'I Am Not The Doctor For You': Physicians' Attitudes About Caring For People With Disabilities

Benefits and Challenges of Pediatric-to-Adult Health Care Transition in Childhood-Onset Neurologic Conditions

Background and Objectives

Although the importance of pediatric-to-adult health care transition (HCT) has been recognized, individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions often encounter challenges during pediatric-to-adult HCT, and HCT benefits for this population remain elusive. We assessed the current HCT situation in individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions to develop an improved transition system that incorporates patient perspectives.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Tokyo Metropolitan Kita Medical and Rehabilitation Center for the Disabled from November 2020 to December 2020. We targeted adults with childhood-onset neurologic conditions who visited the Department of Internal Medicine and their families. Questionnaires provided to 127 patients asked them about their experiences with pediatric-to-adult HCT (i.e., educational opportunities regarding HCT during pediatric visits, difficulties in transition, and the merits/demerits of adult practice) and their families' perspectives regarding pediatric-to-adult HCT. We also reviewed the patients' medical records to examine the severity of their disabilities.

Results

Responses were collected from 111 patients (response rate: 87%). Most patients had both severe physical and intellectual disabilities, and approximately half had a physical disability level of Gross Motor Function Classification System V and a profound intellectual disability. Half of the respondents were not transitioned through pediatric-to-adult HCT by their pediatricians, and they visited adult departments by themselves without a formal referral process. They experienced difficulties during HCT, such as a lack of knowledge regarding adult health care providers and consultants. However, those who underwent HCT benefited from it in terms of their health, experience, and service use, such as age- and condition-appropriate care, seeing adult specialists, and the introduction of adult services. They also addressed challenges in managing appointments and having adult doctors understand their medical history. Nonetheless, they were not informed about diseases and medical and welfare resources for adulthood during pediatric visits and desired to discuss future plans with pediatricians.

Discussion

Systems that provide sufficient pediatric-to-adult HCT for individuals with childhood-onset neurologic conditions are required. Lifelong education for patients and families, training for pediatricians on HCT and neurologists on childhood-onset conditions and disabilities, and clinical practice and human resources that support patients and families are warranted.

Does stronger primary care improve access to health services for persons with spinal cord injury? Evidence from eleven European countries

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between the strength of primary care and perceived access to follow-up care services among persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Data analysis of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) cross-sectional, community-based questionnaire survey conducted in 2017-2019. The association between the strength of primary care (Kringos et al., 2003) and access to health services was established using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for socio-demographic and health status characteristics.

SETTING

Community in eleven European countries: France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain and Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

6658 adults with chronic SCI.

INTERVENTION

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Share of persons with SCI that reported unmet healthcare needs as a measure of access.

RESULTS

Twelve percent of the participants reported unmet healthcare needs: the highest in Poland (25%) and lowest in Switzerland and Spain (7%). The most prevalent access restriction was service unavailability (7%). Stronger primary care was associated with lower odds of reporting unmet healthcare needs, service unavailability, unaffordability and unacceptability. Females, persons of younger age and lower health status, had higher odds of reporting unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS

In all investigated countries, persons with chronic SCI face access barriers, especially with service availability. Stronger primary care for the general population was also associated with better health service access for persons with SCI, which argues for further primary care strengthening.

Quality of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment for Persons With and Without Disabling Conditions

IMPORTANCE

Adverse outcomes associated with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately high among people with disabilities (PWD) compared with those without disability. A gap remains in understanding the quality of OUD treatment for people with physical, sensory, cognitive, and developmental disabilities, specifically regarding medications for OUD (MOUD), a foundation of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use and quality of OUD treatment in adults with diagnosed disabling conditions, compared with adults without these diagnoses.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This case-control study used Washington State Medicaid data from 2016 to 2019 (for use) and 2017 to 2018 (for continuity). Data were obtained for outpatient, residential, and inpatient settings with Medicaid claims. Participants included Washington State full-benefit Medicaid enrollees aged 18 to 64 years, continuously eligible for 12 months, with OUD during the study years and not enrolled in Medicare. Data analysis was performed from January to September 2022.

EXPOSURES

Disability status, including physical (spinal cord injury or mobility impairment), sensory (visual or hearing impairments), developmental (intellectual or developmental disability or autism), and cognitive (traumatic brain injury) disabilities.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were National Quality Forum-endorsed quality measures: (1) use of MOUD (buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone) during each study year and (2) 6-month continuity of treatment (for those taking MOUD).

RESULTS

A total of 84 728 Washington Medicaid enrollees had claims evidence of OUD, representing 159 591 person-years (84 762 person-years [53.1%] for female participants, 116 145 person-years [72.8%] for non-Hispanic White participants, and 100 970 person-years [63.3%] for participants aged 18-39 years); 15.5% of the population (24 743 person-years) had evidence of a physical, sensory, developmental, or cognitive disability. PWD were 40% less likely than those without a disability to receive any MOUD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.58-0.61; P < .001). This was true for each disability type, with variations. Individuals with a developmental disability were least likely to use MOUD (AOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.55; P < .001). Of those using MOUD, PWD were 13% less likely than people without disability to continue MOUD for 6 months (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.93; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this case-control study of a Medicaid population, treatment differences were found between PWD and people without these disabilities; these differences cannot be explained clinically and highlight inequities in treatment. Policies and interventions to increase MOUD access are critical to reducing morbidity and mortality among PWD. Potential solutions include improved enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act, workforce best practice training, and addressing stigma, accessibility, and the need for accommodations to improve OUD treatment for PWD.

The lived experience of people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: Content analysis

Objective

People with disabilities (PWDs) are at greater risk of COVID-19 infection, complications, and death, and experience more difficulty accessing care. We analyzed Twitter tweets to identify important topics and investigate health policies' effects on PWDs.

Methods

Twitter's application programming interface was used to access its public COVID-19 stream. English-language tweets from January 2020 to January 2022 containing a combination of keywords related to COVID-19, disability, discrimination, and inequity were collected and refined to exclude duplicates, replies, and retweets. The remaining tweets were analyzed for user demographics, content, and long-term availability.

Results

The collection yielded 94,814 tweets from 43,296 accounts. During the observation period, 1068 (2.5%) accounts were suspended and 1088 (2.5%) accounts were deleted. Account suspension and deletion among verified users tweeting about COVID-19 and disability were 0.13% and 0.3%, respectively. Emotions were similar among active, suspended, and deleted users, with general negative and positive emotions most common followed by sadness, trust, anticipation, and anger. The overall average sentiment for the tweets was negative. Ten of the 12 topics identified (96.8%) related to pandemic effects on PWDs; "politics that rejects and leaves the disabled, elderly, and children behind" (48.3%) and "efforts to support PWDs in the COVID crisis" (31.8%) were most common. The sample of tweets by organizations (43.9%) was higher for this topic than for other COVID-19-related topics the authors have investigated.

Conclusions

The primary discussion addressed how pandemic politics and policies disadvantage PWDs, older adults, and children, and secondarily expressed support for these populations. The increased level of Twitter use by organizations suggests a higher level of organization and advocacy within the disability community than in other groups. Twitter may facilitate recognition of increased harm to or discrimination against specific populations such as people living with disability during national health events.