Treatment of asthma by the inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide given either in the morning or evening

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled ciclesonide

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended first-line therapy for persistent asthma of all severities; however, oropharyngeal and systemic adverse events can be a concern. Inhaled corticosteroids exert their therapeutic and adverse effects by interacting with glucocorticoid receptors within and outside the lungs, respectively. Ciclesonide is a novel inhaled corticosteroid that possesses a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Ciclesonide is inactive itself and converted to its pharmacologically active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, in the target organ, the lungs. Pulmonary activation combined with low oral deposition may minimize oropharyngeal adverse events, and low oral bioavailability, rapid clearance, and high protein binding may reduce systemic exposure. In addition, high pulmonary deposition due to the highly respirable particles, combined with the potential for prolonged lung retention via lipid conjugation, provides for effective therapeutic action.

Evaluation of tests of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function used to measure effects of inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence supporting the evaluation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function as a measure of systemic exposure and clinical adverse events, discuss factors that affect systemic exposure to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and review the effects of various ICSs that are currently available or under development on HPA axis function from a therapeutic perspective.

DATA SOURCES

Randomized published clinical trials and review articles on the topic of HPA axis suppression were retrieved in MEDLINE. Searches dating back to 1988 were restricted to human studies published in English.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that evaluated HPA axis function and the methods used to measure its activities and the effects of ICSs (fluticasone propionate, budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate, mometasone furoate, and ciclesonide) were selected.

RESULTS

Factors that influence adverse events caused by ICSs include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, delivery devices, and therapeutic dose and duration. Basal measurements of blood and urinary cortisol levels, reflecting basal HPA axis function, are the most sensitive markers for assessing systemic ICS bioavailability but, compared with dynamic stimulation tests, are poor clinical predictors of adrenal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Basal serologic and urinary cortisol tests provide the best measures of assessing and comparing systemic ICS exposure. Long-term clinical studies are needed to determine whether such tests are predictive of ICS toxicity.

Novel therapeutic interventions for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is a high-prevalence disease, affecting 10 - 20% of the general population. Allergic rhinitis is sustained by an IgE-mediated reaction and by a complex inflammatory network of cells, mediators and cytokines that becomes chronic when exposure to allergen persists. A T(H)2-biased immune response is the background of the allergic inflammation. The current therapeutic strategy is mainly based on drugs (antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids, cromones and decongestants) and allergen immunotherapy. Drugs are (overall) effective in controlling symptoms but do not modify the immune background that leads to allergic inflammation and safety concerns may be present, especially for prolonged treatments. Immunotherapy can modify the allergic response but there is still room for improvement. Nowadays, several approaches are under investigation to optimise the management of allergic rhinitis. On one hand, new drugs and antimediators are being developed. On the other hand, attempts are being made to selectively block relevant signal pathways of allergic reaction. Finally, one of the major goals is to modify the T(H)2-biased immune response by improving the characteristics and modes of action of allergen immunotherapy.

Ciclesonide disposition and metabolism: pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion in the mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog

The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of ciclesonide, a novel and effective inhaled glucocorticoid for the treatment of asthma, were investigated after intravenous and oral administration of 14C-ciclesonide in the mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog. The pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide in all animal species were characterized by a low oral bioavailability (approximately 6% or less), a high clearance, and a large volume of distribution. The apparent terminal half-life of ciclesonide was short; the apparent terminal half-life of the active desisobutyryl-ciclesonide metabolite (des-CIC or M1) was longer and ranged from 2.4 to 6.9 hours in the 4 species. Metabolites derived from ciclesonide in serum (or plasma) and excreta samples from the 4 animal species were profiled and identified by LC/RAM/MS (liquid chromatography/radioactivity monitor/mass spectrometry). Ciclesonide was extensively metabolized to yield des-CIC, which was further metabolized to primarily yield hippuric acid and hydroxylated metabolites, namely, isomers of cyclohexane-monohydroxylated des-CIC and B-ring-monohydroxylated des-CIC. Greater than 90% of intravenous and oral 14C-ciclesonide doses were recovered in all species; the main elimination route was fecal/biliary. A comparison of in vitro and in vivo metabolite profiles between mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs with those from humans indicated that metabolic pathways for ciclesonide were qualitatively similar in humans and in the 4 animal species.

Equivalent pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of ciclesonide with and without use of the AeroChamber Plus spacer for inhalation

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid that provides safe and effective control of persistent asthma. Ciclesonide is administered as an aerosol solution in a metered-dose inhaler, using hydrofluoroalkane-134a as a propellant. It is activated in the lung to form its only active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC). A spacer may be used in combination with the hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) to maintain inhaled corticosteroid delivery to the lung in patients with poor inhalation technique.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the pharmacokinetics of des-CIC and ciclesonide are altered when a spacer is used for ciclesonide inhalation.

METHODS

A randomised, open-label, 2-period crossover, single-center pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 30 patients with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second > or = 70% predicted). A single dose of ciclesonide (320 microg ex-actuator; equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) was administered via the HFA-MDI with and without an AeroChamber Plus spacer (Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada). Serum concentrations of ciclesonide and des-CIC were measured before inhalation and at various intervals until 14 hours after treatment using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic properties of the active metabolite, des-CIC, were equivalent after inhalation of ciclesonide with and without the AeroChamber Plus spacer. Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of des-CIC pharmacokinetic properties in the presence or absence of a spacer were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 (area under the serum concentration time curve from time zero to infinity 0.96 [0.85, 1.07]; peak serum concentration 1.05 [0.94, 1.18]; elimination half-life 1.04 [0.92, 1.18]). Furthermore, there was no relevant difference in the point estimate and 90% CI of the difference of the time to reach peak serum concentration of des-CIC with or without a spacer.

CONCLUSION

The AeroChamber Plus spacer did not influence the pharmacokinetics of the pharmacologically active des-CIC. Thus, systemic exposure to the active metabolite is similar when ciclesonide is inhaled with or without a spacer. Furthermore, these results are indicative of comparable lung deposition of ciclesonide in both the presence and absence of a spacer.

A multinational, 12-week, randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide and budesonide in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a new lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) that has shown efficacy in previous placebo-controlled and comparative studies in patients with persistent asthma. It is important to compare new treatments with existing ICSs to obtain relative data concerning their efficacy and tolerability.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ciclesonide QD with budesonide BID in patients with asthma.

