Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters

Stroke Volume Monitoring: Novel Continuous Wave Doppler Parameters, Algorithms and Advanced Noninvasive Haemodynamic Concepts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adequate oxygen delivery is essential for life, with hypoxia resulting in dysfunction, and ultimately death, of the cells, organs and organism. Blood flow delivers the oxygen bound in the blood, while haemodynamics is the science of blood flow. Stroke volume (SV) is the fundamental unit of blood flow, and reflects the interdependent performance of the heart, the vessels and the autonomic nervous system. However, haemodynamic management remains generally poor and predominantly guided by simple blood pressure observations alone.

RECENT FINDINGS

Doppler ultrasound measures SV with unequalled clinical precision when operated by trained personnel. Combining SV with BP measurements allows calculation of flow-pressure based measures which better reflect cardiovascular performance and allows personalised physiologic and pathophysiologic modelling consistent with Frank's and Starling's observations.

SUMMARY

Doppler SV monitoring and novel flow-pressure parameters may improve our understanding of the cardiovascular system and lead to improved diagnosis and therapy. This review examines the physics and practice of Doppler SV monitoring and its application in advanced haemodynamics.

Assessment of method agreement between two minimally invasive hemodynamic measurements in septic shock patients on high doses of vasopressor drugs. A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring is still controversial among the methods used to assess the hemodynamic profile of the septic shock patient. The aim of this study was to test the level of agreement between two different devices.

METHODS

We collected 385 data entries during 12-hour intervals from four critically ill patients with septic shock and high doses of vasoactive therapy using two minimally invasive methods at the same time: Vigileo™ device which uses the pulse contour principle, and EV1000™ monitoring platform which uses the transpulmonary thermodilution principle. The studied parameters were Stroke Volume (SV), Cardiac Output (CO) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP). We tested the agreement by performing the visual examination of data patterns using graphs and studying the bias, limits of agreement and creating Bland-Altman plots. For assessing the systematic, proportional and random differences, we computed a Passing-Bablock regression with the CUSUM test for linearity.

RESULTS

The one sample t-Test for the differences between the two methods against the null value was statistically significant for the studied parameters (p < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis found no agreement between the data obtained using the two techniques, with calculated error percent as high as 88.28% for SV, 82.02% for CO and 42.06% for MAP. The Passing-Bablock regression analysis tested positive for systematic differences, but this could not be accounted for.

CONCLUSION

We found no agreement between data obtained from the studied devices; therefore, these cannot be used interchangeably for critically ill septic shock patients on high doses of vasoactive substances.

Accuracy, Precision, and Trending of 4 Pulse Wave Analysis Techniques in the Postoperative Period

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy, precision, and trending ability of the following 4 pulse wave analysis devices to measure continuous cardiac output: PiCCO₂ ([PCCO]; Pulsion Medical System, Munich, Germany); LiDCO_Rapid ([LCCO]; LiDCO Ltd, London, UK); FloTrac/Vigileo ([FCCO]; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA); and Nexfin ([NCCO]; BMEYE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational clinical study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of a single-center, teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 22 adult patients after elective coronary artery bypass surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Three measurement cycles were performed in all patient durings their immediate postoperative intensive care stay before and after fluid loading. Hemodynamic measurements were performed 5 minutes before and immediately after the administration of 500 mL colloidal fluid over 20 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PCCO, LCCO, FCCO, and NCCO were assessed and compared with cardiac output derived from intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution (ICO). One hundred thirty-two matched sets of data were available for analysis. Bland-Altman analysis using linear mixed effects models with random effects for patient and trial revealed a mean bias ±2 standard deviation (%error) of -0.86 ± 1.41 L/min (34.9%) for PCCO-ICO, -0.26 ± 2.81 L/min (46.3%) for LCCO-ICO, -0.28 ± 2.39 L/min (43.7%) for FCCO-ICO, and -0.93 ± 2.25 L/min (34.6%) for NCCO-ICO. Bland-Altman plots without adjustment for repeated measurements and replicates yielded considerably larger limits of agreement. Trend analysis for all techniques did not meet criteria for acceptable performance.

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 tested devices using pulse wave analysis for measuring cardiac output failed to meet current criteria for meaningful and adequate accuracy, precision, and trending ability in cardiac output monitoring.

ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art

End-organ failure is associated with high mortality and morbidity, in addition to increased health care costs. Organ transplantation is the only definitive treatment that can improve survival and quality of life in such patients; however, due to the persistent mismatch between organ supply and demand, waiting lists continue to grow across the world. Careful intensive care management of the potential organ donor with goal-directed therapy has the potential to optimize organ function and improve donation yield.

The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients

Background

A relatively new uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform cardiac output (CO) measurement technique is the Pulsioflex-ProAQT® system. Aim of this study was to validate this system in cardiac surgery patients with a specific focus on the evaluation of a difference in the radial versus the femoral arterial access, the value of the auto-calibration modus and the ability to show fluid-induced changes.

Methods

In twenty-five patients scheduled for ascending aorta, aortic arch replacement, or both we measured CO simultaneously by transpulmonary thermodilution (COtd) and by using the ProAQT® system connected to the radial (COpR), as well as the femoral artery catheter (COpF). Hemodynamic data were assessed at predefined time points; from incision until 16 h after ICU admission.

