Proximal myotonic myopathy: a new dominant disorder with myotonia, muscle weakness, and cataracts

Myotonic dystrophies 1 and 2: complex diseases with complex mechanisms

Two multi-system disorders, Myotonic Dystrophies type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2), are complex neuromuscular diseases caused by an accumulation of expanded, non-coding RNAs, containing repetitive CUG and CCUG elements. Similarities of these mutations suggest similar mechanisms for both diseases. The expanded CUGn and CCUGn RNAs mainly target two RNA binding proteins, MBNL1 and CUGBP1, elevating levels of CUGBP1 and reducing levels of MBNL1. These alterations change processing of RNAs that are regulated by these proteins. Whereas overall toxicity of CUGn/CCUGn RNAs on RNA homeostasis in DM cells has been proven, the mechanisms which make these RNAs toxic remain illusive. A current view is that the toxicity of RNA CUGn and CCUGn is associated exclusively with global mis-splicing in DM patients. However, a growing number of new findings show that the expansion of CUGn and CCUGn RNAs mis-regulates several additional pathways in nuclei and cytoplasm of cells from patients with DM1 and DM2. The purpose of this review is to discuss the similarities and differences in the clinical presentation and molecular genetics of both diseases. We will also discuss the complexity of the molecular abnormalities in DM1 and DM2 caused by CUG and CCUG repeats and will summarize the outcomes of the toxicity of CUG and CCUG repeats.

Brain involvement in myotonic dystrophies: neuroimaging and neuropsychological comparative study in DM1 and DM2

The objective of this study was to determine the degree of brain involvement in a cohort of myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2 (DM1, DM2) patients by brain studies and functional tests and to compare the results of the two groups. DM1, DM2 are multisystemic disorders due to polynucleotide expansions. Previous studies on brain involvement by neuroimaging and functional methods have led to contradictory results. Fifty molecularly defined DM1 patients and 14 DM2 patients, were recruited for the study. Age at recruitment, age at disease onset, disease duration and educational level were recorded. Neuromuscular assessment was done by MIRS. An extensive neuropsychological battery was performed in 48/50 DM1 and in a control group of 44 healthy matched subjects. Forty six of 50 DM1 and 12/14 DM2 underwent brain MRI; 21/50 DM1 and 9/14 DM2 underwent brain perfusion SPECT, with semiquantitative analysis of the results. MRI images were classified by ARWMC (age-related white matter changes) score, in order to quantify recurrence, localization and patterns of distribution of white matter hyperintense lesions (WMHLs) in our two cohorts. MRI results were matched to SPECT and to neuropsychological results. Thirty-seven of 46 DM1 and 10/12 DM2 had abnormal MRI imaging, showing scattered supratentorial, bilateral, symmetrical focal or diffuse WMHLs. A typical temporo-insular diffuse subcortical pattern was seen in DM1 subjects only, with no correlation with cognitive involvement. Major cognitive involvement was seen in the case of diffuse frontal lesions. A relationship with CTG expansion size was documented for DM1 subjects. SPECT showed minimal hypoperfusion in the posterior cortex planes in DM1 and, to a lesser extent, in DM2. Very mild degrees of involvement in the DM2 cohort were seen. Neuroimaging and functional investigations confirmed a more severe involvement of the brain in DM1 compared to DM2. A temporo-insular diffuse lesional pattern, specific for DM1, was found on MRI. This confirms greater expansion size as a risk factor for more extensive brain involvement in DM1.

ZNF9 activation of IRES-mediated translation of the human ODC mRNA is decreased in myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 (DM1 and DM2) are forms of muscular dystrophy that share similar clinical and molecular manifestations, such as myotonia, muscle weakness, cardiac anomalies, cataracts, and the presence of defined RNA-containing foci in muscle nuclei. DM2 is caused by an expansion of the tetranucleotide CCTG repeat within the first intron of ZNF9, although the mechanism by which the expanded nucleotide repeat causes the debilitating symptoms of DM2 is unclear. Conflicting studies have led to two models for the mechanisms leading to the problems associated with DM2. First, a gain-of-function disease model hypothesizes that the repeat expansions in the transcribed RNA do not directly affect ZNF9 function. Instead repeat-containing RNAs are thought to sequester proteins in the nucleus, causing misregulation of normal cellular processes. In the alternative model, the repeat expansions impair ZNF9 function and lead to a decrease in the level of translation. Here we examine the normal in vivo function of ZNF9. We report that ZNF9 associates with actively translating ribosomes and functions as an activator of cap-independent translation of the human ODC mRNA. This activity is mediated by direct binding of ZNF9 to the internal ribosome entry site sequence (IRES) within the 5′UTR of ODC mRNA. ZNF9 can activate IRES-mediated translation of ODC within primary human myoblasts, and this activity is reduced in myoblasts derived from a DM2 patient. These data identify ZNF9 as a regulator of cap-independent translation and indicate that ZNF9 activity may contribute mechanistically to the myotonic dystrophy type 2 phenotype.

