperfusion on ventricular function.

METHODS

We determined, by logistic regression analysis, the probability of observing a decrement in postmyocardial infarction ventricular function as a function of incremental time delays to reperfusion.

RESULTS

Time delays of 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes to reperfusion increased the likelihood of a worse ventricular function outcome by 1.1-, 1.3-, 1.5-, and 1.7-fold, respectively (P <.02). The upper 95% confidence limits around these odds ratios are as high as 1.3 or 2.7 for 30- and 120-minute delays, respectively. Time from symptom onset to patency remained a significant determinant of ventricular function after adjustment for clinical and procedural factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Delay in time to reperfusion, measured in minutes, results in significant loss of ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Interventional strategies designed for treatment of myocardial infarction when "door-to-balloon" time is expected to exceed 60 minutes should strongly consider incorporation of pharmacologic reperfusion therapy into the therapeutic paradigm.

Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons

I present methods for assessing the relative effectiveness of two treatments when they have not been compared directly in a randomized trial but have each been compared to other treatments. These network meta-analysis techniques allow estimation of both heterogeneity in the effect of any given treatment and inconsistency ('incoherence') in the evidence from different pairs of treatments. A simple estimation procedure using linear mixed models is given and used in a meta-analysis of treatments for acute myocardial infarction.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

The treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes has changed dramatically over the last several years. Most patients now undergo some form of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which includes either stent placement or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Along with new medical interventions for acute coronary syndromes comes the need for new antithrombotic therapies. Combination therapy with antiplatelet agents (aspirin, adenosine diphosphate inhibitors), glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors, and anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparins) is administered, depending on the type of intervention and severity of the coronary lesion. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that recently was approved as an alternative to heparin in patients undergoing PTCA. Compared with unfractionated heparin, bivalirudin reduces the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization, with a concurrent reduction in bleeding. This agent offers promise as a replacement for unfractionated heparin in PCI and is being studied in comparison with unfractionated heparin plus GP IIb-IIIa receptor inhibitors in patients undergoing intracoronary stent placement.

Laser-facilitated thrombectomy: a new therapeutic option for treatment of thrombus-laden coronary lesions

To overcome the adverse complications of balloon angioplasty in thrombus burden lesions (i.e., distal embolization, platelet activation, no-reflow phenomenon with persistent myocardial hypoxemia), mechanical removal of the thrombus or distal embolization protection devices is required. Pulsed ultraviolet excimer laser light at 308 nm can vaporize thrombus and suppress platelet aggregation. Clinical experience has already shown its efficacy in acute ischemic-thrombotic acute coronary syndromes. Unlike other thrombectomy devices, a 308 nm excimer laser can ablate thrombi as well as the underlying plaque, speed up thrombus clearing, and enhance thrombolytic and GP IIb/IIIa activity. It can also be employed in patients with contraindications for systemic thrombolytic agents or GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Our report covers clinical data and technical aspects concerning three patients with acute myocardial infarction who presented with a large thrombus burden. After successful laser-transmitted vaporization of the thrombus mass in these patients, the remaining thrombus burden was evacuated, and normal antegrade coronary flow was successfully restored. This approach can be useful for selective patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Administration of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction require immediate reperfusion therapy. Reperfusion therapy can be provided by either pharmacologic or mechanical means. Pharmacologic reperfusion therapy consists of administering fibrinolytics, whereas mechanical reperfusion consists of performing percutaneous intervention, usually with stent placement. Each approach has been shown to decrease mortality, but each has disadvantages in establishing flow in the infarct-related artery. Regardless of the approach, during an acute myocardial infarction, activation and externalization of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptors occur on the surface of platelets. The GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors block the binding of fibrinogen to these platelet receptors. These inhibitors have been investigated in combination with both reperfusion strategies. The goal of adding GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy to either reperfusion approach is to obtain better early, complete, and sustained reperfusion. Subsequently, this should lead to better clinical outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Although no mortality benefit has been seen with the addition of GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy, ischemic complications have been reduced significantly.

