51
|
Brown CL, Skinner AC, Yin HS, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, Delamater AM, Ravanbakht SN, Perrin EM. Parental Perceptions of Weight During the First Year of Life. Acad Pediatr 2016; 16:558-64. [PMID: 27002214 PMCID: PMC4976024 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Revised: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than half of parents underestimate their overweight child's weight; however, previous research focuses on children older than 2 years of age. The objective of this study was to assess whether parents of 2- to 12-month-old infants are able to accurately perceive their children's weight status. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data collected from the Greenlight study, a cluster randomized obesity prevention trial, at 4 pediatric clinics serving diverse and low-income populations. Infants' length and weight were measured at well-child checks, and parents completed questionnaires including demographic characteristics and perception of their children's weight. Weight-for-length (WFL) percentile at the fifth to ≤95 was considered healthy weight and WFL percentile >95th was considered overweight. We used chi-squared tests to compare accuracy according to weight category and performed logistic regression analysis to assess accuracy at each time point. RESULTS Approximately 85% to 90% of infants (n = 853 at 2 months, n = 563 at 12 months) were at a healthy WFL at all measurement times, and parents of these infants were more likely to have an accurate perception of their child's weight (accuracy 89%-95%) than overweight children (accuracy 7%-26%; P < .001 across time points). Approximately 10% of healthy weight infants were perceived as underweight by their parents at all time points. At 12 months, mothers who were overweight were significantly more likely to underestimate their child's weight status (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS In our diverse and low-income sample, parents of overweight infants infrequently know that their infants are overweight. Future studies should examine how perception is related to feeding habits and weight status over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie L. Brown
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Asheley C. Skinner
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - H. Shonna Yin
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University, New York, NY
| | - Russell L. Rothman
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Lee M. Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Alan M. Delamater
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Sophie N. Ravanbakht
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eliana M. Perrin
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Virudachalam S, Gruver RS, Gerdes M, Power TJ, Magge SN, Shults J, Faerber JA, Kalra GK, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Suh AW, Berkowitz RI, Fiks AG. Mothers' and Clinicians' Priorities for Obesity Prevention Among Black, High-Risk Infants. Am J Prev Med 2016; 51:46-53. [PMID: 26947214 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite many recommended strategies for obesity prevention during infancy, effectively delivering recommendations to parents in clinical settings is challenging, especially among high-risk populations. This study describes and compares mothers' and clinicians' priorities for obesity prevention during infancy, to facilitate more-effective obesity prevention messaging. METHODS A discrete choice experiment using maximum difference scaling was administered in 2013 and analyzed in 2013-2014. Twenty-nine low-income, obese mothers of infants and 30 pediatric clinicians from three urban primary care practices rated the relative importance of 16 items relevant to obesity prevention during infancy, in response to this question: Which topic would be most helpful [for new mothers] to learn about to prevent your [their] child from becoming overweight? Response options encompassed the domains of feeding, sleep, parenting (including physical activity and screen time), and maternal self-care. RESULTS Mothers (all Medicaid-enrolled and black; mean age, 27 years; mean BMI, 35 kg/m(2)) and clinicians (97% female, 87% pediatricians, 13% nurse practitioners) both highly prioritized recognizing infant satiety and hunger cues, and appropriate feeding volume. Mothers rated infant physical activity and maintaining regular routines as 3.5 times more important than clinicians did (p<0.001). Clinicians rated breastfeeding as 3.4 times more important than mothers did (p<0.001). Neither group prioritized learning about screen time or maternal self-care. CONCLUSIONS Low-income, obese, black mothers of infants highly prioritized learning about many effective obesity prevention strategies, including recognizing hunger and satiety cues, promoting infant activity, and maintaining regular routines. Clinicians may frame preventive guidance to be responsive to these priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senbagam Virudachalam
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Rachel S Gruver
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marsha Gerdes
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas J Power
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sheela N Magge
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Center for Translational Science, Children's National Health Systems, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Justine Shults
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer A Faerber
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gurpreet K Kalra
- Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chanelle T Bishop-Gilyard
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew W Suh
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert I Berkowitz
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander G Fiks