[Musculoskeletal pain as the most prominent feature in myotonic dystrophy type 2]

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy type 2/proximal myotonic myopathy (DM 2/PROMM) is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder characterized by proximal muscle weakness, myotonia and musculoskeletal pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We describe five patients with DM 2/PROMM in whom musculoskeletal pain was the most prominent feature. We used the McGill Pain Questionnaire for standardized pain assessment.

RESULTS

The patients reported multiple types of musculoskeletal pain including tenderness, cold-enhanced and exercise-related musculoskeletal pain. Exercise-induced or -enhanced musculoskeletal pain was indicated as the most disabling feature.

CONCLUSIONS

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Family history and laboratory tests provide critical diagnostic clues.

Myotone Dystrophien – und ihre Differenzialdiagnosen

1909 wurde die klassische myotone Dystrophie (DM1) von Steinert erstmals beschrieben, 1994 entdeckte Ricker eine 2. Form (DM2). Als genetische Ursache der DM1 wurde 1992 ein abnorm expandiertes CTG(Cytosin-Thymin-Guanin)-Triplett-Repeat im 3’-UTR des Dystrophia-myotonica-Proteinkinase-Gens (DMPK-Gen) auf Chromosom 19 entdeckt, während 2001 die DM2 auf ein abnorm expandiertes Tetranukleotid-CCTG-Repeat im Intron 1 des Zinkfinger-9-Gens (ZNF-9) auf Chromosom 3q zurückgeführt werden konnte. Multisystemische Symptome betreffen Skelettmuskulatur, Gehirn, Auge, Herz und Endokrinium. Der heterogenen Ätiologie mit 2 genetischen Loci liegt pathogenetisch eine RNA-Prozessierungsstörung mit Fehlregulation und alternativem Spleißen von organspezifisch exprimierter Genen zugrunde (so genanntes Konzept der Spleißopathie). Zusätzliche Störungen des RNA-Metabolismus sind inzwischen evident. Unsere Übersicht umfasst aktuelle Aspekte des Phänotyps, der Differenzialdiagnose, der molekularen Diagnostik, der RNA-Pathogenese sowie symptomatischer und molekularer Therapieoptionen.

[Ocular disturbances in neuromuscular disorders]

Compared with other skeletal muscles, extraocular muscles have fundamentally distinct properties that make them selectively vulnerable to certain neuromuscular disorders. When the oculomotor signs are predominant, their temporal progression allows the clinician to make the distinction between a muscular disease (mitochondrial disorder, oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy...) and a disorder of the neuromuscular junction (myasthenia gravis, botulism...). In other instances, such as myotonic dystrophy or facioscapulohumeral dystrophy, the ocular signs are not in the forefront but must be recognized by the ophthalmologist as hallmarks of a muscular disorder. In all cases, the collaboration between the neurologist and the ophthalmologist is fruitful.

Severity, type, and distribution of myotonic discharges are different in type 1 and type 2 myotonic dystrophy

To characterize and compare electrical myotonia in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), 16 patients with genetically confirmed DM1 and 17 patients with DM2 underwent standardized concentric needle electromyography of deltoid, biceps, extensor digitorum communis, first dorsal interosseous, tensor fascia lata (TFL), vastus lateralis (VL), tibialis anterior, and thoracic paraspinal muscles. Eight needle insertions per muscle were made by electromyographers blinded to DM type who recorded the presence and type of myotonia (e.g., classic waxing-waning or less specific waning discharges). Manual muscle testing was performed by a physical therapist. Overall, myotonia was more elicitable in DM1 than DM2; only in VL and TFL was myotonia more elicitable in DM2 than DM1. The major type of myotonia was waxing-waning in DM1, and waning in DM2. Four DM2 (24%), but no DM1 patients had only waning myotonia. In the arms, myotonia was distally predominant in both DM1 and DM2. In the legs, it was distally predominant in DM1, but both proximal and distal in DM2. The severity of myotonia was positively correlated with muscle weakness and with the presence of waxing and waning discharges in DM1, but with neither in DM2. Thus, myotonia is qualitatively and quantitatively different in DM1 than DM2. Except for proximal leg muscles, myotonia is more evocable in DM1 than DM2. It tends to be waxing-waning in DM1 but waning in DM2, thus making electrodiagnosis of DM2 more challenging. Its severity correlates with muscle weakness and the presence of waxing-waning discharges in DM1 but not DM2.

Haploinsuffciency for Znf9 in Znf9+/− Mice Is Associated with Multiorgan Abnormalities Resembling Myotonic Dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 is caused by a (CCTG)/(CCUG)n repeat expansion in the first intron of the ZNF9 gene. The pathomechanism for the myotonic dystrophies is not well understood and the role of ZNF9 in myotonic dystrophy type 2 pathogenesis has not been fully clarified. We characterized Znf9+/- mice, in which the expression of Znf9 was significantly decreased, and found that their phenotype reflects many of the features of myotonic dystrophy, including muscle histological morphology, and myotonic discharges and heart conduction abnormalities, shown by electromyography and electrocardiogram analysis, respectively. Znf9 is normally highly expressed in heart and skeletal muscle, where skeletal muscle chloride channel 1 (Clc1) plays an important role. Clc1 expression was dramatically decreased in Znf9+/- mice. Znf9 transgenic mice raised Znf9 and Clc1 expression and rescued the myotonic dystrophy phenotype in Znf9+/- mice. Our results suggest that the Znf9 haploinsufficiency contributes to the myotonic dystrophy phenotype in Znf9+/- mice.

