Clinical and immune responses in resected colon cancer patients treated with anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody vaccine that mimics the carcinoembryonic antigen

Towards therapeutic vaccines for colorectal carcinoma: a review of clinical trials

Colorectal carcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite the introduction of new cytotoxic drugs, improved surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques, a large proportion of colorectal carcinomas remain incurable. New targeted therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapy, are being explored as complementary treatments. Recent advances in immunology and molecular biology have opened new avenues for the clinical testing of rationally designed vaccination strategies against cancer. The present report reviews the results of therapeutic vaccine trials in colorectal carcinoma, published mainly in the past 6 years. Tumor-associated antigens (self-antigens) have been targeted by therapeutic vaccination in more than 2000 colorectal carcinoma patients. The results demonstrate that tumor antigen-specific immune responses are reproducibly induced; that is, tolerance can be reversed, without the induction of serious adverse events or autoimmune disorders. No long-term autoimmune side effects have been observed after a minimum follow-up of 4 years in over 700 patients. Over 1300 colorectal carcinoma patients with minimal residual disease have been enrolled in randomized controlled Phase II/III trials using autologous tumor cell vaccines. A significantly improved overall survival was noted for Stages I-IV colorectal carcinoma patients utilizing Newcastle-disease virus as an adjuvant. Autologous tumor cells mixed with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) were of significant clinical benefit for patients with Stage II colon cancer. Results of randomized controlled trials targeting Ep-CAM have shown clinical benefit in subgroups of patients. Several new generation vaccines have demonstrated excellent safety profile and immunogenicity. Some studies have also demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the induced immune response and prolonged overall survival, which should be confirmed in enlarged trials. Although it is unlikely that active specific immunotherapy will provide a standard complementary therapeutic approach for colorectal carcinoma in the near future, the results so far are encouraging. Randomized controlled vaccine trials targeting molecularly defined tumor antigens are warranted, particularly in colon carcinoma with minimal residual disease.

CpG oligonucleotides enhance the tumor antigen-specific immune response of an anti-idiotype antibody-based vaccine strategy in CEA transgenic mice

A murine monoclonal anti-idiotype (Id) antibody, 3H1 has been developed and characterized previously. Anti-Id 3H1 mimics a specific epitope of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and can be used as a surrogate antigen for CEA. 3H1 induced anti-CEA immunity in different species of animals as well as humans and showed promise as a potential vaccine candidate in phase I/II clinical trials for colon cancer patients. One area of interest to us has been the development of new immune adjuvants that may augment the potency of 3H1 as a tumor vaccine. Oligodeoxynucleotides containing unmethylated CpG motifs (CpG ODN) are potent immunostimulatory agents capable of enhancing the Ag-specific Th1 response when used as immune adjuvants. In this study, we have evaluated the efficacy of 3H1 as a tumor vaccine when admixed with a select CpG ODN 1826 in transgenic mice that express human CEA. The vaccine potential of 3H1 was also assessed in the presence of another widely used adjuvant, QS-21. 3H1 coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and mixed with Freund's adjuvant (FA) was used as a gold standard in this system. 3H1 vaccination with different adjuvants induced both humoral and cellular anti-3H1, as well as anti-CEA immunity in CEA transgenic mice. The immune sera could lyse CEA-transfected murine colon carcinoma cells, C15 effectively in an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay. The anti-CEA antibody responses were somewhat comparable in each adjuvant-treated group of mice, whereas cellular immune responses were significantly greater when CpG was used as an adjuvant. Splenocytes obtained from 3H1-CpG-immunized mice showed an increased proliferative CD4(+) Th1-type T-cell response when stimulated in vitro with 3H1 or CEA and secreted elevated levels of Th1 cytokines (IL-2, IFN-gamma). This vaccine also induced MHC class I antigen-restricted CD8(+) T-cell responses. In a solid tumor model, C15 tumor growth was significantly inhibited by 3H1 vaccinations. In 3H1-CpG-vaccinated mice, the duration of survival was, however, longer compared to the 3H1-QS21-vaccinated mice. These findings suggest that 3H1-CpG vaccinations can break peripheral tolerance to CEA and induce protective antitumor immunity in this murine model transgenic for human CEA.

A randomized phase II study of concurrent docetaxel plus vaccine versus vaccine alone in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel has activity against androgen-independent prostate cancer and preclinical studies have shown that taxane-based chemotherapy can enhance antitumor response of vaccines. The primary objective of this study was to determine if concurrent docetaxel (with dexamethasone) had any effect on generating an immune response to the vaccine. Secondary end points were whether vaccine could be given safely with docetaxel and the clinical outcome of the treatment regimen.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The vaccination regimen was composed of (a) recombinant vaccinia virus (rV) that expresses the prostate-specific antigen gene (rV-PSA) admixed with (b) rV that expresses the B7.1 costimulatory gene (rV-B7.1), and (c) sequential booster vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox virus (rF-) containing the PSA gene (rF-PSA). Patients received granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor with each vaccination. Twenty-eight patients with metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomized to receive either vaccine and weekly docetaxel or vaccine alone. Patients on the vaccine alone arm were allowed to cross over to receive docetaxel alone at time of disease progression. The ELISPOT assay was used to monitor immune responses for PSA-specific T cells.

RESULTS

The median increase in these T-cell precursors to PSA was 3.33-fold in both arms following 3 months of therapy. In addition, immune responses to other prostate cancer-associated tumor antigens were also detected postvaccination. Eleven patients who progressed on vaccine alone crossed over to receive docetaxel at time of progression. Median progression-free survival on docetaxel was 6.1 months after receiving vaccine compared with 3.7 months with the same regimen in a historical control.

CONCLUSION

This is the first clinical trial to show that docetaxel can be administered safely with immunotherapy without inhibiting vaccine specific T-cell responses. Furthermore, patients previously vaccinated with an anticancer vaccine may respond longer to docetaxel compared with a historical control of patients receiving docetaxel alone. Larger prospective clinical studies will be required to validate these findings.

Phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin plus either 3H1 anti-idiotype monoclonal antibody or placebo in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The monoclonal antibody 3H1 mimics the external structure of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). It therefore has the potential, via the anti-idiotypic network, to stimulate immune responses to CEA that may benefit colorectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 630 patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomised in a 2:1 fashion to receive bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) plus either 3H1 (n = 422) or placebo (n = 208).

RESULTS

The addition of 3H1 to 5-FU and LV did not result in increased toxicity. Survival for the full intent-to-treat population was 14.7 months for the 3H1 arm and 15.2 months for the placebo arm (P = 0.80). Anti-CEA antibody responses were observed in 70% of patients treated with 3H1. Patients with a negative CEA response had a median survival of 8.3 months (95% CI 7.5-11.0) compared with patients with a strong response: median survival not reached (P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

3H1 is safe and effectively induces immune responses to CEA. Addition of 3H1 to 5-FU and LV was not shown to improve overall patient outcomes. However, improved survival in patients developing anti-CEA responses to 3H1 are provocative and should be studied in further clinical trials.

Human High Molecular Weight Melanoma-Associated Antigen Mimicry by Mouse Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody MK2-23: Enhancement of Immunogenicity of Anti-Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibody MK2-23 by Fusion with Interleukin 2

To overcome unresponsiveness to the self-high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA) in hosts with constitutive HMW-MAA expression, we have used as immunogen the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody (mAb) MK2-23, which mimics the antigenic determinant recognized by the anti-HMW-MAA mAb 763.74. In a phase I/II clinical trial, anti-idiotypic mAb MK2-23, conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as a carrier and given with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) as an adjuvant, elicited HMW-MAA-specific antibodies in about 60% of the immunized melanoma patients. The immune response was associated with survival prolongation. However, safety and standardization issues associated with the use of KLH and BCG in the clinical setting have prompted us to develop alternative immunization strategies. Conjugation of human interleukin 2 (IL-2) to mAb MK2-23 variable regions covalently linked to human immunoglobulin constant regions enhanced mAb MK2-23 immunogenicity in BALB/c mice to an extent similar to that induced by mAb MK2-23 conjugated to KLH and given with Freund's adjuvant. As determined by the level of serum antibodies and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to HMW-MAA-bearing melanoma cells, immunization of mice with the MK2-23-IL-2 fusion protein elicited more robust humoral and cellular responses, respectively, than immunization with KLH-conjugated mAb MK2-23 and separate administration of IL-2. The immunogenicity of the fusion protein is dependent on IL-2 conjugation, because immunization of mice with either mAb MK2-23 or chimeric mAb MK2-23, in combination with IL-2, was not as effective in eliciting HMW-MAA-specific immune responses. These results suggest that the MK2-23-IL-2 fusion protein represents a useful immunogen to implement active specific immunotherapy in patients with melanoma, because it bypasses the requirement for KLH conjugation and adjuvant administration.

The Development of Therapeutic and Preventive Vaccines for Gastric Cancer and Helicobacter pylori

Gastric cancer is one of the most important worldwide public health problems. Convincing epidemiologic and etiologic associations have been made between the development of gastric cancer and infection with Helicobacter pylori. H. pylori not only has adapted to survive within the harsh environment of the stomach but also is able to modulate and avoid endogenous immune responses. The design and creation of efficacious vaccine strategies against H. pylori requires an understanding of the complex interactions that make up mucosal immunity. An effective vaccine strategy against H. pylori has the potential to affect significantly on population health worldwide.

Immunologic Therapies for Gastrointestinal Cancers

The treatment of solid tumors has shown a dramatic change in recent years. This revolution has come from an improved understanding of the mechanisms of tumor growth and the relationship of cancers to their microenvironments. As part of this revolution, we have had a dramatic increase in our understanding of the immune system and the role it could play in the management of cancers. This article reviews the current data supporting the use of cancer immunologic therapies for gastrointestinal tract cancers. The scope is focused on the variety of approaches that have been used, citing the clinical data that have been obtained and reviewing future trials.

Therapeutic vaccination in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. A review of immunological and clinical results

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are the most common types of human cancers. Despite the introduction of new cytotoxic drugs, a large proportion remains incurable. There is a great need to develop new complementary therapeutic modalities. Strategies exploiting targeted therapies are expanding. The focus of the present article is to review active specific immunotherapy (vaccination) in patients with GI malignancies. The review comprises a description of the immunogenicity of GI malignancies, various types of tumour antigens and mechanisms of action of cancer vaccines. Tumour escape from immune surveillance, vaccine strategies and adjuvants are also described. Clinical and immunological endpoints of cancer immunotherapy are outlined. Results of therapeutic vaccine trials published mainly during the last 5 years in PubMed enrolling a minimum of six patients with GI malignancies are included. Studies presented at the two last annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology are also covered. More than 2000 patients have been vaccinated with tumour antigens (self antigens). The procedure is safe and no autoimmune disorders have been observed after >4 years follow-up in a substantial number of patients. Humoral and cellular tumour antigen-specific immune responses were induced. A correlation between immune responses and prolonged overall survival was seen in several studies. The most encouraging results were noted in randomised controlled phase II/III trials including over 1300 colorectal carcinoma patients with minimal residual disease. A statistically significantly improved disease-free or overall survival was shown either in all vaccinated or in sub-groups of patients. Promising results were also reported in pancreatic and hepatocellular carcinoma. If the results of the randomised controlled trials hold true, active specific immunotherapy may provide a new promising targeted therapeutic approach in GI malignancies with minimal toxicity. Further enlarged randomised controlled studies are warranted to confirm the results, particularly in colon carcinoma with minimal residual disease.

