Chronotherapy With Low-Dose Aspirin for Prevention of Complications in Pregnancy

Prophylactic aspirin for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications: An overview of meta-analyses

Benefits of aspirin administration on pre-eclampsia and IUGR depend on the gestational age and dose of aspirin administration. Meta-analyses show that, to prevent preterm labor, aspirin could be administrated even after 16 weeks of gestational age.

Pre-eclampsia screening in the first trimester - preemptive action to prevent the peril

Pre-eclampsia complicating 2-5% of pregnancies is an obstetrical syndrome associated with deleterious short-and long-term consequences to the gravid women, the fetus and the neonate. Majority of the obstetrical complications occur in early pre-eclampsia (requiring delivery <34 weeks). The risk factor based approach recommended by the professional organizations for pre-eclampsia screening has shown suboptimal clinical performance. The combined multimarker screening for pre-eclampsia encompassing documentation of maternal medical history, measurement of mean arterial pressure, estimation of the maternal serum levels of placental growth factor, pregnancy associated plasma protein-A, and recording the Uterine artery mean pulsatility index, performed in the first trimester between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks has proven to be an effective screening strategy. The a-priori risk is determined by multivariate analysis of the factors from history, while the other parameters are converted to log 10 transformed multiple of median values. Bayes' theorem is used to calculate the final risk. The above model has shown to detect 77% of preterm pre-eclampsia (<37 weeks), 96% of early preterm pre-eclampsia (<34 weeks), 38% of term pre-eclampsia and 54% of all pre-eclampsia, at a false positive rate of 10%. Uterine artery Doppler is key to pre-eclampsia screening. Currently a risk of >1:100 for pre-eclampsia developing before 37 weeks (preterm pre-eclampsia) is regarded as screen positive. Aspirin at a dose of 150 mg at bedtime given to screen positive subjects is associated with a significant reduction of preterm pre-eclampsia and early pre-eclampsia. The intervention is now supported by a well conducted randomized trial and metanalysis data. Aspirin acts by diminishing stores of constitutive cyclooxygenase enzyme in the non-nucleated platelets without disturbing systemic prostaglandin production. Selective use of aspirin in screen positive women is associated with a very low incidence of adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal side effects. The screening protocol can be applied to twin pregnancies albeit minor differences. Hence, screening for pre-eclampsia in first trimester, which is now endorsed by the federation of international obstetrical and gynecological societies, should be offered universally to all women at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation, followed by the administration of aspirin and serial maternal-fetal surveillance in the screen positive woman.

Effects of low-dose aspirin on the prevention of preeclampsia and pregnancy outcomes: A randomized controlled trial from Shanghai, China

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the preventive effects of low-dose aspirin on the incidence of preeclampsia and pregnancy outcomes of women at high-risk for preeclampsia.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Obstetrics Department of The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. It analyzed data from 1105 high-risk women who were divided into the control group (placebo group) and the aspirin group (including three subgroups: 25 mg, 50 mg and 75 mg). The aspirin group in this study was instructed to take aspirin daily before bedtime beginning in the 12th week of pregnancy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome is the occurrence of preeclampsia. The secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes (such as premature delivery, FGR etc.), maternal serum biomarkers (including d-dimers, platelet aggregation rates, etc.) and uterine arterial blood flow resistance. The onset of preeclampsia and pregnancy outcomes were recorded after all participants delivered.

RESULTS

Low-dose aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of preeclampsia and early-onset preeclampsia. Aspirin also showed significant dose dependence in preeclampsia prevention. The results of Mantel-Haenszel trend test showed that there was a linear relationship between the dosage and the incidence of preeclampsia and early preeclampsia (P < 0.05). Pearson's results showed that the incidence of preeclampsia and early preeclampsia was negatively correlated with aspirin dosage. There was also a linear relationship between the dosage and the rates of postpartum hemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, premature births and cesarean section (P < 0.05). There was no evidence to suggest differences in the incidence of fetal distress, miscarriage and placental abruption among the four groups. The blood resistance S/D value of uterine artery in early pregnancy was the only independent factor affecting the efficacy of aspirin (OR = 1.405; 95 %CI,1.058-1.867; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose aspirin can prevent preeclampsia and early-preeclampsia. Its efficacy is dose-dependent. It can reduce the rates of postpartum hemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, premature births and cesarean section. The prophylactic effect of aspirin on preeclampsia seemed to be greater in patients with higher blood resistance S/D value of uterine artery during early pregnancy.

Platelet Indices and CXCL12 Levels in Patients with Intrauterine Growth Restriction

Background

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a multifactorial condition, and the precise mechanism is still unknown. In the current study, we aimed to determine the relationship between the platelet (PLT) indices and CXC12 levels in patients with IUGR.

Patients and Materials

In this study, 36 patients with IUGR and 36 healthy pregnant mothers were enrolled as the case and control groups, respectively. Gestational age for both groups was between 24 and 40 years. Blood samples were taken, and platelet indices were examined by a full-diff cell counter. Serum levels of CXCL12 were measured by ELISA, and the data were analyzed using an independent Student's t-test.

Results

In this study, we observed that the mean value of PLT count (154.3 ± 50 vs 236 ± 36) and plateletcrit (0.124 ± 0.038 vs 0.178 ± 0.021) were significantly lower in the case than the control group. In contrast, the mean platelet volume (7.94 ± 0.55 vs 7.62 ± 0.53) and platelet distribution width (17.57 ± 0.7 vs 16.96 ± 0.59) were significantly higher in the case than the control group. More importantly, we found that the serum levels of CXCL12 were significantly higher (5.3 ng/mL± 3.1 vs 2.8 ± 1.6) in the patients compared to the pregnancy controls.

Conclusion

Our data show that platelet indices are changed in IUGR, and the levels of circulating CXCL12 are increased in patients with IUGR. These findings provide a base for further studies to better defining the pathophysiology of IUGR.

[Pregnancy with lupus erythematosus-an update]

Current research in the field of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and pregnancy focuses on predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in pregnancy and the importance of preconception counselling. In particular, the prospective predictors of pregnancy outcome: biomarkers in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and SLE (PROMISSE) study adds to the understanding of risk factors for adverse outcomes. There is increasing evidence of the numerous benefits associated with continuing HCQ treatment in pregnancy and for the use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in the prevention of preeclampsia. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) has published evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of women with SLE and/or antiphospholipid syndrome before, during and after pregnancy. Rheumatologists caring for women with SLE should be familiar with the current state of knowledge in order to help optimize the management and thus the outcome of pregnancy in their patients.

Factors that influence adherence to aspirin therapy in the prevention of preeclampsia amongst high-risk pregnant women: A mixed method analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence with medications in pregnancy is increasingly recognized and often results in a higher rate of preventable maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Non-adherence with prophylactic aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women is associated with higher incidence of preeclampsia, preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction. Yet, the factors that influences adherence with aspirin in pregnancy, from the women's perspective, remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The study is aimed at understanding the factors, from the women's perspective, that influenced adherence with prophylactic aspirin in their pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A sequential-exploratory designed mixed methods quantitative (n = 122) and qualitative (n = 6) survey of women with recent high-risk pregnancy necessitating antenatal prophylactic aspirin was utilized. Women recruited underwent their antenatal care in one of three high-risk pregnancy clinics within the South Western Sydney Local Health District, Australia. The quantitative study was done through an electronic anonymous survey and the qualitative study was conducted through a face-to-face interview. Data obtained was analysed against women's adherence with aspirin utilizing phi correlation (φ) with significance set at <0.05.

