Immunomodulation by theophylline in asthma. Demonstration by withdrawal of therapy

Theophylline as "add-on" therapy in patients with delayed pressure urticaria: a prospective self-controlled study

Delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) is a skin condition that involves the gradual development of wheals and edema at sites of physical pressure. Its pathogenesis is not clear and histamine-1 receptor (H-1R) antagonists provide only partial relief. In this prospective, clinical study, we investigated the effect of theophylline, which has a long history of benefit in allergic asthma, added to cetirizine in patients with DPU. Twenty three patients received during period 1 cetirizine (10 mg po QD) and theophylline (200 mg po BID) for 6 months, followed by period 2 of 1 month washout with only rescue medication as needed, and then by period 3 with cetirizine (10 mg QD plus placebo (BID) for 5 more months. The addition of theophylline resulted in statistically significant improvement over cetirizine alone by 2 months and continued for the duration of treatment. Treatment of cultured human mast cells with theophylline (10 microM) did not inhibit allergic histamine release, but the in vivo beneficial effect of theophylline may require significant pretreatment period to manifest itself, or may involve inhibition of other mast cell dependent mediators. A double-blind study, accompanied by serum histamine and tryptase levels, should be in order.

Therapeutic approach to vascular remodelling in asthma

Bronchial asthma can be characterized by some significant changes in airway blood vessels, which may contribute to airway remodelling. Despite the clinical and functional consequences of bronchial microvascular remodelling in asthma, up to now, little data have been published on the therapeutic approach to this phenomenon. Corticosteroids are the only anti-asthma drugs that act positively on the three aspects of bronchial vascular remodelling: angiogenesis, dilatation and permeability. Modest positive effects of treatments with beta2-agonists and leukotrienes receptor antagonists on bronchial microcirculatory changes have been reported. In the future, agents that specifically inhibit angiogenesis could represent a novel approach for positively acting on bronchial microvascular changes in chronic inflammatory airway diseases, such as chronic bronchitis and asthma.

Aminophilline suppress the release of chemical mediators in treatment of acute asthma

BACKGROUND

The control of airway inflammation is crucial for management of asthma. Theophylline has been demonstrated to have an anti-inflammatory effect as a long-term-medication for asthma in various studies. In the present study we attempted to clarify if aminophylline, a theophylline derivative, could act as an anti-inflammatory agent as well as a bronchodilator in the treatment for acute asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

Patients are initially treated either with an intravenous infusion of aminophylline or with inhalation of salbutamol. Pro-inflammatory mediators such as eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), histamine, serotonin, thromboxane B2, leukotriene C4 were measured before and one hour after the initial treatment. Clinical parameters such as peak expiratory flow (PEF) and SpO2 were also checked during the studies.

RESULTS

Significant improvements of PEF and SpO2 with both aminophylline and salbutamol treatment were seen. Furthermore, significant decreases of ECP, histamine, and serotonin were observed with aminophylline but not with salbutamol.

CONCLUSIONS

Suppressing the release of pro-inflammatory mediators may play a role, at least in part, in the beneficial effects of aminophylline in the treatment of acute exacerbations in asthma. Additionally, this study indicated that treatment with aminophylline is at least as beneficial as nebulized salbutamol in the restoration of lung function.

Theophylline prevents NAD+ depletion via PARP-1 inhibition in human pulmonary epithelial cells

Oxidative DNA damage, as occurs during exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), highly activates the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1). This can lead to cellular depletion of its substrate NAD+, resulting in an energy crisis and ultimately in cell death. Inhibition of PARP-1 results in preservation of the intracellular NAD+ pool, and of NAD+-dependent cellular processes. In this study, PARP-1 activation by hydrogen peroxide decreased intracellular NAD+ levels in human pulmonary epithelial cells, which was found to be prevented in a dose-dependent manner by theophylline, a widely used compound in the treatment of COPD. This enzyme inhibition by theophylline was confirmed in an ELISA using purified human PARP-1 and was found to be competitive by nature. These findings provide new mechanistic insights into the therapeutic effect of theophylline in oxidative stress-induced lung pathologies.

A prospective clinical study of theophylline safety in 3810 elderly with asthma or COPD

A large-scale prospective study was conducted in 3810 Japanese elderly (> or =65 years old) patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had been treated with sustained-release theophylline tablets (THEODUR) at a dose of 400 mg/day for 1-6 months, in principle. Among 3798 protocol-complying patients (mean age: 73.8 +/- 0.10 years, 1997 with COPD), 261 theophylline-related adverse events were observed in 179 (4.71%) patients. The 5 most frequently observed adverse events were "nausea" (40 episodes, 1.05%), "loss of appetite" (22 episodes, 0.56%), "hyperuricemia" (16 episodes, 0.42%), "palpitation" (15 episodes, 0.39%), and "increased alkaline phosphatase" (11 episodes, 0.28%). No convulsions were reported. Six patients had serious adverse events. The incidence of theophylline-related adverse events was higher in patients with hepatic disease (odds ratio: 1:1.81) and in patients with arrhythmia (odds ratio: 1:1.88). Blood drug concentration measurements in 736 patients indicated that the drug levels were < or =15 microg/ml in 641 patients (87.1%), and no correlation was noted between dose and theophylline-related adverse events. These results suggest that sustained-release theophylline can be used safely in elderly patients with asthma or COPD.

Phase II study of theophylline in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E4998)

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performed a phase 2 study in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) of oral theophylline, a methylxanthine that inhibits cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, thereby inducing the intracellular accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). In 25 patients with Rai stages 0-I, theophylline, 200 mg given orally every 12 h was well tolerated. There was one complete response after 22.5 months of treatment, which continues at 27+ months, and 18 other patients had stable disease. In vitro exposure of patients' lymphocytes to aminophylline (75-250 microg/ml), the soluble form of theophylline, resulted in dose- and time-dependent induction of apoptosis in 9/20 patients studied. Apoptosis was documented flow-cytometrically by monitoring the expression of bcl-2 and bax, forward light scatter, fluorescence intensity of binding of CD45 antibody, and the binding of annexin. Patients whose leukemic lymphocytes were susceptible to apoptosis induction by aminophylline in vitro experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival than patients whose cells were resistant to the drug in culture (P=0.025). This suggests that in a CLL population treated with theophylline, induction of an apoptotic response to the drug in vitro is prognostic for absence of clinical progression.

Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory lung disease

Phosphodiesterases (PDE) belong to an important family of proteins that regulate the intracellular levels of cyclic nucleotide second messengers. Targeting PDE with selective inhibitors may offer novel therapeutic strategies in the treatment of various conditions, and in the context of respiratory disease these include asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The rationale for such an approach stems, in part, from the clinical efficacy of theophylline, an orally active drug that is purportedly a nonselective PDE inhibitor. In addition, intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels regulate the function of many of the cells thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD, and these cells also selectively express PDE4. This has offered pharmaceutical companies the opportunity to selectively targeting these enzymes for the treatment of these diseases. Finally, the success of targeting PDE5 in the treatment of erectile dysfunction provides clinical proof of concept for the targeting of PDE in disease. Whether a 'Viagra' of the airways can be found for the treatment of asthma and COPD remains to be seen, but positive results from recent clinical studies examining the efficacy of selective PDE4 inhibitors such as cilomilast and roflumilast offer some optimism. However, one of the major issues to be resolved is the tolerability profile associated with this drug class that is a consequence of PDE4 inhibition. While cilomilast and roflumilast have low emetic potential they are not free from emesis and various strategies are being investigated in the hope of developing a PDE4 inhibitor without this adverse effect.

Treatment of childhood asthma: how do the available options compare?

The National Asthma Council of Australia suggests that "the aim of preventive therapy should be to enable patients to enjoy a normal life (comparable with that of non-asthmatic children), with the least amount of medication and at minimal risk of adverse events. The level of maintenance therapy should be determined by symptom control and lung function in the interval periods." The British Thoracic Society/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network states that the aims of the pharmacological treatment of asthma should be to control symptoms, prevent exacerbations and achieve the best possible lung function with minimal adverse effects. We have used the current published international guidelines to highlight the international differences in management recommendations, and compared the possible pharmacological options with a focus on the above ideals. Cromones have been used for many years in childhood asthma. Most evidence suggests they now have little role. Regarding inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), beclomethasone and budesonide are essentially similar in their efficacy. Fluticasone propionate is equally as effective at one-half the equivalent dose of budesonide or beclomethasone. Adverse effects are rare in dosages <400 microg/day of budesonide and beclomethasone or <200 microg/day of fluticasone propionate, but may occur in individual patients. Relevant clinical adverse effects are rare and pharmacological systemic effects are less noticeable with budesonide and fluticasone propionate than with beclomethasone, but data are conflicting. Long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) are recommended once low-dose ICS have failed to control symptoms. The main pharmacological difference between the agents is that formoterol is a full beta2-adrenergic agonist, whereas salmeterol is a partial agonist at the beta2-adrenoceptor and has a unique pharmacological action. The main clinical distinction between these two agents is that their onset of bronchodilation differs. Bronchodilation begins at about 3 minutes after inhalation of formoterol, which is similar to the short-acting agents, whereas salmeterol has a much slower onset of action at about 15-30 minutes. The many in vitro differences between the two drugs are probably not clinically relevant. There are no comparative pediatric data on the leukotriene modifiers to make clear recommendations.

Management of respiratory failure in status asthmaticus

Status asthmaticus is a life-threatening episode of asthma that is refractory to usual therapy. Recent studies report an increase in the severity and mortality associated with asthma. In the airways, inflammatory cell infiltration and activation and cytokine generation produce airway injury and edema, bronchoconstriction and mucus plugging. The key pathophysiological consequence of severe airflow obstruction is dynamic hyperinflation. The resulting hypoxemia, tachypnea together with increased metabolic demands on the muscles of respiration may lead to respiratory muscle failure. The management of status asthmaticus involves intensive pharmacological therapy particularly with beta-adrenoceptor agonists (beta-agonists) and corticosteroids. Albuterol (salbutamol) is the most commonly used beta2-selective inhaled bronchodilator in the US. Epinephrine (adrenaline) or terbutaline, administered subcutaneously, have not been shown to provide greater bronchodilatation compared with inhaled beta-agonists. Corticosteroids such as methylprednisolone should be administered early. Aerosolized corticosteroids are not recommended for patients with status asthmaticus. Inhaled anticholinergic agents may be useful in patients refractory to inhaled beta-agonists and corticosteroids. In patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the strategy aims to avoid dynamic hyperinflation by enhancing expiratory time to allow complete exhalation. Complications of dynamic inflation are hypotension and barotrauma. Sedation with opioids, benzodiazepines or propofol is required to facilitate ventilator synchrony but neuromuscular blockade should be avoided as myopathy has been a reported complication. Overall, in the management of patients with status asthmaticus, the challenge to the pulmonary/critical care clinician is to provide optimal pharmacological and ventilatory support and avoid the adverse consequences of dynamic hyperinflation.

Comparative efficacy of once-daily therapy with inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene antagonist or sustained-release theophylline in patients with mild persistent asthma

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the inhaled budesonide, sustained-release theophylline and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients with mild persistent asthma. In this single-center, randomized, parallel-group study that not designed blindly and placebo-controlled manner, 74 patients with mild persistent asthma were treated with either inhaled budesonide 400 microg once daily, oral montelukast 10 mg once daily, or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily for 3 months. In all three treatment groups, improvements were attained in overall asthma control. Asthma symptom scores and supplemental beta2-agonist use were quite the same in all three treatment groups (P>0.05). Although inhaled budesonide group resulted in significantly greater improvements compared with the other two groups in the lung functions (P<0.05), the changes in FEV1 and PEF are within the baseline variability and there was no statistically significant difference among the groups when analyzed by treatment month (P>0.05). Exacerbations of asthma were experienced by 16% of the patients in the montekulast group, by 12.5% of the patients in the theophylline group, and by none of the patients in the budesonide group. The adverse event in each of the three groups was 12%, 16% and 16.7%, respectively. It is concluded that the most important clinical parameters do not point that one of the treatments is more effective than others. Treatment with inhaled corticosteroid is preferred, but sustained-release theophylline and leukotriene antagonists are alternative controller medications in mild persistent asthma.

Pharmacology of airway inflammation in asthma and COPD

The current asthma therapies are not cures and symptoms return soon after treatment is stopped even after long term treatment. Although inhaled glucocorticoids are highly effective in controlling airway inflammation in asthma, they are ineffective in the small group of patients with glucocorticoid-dependent and -resistant asthma. With very few exceptions, COPD is caused by tobacco smoking, and smoking cessation is the only truly effective treatment of COPD available. Current pharmacological treatment of COPD is unsatisfactory, as it does not significantly influence the severity of the disease or its natural course. Glucocorticoids are scarcely effective in COPD patients without concomitant asthma. Bronchodilators improves symptoms and quality of life, in COPD patients, but, with the exception of tiotropium, they do not significantly influence the natural course of the disease. Theophylline is the only drug which has been demonstrated to have a significant effect on airway inflammation in patients with COPD. Here we review the pharmacology of currently used antiinflammatory therapies for asthma and COPD and their proposed mechanisms of action. Recent understanding of disease mechanisms in severe steroid-dependent and -resistant asthma and in COPD, has lead to the development of novel compounds, which are in various stages of clinical development. We review the current status of some of these new potential drugs.