Colorectal cancer vaccines: what we know and what we don't yet know

Humans have a sophisticated immune system that functions to clear invading organisms and abnormal cells. However, cancers are able to arise despite this immune system. Vaccines have the potential of benefiting cancer patients by stimulating an immune response against tumor-associated antigens (TAA). Our enhanced understanding of how the immune system processes and presents antigens has allowed an array of vaccine modalities to be developed and tested. The TAA with the greatest number of vaccine platforms tested in colorectal cancer is carcinoembyronic antigen (CEA). Trials to date have demonstrated safety and evidence for the induction of an immune response against CEA. This article will review trials conducted with a variety of CEA vaccines. Most studies conducted are phase I or II in the metastatic disease setting, limiting our understanding of the role of the immune response in controlling colon cancers. Phase III trials conducted to date have conflicting data with respect to improvements in disease-free and overall survival. It is our challenge to determine if and which vaccines have sufficient benefit to warrant large-scale trials in the adjuvant and prevention settings.

Monoclonal Anti-idiotype Antibody 6G6.C4 Fused to GM-CSF Is Capable of Breaking Tolerance to Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) in CEA–Transgenic Mice

Internal image anti-idiotypic antibodies are capable of mimicking tumor-associated antigens and thus may serve as surrogate for vaccination strategies in cancer patients. The monoclonal antibody (mAb) 6G6.C4 mimics an epitope specific for the human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and generates a CEA-specific response (Ab3) in various experimental animals. In humans, however, 6G6.C4 only yields a very limited humoral anti-CEA reaction presumably due to tolerance against the CEA autoantigen. In this study, we investigated the CEA-specific Ab3 response in mice transgenic for the human CEA and tested whether the antigen tolerance could be overcome by fusing a recombinant single-chain variable fragment of 6G6.C4 (scFv6G6.C4) to the murine granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Like mAb 6G6.C4, the fusion protein (scFv6G6.C4/GM-CSF) retained binding to the CEA-specific idiotype mAb T84.66. Also, scFv6G6.C4/GM-CSF was biologically active as measured by proliferation of the GM-CSF-dependent murine FDC-P1 cells in vitro. After immunization with the scFv6G6.C4/GM-CSF fusion protein, CEA-transgenic animals showed significantly enhanced Ab3 antibody responses to scFv6G6.C4 (P=0.005) and to CEA (P=0.012) compared with the scFV6G6.C4 alone. Sera from mice immunized with the fusion protein specifically recognized CEA in Western blot analyses with no cross-reaction to CEA-related antigens. Finally, the Ab3 antisera detected single CEA-expressing tumor cells in suspension as shown by flow cytometry. Taken together, these data show in a model antigenically related to the human system that vaccination with scFv6G6.C4/GM-CSF improves vaccination against an endogenous tumor-associated antigen resulting in a highly specific humoral Ab3 response in vivo that is capable of bind single circulating CEA-positive tumor cells.

Cancer vaccines entering Phase III clinical trials

The last 10 years have seen a growth in the number of tumour antigens identified from immune responses raised in patients. The discovery that tumours can be recognised by the immune system stimulated a great deal of work characterising the molecular mechanisms underlying immune recognition. This in turn has led to an impressive array of immunological approaches to the generation of cancer vaccines; these range from molecularly defined T cell epitopes, antibody-based vaccines, cytokine therapies, immune modulators and DNA vaccines, to whole cell vaccines and, more recently, combinations of these methods. Many of these approaches have entered Phase I/II trials and have shown interesting clinical results. Moreover, they have extended our knowledge of the immune system and our understanding of the mechanisms required to design a successful cancer vaccine. This review outlines some of the approaches that have led to some of these vaccines entering Phase III clinical trials, discusses their modes of action and reports on their current status in trial.

Involvement of the immune response in the cure of metastatic murine CT-26 colon carcinoma by low electric field-enhanced chemotherapy

Low electric field cancer treatment-enhanced chemotherapy (LEFCT-EC) is a new treatment modality that combines chemotherapeutic agents and low electric field stimulation. LEFCT-EC was found to destroy malignant mouse tumors and cause massive death of tumor cells. This may enable the immune system cells to efficiently recognize and eliminate tumor cells at the primary tumor site and at metastatic foci. Mice with 15 mm diameter intracutaneous colon carcinomas (CT-26) were injected with BCNU (35 mg/kg), and 2 min later the tumors were exposed to low electric fields (intensity 40 V/cm, pulse duration 180 micros, frequency 500 Hz) for 12 min (LEFCT-EC). We found that treatment with LEFCT-EC achieved complete cure of 93% of the animals. In comparison, electric fields alone (13% cure), chemotherapy alone (0%), surgery (15%) or a combination of surgery and bis-chloroethyl-nitrosurea, carmustine (BCNU; 84%) treatments resulted in lower cure rates. After treatment and cure with LEFCT-EC, 50% of the cured mice developed resistance to a tumor challenge (surgery + BCNU only 15%). Furthermore, splenocytes from cured animals protected naive animals from a tumorigenic dose of tumor cells. Separation of spleen cells into lymphocyte subpopulations indicated a major role for CD4 and CD8 T cells in this protection. FACS analysis revealed restoration of normal splenocyte subpopulation proportions impaired by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Our results suggest that LEFCT-EC can directly destroy primary tumors and facilitate the destruction of metastatic disease by enforcement of antitumor immune responses.

Colorectal cancer vaccines: principles, results, and perspectives

In the search for novel therapeutic approaches to treat patients with colorectal carcinoma, anticancer vaccination holds promise. A large body of preclinical and clinical evidence has demonstrated that the immune system can be polarized against malignant cells by means of several active specific immunotherapy strategies. Although no vaccination regimen can be currently recommended outside clinical trials, tumor response and immunologic findings observed in animal models and humans prompt researchers to explore further the antitumor potential of such biotherapy in an effort to reproduce in a larger set of patients the cascade of molecular events that characterizes the successful tumor immune rejection currently observed in a minority of vaccinated subjects. In this work, we summarize the principles and the main results of cancer vaccine strategies so far implemented for the treatment of patients with colorectal carcinoma. We also discuss the most recent preclinical tumor immunology insights that might change the way to design the next generation of cancer vaccines, hopefully improving the effectiveness of such a biotherapeutic approach.

