Humanized CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells in CAR-Naive and CAR-Exposed Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Preclinical evaluation of CD70-specific CAR T cells targeting acute myeloid leukemia

Backgrounds

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved unprecedented success in treating hematopoietic malignancies. However, this cell therapy is hampered in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) due to lack of ideal cell surface targets that only express on AML blasts and leukemia stem cells (LSCs) but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Methods

We detected the CD70 expression on the surfaces of AML cell lines, primary AML cells, HSC, and peripheral blood cells and generated a second-generation CD70-specific CAR-T cells using a construct containing a humanized 41D12-based scFv and a 41BB-CD3ζ intracellular signaling domain. Cytotoxicity, cytokine release, and proliferation in antigen stimulation, CD107a assay, and CFSE assays were used to demonstrate the potent anti-leukemia activity in vitro. A Molm-13 xenograft mouse model was established to evaluate the anti-leukemic activity of CD70 CAR-T in vivo. CFU assay was explored to assess the safety of CD70 CAR-T on HSC.

Results

CD70 heterogeneously expressed on AML primary cells, including leukemia blasts, leukemic progenitor, and stem cells, but not expressed on normal HSCs and majority of blood cells. Anti-CD70 CAR-T cells exhibited potent cytotoxicity, cytokines production, and proliferation when incubated with CD70⁺ AML cell lines. It also displayed robust anti-leukemia activity and prolonged survival in Molm-13 xenograft mouse model. However, such CAR-T cell therapy did not completely eliminate leukemia in vivo.

Discussion

Our study reveals that anti-CD70 CAR-T cells are a new potential treatment for AML. However, such CAR-T cell therapy did not completely eliminate leukemia in vivo, suggesting that future studies aiming to generate innovative combinatorial CAR constructs or to increase CD70 expression density on leukemia cell surface to prolong the life-span of CAR-T cells in the circulation will be needed in order to optimize CAR-T cell responses for AML.

Impact of poverty and neighborhood opportunity on outcomes for children treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

Children living in poverty experience excessive relapse and death from newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The influence of household poverty and neighborhood social determinants on outcomes from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (r/r) leukemia is poorly described. We identified patients with r/r CD19+ ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma treated on CD19-directed CAR T-cell clinical trials or with commercial tisagenlecleucel from 2012 to 2020. Socioeconomic status (SES) was proxied at the household level, with poverty exposure defined as Medicaid-only insurance. Low-neighborhood opportunity was defined by the Childhood Opportunity Index. Among 206 patients aged 1 to 29, 35.9% were exposed to household poverty, and 24.9% had low-neighborhood opportunity. Patients unexposed to household poverty or low-opportunity neighborhoods were more likely to receive CAR T-cell therapy with a high disease burden (>25%), a disease characteristic associated with inferior outcomes, as compared with less advantaged patients (38% vs 30%; 37% vs 26%). Complete remission (CR) rate was 93%, with no significant differences by household poverty (P = .334) or neighborhood opportunity (P = .504). In multivariate analysis, patients from low-opportunity neighborhoods experienced an increased hazard of relapse as compared with others (P = .006; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.1). There was no difference in hazard of death (P = .545; adjusted HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.4). Among children who successfully receive CAR T-cell therapy, CR and overall survival are equitable regardless of proxied SES and neighborhood opportunity. Children from more advantaged households and neighborhoods receive CAR T-cell therapy with a higher disease burden. Investigation of multicenter outcomes and access disparities outside of clinical trial settings is warranted.

Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Current Challenges and Future Directions

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) represents an important and potentially curative treatment option for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Relapse continues to remain the most important factor influencing overall survival post allo-HCT. We discuss early identification, clinical manifestations, and management of relapsed disease. Routine evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD) and change in donor chimerism play a crucial role in early detection. Pivotal clinical trials have led to FDA approval of multiple novel agents like blinatumomab and inotuzumab. Combining targeted therapy with cellular immunotherapy serves as the backbone for prolonging overall survival in these patients. Donor lymphocyte infusions have traditionally been used in relapsed disease with suboptimal outcomes. This review provides insight into use of cellular therapy in MRD positivity and decreasing donor chimerism. It also discusses various modalities of combining cellular therapy with novel agents and discussing the impact of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the setting of post allo-HCT relapse both as consolidative therapy and as a bridge to second transplant.

Do Treg Speed Up with CARs? Chimeric Antigen Receptor Treg Engineered to Induce Transplant Tolerance

Adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Treg) can induce transplant tolerance in preclinical models by suppressing alloantigen-directed inflammatory responses; clinical translation was so far hampered by the low abundance of Treg with allo-specificity in the peripheral blood. In this situation, ex vivo engineering of Treg with a T-cell receptor (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) provides a cell population with predefined specificity that can be amplified and administered to the patient. In contrast to TCR-engineered Treg, CAR Treg can be redirected toward a broad panel of targets in an HLA-unrestricted fashion' making these cells attractive to provide antigen-specific tolerance toward the transplanted organ. In preclinical models, CAR Treg accumulate and amplify at the targeted transplant, maintain their differentiated phenotype, and execute immune repression more vigorously than polyclonal Treg. With that, CAR Treg are providing hope in establishing allospecific, localized immune tolerance in the long term' and the first clinical trials administering CAR Treg for the treatment of transplant rejection are initiated. Here, we review the current platforms for developing and manufacturing alloantigen-specific CAR Treg and discuss the therapeutic potential and current hurdles in translating CAR Treg into clinical exploration.

Outcomes of Second Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy (CART2) in Acute B Lymphoblastic Leukemia and the Impact of Allo-HSCT on Efficacy

For patients exhibiting a suboptimal response to the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CART1) or relapse after remission, secondary CAR T-cell therapy (CART2) for the same target may be an option. We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) receiving CD19 CART1 at our center (n = 84) to report the clinical outcomes of CART2 and to identify the factors that may influence the outcomes. Twenty-six patients received CART2 for suboptimal response or relapse post-CART1. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after CART2 was 65.4% (17/26), with 11 cases classified as grade 1 (42.3%), four cases as grade 2 (15.4%), and two cases as grade 3 (7.7%). Neurotoxicity was observed in one patient (3.8%) after CART2 infusion. Fourteen patients (53.8%) achieved complete remission (CR) after CART2. CART2 exhibited an inferior response rate (CART2: 53.8%, 14/26; CART1: 81.0%, 64/79; P = 0.006) and a lower incidence of severe CRS (CART2: 7.7%, 2/26; CART1: 30.4%, 24/79; P = 0.020) compared with CART1, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and a median overall survival (OS) of 6.2 months and 11.2 months, respectively. In particular, patients who progressed after consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) following CART1 and then received CART2 demonstrated promising outcomes with a response rate of 80.0% (8/10), a median PFS of 7.9 months, and a median OS of 25.1 months. After adjusting for the confounding factors, the response rate (85.7%, 6/7) of CART2 administered to this cohort was better than those who did not bridge to allo-HSCT receiving CART2 (28.6%, 2/7) or non-CART2 treatments (13.3%, 2/15). The median OS after CART2, which was not reached, was significantly better than the median OS after CART2 (3.9 months, P = 0.014) and non-CART2 treatments (6.0 months, P = 0.012) administered in patients who did not undergo consolidative allo-HSCT post-CART1. Our results indicated that, although less effective than CART1, a subset of patients can still benefit from CART2 with mild adverse effects. For patients who relapsed after consolidative allo-HSCT post-CART1, treatment with CART2 is a viable option.