METHODS

This 12-week, randomized study was conducted at 62 study sites across Europe. Male and female patients aged 12 to 75 years with primarily mild to moderate asthma were enrolled. This study was double blind with respect to the ciclesonide dose and open label for budesonide, as placebofor budesonide was not available. Patients were randomly assigned to receive inhaled ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg QD (morning) or budesonide 200 microg BID for 12 weeks. Efficacy and tolerability assessments were performed at weeks 0 (baseline), 4, 8, and 12. The primary end point was the change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. Secondary end points were changes from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by monitoring of standard laboratory variables (hematology and biochemistry); physical examination, including vital signs; reporting of adverse events (AEs); and 24-hour urinary cortisol as a measure of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-four patients were randomized (301 men, 253 women; mean age, 41.3 years; ciclesonide 80 microg QD, 182 patients; ciclesonide 320 microg QD, 195; budesonide 200 microg BID, 177). Demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, including age, sex, weight, and (FEV1) were similar between the 3 groups. Compared with baseline values, week-12 FEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] [SEM] A, +0.267 [0.035], +0.256 [0.033], and +0.355 [0.034] L, respectively; all, P<0.001) and morning PEF (LSM [SEM] Delta, +12 [5], +17 [4], and +21 [4] L/min, respectively; all, P<or=0.008) were significantly improved with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID. At 12 weeks, ciclesonide was found to be noninferior to budesonide with regard to mean changes from baseline in (FEV1) (intent to treat [ITT]: 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.192 to 0.015; 97.5 CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -0.200 to 0.001) and morning PEF (ITT. 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 80 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -22 to 5; 97.5% CI for ciclesonide 320 microg QD vs budesonide 200 microg BID, -17 to 10). Similar findings were seen in the per-protocol population. Week-12 daily, daytime, and nighttime asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were significantly decreased from baseline in all 3 treatment groups (all, P<0.001). The prevalences of AEs were similar across all 3 treatment groups. Week-12 mean urinary cortisol excretion was statistically similar to baseline with both ciclesonide doses (Delta, -0.54 and +0.16 nmol/mmol creatinine with ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD, respectively) but was significantly reduced from baseline with budesonide (Delta, -1.42 nmol/mmol creatinine; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study in patients with primarily mild to moderate asthma suggest that ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg QD were similar to budesonide 200 microg BID in improving pulmonary function, controlling asthma symptoms, and reducing the need for rescue medication use. Unlike budesonide, ciclesonide was not associated with significant urinary cortisol suppression in these patients.

In Vitro metabolism of ciclesonide in human lung and liver precision-cut tissue slices

Ciclesonide is a new-generation inhaled corticosteroid developed to treat the inflammation associated with persistent asthma. In order to identify the properties of ciclesonide responsible for anti-inflammatory activity, ciclesonide metabolism was investigated in human lung and liver precision-cut tissue slices. Three human lung and three human liver tissue slices were incubated with 25 microM [14C]-ciclesonide for 2, 6 and 24 h. Cellular viability was assessed using adenosine 5'-triphosphate content and protein synthesis in lung slices and adenosine 5'-triphosphate content and potassium retention in liver slices. Ciclesonide and ciclesonide metabolites were analysed in tissue samples using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and radiochemical detection. Metabolite identity was confirmed using mass spectrometry. In lung slices, the inactive parent compound, ciclesonide, was initially converted to the active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, and subsequently converted to fatty acid conjugates. The reversible formation of fatty acid conjugates was a major pathway of ciclesonide metabolism in human lung slices. The primary conjugate was identified as desisobutyryl-ciclesonide oleate. Ciclesonide was metabolized to at least five polar metabolites in the liver. Dihydroxylated desisobutyryl-ciclesonide was the major polar metabolite in liver slices. Activation and fatty acid esterification in the lung followed by rapid inactivation in the liver may explain the improved safety profile and prolonged anti-inflammatory activity of ciclesonide.

The newly developed inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide for the treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is the most recently developed inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma to enter global markets. It has been formulated as an aerosol solution in a metered dose inhaler with hydrofluoralkane. The mass median aerodynamic diameter of aerosolised ciclesonide is 1 - 2 microm, providing excellent lung deposition characteristics. Ciclesonide can undergo reversible esterification in the lungs, possibly allowing once-daily dosing, and is highly protein bound, possibly leading to reduced systemic side effects. Clinical trials suggest that ciclesonide effectively controls asthma and has a favourable safety profile.

A comparative study of inhaled ciclesonide 160 microg/day and fluticasone propionate 176 microg/day in children with asthma

Ciclesonide (CIC) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with high anti-inflammatory activity and low incidence of local and systemic adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of CIC with fluticasone propionate (FP) in children and adolescents with persistent asthma. This was a 12-week, randomized, double blind, parallel-group study. After a 2-to 4-week baseline period, a total of 556 children (ages 6-15 years) with asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)], 50% to 90% predicted) were treated twice daily with CIC 80 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) or FP 88 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 100 microg ex-valve) administered via a hydrofluoroalkane-propelled metered-dose inhaler. A statistically significant increase from baseline was observed in FEV(1) for both CIC (285 +/- 16 ml) and FP (285 +/- 15 ml) (P < 0.0001 for both) and in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (P < 0.0001 for both). Significant improvements were seen in asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and asthma symptom-free days in both treatment groups, without any differences between the treatment groups in changes from baseline. Two FP-treated patients experienced oral candidiasis and one patient experienced voice alteration. Creatinine-adjusted 24-hr urine cortisol levels increased from baseline levels by 10% in the CIC group (P < 0.05) and by 6% in the FP group (not significant). The efficacy and safety of CIC 160 microg/day were comparable to those of FP 176 microg/day in children with asthma.

The systemic safety of inhaled corticosteroid therapy: a focus on ciclesonide

OBJECTIVE

To review the potential systemic activity of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, by evaluation of the effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE and MEDLINE searches using the keyword ciclesonide, without date restrictions, were conducted to identify published articles that related to clinical trials that included ciclesonide.

