Combination of radiofrequency ablation with antiangiogenic therapy for tumor ablation efficacy: study in mice

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine whether modulation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumor microvasculature by using the antiangiogenic drug sorafenib could increase the extent of radiofrequency (RF)-induced coagulation in an RCC animal tumor model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All investigations received animal care and utilization committee approval. RCC (human 786-0) was implanted subcutaneously into 27 nude mice. Sixteen mice were randomly assigned into one of three groups when tumors reached 12 mm in diameter: Six mice received 80 mg of sorafenib, a Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, per kilogram of body weight; five mice received 20 mg/kg sorafenib; and five mice received a control carrier vehicle alone. Antiangiogenic therapy was administered until a mean 1-mm reduction in tumor diameter was noted in one group. These 16 mice received a standard dose of RF ablation. Ablation size was visualized by using 2% triphenyltetrazolium chloride. An additional 11 tumors in mice treated with sorafenib alone were stained with CD31 to determine microvascular density (MVD). Resultant size of ablation was compared among groups; statistical significance was determined with analysis of variance. Differences in MVD were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Over the 9-day administration of sorafenib, mean tumor size in the control group reached 15.2 mm +/- 0.8 (standard deviation). Tumors in mice receiving 20 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg sorafenib measured 12.2 mm +/- 0.6 and 11.1 mm +/- 0.5, respectively (P < .05). RF-induced coagulation diameter was 8.5 mm +/- 0.4 and 11.1 mm +/- 0.3 in the 20 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg sorafenib groups, respectively, but was only 6.7 mm +/- 0.7 for animals that underwent RF ablation alone (P < .01). Likewise, significant decreases in MVD were noted in the sorafenib-treated animals (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of RCC in nude mice with the antiangiogenic agent sorafenib resulted in markedly decreased MVD and significantly larger zones of RF-induced coagulation necrosis.

Phase I clinical study of AZD2171, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

AZD2171 is a highly potent oral selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of increasing doses of AZD2171, with additional assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In part A, 36 patients with solid tumors and liver metastases refractory to standard therapies received once-daily oral AZD2171 (0.5 to 60 mg). Doses were escalated in successive cohorts until the maximum-tolerated dose was identified. In part B, patients with (n = 36) or without (n = 11) liver metastases were randomly assigned to receive once-daily AZD2171 (20, 30, or 45 mg). In both parts, treatment continued until tumor progression or dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients received AZD2171, which was generally well tolerated at doses of 45 mg/d or less; the most frequently reported dose-related adverse events were diarrhea, dysphonia, and hypertension. The most common DLT was hypertension (n = 7), which occurred at AZD2171 doses of 20 mg and higher. After a single dose, maximum plasma (peak) drug concentration after single-dose administration (Cmax) was achieved 1 to 8 hours postdosing with an arithmetic mean half-life associated with terminal slope of a semilogarithmic concentration-time curve (t1/2 lamda(z)) of 22 hours. Pharmacodynamic assessments demonstrated time-, dose-, and exposure-related decreases in initial area under the curve, defined over 60 seconds post-contrast arrival in the tissue (iAUC60) using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, as well as dose- and time-dependent reductions in soluble VEGF receptor 2 levels. Preliminary evidence of efficacy included two confirmed partial responses and 22 patients with stable disease; effects on tumor size appeared to be dose related.

CONCLUSION

Once-daily oral AZD2171 at doses of 45 mg or less was generally well tolerated and was associated with encouraging antitumor activity in patients with a broad range of advanced solid tumors.

Advanced renal cell carcinoma: current and emerging management strategies

Management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has made considerable progress in recent years, and new emerging strategies are being developed. On the basis of the results of two randomised studies in the early 2000s, nephrectomy has now become the standard as cytoreductive surgery before embarking on systemic treatment with cytokines. Interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon were the standard treatment in metastatic RCC (MRCC) until 2006. The efficacy of these two drugs, which have now been used for >20 years in MRCC, is still controversial. On the basis of many studies, these drugs should not be given to patients with a poor prognosis. In patients with good prognostic factors, a cytokine-based regimen should remain the standard as either a high-dose IL-2 or subcutaneous regimen. In patients with intermediate risk, the results of the French Percy Quattro study encourage the use of new targeted therapies as first-line therapy. Development of targeted therapies in RCC has been necessary largely because the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene is often mutated in sporadic RCC. VHL protein abnormalities lead to accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-alpha and activation of a series of genes, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus inducing angiogenesis. Results from many recent studies with new agents that block the VEGF pathway have been reported and offer new strategic options for patients with MRCC. Sunitinib and sorafenib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, improve progression-free survival in RCC compared with standard treatment and have been recently approved. Temsirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor regulating HIF-alpha, improves survival in RCC patients with poor risk features. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, has shown very promising efficacy. Overall, treatment of MRCC is currently moving from the cytokine era to the targeted agent era. However, many questions still remain regarding the efficacy of combination treatments and on the best way to achieve complete remission, which is probably the best hope of curing MRCC.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of several kinases involved in tumour proliferation and tumour angiogenesis including Raf, VEGFR and platelet derived growth factor receptor. In vivo Raf kinase inhibition has been observed in pharmacodynamic studies. Sorafenib is one of several VEGF-targeting compounds with recently demonstrated substantial anti-tumour effects in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Delay in time to disease progression has been demonstrated in cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and further investigation is ongoing in a wide variety of tumour types. Sorafenib is well tolerated, with common toxicities including rash, diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue and hypertension, when administered as the standard dose of 400 mg b.i.d.