Results

In total 175 (radial) and 179 (femoral) pairs of CO measurement were collected. The accuracy of COpR/COpF was evaluated showing a mean bias of −0.31 L/min (±2.9 L/min) and -0.57 L/min (± 2.8 L/min) with percentage errors of 49 and 46% respectively. Trending ability of the ProAQT® device was evaluated; the four quadrant concordance rates in the radial and femoral artery were 74 and 75% and improved to 77 and 85% after auto-calibration. The mean angular biases in the radial and femoral artery were 6.4° and 6.0° and improved to 5° and 3.3° after auto-calibration. The polar concordance rates in the radial and femoral artery were 65 and 70% and improved to 76 and 84% after auto-calibration. Considering the fluid-induced changes in stroke volume(SV), the coefficient of correlation between the changes in SVtd and SVp was 0.57 (p < 0.01) in the radial artery and 0.60 (p < 0.01) in the femoral artery.

Conclusions

The ProAQT® system can be of additional value if the clinician wants to determine fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients. However, the ProAQT® system provided inaccurate CO measurements compared to transpulmonary thermodilution. The trending ability was poor for COpR but moderate for COpF. Auto-calibration of the system did not improve accuracy of CO measurements nor did it improve the prediction of fluid responsiveness. However, the trending ability was improved by auto-calibration, possibly by correcting a drift over a longer time period.

Organ donation protocols

Organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life in patients with end-organ failure. Waiting lists continue to grow across the world despite remarkable advances in the transplantation process, from the creation of public engagement campaigns to the development of critical pathways for the timely identification, referral, approach, and treatment of the potential organ donor. The pathophysiology of dying triggers systemic changes that are intimately related to organ viability. The intensive care management of the potential organ donor optimizes organ function and improves the donation yield, representing a significant step in reducing the mismatch between organ supply and demand. Different beliefs and cultures reflect diverse legislations and donation practices amongst different countries, creating a challenge to standardized practices. Maintaining public trust is necessary for continued progress in organ donation and transplantation, hence the urge for a joint effort in creating uniform protocols that ensure transparent practices within the medical community.

Correlations between pulmonary artery pressures and inferior vena cava collapsibility in critically ill surgical patients: An exploratory study

INTRODUCTION

As pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use declines, search continues for reliable and readily accessible minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring alternatives. Although the correlation between inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and central venous pressures (CVP) has been described previously, little information exists regarding the relationship between IVC-CI and pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs). The goal of this study is to bridge this important knowledge gap. We hypothesized that there would be an inverse correlation between IVC-CI and PAPs.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of prospectively collected hemodynamic data was performed, examining correlations between IVC-CI and PAPs in a convenience sample of adult Surgical Intensive Care Unit patients. Concurrent measurements of IVC-CI and pulmonary arterial systolic (PAS), pulmonary arterial diastolic (PAD), and pulmonary arterial mean (PAM) pressures were performed. IVC-CI was calculated as ([IVCmax - IVCmin]/IVCmax) × 100%. Vena cava measurements were obtained by ultrasound-credentialed providers. For the purpose of correlative analysis, PAP measurements (PAS, PAD, and PAM) were grouped by terciles while the IVC-CI spectrum was divided into thirds (<33, 33-65, ≥66).

RESULTS

Data from 34 patients (12 women, 22 men, with median age of 59.5 years) were analyzed. Median Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 9. A total of 76 measurement pairs were recorded, with 57% (43/76) obtained in mechanically ventilated patients. Correlations between IVC-CI and PAS (rs = -0.334), PAD (rs = -0.305), and PAM (rs = -0.329) were poor. Correlations were higher between CVP and PAS (R2 = 0.61), PAD (R2 = 0.68), and PAM (R2 = 0.70). High IVC-CI values (≥66%) consistently correlated with measurements in the lowest PAP ranges. Across all PAP groups (PAS, PAD, and PAM), there were no differences between the mean measurement values for the lower and middle IVC-CI ranges (0%-65%). However, all three groups had significantly lower mean measurement values for the ≥66% IVC-CI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low PAS, PAD, and PAM measurements show a reasonable correlation with high IVC-CI (≥66%). These findings are consistent with previous descriptions of the relationship between IVC-CI and CVP. Additional research in this area is warranted to better describe the hemodynamic relationship between IVC-CI and PAPs, with the goal of further reduction in the reliance on the use of PACs.

Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values

Knowing a patient's cardiac output (CO) could contribute to a safe, optimized hemodynamic control during surgery. Precise CO measurements can serve as a guide for resuscitation therapy, catecholamine use, differential diagnosis, and intervention during a hemodynamic crisis. Despite its invasiveness and intermittent nature, the thermodilution technique via a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the clinical gold standard for CO measurements. LiDCOrapid™ (LiDCO, London, UK) and FloTrac/Vigileo™ (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) are less invasive continuous CO monitors that use arterial waveform analysis. Their calculations are based on arterial waveform characteristics and do not require calibration. Here, we evaluated LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) and living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) surgery. This observational, single-center study included 21 patients (11 OPCAB and 10 LDLT). We performed simultaneous measurements of CO at fixed sampling points during surgery using both devices (LiDCOrapid™ version 1.04-b222 and FloTrac/Vigileo™ version 3.02). The thermodilution technique via a PAC was used to obtain the benchmark data. LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ were used in an uncalibrated fashion. We analyzed the measured cardiac index using a Bland-Altman analysis (the method of variance estimates recovery), a polar plot method (half-moon method), a 4-quadrant plot and compared the widths of the limits of agreement (LOA) using an F test. One OPCAB patient was excluded because of the use of an intra-aortic balloon pumping during surgery, and 20 patients (10 OPCAB and 10 LDLT) were ultimately analyzed. We obtained 149 triplet measurements with a wide range of cardiac index. For the FloTrac/Vigileo™, the bias and percentage error were -0.44 L/min/m² and 74.4 %. For the LiDCOrapid™, the bias and percentage error were -0.38 L/min/m² and 53.5 %. The polar plot method showed an angular bias (FloTrac/Vigileo™ vs. LiDCOrapid™: 6.6° vs. 5.8°, respectively) and radial limits of agreement (-63.9 to 77.1 vs. -41.6 to 53.1). A 4-quadrant plot was used to obtain concordance rates (FloTrac/Vigileo™ vs. PAC and LiDCOrapid™ vs. PAC: 84.0 and 92.4 %, respectively). We could compare CO measurement devices across broad ranges of CO and SVR using LDLT and OPCAB surgical patients. An F test revealed no significant difference in the widths of the LoA for both devices when sample sizes capable of detecting a more than two-fold difference were used. We found that both devices tended to underestimate the calculated CIs when the CIs were relatively high. These proportional bias produced large percentage errors in the present study.

