A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma

Lack of Prophylactic Effect of Incadronate on Skeletal Lesions Associated with Implants of Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prophylactic effects of bisphosphonate (BP) on skeletal lesions induced by prostate cancer (CaP).

METHODS

Incadronate, a third-generation BP, was administered weekly for 4 weeks, with or without 4-week pre-administration, to rats whose calvaria had been inoculated with syngeneic CaP tissue.

RESULTS

The transplanted CaP grew up and caused bone resorption with osteoblastic changes regardless of incadronate treatment. Although decrease in bone resorption accompanied by reduced number of osteoclasts was shown by incadronate administration, pre-administration had no additional inhibitory effect on bone destruction and Ki-67 labeling indices of CaP cells were not altered.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that application of BP alone is not sufficient to prevent skeletal lesions due to CaP in patients with high risk of bone metastases although it is useful in inhibition of cancer-induced bone resorption with osteoblastic changes.

Open-label trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid in preventing bone loss in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and bone metastases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in preventing bone loss in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and bone metastases who were receiving androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

Patients received zoledronic acid 4 mg as a 15-minute infusion every 3 weeks for 1 year. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2 to L4) and total hip was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months. Biochemical markers of bone turnover (N-telopeptide and bone alkaline phosphatase) and serum creatinine levels were evaluated at baseline and during the study. Skeletal-related events were assessed at each study visit.

RESULTS

Of the 221 enrolled patients, 202 and 221 patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses, respectively. The mean increase in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and total hip was 7.7% (P <0.001) and 3.6% (P <0.001), respectively. Decreases in N-telopeptide and bone alkaline phosphatase levels were significant and sustained. The median time to the first skeletal-related event was not reached; 11.9% of patients had a skeletal-related event. Arthralgia (20.4%), nausea (14%), fatigue (14%), and back pain (12.2%) were the most common adverse events. Adverse events due to renal function deterioration were infrequent. The mean maximal change in serum creatinine level from baseline was 0.3 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Zoledronic acid administration for 1 year to patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and bone metastases who were receiving androgen deprivation therapy was safe and prevented bone loss, as demonstrated by significant increases in bone mineral density and sustained suppression of biochemical markers of bone turnover.

Prognostic value of serum markers for prostate cancer

The incidence of prostate cancer has increased dramatically during the last 10-15 years and it is now the commonest cancer in males in developed countries. The increase is mainly caused by the increasing use of opportunistic screening or case-finding based on the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in serum. With this approach, prostate cancer is detected 5-10 years before giving rise to symptoms and on average 17 years before causing the death of the patient. While this has led to detection of prostate cancer at a potentially curable stage, it has also led to substantial overdiagnosis, i.e. detection of cancers that would not surface clinically in the absence of screening. A major challenge is thus to identify the cases that need to be treated while avoiding diagnosing patients who will not benefit from being diagnosed and who will only suffer from the stigma of being a cancer patient. It would be useful to have prognostic markers that could predict which patients need to be diagnosed and which do not. Ideally, it should be possible to measure these markers using non-invasive techniques, i.e. by means of serum or urine tests. As it is very useful for both early diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer, PSA is considered the most valuable marker available for any tumor. Although the prognostic value of PSA is limited, measurement of the proportion of free PSA has improved the identification of patients with aggressive disease. Furthermore, the rate of increase in serum PSA reflects tumor growth rate and prognosis but, due to substantial physiological variation in serum PSA, reliable estimation of the rate of PSA increase requires follow-up for at least 2 years. Algorithms based on the combined use of free and total PSA and prostate volume in logistic regression and neural networks can improve the diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer, and assays for minor subfractions of PSA and other new markers may provide additional prognostic information. Markers of neuroendocrine differentiation are useful for the monitoring of androgen-independent disease and various bone markers are useful in patients with metastatic disease.

Complications of androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and locally advanced disease. In addition to sexual side effects, long-term ADT results in several other changes, including hot flashes; gynecomastia; changes in body composition, metabolism, and the cardiovascular system; osteoporosis; anemia; psychiatric and cognitive problems; and fatigue and diminished quality of life. This review discusses these complications of ADT and treatments aimed at reducing them. It is important for clinicians to anticipate these effects and to initiate measures to prevent or minimize them in order to maintain quality of life in prostate cancer survivors.

Osteonecrosis of the jaws in patients with a history of receiving bisphosphonate therapy

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates, inhibitors of osteoclasts, have been shown to alleviate many of the devastating consequences associated with metastatic bone disease. However, recent reports have shown that bisphosphonates may cause osteonecrosis of the jaws. Since the publication of these initial reports, the authors have treated several patients with osteonecrosis of the jaws who had a history of receiving bisphosphonate therapy.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records of patients who visited their clinic between September 2003 and December 2004 and who had osteonecrosis of the jaws and a history of having received bisphosphonate therapy but no irradiation to the head and neck.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (four female and seven male) with a mean age of 69 years were included in this report. They had received bisphosphonate therapy for a mean duration of 34 months. Radiographic data showed loss of bone density at sites of osteonecrosis, and histologic examination demonstrated necrosis of bone without evidence of metastases.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Further research is required for better understanding of the role of bisphosphonates in the development of osteonecrosis of the jaws. Until more is known, the authors recommend that measures be taken to prevent osteonecrosis those at risk, including identifying patients with a history of having received bisphosphonate therapy before they undergo dental surgery. To help identify such patients, the authors propose the use of a screening questionnaire. When feasible, physicians should consult with their patients' general dentists or oral surgeons before patients begin bisphosphonate therapy.