STUDY SELECTION

The primary articles that reported systemic safety data for ciclesonide were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide (320-1,280 microg/d) demonstrated no detectable, clinically relevant effect on HPA axis function as evaluated by basal cortisol excretion measurements and dynamic stimulation tests. Furthermore, ciclesonide had no effect on the normal diurnal rhythm of endogenous cortisol secretion while simultaneously improving pulmonary function and reducing bronchial hyperresponsiveness. These results suggest that ciclesonide has a low systemic activity that may be attributable to unique pharmacologic properties, including a high degree of serum protein binding, a low oral bioavailability, and rapid systemic elimination, that reduce the level of systemically available pharmacologically active drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Even at the higher doses used to treat more severe cases of asthma, ciclesonide was observed to have no effect on HPA axis function. These data, in conjunction with the observed clinical efficacy, suggest that ciclesonide may have an improved therapeutic margin compared with some other currently available inhaled corticosteroid treatments and, therefore, the potential to improve therapeutic outcomes.

Developing the ideal inhaled corticosteroid

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are considered the most effective asthma therapy, but concerns remain about side effects. The ideal ICS would have a larger therapeutic ratio than currently available agents, allowing doses to be increased but without greatly increasing the frequency or severity of adverse events. The ideal ICS would possess the following pharmacokinetic properties to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects: high pulmonary deposition, conversion to an active metabolite, high receptor potency, high pulmonary retention, low oral bioavailability, extensive metabolism, and rapid elimination. The new ICS ciclesonide has been shown to possess many of these characteristics. Ciclesonide has also been shown to improve lung function, to treat the underlying inflammation, to be effective as monotherapy in patients with persistent asthma, to have reduced side effects compared with other ICS, and to be easy to use with once-daily dosing. However, as with all new products, the advantages witnessed in clinical trials still have to be demonstrated to be beneficial long-term in general clinical use. ICS with an improved therapeutic index may have the potential to increase patient adherence, enhance the use of ICS monotherapy in the primary care setting, and increase the range of patients for whom ICS monotherapy would be appropriate.

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging show ciclesonide has high lung deposition and peripheral distribution: a nonrandomized study in healthy volunteers

Drug deposition is an important factor that contributes to safety and efficacy outcomes of inhaled steroid therapy. Ciclesonide is a nonhalogenated, inhaled corticosteroid under investigation for the treatment of asthma. Therefore, this study was performed to assess lung deposition of ciclesonide. Technetium-99m (99mTc)-labeled ciclesonide (where the 99mTc-label is physically dissolved in the ciclesonide-hydrofluoroalkane [HFA] solution aerosol) inhaled by healthy volunteers was analyzed by two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging to determine lung deposition. Six healthy volunteers inhaled one puff of 40 microg (exactuator, equivalent to 50 microg ex-valve) ciclesonide for 2-D imaging, and two healthy volunteers inhaled 10 puffs of 40 microg ciclesonide for 2-D and 3-D imaging. The ciclesonide aerosol was administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) containing HFA-134a as propellant. The ex-actuator mean (+/- standard deviation) deposition of ciclesonide in the lungs was higher (52% +/- 11%) than in the mouth/pharynx (38% +/- 14%). Two-dimensional and 3-D imaging showed that ciclesonide reached all regions of the lung. Mean percent deposition in peripheral regions (47% and 34%) was higher than in lower central regions (17% and 30%), as revealed by 3-D and 2-D imaging, respectively. Inhalation of up to 400 microg of ciclesonide produced no drug-related side effects. In conclusion, ciclesonide administered via metered-dose inhaler using HFA-134a as a propellant provided high lung deposition (>50%), greater distribution throughout peripheral regions of the lungs, and relatively low oropharyngeal deposition.

Ciclesonide is more effective than budesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide is a lung-activated inhaled corticosteroid that provides effective control of persistent asthma. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide versus once-daily budesonide in patients with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 399 patients with asthma were randomised to receive once-daily ciclesonide 320 microg ex-actuator (equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) or once-daily budesonide 400 microg for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)). Additional efficacy variables included forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication and time to onset of effect. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

Both ciclesonide and budesonide significantly increased FEV(1) from baseline (416 and 321 ml, respectively; p<0.0001). The increase in FEV(1) was significantly greater in ciclesonide-treated patients (95% confidence interval: 0.016-0.174; p=0.019 versus budesonide). Similarly, ciclesonide and budesonide significantly improved FVC and PEF from baseline (p<0.0001), and significantly greater increases occurred with ciclesonide (p=0.034 and 0.019 versus budesonide, respectively). Analysis of morning PEF revealed an earlier onset of action for ciclesonide versus budesonide; a significant improvement was seen by day 2 (p=0.039 versus baseline) with ciclesonide compared with day 7 for budesonide (p=0.047 versus baseline). Adverse events occurred with a similar incidence in both treatment groups. Neither treatment caused significant changes in urinary cortisol levels.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily ciclesonide was more effective than once-daily budesonide in improving FEV(1), FVC and PEF. Ciclesonide also had an earlier onset of action than budesonide in patients with persistent asthma. Both ciclesonide and budesonide had good safety and tolerability profiles.

Pharmacologic characteristics and adrenal suppression with newer inhaled corticosteroids: A comparison of ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most potent anti-inflammatory choice for patients with asthma. Selecting the most appropriate ICS for a patient requires a thorough understanding of the pharmacologic properties of each drug.

OBJECTIVE

This review details the pharmacologic properties of ciclesonide (CIC) and fluticasone propionate (FP) and reviews the available data on suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis as a measure of systemic exposure and safety profile.

METHODS

Clinical studies and case reports were identified through a MEDLINE and EMBASE search of English-language articles. The databases were searched for the years 1990 to April 2005 using the terms ciclesonide, fluticasone, ICS, and adrenal suppression. All studies were clinical trials of pharmacologic properties of the ICSs in humans.

RESULTS

A total of 1082 articles were identified. CIC and FP are 2 of the most potent ICSs. Both have high receptor-binding affinities (12 times and 18 times that of dexamethasone, respectively), and both may provide enhanced respiratory effects through a prolonged pulmonary residence time. The CIC metered dose inhaler dispenses smaller and more highly respirable particles than FP (1.1-2.1 pm vs 2.8-3.2 microm, respectively). Therefore, a greater percentage of administered CIC is topically deposited in the lungs (52% vs 12% to 13% for FP). CIC is delivered as an inactive parent compound, which is converted to its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-CIC (des-CIC), by esterases in the airways. More than 50% of a dose of CIC is deposited and distributed evenly throughout the lungs of healthy adults; lipid conjugation in the lung also may increase lung residence time. On entering the systemic circulation, both corticosteroids are rapidly cleared by the liver (elimination half-life of 3.5 hours for CIC vs 7.8 hours for FP). However, plasma protein binding is greater with CIC/des-CIC (99%/ approximately 99%) than FP (90%), resulting in reduced amounts of des-CIC (<I%) versus FP (10%) circulating free in the plasma. Although studies of low or medium doses of FP have produced conflicting results, high doses of FP (>660 pg/d) may result in adrenal suppression. CIC has not been reported to produce any significant adrenal suppression throughout its studied dose range (up to 1280 micro/d).

