Pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin

In vitro adsorption of mebeverine hydrochloride onto kaolin and its relationship to pharmacological effects of the drug in vivo

The in vitro uptake of mebeverine hydrochloride from an initial drug concentration of 0.25-4.25 or 0.2-3.6 g% w/v onto kaolin 5.0 g% w/v at pH 1.8 or 7.5, respectively, at 37 degrees C was represented by a double- layered adsorption isotherm. The calculated data were in accordance with a Langmuir adsorption isotherm for an initial drug concentration up to 2.1 or 2.0 g% w/v when a monolayer was formed at pH 1.8 or 7.5, respectively. The adsorption process is pH dependent, and is affected by the electrolyte concentration and valency. The amount of the drug desorbed (mg% w/v) by washing with different elution media at 37 degrees C followed the sequence 0.1 M hydrochloric acid > 0.1 M magnesium chloride > 0.1 M sodium chloride > simulated intestinal fluid. The results obtained from this study indicate that two mechanisms, ion exchange and physical adsorption, were involved in the uptake of mebeverine hydrochloride by kaolin. The presence of different concentrations of kaolin with the tablets or capsules of the drug, adversely affected the release rate. The in vivo and in vitro studies on guinea pig ileum showed that the presence of kaolin in a mixture with mebeverine hydrochloride did not affect to any significant level the inhibiting effect of the musculotropic drug on carbachol-induced contractions in the isolated guinea pig ileum. In vivo studies showed similar results for barium chloride as well.

Macrolide antibiotics in paediatric infectious diseases

Erythromycin and other macrolides have enjoyed a renaissance in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s secondary to the discovery of "new' pathogens such as Chlamydia, Legionella, Campylobacter and Mycoplasma spp. Erythromycin is an important therapeutic agent in the paediatric age group for several reasons: (a) it exhibits proven efficacy for a wide range of infections (upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin/skin structure infections, prophylaxis of endocarditis/acute rheumatic fever/ophthalmia neonatorum and pre-colonic surgery, campylobacteriosis, chlamydial and ureaplasmal infections, diphtheria, whooping cough, streptococcal pharyngitis) and gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility states; (b) intravenous formulations are widely available; and (c) it is available in a number of formulations as a generic product, which is likely to result in significant cost savings. Nevertheless, erythromycin and similar earlier macrolides are characterised by a number of drawbacks including a narrow spectrum of antimicrobial activity, unfavourable pharmacokinetic properties and poor GI tolerability. Newer macrolides such as clarithromycin and azithromycin are useful in serving the needs of paediatric patients who are erythromycin-intolerant or who have infections caused by organisms that are intrinsically erythromycin-resistant, or for which a high percentage of strains are resistant (e.g. Haemophilus influenzae, Helicobacter pylori, Mycobacterium avium complex). In addition, these newer macrolides may be considered as alternatives to oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, second or third generation cephalosporins, or erythromycin plus sulphonamide in this patient population. Selection between specific macrolides and between macrolides and other antibiotics in the paediatric population is likely to depend, at least for the immediate future, on separate comparisons of product availability, cost, effectiveness and tolerability profiles.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between nefazodone and digoxin in healthy male volunteers

The effect of nefazodone on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of digoxin were evaluated in an open, randomized, multiple-dose, three-way crossover study of 18 healthy male volunteers. The volunteers received nefazodone alone (200 mg twice daily), digoxin alone (0.2 mg daily), or nefazodone combined with digoxin during three 8-day treatment periods, with a single dose on the ninth day. There was a 10-day washout period between treatment periods. Coadministration of nefazodone with digoxin had no effect on the frequency and severity of adverse events compared with those observed with either drug alone. Steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) concentrations of digoxin were significantly higher (15%, 29%, and 27%, respectively) after coadministration of nefazodone/digoxin than after administration of digoxin. Despite these increases, no clinically significant changes in vital signs, heart rate, or PR, QRS, and QT intervals on the electrocardiogram occurred after coadministration from those measured after digoxin monotherapy. Coadministration did not affect the pharmacokinetics of nefazodone or its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, m-chlorophenylpiperazine, triazole dione). Because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index, monitoring of plasma digoxin levels and appropriate adjustment of dosage are recommended when nefazodone and digoxin are administered concurrently.