Therapie des hormonrefraktären Prostatakarzinoms

PSA-progression following primary ADT defines an androgen-refractory but still hormone sensitive PCA which might respond to secondary hormonal manipulations. Secondary hormonal manipulations will result in a PSA decline >50% in about 60-80% of the patients with a mean duration of 7-17 months depending on the type of treatment. PSA-progression following secondary endocrine treatment defines hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPCA) which might be treated by systemic chemotherapy. Based on the results of 2 prospective, randomized clinical phase-III trials comparing docetaxel and mitoxantrone, docetaxel results in a statistically significant survival benefit of 2.5 months, a significantly higher PSA- and pain response and represents the treatment of choice in the management of HRPCA. Bisphosphonates such as zoledronate represent another cornerstone in the management of PSA-progressive PCA demonstrating a significant benefit with regard to the prevention of skeletal related events. Furthermore, bisphosphonates might be indicated in the treatment of symptomatic bone pain. The current article critically reflects the various therapeutic options in the management of PSA progression following primary androgen deprivation for advanced prostate cancer.

Managing metastatic prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in the west. Most patients with metastatic or recurrent prostate cancer initially respond to androgen deprivation therapy, but almost all eventually progress. This review will focus on current treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer, with a focus on hormonal therapies, chemotherapy and treatment of bony disease, along with biological and targeted therapy.

Bone morphogenetic protein-6 promotes osteoblastic prostate cancer bone metastases through a dual mechanism

Prostate cancer frequently metastasizes to bone where it forms osteoblastic lesions through unknown mechanisms. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) are mediators of skeletal formation. Prostate cancer produces a variety of BMPs, including BMP-6. We tested the hypothesis that BMP-6 contributes to prostate cancer-induced osteosclerosis at bone metastatic sites. Prostate cancer cells and clinical tissues produced BMP-6 that increased with aggressiveness of the tumor. Prostate cancer-conditioned medium induced SMAD phosphorylation in the preosteoblast MC3T3 cells, and phosphorylation was diminished by anti-BMP-6 antibody. Prostate cancer-conditioned medium induced mineralization of MC3T3 cells, which was blocked by both the BMP inhibitor noggin and anti-BMP-6. Human fetal bones were implanted in severe combined immunodeficient mice and after 4 weeks, LuCaP 23.1 prostate cancer cells were injected both s.c. and into the bone implants. Anti-BMP-6 or isotype antibody administration was then initiated. Anti-BMP-6 reduced LuCaP 23.1-induced osteoblastic activity, but had no effect on its osteolytic activity. This was associated with increased osteoblast numbers and osteoblast activity based on bone histomorphometric evaluation. As endothelin-1 has been implicated in bone metastases, we measured serum endothelin-1 levels but found they were not different among the treatment groups. In addition to decreased bone production, anti-BMP-6 reduced intraosseous, but not s.c., tumor size. We found that BMP-2, BMP-4, BMP-6, and BMP-7 had no direct effect on prostate cancer cell growth, but BMP-2 and BMP-6 increased the in vitro invasive ability of prostate cancer cell. These data show that prostate cancer promotes osteoblastic activity through BMP-6 and that, in addition to its bone effects, suggest that BMPs promote the ability of the prostate cancer cells to invade the bone microenvironment.

Molecular mechanisms of breast cancer metastases to bone

Bone metastases lead to hypercalcemia, bone pain, fractures, and nerve compression. They cause increased morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced breast cancer. Animal models reproduce many of the features seen in patients with breast cancer and permit identification of tumor- and bone-derived factors important in skeletal metastasis. These factors provide novel targets for therapeutic interventions. Specific tumor-bone molecular interactions mediated by these factors drive a vicious cycle that perpetuates skeletal metastases. In breast cancer, osteolytic metastases are most common, but mixed and osteoblastic metastases occur in a significant number of patients. Parathyroid hormone-related protein is a common osteolytic factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukins 8 and 11 also contribute. Osteoblastic metastases can be caused by tumor-secreted endothelin-1 (ET-1), but there are a variety of other potential osteoblastic factors. Stimulation of osteoblasts can paradoxically increase osteoclast function, as bone-synthesizing osteoblasts are the main regulators of bone-destroying osteoclasts. Coexpression of osteolytic and osteoblastic factors can thus produce mixed metastases or increased osteolysis. Cancer treatments, especially sex steroid deprivation therapies, stimulate bone loss. Bone resorption results in the release of bone growth factors, which may unintentionally increase the formation of bone metastases by activating the vicious cycle. Clinically approved bisphosphonates prevent bone resorption and reduce the release of bone growth factors. Parathyroid hormone-related protein-neutralizing antibody, inhibitors of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand pathway, and ET-1 receptor antagonists are in clinical trials. These agents act on bone cells rather than tumor cells. Recent experiments identify new potential targets for prevention of bone metastases.

Zoledronic acid is effective in preventing and delaying skeletal events in patients with bone metastases secondary to genitourinary cancers

Patients with metastatic bone disease often have severe bone pain and debilitating skeletal complications. Zoledronic acid is the only bisphosphonate shown to be safe and effective in reducing skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and radiation or surgery to bone in patients with bone metastases from advanced prostate cancer or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In both tumour types, zoledronic acid significantly decreased the overall risk of developing an SRE, delayed their onset and significantly reduced the incidence of SREs compared with placebo. In patients with RCC, zoledronic acid also significantly delayed the time to progression of bone lesions by 5 months compared with placebo. Zoledronic acid is safe and well tolerated with long-term use.

Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer After First-Line Chemotherapy

Hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. There are increasing options for both first- and second-line therapy in the palliative treatment of patients with HRPC. Medications to control symptoms should first be optimized in patients with late-stage disease, and radiotherapy applied to dominant painful bone lesions. Docetaxel, mitoxantrone, satraplatin, and ixabepilone are active chemotherapeutic agents in the first- and/or second-line setting for patients with HRPC, and this may be true also of older drugs such as oral cyclophosphamide and vinorelbine. Radioisotopes such as strontium and samarium are useful for treatment of more generalized bone pain. Third-line hormonal maneuvers including glucocorticoids, ketoconazole, and estrogens can lead to further palliation in some patients, and there are provocative data that chemotherapy might restore hormonal sensitivity in a subset of patients.

