Correlation of wing-leg identity in ectopic FGF-induced chimeric limbs with the differential expression of chick Tbx5 and Tbx4

Differential expression of Tbx4 and Tbx5 in Zebrafish fin buds

In here we report the identification of two new members of the T-box gene family, zf-tbx5 and zf-tbx4, from the Zebrafish, Danio rerio. The amino acid sequences within the T-box domain share high homology with the mouse, chick, and newt orthologs. Whole mount in situ hybridization revealed specific expression of these genes in the eye and Fin buds. zf-tbx5 expression is restricted to the pectoral Fin bud, whilst zf-tbx4 transcripts are confined in the pelvic Fin bud. These results reveal the conserved expression pattern of Tbx5 and Tbx4 during appendage development in all animal species studied to date.

Transcription repression by Xenopus ET and its human ortholog TBX3, a gene involved in ulnar-mammary syndrome

T box (Tbx) genes are a family of developmental regulators with more than 20 members recently identified in invertebrates and vertebrates. Mutations in Tbx genes have been found to cause several human diseases. Our understanding of functional mechanisms of Tbx products has come mainly from the prototypical T/Brachyury, which is a transcription activator. We previously discovered ET, a Tbx gene expressed in Xenopus embryos. We report here that ET is an ortholog of the human Tbx3 and that ET is a repressor of basal and activated transcription. Functional dissection of the ET protein reveals a novel transcription-repression domain highly conserved among ET, human TBX3, and TBX2. These results reveal a new transcription repressor domain, show the existence of a subfamily of transcription repressors in the Tbx superfamily, and provide a basis for understanding etiology of diseases caused by Tbx3 mutations.

Chamber-specific cardiac expression of Tbx5 and heart defects in Holt-Oram syndrome

To further define the role of a T-box transcription factor, Tbx5, in cardiac development, we have examined its expression in the developing mouse and chick heart and correlated this pattern with cardiac defects caused by human TBX5 mutations in Holt-Oram syndrome. Early in the developing heart, Tbx5 is uniformly expressed throughout the entire cardiac crescent. Upon formation of the linear heart tube, Tbx5 is expressed in a graded fashion, stronger near the posterior end and weaker at the anterior end. As the heart tube loops, asymmetric Tbx5 expression continues; Tbx5 is expressed in the presumptive left ventricle, but not the right ventricle or outflow tract. This pattern of expression is maintained in more mature hearts. Expression in the ventricular septum is restricted to the left side and is contiguous with left ventricular free wall expression. Trabeculae, vena cavae (inferior and superior), and the atrial aspect of the atrioventricular valves also express high levels of Tbx5. These patterns of Tbx5 expression provide an embryologic basis for the prevalence of atrial septal defects (ostium primum and secundum), ventricular muscular septal defects, and left-sided malformations (endocardial cushion defects, hypoplastic left heart, and aberrant trabeculation) observed in patients with Holt-Oram syndrome.

A novel mammalian T-box-containing gene, Tbr2, expressed in mouse developing brain

We have identified and characterized a new member of the mammalian brain-specific T-box gene family, Tbr2, which is closely related to mouse Tbr1, and to the Xenopus earliest mesodermal gene, Eomesodermin. As Tbr1, Tbr2 is predominantly expressed in some regions of the developing brain, but in a strikingly complementary manner. On embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5), Tbr2 mRNA expression was observed in the mesencephalon and rhombencephalon in contrast to Tbr1 which was expressed mostly in the telencephalon. At this stage, Tbr2 mRNA was readily detectable in the postmitotic and differentiating neurons located in various brain regions, i.e., oculomotor, red, trigeminal, vestibular, facial, and hypoglossal nuclei. However, expression of Tbr2 in these nuclei became undetectable on E18.5. In contrast, Tbr2 mRNA expression was detected in the hippocampus only from E18.5 onwards. Whereas Tbr2 expression disappeared in most parts of the mature adult brain, it remained detectable in the hippocampus and olfactory bulb, regions where some neuronal precursors retain their differentiation potential. These results suggest that Tbr2 may play a crucial role in differentiating neurons rather than in proliferating or already differentiated neurons. In addition, similarly to Xenopus Eomesodermin, mouse Tbr2 showed biphasic expression; a first peak around E6.5 and a second peak around E14.5, suggesting that Tbr2 may also be important at early stages of gastrulation.