[Steinert disease]

Steinert disease, also known as myotonic dystrophy type 1, is a muscle disease characterized by myotonia and by multiorgan damage that combines various degrees of muscle weakness, arrhythmia and/or cardiac conduction disorders, cataract, endocrine damage, sleep disorders and baldness. It is the most frequent of the adult-onset muscular dystrophies; its prevalence is estimated at 1/20,000 inhabitants. Diagnosis is confirmed by the demonstration of an abnormality at the 19q13-2 locus, with the use of molecular genetic techniques. Its transmission is autosomal dominant, and anticipation may occur, that is, disease may be more severe and occur earlier in offspring. Genetic counseling is often delicate for this condition because of the great variability of clinical expression, both within and between families. Prenatal diagnosis is proposed especially for maternal transmission because of the severity of the possible neonatal forms. Management ideally includes multidisciplinary annual follow-up. Disease course is usually slowly progressive but rapid deterioration may sometimes be observed. Life expectancy is reduced by the increased mortality associated with the pulmonary and cardiac complications.

Myotonic dystrophy: Emerging mechanisms for DM1 and DM2

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a complex multisystemic disorder linked to two different genetic loci. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by an expansion of a CTG repeat located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of DMPK (myotonic dystrophy protein kinase) on chromosome 19q13.3. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by an unstable CCTG repeat in intron 1 of ZNF9 (zinc finger protein 9) on chromosome 3q21. Therefore, both DM1 and DM2 are caused by a repeat expansion in a region transcribed into RNA but not translated into protein. The discovery that these two distinct mutations cause largely similar clinical syndromes put emphasis on the molecular properties they have in common, namely, RNA transcripts containing expanded, non-translated repeats. The mutant RNA transcripts of DM1 and DM2 aberrantly affect the splicing of the same target RNAs, such as chloride channel 1 (ClC-1) and insulin receptor (INSR), resulting in their shared myotonia and insulin resistance. Whether the entire disease pathology of DM1 and DM2 is caused by interference in RNA processing remains to be seen. This review focuses on the molecular significance of the similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2 in understanding the disease pathology of myotonic dystrophy.

Cerebral involvement in myotonic dystrophies

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are similar yet distinct autosomal-dominant disorders characterized by muscle weakness, myotonia, cataracts, and multiple organ involvement, including the brain. One key difference between DM1 and DM2 is that a congenital form has been described for DM1 only. Expression of RNA transcripts containing pathogenic repeat lengths produces defects in alternative splicing of multiple RNAs, sequesters specific repeat-binding proteins, and ultimately leads to developmentally inappropriate splice products for a particular tissue. Whether brain pathology in its entirety in adult DM1 and DM2 is caused by interference in RNA processing remains to be determined. This review focuses on the similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2 with respect to neuropsychological, neuropathological, and neuroimaging data relating to cerebral involvement, with special emphasis on the clinical relevance and social consequences of such involvement.

Gene expression analysis in myotonic dystrophy: indications for a common molecular pathogenic pathway in DM1 and DM2

An RNA gain-of-function of expanded transcripts is the most accredited molecular mechanism for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). To disclose molecular parallels and divergences in pathogenesis of both disorders, we compared the expression profile of muscle biopsies from DM1 and DM2 patients to controls. DM muscle tissues showed a reduction in the major skeletal muscle chloride channel (CLCN1) and transcription factor Sp1 transcript levels and an abnormal processing of the CLCN1 and insulin receptor (IR) pre-mRNAs. No essential differences were observed in the muscle blind-like gene (MBNL1) and CUG binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) transcript levels as well as in the splicing pattern of the myotubularin-related 1 (MTMR1) gene. Macroarray analysis of 96 neuroscience-related genes revealed a considerable similar expression profile between the DM samples, reflective of a common muscle pathology origin. Using a twofold threshold, we found six misregulated genes important in calcium and potassium metabolism and in mitochondrial functions. Our results indicate that the DM1 and DM2 overlapping clinical phenotypes may derive from a common trans acting mechanism that traps and influences shared genes and proteins. An RNA gain-of-function of expanded transcripts is the most accredited molecular mechanism for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). To disclose molecular parallels and divergences in pathogenesis of both disorders, we compared the expression profile of muscle biopsies from DM1 and DM2 patients to controls. DM muscle tissues showed a reduction in the major skeletal muscle chloride channel (CLCN1) and transcription factor Sp1 transcript levels and an abnormal processing of the CLCN1 and insulin receptor (IR) pre-mRNAs. No essential differences were observed in the muscle blind-like gene (MBNL1) and CUG binding protein 1 (CUGBP1) transcript levels as well as in the splicing pattern of the myotubularin-related 1 (MTMR1) gene. Macroarray analysis of 96 neuroscience-related genes revealed a considerable similar expression profile between the DM samples, reflective of a common muscle pathology origin. Using a twofold threshold, we found six misregulated genes important in calcium and potassium metabolism and in mitochondrial functions. Our results indicate that the DM1 and DM2 overlapping clinical phenotypes may derive from a common trans acting mechanism that traps and influences shared genes and proteins.

