Duloxetine: clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

Duloxetine reduces pain after Total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of duloxetine in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, the effect of duloxetine on total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of oral duloxetine in THA.

METHODS

We enrolled 96 patients in this randomized controlled trial. These patients were randomized (1,1) to either the duloxetine group or the placebo group and received daily doses of 60 mg duloxetine or placebo, respectively, from 2 d pre-operation to 14 d after surgery. The primary outcome was pain severity upon movement measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included VAS scores for resting pain, morphine consumption, Harris Hip Score, patient satisfaction at discharge, length of postoperative hospital stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Patients in the duloxetine group had significantly lower pain severity scores upon movement within 3 postoperative weeks (p < 0.05) while none of the differences met the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Moreover, patients in the duloxetine group performed better in terms of resting pain (in 3 weeks after surgery), morphine requirements, and satisfaction level at discharge (all p < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in the prevalence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it did not result in a clinically meaning reduction in pain after total hip arthroplasty, perioperative administration of 60 mg of duloxetine daily significantly alleviated pain in the postoperative 3 weeks and morphine requirements during the postoperative 48 h. Therefore, duloxetine still shows promise in optimizing the multimodal pain-management protocols in total hip arthroplasty.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000033606 , 06/06/2020.

Evaluation of Switch-to-Brand Rates as a Potential Signal for Therapeutic Equivalency of Generic Antidepressants: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study

Negative clinical outcomes after switching from brand to generic antidepressants have raised concerns regarding therapeutic equivalency. This research aims to estimate the prevalence of switching and to identify predictors for generic to brand switching for various antidepressants. This retrospective cohort study utilized data from a 10% random sample of enrollees in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims database from 2007-2015. The base cohort consisted of commercially insured patients who were prescribed escitalopram, duloxetine, or venlafaxine extended release (ER) anytime from the year prior to the generic launch through December 2014. The primary outcome was defined as a switch from generic to a brand within 14 days of sustained generic use in a 1-year follow-up period. Adjusted logistic regression and generalized estimating equations for repeated measures estimated the drug specific and overall odds of switch-to-brand among brand initiators relative to generic initiators, respectively. A total of 102,831 unique patients across 3 drug products contributed to the final analytic sample. The overall prevalence of switch from generic to brand was 0.74%. Across all three antidepressants, brands initiators were more likely to experience a switch-to-brand: escitalopram (odds ratio (OR): 14.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.14-18.64), duloxetine (OR: 8.08, 95% CI: 4.85-13.41) and venlafaxine ER (OR: 16.46, 95% CI: 11.56-23.46). The pooled odds of a switch-to-brand in brand vs. generic initiators was 13.77 (95% CI: 11.35-16.71). This study suggests a low overall switch-to-brand prevalence and may support therapeutic equivalence between brand and generic antidepressants. Initiating with a brand product was the strongest predictor for switching back to brand and suggests that patient experience may play a role in drug utilization.

Antidepressant Screening Demonstrated Non-Monotonic Responses to Amitriptyline, Amoxapine and Sertraline in Locomotor Activity Assay in Larval Zebrafish

Antidepressants are well-known drugs to treat depression and major depressive disorder for humans. However, the misuse and abuse of antidepressants keep increasing with several side effects reported. The aim of this study was to assess the potential adverse effects of 18 antidepressants by monitoring zebrafish larval locomotor activity performance based on the total distance traveled, burst movement count, and total rotation count at four dark-light intercalated phases. In general, zebrafish larvae displayed sedative effects after antidepressant exposure by showing a significant reduction in all of the locomotor activity-related endpoints. However, three antidepressants i.e., amitriptyline, amoxapine, and sertraline were able to trigger a significantly high locomotor activity in zebrafish larvae during the light cycle. These differences might be due to the pharmacologic differences among the antidepressants. In addition, since each antidepressant possesses a different dosage range from the other, overdoses of these antidepressants might also be the causes of these differences. Furthermore, based on these results, a further study was conducted to observe the effect of these three antidepressants in lower concentrations. From the results, biphasic effects in terms of zebrafish larval locomotor activity were demonstrated by these drugs. Even though further studies are still required to validate the mechanism, these findings indicate that these antidepressants might share a common mechanism responsible for their effects on zebrafish larval locomotor activity although there were some differences in potency of these effects.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pain syndrome

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is characterized by myofascial trigger points and fascial constrictions. At present, domestic and foreign scholars have not reached a consensus on the etiology and pathogenesis of MPS. Due to the lack of specific laboratory indicators and imaging evidence, there is no unified diagnostic criteria for MPS, making it easy to confuse with other diseases. The Chinese Association for the Study of Pain organized domestic experts to formulate this Chinese Pain Specialist Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of MPS. This article reviews relevant domestic and foreign literature on the definition, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria and treatments of MPS. The consensus is intended to normalize the diagnosis and treatment of MPS and be used by first-line doctors, including pain physicians to manage patients with MPS.