A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study

OBJECTIVES

The Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) study was designed to determine the best reperfusion strategy for patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at hospitals without percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) capability.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that high-risk patients have better outcomes with primary PTCA than with thrombolytic therapy. It is unknown whether this advantage would be lost if the patient had to be transferred for PTCA, and reperfusion was delayed.

METHODS

Patients with high-risk AMI (age >70 years, anterior MI, Killip class II/III, heart rate >100 beats/min or systolic BP <100 mm Hg) who were eligible for thrombolytic therapy were randomized to either transfer for primary PTCA or on-site thrombolysis.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized before the study ended (71 to transfer for PTCA and 67 to thrombolysis). The time from arrival to treatment was delayed in the transfer group (155 vs. 51 min, p < 0.0001), largely due to the initiation of transfer (43 min) and transport time (26 min). Patients randomized to transfer had a reduced hospital stay (6.1 +/- 4.3 vs. 7.5 +/- 4.3 days, p = 0.015) and less ischemia (12.7% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.007). At 30 days, a 38% reduction in major adverse cardiac events was observed for the transfer group; however, because of the inability to recruit the necessary sample size, this did not achieve statistical significance (8.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.331).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high-risk AMI at hospitals without a catheterization laboratory may have an improved outcome when transferred for primary PTCA versus on-site thrombolysis; however, this will require further study. The marked delay in the transfer process suggests a role for triaging patients directly to specialized heart-attack centers.

Fibrin sheaths and central venous catheter occlusions: diagnosis and management

Central venous catheter malfunction diagnosis and treatment is a growing component of the field of interventional radiology. A thorough understanding of the causes of catheter malfunction and the technical skills needed to treat these problems are necessities to appropriate management. In long-standing central venous catheters, the formation of a fibrin sheath can and often does contribute to catheter malfunction. Differentiating a sheath from thrombus is imperative to appropriate therapy. The purpose of this article is to provide an understanding of the causes of fibrin sheaths and how to treat them.

Effect of treatment delay on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Outcomes were evaluated in 1,841 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 1984 to 2000 comparing patients transferred from community hospitals (n = 680) with patients presenting locally (n = 1,161). Baseline variables were similar except transferred patients had fewer prior infarctions (13% vs 21%, p <0.001) and underwent less prior bypass surgery (2.8% vs 6.0%, p = 0.002). Median times from symptom onset to emergency department arrival were similar, but door-to-balloon times and reperfusion times were approximately 1 hour longer in transferred patients (2.8 vs 1.9 hours [p <0.001] and 4.5 vs 3.5 hours [p <0.001], respectively). Despite longer treatment times, there were no significant differences between transferred and nontransferred patients in 30-day mortality (7.6% vs 8.1%, p = 0.73), reinfarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, and late mortality. After adjusting for differences in baseline variables, mortality remained similar between transferred and nontransferred patients (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.36). Peak cardiac enzyme values were higher in transferred patients, but there were no differences in 6-month ejection fractions between groups. In conclusion, patients transferred from community hospitals for primary percutaneous coronary intervention have almost 1-hour additional treatment delay, but this does not appear to have a major adverse effect on clinical outcomes. These data should encourage further randomized trials to evaluate the role of transfer for mechanical reperfusion in patients presenting to community hospitals with acute myocardial infarction.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in the setting of rescue percutaneous coronary intervention