Vaccination of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma with the anti-idiotype ACA125: immunological response and survival (phase Ib/II)

PURPOSE

A Phase I/IIb multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the anti-idiotypic antibody vaccine ACA125 that functionally imitates the tumor antigen CA125 in 119 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. A preliminary report on the initial 42 patients demonstrated safety and immunogenicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using the complete intention-to-treat population (n = 119) who received a mean of 9.7 ACA125 applications, survival was analyzed with respect to immunological responses.

RESULTS

In 81 patients (68.1%), a specific anti-anti-idiotypic antibody (Ab3) response could be induced. Additionally, the development of CA125-specific antibodies (Ab1') and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of CA125-positive tumor cells was observed in 50.4% and 26.9% of patients, respectively. The median survival of all patients was 19.4 months (range, 0.5-56.1 months). Ab3-positive patients showed a significantly longer survival (median, 23.4 months; P < 0.0001) as compared with Ab3-negative patients (median, 4.9 months). A positive Ab3 response remained associated with longer survival when controlling for other prognostic factors including FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) stage, response to and type of first-line chemotherapy, number of previous treatments, or concomitant antitumor therapy. With regard to safety, repeated vaccination was well tolerated. No serious adverse events related to the application of ACA125 occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the uncontrolled design of this study prevents definitive conclusions with respect to subgroups, the data support a relationship between Ab3 response and survival time. Thus, the need for further randomized, controlled clinical trials to establish efficacy of the vaccine ACA125 seems to be indicated.

Dendritic cells pulsed with an anti-idiotype antibody mimicking carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) can reverse immunological tolerance to CEA and induce antitumor immunity in CEA transgenic mice

In this report, we have studied the immunogenicity of the nominal antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and that of an anti-idiotype antibody, 3H1, which mimics CEA and can be used as a surrogate for CEA. We have demonstrated that immunization of CEA transgenic mice with bone marrow-derived mature dendritic cells (DC) loaded with anti-idiotype 3H1 or CEA could reverse CEA unresponsiveness and result in the induction of CEA-specific immune responses and the rejection of CEA-transfected MC-38 colon carcinoma cells, C15. Immunized mice splenocytes proliferated in an antigen-specific manner by a mechanism dependent on the functions of CD4, MHC II, B7-2, CD40, CD28, and CD25. However, immune splenic lymphocytes isolated from 3H1-DC-vaccinated mice when stimulated in vitro with 3H1 or CEA secreted significantly higher levels of Th1 cytokines than did CEA-DC vaccinated mice. DC vaccination also induced antigen-specific effector CD8+ T cells capable of expressing interleukin-2, IFN-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and displayed cytotoxic activity against C15 cells in an MHC class I-restricted manner. 3H1-DC vaccination resulted in augmented CTL responses and the elevated expression of CD69, CD25, and CD28 on CD8(+) CTLs. The immune responses developed in 3H1-DC-immunized mice resulted in rejection of C15 tumor cells in nearly 100% of experimental mice, whereas only 40% of experimental mice immunized with CEA-DC were protected from C15 tumor growth. These findings suggest that under the experimental conditions used, 3H1-DC vaccination was better than CEA-DC vaccination in breaking immune tolerance to CEA and inducing protective antitumor immune responses in this murine model transgenic for human CEA.

A novel CEA vaccine stimulates T cell proliferation, γIFN secretion and CEA specific CTL responses

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a cell surface protein over-expressed by a wide range of tumours. The mouse anti-idiotypic antibody, 708, mimics CEA and can induce both antibody and T cell responses that specifically recognise this antigen. Sequence analysis of 708 revealed homology with a previously identified HLA-A3 T cell epitope in CEA but not to other closely related molecules. 708 was chimerised to a human IgG1 to allow Fc targeting of APCs and was deimmunised to remove unwanted T cell epitopes. The chimerised and deimmunised, but not the mouse 708, could stimulate CTL, proliferation and gammaIFN responses in vitro in normal (HLA-A3, DR1) individuals. Furthermore, the CTLs killed tumour cells expressing CEA suggesting that this deimmunised antibody could be a useful vaccine for solid tumours.

Isolation and characterisation of a human anti-idiotypic scFv used as a surrogate tumour antigen to elicit an anti-HER-2/neu humoral response in mice

HER-2/neu is a tumour antigen that is overexpressed in human breast tumours. Among the vaccine strategies developed to overcome immune tolerance to self-proteins, vaccination with anti-idiotypic (anti-Id) antibodies has been described as a promising approach for treatment of several malignant diseases. To develop an active immunotherapy for cancer patients positive for HER-2/neu, we investigated immunisation with human anti-Id single-chain fragments (scFv) mimicking the conformation of HER-2/neu protein to induce a humoral response in mice. We selected by phage display two human anti-Id scFv (Ab2beta) directed against trastuzumab F(ab')2 fragments (Ab1), a humanised anti-HER-2/neu monoclonal antibody. Using competitive ELISA and Biacore biosensor analysis, we showed that anti-Id scFv 40 and scFv 69 could inhibit HER-2/neu binding to trastuzumab. Following vaccination of BALB/c mice with the soluble or phage-displayed scFv, Ab3 polyclonal antibodies, and among them Ab1' antibodies able to bind HER-2/neu, were detected in the sera of the immunised mice. These results demonstrate that the human anti-Id scFv could act as a surrogate antigen for HER-2/neu. The present study strongly suggests that the novel 30 kDa human mini-antibody could be used as an anti-idiotype-based vaccine formulation to induce an effective humoral response in patients bearing HER-2/neu-positive tumours.

Durable Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Vaccinated with Recombinant CEA and Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE

Previous studies have indicated that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) might be a suitable immunotherapeutic target in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the present study was to analyze the immunological and clinical effects of vaccination with CEA together with the adjuvant granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Twenty-four resected CRC patients without macroscopic disease were immunized seven times with recombinant CEA at four different dose levels over a 12-month period. Half of the patients received GM-CSF (80 microg/day for 4 consecutive days) at each immunization. Patients were monitored immunologically for 36 months and clinically for 76 months. T-cell response was evaluated by a [(3)H]thymidine incorporation assay, and IgG response was determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

Minor local side effects were common. All 12 patients (100%) in the GM-CSF group developed a CEA-specific T-cell as well as an IgG response. The corresponding figures in the CEA alone group were 9 of 12 (75%) and 8 of 12 (66%), respectively. GM-CSF significantly augmented the amplitude of the T-cell response and the IgG titers. No dose-response relationship was noted. The immune responses at 12 months persisted 24 months after the last vaccination. Anti-CEA IgG titers were associated with increased survival (P < 0.05), whereas standard prognostic factors had no relationship, with the exception of serum CEA value.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination with recombinant CEA and GM-CSF appears to be a nontoxic regimen inducing potent and durable antigen-specific IgG and T-cell response. The results of this study justify more extensive trials with recombinant CEA protein for immunotherapy of CRC.