Angiogenesis Inhibitor Therapies: Focus on Kidney Toxicity and Hypertension

Angiogenesis inhibitors that target the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) constitute an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of patients with metastatic disease. However, because the same growth factors are expressed in the kidneys, these treatment molecules have renal side effects. EGFR is expressed mainly in tubules (mainly distal and collecting segments) and mesangial and parietal epithelial cells. EGF is involved in maintaining tubular integrity and is a potent mitogen for cultured mesangial cells. Few cases of acute renal failure have been reported related to EGFR inhibitors. VEGF and VEGF receptors are still highly expressed in the kidney. VEGF is expressed in podocytes in the glomerulus, and VEGF receptors are present on endothelial, mesangial, and peritubular capillary cells. Signaling between endothelial cells and podocytes is essential for the proper development and maintenance of the filtration function of the kidney glomerulus. The most common renal class effects of VEGF antagonists are both manageable; hypertension and proteinuria commonly regressive on drug withdrawal. There was a dose-dependent increase in risk of proteinuria and hypertension in patients with cancer who received targeted therapies. Furthermore, few patients with glomerulonephritis or thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to treatment were reported. Hypertension is believed to be nitric oxide dependent, whereas proteinuria seems to be related to downregulation of podocyte tight junction protein. This article reviews data relating to hypertension and proteinuria associated with the use of these drugs.

Aromatase inhibitors--socioeconomical issues

With costs of health care in general and for cancer therapy in particular escalating due to implementation of novel compounds, there is an increasing focus on therapy costs in most countries. A common way of assessing therapeutic utility versus cost is by assessing cost per additional life year gained or cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with a novel therapy. While endocrine therapy in general is associated with low costs, the fact that aromatase inhibitors are administered over several years to each patient in the adjuvant setting, together with the substantial number of postmenopausal breast cancer patients that are candidates for adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors, advocates critical examination of cost-utilities related to implementation of such therapy in the adjuvant setting. While cost-utility estimates for treatment with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting look favorable, the estimates are sensitive to variations with respect to long-term benefits but also side effects. For patient groups with a low-risk of relapse but also patients with a limited life expectancy due to high age, cost-utility estimates may exceed the upper limits generally proposed for costs per quality-adjusted life year gained.

The evolving role of surgery for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of molecular targeted therapy

PURPOSE

Thoughtful integration of surgical and medical approaches to metastatic renal cell carcinoma is paramount for maximizing disease control. Accomplishing this in the current era of targeted molecular therapies presents unique challenges and opportunities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases, and relevant urological and oncological journals was performed pertaining to cytoreductive nephrectomy, metastasectomy, targeted molecular therapies for renal cell carcinoma, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches to the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

RESULTS

Cytoreductive nephrectomy provides an overall survival advantage in select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive subsequent interferon-alpha. However, cytokine therapies are now being supplanted by targeted molecular approaches that block the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor and other molecular events. Although cytoreductive nephrectomy remains a standard of care, limited insight into the biological effects of nephrectomy on mechanisms such as immunoregulation and angiogenesis precludes definitive statements about how to integrate surgery and targeted agents. Ongoing investigation involving basic science and translational research is required to optimize the integration of these approaches. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant vascular endothelial growth factor targeted approaches to renal cell carcinoma are now also being explored and the unique side effects of these agents, including potential effects on wound healing and vascular integrity, require careful consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated approaches involving surgery and vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies hold much promise for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Prospective clinical testing with vigilant attention to the risk-benefit ratio and thoughtful evaluation of biological correlates are required to optimize these approaches.

Effects of sorafenib on symptoms and quality of life: results from a large randomized placebo-controlled study in renal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the current study was to determine the impact of treatment with sorafenib versus placebo on renal cancer symptoms and quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Symptoms were measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) and QOL by the FACT-General (FACT-G). The FACT-G and FKSI were administered at baseline and day 1 of each cycle. Statistical analyses used a random coefficient model over 5 cycles for total score and individual items, using Memorial Sloan Kettering Risk Score (MSK) and treatment as factors and baseline score and treatment time as covariates. FKSI correlation to survival was based on a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for treatment, age, and MSK.

RESULTS

At baseline and over time, there were no differences in mean scores for either the FACT-G or FKSI between the sorafenib and placebo groups. FKSI single-item analysis showed that sorafenib-treated patients reported significantly fewer symptoms and concerns versus placebo (eg, cough (P < 0.0001), fevers (P = 0.0015), shortness of breath (P < or = 0.0312), ability to enjoy life (P = 0.0119), and worry that condition will get worse (P = 0.0004). Only concern about treatment side effects favored placebo (P < 0.0001). Baseline FKSI total score predicted overall survival (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib shows clinical benefit without adversely impacting overall QOL and has a positive impact on some individual symptoms and concerns. These findings are consistent with other clinical results from this trial of advanced renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib, which included significantly greater progression-free survival and low risk for treatment limited toxicities.