Drug Repurposing Screen for Compounds Inhibiting the Cytopathic Effect of SARS-CoV-2

Drug repurposing is a rapid approach to identify therapeutics for the treatment of emerging infectious diseases such as COVID-19. To address the urgent need for treatment options, we carried out a quantitative high-throughput screen using a SARS-CoV-2 cytopathic assay with a compound collection of 8,810 approved and investigational drugs, mechanism-based bioactive compounds, and natural products. Three hundred and nineteen compounds with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities were identified and confirmed, including 91 approved drugs and 49 investigational drugs. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities of 230 of these confirmed compounds, of which 38 are approved drugs, have not been previously reported. Chlorprothixene, methotrimeprazine, and piperacetazine were the three most potent FDA-approved drugs with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities. These three compounds have not been previously reported to have anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities, although their antiviral activities against SARS-CoV and Ebola virus have been reported. These results demonstrate that this comprehensive data set is a useful resource for drug repurposing efforts, including design of new drug combinations for clinical trials for SARS-CoV-2.

Current Clinical Psychopharmacology in Borderline Personality Disorder

BACKGROUND

Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) manifest affective and behavioral symptoms causing personal distress, relationship difficulties, and reduced quality of life with global functioning impairment, mainly when the disease takes an unfavorable course. A substantial amount of healthcare costs is dedicated to addressing these issues. Many BPD patients receive medications, mostly those who do not respond to psychological interventions.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess the efficacy of the most used strategies of pharmacological interventions in BPD with a comprehensive overview of the field.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for papers focused on the most used psychotropic drugs for BPD. We included randomized controlled trials and open studies in adult patients with BPD, focusing on the efficacy and tolerability of single classes of drugs with respect to specific clinical presentations that may occur during the course of BPD.

RESULTS

Specific second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) or serotonergic antidepressants can be effective for different core symptoms of BPD, mainly including mood symptoms, anxiety, and impulse dyscontrol. Some atypical antipsychotics can also be effective for psychotic and dissociative symptoms. Specific antiepileptics can be useful in some cases in treating different BPD symptoms, mainly including mood instability, impulsiveness, and anger.

CONCLUSION

No medication is currently approved for BPD, and clinicians should carefully assess the benefits and risks of drug treatment. Further studies are needed to identify specific personalized treatment strategies, also considering the clinical heterogeneity and possible comorbidities of BPD.

A Real-World, Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Observational Study of Duloxetine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder or Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Background: Suboptimal treatment response during anti-depressive treatment is fairly common with the first antidepressant (AD) choice, followed by switching to another agent in the majority of cases. However, the efficacy of this strategy over continuation of the original agent is less solidly documented in real-life studies. The aim of our present study was to ascertain the effects of switching to duloxetine following inadequate response to prior ADs on general illness severity, pain, and health-related quality of life in a large sample of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients in a prospective, real-world, multicenter, observational study. Methods: A total of 578 participants with MDD or GAD were enrolled in 58 outpatient sites in an 8-week, single-arm, open-label, flexible-dose trial with duloxetine. Severity of symptoms [with Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)], severity of pain (with a Visual Analog Scale), satisfaction with current treatment, and health-related quality of life [with the three-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)] measures were recorded at baseline and at follow-up visits 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of treatment. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and mixed linear models. Results: 565 patients completed the study and comprised the analyzed dataset. Results indicated that severity of illness significantly decreased over the 8 weeks of the study and already at 4 weeks in both patient groups. Overall quality of life and all of its subindicators also significantly improved in both patient groups and so did subjective experience of pain. Satisfaction with current treatment also significantly increased during the study period. Frequency of side effects was low. In both GAD and MDD groups, two patients dropped out of the study due to adverse effects, leading to treatment termination in four cases (0.7%). Conclusions: This 8-week, multicenter, flexible-dosing, single-arm, open-label, observational real-life study in MDD and GAD patients switched to duloxetine after inadequate response or low tolerability to other ADs showed a significant positive effect on all outcome measures, including a significant decrease in illness severity as well as significant overall symptomatic improvement, with good tolerability.

How Can Drug Metabolism and Transporter Genetics Inform Psychotropic Prescribing?

Many genetic variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been shown to be relevant for treating psychiatric disorders. Associations are strong enough to feature on drug labels and for prescribing guidelines based on such data. A range of commercial tests are available; however, there is variability in included genetic variants, methodology, and interpretation. We herein provide relevant background for understanding clinical associations with specific variants, other factors that are relevant to consider when interpreting such data (such as age, gender, drug-drug interactions), and summarize the data relevant to clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and the available prescribing guidelines. We also highlight areas for future research focus in this field.

Characterization and Catalytic-Site-Analysis of an Aldo-Keto Reductase with Excellent Solvent Tolerance

Aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) mediated stereoselective reduction of prochiral carbonyl compounds is an efficient way of preparing single enantiomers of chiral alcohols due to their high chemo-, enantio-, and regio-selectivity. To date, the application of AKRs in the asymmetric synthesis of chiral alcohols has been limited, due to the challenges of cloning and purifying. In this work, the aldo-keto reductase (AKR3-2-9) from Bacillus sp. was obtained, purified and proved to be NADPH-dependent. It exhibits good bioactivity and stability at 37 °C, pH 6.0. AKR3-2-9 is catalytically active on 11 pairs of substrates such as 3-methylcyclohexanone and methyl pyruvate, among which it showed the highest catalytic activity for acetylacetone. In addition, AKR3-2-9 was able to be resistant to five common organic solvents such as methanol and ethanol, it retained high catalytic activity even in a reaction system containing 10% v/v organic solvent for 6 h, which indicates its broad substrate spectrum and exceptional organic solvent tolerance. Furthermore, its three-dimensional structure was constructed and catalytic-site-analysis of the enzyme was conducted. Notably, it was capable of catalyzing the reaction of the key intermediates of duloxetine. The extensive substrate spectrum and predominant organic solvents resistance makes AK3-2-9 a promising enzyme which can be potentially applied in medicine synthesis.