CONCLUSIONS

A review of the literature suggests that CIC, as compared with FP, achieves greater pulmonary deposition, causes fewer adverse oropharyngeal effects, deposits less biologically active drug in the systemic circulation, and has less potential for adrenal suppression.

Ciclesonide reduces the need for oral steroid use in adult patients with severe, persistent asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Oral corticosteroids (OCS) may be associated with systemic adverse events (AEs), which can be reduced by replacing OCS with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The potential of ciclesonide, a novel ICS, to reduce OCS use in patients with severe, persistent asthma was evaluated in this study.

DESIGN

A phase III, 12-week, international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

PATIENTS

Adult and adolescent patients (> or = 12 years old; n = 141) with severe, persistent, oral steroid (prednisone)-dependent asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive ciclesonide (640 mug/d or 1,280 microg/d [ex-actuator]) bid or placebo for 12 weeks. Weekly evaluations determined eligibility for prednisone dose reduction based on predetermined criteria.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The prednisone dose was significantly reduced by 47% and 63% in the groups receiving ciclesonide, 640 microg/d, and ciclesonide, 1,280 microg/d, respectively, vs an increase of 4% in the placebo group (both p < or = 0.0003) at week 12. By week 12, prednisone was discontinued by approximately 30% of patients in the ciclesonide-treated groups, vs 11% of patients in the placebo group (both p < or = 0.04). FEV1 improved significantly at week 12 in the ciclesonide treatment groups vs placebo (p < 0.03). The occurrence of local and systemic AEs was comparable between all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Study results suggest that ciclesonide significantly reduces the need for OCS in patients with severe, persistent asthma, while maintaining asthma control.

Anti-inflammatory effects of once daily low dose inhaled ciclesonide in mild to moderate asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Ciclesonide exhibits clinical efficacy at 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily but the anti-inflammatory effects at this dose are not known. We wished to know whether 4 weeks therapy with ciclesonide pMDI 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with mild persistent asthma (FEV(1) 3.35 l) were recruited into a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Measurements were made after ciclesonide and placebo treatment as well as after run-in and washout periods, for adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge (primary variable), exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and induced sputum (in a subgroup).

RESULTS

The mean (SEM) AMP bronchial challenge PC(20) following ciclesonide (140 (63) mg/ml) was significantly (P < 0.001) increased compared with placebo (17 (8) mg/ml), run-in (13 (5) mg/ml) and washout (9 (3) mg/ml) periods. This amounted to an eightfold (CI: 5.3-12.0) for ciclesonide vs placebo. Likewise, there were significant improvements in exhaled NO levels and a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophil cell counts.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that inhaled ciclesonide given at 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects that are in keeping with the previously described clinical effects.

Comparison of the efficacy of ciclesonide 160 microg QD and budesonide 200 microg BID in adults with persistent asthma: a phase III, randomized, double-dummy, open-label study

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of ciclesonide 160 mug QD (given either in the morning or evening) was compared with budesonide 200 mug BID in adults with stable asthma that was pretreated with inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

This was a randomized, 3-arm, parallel-group study comparing ciclesonide (given in a double-blind, double-dummy regimen) with open-label budesonide. After 2 to 2.5 weeks, during which patients were treated with budesonide 200 microg BID, patients (n = 405) were randomly assigned to receive ciclesonide 160 microg QD AM or 160 microg QD pm, or budesonide 200 microg BID (all administered by metered-dose inhaler) for 12 weeks. All patients received 2 puffs of medication (or placebo) in the morning and evening. The primary efficacy variable was the difference in spirometric forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1) in liters) from randomization to study end. Secondary efficacy end points were forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow by spirometry, and diary assessments of peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and rescue medication use. Adverse events were assessed by patient report, investigator observation, physical examination, and laboratory testing; events were classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics with regard to sex, age, weight, smoking status, baseline medication use, and FEV(1) were balanced among the treatment groups. Over the course of treatment, both ciclesonide and budesonide maintained FEV(1) compared with baseline. Both ciclesonide regimens were as effective as budesonide 200 microg BID in maintaining FEV(1) during the treatment period versus baseline (ciclesonide 160 microg QD am: 95% CI, -0.120 to 0.045 vs budesonide; P = NS; ciclesonide 160 microg QD pm: 95% CI, -0.061 to 0.105 vs budesonide; P = NS). Ciclesonide 160 microg QD (morning or evening) was comparable with budesonide 200 microg BID for maintaining pulmonary function, asthma symptom scores, and rescue medication use. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different among the treatment groups, and most adverse events were not related to study medication.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, ciclesonide 160 microg QDwas as effective as budesonide 200 microg BID (400 microg total daily dose) in these adults with persistent asthma. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Once-daily ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg for 12 weeks is safe and effective in patients with persistent asthma

The efficacy and safety of ciclesonide was assessed in this randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with persistent asthma (randomized n=360) maintained on low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomized to receive ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg (ex-actuator doses, equivalent to 100 and 400 microg ex-valve, respectively) or placebo once daily in the morning via metered-dose inhaler for 12 weeks. Morning peak expiratory flow was maintained throughout the treatment period in patients treated with ciclesonide and decreased significantly in patients treated with placebo (P=0.0003). Ciclesonide (80 and 320 microg) significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1s from baseline (0.13 and 0.19 L increases, respectively; P<0.01); improvements were superior versus placebo (P=0.0044 for 80 microg ciclesonide; P<0.0001 for 320 microg ciclesonide). The probability of losing efficacy decreased in a dose-dependent manner (55% for placebo, 38% for ciclesonide 80 microg, 23% for ciclesonide 320 microg). Asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were unchanged with ciclesonide and significantly worsened with placebo. The incidence of adverse events was comparable in all treatment groups and no cortisol suppression was observed. Therefore, ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg administered once daily was a safe and effective maintenance treatment for patients with persistent asthma.