Consolidative Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatectomy for Partial Response After Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

The advent of molecularly targeted agents is rapidly changing the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A case in which surgical metastatectomy was used in the setting of dramatic but incomplete disease response to sunitinib is presented. Some of the issues complicating operative intervention in the setting of multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors are discussed.

Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are key signaling pathways involved in the regulation of normal cell proliferation, survival and differentiation. Aberrant regulation of MAPK cascades contribute to cancer and other human diseases. In particular, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) MAPK pathway has been the subject of intense research scrutiny leading to the development of pharmacologic inhibitors for the treatment of cancer. ERK is a downstream component of an evolutionarily conserved signaling module that is activated by the Raf serine/threonine kinases. Raf activates the MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK)1/2 dual-specificity protein kinases, which then activate ERK1/2. The mutational activation of Raf in human cancers supports the important role of this pathway in human oncogenesis. Additionally, the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is a key downstream effector of the Ras small GTPase, the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers. Finally, Ras is a key downstream effector of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is mutationally activated and/or overexpressed in a wide variety of human cancers. ERK activation also promotes upregulated expression of EGFR ligands, promoting an autocrine growth loop critical for tumor growth. Thus, the EGFR-Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling network has been the subject of intense research and pharmaceutical scrutiny to identify novel target-based approaches for cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the current status of the different approaches and targets that are under evaluation and development for the therapeutic intervention of this key signaling pathway in human disease.

The potential of antiangiogenic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

The long-term prognosis for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor despite the availability of several cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The use of targeted therapies, particularly those against the key mediator of angiogenesis vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has the potential to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody, is the most clinically advanced antiangiogenic agent in NSCLC. In a phase III study, bevacizumab showed significantly improved overall and progression-free survival when used in combination with standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC; however, tumor-related bleeding adverse events have been noted in some patients, predominantly those with squamous cell histology or centrally located tumors. Several small-molecule VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown promise in phase I and II trials in NSCLC. This review summarizes the most important findings of angiogenesis inhibitors in NSCLC and discusses the potential for the use of these novel agents in different settings of NSCLC.

Sorafenib inhibits the angiogenesis and growth of orthotopic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma xenografts in nude mice

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) remains one of the most lethal human cancers. We hypothesized that sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of the BRaf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta kinase, would decrease tumor growth and angiogenesis in an orthotopic model of ATC. The in vitro antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of sorafenib on ATC cell lines were examined. To study the in vivo effects of sorafenib on orthotopic ATC tumors in nude mice, sorafenib was given p.o. at 40 or 80 mg/kg daily. Intratumoral effects were studied using immunohistochemical analysis. The effect of sorafenib on survival of the mice was also studied. Sorafenib inhibited the in vitro proliferation of ATC cell lines. Sorafenib also significantly inhibited tumor angiogenesis via the induction of endothelial apoptosis in an orthotopic model of thyroid cancer. As result, the growth of orthotopic ATC xenografts was reduced and the survival of the test animals was improved. Sorafenib exerts significant antitumor activity in an orthotopic xenograft model of ATC via a potent antiangiogenic effect. The antiangiogenic effects of sorafenib suggest that its use in clinical setting may not depend on the BRAF mutational status of thyroid tumors. Given the lack of curative options for patients with ATC, sorafenib warrants further study as a therapeutic agent against ATC.

Combination therapy of an orthotopic renal cell carcinoma model using intratumoral vector-mediated costimulation and systemic interleukin-2

PURPOSE

Interleukin (IL)-2 therapy is currently used for therapy of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, it is only effective in approximately 10% to 15% of patients, showing a need for additional therapies. We have previously described a replication-defective fowlpox vector encoding three costimulatory molecules (B7-1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3), designated rF-TRICOM. Here, we show that intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM in an orthotopic RCC model effectively enhances tumor immunogenicity and reduces tumor burden in mice and the combination of rF-TRICOM and IL-2 is more effective than either therapy alone.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

RCC cells were implanted under the capsule of the kidney, and mice were given rF-TRICOM intratumorally 14 days later. We compared the effect of rF-TRICOM, rF-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and two doses of IL-2 and combinations of the above on antitumor efficacy and survival. Host CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The results show that (a) systemic IL-2 therapy was moderately effective in the reduction of tumor burden in an orthotopic RCC model; (b) a single intratumoral injection of rF-TRICOM and rF-GM-CSF significantly reduced tumor burden; (c) the addition of systemic IL-2 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF administration resulted in further reduction of tumor burden, decrease in the incidence of metastasis, and extended survival in tumor-bearing mice above that seen with either treatment alone; and (d) CD8(+) T cells played a critical role in the antitumor effect seen with rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF + IL-2 therapy. Finally, the addition of systemic recombinant IL-15 or intratumoral vector-delivered IL-15 to intratumoral rF-TRICOM/rF-GM-CSF administration resulted in substantially more tumor-free mice than either therapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies show that intratumoral administration of rF-TRICOM admixed with rF-GM-CSF is effective at reducing tumor burden in mice and the addition of IL-2 further contributes to this effect. These studies thus form the rationale for combination immunotherapy clinical trials in patients with RCC.

Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with IFN alpha-2a in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

To determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy, and to evaluate biomarkers, of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib plus IFN alpha-2a in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or melanoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients received 28-day cycles of continuous, oral sorafenib twice daily and s.c. IFN thrice weekly: sorafenib 200 mg twice daily plus IFN 6 million IU (MIU) thrice weekly (cohort 1); and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus IFN 6 MIU thrice weekly (cohort 2); or plus IFN 9 MIU thrice weekly (cohort 3). Tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received at least one dose of sorafenib plus IFN (12 RCC; one melanoma). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached [only one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 asthenia)]. Most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were grade 2 or less in severity, including fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, alopecia, and hand-foot skin reaction. One (7.7%) RCC patient achieved partial response and eight (61.5%) had stable disease (including the melanoma patient). Good responders assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography had increased progression-free survival and overall survival, relative to poor responders. IFN had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib. There were no significant changes in absolute values of lymphocytes, levels of proangiogenic cytokines, or inhibition of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase in T cells or natural killer cells, with combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This sorafenib combination was well tolerated, with preliminary antitumor activity in advanced RCC and melanoma patients. There were no drug-drug interactions and the recommended dose for future studies is sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus IFN 9 MIU.

Sunitinib: a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A brief review of its therapeutic potential in the treatment of renal carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

Sunitinib malate is a novel oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activities. Sunitinib was recently approved in first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after disease progression or intolerance to imatinib mesylate therapy. We report the very interesting results of the phase II trials after cytokin failure and of the randomized recent trial of sunitinib versus cytokin-based therapy in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic RCC, as well as the promising results of the recent trials on patients with GIST after disease progression or intolerance to imatinib mesylate therapy. Oral sunitinib demonstrates a high level of efficacy with acceptable tolerability with the 50 mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off schedule; a continuous schedule could be of interest. Hypertension and asthenia are the most common side effects with sunitinib. Regardless of these encouraging results, studies investigating sunitinib in first-line treatment (for patients with GIST), adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings are awaited, as well as trials using sunitinb in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies. Clinical trials investigating sunitinib in other tumor types are ongoing.

We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST

PURPOSE

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are insensitive in evaluating imatinib-treated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Response by Choi criteria, a 10% decrease in size or a 15% decrease in density on contrast-enhanced CT, correlated well in a small training set of patients who showed response as measured by positron emission tomography, and was more predictive of time to tumor progression (TTP) than response by RECIST. This study was designed to validate these observations in an independent data set.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with imatinib-treated GISTs were evaluated by RECIST and Choi criteria. TTP was compared with TTP in the training set. Patients were analyzed initially with follow-up to 28 months, extended to 60 months for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who met Choi response criteria on CT at 2 months had significantly better TTP than those who did not (P = .0002), whereas response group by RECIST was not significantly correlated with TTP. Even when the 98 patients from both sets were analyzed together, the response group by RECIST did not correlate significantly with TTP, whereas response group by Choi criteria did correlate significantly with TTP. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was also significantly correlated with response group by Choi criteria (P = .04), but not with response group by RECIST.

CONCLUSION

Choi response criteria are reproducible, more sensitive, and more precise than RECIST in assessing the response of GISTs to imatinib mesylate. Response by Choi criteria, unlike response by RECIST, correlates significantly with TTP and DSS. Response by Choi criteria should be incorporated routinely into future studies of GIST therapy. We should desist using RECIST, at least in GIST.

New molecular targets and novel agents in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer

Standard cytotoxic regimens for metastatic bladder cancer, such as gemcitabine/cisplatin or methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cipslatin (M-VAC), yield impressive overall response rates of 45% to 70%. Despite this, long-term, disease-free, overall survival is rare, and most patients eventually succumb to the disease. Much work has been undertaken evaluating the clinical and molecular factors associated with progressive bladder cancer, and this has, in turn, led to the development of both novel targets and agents. These include standard cytotoxics such as pemetrexed, an antifolate and antimetabolite agent that has demonstrated an overall response rate of 30% in early studies, and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib, which will be studied as maintenance therapy for patients who respond to first-line chemotherapy. The evaluation of new targets and new agents in the midst of limited patient, logistical, and financial resources will be one of the more difficult challenges for investigators over the next several years.

The role of VEGF and EGFR inhibition: implications for combining anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents

Multiple cellular pathways influence the growth and metastatic potential of tumors. This creates heterogeneity, redundancy, and the potential for tumors to bypass signaling pathway blockade, resulting in primary or acquired resistance. Combining therapies that inhibit different signaling pathways has the potential to be more effective than inhibition of a single pathway and to overcome tumor resistance. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors have become key therapies in several tumor types. Close relationships between these factors exist: VEGF signaling is up-regulated by EGFR expression and, conversely, VEGF up-regulation independent of EGFR signaling seems to contribute to resistance to EGFR inhibition. Therefore, inhibition of both pathways could improve antitumor efficacy and overcome resistance to EGFR inhibition. Preclinical studies have shown that VEGF and EGFR inhibitors can have additive effects and that combined inhibition is effective in EGFR inhibitor-resistant cell lines. Clinical trials have also produced promising data: combining the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab or the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib increases benefit compared with either of these anti-EGFR agents alone or combined with chemotherapy. The potential of this novel approach to anticancer therapy will be elucidated by large, ongoing clinical trials.