Bisphosphonates for Treatment and Prevention of Bone Metastases

Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity for men with prostate cancer. Complications of bone metastases include pain, fractures, and spinal cord compression. Although they appear osteoblastic by radiographic imaging, most bone metastases are characterized by excess osteoclast number and activity. In addition, pathologic osteoclast activation is associated with increased risk of skeletal complications. Zoledronic acid, a potent inhibitor of osteoclast activity, differentiation, and survival, decreases the risk of skeletal complications in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer and bone metastases. Other bisphosphonates, including pamidronate and clodronate, seem to be ineffective in this setting. The reduction in risk of skeletal complications with zoledronic acid must be weighed against potential adverse effects. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal timing, schedule, and duration of treatment in men with bone metastases as well as the potential role of bisphosphonates in other settings including the prevention of bone metastases.

Present status and perspectives in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer

The cornerstone in the treatment of de novo or recurrent metastatic prostate cancer is androgen deprivation. Unfortunately, nearly all patients will develop androgen-independent ('hormone-refractory') disease with progressive clinical deterioration and ultimately death. Chemotherapy has been shown to palliate symptoms of hormone-refractory disease but not to improve survival. Recently, two large phase III trials have demonstrated an overall survival advantage for patients treated with docetaxel-based regimens as compared to the best standard of care. Indeed, investigations into the pathophysiology of this malignancy, novel biological agents, skeletal protectants and radiopharmaceuticals are expanding the clinician's armamentarium and improving the patient's outcome.

Predictive factors for skeletal complications in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with metastatic bone disease

Factors predictive of skeletal-related events (SREs) in bone metastatic prostate cancer patients with hormone-refractory disease were investigated. We evaluated the frequency of SREs in 200 hormone-refractory patients consecutively observed at our Institution and followed until death or the last follow-up. Baseline parameters were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analysis as potential predictive factors of SREs. Skeletal-related events were observed in 86 patients (43.0%), 10 of which (5.0%) occurred before the onset of hormone-refractory disease. In univariate analysis, patient performance status (P=0.002), disease extent (DE) in bone (P=0.0001), bone pain (P=0.0001), serum alkaline phosphatase (P=0.0001) and urinary N-telopeptide of type one collagen (P=0.0001) directly correlated with a greater risk to develop SREs, whereas Gleason score at diagnosis, serum PSA, Hb, serum albumin, serum calcium, types of bone lesions and duration of androgen deprivation therapy did not. Both DE in bone (hazard ratio (HR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.25, P=0.000) and pain score (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, P=0.000) were independent variables predicting for the onset of SREs in multivariate analysis. In patients with heavy tumour load in bone and great bone pain, the percentage of SREs was almost twice as high as (26 vs 52%, P<0.02) and occurred significantly earlier (P=0.000) than SREs in patients with limited DE in bone and low pain. Bone pain and DE in bone independently predict the occurrence of SREs in bone metastatic prostate cancer patients with hormone-refractory disease. These findings could help physicians in tailoring the skeletal follow-up most appropriate to individual patients and may prove useful for stratifying patients enrolled in bisphosphonate clinical trials.

Clinical benefit of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in advanced prostate cancer

Men with prostate cancer are at high risk of developing bone metastases that can lead to clinically significant skeletal morbidity. Recently, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in 422 men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases demonstrated that zoledronic acid (4 mg every 3 weeks) significantly reduced the incidence and onset of skeletal complications and provided significant long-term reductions in bone pain compared with placebo. Patients received zoledronic acid for a 15-month core phase, with the option to continue therapy for 9 more months on the extension phase. To evaluate the continuing benefit of long-term zoledronic acid therapy, retrospective exploratory analyses were conducted based on the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs; defined as pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation therapy to bone, or change in antineoplastic therapy for bone pain) occurring only during the extension phase of this trial. Quality of life parameters included assessment with the Brief Pain Inventory. Similar to results reported for the 15-month core phase and the entire 24-month study, the 9-month extension phase demonstrated that zoledronic acid significantly reduced the percentage of patients with an SRE (P = 0.017), prolonged the median time to first SRE (P = 0.036), reduced the annual incidence of SREs by 52% (P = 0.016), and reduced the risk of SREs by 53% (P = 0.022) compared with placebo. Furthermore, zoledronic acid was safe and well tolerated. Therefore, zoledronic acid provides long-term continuing clinical benefit for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases and represents a new therapeutic option for this population.

The Bisphosphonate YM529 Inhibits Osteolytic and Osteoblastic Changes and CXCR-4–Induced Invasion in Prostate Cancer

Bisphosphonates are useful for the treatment of prostate cancer bone metastasis. However, the role of bisphosphonate on the development of the osteoblastic component of prostate cancer bone metastases is not defined. In the present study, the third-generation bisphosphonate, YM529 (minodoronate), was tested for its effects on the osteolytic PC-3 and novel osteoblastic LNCaP-SF cell lines. YM529 inhibited both osteolytic and osteoblastic changes in an intratibial tumor injection murine model. In vitro, YM529 inhibited both the proliferation and the invasion of both prostate cancer cell lines. The stromal cell-derived factor-1 (or CXCL12)/CXCR-4 pathway is believed to play an important role in the development of prostate cancer bone metastases. Thus, we determined if YM529 affected this pathway. YM529 suppressed CXCR-4 expression in PC-3 and LNCaP-SF in vitro and in vivo and this was associated with decreased in vitro invasion. These results suggest that YM529 may inhibit cancer cell invasion into the bone matrix by repressing the expression of CXCR-4 in bone metastasis lesions.

MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PALLIATIVE CARE OF PATIENTS WITH UROLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES

PURPOSE

Urological malignancies are relatively common and patients often live many years with disease. There are many effective medical and surgical palliative treatments, although few comprehensive guidelines have been published. We reviewed the various palliative treatments available for the 3 most common urological malignancies, namely prostate cancer, bladder cancer and renal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of the last 15 years was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed. In addition, relevant journals were targeted for specific information related to this review. Our clinical experience was combined with the current literature to create guidelines for palliative care.

RESULTS

Several effective treatments are available for the palliative care of patients with prostate, bladder or renal cancer. Options in palliative care are varied with regard to invasiveness, morbidity, risks and benefits. The algorithms described provide a framework to a sequential approach to achieving palliation. Urologists are central to initiating care and referrals to improve outcomes in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care includes disease directed treatment as well as functional, psychosocial and spiritual support. Disease directed therapy and palliative care should be provided simultaneously throughout illness. Improved quality of care and quality of life as well as physician satisfaction are frequent outcomes of this approach. Supportive care begins at initial diagnosis and it should be flexible to meet the changing needs of patients with cancer and their families.

Efficacy of Ibandronate in Metastatic Bone Disease: Review of Clinical Data

Metastatic bone disease affects many cancer patients and has a significant disease burden because of complications such as pathologic fractures and severe pain, which affect patient mobility and quality of life. Bisphosphonates are the current standard of care for treating metastatic bone disease. Available agents have shown varying degrees of efficacy in clinical trials, and treatment potential can be limited by efficacy, tolerance, or toxicity issues. Ibandronate (Bondronat); F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com) is a highly potent, single-nitrogen bisphosphonate that is available in i.v. and oral formulations. In phase III trials in breast cancer patients, both formulations reduced the incidence of skeletal complications associated with metastatic bone disease and had significant and sustained effects on bone pain and patient quality of life. Open-label studies of loading-dose ibandronate administered over consecutive days suggest it also may be useful for relieving severe or opioid-resistant metastatic bone pain. New trials have been designed or are in progress that may extend the clinical indications of ibandronate for patients with metastatic bone disease.

Das Nachsorgeprinzip beim metastasierten Prostatakarzinom

For advanced prostate cancer - not including intermittent strategies - the patient is in continual treatment. The effect of the therapy must be controlled so that its failure can be determined as soon as possible and a new regimen started. As in most cases the progression of the disease can not be stopped, the aim of the therapy is to provide the patient with the best possible quality of life. In order to carry out therapy, if possible in the patient's usual environment, supportive therapies should be used, such as compensation for anaemia or pain therapy as required. Skeletal complications can be prophylactically treated by the use of biphosphonates.

Prostate-specific antigen response duration and risk of death for patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the time to return to the baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (PSA response duration) is significantly associated with the time to death after randomization for men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

METHODS

The study (n = 213) and validation (n = 281) cohorts constituted 494 men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer treated in four prospective randomized Phase II studies between February 1996 and October 2001. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate whether a significant association existed between the PSA response duration and the time to death after randomization, controlling for treatment and known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A decreasing PSA response duration was significantly associated with a shorter survival after randomization in the study (P = 0.001) and validation (P = 0.02) cohorts, controlling for treatment and known prognostic factors, which included serum PSA, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, and hemoglobin levels and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 2.6; P = 0.0002) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.5; P = 0.01) for men in the study and validation cohorts, respectively, whose PSA response duration was shorter than the median value of 3 months. The PSA response duration dichotomized about the median remained significantly associated with death whether patients in the validation cohort experienced at least a 50% reduction (P = 0.05) in the PSA level or not (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The duration of the PSA response to treatment is significantly associated with length of survival for men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

Safety and Tolerability of PCK3145, a Synthetic Peptide Derived from Prostate Secretory Protein 94 (PSP94) in Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and preliminary efficacy of PCK3145 were determined in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PCK3145 was administered in ascending doses of 5, 20, 40, and 80 mg/m2 3 times per week for 4 weeks to cohorts of 4 patients. Dose escalation was based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Pharmacokinetic profiles, tumor burden, and tumor markers (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9] levels) were assessed. Sixteen patients received PCK3145. The median age was 66 years, and the median PSA level was 232.5 microg/L. A total of 32 cycles of therapy were administered.

RESULTS

The most common adverse events reported were pain and nausea. The only DLT was a grade 4 cardiac arrhythmia in a patient treated at the 80-mg/m2 dose level. Pharmacokinetic analysis using a 2-compartment model indicated that the mean area under the curve values increased as the dose range increased, and the mean elimination half-life ranged from 0.35 hours to 1.45 hours. The best tumor response was stable disease in 10 patients and progressive disease in 5 patients. No PSA responses were observed, but 1 patient showed a marked reduction in PSA of 41% at cycle 2. A substantial reduction in MMP-9 levels was observed in patients with baseline levels of MMP-9 > 100 microg/L.

CONCLUSION

PCK3145 was safe and well tolerated at all doses. Efficacy observations were encouraging, and the biologic activity of PCK3145 in reducing MMP-9 level may suggest a potential role of this peptide in the regulation of metastatic tumor growth.

Controversies in pharmacotherapy of pain management

Since the establishment of the WHO three-step ladder for management of cancer pain, several controversies have arisen, which are partly due to new drug development, reformulations of older analgesics, and technological advancements. As a result, clinicians need clarification of several questions. Is morphine the opioid of choice for moderate to severe pain in cancer? Should combinations of opioids be used? When should spinal opioids be used to treat pain in cancer? What are the appropriate opioid doses for breakthrough pain? Should selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX) 2 inhibitors be used? What is the best tactic to treat neuropathic pain, and what first-line adjuvant analgesic should be used? And do bisphosphonates relieve bone pain in cancers other than breast cancer and myeloma? This review addresses these questions.