Safety and Efficacy of Humanized Versus Murinized CD19 and CD22 CAR T-Cell Cocktail Therapy for Refractory/Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is efficacious for refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell hematological malignancies, yet relapse due to CD19 antigen escape remains a challenge. Our trial explored simultaneous targeting of multiple B-cell antigens as a therapeutic approach that may reduce the risk of relapse. We tested the safety and efficacy of CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy including murinized and humanized products among patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma. In the group that received the humanized product, 11/12 (91.7%) patients achieved an objective response, including 9/12 (75%) complete responses (CRs) by day 28. The overall response rate and CR rate in the murinized group was 92.9% (13/14) and 42.9% (6/14), respectively. Nine of 12 (75%) patients in the humanized group maintained CR at month 3 following infusion, compared to 5/14 patients (35.7%) in the murinized group. Progression-free survival (PFS) was more favorable in the humanized compared to the murinized group. Most patients had mild cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (grade 1-2) in both groups. This study demonstrates that CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy is safe and effective for R/R B-cell lymphoma and that patients treated with a humanized CAR-T exhibited better efficacy compared to patients treated with a murinized CAR-T therapy.

Cytopenias following anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic analysis for contributing factors

BACKGROUND

Cytopenia is one of the most common adverse events following the CAR-T cell infusion, affecting the quality of life and potentially leading to life-threatening bleeding and infection. This study aimed to systematically review the cytopenias following anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy and further analyse the contributing factors.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were systematically searched on 8 May 2022. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to estimate the incidence of cytopenia, and subgroup analyses were applied to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 68 studies involving 2950 patients were included in this study. The overall incidence of all grade anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopoenia, lymphocytopenia and febrile neutropenia was 65%, 55%, 78%, 62%, 70% and 27%, respectively, and the corresponding cytopenias of grade 3 or worse were 33%, 31%, 61%, 45%, 46%, and 21%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed increased incidence of cytopenias in subgroups with lower median age, proportion of males (<65%) and proportion of bridging therapy (<80%) and in the subgroup with a median line of prior therapy ≥3. In terms of disease and therapeutic target, cytopenias were more frequent in ALL patients and in dual-target CAR-T therapies (targeting CD19 in combination with other targets). Furthermore, CAR-T products manufactured by lentiviral vectors and those with the costimulatory domain of CD28 were more likely to cause haematological toxicity. No significant differences were observed in cytopenia between patients treated with CAR-T products with murine and humanized scFv.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, neutropenia is the most frequent cytopenia after CAR-T therapy, both in all grades or grade ≥3. The incidence of cytopenias following CAR-T therapy is influenced by the age, sex, disease and number of prior therapy lines of the patients, as well as the target and costimulatory domain of CAR-T cells, and viral vectors used for manufacturing.KEY MESSAGESNeutropenia is the most frequent cytopenia after CAR-T therapy.The clinical characteristics of the patients, the design of CAR-T cells and the protocol of CAR-T treatment can influence the occurrence of cytopenias following the CAR-T therapy.

Nanobody-based CAR-T cells for cancer immunotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is the result of combining genetic engineering-based cancer immunotherapy with adoptive cell therapy (ACT). CAR-T therapy has been successful in treating various types of hematological cancers. CARs are receptors made of an extracellular domain, a membrane-spanning domain, and an intracellular domain. The extracellular domain of CARs harbors an antigen-targeting domain responsible for recognizing and binding cell surface-expressed target antigens. Conventionally, the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) is used as the antigen-targeting domain of CARs. However, of late, researchers have exploited nanobodies for this aim based on numerous rationales including the small size of nanobodies, their stability, specificity, and high affinity, and their easy and feasible development process. Many findings have confirmed that nanobody-based CAR-Ts can be as functional as scFv-based CAR-Ts in preclinical and clinical settings. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of scFvs and nanobodies in regards to their application as the targeting domain of CARs. Ultimately, we discuss various CAR target antigens which have been targeted using nanobody-based CAR-T cells for the treatment of different types of malignancies.

Multiple CAR-T cell therapy for acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A case report

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood malignancy. The cure rate has reached 90% after conventional chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but the prognosis of patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) leukemia is still poor after conventional treatment. Since FDA approved CD19 CAR-T cell (Kymriah) for the treatment of R/R B-ALL, increasing studies have been conducted on CAR-T cells for R/R ALL. Herein, we report the treatment of a patient with ALL who relapsed after allogeneic HSCT, had a complete remission (CR) to murine scFv CD19 CAR-T but relapsed 15 months later. Partial response was achieved after humanized CD19 CAR-T treatment, and the patient finally achieved disease-free survival after sequential CD22 CAR-T treatment. By comparing the treatment results of different CAR-T cells in the same patient, this case suggests that multiple CAR-T therapies are effective and safe in intramedullary and extramedullary recurrence in the same patient, and the expansion of CAR-T cells and the release of inflammatory cytokines are positively correlated with their efficacy. However, further clinical studies with large sample sizes are still needed for further clarification.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells in combination with ibrutinib for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who achieve a complete remission (CR) to anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-19), remissions are remarkably durable. Preclinical data suggesting synergy between CART-19 and the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib prompted us to conduct a prospective single-center phase 2 trial in which we added autologous anti-CD19 humanized binding domain T cells (huCART-19) to ibrutinib in patients with CLL not in CR despite ≥6 months of ibrutinib. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility, and achievement of a CR within 3 months. Of 20 enrolled patients, 19 received huCART-19. The median follow-up for all infused patients was 41 months (range, 0.25-58 months). Eighteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; grade 1-2 in 15 of 18 subjects), and 5 developed neurotoxicity (grade 1-2 in 4 patients, grade 4 in 1 patient). While the 3-month CR rate among International Working Group on CLL (iwCLL)-evaluable patients was 44% (90% confidence interval [CI], 23-67%), at 12 months, 72% of patients tested had no measurable residual disease (MRD). The estimated overall and progression-free survival at 48 months were 84% and 70%, respectively. Of 15 patients with undetectable MRD at 3 or 6 months, 13 remain in ongoing CR at the last follow-up. In patients with CLL not achieving a CR despite ≥6 months of ibrutinib, adding huCART-19 mediated a high rate of deep and durable remissions. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02640209.

