51
|
Huddlestone L, Turner J, Eborall H, Hudson N, Davies M, Martin G. Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:52. [PMID: 32178624 PMCID: PMC7075013 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01107-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) provides a framework to understand how interventions are implemented, embedded, and integrated in healthcare settings. Previous reviews of published literature have examined the application of NPT across international healthcare and reports its benefits. However, given the distinctive clinical function, organisational arrangements and the increasing management of people with a wide variety of conditions in primary care settings in the United Kingdom, it is important to understand how and why authors utilise and reflect on NPT in such settings to inform and evaluate implementation processes. Methods A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature using NPT in primary care settings in the United Kingdom (UK) was conducted. Eight electronic databases were searched using replicable methods to identify articles published between January 2012 and April 2018. Data were analysed using a framework approach. Results Thirty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Researchers utilised NPT to explore the implementation of interventions, targeting a wide range of health services and conditions, within primary care settings in the UK. NPT was mostly applied qualitatively; however, a small number of researchers have moved towards mixed and quantitative methods. Some variation was observed in the use of NPT constructs and sub-constructs, and whether and how researchers undertook modification to make them more relevant to the implementation process and multiple stakeholder perspectives. Conclusion NPT provides a flexible framework for the development and evaluation of complex healthcare interventions in UK primary care settings. This review updates the literature on NPT use and indicates that its application is well suited to these environments, particularly in supporting patients with long-term conditions and co-morbidities. We recommend future research explores the receipt of interventions by multiple stakeholders and suggest that authors reflect on justifications for using NPT in their reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Huddlestone
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Jessica Turner
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Hawthorn Building, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Helen Eborall
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Nicky Hudson
- School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Hawthorn Building, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
| | - Melanie Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, Affiliated with the Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Graham Martin
- The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute), University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Clifford Allbutt Building, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Kumpunen S, Edwards N, Georghiou T, Hughes G. Why do evaluations of integrated care not produce the results we expect? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2053434520909089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A number of evaluations of models of integrated care have not produced the expected result of reduced hospital admissions, and in some cases have even found people receiving integrated care services using hospitals more than matched controls. We tested three hypotheses for these surprising results with a group of 50 integrated care experts in a seminar: (1) problems with the model; (2) problems of implementation; and (3) problems of evaluation. Our group of experts did not rule out any of these hypotheses and came up with some advice as to manage these issues. For example, model designers should rigorously test the underlying logic; commissioners should seek out advice from experts and patients/professionals; and evaluators should choose outcomes wisely, use mixed methods approaches, and provide regular feedback loops to implementation sites. Evaluating integrated care is a skilled task that requires multiple approaches in terms of the design and implementation of the models. National research funders or other appropriate bodies might consider developing an advisory service to provide support to local systems planning evaluations.
Collapse
|
53
|
Mitchell S, Malanda B, Damasceno A, Eckel RH, Gaita D, Kotseva K, Januzzi JL, Mensah G, Plutzky J, Prystupiuk M, Ryden L, Thierer J, Virani SS, Sperling L. A Roadmap on the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Among People Living With Diabetes. Glob Heart 2020; 14:215-240. [PMID: 31451236 DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Belma Malanda
- International Diabetes Federation, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Robert H Eckel
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, and Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Dan Gaita
- Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Victor Babes, Institutul de Boli Cardiovasculare, Clinica de Recuperare Cardiovasculara, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Kornelia Kotseva
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Prevention and Cardiovascular Health, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - James L Januzzi
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George Mensah
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jorge Plutzky
- Preventive Cardiology, Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Shapiro Cardiovascular Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maksym Prystupiuk
- Department of Surgery №2, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Lars Ryden
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jorge Thierer
- Unidad de Insuficiencia Cardíaca, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigación Clínica CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Salim S Virani
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Sections, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laurence Sperling
- Emory Heart Disease Prevention Center, Department of Global Health Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Bligaard Madsen S, Burau V. Relational coordination in inter-organizational settings. How does lack of proximity affect coordination between hospital-based and community-based healthcare providers? J Interprof Care 2020; 35:136-139. [PMID: 32013663 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1712332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Coordination among healthcare providers in intra- and inter-organizational networks is critical for the provision of seamless and efficient healthcare. Relational Coordination (RC) represents a type of coordination that enables network participants to manage interdependencies and has consistently been found to improve quality and efficiency of patient care. The majority of RC studies focuses on intra-organizational settings, while less is known about inter-organizational settings. This pilot study examined RC in relation to a collaboration between a hospital-based geriatric team and a community-based acute care team. The study focused especially on how structural challenges due to lack of technological, geographical and organizational proximity between the healthcare providers affected RC, drawing on literature on inter-organizational collaboration. We adopted a qualitative case design to gain an in-depth understanding of barriers and facilitators of interprofessional RC. Data included seven qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals and managers across the two provider teams and 16 hours of participant observations. Findings suggested that core tasks were coordinated through strong RC, while RC in non-core tasks were systematically hindered by structural challenges of the inter-organizational setting. Findings also indicated that RC in core tasks was partly dependent on formal coordination mechanisms to overcome frictions in inter-organizational structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Viola Burau
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Political Science, Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Austin T, Chreim S, Grudniewicz A. Examining health care providers' and middle-level managers' readiness for change: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:47. [PMID: 31952525 PMCID: PMC6969476 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4897-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Readiness is a critical precursor of successful change; it denotes whether those involved in the change are motivated and empowered to participate in the change. Research on readiness tends to focus on frontline providers or individuals in non-managerial positions and offers limited attention to individuals in middle management positions who are expected to lead frontline providers in change implementation. Yet middle-level managers are also recipients of changes that are planned and decreed by those in higher positions. This study sought to examine both frontline provider and middle manager readiness for change in the context of primary care program integration. Methods Using a qualitative case study approach, we examined how frontline providers and middle managers experienced six readiness factors: discrepancy, appropriateness, valence, efficacy, fairness and trust in management. Data were collected through documents, meeting observation and semi-structured interviews with frontline providers and middle managers involved in the change. Results The findings highlighted similarities and differences in readiness experiences of frontline providers and middle managers. Across both types of participants, we found that the notion of valence should be expanded to consider individuals’ evaluation of benefits to patients and the health system; efficacy applies to both content and process of change; fairness and trust in management findings require further exploration to determine their appropriateness to be incorporated in models of readiness for change; and trust in management (or lack of trust) has a cascading influence across the levels in the organization. Conclusions Our study makes a contribution by nuancing and extending conceptualizations of individual readiness factors, and by highlighting the central role of middle manager readiness for change. Implications of the study include the need to consider readiness factors prior to the implementation of change and the importance of fostering readiness throughout all levels of the organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tujuanna Austin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Samia Chreim
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada.
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Chambers D, Cantrell A, Booth A. Implementation of interventions to reduce preventable hospital admissions for cardiovascular or respiratory conditions: an evidence map and realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundIn 2012, a series of systematic reviews summarised the evidence regarding interventions to reduce preventable hospital admissions. Although intervention effects were dependent on context, the reviews revealed a consistent picture of reduction across different interventions targeting cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. The research reported here sought to provide an in-depth understanding of how interventions that have been shown to reduce admissions for these conditions may work, with a view to supporting their effective implementation in practice.ObjectivesTo map the available evidence on interventions used in the UK NHS to reduce preventable admissions for cardiovascular and respiratory conditions and to conduct a realist synthesis of implementation evidence related to these interventions.MethodsFor the mapping review, six databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and October 2017. Studies were included if they were conducted in the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia or New Zealand; recruited adults with a cardiovascular or respiratory condition; and evaluated or described an intervention that could reduce preventable admissions or re-admissions. A descriptive summary of key characteristics of the included studies was produced. The studies included in the mapping review helped to inform the sampling frame for the subsequent realist synthesis. The wider evidence base was also engaged through supplementary searching. Data extraction forms were developed using appropriate frameworks (an implementation framework, an intervention template and a realist logic template). Following identification of initial programme theories (from the theoretical literature, empirical studies and insights from the patient and public involvement group), the review team extracted data into evidence tables. Programme theories were examined against the individual intervention types and collectively as a set. The resultant hypotheses functioned as synthesised statements around which an explanatory narrative referenced to the underpinning evidence base was developed. Additional searches for mid-range and overarching theories were carried out using Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA).ResultsA total of 569 publications were included in the mapping review. The largest group originated from the USA. The included studies from the UK showed a similar distribution to that of the map as a whole, but there was evidence of some country-specific features, such as the prominence of studies of telehealth. In the realist synthesis, it was found that interventions with strong evidence of effectiveness overall had not necessarily demonstrated effectiveness in UK settings. This could be a barrier to using these interventions in the NHS. Facilitation of the implementation of interventions was often not reported or inadequately reported. Many of the interventions were diverse in the ways in which they were delivered. There was also considerable overlap in the content of interventions. The role of specialist nurses was highlighted in several studies. The five programme theories identified were supported to varying degrees by empirical literature, but all provided valuable insights.LimitationsThe research was conducted by a small team; time and resources limited the team’s ability to consult with a full range of stakeholders.ConclusionsOverall, implementation appears to be favoured by support for self-management by patients and their families/carers, support for services that signpost patients to consider alternatives to seeing their general practitioner when appropriate, recognition of possible reasons why patients seek admission, support for health-care professionals to diagnose and refer patients appropriately and support for workforce roles that promote continuity of care and co-ordination between services.Future workResearch should focus on understanding discrepancies between national and international evidence and the transferability of findings between different contexts; the design and evaluation of implementation strategies informed by theories about how the intervention being implemented might work; and qualitative research on decision-making around hospital referrals and admissions.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Chambers