Effect of multiple doses of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of digoxin in healthy volunteers

1. Losartan (DuP 753, MK-954) is a novel, potent and highly selective AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The effect of multiple oral doses of losartan on digoxin pharmacokinetics was evaluated in healthy male subjects. 2. In a double-blind and randomized fashion, subjects received 50 mg losartan or placebo once daily for 15 days in each period. At least 7 days elapsed between the two treatment periods. On days 4 and 11 of each period, subjects also received a single 0.5 mg dose of digoxin intravenously and orally respectively. 3. Eleven of 13 subjects completed the study. Side effects were mild and transient (12 out of 13 subjects reported at least one adverse experience). During the study, no laboratory abnormalities were noted. 4. Multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of 0.5 mg of digoxin i.v. AUC(0.48h) of immunoreactive digoxin during losartan 28.8 +/- 2.9 vs 28.5 +/- 3.9 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 54.0 +/- 7.2 vs 51.9 +/- 6.5% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) and 1.09 (0.98, 1.21). 5. Multiple oral doses of losartan did not affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral digoxin AUC(0.48 h) during losartan 23.6 +/- 3.7 ng ml-1 h vs 22.4 +/- 2.6 ng ml-1 h during placebo; not significant, Cmax 3.5 +/- 0.7 ng ml-1 with vs 3.1 +/- 0.5 ng ml-1 without losartan; not significant and tmax 0.6 +/- 0.2 h with vs 0.9 +/- 0.7 h without losartan; not significant, and 96 h urinary excretion [% dose] during losartan 51.2 +/- 6.3 vs 46.3 +/- 2.4% during placebo; not significant). Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC and urinary excretion were respectively, 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) and 1.12 (0.97, 1.28). 6. We conclude that multiple oral doses of losartan (50 mg daily) do not alter the pharmacokinetics of immunoreactive digoxin, following either intravenous or oral digoxin. Furthermore, the co-administration of digoxin with losartan is well tolerated by healthy male volunteers.

Symposium on geriatrics--Part I: Drug prescribing for elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes that occur with aging and to discuss common problems noted with the use of medications often prescribed for elderly patients.

DESIGN

We searched the medical literature, reviewed pertinent articles, and summarized drug-related information applicable to geriatric patients.

RESULTS

Use of medications is common in the elderly population; most elderly persons take two or more different medications each day. Aging is associated with anatomic and physiologic changes that can have an effect on how medications are handled. Such changes include alterations in various volumes of drug distribution and in drug absorption, metabolism, and clearance. Elderly patients may also have increased or decreased drug effects because of alteration in receptor response. These changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may result in a prolonged drug half-life, an increased potential for drug toxicity, and a greater likelihood for adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSION

Medications for elderly patients should be prescribed only after the anatomic and physiologic changes of aging are understood and with increased surveillance for potential drug toxicity or adverse drug reactions.

Pharmacokinetic effects of fluvastatin in patients chronically receiving digoxin

A double-blind, randomized, crossover study assessed the effects of a single 40-mg dose of fluvastatin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin in chronically treated patients. After demonstrating consistent digoxin serum concentrations as part of the inclusion criteria, 18 patients received a single dose of either fluvastatin or placebo, with a 1-week washout period between crossover to the other treatment. For each patient, 14 serum samples were drawn and urine collected over 24 hours; all samples were assayed for digoxin using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental techniques: area under the curve for 24 hours (AUC24); time to maximum concentration after digoxin (tmax); maximum concentration after digoxin dosing (Cmax); concentration at 24 hours after fluvastatin or placebo (Cmin); total amount excreted in the urine over 24 hours (U24); and urinary clearance (Clren). The pharmacokinetic data were analyzed for sequence, patient nested with sequence, and period and treatment differences using ANOVA, Schuirmann's two one-sided testing approach, confidence intervals, and power analysis. The AUC24, Cmax, and tmax for digoxin were considered bioequivalent with the two treatments. The differences in Cmax, U24, and Clren were statistically significant but were not considered to be clinically relevant due to the low magnitude of the difference (< 20%). There were no clinically significant adverse reactions attributable to either digoxin or fluvastatin.