Loop CD20/CD19 CAR-T cells eradicate B-cell malignancies efficiently

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown robust efficacy in relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R ALL), but compromising result in chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). CD19 relapse and the lack of CAR-T cell persistence which result in treatment failure are considerable obstacles to overcome. CAR-T targeting CD20 is an option for salvaging CD19 CAR-T failure. Previous studies have established variant structures of bispecific CAR-T which could avoid antigen-loss and immune escape. Here, we constructed tandem and loop CAR structures targeting both CD19 and CD20 antigen. Bispecific CAR-T cells could eliminate either CD19 or CD20 negative lymphoma cells, suggesting they exhibited dual antigen targeting of CD19 and CD20. By comparing the efficiency of four bispecific CAR modified T cells, it was found that loop2019 CAR was the best structure among them to eradicate lymphoma cell lines and patients' primary lymphoma or CLL cells in a very low dose in vitro and prolong the survival time dramatically in lymphoma xenograft mice model. These data highlighted the potential of loop2019 CAR-T in clinical treatment.

The Evolution of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is a revolutionary treatment for pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients (AYA) with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. While the landscape of immunotherapy continues to rapidly evolve, widespread use of CAR T therapy is limited and many questions remain regarding the durability of CAR T therapy, methods to avoid CAR T therapy resistance and the role of consolidative stem cell transplant. Modified strategies to develop effective and persistent CAR T cells at lower costs and decreased toxicities are warranted. In this review we present current indications, limitations and future directions of CAR T therapy for ALL in the pediatric and AYA population.

Cancer cell membrane-wrapped nanoparticles for cancer immunotherapy: A review of current developments

Background

As the forefront of nanomedicine, bionic nanotechnology has been widely used for drug delivery in order to obtain better efficacy but less toxicity for cancer treatments. With the rise of immunotherapy, the combination of nanotechnology and immunotherapy will play a greater potential of anti-tumor therapy. Due to its advantage of homologous targeting and antigen library from source cells, cancer cell membrane (CCM)-wrapped nanoparticles (CCNPs) has become an emerging topic in the field of immunotherapy.

Key scientific concepts of review

CCNP strategies include targeting or modulating the tumor immune microenvironment and combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines. This review summarizes the current developments in CCNPs for cancer immunotherapy and provides insight into the challenges of transferring this technology from the laboratory to the clinic as well as the potential future of this technology.

Conclusion

This review described CCNPs have enormous potential in cancer immunotherapy, but there are still challenges in terms of translating their effects in vitro to the clinical setting. We believe that these challenges can be addressed in the future with a focus on individualized treatment with CCNPs as well as CCNPs combined with other effective treatments.

CD19/22 CAR T cells in children and young adults with B-ALL: phase 1 results and development of a novel bicistronic CAR

Remission durability following single-antigen targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells is limited by antigen modulation, which may be overcome with combinatorial targeting. Building upon our experiences targeting CD19 and CD22 in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), we report on our phase 1 dose-escalation study of a novel murine stem cell virus (MSCV)-CD19/CD22-4-1BB bivalent CAR T-cell (CD19.22.BBζ) for children and young adults (CAYA) with B-cell malignancies. Primary objectives included toxicity and dose finding. Secondary objectives included response rates and relapse-free survival (RFS). Biologic correlatives included laboratory investigations, CAR T-cell expansion and cytokine profiling. Twenty patients, ages 5.4 to 34.6 years, with B-ALL received CD19.22.BBζ. The complete response (CR) rate was 60% (12 of 20) in the full cohort and 71.4% (10 of 14) in CAR-naïve patients. Ten (50%) developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with 3 (15%) having ≥ grade 3 CRS and only 1 experiencing neurotoxicity (grade 3). The 6- and 12-month RFS in those achieving CR was 80.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.4%-94.9%) and 57.7% (95% CI: 22.1%-81.9%), respectively. Limited CAR T-cell expansion and persistence of MSCV-CD19.22.BBζ compared with EF1α-CD22.BBζ prompted laboratory investigations comparing EF1α vs MSCV promoters, which did not reveal major differences. Limited CD22 targeting with CD19.22.BBζ, as evaluated by ex vivo cytokine secretion and leukemia eradication in humanized mice, led to development of a novel bicistronic CD19.28ζ/CD22.BBζ construct with enhanced cytokine production against CD22. With demonstrated safety and efficacy of CD19.22.BBζ in a heavily pretreated CAYA B-ALL cohort, further optimization of combinatorial antigen targeting serves to overcome identified limitations (www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03448393).

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy: Current Status and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has transformed the treatment paradigm for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with complete remission rates in key pivotal CD19-CART trials ranging from 65% to 90%. Alongside this new therapy, new toxicity profiles and treatment limitations have emerged, necessitating toxicity consensus grading systems, cooperative group trials, and novel management approaches. This review highlights the results of key clinical trials of CART for pediatric hematologic malignancies, discusses the most common toxicities seen to date, and elucidates challenges, opportunities, and areas of active research to optimize this therapy.

Statistical considerations for analyses of time-to-event endpoints in oncology clinical trials: Illustrations with CAR-T immunotherapy studies

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology and has received a lot of interest in recent years. Many time-to-event (TTE) endpoints related to relapse, disease progression, and remission are analyzed in CAR-T studies to assess treatment efficacy. Definitions of these TTE endpoints are not always consistent, even for the same outcomes (e.g., progression-free survival), which often stems from analysis choices regarding which events to consider as part of the composite endpoint, censoring or competing risk in the analysis. Subsequent therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are common but are not treated the same in different studies. Standard survival analysis methods are commonly applied to TTE analyses but often without full consideration of the assumptions inherent in the chosen analysis. We highlight two important issues of TTE analysis that arise in CAR-T studies, as well as in other settings in oncology: the handling of competing risks and assessing the association between a time-varying (post-infusion) exposure and the TTE outcome. We review existing analytical methods, including the cumulative incidence function and regression models for analysis of competing risks, and landmark and time-varying covariate analysis for analysis of post-infusion exposures. We clarify the scientific questions that the different analytical approaches address and illustrate how the application of an inappropriate method could lead to different results using data from multiple published CAR-T studies. Codes for implementing these methods in standard statistical software are provided.

