Identification of therapeutic benefit from revascularization in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: inducible ischemia versus hibernating myocardium

Association of Ischemic Evaluation and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Admitted With New-Onset Heart Failure

Background

The significant morbidity associated with systolic heart failure makes it imperative to identify patients with a reversible cause. We thus sought to evaluate the proportion of patients who received an ischemic evaluation after a hospitalization for new‐onset systolic heart failure.

Methods and Results

Patients admitted with a new diagnosis of heart failure and a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) were identified in the VA Healthcare System from January 2006 to August 2017. Among those who survived 90 days without a readmission, we evaluated the proportion of patients who underwent an ischemic evaluation. We identified 9625 patients who were admitted with a new diagnosis of systolic heart failure with a concomitant reduction in ejection fraction. A minority of patients (3859, 40%) underwent an ischemic evaluation, with significant variation across high‐performing (90th percentile) and low‐performing (10th percentile) sites (odds ratio, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.90–4.31). Patients who underwent an evaluation were more likely to be treated with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (75% versus 64%, P<0.001) or beta blockers (92% versus 82%, P<0.001) and subsequently undergo percutaneous (8% versus 0%, P<0.001) or surgical (2% versus 0%, P<0.001) revascularization. Patients with an ischemic evaluation also had a significantly lower adjusted hazard of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47–0.61) compared with those without an evaluation.

Conclusions

Ischemic evaluations are underutilized in patients admitted with heart failure and a new reduction in left ventricular systolic function. A focused intervention to increase guideline‐concordant care could lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Role of quantitative myocardial blood flow and 13N-ammonia washout for viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

Positron emission tomography (PET) integrating assessment of perfusion with 13N-ammonia (NH3) and viability with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has high accuracy to identify viable, hibernating myocardium. We tested whether quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and washout (k2) can predict myocardial viability using FDG as standard of reference.

METHODS

In 180 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardium was categorized on a segment-level into normal, ischemic, hibernating, and scar. From dynamic images, stress MBF, rest MBF, and k2 were derived and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and volume of distribution (VD) were calculated.

RESULTS

Across myocardial tissues, all parameters differed significantly. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.564 (95% CI 0.527-0.601), 0.635 (0.599-0.671), 0.553 (0.516-0.591), 0.520 (0.482-0.559), and 0.560 (0.522-0.597) for stress MBF, rest MBF, MFR, k2, and VD. The generalized linear mixed model correctly classified 81% of scar as viable, hibernating myocardium. If the threshold of rest MBF to predict viability was set to 0.45 mL·min-1·g-1, sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative NH3 PET parameters have low to moderate diagnostic performance to predict viability in ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, if rest MBF falls below 0.45 mL·min-1·g-1, viability testing by FDG-PET may be safely deferred.

Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome and represents the final path of numerous heart diseases. Coronary artery disease is recognized as the primary risk factor for heart failure development, being the main etiological factor in more than 50% of heart failure patients in North America and Europe. Regardless of overt coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia is a common finding in failing hearts, likely due to structural or functional coronary circulation alterations. Ischemia is a self-propagating process which irreversibly impairs the cardiac function and negatively impacts prognosis. Thus, a better and thorough understanding of myocardial ischemia pathophysiology in heart failure would likely lead to significantly improved outcomes in these patients. This review aims to describe the mechanisms of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease in heart failure, focusing on coronary circulation dysfunctions due to increased parietal stress or non-obstructive coronary disease, and discussing the association and management of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac MRI viability assessment prior to revascularization