RESULTS

Two key themes, from the women's perspective, that influenced their adherence with aspirin in pregnancy were identified; (1) pill burden and non-intention omission (2) communication and relationship with health care provider (HCP). Pill burden and its associated non-intentional omission, both strongly corelated with reduced adherence (Φ = 0.8, p = 0.02, Φ = 0.8, p<0.01) whilst the use of reminder strategies minimized accidental omission and improved adherence (Φ = 0.9, p<0.01). Consistent communication between HCPs and a good patient-HCP relationship was strongly associated with improved adherence (Φ = 0.7, p = 0.04, Φ = 0.9, p = <0.01) and more importantly was found to play an important role in alleviating factors that had potentials to negatively influence adherence with aspirin in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

This study identified factors that both positively and negatively influenced adherence with aspirin amongst high-risk pregnant women. Is highlights the importance in recognizing the impact of pill burden in pregnancy and the need to counsel women on the utility of reminder strategies to minimize non-intentional omission. Importantly, it emphasizes on the importance of a positive patient-HCP relationship through effective and consistent communication to achieve the desired maternal and fetal outcomes.

Impact of low-dose aspirin on adverse perinatal outcome: meta-analysis and meta-regression

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the impact of low-dose aspirin (LDA) on perinatal outcome, independent of its effect on pre-eclampsia (PE), preterm birth and low birth weight.

METHODS

An electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, PROSPERO and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify RCTs assessing the impact of LDA in pregnancy, published in English prior to May 2019, which reported perinatal outcomes of interest (placental abruption, delivery mode, low 5-min Apgar score, neonatal acidosis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, periventricular hemorrhage and perinatal death). Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were calculated and pooled for analysis. Analysis was stratified according to gestational age at commencement of treatment (≤ 16 weeks vs > 16 weeks) and subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of aspirin dose (< 100 mg vs ≥ 100 mg). Meta-regression was used to assess the impact of LDA on perinatal outcome, independent of the reduction in PE, preterm birth and low birth weight.

RESULTS

Forty studies involving 34 807 participants were included. When LDA was commenced ≤ 16 weeks' gestation, it was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of perinatal death (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; P = 0.02; number needed to treat, 92); however, this risk reduction was only seen when a daily dose of ≥ 100 mg was administered. If commenced > 16 weeks' gestation, LDA was associated with a significant reduction in 5-min Apgar score < 7 (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = 0.02) and periventricular hemorrhage (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99; P = 0.04), but a trend towards an increase in the risk of placental abruption (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.00-1.46; P = 0.06) was also noted. LDA was not associated with any significant increase in adverse events if commenced ≤ 16 weeks gestation. LDA had no effect on delivery mode, irrespective of the gestational age at which it was started. Meta-regression confirmed that the effect of LDA on perinatal death, when treatment was started ≤ 16 weeks' gestation, was independent of any reduction in the rate of PE and preterm birth.

CONCLUSION

LDA improves some important perinatal outcomes, without increasing adverse events such as placental abruption or periventricular hemorrhage, and its utility, if commenced prior to 16 weeks' gestation, may be considered in a wider context beyond the prevention of PE or fetal growth restriction. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cross-Talk between Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Preeclampsia

The occurrence of hypertensive syndromes during pregnancy leads to high rates of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality. Amongst them, preeclampsia (PE) is one of the most common. This review aims to describe the relationship between oxidative stress and inflammation in PE, aiming to reinforce its importance in the context of the disease and to discuss perspectives on clinical and nutritional treatment, in this line of research. Despite the still incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of PE, it is well accepted that there are placental changes in pregnancy, associated with an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species and the antioxidant defence system, characterizing the placental oxidative stress that leads to an increase in the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Hence, a generalized inflammatory process occurs, besides the presence of progressive vascular endothelial damage, leading to the dysfunction of the placenta. There is no consensus in the literature on the best strategies for prevention and treatment of the disease, especially for the control of oxidative stress and inflammation. In view of the above, it is evident the important connection between oxidative stress and inflammatory process in the pathogenesis of PE, being that this disease is capable of causing serious implications on both maternal and fetal health. Reports on the use of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds are analysed and still considered controversial. As such, the field is open for new basic and clinical research, aiming the development of innovative therapeutic approaches to prevent and to treat PE.

Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia is associated with deficient intravascular production of prostacyclin, a vasodilator, and excessive production of thromboxane, a vasoconstrictor and stimulant of platelet aggregation. These observations led to the hypotheses that antiplatelet agents, low-dose aspirin in particular, might prevent or delay development of pre-eclampsia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and dipyridamole, when given to women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (30 March 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies. We updated the search in September 2019 and added the results to the awaiting classification section of the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised trials comparing antiplatelet agents with either placebo or no antiplatelet agent were included. Studies only published in abstract format were eligible for inclusion if sufficient information was available. We would have included cluster-randomised trials in the analyses along with individually-randomised trials, if any had been identified in our search strategy. Quasi-random studies were excluded. Participants were pregnant women at risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Interventions were administration of an antiplatelet agent (such as low-dose aspirin or dipyridamole), comparisons were either placebo or no antiplatelet.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data independently. For binary outcomes, we calculated risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), on an intention-to-treat basis. For this update we incorporated individual participant data (IPD) from trials with this available, alongside aggregate data (AD) from trials where it was not, in order to enable reliable subgroup analyses and inclusion of two key new outcomes. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and created a 'Summary of findings' table using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-seven trials (40,249 women, and their babies) were included, although three trials (relating to 233 women) did not contribute data to the meta-analysis. Nine of the trials contributing data were large (> 1000 women recruited), accounting for 80% of women recruited. Although the trials took place in a wide range of countries, all of the nine large trials involved only women in high-income and/or upper middle-income countries. IPD were available for 36 trials (34,514 women), including all but one of the large trials. Low-dose aspirin alone was the intervention in all the large trials, and most trials overall. Dose in the large trials was 50 mg (1 trial, 1106 women), 60 mg (5 trials, 22,322 women), 75mg (1 trial, 3697 women) 100 mg (1 trial, 3294 women) and 150 mg (1 trial, 1776 women). Most studies were either low risk of bias or unclear risk of bias; and the large trials were all low risk of bas. Antiplatelet agents versus placebo/no treatment The use of antiplatelet agents reduced the risk of proteinuric pre-eclampsia by 18% (36,716 women, 60 trials, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88; high-quality evidence), number needed to treat for one women to benefit (NNTB) 61 (95% CI 45 to 92). There was a small (9%) reduction in the RR for preterm birth <37 weeks (35,212 women, 47 trials; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95, high-quality evidence), NNTB 61 (95% CI 42 to 114), and a 14% reduction infetal deaths, neonatal deaths or death before hospital discharge (35,391 babies, 52 trials; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95; high-quality evidence), NNTB 197 (95% CI 115 to 681). Antiplatelet agents slightly reduced the risk of small-for-gestational age babies (35,761 babies, 50 trials; RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.92; high-quality evidence), NNTB 146 (95% CI 90 to 386), and pregnancies with serious adverse outcome (a composite outcome including maternal death, baby death, pre-eclampsia, small-for-gestational age, and preterm birth) (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96; 17,382 women; 13 trials, high-quality evidence), NNTB 54 (95% CI 34 to 132). Antiplatelet agents probably slightly increase postpartum haemorrhage > 500 mL (23,769 women, 19 trials; RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12; moderate-quality evidence due to clinical heterogeneity), and they probably marginally increase the risk of placental abruption, although for this outcome the evidence was downgraded due to a wide confidence interval including the possibility of no effect (30,775 women; 29 trials; RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54; moderate-quality evidence). Data from two large trials which assessed children at aged 18 months (including results from over 5000 children), did not identify clear differences in development between the two groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Administering low-dose aspirin to pregnant women led to small-to-moderate benefits, including reductions in pre-eclampsia (16 fewer per 1000 women treated), preterm birth (16 fewer per 1000 treated), the baby being born small-for-gestational age (seven fewer per 1000 treated) and fetal or neonatal death (five fewer per 1000 treated). Overall, administering antiplatelet agents to 1000 women led to 20 fewer pregnancies with serious adverse outcomes. The quality of evidence for all these outcomes was high. Aspirin probably slightly increased the risk of postpartum haemorrhage of more than 500 mL, however, the quality of evidence for this outcome was downgraded to moderate, due to concerns of clinical heterogeneity in measurements of blood loss. Antiplatelet agents probably marginally increase placental abruption, but the quality of the evidence was downgraded to moderate due to low event numbers and thus wide 95% CI. Overall, antiplatelet agents improved outcomes, and at these doses appear to be safe. Identifying women who are most likely to respond to low-dose aspirin would improve targeting of treatment. As almost all the women in this review were recruited to the trials after 12 weeks' gestation, it is unclear whether starting treatment before 12 weeks' would have additional benefits without any increase in adverse effects. While there was some indication that higher doses of aspirin would be more effective, further studies would be warranted to examine this.