Improved anti-solid tumor response by humanized anti-podoplanin chimeric antigen receptor transduced human cytotoxic T cells in an animal model

Recently, research has been conducted with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells to improve efficacy against solid tumors. Humanized CAR improved the long-term survival of CAR-T cells in patients' peripheral blood, resulting in increased therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, the humanization of the CAR-gene sequence is considered an effective method. Podoplanin (PDPN) is a glycosylated transmembrane protein that is highly expressed in solid tumors and is associated with poor prognosis in patients with cancer. Therefore, PDPN is considered a biomarker and good target for cancer treatment with CAR-T cells. Previously, an anti-PDPN CAR was generated from a conventional non-humanized antibody-NZ-1, the only anti-PDPN antibody for which a CAR was produced. In this study, we investigated other anti-PDPN CARs from the antibody NZ-27, or humanized NZ-1, to enhance the therapeutic potential of CAR-T cells. The CAR signal intensity was enhanced by the efficient expression of CAR proteins on the T-cell surface of NZ-27 CAR-T cells, which show tumor-specific cytotoxicity, proinflammatory cytokine production, and anti-tumor activity against PDPN-expressing tumor xenografts in mice that were significantly better than those in non-humanized NZ-1 CAR-T cells. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies: Current Opportunities and Challenges

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy represents a major breakthrough in cancer treatment, and it has achieved unprecedented success in hematological malignancies, especially in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. At present, CD19 and BCMA are the most common targets in CAR-T cell therapy, and numerous novel therapeutic targets are being explored. However, the adverse events related to CAR-T cell therapy might be serious or even life-threatening, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), CAR-T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), infections, cytopenia, and CRS-related coagulopathy. In addition, due to antigen escape, the limited CAR-T cell persistence, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, a considerable proportion of patients relapse after CAR-T cell therapy. Thus, in this review, we focus on the progress and challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies, such as attractive therapeutic targets, CAR-T related toxicities, and resistance to CAR-T cell therapy, and provide some practical recommendations.

Efficacy and safety of CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Although allo-HSCT can be curative for some B-ALL patients, relapse still occurs in some patients following allo-HSCT. Conventional chemotherapies show poor efficacy in B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT. In the past decade, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown to be efficacious for B-ALL patients. In particular, autologous CD19 CAR-T therapy results in a high remission rate. However, there are challenges in the use of CD19 CAR-T therapy for B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT, including the selection of CAR-T cell source for manufacturing, post-CAR-T graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risk, maintenance of long-term efficacy after remission through CAR-T therapy, and whether a consolidative second transplant is needed. In this review, we describe the current status of CAR-T therapy for B-ALL patients who have relapsed following allo-HSCT, the advantages and disadvantages of various CAR-T cell sources, the characteristics and management of GVHD following CAR-T therapy, and the risk factors that may affect long-term efficacy.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of CD19 Humanized Selective CAR-T Therapy in B-ALL Patients Who Have Previously Received Murine-Based CD19 CAR-T Therapy

Murine-based CD19 CAR-T (CD19m CAR-T) therapy can lead to a relatively high CR rate when administered to B-ALL patients for the first time. However, the DOR is sub-optimal and a subset of patients even show primary resistance to CD19m CAR-T. To address these issues, we employed a humanized selective CD19CAR-T (CD19hs CAR-T) and evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of treating 8 R/R B-ALL patients who had relapsed or failed to achieve CR following CD19m CAR-T infusion (Clinical trials’ number: ChiCTR1800014761 and ChiCTR1800017439). Of the 8 patients, 7 achieved CR on Day 30 after the 1^st infusion of CD19hs CAR-T. The median CRS grade was 1 without significant neurotoxicity seen in any of the 8 patients. The median DOR was 11 months, significantly longer than the DOR following CD19mCAR-T infusions. Anti-CAR antibodies were induced in patients who had received prior CD19m CAR-T infusions but not in those following a single or repeated CD19hsCAR-T treatment, which probably had contributed to the sub-optimal DOR and/or failure of effective response in these patients. CD19hs CAR-T, in contrast, induced low immunogenicity compared with CD19m CAR-T, suggesting that a repeat dosing strategy might be feasible and efficacious for patients who have relapsed and/or show primary resistance to CD19m CAR-T therapy. In this clinical study, CD19hs CAR-T showed a significant clinical efficacy with mild side effect among patients with R/R B-ALL who had previously received CD19m CAR-T.

CAR-T cells for cancer immunotherapy-the barriers ahead and the paths through

This review discusses the major concerns and changes emerged during the rapidly extended clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy based on our experience and understanding. In the past decades, the CAR-T cells have been questioned, sequentially, about their capability of inducing initial remission, their safety profile, their ability to sustain long-term persistence and response, and their potential to be industrialized. Significant advances, novel targeting strategies, innovative molecular structure, fine tuning of both CAR-T and host immune system, combination with other therapies, streamlined manufacturing, and etc., have been made to overcome these challenges. Although not perfectly resolved, rational pathways have been proposed to pass through the barriers. Here, we present the recent achievements on these pathways, and look into the possible future directions.

Immunogenicity of CAR-T Cell Therapeutics: Evidence, Mechanism and Mitigation

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy demonstrated remarkable success in long-term remission of cancers and other autoimmune diseases. Currently, six products (Kymriah, Yescarta, Tecartus, Breyanzi, Abecma, and Carvykti) are approved by the US-FDA for treatment of a few hematological malignancies. All the six products are autologous CAR-T cell therapies, where delivery of CAR, which comprises of scFv (single-chain variable fragment) derived from monoclonal antibodies for tumor target antigen recognition is through a lentiviral vector. Although available CAR-T therapies yielded impressive response rates in a large number of patients in comparison to conventional treatment strategies, there are potential challenges in the field which limit their efficacy. One of the major challenges is the induction of humoral and/or cellular immune response in patients elicited due to scFv domain of CAR construct, which is of non-human origin in majority of the commercially available products. Generation of anti-CAR antibodies may lead to the clearance of the therapeutic CAR-T cells, increasing the likelihood of tumor relapse and lower the CAR-T cells efficacy upon reinfusion. These immune responses influence CAR-T cell expansion and persistence, that might affect the overall clinical response. In this review, we will discuss the impact of immunogenicity of the CAR transgene on treatment outcomes. Finally, this review will highlight the mitigation strategies to limit the immunogenic potential of CARs and improve the therapeutic outcome.

Approval of brexucabtagene autoleucel for adults with relapsed and refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia

In October 2021, brexucabtagene autoleucel became the first anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell product to receive approval from the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adults with relapsed and refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL). The approval is based on results from the Zuma-3 trial and significantly widens treatment options for this patient population. In this article we will review outcomes from this study and its implications.