Predictive Value of Bone Resorption and Formation Markers in Cancer Patients With Bone Metastases Receiving the Bisphosphonate Zoledronic Acid

Purpose

Three large, randomized trials of patients with bone metastases recently demonstrated that zoledronic acid reduces the risk of skeletal-related events. These trials provide an opportunity for investigating the correlation between bone metabolism and clinical outcome during bisphosphonate therapy.

Patients and Methods

Urinary measurements of N-telopeptide (Ntx) and serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) were obtained in 1,824 bisphosphonate-treated patients—1,462 with zoledronic acid (breast, 490; prostate, 411; myeloma, 210; non–small-cell lung, 183; other, 168) and 362 with pamidronate (breast, 254; myeloma, 108). This exploratory cohort analysis grouped patients by baseline and most recent levels of Ntx as low (< 50 nmol/mmol creatinine), moderate (50 to 99 nmol/mmol creatinine), or high (≥ 100 nmol/mmol creatinine), and BAP as low (< 146 U/L) or high (≥ 146 U/L). The relative risks for negative clinical outcomes were estimated for each group using multiple-event and Cox regression models with time-varying covariates.

Results

Patients with high and moderate Ntx levels had 2-fold increases in their risk of skeletal complications and disease progression compared with patients with low Ntx levels (P < .001 for all). High Ntx levels in each solid tumor category were associated with a 4- to 6-fold increased risk of death on study, and moderate Ntx levels a 2- to 4-fold increased risk compared with low Ntx levels (P < .001 for all). Bone alkaline phosphatase also showed some correlation with risk of negative clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The bone resorption marker Ntx provides valuable prognostic information in patients with bone metastases receiving bisphosphonates.

Bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer without bone metastases treated with intermittent androgen suppression

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prospectively the effects of intermittent androgen suppression (AS) on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with prostate cancer without bone metastases.

METHODS

A total of 19 hormone-naive patients with Stage D0 disease were treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog and an antiandrogen for 9 months, after which AS was discontinued. When the prostate-specific antigen level reached a predetermined threshold, AS was restarted. BMD was measured at baseline, after 9 months of AS, and at the end of the first off-treatment period or at 1 year, whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients, 17 had normal BMD at baseline; 2 patients with osteopenia at baseline were excluded from the analysis. All but 1 of the 17 patients with normal baseline BMD experienced a decline in BMD in the lumbar spine or hip, or both, during AS. After 9 months, the mean BMD in these patients had decreased by 4.5% at the lumbar spine (P = 0.0007) and by 2.5% at the hip (P = 0.00013). After a median off-treatment period of 7.9 months, the mean change in BMD of the lumbar spine and hip relative to the post-AS values was 1.5% (P = 0.06) and -0.01% (P = 0.09), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed loss of BMD during 9 months of AS is significantly greater than the expected 0.5% to 1% annual loss. Interruption of AS attenuated the rate of bone loss, although full recovery to the baseline BMD was not achieved in all patients. These data suggest that men treated with AS should undergo baseline and periodic follow-up BMD assessments, because significant bone loss can occur during the first 9 months of AS.

Prognostic model of event-free survival for patients with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to develop a prognostic model of event-free survival (EFS) in men with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma (AIPC).

METHODS

Data from 160 patients diagnosed with AIPC between 1989-2002 were reviewed. No patient had received cytotoxic chemotherapy. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model identified significant predictors of EFS. Recursive partitioning analysis divided these significant variables into prognostic risk groups. The final prognostic model was tested with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The final prognostic risk model included the presence of metastatic disease at the time of androgen-independent disease progression (P = 0.040), time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (P = 0.043), and PSA doubling time (P < 0.01). Three highly independent risk groups were identified. The observed median EFSs were 6.1 months (95% confidence interval [95= CI], 3.4-8.8 months), 33.6 months (95= CI, 25.3-41.9 months), and 96.1 months (95= CI, 57.9-134.3 months) for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. Each risk group was found to be independently predictive of EFS (P < 0.01). Patients who died of prostate carcinoma experienced significantly more clinical events than those who died of other causes (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic model in the current study stratified patients into three highly significant and independent risk groups for EFS. A detailed PSA history and knowledge of metastatic disease are sufficient to risk-stratify patients with AIPC. One very unique aspect of this model was that it was developed from a patient cohort that never received chemotherapy.

Prostate cancer clinical trial end points: "RECIST"ing a step backwards

PURPOSE

To relate clinical issues to the clinical manifestations of prostate cancers across disease states using the eligibility and outcome criteria defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The manifestations of prostate cancer that characterize localized, recurrent, and metastatic disease were considered using the eligibility criteria for trials defined by RECIST. To do so, we analyzed the sites, size, and distribution of lesions in patients enrolled on contemporary Institutional Review Board-approved trials for progressive castrate and noncastrate metastatic disease. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were also assessed. RECIST-defined outcome measures for tumor regression were then applied to the metastatic patient cohorts, and separately to the states of a rising PSA (noncastrate and castrate) and localized disease.

RESULTS

Only 43.5% of men with castrate metastatic and 16% of noncastrate metastatic disease had measurable target lesions > 2 cm in size. Overall, 84.4% of the target lesions were lymph nodes, of which 67.7% were > or = 2 cm in the long axis. There are no target lesions in patients in the states of a rising PSA and localized disease, making them ineligible for trials under these criteria. PSA-based eligibility and outcomes under RECIST conflict with established reporting standards for the states of a rising PSA and castrate metastatic disease. The clinical manifestations of prostate cancer across multiple disease states are not addressed adequately using the eligibility criteria and outcomes measures defined by RECIST. Important treatment effects are not described.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial eligibility and end points based solely on tumor regression are not applicable to the majority of the clinical manifestations of prostate cancers representing all clinical states. Treatment effects can be described more precisely if eligibility criteria are adapted to the clinical question being addressed and clinical state under study, focusing on the duration of benefit defined biochemically, radiographically, and/or clinically.