Vortioxetine versus other antidepressants in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: An open-label randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

This randomized open-label trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine (15 mg/daily) with different antidepressants in the treatment of patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS).

METHODS

One and hundred fifty BMS patients were randomized into five groups and treated with either vortioxetine, paroxetine (20 mg/daily), sertraline (50 mg/daily), escitalopram (10 mg/daily) or duloxetine (60 mg/daily). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Total Pain Rating Index (T-PRI), Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HAM-D) and Anxiety (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) and Efficacy scales (CGI-E) were performed at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of treatment. Any adverse events (AEs) were tabulated for each group. Descriptive statistics, including the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test and the Friedman non-parametric test for median comparisons between different times, were used.

RESULTS

All the antidepressants (AD) were associated with a significant decrease in the VAS, T-PRI, HAM-A, HAM-D, CGI-I, and CGI-E scores in the long-term (p < .001). However, the response rate of the vortioxetine group showed a significant reduction after six months. The medians, after 6 months, were as follows: VAS 0.0; T-PRI 2.0; HAM-A 7.0; HAM-D 7.0; CGI-I 1.0; and CGI-E 1.0 with a lower incidence of AEs (p < .019).

CONCLUSION

Vortioxetine was efficacious with a shorter latency of action and fewer AEs compared with other ADs.

Can wastewater analysis be used as a tool to assess the burden of pain treatment within a population?

Pain is a global health priority that is challenging to asses. Here we propose a new approach to estimating the burden of pain treatment in a population using wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). WBE is able to quantify multiple pharmaceutical compounds in order to estimate consumption by a population. Wastewater samples collected from areas representing whole communities can be analysed to estimate the consumption of drugs used to treat pain, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. The collection and analysis of wastewater can be conducted systematically to estimate the total consumption of NSAIDs and/or opioids in the population of a catchment area and to compare changes over time within the catchment or between different catchment populations. Consumption estimates can be combined by standardising the mass consumed to Defined Daily Doses (DDD) or morphine equivalents in order to assess, the population burden of pain treatment from mild to moderate (for NSAIDs) and for strong and severe pain (for opioids). We propose this method could be used to evaluate the total pain treatment burden between locations and over time. While this concept shows promise, future studies should evaluate the applicability as a tool to measure the burden of pain receiving treatment in a community.

Potential Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions between Cannabinoids and Drugs Used for Chronic Pain

Choosing an appropriate treatment for chronic pain remains problematic, and despite the available medication for its treatment, still, many patients complain about pain and appeal to the use of cannabis derivatives for pain control. However, few data have been provided to clinicians about the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of cannabinoids with other concomitant administered medications. Therefore, the aim of this brief review is to assess the interactions between cannabinoids and pain medication through drug transporters (ATP-binding cassette superfamily members) and/or metabolizing enzymes (cytochromes P450 and glucuronyl transferases).

Targeting Pathological Tau by Small Molecule Inhibition of the Poly(A):MSUT2 RNA-Protein Interaction

Neurofibrillary tangles composed of aberrantly aggregating tau protein are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia disorders. Recent work has shown that mammalian suppressor of tauopathy 2 (MSUT2), also named ZC3H14 (Zinc Finger CCCH-Type Containing 14), controls accumulation of pathological tau in cultured human cells and mice. Knocking out MSUT2 protects neurons from neurodegenerative tauopathy and preserves learning and memory. MSUT2 protein functions to bind polyadenosine [poly(A)] tails of mRNA through its C-terminal CCCH type zinc finger domains, and loss of CCCH domain function suppresses tauopathy in Caenorhabditis elegans and mice. Thus, we hypothesized that inhibiting the poly(A):MSUT2 RNA-protein interaction would ameliorate pathological tau accumulation. Here we present a high-throughput screening method for the identification of small molecules inhibiting the poly(A):MSUT2 RNA-protein interaction. We employed a fluorescent polarization assay for initial small molecule discovery with the intention to repurpose hits identified from the NIH Clinical Collection (NIHCC). Our drug repurposing development workflow included validation of hits by dose-response analysis, specificity testing, orthogonal assays of activity, and cytotoxicity. Validated compounds passing through this screening funnel will be evaluated for translational effectiveness in future studies. This preclinical drug development pipeline identified diverse FDA approved drugs duloxetine, saquinavir, and clofazimine as potential repurposing candidates for reducing pathological tau accumulation.