Efficacy of second CAR-T (CART2) infusion limited by poor CART expansion and antigen modulation

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) are active in relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but relapse remains a substantial challenge. Reinfusion with the same CART product (CART2) in patients with suboptimal response or antigen positive relapse following first infusion (CART1) represents a potential treatment strategy, though early experiences suggest limited efficacy of CART2 with CD19 targeting. We report on our experience with CART2 across a host of novel CAR T-cell trials. This was a retrospective review of children and young adults with B-ALL who received reinfusion with an anti-CD19, anti-CD22, or anti-CD19/22 CART construct on one of 3 CAR T-cells trials at the National Cancer Institute (NCT01593696, NCT02315612, NCT0344839) between July 2012 and January 2021. All patients received lymphodepletion (LD) pre-CART (standard LD: 75 mg/m² fludarabine, 900 mg/m² cyclophosphamide; or intensified LD: 120 mg/m² fludarabine, 1200 mg/m² cyclophosphamide). Primary objectives were to describe response to and toxicity of CART2. Indication for CART2, impact of LD intensity, and CAR T-cell expansion and leukemia antigen expression between CART infusions was additionally evaluated. Eighteen patients proceeded to CART2 due to persistent (n=7) or relapsed antigen positive disease (n=11) following CART1. Seven of 18 (38.9%) demonstrated objective response (responders) to CART2: 5 achieved a minimal residual disease (MRD) negative CR, 1 had persistent MRD level disease, and 1 showed a partial remission, the latter with eradication of antigen positive disease and emergence of antigen negative B-ALL. Responders included four patients who had not achieved a CR with CART1. Limited cytokine release syndrome was seen following CART2. Peripheral blood CART1 expansion was higher than CART2 expansion (p=0.03). Emergence of antigen negative/dim B-ALL in 6 (33.3%) patients following CART2 contributed to lack of CR. Five of seven (71.4%) responders received intensified LD pre-CART2, which corresponded with higher CART2 expansion than in those receiving standard LD (p=0.029). Diminished CAR T-cell expansion and antigen downregulation/loss impeded robust responses to CART2. A subset of patients, however, may derive benefit from CART2 despite suboptimal response to CART1. Intensified LD may be one strategy to augment CART2 responses, though further study of factors associated with CART2 response, including serial monitoring of antigen expression, is warranted.

Nanobody-based CAR-T cells for cancer immunotherapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is the result of combining genetic engineering-based cancer immunotherapy with adoptive cell therapy (ACT). CAR-T therapy has been successful in treating various types of hematological cancers. CARs are receptors made of an extracellular domain, a membrane-spanning domain, and an intracellular domain. The extracellular domain of CARs harbors an antigen-targeting domain responsible for recognizing and binding cell surface-expressed target antigens. Conventionally, the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) is used as the antigen-targeting domain of CARs. However, of late, researchers have exploited nanobodies for this aim based on numerous rationales including the small size of nanobodies, their stability, specificity, and high affinity, and their easy and feasible development process. Many findings have confirmed that nanobody-based CAR-Ts can be as functional as scFv-based CAR-Ts in preclinical and clinical settings. In this review, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of scFvs and nanobodies in regards to their application as the targeting domain of CARs. Ultimately, we discuss various CAR target antigens which have been targeted using nanobody-based CAR-T cells for the treatment of different types of malignancies.

Progress on CAR-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment for hematological malignancies, which have experienced the development of CD19 CAR-T cells for B lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma, B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T cells for multiple myeloid, and more recently, the development of CD7 CAR-T cells for T cell malignancies. There are more obstacles for myeloid malignancies compared to other hematological malignancies in this field, thus concerning researches are in more diverse ways. In order to obtain more effective clinical CAR-T cells with lower side effects, scientists have developed multi-target CAR-T cells, universal CAR-T cells, as well as CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, CAR-iMac cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) by genetic engineering. Chinese scientists have made significant contribution to the invention and manufacture of origin CAR-T cells and the establishment of an intact clinical research system. This review introduces the latest progress involving CAR-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies including B lymphoblastic malignancies, T lymphoblastic malignancies and myeloid malignancies, and also discuss the future developments including multi-target, universal and iPSC-derived CAR-related cell therapy.

Humanized CD19 CAR-T cells in relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients who relapsed after or failed murine CD19 CAR-T therapy

BACKGROUND

For CD19-positive relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL) after treatment with murine CD19 (mCD19) CAR-T, the reinfusion of mCD19 CAR-T cells may be ineffective due to anti-mouse single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody caused by mCD19 CAR. To overcome this immunogenicity, we applied humanized CD19 (hCD19) CAR-T cells to treat r/r B-ALL patients with prior mCD19 CAR-T therapy.

METHODS

Nineteen pediatric and adult patients were included, 16 relapsed after and 3 were primarily resistant to mCD19 CAR-T. All patients presented with more than 5% blasts in bone marrow and/or extramedullary disease, and still showed CD19 antigen expression. Humanized CD19-CARs were lentiviral vectors carrying a second generation CAR with 4-1-BB co-stimulatory and CD3ζ signaling domains. Patient-derived cells were collected for producing CAR-T cells, the median dose of infused hCD19 CAR-T cells was 2.4 × 10⁵/kg (range, 1.0-18.0 × 10⁵/kg).

RESULTS

hCD19 CAR-T resulted in a complete remission (CR) rate of 68% (13/19). Among 13 remission patients, 11 underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) (3 were second HCT) and 10 remained in CR; the event-free survival rates at 12-18 months were 91% in 11 patients received following allo-HCT and 69% in all CR patients. Six cases had no response to hCD19 CAR-T, 3 died of disease progression; another 3 received salvage second transplantation, of them, 2 relapsed again (one died). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 95% (18/19) of patients, most CRS events were grade 1 and grade 2 (n = 17), there was only one grade 4 CRS. Two cases experienced grade 1 neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Humanized CD19 CAR-T cell therapy could be a treatment option for CD19-positive B-ALL patients who relapsed after or resisted prior murine CD19 CAR-T, hCD19 CAR-T followed by allo-HCT provided a longer remission in CR patients. Nevertheless, the prognosis of non-responders to hCD19 CAR-T remained dismal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry/WHO International Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR1900024456 , URL: www.chictr.org.cn ); registered on July 12, 2019.

Impact of high-risk cytogenetics on outcomes for children and young adults receiving CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce durable remissions of relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, case reports suggested differential outcomes mediated by leukemia cytogenetics. We identified children and young adults with relapsed/refractory CD19+ ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma treated on 5 CD19-directed CAR T-cell (CTL019 or humanized CART19) clinical trials or with commercial tisagenlecleucel from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were hierarchically categorized according to leukemia cytogenetics: High-risk lesions were defined as KMT2A (MLL) rearrangements, Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+), Ph-like, hypodiploidy, or TCF3/HLF; favorable as hyperdiploidy or ETV6/RUNX1; and intermediate as iAMP21, IKZF1 deletion, or TCF3/PBX1. Of 231 patients aged 1 to 29, 74 (32%) were categorized as high risk, 28 (12%) as intermediate, 43 (19%) as favorable, and 86 (37%) as uninformative. Overall complete remission rate was 94%, with no difference between strata. There was no difference in relapse-free survival (RFS; P = .8112), with 2-year RFS for the high-risk group of 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52-77). There was similarly no difference seen in overall survival (OS) (P = .5488), with 2-year OS for the high-risk group of 70% (95% CI, 60-82). For patients with KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL (n = 13), 2-year RFS was 67% (95% CI, 45-99), and OS was 62% (95% CI, 40-95), with multivariable analysis demonstrating no increased risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.21-2.90; P = .7040) but a higher proportion of relapses associated with myeloid lineage switch and a 3.6-fold increased risk of all-cause death (95% CI, 1.04-12.75; P = .0434). CTL019/huCART19/tisagenlecleucel are effective at achieving durable remissions across cytogenetic categories. Relapsed/refractory patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including KMT2A-rearranged infant ALL, demonstrated high RFS and OS probabilities at 2 years.