Once-daily ciclesonide in children: efficacy and safety in asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily inhaled ciclesonide 40 mug (CIC40), 80 mug (CIC80), and 160 mug (CIC160) with placebo in children with persistent asthma of all severities.

STUDY DESIGN

Overall, 1031 children age 4 to 11 years were randomized into 2 identical double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group studies consisting of a run-in phase followed by 12 weeks of treatment. Both studies were designed to allow for a prespecified integrated analysis. The primary outcome variable was change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) percent predicted between baseline and study end; treatment comparisons were assessed using analysis of covariance. Additional endpoints included asthma symptom scores, daily albuterol use, and safety, including hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable; 59.4% of patients had moderate asthma, and 24.1% had severe asthma. All ciclesonide doses were associated with greater improvements in baseline to week 12 FEV(1) percent predicted versus placebo (CIC40, 11.97; CIC80, 13.58, P <.05; CIC160, 14.17, P < .01). Significant improvements in asthma symptoms (P < .01) and reductions in albuterol use were reported. Ciclesonide was well tolerated with no effect on HPA axis function.

CONCLUSIONS

In this integrated analysis, ciclesonide was effective and well tolerated in children with persistent asthma.

Comparative efficacy of once-daily ciclesonide and budesonide in the treatment of persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide, a new-generation, on-site-activated, inhaled corticosteroid, with once-daily budesonide in persistent asthma.

METHODS

Eligible patients requiring budesonide or equivalent 320-640 microg (ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 400-800 microg; Turbohalertrade mark) daily entered a 2-week baseline, and then a 2- to 4-week pretreatment period (budesonide 1280 microg/day; ex-mouthpiece, equivalent to 1600 microg/day). Patients with an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) of 7% or 0.15 L were randomised to ciclesonide 320 microg (ex-actuator, equivalent to 400 microg ex-valve) via a hydrofluoroalkane-metered dose inhaler (HFA-MDI) without a spacer or budesonide 320 microg once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Change in FEV1 was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

In all, 359 patients were randomised. The FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) decreased by 0.18 and 0.12L, respectively, in the ciclesonide group, and by 0.23 and 0.21L in the budesonide group. For FEV1, ciclesonide was noninferior and numerically superior to budesonide. For FVC, ciclesonide was statistically superior to budesonide (P=0.010). Asthma symptom scores were comparable; the median percentage of symptom-free days was significantly higher for ciclesonide (43.6%) versus budesonide (25.8%) (P=0.017). Rescue medication use decreased significantly only for ciclesonide patients (P=0.009). Frequency of adverse events was low in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide 320 microg once daily by HFA-MDI without a spacer was at least as effective as budesonide 320 microg once daily in persistent asthma.

New anti-inflammatory therapies and targets for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are diseases of the airways with an underlying inflammatory component. The prevalence and healthcare burden of asthma and COPD is still rising and is predicted to continue to rise in the foreseeable future. Beta-agonists and corticosteroids form the basis of the therapies available to treat asthma. However, the treatments available for COPD, corticosteroids and anticholinergics, reduce the number and severity of exacerbations, but have a limited effect on slowing the progression of the disease. The inflammatory processes underlying the pathology of asthma have received a great deal of attention and more recently, those underlying COPD have begun to be elucidated. This has resulted in the identification of new targets that will allow the development of novel approaches by the pharmaceutical industry, which will be able to focus its efforts in an attempt to provide new and improved therapies to treat these debilitating diseases. The resultant therapies should impinge on the underlying development of these diseases rather than providing symptomatic relief or palliative treatment alone. This review will outline new targets and novel approaches currently under investigation, which may provide opportunities for novel anti-inflammatory therapeutic interventions that slow or halt disease progression in asthma and COPD.

Model-based covariate pharmacokinetic analysis and lack of cortisol suppression by the new inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide using a novel cortisol release model

Ciclesonide is a novel and effective inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma that is converted into the active metabolite C21-desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC) in the lung. The objectives of this analysis were to characterize covariate effects on des-CIC pharmacokinetics (PK) and circadian cortisol release. In addition, the effect of systemic des-CIC exposure on circadian cortisol release was also evaluated. Data from 12 phase I and 3 phase III studies in adults and 2 phase III studies in children (ex-actuator dose of ciclesonide: 40-2880 microg) were pooled. There were 635 subjects in the analysis with 5238 and 4470 observations recorded for concentrations of des-CIC and cortisol, respectively. The des-CIC PK was described using a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and no clinically relevant differences in des-CIC PK due to body weight, race, asthma severity, or gender. The mean PK parameters estimates of apparent clearance and apparent volume of distribution were 302 L/h and 1310 L, respectively. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption, an endogenous "predose" cortisol concentration at dose interval and a lag time based on a fixed, hypothetical cortisol dosing time of 10:00 PM could adequately characterize the circadian rhythm of endogenous cortisol release. The potential effect of des-CIC on the circadian rhythm of endogenous cortisol release was evaluated using dose and AUC as covariates and applying the Emax model. Less than 1% of all observed des-CIC concentrations were higher than the EC50 for cortisol suppression, indicating negligible changes in cortisol concentrations at therapeutically relevant doses.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids: room for improvement

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the standard of care in asthma and are widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High-dose regimens and long-term use of ICS in predisposed individuals may be associated with a variety of side effects, similar to those observed with systemic corticosteroid therapy. Side effects associated with long-term ICS use include reduction in growth velocity, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and fractures. Fear of unwanted complications may be of concern in all patients using ICS, particularly in age- and gender-specific populations that are more prone to develop side effects or to reduce treatment adherence because of physical, behavioral, or psychological problems. In addition to concerns about ICS safety, dosing regimens that are difficult to follow may further reduce a patient's ability to comply with treatment. Ciclesonide, a new-generation ICS with unique pharmacokinetic properties, was developed to provide effective anti-inflammatory control for asthma with once-daily administration to improve patient adherence and a high safety profile to reduce the occurrence of local and systemic side effects.

