Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial

Relationship between prognostic impact of N3 lymph node metastasis at the root of the feeding artery and location of colon cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether N3 nodal involvement predicts outcomes and whether its prognostic implications vary with tumor location in patients with Stage III colon cancer (CC).

METHODS

We defined N3 as lymph node metastases near the bases of the major feeding arteries. We retrospectively examined recurrence rates and patterns by tumor location and sites of lymph node metastases in 57 patients with N3 CC who had undergone curative resections between January 2000 and March 2019. Survival analysis was performed to compare the prognoses of patients with and without N3 lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Most N3 patients had large tumors (T ≥ 3); five had T2 disease. Recurrence occurred quickly in one patient with T2N3M0 disease. Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that N3 lymph node metastasis is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in Stage III CC patients (P < 0.001). Categorizing N3 patients according to UICC-TNM staging system does not stratify risk of recurrence (P = 0.970). To investigate the impact of tumor location on recurrence risk, we classified N3 CC into two subtypes according to tumor location: metastasis at the base of the superior mesenteric artery in right-sided CC and inferior mesenteric artery in left-sided CC. The former was found to have a statistically significant poorer prognosis than the latter (P = 0.091).

CONCLUSION

N3 is a robust prognostic marker in CC patients. Recurrence risk varies by tumor location. N3 right-sided CCs with lymph node metastasis at the base of the superior mesenteric artery have poorer prognoses than do N3 left-sided CCs.

PI3K Pathway Alterations in Peritoneal Metastases are Associated with Earlier Recurrence in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis (CRC-PM) represents a biologically heterogeneous disease; yet little is known regarding the impact of tumor biology on survival outcomes following optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS). We analyzed the frequency of alterations in cancer signaling pathways in patients with CRC-PM and their impact on recurrence-free survival (RFS) following optimal CRS.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive CRC-PM patients who underwent optimal CRS/HIPEC and next generation sequencing of peritoneal metastases were included in the study. Alterations in eight cancer-related signaling pathways were analyzed: Wnt/APC, p53, RTK-RAS, PI3K, TGF-B, Notch, Myc, and cell cycle. The association of pathway alterations with RFS and OS following optimal cytoreduction was estimated using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

RESULTS

The most frequently altered pathways were Wnt/APC (63%), p53 (63%), RTK-RAS (60%), and PI3K (23%). Among optimally cytoreduced patients with CRC-PM, PI3K pathway alterations were an independent predictor of worse RFS (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval CI 1.3-8.3, p = 0.01) with a clinically meaningful impact on median months to recurrence (5 vs. 13 months, p = 0.02). Alterations in p53, Wnt, and RTK-RAS pathways were not significantly associated with a difference in RFS following CRS. Alterations in the four pathways were not associated with differences in OS following CRS (median OS was 50 (interquartile range 23-80) months).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRC-PM, PI3K pathway alterations are associated with earlier recurrence following optimal CRS, which may represent a distinct molecular subtype. This novel finding can tailor clinical trials by using PIK3CA-directed interventions to reduce risk of recurrence after optimal CRS.

Controversies and management of deficient mismatch repair gastrointestinal cancers in the neoadjuvant setting

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype is a distinct molecular signature across gastrointestinal cancers characterized by high tumor mutational burden and high neoantigen load. Tumors harboring dMMR are highly immunogenic and heavily infiltrated by immune cells; consequently, they are uniquely vulnerable to therapeutic strategies enhancing immune antitumor response such as checkpoint inhibitors. The MSI-H/dMMR phenotype arose as a powerful predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors with evidence supporting significantly improved outcomes in the metastatic setting. On the other hand, the genomic instability characteristic of MSI-H/dMMR tumors appears to be associated with decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy, and the benefits of standard adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches in this subtype are being increasingly questioned. Here, we review the prognostic and predictive impact of MMR status in localized gastric and colorectal cancers, and highlight the emerging clinical data incorporating checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting.

DNA ploidy and stroma predicted the risk of recurrence in low-risk stage III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

For clinically low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, the decision on cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is disputed. The present study investigates the use of additional biomarkers of ploidy and stroma-ratio(PS) to stratify patients with low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, providing a basis for individualized treatment in the future.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 198 patients with clinical-low-risk stage III colorectal cancer (T1-3N1M0) and analyzed the DNA ploidy and stroma ratio of FFPE tumor tissues. The patients were divided into PS-low-risk group (Diploidy or Low-stroma) and PS-high-risk group (Non-diploid and High-stroma). For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used.

RESULTS

The results showed that the 5-year DFS of the PS-high-risk group was significantly lower than that in the PS-low-risk group (78.6 vs. 91.2%, HR = 2.606 [95% CI: 1.011-6.717], P = 0.039). Besides, in the PS-low-risk group, the 5 year OS (98.2 vs. 86.7%, P = 0.022; HR = 5.762 [95% CI: 1.281-25.920]) and DFS (95.6, vs 79.9%, P = 0.019; HR = 3.7 [95% CI: 1.24-11.04]) of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for > 3 months were significantly higher than those received adjuvant chemotherapy for < 3 months. We also found that the PS could stratify the prognosis of patients with dMMR tumors. The 5-year OS (96.3 vs 71.4%, P = 0.037) and DFS (92.6 vs 57.1%, P = 0.015) were higher in the PS-low-risk dMMR patients than those in the PS-high-risk dMMR patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that PS can predict the prognosis of patients with stage III low-risk CRC. Besides, it may guide the decision on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Identification of necroptosis-related subtypes, development of a novel signature, and characterization of immune infiltration in colorectal cancer

Introduction

Necroptosis, a type of programmed cell death, has recently been extensively studied as an important pathway regulating tumor development, metastasis, and immunity. However, the expression patterns of necroptosis-related genes (NRGs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and their potential roles in the tumor microenvironment (TME) have not been elucidated.

Methods

We explored the expression patterns of NRGs in 1247 colorectal cancer samples from genetics and transcriptional perspective. Based on a consensus clustering algorithm, we identified NRG molecular subtypes and gene subtypes, respectively. Furthermore, we constructed a necroptosis-related signature for predicting overall survival time and verified the predictive ability of the model. Using the ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and ssGSEA algorithms, we assessed the association between the above subtypes, scores and immune infiltration.

Results

Most NRGs were differentially expressed between CRC tissues and normal tissues. We found that distinct subtypes exhibited different NRGs expression, patients' prognosis, immune checkpoint gene expression, and immune infiltration characteristics. The scores calculated from the necroptosis-related signature can be used to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, with the high-risk group corresponding to reduced immune cell infiltration and immune function, and a greater risk of immune dysfunction and immune escape.

Discussion

Our comprehensive analysis of NRGs in CRC demonstrated their potential role in clinicopathological features, prognosis, and immune infiltration in the TME. These findings help us deepen our understanding of NRGs and the tumor microenvironment landscape, and lay a foundation for effectively assessing patient outcomes and promoting more effective immunotherapy.

The distinct clinical trajectory, metastatic sites, and immunobiology of microsatellite-instability-high cancers

Microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) cancers form a spectrum of solid organ tumors collectively known as Lynch Syndrome cancers, occurring not only in a subset of colorectal, endometrial, small bowel, gastric, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers but also in prostate, breast, bladder, and thyroid cancers. Patients with Lynch Syndrome harbor germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, with a high degree of genomic instability, leading to somatic hypermutations and, therefore, oncogenesis and cancer progression. MSI-H cancers have unique clinicopathological characteristics compared to their microsatellite-stable (MSS) counterparts, marked by a higher neoantigen load, immune cell infiltration, and a marked clinical response to immune checkpoint blockade. Patients with known Lynch Syndrome may be detected early through surveillance, but some patients present with disseminated metastatic disease. The treatment landscape of MSI-H cancers, especially colorectal cancers, has undergone a paradigm shift and remains to be defined, with immune checkpoint blockade coming to the forefront of treatment strategies in the stage IV setting. We summarize in this review the clinical features of MSI-H cancers with a specific interest in the pattern of spread or recurrence, disease trajectory, and treatment strategies. We also summarize the tumor-immune landscape and genomic profile of MSI-H cancers and potential novel therapeutic strategies.