Low-dose theophylline in childhood asthma: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study

Regular anti-inflammatory treatment is essential in treating persistent asthma. Most commonly, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are used. However, especially in children, there is concern about the long-term safety of ICS such that doses should be kept to a minimum. The use of theophylline has decreased because of frequent side-effects in therapeutic doses. In adults, there have been reports about an immunomodulatory effect of low-dose theophylline. To study the clinical and immunomodulatory effect in children, 36 patients (mean age 12.5 SD 2.4 years) with moderate, persistent asthma on regular ICS were recruited into a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. After a 6-week run-in period, patients received either theophylline 10 mg/kg bodyweight or placebo for 12 weeks. Diary cards, lung function, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) were assessed. In the treatment group, mean serum theophylline was 7.1 mg/l. There was no change in symptoms or use of rescue medication. Mean (SD) peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased from 86% (24) to 95% (18) predicted. sECP decreased from 43.2 microg/l (32.5) to 26.5 microg/l (16.9) (p = 0.02). Lymphocyte subpopulations did not change. The study failed to show a beneficial clinical or an immunomodulatory effect of theophylline when used in low doses. These results do not support a more important role of theophylline in the long-term treatment of moderate childhood asthma.

Treating the wheezing infant

The management of infants and small children with asthma is a challenging task because of the many issues unique to this age group that deserve special consideration. The diagnosis of asthma is limited by inherent difficulties in obtaining objective measures of lung function and airway inflammation. In persistently symptomatic patients, the decision to initiate controller therapy is not as great an issue as it is in infants and young children with recurrent episodic wheeze in whom early intervention may allow a window of opportunity potentially to alter the course of the disease. The reality is that even if atopy has been consistently implicated in the development of persistent asthma, there is not a well-established set of criteria by which patients who are likely to benefit from early intervention controller therapy can be identified. Hence, large prospective studies need to be performed evaluating the impact of early pharmacologic intervention on the natural history of infantile asthma. Many areas needing investigation involve what medications to use, how best to deliver the medications, and how to monitor the response to treatment. Only a few medications have been approved for use in this population. Long-term studies evaluating available drugs such as inhaled glucocorticoids, LABAs, and the leukotriene-modifying agents in young children still need to be performed.

Anti-inflammatory treatment for recurrent wheezing in the first five years of life

Medications identified for the treatment of recurrent wheezing in preschool children by the Expert Panel Report of the NHLBI Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma include inhaled corticosteroids, chromones, theophylline, and leukotriene pathway modifiers. However, these various agents differ in their mechanism, extent of action on the airway inflammatory process, and degree of clinical efficacy. Inhaled corticosteroids can control symptoms in many young children with even severe persistent wheezing, but data on their long-term safety when administered in preschool-age children are scarce. There is some information on the uninterrupted use of inhaled corticosteroids in school-age children and the absence of an adverse effect on ultimate adult height. Despite laboratory evidence of adrenal suppression in some studies, few pediatric cases of clinical adrenal insufficiency have been reported. Low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (<400 mcg/day for beclomethasone), which is adequate for controlling mild persistent symptoms, is generally safe. Chromones have a remarkable safety profile, but they are most effective for symptoms of mild severity. Promising data have been published on the efficacy and safety of leukotriene pathway modifiers when used in young children with persistent symptoms. It is uncertain whether early introduction and long-term administration of inhaled corticosteroids prevent development of irreversible airway obstruction. Nevertheless, they may be especially useful for patients with moderate to severe disease in whom other agents (chromones or leukotriene pathway modifiers) will most likely fail to control symptoms. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003; 35:241-252.

Effect of theophylline and specific phosphodiesterase IV inhibition on proliferation and apoptosis of progenitor cells in bronchial asthma

1. Theophylline possesses anti-inflammatory activities in asthma. We examined whether theophylline and agents that modulate cyclic AMP can determine the survival and proliferation of progenitor cells. 2. Progenitor cells from the blood of normal and asthmatic subjects were cultured for 14 days in methylcellulose with GM-CSF, stem cell factor, IL-3 and IL-5. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry of propidium-iodide-stained cells. 3. A greater number of colonies with a higher proportion of cells of eosinophil lineage from asthmatics compared to normal subjects were grown. Theophylline (at 5 and 20 micro g ml(-1)) significantly inhibited colony formation and increased apoptotic cells in asthmatics compared to control. Salbutamol (0.1, 1, 10 micro M), dibutyryl-cAMP (0.1, 1 mM) and rolipram (0.1, 1 mM), a phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor, also dose-dependently decreased colony numbers and increased apoptosis of progenitor cells from asthmatics. 4. There was no significant effect of theophylline, db-cAMP, salbutamol or rolipram on colony formation or the survival of progenitor cells from normal subjects. AMP did not affect the colony formation and apoptosis. Expression of Bcl-2 protein on progenitor cells of asthma was downregulated by theophylline, salbutamol, db-cAMP and rolipram. 5. Theophylline and rolipram decreased colony formation committed to the eosinophil lineage, together with an increase in apoptosis through an inhibition of Bcl-2 expression effects that may occur through cAMP. The anti-inflammatory properties of theophylline include an inhibition of circulating progenitor cells.

Pharmacotherapy and airway remodelling in asthma?

Over the last few decades attention has largely focused on airway inflammation in asthma, but more recently it has been appreciated that there are important structural airway changes which have been grouped together under the term "airway remodelling". It is only now that questions have been asked about the impact of treatment on these structural changes. This review examines the nature of these structural airway changes, the mechanisms of their generation, their potential consequences, and what is known about the ability of anti-asthma treatments to modulate these changes.