Phase I Trial of Sorafenib in Combination with Gefitinib in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the combination of sorafenib and gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this dose-escalation trial, patients received oral sorafenib (200-400 mg) twice daily with gefitinib (250 mg orally) once daily to identify the recommended dose for phase II trials (RDP; part A). The pharmacokinetics of the RDP were characterized further in additional patients (part B) receiving single-agent gefitinib or sorafenib for 21 days followed by a 7-day washout with crossover to the other agent for an additional 21 days. Patients then received the combination of sorafenib plus gefitinib in 28-day cycles. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor efficacy were evaluated. Potential drug-drug interactions and the relationship between pharmacokinetics and toxicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were treated (n=12, part A; n=19, part B). Most adverse events were grade 1/2. The most frequent grade 3/4 events included diarrhea and elevated alanine aminotransferase (both 9.7%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred (part A: elevated alanine aminotransferase at 400 mg twice daily). Gefitinib had no effect on sorafenib pharmacokinetics. However, gefitinib C(max) (26%) and area under the curve (38%) were reduced by concomitant sorafenib. One patient had a partial response; 20 (65%; n=8, part A; n=12, part B) had stable disease >or=4 months. The RDP was sorafenib 400 mg twice daily with gefitinib 250 mg once daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib combined with gefitinib is well tolerated, with promising efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Studies to further investigate the significance of the reduction in gefitinib exposure by sorafenib are warranted.

Vatalanib: the clinical development of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of angiogenesis in solid tumours

The licensing of bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has fueled research in angiogenesis. Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK 222584), a potent oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a selective range of molecular targets, has been extensively investigated and has shown promising results in patients with colorectal cancer in early trials. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI has been useful as a pharmacodynamic tool to define the dose that has a biological effect. The primary objectives of the Phase III CONFIRM (Colorectal Oral Novel Therapy for the Inhibition of Angiogenesis and Retarding of Metastases in First-line) studies were not met. However, an interesting pre-planned subset analysis in both studies showed that patients with high lactate dehydrogenase derived clinical benefit. Although this type of analysis should always be considered with caution, the Phase III clinical programme of vatalanib is continuing with further innovative studies looking at other indications and schedules for vatalanib.

Phase 2 studies of sunitinib and AG013736 in patients with cytokine-refractory renal cell carcinoma

Frequent loss of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene product in conventional-type renal cell carcinoma results in constitutive expression of proangiogenic growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). VEGF and PDGF function in a paracrine manner to stimulate tumor angiogenesis that results in a hypervascular phenotype. Dependency on this hypervascularity is underscored by the recent clinical efficacy shown by inhibition of the VEGF pathway. Most strategies that primarily target the VEGF pathway (neutralizing antibodies or receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors) result in objective tumor responses in < or =10% of cases but show a significant delay in time to disease progression. In contrast, two multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target both VEGF and PDGF receptors (sunitinib and AG013736) have shown > or =40% objective responses with clinically important duration. Several hypotheses may explain the discrepancy of these response rates from other strategies in the class, including the synergistic effects of dual inhibition of VEGF and PDGF receptors, supported by preclinical studies. Ultimately, further clinical investigations with pharmacodynamic and correlative science end points are needed to clarify the mechanisms of action and resistance to build on the biological and clinical effects of these multitargeted agents.

Sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma

Sorafenib is an orally available inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta, and RAF kinases. A dose of 400 mg twice daily administered continuously was selected for phase 2 testing, although 600 mg twice daily formally met criteria for a maximum tolerated dose. It is well tolerated compared with cytokine therapy. Antitumor activity was shown clearly in the context of a randomized discontinuation phase 2 trial. In this setting, even disease stabilization was established as a treatment-related phenomenon. A phase 3 trial with sorafenib confirmed a benefit of therapy across the vast majority of patients treated with sorafenib as opposed to placebo. Limited investigations into the mechanism of action of sorafenib in renal cell carcinoma support vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonism as the primary mediator of effect. The toxicity profile of sorafenib allows for its use in combination regimens. The focus of efforts to improve on the efficacy of sorafenib is on use with IFN, bevacizumab, or temsirolimus. Preliminary evidence with this approach is promising and will be the subject of the next generation of randomized trials in renal cell carcinoma.