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anna Cantrell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
McGeechan GJ, Giles EL, Scott S, McGovern R, Boniface S, Ramsay A, Sumnall H, Newbury-Birch D, Kaner E. A qualitative exploration of school-based staff's experiences of delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high school setting: findings from the SIPS JR-HIGH trial. J Public Health (Oxf) 2019; 41:821-829. [PMID: 30371806 PMCID: PMC6923514 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whilst underage drinking in the UK has been declining in recent years, prevalence is still higher than in most other Western European countries. Therefore, it is important to deliver effective interventions to reduce risk of harm. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with staff delivering an alcohol screening and brief intervention in the high-school setting. The analysis was informed by normalization process theory (NPT), interviews were open coded and then a framework applied based on the four components of NPT. RESULTS Five major themes emerged from the analysis. The majority of participants felt that the intervention could be useful, and that learning mentors were ideally suited to deliver it. However, there was a feeling that the intervention should have been targeted at young people who drink the most. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was generally well received in schools and seen as an effective tool for engaging young people in a discussion around alcohol. However, in the future schools need to consider the level of staffing in place to deliver the intervention. Furthermore, the intervention could focus more on the long-term risks of initiating alcohol consumption at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J McGeechan
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
| | - E L Giles
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
| | - S Scott
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
| | - R McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4AX, UK
| | - S Boniface
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - A Ramsay
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - H Sumnall
- Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK
| | - D Newbury-Birch
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
| | - E Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4AX, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Fares J, Chung KSK, Passey M, Longman J, Valentijn PP. Exploring the psychometric properties of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care measurement tool for care providers in Australia. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027920. [PMID: 31857296 PMCID: PMC6937055 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the reliability and validity of a shortened version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC) measurement tool (MT). The original version of the measurement tool has been modified (shortened) for the Australian context. DESIGN Validation of the psychometric properties of the RMIC-MT. SETTING Healthcare providers providing services to a geographically defined rural area in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. PARTICIPANTS A sample of 56 healthcare providers providing mental and physical healthcare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The psychometric properties of the tool were tested using principal component analysis for validity and Cronbach's alpha for reliability. RESULTS The tool was shown to have good validity and reliability. The 35 items used in the shortened version of the tool were reduced to 29 items grouped into four dimensions: community-governance orientation, normative integration, functional integration and clinical-professional coordination. CONCLUSIONS The shortened version of the RMIC-MT is a valid and reliable tool that evaluates integrated care from a healthcare provider's perspective in NSW, Australia. In order to assess the tool's appropriateness in an international context, future studies should focus on validating the tool in other healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Fares
- Engineering and Information Technologies, Project Management Program, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kon Shing Kenneth Chung
- Engineering and Information Technologies, Project Management Program, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Passey
- University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jo Longman
- University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pim P Valentijn
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Integrated Care Evaluation, Essenburgh, Hierden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Holding E, Blank L, Crowder M, Goyder E. Bridging the gap between the home and the hospital: a qualitative study of partnership working across housing, health and social care. J Interprof Care 2019; 34:493-499. [PMID: 31821055 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1694496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Rising demand and financial challenges facing public services have increased the impetus for greater integration across housing, health and social care. To provide insight into the benefits and challenges of partnership, we interviewed 37 housing professionals and held a validation workshop with eight external agencies working within a new, integrated housing service in the United Kingdom. The strength of the initiative rests on the capacity of neighborhood officers to conduct home visits and refer tenants to support agencies. Yet this strength poses problems in partnership building because increased referrals threaten to overwhelm already stretched health services. Despite broadly supporting the initiative, officers expressed concern over losing specialist housing knowledge whilst filling in gaps for services. Tensions over professional role boundaries between officers and social workers, poor communication, lack of capacity in external agencies and difficulties in sharing information were identified as barriers to partnership. Whilst capacity issues were acknowledged, partner agencies welcomed the initiative and called for joint meetings and colocation of services. Lack of capacity of external agencies to respond to referrals threatens integrated housing and health initiatives. Greater interprofessional collaboration and further investment across the system is required to increase capacity and ensure referrals are translated into healthcare outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Holding
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
| | - Lindsay Blank
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
| | - Mary Crowder
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goyder
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Kates N, Arroll B, Currie E, Hanlon C, Gask L, Klasen H, Meadows G, Rukundo G, Sunderji N, Ruud T, Williams M. Improving collaboration between primary care and mental health services. World J Biol Psychiatry 2019; 20:748-765. [PMID: 29722600 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2018.1471218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Previous guidelines and planning documents have identified the key role primary care providers play in delivering mental health care, including the recommendation from the WHO that meeting the mental health needs of the population in many low and middle income countries will only be achieved through greater integration of mental health services within general medical settings. This position paper aims to build upon this work and present a global framework for enhancing mental health care delivered within primary care.Methods: This paper synthesizes previous guidelines, empirical data from the literature and experiences of the authors in varied clinical settings to identify core principles and the key elements of successful collaboration, and organizes these into practical guidelines that can be adapted to any setting.Results: The paper proposes a three-step approach. The first is mental health services that any primary care provider can deliver with or without the presence of a mental health professional. Second is practical ways that effective collaboration can enhance this care. The third looks at wider system changes required to support these new roles and how better collaboration can lead to new responses to respond to challenges facing all mental health systems.Conclusions: This simple framework can be applied in any jurisdiction or country to enhance the detection, treatment, and prevention of mental health problems, reinforcing the role of the primary care provider in delivering care and showing how collaborative care can lead to better outcomes for people with mental health and addiction problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Kates
- Department of Psychiatry, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bruce Arroll
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Linda Gask
- Department of Psychiatry, Manchester University, Manchester, UK
| | - Henrikje Klasen
- Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Graham Meadows
- Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Godfrey Rukundo
- Department of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Nadiya Sunderji
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Torleif Ruud
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mark Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Multiple Perspectives Analysis of the Implementation of an Integrated Care Model for Older Adults in Quebec. Int J Integr Care 2019; 19:6. [PMID: 31798357 PMCID: PMC6857522 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Integrated care models for older adults are increasingly utilised in healthcare systems to overcome fragmentations. Several groups of stakeholders are involved in the implementation of integrated care. The aim of this study is to identify the main concerns, convergences and divergences in perspectives of stakeholders involved in the implementation of a centralised system-wide integrated care model for older adults in Quebec. Theory and methods: Qualitative multiple-case study. Semi-structured interviews of key stakeholders: policymakers (n = 11), providers (n = 29), managers (n = 34), older adult patients (n = 14) and caregivers (n = 9), including document analysis. Thematic analysis of the views of stakeholders along the lines of the six dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Results: While patients/caregivers were mostly concerned by their unmet individual needs, policymakers, managers and providers were concerned by structural barriers to integrating care. Stakeholders’ diverse perspectives indicated implementation gaps in a top-down implementation context. Conclusion: Mandated system-wide integration appears to have structural, organizational, functional, and normative transformations, but its clinical changes are more uncertain in view of the observed divergent perspectives of actors. It will be interesting to explore if the systemic changes are precursors of clinical changes or, on the contrary, explains the lack of clinical changes.
Collapse
|
62
|
Exploring improvement plans of fourteen European integrated care sites for older people with complex needs. Health Policy 2019; 123:1135-1154. [PMID: 31615623 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Integrated care programmes are increasingly being put in place to provide care to older people living at home. However, knowledge about further improving integrated care is limited. In fourteen integrated care sites in Europe, plans to improve existing ways of working were designed, implemented and evaluated to enlarge the understanding of what works and with what outcomes when improving integrated care. This paper provides insight into the existing ways that the sites were working with respect to integrated care, their perceived difficulties and their plans for working towards improvement. The seven components of the Expanded Chronic Care Model provided a conceptual framework for describing the fourteen sites. Although sites were spread across Europe and differed in basic characteristics and existing ways of working, a number of difficulties in delivering integrated care were similar. Existing ways of working and improvement plans mostly focused on three components of the Expanded Chronic Care Model: delivery system design; decision support; self-management. Two components were represented less frequently in existing ways of working and improvement plans: building healthy public policy; building community capacity. These findings suggest that broadly-based prevention efforts, population health promotion and community involvement remain limited. From the Expanded Chronic Care Model perspective, therefore, opportunities for improving integrated care outcomes may continue to be restricted by the narrow focus of developed improvement plans.
