Adiposopathy: sick fat causes high blood sugar, high blood pressure and dyslipidemia

Anthropometric measurements and diabetes mellitus: clues to the "pathogenic" and "protective" potential of adipose tissue

BACKGROUND

Increased visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is "pathogenic" through adverse endocrine and immune contributions to metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Increased VAT increases waist circumference (WC), and WC is a recommended anthropometric measure of pathogenic adipose tissue distribution. Increased subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) is often described as "protective" against metabolic disease and frequently approximated by hip circumference (HC).

METHODS

The Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD) evaluated a study sample weighted to reflect the U.S. adult population. Respondents diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; n = 3825) and without T2DM (n = 13,327) self-reported their weight and height, WC, and HC.

RESULTS

T2DM men and women had a disproportionate increase in body mass index (BMI) and WC, with 30% of T2DM men and 40% of T2DM women having a WC within the highest quintile compared to the overall study population. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) appeared to be the best anthropometric predictor of T2DM. However, both T2DM men and women also had a disproportionate increase in HC, with 30% of T2DM men and 34% of T2DM women having a HC within the highest quintile, which was generally similar to the distribution of BMI and WHR.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that: (1) An increase in adipose tissue generally increases the risk of T2DM; (2) central adiposity is more pathogenic than peripheral subcutaneous adiposity; and (3) SAT accumulation, as assessed by increased HC, does not always "protect" against metabolic diseases such as T2DM.

Adiposopathy: treating pathogenic adipose tissue to reduce cardiovascular disease risk

Excessive adipose tissue is potentially pathogenic due to its mass effects and through adverse metabolic/immune responses, which may lead to cardiovascular disease risk factors (eg, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and possibly atherosclerosis itself). Positive caloric balance in genetically/environmentally susceptible patients may result in adipocyte hypertrophy, visceral adipose tissue accumulation, and ectopic fat deposition, all causally associated with metabolic disease, and all anatomic manifestations of "adiposopathy" (a term used to describe adipose tissue pathology). Weight loss through improved nutrition, increased physical activity, and weight loss agents (ie, orlistat and sibutramine) improves adiposopathy and improves many metabolic diseases whose prevalence are directly associated with an increase in body fat and sedentary lifestyle. Cannabinoid receptor antagonists improve adiposopathy through weight reduction and favorable metabolic effects upon multiple body organs (including adipocytes). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists may improve adiposopathy through recruitment of functional fat cells and apoptosis of dysfunctional fat cells.

Visceral obesity and metabolic syndrome: two faces of the same medal?

In this review, we have analyzed the role of visceral obesity in the occurrence of metabolic syndrome (MetS). MetS is a common metabolic disorder that has been related recently to the increasing prevalence of obesity. The disorder is defined in various ways, but in the near future a new definition(s) should be applicable worldwide. The pathophysiology has been largely attributed, in the past years, to insulin resistance, although several epidemiological and pathophysiological data now indicate visceral obesity as a main factor in the occurrence of all the components of MetS. In view of this, relationships among visceral obesity, free fatty acids, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance have been reported. In addition, the effects of some adipocytokines and other proinflammatory factors produced by fat accumulation on the occurrence of MetS have been also emphasized. Accordingly, the "hypoadiponectinemia hypothesis" has been proposed as the most interesting to explain the pathophysiology of MetS. The epidemiologic, pathophysiologic and clinical data reported seem to indicate that MetS might be considered a fatal consequence of visceral obesity.

Adiposopathy and bariatric surgery: is 'sick fat' a surgical disease?

OBJECTIVE

To review how bariatric surgery in obese patients may effectively treat adiposopathy (pathogenic adipose tissue or 'sick fat'), and to provide clinicians a rationale as to why bariatric surgery is a potential treatment option for overweight patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia.

METHODS

A group of clinicians, researchers, and surgeons, all with a background in treating obesity and the adverse metabolic consequences of excessive body fat, reviewed the medical literature regarding the improvement in metabolic disease with bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Bariatric surgery improves metabolic disease through multiple, likely interrelated mechanisms including: (i) initial acute fasting and diminished caloric intake inherent with many gastrointestinal surgical procedures; (ii) favourable alterations in gastrointestinal endocrine and immune responses, especially with bariatric surgeries that reroute nutrient gastrointestinal delivery such as gastric bypass procedures; and (iii) a decrease in adipose tissue mass. Regarding adipose tissue mass, during positive caloric balance, impaired adipogenesis (resulting in limitations in adipocyte number or size) and visceral adiposity are anatomic manifestations of pathogenic adipose tissue (adiposopathy). This may cause adverse adipose tissue endocrine and immune responses that lead to metabolic disease. A decrease in adipocyte size and decrease in visceral adiposity, as often occurs with bariatric surgery, may effectively improve adiposopathy, and thus effectively treat metabolic disease. It is the relationship between bariatric surgery and its effects upon pathogenic adipose tissue that is the focus of this discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

In selective obese patients with metabolic disease who are refractory to medical management, adiposopathy is a surgical disease.

