Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Enantioselective Disposition of Lansoprazole and Rabeprazole in Human Plasma

Lansoprazole is extensively metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in the liver, whereas rabeprazole is primarily converted non-enzymatically to rabeprazole-thioether, with only some being oxidized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole possess asymmetric sulfur in their chemical structure and have typically been used clinically as a racemic mixture. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers of lansoprazole and rabeprazole in relation to the CYP2C19 genotypes. In our studies in healthy Japanese subjects, the magnitude of contribution of each lansoprazole enantiomer for CYP2C19 was greater than that for CYP3A4. CYP2C19 influenced the disposition of (S)-lansoprazole to a greater extent than the (R)-enantiomer. The R/S ratios for the AUC of lansoprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was 12.7, 8.5 and 5.8, respectively. On the other hand, (R)-rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than (S)-rabeprazole. However, the R/S ratios for the AUC of rabeprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was only 1.8, 2.2 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting a lesser effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole compared to lansoprazole. Such a difference in the AUC between rabeprazole enantiomers is likely to be dependent on stereoselectivity in the CYP3A4-mediated metabolic conversion from rabeprazole-thioether to rabeprazole. Both enantiomers of these PPIs have been reported to possess equal potency. Therefore, particularly with lansoprazole, the use of (R)-lansoprazole alone would be highly desirable for use in clinical applications.

Determination of rabeprazole enantiomers and their metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography with solid-phase extraction

Here, we describe the development of a rapid, simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the simultaneous quantitative determination of rabeprazole enantiomers (1a,b) and their metabolites, rabeprazole-thioether (2) and rabeprazole sulfone (3), in human plasma. Analytes and the internal standard (omeprazole-thioether) were separated using a mobile phase of 0.5 M NaClO4-acetonitrile (6:4, v/v) over a Chiral CD-Ph column. Analysis required only 100 microl of plasma and involved solid-phase extraction with an Oasis HLB cartridge, which gave high recovery (>91.8%) with good selectivity for all analytes. The lower limit of quantification was 5 ng/ml for analytes 1a, 1b and 3 and 10 ng/ml for 2. Linearity of this assay was determined to lie between 5 and 1000 ng/ml for 1a, 1b and 3 and 10 and 1000 ng/ml for 2 (r2>0.982 of the regression line). Inter- and intra-day coefficients of variation were less than 7.8% and accuracies were within 8.4% over the linear range for all analytes. Our results indicate that this method is applicable to the simultaneous monitoring of plasma levels of rabeprazole enantiomers and associated metabolites in human plasma.

Sensitive quantification of omeprazole and its metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

A sensitive method was developed for the simultaneous determination of omeprazole and its major metabolites 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone in human plasma by HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry. Following liquid-liquid extraction HPLC separation was achieved on a ProntoSil AQ, C18 column using a gradient with 10 mM ammonium acetate in water (pH 7.25) and acetonitrile. The mass spectrometer was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode using the respective MH(+) ions, m/z 346 for omeprazole, m/z 362 for 5-hydroxy-omeprazole and omeprazol-sulfone and m/z 300 for the internal standard (2-{[(3,5-dimethylpyridine-2-yl)methyl]thio}-1H-benzimidazole-5-yl)methanol. The limit of quantification (LOQ) achieved with this method was 5 ng/ml for 5-hydroxyomeprazole and 10 ng/ml for omeprazole and omeprazole-sulfone using 0.25 ml of plasma. Intra- and inter-assay variability was below 11% over the whole concentration range from 5 to 250 ng/ml for 5-hydroxyomeprazol and from 10 to 750 ng/ml for omeprazole and omeprazole-sulfone. The method was successfully applied to the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters of esomeprazole and the two major metabolites after a single dose and under steady state conditions.

The effect of aging on the relationship between the cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The metabolic activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is genetically determined, and the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, a substrate for CYP2C19, are dependent on the CYP2C19 genotype. However, a discrepancy between the CYP2C19 genotype and omeprazole pharmacokinetics was reported in patients with liver disease or advanced cancer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of aging on the relationship between the CYP2C19 genotype and its phenotype.

