If we build it, will they come? Issues of engagement with digital health interventions for trauma recovery

Who Benefits Most from Adding Technology to Depression Treatment and How? An Analysis of Engagement with a Texting Adjunct for Psychotherapy

Introduction: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an established treatment for depression, but its success is often impeded by low attendance. Supportive text messages assessing participants' mood in between sessions might increase attendance to in-clinic CBT, although it is not fully understood who benefits most from these interventions and how. This study examined (1) user groups showing different profiles of study engagement and (2) associations between increased response rates to mood texts and psychotherapy attendance. Methods: We included 73 participants who attended Group CBT (GCBT) in a primary care clinic and participated in a supportive automated text-messaging intervention. Using unsupervised machine learning, we identified and characterized subgroups with similar combinations of total texting responsiveness and total GCBT attendance. We used mixed-effects models to explore the association between increased previous week response rate and subsequent week in-clinic GCBT attendance and, conversely, response rate following attendance. Results: Participants could be divided into four clusters of overall study engagement, showing distinct profiles in age and prior texting knowledge. The response rate to texts in the week before GCBT was not associated with GCBT attendance, although the relationship was moderated by age; there was a positive relationship for younger, but not older, participants. Attending GCBT was, however, associated with higher response rate the week after an attended session. Conclusion: User groups of study engagement differ in texting knowledge and age. Younger participants might benefit more from supportive texting interventions when their purpose is to increase psychotherapy attendance. Our results have implications for tailoring digital interventions to user groups and for understanding therapeutic effects of these interventions.

A comparative study of engagement in mobile and wearable health monitoring for bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Self-monitoring is recommended for individuals with bipolar disorder, with numerous technological solutions available. This study aimed to identify basic components of these solutions that increase engagement with self-monitoring.

METHODS

Participants with bipolar disorder (n = 47) monitored their symptoms with a Fitbit and a smartphone app and were randomly assigned to either review or not review recorded symptoms weekly. We tested whether individuals would better adhere to and prefer monitoring with passive monitoring with an activity tracker compared to active monitoring with a smartphone app and whether individuals would better adhere to self-monitoring if their recorded symptoms were reviewed with an interviewer.

RESULTS

Monitoring with a smartphone app achieved similar adherence and preference to Fitbit (P > .85). Linear mixed effects modeling found adherence decreased significantly more over the study for the Fitbit (12% more, P < .001) even though more participants reported they would use the Fitbit over a year compared to the app (72.3% vs 46.8%). Reviewing symptoms weekly did not improve adherence, but most participants reported they would prefer to review symptoms with a clinician (74.5%) and on monthly basis (57.5%) compared to alternatives. Participants endorsed sleep as the most important symptom to monitor, forgetfulness as the largest barrier to self-monitoring, and raising self-awareness as the best reason for self-monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a combined strategy of wearable and mobile monitoring that includes reminders, targets raising self-awareness, and tracks sleep. A clinician may want to review symptoms on a monthly basis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03358238.

Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance

BACKGROUND

Multicomponent interventions combined with health coaching are widely recommended to improve a healthy lifestyle. The aim of the present study was to analyse the usage and acceptance of a multicomponent intervention (telephone, web and face-to-face coaching) for low back pain patients, and thereby gain an understanding of why this intervention was not as effective as expected.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial, aimed at promoting physical activity, was conducted. It was a cross-sectional study based on data of a multicomponent intervention group (baseline = 201 participants). For evaluating the usage and acceptance, descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

Over half (n = 118) of the patients participated at least once in the telephone coaching. Approximately half of the participants (44 of 90) rated the telephone coaching as "good".34 of 92 (37%) participants reported of visiting the web-platform. The web-platform was comprehensible for nearly one-quarter (n = 8 of 33) and very useful for one participant.The face-to-face-contact was rated highly (range: 79.4-88.2 out of 100).

CONCLUSION

Usage of the telephone coaching approach was moderate with even fewer participants visiting the web-platform. In addition, these approaches were not rated as very useful. The acceptance of the face-to-face contact was high.Since the usage and acceptance could influence the effectiveness, utilisation and acceptance studies might help to explain the reason for non-effective lifestyle interventions. Therefore, more studies analysing the usage and acceptance are needed. To improve the usage and acceptance, a stronger participatory orientation in the design of interventions and the integration of face-to-face contact could be helpful.

Adapting Evidence-Based Treatments for Digital Technologies: a Critical Review of Functions, Tools, and the Use of Branded Solutions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide a critical review of digital technologies in evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for mental health with a focus on the functions technologies are intended to serve. The review highlights issues related to clarity of purpose, usability, and assumptions related to EBT technology integration, branding, and packaging.

RECENT FINDINGS

Developers continue to use technology in creative ways, often combining multiple functions to convey existing EBTs or to create new technology-enabled EBTs. Developers have a strong preference for creating and investigating whole-source, branded solutions related to specific EBTs, in comparison to developing or investigating technology tools related to specific components of behavior change, or developing specific clinical protocols that can be delivered via existing technologies. Default assumptions that new applications are required for each individual EBT, that EBTs are best served by the use of only one technology solution rather than multiple tools, and that an EBT-specific technology product should include or convey all portions of an EBT slow scientific progress and increase risk of usability issues that negatively impact uptake. We contend that a purposeful, functions-based approach should guide the selection, development, and application of technology in support of EBT delivery.

Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders: A Summary of the Evidence and Potential Mechanisms of Behavior Change

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most evaluated behavioral interventions for substance use disorders, with considerable empirical evidence supporting its efficacy. However, despite CBT's strong support from efficacy trials, broad dissemination and implementation have been challenging. Furthermore, there remains limited understanding regarding CBT's mechanisms of behavior change; the theory-driven assumption that individuals acquire new skills for coping with triggers for substance use has notoriously lacked statistical support. The emergence of computer-delivered interventions has the potential to address dissemination and implementation challenges, as well as offer advantages toward understanding treatment mechanisms. This article will provide a summary of the current evidence supporting one particular computerized CBT program, CBT4CBT. Multiple clinical trials in different treatment settings have indicated CBT4CBT's efficacy at reducing rates of alcohol and drug use when provided as an add-on to standard addiction treatment, as well as when provided with minimal clinical monitoring (i.e., virtual stand-alone). These effects have also been relatively durable after treatment termination, consistent with findings of traditional CBT. It is important to note that the evaluation of individuals' cognitive and behavioral coping skills prior and following treatment has indicated the acquisition/improvement of these skills may be a mechanism of behavior change for those who engage with CBT4CBT. Thus, computerized delivery may be a strategy for enhancing individuals' learning of cognitive and behavioral skills for successfully avoiding substance use. Future work should aim to identify the optimal type of setting, clinician role, and patient characteristics for targeted dissemination and implementation.

PTSD as a Public Mental Health Priority

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews recent evidence related to public health epidemiology and intervention for traumatic stress and PTSD. Recent evidence is presented regarding incidence of traumatic stress worldwide, as well as most frequent types of traumas, indicators of the public health burden of PTSD, and prevalence, predictors, and correlates of PTSD. Public health perspectives on intervention and treatment are delineated, and innovations in both psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions are highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

PTSD has been associated with substantial medical and economic burden. Recent public health preventive innovations include integrated medical/behavioral health care, acute CBT and attention interventions, modifications to CBT protocols, use of novel and augmentative psychopharmacological agents, and use of technology. Recent research regarding the scope and impact of traumatic stress, as well as prevention strategies for PTSD, have resulted in an improved understanding of its impact and more effective public health interventions.