- Division of General Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Wood CT, Skinner AC, Yin HS, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, Delamater AM, Perrin EM. Bottle Size and Weight Gain in Formula-Fed Infants. Pediatrics 2016; 138:peds.2015-4538. [PMID: 27273748 PMCID: PMC4925078 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-4538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Formula-fed infants may be at greater risk for overfeeding and rapid weight gain. Different size bottles are used for feeding infants, although little is known about whether bottle size is related to weight gain in bottle-fed infants. METHODS Data from the Greenlight Intervention Study, a cluster randomized trial to prevent childhood obesity at 4 pediatric resident clinics, were used to analyze the exposure to regular (<6 oz) or large (≥6 oz) bottle size at the 2-month visit on changes in weight, weight-for-age z score (WAZ), and weight-for-length z score (WLZ) at the 6-month visit. Using multivariable regression, we adjusted for potential confounders (birth weight, gender, age, weight measures at 2 months, parent race/ethnicity, education, household income and size, time between 2- and 6-month visits, and first child status). RESULTS Forty-five percent (n = 386; 41% black, 35% Hispanic, 23% white, 2% other) of infants at the 2-month visit were exclusively formula-fed, and 44% used large (≥6 oz) bottles. Infants whose parents fed with large bottles had 0.21 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05 to 0.37) more weight change, 0.24 U (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.41) more change in WAZ, and 0.31 U (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.54) more change in WLZ during this period than infants fed with regular bottles. CONCLUSIONS Using a large bottle in early infancy independently contributed to greater weight gain and change in WLZ at the 6-month visit. Although growth in infancy is complex, bottle size may be a modifiable risk factor for rapid infant weight gain and later obesity among exclusively formula-fed infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles T. Wood
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;,Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Asheley C. Skinner
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - H. Shonna Yin
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Russell L. Rothman
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Lee M. Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University, Stanford, California; and
| | - Alan M. Delamater
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Eliana M. Perrin
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Wood CT, Perreira KM, Perrin EM, Yin HS, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, Delamater AM, Bentley ME, Bronaugh AB, Thompson AL. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire in Latino families. Appetite 2016; 100:118-25. [PMID: 26876910 PMCID: PMC4799737 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Revised: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parent feeding practices affect risk of obesity in children. Latino children are at higher risk of obesity than the general population, yet valid measure of feeding practices, one of which is the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire (IFSQ), have not been formally validated in Spanish. OBJECTIVE To validate the IFSQ among Latino families, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis of pressuring, restrictive, and responsive feeding constructs from the IFSQ. DESIGN/METHODS The IFSQ was administered at the 12-month visit in the Greenlight study, a multi-center cluster randomized trial to prevent obesity. Parents were included if they were of Latino origin (n = 303) and completed an English or Spanish language modified IFSQ (without the indulgence construct). Scores from nine sub-constructs of the IFSQ were compared between English and Spanish language versions. We tested reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficients and performed confirmatory factor analysis to examine factor loadings and goodness of fit characteristics, modifying constructs to achieve best fit. RESULTS Of 303 parents completing the IFSQ, 84% were born outside the US, and 74% completed the IFSQ in Spanish. Reliability coefficients ranged from 0.28 to 0.61 for the laissez-faire sub-constructs and from 0.58 to 0.83 for the pressuring, restrictive, and responsive sub-constructs. Results for all coefficients were similar between participants responding to an English and Spanish version of the IFSQ. Goodness of fit indices ranged from CFI 0.82-1 and RMSEA 0.00-0.31, and the model performed best in pressuring-soothing (CFI 1.0, RMSEA 0.00) and restrictive-amount (CFI 0.98, RMSEA 0.1) sub-constructs. CONCLUSIONS In a sample of Latino families, pressuring, restrictive, and responsive constructs performed well. The modified IFSQ in both English and Spanish-speaking Latino families may be used to assess parenting behaviors related to early obesity risk in this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles T Wood
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Krista M Perreira
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eliana M Perrin
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H Shonna Yin
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Russell L Rothman
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lee M Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alan M Delamater
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Margaret E Bentley
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrea B Bronaugh
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda L Thompson