"Sick fat," metabolic disease, and atherosclerosis

Atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality among men and women in developed nations. The obesity epidemic contributes to the increasing prevalence of high blood sugar (as may be found in patients with diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome), high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia--all CHD risk factors. Metabolic syndrome describes the common clinical finding wherein component CHD risk factors cluster within a single patient, but this term does not identify any unified pathophysiologic process. However, a component of the metabolic syndrome is abdominal obesity, which does reflect an anatomic manifestation of a "common-soil" pathophysiologic process that promotes the onset of CHD risk factors, and thus increases CHD risk. Adiposopathy ("sick fat") is anatomically characterized by visceral adiposity and adipocyte hypertrophy; it is manifested physiologically by a net increase in release of free fatty acids and by pathogenic adipose tissue metabolic/immune responses that promote metabolic disease and increase CHD risk. Understanding the relation of adiposopathy to CHD risk factors and recognizing the importance of treating both the "cause and effect" of metabolic diseases are critical toward a comprehensive approach in reducing CHD risk. Regarding the "cause," clinicians and their patients should be diligent regarding appropriate nutritional and lifestyle interventions that may favorably affect health. Regarding the "effect," clinicians and their patients should be equally diligent toward appropriate pharmaceutical interventions that reduce CHD risk factors when nutritional and lifestyle interventions do not sufficiently achieve desired metabolic treatment goals.

Is adiposopathy (sick fat) an endocrine disease?

OBJECTIVE

To review current consensus and controversy regarding whether obesity is a 'disease', examine the pathogenic potential of adipose tissue to promote metabolic disease and explore the merits of 'adiposopathy' and 'sick fat' as scientifically and clinically useful terms in defining when excessive body fat may represent a 'disease'.

METHODS

A group of clinicians and researchers, all with a background in endocrinology, assembled to evaluate the medical literature, as it pertains to the pathologic and pathogenic potential of adipose tissue, with an emphasis on metabolic diseases that are often promoted by excessive body weight.

RESULTS

The data support pathogenic adipose tissue as a disease. Challenges exist to convince many clinicians, patients, healthcare entities and the public that excessive body fat is often no less a 'disease' than the pathophysiological consequences related to anatomical abnormalities of other body tissues. 'Adiposopathy' has the potential to scientifically define adipose tissue anatomic and physiologic abnormalities, and their adverse consequences to patient health. Adiposopathy acknowledges that when positive caloric balance leads to adipocyte hypertrophy and visceral adiposity, then this may lead to pathogenic adipose tissue metabolic and immune responses that promote metabolic disease. From a patient perspective, explaining how excessive caloric intake might cause fat to become 'sick' also helps provide a rationale for patients to avoid weight gain. Adiposopathy also better justifies recommendations of weight loss as an effective therapeutic modality to improve metabolic disease in overweight and obese patients.

CONCLUSION

Adiposopathy (sick fat) is an endocrine disease.

Pathogenic potential of adipose tissue and metabolic consequences of adipocyte hypertrophy and increased visceral adiposity

When caloric intake exceeds caloric expenditure, the positive caloric balance and storage of energy in adipose tissue often causes adipocyte hypertrophy and visceral adipose tissue accumulation. These pathogenic anatomic abnormalities may incite metabolic and immune responses that promote Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia. These are the most common metabolic diseases managed by clinicians and are all major cardiovascular disease risk factors. 'Disease' is traditionally characterized as anatomic and physiologic abnormalities of an organ or organ system that contributes to adverse health consequences. Using this definition, pathogenic adipose tissue is no less a disease than diseases of other body organs. This review describes the consequences of pathogenic fat cell hypertrophy and visceral adiposity, emphasizing the mechanistic contributions of genetic and environmental predispositions, adipogenesis, fat storage, free fatty acid metabolism, adipocyte factors and inflammation. Appreciating the full pathogenic potential of adipose tissue requires an integrated perspective, recognizing the importance of 'cross-talk' and interactions between adipose tissue and other body systems. Thus, the adverse metabolic consequences that accompany fat cell hypertrophy and visceral adiposity are best viewed as a pathologic partnership between the pathogenic potential adipose tissue and the inherited or acquired limitations and/or impairments of other body organs. A better understanding of the physiological and pathological interplay of pathogenic adipose tissue with other organs and organ systems may assist in developing better strategies in treating metabolic disease and reducing cardiovascular disease risk.