A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Perioperative interventions, targeted to increase global blood flow defined by explicit measured goals, reduce postoperative complications. Consequently, reliable non-invasive estimation of the cardiac output could have far-reaching benefit.

METHODS

This study compared a non-invasive Doppler device - the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) - with the oesophageal Doppler monitor (ODM), on 25 patients during major abdominal surgery. Stroke volume was determined by USCOM (SV_USCOM) and ODM (SV_ODM) pre and post fluid challenges.

RESULTS

A ≥ 10% change (Δ) SV_USCOM had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 88% to detect a ≥ 10% Δ SV_ODM; the area under the receiver operating curve was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.99). Concordance was 98%, using an exclusion zone of <10% Δ SV_ODM. 135 measurements gave median SV_USCOM 80 ml (interquartile range 65-93 ml) and SV_ODM 86 ml (69-100 ml); mean bias was 5.9 ml (limits of agreement -20 to +30 ml) and percentage error 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

Following fluid challenges SV_USCOM showed good concordance and accurately discriminated a change ≥10% in SV_ODM.

Pulse waveform hemodynamic monitoring devices: recent advances and the place in goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgical patients

Hemodynamic monitoring has evolved and improved greatly during the past decades as the medical approach has shifted from a static to a functional approach. The technological advances have led to innovating calibrated or not, but minimally invasive and noninvasive devices based on arterial pressure waveform (APW) analysis. This systematic clinical review outlines the physiologic rationale behind these recent technologies. We describe the strengths and the limitations of each method in terms of accuracy and precision of measuring the flow parameters (stroke volume, cardiac output) and dynamic parameters which predict the fluid responsiveness. We also analyzed the place of the APW monitoring devices in goal-directed therapy (GDT) protocols in cardiac surgical patients. According to the data from the three GDT-randomized control trials performed in cardiac surgery (using two types of APW techniques PiCCO and FloTrac/Vigileo), these devices did not demonstrate that they played a role in decreasing mortality, but only decreasing the ventilation time and the ICU and hospital length of stay.

Predicting cardiorespiratory instability

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine 2016. Other selected articles can be found online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2016. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Synchronizing thermodilution cardiac output measurements with spontaneous breathing does not improve precision

INTRODUCTION

Measuring cardiac output (CO) with the pulmonary artery catheter intermittent bolus thermodilution technique (PAC-IBTD) is less precise with spontaneous breathing compared to controlled ventilation. We aimed to test if precision could be improved in spontaneous breathing by synchronizing the measurement with respiration or using instructed respiration in 18 post-operative cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

We performed eight CO measurements with PAC-IBTD using cold saline in three different situations; in random order: 1) random compared to respiration, 2) timed to the start of expiration, and 3) synchronized with a slow exhalation through a PEP-flute. We calculated the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and precision in the total material and in the three situations using a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 408 CO measurements were performed in 17 included patients. There were no differences between the three study situations regarding mean or precision. The overall CO was 6.0 ± 1.4 l/min (mean ± SD), CV 6.2% and precision 12.2% for single measurements. Averaging three measurements increased the precision to 7.0%.

CONCLUSION

We could not improve the precision of PAC-IBTD in spontaneously breathing patients by synchronizing the measurements with respiration.

Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs

OBJECTIVE

To assess agreement and trending ability of transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD), calibrated pulse contour (PiCCO), and pulse power (PulseCO) methods compared to pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD) for determination of cardiac output (CO) in anesthetized dogs.

DESIGN

Experimental, prospective study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Six adult Beagle dogs.

INTERVENTIONS

Dogs were anesthetized with sevoflurane and instrumented with pulmonary and femoral artery thermodilution catheters. CO was measured at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after IV administration of ketamine or s-ketamine. Baseline PATD and TPTD calibrated PulseCO and PiCCO, respectively. Agreement and trending ability was analyzed with Bland-Altman, concordance, and polar plot methodology.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Median (range) CO values of 2.27 (0.98-3.4) L/min were measured with PATD, and 2.8 (1.9-4.04) L/min with TPTD, which resulted in a mean bias (± standard deviation) of -0.66 (± 0.36) L/min. Concordance rate was 91% and radial limits of agreement (RLOA) were ±35°. PATD against PiCCO resulted in a mean bias of -0.71 (± 0.62) L/min and PATD against PulseCO in a mean bias of 0.13 (± 0.46) L/min. The continuous techniques resulted in concordance rates of 77% for PATD-PiCCO and 74% for PATD-PulseCO and RLOA of ±57° and ±60°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent TPTD showed marginal trending ability, while continuous pulse contour and pulse power methods showed poor trending ability over a 4-hour period. The poor performance and possible side effects of the methods tested in this study suggest that they should not be recommended for use in critical patients.