Collapse
|
63
|
Harlock J, Caiels J, Marczak J, Peters M, Fitzpatrick R, Wistow G, Forder J, Jones K. Challenges in integrating health and social care: the Better Care Fund in England. J Health Serv Res Policy 2019; 25:86-93. [DOI: 10.1177/1355819619869745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The Better Care Fund is the first and only national policy in England that has legally mandated the use of pooled budgets to support local health and social care systems to provide better integrated care. Methods We report qualitative findings from the first national multi-method evaluation of the Better Care Fund, focusing on its implementation, perceptions of progress and expected impacts among key stakeholders. Interviews were carried out with 40 staff responsible for Better Care Fund implementation in 16 local health and social care sites between 2017 and 2018. Results Study participants reported their experiences of implementation, and we present these in relation to three themes: organizational issues, relational issues and wider contextual issues. Participants stressed the practical and political challenges of managing pooled budgets and the complexity of working across geographical boundaries. In a context of unprecedented austerity, shared vision and strong leadership were even more vital to achieve collaborative outcomes. Conclusion Pooling budgets through the Better Care Fund can lever closer collaboration between sectors and services. Shared vision and leadership are essential to develop and foster this closer collaboration. Although some successes were reported, the study highlights that there are major cultural, operational and territorial barriers to overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Harlock
- Senior Research Fellow, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK
| | - James Caiels
- Research Fellow, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, UK
| | - Joanna Marczak
- Researcher, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
| | - Michele Peters
- Associate Professor, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Raymond Fitzpatrick
- Professor of Public Health and Primary Care, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Gerald Wistow
- Professorial Research Fellow, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
| | | | - Karen Jones
- Professor of the Economics of Social Policy, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Naqvi D, Malik A, Al-Zubaidy M, Naqvi F, Tahir A, Tarfiee A, Vara S, Meyer E. The general practice perspective on barriers to integration between primary and social care: a London, United Kingdom-based qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029702. [PMID: 31434776 PMCID: PMC6707672 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is an ongoing challenge of effective integration between primary and social care in the United Kingdom; current systems have led to fragmentation of services preventing holistic patient-centred care for vulnerable populations. To improve clinical outcomes and achieve financial efficiencies, the barriers to integration need to be identified and addressed. This study aims to explore the unique perspectives of frontline staff (general practitioners and practice managers) towards these barriers to integration. DESIGN Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and thematic analysis to obtain results. SETTING General practices within London. PARTICIPANTS 18 general practitioners (GPs) and 7 practice managers (PMs) based in London with experience of working with social care. RESULTS The study identified three overarching themes where frontline staff believed problems exist: accessing social services, interprofessional relationships and infrastructure. Issues with contacting staff from other sectors creates delays in referrals for patient care and perpetuates existing logistical challenges. Likewise, professionals noted a hostile working culture between sectors that has resulted in silo working mentalities. In addition to staff being overworked as well as often inefficient multidisciplinary team meetings, poor relationships across sectors cause a diffusion of responsibility, impacting the speed with which patient requests are responded to. Furthermore, participants identified that a lack of interoperability between information systems, lack of pooled budgets and misaligned incentives between managerial staff compound the infrastructural divide between both sectors. CONCLUSION In this study, primary care staff identify intangible barriers to integration such as poor interprofessional relationships, in addition to more well-described structural issues such as insufficient funding and difficulty accessing social care. Participants believe that educating the next generation of medical professionals may lead to the development of collaborative, instead of siloed, working cultures and that change is needed at both an interpersonal and institutional level to successfully integrate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Edgar Meyer
- Imperial College Business School, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Harnett PJ, Kennelly S, Williams P. A 10 Step Framework to Implement Integrated Care for Older Persons. AGEING INTERNATIONAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12126-019-09349-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
66
|
Pescheny JV, Gunn LH, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. The impact of the Luton social prescribing programme on energy expenditure: a quantitative before-and-after study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026862. [PMID: 31209089 PMCID: PMC6588998 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the change in energy expenditure levels of service users after participation in the Luton social prescribing programme. DESIGN Uncontrolled before-and-after study. SETTING This study was set in the East of England (Luton). PARTICIPANTS Service users with complete covariate information and baseline measurements (n=146) were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION Social prescribing, which is an initiative that aims to link patients in primary care with sources of support within the community sector to improve their health, well-being and care experience. Service users were referred to 12 sessions (free of charge), usually provided by third sector organisations. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Energy expenditure measured as metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week. RESULTS Using a Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial model to account for a large number of observed zeros in the data, 95% posterior intervals show that energy expenditure from all levels of physical activities increased post intervention (walking 41.7% (40.31%, 43.11%); moderate 5.0% (2.94%, 7.09%); vigorous 107.3% (98.19%, 116.20%) and total 56.3% (54.77%, 57.69%)). The probability of engaging in physical activity post intervention increased, in three of four MET physical activity levels, for those individuals who were inactive at the start of the programme. Age has a negative effect on energy expenditure from any physical activity level. Similarly, working status has a negative effect on energy expenditure in all but one MET physical activity level. No consistent pattern was observed across physical activity levels in the association between gender and energy expenditure. CONCLUSION This study shows that social prescribing may have the potential to increase the physical activity levels of service users and promote the uptake of physical activity in inactive patient groups. Results of this study can inform future research in the field, which could be of use for commissioners and policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura H Gunn
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Giles EL, McGeechan GJ, Coulton S, Deluca P, Drummond C, Howel D, Kaner E, McColl E, McGovern R, Scott S, Stamp E, Sumnall H, Todd L, Vale L, Albani V, Boniface S, Ferguson J, Gilvarry E, Hendrie N, Howe N, Mossop H, Ramsay A, Stanley G, Newbury-Birch D. Brief alcohol intervention for risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in secondary schools: the SIPS JR-HIGH RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/phr07090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Adverse effects from young people’s alcohol consumption manifest in a range of physical and psychosocial factors, including neurological issues, cognitive impairment and risk-taking behaviours. The SIPS JR-HIGH pilot trial showed alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) to be acceptable to young people and schools in the north-east of England.
Objectives
To conduct a two-arm, individually randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ASBI for risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in the school setting, to monitor the fidelity of ASBI and to explore the barriers to, and facilitators of, implementation with staff, young people and parents.
Design
A baseline survey with a 12-month follow-up. Interviews with 30 school staff, 21 learning mentors and nine teachers, and 33 young people and two parents.
Setting
Thirty state schools in four areas of England: north-east, north-west, Kent and London.
Participants
Year 10 school pupils who consented to the study (aged 14–15 years, recruited between November 2015 and June 2016), school-based staff and parents of the young people who took part in the study.
Interventions
Young people who screened positively on a single alcohol screening question and consented were randomised to the intervention or control arm (blinded). The intervention was a 30-minute one-to-one structured brief intervention with a trained learning mentor and an alcohol leaflet. The control group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet (no alcohol information).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was total alcohol consumed in the last 28 days. Secondary outcomes related to risky drinking, general psychological health, sexual risk-taking, energy drink consumption, age of first smoking, quality of life, quality-adjusted life-years, service utilisation and demographic information.
Results
A total of 4523 young people completed the baseline survey, with 1064 screening positively (24%) and 443 being eligible to take part in the trial. Of those 443, 233 (53%) were randomised to the control arm and 210 were randomised to the intervention arm. Of the 443, 374 (84%) were successfully followed up at 12 months (intervention, n = 178; control, n = 196). The results were that the intervention showed no evidence of benefit for any alcohol-related measure when compared with the control arm. At 12 months we found a reduction from 61.9% to 43.3% using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test cut-off point of 8 and cut-off point of 4 (69.0% to 60.7%). These results were not significant. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the average net cost saving of the brief intervention was £2865 (95% confidence interval –£11,272 to £2707) per year compared with usual practice, with the intervention showing a 76% probability of being cost saving compared with usual practice. The interview findings showed that school was an acceptable setting to carry out ASBI among staff and young people.
Limitations
Recruitment of parents to take part in interviews was poor. Only 18 ASBI sessions were recorded, making it difficult to assess internal validity.
Conclusions
Although the intervention was ineffective in reducing risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 years, it was well received by the young people and school staff who participated.
Future work
Uniform reporting of the outcomes used for ASBI would generate more robust conclusions on the effectiveness of ASBI in the future. Pilot feasibility studies should include more than one geographical area. Future work on involving parents is needed.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN45691494.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Giles
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Grant J McGeechan
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Paolo Deluca
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Denise Howel
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ruth McGovern
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephanie Scott
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Elaine Stamp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Harry Sumnall
- Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Liz Todd
- School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Viviana Albani
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sadie Boniface
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Ferguson
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Eilish Gilvarry
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nadine Hendrie
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Nicola Howe
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen Mossop
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amy Ramsay
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Grant Stanley
- Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
68
|
Leviton A, Oppenheimer J, Chiujdea M, Antonetty A, Ojo OW, Garcia S, Weas S, Fleegler E, Chan E, Loddenkemper T. Characteristics of Future Models of Integrated Outpatient Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2019; 7:healthcare7020065. [PMID: 31035586 PMCID: PMC6627383 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7020065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Replacement of fee-for-service with capitation arrangements, forces physicians and institutions to minimize health care costs, while maintaining high-quality care. In this report we described how patients and their families (or caregivers) can work with members of the medical care team to achieve these twin goals of maintaining-and perhaps improving-high-quality care and minimizing costs. We described how increased self-management enables patients and their families/caregivers to provide electronic patient-reported outcomes (i.e., symptoms, events) (ePROs), as frequently as the patient or the medical care team consider appropriate. These capabilities also allow ongoing assessments of physiological measurements/phenomena (mHealth). Remote surveillance of these communications allows longer intervals between (fewer) patient visits to the medical-care team, when this is appropriate, or earlier interventions, when it is appropriate. Systems are now available that alert medical care providers to situations when interventions might be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Leviton
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Julia Oppenheimer
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Madeline Chiujdea
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Annalee Antonetty
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Oluwafemi William Ojo
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Stephanie Garcia
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Sarah Weas
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Eric Fleegler
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Eugenia Chan
- Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Tobias Loddenkemper
- Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Riordan F, McGrath N, Dinneen SF, Kearney PM, McHugh SM. 'Sink or Swim': A Qualitative Study to Understand How and Why Nurses Adapt to Support the Implementation of Integrated Diabetes Care. Int J Integr Care 2019; 19:2. [PMID: 30971868 PMCID: PMC6450245 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated care, organising care delivery within and between services, is an approach to improve the quality of care. Existing specialist roles have evolved to work across settings and services to integrate care. However, there is limited insight into how these expanded roles are implemented, including how they may be shaped by context. This paper examines how new diabetes nurse specialists working across care boundaries, together with hospital-based diabetes nurse specialists, adapt to support the implementation of integrated care. METHODS We conducted semi-structured focus groups and interviews with diabetes nurse specialists purposively sampled by work setting and health service region (n = 30). Analysis was data-driven, coding actions or processes to stay closer to the data and using In Vivo codes to preserve meaning. FINDINGS Community nurse specialists described facing a choice of "sink or swim" when appointed with limited guidance on their role. To 'swim' and implement their role, required them to use their initiative and adapt to the local context. When first appointed, both community and hospital nurse specialists actively managed misconceptions of their role by other staff. To establish clinics in general practices, community nurse specialists capitalised on professional contacts to access GPs who might utilise their role. They built GP trust by adopting practice norms and responding to individual needs. They adapted to the lack of a multidisciplinary team "safety net" in the community, by "practicing at a higher level", working more autonomously. Developing professional links and pursuing on-going education was a way to create an alternative 'safety net' so as to feel confident in their clinical decision-making when working in the community. Workarounds facilitated information flow (i.e. patient blood results, treatment, and appointments) between settings in the absence of an electronic record shared between general practices and hospital settings. CONCLUSIONS Flexibility and innovation facilitates a new way of working across boundaries. Successful implementation of nurse specialist-led integrated care requires strategies to address elements in the inner (differences in practice organisation, role acceptance) and outer (information systems) context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Riordan
- School of Public Health, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IE
| | - Niamh McGrath
- School of Public Health, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IE
| | - Sean F. Dinneen
- Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Galway University Hospitals, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, IE
| | - Patricia M. Kearney
- School of Public Health, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IE
| | - Sheena M. McHugh
- School of Public Health, Western Gateway Building, University College Cork, IE
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Conroy SP, Bardsley M, Smith P, Neuburger J, Keeble E, Arora S, Kraindler J, Ariti C, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Street A, Roberts H, Kennedy S, Martin G, Phelps K, Regen E, Kocman D, McCue P, Fisher E, Parker S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for frail older people in acute hospitals: the HoW-CGA mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to provide high-quality evidence on delivering hospital-wide Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA).Objective(s)(1) To define CGA, its processes, outcomes and costs in the published literature, (2) to identify the processes, outcomes and costs of CGA in existing hospital settings in the UK, (3) to identify the characteristics of the recipients and beneficiaries of CGA in existing hospital settings in the UK and (4) to develop tools that will assist in the implementation of hospital-wide CGA.DesignMixed-methods study combining a mapping review, national survey, large data analysis and qualitative methods.ParticipantsPeople aged ≥ 65 years in acute hospital settings.Data sourcesLiterature review – Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Survey – acute hospital trusts. Large data analyses – (1) people aged ≥ 75 years in 2008 living in Leicester, Nottingham or Southampton (development cohort,n = 22,139); (2) older people admitted for short stay (Nottingham/Leicester,n = 825) to a geriatric ward (Southampton,n = 246) or based in the community (Newcastle,n = 754); (3) people aged ≥ 75 years admitted to acute hospitals in England in 2014–15 (validation study,n = 1,013,590). Toolkit development – multidisciplinary national stakeholder group (co-production); field-testing with cancer/surgical teams in Newcastle/Leicester.ResultsLiterature search – common outcomes included clinical, operational and destinational, but not patient-reported, outcome measures. Survey – highly variable provision of multidisciplinary assessment and care across hospitals. Quantitative analyses – in the development cohort, older people with frailty diagnoses formed a distinct group and had higher non-elective hospital use than older people without a frailty diagnosis. Patients with the highest 20% of hospital frailty risk scores had increased odds of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.7], long length of stay (OR 6.0) and 30-day re-admission (OR 1.5). The score had moderate agreement with the Fried and Rockwood scales. Pilot toolkit evaluation – participants across sites were still at the beginning of their work to identify patients and plan change. In particular, competing definitions of the role of geriatricians were evident.LimitationsThe survey was limited by an incomplete response rate but it still provides the largest description of acute hospital care for older people to date. The risk stratification tool is not contemporaneous, although it remains a powerful predictor of patient harms. The toolkit evaluation is still rather nascent and could have meaningfully continued for another year or more.ConclusionsCGA remains the gold standard approach to improving a range of outcomes for older people in acute hospitals. Older people at risk can be identified using routine hospital data. Toolkits aimed at enhancing the delivery of CGA by non-specialists can be useful but require prolonged geriatrician support and implementation phases. Future work could involve comparing the hospital-based frailty index with the electronic Frailty Index and further testing of the clinical toolkits in specialist services.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Paul Conroy
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Street
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Helen Roberts
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Sheila Kennedy
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Graham Martin
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kay Phelps
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Emma Regen
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - David Kocman
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Patricia McCue
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Stuart Parker
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Exley J, Abel GA, Fernandez JL, Pitchforth E, Mendonca S, Yang M, Roland M, McGuire A. Impact of the Southwark and Lambeth Integrated Care Older People's Programme on hospital utilisation and costs: controlled time series and cost-consequence analysis. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e024220. [PMID: 30833317 PMCID: PMC6443075 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 09/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the impact on hospital utilisation and costs of a multi-faceted primary care intervention for older people identified as being at risk of avoidable hospitalisation. DESIGN Observational study: controlled time series analysis and estimation of costs and cost consequences of the Programme. General practitioner (GP)'s practice level data were analysed from 2009 to 2016 (intervention operated from 2012 to 2016). Mixed-effect Poisson regression models of hospital utilisation included comparisons with control practices and background trends in addition to within-practice comparisons. Cost estimation used standard tariff values. SETTING 94 practices in Southwark and Lambeth and 263 control practices from other parts of England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital utilisation: emergency department attendance, emergency admissions, emergency admissions for ambulatory sensitive conditions, outpatient attendance, elective admission and length of stay. RESULTS By the fourth year of the Programme, there were reductions in accident and emergency (A&E) attendance (rate ratio 0.944, 95% CI 0.913 to 0.976), outpatient attendances (rate ratio 0.938, 95% CI 0.902 to 0.975) and elective admissions (rate ratio 0.921, 95% CI 0.908 to 0.935) but there was no evidence of reduced emergency admissions. The costs of the Programme were £149 per resident aged 65 and above but savings in hospital costs were only £86 per resident aged 65 and above, equivalent to a net increase in health service expenditure of £64 per resident though the Programme was nearly cost neutral if set-up costs were excluded. Holistic assessments carried out by GPs and consequent Integrated Care Management (ICM) plans were associated with increases in elective activity and costs; £126 increase in outpatient attendance and £936 in elective admission costs per holistic assessment carried out, and £576 increase in outpatient and £5858 in elective admission costs per patient receiving ICM. CONCLUSIONS The Older People's Programme was not cost saving. Some aspects of the Programme were associated with increased costs of elective care, possibly through the identification of unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Exley
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Gary A Abel
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - José-Luis Fernandez
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | | | - Silvia Mendonca
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Miaoqing Yang
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Martin Roland
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alistair McGuire
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Hughes G. Experiences of integrated care: reflections on tensions of size, scale and perspective between ethnography and evaluation. Anthropol Med 2019; 26:33-47. [PMID: 30714817 PMCID: PMC6607042 DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2018.1507105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
An in-depth case study of integrated health and social care provides the empirical basis for this exploration of tensions between ethnography and evaluation. The case study, developed from a two year period of fieldwork, is based on ethnographic data of individuals' experiences of living with multiple long-term conditions, their experiences of integrated care, and integrated care commissioning practices. Narrative and phenomenological analysis show how temporal aspects of ethnographic fieldwork contribute to producing knowledge of patients' experiences. However, tensions emerge when attempting to bring learning from these experiences into discussions about evaluations of services. Data generated from fieldwork are seen as both too 'big', in terms of quantity of details, and too 'small', in terms of generalisability. Scale is also of concern, as tensions between ethnography and evaluation play out in questions of relevance. Ethnography foregrounds embodied, day-to-day lived experience, bringing the minutiae of daily life into sharp focus whereas evaluators need a wider angle to foreground larger objects of interest; organisations, budgets, services. A further source of tension between ethnography and evaluation emerges in defining interventions as distinct from context, when the conceptual boundary required to distinguish the shape of the intervention within a social world blurs and dissolves under the close gaze of an immersed ethnographer, problematizing attempts to inform causation. Concerns are raised that without greater dialogue about the nature of knowledge produced by patients' experiences, these experiences are at risk of being marginalised and de-centred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Hughes
- a Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Santos Júnior GAD, Onozato T, Rocha KSS, Ramos SF, Pereira AM, Cruz CFDS, Brito GC, Lyra-Jr DPD. Integration of clinical pharmacy services into the Brazilian health system using Problematization with Maguerez Arc. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019; 15:173-181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
74
|
Abstract
The importance of better care integration is emphasized in many national dementia plans. The inherent complexity of organizing care for people with dementia provides both the justification for improving care integration and the challenges to achieving it. The prevention, detection, and early diagnosis of cognitive disorders mainly resides in primary care, but how this is best integrated within the range of disorders that primary care clinicians are expected to screen is unclear. Models of integrated community dementia assessment and management have varying degrees of involvement of primary and specialist care, but share an emphasis on improving care coordination, interdisciplinary teamwork, and personalized care. Integrated care strategies in acute care are still in early development, but have been a focus of investigation in the past decade. Integrated care outreach strategies to reduce transfers from long-term residential care to acute care have been consistently effective. Integrated long-term residential care includes considerations of end-of-life care. Future directions should include strategies for training and education, early detection in anticipation of disease modifying treatments, integration of technological developments into dementia care, integration of dementia care into general health and social care, and the encouragement of a dementia-friendly society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Draper
- a School of Psychiatry , University of NSW , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Lee-Fay Low
- b Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- c Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing , University of NSW Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
EMBULDENIYA GAYATHRI, KIRST MARITT, WALKER KEVIN, WODCHIS WALTERP. The Generation of Integration: The Early Experience of Implementing Bundled Care in Ontario, Canada. Milbank Q 2018; 96:782-813. [PMID: 30417941 PMCID: PMC6287073 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points Policymakers interested in advancing integrated models of care may benefit from understanding how integration itself is generated. Integration is analyzed as the generation of connectivity and consensus-the coming together of people, practices, and things. Integration was mediated by chosen program structures and generated by establishing partnerships, building trust, developing thoughtful models, engaging clinicians in strategies, and sharing data across systems. This study provides examples of on-the-ground integration strategies in 6 programs, suggests contexts that better lend themselves to integration initiatives, and demonstrates how programs may be examined for the very thing they seek to implement-integration itself. CONTEXT By bundling services and encouraging interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration, integrated health care models counter fragmented health care delivery and rising system costs. Building on a policy impetus toward integration, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care in the Canadian province of Ontario chose 6 programs, each comprising multiple hospital and community partners, to implement bundled care, also referred to as integrated-funding models. While research has been conducted on the facilitators and challenges of integration, there is less known about how integration is generated. This article explores the generation of integration through the dynamic interplay of contexts and mechanisms and of structures and subjects. METHODS For this qualitative study, we conducted 48 interviews with program stakeholders, from organization leaders and managers to physicians and integrated care coordinators, across the hospital-community spectrum. We then used content analysis to explore the extent to which themes were shared across programs and to identify idiosyncrasies, followed by a realist evaluation approach to understand how integration was produced in structural and everyday ways in local program contexts. FINDINGS Integration was generated through the successful production of connectivity and consensus-the coming together of people, practice, and things, as perceived and experienced by stakeholders. When able, the programs harnessed existing cultures of clinician engagement, and leveraged established partnerships. However, integration could be achieved even without these histories, by building trust, developing thoughtful models, using clinicians' existing engagement strategies, and implementing shared systems and technologies. The programs' structures (from their scale to their chosen patient population) also contextualized and mediated integration. CONCLUSIONS This article has both practical and theoretical implications. It provides transferable insights into the strategies by which integration is generated. It also contributes conceptually to realist approaches to evaluation by advancing an understanding of mechanisms as contextually and temporally contingent, with the capacity to produce new contexts, which in turn generate new sets of mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - MARITT KIRST