Theophylline and PDE4 inhibitors in asthma

Over the past three decades, beta -adrenoceptor agonists and glucocorticosteroids have formed the mainstay of treatment for patients with asthma; during this time, only one new drug class, leukotriene receptor antagonists, have been introduced. Theophylline has also been used in the treatment of patients with asthma, although there is a perception that this drug does not offer the patient any advantages over conventional therapeutic strategies. However, a number of clinical studies have documented the efficacy of this orally active drug. The mechanism by which theophylline exerts its well recognized antiinflammatory activity remains to be established but, if explained, could lead to newer drug development with greater efficacy. The development of phosphodiesterase (PDE)4 inhibitors is one such approach, and recent studies have demonstrated the potential utility of this new drug class for the treatment of patients with asthma.(2)

Therapeutic drug monitoring of theophylline in frail elderly patients: oral compared with nasogastric tube administration

SUMMARY

Treating debilitated elderly patients through nasogastric tube (NGT) can change the pharmacokinetic characteristics of drugs, mainly those that are slow released (SR). The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between patients who receive SR theophylline orally and those who receive it through NGT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors studied elderly patients in the geriatric ward receiving SR theophylline for chronic obstructive lung disease. In 17 patients fed by NGT (group I), theophylline was removed from the capsule and mixed with 10 mL of water. Group II included 15 patients who swallowed the drug orally. Theophylline blood levels were measured, as were peak concentration (C(max) ), time to peak (T(max) ), and area under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC).

RESULTS

The mean daily dose was not statistically different between the two groups: 320 +/- 130 (200-500) mg/d in group I and 360 +/- 85 (200-500) mg/d in group II, given twice daily. All pharmacokinetic measurements were lower in group I as compared with group II: trough theophylline blood levels were 3.78 +/- 3.2 (0.5-10.77) microg/mL versus 8.63 +/- 4.6 (0-15.61) microg/mL ( P= 0.002); C(max) was 6.53 +/- 4.1 (1.3-13.33) microg/mL versus 10.51 +/- 3.30 (4.3-16.28) microg/mL (P = 0.0058), and AUC was 50.04 +/- 38.59 (11-112) microg/h/mL versus 80.37 +/- 28.8 (23-148) microg/h/ml (P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving the drug through NGT had variability and unexpectedly low blood levels. Therefore, the pharmacokinetic parameters of SR preparations should be evaluated before their administration through NGT.

Effects of adding either a leukotriene receptor antagonist or low-dose theophylline to a low or medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with persistent asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of adding zafirlukast or low-dose theophylline to a beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane aerosol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness as the primary outcome variable.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with mild-to-moderate asthma were studied using a randomized crossover design with the following three treatment blocks: (1) beclomethasone, 100 microg/d, alone for the first 2 weeks followed by 400 microg/d alone for the next 2 weeks; (2) beclomethasone, 100 microg/d, followed by 400 microg/d, with the addition of zafirlukast, 20 mg bid; (3) beclomethasone, 100 microg/d, followed by 400 microg/d, with the addition of theophylline, 200 to 300 mg bid. Measurements were made after 2 and 4 weeks of each treatment and at pretreatment baseline.

RESULTS

The mean trough plasma theophylline concentration was 6.7 mg/L, coinciding with the anti-inflammatory target range (ie, 5 to 10 mg/L). The provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (as doubling dose difference from baseline) was significantly (p < 0.05) greater with beclomethasone, 100 microg, plus zafirlukast (1.1 doubling dose) but not with beclomethasone, 100 microg, plus theophylline (0.7 doubling dose) compared to beclomethasone, 100 microg alone (0.4 doubling dose), but not compared to beclomethasone, 400 microg alone (1.1 doubling dose). There were also significant (p < 0.05) differences between beclomethasone, 100 microg, plus zafirlukast (but not BDP, 100 microg, plus theophylline) vs beclomethasone, 100 microg, alone in terms of nitric oxide level, midexpiratory phase of forced expiratory flow, and peak expiratory flow. There were no further significant improvements observed with the addition of zafirlukast or theophylline to beclomethasone, 400 microg.

CONCLUSIONS

A leukotriene receptor antagonist, but not low-dose theophylline, conferred significant additive anti-inflammatory effects to therapy with a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid but not to that with a medium dose of an inhaled corticosteroid. Thus, optimizing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid as monotherapy would seem to be the logical first step, which is in keeping with current guidelines.

Furosemide: progress in understanding its diuretic, anti-inflammatory, and bronchodilating mechanism of action, and use in the treatment of respiratory tract diseases

Accumulated experimental and clinical data suggest that adrenocorticosteroids and/or endogenous ouabain-like substances may play an important role in the mechanism of furosemide diuretic action. It was reported that the drug is highly bound in the adrenals, lungs, kidney, spleen, and liver. In patients with liver cirrhosis, furosemide exerted a markedly decreased natriuretic effect compared with normal subjects, and the plasma levels of circulating endothelin and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) were significantly elevated. In neonates, after administration of furosemide, the urinary excretion of endothelin-1 and aldosterone increased markedly, and it is known that endothelin may release ANF and aldosterone in a dose-dependent manner. Furosemide was used to stimulate zona glomerulosa, whereas ANF decreased the production of steroids in zona glomerulosa and fasciculata cell culture owing to stimulation by various factors. Because the concomitant use of ANF and furosemide appeared to be diuretically effective in newborns after cardiac surgery, one may suggest that furosemide competes with ANF for its effects on the adrenals. Furosemide administered by inhalation exerted a protective effect on allergic and perennial nonallergic rhinitis and was effective in preventing the postsurgical recurrence of nasal polyposis. The drug can also be used as an antiasthmatic agent. In preterm ventilator-dependent infants with chronic lung disease, aerosolized furosemide improved pulmonary function with no marked effect on diuresis. In adults and children with asthma, furosemide exerted a protective effect against bronchoconstriction induced by several indirect stimuli similar to that of disodium cromoglycate or nedocromil. Aerosolized furosemide had a preventive effect also on bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma. In high-dose beclomethasone-dependent asthma, inhaled lysine acetylsalicylate and furosemide exerted a mutually potentiating antiasthmatic activity, allowing considerable sparing of the inhaled steroid. It is proposed that this effect may be explained by the corticosteroid-sparing action of lysine released from the lysine acetylsalicylate molecule because similar beneficial effects were also obtained after the concomitant use of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (whose chemical structure is almost the same as that of lysine) and prednisone. Furosemide exhibited an anti-inflammatory effect through inhibition of production and release of cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha from peripheral mononuclear cells, which may have a beneficial effect on local inflamed tissue imbalance in the ratio of different cytokines, thus improving the sensitivity of target cells to endogenous glucocorticosteroids.