Blood pressure and heart rate from the arterial blood pressure waveform can reliably estimate cardiac output in a conscious sheep model of multiple hemorrhages and resuscitation using computer machine learning approaches

BACKGROUND

This study was a first step to facilitate the development of automated decision support systems using cardiac output (CO) for combat casualty care. Such systems remain a practical challenge in battlefield and prehospital settings. In these environments, reliable CO estimation using blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) may provide additional capabilities for diagnosis and treatment of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that continuous BP and HR from the arterial BP waveform coupled with machine learning (ML) can reliably estimate CO in a conscious sheep model of multiple hemorrhages and resuscitation.

METHODS

Hemodynamic parameters (BPs, HR) were derived from 100-Hz arterial BP waveforms of 10 sheep records, 3 hours to 4 hours long. Two models (mean arterial pressure, Windkessel) were then applied and merged to estimate COVS. ML was used to develop a rule for identifying when models required calibration. All records contained 100-Hz recording of pulmonary arterial blood flow using Doppler transit time (COFP). COFP and COVS were analyzed using equivalence tests and Bland-Altman analysis, as well as waveform and concordance plots.

RESULTS

Baseline COFP varied from 3.0 L/min to 5.4 L/min, while posthemorrhage COFP varied from 1.0 L/min to 1.8 L/min. A total of 315,196 pairs of data were obtained. Equivalence tests for individual records showed that COVS was statistically equivalent to COFP (p < 0.05). Smaller equivalence thresholds (<0.3 L/min) indicated an overall high COFP accuracy. The agreement between COFP and COVS was -0.13 (0.69) L/min (Bland-Altman). In an exclusion zone of 12%, trending analysis found a 92% concordance between 5-minute changes in COFP and COVS.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that CO can be reliably estimated using BPs and HR from the arterial BP waveform in combination with ML. A next step will be to test this approach using noninvasive BPs and HR.

Management of labour and delivery in congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries

A descriptive case report of the labour and delivery management of a 28-year-old woman who presented with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries, dextrocardia, systemic ventricular dysfunction and junctional tachycardia. Patients with congenitally corrected transposition have a thin-walled morphological right ventricle as the systemic circulatory pump. The stress of increased cardiac output can lead to congestive heart failure, systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation and arrhythmias. We used minimally invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring, fluid balance optimization and good maternal pain control to prevent decompensation and achieve vaginal delivery with a good maternal and neonatal outcome.

Comparison of Minimally and More Invasive Methods of Determining Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of a minimally invasive, 2-step, lookup method for determining mixed venous oxygen saturation compared with conventional techniques.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital, university setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen elective cardiac and vascular surgery patients.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received intra-arterial and pulmonary artery catheters. Minimally invasive oxygen consumption and cardiac output were measured using a metabolic module and lithium-calibrated arterial waveform analysis (LiDCO; LiDCO, London), respectively. For the minimally invasive method, Step 1 involved these minimally invasive measurements, and arterial oxygen content was entered into the Fick equation to calculate mixed venous oxygen content. Step 2 used an oxyhemoglobin curve spreadsheet to look up mixed venous oxygen saturation from the calculated mixed venous oxygen content. The conventional "invasive" technique used pulmonary artery intermittent thermodilution cardiac output, direct sampling of mixed venous and arterial blood, and the "reverse-Fick" method of calculating oxygen consumption.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

LiDCO overestimated thermodilution cardiac output by 26%. Pulmonary artery catheter-derived oxygen consumption underestimated metabolic module measurements by 27%. Mixed venous oxygen saturation differed between techniques; the calculated values underestimated the direct measurements by between 12% to 26.3%, this difference being statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of the differences between the minimally invasive and invasive techniques was too great for the former to act as a surrogate of the latter and could adversely affect clinical decision making.

A novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment in a porcine model of lung lavage

BACKGROUND

We have evaluated a new method for continuous monitoring of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF ), i.e. cardiac output (CO) minus intra-pulmonary shunt, during mechanical ventilation. The method has shown good trending ability during severe hemodynamic challenges in a porcine model with intact lungs. In this study, we further evaluate the COEPBF method in a model of lung lavage.

METHODS

COEPBF was compared to a reference method for CO during hemodynamic and PEEP alterations, 5 and 12 cmH2 O, before and after repeated lung lavages in 10 anaesthetised pigs. Bland-Altman, four-quadrant and polar plot methodologies were used to determine agreement and trending ability.

RESULTS

After lung lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure related to inspired fraction of oxygen significantly decreased. The mean difference (limits of agreement) between methods changed from 0.2 (-1.1 to 1.5) to -0.9 (-3.6 to 1.9) l/min and percentage error increased from 34% to 70%. Trending ability remained good according to the four-quadrant plot (concordance rate 94%), whereas mean angular bias increased from 4° to -16° when using the polar plot methodology.

CONCLUSION

Both agreement and precision of COEPBF were impaired in relation to CO when the shunt fraction was increased after lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O. However, trending ability remained good as assessed by the four-quadrant plot, whereas the mean polar angle, calculated by the polar plot, was wide.