Which patients are prone to suffer liver metastasis? A review of risk factors of metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

Background

In recent years, with the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its high fatality rate, CRC has seized the attention of the world. And liver metastasis, as the main cause of death of CRC, has become the leading cause of treatment failure in CRC, especially metachronous liver metastasis, have caused patients who underwent bowel resection to experience multiple tortures.

Main body

Metachronous liver metastasis has severely affected the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Therefore, in this review, we discuss risk factors for metachronous liver metastasis of CRC, which is the premise for effective intervention for CRC patients who suffer metachronous liver metastasis after undergoing surgery, as well as the signaling pathways associated with CRC.

Conclusion

The occurrence of metachronous liver metastasis is closely related to histology-based prognostic biomarkers, serum-based biomarkers, tumor microenvironment, pre-metastatic niche, liquid biopsy and tissue-based biomarkers. Further research is required to explore the risk factors associated with liver metastasis of CRC.

Gemcitabine: An Alternative Treatment for Oxaliplatin-Resistant Colorectal Cancer

Resistance to treatments is one of the leading causes of cancer therapy failure. Oxaliplatin is a standard chemotherapy used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. However, its efficacy is greatly reduced by the development of resistances. In a previous study, we deciphered the mechanisms leading to oxaliplatin resistance and highlighted the roles played by ROS production and the p38 MAPK pathway in this phenomenon. In this report, we studied the effects of different chemotherapy molecules on our oxaliplatin-resistant cells to identify alternative treatments. Among all the studied molecules, gemcitabine was the only one to present a major cytotoxic effect on oxaliplatin-resistant cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro. However, the combination of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine did not present any major interest. Indeed, the study of combination efficiency using Chou and Talalay's method showed no synergy between oxaliplatin and gemcitabine. Using PamGene technology to decipher gemcitabine's effects on oxaliplatin-resistant cells, we were able to show that gemcitabine counteracts chemoresistance by strongly inhibiting the Akt and src/p38 MAPK pathways, leading to apoptosis induction and cell death. In view of these results, gemcitabine could be an interesting alternative therapy for patients with colorectal cancer not responding to oxaliplatin-based protocols such as FOLFOX.

Comprehensive Review of Biomarkers for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

Despite the implementation of global screening programs, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. More than 10% of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed as having locally advanced disease with a relatively poor five-year survival rate. Locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) presents surgical challenges to R0 resection. The advantages and disadvantages of preoperative radiotherapy for LACC remain undetermined. Although several reliable novel biomarkers have been proposed for the prediction and prognosis of CRC, few studies have focused solely on the treatment of LACC. This comprehensive review highlights the role of predictive biomarkers for treatment and postoperative oncological outcomes for patients with LACC. Moreover, this review discusses emerging needs and approaches for the discovery of biomarkers that can facilitate the development of new therapeutic targets and surveillance of patients with LACC.

Assessing Oncologists' Adoption of Biomarker Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

Despite national guideline recommendations for universal biomarker testing (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and mismatch repair and microsatellite instability [MMR/MSI]) in all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), little is known regarding adherence to these recommendations in routine practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with mCRC diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 27, 2018, from a de-identified electronic health record-derived database. We analyzed disparities in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI testing by race, age, sex, and insurance status using χ2 tests and t tests. We evaluated changes in biomarker testing over time with attention to changes around dates of landmark publications and guideline updates using χ2 tests and Cochran-Armitage tests.

RESULTS

A total of 20 333 patients were identified of which 66.6% had test results for any biomarker. Rates of test results for all 4 biomarkers statistically significantly increased over time (P < .001). However, as of June 30, 2018, the rate of test results was only 46% for NRAS, 56% for KRAS, and 46% for BRAF. As of December 31, 2017, the rate of MMR/MSI testing was 59%. Higher documented testing rates were associated with younger age, lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and commercial insurance. There were no clinically meaningful and/or statistically significant differences in documented testing rates by tumor sidedness, race, sex, or initial stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased rates of documented testing for NRAS, BRAF, and MMR/MSI in mCRC was seen between 2013 and 2018 reflecting adoption of guideline recommendations. However, the rate of documented testing remains lower than expected and warrants additional research to understand the extent to which this may represent a clinical practice quality concern.

Heparanase modulates the prognosis and development of BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer by regulating AKT/p27Kip1/Cyclin E2 pathway

BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer with poor prognosis. Compelling evidence indicates that the heparanase (HPSE) gene has multiple functions in cancer, however, its role in BRAF V600E-mutant CRC remains elusive. Differentially expressed genes between BRAF V600E-mutant and wild-type patients were explored by analyzing public data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Gene Expression Omnibus. Clinical samples of 172 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant CRC diagnosed at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University were collected. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. Cell models and xenografts were utilized to investigate the effect of HPSE on tumor proliferation. HPSE was significantly highly expressed in the BRAF V600E-mutant group. High HPSE expression level was independently associated with inferior survival in the BRAF V600E-mutant cohort. HPSE knockdown impeded tumor proliferation of BRAF V600E-mutant CRC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, HPSE silencing arrested cell cycle in G0/G1 phase by downregulating Cyclin E2 expression via the AKT/p27Kip1 pathway. These findings support a role for HPSE in promoting BRAF V600E-mutant CRC progression, which suggests it holds great promise as a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for the aggressive CRC subtype.

Neoadjuvant treatment of advanced colonic cancer: a paradigm shift?

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an exciting and emerging field for colonic cancer treatment. This article reviews the evidence for such treatment and the role of of molecular testing in treatment selection.

Stage-dependent prognostic shift in mismatch repair-deficient tumors: Assessing patient outcomes in stage II and III colon cancer

Introduction

Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is associated with an improved prognosis in colon cancer stage II but poor prognosis in stage IV colon cancer. The clinical significance of dMMR in colon cancer stage III is not established.

Methods

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 544 patients with colon cancer stage II and III with clinicopathological and survival data were stained for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, CD3, CD8, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and programmed death ligand- 1 (PD-L1). Patient outcomes were reviewed.

Results

In stage III colon cancer, dMMR was a marker of poor disease-free survival (DFS) (Kaplan–Meier, mean survival in months: dMMR: 28.76 (95% CI 18.46–39.05) vs. pMMR 40.91 (37.20–44.63), p=0.014, multivariate Cox regression: hazard ratio (HR) 4.17 (95% CI 2.02–8.61), p<0.001). In stage II colon cancer, there was a tendency toward improved DFS for dMMR patients (dMMR: 57.14 (95% CI 54.66–59.62) vs. pMMR 53.54 (95% CI 51.48–55.60), p=0.015, multivariate Cox regression HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.06-1.04), p=0.057). CD3, CD8, and PD-L1 expression was not associated with prognosis of dMMR patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a significant interaction between the MMR phenotype and stage (p=0.001).

Conclusion

dMMR is associated with an improved prognosis in stage II colon cancer but is no longer associated with a favorable prognosis in stage III colon cancer.