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
- Wilfrid Laurier University
| | - KEVIN WALKER
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| | - WALTER P. WODCHIS
- Institute of Health PolicyManagement and Evaluation, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Buch MS, Kjellberg J, Holm-Petersen C. Implementing Integrated Care - Lessons from the Odense Integrated Care Trial. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:6. [PMID: 30386188 PMCID: PMC6208289 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Creating coordination and concerted action between sectors of modern healthcare is an inherent challenge, and decision makers in search for solutions tend replicate new models across countries and settings. An example of this is the translation of the North West London integrated care pilot into a large-scale trial that took place in the Danish Municipality of Odense from 2013-2016. This article highlights the findings from our evaluation of the ill-fated project and discusses lessons learned. METHODS We examined implementation and short-term outcome in a multi-method evaluation based on qualitative interviews, direct observation, electronic surveys and quantitative analysis of change in service use and costs, using patient level data and a matched control group. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Despite an ambitious setup, ample financing, a shared governance structure and a well-functioning project organisation, implementation failed at the clinical level. Also, service use and costs for included patients increased significantly, without yielding the intended results. Primary explanations relate to an overly optimistic timeframe and a failure to take professionals' wishes, daily practices and values into account. The results underline the importance of basing future attempts at integrated care on thorough studies of the perception of actual needs and timing, including rigorous pilot testing on a smaller scale, before attempting large-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jakob Kjellberg
- VIVE – Danish Institute for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, DK
| | | |
Collapse
|
77
|
Sørensen M, Stenberg U, Garnweidner-Holme L. A Scoping Review of Facilitators of Multi-Professional Collaboration in Primary Care. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:13. [PMID: 30220896 PMCID: PMC6137624 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multi-professional collaboration (MPC) is essential for the delivery of effective and comprehensive care services. As in other European countries, primary care in Norway is challenged by altered patient values and the increased expectations of health administrations to participate in team-based care. This scoping review reports on the organisational, processual, relational and contextual facilitators of collaboration between general practitioners (GP) and other healthcare professionals (HCPs) in primary care. METHODS A systematic search in specialist and Scandinavian databases retrieved 707 citations. Following the inclusion criteria, nineteen studies were considered eligible and examined according to Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews. The retrieved literature was analysed employing a content analysis approach. A group of stakeholders commented on study findings to enhance study validity. RESULTS Primary care research into MPC is immature and emerging in Norway. Our analysis showed that introducing common procedures for documentation and handling of patient data, knowledge sharing, and establishing local specialised multi-professional teams, facilitates MPC. The results indicate that advancements in work practices benefit from an initial system-level foundation with focus on local management and MPC leadership. Further, our results show that it is preferable to enhance collaborative skills before introducing new professional teams, roles and responsibilities. Investing in professional relations could build trust, respect and continuity. In this respect, sufficient time must be allocated during the working day for professionals to share reflections and engage in mutual learning. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of research concerning the application and management of MPC in Norwegian primary care. The work practices and relations between professionals, primary care institutions and stakeholders on a macro level is inadequate. Health care is a complex system in which HCPs need managerial support to harvest the untapped benefits of MPC in primary care. As international research demonstrates, local managers must be supported with infrastructure on a macro level to understand the embedding of practice and look at what professionals actually do and how they work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Sørensen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NO
- The Norwegian Directorate of Health, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NO
| | - Una Stenberg
- The Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Trondheimsveien 235, 0586 Oslo, NO
| | - Lisa Garnweidner-Holme
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NO
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. Understanding new models of integrated care in developed countries: a systematic review. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe NHS has been challenged to adopt new integrated models of service delivery that are tailored to local populations. Evidence from the international literature is needed to support the development and implementation of these new models of care.ObjectivesThe study aimed to carry out a systematic review of international evidence to enhance understanding of the mechanisms whereby new models of service delivery have an impact on health-care outcomes.DesignThe study combined rigorous and systematic methods for identification of literature, together with innovative methods for synthesis and presentation of findings.SettingAny setting.ParticipantsPatients receiving a health-care service and/or staff delivering services.InterventionsChanges to service delivery that increase integration and co-ordination of health and health-related services.Main outcome measuresOutcomes related to the delivery of services, including the views and perceptions of patients/service users and staff.Study designEmpirical work of a quantitative or qualitative design.Data sourcesWe searched electronic databases (between October 2016 and March 2017) for research published from 2006 onwards in databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science Citation Index, Social Science Citation Index and The Cochrane Library. We also searched relevant websites, screened reference lists and citation searched on a previous review.Review methodsThe identified evidence was synthesised in three ways. First, data from included studies were used to develop an evidence-based logic model, and a narrative summary reports the elements of the pathway. Second, we examined the strength of evidence underpinning reported outcomes and impacts using a comparative four-item rating system. Third, we developed an applicability framework to further scrutinise and characterise the evidence.ResultsWe included 267 studies in the review. The findings detail the complex pathway from new models to impacts, with evidence regarding elements of new models of integrated care, targets for change, process change, influencing factors, service-level outcomes and system-wide impacts. A number of positive outcomes were reported in the literature, with stronger evidence of perceived increased patient satisfaction and improved quality of care and access to care. There was stronger UK-only evidence of reduced outpatient appointments and waiting times. Evidence was inconsistent regarding other outcomes and system-wide impacts such as levels of activity and costs. There was an indication that new models have particular potential with patients who have complex needs.LimitationsDefining new models of integrated care is challenging, and there is the potential that our study excluded potentially relevant literature. The review was extensive, with diverse study populations and interventions that precluded the statistical summary of effectiveness.ConclusionsThere is stronger evidence that new models of integrated care may enhance patient satisfaction and perceived quality and increase access; however, the evidence regarding other outcomes is unclear. The study recommends factors to be considered during the implementation of new models.Future workLinks between elements of new models and outcomes require further study, together with research in a wider variety of populations.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD37725.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Baxter
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Maxine Johnson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Duncan Chambers
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Anthea Sutton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Elizabeth Goyder
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Bower P, Reeves D, Sutton M, Lovell K, Blakemore A, Hann M, Howells K, Meacock R, Munford L, Panagioti M, Parkinson B, Riste L, Sidaway M, Lau YS, Warwick-Giles L, Ainsworth J, Blakeman T, Boaden R, Buchan I, Campbell S, Coventry P, Reilly S, Sanders C, Skevington S, Waheed W, Checkland K. Improving care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs in Salford: the CLASSIC mixed-methods study, including RCT. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe Salford Integrated Care Programme (SICP) was a large-scale transformation project to improve care for older people with long-term conditions and social care needs. We report an evaluation of the ability of the SICP to deliver an enhanced experience of care, improved quality of life, reduced costs of care and improved cost-effectiveness.ObjectivesTo explore the process of implementation of the SICP and the impact on patient outcomes and costs.DesignQualitative methods (interviews and observations) to explore implementation, a cohort multiple randomised controlled trial to assess patient outcomes through quasi-experiments and a formal trial, and an analysis of routine data sets and appropriate comparators using non-randomised methodologies.SettingSalford in the north-west of England.ParticipantsOlder people aged ≥ 65 years, carers, and health and social care professionals.InterventionsA large-scale integrated care project with three core mechanisms of integration (community assets, multidisciplinary groups and an ‘integrated contact centre’).Main outcome measuresPatient self-management, care experience and quality of life, and health-care utilisation and costs.Data sourcesProfessional and patient interviews, patient self-report measures, and routine quantitative data on service utilisation.ResultsThe SICP and subsequent developments have been sustained by strong partnerships between organisations. The SICP achieved ‘functional integration’ through the pooling of health and social care budgets, the development of the Alliance Agreement between four organisations and the development of the shared care record. ‘Service-level’ integration was slow and engagement with general practice was a challenge. We saw only minor changes in patient experience measures over the period of the evaluation (both improvements and reductions), with some increase in the use of community assets and care plans. Compared with other sites, the difference in the rates of admissions showed an increase in emergency admissions. Patient experience of health coaching was largely positive, although the effects of health coaching on activation and depression were not statistically significant. Economic analyses suggested that coaching was likely to be cost-effective, generating improvements in quality of life [mean incremental quality-adjusted life-year gain of 0.019, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.006 to 0.043] at increased cost (mean incremental total cost increase of £150.58, 95% CI –£470.611 to £711.776).LimitationsThe Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care study represents a single site evaluation, with consequent limits on external validity. Patient response rates to the cohort survey were < 40%.ConclusionsThe SICP has been implemented in a way that is consistent with the original vision. However, there has been more rapid success in establishing new integrated structures (such as a formal integrated care organisation), rather than in delivering mechanisms of integration at sufficient scale to have a large impact on patient outcomes.Future workFurther research could focus on each of the mechanisms of integration. The multidisciplinary groups may require improved targeting of patients or disease subgroups to demonstrate effectiveness. Development of a proven model of health coaching that can be implemented at scale is required, especially one that would provide cost savings for commissioners or providers. Similarly, further exploration is required to assess the longer-term benefits of community assets and whether or not health impacts translate to reductions in care use.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN12286422.FundingThis project was funded by the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 6, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Reeves
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Amy Blakemore
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Hann
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Howells
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Luke Munford
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Beth Parkinson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa Riste
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Yiu-Shing Lau
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lynsey Warwick-Giles
- Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas Blakeman
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Boaden
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Greater Manchester, Alliance Business School Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Campbell
- National Institute for Health Research Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Caroline Sanders
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzanne Skevington
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Checkland
- Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Stokes J, Struckmann V, Kristensen SR, Fuchs S, van Ginneken E, Tsiachristas A, Rutten van Mölken M, Sutton M. Towards incentivising integration: A typology of payments for integrated care. Health Policy 2018; 122:963-969. [PMID: 30033204 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Traditional provider payment mechanisms may not create appropriate incentives for integrating care. Alternative payment mechanisms, such as bundled payments, have been introduced without uniform definitions, and existing payment typologies are not suitable for describing them. We use a systematic review combined with example integrated care programmes identified from practice in the Horizon2020 SELFIE project to inform a new typology of payment mechanisms for integrated care. The typology describes payments in terms of the scope of payment (Target population, Time, Sectors), the participation of providers (Provider coverage, Financial pooling/sharing), and the single provider/patient involvement (Income, Multiple disease/needs focus, and Quality measurement). There is a gap between rhetoric on the need for new payment mechanisms and those implemented in practice. Current payments for integrated care are mostly sector- and disease-specific, with questionable impact on those with the most need for integrated care. The typology provides a basis to improve financial incentives supporting more effective and efficient integrated care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Stokes
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
| | - Verena Struckmann
- Berlin University of Technology, Department of Health Care Management, Straße des 17.Juni 135, Berlin 10623, Germany.