The landscape of receptor-mediated precision cancer combination therapy via a single-cell perspective

Mining a large cohort of single-cell transcriptomics data, here we employ combinatorial optimization techniques to chart the landscape of optimal combination therapies in cancer. We assume that each individual therapy can target any one of 1269 genes encoding cell surface receptors, which may be targets of CAR-T, conjugated antibodies or coated nanoparticle therapies. We find that in most cancer types, personalized combinations composed of at most four targets are then sufficient for killing at least 80% of tumor cells while sparing at least 90% of nontumor cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, as more stringent and selective killing is required, the number of targets needed rises rapidly. Emerging individual targets include PTPRZ1 for brain and head and neck cancers and EGFR in multiple tumor types. In sum, this study provides a computational estimate of the identity and number of targets needed in combination to target cancers selectively and precisely.

Preparing for CAR T cell therapy: patient selection, bridging therapies and lymphodepletion

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have emerged as a potent therapeutic approach for patients with certain haematological cancers, with multiple CAR T cell products currently approved by the FDA for those with relapsed and/or refractory B cell malignancies. However, in order to derive the desired level of effectiveness, patients need to successfully receive the CAR T cell infusion in a timely fashion. This process entails apheresis of the patient's T cells, followed by CAR T cell manufacture. While awaiting infusion at an authorized treatment centre, patients may receive interim disease-directed therapy. Most patients will also receive a course of pre-CAR T cell lymphodepletion, which has emerged as an important factor in enabling durable responses. The time between apheresis and CAR T cell infusion is often not a simple journey, with each milestone being a critical step that can have important downstream consequences for the ability to receive the infusion and the strength of clinical responses. In this Review, we provide a summary of the many considerations for preparing patients with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia for CAR T cell therapy, and outline current limitations and areas for future research.

Impact of High Disease Burden on Survival in Pediatric Patients with B-ALL Treated with Tisagenlecleucel

CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, including the FDA-approved tisagenlecleucel, induce high rates of remission in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, post-treatment relapse remains an issue. Optimal management of B-ALL after tisagenlecleucel treatment remains elusive, and continued tracking of outcomes is necessary to establish a standard of care for this population. We sought to evaluate outcomes on the real-world use of tisagenlecleucel in a contemporary pediatric patient population and to identify risk factors influencing event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, we aimed to describe post-tisagenlecleucel management strategies, including use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AlloHCT) or repeat CAR T-cell infusions. We report on 31 pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients (AYA) with B-ALL, treated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by tisagenlecleucel. Patients were treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital and St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between March 2018 and November 2020. Data on patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively from medical records and described. EFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Single-factor and multiple-factor analysis of EFS and OS were performed by fitting Cox regression models. Of the 30 evaluable patients, 25 (83.3%) experienced a complete response, with 21 having negative minimal residual disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with expected rates of cytokine release syndrome (61.3%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (29%). After initial complete response, 12 patients (48%) had subsequent disease recurrence, with CD19-negative relapse (n = 6) occurring sooner than CD19-positive relapse (P = .0125). With a median follow-up time of 386 days (range 11-1187 days), the EFS for the entire cohort (n = 31) at 6 and 12 months after infusion was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4%-63.4%) and 35.2% (95% CI, 18.4%-52.5%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, high pretreatment leukemic burden (≥5% bone marrow blasts) was an independent risk factor for inferior EFS (HR 5.98 [95% CI, 1.1-32.4], P = .0380) and OS (HR 4.2 [95% CI, 1.33-13.39], P = .0148). Tisagenlecleucel induced high initial response rates in a contemporary cohort of pediatric and AYA patients with B-ALL. However, 48% of patients experienced subsequent disease relapse, including 6 with antigen-escape variants. This highlights a considerable limitation of single-agent autologous CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. Pretreatment leukemic disease burden of ≥5% blasts was significantly associated with worse outcomes in this study, including lower EFS and OS. Our findings suggest that reducing preinfusion leukemic burden is a viable treatment strategy to improve outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy.

Tisagenlecleucel outcomes in relapsed/refractory extramedullary ALL: a Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium Report

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have transformed the therapeutic options for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Data for CAR therapy in extramedullary (EM) involvement are limited. Retrospective data were abstracted from the Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium (PRWCC) of 184 infused patients from 15 US institutions. Response (complete response) rate, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and duration of B-cell aplasia (BCA) in patients referred for tisagenlecleucel with EM disease (both central nervous system (CNS)3 and non-CNS EM) were compared with bone marrow (BM) only. Patients with CNS disease were further stratified for comparison. Outcomes are reported on 55 patients with EM disease before CAR therapy (CNS3, n = 40; non-CNS EM, n = 15). The median age at infusion in the CNS cohort was 10 years (range, <1-25 years), and in the non-CNS EM cohort it was 13 years (range, 2-26 years). In patients with CNS disease, 88% (35 of 40) achieved a complete response vs only 66% (10 of 15) with non-CNS EM disease. Patients with CNS disease (both with and without BM involvement) had 24-month OS outcomes comparable to those of non-CNS EM or BM only (P = .41). There was no difference in 12-month RFS between CNS, non-CNS EM, or BM-only patients (P = .92). No increased toxicity was seen with CNS or non-CNS EM disease (P = .3). Active CNS disease at time of infusion did not affect outcomes. Isolated CNS disease trended toward improved OS compared with combined CNS and BM (P = .12). R/R EM disease can be effectively treated with tisagenlecleucel; toxicity, relapse, and survival rates are comparable to those of patients with BM-only disease. Outcomes for isolated CNS relapse are encouraging.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Paediatric B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Curative Treatment Option or Bridge to Transplant?