A molecular mechanism of action of theophylline: Induction of histone deacetylase activity to decrease inflammatory gene expression

The molecular mechanism for the anti-inflammatory action of theophylline is currently unknown, but low-dose theophylline is an effective add-on therapy to corticosteroids in controlling asthma. Corticosteroids act, at least in part, by recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) to the site of active inflammatory gene transcription. They thereby inhibit the acetylation of core histones that is necessary for inflammatory gene transcription. We show both in vitro and in vivo that low-dose theophylline enhances HDAC activity in epithelial cells and macrophages. This increased HDAC activity is then available for corticosteroid recruitment and predicts a cooperative interaction between corticosteroids and theophylline. This mechanism occurs at therapeutic concentrations of theophylline and is dissociated from phosphodiesterase inhibition (the mechanism of bronchodilation) or the blockade of adenosine receptors, which are partially responsible for its side effects. Thus we have shown that low-dose theophylline exerts an anti-asthma effect through increasing activation of HDAC which is subsequently recruited by corticosteroids to suppress inflammatory genes.

Effect of theophylline on induced sputum inflammatory indices and neutrophil chemotaxis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a neutrophilic airway inflammation that can be demonstrated by examination of induced sputum. Theophylline has antiinflammatory effects in asthma, and in the present study we investigated whether a similar effect occurs in COPD patients treated with low doses of theophylline. Twenty-five patients with COPD were treated with theophylline (plasma level of 9-11 mg/L) for 4 weeks in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind crossover study. Theophylline was well tolerated. Induced sputum inflammatory cells, neutrophils, interleukin-8, myeloperoxidase, and lactoferrin were all significantly reduced by about 22% by theophylline. Neutrophils from subjects treated with theophylline showed reduced chemotaxis to N-formyl-met-leu-phe (approximately 28%) and interleukin-8 (approximately 60%). Neutrophils from a healthy donor showed reduced chemotaxis (approximately 30%) to induced sputum samples obtained during theophylline treatment. These results suggest that theophylline has antiinflammatory properties that may be useful in the long-term treatment of COPD.

Comparison of second controller medications in addition to inhaled corticosteroid in patients with moderate asthma

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the second controller medications (long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene receptor antagonist and sustained-release theophylline) used in addition to inhaler corticosteroid treatment in moderate persistent asthma. A total of 64 patients with asthma, in the moderate persistent asthma category, were divided into three groups. Patients, all of whom were concurrently using inhaled corticosteroid (Budesonide 400 microg twice daily), were treated for 3 months with either inhaled formoterol 9 microg twice daily (first group), oral zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily (second group), or sustained-release theophylline 400 mg once daily (third group). All of the patients were subjected to assessments on the subject of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), asthma symptom scores (daytime and night-time), supplemental terbutalin use, asthma exacerbations and adverse events. Over the 3-month treatment period. In all of the three groups, significant improvements were recorded in the lung function, asthma symptom scores and supplemental terbutalin use criteria, as a result oftreatments applied. Formoterol treatment resulted in significantly greater and earlier improvements compared with the other two groups in several criteria: PEF variability (17.9 +/- 2.5; 21.9 +/- 3.2; 23.7 +/- 3.3; P < 0.001); asthma symptom score (daytime) (1.6 +/- 0.5; 1 +/- 0.5; 2.0 +/- 0,5; P < 0.05); asthma symptom score (night-time) (1.2 +/- 0.4; 2.2 +/- 0.5; 16 +/- 0.6; P < 0001); and supplement alter butalin use (1.2 +/- 0.3; 1.8 +/- 0.5; 1.7 +/- 0.5; P < 0.05). However, at the end of the treatment, in all of the three groups studied, improvements were attained in overall asthma control and there was no statistical difference among the groups. Although there were no side effects which required the discontinuation of the treatment, it was observed that the maximum side effect was in the second group (20%, 31.6% and 20%, respectively). In conclusion, in patients who still have symptoms on treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist, leukotriene antagonists or sustained-release theophylline to the treatment is a logical approach, and, in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, any one of these second controller medications may be chosen in patients with moderate asthma.

Synergistic effect of theophylline and procaterol on interleukin-5-induced degranulation from human eosinophils

Inhibiting the release of toxic granule proteins from eosinophils is a possible means of treating allergic inflammation. This study was performed to examine whether procaterol and theophylline, commonly used bronchodilators in asthma, inhibit eosinophil degranulation induced by interleukin (IL)-5. Purified eosinophils from patients with asthma were incubated with IL-5 for 24 hr in the presence of theophylline, procaterol, combinations of theophylline and procaterol, or dexamethasone. Levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in the supernatants were measured with radioimmunoassay. Theophylline inhibited IL-5-induced release of EDN in a concentration-dependent manner. Procaterol inhibited degranulation only at high concentrations. However, procaterol at 10(-9) M and 10(-8) M, which are physiologic concentrations, together with theophylline at 10(-5) M, which is a concentration commonly found in the serum of patients receiving low-dose theophylline, inhibited degranulation by 43.8%. This finding indicates that theophylline and procaterol have synergistic effects. The inhibition was comparable to that with dexamethasone at 10(-9) M. Our results suggest that a combination of low-dose theophylline and procaterol exhibits antiinflammatory effects in asthma by inhibiting eosinophil-effector functions.

Selective phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors reduce the prolonged survival of eosinophils stimulated by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

It is well known that bronchial asthma is defined as chronic eosinophilic inflammation of the respiratory tract and that as one of the various types of inflammatory cells, eosinophils induce the airway inflammation of chronic asthma. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to play an important role in the prolongation of the survival of eosinophils. We investigated the inhibitory effect of the selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitors, 3,4-dipropyl-4,5,7,8-tetrahydro-3H-imidazo[1,2-i]purin-5-one (XT-611) and rolipram, and the nonselective PDE inhibitor theophylline, against GM-CSF-induced prolongation of the survival of eosinophils isolated from patients with bronchial asthma. Eosinophils (10(6) cells/ml) were incubated in the presence of GM-CSF together with or without theophylline, rolipram or XT-611 at 37 degrees C, and the viable cells were assessed up to 4d using Trypan blue dye exclusion. The presence of theophylline (10(-4) M), rolipram (10(-4)-10(-5) M) or XT-611 (10(-4)-10(-5) M) significantly reduced the GM-CSF (10 pg/ml)-induced prolongation of viability of eosinophils. These findings suggest that selective PDE 4 inhibitors, including XT-611, may effectively reduce the activities of inflammatory cells in the airway of bronchial asthma patients.