METHODS

Twenty-eight elderly and 23 young Japanese volunteers were enrolled after being genotyped. Each subject received a single intravenous dose of omeprazole (10 mg and 20 mg for the elderly and the young groups, respectively) and blood samples were obtained up to 6 hours after dose administration to determine the plasma concentrations of omeprazole and its metabolites, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulfone. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. Linear regression models were used to examine the joint effects of covariates such as genotype, age, etc., on the pharmacokinetic parameters, and the pharmacokinetic parameters showing statistical significance were compared by ANOVA.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between genotypes in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the young group and the elderly group. The number of mutation alleles and age were significant covariates for systemic clearance (CL), but age was the only significant covariate for volume of distribution at steady state (Vss). There were significant age- and genotype-related differences and a significant age x genotype interaction in CL (20.6+/-11.0/12.7+/-4.0/3.2+/-1.0 and 5.4+/-4.0/3.7+/-1.4/2.1+/-0.7 L/h for homozygous extensive metabolisers [EMs]/heterozygous EMs/poor metabolisers [PMs] of the young and the elderly groups, respectively). In Vss, a significant difference was found between the young and the elderly groups (219+/-115 and 107+/-44.5 mL/kg, respectively), but not between three genotypes (178+/-142, 173+/-79 and 110+/-51 mL/kg for homozygous EMs, heterozygous EMs and PMs, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The elderly EMs showed wide variance in the in vivo CYP2C19 activity and were phenotypically closer to the elderly PMs than the young EMs were to the young PMs. Some of the elderly homozygous EMs, as well as heterozygous EMs, have a metabolic activity similar to PMs, and the CYP2C19 genotype may therefore not be as useful as phenotyping in the elderly.

Recent advances in the treatment of GERD in the elderly: focus on proton pump inhibitors

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age, and older people are more likely to develop severe disease. Studies of elderly patients with GERD indicate differences in presentation and diagnosis, compared with GERD in younger adults. Indeed, an older patient with GERD may present with atypical symptoms such as dysphagia, vomiting, weight loss, anaemia and anorexia, and less frequently with typical symptoms such as heartburn or acid regurgitation. These findings are attributed to pathophysiological changes in esophageal function that occur with age. Therefore, GERD in elderly patients is more likely to be poorly diagnosed or undiagnosed. Although few studies have concentrated specifically on elderly patients, the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to be more effective than histamine receptor antagonists for healing reflux esophagitis and for preventing its recurrence when they are given as maintenance therapy. In addition, the PPIs seem to be safe both in short- and in long-term therapy of elderly patients with GERD.

Influence of 1-week Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole on 13C-aminopyrine breath test

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is commonly prescribed in the general population. Treatment consists of drugs that are mainly metabolized by the liver cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymatic pool. Most H. pylori-infected patients often take drugs for comorbid illnesses, therefore increasing the potential for drug-drug interactions. We aimed to evaluate the interactions of rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole 1-week H. pylori eradication therapy with CYP-dependent liver metabolic function in clinical practice. Ten patients referred to our unit for H. pylori infection underwent 1-week eradication therapy with rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.), and metronidazole (500 mg, b.i.d.). We chose the 13C-aminopyrine breath test (13C-ABT) to evaluate CYP-dependent liver function since it is noninvasive and nonharmful. All patients underwent 13C-ABT at three time points: before therapy (to), at the end of therapy (t8), and after 1 month of follow-up (t38). Mean 13C-ABT dose/hr (t0 = 14.0 +/- 5.4, t8 = 13.5 +/- 4.0, t38 = 16.1 +/- 5.6) as well as 13C-ABT cumulative dose (t0 = 2.4 +/- 1.1, t8 = 2.4 +/- 0.8, t38 = 2.6 +/- 1.0) were not statistically different at the three time points of the study. These results did not seem to be influenced by drugs being administered concomitantly. In everyday clinical practice rabeprazole-based H. pylori eradication therapy does not seem to display any significant interactions with CYP-dependent liver function, even in patients on multiple drugs.

Novel effects other than antisecretory action and off-label use of proton pump inhibitors

The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a relatively new class of agents used for the treatment of acid-related disorders, including peptic ulcer diseases, reflux oesophagitis and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and in enhancing antibiotic therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with peptic ulcer disease. The PPIs are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents currently in clinical use. According to the recent basic study, PPIs may act not only as potent acid suppressants, but also as anti-inflammatory or pro-regenerative agents. On the other hand, in the clinical field, general practitioners still tend to prescribe PPIs for unlicensed indications, such as non-ulcer dyspepsia and nonspecific abdominal pain. This article reviews the novel pharmacological action other than acid secretion and the diverse clinical usage of PPIs, in order to seek possible extensions of the use of this unique agent.

[Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of antibiotic therapy in dentistry and stomatology]

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the efficacy of various antimicrobial treatments for orofacial infections on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) criteria.

METHODS

A complete a literature search was undertaken to establish the MIC90 values of the five microorganisms most frequently isolated in odontogenic infections and the pharmacokinetic parameters of 13 antibiotics used in these infections. Pharmacokinetic simulations were then carried out with mean population parameters and efficacy indexes were calculated for the 47 treatment regimens analyzed. For drugs showing time-dependent antibacterial killing, the time above MIC (t > MIC) was calculated. For drugs with concentration-dependent bactericidal activity, the AUC/MIC was calculated.

RESULTS

Amoxicillin-clavulanic (500 mg/8 h or 1000 mg/12 h) and clindamycin (300 mg/6 h) in the time-dependent killing group and moxifloxacin (400 mg/24 h) in the concentration-dependent group showed adequate efficacy indexes against the five pathogens considered to be the most commonly implicated in odontogenic infections. The spiramycin plus metronidazole combination, present in the commercial formulation Rhodogyl, did not reach satisfactory PK/PD indexes.

CONCLUSION

PK/PD indexes, which are useful predictors of the potential efficacy of antibacterial therapy, were used with ontogenic infections in the present study. The PK/PD simulations showed that amoxicillin-clavulanic, clindamycin and moxifloxacin were the most suitable antibiotics for this kind of infection. Clinical trials are required to confirm that this methodology is useful in these pathologic processes.

Potent Gastric Acid Inhibition in Helicobacter pylori Eradication

At present, antisecretory drugs--foremost among them the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)--represent a keystone in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. The present article shall first compare the role of PPIs as compared with histamine H2 receptor antagonists, both of them in the role of antibiotic-associated antisecretory therapy, and shall then address the contribution of each of the various PPIs that have been developed until the present time to the H. pylori eradication therapies. In summary, it may be concluded that PPIs are more effective overall than H2 receptor antagonists when the two groups of antisecretory drugs are given at the usual standard doses together with antibiotics with the intention of eradicating H. pylori infection. However, all PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, and esomeprazole) are equivalent when given together with two antibiotics to cure the infection.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Antimicrobial Treatments of Orofacial Odontogenic Infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy in oral odontogenic infections using estimated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters or efficacy indices, and to compare pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards' (NCCLS) breakpoints.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective literature search to obtain minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, pharmacokinetic parameters of antimicrobials and NCCLS breakpoints. Pharmacokinetic simulations were carried out using WinNonlin software (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).

METHODS

For antimicrobials with time-dependent activity, the time that the plasma drug concentration exceeds the MIC as the percentage of dose interval at steady state was calculated. For antimicrobials with concentration-dependent activity, the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours at steady state divided by the MIC was calculated. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints were calculated according to these parameters.

RESULTS

Only amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and clindamycin showed adequate efficacy indices against the most commonly isolated bacteria in odontogenic infections. Metronidazole reached good indices against anaerobes only. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic susceptibility breakpoints do not coincide exactly with NCCLS breakpoints.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the scarcity of double-blind, clinical trials on the use of antimicrobials in endodontics, this study may be useful in determining the best antimicrobial treatment in these infections. However, as we have not used concentration data in infected tissue to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, it would be necessary to design clinical trials in order to confirm these results.

Review article: the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors--overview and clinical implications

During the past two decades, enormous changes occurred in the management of gastric acid-related diseases. First, the histamine2-receptor antagonists were introduced, offering patients the first single-agent therapy that effectively reduced gastric acid secretion. Proton pump inhibitors became widely available in the early 1990s, and they generally appeared to be superior to the histamine2-receptor antagonists in acid-suppressing activity, symptom control and healing. Most physicians now use proton pump inhibitors as first-line treatment for many patients with acid-peptic disorders, including erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and duodenal and gastric ulcers. Although proton pump inhibitors are often thought to be interchangeable, some differences have emerged in their pharmacological properties, which may be reflected in some aspects of clinical efficacy. Such differences include potency, speed of onset and duration of pH 'holding times'. Helicobacter pylori has now been recognized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of acid-peptic disorders. It is clear that H. pylori eradication can dramatically reduce the chronicity of gastric and duodenal ulcers, and accepted therapeutic regimens for H. pylori eradication now include proton pump inhibitors and two or more antibiotics. Although all accepted proton pump inhibitor-based 'triple therapies' are roughly equivalent in efficacy, there is now a shortened regimen available that will potentially enhance compliance and decrease cost. This review examines the relative advantages of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine2-receptor antagonists in the context of acid suppression and in various gastric acid-related diseases. A brief overview presents the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the proton pump inhibitors with particular attention paid to rabeprazole, one of the newer drugs in its class.