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) targeting CD19 has been associated with remarkable responses in paediatric patients and adolescents and young adults (AYA) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL). Tisagenlecleucel, the first approved CD19 CAR-T, has become a viable treatment option for paediatric patients and AYAs with BCP-ALL relapsing repeatedly or after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Based on the chimeric antigen receptor molecular design and the presence of a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, tisagenlecleucel can persist for a long time and thereby provide sustained leukaemia control. "Real-world" experience with tisagenlecleucel confirms the safety and efficacy profile observed in the pivotal registration trial. Recent guidelines for the recognition, management and prevention of the two most common adverse events related to CAR-T - cytokine release syndrome and immune-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome - have helped to further decrease treatment toxicity. Consequently, the questions of how and for whom CD19 CAR-T could substitute HSCT in BCP-ALL are inevitable. Currently, 40-50% of R/R BCP-ALL patients relapse post CD19 CAR-T with either CD19- or CD19+ disease, and consolidative HSCT has been proposed to avoid disease recurrence. Contrarily, CD19 CAR-T is currently being investigated in the upfront treatment of high-risk BCP-ALL with an aim to avoid allogeneic HSCT and associated treatment-related morbidity, mortality and late effects. To improve survival and decrease long-term side effects in children with BCP-ALL, it is important to define parameters predicting the success or failure of CAR-T, allowing the careful selection of candidates in need of HSCT consolidation. In this review, we describe the current clinical evidence on CAR-T in BCP-ALL and discuss factors associated with response to or failure of this therapy: product specifications, patient- and disease-related factors and the impact of additional therapies given before (e.g., blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin) or after infusion (e.g., CAR-T re-infusion and/or checkpoint inhibition). We discuss where to position CAR-T in the treatment of BCP-ALL and present considerations for the design of supportive trials for the different phases of disease. Finally, we elaborate on clinical settings in which CAR-T might indeed replace HSCT.

Novel Treatments for Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Acute B-Cell Lineage Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Precision Medicine Era

With the markedly increased cure rate for children with newly diagnosed pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), relapse and refractory B-ALL (R/R B-ALL) remain the primary cause of death worldwide due to the limitations of multidrug chemotherapy. As we now have a more profound understanding of R/R ALL, including the mechanism of recurrence and drug resistance, prognostic indicators, genotypic changes and so on, we can use newly emerging technologies to identify operational molecular targets and find sensitive drugs for individualized treatment. In addition, more promising and innovative immunotherapies and molecular targeted drugs that are expected to kill leukemic cells more effectively while maintaining low toxicity to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and better bridge hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have also been widely developed. To date, the prognosis of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL has been enhanced markedly thanks to the development of novel drugs. This article reviews the new advancements of several promising strategies for pediatric R/R B-ALL.

Critical care management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a promising immunotherapeutic treatment concept that is changing the treatment approach to hematologic malignancies. The development of CAR T-cell therapy represents a prime example for the successful bench-to-bedside translation of advances in immunology and cellular therapy into clinical practice. The currently available CAR T-cell products have shown high response rates and long-term remissions in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and relapsed/refractory lymphoma. However, CAR T-cell therapy can induce severe life-threatening toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or infection, which require rapid and aggressive medical treatment in the intensive care unit setting. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in the clinical management of severe life-threatening events in CAR T-cell recipients. Furthermore, key challenges that have to be overcome to maximize the safety of CAR T cells are discussed.

Imagining the cell therapist: Future CAR T cell monitoring and intervention strategies to improve patient outcomes

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is now approved for the standard of care treatment of several types of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Future advances may extend cellular therapies to solid tumors or even non-malignant diseases. As patient need grows, a clinical specialty of "cell therapy" may emerge. Here, we envision the needs of a clinical cell therapist to monitor and intervene upon patients receiving cell therapies. These include: (1) monitoring patient T cell quality and the host immune environment to ensure optimal timing for cell therapy. (2) Tumor antigen profiling to personalize CAR T cell targeting. (3) Real-time monitoring of CAR T cells and circulating tumor DNA to modulate CAR T cell activity to maximize tumor eradication while mitigating toxicity. (4) Monitoring of CAR rejection and anti-CAR immunity posttreatment to inform re-dosing and subsequent cell therapy strategies. Armed with these tools, the future Cell Therapist may optimize and personalize treatment to avoid toxicity and improve efficacy universally across CAR designs.

Relapsed ALL: CAR T vs transplant vs novel therapies

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy targeting CD19 (CART19) has expanded the treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The approval of tisagenlecleucel for pediatric and young adult patients with r/r ALL has allowed broader access for some patients, but the treatment of older adults is available (at the time of this writing) only within a clinical trial. High remission rates have been consistently observed with varied CART19 products and treatment platforms, but durability of remissions and thus the potential role of a consolidative allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) is more uncertain and likely to vary by product and population treated. The immunologic characteristics of CARTs that confer high response rates also account for the life-threatening toxicities of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, the severity of which also varies by patient and disease characteristics and product. Further considerations informing a decision to treat include feasibility of leukapheresis and timeline of manufacture, alternative treatment options available, and the appropriateness of a potential consolidative allogeneic SCT. Advances in the field are under way to improve rate and duration of responses and to mitigate toxicity.

Paediatric Strategy Forum for medicinal product development of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in children and adolescents with cancer: ACCELERATE in collaboration with the European Medicines Agency with participation of the Food and Drug Administration

The seventh multi-stakeholder Paediatric Strategy Forum focused on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells for children and adolescents with cancer. The development of CAR T-cells for patients with haematological malignancies, especially B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL), has been spectacular. However, currently, there are scientific, clinical and logistical challenges for use of CAR T-cells in BCP-ALL and other paediatric malignancies, particularly in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), lymphomas and solid tumours. The aims of the Forum were to summarise the current landscape of CAR T-cell therapy development in paediatrics, too identify current challenges and future directions, with consideration of other immune effector modalities and ascertain the best strategies to accelerate their development and availability to children. Although the effect is of limited duration in about half of the patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cells produce high response rates in relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL and this has highlighted previously unknown mechanisms of relapse. CAR T-cell treatment as first- or second-line therapy could also potentially benefit patients whose disease has high-risk features associated with relapse and failure of conventional therapies. Identifying patients with very early and early relapse in whom CAR T-cell therapy may replace haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and be definitive therapy versus those in whom it provides a more effective bridge to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a very high priority. Development of approaches to improve persistence, either by improving T cell fitness or using more humanised/fully humanised products and co-targeting of multiple antigens to prevent antigen escape, could potentially further optimise therapy. Many differences exist between paediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) and BCP-ALL. In view of the very small patient numbers with relapsed lymphoma, careful prioritisation is needed to evaluate CAR T-cells in children with Burkitt lymphoma, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma and other NHL subtypes. Combination trials of alternative targets to CD19 (CD20 or CD22) should also be explored as a priority to improve efficacy in this population. Development of CD30 CAR T-cell immunotherapy strategies in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma will likely be most efficiently accomplished by joint paediatric and adult trials. CAR T-cell approaches are early in development for AML and T-ALL, given the unique challenges of successful immunotherapy actualisation in these diseases. At this time, CD33 and CD123 appear to be the most universal targets in AML and CD7 in T-ALL. The results of ongoing or planned first-in-human studies are required to facilitate further understanding. There are promising early results in solid tumours, particularly with GD2 targeting cell therapies in neuroblastoma and central nervous system gliomas that represent significant unmet clinical needs. Further understanding of biology is critical to success. The comparative benefits of autologous versus allogeneic CAR T-cells, T-cells engineered with T cell receptors T-cells engineered with T cell receptor fusion constructs, CAR Natural Killer (NK)-cell products, bispecific T-cell engager antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates require evaluation in paediatric malignancies. Early and proactive academia and multi-company engagement are mandatory to advance cellular immunotherapies in paediatric oncology. Regulatory advice should be sought very early in the design and preparation of clinical trials of innovative medicines, for which regulatory approval may ultimately be sought. Aligning strategic, scientific, regulatory, health technology and funding requirements from the inception of a clinical trial is especially important as these are very expensive therapies. The model for drug development for cell therapy in paediatric oncology could also involve a 'later stage handoff' to industry after early development in academic hands. Finally, and very importantly, strategies must evolve to ensure appropriate ease of access for children who need and could potentially benefit from these therapies.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy followed by Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Young Adults: Superior Survival but Relatively High Post-Transplantation Relapse