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Wood CT, Skinner AC, Yin HS, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, Delamater A, Ravanbakht SN, Perrin EM. Association Between Bottle Size and Formula Intake in 2-Month-Old Infants. Acad Pediatr 2016; 16:254-9. [PMID: 26525989 PMCID: PMC4808476 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Revised: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/01/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine range of bottle sizes used and examine the relationship between bottle size and total daily consumption of infant formula. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data collected as part of Greenlight, a cluster randomized trial to prevent childhood obesity at 4 pediatric resident clinics. The Greenlight study included healthy, term infants. For our analysis, parents of exclusively formula-fed infants reported volume per feed, number of feeds per day, and bottle size, which was dichotomized into small (<6 oz) or large (≥6 oz). We identified determinants of bottle size, and then examined relationships between bottle size and volume fed with log-transformed ordinary least squares regression, adjusting for infant age, sex, birth weight, current weight, race/ethnicity, and enrollment in Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. RESULTS Of 865 participants in the Greenlight study, 44% (n = 378; 21.8% white, 40.6% black, 35.3% Hispanic, 2.4% other) of infants were exclusively formula fed at 2 months. Median volume per day was 30 oz (interquartile range 12), and 46.0% of infants were fed with large bottles. Adjusted for covariates, parents using larger bottles reported feeding 4 oz more formula per day (34.2 oz, 95% confidence interval 33.5-34.9 vs 29.7 oz, 95% confidence interval 29.2-30.3, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Among exclusively formula-fed infants, use of a larger bottle is associated with parental report of more formula intake compared to infants fed with smaller bottles. If infants fed with larger bottles receive more formula, these infants may be overfed and consequently at risk for obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles T. Wood
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Asheley C. Skinner
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - H. Shonna Yin
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine/Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
| | - Russell L. Rothman
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 6103 Medical Center East, Nashville, TN 37232
| | - Lee M. Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University, 117 Encina Commons, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Alan Delamater
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1601 NW 12 Avenue, #4046, Miami, FL 33136
| | - Sophie N. Ravanbakht
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eliana M. Perrin
- Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Abstract
Human milk is the optimal feeding choice for infants, as it dynamically provides the nutrients, immunity support, and other bioactive factors needed for infants at specific stages during development. Observational studies and several meta-analyses have suggested that breastfeeding is protective against development of obesity in childhood and beyond. However, these findings are not without significant controversy. This review includes an overview of observational findings to date, then focuses on three specific pathways that connect human milk and infant physiology: maternal obesity, microbiome development in the infant, and the development of taste preference and diet quality. Each of these pathways involves complex interactions between mother and infant, includes both biologic and non-biologic factors, and may have both direct and indirect effects on obesity risk in the offspring. This type of integrated approach to examining breastfeeding and childhood obesity is necessary to advance research in this area beyond observational findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica G Woo
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5041, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
| | - Lisa J Martin
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 4006, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Ethnic differences in dietary intake at age 12 and 18 months: the Born in Bradford 1000 Study. Public Health Nutr 2015; 19:114-22. [PMID: 25908276 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980015000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the intake of key indicator foods at age 12 months and 18 months between infants of Pakistani and White British origin. DESIGN Logistic regression was used to model associations between ethnicity and consumption of key indicator foods defined by high or low energy density using an FFQ at age 12 and 18 months. SETTING Born in Bradford 1000 study, Bradford, UK. SUBJECTS Infants (n 1259; 38 % White British, 49 % Pakistani), mean age 12·7 (sd 1·0) months and toddlers (n 1257; 37 % White British, 49 % Pakistani), mean age 18·7 (sd1·0) months. RESULTS At 12 months, Pakistani infants consumed more commercial sweet baby meals than White British infants, with greater odds for being above average consumers (adjusted OR (AOR)=1·90; 95 % CI 1·40, 2·56), more chips/roast potatoes (AOR=2·75; 95 % CI 2·09, 3·62), less processed meat products (AOR=0·11; 95 % CI 0·08, 0·15), more fruit (AOR=2·20; 95 % CI 1·70, 2·85) and more sugar-sweetened drinks (AOR=1·68; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·18). At 18 months these differences persisted, with Pakistani infants consuming more commercial sweet baby meals (AOR=4·57; 95 % CI 2·49, 8·39), more chips/roast potato shapes (AOR=2·26; 95 % CI 1·50, 3·43), more fruit (AOR=1·40; 95 % CI 1·08, 1·81), more sugar-sweetened drinks (AOR=2·03; 95 % CI 1·53, 2·70), more pure fruit juice (AOR=1·82; 95 % CI 1·40, 2·35), more water (AOR=3·24; 95 % CI 2·46, 4·25) and less processed meat (AOR=0·10; 95 % CI 0·06, 0·15) than White British infants. CONCLUSIONS Dietary intake during infancy and the early toddlerhood period is associated with ethnicity, suggesting the importance of early and culturally adapted interventions aimed at establishing healthy eating behaviours.