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of pantoprazole-based one-week triple therapy in H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing

OBJECTIVE

Recently, proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has been recommended as a first line treatment in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this open, multicentre trial was to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and the ulcer healing rate of a triple regimen consisting of pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 7 days, in the eradication of H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in Turkey.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

H. pylori infection was assessed by histological examination and rapid urease test at baseline and 4 weeks after the completion of the therapy. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, 5 were excluded due to various reasons and 72 completed the entire course of the trial.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 49 of these patients; the eradication rate was 68% by per-protocol analysis and 63.6% by intention-to-treat analysis. The ulcers were completely healed in 61 patients (85%) at the second endoscopic examination. Drug compliance was excellent (97.3%) and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole-based 1-week triple therapy was well tolerated and the ulcer healing rate was high (85%). Relatively low H. pylori eradication rates may be attributed to rising antibiotic resistance over recent years. A large scale, comparative study with other PPI-based regimens is warranted based on the results of this open study with the pantoprazole-based regimen.

CYP2C19Polymorphism and Proton Pump Inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole (esomeprazole), lansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole are eliminated by the hepatic route and the polymorphic CYP2C19 is mainly involved in their metabolism. In different populations three phenotypes have been identified: extensive metabolizers, poor metabolizers and individuals carrying one wild type and one mutant allele (het extensive metabolizers). Systemic exposure to the proton pump inhibitors as expressed by the AUC (area under the plasma level time profiles) is 5-12-times higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers. As the pharmacodynamic response (elevation of intragastric pH) to the proton pump inhibitors is related directly to their AUC, a much higher pH can be monitored over 24 hr in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers. Furthermore, clinical efficacy of all proton pump inhibitors depend on maintaining intragastric pH above certain threshold levels and significantly higher eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori have been observed in patients of the poor metabolizers and het extensive metabolizers phenotype if compared to extensive metabolizers. Likewise, limited data suggest that proton pump inhibitors-induced healing rates in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are apparently higher in poor metabolizers/het extensive metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19. Therefore initial genotyping for this enzyme and higher dosage in extensive metabolizers is likely to improve the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel proton pump inhibitor, YH1885, in healthy volunteers

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of YH1885, a novel proton pump inhibitor, a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-rising, parallel-group study was conducted in 46 healthy volunteers. The volunteers were randomly allocated to single dose groups of 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg (6 subjects per dose, including 2 placebos) or to multiple-dose groups of 150 mg and 300 mg (once-daily dosing for 7 days; 8 subjects per dose, including 2 placebos). The multiple-dose study was conducted separately after the single-dose study. YH1885 was administered orally after overnight fasting. Serial blood samples, urine samples, and pharmacodynamic measurements were taken. Drug concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Pharmacodynamic changes were evaluated by ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring and by serial measurements of serum gastrin concentrations. Assessments of safety and tolerability also were made. Plasma concentrations of YH1885 reached peak levels 1.3 to 2.5 hours after single-dose administration and then declined monoexponentially with a terminal half-life (t(1/2)) of 2.2 to 2.4 hours in dosage groups up to 200 mg in the single-dose study. YH1885 showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics, and little accumulation occurred after multiple administrations. The parent drug was not detected in urine. Dose-related pharmacological effects were obvious for dose groups of 150 mg and higher in the single-dose study. The mean intragastric pH and the percentage of time at pH>4 were significantly increased. The onset of drug effect was rapid, and maximal effects were observed on the first day of administration during multiple dosing. Serum gastrin levels also showed rapid increases during dosing but with a weak dose-effect relationship. Neither serious nor dose-limiting adverse effects were observed. YH1885 was found to be safe and well tolerated and effectively inhibited acid secretion with dose-dependent increases in intragastric pH. The acid-suppressing efficacy of YH1885 needs to be further evaluated in patients with gastric acid-related diseases.