Bone microenvironment modulates expression and activity of cathepsin B in prostate cancer

Prostate cancers metastasize to bone leading to osteolysis. Here we assessed proteolysis of DQ-collagen I (a bone matrix protein) and, for comparison, DQ-collagen IV, by living human prostate carcinoma cells in vitro. Both collagens were degraded, and this degradation was reduced by inhibitors of matrix metallo, serine, and cysteine proteases. Because secretion of the cysteine protease cathepsin B is increased in human breast fibroblasts grown on collagen I gels, we analyzed cathepsin B levels and secretion in prostate cells grown on collagen I gels. Levels and secretion were increased only in DU145 cells--cells that expressed the highest baseline levels of cathepsin B. Secretion of cathepsin B was also elevated in DU145 cells grown in vitro on human bone fragments. We further investigated the effect of the bone microenvironment on cathepsin B expression and activity in vivo in a SCID-human model of prostate bone metastasis. High levels of cathepsin B protein and activity were found in DU145, PC3, and LNCaP bone tumors, although the PC3 and LNCaP cells had exhibited low cathepsin B expression in vitro. Our results suggest that tumor-stromal interactions in the context of the bone microenvironment can modulate the expression of the cysteine protease cathepsin B.

Enhanced tumor regression and tissue repair when zoledronic acid is combined with ifosfamide in rat osteosarcoma

The efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZOL), with or without the anticancer drug ifosfamide (IFO), was tested on primary bone tumor growth using a rat-transplantable model of osteosarcoma. The effects on bone remodeling and tumor growth were analyzed by radiography, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and histological staining. The in vitro effects of ZOL were studied by proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle analyses on the osteosarcoma cells OSRGA compared to rat primary osteoblasts. Treatment with ZOL was effective in preventing the formation of osteolytic lesions that developed in bone sites and in reducing the local tumor growth, as compared to the untreated rats. The combination of ZOL and IFO was more effective than each agent alone in preventing tumor recurrence, improving tissue repair, and increasing bone formation as revealed by the analysis of trabecular architecture. In vitro studies demonstrated that ZOL was more potent against the OSRGA cell line than osteoblasts (with a half-maximal inhibitory effect on proliferation seen at 0.2 and 20 microM, respectively), the ZOL-induced inhibition of OSRGA proliferation being due to cell cycle arrest in S-phase. No effect on OSRGA apoptosis could be observed in vitro, as assessed by Hoechst staining and caspase-1 and -3 activation. In situ cell death was determined by TUNEL staining on tumor tissue sections. No significant difference in TUNEL-positive cells could be observed between ZOL-treated and -untreated rats. This is the first report of the anti-bone resorption and antitumoral activities of zoledronic acid in a rat model of osteosarcoma, and its beneficial association with an antitumoral chemotherapeutic drug in preventing tumor recurrence.

Bisphosphonates' use in metastatic

Bisphosphonates already have an established role in the management of the skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease. The development of new, highly potent compounds has led to investigation into their use as preventive agents in the adjuvant setting. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the evidence for their use in prevention and treatment.

Zoledronic acid-related angiogenesis modifications and survival in advanced breast cancer patients

The proven antiangiogenic activity of zoledronic acid, a third-generation bisphosphonate widely used in bone metastatic cancer patients, led us to investigate if the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-related zoledronic acid modifications are correlated with survival advantages in advanced breast cancer patients. Forty-two consecutive breast cancer patients with scintigraphic and radiographic evidence of bone metastases were treated with a single infusion of 4 mg zoledronic acid before anticancer chemotherapy. The patients were prospectively evaluated for circulating levels of VEGF and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) just before and at 1, 2, 7, and 21 days after zoledronic acid infusion. Afterward, clinical outcome was prospectively monitored. The basal serum VEGF median levels were significantly decreased at each time point, but the major reduction was recorded 21 days after the infusion. In particular, 25 patients of 42 (59.5%) experienced a reduction of at least 25% in the VEGF circulating levels. In contrast, no statistically significant modifications of the IFN-gamma serum levels were recorded. We stratified patients on the basis of this VEGF reduction 21 days after the infusion. No differences in patient features were recorded between those with or without the VEGF reduction. The analysis of survival showed that patients with a reduction in the VEGF circulating levels had a longer time to first skeletal-related event (p = 0.0002), time to bone progression disease (p = 0.0024), and time to performance status worsening (p = 0.0352) than those without the VEGF reduction. No statistically significant differences were recorded in terms of overall survival and time to visceral progression. This study confirms that zoledronic acid could have an in vivo antiangiogenic property and that the VEGF modifications may represent a surrogate marker able to predict time to first skeletal-related event, time to bone progression disease, and time to worsening of performance status.

Management of bone metastases in cancer: a review

The presence of bone metastases is indicative of disseminated disease and typically indicates a short-term prognosis in cancer patients. Palliation of symptoms is the primary goal of therapy, with multidisciplinary efforts yielding the best results. New classes of drugs, such as bisphosphonates that significantly increase the time to first skeletal-related event (SRE), represent useful tools for the treatment of bone metastases. While the optimal duration of therapy needs to be defined, there is clinical benefit derived from the use of this class of agents. A potential role for bisphosphonates in the prevention of bone metastases is under current evaluation in clinical trials encompassing different solid tumor types. In combination with ongoing clinical trials, basic research to identify potential novel targets in the tumor cells-bone microenvironment will further define future strategies in the treatment of bone metastases.