Hemodynamic assessment in the contemporary intensive care unit: a review of circulatory monitoring devices

The assessment of the circulating volume and efficiency of tissue perfusion is necessary in the management of critically ill patients. The controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization has led to a new wave of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, including echocardiographic and Doppler imaging, pulse wave analysis, and bioimpedance. This article reviews the principles, advantages, and limitations of these technologies and the clinical contexts in which they may be clinically useful.

The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model

BACKGROUND

In critically ill patients with significant pulmonary hypertension (PH), close perioperative cardiovascular monitoring is mandatory, considering the increased morbidity and mortality in this patient group. Although the pulmonary artery catheter is still the standard for the diagnosis of PH, its use to monitor cardiac output (CO) in patients with PH is decreasing as a result of increased morbidity and possible influence of tricuspid regurgitation on the measurements. However, continuous CO measurement methods have never been evaluated under PH regarding their agreement and trending ability. In this study, we evaluated the influence of acute PH and different CO states on transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and calibrated pulse contour analysis (PiCCO; both assessed with PiCCO plus™), intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (PATD), and continuous thermodilution (CCO) compared with a modified Fick method (FICK) in an animal model.

METHODS

Nine healthy pigs were studied under anesthesia. PH of 25 and 40 mm Hg (by administration of the thromboxane analog U46619), CO decreases, and CO increases were induced to test the different CO measurement techniques over a broad range of hemodynamic situations. Before each step, a new baseline data set was collected. CO values were compared using Bland-Altman analysis; trending abilities were assessed via concordance and polar plot analysis. The influence of pulmonary pressure on CO measurements was analyzed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

A mean bias of -0.26 L/min with prediction intervals of -0.88 to 1.4 L/min was measured between TPTD and FICK. Their concordance rate was 100% (94%-100% confidence interval), and the mean polar angle -3° with radial limits of agreement of ±28° indicated good trending abilities. PATD compared with FICK also showed good trending ability. Comparisons of PiCCO and CCO versus FICK revealed low agreement and poor trending results with concordance rates of 84% (71%-93%) and 88% (74%-95%), mean polar angles from -17° and -19°, and radial limits of agreement of ±45° and 40°. Pulmonary pressures influenced only the difference between FICK and PiCCO, as assessed by linear mixed models.

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD compared with FICK was able to track all changes induced during the study period, including those by PH. It yielded better agreement than PATD both compared with FICK. PiCCO and CCO were not mapping all changes correctly, and when used clinically in unstable patients, regular controls with intermittent techniques are required. Acute pharmacologically induced PH did influence the difference between FICK and PiCCO.

Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Different mathematical approaches are used to calculate arterial pulse pressure wave analysis (PPWA) cardiac output. The CardioQ-Combi is a research oesophageal Doppler (COODM) monitor that includes these five fundamental PPWA algorithms. We compared these PPWA cardiac output readings to COODM and suprasternal USCOM Doppler (COUS) over a range of cardiac output values induced by dopamine infusion in patients undergoing major surgery. USCOM acted as a control.

METHODS

Serial sets of cardiac output data were recorded at regular intervals as cardiac output increased. Formulae included: cardiac output calculated form systemic vascular resistance (COMAP), pulse pressure (COPP), Liljestrand-Zander formula (COLZ), alternating current power (COAC) and systolic area with Kouchoukos correction (COSA). The reference method for comparisons was COODM. Statistical methods included: Scatter plots (correlation), Bland-Altman (agreement) and concordance (trending) and polar (trending).

RESULTS

From 20 patients 255 sets of cardiac output comparative data were collected. Mean cardiac output for each method ranged between 5.0 and 5.5 litre min(-1). For comparisons between COUS and the five PPWA algorithms with COODM: Correlation was best with COUS (R(2)=0.81) followed by COLZ (R(2)=0.72). Bias ranged between 0.1 and 0.5 litre min(-1). Percentage error was lowest with COUS (26.4%) followed by COLZ (35.2%), others (40.7 to 56.3%). Concordance was best with COUS (92%), followed by COLZ (71%), others (64 to 66%). Polar analysis (mean(standard deviation)) were best with COUS (-2.7 (21.1)), followed by COLZ (+4.7 (26.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The Liljestrand-Zander PPWA formula was most reliable compared with oesophageal Doppler in major surgical patients under general anaesthesia, but not better than USCOM.

Minimally invasive monitoring

Although use of the classic pulmonary artery catheter has declined, several techniques have emerged to estimate cardiac output. Arterial pressure waveform analysis computes cardiac output from the arterial pressure curve. The method of estimating cardiac output for these devices depends on whether they need to be calibrated by an independent measure of cardiac output. Some newer devices have been developed to estimate cardiac output from an arterial curve obtained noninvasively with photoplethysmography, allowing a noninvasive beat-by-beat estimation of cardiac output. This article describes the different devices that perform pressure waveform analysis.

Evaluation of the non-calibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitor FloTrac/Vigileo against thermodilution in standing horses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the non-calibrated, minimally invasive cardiac output (CO) monitor FloTrac/Vigileo (FloTrac) against thermodilution (TD) CO in standing horses.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, experimental trial.

ANIMALS

Nine adult horses weighing a median (range) of 535 (470-602) kg.

METHODS

Catheters were placed in the right atrium, pulmonary artery and carotid artery under local anaesthesia. CO was measured 147 times by TD and FloTrac and indexed to body weight. Changes in CO were achieved with romifidine or xylazine and dobutamine constant rate infusions. Bland-Altman analysis, concordance and polar plot analysis were used to assess agreement and ability to track changes in CO.