The treatment of asthma in children: inhaled corticosteroids

The evidence that asthma is characterized by extensive inflammation of the airways has warranted the use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in asthma maintenance therapy. Corticosteroid treatment, especially if high or frequent doses are required, is associated with a range of adverse effects including adrenal suppression and impairment in growth and bone metabolism. New corticosteroids are in development, including mometasone furoate, and some of these are predicted to have reduced adverse effects such as the soft steroid ciclesonide. Soft steroids are designed for delivery near to their site of action, to exert their effect and then to undergo controlled and predictable metabolism to inactive metabolites. This review points out the anti-inflammatory effects of corticosteroid in asthmatic airways and the clinical efficacy and safety of ICS in asthmatic children. The development of a soft steroid should help to achieve the aim of improving the therapeutic profile of ICS in asthma and thus alleviate the ongoing problem of poor patient compliance especially in childhood.

Comparable efficacy of ciclesonide once daily versus fluticasone propionate twice daily in asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy in asthma, but local and systemic side effects and adherence remain a concern. Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid with on-site lung activation that provides potent anti-inflammatory activity and has been shown to have a good safety profile, even at high doses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily ciclesonide versus twice-daily fluticasone propionate at comparable daily doses in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 529 patients were randomized to ciclesonide 160 microg once daily or fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in lung function.

RESULTS

Both ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1s, forced vital capacity, and morning peak expiratory flow compared with baseline (p<0.0001 for all variables). Both medications reduced asthma symptoms and rescue medication use within the first 24 h. At the tested dose, both medications were equally safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide 160 microg once daily was as effective as fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily in improving lung function and asthma symptoms, and in reducing rescue medication use in patients with asthma.

Formation of fatty acid conjugates of ciclesonide active metabolite in the rat lung after 4-week inhalation of ciclesonide

Ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with prolonged anti-inflammatory activity, is being developed for the treatment of asthma. Fatty acid conjugation of ICS is thought to be related to prolonged ICS activity. In vitro studies demonstrated that ciclesonide is converted to an active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), which undergoes reversible fatty acid conjugation. We tested the in vivo metabolism of ciclesonide in the lung by exposing rats to inhaled ciclesonide (0.16 mg/kg/day) for 1h daily over 4 weeks. Lungs (n=6 per time point) were extracted with ethanol 2, 5, and approximately 27 h after the final treatment. Ciclesonide and des-CIC concentrations were determined using solid-phase extraction and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Concentrations of fatty acid ester conjugates were indirectly assessed using enzymatic de-esterification before LC/MS/MS. At 2 and 5 h, fatty acid conjugates of des-CIC were the major metabolites (61 and 55%, respectively). Ciclesonide, des-CIC, and fatty acid conjugates of des-CIC were clearly present in lung samples the day after the last inhalation. This in vivo study confirmed ciclesonide activation to des-CIC and formation of fatty acid conjugates. The presence of des-CIC fatty acid conjugates at >24 h after dosing suggests that ciclesonide is appropriate for once-daily dosing.

Cytokine-activated bronchial epithelial cell pro-inflammatory functions are effectively downregulated in vitro by ciclesonide

Ciclesonide, a new inhaled corticosteroid, is administered as a parent compound and converted in the airway mucosa into the active metabolite, desisobutyryl-(des-)ciclesonide. A study was designed to evaluate the ability of ciclesonide to modulate pro-inflammatory functions of human bronchial epithelial cell (HBEC) primary cultures being converted into des-ciclesonide. HBECs were stimulated with interleukin (IL)-4 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha (20 ng/mL) in the presence of ciclesonide and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-8 release evaluated respectively by FACS and ELISA. Ciclesonide (3 microM) significantly inhibited ICAM-1 expression by stimulated HBECs, already after 3h and still after 48 h culture (p < 0.01). At all the concentrations tested ciclesonide inhibited ICAM-1 expression (p < 0.05). GM-CSF and IL-8 release by stimulated HBECs was also downregulated by ciclesonide (p < 0.05). All the ciclesonide activities tested appeared to be mainly due to a partial inhibition of the 'IL-4 + TNF-alpha-induced' and little or no involvement of the 'constitutive' cell functions. Des-ciclesonide was detected in 24 h culture HBEC supernatants using high-performance liquid chromatography, while no parental compound ciclesonide was present. These results show at cellular level the fast and prolonged activity of ciclesonide on pro-inflammatory functions of HBECs, a selective target of asthma therapy, involved in the activation of this new inhaled corticosteroid.

Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Despite their proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of asthma exacerbations, current inhaled corticosteroids carry safety concerns, especially adrenal suppression. Ciclesonide (hydrofluoroalkane propellant) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with few, if any, clinical adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effects of ciclesonide therapy on the dynamic cortisol response to sequential low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized and treated; 148 patients completed the study. Fluticasone propionate (chlorofluorocarbon propellant) was used as an active comparator. The doses administered were 320 microg of ciclesonide once daily, 320 microg of ciclesonide twice daily, and 440 microg of fluticasone propionate twice daily, all doses ex-actuator.

RESULTS

For both ciclesonide groups, changes in mean low- and high-dose peak serum cortisol levels and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels corrected for creatinine were small vs baseline and comparable with placebo. For the fluticasone propionate group, significant reductions vs placebo in serum cortisol levels in response to high-dose cosyntropin stimulation and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were observed. Oral candidiasis rates were 2.5% for 320-microg/d ciclesonide, 2.4% for 640-microg/d ciclesonide, and 22.0% for 880-microg/d fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the safety of ciclesonide therapy, demonstrating that at doses up to 640 microg/d, the drug does not affect sensitive markers of adrenal function.

Preclinical profile of ciclesonide, a novel corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

Ciclesonide is a novel, inhaled corticosteroid under development for the treatment of asthma. Ciclesonide is activated to desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC) in the lungs to provide potent anti-inflammatory activity. The investigations herein compared the activity of ciclesonide with fluticasone in animal models to assess efficacy/potency as an airway anti-inflammatory and the comparative side effect potential to consider the therapeutic ratio of each compound. In radioligand binding assays, des-CIC and fluticasone exhibited comparable high-affinity binding to the glucocorticoid receptor, whereas ciclesonide exhibited 100-fold less binding affinity. In the Brown Norway rat model of antigen-induced airway eosinophilia and in a model of Sephadex-induced lung edema, ciclesonide and fluticasone exhibited comparable efficacy. Interestingly, following 7-day intratracheal administration, ciclesonide elicited adrenal involution with a potency that was 44-fold less than fluticasone. Furthermore, ciclesonide was 22-fold less active than fluticasone in eliciting hypoplasia of the femoral growth plate. These data support the concept that ciclesonide acts as a parent compound that, when delivered to the airways, can be transformed into the active metabolite des-CIC, resulting in local high anti-inflammatory activity. Furthermore, ciclesonide possesses equivalent anti-inflammatory efficacy through pulmonary activation with a significantly improved safety profile in preclinical animal models compared with fluticasone.