Impact of Polymorphism of CYP2D6 on Equilibrium Concentration of Duloxetine in Patients Suffering from Major Depressive Disorder

INTRODUCTION

Duloxetine is commonly prescribed to patients with recurrent depressive disorder. Some part of patients in this group do not respond adequately to treatment regimen containing duloxetine, while many of them experience dose-dependent adverse drug reactions. Previous research investigated that CYP2D6 is involved in the biotransformation of duloxetine, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of 1846G > A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of duloxetine, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from recurrent depressive disorder.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study enrolled 118 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (average age - 40.6±17.1 years). Therapy included duloxetine in an average daily dose of 103.7±37.1 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the international psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMD scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 9.0 [7.0; 10.0] and (GA) 11.0 [8.5; 14.0], p < 0.001; at the same time, the statistical significance in the safety profile was obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [3.0; 4.0] and (GA) 4.0 [3.0; 4.0], p = 0.007. We revealed a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of duloxetine in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.776 [0.529; 1.067] and (GA) 1.388 [0.942; 1.732], p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the effect of genetic polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the efficacy and safety profiles of duloxetine was demonstrated in a group of 118 patients with recurrent depressive disorder.

Smoking cessation and duloxetine toxicity: A case report

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric medications are among the drugs affected by cigarette smoke, and because of the high prevalence of smoking in the psychiatric community, psychiatric patients are particularly at risk when entering the smoke-free environment of a hospital.

CASE SUMMARY

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in cigarette smoke are well-known inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. CYP1A2 induction by cigarette smoking increases metabolic clearance of substrates of this enzyme; smoking cessation results in a decrease in CYP1A2 activity, which causes an increase in serum substrate levels. Although these effects are well documented, the effect of smoking cessation remains a hidden danger, in part, because computerized drug interaction surveillance systems are not designed to alert clinicians when an offending agent is discontinued.

PRACTICE IMPLICATION

To raise awareness and demonstrate the importance of a thorough assessment of smoking status, we present a case in which the temporal relationship of smoking cessation to the emergence of nausea, vomiting, and tachycardia 3 days later (day 3); the development of myoclonic jerks by day 5; and the resolution of symptoms on reduction of duloxetine dosage on day 44 implicates duloxetine toxicity in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy awaiting implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Duloxetine-Induced Neural Cell Death and Promoted Neurite Outgrowth in N2a Cells

Duloxetine is a clinical drug that is primarily used for treatment of depression and pain, but it has side effects of addiction and tolerance. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) is its metabolic enzyme, and the drug's biofunction results from its neuro-protective effect in animal and cell models. We aimed to investigate the duloxetine-induced neural cytotoxicity effect and its performance in an N2a cell neurite outgrowth model. Cell death was assessed as cell viability using a Cell Count Kit-8 and further evaluated using bright-field images, propidium iodide (PI) and annexin V staining, colony-formation analysis, TUNEL staining of the cells, and biochemical testing. N2a cells were committed to differentiation by serum withdrawal and RA induction, and the neurite outgrowth was evaluated as the number of differentiated cells, longest neurite length, and average neurite length. Cell cycle analysis, PI and annexin V staining, mRNA expression, and biochemical testing were used to evaluate the drug effects on differentiation. The induction of neural cell death by duloxetine was not affected by classic cell death inhibitors but was promoted by the CYP inducer rifampicin. N2a cell neurite outgrowth was promoted by duloxetine via reduction of the CYP2D6 and MDA levels and induction of Bdnf protein levels. Duloxetine induces neural cell death through effects on CYP and promotes N2a cell neurite outgrowth by regulating CYP, Bdnf protein, and the intracellular lipid peroxidation level.

Achiral and chiral analysis of duloxetine by chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, a review on the separation methodologies

Duloxetine (DLX) is a widely used antidepressant drug belonging to the class of selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); its efficacy has been demonstrated in the treatment of not only major depressive disorders but also diabetic neuropathic pain, generalized anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia or stress urinary incontinence. It is a chiral substance and is used in therapy in the form of the enantiopure S-DLX, which is twice as active as R-DLX. Several methods have been published for the achiral and chiral determination of DLX in pharmaceuticals, biological materials and environmental samples, the majority using liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis coupled with different detection techniques (UV detection, fluorescence, mass spectrometry). The aim of the current review is to provide a systematic survey of the analytical techniques used for the determination of DLX from different matrices.

Real world, open label experience with lacosamide against acute painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity

We report the outcome of a pilot, open-label study that tested the potential of lacosamide (200 mg/bi.d) as an effective and safe symptomatic treatment against acute painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN). Lacosamide was introduced in 18 colorectal cancer patients with evidence of clinically significant acute, painful OXAIPN after infusion of the third course (T1) of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) and was maintained until completion of all 12 courses (T4). The OXA-Neuropathy Questionnaire (OXA-NQ) was used to record the severity of acute OXAIPN; the PI-NRS estimated the severity of neuropathic pain, while the chronic OXAIPN was graded with TNSc. The EuroQOL (EQ-5D) instrument was also applied. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale measured the lacosamide-attributed perception of change. LCM-responders were considered those with ≥50% reduction in PI-NRS and OXA-NQ scores at T4, compared to T1. Patients experienced on T1 a median number of acute OXAIPN symptoms of 4 and had a median neuropathic pain severity score of 6, which was strongly related to lower quality of life, according to EQ-VAS (P < .001). At T4, 12 patients (66.7%) were classified as responders. A significant clinical improvement was documented in the severity of acute OXAIPN and neuropathic pain in relation to lacosamide (P < .001) at T4 compared to T1, which was associated with improved EQ-VAS scores (P < .001). Twelve patients scored PGIC ≥5 (lacosamide-attributed) at T4. There were no incidences of early drop-outs for safety reasons. Lacosamide appears to be an effective and well-tolerated symptomatic treatment against acute, painful OXAIPN.