Coronary artery bypass grafting improves survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, however, these patients are at high risk for morbidity and mortality. The role of viability testing to guide revascularization in these patients is unclear. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has not been studied adequately in this population despite being considered a reference standard for infarct imaging. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients (n = 154) with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction [ejection fraction (EF) < 35%] on CMR who underwent CMR viability assessment prior to consideration for revascularization. Using the AHA16-segment model, percent total myocardial viability was determined depending on the degree of transmural scar thickness. Patients with or without revascularization had similar clinical characteristics and were prescribed similar medical therapy. Overall, 43% of patients (n = 66) experienced an adverse event during the median 3 years follow up. For the composite outcome (death, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, ventricular tachycardia) patients receiving revascularization were less likely to experience an adverse event compared to those without revascularization (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.86, p = 0.01). Patients with > 50% viability on CMR had a 47% reduction in composite events when undergoing revascularization opposed to medical therapy alone (HR 0.53, p = 0.02) whereas patients with a viability < 50% were 2.7 times more likely to experience an adverse event (p = 0.01). CMR viability assessment may be an important tool in the shared decision-making process when considering revascularization options in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Prognostic Value of Quantitative Metrics From Positron Emission Tomography in Ischemic Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and clinical value of quantitative positron emission tomographic (PET) metrics in patients with ischemic heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Although myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is a strong predictor of cardiac risk in patients without heart failure, it is unknown whether quantitative PET metrics improve risk stratification in patients with ischemic heart failure.

METHODS

The study included 254 patients referred for stress and rest myocardial perfusion imaging and viability testing using PET. Major adverse cardiac event(s) (MACE) consisted of death, resuscitated sudden cardiac death, heart transplantation, acute coronary syndrome, hospitalization for heart failure, and late revascularization.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 170 patients (67%) during a median follow-up of 3.3 years. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model including multiple quantitative PET metrics, only MFR predicted MACE significantly (p = 0.013). Beyond age, symptom severity, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction or revascularization, 3-vessel disease, renal insufficiency, ejection fraction, as well as presence and burden of ischemia, scar, and hibernating myocardium, MFR was strongly associated with MACE (adjusted hazard ratio per increase in MFR by 1: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.91). Incorporation of MFR into a risk assessment model incrementally improved the prediction of MACE (likelihood ratio chi-square test [16] = 48.61 vs. chi-square test [15] = 39.20; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort, quantitative PET metrics of myocardial blood flow all improved risk stratification in patients with ischemic heart failure. However, in a hypothesis-generating analysis, MFR appears modestly superior to the other metrics as a prognostic index.

Myocardial Viability Testing by Positron Emission Tomography: Basic Concepts, Mini-Review of the Literature and Experience From a Tertiary PET Center

Ischemic heart disease ranges in severity from slightly reduced myocardial perfusion with preserved contractile function to chronic occlusion of coronary arteries with myocardial cells replaced by acontractile scar tissue-ischemic heart failure (iHF). Progression towards scar tissue is thought to involve a period in which the myocardial cells are acontractile but still viable despite severely reduced perfusion. This state of reduced myocardial function that can be reversed by revascularization is termed "hibernation." The concept of hibernating myocardium in iHF has prompted an increasing amount of requests for preoperative patient workup, but while the concept of viability is widely agreed upon, no consensus on clinical testing of hibernation has been established. Therefore, a variety of imaging methods have been used to assess hibernation including morphology based (MRI and ultrasound), perfusion based (MRI, SPECT, or PET) and/or methods to assess myocardial metabolism (PET). Regrettably, the heterogeneous body of literature on the subject has resulted in few robust prospective clinical trials designed to assess the impact of preoperative viability testing prior to revascularization. However, the PARR-2 trial and sub-studies has indicated that >5% hibernating myocardium favors revascularization over optimized medical therapy. In this paper, we review the basic concepts and current evidence for using PET to assess myocardial hibernation and discuss the various methodologies used to process the perfusion/metabolism PET images. Finally, we present our experience in conducting PET viability testing in a tertiary referral center.

Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Ischemic Heart Disease by PET/MRI: Comparison of Left Ventricular Perfusion, Hibernation, and Scar Burden

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Hybrid positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET-MR) is a novel imaging technology that enables a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability. The aim of this study was to intra-individually compare simultaneously acquired viability parameters from MRI and PET to determine complementary and redundant information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) underwent cardiac PET-MR for myocardial viability assessment. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and PET, including a dynamic dual-tracer acquisition of [¹³N]ammonia ([¹³N]NH₃)/[¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG), were performed simultaneously. Allocation, extent, and transmural degree of left ventricular (LV) scars were measured from LGE. Perfusion, viability, and hibernation were assessed by PET.