RESULTS

Mean ± standard deviation COTD of 48 ± 16 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) (range: 19-93 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) ) and mean COF loTrac of 9 ± 3 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) (range: 5-21 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) ) were measured. Low agreement with a large mean bias of 39 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) and wide limits of agreement of 8-70 mL kg(-1) minute(-1) were found. The percentage error of 108% and precision of TD of ± 18% resulted in an estimated precision of FloTrac of ± 106%. Comparison of changes in COF loTrac with changes in COTD gave a concordance rate of 52% in the four-quadrant plot, and a mean polar angle of -11° with radial limits of agreement of ± 61 ° in the polar plot. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and COF loTrac were positively correlated (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001). No correlation of MAP with COTD was observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The FloTrac system, originally designed for use in humans, neither measured absolute CO in standing horses accurately nor tracked relative changes in CO measured by TD correctly. The false dependence of COF loTrac on arterial blood pressure further discourages the use of this technique in horses.

Closed-loop assisted versus manual goal-directed fluid therapy during high-risk abdominal surgery: a case-control study with propensity matching

INTRODUCTION

Goal-directed fluid therapy strategies have been shown to benefit moderate- to high-risk surgery patients. Despite this, these strategies are often not implemented. The aim of this study was to assess a closed-loop fluid administration system in a surgical cohort and compare the results with those for matched patients who received manual management. Our hypothesis was that the patients receiving closed-loop assistance would spend more time in a preload-independent state, defined as percentage of case time with stroke volume variation less than or equal to 12%.

METHODS

Patients eligible for the study were all those over 18 years of age scheduled for hepatobiliary, pancreatic or splenic surgery and expected to receive intravascular arterial blood pressure monitoring as part of their anesthetic care. The closed-loop resuscitation target was selected by the primary anesthesia team, and the system was responsible for implementation of goal-directed fluid therapy during surgery. Following completion of enrollment, each study patient was matched to a non-closed-loop assisted case performed during the same time period using a propensity match to reduce bias.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled, 5 were ultimately excluded and 25 matched pairs were selected from among the remaining 35 patients within the predefined caliper distance. There was no significant difference in fluid administration between groups. The closed-loop group spent a significantly higher portion of case time in a preload-independent state (95 ± 6% of case time versus 87 ± 14%, P =0.008). There was no difference in case mean or final stroke volume index (45 ± 10 versus 43 ± 9 and 45 ± 11 versus 42 ± 11, respectively) or mean arterial pressure (79 ± 8 versus 83 ± 9). Case end heart rate was significantly lower in the closed-loop assisted group (77 ± 10 versus 88 ± 13, P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

In this case-control study with propensity matching, clinician use of closed-loop assistance resulted in a greater portion of case time spent in a preload-independent state throughout surgery compared with manual delivery of goal-directed fluid therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02020863. Registered 19 December 2013.

Protocolized fluid therapy in brain-dead donors: the multicenter randomized MOnIToR trial

BACKGROUND

Critical shortages of organs for transplantation jeopardize many lives. Observational data suggest that better fluid management for deceased organ donors could increase organ recovery. We conducted the first large multicenter randomized trial in brain-dead donors to determine whether protocolized fluid therapy increases the number of organs transplanted.

METHODS

We randomly assigned donors to either protocolized or usual care in eight organ procurement organizations. A "protocol-guided fluid therapy" algorithm targeting the cardiac index, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation was used. Our primary outcome was the number of organs transplanted per donor, and our primary analysis was intention to treat. Secondary analyses included: (1) modified intention to treat where only subjects able to receive the intervention were included and (2) 12-month survival in transplant recipients. The study was stopped early.

RESULTS

We enrolled 556 donors: 279 protocolized care and 277 usual care. Groups had similar characteristics at baseline. The study protocol could be implemented in 76 % of subjects randomized to the intervention. There was no significant difference in mean number of organs transplanted per donor: 3.39 organs per donor (95 % CI 3.14-3.63) with protocolized care compared to 3.29 usual care (95 % CI 3.04-3.54; mean difference, 0.1, 95 % CI -0.25 to 0.45; p = 0.56). In modified intention-to-treat analysis the mean number of organs increased (3.52 organs per donor, 95 % CI 3.23-3.8), but not statistically significantly (mean difference, 0.23, 95 % CI -0.15 to 0.61; p = 0.23). Among the 1,430 recipients of organs from study subjects with data available, 56 deaths (7.8 %) occurred in the protocolized care arm and 56 (7.9 %) in the usual care arm in the first year (hazard ratio: 0.97, p = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

In brain-dead organ donors, protocol-guided fluid therapy compared to usual care may not increase the number of organs transplanted per donor.