Respiratory involvement in inherited primary muscle conditions

Patients with inherited muscle disorders can develop respiratory muscle weakness leading to ventilatory failure. Predicting the extent of respiratory involvement in the different types of inherited muscle disorders is important, as it allows clinicians to impart prognostic information and offers an opportunity for early interventional management strategies. The approach to respiratory assessment in patients with muscle disorders, the current knowledge of respiratory impairment in different muscle disorders and advice on the management of respiratory complications are summarised.

RNA-MEDIATED NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by a CTG expansion mutation located in the 3' untranslated portion of the dystrophica myotonin protein kinase gene. The identification and characterization of RNA-binding proteins that interact with expanded CUG repeats and the discovery that a similar transcribed but untranslated CCTG expansion in an intron causes myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) have uncovered a new type of mechanism in which microsatellite expansion mutations cause disease through an RNA gain-of-function mechanism. This review discusses RNA pathogenesis in DM1 and DM2 and evidence that similar mechanisms may play a role in a growing number of dominant noncoding expansion disorders, including fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8), SCA10, SCA12, and Huntington's disease-like 2 (HDL2).

Myotonic dystrophies type 1 and 2: a summary on current aspects

Myotonic dystrophies (DMs) encompass at least 2 forms: myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2. In general, DMs are late-onset autosomal dominant disorders characterized by a variety of multisystemic features including myotonia, muscular dystrophy, cardiac conduction defects, dilated cardiomyopathy, posterior iridescent cataracts, frontal balding, insulin-resistance and disease-specific serological abnormalities such as gamma-glutamyltransferase and creatine kinase elevations, hyperglycemia, hypotestosteronism, and reduced immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM levels. Beyond the adult forms, in the classic DM1, a congenital form and an early-onset form is recognized. Here we summarize current aspects of the myotonic dystrophy pathogenesis and review the core features of both types of myotonic dystrophies, including the congenital DM1.

DM2 intronic expansions: evidence for CCUG accumulation without flanking sequence or effects on ZNF9 mRNA processing or protein expression

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by a CCTG expansion mutation in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene. The mean expansion size in patients is larger than for DM1 or any previously reported disorder (mean=5000 CCTGs; range=75-11 000), and similar to DM1, repeats containing ribonuclear inclusions accumulate in affected DM2 tissue. Although an RNA gain-of-function mechanism involving DM1 CUG or DM2 CCUG expansion transcripts is now well established, still debated are the potential role that flanking sequences within the DMPK 3'-UTR may have on disease pathogenesis and whether or not decreased expression of DMPK, ZNF9 or neighboring genes at these loci contribute to disease. To address these questions in DM2, we have examined the nucleic acid content of the ribonuclear inclusions and the effects of these large expansions on ZNF9 expression. Using cell lines either haploid or homozygous for the expansion, as well as skeletal muscle biopsy tissue, we demonstrate that pre-mRNAs containing large CCUG expansions are normally spliced and exported from the nucleus, that the expansions do not decrease ZNF9 expression at the mRNA or protein level, and that the ribonuclear inclusions are enriched for the CCUG expansion, but not intronic flanking sequences. These data suggest that the downstream molecular effects of the DM2 mutation are triggered by the accumulation of CCUG repeat tract alone.

Muscle channelopathies and critical points in functional and genetic studies

Muscle channelopathies are caused by mutations in ion channel genes, by antibodies directed against ion channel proteins, or by changes of cell homeostasis leading to aberrant splicing of ion channel RNA or to disturbances of modification and localization of channel proteins. As ion channels constitute one of the only protein families that allow functional examination on the molecular level, expression studies of putative mutations have become standard in confirming that the mutations cause disease. Functional changes may not necessarily prove disease causality of a putative mutation but could be brought about by a polymorphism instead. These problems are addressed, and a more critical evaluation of the underlying genetic data is proposed.

New classification and treatment for myotonic disorders

Myotonia is repetitive firing of muscle action potentials causing prolonged muscle contractions even after mechanical stimulations to the muscles have ceased. Most common myotonic disorder is myotonic dystrophy which is now termed DM1, myotonic dystrophy type 1. In Japan, proximal myotonic myopathy, which is now called DM2 has not been reported. Both DM1 and DM2 have Cl channel abnormality which causes myotonia. Less commonly we encounter Thomsen's disease, and autosomal recessive generalized myotonia (Becker type) which also have a Cl channel abnormality. There are other myotonic disorders related to Na channelopathy which include three disorders: paramyotonia congenita, adynamia episodica hereditaria, and myotonia fluctuans. Myotonia has been treated by various Na channel blockers, mexiletine, phenytoin, and carbamazepine, but they were originally developed for cardiac arrhythmia, or seizure disorders and they have undesirable side effects, weakness. Comprehensive treatment includes myotonia control without reducing the strength, and care for systemic manifestations of DM1.