RESULTS

A comparison of scar location revealed six more areas of infarction on MR than on PET. Mean LV scarring by CMR was 14% (range, 2% to 42%) and 14% (range, 1% to 46%) by PET (CMR vs. PET: p = 0.9). An intra-individual comparison of scarring showed a good inter-method correlation (r = 0.7), which was also evident in the subgroup with low ejection fraction (EF) (r = 0.6). Hibernation and transmural degree of scars showed a moderate to weak correlation (r = 0.4), which was even worse in the low EF group (r = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IHD, there was a good correlation between PET and CMR for the LV scar extent using hybrid cardiac PET-MR. The degree of transmural scarring by CMR showed no correlation to PET hibernation. Therefore, cardiac PET-MR might be a suitable tool for a comprehensive assessment of myocardial viability if used to predict response to cardiac reperfusion strategies.

Nuclear investigative techniques and their interpretation in the heart and vascular disease

Over the last several decades, myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography has been a mainstay for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease non-invasively. Technical advances in imaging modalities and radiopharmaceutical have revolutionaries the understanding of pathogenesis and management of various diseases. In this article, we shall discuss the various available imaging nuclear medicine techniques, radiopharmaceutical, and common indications. In the era of “precision medicine,” imaging has to be patient centered. We will briefly review the upcoming areas of nuclear medicine imaging apart from perfusion imaging, such as advances in myocardial blood flow quantitation and molecular imaging.

Jeopardized Myocardium Defined by Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Survival in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Impact of Revascularization

Background The prognostic impact of jeopardized myocardium ( JM ) in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy ( ICM ) is unclear. We hypothesized that JM is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with advanced ICM . Methods and Results Patients with ICM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging between January 2002 and January 2013 were included in our study. JM was identified as a vascular territory with <50% myocardial scarring on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and with >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessel that was not subsequently revascularized. A propensity score was developed for revascularization. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of JM with all-cause mortality. We evaluated 631 patients over a mean follow-up of 5.1 years. Overall, 336 patients underwent subsequent revascularization during the follow-up period, among whom 23% had remaining JM , while 295 patients were medically treated (57% with JM ). There were 204 deaths (32%). On multivariable analysis, JM (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.55 [ P<0.001]) was independently associated with all-cause mortality after adjusting for multiple other factors. The risk associated with the presence of JM increased by 5% for every 10-unit increase in left ventricular end-systolic volume index. Conclusions JM is an independent and incremental predictor of mortality in patients with advanced ICM . Patients undergoing revascularization with residual JM had similar risk of mortality compared with medically treated patients with JM . The risk associated with JM significantly increased in the presence of worsening adverse left ventricular remodeling. Cardiac magnetic resonance viability assessment may provide important risk stratification in patients with ICM .

Relationship of myocardial hibernation, scar, and angiographic collateral flow in ischemic cardiomyopathy with coronary chronic total occlusion

BACKGROUND

The relationship between myocardial viability and angiographic collateral flow is not fully elucidated in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) with coronary artery chronic total occlusion (CTO). We aimed to clarify the relationship between myocardial hibernation, myocardial scar, and angiographic collateral flow in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-one consecutive ICM patients with 122 CTOs and 652 dysfunctional segments within CTO territories were retrospectively analyzed. Myocardial hibernation (perfusion-metabolism mismatch) and the extent of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) abnormalities were assessed using 99mTc-sestamibi and 18F-FDG imaging. Myocardial scar was evaluated by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Collateral flow observed on coronary angiography was assessed using Rentrop classification. In these patients, neither the extent nor frequency of myocardial hibernation or scar was related to the status of collateral flow. Moreover, the matching rate in determining myocardial viability was poor between any 2 imaging indices. The extent of 18F-FDG abnormalities was linearly related to the extent of LGE rather than myocardial hibernation. Of note, nearly one-third (30.4%) of segments with transmural scar still had hibernating tissue. Hibernation and non-transmural scar had higher sensitivity (63.0% and 66.7%) than collateral flow (37.0%) in predicting global functional improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiographic collateral cannot accurately predict myocardial viability, and has lower sensitivity in prediction of functional improvement in CTO territories in ICM patients. Hence, assessment of myocardial viability with non-invasive imaging modalities is of importance. Moreover, due to the lack of correlation between myocardial hibernation and scar, these two indices are complementary but not interchangeable.