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom; Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Sabine Fuchs
- Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Straße des 17. Juni 135, Berlin 10623, Germany.
| | - Ewout van Ginneken
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Berlin University of Technology, Strasse des 17. Juni 135, Berlin 10623, Germany.
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
| | - Maureen Rutten van Mölken
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam 3000 DR, The Netherlands.
| | - Matt Sutton
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Elvey R, Bailey S, Checkland K, McBride A, Parkin S, Rothwell K, Hodgson D. Implementing new care models: learning from the Greater Manchester demonstrator pilot experience. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:89. [PMID: 29921230 PMCID: PMC6006551 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0773-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Current health policy focuses on improving accessibility, increasing integration and shifting resources from hospitals to community and primary care. Initiatives aimed at achieving these policy aims have supported the implementation of various ‘new models of care’, including general practice offering ‘additional availability’ appointments during evenings and at weekends. In Greater Manchester, six ‘demonstrator sites’ were funded: four sites delivered additional availability appointments, other services included case management and rapid response. The aim of this paper is to explore the factors influencing the implementation of services within a programme designed to improve access to primary care. The paper consists of a qualitative process evaluation undertaken within provider organisations, including general practices, hospitals and care homes. Methods Semi-structured interviews, with the data subjected to thematic analysis. Results Ninety-one people participated in interviews. Six key factors were identified as important for the establishment and running of the demonstrators: information technology; information governance; workforce and organisational development; communications and engagement; supporting infrastructure; federations and alliances. These factors brought to light challenges in the attempt to provide new or modify existing services. Underpinning all factors was the issue of trust; there was consensus amongst our participants that trusting relationships, particularly between general practices, were vital for collaboration. It was also crucial that general practices trusted in the integrity of anyone external who was to work with the practice, particularly if they were to access data on the practice computer system. A dialogical approach was required, which enabled staff to see themselves as active rather than passive participants. Conclusions The research highlights various challenges presented by the context within which extended access is implemented. Trust was the fundamental underlying issue; there was consensus amongst participants that trusting relationships were vital for effective collaboration in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Elvey
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Simon Bailey
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Kath Checkland
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Anne McBride
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Stephen Parkin
- Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Katy Rothwell
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC), Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, M6 8HD, UK
| | - Damian Hodgson
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
May CR, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair FS, May CM, Murray E, Myall M, Rapley T, Finch T. Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2018; 13:80. [PMID: 29879986 PMCID: PMC5992634 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 316] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Normalization Process Theory (NPT) identifies, characterises and explains key mechanisms that promote and inhibit the implementation, embedding and integration of new health techniques, technologies and other complex interventions. A large body of literature that employs NPT to inform feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions has now emerged. The aims of this review were to review this literature; to identify and characterise the uses and limits of NPT in research on the implementation and integration of healthcare interventions; and to explore NPT's contribution to understanding the dynamics of these processes. METHODS A qualitative systematic review was conducted. We searched Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles with empirical data in peer-reviewed journals that cited either key papers presenting and developing NPT, or the NPT Online Toolkit ( www.normalizationprocess.org ). We included in the review only articles that used NPT as the primary approach to collection, analysis or reporting of data in studies of the implementation of healthcare techniques, technologies or other interventions. A structured data extraction instrument was used, and data were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS Searches revealed 3322 citations. We show that after eliminating 2337 duplicates and broken or junk URLs, 985 were screened as titles and abstracts. Of these, 101 were excluded because they did not fit the inclusion criteria for the review. This left 884 articles for full-text screening. Of these, 754 did not fit the inclusion criteria for the review. This left 130 papers presenting results from 108 identifiable studies to be included in the review. NPT appears to provide researchers and practitioners with a conceptual vocabulary for rigorous studies of implementation processes. It identifies, characterises and explains empirically identifiable mechanisms that motivate and shape implementation processes. Taken together, these mean that analyses using NPT can effectively assist in the explanation of the success or failure of specific implementation projects. Ten percent of papers included critiques of some aspect of NPT, with those that did mainly focusing on its terminology. However, two studies critiqued NPT emphasis on agency, and one study critiqued NPT for its normative focus. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates that researchers found NPT useful and applied it across a wide range of interventions. It has been effectively used to aid intervention development and implementation planning as well as evaluating and understanding implementation processes themselves. In particular, NPT appears to have offered a valuable set of conceptual tools to aid understanding of implementation as a dynamic process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl R. May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amanda Cummings
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Melissa Girling
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mike Bracher
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Frances S. Mair
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christine M. May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Michelle Myall
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tim Rapley
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Tracy Finch
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Turner A, Mulla A, Booth A, Aldridge S, Stevens S, Begum M, Malik A. The international knowledge base for new care models relevant to primary care-led integrated models: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [PMID: 29972636 DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe Multispecialty Community Provider (MCP) model was introduced to the NHS as a primary care-led, community-based integrated care model to provide better quality, experience and value for local populations.ObjectivesThe three main objectives were to (1) articulate the underlying programme theories for the MCP model of care; (2) identify sources of theoretical, empirical and practice evidence to test the programme theories; and (3) explain how mechanisms used in different contexts contribute to outcomes and process variables.DesignThere were three main phases: (1) identification of programme theories from logic models of MCP vanguards, prioritising key theories for investigation; (2) appraisal, extraction and analysis of evidence against a best-fit framework; and (3) realist reviews of prioritised theory components and maps of remaining theory components.Main outcome measuresThe quadruple aim outcomes addressed population health, cost-effectiveness, patient experience and staff experience.Data sourcesSearches of electronic databases with forward- and backward-citation tracking, identifying research-based evidence and practice-derived evidence.Review methodsA realist synthesis was used to identify, test and refine the following programme theory components: (1) community-based, co-ordinated care is more accessible; (2) place-based contracting and payment systems incentivise shared accountability; and (3) fostering relational behaviours builds resilience within communities.ResultsDelivery of a MCP model requires professional and service user engagement, which is dependent on building trust and empowerment. These are generated if values and incentives for new ways of working are aligned and there are opportunities for training and development. Together, these can facilitate accountability at the individual, community and system levels. The evidence base relating to these theory components was, for the most part, limited by initiatives that are relatively new or not formally evaluated. Support for the programme theory components varies, with moderate support for enhanced primary care and community involvement in care, and relatively weak support for new contracting models.Strengths and limitationsThe project benefited from a close relationship with national and local MCP leads, reflecting the value of the proximity of the research team to decision-makers. Our use of logic models to identify theories of change could present a relatively static position for what is a dynamic programme of change.ConclusionsMultispecialty Community Providers can be described as complex adaptive systems (CASs) and, as such, connectivity, feedback loops, system learning and adaptation of CASs play a critical role in their design. Implementation can be further reinforced by paying attention to contextual factors that influence behaviour change, in order to support more integrated working.Future workA set of evidence-derived ‘key ingredients’ has been compiled to inform the design and delivery of future iterations of population health-based models of care. Suggested priorities for future research include the impact of enhanced primary care on the workforce, the effects of longer-term contracts on sustainability and capacity, the conditions needed for successful continuous improvement and learning, the role of carers in patient empowerment and how community participation might contribute to community resilience.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016039552.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Turner
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Abeda Mulla
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shiona Aldridge
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Sharon Stevens
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Mahmoda Begum
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| | - Anam Malik
- The Strategy Unit, NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Wankah P, Couturier Y, Belzile L, Gagnon D, Breton M. Providers' Perspectives on the Implementation of Mandated Local Health Networks for Older People in Québec. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:2. [PMID: 30127686 PMCID: PMC6095055 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In many countries, integrated care has been implemented to improve the quality, efficiency and patient experience of services. Understanding how integrated care is adopted in different settings may give insights into where, how and why different components of the organisational design work. The aim of this article is to understand how and why integrated care for older people has been implemented in different contexts from the perspective of providers. THEORY AND METHODS The study uses an innovative composite framework for the implementation of integrated care models, which posits that structural, organisational, provider, innovation and patient factors influence implementation along six dimensions of integration. A qualitative multiple case study was done of three cases in Québec using document analysis and semi-structured interviews of 28 providers. Descriptive comparisons and thematic analysis were performed. RESULTS Providers considered that structural (government policy) and organisational (mergers) factors highly influenced the implementation of organisational and functional dimensions of integration, at the detriment of clinical integration. Provider, innovation and patient factors mildly or moderately influenced the implementation of integration. CONCLUSION Structural and organisational factors were necessary conditions for the implementation of administrative components of integration, with great variability in the implementation of some clinical components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Wankah
- Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne – Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, CA
| | - Yves Couturier
- Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne – Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, CA