Fluid responsiveness is about stroke volume, and not pulse pressure Yogi: the power of Doppler fluid management and cardiovascular monitoring

Fluid infusion is one of the most common critical care interventions, yet approximately 50% of all fluid interventions are unnecessary and potentially harmful. An improved approach to identification of fluid responsiveness is of clinical importance. Currently fluid responsiveness is most frequently identified by blood pressure (BP) measurements or a surrogate. However fluid responsiveness is simply the increase in stroke volume (SV) associated with volume expansion, and may not be reflected in BP or BP surrogates. Guyton demonstrated that BP=COxSVR, and it is know that baroreceptor mediated autonomic nervous system regulation of SV and SVR to preserve BP may mask significant and critical changes in haemodynamics. Dr Pinsky in his recent J Clin Monit Comput Editorial evaluated the relative merits of pulse pressure variability (PPV) methods, a variant on BP measurement, for assessment of fluid responsiveness and promoted the use of physiologic challenges to augment the applicability of PPV. However this guidance is only half right. This letter reminds clinicians of the physiologic limitations of PPV as a measure of fluid responsiveness, even when combined with physiologic challenges, and recommends the replacement of BP with SV measurements. The combination of accurate Doppler measurement of SV and physiologic challenges, as Dr Pinsky recommends, is a physiologically rational and effective approach to identification of fluid responsiveness with established evidence. The direct monitoring of SV and SV changes has the potential to improve a long standing critical care and anaesthetic conundrum; when to give fluid and when to stop.

An improved artifact removal algorithm for continuous cardiac output and blood pressure recordings

Measurement artifacts are common in hemodynamic recordings such as cardiac output and blood pressure. Manual artifact removal is cumbersome for large datasets, and automatic processing using algorithms may reduce workload and provide more reproducible outcomes. This paper presents an artifact removal algorithm which is more aggressive compared to a previously described method. The algorithm was evaluated on cardiac output (CO) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) recordings from 23 subjects measured by two different devices (LiDCO and Nexfin), and compared to the previously described method as a reference. Precision, recall and F-score was determined by agreement with manual inspection by an expert. Based on the total of all measurements from CO and MAP by LiDCO and CO and MAP by Nexfin, precision was 86%, 79%, 79% and 68% respectively (87%, 62%, 76% and 58% for the reference method), recall was 97%, 94%, 89% and 97% (31%, 6%, 28% and 6% for reference), F-score was 91%, 85%, 84% and 80% (46%, 10%, 41% and 10% for reference). The proposed algorithm offers an improved performance in removing true artifacts, in some cases a reduced ability to preserve true measurements, but an improved overall accuracy.

Inter-device differences in monitoring for goal-directed fluid therapy

PURPOSE

Goal-directed fluid therapy is an integral component of many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols currently in use. The perioperative clinician is faced with a myriad of devices promising to deliver relevant physiologic data to better guide fluid therapy. The goal of this review is to provide concise information to enable the clinician to make an informed decision when choosing a device to guide goal-directed fluid therapy.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The focus of many devices used for advanced hemodynamic monitoring is on providing measurements of cardiac output, while other, more recent, devices include estimates of fluid responsiveness based on dynamic indices that better predict an individual's response to a fluid bolus. Currently available technologies include the pulmonary artery catheter, esophageal Doppler, arterial waveform analysis, photoplethysmography, venous oxygen saturation, as well as bioimpedance and bioreactance. The underlying mechanistic principles for each device are presented as well as their performance in clinical trials relevant for goal-directed therapy in ERAS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS protocols typically involve a multipronged regimen to facilitate early recovery after surgery. Optimizing perioperative fluid therapy is a key component of these efforts. While no technology is without limitations, the majority of the currently available literature suggests esophageal Doppler and arterial waveform analysis to be the most desirable choices to guide fluid administration. Their performance is dependent, in part, on the interpretation of dynamic changes resulting from intrathoracic pressure fluctuations encountered during mechanical ventilation. Evolving practice patterns, such as low tidal volume ventilation as well as the necessity to guide fluid therapy in spontaneously breathing patients, will require further investigation.

Mechanical ventilation-induced intrathoracic pressure distribution and heart-lung interactions*

OBJECTIVE

Mechanical ventilation causes cyclic changes in the heart's preload and afterload, thereby influencing the circulation. However, our understanding of the exact physiology of this cardiopulmonary interaction is limited. We aimed to thoroughly determine airway pressure distribution, how this is influenced by tidal volume and chest compliance, and its interaction with the circulation in humans during mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Intervention study.

SETTING

ICU of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty mechanically ventilated patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

INTERVENTION

Patients were monitored during controlled mechanical ventilation at tidal volumes of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mL/kg with normal and decreased chest compliance (by elastic binding of the thorax).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Central venous pressure, airway pressure, pericardial pressure, and pleural pressure; pulse pressure variations, systolic pressure variations, and stroke volume variations; and cardiac output were obtained during controlled mechanical ventilation at tidal volume of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mL/kg with normal and decreased chest compliance. With increasing tidal volume (4, 6, 8, and 10 mL/kg), the change in intrathoracic pressures increased linearly with 0.9 ± 0.2, 0.5 ± 0.3, 0.3 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm Hg/mL/kg for airway pressure, pleural pressure, pericardial pressure, and central venous pressure, respectively. At 8 mL/kg, a decrease in chest compliance (from 0.12 ± 0.07 to 0.09 ± 0.03 L/cm H2O) resulted in an increase in change in airway pressure, change in pleural pressure, change in pericardial pressure, and change in central venous pressure of 1.1 ± 0.7, 1.1 ± 0.8, 0.7 ± 0.4, and 0.8 ± 0.4 mm Hg, respectively. Furthermore, increased tidal volume and decreased chest compliance decreased stroke volume and increased arterial pressure variations. Transmural pressure of the superior vena cava decreased during inspiration, whereas the transmural pressure of the right atrium did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased tidal volume and decreased chest wall compliance both increase the change in intrathoracic pressures and the value of the dynamic indices during mechanical ventilation. Additionally, the transmural pressure of the vena cava is decreased, whereas the transmural pressure of the right atrium is not changed.