Pharmacokinetics of beta-methyldigoxin in subjects with normal and impaired renal function

Beta-methyldigoxin (beta-MD) was administered orally (0.2 mg) to 24 patients with various degrees of renal function, to investigate its pharmacokinetic characteristics related to renal function. Serum and urine collected until 120 hours after dosing were assayed for beta-MD and digoxin by high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay method. The steady-state volume of distribution decreased proportionately as creatinine clearance (CLCR) decreased, although steady-state volume of distribution of hemodialysis patients had large interindividual variability, and their mean value was not different from that of patients with normal renal function. Both renal clearance of beta-MD and digoxin were significantly correlated with CLCR (r = .820, P < .001 and r = .822, P < .01, respectively), and the slope of regression line for beta-MD was only 44% that for digoxin. Significantly reduced urinary excretion of total drug (beta-MD plus digoxin) was shown in patients with CLCR below 50 mL/minute/1.48 m2. This study suggests that the dosage modification is not necessary until CLCR decreases to below 50 mL/minute/1.48 m2, but careful attention should be given in the use of beta-MD in patients with CLCR below this value.

Clinical and pharmacologic study of fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maternal digoxin administration in 16 cases of fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia diagnosed by fetal echocardiography; cardiac anatomy was normal in all cases. The retrospective analysis included nine mothers who received digoxin orally in most cases, with control of the arrhythmia in two fetuses. The addition of amiodarone (five cases) and propranolol (two cases) yielded two successes with amiodarone. The therapeutic regimen of digoxin was then modified on the basis of poor response to orally administered digoxin. In the prospective study, digoxin was administered intravenously to seven mothers according to a standard protocol; high doses (1 to 2 mg intravenously) were prescribed for the first 24 hours and intravenous digoxin therapy was maintained for at least 5 days, depending on the fetal response. Digoxin pharmacokinetic studies of four mothers showed an increased plasma clearance and reduced elimination half-life. Digoxin controlled the five supraventricular tachycardias (with hydrops in four cases). Maternal flecainide therapy restored sinus rhythm in two cases of atrial flutter. Our prospective study emphasizes the efficacy and safety for the fetus and the mother of intravenously administered digoxin as a first-choice drug in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Flecainide may be a promising second-choice drug but requires further clinical investigation. Amiodarone and propranolol seem to be ineffective.

The rational pharmacology of digoxin

Although digoxin remains one of the most widely prescribed drugs in the United States, potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between this compound and other drugs, diseases, and events commonly encountered in the perioperative period remain largely unappreciated. Furthermore, the therapeutic benefit of discontinuing or initiating digoxin treatment preoperatively remains unclear. We present a basic review of current knowledge regarding digoxin pharmacology and examine those concepts from the perspective of clinical anesthesiologists.

Digoxin-interactions in man: spironolactone reduces renal but not biliary digoxin clearance

The possibility of an inhibitory effect of spironolactone on the biliary clearance of digoxin has been investigated in 6 healthy subjects. Plasma clearance and the renal and biliary clearance of digoxin were determined twice at steady state (digoxin 0.5 to 1 mg.d-1 p.o. for 6 days), alone or in combination with spironolactone 200 mg daily, after an intravenous dose of digoxin (0.7 x oral dose) on Day 7. Plasma and urine were collected for 48 h. Biliary clearance of digoxin was determined on Day 8 by a duodenal perfusion technique. During spironolactone treatment plasma digoxin clearance tended to be lower (255 vs 224 ml/min; P = 0.057) and renal clearance significantly lower (166 vs 144 ml/min), while the biliary clearance of digoxin remained unchanged (106 vs 103 ml/min). Thus, spironolactone reduced the renal clearance of digoxin by an average of 13%, without affecting its biliary clearance.