The spectrum of mutations in TBX3: Genotype/Phenotype relationship in ulnar-mammary syndrome

Ulnar-mammary syndrome (UMS) is a pleiotropic disorder affecting limb, apocrine-gland, tooth, hair, and genital development. Mutations that disrupt the DNA-binding domain of the T-box gene, TBX3, have been demonstrated to cause UMS. However, the 3' terminus of the open reading frame (ORF) of TBX3 was not identified, and mutations were detected in only two families with UMS. Furthermore, no substantial homology outside the T-box was found among TBX3 and its orthologues. The subsequent cloning of new TBX3 cDNAs allowed us to complete the characterization of TBX3 and to identify alternatively transcribed TBX3 transcripts, including one that interrupts the T-box. The complete ORF of TBX3 is predicted to encode a 723-residue protein, of which 255 amino acids are encoded by newly identified exons. Comparison of other T-box genes to TBX3 indicates regions of substantial homology outside the DNA-binding domain. Novel mutations have been found in all of eight newly reported families with UMS, including five mutations downstream of the region encoding the T-box. This suggests that a domain(s) outside the T-box is highly conserved and important for the function of TBX3. We found no obvious phenotypic differences between those who have missense mutations and those who have deletions or frameshifts.

Limb development: Farewell to arms

Forelimbs and hindlimbs are, clearly, quite different, and it has long been appreciated that their differences are assigned early in development; the genetic basis of these differences has been more mysterious, however. Recent work has now shown that the homeobox gene Pitx1 imparts identity to the developing hindlimb bud.

Tbx5 and Tbx4 genes determine the wing/leg identity of limb buds

Much progress has been made in understanding limb development. Most genes are expressed equally and in the same pattern in the fore- and hindlimbs, which nevertheless develop into distinct structures. The T-box genes Tbx5 and Tbx4, on the other hand, are expressed differently in chick wing (Tbx5) and leg (Tbx4) buds. Molecular analysis of the optomotor blind gene, which belongs to the same family of transcription factors, has revealed that this gene is involved in the transdetermination of Drosophila wing and leg imaginal discs. In addition, expression of Tbx5 and Tbx4 correlates well with the identity of ectopic limb buds induced by fibroblast growth factor. Thus, it is thought that Tbx5 and Tbx4 might be involved in determining limb identity. Another candidate is the Pitx1 gene, which encodes a bicoid-type homeodomain transcription factor that is expressed in leg buds. Here we determine the importance of these factors in establishing limb identity.

The T-box genes Tbx4 and Tbx5 regulate limb outgrowth and identity

During embryonic development, initially similar fields can develop into distinct structures, such as the vertebrate fore- and hindlimbs. Although considerable progress has been made in our understanding of the genetic control underlying the establishment of the different limb axes, the molecular cues that specify the differential development of the fore- and hindlimbs are unknown. Possible candidates for genes determining limb identity are Pitx1, a gene whose transcripts are detected in the early hind- but not forelimb bud, and two members of the T-box (Tbx) gene family, Tbx4 and Tbx5, which are specifically expressed in the hindlimb and forelimb buds, respectively. Here we show that Tbx4 and Tbx5 are essential regulators of limb outgrowth whose roles seem to be tightly linked to the activity of three signalling proteins that are required for limb outgrowth and patterning: fibroblast growth factor (FGF), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wnt. In addition, we provide evidence that Tbx4 and Tbx5 are involved in controlling limb identity. Our findings provide insight into how similar developmental fields can evolve into homologous but distinct structures.

Tbx5 is essential for heart development

Mutations in the Tbx5 transcription factor cause heart septal defects found in human Holt-Oram Syndrome. The complete extent to which Tbx5 functions in heart development, however, has not been established. Here we show that, in Xenopus embryos, Tbx5 is expressed in the early heart field, posterior to the cardiac homeobox transcription factor, Nkx2.5. During morphogenesis, Tbx5 is expressed throughout the heart tube except the anterior portion, the bulbus cordis. When Tbx5 activity is antagonized with a hormone-inducible, dominant negative version of the protein, the heart fails to develop. These results suggest that, in addition to its function in heart septation, Tbx5 has a more global role in cardiac specification and heart development in vertebrate embryos.