It is clear that survival and better outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are dependent on rapid, complete, and sustained reperfusion of the affected myocardium. Thrombolytic therapy is currently the most common reperfusion strategy in AMI, however, a significant proportion of patients fail to reach reperfusion with this form of therapy. There is evidence from randomized trials that rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for failed thrombolysis may convey better outcomes to patients when compared to a conservative management. Nevertheless, it is not surprising that in this inherently thrombogenic milieu, rescue PCI has a lower success rate and a high incidence of rethrombosis, which have a profoundly negative impact on the outcome of patients. Platelets are thought to play a central role in the pathophysiology of failed thrombolysis and in the thrombotic complications following PCIs. Therefore, platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist may be of benefit in the setting of rescue PCI. Two retrospective subgroup analyses have suggested that these potent antiplatelet agents may improve the outcome of patients undergoing rescue PCI after failed full-dose thrombolytic therapy. An increase in major bleeding, however, has also been noted. Therefore, in light of the lack of evidence deriving from randomized, placebo-controlled trials, careful consideration of several aspects relevant to this setting is needed before GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are administered in rescue percutaneous coronary procedures.

Highlights of latest American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association Guidelines for Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

The recently published American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction stress 3 major points: (1) the prehospital phase from the onset of symptoms to definitive therapy in the emergency department must be shortened by 50% in order to reduce further the estimated 30% mortality rate for all patients in the community who suffer an acute myocardial infarction; (2) a more widespread use of thrombolytic agents is warranted because of the demonstrated, extremely time-dependent benefit to survivorship: the sooner it is given, the better the outcome; and (3) the administration of aspirin (160-325 mg) daily for an indefinite period is perhaps the most important therapy for a patient with acute myocardial infarction. Long-term therapy with lipid-lowering Statin drugs and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor agents are gaining increasing evidence-based data to support their perpetual use as well.

Bivalirudin: a direct thrombin inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Studies of the anticoagulant effects of hirudin, which is derived from the saliva of the leech Hirudo medicinalis, led to the development of compounds that can directly inhibit thrombin activity without the need for additional cofactors. One of these is the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, which has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as an anticoagulant in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE

This is a review of the pharmacologic properties, efficacy, tolerability, and potential cost-effectiveness of bivalirudin in the treatment of ischemic coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Articles were identified by searches of MEDLINE (1966-September 2001), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-September 2001), and the Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-September 2001) using the terms bivalirudin and Hirulog. The reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed for relevant articles.

RESULTS

Bivalirudin is a synthetic polypeptide that directly inhibits thrombin by binding simultaneously to its active catalytic site and its substrate recognition site. After intravenous administration, peak plasma concentrations occur in 2 minutes. In patients given a 1.0-mg/kg bolus followed by a 2.5-mg/kg per hour infusion, a median activated clotting time of 346 seconds is achieved with little interpatient or intrapatient variability. Clearance of bivalirudin occurs through a combination of renal elimination and proteolytic cleavage, and doses may need to be decreased in the presence of renal dysfunction. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin has been associated with equivalent efficacy but lower bleeding rates (P < 0.001) than unfractionated heparin (UFH). Data from the Hirulog Early Reperfusion/Occlusion-2 study suggest no reduction in mortality with bivalirudin compared with heparin when either is added to aspirin and streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction, despite a lower reinfarction rate (P < 0.001). Experience with bivalirudin in patients with unstable angina and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), as well as in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIla inhibitors, is limited. The differences in bleeding rates between bivalirudin and heparin in published clinical trials probably reflect differences in levels of anticoagulation achieved in comparator groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Given its high cost, bivalirudin should be reserved for use as an alternative to UFH, primarily in patients with HIT, until clinical trials have more clearly demonstrated its benefits in terms of efficacy or safety.

Left ventricular function and infarct size 20 months after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To study changes in left ventricular function and infarct size during long-term follow-up after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty.

DESIGN

From 1996 to 1998, 100 consecutive patients were treated with primary angioplasty for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Angioplasty was successful in 95% of the patients. Global left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined by radionuclide ventriculography before discharge, after 6 weeks and after a mean follow-up time of 20 months. Infarct size was assessed by technetium 99m-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion tomography (SPECT) at rest, performed at the same time intervals.