Saudi Heart Association (SHA) guidelines for the management of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and negatively impacts quality of life, healthcare costs, and longevity. Although data on HF in the Arab population are scarce, recently developed regional registries are a step forward to evaluating the quality of current patient care and providing an overview of the clinical picture. Despite the burden of HF in Saudi Arabia, there are currently no standardized protocols or guidelines for the management of patients with acute or chronic heart failure. Therefore, the Heart Failure Expert Committee, comprising 13 local specialists representing both public and private sectors, has developed guidelines to address the needs and challenges for the diagnosis and treatment of HF in Saudi Arabia. The ultimate aim of these guidelines is to assist healthcare professionals in delivering optimal care and standardized clinical practice across Saudi Arabia.

Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Low-Dose Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography with 99mTc-Sestamibi Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Assessment of Myocardial Viability

INTRODUCTION

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and myocardial perfusion scan are the commonly used modalities to detect viable myocardium. DSE is comparatively cheaper and widely available but has a lower sensitivity.

AIM

We aimed to compare contrast-enhanced low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE) and gated 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scan (MPS) for the degree of agreement in the detection of myocardial viability.

METHODS

We studied 850 left ventricular segments from 50 patients (42 men, mean age 55.5 years), with coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 40%), using contrast-enhanced LDDE and 99mTc-Sestamibi gated SPECT. Segments were assessed for the presence of viability by both techniques and head to head comparisons were made.

RESULTS

Adequate visualisation increased from 80% in unenhanced segments to 96% in contrast-enhanced segments. Of the total 850 segments studied, 290 segments (34.1%) had abnormal contraction (dysfunctional). Among these, 138 were hypokinetic (16.2% of total), 144 were severely hypokinetic or akinetic (16.9% of total), and 8 segments were dyskinetic or aneurismal (0.9% of total). Among 151 segments considered viable by technetium, 137 (90.7%) showed contractile improvement with dobutamine; in contrast, only 8 of the 139 segments (5.7%) considered nonviable by technetium had a positive dobutamine response. The per cent of agreement between technetium uptake and a positive response to dobutamine was 78.6% with kappa = 0.63, suggestive of a substantial degree of agreement between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

Use of contrast-enhanced LDDE significantly increased the adequate endocardial border visualisation. Furthermore, this study showed a strong degree of agreement between the modalities in the detection of viable segments. So, contrast-enhanced LDDE appears to be a safe and comparable alternative to MPS in myocardial viability assessment.

Actual Problems of Diagnostics of Viable Myocardium

The article presents modern analysis of the studies and reflects the key problems concerning the feasibility of performing cardiac MRI for assessment of myocardial viability in patients with history of myocardial infarction (with postinfarction cardiosclerosis), as well as the effectiveness of the method for predicting restoration of the function of hibernating myocardium after myocardial revascularization.