Clinical and molecular aspects of the myotonic dystrophies: a review

Type 1 myotonic dystrophy or DM1 (Steinert's disease), which is the commonest muscular dystrophy in adults, has intrigued physicians for over a century. Unusual features, compared with other dystrophies, include myotonia, anticipation, and involvement of other organs, notably the brain, eyes, smooth muscle, cardiac conduction apparatus, and endocrine system. Morbidity is high, with a substantial mortality relating to cardiorespiratory dysfunction. More recently a second form of multisystem myotonic disorder has been recognized and variously designated as proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM), proximal myotonic dystrophy (PDM), or DM2. For both DM1 and DM2 the molecular basis is expansion of an unstable repeat sequence in a noncoding part of a gene (DMPK in DM1 and ZNF9 in DM2). There is accumulating evidence that the basic molecular mechanism is disruption of mRNA metabolism, which has far-reaching effects on many other genes, in part through the induction of aberrant splicing, explaining the multisystemic nature of the disease. The unstable nature of the expansion provides a molecular explanation for anticipation. This review emphasizes the clinical similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2. It examines current views about the molecular basis of these disorders, and contrasts them with other repeat expansion disorders that have increasingly been recognized as a cause of neurological disease.

Tau protein as a differential biomarker of tauopathies

Microtubule-associated Tau proteins are the basic component of intraneuronal and glial inclusions observed in many neurological disorders, the so-called tauopathies. Many etiological factors, phosphorylation, splicing, and mutations, relate Tau proteins to neurodegeneration. Molecular analysis has revealed that hyperphosphorylation and abnormal phosphorylation might be one of the important events in the process leading to tau intracellular aggregation. Specific set of pathological tau proteins exhibiting a typical biochemical pattern, and a different regional and laminar distribution, could characterize five main classes of tauopathies. A direct correlation has been established between the regional brain distribution of tau pathology and clinical symptoms; for instance progressive involvement of neocortical areas is well correlated to the severity of dementia in Alzheimer's disease, overall suggesting that pathological tau proteins are reliable marker of the neurodegenerative process. Recent discovery of tau gene mutations in frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 has reinforced the predominant role attributed to tau proteins in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, and underlined the fact that distinct sets of tau isoforms expressed in different neuronal populations could lead to different pathologies. Overall, a better knowledge of the etiological factors responsible for the aggregation of tau proteins in brain diseases is essential for development of future differential diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. They would hopefully find their application against Alzheimer's disease but also in all neurological disorders for which a dysfunction of Tau biology has been identified.

RNA pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies

Myotonic dystrophy (dystrophia myotonica, DM) is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults. The presence of two genetic forms of this complex multisystemic disease (DM1 and DM2) was unrecognized until the genetic cause of DM1 was identified in 1992. The fact that the DM1 mutation is an untranslated CTG expansion led to extended controversy about the molecular pathophysiology of this disease. When the DM2 mutation was identified in 2001 as being a similarly untranslated CCTG expansion, the molecular and clinical parallels between DM1 and DM2 substantiated the role of a novel mechanism in generating the unusual constellation of clinical features seen in these diseases: the repeat expansions expressed at the RNA level alter RNA processing, at least in part by interfering with alternative splicing of other genes. For example, in both DM1 and DM2, altered splicing of chloride channel and insulin receptor transcripts leads to myotonia and insulin resistance, respectively. Although other mechanisms may underlie the differences between DM1 and DM2, the pathogenic effects of the RNA mechanism are now clear, which will facilitate development of appropriate treatments.

Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of the myotonic dystrophies

Pathogenic repeat expansions were initially identified as causing either a loss of gene product, such as in fragile X mental retardation, or an expansion of a polyglutamine region of a protein, as was first shown in spinobulbar muscular atrophy (Kennedy's disease). The pathogenic effect of the repeat expansion in myotonic dystrophy type 1, however, has been controversial because it does not encode a protein but nonetheless results in a highly penetrant dominant disease. Clinical and molecular characterization of myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 have now demonstrated a novel disease mechanism involving pathogenic effects of repeat expansions that are expressed in RNA but are not translated into protein.

Molecular diagnosis of inheritable neuromuscular disorders. Part II: Application of genetic testing in neuromuscular disease

Molecular genetic advances have led to refinements in the classification of inherited neuromuscular disease, and to methods of molecular testing useful for diagnosis and management of selected patients. Testing should be performed as targeted studies, sometimes sequentially, but not as wasteful panels of multiple genetic tests performed simultaneously. Accurate diagnosis through molecular testing is available for the vast majority of patients with inherited neuropathies, resulting from mutations in three genes (PMP22, MPZ, and GJB1); the most common types of muscular dystrophies (Duchenne and Becker, facioscapulohumeral, and myotonic dystrophies); the inherited motor neuron disorders (spinal muscular atrophy, Kennedy's disease, and SOD1 related amyotrophic lateral sclerosis); and many other neuromuscular disorders. The role of potential multiple genetic influences on the development of acquired neuromuscular diseases is an increasingly active area of research.