Molecular Targets of Aspirin and Prevention of Preeclampsia and Their Potential Association with Circulating Extracellular Vesicles during Pregnancy

Uncomplicated healthy pregnancy is the outcome of successful fertilization, implantation of embryos, trophoblast development and adequate placentation. Any deviation in these cascades of events may lead to complicated pregnancies such as preeclampsia (PE). The current incidence of PE is 2–8% in all pregnancies worldwide, leading to high maternal as well as perinatal mortality and morbidity rates. A number of randomized controlled clinical trials observed the association between low dose aspirin (LDA) treatment in early gestational age and significant reduction of early onset of PE in high-risk pregnant women. However, a substantial knowledge gap exists in identifying the particular mechanism of action of aspirin on placental function. It is already established that the placental-derived exosomes (PdE) are present in the maternal circulation from 6 weeks of gestation, and exosomes contain bioactive molecules such as proteins, lipids and RNA that are a “fingerprint” of their originating cells. Interestingly, levels of exosomes are higher in PE compared to normal pregnancies, and changes in the level of PdE during the first trimester may be used to classify women at risk for developing PE. The aim of this review is to discuss the mechanisms of action of LDA on placental and maternal physiological systems including the role of PdE in these phenomena. This review article will contribute to the in-depth understanding of LDA-induced PE prevention.

A pharmacokinetic assessment of optimal dosing, preparation, and chronotherapy of aspirin in pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The benefit of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia is well established; however, studies over the years have demonstrated variability in outcomes with its use. Potential contributing factors to this variation in efficacy include dosing, time of dosing, and preparation of aspirin.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the difference in pharmacokinetics of aspirin, through its major active metabolite, salicylic acid, in pregnant women and nonpregnant women, and to examine the effect of dose (100 mg vs 150 mg), preparation (enteric coated vs non-enteric-coated), and chronotherapy of aspirin (morning vs evening) between the 2 groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve high-risk pregnant women and 3 nonpregnant women were enrolled in this study. Pregnant women were in 1 of 4 groups (100 mg enteric coated, 100 mg non-enteric-coated, 150 mg non-enteric-coated morning dosing, and 150 mg non-enteric-coated evening dosing), whereas nonpregnant women undertook each of the 4 dosing schedules with at least a 30-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at baseline (before ingestion) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after ingestion of aspirin. Plasma obtained was analyzed for salicylic acid levels by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic values of area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours point of maximum concentration, time of maximum concentration, volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were analyzed for statistical significance with SPSS v25 software.

RESULTS

Pregnant women had a 40% ± 4% reduction in area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours (P < .01) and 29% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) with a 44% ± 8% increase in clearance (P < .01) in comparison to that in nonpregnant women when 100 mg aspirin was administered. The reduction in the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours, however, was minimized with the use of 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women, with which the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours was closer to that achieved with the use of 100 mg aspirin in nonpregnant women. There was a 4-hour delay (P < .01) in the time of maximum concentration, a 47% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) and a 48% ± 1% increase in volume of distribution (P < .01) with the use of 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin compared to non-enteric-coated aspirin, with no difference in the overall area under the curve. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of aspirin between morning and evening dosing.

CONCLUSION

There is a reduction in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin in pregnancy, and therefore a dose adjustment is potentially required in pregnant women. This is likely due to the altered pharmacokinetics of aspirin in pregnancy, with an increase in clearance. There was no difference in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin between enteric-coated and non-enteric-coated aspirin and between morning and evening dosing of aspirin. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to examine the clinical relevance of these pharmacokinetic findings.

Temporal effect of electroacupuncture on anxiety-like behaviors and c-Fos expression in the anterior cingulate cortex in a rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a psychiatric disease which leads to a series of anxiety-like behaviors. In this study, we investigated the temporal effects of electroacupuncture (EA) at acupoint ST36 on anxiety-like behaviors and the expression of c-Fos in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in a rat model of PTSD. PTSD was induced by a single prolonged stress procedure comprising three stages: restraint for 2 h, forced swim for 20 min, and pentobarbital sodium anesthesia. EA at acupoint ST36 was performed from 7:00-9:00 once a day for 7 consecutive days. Open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze (EPM) test were used to assess the success of the model and evaluate anxiety-like behaviors. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect Fos-positive nuclei in the ACC. We observed that EA performed from 7:00-9:00 was associated with significantly more time spent in the center area during the OFT and in the open arm during the EPM, as well as lower corticosterone response compared with that of regular EA (P < 0.05). PTSD rats expressed significantly less c-Fos in the ACC. Timed EA significantly increased c-Fos expression in the ACC. The effect of timed EA acting on PTSD rats was linked to altered neuronal activation in the ACC. Compared to regular EA, timed EA exhibited superior therapeutic effects by attenuating anxiety-like behaviors in PTSD rats. These results emphasize the association between temporal parameters of EA manipulation and acupuncture effects. Timed acupuncture therapy may be a novel therapeutic application in the treatment of PTSD.