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists--their efficacy with antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether proton pump inhibitors are superior to H2-receptor antagonists in Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens.

AIM

To perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of both antisecretors when co-prescribed with antibiotics.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials comparing proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists with the same antibiotics were selected. Data sources included PubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and abstracts from congresses up to January 2002. A meta-analysis was performed by combining the odds ratios.

RESULTS

Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean eradication rates with proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists plus antibiotics were 74% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71-76%] and 69% (95% CI, 66-71%), respectively. The odds ratio for this comparison was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58). The number needed to treat with proton pump inhibitors to achieve eradication success, compared with H2-receptor antagonists, was 25. When studies prescribing very high doses of H2-receptor antagonists (two of the outliers) were excluded, the odds ratio (for proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists) increased to 1.37, the number needed to treat decreased to 20 and the heterogeneity between the studies decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists when prescribed at usual doses with antibiotics to eradicate H. pylori infection.

Rabeprazole in a one-week eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori: comparison of different dosages

AIM

Many data regarding omeprazole-, lanzoprazole- and pantoprazole-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have been reported, but there is few data present regarding rabeprazole (R). We report the efficacy and tolerability of rabeprazole in different dosages in association with clarithromycin (C)and tinidazole (T) in H. pylori eradication.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Ninety-four H. pylori-positive patients with dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled and randomly allocated to eradication therapy in two different one-week regimens. In regimen A, 47 patients received R 20 mg b.i.d, C 500 mg b.i.d and T 500 mg b.i.d, while in regimen B, 47 patients received R 10 mg b.i.d, C 500 mg b.i.d and T 500 mg b.i.d. Eradication of H. pylori was evaluated by a 13C urea breath test (UBT) two months after the end of the therapy.

RESULTS

Four patients (two in each regimen) did not complete treatment. The H. pylori eradication rate was 91.4% in group A compared to 89.3% in group B (P-value not significant). Minor side-effects were reported in 4.2% of group A and 6.4% of group B patients.

CONCLUSION

Rabeprazole showed good efficacy and tolerability in one-week H. pylori therapy at 20 mg b.i.d and 10 mg b.i.d, suggesting the use of the lower dosage.

Short- and long-term therapy for reflux oesophagitis in the elderly: a multi-centre, placebo-controlled study with pantoprazole

BACKGROUND

No placebo-controlled clinical trials have yet been published on the efficacy of therapy in older subjects with oesophagitis.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing the recurrence of oesophagitis in elderly subjects.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-four patients aged 65 years and over with acute oesophagitis were treated openly with pantoprazole, 40 mg daily, for 8 weeks. Patients with documented healing of erosive oesophagitis were then treated with pantoprazole, 20 mg daily, for 6 months. Thereafter, cured patients were randomized to receive pantoprazole, 20 mg daily, or placebo for the following 6 months. Clinical evaluations were performed every 2 months, and endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks and after 6 and 12 months and/or whenever symptoms suggested a relapse of oesophagitis.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, the healing rates of oesophagitis were 81.1% (75.1-87.1%) and 93.7% (89.7-97.7%) by intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. After 6 months, the corresponding values were 82% (75.4-88.5%) and 92.4% (87.6-97.2%), respectively. After 12 months, the per protocol and intention-to-treat healing rates of oesophagitis were 95.1% (88.5-100%) and 79.6% (68.3-90.9%), respectively, in the treatment group vs. 32.7% (19.9-45.4%) and 30.4% (18.3-42.4%), respectively, in the placebo group (P = 0.0001). Heartburn, acid regurgitation and chest pain were significantly associated with the relapse of oesophagitis (P = 0.0001), whereas hiatus hernia, Helicobacter pylori infection, concomitant diseases and treatments were not.

CONCLUSION

In the elderly, pantoprazole was highly effective in healing and reducing the relapse of oesophagitis; discontinuing active treatment after 6 months was associated with a significant increase in the relapse rate.