Identification of hub genes related to CD4+ memory T cell infiltration with gene co-expression network predicts prognosis and immunotherapy effect in colon adenocarcinoma

Background: CD4+ memory T cells (CD4+ MTCs), as an important part of the microenvironment affecting tumorigenesis and progression, have rarely been systematically analyzed. Our purpose was to comprehensively analyze the effect of CD4+ MTC infiltration on the prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). Methods: Based on RNA-Seq data, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to screen the CD4+ MTC infiltration genes most associated with colon cancer and then identify hub genes and construct a prognostic model using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm (LASSO). Finally, survival analysis, immune efficacy analysis, and drug sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate the role of the prognostic model in COAD. Results: We identified 929 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with CD4+ MTCs and constructed a prognosis model based on five hub genes (F2RL2, TGFB2, DTNA, S1PR5, and MPP2) to predict overall survival (OS) in COAD. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed poor prognosis in the high-risk group, and the analysis of the hub gene showed that overexpression of TGFB2, DTNA, S1PR5, or MPP2 was associated with poor prognosis. Clinical prediction nomograms combining CD4+ MTC-related DEGs and clinical features were constructed to accurately predict OS and had high clinical application value. Immune efficacy and drug sensitivity analysis provide new insights for individualized treatment. Conclusion: We constructed a prognostic risk model to predict OS in COAD and analyzed the effects of risk score on immunotherapy efficacy or drug sensitivity. These studies have important clinical significance for individualized targeted therapy and prognosis.

Anatomic location of colorectal cancer presents a new paradigm for its prognosis in African American patients

Among all racial groups in the U.S., African Americans (AA) have the highest incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). Although socioeconomic factors, as the major contributors to racial disparity of CRC, have been widely investigated, there is a dearth of information germane to understanding its biological basis. To better elucidate the clinicopathologic features we extracted demographic, clinical, pathologic and molecular features of 500 consecutive cases of CRC diagnosed at our institution which has an AA-predominant patient population (75% of all patients). We compared data from our AA patients with those of white patients both from our institution and from SEER and the published literature for meaningful comparison. AA patients were more likely to be at an advanced disease stage (25.9% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.041), have low grade tumors (89.2% vs. 77.5%, p<0.001) in cecum (18.7% vs. 16.2%, p<0.001) and <60-years-old than white patients (31.8% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.015). The frequency of KRAS mutation was higher in AA patients than in white patients (56.8% vs. 20.7%, p<0.001). Amongst subtypes of KRAS tested in CRC, codon 12 mutation is more common in AA than white patients (85.2% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.020). Compared with other racial groups, we found AA patients to have worse disease-free survival (HR = 3.682, p = 0.035). Also, AA patients with CRC in distal (sigmoid and rectum) or proximal (cecum) colon have worse overall survival than those with CRC in middle colon (HR = 2.926, p = 0.014), a finding not observed in white patients. In both racial groups, advanced stage, perforation, and hypertension were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (p<0.05). Similarly, low body-mass index at presentation, mucinous adenocarcinoma, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and KRAS mutations were independent factors significantly associated with poor disease-free survival. Collectively, our data provide new insights into the roles of clinicopathologic features, especially anatomic distribution, in predicting outcomes of CRC in AA population.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer and the potential role of exosomes in drug delivery

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is third most common cancer with second most common cause of death worldwide. One fourth to one fifth of the CRC cases are detected at advance stage. Early detection of colorectal cancer might help in decreasing mortality and morbidity worldwide. CRC being a heterogeneous disease, new non-invasive approaches are needed to complement and improve the screening and management of CRC. Reliable and early detectable biomarkers would improve diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic responses, and will enable the prediction of drug response and recurrence risk. Over the past decades molecular research has demonstrated the potentials of CTCs, ctDNAs, circulating mRNA, ncRNAs, and exosomes as tumor biomarkers. Non-invasive screening approaches using fecal samples for identification of altered gut microbes in CRC is also gaining attention. Exosomes can be potential candidates that can be employed in the drug delivery system. Further, the integration of in vitro, in vivo and in silico models that involve CRC biomarkers will help to understand the interactions occurring at the cellular level. This review summarizes recent update on CRC biomarkers and their application along with the nanoparticles followed by the application of organoid culture in CRC.

Exploring immunotherapy in colorectal cancer

Chemotherapy combined with or without targeted therapy is the fundamental treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Due to the adverse effects of chemotherapeutic drugs and the biological characteristics of the tumor cells, it is difficult to make breakthroughs in traditional strategies. The immune checkpoint blockades (ICB) therapy has made significant progress in the treatment of advanced malignant tumors, and patients who benefit from this therapy may obtain a long-lasting response. Unfortunately, immunotherapy is only effective in a limited number of patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), and segment initial responders can subsequently develop acquired resistance. From September 4, 2014, the first anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drug Pembrolizumab was approved by the FDA for the second-line treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. Subsequently, it was approved for mCRC second-line treatment in 2017. Immunotherapy has rapidly developed in the past 7 years. The in-depth research of the ICB treatment indicated that the mechanism of colorectal cancer immune-resistance has become gradually clear, and new predictive biomarkers are constantly emerging. Clinical trials examining the effect of immune checkpoints are actively carried out, in order to produce long-lasting effects for mCRC patients. This review summarizes the treatment strategies for mCRC patients, discusses the mechanism and application of ICB in mCRC treatment, outlines the potential markers of the ICB efficacy, lists the key results of the clinical trials, and collects the recent basic research results, in order to provide a theoretical basis and practical direction for immunotherapy strategies.

Larotrectinib in Mismatch-Repair-Deficient TRK Fusion-Positive Metastatic Colon Cancer After Progression on Immunotherapy

A 43-year-old woman presented with recurrent metastatic colon cancer with metastases to the peritoneum after having initially been diagnosed with stage IIB colon cancer and deferring adjuvant chemotherapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based liquid biopsy testing revealed microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status, which was also confirmed on tissue testing. This patient then underwent four cycles of pembrolizumab and two cycles of ipilimumab and nivolumab (CTLA-4 rescue) with, unfortunately, progression of the disease. The patient was subsequently treated with larotrectinib, given the findings of TRK fusion-positive cancer on next-generation sequencing (NGS), and she was able to undergo curative surgery two months later that showed complete pathologic response. She continues to have no evidence of disease years later as well as no detectable ctDNA on NGS as well as tumor-informed minimal residual disease platforms. This case represents a marked and durable response to larotrectinib in a patient with deficiency in mismatch repair/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer harboring an NTRK fusion, bringing to light the potential for use of larotrectinib in earlier treatment lines in patients, and/or choice of targeted therapy versus immunotherapy in this patient subset.

Dynamic Co-Evolution of Cancer Cells and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Role in Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer Progression and Its Clinical Relevance

Simple Summary

The versatile crosstalk between cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) of the tumour microenvironment (TME) drives colorectal carcinogenesis and heterogeneity. Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be classified by the anatomical sites from which the cancer arises, either from the right or left colon. Although the cancer cell–CAF interaction is being widely studied, its role in the progression of cancer in the right and left colon and cancer heterogeneity are still yet to be elucidated. Further insight into the complex interaction between different cellular components in the cancer niche, their evolutionary process and their influence on cancer progression would propel the discovery of effective targeted CRC therapy.

Abstract

Cancer is a result of a dynamic evolutionary process. It is composed of cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME). One of the major cellular constituents of TME, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to interact with cancer cells and promote colorectal carcinogenesis. The accumulation of these activated fibroblasts is linked to poor diagnosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and recurrence of the disease. However, the interplay between cancer cells and CAFs is yet to be described, especially in relation to the sidedness of colorectal carcinogenesis. CRC, which is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer globally, can be classified according to the anatomical region from which they originate: left-sided (LCRC) and right-sided CRC (RCR). Both cancers differ in many aspects, including in histology, evolution, and molecular signatures. Despite occurring at lower frequency, RCRC is often associated with worse diagnosis compared to LCRC. The differences in molecular profiles between RCRC and LCRC also influence the mode of treatment that can be used to specifically target these cancer entities. A better understanding of the cancer cell–CAF interplay and its association with RCRC and LRCR progression will provide better insight into potential translational aspects of targeted treatment for CRC.