Medicine in the Fourth Dimension

The importance of circadian biology has rarely been considered in pre-clinical studies, and even more when translating to the bedside. Circadian biology is becoming a critical factor for improving drug efficacy and diminishing drug toxicity. Indeed, there is emerging evidence showing that some drugs are more effective at nighttime than daytime, whereas for others it is the opposite. This suggests that the biology of the target cell will determine how an organ will respond to a drug at a specific time of the day, thus modulating pharmacodynamics. Thus, it is now time that circadian factors become an integral part of translational research.

Evidence-Based Prevention of Preeclampsia: Commonly Asked Questions in Clinical Practice

In this review, we discuss the recent literature regarding the prevention of preeclampsia and aim to answer common questions that arise in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women. Prescription of low-dose aspirin for high-risk patients has been shown to reduce the risk of preeclampsia (PE). A daily dose between 100 and 150 mg taken in the evening should be initiated prior to 16 weeks of gestation and can be continued until delivery. Calcium supplementation seems to be advantageous but currently it is only considered for patients with poor dietary intake and high risk for PE. Recent data about heparin are still conflicting, and therefore, heparin can currently not be recommended in the prevention of PE.

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention

Pre‐eclampsia (PE) is a multisystem disorder that typically affects 2%–5% of pregnant women and is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when the condition is of early onset. Globally, 76 000 women and 500 000 babies die each year from this disorder. Furthermore, women in low‐resource countries are at a higher risk of developing PE compared with those in high‐resource countries. Although a complete understanding of the pathogenesis of PE remains unclear, the current theory suggests a two‐stage process. The first stage is caused by shallow invasion of the trophoblast, resulting in inadequate remodeling of the spiral arteries. This is presumed to lead to the second stage, which involves the maternal response to endothelial dysfunction and imbalance between angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, resulting in the clinical features of the disorder. Accurate prediction and uniform prevention continue to elude us. The quest to effectively predict PE in the first trimester of pregnancy is fueled by the desire to identify women who are at high risk of developing PE, so that necessary measures can be initiated early enough to improve placentation and thus prevent or at least reduce the frequency of its occurrence. Furthermore, identification of an “at risk” group will allow tailored prenatal surveillance to anticipate and recognize the onset of the clinical syndrome and manage it promptly. PE has been previously defined as the onset of hypertension accompanied by significant proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. Recently, the definition of PE has been broadened. Now the internationally agreed definition of PE is the one proposed by the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). According to the ISSHP, PE is defined as systolic blood pressure at ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure at ≥90 mm Hg on at least two occasions measured 4 hours apart in previously normotensive women and is accompanied by one or more of the following new‐onset conditions at or after 20 weeks of gestation: 1.Proteinuria (i.e. ≥30 mg/mol protein:creatinine ratio; ≥300 mg/24 hour; or ≥2 + dipstick); 2.Evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction, including: acute kidney injury (creatinine ≥90 μmol/L; 1 mg/dL); liver involvement (elevated transaminases, e.g. alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >40 IU/L) with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain; neurological complications (e.g. eclampsia, altered mental status, blindness, stroke, clonus, severe headaches, and persistent visual scotomata); or hematological complications (thrombocytopenia–platelet count <150 000/μL, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolysis); or 3.Uteroplacental dysfunction (such as fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis, or stillbirth). It is well established that a number of maternal risk factors are associated with the development of PE: advanced maternal age; nulliparity; previous history of PE; short and long interpregnancy interval; use of assisted reproductive technologies; family history of PE; obesity; Afro‐Caribbean and South Asian racial origin; co‐morbid medical conditions including hyperglycemia in pregnancy; pre‐existing chronic hypertension; renal disease; and autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. These risk factors have been described by various professional organizations for the identification of women at risk of PE; however, this approach to screening is inadequate for effective prediction of PE. PE can be subclassified into: 1.Early‐onset PE (with delivery at <34+0 weeks of gestation); 2.Preterm PE (with delivery at <37+0 weeks of gestation); 3.Late‐onset PE (with delivery at ≥34+0 weeks of gestation); 4.Term PE (with delivery at ≥37+0 weeks of gestation). These subclassifications are not mutually exclusive. Early‐onset PE is associated with a much higher risk of short‐ and long‐term maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Obstetricians managing women with preterm PE are faced with the challenge of balancing the need to achieve fetal maturation in utero with the risks to the mother and fetus of continuing the pregnancy longer. These risks include progression to eclampsia, development of placental abruption and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, low platelet) syndrome. On the other hand, preterm delivery is associated with higher infant mortality rates and increased morbidity resulting from small for gestational age (SGA), thrombocytopenia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cerebral palsy, and an increased risk of various chronic diseases in adult life, particularly type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Women who have experienced PE may also face additional health problems in later life, as the condition is associated with an increased risk of death from future cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, renal impairment, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. The life expectancy of women who developed preterm PE is reduced on average by 10 years. There is also significant impact on the infants in the long term, such as increased risks of insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and hypertension in infants born to pre‐eclamptic women. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) brought together international experts to discuss and evaluate current knowledge on PE and develop a document to frame the issues and suggest key actions to address the health burden posed by PE. FIGO's objectives, as outlined in this document, are: (1) To raise awareness of the links between PE and poor maternal and perinatal outcomes, as well as to the future health risks to mother and offspring, and demand a clearly defined global health agenda to tackle this issue; and (2) To create a consensus document that provides guidance for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, and to disseminate and encourage its use. Based on high‐quality evidence, the document outlines current global standards for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, which is in line with FIGO good clinical practice advice on first trimester screening and prevention of pre‐eclampsia in singleton pregnancy.1 It provides both the best and the most pragmatic recommendations according to the level of acceptability, feasibility, and ease of implementation that have the potential to produce the most significant impact in different resource settings. Suggestions are provided for a variety of different regional and resource settings based on their financial, human, and infrastructure resources, as well as for research priorities to bridge the current knowledge and evidence gap. To deal with the issue of PE, FIGO recommends the following: Public health focus: There should be greater international attention given to PE and to the links between maternal health and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) on the Sustainable Developmental Goals agenda. Public health measures to increase awareness, access, affordability, and acceptance of preconception counselling, and prenatal and postnatal services for women of reproductive age should be prioritized. Greater efforts are required to raise awareness of the benefits of early prenatal visits targeted at reproductive‐aged women, particularly in low‐resource countries. Universal screening: All pregnant women should be screened for preterm PE during early pregnancy by the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors and biomarkers as a one‐step procedure. The risk calculator is available free of charge at https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia. FIGO encourages all countries and its member associations to adopt and promote strategies to ensure this. The best combined test is one that includes maternal risk factors, measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum placental growth factor (PLGF), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UTPI). Where it is not possible to measure PLGF and/or UTPI, the baseline screening test should be a combination of maternal risk factors with MAP, and not maternal risk factors alone. If maternal serum pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A) is measured for routine first‐trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies, the result can be included for PE risk assessment. Variations to the full combined test would lead to a reduction in the performance screening. A woman is considered high risk when the risk is 1 in 100 or more based on the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors, MAP, PLGF, and UTPI. Contingent screening: Where resources are limited, routine screening for preterm PE by maternal factors and MAP in all pregnancies and reserving measurements of PLGF and UTPI for a subgroup of the population (selected on the basis of the risk derived from screening by maternal factors and MAP) can be considered. Prophylactic measures: Following first‐trimester screening for preterm PE, women identified at high risk should receive aspirin prophylaxis commencing at 11–14+6 weeks of gestation at a dose of ~150 mg to be taken every night until 36 weeks of gestation, when delivery occurs, or when PE is diagnosed. Low‐dose aspirin should not be prescribed to all pregnant women. In women with low calcium intake (<800 mg/d), either calcium replacement (≤1 g elemental calcium/d) or calcium supplementation (1.5–2 g elemental calcium/d) may reduce the burden of both early‐ and late‐onset PE.