Pantoprazole: an update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acid-related disorders

Pantoprazole (Protonix) is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor (PPI) that reduces gastric acid secretion. In combination with two antimicrobial agents (most commonly metronidazole, clarithromycin or amoxicillin) for 6-14 days, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily produced Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of 71-93.8% (intent-to-treat [ITT] or modified ITT analysis) in patients without known antibacterial resistance. Pantoprazole-containing triple therapy was at least as effective as omeprazole- and similar in efficacy to lansoprazole-containing triple therapy in large trials. In the treatment of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oral pantoprazole 40 mg/day was as effective as other PPIs (omeprazole, omeprazole multiple unit pellet system, lansoprazole and esomeprazole) and significantly more effective than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Pantoprazole 20 mg/day provided effective mucosal healing in patients with GORD and mild oesophagitis. Intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/day can be used in patients who are unable to take oral medication. Oral pantoprazole 20-40 mg/day for up to 24 months prevented relapse in most patients with healed GORD. According to preliminary data, oral pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg/day was effective at healing and preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related ulcers, and intravenous pantoprazole was at least as effective as intravenous ranitidine in preventing ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. Oral or intravenous pantoprazole up to 240 mg/day maintained target acid output levels in most patients with hypersecretory conditions, including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Oral and intravenous pantoprazole appear to be well tolerated in patients with acid-related disorders in short- and long-term trials. Tolerability with oral pantoprazole was similar to that with other PPIs or histamine H(2)-antagonists in short-term trials. Formal drug interaction studies have not revealed any clinically significant interactions between pantoprazole and other agents. In conclusion, pantoprazole is an effective agent in the management of acid-related disorders. As a component of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication and as monotherapy for the healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of GORD, pantoprazole has shown similar efficacy to other PPIs and greater efficacy than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Limited data suggest that it is also effective in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in preventing ulcer rebleeding. Pantoprazole is well tolerated with minimal potential for drug interactions. The availability of pantoprazole as both oral and intravenous formulations provides flexibility when the oral route of administration is not appropriate. Thus, pantoprazole is a valuable alternative to other PPIs in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

Pharmacogenetics of the proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 mediates the major metabolic transformations of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole, and rabeprazole. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 can lead to significant phenotypic variation in the activity of this isoenzyme and thus in the metabolism of PPIs. We systematically reviewed the pharmacogenetic studies of PPIs with respect to the effects of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the clinical outcomes of PPI therapy. We searched MEDLINE (January 1966-August 2002) and EMBASE (January 1988-August 2002) for English-language articles on the pharmacogenetics of PPIs; the search was supplemented by a bibliographic review of all relevant articles. Seventeen pertinent citations were identified, and the quality (level) of evidence for each was categorized according to the rating scale of the United States Preventive Services Task Force. We found that the relationship between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism and clinical outcomes after PPI therapy has not yet been clearly delineated. Virtually all pharmacogenetic studies of PPIs have been performed in Japanese men; thus, the clinical relevance of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism in non-Asian patients and women is unknown. Differences among dual- and triple-therapy drug regimens make it difficult to compare H. pylori eradication studies and assess their applicability to current practice patterns. Drug adherence, a pivotal factor in the success of eradication therapy, was addressed in only four trials. Future directions for research include performing more studies with larger sample sizes, particularly in non-Asian populations and women; measuring plasma PPI concentrations to directly correlate H. pylori infection and ulcer cure rates with plasma drug availability; expanding the study population to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease; and exploring the influence of CYP3A4 in the success or failure of PPI therapy. Although CYP2C19 genotyping is currently only a research instrument, it may be a valuable clinical tool in select patients to ensure optimal PPI therapy.

Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism

Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is the main (or partial) cause for large differences in the pharmacokinetics of a number of clinically important drugs. On the basis of their ability to metabolise (S)-mephenytoin or other CYP2C19 substrates, individuals can be classified as extensive metabolisers (EMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs). Eight variant alleles (CYP2C19*2 to CYP2C19*8) that predict PMs have been identified. The distribution of EM and PM genotypes and phenotypes shows wide interethnic differences. Nongenetic factors such as enzyme inhibition and induction, old age and liver cirrhosis can also modulate CYP2C19 activity. In EMs, approximately 80% of doses of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole seem to be cleared by CYP2C19, whereas CYP3A is more important in PMs. Five-fold higher exposure to these drugs is observed in PMs than in EMs of CYP2C19, and further increases occur during inhibition of CYP3A-catalysed alternative metabolic pathways in PMs. As a result, PMs of CYP2C19 experience more effective acid suppression and better healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers during treatment with omeprazole and lansoprazole compared with EMs. The pharmacoeconomic value of CYP2C19 genotyping remains unclear. Our calculations suggest that genotyping for CYP2C19 could save approximately 5000 US dollars for every 100 Asians tested, but none for Caucasian patients. Nevertheless, genotyping for the common alleles of CYP2C19 before initiating PPIs for the treatment of reflux disease and H. pylori infection is a cost effective tool to determine appropriate duration of treatment and dosage regimens. Altered CYP2C19 activity does not seem to increase the risk for adverse drug reactions/interactions of PPIs. Phenytoin plasma concentrations and toxicity have been shown to increase in patients taking inhibitors of CYP2C19 or who have variant alleles and, because of its narrow therapeutic range, genotyping of CYP2C19 in addition to CYP2C9 may be needed to optimise the dosage of phenytoin. Increased risk of toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants is likely in patients whose CYP2C19 and/or CYP2D6 activities are diminished. CYP2C19 is a major enzyme in proguanil activation to cycloguanil, but there are no clinical data that suggest that PMs of CYP2C19 are at a greater risk for failure of malaria prophylaxis or treatment. Diazepam clearance is clearly diminished in PMs or when inhibitors of CYP2C19 are coprescribed, but the clinical consequences are generally minimal. Finally, many studies have attempted to identify relationships between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype and susceptibility to xenobiotic-induced disease, but none of these are compelling.

Effects of rabeprazole, lansoprazole and omeprazole on intragastric pH in CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers

AIM

To investigate the inhibitory effects on gastric acid secretion of three proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole, using a three-way crossover design in healthy Helicobacter pylori-negative,S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) homo- and hetero-extensive metabolizers.

METHODS

Eight healthy Japanese male volunteers were enrolled. After the administration of rabeprazole (10 mg/day), lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or omeprazole (20 mg/day), intragastric pH monitoring was commenced from 24 h before the first proton pump inhibitor dose, and continued for days 1-3 after proton pump inhibitor administration. The pH electrode was used for 48 h and changed just before pH monitoring on day 2.

RESULTS

For the administration of 10 mg/day rabeprazole, the mean ratios of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time were 5.7 +/- 1.1%,13.6 +/- 2.2%, 35.3 +/- 2.7% and 62.8 +/- 3.1% for the pre-treatment day and days 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The same ratios for lansoprazole (30 mg/day) were 5.7 +/- 0.7%, 7.4 +/- 1.5%, 13.6 +/- 3.4% and 26.6 +/- 4.9%; the same ratios for 20 mg/day omeprazole were 5.9 +/- 0.9%, 6.1 +/- 1.2%, 11.4 +/- 2.8% and 16.4 +/- 4.6%. The mean ratio of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time of days 1-3 increased significantly compared to the pre-treatment day (P < 0.01) with the administration of rabeprazole and lansoprazole. The magnitude of inhibition of gastric acid secretion after rabeprazole administration was stronger than that after lansoprazole. A significant elevation of the mean ratio of the 24-h pH > or = 3 holding time was demonstrated on days 2 and 3 with omeprazole (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In H. pylori-negative CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers, rabeprazole (10 mg/day) shows a faster onset of rising intragastric pH and a stronger inhibition of gastric acid secretion than do lansoprazole (30 mg/day) or omeprazole (20 mg/day).

Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease in older patients: current management strategies

The incidence of peptic ulcer and its severe complications, i.e. bleeding or perforation, is increasing in elderly patients worldwide. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer aged over 65 years has been reported to range from 58 to 78%. However, in elderly patients hospitalised for ulcer disease, the rate of diagnostic screening or treatment for H. pylori infection was less than 60%, and only 50 to 73% of patients who had a positive H. pylori test were treated with antibacterials. The eradication of H. pylori infection is known to be of proven benefit for elderly patients with H. pylori-associated ulcer disease. Significant improvement of the clinical outcome, and reduction of ulcer recurrences, symptoms and histological signs of ulcer-associated chronic gastritis activity, as well as decreased costs in elderly healthcare, all result from successful therapy. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy regimens including clarithromycin, amoxicillin and/or nitroimidazoles are highly effective and well tolerated in elderly patients, particularly if therapy is of a short duration and low doses of both the PPI and clarithromycin are used. Resistance of H. pylori to antibacterials and low compliance are the major reasons for treatment failure. Surveillance of H. pylori susceptibility to antibacterials at the regional level and enhanced compliance programmes give promising results that suggest new approaches to anti-H. pylori treatment, especially in elderly patients. The role of H. pylori infection in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related peptic ulcer still remains controversial. At present, no clear evidence supports the testing and treatment of H. pylori infection for the prevention of drug-related peptic ulcer in elderly patients receiving an NSAID or aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). After therapy, elderly patients with peptic ulcer may be re-evaluated by invasive methods, i.e. endoscopy and gastric biopsies. or by noninvasive methods. In elderly patients, the 13C-urea breath test demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for detecting H. pylori infection than anti-H. pylori antibodies.