RESULTS

Mean LVEF was 56% at discharge, 55% after 6 weeks and 57% after 20 months of follow-up. No significant improvement in LVEF was observed. Only 8% of the patients at follow-up had LVEF lower than 40%. After 1 week, a mean perfusion defect of 19% was measured by SPECT. After 6 weeks and 20 months of follow-up, the mean perfusion defects were reduced to 14% (p < 0.001) and 15%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Left ventricular function was well preserved with a mean LVEF of 57% 20 months after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. No significant change in LVEF was observed from 1 week after angioplasty to follow-up. Infarct sizes as assessed by SPECT imaging with tetrofosmin were reduced from 1 to 6 weeks, but did not change further during long-term follow-up. The reduction in the perfusion defects over time was probably due to gradual relief of stunning.

Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial)

The mortality benefit of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is strongly dependent on time to treatment. Recent observations suggest that time to treatment may be less important with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients with AMI of <12 hours duration, without cardiogenic shock, who were treated with primary PTCA from the Stent PAMI Trial (n = 1,232) were evaluated to assess the effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was achieved in a high proportion of patients regardless of time to treatment. Improvement in ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was substantial with reperfusion at <2 hours but was modest and relatively independent of time to reperfusion after 2 hours (<2 hours, 12.3% vs > or =2 hours, 4.2%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in 1- or 6-month mortality by time to reperfusion (6-month mortality: <2 hours [5.5%], 2 to <4 hours [4.6%], 4 to <6 hours [4.5%], >6 hours [4.2%], p = 0.97). There were also no differences in other clinical outcomes by time to reperfusion, except that reinfarction and infarct artery reocclusion at 6 months were more frequent with later reperfusion. The lack of correlation between time to treatment and mortality in patients without cardiogenic shock suggests that the survival benefit of primary PTCA may be related principally to factors other than myocardial salvage. These data may also have implications regarding the triage of patients with AMI for primary PTCA.

Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in angiographically documented occluded infarct vessel : limitations of ST-segment elevation in standard and extended ECG leads

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The majority of thrombolysis studies require defined ST-segment elevations as an inclusion criterion for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, depending on the occluded infarct vessel and the criteria applied, the ECG diagnosis of AMI can be difficult to establish. Accordingly, this study was performed to evaluate the sensitivity of ST-segment elevation of standard and extended ECG leads in a cohort of patients with angiographically confirmed diagnosis of AMI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 418 patients (mean +/- SD age, 60 +/- 13 years) with AMI (pain onset, 4.8 +/- 3.0 h), coronary angiography with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/stenting of the culprit lesion was performed. The diagnosis of AMI was confirmed by emergency coronary angiography and laboratory analyses. ST-segment elevation (in two contiguous leads) of 1 mm in standard lead I through aVF and ST-segment elevations of 2 mm (or 1 mm, corresponding values presented in parentheses) in V(1) through V(6) were considered significant. In a subset of 102 AMI patients, additional right precordial leads V(3)R through V(6)R for evaluation of right ventricular infarction and additional chest leads V(7) through V(9) for evaluation of posterior infarction were recorded. ST-segment elevations of 1 mm in the right precordial leads and 1 mm or 0.5 mm in the posterior leads were considered significant.

RESULTS

Standard leads I through V(6) showed ST-segment elevation in 85% (96%) of patients with left anterior descending artery occlusion, in 46% (61%) of patients with left circumflex coronary artery (CX) occlusion, and in 85% (90%) of patients with right coronary artery occlusion. On consideration of additional ECG tracings in the subgroup of 102 patients (V(3)R through V(6)R and V(7) through V(9)), the respective numbers increased by 2 to 8% depending on different criteria for ST-segment elevation; in patients with CX occlusion, the increase amounted to 6 to 14%. There was a trend toward an extended infarct size (maximum creatine kinase [CK] values) with concomitant ST-segment elevation in additional ECG leads as assessed by maximum CK levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of the ECG diagnosis of AMI is only marginally increased by extended precordial chest leads. There is a trend toward an extended infarct size in those patients with concomitant ST-segment elevation in additional ECG leads.