Pulmonary function changes and immunomodulation of Th 2 cytokine expression induced by aminophylline after sensitization and allergen challenge in brown Norway rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Evidence has shown that aminophylline has bronchoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of different doses of aminophylline on the late-phase reaction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and T cell-related cytokine mRNA expression in brown Norway rats induced by ovalbumin (OA) sensitization.

METHODS

Forty rats were equally divided into four groups. Groups I, II, and III animals were sensitized and subsequently provoked with OA. Aminophylline 25 mg/kg was given intraperitoneally to the group I animals and 5 mg/kg to group II animals. Group III animals received intraperitoneal normal saline. Group IV breathed aerosolized saline as a control. After OA provocation, the animals were anesthetized. Pulmonary function tests were performed at baseline and after varying doses of acetylcholine. Thereafter, bronchoalveolar lavage was performed and the lungs were examined histologically. Total RNA was extracted from lung tissue and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed using primers for interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, interferon-gamma, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and beta-actin.

RESULTS

Group III had worse pulmonary function tests, more severe BHR, and more severe lung inflammation, higher IL-4 and IL-10 cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and higher IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression than the other three groups. Expression of IL-2 and interferon-gamma was significantly reduced in group III.

CONCLUSIONS

Both low and high dose aminophylline are effective in preventing late-phase bronchoconstriction, BHR, and an inflammatory response. Aminopylline decreases T helper cell 2-related cytokine mRNA expression but increases T helper cell 1-related cytokines mRNA expression.

Childhood asthma: new insights into management

Recently, a concerted effort has been made to reverse the trend of increasing asthma mortality and morbidity. One additional strategy might be to recognize patients at risk for persistent asthma and to intervene early. This review summarizes new information on asthma pathogenesis that has helped shape a new direction in managing childhood asthma. At the core is the recognition that asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease. Subsequently, inhaled steroids, the most potent anti-inflammatory asthma medications, have emerged as the cornerstone of the management of persistent asthma. The recent report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Childhood Asthma Management Program provides a comprehensive "profile of performance" for 3 treatment choices for the management of persistent asthma. This study answers questions regarding the benefits and shortcomings of the medications evaluated and prompts a closer evaluation of the long-term effects of other treatment strategies, including medications currently being developed. Although intervention with inhaled steroids offers new opportunities to control the development of asthma, one must be cognizant of potential risks in early and long-term therapeutic intervention. This review provides a perspective on our present knowledge, the rationale for early intervention, and opportunities for more aggressive therapy, as well as speculation on how ongoing clinical research will continue to play a role in advancing asthma care and moving toward a "cure" for this life-threatening disease.

Effects of theophylline withdrawal in well-controlled asthmatics treated with inhaled corticosteroid

We examined effects of theophylline withdrawal in 17 adult asthmatics whose symptoms were well controlled under a treatment of a combination of theophylline and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (iBDP). We measured daily symptoms, daily peak flow values, spirometry, peripheral blood eosinophil count (EOS), and serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) at intervals of 1-3 weeks for 3 months after theophylline withdrawal. Twelve patients experienced exacerbation of asthma (exacerbation group), whereas the remaining 5 patients exhibited no symptoms (stationary group). In the exacerbation group, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and percent vital capacity (% VC) gradually decreased until exacerbation of asthma, and the extent of these decreases within the first week after the withdrawal was greater compared with that at later than the third week. V25/HT decreased in both the exacerbation and stationary groups. In particular, the extent of the velocity of expiratory flow at 25% of the vital capacity/height (V25/HT) decrease in the exacerbation group was much greater than that of FEV1 or % VC in this group. Neither EOS nor sECP changed significantly during the clinical course in any patient. The rapid decrease in FEV1 and % VC after the withdrawal suggests that under treatment with iBDP, theophylline causes direct bronchodilating effects on smooth muscle, rather than anti-inflammatory effects. These results also suggest the importance of theophylline on peripheral as well as central airways.

Efficacy of inhaled budesonide and oral theophylline in asthmatic subjects

The aim of present study was to evaluate clinical, functional, and anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled budesonide and oral theophylline treatments in patients with mild to moderate asthma. The study included 38 patients. After a 10-day run-in period, the patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1 received inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) 800 microg/day for 4 weeks. Group 2 received oral theophylline (Talotren tablets, 200 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks. Inhaled budesonide therapy was accompanied by a significant decrease in serum interleukin (IL)-5 levels (p < 0.0005) and blood, sputum, and nasal eosinophil counts (p < 0.005). It produced a significant reduction in daytime (p < 0.01) and nighttime (p < 0.005) symptom scores and an increase in morning (p < 0.005) and evening (p < 0.05) peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in I sec (FEV1) values (p < 0.01). Theophylline therapy was associated with a significant decrease in blood (p < 0.02) and nasal (p < 0.01) eosinophil counts and serum IL-5 levels (p < 0.01). It resulted in significant improvements in daytime and nighttime symptom scores (p < 0.05), and morning PEF and FEV1 values (p < 0.05). These changes were more significant in group I than in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to post-treatment values. Our results confirm the role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma and are consistent with the recommendation that theophylline exerts an anti-inflammatory effect. Further studies should be conducted to determine long-term benefits of theophylline.

Low-dose theophylline does not exert its anti-inflammatory effects in mild asthma through upregulation of interleukin-10 in alveolar macrophages

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence that theophylline has anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory effects. This may be, in part, mediated via an upregulation in the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10. We determined whether low-dose theophylline (LDT) would increase the production of IL-10, and attenuate the production of proinflammatory cytokines by alveolar macrophages.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study involving 15 steroid-free patients with mild asthma, fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed at the end of the treatment and placebo periods. Alveolar macrophages were cultured in vitro, and we measured their release of IL-10, GM-CSF, and TNF-alpha. We also measured IL-10 production in whole blood together with the number of monocytes and T cells expressing intracellular IL-10 by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

LDT did not increase the production of IL-10, or attenuate the production of GM-CSF or TNF-alpha by alveolar macrophages. However, after theophylline treatment, there was a significant reduction in mean (SD) (95% CI) BAL eosinophil number from 3.4 (1.7)% (95% CI 2.4-4.4) to 1.7 (1.0)% (95% CI 1.1-2.3) compared with placebo (P<0.05). Similarly, there was no increase in whole-blood IL-10 release or in the number of monocytes and T cells expressing intracellular IL-10 after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

LDT has an anti-inflammatory effect in asthma; however, this effect is not mediated via the production of IL-10 or the attenuation of GM-CSF or TNF-alpha. The mechanisms of theophylline activity remain to be determined.