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Brief Review of Nuclear and Nonnuclear Techniques and Comparative Evaluation of Recent Advances

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard for the evaluation of epicardial CAD. In the pathogenesis of the CAD, myocardial perfusion abnormalities are the first changes that appear followed by wall motion abnormalities, electrocardiogram changes, and angina. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) demonstrates the cumulative effect of pathology at epicardial coronary arteries, small vessels, and endothelium. Thus, it evaluates the overall burden of ischemic heart disease (IHD). MPI is used noninvasively to diagnose early asymptomatic CAD or to know the functional significance of known CAD. There are evidence that early detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities followed by aggressive intervention against cardiovascular risk factors may restore myocardial perfusion. This may lead to reduce morbidity and mortality. Various MPI modalities have been used to diagnose and define the severity of CAD. Cardiac myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy [MPS]) has been in use since decades. Several newer modalities such as positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography perfusion, and myocardial contrast echocardiography are developing utilizing the similar principle of MPS. We shall be reviewing briefly these modalities, their performance, comparison to each other, and with ICA.

Viability testing to guide myocardial revascularisation in patients with heart failure

Myocardial revascularisation has the potential to restore ventricular function and improve survival in patients with heart failure due to underlying coronary artery disease. Viability testing is routinely used to identify which patients are likely to benefit, given that revascularisation may entail substantial procedural risk. However, while the concept of viability testing and revascularisation of patients with ‘hibernating myocardium’ is strongly supported by observational series, randomised studies have failed to demonstrate clear benefit. This divergence in the evidence base is reflected in current European and US guidelines, in which viability testing has a class II recommendation. In this article, we review the current evidence for routine viability testing prior to revascularisation of patients with heart failure, outline its use in clinical practice and discuss ongoing trials in the field.

Practical Implications of Myocardial Viability Studies

Many non-invasive methods, such as imaging tests, have been developed aiming to add a contribution to existing studies in estimating patients’ prognosis after myocardial injury. This prognosis is proportional to myocardial viability, which is evaluated in coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction patients only.

While myocardial viability represents the likelihood of a dysfunctional muscle (resulting from decreased oxygen supply for coronary artery obstruction), hibernation represents post-interventional functional recovery itself.

This article proposes a review of pathophysiological basis of viability, diagnostic methods, prognosis and future perspectives of myocardial viability. An electronic bibliographic search for articles was performed in PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane and Scielo databases, according to pre-established criteria.

The studies showed the ability of many imaging techniques in detecting viable tissues in dysfunctional areas of left ventricle resulting from coronary artery injuries. These techniques can identify patients who may benefit from myocardial revascularization and indicate the most appropriate treatment.

Accuracy of myocardial viability imaging by cardiac MRI and PET depending on left ventricular function

AIM

To compare myocardial viability assessment accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) compared to [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- positron emission tomography (PET) depending on left ventricular (LV) function.

METHODS

One-hundred-five patients with known obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and anticipated coronary revascularization were included in the study and examined by CMR on a 1.5T scanner. The CMR protocol consisted of cine-sequences for function analysis and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging for viability assessment in 8 mm long and contiguous short axis slices. All patients underwent PET using [¹⁸F]-FDG. Myocardial scars were rated in both CMR and PET on a segmental basis by a 4-point-scale: Score 1 = no LGE, normal FDG-uptake; score 2 = LGE enhancement < 50% of wall thickness, reduced FDG-uptake ( ≥ 50% of maximum); score 3 = LGE ≥ 50%, reduced FDG-uptake (< 50% of maximum); score 4 = transmural LGE, no FDG-uptake. Segments with score 1 and 2 were categorized “viable”, scores 3 and 4 were categorized as “non-viable”. Patients were divided into three groups based on LV function as determined by CMR: Ejection fraction (EF), < 30%: n = 45; EF: 30%-50%: n = 44; EF > 50%: n = 16). On a segmental basis, the accuracy of CMR in detecting myocardial scar was compared to PET in the total collective and in the three different patient groups.