[Aspirin and preeclampsia]

Indications for aspirin during pregnancy are a matter of debate and there is a recent trend to an extended prescription and an overuse of aspirin in pregnancy. Aspirin is efficient in secondary prevention of preeclampsia essentially in patients with a personal history of preeclampsia. The effect of aspirin on platelet aggregation and on the TXA2/PGI2 balance is dose-dependent. The optimum dosage, from 75mg/day to 150mg/day, needs to be determined. Fetal safety data at 150mg/day are still limited. The efficacy of aspirin seems to be subject to a chronobiological effect. It is recommended to prescribe an evening or bedtime intake. Aspirin, in primary prevention of preeclampsia, given to high-risk patients identified in the first trimester by screening tests, seems to reduce the occurrence of early-onset preeclampsia. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data for the implementation of such screening procedures in practice.

Circadian disruption and human health: A bidirectional relationship

Circadian rhythm disorders have been classically associated with disorders of abnormal timing of the sleep-wake cycle, however circadian dysfunction can play a role in a wide range of pathology, ranging from the increased risk for cardiometabolic disease and malignancy in shift workers, prompting the need for a new field focused on the larger concept of circadian medicine. The relationship between circadian disruption and human health is bidirectional, with changes in circadian amplitude often preceding the classical symptoms of neurodegenerative disorders. As our understanding of the importance of circadian dysfunction in disease grows, we need to develop better clinical techniques for identifying circadian rhythms and also develop circadian based strategies for disease management. Overall this review highlights the need to bring the concept of time to all aspects of medicine, emphasizing circadian medicine as a prime example of both personalized and precision medicine.

The case for a chronobiological approach to neonatal care

Time of day is a critical factor for most biological functions, but concepts from the field of chronobiology have yet to be fully translated to clinical practice. Circadian rhythms, generated internally and synchronised to the external environment, promote function and support survival in almost every living species. Fetal circadian rhythms can be observed in utero from 30weeks gestation, coupled to the maternal rhythm, but synchronise to the external environment only after birth. Important cues for synchronisation include the light/dark cycle, the timing of feeding, and exposure to melatonin in breast milk. Disruption to these cues may occur during admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. This can impair the development of circadian rhythms, and influence survival and function in the neonatal period, with a potential to impact health and well-being throughout adult life. Here we outline the rationale and evidence to support a chronobiological approach to neonatal care.

Interactions between the Cyclooxygenase Metabolic Pathway and the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Systems: Their Effect on Cardiovascular Risk, from Theory to the Clinical Practice

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke are the most common and serious long-term complications of hypertension. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) significantly reduces their incidence and cardiovascular mortality. The RAAS activation plays an important role in pathogenesis of CVD, resulting in increased vascular resistance, proliferation of vascular-smooth-muscle-cells, and cardiac hypertrophy. Drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular events in population with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The cyclooxygenase inhibitors limit the beneficial effect of RAAS-inhibitors, which in turn may be important in subjects with hypertension, CAD, and congestive heart failure. These observations apply to most of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ASA at high doses. Nevertheless, there is no strong evidence confirming presence of similar effects of cardioprotective ASA doses. The benefit of combined therapy with low-doses of ASA is-in some cases-significantly higher than that of monotherapy. So far, the significance of ASA in optimizing the pharmacotherapy remains not fully established. A better understanding of its influence on the particular CVD should contribute to more precise identification of patients in whom benefits of ASA outweigh the complication risk. This brief review summarizes the data regarding usefulness and safety of the ASA combination with drugs acting directly on the RAAS.

Low dose aspirin for preventing fetal growth restriction: a randomised trial

The purpose of this study was to investigate when in pregnancy to stop the administration of low dose aspirin (150 mg/daily) so as to prevent fetal growth restriction (FGR) A randomised, placebo-controlled study was designed. The patients were all screened positive using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) early pregnancy screening test for preeclampsia (PE) and FGR prediction. One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled and divided equally into three groups: A – the controls who received placebo treatment; B – those who received aspirin till 32 weeks of gestation and C – those who received aspirin till 36 weeks of gestation. The mean gestational age at enrollment was similar for all the groups (12.4 weeks). The growth curves, fetal and maternal Doppler measurements and amniotic fluid index (AFI) were monitored every 4 weeks. Also, the outcome of the pregnancy was noted and all the results were compared between the groups. FGR was defined as a fetal weight below the 10th centile for gestational age. In group C, there were less cases of FGR compared with the other groups: 6% vs. 10% in group B vs. 24% in controls. Also, there was a significant birth weight improvement in this group with a median of 3180 g compared with 2950 g in group B and 2760 g in group A (P=0.01). The gestational age at delivery was similar in all the groups (39 weeks in group C/39.2 weeks in group B/38.6 weeks in group A). In conclusion, low dose aspirin improves the outcome in the selected population and should be offered for prevention of FGR from 12 to 36 weeks.

Bleeding complications and antithrombotic treatment in 264 pregnancies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of antithrombotic treatments prescribed during pregnancy in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods This international, multicenter study included two cohorts of patients: a retrospective French cohort and a prospective US cohort (PROMISSE study). Inclusion criteria were (1) APS (Sydney criteria), (2) live pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation (WG) with (3) follow-up data until six weeks post-partum. According to APS standard of care, patients were treated with aspirin and/or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic (pure obstetric APS) or therapeutic doses (history of thrombosis). Major bleeding was defined as abnormal blood loss during the pregnancy and/or post-partum period requiring intervention for hemostasis or transfusion, or during the peripartum period greater than 500 mL and/or requiring surgery or transfusion. Other bleeding events were classified as minor. Results Two hundred and sixty-four pregnancies (87 prospectively collected) in 204 patients were included (46% with history of thrombosis, 23% with associated systemic lupus). During pregnancy, treatment included LMWH ( n = 253; 96%) or low-dose aspirin ( n = 223; 84%), and 215 (81%) patients received both therapies. The live birth rate was 89% and 82% in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in 28% of the retrospective cohort and in 40% of the prospective cohort. No maternal death was observed in either cohort. A combined total of 45 hemorrhagic events (25%) occurred in the retrospective cohort, but major bleeding was reported in only six pregnancies (3%). Neither heparin nor aspirin alone nor combined therapy increased the risk of hemorrhage. We also did not observe an increased rate of bleeding in the case of a short interval between last LMWH (less than 24 hours) or aspirin (less than five days) doses and delivery. Only emergency Caesarean section was significantly associated with an increased risk of bleeding (odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (1.41-17.96); p=.016). In the prospective cohort, only one minor bleeding event was reported (vaginal bleeding). Conclusion Our findings support the safety of antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and/or LMWH during pregnancy in high-risk women with APS, and highlight the need for better treatments to improve pregnancy outcomes in APS. PROMISSE Study ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00198068.