Outcome of asthma in children and adolescents at a specialty-based care program

BACKGROUND

Asthma remains a major cause of morbidity for children despite national guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcome from a structured specialty-based care program.

METHODS

Comparison of previous and subsequent years for children ranging from infancy to adolescence who entered a specialty clinic program at a university hospital serving a widely dispersed patient population. One hundred fifty-seven patients previously receiving primary care for their respiratory symptoms were seen during the study period; 23 were lost to followup, 15 were excluded because of other serious concurrent medical problems, and 119 were available for outcome analysis. Evaluation included historical data base from a structured interview, evaluation of pulmonary physiology, and allergy skin testing. Treatment decisions were evidence-based. Patient and/or family education was targeted at decision-making. Toll-free telephone access to the specialty service was provided around the clock. Frequency of unscheduled medical care, hospitalizations, sleep disturbance, activity interference, attainment of defined criteria for control, and medication use were quantified.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-five acute care visits were reduced to 47, and 99 hospitalizations were decreased to 10 (P < 0.001 for both). Nocturnal symptoms and exercise limitation decreased significantly (P < 0.001 for both). All criteria for control of asthma were met in 89% of 75 without tobacco smoke exposure and 50% of 44 with exposure (P < 0.0001 for the difference in outcome). Frequent antibiotic use for respiratory symptoms were eliminated after entering the program. Maintenance medications were not used in 72 with an intermittent pattern of viral respiratory infection-induced asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid use increased from 38 to 68% among 47 subjects with a chronic pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity from asthma is largely prevented with often less, but better selected, medication than had been occurring in previous primary care. These data have implications for revised guidelines directed at primary care physicians.

Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of N-arylrolipram derivatives as inhibitors of PDE4 isozymes

Structure activity studies of N-phenylrolipram derivatives have led to the identification of highly potent PDE4 inhibitors. The potential of these inhibitors for cellular activity was routinely assessed in an assay of fMLP induced oxidative burst in human eosinophils. Since first generation PDE4 inhibitors have been plagued with a number of unwanted side effects, parallel structure activity studies for competition with the [3H]-rolipram binding site in rat brain were performed. In this fashion 5-[4-(3-cyclopentyloxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-oxo-pyrrolidin-1-yl]-3-(3-methoxybenzyloxy)benzoic acid N',N'-dimethylhydrazide (22) was identified as a potent inhibitor of PDE4 which exhibits >1000 fold selectivity versus PDE3, and is a nanomolar inhibitor in all the cellular assays tested. Studies on the stereoselectivity of PDE4 inhibition of this class of rolipram based compounds revealed, that for example (S)-11 is a more potent inhibitor than (R)-11. This effect can also be observed in primary human cells where the (S)-enantiomer is about 10 fold more potent than the corresponding (R)-enantiomer.

Low-dose theophylline reduces eosinophilic inflammation but not exhaled nitric oxide in mild asthma

Theophylline is well-established in the management of asthma, and there is some evidence of an antiinflammatory effect in asthma. It is not known whether theophylline affects inflammatory markers such as sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in patients with mild asthma not receiving inhaled steroid therapy. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of 15 patients with mild asthma, we assessed the effect of low-dose theophylline therapy (250 mg twice per day) on eosinophils in induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway biopsies at the end of both the treatment and placebo periods. Measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) were made at the end of the active and placebo treatment periods of 5 wk each. Low-dose theophylline (mean serum level, 6.1 mg/L) led to a significant reduction in mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) sputum eosinophils from 11.3% (7.80-14.76%) to 8.0% (5.46-10.44%), BAL eosinophils from 3.4% (2.4-4.4%) to 1.7% (1.1-2.3%) and biopsy eosinophils from 1.83% (0.76-2.89%) to 1.20% (0.27-2.13%) compared with placebo (all p < 0.05). There was no significant change in levels of exhaled NO or improvement in lung function and bronchial responsiveness. Low-dose theophylline induced antiinflammatory effects in asthma, reflected by a fall in airway eosinophils with no change in exhaled NO or changes in lung function.

Clinical pharmacology of furosemide in children: a supplement

Furosemide is one of the most effective and least toxic diuretics used in pediatric practice. Experimental and clinical data suggest that adrenocorticosteroids and/or endogenous ouabain-like substances may play an important role in its diuretic effect. Also, the drug appears to have anti-inflammatory properties. In children with different diseases who received orally or intravenously 1 to 2 mg/kg doses of furosemide, a statistically significant positive linear relationship was found between the drug urinary excretion rate and the urine flow rate, but log dose-response curves to the drug were found to vary depending on the disease and the route of the drug administration. No sigmoid-shaped log dose-response curve (ie, one approaching a zero response at very low furosemide urinary excretion rates and a maximum response at very high excretion rates) was attained, which may suggest that the capacity of the kidney tubules to respond diuretically to the aforementioned doses of furosemide was not exceeded in these patients. However, in infants with different diseases and reasonably normal renal function who required administration of this diuretic, a very steep log dose-response curve to a 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of furosemide was found, which may suggest that higher doses may not result in a significant increase in diuretic response. The lowest mean furosemide urinary excretion rate and its concentration in urine associated with a significant diuresis were found to be 0.58 +/- 0.33 microg/kg/min and 24.2 +/- 10.5 microg/ml, respectively. Also, a significant correlation was found between the amount (in milligrams) of furosemide excreted in the urine during the first 6 hours after administration and the urine volume collected during that time. Patients with cystic fibrosis appeared to have a markedly more pronounced diuretic response to the average oral dose of 0.835 +/- 0.18 mg/kg than that reported in control children given 2 mg/kg. In children with acute renal failure caused by acute gastroenterocolitis or glomerulonephritis, a broad relationship was observed between a single intravenous dose and diuretic response after administration of furosemide (1.2 to 30.8 mg/kg). It was suggested that the total daily dose of the drug should not exceed 100 mg in these patients. Furosemide was found to be effective in management of bronchoconstriction accompanying chronic lung disease and narrowing of the upper respiratory airways; in hydrocephalus in infancy to avoid cerebrospinal fluid shunts; in some diagnostic procedures, such as an assessment of fetal and neonatal hydronephrosis; and in evaluation of different types of renal tubular acidosis. Among side effects accompanying clinical use of this drug were cholelithiasis in premature infants receiving total parenteral nutrition concomitantly with the diuretic; secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone disease in infants obtaining long-term furosemide treatment; and drug-induced fever.