Arterial waveform analysis

The bedside measurement of continuous arterial pressure values from waveform analysis has been routinely available via indwelling arterial catheterization for >50 years. Invasive blood pressure monitoring has been utilized in critically ill patients, in both the operating room and critical care units, to facilitate rapid diagnoses of cardiovascular insufficiency and monitor response to treatments aimed at correcting abnormalities before the consequences of either hypo- or hypertension are seen. Minimally invasive techniques to estimate cardiac output (CO) have gained increased appeal. This has led to the increased interest in arterial waveform analysis to provide this important information, as it is measured continuously in many operating rooms and intensive care units. Arterial waveform analysis also allows for the calculation of many so-called derived parameters intrinsically created by this pulse pressure profile. These include estimates of left ventricular stroke volume (SV), CO, vascular resistance, and during positive-pressure breathing, SV variation, and pulse pressure variation. This article focuses on the principles of arterial waveform analysis and their determinants, components of the arterial system, and arterial pulse contour. It will also address the advantage of measuring real-time CO by the arterial waveform and the benefits to measuring SV variation. Arterial waveform analysis has gained a large interest in the overall assessment and management of the critically ill and those at a risk of hemodynamic deterioration.

An assessment of two Doppler-Based Monitors to Track Cardiac Output Changes in Anaesthetised Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

Minimally-invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring to follow changes in CO would be helpful in anaesthesia practice. Two Doppler systems marketed for this purpose include the CardioQ (Deltex Medical Group, Chichester, United Kingdom), which uses an oesophageal probe, and the USCOM (USCOM Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia), which uses a hand-held probe. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of these two methods to track CO during major surgery and to determine their relationship. Twenty patients, age 58 (26 to 81) years, (m/f) 15/5, requiring abdominal surgery were studied. The surgical procedures lasted between 128 and 408 minutes and a total of 285 data pairs (8 to 22 per case) were collected. Time plots showed good tracking ability across a wide range of CO in most patients. Correlation between the two devices was excellent in 14 patients (R2 >0.85), good in another four (R2 >0.64) and poor in two. Regression line data supported the hypothesis that CardioQ under-reads at low CO and over-reads at high CO in respect to the USCOM. However, the precision between the two CO readings was poor with wide limits of agreement and a percentage error of ± 37%. These findings indicate that these devices individually track changes in CO in many patients but cannot be relied upon to provide the same values.

The reliability and validity of passive leg raise and fluid bolus to assess fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing emergency department patients

PURPOSE

We investigated the reproducibility of passive leg raise (PLR) and fluid bolus (BOLUS) using the Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitor (NICOM; Cheetah Medical, Tel Aviv, Israel) for assessment of fluid responsiveness (FR) in spontaneously breathing emergency department (ED) patients.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study of a convenience sample of adult ED patients receiving intravenous fluid bolus. We assessed stroke volume (SV) using NICOM and obtained results from PLR, where the head of the bed was changed from semirecumbent to supine while the patients' legs raised to 45° for 3 minutes. Fluid bolus was defined as 5 mL/kg normal saline infusion. Maximal increase in SV was recorded. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of SV greater than 10% from baseline. We obtained 4 consecutive responses for each patient; PLR1, PLR2, BOLUS1 separated each by 10 minutes, and BOLUS2 initiated immediately after the end of BOLUS1. We calculated κ statistics, correlation coefficients, and odds ratios with 95% confidence interval and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

We enrolled 109 patients enrolled in this study. The 2 PLRs were significantly correlated (r = 0.78, P < .001) with κ = 0.46 for FR (P < .001). The 2 BOLUSES less strongly correlated (r = 0.14, P = .001) and κ = 0.06 for FR (P < .001). Patients who were responsive to PLR1 had 9.5 (3.6-25) odds of being FR for PLR2, whereas those responsive to BOLUS1 had a 1.8 (0.76-4.3) increased odds of FR for BOLUS2.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we have found PLR as measured by the NICOM to be a promising tool for the evaluation of SV responsiveness. It was feasible for use in the ED, and the data suggest that the PLR technique may be more reproducible than the fluid bolus technique for assessing volume responsiveness.

Functional haemodynamic monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional haemodynamic monitoring is the assessment of the dynamic interactions of haemodynamic variables in response to a defined perturbation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fluid responsiveness can be predicted during positive pressure breathing by variations in venous return or left ventricular output using numerous surrogate markers, such as arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV), left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV), aortic velocity variation, inferior and superior vena cavae diameter changes and pulse oximeter pleth signal variability. Similarly, dynamic changes in cardiac output to a passive leg raising manoeuvre can be used in any patient and measured invasively or noninvasively. However, volume responsiveness, though important, reflects only part of the overall spectrum of functional physiological variables that can be measured to define physiologic state and monitor response to therapy. The ratio of PPV to SVV defines central arterial elastance and can be used to identify those hypotensive patients who will not increase their blood pressure in response to a fluid challenge despite increasing cardiac output. Dynamic tissue O2 saturation (StO2) responses to complete stop flow conditions, as can be created by measuring hand StO2 and occluding flow with a blood pressure cuff, assesses cardiovascular sufficiency and micro-circulatory blood flow distribution. They can be used to identify those ventilator-dependent individuals who will fail a spontaneous breathing trial or trauma patients in need of life-saving interventions.

SUMMARY

Functional haemodynamic monitoring approaches are increasing in numbers, conditions in which they are useful and resuscitation protocol applications. This is a rapidly evolving field whose pluripotential is just now being realized.