Drug metabolism and drug interactions in the elderly

In the elderly concomitant use of several drugs (polypharmacy) is very common. Thus, the risk for drug interactions might be increased in this population. Since most drugs are hepatically eliminated by various metabolic pathways, liver function has to be considered as an additional factor modifying drug response. This chapter focuses on the hepatic mechanisms of interactions, especially on various inhibitors and inducers of the most important cytochrome P450 isoenzymes involved in drug metabolism. In addition, age-dependent changes in liver function are addressed. Based on pharmacokinetic results with different probe drugs, some inconsistencies in this area are discussed. The most important metabolic drug-drug interactions are independent of the age of the patients. However, since elderly patients consume a greater proportional share of drugs, they represent a population at risk for interactions. Awareness of this clinical problem may help to diminish those risks.

Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in elderly patients: comparison of low versus high doses of clarithromycin in combination with amoxicillin and pantoprazole

BACKGROUND

Advancing age may influence clarithromycin's pharmacokinetics. No studies have yet compared the effects of different dosages of clarithromycin in combination with a proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin in elderly patients.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin 250 mg vs. clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily (b.d.) in combination with pantoprazole and amoxicillin in elderly patients.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four elderly patients with H. pylori-associated ulcer disease or chronic gastritis were consecutively randomized to receive pantoprazole 40 mg daily plus amoxicillin 1 g, and either clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (PAC 250) or clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (PAC 500). Two months after therapy, endoscopy and gastric biopsies were repeated.

RESULTS

The cure rates of H. pylori infection in the PAC 250 and PAC 500 groups were, respectively, 83% and 79% (ITT analysis) and 94% and 88% (PP analysis) (P=N.S.). Significant decreases in chronic gastritis activity both in the body (P < 0.00001) and the antrum (P < 0.0001) of the stomach were found in H. pylori-cured patients, independently of clarithromycin dosage. Four patients in PAC 250 (5%) and seven in PAC 500 (9%) reported adverse events (P=N.S.). One patient in PAC 250 (25%) and three in PAC 500 (43%) discontinued the study because of these drug-related side-effects (P=N.S.).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients, 1-week triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin is a highly effective and well tolerated anti-H. pylori treatment. With this combination, clarithromycin at the lower dose of 250 mg b.d. achieved excel- lent cure rates and minimized adverse events and costs.

Influence of age on the steady state disposition of drugs commonly used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

The success of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori might be affected by the age of patients.

AIM

To investigate whether disposition of drugs commonly used for H. pylori eradication is age-dependent.

METHODS

Trough steady state serum levels of lansoprazole or ranitidine, amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole were monitored in 232 patients during the last dosing interval of a 5-day quadruple H. pylori eradication regimen. Detailed pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 28 patients.

RESULTS

Linear correlations between age and trough serum levels were observed with lansoprazole (r=0.25; P=0.002), ranitidine (r=0. 38; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.36; P < 0.0001). These associations were also inversely dependent of creatinine clearance for ranitidine (r=0.36; P=0.001) and clarithromycin (r=0.30; P < 0. 0001). Multiple linear regression revealed age as an important factor influencing trough serum levels of lansoprazole, clarithromycin and ranitidine. There were significant inverse relationships between creatinine clearance and area under curve of ranitidine (r=0.88; P < 0.0001) and amoxycillin (r=0.56; P=0.002). Multiple linear regression revealed serum creatinine as the most important factor influencing the area under curve of ranitidine, clarithromycin and amoxycillin.

CONCLUSIONS

Age per se has little influence on pharmacokinetics of amoxycillin and ranitidine, which depend more on age-dependent decline in renal function. The influence of age, but not renal function was established for lansoprazole. Age and renal function have independent impacts on clarithromycin disposition.