RESULTS

CMR and PET data of all 105 patients were sufficient for evaluation and 5508 segments were compared in total. In all patients, CMR detected significantly more scars (score 2-4) than PET: 45% vs 40% of all segments (P < 0.0001). In the different LV function groups, CMR found more scar segments than PET in subjects with EF< 30% (55% vs 46%; P < 0.0001) and EF 30%-50% (44% vs 40%; P < 0.005). However, CMR revealed less scars than PET in patients with EF > 50% (15% vs 23%; P < 0.0001). In terms of functional improvement estimation, i.e., expected improvement after revascularization, CMR identified “viable” segments (score 1 and 2) in 72% of segments across all groups, PET in 80% (P < 0.0001). Also in all LV function subgroups, CMR judged less segments viable than PET: EF < 30%, 66% vs 75%; EF = 30%-50%, 72% vs 80%; EF > 50%, 91% vs 94%.

CONCLUSION

CMR and PET reveal different diagnostic accuracy in myocardial viability assessment depending on LV function state. CMR, in general, is less optimistic in functional recovery prediction.

Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Coronary Artery Disease

Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are encouraging precise non-invasive imaging modalities that allow imaging of the cellular function of the heart, while other non-invasive cardiovascular imaging modalities are considered to be techniques for imaging the anatomy, morphology, structure, function and tissue characteristics. The role of cardiac PET has been growing rapidly and providing high diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery disease (CAD). Clinical cardiology has established PET as a criterion for the assessment of myocardial viability and is recommended for the proper management of reduced left ventricle (LV) function and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hybrid PET/CT imaging has enabled simultaneous integration of the coronary anatomy with myocardial perfusion and metabolism and has improved characterization of dysfunctional areas in chronic CAD. Also, the availability of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) evaluation with various PET perfusion tracers provides additional prognostic information and enhances the diagnostic performance of nuclear imaging.

Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction: Rationale and Design of the REVIVED-BCIS2 Trial: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate whether PCI in combination with optimal medical therapy (OMT) will reduce all-cause death and hospitalization for HF compared to a strategy of OMT alone.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is the most common cause of heart failure (HF) and is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Surgical revascularization has been shown to improve long-term outcomes in some patients, but surgery itself carries a major early hazard. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may allow a better balance between risk and benefit.

METHODS

REVIVED-BCIS2 is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, funded by the National Institute for Health Research in the United Kingdom. Follow-up will be for at least 2 years from randomization. Secondary outcomes include left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), quality of life scores, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy and acute myocardial infarction. Patients with LVEF ≤35%, extensive coronary disease and demonstrable myocardial viability are eligible for inclusion and those with a myocardial infarction within 4 weeks, decompensated HF or sustained ventricular arrhythmias within 72 h are excluded. A trial of 700 patients has more than 85% power to detect a 30% relative reduction in hazard.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients have been enrolled to date.

CONCLUSIONS

International guidelines do not provide firm recommendations on the role of PCI in managing severe ICM, because of a lack of robust evidence. REVIVED-BCIS2 will provide the first randomized data on the efficacy and safety of PCI in ICM and has the potential to inform guidelines pertaining to both revascularization and HF. (Study of Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Improve Survival in Heart Failure [REVIVED-BCIS2]; NCT01920048) (REVascularisation for Ischaemic VEntricular Dysfunction; ISRCTN45979711).

PET-CMR in heart failure - synergistic or redundant imaging?

Imaging in heart failure (HF) provides data for diagnosis, prognosis and disease monitoring. Both MRI and nuclear imaging techniques have been successfully used for this purpose in HF. Positron Emission Tomography-Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (PET-CMR) is an example of a new multimodality diagnostic imaging technique with potential applications in HF. The threshold for adopting a new diagnostic tool to clinical practice must necessarily be high, lest they exacerbate costs without improving care. New modalities must demonstrate clinical superiority, or at least equivalence, combined with another important advantage, such as lower cost or improved patient safety. The purpose of this review is to outline the current status of multimodality PET-CMR with regard to HF applications, and determine whether the clinical utility of this new technology justifies the cost.