| | - Louise Belzile
- Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne – Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, CA
| | | | - Mylaine Breton
- Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne – Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean sur les innovations en santé, CA
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Stocker R, Bamford C, Brittain K, Duncan R, Moffatt S, Robinson L, Hanratty B. Care home services at the vanguard: a qualitative study exploring stakeholder views on the development and evaluation of novel, integrated approaches to enhancing healthcare in care homes. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e017419. [PMID: 29581198 PMCID: PMC5875673 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore stakeholders' understanding of novel integrated approaches to enhancing care in care homes (a care home 'vanguard') and identify priorities for evaluation. DESIGN A qualitative study, using semistructured interviews with commissioners and service providers to/within care homes, and third sector organisations with thematic analysis. SETTING A Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) area in England. PARTICIPANTS Thirty interviewees from care homes, the National Health Service (NHS; England) and local authority, third sector (10 care home managers, 5 general practitioners, 4 CCG employees, 4 local authority employees, 1 national (NHS England) vanguard lead, 2 specialist nurses, 2 geriatricians, 1 third sector and 1 health manager). RESULTS Four higher level themes emerged from the data: understanding of proposed changes, communication, evaluation of outcome measures of success, and trust and complexity. The vision for the new programme was shared by stakeholders, with importance attached to equitable access to high-quality care. Support for the programme was described as being 'the right thing to do', inferring a moral imperative. However, the practical implications of key aspects, such as integrated working, were not clearly understood and the programme was perceived by some as being imposed, top down, from the health service. Barriers and facilitators to change were identified across themes of communication, outcomes, trust and complexity. Importance was attached to the measurement of intangible aspects of success, such as collaboration. Interviewees understood that outcome-based commissioning was one element of the new programme, but discussion of their aspirations and practices revealed values and beliefs more compatible with a system based on trust. CONCLUSIONS Innovation in service delivery requires organisations to adopt common priorities and share responsibility for success. The vanguard programme is working to ensure health and local authorities have this commitment, but engaging care homes that may feel isolated from the welfare system needs sustained dialogue over the longer term. Evaluation of the programme needs to measure what is important to stakeholders, and not focus too closely on resource consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Stocker
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Claire Bamford
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katie Brittain
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Duncan
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Suzanne Moffatt
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Evaluating the Implementation and Delivery of a Social Prescribing Intervention: A Research Protocol. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:13. [PMID: 30127682 PMCID: PMC6095070 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In response to the increasing numbers of people with (multiple) chronic conditions, the need for integrated care is increasing too. Social prescribing is a new approach that aims to integrate the social and healthcare sector to improve the quality of care and user experience. Understanding main stakeholders' perceptions and experiences is key to the implementation of social prescription and for informing future initiatives. Objectives This paper presents the protocol of a qualitative research study to explore factors that (i) facilitate and hinder the implementation of a social prescribing pilot in the East of England, and (ii) affect the uptake, adherence, and completion rates by service users. Methods A qualitative study including semi-structured interviews with managers, health professionals, service providers, navigators, and service users. Iterative thematic analysis will be used to analyse the data. Conclusion This study will produce evidence on factors that hinder and facilitate the implementation of a social prescribing programme, as well as factors affecting the engagement, and non-engagement, of service users. Findings can contribute to the development of an evidence base for social prescription programmes in the UK, and inform practice, policy, and future research in the field.
Collapse
|
87
|
Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:86. [PMID: 29415720 PMCID: PMC5803993 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2893-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social Prescribing is a service in primary care that involves the referral of patients with non-clinical needs to local services and activities provided by the third sector (community, voluntary, and social enterprise sector). Social Prescribing aims to promote partnership working between the health and the social sector to address the wider determinants of health. To date, there is a weak evidence base for Social Prescribing services. The objective of the review was to identify factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of SP services based in general practice involving a navigator. METHODS We searched eleven databases, the grey literature, and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services in June and July 2016. Searches were limited to literature written in English. No date restrictions were applied. Findings were synthesised narratively, employing thematic analysis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2011 was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS Eight studies were included in the review. The synthesis identified a range of factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of SP services. Facilitators and barriers were related to: the implementation approach, legal agreements, leadership, management and organisation, staff turnover, staff engagement, relationships and communication between partners and stakeholders, characteristics of general practices, and the local infrastructure. The quality of most included studies was poor and the review identified a lack of published literature on factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services. CONCLUSION The review identified a range of factors that facilitate and hinder the implementation and delivery of Social Prescribing services. Findings of this review provide an insight for commissioners, managers, and providers to guide the implementation and delivery of future Social Prescribing services. More high quality research and transparent reporting of findings is needed in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Kozlowska O, Lumb A, Tan GD, Rea R. Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review. Future Healthc J 2018; 5:64-80. [PMID: 31098535 PMCID: PMC6510038 DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-1-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Many national policies propose integration between primary and specialist care to improve the care of people with long-term conditions. There is an increasing need to understand how to practically implement such service redesign. This paper reviews the literature on the barriers to, and facilitators of, integrating primary and specialist healthcare for people with long-term conditions in the UK, with the aim of informing the development and implementation of similar initiatives in integration. MEDLINE and CINAHL databases were searched and 14 articles discussing factors hindering or enabling integration were identified. The factors were extracted and synthesised and key lessons were tabulated. Successful integration of care requires synchronised changes on different levels, a well-resourced team, a well-defined and evidence-based service, agreed and articulated new roles and responsibilities, and a willingness among healthcare professionals to co-work and co-learn. Barriers to successful implementation of integrated care include a lack of commitment across organisations, limited resources, poorly functioning information technology (IT), poor coordination of finances and care pathways, conflicting objectives, and conflict within teams. The examples of integrated working provide insights into problems and solutions around interorganisational and interprofessional working that will guide those planning integration in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alistair Lumb
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Garry D Tan
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Rustam Rea
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Auschra C. Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:5. [PMID: 29632455 PMCID: PMC5887071 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, inter-organisational collaboration between healthcare organisations has become of increasingly vital importance in order to improve the integration of health service delivery. However, different barriers reported in academic literature seem to hinder the formation and development of such collaboration. THEORY AND METHODS This systematic literature review of forty studies summarises and categorises the barriers to integrated care in inter-organisational settings as reported in previous studies. It analyses how these barriers operate. RESULTS Within these studies, twenty types of barriers have been identified and then categorised in six groups (barriers related to administration and regulation, barriers related to funding, barriers related to the inter-organisational domain, barriers related to the organisational domain, barriers related to service delivery, and barriers related to clinical practices). Not all of these barriers emerge passively, some are set up intentionally. They are not only context-specific, but are also often related and influence each other. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The compilation of these results allows for a better understanding of the characteristics and reasons for the occurrence of barriers that impede collaboration aiming for the integration of care, not only for researchers but also for practitioners. It can help to explain and counteract the slow progress and limited efficiency and effectiveness of some of the inter-organisational collaboration in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Auschra
- Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Management, Boltzmannstr. 20, 14195 Berlin, DE
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Abstract
Integrated palliative care is viewed as having the potential to improve service coordination, efficiency, and quality outcomes for patients and family carers. However, the majority of Canadians do not have access to regional, comprehensive, integrated palliative care. Work needs to be directed toward planning palliative care services that is integrated into the healthcare and social care system. To further this goal, it is important to have a conceptual understanding of the meaning of integrated care and its expression in organizational models for the provision of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Brazil
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
'Complexity-compatible' policy for integrated care? Lessons from the implementation of Ontario's Health Links. Soc Sci Med 2017; 198:95-102. [PMID: 29310110 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory views healthcare as numerous sub-systems characterized by diverse agents that interact, self-organize, and continuously adapt. We apply this complexity science perspective to examine the extent to which CAS theory is a useful lens for designing and implementing health policies. We present the case of Health Links, a "low rules" policy intervention in Ontario, Canada aimed at stimulating the development of voluntary networks of health and social organizations to improve care coordination for the most frequent users of the healthcare system. Our sample consisted of stakeholders from regional governance bodies and organizations partnering in Health Links. Qualitative interview data were coded using the key complexity concepts of sensemaking, self-organization, interconnections, coevolution, and emergence. We found that the complexity-compatible policy design successfully stimulated local dynamics of flexibility, experimentation, and learning and that important mediating factors include leadership, readiness, relationship-building, role clarity, communication, and resources. However, we saw tensions between preferences for flexibility and standardization. Desirable developments occurred only in some settings and failed to flow upward to higher levels, resulting in a piecemeal and patchy landscape. Attention needs to be paid not only to local dynamics and processes, but also to regional and provincial levels to ensure that learning flows to the top and informs decision-making. We conclude that implementation of complexity-compatible policies needs a balance between flexibility and consistency and the right leadership to coordinate the two. Complexity-compatible policy for integrated healthcare is more than simply 'letting a thousand flowers bloom'.