Reconstructing the history of human limb development: lessons from birth defects

A major goal of biology has been to understand the developmental mechanisms behind evolutionary trends. This has led to a growing interest in studying the molecular basis of the evolution of developmental programs such as those mediating the diversification of tetrapod limbs. Over the last 10 y, it has become clear that the genes and general developmental programs used to build a limb are strongly conserved among widely disparate species. This finding suggests that altered regulation of the timing and locations of developmental events may be responsible for the morphologic variation observed among some species. However, genetic analyses of the regulatory regions of genes controlling vertebrate developmental programs are very limited. Characterization of the genetic basis of human birth defects of the limb provides an opportunity to dissect the developmental programs used to modify the architecture of the hominoid limb. This may allow us to assess the relative contributions of altered gene regulation to morphologic variation among species and reconstruct the evolutionary history of the hominid limb. Such insight is also important because morphologic differences in the hominid upper limb have been correlated with the use of tools, and tool making is often regarded as the milestone that marked the emergence of the genus Homo.

Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation

The interactions between fibroblast growth factors (FGF) and their receptors have important roles in mediating mesenchymal-epithelial cell interactions during embryogenesis. In particular, Fgf10 is predicted to function as a regulator of brain, lung and limb development on the basis of its spatiotemporal expression pattern in the developing embryo. To define the role of Fgf10, we generated Fgf10-deficient mice. Fgf10-/- mice died at birth due to the lack of lung development. Trachea was formed, but subsequent pulmonary branching morphogenesis was disrupted. In addition, mutant mice had complete truncation of the fore- and hindlimbs. In Fgf10-/- embryos, limb bud formation was initiated but outgrowth of the limb buds did not occur; however, formation of the clavicles was not affected. Analysis of the expression of marker genes in the mutant limb buds indicated that the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) and the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) did not form. Thus, we show here that Fgf10 serves as an essential regulator of lung and limb formation.

Molecular and cellular basis of pattern formation during vertebrate limb development

The body plan is generated by cells and tissues that become arranged precisely in the embryo. This process, termed pattern formation, involves cell interactions in which a particular group of cells produce signals that specify new cell types or patterns of differentiation in responding cells. These patterning signals emanate from very discrete centers called "organizer centers," such as the Hensen's node or Spemann organizer, the midbrain-hindbrain junction, the notochord, or in the case of the limb, the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) or the apical ectodermal ridge (AER). The developing vertebrate limb is an ideal model system for the study of pattern formation because, in addition to surgical manipulations, molecular manipulations are now feasible. In this review we summarize early experiments that established, by means of surgical manipulations, the different organizer centers of the vertebrate limb: the ectoderm covering the limb bud, the apical ectodermal ridge, the zone of polarizing activity, and the distal mesoderm (progress zone) underlying the AER. We then describe the domains of expression of various genes present during the development of the limb and discuss some of the functional approaches (overexpression and lack of function studies) undertaken to ascertain their role in limb outgrowth. The knowledge acquired in the last few years has had an enormous impact not only on our view of how limbs develop (perhaps now one of the most approachable vertebrate model systems) but also in a more general sense of how the embryo is organized in space and time.

Differential regulation of T-box and homeobox transcription factors suggests roles in controlling chick limb-type identity

The wing and the leg of the chick, although homologous structures, have characteristic patterns of skeletal elements, muscles, tendons, featherbuds and scales. Despite recent advances in understanding the common genetic pathways patterning the wing and leg, the molecular nature of the specification of limb-type identity has remained elusive. Embryological experiments have indicated the existence of limb-specific territories in the flank. In the newt, deviation of nerves from the limb into the flank can induce ectopic limbs to form from this tissue. In the chick, Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-soaked beads applied to the flank can induce ectopic formation of limbs from the surrounding tissue. In both cases, the type of limb that forms, either a wing/forelimb or leg/hindlimb, is dependent upon the location to which the limb-inducing signal is applied. We have isolated and characterised three candidate genes for controlling limb identity in the chick. Two T-box transcription factors, cTbx4 and cTbx5, are expressed in a restricted manner in the leg bud and wing buds, respectively. cPtx1, a member of the Otx-related subclass of paired-type homeodomain proteins, is expressed exclusively in the leg bud. Using FGF to induce ectopic limb buds of wing, leg and intermediate identity, we show that early expression of cTbx5, cTbx4 and cPtx1 in the induced limb buds correlates with later wing- or leg-type identity of ectopic limbs. We observe a general correlation between the location of an ectopic outgrowth induced by FGF and the identity of the resulting limb but, significantly, we report that there is no definitive rostral-caudal level that divides the ectopic wing and leg territories.