Pathogenic RNA repeats: an expanding role in genetic disease

Fragile X mental retardation and Friedreich's ataxia were among the first pathogenic trinucleotide repeat disorders to be described in which noncoding repeat expansions interfere with gene expression and cause a loss of protein production. Invoking a similar loss-of-function hypothesis for the CTG expansion causing myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) located in the 3' noncoding portion of a kinase gene was more difficult because DM is a dominantly inherited multisystemic disorder in which the second copy of the gene is unaffected. However, the discovery that a transcribed but untranslated CCTG expansion causes myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), along with other discoveries on DM1 and DM2 pathogenesis, indicate that the CTG and CCTG expansions are pathogenic at the RNA level. This review will detail recent developments on the molecular mechanisms of RNA pathogenesis in DM, and the growing number of expansion disorders that might involve similar pathogenic RNA mechanisms.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 and related myotonic disorders

The myotonic dystrophies are a group of dominantly inherited disorders characterized by muscle wasting, myotonia, cataracts, hypogonadism and other system manifestations. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) results from an unstable expansion of a CTG repeat in 3' UTR of the DM protein kinase (DMPK) gene on chromosome 19q 13.3. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by an unstable expansion of a CCTG tetraplet repeat in intron 1 of the zinc finger 9 (ZFN9 gene) on chromosome 3q 21.3. However, the clinical diagnosis of DM2 is more complex than that of DM1, and conventional molecular genetic methods used for diagnosis of DM1 are not helpful for DM2. We here describe the detailed clinical, laboratory and biomolecular tests to identify DM2 and related myotonic disorders. At present, foci of accumulated noncoding CCTG repeat RNA (ribonuclear inclusions) in the cell nuclei are thought to interfere with the regulation and expression of several genes at the basis of multisystemic aspects of myotonic dystrophy type 2.

Myotonic dystrophy: RNA pathogenesis comes into focus

Myotonic dystrophy (DM)--the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, affecting 1/8000 individuals--is a dominantly inherited disorder with a peculiar and rare pattern of multisystemic clinical features affecting skeletal muscle, the heart, the eye, and the endocrine system. Two genetic loci have been associated with the DM phenotype: DM1, on chromosome 19, and DM2, on chromosome 3. In 1992, the mutation responsible for DM1 was identified as a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase gene (DMPK). How this untranslated CTG expansion causes myotonic dystrophy type 1(DM1) has been controversial. The recent discovery that myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is caused by an untranslated CCTG expansion, along with other discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, indicate that the clinical features common to both diseases are caused by a gain-of-function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes. We discuss the pathogenic mechanisms that have been proposed for the myotonic dystrophies, the clinical and molecular features of DM1 and DM2, and the characterization of murine and cell-culture models that have been generated to better understand these diseases.

New methods for molecular diagnosis and demonstration of the (CCTG)n mutation in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2)

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 are autosomal dominant, multisystemic disorders with many similarities in their clinical manifestations. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is caused by a (CTG)n expansion in the 3' untranslated region of the DMPK gene in 19q13.3 and myotonic dystrophy type 2 by a (CCTG)n expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9 in 3q21.3. However, the clinical diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 2 is more complex than that of myotonic dystrophy type 1, and conventional molecular genetic methods used for diagnosing myotonic dystrophy type 1 are insufficient for myotonic dystrophy type 2. Herein we describe two in situ hybridization protocols for the myotonic dystrophy type 2 mutation detection. Chromogenic in situ hybridization was used to detect both the genomic expansion and the mutant transcripts in muscle biopsy sections. Chromogenic in situ hybridization can be used in routine myotonic dystrophy type 2 diagnostics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization on extended DNA fibers was used to directly visualize the myotonic dystrophy type 2 mutation and to estimate the repeat expansion sizes.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: human founder haplotype and evolutionary conservation of the repeat tract

Myotonic dystrophy (DM), the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, can be caused by a mutation on either chromosome 19 (DM1) or 3 (DM2). In 2001, we demonstrated that DM2 is caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene. To investigate the ancestral origins of the DM2 expansion, we compared haplotypes for 71 families with genetically confirmed DM2, using 19 short tandem repeat markers that we developed that flank the repeat tract. All of the families are white, with the majority of Northern European/German descent and a single family from Afghanistan. Several conserved haplotypes spanning >700 kb appear to converge into a single haplotype near the repeat tract. The common interval that is shared by all families with DM2 immediately flanks the repeat, extending up to 216 kb telomeric and 119 kb centromeric of the CCTG expansion. The DM2 repeat tract contains the complex repeat motif (TG)(n)(TCTG)(n)(CCTG)(n). The CCTG portion of the repeat tract is interrupted on normal alleles, but, as in other expansion disorders, these interruptions are lost on affected alleles. We examined haplotypes of 228 control chromosomes and identified a potential premutation allele with an uninterrupted (CCTG)(20) on a haplotype that was identical to the most common affected haplotype. Our data suggest that the predominant Northern European ancestry of families with DM2 resulted from a common founder and that the loss of interruptions within the CCTG portion of the repeat tract may predispose alleles to further expansion. To gain insight into possible function of the repeat tract, we looked for evolutionary conservation. The complex repeat motif and flanking sequences within intron 1 are conserved among human, chimpanzee, gorilla, mouse, and rat, suggesting a conserved biological function.