The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys

The objectives of this study were to explore the relation between body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia; examine BMI distributions among patients with these conditions; and compare results from two national surveys. The Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD) 2004 screening questionnaire (mailed survey) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1999-2002 (interview, clinical and laboratory data) were conducted in nationally representative samples>or=18 years old. Responses were received from 127,420 of 200,000 households (64%, representing 211,097 adults) for SHIELD, and 4257 participants for NHANES. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia was estimated within BMI categories, as was distribution of BMI levels among individuals with these diseases. Mean BMI was 27.8 kg/m2 for SHIELD and 27.9 kg/m2 for NHANES. Increased BMI was associated with increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in both studies (p<0.001). For each condition, approximately [corrected] 75% or more [corrected] of patients had BMI>or=25 kg/m2. Estimated prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was similar in both studies, while dyslipidaemia was substantially higher in NHANES than SHIELD. In both studies, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia occurred across all ranges of BMI, but increased with higher BMI. However, not all overweight or obese patients had these metabolic diseases and not all with these conditions were overweight or obese. Except for dyslipidaemia prevalence, SHIELD was comparable with NHANES. Consumer panel surveys may be an alternative method to collect data on the relationship of BMI and metabolic diseases.

Adiposopathy is a more rational treatment target for metabolic disease than obesity alone

Current guidelines recommend that weight-loss therapy should be primarily based upon specific body mass index (BMI) cut-off limits. However, in the adipocentric paradigm, it is acknowledged that co-morbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, occur at all levels of BMI. Excessive fat mass (adiposity) in genetically susceptible individuals results in fat dysfunction (adiposopathy), which then contributes to metabolic disorders that increase the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this paradigm, the term "anti-obesity" treatment might best be replaced by "anti-adiposopathy" treatment, wherein the focus is not based solely on BMI, but instead directed towards physiologically improving fat cell function and clinically improving the metabolic health of patients. This may occur through appropriate diet, physical exercise, and other lifestyle changes, and/or from drug therapies. Cannabinoid receptor antagonists and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor agonists are examples of agents that physiologically improve fat function and clinically improve metabolic disease.

Statin safety: an overview and assessment of the data--2005

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statin drugs, have been studied in numerous controlled human research trials involving hundreds of thousands of study participants. Statins have been prescribed for millions of patients. Based on this vast research and clinical experience, statins have been shown to improve lipid blood levels and reduce atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, resulting in reduced CAD morbidity and mortality, and in several studies, reduced overall ("all-cause") mortality. From a safety perspective, both research trial evidence and clinical practice experience have demonstrated that statins are generally well tolerated. However, as with all pharmaceuticals, safety considerations exist with both monotherapy and combination statin therapy, mainly involving potential adverse effects on muscle, liver, kidney, and the nervous system. The evidence supporting statin-related potential adverse experiences on these organ systems is sometimes strong and based on clear clinical trial evidence (such as the increased risk of muscle enzyme elevation with higher statin doses). The evidence is at other times more speculative, being based on case reports and inconclusive clinical trial data (such as possible favorable or unfavorable effects of statins on cognition). Because the use of statins is so widespread, it is useful for the clinician to understand statin safety issues and the level of available evidence supporting the contention that various adverse effects are caused by statins. This review presents an assessment of statin safety based on an overview of the current statin safety data and their clinical implications.

The Melanocortin System as a Therapeutic Treatment Target for??Adiposity and Adiposopathy

The melanocortin system is an important treatment target towards improving both adiposity (excessive body fat) and adiposopathy (dysfunctional body fat). Melanocortin agonism can be achieved by increasing CNS leptin and/or insulin activity, which is dependent upon peripheral leptin/insulin production, transport across the blood-brain barrier (potentially relevant to inhaled/nasal insulin), and effects upon CNS target receptors. Melanocortin agonism may also be achieved through inhibiting inverse agonists of melanocortin receptors (such as inhibition of agouti-related peptide), and directly through selective melanocortin receptor ligands such as piperazine, piperidine, pyridazinone, tetrahydropyran, thiadiazole and diazole derivatives. While the development of most (but not all) neuropeptide Y inhibitors as monotherapy interventions have demonstrated limited efficacy thus far, it is possible that the combination of a neuropeptide Y inhibitor with a selective melanocortin receptor ligand may provide improved weight loss over that of either agent alone. In general, melanocortin system agonism promotes weight loss through decreasing appetite, increasing sympathetic nervous system activity, and modulating thyroid-releasing hormone, corticotropin-releasing hormone, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, melanin-concentrating hormone and orexin. Of particular interest, given the development of cannabinoid receptor antagonists as weight loss agents, is the fact that receptors in the endocannabinoid system are also affected by the melanocortin system. It will only be through the conduct of human clinical trials that melanocortin agonists will be proven to reduce adiposity to a meaningful degree, and, as importantly, be proven to improve adiposopathy, and thus effectively treat excessive fat-related metabolic diseases.

Importance and Management of Dyslipidemia in the Metabolic Syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is a common disorder characterized by central obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension, and atherogenic dyslipidemia (including the combination of hypertriglyceridemia, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a preponderance of small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles). In this manuscript, we review the pathogenesis and significance of dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome, the role of nonpharmacologic therapy with therapeutic lifestyle changes, and drug therapies, including statins, fibrates, nicotinic acid, and omega-3 fatty acids or fish oils, alone or in drug combinations, to improve lipids and reduce the chance of subsequent cardiovascular disease events.