Developing an Analytical Method Based on Graphene Quantum Dots for Quantification of Deferiprone in Plasma

In the world of nanotechnology, graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have been considerably employed in numerous optical sensing and bioanalytical applications. Herein, a simple and cost-efficient methodology was developed to the quantification of deferiprone in plasma samples by utilizing the selective interaction of the GQDs and drug in the presence of Fe³⁺ ions. GQDs were synthesized by a bottom-up technique as an advantageous fluorescent probe. Increasing levels of deferiprone ranging from 5 to 50 mg.L^-1, leads to significant fluorescence quenching of GQDs. In addition, the calibration curve was revealed a linear response in this range with a sensitivity of 5 mg.L^-1. The method validation was carried out according to the FDA guidelines to confirm the accuracy, precision, stability and selectivity of the developed method. The results show that this green and low-cost fluorescent probe could be used for the analysis of deferiprone.

The Effect of Food on the Single-Dose Bioavailability and Tolerability of the Highest Marketed Strength of Duloxetine

Duloxetine is a combined serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor indicated in adults for the treatment of major depressive disorder, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, and generalized anxiety disorder. The aim of these studies was to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and safety of duloxetine 60‐mg gastroresistant hard capsules following single‐dose administration. The data were obtained from 2 phase 1 bioequivalence studies, 1 in a fasting state and the other under fed conditions. Both studies have shown that, when administered as a single dose in the same prandial state, the test and reference duloxetine treatments were bioequivalent and exhibited similar safety profiles. The mean fed and fasting pharmacokinetic parameters and drug‐related adverse events from the 2 studies were compared in order to assess the effect of food on the duloxetine bioavailability and respectively, tolerability. Administration of duloxetine in fed conditions increased peak plasma concentration by up to 30% and delayed mean time to peak concentration by an average of 1.15 hours while having an insignificant effect on extent of absorption (area under the plasma concentration–time curve in fed state within ±6% as compared with fasting conditions). Even though peak plasma levels were substantially higher in the fed state, there was no negative impact on the drug's safety profile. Actually, administration with food resulted in a lower average number of adverse events per single dose exposure. The negligible variation in overall systemic exposure suggests that efficacy remains unchanged irrespective of administration conditions; however, a better tolerability of the 60‐mg dose is expected when the drug is taken with food.

Managing fibromyalgia syndrome in pregnancy no bridges between USA and EU

The first aim of this article is to analyze the risk/benefit ratio of using psychotropic drugs approved in some countries for treating fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) during pregnancy. Assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions is the second scope of this article, in order to help clinicians to manage FMS in pregnancy in those countries were no drugs are approved for treating the disease. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar. Separate literature searches were performed for the three psychotropic drugs approved in the USA for treating FMS, psychotherapy, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Perinatal duloxetine exposure is associated with increased risk of gestational and perinatal complications. With regards pregabalin, available information suggests that the drug is not devoid of structural teratogenicity potential. No data are available for milnacipran. Duloxetine and pregabalin should be only given to pregnant women diagnosed with severe forms of FMS after carefully weighing the benefits and risks for the mother-fetus dyad. On the other hand, we have to consider that the proportion of women who discontinue psychotropic drugs during pregnancy is as high as 85.4%. This figure raises further questions about adequate alternative treatment of FMS during the perinatal period. Moreover, neither duloxetine nor milnacipran or pregabalin have been approved by the EMEA for the treatment of FMS. Unfortunately, psychological treatment of FMS in perinatal women are not yet tested and data on TMS are conflicting.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of CYP2D6-Mediated Gene-Drug-Drug Interactions

The aim of this work was to predict the extent of Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6)‐mediated drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in different CYP2D6 genotypes using physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Following the development of a new duloxetine model and optimization of a paroxetine model, the effect of genetic polymorphisms on CYP2D6‐mediated intrinsic clearances of dextromethorphan, duloxetine, and paroxetine was estimated from rich pharmacokinetic profiles in activity score (AS)1 and AS2 subjects. We obtained good predictions for the dextromethorphan–duloxetine interaction (Ratio of predicted over observed area under the curve (AUC) ratio (R_pred/obs) 1.38–1.43). Similarly, the effect of genotype was well predicted, with an increase of area under the curve ratio of 28% in AS2 subjects when compared with AS1 (observed, 33%). Despite an approximately twofold underprediction of the dextromethorphan–paroxetine interaction, an R_pred/obs of 0.71 was obtained for the effect of genotype on the area under the curve ratio. Therefore, PBPK modeling can be successfully used to predict gene–drug–drug interactions (GDDIs). Based on these promising results, a workflow is suggested for the generic evaluation of GDDIs and DDIs that can be applied in other situations.