Comparative pharmacokinetic and clinical profiles of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists in systemic hypertension

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium antagonists are important classes of antihypertensive agents. Within their respective classes, ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists share common pharmacokinetic properties, but in contrast to ACE inhibitors, some calcium antagonists may cause a significant increase in plasma digoxin concentrations. Clinically, both classes of agents have been shown to be safe and effective in large-scale, long-term clinical trials. ACE inhibitors appear to be very well tolerated and may be associated with fewer adverse effects than some calcium antagonists. ACE inhibitors appear to blunt diuretic-induced hypokalemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia, and hyperglycemia. Both classes of agents can be used safely in patients with renal disease, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. They may also be used in the elderly. While ACE inhibitors are particularly useful in hypertension accompanied by congestive heart failure, calcium antagonists can be very useful when angina pectoris is present in the hypertensive patient.

Age-related differences in digoxin toxicity and its treatment

Digoxin toxicity remains a common medical problem for both adults and children. In addition to a vastly improved understanding of the mechanisms for digoxin action on the heart, there are now data which clearly demonstrate that there are potentially important developmental differences in both the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of digoxin which have a direct impact on its efficacy and toxicity profile. The developmental pharmacokinetics of the drug have been extensively studied such that profiles for age-dependent differences in the apparent volume of distribution, plasma and renal clearance and elimination half-life now exist. It is these data which have also produced the current age-specific dosing guidelines for the therapeutic administration of digoxin in various paediatric subpopulations. Despite this new knowledge, both accidental and iatrogenic digoxin toxicity still occurs in paediatric patients, with potentially life-threatening arrhythmias being produced when steady-state serum digoxin concentrations exceed 5.1 nmol/L. Consequently, the clinician may be faced with the decision to use antidotal therapy with digoxin-specific Fab fragments (d-Fab). This article reviews the developmental basis for digoxin disposition and its pharmacological and toxic effects. Additionally, the treatment of acute digoxin toxicity in children is reviewed, especially as pertains to the therapeutic use of d-Fab.

Interaction of ORG 10172, a low molecular weight heparinoid, and digoxin in healthy volunteers

Potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between a new low molecular weight heparinoid Org 10172 (bolus injection of 3250 anti-Xa units) and digoxin (0.25 mg once daily for 8 days) were studied in 6 healthy male volunteers using an open, randomised three-way cross-over design. Digoxin produced a slight increase in clearance of anti-Xa activity from 4.3 to 4.8 ml.min-1, while plasma antithrombin and thrombin generation inhibiting (TG1) activity remained unchanged. Digoxin did not affect the actions of Org 10172 on the clotting tests. In the presence of Org 10172 there was a reduction in the AUC of digoxin during one dosing interval after the seventh digoxin tablet from 20 to 17 ng.ml-1.h, and a significant reduction in the average serum digoxin concentration. Since renal digoxin clearance was not significantly changed this probably might be due to a change in the non-renal clearance of digoxin. Atrio-ventricular node conduction, as measured by PR-time intervals, remained unchanged during all three treatments. In conclusion, although the pharmacokinetics of Org 10172 and digoxin were slightly changed by the combination, it is probably safe to administer Org 10172 and digoxin simultaneously. The clinical relevance of the slight decrease in plasma anti-Xa activity levels cannot yet be defined.