NUCLEAR IMAGING IN SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH RISK ASSESSMENT

Sudden cardiac death is a cause of fatal outcomes in large proportion of cardiovascular patients. Left ventricle ejection fraction at the moment is the main criteria for sudden cardiac death risk stratification, however the parameter is not enough reliable. Nuclear imaging methods make it to visualize finer pathophysiological processes representing the probability of the life threatening ventricular arrhythmias development. The review is focused on recent data on nuclear imaging for cellular perfusion assessment, transient ischemia, vitality of myocardium and myocardial blood flow, metabolic disorders and sympathetic innervation.

Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is well established. There is paucity of data on how the prognostic value of PET relates to the hemodynamic response to vasodilator stress. We hypothesize that inadequate hemodynamic response will affect the prognostic value of PET MPI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a multicenter rubidium (Rb)-82 PET registry, 3406 patients who underwent a clinically indicated rest/stress PET MPI with a vasodilator agent were analyzed. Patients were categorized as, "responders" [increase in heart rate ≥ 10 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥10 mmHg], "partial responders" (either a change in HR or SBP), and "non-responders" (no change in HR or SBP). Primary outcome was all-cause death (ACD), and secondary outcome was cardiac death (CD). Ischemic burden was measured using summed stress score (SSS) and % left ventricular (LV) ischemia. After a median follow-up of 1.68 years (interquartile range = 1.17- 2.55), there were 7.9% (n = 270) ACD and 2.6% (n = 54) CD. Responders with a normal PET MPI had an annualized event rate (AER) of 1.22% (SSS of 0-3) and 1.58% (% LV ischemia = 0). Partial and non-responders had higher AER with worsening levels of ischemic burden. In the presence of severe SSS ≥12 and LV ischemia of ≥10%, partial responders had an AER of 10.79% and 10.36%, compared to non-responders with an AER of 19.4% and 12.43%, respectively. Patient classification was improved when SSS was added to a model containing clinical variables (NRI: 42%, p < 0.001) and responder category was added (NRI: 61%, p < 0.001). The model including clinical variables, SSS and hemodynamic response has good discrimination ability (Harrell C statistics: 0.77 [0.74-0.80]).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic response during a vasodilator Rb-82 PET MPI is predictive of ACD. Partial and non-responders may require additional risk stratification leading to altered patient management.

Update on revascularization in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review explores the recent findings surrounding the evaluation and the treatment of patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease. It also shed the light on the gaps in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgical revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy has the potential to offer symptomatic and survival benefits.

SUMMARY

Patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease should be considered candidates for revascularization on the basis of their symptoms, extent of the disease, and comorbidities. Surgical revascularization in these patients provides a symptomatic relief, and a survival benefit.

Downstream resource utilization following SPECT: Impact of age and gender

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have identified a downstream referral age and gender bias for invasive coronary anatomy evaluation after single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI). The present study evaluates if such bias still persists despite advancements in SPECT MPI and angiography. We hypothesized that women and patients ≥80 years old are less likely to undergo invasive coronary angiography after adjusting for clinical and scan variables.

METHODS

Patients (n = 3824) who referred to a nuclear cardiology laboratory at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively identified. Regression analysis tested age (<55; 55-69; 70-79; ≥80 years) and gender as predictors of diagnostic angiogram at 90 days post-SPECT after adjustment for known CAD, CAD risk equivalent, SSS, SDS, and LVEF.

RESULTS

Younger patients were more likely to undergo an angiogram as compared to octogenarians (77% more likely if <55 years old, 69% if 55-69 years old, and 52% if 70-79 years old). No effect was found for gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients were less likely to be referred for angiogram as compared to their younger counterparts. Further study is needed to determine which factors guide this decision-making process in older adults and the influence of these factors on the referral bias.

N-Terminal Pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels Are Related to the Extent of Hibernating Myocardium in Patients With Ischemic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Increased N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) can identify patients with heart failure (HF) who are at increased risk of cardiac events. The relationship of these biomarkers to the extent of hibernating myocardium and scar has not been previously characterized in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and HF.