Lower oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled ciclesonide via hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler compared with budesonide via chlorofluorocarbon metered-dose inhaler in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

Inhaled corticosteroids may cause oropharyngeal side effects if deposited in the oropharynx in active form. Ciclesonide, an inhaled corticosteroid with low glucocorticoid receptor affinity, is activated primarily in the lung by esterases to an active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), with high glucocorticoid receptor affinity. We studied oropharyngeal deposition of ciclesonide, des-CIC, and budesonide.

METHODS

In an open-label, randomized, two-treatment (administered in sequence), five-period study, 18 healthy subjects received 800 microg (ex-valve) inhaled ciclesonide via a hydrofluoroalkane-pressurized, metered-dose inhaler followed by 800 microg budesonide (Pulmicort) by a chlorofluorocarbon-pressurized, metered-dose inhaler (four puffs of 200 microg each, ex-valve) or vice versa. Oropharyngeal cavity rinsing was performed immediately, or 15, 30, 45, or 60 min after inhalation (one rinsing per study period), and the solutions were analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection.

RESULTS

Ciclesonide and budesonide were detected in most oropharyngeal wash samples. Maximal concentration of each inhaled corticosteroid was reached immediately post-inhalation; maximal concentrations of ciclesonide and des-CIC were 30% and 0.67%, respectively, of budesonide. Oropharyngeal deposition of ciclesonide and budesonide decreased rapidly within 15 min post-inhalation, and less rapidly thereafter. Less than 10% of the residual ciclesonide in the oropharynx was converted to des-CIC. The molar dose-adjusted amount of des-CIC was 4% of budesonide (P < 0.0001). There were no significant adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Oropharyngeal deposition of des-CIC was more than one order of magnitude lower than that of budesonide when administered by the respective metered-dose inhalers. This may explain the low frequency of oropharyngeal side effects of ciclesonide in clinical studies.

Maintenance of asthma control by once-daily inhaled ciclesonide in adults with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended therapy for persistent asthma, although side effects can limit appropriate use. Ciclesonide, a novel ICS, is activated in the lung, thereby reducing systemic activity and side effects. This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in adults with persistent asthma.

METHODS

After a 2-week baseline period in which current ICS treatment was continued, 329 patients were randomized to receive ciclesonide 160 microg (n = 107) or 640 microg (n = 112) (ex-actuator doses, equivalent to 200 and 800 microg ex-valve, respectively), or placebo (n = 110) once daily in the morning. Efficacy was monitored by asthma symptom scores, rescue medication use, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, spirometry, and probability of study completion without experiencing lack of efficacy.

RESULTS

Morning PEF remained stable with either ciclesonide dose but decreased with placebo; the differences were significant (P < 0.0001) for both ciclesonide doses vs placebo. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity decreased significantly with placebo (P < 0.005), but were unchanged with ciclesonide. Lack of efficacy was significantly greater for patients switched to placebo (63%) than it was for those treated with ciclesonide 160 microg (30%) (P < 0.0001 vs placebo) or ciclesonide 640 microg (31%) (P < 0.0001 vs placebo). There were no significant differences between the two tested doses of ciclesonide with respect to efficacy and safety. Serum and 24-h urine cortisol were unaffected by ciclesonide treatment. Both doses of ciclesonide were well tolerated with no cases of oral candidiasis.

CONCLUSION

Ciclesonide (160 or 640 microg) once daily in the morning effectively maintains asthma control, does not affect cortisol levels, and has an adverse event profile comparable with placebo in adults with primarily mild to moderate asthma.

Once-daily inhaled budesonide for the treatment of asthma: clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic explanation

BACKGROUND

Budesonide, a widely used inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a favorable therapeutic ratio, is available via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) and as a suspension for nebulization (Pulmicort Respules).

METHODS

MEDLINE and an AstraZeneca database were searched to identify relevant controlled clinical trials published between 1986 and 2002 using the key words budesonide OR inhaled corticosteroid, AND once daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-four controlled clinical studies involving once-daily administration of budesonide to asthmatic patients were identified. Excluding long-term studies, this review presents data from 23 controlled studies for 4466 adults or adolescents and 1532 children with asthma and demonstrates efficacy of budesonide in both corticosteroid-naïve patients and patients previously treated with ICS. Once-daily administration of budesonide achieves clinical efficacy comparable with that of twice-daily regimens in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and is equally effective when given in the morning or evening. Once-daily administration simplifies treatment regimens and may improve patient compliance. The tolerability profiles of budesonide once-daily via Turbuhaler or as budesonide inhalation suspension are good and comparable with those for twice-daily dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily budesonide is effective and well tolerated as initial treatment for adults and children with mild asthma and as maintenance therapy in patients with more severe asthma once asthma control has been achieved.

[The therapeutic index in asthma: how should it be defined?]

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic index (efficacy/tolerance or benefit/risk ratio) is a major determinant of treatment decisions in asthma.

METHODS

For the numerator, the therapeutic index depends on efficacy (maximal effect) and not potency (dose-response relationship). With regard to the denominator, several pharmacological factors influence the occurrence of side-effects, the acceptability of which also has to be considered.

RESULTS

In asthma, some strategies have a more favourable therapeutic index than others;e.g additional treatment (long acting beta2 agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, theophylline) to inhaled corticosteroids instead of doubling the dose of the latter. Conversely, it is extremely difficult to compare the therapeutic indices of different molecules of inhaled corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential risk of systemic side effects with long-term administration of high doses of inhaled corticosteroids suggests the need to seek the minimal effective dose.

Ciclesonide

Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid (delivered via a hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler) that is converted to an active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, in the lung, thereby minimising effects on endogenous cortisol. In two 12-week, randomised studies in patients with asthma, ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg once daily was at least as effective as budesonide 400 microg/day at increasing forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline; ciclesonide 320 microg daily was significantly more effective than budesonide 400 microg once daily in one study. In a randomised, double-blind study in patients with asthma controlled with high-dosages of inhaled corticosteroids, FEV(1) and FVC decreased significantly from baseline at 12 weeks in patients receiving ciclesonide 320 microg daily or budesonide 400 microg daily; peak expiratory flow values decreased significantly only in patients receiving budesonide. Inhaled ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg daily improved asthma symptom scores and decreased the use of rescue medication by a similar, significant amount to budesonide 400 microg/day in two 12-week studies. Inhaled ciclesonide was generally well tolerated in patients with asthma. Ciclesonide did not suppress biochemical markers of adrenal function in 52-week studies. The long-term (>52 weeks) systemic effects of ciclesonide remain unknown.