Acute Hyponatremia Resulting from Duloxetine-induced Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion

A 77-year-old woman who had taken a single oral dose of duloxetine subsequently developed a headache and nausea. On the first day, her serum sodium level was 135 mEq/L. She became confused on the third day. Her serum sodium level was 119 mEq/L and her antidiuretic hormone level was 1.9 IU. We diagnosed her with acute hyponatremia from duloxetine-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). This case suggests that we must not rule out SIADH on the basis of normal serum sodium levels when a patient who has started serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) treatment presents with symptoms similar to hyponatremia.

Duloxetine and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Combination Potentially Induce Severe Hyponatremia in an Elderly Woman

We encountered a case of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) caused by duloxetine, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). A 74-year-old woman complaining of severe lethargy was transferred to our emergency department. Her serum sodium level was 109 mEq/L. Plasma hypo-osmolality with urine normo-osmolality was observed, indicating SIADH. Her essential hypertension had long been treated with telmisartan, and she had just started duloxetine 20 mg/day for chronic musculoskeletal pain 4 days prior to admission. On prescribing duloxetine in the primary care setting, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of duloxetine-induced hyponatremia, particularly in combination with telmisartan.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

SSRIs and SNRIs (SRI) in Pregnancy: Effects on the Course of Pregnancy and the Offspring: How Far Are We from Having All the Answers?

Serotonin has important roles in the development of the brain and other organs. Manipulations of synaptic serotonin by drugs such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) might alter their development and function. Of interest, most studies on the outcome of prenatal exposure to SRI in human have not found significant embryonic or fetal damage, except for a possible, slight increase in cardiac malformations. In up to a third of newborns exposed to SRI, exposure may induce transient neonatal behavioral changes (poor neonatal adaptation) and increased rate of persistent pulmonary hypertension. Prenatal SRI may also cause slight motor delay and language impairment but these are transient. The data on the possible association of prenatal SRIs with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are inconsistent, and seem to be related to pre-pregnancy treatment or to maternal depression. Prenatal SRIs also appear to affect the hypothalamic hypophyseal adrenal (HPA) axis inducing epigenetic changes, but the long-term consequences of these effects on humans are as yet unknown. SRIs are metabolized in the liver by several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Faster metabolism of most SRIs in late pregnancy leads to lower maternal concentrations, and thus potentially to decreased efficacy which is more prominent in women that are rapid metabolizers. Studies suggest that the serotonin transporter SLC6A4 promoter is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes after SRI exposure. Since maternal depression may adversely affect the child's development, one has to consider the risk of SRI discontinuation on the fetus and the child. As with any drug treatment in pregnancy, the benefits to the mother should be considered versus the possible hazards to the developing embryo/fetus.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antidepressants

For a number of antidepressants in current clinical use, concentrations in serum or plasma are a more reliable index of target drug concentrations than is dosage. For such drugs, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be a useful clinical guide for the purpose of maximizing the likelihood of favorable therapeutic outcome while minimizing the probability of clinical ineffectiveness or adverse side effects. TDM is of greatest benefit when a therapeutic range of serum concentrations has been well established. Even if such a range is not definitively determined, TDM can be of help in situations in which patients are refractory to therapy despite adequate or high dosages, when adverse events supervene even with low doses, or when noncompliance with the intended dosage plan is suspected. Serum antidepressant concentrations from TDM should be interpreted in the full context of the patient's demographic characteristics and clinical status, along with an understanding of the pharmacokinetics of the medication being taken, the timing of the sample in relation to the dosage regimen, and the specific laboratory assay procedure. TDM measurements may be costly, and the potential benefits of the information need to be weighed against the cost to the patient or to the health care system.

Clinical implications of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors-selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors pharmacogenetics during pregnancy and lactation

Depression occurs during pregnancy in 3.9–12.8% of the women. The different serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are metabolized in the liver by CYP450 enzymes. CYP2D6 metabolizes paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine and venlafaxine, while CYP2C19 deactivates citalopram and escitalopram. Polymorphisms in these enzymes change the metabolic clearance and levels of these drugs. Higher metabolism of most SRIs in late pregnancy results in lower maternal levels, which could result in decreased efficacy. Very few studies have addressed the potential interaction between pregnancy-induced increase in 2D6 metabolism and specific genotypes of the women, suggesting that ultra-rapid and extensive metabolizers exhibit lower serum concentrations than the other slower genotypes. Preliminary studies suggest that some genotypes of the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) promoter are associated and are linked to adverse effects in infants with SRI exposure during pregnancy. Presently, there are no clear clinical implications of SRI pharmacogenetic status in pregnancy and lactation. In late pregnancy, women may exhibit lower steady state concentrations of these drugs, necessitating increased doses but these are presently guided clinically and not through genotyping. Much more work is needed to define whether SRI genotype has clinical implications and predictive value for either mother or offspring.