METHODS

Patients with ischemic HF meeting recruitment criteria and undergoing perfusion and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography to define myocardial hibernation and scar were included in the study. A total of 39 patients (mean age 67 ± 8 years) with New York Heart Association class II-IV HF and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction [EF], 27.9% ± 8.5%) were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

Serum NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels were elevated in patients with ≥ 10% hibernating myocardium compared with those with < 10% (NT-pro-BNP, 7419.10 ± 7169.5 pg/mL vs 2894.6 ± 2967.4 pg/mL; hs-cTnT, 789.3 ± 1835.3 pg/mL vs 44.8 ± 78.9 pg/mL; P < 0.05). The overall receiver operating characteristic under the curve value for NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT to predict hibernating myocardium was 0.76 and 0.78, respectively (P < 0.05). The NT-proBNP (P = 0.02) and hs-cTnT (P < 0.0001) levels also correlated with hibernation, particularly in patients with ≥ 10% scar, independent of EF, age, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. No differences were noted in biomarker levels for patients with vs those without ≥ 10% scar.

CONCLUSIONS

NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT levels are elevated in patients with ischemic HF hibernation and are correlated with the degree of hibernation but not with the presence or extent of scar. Taken together, these data support the novel concept that NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT release in patients with ischemic HF reflects the presence and extent of hibernating myocardium.

Revascularization in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Is the Assessment of Viability Still Viable?

Myocardial viability assessment is typically reserved for patients with coronary artery disease and significant left ventricular dysfunction. In this setting, there is myocardial adaptation to an altered physiological state that is potentially reversible. Imaging can characterize different parameters of cardiac function; however, despite previously published appraisals of different imaging modalities, there is still uncertainty regarding the role of these tests in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to reflect on the physiological basis of myocardial viability, discuss the imaging tests available that characterize myocardial viability, and summarize the current published reports on the use of these tests in clinical practice.

Survival Benefits of Invasive Versus Conservative Strategies in Heart Failure in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Coronary Artery Disease

Background—

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction caused by ischemic heart disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It remains unclear whether revascularization by either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) carries benefits or risks in this group of stable patients compared with medical treatment.

Methods and Results—

We performed a meta-analysis of available studies comparing different methods of revascularization (PCI or CABG) against each other or medical treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stroke were also analyzed. Twenty-one studies involving a total of 16 191 patients were included. Compared with medical treatment, there was a significant mortality reduction with CABG (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.61–0.72; P <0.001) and PCI (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–0.85; P <0.001). When compared with PCI, CABG still showed a survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.75–0.90; P <0.001).

Conclusions—

The present meta-analysis indicates that revascularization strategies are superior to medical treatment in improving survival in patients with ischemic heart disease and reduced ejection fraction. Between the 2 revascularization strategies, CABG seems more favorable compared with PCI in this particular clinical setting.

The role of nuclear cardiac imaging in risk stratification of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents a significant portion of all cardiac deaths. Current guidelines focus mainly on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as the main criterion for SCD risk stratification and management. However, LVEF alone lacks both sensitivity and specificity in stratifying patients. Recent research has provided interesting data which supports a greater role for advanced cardiac imaging in risk stratification and patient management. In this article, we will focus on nuclear cardiac imaging, including left ventricular function assessment, myocardial perfusion imaging, myocardial blood flow quantification, metabolic imaging, and neurohormonal imaging. We will discuss how these can be used to better understand SCD and better stratify patient with both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Heart Failure

Cardiovascular imaging is key for the assessment of patients with heart failure. Today, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging plays an established role in the assessment of patients with suspected and confirmed heart failure syndromes, in particular identifying aetiology. Its role in informing prognosis and guiding decisions around therapy are evolving. Key strengths include its accuracy; reproducibility; unrestricted field of view; lack of radiation; multiple abilities to characterise myocardial tissue, thrombus and scar; as well as unparalleled assessment of left and right ventricular volumes. T2* has an established role in the assessment and follow-up of iron overload cardiomyopathy and a role for T1 in specific therapies for cardiac amyloid and Anderson-Fabry disease is emerging.