New systemic frontline treatment for metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Options for first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma have broadened considerably with the introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Furthermore, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine has demonstrated efficacy in Phase III trials and recently was approved for first-line treatment in Europe and the United States. Capecitabine yielded similar median times to disease progression and median survival rates compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (Mayo Clinic/North Central Cancer Treatment Group regimen), with superior and similar response rates, respectively. However, its role as a first-line, single-agent substitute for intermittent infusional 5-FU/LV remains to be defined. The addition of irinotecan or oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV resulted in improved response rates and progression-free survival in large, randomized trials; moreover, irinotecan-containing regimens resulted in improved overall survival. Prevalent regimens of irinotecan/5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin/5-FU/LV have been compared in two randomized Phase III trials. One study demonstrated the statistical superiority of oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU/LV over irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV in terms of response, time to disease progression, and median survival; however, those advantages may have been attributable to infusional administration or to major differences in second-line therapy. A randomized Phase III study comparing irinotecan and oxaliplatin in combination with the same infusional 5-FU/LV regimens and crossover in case of disease progression showed equivalent efficacy for both schedules in the first-line setting, but the irinotecan combination proved beneficial in terms of safety. New molecular targeted agents, such as angiogenesis-modulating compounds (e.g., bevacizumab) and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (e.g., cetuximab), are under clinical investigation. This review updates current systemic frontline treatments and future perspectives for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

Tumour vaccine associated lymphadenopathy and false positive positron emission tomography scan changes

A patient receiving intradermal injections of vaccine directed towards carcinoembryonic antigen-bearing metastases from colorectal cancer showed uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in local draining lymph nodes during the course of treatment. This appearance should be considered as a possible false positive in patients undergoing such treatment who are being investigated with PET scans.

Tumor markers and colorectal cancer: utility in management

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although genetic testing can screen for rare hereditary CRC syndromes, there is no ideal means of screening for sporadic forms of CRC. This review will focus on markers that are currently used in the management of sporadic CRC and their limitations, as well as possible future clinical applications.

Phase I clinical trial of a human idiotypic p53 vaccine in patients with advanced malignancy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to induce immunity to p53 by using an idiotypic vaccine, composed of a pool of eight peptides derived from the complimentarity determining regions (CDRs) of human anti-p53 antibodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects with advanced malignancy received up to four, monthly intradermal injections of pooled peptides (500 microg of each) admixed with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; 100 microg). In addition, two sheep and two rabbits were also vaccinated with the pooled peptides.

RESULTS

Fourteen subjects were enrolled into the study and six of these completed the vaccination schedule. The vaccine was well tolerated by all subjects and no major adverse events were attributable to the vaccine. All subjects mounted in vivo delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to two or more of the individual vaccine peptides. Vaccine-induced antibodies specific for peptides 2, 5 or 8 were detected in four of six subjects, and two of these had vaccine-specific, cell-mediated responses. Increasing titers of p53-specific antibodies were found in one patient. No T-cell response to p53 was observed in any of the subjects. All animals developed humoral immunity to the peptides and one of the sheep developed rising serum titers of anti-p53 antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination with human antibody CDR regions represents a novel method for inducing human antibodies, which may in turn serve as immunological mimics of p53.

Clinical application of dendritic cells in cancer vaccination therapy

During the last decade use of dendritic cells (DC) has moved from murine and in vitro studies to clinical trials as adjuvant in cancer immunotherapy. Here they function as delivery vehicles for exogenous tumor antigens, promoting an efficient antigen presentation. The development of protocols for large-scale generation of dendritic cells for clinical applications has made possible phase I/II studies designed to analyze the toxicity, feasibility and efficacy of this approach. In clinical trials, DC-based vaccination of patients with advanced cancer has in many cases led to immunity and in selected patients to tumor regression. However, the majority of clinical trials are still in phase I, and interpretations are hampered by pronounced variation in study design related to technical aspects of DC preparation, treatment and schedule, monitoring of immune response, and clinically relevant endpoints, including toxicity and response evaluation. This paper aims to review the technical aspects and clinical impact of vaccination trials, focusing on the generation of DC-based vaccines, evaluation of immunologic parameters and design of clinical trials necessary to meet the need for good laboratory and clinical practice.

Vector-based delivery of tumor-associated antigens and T-cell co-stimulatory molecules in the induction of immune responses and anti-tumor immunity

It has now been demonstrated in both experimental models and recent clinical trials that certain "self" antigens, which are functionally non-immunogenic in the host, can become immunogenic if presented to the immune system in a certain way. Here, we describe recombinant vaccines and vaccine strategies that have been developed to induce and potentiate T-cell responses of the host to such self-antigens. These strategies include: (a) the use of recombinant poxvirus vectors in which the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) is inserted as a transgene. Recombinant vaccinia vaccines and recombinant avipox (replication-defective) vaccines have been employed to break tolerance to a self-antigen; (b) the use of diversified prime and boost strategies using different vaccines; and (c) the insertion of multiple T-cell co-stimulatory molecules into recombinant poxvirus vectors, along with the TAA gene, to enhance T-cell immune responses to the TAA and induce anti-tumor immunity.