Sunitinib: from rational design to clinical efficacy

Sunitinib (SU011248) is an oral small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitor that exhibits potent antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as SU6668 and SU5416 (semaxanib) demonstrated poor pharmacologic properties and limited efficacy; therefore, sunitinib was rationally designed and chosen for its high bioavailability and its nanomolar-range potency against the antiangiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)--vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). Sunitinib inhibits other tyrosine kinases including, KIT, FLT3, colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), and RET, which are involved in a number of malignancies including small-cell lung cancer, GI stromal tumors (GISTs), breast cancer, acute myelogenous leukemia, multiple endocrine neoplasia types 2A and 2B, and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Sunitinib demonstrated robust antitumor activity in preclinical studies resulting not only in tumor growth inhibition, but tumor regression in models of colon cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, renal carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma, which were associated with inhibition of VEGFR and PDGFR phosphorylation. Clinical activity was demonstrated in neuroendocrine, colon, and breast cancers in phase II studies, whereas definitive efficacy has been demonstrated in advanced renal cell carcinoma and in imatinib-refractory GISTs, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of sunitinib for treatment of these two diseases. Studies investigating sunitinib alone in various tumor types and in combination with chemotherapy are ongoing. The clinical benchmarking of this small-molecule inhibitor of members of the split-kinase domain family of RTKs will lead to additional insights regarding the biology, potential biomarkers, and clinical utility of agents that target multiple signaling pathways in tumor, stromal, and endothelial compartments.

[Metastatic renal cell carcinoma and its treatments]

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma is deeply evolving. After the cytokines, interleukin 2 and interferon era, which raised great expectations followed by deep disillusions (related to an efficacy limited to a small group of patients and an important toxicity for a majority of them), the time of targeted therapies has come. These new therapies mainly work on the VHL-HIF way, which controls several key molecules involved in the tumour angiogenesis phenomena, especially the VEGF. Several drugs currently being developed allow to stop either the circulating angiogenic factors (mainly the VEGF), or the tyrosine kinase receptors, especially the VEGF and the PDGF receptors. The reported activity and potential of these drugs are: tumour reduction, improvement of progression-free survival, effects on the overall survival. Currently, 4 among these drugs are in phase III (sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab and temsirolimus), sorafenib and sunitinib have been allowed by the FDA, in the USA, and by the EMEA, in Europe, in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Despite the optimization of chemotherapy regimens, treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still considered to be disappointing. Thus, clinical research of new treatment strategies is warranted. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in NSCLC, but to date, only a few of these new agents can offer hope of a substantial impact on the natural history of the disease. One of the main reasons for the failure of several clinical trials of targeted therapy in lung cancer is that there is multilevel cross-stimulation among the targets of the new biological agents along several pathways of signal transduction that lead to neoplastic events; blocking only one of these pathways, as most first-generation targeted agents do, allows others to act as salvage or escape mechanisms for cancer cells. Sorafenib and sunitinib are two oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-beta and stem cell factor receptor [KIT]). Sunitinib is a multitargeted inhibitor of PDGFR, KIT, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and VEGFR. The kinases targeted and inhibited by sorafenib and sunitinib directly and indirectly regulate tumor growth, survival, and angiogenesis, and this might be expected to result in broad antitumor efficacy. Sorafenib and sunitinib have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib has also been approved for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Their mechanism of action, preclinical data, and phase II studies suggest efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Targeting von Hippel-Lindau pathway in renal cell carcinoma

Inheritance of a defective copy of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene leads to the most common cause of inherited renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In addition, most patients with sporadic RCC have aberrant VHL. In the absence of VHL, hypoxia-inducible factor alpha accumulates, leading to production of several growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. We review here the biology of RCC and how a combination of proximal and distal block of VHL/hypoxia-inducible factor alpha pathway by novel targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab, everolimus, and temsirolimus, has led to significant improvements in progression-free survival.

A review of the latest clinical compounds to inhibit VEGF in pathological angiogenesis

Angiogenesis plays an important role in the formation of new blood vessels and is crucial for tumour development and progression. Imbalance between pro- and antiangiogenesis factors regulates the biological process of angiogenesis. The best characterised of the proangiogenic factors and the most potent is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The binding of VEGF to one of its transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptors, which are predominantly found on endothelial cells, results in receptor dimerisation, activation and autophosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase domain. This triggers a cascade of complex downstream signalling pathways. Several strategies targeting the VEGF signalling pathway have been developed. These include neutralising antibodies to VEGF (bevacizumab) or VEGF receptors (VEGFRs) (DC101), soluble VEGFR/VEGFR hybrids (VEGF-Trap), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors of VEGFRs (BAY43-9006, SU11248, ZD6474, AZD2171, PTK/ZK and others). Several of these agents are now being investigated in clinical trials.

Forthcoming receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Receptor tyrosine kinases play a significant role in carcinogenesis and have been successfully targeted with monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors. There have been recent developments in the understanding of receptor tyrosine kinase signal transduction which have enabled better drug development. The use of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical practice has expanded the knowledge on cancer biology, in particular the understanding of resistant mutations and strategies to overcome such resistance. This has driven drug development from single kinase inhibitors to multi-kinase inhibitors and high-affinity kinase inhibitors. Finally, as the use of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors grows in clinical practice, more is learned about appropriate patient selection for such therapies. This is an exciting time in cancer therapeutics, highlighted by the advent of effective targeted therapy with receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Targeted agents and esophageal cancer--the next step?