Collapse
|
92
|
Lai YF, Lum AYW, Ho ETL, Lim YW. Patient-provider disconnect: A qualitative exploration of understanding and perceptions to care integration. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187372. [PMID: 29077758 PMCID: PMC5659677 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated care has been well-recognized as a solution to improve quality of care for patients with complex needs. As Singapore increasingly develops and promotes integrated models of care, it is unclear if providers, patients, and caregivers share similar understanding of changes in the healthcare system. OBJECTIVES This study aims at exploring three dimensions of care integration: a) understanding of integration; b) challenges and c) changes perceived as essential among three distinct stakeholder groups: providers, patients and caregivers. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted among 41 care providers (clinicians and administrators) and care consumers (patients and caregivers) in Singapore utilizing 29 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus group discussions. Study participants were selected by purposive, snowball sampling from various clinical settings. Data were transcribed, familiarized, coded and analyzed using a conceptual framework. RESULTS Understanding of care integration was generally lacking among patient and caregivers. Most of them focused on healthcare costs and accessibility of services. Providers characterized care integration in clinical process terms and had a more systems view of the concept. Most participants viewed resource constraints as a key challenge in integrating care. Additionally, providers expressed the need for patients and their families to play a greater role in managing their health. Individuals and the community are key components of an integrated care system in the future. Reliance on the healthcare system alone is not sustainable. CONCLUSIONS Patients, caregivers and providers have varying degrees of understanding towards care integration. The success of engaging stakeholders on the ground to be active participants in the healthcare system integration process requires policymakers and healthcare leaders to increase patient engagement efforts and to better appreciate the challenges faced by the healthcare workers in the rapidly changing national and global healthcare landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Feng Lai
- Department of Pharmacy, Sengkang Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Emily Tse Lin Ho
- Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yee Wei Lim
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Kirst M, Im J, Burns T, Baker GR, Goldhar J, O'Campo P, Wojtak A, Wodchis WP. What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29:612-624. [PMID: 28992156 PMCID: PMC5890872 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A realist review of the evaluative evidence was conducted on integrated care (IC) programs for older adults to identify key processes that lead to the success or failure of these programs in achieving outcomes such as reduced healthcare utilization, improved patient health, and improved patient and caregiver experience. DATA SOURCES International academic literature was searched in 12 indexed, electronic databases and gray literature through internet searches, to identify evaluative studies. STUDY SELECTION Inclusion criteria included evaluative literature on integrated, long-stay health and social care programs, published between January 1980 and July 2015, in English. DATA EXTRACTION Data were extracted on the study purpose, period, setting, design, population, sample size, outcomes, and study results, as well as explanations of mechanisms and contextual factors influencing outcomes. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS A total of 65 articles, representing 28 IC programs, were included in the review. Two context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOcs) were identified: (i) trusting multidisciplinary team relationships and (ii) provider commitment to and understanding of the model. Contextual factors such as strong leadership that sets clear goals and establishes an organizational culture in support of the program, along with joint governance structures, supported team collaboration and subsequent successful implementation. Furthermore, time to build an infrastructure to implement and flexibility in implementation, emerged as key processes instrumental to success of these programs. CONCLUSIONS This review included a wide range of international evidence, and identified key processes for successful implementation of IC programs that should be considered by program planners, leaders and evaluators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maritt Kirst
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
- Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3C5
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
| | - Jennifer Im
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
| | - Tim Burns
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
| | - G. Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
| | - Jodeme Goldhar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
- The Change Foundation, 200 Front Street West, Toronto, Canada M5V 3M1
| | - Patricia O'Campo
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
- Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St., Toronto, Canada M5B 1W8
| | - Anne Wojtak
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
- Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network, 250 Dundas St. West, Toronto, Canada M5T 2Z5
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St., Toronto, Canada M5T 3M6
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, 550 University Ave., Toronto, Canada M5G 2A2
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5
| |
Collapse
|
94
|
Borgermans L, Marchal Y, Busetto L, Kalseth J, Kasteng F, Suija K, Oona M, Tigova O, Rösenmuller M, Devroey D. How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions: Key Findings from EU FP-7 Project INTEGRATE and Beyond. Int J Integr Care 2017; 17:7. [PMID: 29588630 PMCID: PMC5854097 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Political and public health leaders increasingly recognize the need to take urgent action to address the problem of chronic diseases and multi-morbidity. European countries are facing unprecedented demand to find new ways to deliver care to improve patient-centredness and personalization, and to avoid unnecessary time in hospitals. People-centred and integrated care has become a central part of policy initiatives to improve the access, quality, continuity, effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems and are thus preconditions for the economic sustainability of the EU health and social care systems. PURPOSE This study presents an overview of lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care based on findings from the EU FP-7 Project Integrate, a literature review, other EU projects with relevance to this study, a number of best practices on integrated care and our own experiences with research and policy making in integrated care at the national and international level. RESULTS Seven lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care were identified. CONCLUSION The lessons learned and critical success factors to policy making on integrated care show that a comprehensive systems perspective should guide the development of integrated care towards better health practices, education, research and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Borgermans
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| | - Yannick Marchal
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| | - Loraine Busetto
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, NL
| | - Jorid Kalseth
- SINTEF Technology and Society, Health Services Research, Trondheim, NO
| | - Frida Kasteng
- SINTEF Technology and Society, Health Services Research, Trondheim, NO
| | - Kadri Suija
- Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EE
| | - Marje Oona
- Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, EE
| | - Olena Tigova
- Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management, IESE Business School, ES
| | - Magda Rösenmuller
- Center for Research in Healthcare Innovation Management, IESE Business School, ES
| | - Dirk Devroey
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, BE
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Lees C, Hutchison T, O'Brien S. Introducing community integrated nursing teams: How one Clinical Commissioning Group applied an evidence-based approach. Br J Community Nurs 2017; 22:289-294. [PMID: 28570114 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2017.22.6.289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The present day collection of financial and demographic challenges confronted by health and social care mean that integrated services are undoubtedly essential to sustain adequate care. However, the impact of integrated care upon healthcare staff and patients as well as new ways of working will need to be demonstrated, with collaboration and engagement throughout any transition. This paper provides an overview of the evidence relating to the delivery of effective, integrated out-of-hospital care, with a discussion of the literature. It also considers how one Clinical Commissioning Group has begun the process of integration with the focus on community nursing services for the provision of better care for patients with an evidence-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Lees
- Senior Lecturer, Liverpool John Moores University
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Eyre L, Farrelly M, Marshall M. What can a participatory approach to evaluation contribute to the field of integrated care? BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 26:588-594. [PMID: 27932546 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Revised: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Better integration of care within the health sector and between health and social care is seen in many countries as an essential way of addressing the enduring problems of dwindling resources, changing demographics and unacceptable variation in quality of care. Current research evidence about the effectiveness of integration efforts supports neither the enthusiasm of those promoting and designing integrated care programmes nor the growing efforts of practitioners attempting to integrate care on the ground. In this paper we present a methodological approach, based on the principles of participatory research, that attempts to address this challenge. Participatory approaches are characterised by a desire to use social science methods to solve practical problems and a commitment on the part of researchers to substantive and sustained collaboration with relevant stakeholders. We describe how we applied an emerging practical model of participatory research, the researcher-in-residence model, to evaluate a large-scale integrated care programme in the UK. We propose that the approach added value to the programme in a number of ways: by engaging stakeholders in using established evidence and with the benefits of rigorously evaluating their work, by providing insights for local stakeholders that they were either not familiar with or had not fully considered in relation to the development and implementation of the programme and by challenging established mindsets and norms. While there is still much to learn about the benefits and challenges of applying participatory approaches in the health sector, we demonstrate how using such approaches have the potential to help practitioners integrate care more effectively in their daily practice and help progress the academic study of integrated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Eyre
- Reserach Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Farrelly
- School of Histories, Languages and Cultures, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Martin Marshall
- Reserach Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Leonardsen ACL, Del Busso L, Grøndahl VA, Ghanima W, Jelsness-Jørgensen LP. General practitioners' perspectives on referring patients to decentralized acute health care. Fam Pract 2016; 33:709-714. [PMID: 27543796 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Municipality acute wards (MAWs) have recently been introduced in Norway. Their mandate is to provide treatment for patients who otherwise would have been hospitalized. Even though GPs are key stakeholders, little is known about how they perceive referring patients to these wards. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' perspectives on factors relevant for their decision-making when referring patients to MAWs. METHODS We used a qualitative approach, conducting semi-structured interviews with 23 GPs from five different MAW catchment areas in the southeastern part of Norway. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The GPs experienced challenges in deciding which patients were suitable for treatment at a MAW, including whether patients could be regarded as medically clarified, and whether these services were sufficient and safe. GPs were also under pressure from several other stakeholders when deciding where to refer their patients. Moreover, the MAWs were viewed not merely as an alternative to hospitals, but also as a service in addition to hospitals. CONCLUSION This study improves our understanding of how GPs experience decentralized acute health care services, by identifying factors that influence and challenge their referral decisions. For these services to be used as intended in the collaboration reform, integrating the perspectives of GPs in the development and implementation of these services may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lilliana Del Busso
- Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway and
| | - Vigdis A Grøndahl
- Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway and
| | - Waleed Ghanima
- Department of Research, Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen
- Department of Research, Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Studies, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway and
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
|
99
|
You EC, Dunt D, Doyle C. Influences on Case-Managed Community Aged Care Practice. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2016; 26:1649-1661. [PMID: 26318797 DOI: 10.1177/1049732315601669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Case management has been widely implemented in the community aged care setting. In this study, we aimed to explore influences on case-managed community aged care practice from the perspectives of community aged care case managers. We conducted 33 semistructured interviews with 47 participants. We drew these participants from a list of all case managers working in aged care organizations that provided publicly funded case management program(s)/packages in Victoria, Australia. We used a multilevel framework that included such broad categories of factors as structural, organizational, case manager, client, and practice factors to guide the data analysis. Through thematic analysis, we found that policy change, organizational culture and policies, case managers' professional backgrounds, clients with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, and case management models stood out as key influences on case managers' practice. In the future, researchers can use the multilevel framework to undertake implementation research in similar health contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Dunt
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colleen Doyle
- Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Evans JM, Grudniewicz A, Baker GR, Wodchis WP. Organizational Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Review of Measurement Tools. Eval Health Prof 2016; 39:391-420. [PMID: 27664122 DOI: 10.1177/0163278716665882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The success of integrated care interventions is highly dependent on the internal and collective capabilities of the organizations in which they are implemented. Yet, organizational capabilities are rarely described, understood, or measured with sufficient depth and breadth in empirical studies or in practice. Assessing these capabilities can contribute to understanding why some integrated care interventions are more effective than others. We identified, organized, and assessed survey instruments that measure the internal and collective organizational capabilities required for integrated care delivery. We conducted an expert consultation and searched Medline and Google Scholar databases for survey instruments measuring factors outlined in the Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care Framework. A total of 58 instruments were included in the review and assessed based on their psychometric properties, practical considerations, and applicability to integrated care efforts. This study provides a bank of psychometrically sound instruments for describing and comparing organizational capabilities. Greater use of these instruments across integrated care interventions and studies can enhance standardized comparative analyses and inform change management. Further research is needed to build an evidence base for these instruments and to explore the associations between organizational capabilities and integrated care processes and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Evans
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada .,Enhanced Program Evaluation Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|