Antibody-based therapeutics in oncology

The recent clinical and commercial success of anticancer antibodies, such as rituximab (Rituxan) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) has created great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies versus small molecules, the potential increase in efficacy by conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drug's clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. It is also likely that conjugation strategies will add new radiolabeled and toxin-linked products to the market to complement the recent approvals of ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and gemtuzumab ozogamycin (Mylotarg). However, although there are a large number of agents in both early and later stages of clinical development, only a handful will make it through regulatory approval and become successful products. This review considers the structure of anticancer therapeutic antibodies, the techniques used to reduce their antigenicity, factors that influence efficacy and toxicity, conjugation with isotopes and toxins and antibody target validation.

Anti-idiotype antibody vaccine therapy for cancer

The use of anti-idiotype (Id) antibodies as vaccines to stimulate antitumour immunity is one of several promising immunologic approaches to the therapy of cancer. Extensive studies in animal tumour models have demonstrated the efficacy of anti-Id vaccines in preventing tumour growth and curing mice with established tumours. A number of monoclonal anti-Id antibodies that mimic distinct human tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) have been developed and tested in the clinic, and demonstrate encouraging results. In general, the antigen mimicry by anti-Id antibodies has reflected structural homology in the majority of the cases, and amino acid sequence homology in a few of them. The greatest challenge of immunotherapy by means of anti-Id vaccines is to identify the optimal anti-Id antibody that will function as a true surrogate antigen for a TAA system, and ideally will generate both humoral and cellular immune responses. Although several clinical studies have shown enhanced survival of patients receiving anti-Id vaccines, the efficacy of these vaccines will depend on the results of several randomised Phase III clinical trials that are currently planned or ongoing.

Adjuvant therapy of cancers of the colon and rectum

Important advances have been made in our understanding of the role of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer. Current standard 5FU-based regimens have been convincingly shown to reduce the incidence of recurrences and to prolong overall survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Colon cancer patients with stage II disease have a better-overall prognosis than those with stage III; however, the relative merits of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. Combined chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is currently the standard adjuvant approach for stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Despite the advances that have been made, far too many patients with resectable colorectal cancer ultimately relapse and die of their disease. There remains a pressing need for continued development of improved adjuvant treatments. Participation of eligible patients in clinical trials must continue to be actively encouraged. Only in this way will we be able to continue to build and expand on the progress that has been made thus far.

European approach to antibody-based immunotherapy of melanoma

In the past two decades, the worldwide steadily rising incidence of melanoma, its dismal prognosis when locally advanced or metastatic, and the absence of clinically effective therapeutic options have prompted studies that generated extensive preclinical knowledge on the biology of melanoma cells and their interaction with the host's immune system. As a consequence, among solid tumors, melanoma represents a "model malignancy" to design and apply in the clinic new bioimmunotherapeutic approaches, that are eventually translated to solid tumors of different histotypes. Despite its waxing and waning appeal as a therapeutic strategy, antibody treatment still represents a promising clinical approach to melanoma. Europe is no exception in the clinical interest for antibodies as therapeutic tools in melanoma patients; European researchers have also focused on preclinical issues that may improve current antibody-based therapeutic approaches on the one hand, while providing novel clinical strategies on the other hand.

Antibody-based vaccines for the treatment of melanoma

Malignant melanoma remains a difficult clinical problem. Chemotherapy is not effective and immunotherapy has long been contemplated as the preferred approach to this disease. Extensive passive and active immunotherapy trials have been conducted. Active vaccination with whole cells or defined antigens, administered with a panoply of techniques to increase immunogenicity, has yielded inconsistent results. The development of antibody-based vaccines has allowed vaccination without the need for tumor tissue material or purified antigens. The idiotype network theory originally proposed by Lindemann and by Jerne provided the basis for the development of anti-idiotype (anti-Id) antibody vaccines, which mimic the internal image of the epitope targeted for immunization. Preclinical and phase I clinical data are available for various malignancies. In melanoma, some of the anti-Id vaccines have targeted gangliosides. One of these vaccines, TriGem, has been successful in generating a robust and specific humoral immunity in melanoma patients. Phase II data suggest this anti-Id vaccine has clinical activity.

The case for polyvalent cancer vaccines that induce antibodies

Antibodies are ideally suited for eradicating pathogens from the bloodstream and early tissue invasion. With regard to cancer cells, passively administered and vaccine induced antibodies have accomplished this, eliminating circulating tumor cells and systemic or intraperitoneal micrometastases in a variety of preclinical models. A series of cancer cell-surface differentiation antigens have now been identified and synthesized. Antibodies against each can be induced in most vaccinated patients using keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugate vaccines with a potent immunological adjuvant. Polyvalent vaccines may be required due to tumor cell heterogenely, heterogeneity of the human immune response and the correlation between overall antibody titer against tumor cells and antibody effector mechanisms. Trials testing the clinical impact of these polyvalent vaccines in the adjuvant setting are planned for the near future.

Biological therapy of colorectal cancer

In this review, the immunogenicity of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the results of clinical and recent preclinical studies are discussed. Evidence for immune reactivity has been found in several preclinical models and the prognostic value of some of these immune responses have been reported. The possible mechanisms are discussed. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies is still experimental; as previously described benefit of treatment with monoclonal antibodies could not be confirmed. Labelled monoclonal antibody therapy has produced mixed results and also need further investigation. Several antigens are used in active specific immunotherapy (ASI). Its targets and modifications are discussed, as are their use in clinical studies. Although some of the results are promising, the results still have to be confirmed in larger studies. Since there is sufficient evidence for immune reactivity in CRC, further research on immunotherapeutic strategies is justified and will be focused on the development of humanised antibodies, the search for other relevant T-cell epitopes and ways to induce a more effective T cell response.