New advances and potential therapies for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is a disease of the airways with an underlying inflammatory component. The prevalence and healthcare burden of asthma is still rising and is predicted to continue to rise in the current century. Inhaled beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists and corticosteroids form the basis of the treatments available to alleviate the symptoms of asthma. There is a need for novel, safe treatments to tackle the underlying inflammation that characterizes asthma pathology. Furthermore, there is a requirement for new treatments to be developed as oral therapy in order to alleviate patient compliance issues, especially in children. A multitude of new approaches and new targets are being investigated, which may provide opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions in this debilitating disease. For simplicity, these approaches can be divided into two categories. The first comprises therapies directed against specific components or steps seen in allergic asthma. By 'components' we mean the key inflammatory cells (T cells [in particular T(h)2], B cells, eosinophils, mast cells, basophils and antigen presenting cells [APC]) and mediators (immunoglobulin E [IgE], cytokines, histamines, leukotrienes and prostanoids) believed to be involved in the chronic inflammation seen in asthma. By 'steps' we mean the allergic response, such as antigen processing and presentation, T(h)2-cell activation, B-cell isotype switching, mast cell involvement and airway remodeling. The other category of novel approaches to disease modification in asthma encompasses general anti-inflammatory therapies including phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonists, and lipoxins.

Soft steroids: a new approach to the treatment of inflammatory airways diseases

Inhaled synthetic glucocorticosteroids are widely used in the treatment of bronchial asthma where they provide very effective first line treatment. However, a range of unwanted side effects and the often complex dosing schedules associated with these drugs frequently result in poor patient compliance. The soft drug approach has been utilised as a means of delivering these potent anti-inflammatory agents close to their site of action while reducing the degree of systemic exposure and thus limiting or eliminating the associated systemic and local side effects. A further target for pharmaceutical companies is to deliver these new treatments in a once daily formulation thus further enhancing patient compliance. While many soft steroids have failed to progress into the clinic two are meeting with some degree of success. Loteprednol etabonate, an inactive metabolite soft steroid, has been accepted for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders and is being examined in clinical trials for its effects on airway inflammation. Ciclesonide, a pro-drug soft steroid, has demonstrated efficacy without side effects in a once daily formulation in asthma patients and is being developed for the treatment of both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with launches of a once daily inhaler formulation expected in 2003. These drugs may represent a significant step forward in the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the airways.

Risk-benefit value of inhaled glucocorticoids: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective

Inhaled glucocorticoids induce therapeutic and adverse systemic effects via the same types of receptors. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of inhaled glucocorticoids generates a risk-benefit value (RBV). Targeted efficacy with minimal adverse effects helps to quantify an appropriate RBV. High lung deposition/targeting, high receptor binding, longer pulmonary retention, and high lipid conjugation are among the pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered for improved efficacy of the compound. Low or negligible oral bioavailability, small particle size and inactive drug at the oropharynx, high plasma protein binding, rapid metabolism, high clearance, and lower systemic concentrations are associated with low risks for adverse effects. Inhaled glucocorticoid potency is enhanced by solution inhalers, which result in higher pulmonary deposition and minimize local adverse effects. These properties, among others, determine the efficacy and safety of inhaled glucocorticoids. Currently available inhaled glucocorticoids do not provide the complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters to optimize RBV, leaving room for improvement in the development of future agents.

Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the mainstay of asthma therapy. Although compliance to this type of medication is often suboptimal and once-daily dosing can help to improve adherence to the treatment, the clinical implications of such a mode of administration should be determined.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review summarizes the recent studies on comparative efficacy of once-versus twice-daily administration of ICS, in light of previous reports.

SUMMARY

Although twice-daily administration of ICS is often better to optimize asthma parameters, in many patients, asthma can be sufficiently controlled by a once-daily regimen of most ICS. An increased frequency of dosing seems preferable if asthma becomes uncontrolled or is severe, although this requires further study. A therapeutic trial should, however, be done to ensure that asthma control is adequate. Comparative long-term effects of such a strategy on inflammatory and remodeling parameters remain to be determined, as does the proportion of patients who can adequately control their asthma with once-daily administration of the various ICS available.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ciclesonide

Ciclesonide is a novel glucocorticoid that is converted into ciclesonide--active principle (CIC-AP) in the lung. The study objectives were to identify a structural model for population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CIC-AP using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, assess the influence of select covariates on PK and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters, and investigate the effects of CIC-AP on endogenous cortisol. Pooled concentration data from nine phase I studies (dose: 400-3600 micrograms) involving healthy and asthmatic patients were included in the PK analysis. There were 151 subjects (3300 observations) for the CIC-AP population PK analysis. Various models examined inter- and intrasubject variability for the PK parameters. Population estimates of the PK parameters of clearance and volume of distribution were 396 L/h (64.8% co-efficient of variation [CV]) and 1190 L (41.2% CV), respectively. Pharmacodynamic population estimates included maximum cortisol release rate, 3140 ng/h (5.4% CV). The EC50 of CIC-AP was 0.88 ng/mL. Ciclesonide is a safe corticosteroid that causes negligible cortisol suppression. The disposition and effect of CIC-AP can be described using mixed-effect modeling. The estimated EC50 is similar to mean Cmax from an 800-micrograms dose, further suggesting CIC-AP has little effect on cortisol suppression.

Dose response and therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

Inhaled glucocorticoids play an indispensable role in the therapy of asthma. Development of new compounds was initially directed to increase the potency of the individual corticosteroid; thereafter, pharmacokinetic characteristics were modified to reduce unwanted systemic effects. Target of the present development is to attain compounds with the most favorable risk-to-benefit ratios. Since then, there has been substantial discussion about how to rank and weigh the different glucocorticoids. This article provides an evaluation of the relevant clinical studies published between May 2001 and June 2002, identifying the main determinants of the therapeutic value of inhaled glucocorticoids.