Involvement of T-box genes Tbx2-Tbx5 in vertebrate limb specification and development

We have recently shown in mice that four members of the T-box family of transcription factors (Tbx2-Tbx5) are expressed in developing limb buds, and that expression of two of these genes, Tbx4 and Tbx5, is primarily restricted to the developing hindlimbs and forelimbs, respectively. In this report, we investigate the role of these genes in limb specification and development, using the chick as a model system. We induced the formation of ectopic limbs in the flank of chick embryos to examine the relationship between the identity of the limb-specific T-box genes being expressed and the identity of limb structures that subsequently develop. We found that, whereas bud regions expressing Tbx4 developed characteristic leg structures, regions expressing Tbx5 developed characteristic wing features. In addition, heterotopic grafts of limb mesenchyme (wing bud into leg bud, and vice versa), which are known to retain the identity of the donor tissue after transplantation, retained autonomous expression of the appropriate, limb-specific T-box gene, with no evidence of regulation by the host bud. Thus there is a direct relationship between the identity of the structures that develop in normal, ectopic and recombinant limbs, and the identity of the T-box gene(s) being expressed. To investigate the regulation of T-box gene expression during limb development, we employed several other embryological manipulations. By surgically removing the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) from either wing or leg buds, we found that, in contrast to all other genes implicated in the patterning of developing appendages, maintenance of T-box gene expression is not dependent on the continued provision of signals from the AER or the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA). By generating an ectopic ZPA, by grafting a sonic hedgehog (SHH)-expressing cell pellet under the anterior AER, we found that Tbx2 expression can lie downstream of SHH. Finally, by grafting a SHH-expressing cell pellet to the anterior margin of a bud from which the AER had been removed, we found that Tbx2 may be a direct, short-range target of SHH. Our findings suggest that these genes are intimately involved in limb development and the specification of limb identity, and a new model for the evolution of vertebrate appendages is proposed.

The loss of ventral ectoderm identity correlates with the inability to form an AER in the legless hindlimb bud

We have characterized the early stages of murine hindlimb morphogenesis in the legless (lgl)mutant and non-mutant littermates. Initially the entire ventral ectoderm expresses many genetic markers characteristic of the AER (en-1, fgf-8, msx-2, dlx-2, cd44, and cx-43). Subsequently, the expression domain of most of these genes is restricted to the thickened ectoderm of the disto-ventral limb margin prior to forming an AER. In lgl, the expression of these genes is initiated but not maintained and the disto-ventral marginal ectoderm does not thicken. In contrast, Wnt7a expression is initiated and maintained in the dorsal ectoderm. The limb mesenchyme of lgl and non-mutant embryos initially expresses lmx-1b and fgf-10 uniformly. As the ventro-distal marginal ectoderm thickens, lmx-1b is progressively dorsally restricted in non-mutants but continues to be expressed ventrally in lgl hindlimb buds. These data suggest that establishment of a dorso-ventral ectodermal interface is not sufficient for AER formation and that restriction of lmx-1b to the dorsal mesenchyme is coordinately linked to AER formation.

Tbx genes and limb identity in chick embryo development

Tbx-2, Tbx-3, Tbx-4 and Tbx-5 chick genes have been isolated and, like the mouse homologues, are expressed in the limb regions. Tbx-2 and Tbx-3 are expressed in anterior and posterior domains in wings and legs, as well as throughout the flank. Of particular interest, however, are Tbx-5, which is expressed in wing and flank but not leg, and Tbx-4, which is expressed very strongly in leg but not wing. Grafts of leg tissue to wing and wing tissue to leg give rise to toe-like or wing-like digits in wing and leg respectively. Expression of Tbx-4 is stable when leg tissue is grafted to wing, and Tbx-5 expression is stable when wing tissue is grafted to leg. Induction of either extra wings or legs from the flank by applying FGF-2 in different positions alters the expression of Tbx-4 and Tbx-5 in such a way that suggests that the amount of Tbx-4 that is expressed in the limb determines the type that will form. The ectopic limb always displays a limb-like Tbx-3 expression. Thus Tbx-4 and Tbx-5 are strong candidates for encoding ‘wingness’ and ‘legness’.

Limb development: molecular dysmorphology is at hand!

We present a review of limb development integrating current molecular information and selected genetic disorders to illustrate the advances made in this field over the last few years. With this knowledge, clinical geneticists can now begin to consider molecular mechanisms and pathways when investigating patients with limb malformation syndromes.