Carcinoembryonic antigen as a target for therapeutic anticancer vaccines: a review

PURPOSE

To describe the features of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) that are important for its use in vaccination approaches and review the clinical experience with therapeutic vaccines targeting CEA.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed on CEA, along with various qualifiers such as cancer vaccines, epitopes, and function. Relevant articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

CEA is a member of the immunoglobulin supergene family and may play a role in tumorigenesis. CEA protein is processed and presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins for multiple alleles, including HLA A2, A3, and A24. T lymphocytes from healthy volunteers and cancer patients can recognize the processed epitopes of CEA and can become activated to lyse CEA-expressing tumors. Therapeutic vaccination approaches that have targeted CEA include vaccination with recombinant CEA protein, CEA anti-idiotype antibodies, and dendritic cells pulsed with agonist epitopes of CEA. Humoral responses have predominantly been induced with the first two approaches, whereas CD4 and CD8 responses, disease stabilization, and even objective clinical responses have been seen with the dendritic cell approach. Recently, CEA-poxvirus vectors encoding CEA and costimulatory molecules such as B7.1 have been shown to be safe and to induce increases in the frequency of T-cell precursors that recognize processed epitopes of CEA presented on MHC class 1 molecules. Disease stabilization has been seen in up to 37% of patients treated with these vaccines.

CONCLUSION

Tolerance to CEA in patients with cancer can be overcome with several different vaccination approaches, and such vaccinations are safe and immunologically active. Poxvirus-based vaccines can reproducibly generate T-cell responses to CEA and to tumors expressing CEA. Clinical activity has been seen with poxvirus or dendritic cell approaches. Other approaches are also being explored.

Immunologic monitoring of cancer vaccine therapy: results of a workshop sponsored by the Society for Biological Therapy

The Society for Biological Therapy held a Workshop last fall devoted to immune monitoring for cancer immunotherapy trials. Participants included members of the academic and pharmaceutical communities as well as the National Cancer Institute and the Food and Drug Administration. Discussion focused on the relative merits and appropriate use of various immune monitoring tools. Six breakout groups dealt with assays of T-cell function, serologic and proliferation assays to assess B cell and T helper cell activity, and enzyme-linked immunospot assay, tetramer, cytokine flow cytometry, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays of T-cell immunity. General conclusions included: (1) future vaccine studies should be designed to determine whether T-cell dysfunction (tumor-specific and nonspecific) correlated with clinical outcome; (2) tetramer-based assays yield quantitative but not functional data (3) enzyme-linked immunospot assays have the lowest limit of detection (4) cytokine flow cytometry have a higher limit of detection than enzyme-linked immunospot assay, but offer the advantages of speed and the ability to identify subsets of reactive cells; (5) antibody tests are simple and accurate and should be incorporated to a greater extent in monitoring plans; (6) proliferation assays are imprecise and should not be emphasized in future studies; (7) the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay is a promising research approach that is not ready for widespread application; and (8)there is a critical need to validate these assays as surrogates for vaccine potency and clinical effect. Current data and opinion support the use of a functional assay like the enzyme-linked immunospot assay or cytokine flow cytometry in combination with a quantitative assay like tetramers for immune monitoring. At present, assays appear to be most useful as measures of vaccine potency. Careful immune monitoring in association with larger scale clinical trials ultimately may enable the correlation of monitoring results with clinical benefit.

Production and characterisation of monoclonal anti-idiotype antibody to Vibrio anguillarum

Seven monoclonal anti-idiotype antibodies (mab2) were raised against mouse monoclonal antibody (mab1) 4A6. Identification of subclass showed that 1H5, 1D1, 2B12 and 2F12 belonged to IgG2b, 2H12 and 1H12 to IgG2a and lE10 to IgG3. The titres of these mab2 ascitic fluids ranged from 1 x 10(-4)-1 x 10(-6). The capacity of the mab2 to inhibit the binding between the corresponding rabbit antiserum and Vibrio anguillarum was investigated with the competitive inhibition ELISA. The results showed that mab2 1D1, 1E10, 1H5 and 1H12 were able to inhibit this binding. Another experiment demonstrated that mab2 1D1, 1E10 and 1H5 might induce Balb/c mice to produce Ab3 and these Ab3 competed the same antigen epitopes with Ab1. These results indicate that mab2 1D1, 1E10 and 1H5 are likely to represent an internal image of V. anguillarum and may thus be described as Ab2-beta anti-idiotype antibodies. In protection experiments, Japanese flounders vaccinated with mab21D1, 1E10 and 1H5 showed significantly enhanced survival from challenge with V. anguillarum. Thus. mab21D1, 1E10 and 1H5 may have use as idiotype vaccines for fish in aquaculture.

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite advances in screening procedures and the use of adjuvant therapy, approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer eventually will develop metastatic disease. Long-term disease-free survival can be achieved in 25% to 40% of selected patients who undergo resection of liver or lung metastases. For all other patients, treatment is palliative. For decades, 5-fluorouracil was the only available drug for colorectal cancer; hence, numerous trials were performed that used various administration schedules and modulating agents to improve therapeutic efficacy. The addition of leucovorin to 5-FU improves response but not survival. Infusion schedules alter the toxicity profile but have a negligible impact on survival. Irinotecan was the first new drug to demonstrate activity in colorectal cancer. It was used initially in the second-line setting, where it was shown to improve quality of life and survival over best supportive care or infusional 5-FU. Recently, irinotecan has been incorporated into the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin; this combination improves survival by approximately 3 months. Careful patient selection and adherence to strict dose adjustments are essential to prevent significant toxicity when patients are treated on this regimen. The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine recently has been approved for the front-line treatment of patients with colorectal cancer who are not appropriate candidates for combination therapy. Oxaliplatin, a novel DACH (diaminocyclohexane) platinum with definite activity in colorectal cancer, is approved for this disease in Europe and is undergoing phase III clinical trials in the United States. Other drugs with potential activity in colorectal cancer include raltitrexed, pemetrexed disodium, and the epothilone analog BMS-247550 (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY). Novel cytostatics with promising activity in colorectal cancer are being evaluated in clinical trials, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, such as IMC-C225 (Imclone Systems, New York, NY) and ZD1839 (AstraZeneca, London, UK), angiogenesis inhibitors such as bevacizumab and SU5416 (Sugen, San Francisco, CA), and vaccines such as CEAVac (Titan Pharmaceuticals, San Francisco, CA). For those patients whose disease is localized to the liver, there also is an emerging role for local therapies, including cryosurgery, radiofrequency ablation, and hepatic artery infusional chemotherapy, and resection. The emergence of these new drugs and new interventional modalities has allowed physicians who treat colorectal cancer to move beyond 5-FU.