Digoxin pharmacokinetics and spirapril, a new ace inhibitor

As concurrent use of digoxin with the novel ACE inhibitor spirapril should be common, potential for spirapril to affect steady-state digoxin kinetics was studied. Fifteen healthy white male volunteers aged 22-42 and weighing 135-225 lbs took digoxin tablets 0.25 mg every 12 hours for 5 weeks. In crossover design, each also received spirapril or matching placebo capsules during weeks 1 and 2, or 4 and 5. Dosage of spirapril was increased from 12 mg to 48 mg once daily. Spirapril produced no significant effect on mean (+/- SD) serum digoxin concentration in the steady state, area under curve for 12 hours, peak digoxin level, time to peak, or urinary digoxin excretion over 12 hours. No change in renal or whole body digoxin clearance was seen. Unlike some other cardiovascular drugs, spirapril does not alter steady-state digoxin kinetics in healthy adults.

Treatment of digitalis intoxication with emphasis on the clinical use of digoxin immune Fab

Many studies and cases of digitalis intoxication have been reported since the time of William Withering's first publication in 1785. Recognition and management of digitalis toxicity is challenging. Before digoxin immune Fab was commercially available, treatment consisted of managing the signs and symptoms of toxicity until the digitalis was eliminated. Digoxin immune Fab offers a safe, effective, and specific method of quickly reversing digitalis toxicity. Factors that must be considered with the clinical use of this agent include the dosage calculation, administration technique, postdose monitoring, pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, interference with commercially available digoxin assays, partial neutralizing dosing, rebound of free digoxin, and indications for use. For severe, life-threatening toxicity, digoxin immune Fab is the treatment of choice.

Investigation of possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between epanolol and digoxin

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interaction between epanolol and digoxin has been investigated in 10 healthy male subjects taking digoxin 0.375 mg daily for 14 days. During that period epanolol 200 mg daily or matching placebo was also given, each for 7 days, according to a double-blind, randomized cross-over plan. The plasma digoxin concentration-time profiles after 7 days of concomitant placebo or epanolol were comparable. Trough and peak plasma digoxin levels were similar (placebo: 0.84 and 2.62 ng.ml-1; epanolol: 0.87 and 2.46 ng.ml-1). The renal clearances of digoxin and creatinine were lower during treatment with epanolol, but the differences were not significant (placebo 142.0 and 126.5 ml.min-1; epanolol 105.7 and 109.3 ml.min-1). STI indexes were lower during treatment with digoxin plus epanolol, than after digoxin alone. The difference was significant for QS2I (513 versus 503 ms), PEPI (119 versus 112 ms) and PEP/LVET (0.286 versus 0.304). The observations suggest that in healthy volunteers there is no pharmacokinetic interaction between epanolol and digoxin, and that epanolol does not interfere with the positive inotropic action of digoxin.

Carvedilol increases the systemic bioavailability of oral digoxin

The effects of a single oral dose of 25 mg carvedilol on the plasma and urinary kinetics of digoxin after an oral and intravenous 0.5 mg dose, were investigated in two separate double-blind, placebo-controlled, period-balanced cross-over studies in healthy male subjects. Carvedilol increased the mean maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration time-curve of digoxin when administered orally. The effects were virtually confined to the first 4 h after dosing, and the apparent terminal disposition rate constant was not changed. Carvedilol did not alter the plasma and urinary kinetics of intravenously administered digoxin.

Lack of effect of enoximone on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure

The aim of this study was to investigate if the concomitant administration of the positive inotropic drug enoximone (100 mg tid) has any effect on the morning through levels of the cardiac glycoside digoxin in 17 patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV). Plasma concentrations of digoxin were 1.05 +/- 0.37 ng/mL before enoximone, 0.95 +/- 0.31 ng/mL at the end of the enoximone treatment period of 1 week and 0.95 +/- 0.36 ng/mL 1 week after cessation of enoximone treatment. Thus, concomitant administration of enoximone had no effect on plasma concentrations of digoxin while on the other hand the hemodynamics as assessed by NYHA-classification and determination of the heart volume improved significantly.