Does the timing of aspirin administration influence its antiplatelet effect - review of literature on chronotherapy

This publication is a summary of the multidirectional effects of aspirin and its role in modern medicine. The history of aspirin, or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and its use dates back to ancient times, although the substance in its pure form has been produced and sold since 1899. Initially it was used for its antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory effects. Over the years many other benefits associated with the administration of ASA have been revealed. The mechanism of aspirin’s action was discovered thanks to the British pharmacologist and Nobel Prize winner Sir John Vane. Understanding the effects of acetylsalicylic acid, associated with the inhibition of cyclooxygenase and proinflammatory thromboxane A2 and with increased concentration of vasoprotective, antithrombotic prostacyclin, gave rise to the era of using small “cardiac” doses of ASA in cardiovascular diseases. In addition to the well-researched antiplatelet effect, other properties of ASA have been discovered, such as the non-COX-1 dependent improvement of endothelial function or the hypotensive effect after evening administration. According to the currently available knowledge, it is possible to speak of a pleiotropic effect of ASA and its use in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, taking into account its anti-aggregation effect, circadian rhythms, and the principles of chronotherapy.

Meta-analysis on the effect of aspirin use for prevention of preeclampsia on placental abruption and antepartum hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE DATA

Impaired placentation in the first 16 weeks of pregnancy is associated with increased risk of subsequent development of preeclampsia, birth of small-for-gestational-age neonates, and placental abruption. Previous studies reported that prophylactic use of aspirin reduces the risk of preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age neonates with no significant effect on placental abruption. However, meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that examined the effect of aspirin in relation to gestational age at onset of therapy and dosage of the drug reported that significant reduction in the risk of preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age neonates is achieved only if the onset of treatment is at ≤16 weeks of gestation and the daily dosage of the drug is ≥100 mg.

STUDY

We aimed to estimate the effect of aspirin on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage in relation to gestational age at onset of therapy and the dosage of the drug.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that evaluated the prophylactic effect of aspirin during pregnancy, we used PubMed, Cinhal, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library from 1985 to September 2017. Relative risks of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the use of random effect models. Analyses were stratified according to daily dose of aspirin (<100 and ≥100 mg) and the gestational age at the onset of therapy (≤16 and >16 weeks of gestation) and compared with the use of subgroup difference analysis.

RESULTS

The entry criteria were fulfilled by 20 studies on a combined total of 12,585 participants. Aspirin at a dose of <100 mg per day had no impact on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage, irrespective of whether it was initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-2.36) or at >16 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.39). At ≥100 mg per day, aspirin was not associated with a significant change on the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage, whether the treatment was initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.26), or at >16 weeks of gestation (relative risk, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-5.06), but the difference between the subgroups was significant (P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Aspirin at a daily dose of ≥100 mg for prevention of preeclampsia that is initiated at ≤16 weeks of gestation, rather than >16 weeks, may decrease the risk of placental abruption or antepartum hemorrhage.

Low-dose aspirin at ≤16 weeks of gestation for preventing preeclampsia and its maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of the present meta-analysis study was to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose aspirin, commenced at ≤16 weeks of gestation, in preventing preterm and term preeclampsia, as well as associated maternal and neonatal adverse events in women at risk of preeclampsia. The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Web of Science databases were searched for relevant random controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1979 and October 2017. After quality assessment and data extraction, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Outcomes of interest were preeclampsia with subgroups of preterm preeclampsia (delivery at <37 weeks) and term preeclampsia, as well as maternal adverse outcomes, including gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage and preterm birth, and neonatal adverse outcomes, including intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) or small for gestation age infant (SGA), stillbirth or death, and newborn weight. A total of 10 RCTs involving 3,168 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared with placebo or no treatment, low-dose aspirin was associated with a significant reduction in the overall risk ratio (RR) of preeclampsia regardless of the time to delivery [RR=0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.57-0.80]. This was apparent for preterm preeclampsia (RR=0.35; 95% CI=0.13-0.94) but not for term preeclampsia (RR=1.01; 95% CI=0.60-1.70). Except for postpartum hemorrhage, low-dose aspirin also significantly reduced the risk of maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. In conclusion, low-dose aspirin in women at risk of preeclampsia, commenced at ≤16 weeks of gestation, was associated with a reduced risk of preterm preeclampsia, and of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy

Small for gestational age is usually defined as an infant with a birthweight <10th centile for a population or customized standard. Fetal growth restriction refers to a fetus that has failed to reach its biological growth potential because of placental dysfunction. Small-for-gestational-age babies make up 28-45% of nonanomalous stillbirths, and have a higher chance of neurodevelopmental delay, childhood and adult obesity, and metabolic disease. The majority of small-for-gestational-age babies are not recognized before birth. Improved identification, accompanied by surveillance and timely delivery, is associated with reduction in small-for-gestational-age stillbirths. Internationally and regionally, detection of small for gestational age and management of fetal growth problems vary considerably. The aim of this review is to: summarize areas of consensus and controversy between recently published national guidelines on small for gestational age or fetal growth restriction; highlight any recent evidence that should be incorporated into existing guidelines; and identify future research priorities in this field. A search of MEDLINE, Google, and the International Guideline Library identified 6 national guidelines on management of pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction/small for gestational age published from 2010 onwards. There is general consensus between guidelines (at least 4 of 6 guidelines in agreement) in early pregnancy risk selection, and use of low-dose aspirin for women with major risk factors for placental insufficiency. All highlight the importance of smoking cessation to prevent small for gestational age. While there is consensus in recommending fundal height measurement in the third trimester, 3 specify the use of a customized growth chart, while 2 recommend McDonald rule. Routine third-trimester scanning is not recommended for small-for-gestational-age screening, while women with major risk factors should have serial scanning in the third trimester. Umbilical artery Doppler studies in suspected small-for-gestational-age pregnancies are universally advised, however there is inconsistency in the recommended frequency for growth scans after diagnosis of small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction (2-4 weekly). In late-onset fetal growth restriction (≥32 weeks) general consensus is to use cerebral Doppler studies to influence surveillance and/or delivery timing. Fetal surveillance methods (most recommend cardiotocography) and recommended timing of delivery vary. There is universal agreement on the use of corticosteroids before birth at <34 weeks, and general consensus on the use of magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection in early-onset fetal growth restriction (<32 weeks). Most guidelines advise using cardiotocography surveillance to plan delivery in fetal growth restriction <32 weeks. The recommended gestation at delivery for fetal growth restriction with absent and reversed end-diastolic velocity varies from 32 to ≥34 weeks and 30 to ≥34 weeks, respectively. Overall, where there is high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses, eg, use of umbilical artery Doppler and corticosteroids for delivery <34 weeks, there is a high degree of consistency between national small-for-gestational-age guidelines. This review discusses areas where there is potential for convergence between small-for-gestational-age guidelines based on existing randomized controlled trials of management of small-for-gestational-age pregnancies, and areas of controversy. Research priorities include assessing the utility of late third-trimester scanning to prevent major morbidity and mortality and to investigate the optimum timing of delivery in fetuses with late-onset fetal growth restriction and abnormal Doppler parameters. Prospective studies are needed to compare new international population ultrasound standards with those in current use.