Confirmation of the type 2 myotonic dystrophy (CCTG)n expansion mutation in patients with proximal myotonic myopathy/proximal myotonic dystrophy of different European origins: a single shared haplotype indicates an ancestral founder effect

Myotonic dystrophy (DM), the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults, is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous neuromuscular disorder. DM is characterized by autosomal dominant inheritance, muscular dystrophy, myotonia, and multisystem involvement. Type 1 DM (DM1) is caused by a (CTG)(n) expansion in the 3' untranslated region of DMPK in 19q13.3. Multiple families, predominantly of German descent and with clinically variable presentation that included proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM) and type 2 DM (DM2) but without the DM1 mutation, showed linkage to the 3q21 region and were recently shown to segregate a (CCTG)(n) expansion mutation in intron 1 of ZNF9. Here, we present linkage to 3q21 and mutational confirmation in 17 kindreds of European origin with PROMM and proximal myotonic dystrophy, from geographically distinct populations. All patients have the DM2 (CCTG)(n) expansion. To study the evolution of this mutation, we constructed a comprehensive physical map of the DM2 region around ZNF9. High-resolution haplotype analysis of disease chromosomes with five microsatellite and 22 single-nucleotide polymorphism markers around the DM2 mutation identified extensive linkage disequilibrium and a single shared haplotype of at least 132 kb among patients from the different populations. With the exception of the (CCTG)(n) expansion, the available markers indicate that the DM2 haplotype is identical to the most common haplotype in normal individuals. This situation is reminiscent of that seen in DM1. Taken together, these data suggest a single founding mutation in DM2 patients of European origin. We estimate the age of the founding haplotype and of the DM2 (CCTG) expansion mutation to be approximately 200-540 generations.

Myopathies

Electrodiagnostic studies are an important adjunct to the clinical examination of a patient with a suspected myopathy; however, the clinical examination is crucial in making an accurate diagnosis, because electrodiagnostic studies have only a limited role in delineating with certainty the underlying myopathic disorder. Hereditary and acquired myopathies are reviewed in this article, with particular emphasis on distinguishing clinical and electrodiagnostic features. The hereditary myopathies that are discussed include the muscular dystrophies and the congenital distal mitochondrial, and metabolic myopathies. Acquired myopathies, including inflammatory, endocrine, and toxic myopathies, as well as those associated with systemic illness, are briefly reviewed.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: molecular, diagnostic and clinical spectrum

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2/proximal myotonic myopathy PROMM) are dominantly inherited disorders with unusual multisystemic clinical features. The authors have characterized the clinical and molecular features of DM2/PROMM, which is caused by a CCTG repeat expansion in intron 1 of the zinc finger protein 9 (ZNF9) gene.

METHODS

Three-hundred and seventy-nine individuals from 133 DM2/PROMM families were evaluated genetically, and in 234 individuals clinical and molecular features were compared.

RESULTS

Among affected individuals 90% had electrical myotonia, 82% weakness, 61% cataracts, 23% diabetes, and 19% cardiac involvement. Because of the repeat tract's unprecedented size (mean approximately 5,000 CCTGs) and somatic instability, expansions were detectable by Southern analysis in only 80% of known carriers. The authors developed a repeat assay that increased the molecular detection rate to 99%. Only 30% of the positive samples had single sizeable expansions by Southern analysis, and 70% showed multiple bands or smears. Among the 101 individuals with single expansions, repeat size did not correlate with age at disease onset. Affected offspring had markedly shorter expansions than their affected parents, with a mean size difference of -17 kb (-4,250 CCTGs).

CONCLUSIONS

DM2 is present in a large number of families of northern European ancestry. Clinically, DM2 resembles adult-onset DM1, with myotonia, muscular dystrophy, cataracts, diabetes, testicular failure, hypogammaglobulinemia, and cardiac conduction defects. An important distinction is the lack of a congenital form of DM2. The clinical and molecular parallels between DM1 and DM2 indicate that the multisystemic features common to both diseases are caused by CUG or CCUG expansions expressed at the RNA level.

Myotonic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent advances in understanding the clinical manifestations and molecular genetics of myotonic syndromes, with particular emphasis on the myotonic dystrophies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Myotonic syndromes include the non-dystrophic myotonias, caused by mutations in genes encoding the chloride or sodium channels that are specific to skeletal muscle, and the myotonic dystrophies. Previous studies have shown that myotonic dystrophy type 1 is caused by the expansion of a CTG repeat in the gene. Recently, it was discovered that myotonic dystrophy type 2 (proximal myotonic myopathy) is also caused by a DNA expansion mutation. In both types of myotonic dystrophy the expanded repeat is transcribed and the RNA produced from the mutant allele is retained in nuclear inclusions. Recent studies suggest that the mutant RNA has a toxic effect on muscle fibers by interfering with the essential functions of the myonucleus, such as RNA processing.

SUMMARY

It now appears likely that myotonic dystrophy is the first instance of a genetic disease in which the harmful effect of a mutation involves the production of a pathogenic RNA. However, the exact mechanism is not understood, and it is unclear whether this RNA-mediated disease process is also responsible for the manifestations of myotonic dystrophy in non-muscle tissues.