New therapeutic agents for the treatment of bone diseases

Bisphosphonates have demonstrated important clinical benefits for patients with malignant bone disease, metabolic bone diseases, such as Paget's disease, and postmenopausal osteoporosis. The introduction of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates with high affinity for hydroxyapatite in bone represents an important advancement. These agents are now a standard of care for osteoporosis, Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, primary bone lesions from multiple myeloma and bone metastases from breast cancer. Moreover, the recent clinical development of zoledronic acid (4 mg by 15-minute intravenous infusion) has expanded the benefits of bisphosphonate therapy to patients with bone metastases from any solid tumour. Bisphosphonates are also being investigated at present for the prevention of bone loss resulting from cancer therapy. In addition, a variety of novel biologic agents, receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand antibodies, osteoprotegerin and cathepsin K inhibitors are being investigated at present for the treatment of malignant bone disease. The management of bone health is an important area of active research, and the armamentarium and role of bone-specific therapies continue to expand.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Bisphosphonates for Patients with Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone: A Review of Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trials

Intravenous bisphosphonates are the preferred treatment to prevent skeletal complications for patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. Pamidronate, a single-nitrogen bisphosphonate, was the early standard of care for such patients based on 2 large, placebo-controlled trials involving 754 patients. Zoledronic acid, a new-generation bisphosphonate containing 2 nitrogens, was evaluated in 1130 patients with breast cancer in a large, randomized, comparative, phase III trial with pamidronate. At 25 months, zoledronic acid (4 mg) significantly reduced the overall risk of developing a skeletal-related event (SRE) by an additional 20% versus 90 mg pamidronate by multiple-event analysis. Furthermore, zoledronic acid was at least as effective as pamidronate in reducing the proportion of patients with > or = 1 SRE and in delaying the onset of SREs. Moreover, a retrospective subset analysis of 352 patients with > or = 1 osteolytic lesion proved zoledronic acid more effective than pamidronate in reducing the risk and delaying the onset of SREs. Intravenous ibandronate (6 mg via 1-2-hour infusion) was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, phase III trial of 466 patients and was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the number of 12-week treatment periods in which an SRE occurred. The safety profiles among all intravenous bisphosphonates were similar; patients treated with intravenous bisphosphonates reported notably less bone pain but a higher incidence of mild to moderate transient infusion-related adverse events (eg, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, and anorexia) compared with placebo. In summary, intravenous bisphosphonates are effective for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer and have similar safety profiles, but the shorter infusion time and greater efficacy of zoledronic acid in reducing overall skeletal morbidity provide advantages over other available agents.

National cooperative group trials

Now is the time to answer critical questions in the management of prostate cancer through enrollment in high-priority national phase 3 clinical trials. Studies of systemic therapy before and after local therapy are vitally important to determine whether early systemic interventions might delay cancer progression. Chemotherapy must be studied in earlier disease progression. Novel targeted therapies, such as vaccine therapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, and newer microtubule targeting agents, should be studied in all stages of progression. Despite these needs and the availability of systemic therapies, accrual to trials has been lagging. This article reviews the national cooperative group clinical trials, whether currently open or planned, and suggests practical strategies to improve accrual.

Future therapies in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) remains true to its name: it is largely refractory to attempts to delay its progression. Although the number of men presenting with metastatic prostate cancer has decreased significantly over the last several years, the death rate for those men is essentially unchanged. To alter the currently inevitable progression of HRPC to death, new targets and new therapies are needed. This article reviews investigational therapies directed against standard targets (eg, the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis) as well as novel targets (eg, the endothelin axis).

Cancer pain assessment in clinical trials. A review of the literature (1999-2002)

The aim of this review was to evaluate the methods of pain measurement in controlled clinical trials in oncology published between 1999 and 2002. An electronic literature search strategy was used according to established criteria applied to the Medline database and PubMed search engine. Articles were selected to include only studies that had chronic cancer pain as the primary or secondary objective of a controlled clinical trial. A specific evaluation scheme was used to examine how pain measurement methods were chosen and implemented in the study procedures. The search strategy identified 613 articles, and 68 were selected for evaluation. Most articles (69%) chose unidimensional pain measurement tools, such as visual analogue scales, numerical rating scales and verbal rating scales, whereas others used questionnaires. The implementation of the pain assessment method was problematic in many studies, especially as far as time frame of pain assessment (70%), administration modalities (46%), and use of non-validated measurement methods (10%). Design of study and data analysis were often unclear about the definition of pain outcome measure (40%), patient compliance with pain assessment (98%), and impact of missing data (56%). Statistical techniques were seldom appropriate to the type of data collected and often inadequate to describe the pain variable under study. It is clear from this review that most authors were aware of the need of valid pain measurement tools to be used in clinical trials. However, too often these tools were not appropriately used in the trial, or at least their use was not described with sufficient accuracy in the trial methods.

Bisphosphonates Treatment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

The skeleton is the third most common site for cancer to spread after the liver and lungs. Malignancies that can cause destruction of skeletal bones include multiple myeloma and metastatic diseases of the lung, prostate and other solid cancers. The clinical complications include pain, fractures, compression of the spinal cord and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Bisphosphonates are bone-seeking agents originally designed to treat loss of bone density. Accumulating data show that they are effective in diseases in which there is upregulation of osteoclastic or osteolytic activity. Bisphosphonates can reduce skeletal-related events and bone pain, as well as reduce the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy on skeletal integrity. However, it is clear that bisphosphonates do not represent a decisive treatment in the care of metastases but a therapeutic choice in synergy with regular anti-tumor drugs. The preclinical and clinical data to support this are reviewed here.

Review of ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic bone disease: experience from phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Metastatic bone disease is a serious clinical problem in patients with advanced cancer. Bisphosphonates inhibit the activity of osteoclasts and are the treatment of choice for bone metastases.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the efficacy and safety data from Phase III trials of ibandronate in metastatic bone disease.