The role of aspirin, heparin, and other interventions in the prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction and related placental pathologies such as preeclampsia, stillbirth, and placental abruption are believed to arise in early pregnancy when inadequate remodeling of the maternal spiral arteries leads to persistent high-resistance and low-flow uteroplacental circulation. The consequent placental ischaemia, reperfusion injury, and oxidative stress are associated with an imbalance in angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors. Many interventions have centered on the prevention and/or treatment of preeclampsia with results pertaining to fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age pregnancy often included as secondary outcomes because of the common pathophysiology. This renders the study findings less reliable for determining clinical significance. For the prevention of fetal growth restriction, a recent large-study level meta-analysis and individual patient data meta-analysis confirm that aspirin modestly reduces small-for-gestational-age pregnancy in women at high risk (relative risk, 0.90, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.00) and that a dose of ≥100 mg should be recommended and to start at or before 16 weeks of gestation. These findings support national clinical practice guidelines. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that low-molecular-weight heparin may prevent fetal growth restriction; however, evidence from randomized control trials is inconsistent. A meta-analysis of multicenter trial data does not demonstrate any positive preventative effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on a primary composite outcome of placenta-mediated complications including fetal growth restriction (18% vs 18%; absolute risk difference, 0.6%; 95% confidence interval, 10.4-9.2); use of low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of fetal growth restriction should remain in the research setting. There are even fewer treatment options once fetal growth restriction is diagnosed. At present the only management option if the risk of hypoxia, acidosis, and intrauterine death is high is iatrogenic preterm birth, with the use of peripartum maternal administration of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection and corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity, to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes. The pipeline of potential therapies use different strategies, many aiming to increase fetal growth by improving poor placentation and uterine blood flow. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors that potentiate nitric oxide availability such as sildenafil citrate have been extensively researched both in preclinical and clinical studies; results from the Sildenafil Therapy In Dismal Prognosis Early-Onset Intrauterine Growth Restriction consortium of randomized control clinical trials are keenly awaited. Targeting the uteroplacental circulation with novel therapeutics is another approach, the most advanced being maternal vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy, which is being translated into the clinic via the doEs Vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy safEly impRove outcome in seveRe Early-onset fetal growth reSTriction consortium. Other targeting approaches include nanoparticles and microRNAs to deliver drugs locally to the uterine arterial endothelium or trophoblast. In vitro and in vivo studies and animal models have demonstrated effects of nitric oxide donors, dietary nitrate, hydrogen sulphide donors, statins, and proton pump inhibitors on maternal blood pressure, uteroplacental resistance indices, and angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors. Data from human pregnancies and, in particular, pregnancies with fetal growth restriction remain very limited. Early research into melatonin, creatine, and N-acetyl cysteine supplementation in pregnancy suggests they may have potential as neuro- and cardioprotective agents in fetal growth restriction.

Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia

Aspirin is currently the most widely prescribed treatment in the prevention of cardiovascular complications. The indications for the use of aspirin during pregnancy are, however, the subject of much controversy. Since the first evidence of the obstetric efficacy of aspirin in 1985, numerous studies have tried to determine the effect of low-dose aspirin on the incidence of preeclampsia, with very controversial results. Large meta-analyses including individual patient data have demonstrated that aspirin is effective in preventing preeclampsia in high-risk patients, mainly those with a history of preeclampsia. However, guidelines regarding the usage of aspirin to prevent preeclampsia differ considerably from one country to another. Screening modalities, target population, and aspirin dosage are still a matter of debate. In this review, we report the pharmacodynamics of aspirin, its main effects according to dosage and gestational age, and the evidence-based indications for primary and secondary prevention of preeclampsia.

How important is aspirin adherence when evaluating effectiveness of low-dose aspirin?

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is advocated for women at high-risk of pre-eclampsia, providing a modest, 10%, reduction in risk. Cardiology meta-analyses demonstrate 18% reduction in serious vascular events with LDA. Non-responsiveness to aspirin (sometimes termed aspirin resistance) and variable clinical effectiveness are often attributed to suboptimal adherence. The aim of this review was to identify the scope of adherence assessments in RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness in cardiology and obstetrics and discuss the quality of information provided by current methods. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, limited to humans and English language, for RCTs evaluating aspirin in cardiology; 14/03/13-13/03/16 and pregnancy 1957-13/03/16. Search terms; 'aspirin', 'acetylsalicylic acid' appearing adjacent to 'myocardial infarction' or 'pregnancy', 'pregnant', 'obstetric' were used. 38% (25/68) of obstetric and 32% (20/62) of cardiology RCTs assessed aspirin adherence and 24% (6/25) and 29% (6/21) of obstetric and cardiology RCTs, respectively, defined acceptable adherence. Semi-quantitative methods (pill counts, medication weighing) prevailed in obstetric RCTs (93%), qualitative methods (interviews, questionnaires) were more frequent in obstetrics (67%). Two obstetric RCTs quantified serum thromboxane B₂ and salicylic acid, but no quantitative methods were used in cardiology Aspirin has proven efficacy, but suboptimal adherence is widespread and difficult to accurately quantify. Little is currently known about aspirin adherence in pregnancy. RCTs evaluating aspirin effectiveness show over-reliance on qualitative adherence assessments vulnerable to inherent inaccuracies. Reliable adherence data is important to assess and optimise the clinical effectiveness of LDA. We propose that adherence should be formally assessed in future trials and that development of quantitative assessments may prove valuable for trial protocols.

Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Preterm preeclampsia is an important cause of maternal and perinatal death and complications. It is uncertain whether the intake of low-dose aspirin during pregnancy reduces the risk of preterm preeclampsia.

METHODS

In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1776 women with singleton pregnancies who were at high risk for preterm preeclampsia to receive aspirin, at a dose of 150 mg per day, or placebo from 11 to 14 weeks of gestation until 36 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was delivery with preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation. The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

A total of 152 women withdrew consent during the trial, and 4 were lost to follow up, which left 798 participants in the aspirin group and 822 in the placebo group. Preterm preeclampsia occurred in 13 participants (1.6%) in the aspirin group, as compared with 35 (4.3%) in the placebo group (odds ratio in the aspirin group, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.74; P=0.004). Results were materially unchanged in a sensitivity analysis that took into account participants who had withdrawn or were lost to follow-up. Adherence was good, with a reported intake of 85% or more of the required number of tablets in 79.9% of the participants. There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with low-dose aspirin in women at high risk for preterm preeclampsia resulted in a lower incidence of this diagnosis than placebo. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program and the Fetal Medicine Foundation; EudraCT number, 2013-003778-29 ; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13633058 .).