Several studies have indicated that chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is beneficial for treating patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Whether consolidative unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is suitable in R/R B-ALL after CAR-T therapy remain uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy before UCBT in children and young adults with R/R B-ALL. We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients aged <18 years with R/R B-ALL who underwent single-unit UCBT at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between February 2012 and November 2020. Among them, 21 patients achieved complete remission (CR) following CAR-T therapy before UCBT (the CAR-T group), and the remaining 22 patients remained in nonremission (NR) without prior CAR-T therapy before UCBT (the NR group). The clinical outcomes in the 2 groups were analyzed. The median time from CAR-T therapy to UCBT was 62 days (range, 42 to 185 days). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grade III-IV acute GVHD, and 2-year extensive chronic GVHD. Compared with the NR group, the CAR-T group had a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of transplantation-related mortality and higher probabilities of 2-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (P = .037, .005, .028, and .017, respectively). However, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was comparably high in the 2 groups (26.7% in the CAR-T group and 38.3% in the NR group; P = .41). In the CAR-T group, patients who were minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive before UCBT had a higher CIR compared with those who were MRD-negative before UCBT (66.7% versus 19.2%; P = .006). CAR-T therapy followed by UCBT produces superior survival in R/R B-ALL, but treated patients still have a high post-transplantation relapse rate.

Mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CAR T-cell therapy and associated prevention and management strategies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has yielded impressive outcomes and transformed treatment algorithms for hematological malignancies. To date, five CAR T-cell products have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, some significant toxicities pose great challenges to the development of CAR T-cell therapy, most notably cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Understanding the mechanisms underlying these toxicities and establishing prevention and treatment strategies are important. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms underlying CRS and ICANS and provide potential treatment and prevention strategies.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for CNS relapsed or refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five clinical trials

BACKGROUND

CNS relapse of acute lymphocytic leukaemia is difficult to treat. Durable remissions of relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia have been observed following treatment with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells; however, most trials have excluded patients with active CNS disease. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with a history of CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

METHODS

In this post-hoc analysis, we included 195 patients (aged 1-29 years; 110 [56%] male and 85 [44%] female) with relapsed or refractory CD19-positive acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma from five clinical trials (Pedi CART19, 13BT022, ENSIGN, ELIANA, and 16CT022) done at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA), in which participants received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy between April 17, 2012, and April 16, 2019. The trials required control of CNS disease at enrolment and infusion and excluded treatment in the setting of acute neurological toxic effects (>grade 1 in severity) or parenchymal lesions deemed to increase the risk of neurotoxicity. 154 patients from Pedi CART19, ELIANA, ENSIGN, and 16CT022 received tisagenlecleucel and 41 patients from the 13BT022 trial received the humanised CD19-directed CAR, huCART19. We categorised patients into two strata on the basis of CNS status at relapse or within the 12 months preceding CAR T-cell infusion-either CNS-positive or CNS-negative disease. Patients with CNS-positive disease were further divided on the basis of morphological bone marrow involvement-either combined bone marrow and CNS involvement, or isolated CNS involvement. Endpoints were the proportion of patients with complete response at 28 days after infusion, Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival and overall survival, and the incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.

FINDINGS

Of all 195 patients, 66 (34%) were categorised as having CNS-positive disease and 129 (66%) as having CNS-negative disease, and 43 (22%) were categorised as having isolated CNS involvement. The median length of follow-up was 39 months (IQR 25-49) in the CNS-positive stratum and 36 months (18-49) in the CNS-negative stratum. The proportion of patients in the CNS-positive stratum with a complete response at 28 days after infusion was similar to that in the CNS-negative stratum (64 [97%] of 66 vs 121 [94%] of 129; p=0·74), with no significant difference in relapse-free survival (60% [95% CI 49-74] vs 60% [51-71]; p=0·50) or overall survival (83% [75-93] vs 71% [64-79]; p=0·39) at 2 years between the two groups. Overall survival at 2 years was significantly higher in patients with isolated CNS involvement compared with those with bone marrow involvement (91% [82-100] vs 71% [64-78]; p=0·046). The incidence and severity of neurotoxicity (any grade, 53 [41%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 1, 24 [19%] vs 20 [30%]; grade 2, 14 [11%] vs 10 [15%]; grade 3, 12 [9%] vs 6 [9%], and grade 4, 3 [2%] vs 2 [3%]; p=0·20) and cytokine release syndrome (any grade, 110 [85%] vs 53 [80%]; grade 1, 12 [9%] vs 2 [3%]; grade 2, 61 [47%] vs 38 [58%]; grade 3, 18 [14%] vs 7 [11%] and grade 4, 19 [15%] vs 6 [9%]; p=0·26) did not differ between the CNS-negative and the CNS-positive disease strata.

INTERPRETATION

Tisagenlecleucel and huCART19 are active at clearing CNS disease and maintaining durable remissions in children and young adults with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma, without increasing the risk of severe neurotoxicity; although care should be taken in the timing of therapy and disease control to mitigate this risk. These preliminary findings support the use of these CAR T-cell therapies for patients with CNS relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphocytic leukaemia.

FUNDING

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Frontier Program.

Beyond the storm - subacute toxicities and late effects in children receiving CAR T cells

As clinical advances with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are increasingly described and the potential for extending their therapeutic benefit grows, optimizing the implementation of this therapeutic modality is imperative. The recognition and management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) marked a milestone in this field; however, beyond the understanding gained in treating CRS, a host of additional toxicities and/or potential late effects of CAR T cell therapy warrant further investigation. A multicentre initiative involving experts in paediatric cell therapy, supportive care and/or study of late effects from cancer and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation was convened to facilitate the comprehensive study of extended CAR T cell-mediated toxicities and establish a framework for new systematic investigations of CAR T cell-related adverse events. Together, this group identified six key focus areas: extended monitoring of neurotoxicity and neurocognitive function, psychosocial considerations, infection and immune reconstitution, other end organ toxicities, evaluation of subsequent neoplasms, and strategies to optimize remission durability. Herein, we present the current understanding, gaps in knowledge and future directions of research addressing these CAR T cell-related outcomes. This systematic framework to study extended toxicities and optimization strategies will facilitate the translation of acquired experience and knowledge for optimal application of CAR T cell therapies.