Pharmacologic treatment of the adult hospitalized asthma patient

Acute severe asthma calls for aggressive and early therapy of a multifaceted and all-inclusive approach (Fig. 2). Therapy merely begins in the ED and manifold distinct issues need to find consideration during ongoing hospital care. Currently, beta-agonists, anti-cholinergic agents, and corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy. Methylxanthines and magnesium may find consideration in carefully selected patients. Multiple new therapeutic avenues, such as the anti-leukotriene drugs, seem promising and future studies will hopefully extend our armamentarium against life threatening complication of a common disease. Asthma education begun in the hospital may provide the platform for preventing severe acute exacerbations and hospitalization.

Drug treatment of airway inflammation in asthma

Several methods are available for assessing drug effects on airway inflammation and the antiinflammatory effects of drugs for asthma. Cromolyn and theophylline are well-established drugs for the treatment of asthma, and each has antiinflammatory properties. Drugs in development include those aimed at inhibiting inflammatory mediators and immunoglobulin E function; clinical studies, however, have been conducted largely in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice

BACKGROUND

Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory effects. A study was undertaken to determine whether theophylline added to low dose inhaled steroids would be as efficacious as high dose inhaled steroids in asthma.

METHODS

In a study in general practice of 155 recruited asthmatic patients with continuing symptomatic asthma while on 400 microgram beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) daily and inhaled beta(2) agonist as required, the effect of (1) continuing low dose inhaled steroids alone (LDS, 200 microgram BDP twice daily), (2) low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline (LDT, 400 mg daily), or (3) high dose inhaled steroids (HDS, 500 microgram BDP) over a six month period was examined.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients completed the study. Between group comparison using analysis of variance showed no overall differences in peak flow measurements, diurnal variation, and symptom scores. Changes in evening peak flows approached significance at the 5% level (p=0.077). The mean improvement in evening peak flow in the LDT compared with the LDS group was 20.6 l/min (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.5 to 38.8). In the LDT group there was an increase in evening peak flows at the end of the study compared with entry values (22.5 l/min), while in the LDS and HDS groups evening peak flows increased by 1.9 and 8.3 l/min, respectively. There was no significant difference in exacerbations or in side effects.

CONCLUSION

There were no overall significant differences between the low dose steroid, low dose steroid with theophylline, and the high dose steroid groups. The greatest within-group improvement in evening peak flows was found after theophylline. A larger study may be necessary to show significant effects.

Effect of a 4-week treatment with theophylline on sputum eosinophilia and sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity in steroid-naive asthmatics

BACKGROUND

The precise mechanism of action of theophylline in asthma is not fully understood but recent data have drawn attention to its potential anti-inflammatory effect.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of theophylline on sputum eosinophilia and sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity in steroid-naive asthmatics.

METHOD

We performed a 4-week randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in 21 mild to moderate steroid-naive asthmatics whose sputum eosinophilia was found twice > 5% during the run in period. Eleven subjects received 600 mg/24 h theophylline for the first 2 weeks and 900 mg/24 h for the last 2 weeks while 10 subjects took a placebo for 4 weeks. Sputum was induced after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment and 1 week after stopping the treatment. The sputum samples were compared for their cell counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels and eosinophil chemotactic activity using micro-Boyden chambers.

RESULTS

Serum theophylline concentrations reached 7 and 11 microg/mL at V3 and V4, respectively. Intragroup comparisons showed that theophylline, but not placebo, caused a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil counts at V3 (62 +/- 10% from baseline, P < 0.01) and a strong trend at V4 (67 +/- 16% from baseline, P = 0.07) when compared to baseline. The intergroup difference obtained after comparing the area under the curve over the 4 week treatment period only approached the statistical significance (P = 0.08). At baseline the fluid phase of the sputum contained a significant eosinophil chemotactic activity which was inhibited after a 4-week treatment by theophylline (P < 0. 01) but not by placebo. The mean sputum theophylline levels after 4 weeks of treament (1.7 microg/mL) was lower than that required to cause significant inhibition of eosinophil chemotaxis in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Theophylline decreases the natural sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity present in asthmatics. However, when using a small sample size, the 35% reduction in sputum eosinophilia achieved by theophylline failed to reach statistical significance when compared to that seen after placebo.

Evaluation of current pharmacotherapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a severe chronic respiratory condition characterised by progressive, irreversible airflow limitation. It is common, affecting more than 16 million people in the United States and is the fourth highest cause of death. The worldwide incidence of COPD is increasing and, in parallel, the economic and social burden the disease incurs. The treatment of COPD is symptomatic, with no drugs currently available to halt the relentless progression of airflow obstruction. However, with a better understanding of the pathological features of the airway inflammation and alveolar destruction that characterises COPD, new therapeutic strategies are being developed. This article provides a critical evaluation of current pharmacotherapy in COPD, essentially bronchodilators (anticholinergics, beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and theophylline) and corticosteroids, and an overview of international recommendations for their use.

Prevention by theophylline of beta-2-receptor down regulation in healthy subjects

Adrenergic down-regulation can occur rapidly in many tissues. Therefore beta 2-agonists might have a rapidly decreasing effect in time, which is a potential problem for the treatment of bronchial asthma. This in vivo study tested the hypothesis that theophyline can prevent adrenergic down-regulation. A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study was performed in eight healthy subjects. Terbutaline concentration-effect relationships were studied before and after one week of dosing of terbutaline, with or without theophylline. Slow-release terbutaline 5 mg daily was administered for 7 days in combination with either placebo or slow-release theophylline. Concentration-effect relationships of terbutaline after a single subcutaneous injection were studied before and after the 7 day terbutaline treatment. Eosinopenia and hypokalemia were the systemic effect parameters. Terbutaline concentration-time courses were described with a two-compartment model and those of theophylline with a polynomial equation. A hypothetical effect compartment model was applied to link terbutaline plasma concentration via an Emax model to the studied effects. The interaction of theophylline and terbutaline was described with a non-competitive pharmacodynamic model. After one week of oral terbutaline, the mean EC50 (ng/L) of terbutaline increased for the eosinopenia from 1.87 +/- 1.66 to 3.78 +/- 2.18 (+102%) (p = 0.012) with placebo, and to 2.73 +/- 1.99 (+46%) (p = 0.025) with theophylline; for the hypokalemia the EC50 increased from 4.70 +/- 2.91 to 8.52 +/- 7.26 (+81%) (p = 0.012) with placebo, and to 5.64 + 2.59 (+20%) (p = 0.16) with theophylline. The results indicate that the non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline can prevent terbutaline-induced adrenergic down-regulation to a substantial degree.