Myotonic dystrophy: clinical and molecular parallels between myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a dominantly inherited disorder with a peculiar pattern of multisystemic clinical features affecting skeletal muscle, the heart, the eye, and the endocrine system. Two genetic loci have been associated with the DM phenotype: DM1 on chromosome 19, and DM2 on chromosome 3. In 1992, the mutation responsible for DM1 was identified as a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophica myotonica-protein kinase gene (DMPK). How this untranslated CTG expansion causes DM1 has been a matter of controversy. The recent discovery that DM2 is caused by an untranslated CCTG expansion, along with other discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, indicate that the clinical features common to both diseases are caused by a gain of function RNA mechanism in which the CUG and CCUG repeats alter cellular function, including alternative splicing of various genes.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a clinically but not genetically heterogeneous, multisystem disorder, that is clinically similar to, but distinct from myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Initially, different phenotypes of DM2 were described by Ricker (proximal myotonic myopathy, PROMM), Ranum (myotonic dystrophy 2, DM2) and Udd (proximal myotonic dystrophy, PDM). Clinical features these three phenotypes had in common were diffuse, proximal or distal weakness, wasting, myotonia, cataract, cerebral, endocrine and cardiac abnormalities. Initially, the clinical differences between DM1 and PROMM seemed unmistakable, but meanwhile it has become apparent that the clinical differences between these entities are blurring. In 1999, Day et al., Meola et al. and Ricker et al. mapped the mutated gene of all three phenotypes to chromosome 3q. In 2001, the three different phenotypes were found to rely on the same mutation in the ZNF9 gene on chromosome 3q21.3. Although DM2 may be clinically heterogeneous, it is by result of a mutation in a single gene. The mutation responsible for DM2 is a CCTG-repeat expansion of 75-11 000 repeats in intron 1 of the ZNF9 gene on chromosome 3q21.3. Because of the clinical heterogeneity, the diagnosis of DM2 should rely on DNA analysis alone.

Genetic diseases of muscle

In the last twenty years, the genetic basis for most of the inherited myopathies and muscular dystrophies has been unveiled. Diseases have been found to result from loss of function of structural components of the muscle basal lamina (e.g., MCD1A), sarcolemma (e.g., the sarcoglycanopathies), nucleus (e.g., EDMD) and sarcomere (e.g., the nemaline myopathies). A few have been associated with abnormalities in the genes for muscle enzymes (e.g., calpain and fukutin). Alternate mechanisms of pathogenesis have also recently been suggested by mutations lying outside of coding regions, such as the "field effect" of chromosomal mutations in DM2. In the future, we will likely identify the genes responsible for the remaining disorders, including many of the distal myopathies. In addition, we may also find skeletal muscle diseases associated with some of the presently non-implicated muscle proteins: syntropin, dystrobrevin, epsilon-sarcoglycan and sarcospan. The next steps may be to identify and understand the relationship of modifier genes producing the phenotypic heterogeneity of many of these diseases and to characterize those and other targets for therapeutic intervention, whether by gene therapy or by pharmacological treatment.

Dominantly inherited, non-coding microsatellite expansion disorders

Dominantly inherited diseases are generally caused by mutations resulting in gain of function protein alterations. However, a CTG expansion located in the 3' untranslated portion of a kinase gene was found to cause myotonic dystrophy type 1, a multisystemic dominantly inherited disorder. The recent discovery that an untranslated CCTG expansion causes the same constellation of clinical features in myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), along with other recent discoveries on DM1 pathogenesis, have led to the understanding that both DM1 and DM2 mutations are pathogenic at the RNA level. These findings indicate the existence of a new category of disease wherein repeat expansions in RNA alter cellular function. Pathogenic repeat expansions in RNA may also be involved in spinocerebellar ataxia types 8, 10 and 12, and Huntington's disease-like type 2.

[Camptocormia: a sign of axial myopathy. Report of 7 cases]

PURPOSE

Camptocormia or progressive lumbar kyphosis is an anterior bend of the trunk. It appears in orthostatism or while walking and is reducible in the decubitus position. It concerns patients older than 60 years of age. It is due to a fatty degeneration of the paravertebral muscles, although the physiopathology remains unclear.

METHODS

We report seven cases of camptocormia revealing authentic myopathies.

RESULTS

Our observations concern five women and two men of 55 to 72 years of age. All patients present lumbar kyphosis and had a fatty involution of the paraspinal muscles on the muscular MRI. Four patients fulfilled the Bohan and Peter criteria of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. In the other cases paravertebral muscular biopsies led to the diagnosis of a congenital myopathy, a mitochondrial myopathy and an amyloid myopathy. Four patients received a corticosteroid-immunoglobulins or cyclosporin regimen. An improvement in the camptocormia was observed in three cases. In the other cases the treatment consisted of chemotherapy on account of severe nephrotic syndrome, a coenzyme-Q treatment for the patient with mitochondrial myopathy and only physiotherapy in the case of congenital myopathy, but without positive effect on camptocormia.

CONCLUSION

Camptocormia appears as a muscular symptom that may reveal an axial myopathy due to multiple and varied pathologies. Thus, the discovery of camptocormia requires an aetiological investigation in order to propose an adequate treatment, which should be associated with physiotherapy.