Discordant prognosis of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal and endometrial cancer reflects variation in antitumour immune response and immune escape

Defective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) causes elevated tumour mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in multiple cancer types. dMMR/MSI colorectal cancers (CRCs) have enhanced T-cell infiltrate and favourable outcome; however, this association has not been reliably detected in other tumour types, including endometrial cancer (EC). We sought to confirm this and explore the underpinning mechanisms. We first meta-analysed CRC and EC trials that have examined the prognostic value of dMMR/MSI and confirmed that dMMR/MSI predicts better prognosis in CRC, but not EC, with statistically significant variation between cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-0.73 versus HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.72-1.58; PINT  = 0.02). Next, we studied intratumoural immune infiltrate in CRCs and ECs of defined MMR status and found that while dMMR was associated with increased density of tumour-infiltrating CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells in both cancer types, the increases were substantially greater in CRC and significant only in this group (PINT  = 4.3e-04 and 7.3e-03, respectively). Analysis of CRC and EC from the independent Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) series revealed similar variation and significant interactions in proportions of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, CD8+ , CD4+ , NK cells and immune checkpoint expression, confirming a more vigorous immune response to dMMR/MSI in CRC than EC. Agnostic analysis identified the IFNγ pathway activity as strongly upregulated by dMMR/MSI in CRC, but downregulated in EC by frequent JAK1 mutations, the impact of which on IFNγ response was confirmed by functional analyses. Collectively, our results confirm the discordant prognosis of dMMR/MSI in CRC and EC and suggest that this relates to differences in intratumoural immune infiltrate and tumour genome. Our study underscores the need for tissue-specific analysis of cancer biomarkers and may help inform immunotherapy use. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents approximately 10% of all cancers and is the second most common cause of cancer deaths. Initial clinical presentation as metastatic CRC (mCRC) occurs in approximately 20% of patients. Moreover, up to 50% of patients with localized disease eventually develop metastases. Appropriate clinical management of these patients is still a challenging medical issue. Major efforts have been made to unveil the molecular landscape of mCRC. This has resulted in the identification of several druggable tumor molecular targets with the aim of developing personalized treatments for each patient. This review summarizes the improvements in the clinical management of patients with mCRC in the emerging era of precision medicine. In fact, molecular stratification, on which the current treatment algorithm for mCRC is based, although it does not completely represent the complexity of this disease, has been the first significant step toward clinically informative genetic profiling for implementing more effective therapeutic approaches. This has resulted in a clinically relevant increase in mCRC disease control and patient survival. The next steps in the clinical management of mCRC will be to integrate the comprehensive knowledge of tumor gene alterations, of tumor and microenvironment gene and protein expression profiling, of host immune competence as well as the application of the resulting dynamic changes to a precision medicine-based continuum of care for each patient. This approach could result in the identification of individual prognostic and predictive parameters, which could help the clinician in choosing the most appropriate therapeutic program(s) throughout the entire disease journey for each patient with mCRC. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:000-000.

From Intestinal Epithelial Homeostasis to Colorectal Cancer: Autophagy Regulation in Cellular Stress

The intestinal epithelium is continuously exposed to abundant stress stimuli, which relies on an evolutionarily conserved process, autophagy, to maintain its homeostasis by degrading and recycling unwanted and damaged intracellular substances. Otherwise, disruption of this balance will result in the development of a wide range of disorders, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Dysregulated autophagy is implicated in the regulation of cellular responses to stress during the development, progression, and treatment of CRC. However, experimental investigations addressing the impact of autophagy in different phases of CRC have generated conflicting results, showing that autophagy is context-dependently related to CRC. Thus, both inhibition and activation of autophagy have been proposed as therapeutic strategies against CRC. Here, we will discuss the multifaceted role of autophagy in intestinal homeostasis and CRC, which may provide insights for future research directions.

Anticancer Potential of Hydroxychavicol Derived from Piper betle L: An in Silico and Cytotoxicity Study

Piper betle L. is a popular medicinal plant in Asia, and extracts of the plant leaf are used for several therapeutics. It is known for its rich source of phenolic compounds, including hydroxychavicol. Hydroxychavicol is an allylbenzene that has gained much attention due to its anticancer properties. The current study quantified and purified hydroxychavicol from P. betle L. and predicted its anticancer competence through in silico and cytotoxicity studies. Leaf samples of 22 P. betle L. accessions from different locations of Tamil Nadu, India, were analyzed using reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography for quantification of hydroxychavicol. The highest quantity of hydroxychavicol was obtained from the accession BV22 (89.2%). Chemical absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis of hydroxychavicol using SwissADME satisfied the physicochemical property guidelines of Lipinski's Rule of Five, ensuring its drug-likeness behavior. Molecular docking studies confirmed the interaction of hydroxychavicol with all 16 tested cancer targets. In Vitro MTT assay of hydroxychavicol in bone cancer cell lines (MG63) also demonstrated the anticancer competency, indicating the requirement to formulate the molecule as a drug in treating various types of cancers.

Impact of Relative Dose Intensity of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Risk of Death Among Stage III Colon Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have recommended tailored chemotherapy for stage III high-risk (T4 and/or N2) and low-risk (T1-T3 and N1) colon cancer since 2018. Studies have investigated the effect of relative dose intensity (RDI) of FOLFOX on stage III colon cancer survival, however, none has performed a stratified analysis by risk profiles. This study aims to identify the FOLFOX optimal RDI for high-risk and low-risk stage III colon cancer patients.

METHODS

Data on 407 eligible patients, diagnosed with stage III colon cancer in 2011 who received FOLFOX, were collected by 8 population-based cancer registries. Multivariable Cox model and Fine-Gray competing risks model were employed to explore Optimal RDI defined as the lowest RDI administered without significant differences in either overall or cause-specific death.

RESULTS

Among the 168 high-risk patients, the optimal RDI cut-off was 70% (HR = 1.59 with 95% CI: 0.69-3.66 in overall mortality; HR = 1.24 with 95% CI: 0.42-3.64 in cause-specific mortality when RDI < 70% vs. RDI ≥ 70%). Among the 239 low-risk patients, none of the evaluated cut-offs were associated with significant differences in risk of death between comparison groups. The lowest assessed RDI was 45%, HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.24 to 2.73 for overall mortality and HR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.06 to 4.95 for cause-specific mortality, when RDI <45% versus RDI ≥45%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant harm on the risk of death when reducing RDI by <30% for high-risk patients. For the low-risk patients, we found that RDI as low as 45% did not significantly affect the risk of death.

Clinical impact of primary tumor sidedness and sex on unresectable post-recurrence survival in resected pathological stage II-III colorectal cancers: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study

Background

Several studies have demonstrated that right-sided tumors have poorer prognosis than left-sided tumors in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC). The predictive ability of the tumor sidedness in CRC treated with chemotherapy in each sex is unclear.

Methods

Subjects were 964 unresectable recurrent patients treated with chemotherapy with stage II-III CRC after curative resection between 2004 and 2012. Post-recurrence cancer-specific survival (CSS) for each sex was examined.

Results

Patients were 603 males (222 right-side tumors (cecum to transverse colon) and 381 left-sided tumors (descending colon to rectum)), and 361 females (167 right-side tumors and 194 left-sided tumors). Right-sided tumors developed peritoneal recurrences in males and females. Left-sided tumors were associated with locoregional recurrences in males and with lung recurrences in females. Right-sided tumors were associated with shorter post-recurrence CSS in both sexes. In males, multivariate analyses showed that right-sided tumors were associated with shorter post-recurrence CSS (HR: 1.53, P < 0.0001) together with the presence of regional lymph node metastasis histopathological type of other than differentiated adenocarcinoma, the recurrence of liver only, the recurrence of peritoneal dissemination only, and relapse-free interval less than one-year. In females, multivariate analyses showed that right-sided tumors were associated with shorter post-recurrence CSS (HR: 1.50, P = 0.0019) together with advanced depth of invasion, the presence of regional lymph node metastasis, and recurrence of liver only.