Cancer immunotherapy: insights from transgenic animal models

A wide range of strategies in cancer immunotherapy has been developed in the last decade, some of which are currently being used in clinical settings. The development of these immunotherapeutical strategies has been facilitated by the generation of relevant transgenic animal models. Since the different strategies in experimental immunotherapy of cancer each aim to activate different immune system components, a variety of transgenic animals have been generated either expressing tumor associated, HLA, oncogenic or immune effector cell molecule proteins. This review aims to discuss the existing transgenic mouse models generated to study and develop cancer immunotherapy strategies and the variable results obtained. The potential of the various transgenic animal models regarding the development of anti-cancer immunotherapeutical strategies is evaluated.

Gene therapy for colorectal cancer: therapeutic potential

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in Western countries. Gene therapy has been proposed as a potential novel treatment modality for colorectal cancer, but it is still in an early stage of development. The preclinical data have been promising and numerous clinical trials are underway. This brief review aims to summarise the current status of clinical trials of different gene therapy strategies, including immune stimulation, mutant gene correction, prodrug activation and oncolytic virus therapy, for patients with colorectal cancer. Data from phase I trials have proven the safety of the reagents but have not yet demonstrated significant therapeutic benefit. In order to achieve this and extend the scope of the treatment, continuing efforts should be made to improve the antitumour potency, efficiency of gene delivery and accuracy of gene targeting.

Vaccines for colorectal cancer

Despite recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer, the overall survival rate for those patients with advanced locoregional disease remains less than 50%. Although adjuvant systemic chemotherapy has improved survival of these patients, more effective therapies are needed. Immunotherapy is an approach that could have a particular role in the adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. There is now convincing evidence that the immune system can specifically recognize and destroy malignant cells. Although both antibody- and T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses have been documented, the cellular immune response with its direct cytotoxic mechanisms is felt to be the principal anti-tumor arm of the immune system. Analysis of the T cells that recognize tumors has led to the identification and characterization of many tumor-associated antigens including several colorectal antigens. Current approaches to developing a vaccine for colorectal cancer use our expanded understanding of these tumor-associated antigens and the conditions that allow development of an effective cellular immune response to them.

CancerVax, an allogeneic tumor cell vaccine, induces specific humoral and cellular immune responses in advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The immunogenicity of the polyvalent tumor cell vaccine CancerVax has been correlated with the survival of patients receiving active immunotherapy for melanoma. Because the various antigens expressed on the vaccine are common to colon adenocarcinoma cells, we examined the survival impact of immune responses elicited by CancerVax in patients with advanced colon cancer refractory to standard therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma were entered prospectively into the study. CancerVax was coadministered with bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for the first 2 weeks of vaccine treatment. Blood was drawn at the start of therapy and every 2 weeks thereafter to measure serum titers of immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM against TA90 (a 90-kD immunogen common to colon cancer and CancerVax cells) and against purified protein derivative (PPD), a nontumor control antigen. Cellular immune responses were evaluated by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction to vaccine cells and to PPD. Mean follow-up time was 17.5 months.

RESULTS

There was a significant (P = .0001) increase in anti-TA90 IgG and IgM titers and in DTH response to vaccine cells. Humoral and skin responses to TA90 did not correlate with responses to PPD (P = .199 for IgM, P = .958 for IgG, and P = .149 for DTH). This suggests that these responses are not a manifestation of general immune competence. The median overall survival (OS) was 21.9 months for the entire group. Overall survival was higher among patients whose IgMTA90 titer was >800 (P = .003) or whose disease-free interval exceeded 12 months (P = .031). Multivariate Cox regression analysis-using age, sex, disease-free interval, disease status, extent of metastasis, humoral responses, and DTH responses-found only peak IgMTA90 titer to be a significant predictor of overall survival (P = .0365).

CONCLUSIONS

CancerVax can induce measurable humoral and cellular immune responses to tumor-associated antigens in patients with advanced-stage colon cancer. These responses correlate with overall survival. This novel therapeutic regimen for patients with advanced colon cancer merits further investigation.

Murine monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody as a surrogate antigen for human Her-2/neu

The anti-idiotypic (Id) monoclonal antibody (MAb) 520C9-6b (IgG1k), raised in syngenic mice against the murine anti-Her2/neu MAb 520C9 (Ab1), functionally mimics a human Her2/neu epitope and serves as a surrogate for the protein antigen. Immunization of allogeneic C57BL/6 mice and rabbits with 520C9-6b (Ab2) induced anti-Her2/neu-specific antibodies that react with antigen-positive SKBr3 cells by ELISA and FACS analysis. The immune sera inhibited binding between Ab1 and Ab2 and vice versa (binding of Ab2 to Ab1), indicating that it was a true anti-anti-Id (Ab3) antibody. The Ab3 sera or purified Ab3 specifically lysed Her2/neu-positive SKBr3 cells, but no significant lysis was observed in antigen-negative LS174T cells in an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assay. An Id-specific cellular immune response was also demonstrated in an in vitro lymphocyte proliferation assay. Furthermore, a panel of tumor tissues and tumor cells was screened for the presence of the Her2/neu epitope by its reactivity with Ab1 and Ab3 using immunohistochemistry and FACS analysis. Identical results were obtained using either Ab1 or Ab3 (Ab1'). The data indicated that anti-Id 520C9-6b can induce Her2/neu-specific antibody in experimental animals and may serve as a potential network antigen for the treatment of patients bearing Her2/neu-positive tumors.

Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer

Immunologic approaches to therapy for colorectal cancer have evolved substantially. In the past, patients were treated with nonspecific immune stimulants such as bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The current focus lies in targeting tumor-associated antigens. This is done either through passive immune therapy, with antibodies targeted directly to tumor cells, or by active immune therapy through vaccination with tumor cells, tumor cell lysates, peptides, carbohydrates, gene constructs encoding proteins, or anti-idiotype antibodies that mimic tumor-associated antigens. These different approaches to immunotherapy are reviewed.