METHODS

Phase III data (available as of June 2004) for ibandronate were reviewed. Literature searches using the MEDLINE database and abstracts from scientific meetings were used to obtain data from Phase III trials of ibandronate.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, patients with bone metastases from breast cancer receiving IV ibandronate (6 mg infused over 1-2 hours every 3-4 weeks) or oral ibandronate (50 mg/d for up to 96 weeks) had a statistically significant reduction in skeletal complications, as measured by the Skeletal Morbidity Period Rate (P = 0.004 vs placebo). Multivariate Poisson regression analysis of the data showed that the risk of a new bone event was reduced by 40% with IV ibandronate 6 mg and by 38% with oral ibandronate 50 mg, compared with placebo (P < or = 0.003). Both formulations also reduced bone pain below baseline levels over 2 years (P < or = 0.001 vs placebo). IV and oral ibandronate were well tolerated, with adverse-event profiles comparable to placebo and no significant renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

IV and oral ibandronate provide meaningful clinical benefits in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Both formulations reduce the risk of skeletal events and provide sustained relief from metastatic bone pain. With its favorable efficacy and safety profile, and the added convenience of the oral formulation, ibandronate provides improved treatment options for managing metastatic bone disease.

Management of cancer pain

There are four basic approaches to cancer pain control: modify the source of pain, alter central perception of pain, modulate transmission of pain to the central nervous system, and block transmission of pain to the central nervous system. Systemic pharmacologic management aimed at the first three of these approaches is the cornerstone of the treatment of most cancer patients with moderate to severe pain. Optimal pharmacologic management of cancer pain requires selection of the appropriate analgesic drug; prescription of the appropriate dose; administration of the analgesic by the appropriate route; scheduling of the appropriate dosing interval; prevention of persistent pain and relief of breakthrough pain; aggressive titration of the dose of the analgesic; prevention, anticipation, and management of analgesic side effects; consideration of sequential trials of opioid analgesics; and use of appropriate co-analgesic drugs for specific pain syndromes. Most clinicians should be able to control most of the pain in most of their cancer patients. Collaboration with pain and hospice/palliative care experts should help the rest. No cancer patient should live or die with unrelieved pain.

A randomized, phase II trial of ketoconazole plus alendronate versus ketoconazole alone in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer and bone metastases

PURPOSE

Alendronate (AL), a potent oral bisphosphonate, blocks the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and the establishment of bone metastases in animal models. Ketoconazole (KT) has demonstrated activity in androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). In this study we determined whether KT plus AL produced acceptable disease responses compared with KT alone. As the experimental design, 72 patients with progressive AIPC metastatic to bone were randomized to receive KT (1,200 mg daily) plus hydrocortisone (H) (30 mg daily) with or without AL (40 mg daily). Prostate specific antigen (PSA) consensus criteria and radiographic scans were used to determine the proportion of patients with a PSA decrease, time to progression and response duration. The pharmacokinetics of KT and AL were characterized and changes in circulating angiogenic factors were assessed.

RESULTS

At a median potential followup of 23.9 months the proportion of patients with a greater than 50% decrease in PSA was similar in the KT/H/AL and KT/H, groups (50% and 47%, respectively). The median duration of response was 8.9 and 6.3 months in the KT/H/AL and KT/H groups, respectively (p = 0.125). Median progression-free survival was not significantly prolonged in the KT/H/AL group (4.6 vs 3.8 months, p = 0.27). There was no significant difference in overall survival between the 2 treatment arms but there was a trend toward improved survival in the KT/H arm (p = 0.074). Toxicity in the 2 groups was mild and there were no clear associations between changes in circulating angiogenic factor levels and clinical outcomes in either treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences in response rate, progression-free survival or overall survival between KT/H alone and KT/H plus AL treatment in patients with AIPC. The addition of AL to KT/H may increase the response duration with an acceptable safety profile compared with treatment with KT/H alone. However, the addition of AL offers no survival benefit in patients with AIPC.

Bisphosphonate therapy in the oncology setting

Patients with metastatic cancer and bone involvement are at chronic risk of skeletal complications, including bone pain, fractures, spinal cord compression and hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Therapies targeting the primary malignancy are often unable to prevent skeletal complications, which often require orthopaedic surgery, radiation therapy and analgesics. Intravenous bisphosphonates can reduce the risk of skeletal complications and the requirement for palliative radiation therapy. Since its broad regulatory approval, zoledronic acid (ZOMETA, Novartis Pharma AG/Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation) 4 mg by 15-minute intravenous infusion has become widely used to treat bone metastases from all solid tumours and is becoming the standard of care for advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma. Additionally, cancer treatment-induced bone loss is an emerging problem in clinical oncology, and bisphosphonates -- particularly intravenous bisphosphonates -- may provide benefits even before bone lesions develop. Further investigations of bisphosphonates in these and other indications are ongoing.

The role of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer and biochemical failure: considerations for optimal use

BACKGROUND

More patients are being diagnosed with prostate cancer at an earlier age with earlier stage disease because of advances in screening and detection. Investigators continue to explore the use of hormone therapy, particularly luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues, earlier in the course of disease.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes clinical evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of LHRH analogues in the treatment of locoregional disease or following biochemical failure.

METHODS

Relevant information from clinical studies was identified through a MEDLINE search of the medical literature published in English in the last 5 years (search terms: LHRH and prostate cancer). The search included prospective and retrospective clinical studies on LHRH therapy in locally advanced prostate cancer. Additional relevant publications published before 1999 were identified from citations in the resulting articles.

RESULTS

The available clinical evidence suggests that the use of LHRH analogues as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in conjunction with radiation therapy may improve survival outcomes. Few studies have evaluated the use of LHRH analogues after biochemical failure. However, several related studies indicate that initiating hormone therapy earlier rather than later may provide some clinical benefit. When considering early initiation of LHRH therapy, the potential risks of long-term treatment must be considered. Physiologic changes, such as deterioration of body composition and bone quality, may have important effects on the risk of developing cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some clinical evidence supports the use of LHRH analogues as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy or following biochemical failure, further study is needed. In the meantime, clinicians should carefully weigh the potential benefits and risks of early hormone therapy when making treatment decisions.