Dual Antidepressant Duloxetine Blocks Nicotinic Receptor Currents, Calcium Signals and Exocytosis in Chromaffin Cells Stimulated with Acetylcholine

The inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) has been proposed as a potential strategy to develop new antidepressant drugs. This is based on the observation that antidepressants that selectively block noradrenaline (NA) or serotonin (5-HT) reuptake also inhibit nAChRs. Dual antidepressants blocking both NA and 5-HT reuptake were proposed to shorten the delay in exerting their clinical effects; whether duloxetine, a prototype of dual antidepressants, also blocks nAChRs is unknown. Here we explored this question in bovine chromaffin cells (BCCs) that express native α₃, α₅, and α₇ nAChRs and in cell lines expressing human α₇, α₃β₄, or α₄β₂ nAChRs. We have found that duloxetine fully blocked the acetylcholine (ACh)-elicited nicotinic currents in BCCs with an IC₅₀ of 0.86 µM. Such blockade seemed to be noncompetitive, voltage dependent, and partially use dependent. The ACh-elicited membrane depolarization, the elevation of cytosolic calcium ([Ca²⁺]_c), and catecholamine release in BCCs were also blocked by duloxetine. This blockade developed slowly, and the recovery of secretion was also slow and gradual. Duloxetine did not affect Na⁺ or Ca²⁺ channel currents neither the high-K⁺-elicited [Ca²⁺]_c transients and secretion. Of interest was that in cell lines expressing human α₇, α₃β₄, and α₄β₂ nAChRs, duloxetine blocked nicotinic currents with IC₅₀ values of 0.1, 0.56, and 0.85 µM, respectively. Thus, in blocking α₇ receptors, which are abundantly expressed in the brain, duloxetine exhibited approximately 10-fold to 100- fold higher potency with respect to reported IC₅₀ values for various antidepressant drugs. This may contribute to the antidepressant effect of duloxetine.

The Role of Genetic Polymorphisms in Chronic Pain Patients

It is estimated that the total annual financial cost for pain management in the U.S. exceeds 100 billion dollars. However, when indirect costs are included, such as functional disability and reduction in working hours, the cost can reach more than 300 billion dollars. In chronic pain patients, the role of pharmacogenetics is determined by genetic effects on various pain types, as well as the genetic effect on drug safety and efficacy. In this review article, we discuss genetic polymorphisms present in different types of chronic pain, such as fibromyalgia, low back pain, migraine, painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy and trigeminal neuralgia. Furthermore, we discuss the role of CYP450 enzymes involved in metabolism of drugs, which have been used for treatment of chronic pain (amitriptyline, duloxetine, opioids, etc.). We also discuss how pharmacogenetics can be applied towards improving drug efficacy, shortening the time required to achieve therapeutic outcomes, reducing risks of side effects, and reducing medical costs and reliance upon polypharmacy.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use in pregnant women; pharmacogenetics, drug-drug interactions and adverse effects

INTRODUCTION

Possible negative effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pregnancy relate to congenital anomalies, negative perinatal events and neurodevelopmental outcome. Many studies are confounded by the underlying maternal disease and by pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic differences of these drugs. Areas covered: The possible interactions of SSRIs and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors with other drugs and the known effects of SSRIs on congenital anomalies, perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. Expert opinion: SSRIs should be given with caution when combined with other drugs that are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. SSRIs apparently increase the rate of severe cardiac malformations, induce neonatal adaptation problems in up to 30% of the offspring, increase the rate of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and possibly slightly increase the rate of prematurity and low birth weight. Most neurodevelopmental follow up studies did not find significant cognitive impairments except some transient gross motor delay, slight impairment of language abilities and possibly behavioral changes. The literature on the possible association of SSRIs with autism spectrum disorder is inconsistent; if an association exists, it is apparently throughout pregnancy. The risk associated with treatment discontinuation seems to outweigh the risk of treatment, as severe maternal depression may negatively affect the child's development. If needed, treatment should continue in pregnancy with the minimal effective dose.

Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors

This chapter covers antidepressants that fall into the class of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors. That is, they bind to the 5-HT and NE transporters with varying levels of potency and binding affinity ratios. Unlike the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), most of these antidepressants have an ascending rather than a flat dose-response curve. The chapter provides a brief review of the chemistry, pharmacology, metabolism, safety and adverse effects, clinical use, and therapeutic indications of each antidepressant. Venlafaxine, a phenylethylamine, is a relatively weak 5-HT and weaker NE uptake inhibitor with a 30-fold difference in binding of the two transporters. Therefore, the drug has a clear dose progression, with low doses predominantly binding to the 5-HT transporter and more binding of the NE transporter as the dose ascends. Venlafaxine is metabolized to the active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV; desvenlafaxine) by CYP2D6, and it therefore is subject to significant inter-individual variation in blood levels and response dependent on variations in CYP2D6 metabolism. The half-life of venlafaxine is short at about 5 h, with the ODV metabolite being 12 h. Both parent compound and metabolite have low protein binding and neither inhibit CYP enzymes. Therefore, both venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine are potential options if drug-drug interactions are a concern, although venlafaxine may be subject to drug-drug interactions with CYP2D6 inhibitors. At low doses, the adverse effect profile is similar to an SSRI with nausea, diarrhea, fatigue or somnolence, and sexual side effects, while venlafaxine at higher doses can produce mild increases in blood pressure, diaphoresis, tachycardia, tremors, and anxiety. A disadvantage of venlafaxine relative to the SSRIs is the potential for dose-dependent blood pressure elevation, most likely due to the NE reuptake inhibition caused by higher doses; however, this adverse effect is infrequently observed at doses below 225 mg per day. Venlafaxine also has a number of potential advantages over the SSRIs, including an ascending dose-antidepressant response curve, with possibly greater overall efficacy at higher doses. Venlafaxine is approved for MDD as well as generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Desvenlafaxine is the primary metabolite of venlafaxine, and it is also a relatively low-potency 5-HT and NE uptake inhibitor. Like venlafaxine it has a favorable drug-drug interaction profile. It is subject to CYP3A4 metabolism, and it is therefore vulnerable to enzyme inhibition or induction. However, the primary metabolic pathway is direct conjugation. It is approved in the narrow dose range of 50-100 mg per day. Duloxetine is a more potent 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibitor with a more balanced profile of binding at about 10:1 for 5HT and NE transporter binding. It is also a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6, so that modest dose reductions and careful monitoring will be needed when prescribing duloxetine in combination with drugs that are preferentially metabolized by CYP2D6. The most common side effects identified in clinical trials are nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, constipation, insomnia, asthenia, and hypertension, consistent with its mechanisms of action. Clinical trials to date have demonstrated rates of response and remission in patients with major depression that are comparable to other marketed antidepressants reviewed in this book. In addition to approval for MDD, duloxetine is approved for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, and musculoskeletal pain. Milnacipran is marketed as an antidepressant in some countries, but not in the USA. It is approved in the USA and some other countries as a treatment for fibromyalgia. It has few pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with other drugs. Milnacipran has a half-life of about 10 h and therefore needs to be administered twice per day. It is metabolized by CYP3A4, but the major pathway for clearance is direct conjugation and renal elimination. As with other drugs in this class, dysuria is a common, troublesome, and dose-dependent adverse effect (occurring in up to 7% of patients). High-dose milnacipran has been reported to cause blood pressure and pulse elevations. Levomilnacipran is the levorotary enantiomer of milnacipran, and it is pharmacologically very similar to the racemic compound, although the side effects may be milder within the approved dosing range. As with other NE uptake inhibitors, it may increase blood pressure and pulse, although it appears to do so less than some other medications. All medications in the class can cause serotonin syndrome when combined with MAOIs.

Impact of CYP2D6 Functional Allelic Variations on Phenoconversion and Drug-Drug Interactions

We investigated whether CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers carrying a nonfunctional allele are at higher risk of phenoconversion to poor metabolizers in the presence of CYP2D6 inhibitors. Seventeen homozygous carriers of two fully-functional alleles and 17 heterozygous carriers of one fully-functional and one nonfunctional allele participated in this trial. Dextromethorphan 5 mg and tramadol 10 mg were given at each of the three study sessions. CYP2D6 was inhibited by duloxetine 60 mg (session 2) and paroxetine 20 mg (session 3). A higher rate of phenoconversion to intermediate metabolizers with duloxetine (71% vs. 25%, P = 0.009) and to poor metabolizers with paroxetine (94% vs. 56%, P = 0.011) was observed in heterozygous than homozygous extensive metabolizers. The magnitude of drug-drug interaction between dextromethorphan and paroxetine was higher in homozygous than in heterozygous subjects (14.6 vs. 8.5, P < 0.028). Our study suggests that genetic extensive metabolizers may not represent a homogenous population and that available genetic data should be considered when addressing drug-drug interactions in clinical practice.

Occupancy of Norepinephrine Transporter by Duloxetine in Human Brains Measured by Positron Emission Tomography with (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2

BACKGROUND

The norepinephrine transporter in the brain has been targeted in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Duloxetine is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that has been widely used for the treatment of depression. However, the relationship between dose and plasma concentration of duloxetine and norepinephrine transporter occupancy in the human brain has not been determined. In this study, we examined norepinephrine transporter occupancy by different doses of duloxetine.

METHODS

We calculated norepinephrine transporter occupancies from 2 positron emission tomography scans using (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2 before and after a single oral dose of duloxetine (20 mg, n = 3; 40 mg, n = 3; 60 mg, n =2). Positron emission tomography scans were performed from 120 to 180 minutes after an i.v. bolus injection of (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2. Venous blood samples were taken to measure the plasma concentration of duloxetine just before and after the second positron emission tomography scan.

RESULTS

Norepinephrine transporter occupancy by duloxetine was 29.7% at 20 mg, 30.5% at 40 mg, and 40.0% at 60 mg. The estimated dose of duloxetine inducing 50% norepinephrine transporter occupancy was 76.8 mg, and the estimated plasma drug concentration inducing 50% norepinephrine transporter occupancy was 58.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Norepinephrine transporter occupancy by clinical doses of duloxetine was approximately 30% to 40% in human brain as estimated using positron emission tomography with (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2.