Collapse
|
58
|
Fuemmeler BF, Stroo M, Lee CT, Bazemore S, Blocker B, Østbye T. Racial Differences in Obesity-Related Risk Factors Between 2-Year-Old Children Born of Overweight Mothers. J Pediatr Psychol 2015; 40:649-56. [PMID: 25797946 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate racial differences in a range of obesity-related socio-behavioral risk factors in children born of obese mothers. METHODS 142 Black and 151 White 2-year-old children and their parents were surveyed on their physical activity environment, food environment, parental role modeling, eating behaviors, feeding practices, child physical activity, dietary intake, and eating behaviors; body mass index (BMI) for parents and children (BMI z-score) were calculated. RESULTS In bivariate analyses, Black families reported significantly more risk factors for early-childhood obesity than White families, including greater availability of soda, more television viewing, and poorer dietary intake. In multivariate analyses adjusting for maternal and socioeconomic factors, the differences between Black and White families on factors including television watching and dietary intake remained significant. CONCLUSION These data show a greater number of risk factors for obesity among Black children and their families compared with White children even after adjustment for maternal BMI and socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard F Fuemmeler
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center,
| | - Marissa Stroo
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Chien-Ti Lee
- Department of Family, Home, and Social Sciences, School of Family Life, Brigham Young University
| | - Sharnail Bazemore
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Brooke Blocker
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Truls Østbye
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, and Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Kent G. Global infant formula: monitoring and regulating the impacts to protect human health. Int Breastfeed J 2015; 10:6. [PMID: 25784954 PMCID: PMC4362817 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-014-0020-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 11/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide promotion of infant formula and other commercial baby foods is leading to increased use of these products, raising concerns about their impact on the health of infants. These products are made and marketed through a global system that extends beyond the control of separate nations. As the industry is increasingly globalized, there is a growing need for guidance, monitoring, and regulation. This study suggests a path toward achieving better control of infant formula and other baby foods to ensure that infants and young children everywhere are well nourished. The negotiation of a new Optional Protocol on Children's Nutrition, to be linked to the most relevant human rights treaty, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, would bring the major issues relating to infant formula and other baby foods to the attention of the global community and all national governments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Kent
- Department of Political Science, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI 96825 USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Morphological features of the neonatal brain following exposure to regional anesthesia during labor and delivery. Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 33:213-21. [PMID: 25179140 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 08/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent animal and human epidemiological studies suggest that early childhood exposure to anesthesia may have adverse effects on brain development. As more than 50% of pregnant women in the United States and one-third in the United Kingdom receive regional anesthesia during labor and delivery, understanding the effects of perinatal anesthesia on postnatal brain development has important public health relevance. METHODS We used high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the effects of regional anesthesia during labor and delivery as part of a larger study of perinatal exposures on the morphological features of the neonatal brain. We mapped morphological features of the cortical surface in 37 healthy infants, 24 exposed and 13 unexposed to regional anesthesia at delivery, who were scanned within the first 6 weeks of life. RESULTS Infants exposed to maternal anesthesia compared with unexposed infants had greater local volumes in portions of the frontal and occipital lobes bilaterally and right posterior portion of the cingulate gyrus. Longer durations of exposure to anesthesia correlated positively with local volumes in the occipital lobe. CONCLUSIONS Anesthesia exposure during labor and delivery was associated with larger volumes in portions of the frontal and occipital lobes and cingulate gyrus in neonates. Longitudinal MRI studies are needed to determine whether these morphological effects of anesthesia persist and what their consequences on cognition and behavior may be.
Collapse
|