The effect of low-dose aspirin on fetal weight of idiopathic asymmetrically intrauterine growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indices: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of aspirin on fetal weight in fetuses with idiopathic asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) complicated by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at Woman's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, between June 2016 and the January 2017 included 60 pregnant women (28-30 weeks) with idiopathic asymmetrical IUGR associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indices. Women were randomly assigned to group I (aspirin 75 mg) daily for four weeks or group II (no intervention). The primary outcome was the fetal weight after four weeks. Secondary outcomes included Doppler blood flow changes in the umbilical artery plus delivery and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

The estimated fetal weight and umbilical artery blood flow increased significantly in aspirin group (p = .00) when compared with no intervention group. As regard neonatal outcomes; aspirin group showed better results and encouraging outcomes (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin improves fetal weight and umbilical artery blood flow in idiopathic asymmetrical IUGR fetuses complicated by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler blood flow.

[For a targeted use of aspirin]

The use of low-dose aspirin in pregnancy should remain a highly targeted indication since its long-term safety has not been established and should be restricted to women at high risk of vascular complications. Indications for which the benefit of aspirin has been shown are women with a history of preeclampsia responsible for a premature birth before 34 weeks, those having at least two history of preeclampsia, those with an antiphospholipid syndrome and those with lupus associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies or renal failure. In all other cases, the level of evidence of the benefit of aspirin is insufficient to recommend its routine prescription.

The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction are major causes of perinatal death and handicap in survivors. Randomized clinical trials have reported that the risk of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction can be reduced by the prophylactic use of aspirin in high-risk women, but the appropriate dose of the drug to achieve this objective is not certain.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate the impact of aspirin dosage on the prevention of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of daily aspirin or placebo (or no treatment) during pregnancy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2015, and study bibliographies were reviewed. Authors were contacted to obtain additional data when needed. Relative risks for preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using random-effect models. Dose-response effect was evaluated using meta-regression and reported as adjusted R². Analyses were stratified according to gestational age at initiation of aspirin (≤16 and >16 weeks) and repeated after exclusion of studies at high risk of biases.

RESULTS

In all, 45 randomized controlled trials included a total of 20,909 pregnant women randomized to between 50-150 mg of aspirin daily. When aspirin was initiated at ≤16 weeks, there was a significant reduction and a dose-response effect for the prevention of preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.75; P < .001; R², 44%; P = .036), severe preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.83; P = .009; R², 100%; P = .008), and fetal growth restriction (relative risk, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.70; P < .001; R², 100%; P = .044) with higher dosages of aspirin being associated with greater reduction of the 3 outcomes. Similar results were observed after the exclusion of studies at high risk of biases. When aspirin was initiated at >16 weeks, there was a smaller reduction of preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.99; P = .04) without relationship with aspirin dosage (R², 0%; P = .941). Aspirin initiated at >16 weeks was not associated with a risk reduction or a dose-response effect for severe preeclampsia (relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.14; P = .28; R², 0%; P = .838) and fetal growth restriction (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.05; P = .34; R², not available; P = .563).

CONCLUSION

Prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction using aspirin in early pregnancy is associated with a dose-response effect. Low-dose aspirin initiated at >16 weeks' gestation has a modest or no impact on the risk of preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. Women at high risk for those outcomes should be identified in early pregnancy.

Perspectives, preferences and needs regarding early prediction of preeclampsia in Dutch pregnant women: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

To improve early risk-identification in pregnancy, research on prediction models for common pregnancy complications is ongoing. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to explore pregnant women's perceptions, preferences and needs regarding prediction models for first trimester screening for common pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, to support future implementation.

METHOD

Ten focus groups (of which five with primiparous and five with multiparous women) were conducted (n = 45). Six focus groups were conducted in urban regions and four in rural regions. All focus group discussions were audio taped and NVIVO was used in order to facilitate the thematic analysis conducted by the researchers.

RESULTS

Women in this study had a positive attitude towards first trimester screening for preeclampsia using prediction models. Reassurance when determined as low-risk was a major need for using the test. Self-monitoring, early recognition and intensive monitoring were considered benefits of using prediction models in case of a high-risk. Women acknowledged that high-risk determination could cause (unnecessary) anxiety, but it was expected that personal and professional interventions would level out this anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Women in this study had positive attitudes towards preeclampsia screening. Self-monitoring, together with increased alertness of healthcare professionals, would enable them to take active actions to improve pregnancy outcomes. This attitude enhances the opportunities for prevention, early recognition and treatment of preeclampsia and probably other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin and omega 3 in treatment of asymmetrically intrauterine growth restriction: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To test the effect of aspirin and omega 3 on fetal weight as well as feto-maternal blood flow in asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a clinically registered (NCT02696577), open, parallel, randomized controlled trial, conducted at Assiut Woman's Health Hospital, Egypt including 80 pregnant women (28-30 weeks) with IUGR. They were randomized either to group I: aspirin or group II: aspirin plus omega 3. The primary outcome was the fetal weight after 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included Doppler blood flow changes in both uterine and umbilical arteries, birth weight, time and method of delivery and admission to NICU. The outcome variables were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

The estimated fetal weight increased significant in group II more than group I (p=0.00). The uterine and umbilical arteries blood flow increased significantly in group II (p<0.05). The birth weight in group II was higher than that observed in group I (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The using of aspirin with omega 3 is more effective than using aspirin only in increasing fetal weight and improving utero-placental blood flow in IUGR.

Effect of a small dose of aspirin on quantitative test of 24-h urinary protein in patients with hypertension in pregnancy

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a small dose of aspirin on a quantitative test of 24-h urinary protein in patients with hypertension in pregnancy. In total, 224 patients with hypertension in pregnancy were continuously selected and were randomly divided into the control group (50 cases with conventional therapy), aspirin 50 mg/day group (60 cases), aspirin 75 mg/day group (58 cases), and aspirin 100 mg/day group (56 cases). Clinical effects were compared from 16 gestational weeks to childbirth. According to the comparison in the four groups, there was no statistical difference in the mean arterial pressure, pre-eclampsia rate, gestational weeks, and caesarean section rate (p>0.05). The 24-h urinary protein and endothelin-1 (ET-1) level were significantly decreased following treatment, and were less than the control and 50 mg/day groups. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) level was significantly increased, and higher than the control and 50 mg/day groups. In terms of the 75 and 100 mg/day, control and 50 mg/day groups, there was no statistical difference (p>0.05). A comparison of the complication rate in the four groups of fetuses during the perinatal period, no statistical difference was observed (p>0.05). Thus, the results show that, regarding patients with hypertension in pregnancy, 75 mg/day aspirin can decrease the 24-h urinary protein, SOD, and ET-1 level. However, the results remain to be confirmed to improve maternal and infant outcome in delivery.