Conclusions

Primary tumor sidedness in both sexes in unresectable recurrent CRC patients treated with chemotherapy may have prognostic implications for post-recurrence CSS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09615-z.

Concurrent BRAFV600E and BRCA Mutations in MSS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Prevalence and Case Series of mCRC patients with prolonged OS

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E+ microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients comprise up to 10% of advanced CRC. They have a poor prognosis with a median survival typically <1 year. Despite use of multi-agent 1^st line chemotherapy regimens and combination targeted therapies, outcomes are still poor. In our Institutional Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) database, we identified 3 mCRC patients with MSS/BRAF V600E who also had a BRCA1 or BRCA2 co-mutation and had relatively long overall survivals. Prior studies suggested that BRCA mutations are uncommon in CRC and we queried the Foundation Medicine (FM) genomic database to evaluate the prevalence of these cases as well as those with co-mutations in other homologous recombination genes.

METHODS

36,966 CRC pts were sequenced by FMI using hybrid capture comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations (GA) for pathogenic BRAF mutations and/or a mutation in BRCA1/2 or a co-mutation in other homologous recombination (HR) genes (BARD1, CDK12, FANCL, PALB2, ATM, RAD54L, CHEK2, BRAF, BRIP1, RAD51D, RAD51C, RAD51B, CHEK1). Selected cohort analysis of BRAF V600E co-mutated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were separated into MSI-H and MSS cohorts. The clinicopathological features and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) of those with a BRAF V600E and a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation were collected and analyzed. We also describe 3 consecutive cases of mCRC patients, identified through the Inova Schar Cancer Institute (ISCI) MTB registry, whom had prolonged OS.

RESULTS

Of 36,966 colorectal cancer pts, 6.6% were BRAF V600E+ and 1.5% had any co-occurring HR gene mutation(s) with 0.6% of the total mCRC population having co-ocurring BRAF V600E and BRCA1/2 alterations. BRCA co-mutations were higher in MSI-High BRAF V600E, however 24.1% of co-occurrences were observed in MSS samples. BRCA1 co-mutation was more commonly associated with MSS BRAF V600E and was associated with a higher gLOH than MSI-H BRAF V600E (18.7% vs 2.8%; p <0.001). In our institutional MTB database, (3/241;1.2%) CRC patients were MSS, BRAF V600E+ with BRCA1 or BRCA2 co-mutations, all somatic in origin, with an average gLOH of 21.4% and overall survivals of 72+(alive), 17+(alive), and 30 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Co-existence of BRAF V600E/BRCA1/2 may represent a unique subset of advanced MSS CRC that may have a better prognosis and represent an opportunity to test novel targeted therapies. The elevated gLOH in these cases may also be a valuable biomarker for these pts. Larger prospective clinical validation trials in this subset is warranted.

The frequency and clinical implication of mismatch repair protein deficiency in Chinese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Background

The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of deficient mismatch repair (MMR) in Chinese ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) patients and its association with clinicopathologic features.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry with four antibodies against MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 was performed on whole section slides, and the results were correlated with clinicopathologic variables.

Results

A total of 108 cases were included in the present study with a median age of 52 years at first diagnosis. Early-stage disease and platinum-sensitive recurrence accounted for 62.3 and 69.6%, respectively, of the total cases. Overall, the estimated 5-year overall survival was 70.3 and 20.7% in patients with early- and late-stage tumors, respectively. Deficient MMR was identified in 5.6% (6/108) of the cohort and included MSH2/MSH6 (n = 4) and MLH1/PMS2 (n = 2). The average age of the six patients with deficient MMR was 45.6 years, and the rate of MMR-deficient tumors in women ≤50 years was relatively higher than that in women over 50 years (10.0% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.266). Half of the patients with deficient MMR were diagnosed with synchronous (endometrial or colorectal) and metachronous (endometrial) cancer, which was significantly more than their intact counterparts (P = 0.002). All six patients with deficient MMR had early-stage tumors, and the majority (83.3%) were platinum sensitive. The median progression-free survival was slightly higher in patients with defective MMR expression than in their intact counterparts (30 months vs. 27 months), but significance was not achieved (P = 0.471).

Conclusions

Young ovarian CCC patients with concurrent diagnosis of endometrial and colorectal cancer are more likely to have MMR-deficient tumors, thereby warranting additional studies to determine whether patients harboring MMR abnormalities have a favorable prognosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09588-z.

BRAF-mutated colorectal adenocarcinomas: pathological heterogeneity and clinical implications

Advances in molecular biology have markedly increased our understanding of the heterogeneous molecular landscape of colorectal cancer (CRC). Up to 15% of CRCs harbor the BRAF p.V600E somatic mutation (BRAFmt), a well-established negative prognostic marker in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). The BEACON CRC trial set a new standard of care in patients with progressive BRAFmt cancers, consisting of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab. On these bases, BRAF mutational testing is now recommended in patients with mCRC. However, efforts are needed to further stratify patients carrying this mutation. Here, we discuss the heterogeneous pathologic and molecular landscape of BRAFmt CRCs, focusing on the promises and pitfalls of molecular diagnostics, on novel biomarkers to improve patients' stratification and on the current diagnostic scenario for CRC. We believe that a better stratification based on histopathological features and novel molecular biomarkers should be performed to optimize patient management and therapeutic decision-making.

The View of Turkish Oncologists Regarding MSI Status and Tumor Localization in Stage II and III Colon Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although several clinical factors which show the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in early-stage colon cancer use for evaluating the risk of relapse, there is no consensus on which risk factors are more reliable. In this study, we evaluated both the utility of MSI and the daily practice of the Turkish oncologists in stage II and III colon cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted an online questionnaire which was consisting of twenty questions including the treatment choices and duration about stage II-III colon cancer depending on sidedness and risk factors for relapse.

RESULTS

More than 65% of the oncologists declared the use of MSI testing in stage II colon cancer without considering any risk factors. In stage 3 colon cancer oncologists had an equal decision "to do or not to do" in MSI testing. More than 50% of the oncologists had preferred XELOX protocol in high-risk stage II (T4N0) colon cancer, while three out of four preferred observation in low-risk stage II (T3N0) patients without risk factors. Two-thirds of the oncologists had preferred 6 months of treatment in stage II colon cancer with at least one risk factor.

CONCLUSION

Turkish oncologists participating to this trial had declared conflicting results about adjuvant treatment in early-stage colorectal cancer in their daily practice compared with the updated guidelines, especially, MSI evaluation utility in stage III colon cancers, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) duration, and oxaliplatin adding to AC in elderly and stage II patients.

Improved Survival over Time After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and Clinical Impact of Multigene Alteration Testing in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The past 20 years have seen advances in colorectal cancer management. We sought to determine whether survival in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has improved in association with three landmark advances: introduction of irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens, molecular targeted therapy, and multigene alteration testing.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CLM resection during 1998-2014 were identified and grouped by resection year. The influence of alterations in RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 was evaluated and validated in an external cohort including patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Of 1961 patients, 1599 met the inclusion criteria. Irinotecan- and/or oxaliplatin-containing regimens and molecular targeted therapy were used for more than 50% of patients starting in 2001 and starting in 2006, respectively, so patients were grouped as undergoing resection during 1998-2000, 2001-2005, or 2006-2014. Liver resectability indications expanded over time. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in 2006-2014, vs. 2001-2005 (56.5% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.001). RAS alteration was associated with worse 5-year OS than RAS wild-type (44.8% vs. 63.3%, P < 0.001). However, OS did not differ significantly between patients with RAS alteration and wild-type TP53 and SMAD4 and patients with RAS wild-type in our cohort (P = 0.899) or the external cohort (P = 0.932). Of 312 patients with genetic sequencing data, 178 (57.1%) had clinically actionable alterations.

CONCLUSION

OS after CLM resection has improved with advances in medical therapy and surgical technique. Multigene alteration testing is useful for prognostication and identification of potential therapeutic targets.