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive cancer and is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the United States and Western Europe, there has been a decline in the incidence of squamous cell carcinomas coupled with a rapid rise in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Although the 5-year survival rates have slowly increased over time from 4% to 14%, the outcomes are still dismal. The lack of adequate preventative strategies, inadequate screening techniques, early lymphatic and hematogenous spread, and lack of truly effective therapeutic agents all contribute to the poor outcome. This review will highlight the current status of targeted therapies in EC. This will include a review of agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor pathways and trials planned or ongoing to incorporate these and other agents into therapy for advanced disease and into combined modality therapy for early-stage tumors. Further work is required regarding the rational integration of these targeted agents and the optimal selection of patients who will most likely benefit.

What Is Standard Initials Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma?

Historically, systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma RCC) have met with minimal success. Recently, an improved understanding of cancer biology has been translated into therapies that target pathways critical for RCC growth and survival and produce more robust clinical impact. The risks and benefits of several approaches to systemic therapy in metastatic RCC are reviewed. The need for chronic therapy of novel agents and potential for toxicity raise questions in regard to the timing of therapy and value of combination therapy over sequential single agents. Further insight into the biology of response, resistance, and toxicity is needed to allow for rational patient selection and enhanced application of systemic therapies. As new standard therapies for metastatic RCC emerge, clinical trial conduct remains a priority to further optimize patient outcome.

Update on the epidemiology and biology of renal cortical neoplasms

A new era is developing in the understanding of the diagnosis, classification, and management of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). Historically, RCC has been divided into subtypes on the basis of the histopathologic findings alone. Now, genetic alterations, nuclear characteristics, and clinical criteria are routinely incorporated into the classification. The greater use of axial imaging that began in the 1980s dramatically increased the incidence of RCC, but there has not been a decrease in the percentage of cases that are metastatic. Nevertheless, many incidental lesions prove to be benign, so there is renewed enthusiasm for biopsy before treatment is selected. Genetic conditions associated with RCC, such as Von Hippel Lindau and Birt-Hogg-Dube syndromes, along with genetic analyses of tumors, have provided considerable insight into the pathogenesis of these lesions. Renal-cell carcinoma is resistant to chemotherapy, and high-dose interleukin-2 is the only regimen currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced RCC. Stem cell transplantation is an evolving therapy. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and transforming growth factor-alpha pathways are promising targets for medical therapy of RCC. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that acts as a competitive blocker of the VEGF receptor; sorafenib, an oral well-tolerated tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks the intracellular second-messenger system associated with the VEGF receptor; sunitinib, a multitarget inhibitor of kinases associated with the VEGF and PDGF receptors; temsirolimus (CCI-779), a kinase blocker that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway; and erlotinib, an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases associated with the EGF receptor, have shown promise. Combinations of the above therapies and cytokines also are being investigated, as there may be synergistic effects.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of lung cancer

Despite improvements in cytotoxic chemotherapy and combined modality therapies for lung cancer, the prognosis for patients remains poor, and the majority of patients die from the disease. Angiogenesis, i.e. the formation of new blood vessels, is important for tumor growth, invasion and metastasis and represents a rational target in the development of more effective treatments. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the angiogenic process and consequently, inhibitors of this system are currently under development. The most studied anti-angiogenic agents include anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Recent clinical trials have yielded promising results. This article will review angiogenesis inhibitors targeting the VEGF pathway which are currently being developed for the treatment of lung cancer.

Present strategies in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an update on molecular targeting agents

The understanding of cellular processes underlying tumour biology has allowed the development of novel molecular-targeted drugs with optimistic results in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau gene are found in 75% of sporadic RCCs, which results in upregulation of several genes involved in angiogenesis, e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. Other activated pathways in RCC are the epidermal growth factor receptor and the mTOR pathway, which regulate survival and cell growth. In addition to temsirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) two different strategies have been studied to inhibit these targets: monoclonal antibodies, e.g. bevacizumab, and small molecule tyrosine-kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, sunitinib and AG 013736. Phase II studies with these drugs reported substantial clinical activity in advanced RCC. Survival benefit was reported with temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib in randomized trials, which led to the accelerated approval of sorafenib and sunitinib for advanced RCC by regulatory authorities in the USA and Europe. Nevertheless, as new therapies develop, new challenges arise for the optimum use of these targeted drugs. We discuss the rationale and the clinical development of these novel molecular-targeted agents, with special emphasis on updated information presented at recent meetings because of the relevance of the data reported and the potential future impact in the management of patients with RCC.

Anti-angiogenic therapy in the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer

Metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and is resistant to traditional chemotherapy agents. The majority of tumours are associated with inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau gene and subsequent overexpression of proangiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Drugs targeting these pathways have undergone clinical testing in renal cell cancer with encouraging results. This type of therapy is set to revolutionise the treatment of renal cell cancer and this review outlines recent evidence from clinical trials investigating the most promising of these agents.

Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression

The traditional development paradigm for phase II trials in oncology has been challenged in recent years by the introduction of cytostatic therapies. These agents slow the growth of tumors rather than cause high rates of shrinkage, this argues for the use of endpoints that measure growth inhibition such as progression free survival. We have previously argued the need for randomized trials in this setting. Here we discuss methodological solutions to enhance the development decision at the end of phase II in the context of progression endpoints employed in randomized trials. There are well recognized issues associated with progression endpoints relating to bias in the timing and interpretation of assessments. In this paper we present design and analysis solutions that will minimize bias by using methods that are either partially or completely time independent. We also discuss other design features to maximize the information yielded in a phase II setting. We advocate the creation of progression endpoints that utilize all available progression data rather than early fixed time-point analyses and show that little is to be gained by assessing progression status any more frequently than would be required in routine clinical practice. Such design and analysis measures will optimize the development decision made at the end of phase II clinical evaluation.

Biomarkers for Monitoring Antiangiogenic Therapy: Fig. 1

A variety of antiangiogenic agents are currently available for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. With these exciting new therapeutic agents comes the challenge of elucidating useful biomarkers to monitor patients receiving these therapies. Although many patients benefit from antiangiogenic therapies, it is often by achieving stability of their disease. Thus, development of noninvasive biomarkers of disease response and relapse is a crucial objective to aid in the management of patients. The current technologies being explored in this field include circulating plasma proteins, cells, and nucleic acids and novel imaging techniques. Surrogate markers of angiogenesis could help with selecting patients for therapy, determining optimal dosing of therapy, deciding whether to change therapy, and assessing appropriate salvage therapy.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is It Still Imperative in the Era of Targeted Therapy?

In the era before cytokine therapy, controversy existed about the need for cytoreductive nephrectomy in treating patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In 1978, Dekernion showed that nephrectomy alone had no effect on survival. During this period, removal of the malignant kidney was confined to palliative therapy in some settings of metastatic RCC, such as pain related to the kidney mass, intractable hematuria, erythrocytosis, uncontrolled hypertension, or poorly controlled hypercalcemia. When interleukin-2 was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992, the role of nephrectomy was reexamined. After a decade of controversy, two randomized controlled studies established that cytoreductive surgery has a role in properly selected patients and offers a survival advantage when done before cytokine therapy. Unfortunately, the mechanisms underlying this benefit remain poorly understood. Immunotherapy may work best when there is a small volume of cancer present, and removing a large primary tumor may prevent the seeding of additional metastases. Data have also suggested that primary tumors were capable of producing immunosuppressive compounds that might decrease the efficacy of immunotherapy. Another hypothesis suggested that removing the kidney altered the acid/base status of the patient to such an extent that the growth of the tumor was hindered. With the emergence in 2006 of two targeted agents for advanced renal cell carcinoma, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy has re-emerged as a source of controversy. Although evidence-based medical practice suggests a role for nephrectomy before the use of targeted agents, the arguments for and against this practice will be weighed.

Innovations and Challenges in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Summary Statement from the Second Cambridge Conference: Fig. 1

Innovations and Challenges in Renal Cancer, chaired by Michael B. Atkins, was held April 28 to 29, 2006 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The conference brought together leading experts in the fields of cancer research, medical oncology, urology, immunology, radiology, and immunotherapy, with the goal of advancing the field of renal cancer treatment by critiquing new data from ongoing clinical trials and stimulating communication among those involved in basic and clinical research. The conference proceedings published in this educational supplement to Clinical Cancer Research are intended to provide timely information and recommendations on important aspects of renal cancer genetics and biology and advances in prognostic classification and treatment.

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: a RAND Appropriateness Panel

BACKGROUND

New developments in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC) have suggested a need to reevaluate the role of systemic therapies. The authors convened a panel of medical and urologic oncologists to rate the appropriateness of the main options.

METHODS

The authors used the RAND/University of California-Los Angeles Appropriateness Method to evaluate systemic therapy options and cytoreductive nephrectomy. After a comprehensive literature review, an expert panel rated the appropriateness of systemic options (108 permutations) and cytoreductive nephrectomy (24 permutations) for patients with MRCC.

RESULTS

The appropriateness evaluation indicated that 27.3% of permutations were rated "appropriate," 46.9% were rated "inappropriate," and 25.8% were rated "uncertain." There was a high rate of agreement (95%). Sunitinib and sorafenib were rated appropriate for patients with low-to-moderate risk regardless of prior treatment. Temsirolimus was rated appropriate for first-line therapy for higher risk patients. Interferon-alpha and low-dose interleukin-2 were rated inappropriate or uncertain. In patients who received prior immunotherapy, cytokines were rated inappropriate. In all permutations for evaluating systemic therapy, enrollment into an investigational trial was considered appropriate, treatment with bevacizumab was uncertain, and thalidomide was inappropriate regardless of risk status or prior therapy. For good surgical risk patients with planned immunotherapy, nephrectomy was rated appropriate in patients who had limited metastatic burden regardless of tumor-related symptoms and in symptomatic patients regardless of metastatic burden. Only the most favorable combination of surgical risk, metastatic burden, and symptoms generated an "appropriate" rating for patients with planned targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results begin the process of defining an appropriate role for cytokines, newer targeted therapies, and surgery in the treatment of MRCC.