Current Perspectives on the Importance of Pathological Features in Prognostication and Guidance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer

There is not a clear consensus on which pathological features and biomarkers are important in guiding prognosis and adjuvant therapy in colon cancer. The Pathology in Colon Cancer, Prognosis and Uptake of Adjuvant Therapy (PiCC UP) Australia and New Zealand questionnaire was distributed to colorectal surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists after institutional board approval. The aim of this study was to understand current specialist attitudes towards pathological features in the prognostication of colon cancer and adjuvant therapy in stage II disease. A 5-scale Likert score was used to assess attitudes towards 23 pathological features for prognosis and 18 features for adjuvant therapy. Data were analysed using a rating scale and graded response model in item response theory (IRT) on STATA (Stata MP, version 15; StataCorp LP). One hundred and sixty-four specialists (45 oncologists, 86 surgeons and 33 pathologists) participated. Based on IRT modelling, the most important pathological features for prognosis in colon cancer were distant metastases, lymph node metastases and liver metastases. Other features seen as important were tumour rupture, involved margin, radial margin, CRM, lymphovascular invasion and grade of differentiation. Size of tumour, location, lymph node ratio and EGFR status were considered less important. The most important features in decision making for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer were tumour rupture, lymphovascular invasion and microsatellite instability. BRAF status, size of tumour, location, tumour budding and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes were factored as lesser importance. Biomarkers such as CDX2, EGFR, KRAS and BRAF status present areas for further research to improve precision oncology. This study provides the most current status on the importance of pathological features in prognostication and recommendations for adjuvant therapy in Australia and New Zealand. Results of this nationwide study may be useful to help in guiding prognosis and adjuvant treatment in colon cancer.

The Interaction Between N6-Methyladenosine Modification and Non-Coding RNAs in Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most common epigenetic modification of eukaryotic RNA, which can participate in the growth and development of the body and a variety of physiological and disease processes by affecting the splicing, processing, localization, transport, translation, and degradation of RNA. Increasing evidence shows that non-coding RNAs, particularly microRNA, long non-coding RNA, and circular RNA, can also regulate the RNA m⁶A modification process by affecting the expression of m⁶A-related enzymes. The interaction between m⁶A modification and non-coding RNAs provides a new perspective for the exploration of the potential mechanism of tumor genesis and development. In this review, we summarize the potential mechanisms and effects of m⁶A and non-coding RNAs in gastrointestinal tract cancers.

Validation of Urinary Charged Metabolite Profiles in Colorectal Cancer Using Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry

This study aimed to validate and reanalyze urinary biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancers (CRCs). We previously conducted urinary metabolomic analyses using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry and found a significant difference in various metabolites, especially polyamines, between patients with CRC and healthy controls (HC). We analyzed additional samples and confirmed consistency between the newly and previously analyzed data. In total, we included 36 HC, 34 adenoma (AD), and 214 CRC samples, which were used for subsequent analyses. Among the 132 quantified metabolites, 16 exhibited consistent differences in both datasets, which included polyamines, etc. Pathway analyses of the integrated data revealed significant differences in many metabolites, such as glutamine, and metabolites of the TCA (tricarboxylic acid cycle) and urea cycles. The discrimination ability of the combination of multiple metabolites among the three groups was evaluated, which yielded higher sensitivity than tumor markers. The Mann–Whitney test was employed to evaluate the prognosis predictivity of the assessed metabolites and the difference between the patients with or without recurrence, which yielded 16 significantly different metabolites. Among these 16 metabolites, 11 presented significant prognosis predictivity. These data indicated the potential of metabolite-based discrimination of patients with CRC and AD from HC and prognosis predictivity of the monitored metabolites.

Clinical Implication of KRAS Mutation Variants in Patients With Resected Colon Cancer

AIM

This study evaluated the clinical implication of KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) mutation variants in patients with resected colon cancer (CC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 482 patients diagnosed with CC who underwent curative surgical resection at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital. The inclusion criteria were: Pathologically diagnosed with primary CC; stage I-III CC according to the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system; and with available test results for KRAS mutation status. In total, 345 patients met these criteria and were included in this study.

RESULTS

Among the 345 patients, 140 (40.6%) exhibited KRAS mutations, with their incidences as follows: 90/140 (64.3%) in exon 2 codon 12, 37/140 (26.4%) in exon 2 codon 13, 1/140 (0.1%) in exon 3 codon 59, 7/140 (5.0%) in exon 3 codon 61, and 5/140 (3.6%) in exon 4 codon 146. KRAS mutation status was not a significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival or overall survival. Although there were no significant differences in survival between patients with exon 2 codon 12 and exon 2 codon 13 mutations, poorer disease-free survival (p=0.085) and overall survival (p=0.005) were seen in those with exon 3 codon 61 mutation than in others.

CONCLUSION

KRAS mutation status was not correlated with survival, but exon 3 codon 61 mutation might be a factor for poor prognosis in patients after resection of CC.

BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer: An update

Colon cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. About 10% of all colon cancer patients are found to have a mutation in BRAF proto-oncogene that arise as a result of a substitution of amino acid valine with glutamate at position 600 (V600E). This specific mutation is also found in melanomas, but at even higher percent - in up to 60% of patients. A particular category of drugs called BRAF inhibitors, have been developed in order to increase survival. But, while in patients with melanoma this class of drugs work well especially when combined with mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, they have low efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer suggesting different mechanism of action and development of drug resistance. This review summarise recent findings aimed to highlight events in BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Sustainable Clinical Development of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer

Numerous clinical studies in an adjuvant setting have been conducted and the combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin has been established as the standard treatment for Stage III and as an option for high-risk Stage II patients. Biologics such as bevacizumab and antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibodies have failed to show additional survival benefits. The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy has been determined according to the pathological stage. Nevertheless, a pathological diagnosis does not necessarily result in selection of the optimal treatment. To improve treatment decisions, many trials have aimed to stratify patients into treatment groups using genomic testing. Recently, gene signature, Immunoscore, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays have been reported and among them, ctDNA was shown to be a promising accurate predictive marker for recurrence. Treatment of ctDNA-positive patients with aggressive chemotherapy may reduce recurrence rates. The ultimate goal is to accurately predict the risk of recurrence and to prevent recurrence in colon cancer patients. In this review we focus on the clinical development of adjuvant chemotherapy and stratification of patients according to risk of recurrence and the future direction of adjuvant chemotherapy.

A Network-Centric Framework for the Evaluation of Mutual Exclusivity Tests on Cancer Drivers

One of the key concepts employed in cancer driver gene identification is that of mutual exclusivity (ME); a driver mutation is less likely to occur in case of an earlier mutation that has common functionality in the same molecular pathway. Several ME tests have been proposed recently, however the current protocols to evaluate ME tests have two main limitations. Firstly the evaluations are mostly with respect to simulated data and secondly the evaluation metrics lack a network-centric view. The latter is especially crucial as the notion of common functionality can be achieved through searching for interaction patterns in relevant networks. We propose a network-centric framework to evaluate the pairwise significances found by statistical ME tests. It has three main components. The first component consists of metrics employed in the network-centric ME evaluations. Such metrics are designed so that network knowledge and the reference set of known cancer genes are incorporated in ME evaluations under a careful definition of proper control groups. The other two components are designed as further mechanisms to avoid confounders inherent in ME detection on top of the network-centric view. To this end, our second objective is to dissect the side effects caused by mutation load artifacts where mutations driving tumor subtypes with low mutation load might be incorrectly diagnosed as mutually exclusive. Finally, as part of the third main component, the confounding issue stemming from the use of nonspecific interaction networks generated as combinations of interactions from different tissues is resolved through the creation and use of tissue-specific networks in the proposed framework. The data, the source code and useful scripts are available at: https://github.com/abu-compbio/NetCentric.

Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer

The prognostication of colorectal cancer (CRC) has traditionally relied on staging as defined by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging classifications. However, clinically, there appears to be differences in survival patterns independent of stage, suggesting a complex interaction of stage, pathological features, and biomarkers playing a role in guiding prognosis, risk stratification, and guiding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Histological features such as tumour budding, perineural invasion, apical lymph node involvement, lymph node yield, lymph node ratio, and molecular features such as MSI, KRAS, BRAF, and CDX2 may assist in prognostication and optimising adjuvant treatment. This study provides a comprehensive review of the pathological features and biomarkers that are important in the prognostication and treatment of CRC. We review the importance of pathological features and biomarkers that may be important in colorectal cancer based on the current evidence in the literature.

Molecular Analysis of Colorectal Cancers Suggests a High Frequency of Lynch Syndrome in Indonesia

Simple Summary

The incidence of young people <50 years old who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), termed as early onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), accounted for nearly 30% of the total CRC patients in Indonesia, which is about three times higher than what is being reported in Europe, the UK and USA. Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary type of CRC that is associated with a younger age of onset. Detecting LS has been long reported to be a cost-effective strategy to provide aid in the diagnosis or management of the individual or at-risk family members. The aim of this retrospective study was to screen for Lynch Syndrome in Indonesian CRC patients using simple and robust polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular testing, known as N_LyST (Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test). To our knowledge, we are the first to study and observe a potentially higher frequency of LS (13.85%) among CRC patients in Indonesia (n = 231). This may partially contribute to the reported much higher rate of EOCRC found in the country.

Abstract

There is about three times higher incidence of young patients <50 years old with colorectal cancer, termed EOCRC, in Indonesia as compared to Europe, the UK and USA. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of Lynch Syndrome (LS) in Indonesian CRC patients. The previously described Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST) was used in this project. N_LyST is a robust high-resolution melting (HRM)-based test that has shown 100% concordance with standard reference methods, including capillary electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. The test consisted of five mononucleotide microsatellite markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 region C promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA). A total of 231 archival (2016–2019) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour tissues from CRC patients collected from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia, were successfully tested and analysed. Among those, 44/231 (19.05%) were MSI, 25/231 (10.82%) were harbouring BRAF V600E mutation and 6/231 (2.60%) had MLH1 promoter methylation. Almost all—186/197 (99.45%)—MSS cases were MLH1 promoter unmethylated, while there were only 5/44 (11.36%) MSI cases with MLH1 promoter methylation. Similarly, only 9/44 (20.45%) of MSI cases were BRAF mutant. There were 50/231 (21.65%) EOCRC cases, with 15/50 (30%) regarded as MSI, as opposed to 29/181 (16.02%) within the older group. In total, 32/231 patients (13.85%) were classified as “Probable Lynch” (MSI, BRAF wildtype and MLH1 promoter unmethylated), which were enriched in EOCRC as compared to older patients (24% vs. 11.05%, p = 0.035). Nonetheless, 30/50 (76.00%) cases among the EOCRC cases were non-LS (sporadic) and were significantly associated with a left-sided tumour. The overall survival of both “Probable Lynch” and non-LS (sporadic) groups (n = 227) was comparable (p = 0.59), with follow up period of 0–1845 days/61.5 months. Stage, node status, histological grading and ECOG score were significantly associated with patient overall survival (p < 0.005), yet only ECOG was an independent factor for OS (HR: 4.38; 95% CI: 1.72–11.2; p = 0.002). In summary, this study is the first to reveal a potentially higher frequency of LS among CRC patients in Indonesia, which may partially contribute to the reported much higher number of EOCRC as compared to the incidence in the West.

Do tumor localization, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency have an impact on the prognosis of colorectal cancer?

Background

Recent reports have shown that left-and right-sided colon cancers display different clinical and biological features. Chromosomal instability, epigenetic alterations, and defects in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair (MMR) system may lead to the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Besides microsatellite instability (MSI) caused by DNA MMR activity degradation increases the risk for CRC.

Aim

We aimed to show the differences between CRCs in different locations, to research the cause of these differences, to present whether there is a relation between MMR and MSI, and to evaluate their effects on prognosis.

Patients and Methods

641 CRC cases were divided into three groups: Group 1 (right-sided), Group 2 (left-sided), and Group 3 (rectum). Demographics, cancer stages, location of the tumors, number of the lymph nodes removed, MMR deficiency or proficiency, MSI status, and survival were assessed by retrospective review of the patients.

Results

Among 641 patients, 64.9% were males. Group 1, 2, and 3 comprised 31.2%, 45.7%, and 23.1% of all the cases, respectively. There was a significant difference in terms of survival and location only in stage II tumors. Stage II left colon cancer (LCCs) had a statistically significant lower survival rate. There was no significant difference in survival between both MSI and MMR statuses. In addition, cases were also stratified by stages. According to this data, 10.1, 45.7, and 44.2% of the patients had stages I, II, and III disease, respectively.

Conclusions

Although it was not statistically significant, tumors with MMR deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are more common in right-sided colon tumors.

Interacting Genetic Lesions of Melanoma in the Tumor Microenvironment: Defining a Viable Therapy

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer with an estimated 106,110 newly diagnosed cases in the United States of America in 2021 leading to an approximated 7180 melanoma-induced deaths. Cancer typically arises from an accumulation of somatic mutations and can be associated with mutagenic or carcinogenic exposure. A key characteristic of melanoma is the extensive somatic mutation rate of 16.8 mutations/Mb, which is largely attributed to UV exposure. Bearing the highest mutational load, many of them occur in key driver pathways, most commonly the BRAFV600E in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. This driver mutation is targeted clinically with FDA-approved therapies using small molecule inhibitors of oncogenic BRAFV600E and MEK, which has greatly expanded therapeutic intervention following a melanoma diagnosis. Up until 2011, therapeutic options for metastatic melanoma were limited, and treatment typically fell under the spectrum of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.Attributed to the extensive mutation rate, as well as having the highest number of neoepitopes, melanoma is deemed to be extremely immunogenic. However, despite this highly immunogenic nature, melanoma is notorious for inducing an immunosuppressive microenvironment which can be relieved by checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The two molecules currently approved clinically are ipilimumab and nivolumab, which target the molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1, respectively.A plethora of immunomodulatory molecules exist, many with redundant functions. Additionally, these molecules are expressed not only by immune cells but also by tumor cells within the tumor microenvironment. Tumor profiling of these cell surface checkpoint molecules is necessary to optimize a clinical response. The presence of immunomodulatory molecules in melanoma, using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and validation of expression in two model systems, human melanoma tissues and patient-derived melanoma cells, revealed that the expression levels of B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), TIM1, and CD226, concurrently with the BRAFV600E mutation status, significantly dictated overall survival in melanoma patients. These molecules, along with herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and CD160, two molecules that are a part of the HVEM/BTLA/CD160 axis, had a higher expression in human melanoma tissues when compared to normal skin melanocytes and have unique roles to play in T cell activation. New links are being uncovered between the expression of immunomodulatory molecules and the BRAFV600E genetic lesion in melanoma. Small molecule inhibitors of the MAPK pathway regulate the surface expression of this multifaceted molecule, making BTLA a promising target for immuno-oncology to be targeted in combination with small molecule inhibitors, potentially alleviating T regulatory cell activation and improving patient prognosis.

Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients With a Plasma-Based Real-Time PCR Analysis

A microsatellite instability (MSI) test is crucial for screening for HNPCC (Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; Lynch syndrome) and optimization of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is a predictor for good response of immune checkpoint inhibitors in various malignancies. In this study, we evaluated the results of a newly developed plasma-based real-time PCR kit for the detection of MSI in CRC patients. We assessed a peptide nucleotide acid (PNA) probe-mediated real-time PCR test (U-TOP MSI Detection Kit Plus) that determines MSI status by using amplicon melting analysis of five markers (NR21, NR24, NR27, BAT25, and BAT26) from plasma. Eighty-four CRC patients (46 dMMR and 38 pMMR) with colorectal cancer were analyzed. The concordance rate of MSI status assessment between the plasma kit and IHC was 63.0% in dMMR patients (29/46), but in the pMMR evaluation, a 100% (38/38) concordance rate was observed. In the evaluation of the performance of a custom tissue U-TOP MSI Detection Kit and plasma kit in 28 patients, sensitivity, specificity, PPV (positive predictive value) and NPV (negative predictive value) of plasma kit were 68.4, 100, 100, and 44.4%, respectively, with the tissue U-TOP MSI Detection Kit. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a non-invasive and rapid plasma-based real-time PCR kit (U-TOP MSI Detection Kit Plus) for the detection of MSI in colorectal cancer.

The impact of KRAS mutation, microsatellite instability, and tumor laterality on the prognosis of nonmetastatic colon cancer

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutations, microsatellite instability, and tumor location have been found to be significant prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. The interaction between these variables and its effect on overall survival in nonmetastatic colon cancer has not been well elucidated.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with stage I-III colon cancer and known microsatellite instability and KRAS status undergoing curative resection.

RESULTS

A total of 5,292 patients were identified: 60.4% had right-sided cancers, 36.4% had KRAS mutations, and 15.6% had microsatellite instability. Right-sided tumors were more likely to have microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations compared to left-sided tumors. On univariable analysis, KRAS mutations and microsatellite instability status were not associated with differences in survival, whereas right-sided cancers had worse overall survival compared to left-sided cancers (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.47). On multivariable analysis, right-sided location, KRAS mutations, and microsatellite instability were not independent prognostic factors. However, a significant interaction between laterality and KRAS status was observed. In patients with mutated KRAS cancers, left-sided tumors were at increased risk of death compared to right-sided tumors (hazard ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.63), whereas in patients with wild-type KRAS cancers, left-sided tumors were at decreased risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.97).

CONCLUSION

In patients with stage I-III colon cancer, laterality, KRAS mutation, and microsatellite instability status were not independently prognostic after curative resection. However, the effect of laterality was opposite based on KRAS status, with left-sided (compared to right-sided) tumors associated with worse overall survival in mutated KRAS patients and better overall survival in wild-type KRAS individuals. Laterality itself may not be an independent prognostic factor but a reflection of differing genetic profiles within the colon.

Modern Approaches to Testing Drug Sensitivity of Patients' Tumors (Review)

Drug therapy is still one of the basic techniques used to treat cancers of different etiology. However, tumor resistance to drugs is a pressing problem limiting drug treatment efficacy. It is obvious for both modern fundamental and clinical oncology that there is the need for an individual approach to treating cancer taking into account the biological properties of a tumor when prescribing chemo- and targeted therapy. One of the promising strategies is to increase the antitumor therapy efficacy by developing predictive tests, which enable to evaluate the sensitivity of a particular tumor to a specific drug or a drug combination before the treatment initiation and, thus, make individual therapy selection possible.

The present review considers the main approaches to drug sensitivity assessment of patients’ tumors: molecular genetic profiling of tumor cells, and direct efficiency testing of the drugs on tumor cells isolated from surgical or biopsy material. There were analyzed the key directions in research and clinical studies such as: the search for predictive molecular markers, the development of methods to maintain tumor cells or tissue sections viable, i.e. in a condition maximum close to their physiological state, the development of high throughput systems to assess therapy efficiency. Special attention was given to a patient-centered approach to drug therapy in colorectal cancer.

Age-dependent prognostic value of KRAS mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: The age-dependent prognostic impact of KRAS status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unknown. Materials & Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to evaluate the survival by KRAS status for age-groups <50, 50-69 and ≥70, adjusting for relevant patient and tumor characteristics. Results: mCRC patients (n = 26,095; 33.5%) had KRAS status reported, and 11,338 of these patients (43.4%) had mutations in the KRAS gene. Patients with KRAS mutations had worse overall survival than wild-type KRAS patients. In age-groups <50 years (23 vs 29 months; p < 0.001) and 50-69 (21 vs 23.4 months; p < 0.001), KRAS mutations were significantly associated with worse survival, whereas in the ≥70-year age-group, there was no significant association (14 vs 14 months; p = 0.34). Conclusion: We conclude that the age of patients influences the prognostic value of KRAS mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer.

[Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of resectable colon cancer - Current standards and developments]

The present review focusses on perioperative diagnosis and treatment of resectable colon cancer. In UICC stages associated with a higher risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor is an established standard. While initial data also indicate the benefit of Neoadjuvant, pre-operative chemotherapy, a final evaluation is still pending. The main focus of molecular testing in the perioperative setting is the analysis of microsatellite instability, which should routinely be performed in defined subgroups. In UICC stage II without risk factors, adjuvant therapy has a limited benefit and therefore is not a preferred option. In UICC stage II with risk factors, adjuvant therapy can be performed. The approach here is based on the recommendations applicable to stage III. In UICC stage III with low risk, adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX for 3 months is preferentially recommended. In UICC stage III with high risk, adjuvant chemotherapy over 6 months is recommended, preferentially with FOLFOX. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is clearly associated with favorable prognosis in non-metastatic colon cancer. However, it cannot be considered a predictive factor for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, recent data of the IDEA study have opened the arena for shared decision making between physicians and patients allowing to define individual treatment approaches based on common assessment of risks and benefits. After completion of perioperative treatment, structured follow-up is of great importance and should be carried out according to the recommendations of the S3 guideline.

Role of oncogenic KRAS in the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease at the cellular and molecular levels. Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) is a commonly mutated oncogene in CRC, with mutations in approximately 40% of all CRC cases; its mutations result in constitutive activation of the KRAS protein, which acts as a molecular switch to persistently stimulate downstream signaling pathways, including cell proliferation and survival, thereby leading to tumorigenesis. Patients whose CRC harbors KRAS mutations have a dismal prognosis. Currently, KRAS mutation testing is a routine clinical practice before treating metastatic cases, and the approaches developed to detect KRAS mutations have exhibited favorable sensitivity and accuracy. Due to the presence of KRAS mutations, this group of CRC patients requires more precise therapies. However, KRAS was historically thought to be an undruggable target until the development of KRAS^G12C allele-specific inhibitors. These promising inhibitors may provide novel strategies to treat KRAS-mutant CRC. Here, we provide an overview of the role of KRAS in the prognosis, diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

BRAF testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma and novel, chemotherapy-free therapeutic options

In the past 25 years, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone profound changes. The approval of newer chemotherapeutics such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin was followed in 2005 by the first targeted therapies, for example, monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as cetuximab and panitumumab, or the angiogenesis inhibitors bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and aflibercept. With the rapidly progressing molecular characterization of mCRC in the last 10 years and the classification of the disease in four consensus subtypes, further changes are emerging, which will promote, among other things, the introduction of protein-kinase inhibitors developed for specific molecular aberrations as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment algorithm.Thorough molecular pathologic testing is indispensable today for guideline-compliant treatment of mCRC patients. In addition to RAS testing as a precondition for the therapy decision with regard to cetuximab and panitumumab, BRAF testing is of considerable relevance to allow decision making with regard to the newly approved chemotherapy-free combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and cetuximab in cases where a BRAF-V600E mutation is detected. Additional diagnostic tests should also include genome instability (microsatellite instability). Overall, more and more molecular alterations need to be investigated simultaneously, so that the use of focused next-generation sequencing is increasingly recommended.This overview describes the prognostic relevance of BRAF testing in the context of molecular pathologic diagnostics of mCRC, presents new treatment options for BRAF-mutated mCRC patients, and explains which modern DNA analytical and immunohistochemical methods are available to detect BRAF mutations in mCRC patients.