1151
|
Capoluongo E, Scambia G, Nabholtz JM. Main implications related to the switch to BRCA1/2 tumor testing in ovarian cancer patients: a proposal of a consensus. Oncotarget 2018. [PMID: 29731958 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24728] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since the approval of the first poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi; olaparib [Lynparza™]) for platinum-sensitive relapsed high grade ovarian cancer, with either germline or somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious variants, the strategies for BRCA1/2 are dynamically changing. Along with germline testing within the context of familial or sporadic ovarian cancer, patients are now being referred for BRCA1/2 genetic assay above all for treatment decisions: in this setting tumour BRCA assay can allow to identify an estimated 3-9% of patients with peculiar somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. These women could also benefit from PARPi therapy. This new type of approach is really challenging, in particular due to the technical and analytical difficulties regarding low quality DNA deriving from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens. Aim in this manuscript, we try to a) underline many issues related to BRCA1/2 analysis by next generation sequencing technologies (NGS), b) provide some responses to many questions regarding this new paradigm related to OvCa patients' management. Some considerations for incorporating genetic analysis of ovarian tumour samples into the patient pathway and ethical requirements are also provided. Methods we used our retrospective data based on thousands of ovarian cancer women sequenced for BRCA1/2 genes. Discussion tumor BRCA1/2 assay should be rapidly introduced in routine laboratory practice as first line testing by using harmonized pipelines based on consensus guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ettore Capoluongo
- Laboratory of Advanced Molecular Diagnostics (DIMA), Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Fondazione Luigi Maria Monti, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Molipharma Srl, a Spinoff of Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Molipharma Srl, a Spinoff of Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Jean-Marc Nabholtz
- Cancer Research Oncology Centre, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, KSA
| |
Collapse
|
1152
|
Capoluongo E, Scambia G, Nabholtz JM. Main implications related to the switch to BRCA1/2 tumor testing in ovarian cancer patients: a proposal of a consensus. Oncotarget 2018; 9:19463-19468. [PMID: 29731958 PMCID: PMC5929401 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Since the approval of the first poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi; olaparib [Lynparza™]) for platinum-sensitive relapsed high grade ovarian cancer, with either germline or somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious variants, the strategies for BRCA1/2 are dynamically changing. Along with germline testing within the context of familial or sporadic ovarian cancer, patients are now being referred for BRCA1/2 genetic assay above all for treatment decisions: in this setting tumour BRCA assay can allow to identify an estimated 3–9% of patients with peculiar somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. These women could also benefit from PARPi therapy. This new type of approach is really challenging, in particular due to the technical and analytical difficulties regarding low quality DNA deriving from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens. Aim in this manuscript, we try to a) underline many issues related to BRCA1/2 analysis by next generation sequencing technologies (NGS), b) provide some responses to many questions regarding this new paradigm related to OvCa patients’ management. Some considerations for incorporating genetic analysis of ovarian tumour samples into the patient pathway and ethical requirements are also provided. Methods we used our retrospective data based on thousands of ovarian cancer women sequenced for BRCA1/2 genes. Discussion tumor BRCA1/2 assay should be rapidly introduced in routine laboratory practice as first line testing by using harmonized pipelines based on consensus guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ettore Capoluongo
- Laboratory of Advanced Molecular Diagnostics (DIMA), Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Fondazione Luigi Maria Monti, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Molipharma Srl, a Spinoff of Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.,Molipharma Srl, a Spinoff of Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Jean-Marc Nabholtz
- Cancer Research Oncology Centre, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, KSA
| |
Collapse
|
1153
|
Boca SM, Panagiotou OA, Rao S, McGarvey PB, Madhavan S. Future of Evidence Synthesis in Precision Oncology: Between Systematic Reviews and Biocuration. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:PO.17.00175. [PMID: 31930186 PMCID: PMC6953752 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simina M. Boca
- Simina M. Boca, Shruti Rao, Peter B. McGarvey, and Subha Madhavan, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Orestis A. Panagiotou, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Orestis A. Panagiotou
- Simina M. Boca, Shruti Rao, Peter B. McGarvey, and Subha Madhavan, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Orestis A. Panagiotou, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Shruti Rao
- Simina M. Boca, Shruti Rao, Peter B. McGarvey, and Subha Madhavan, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Orestis A. Panagiotou, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Peter B. McGarvey
- Simina M. Boca, Shruti Rao, Peter B. McGarvey, and Subha Madhavan, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Orestis A. Panagiotou, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Subha Madhavan
- Simina M. Boca, Shruti Rao, Peter B. McGarvey, and Subha Madhavan, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Orestis A. Panagiotou, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
1154
|
DiNardo CD, Routbort MJ, Bannon SA, Benton CB, Takahashi K, Kornblau SM, Luthra R, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Medeiros LJ, Garcia-Manero G, M. Kantarjian H, Futreal PA, Meric-Bernstam F, Patel KP. Improving the detection of patients with inherited predispositions to hematologic malignancies using next-generation sequencing-based leukemia prognostication panels. Cancer 2018; 124:2704-2713. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney D. DiNardo
- Department of Leukemia; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Mark J. Routbort
- Department of Hematopathology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Sarah A. Bannon
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Christopher B. Benton
- Department of Leukemia; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Koichi Takahashi
- Department of Leukemia; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Steve M. Kornblau
- Department of Leukemia; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Rajyalakshmi Luthra
- Department of Hematopathology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
- Department of Hematopathology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - L. Jeffrey Medeiros
- Department of Hematopathology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | | | - Hagop M. Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - P. Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Keyur P. Patel
- Department of Hematopathology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
1155
|
Miller KE, Kelly B, Fitch J, Ross N, Avenarius MR, Varga E, Koboldt DC, Boué DR, Magrini V, Coven SL, Finlay JL, Cottrell CE, White P, Gastier-Foster JM, Wilson RK, Leonard J, Mardis ER. Genome sequencing identifies somatic BRAF duplication c.1794_1796dupTAC;p.Thr599dup in pediatric patient with low-grade ganglioglioma. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2018; 4:mcs.a002618. [PMID: 29434027 PMCID: PMC5880266 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a002618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gangliogliomas (WHO grade I) are rare tumors affecting the central nervous system and are most frequently observed in children. Next-generation sequencing of tumors is being utilized at an increasing rate in both research and clinical settings to characterize the genetic factors that drive tumorigenesis. Here, we report a rare BRAF somatic mutation (NM_004333.4:c.1794_1796dupTAC; p.Thr599dup) in the tumor genome from a pediatric patient in her late teens, who was initially diagnosed with low-grade ganglioglioma at age 13. This duplication of 3 nt introduces a second threonine residue at amino acid 599 of the BRAF protein. Based on previous studies, this variant is likely to increase kinase activity, similar to the well-characterized BRAF p.Val600Glu (V600E) pathogenic variant. In addition, although the p.T599dup somatic mutation has been documented rarely in human cancers, the variant has not been previously reported in ganglioglioma. The identification of this variant presents an opportunity to consider targeted therapy (e.g., BRAF inhibitor) for this patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Miller
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Benjamin Kelly
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - James Fitch
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Nicole Ross
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Matthew R Avenarius
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Elizabeth Varga
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Daniel C Koboldt
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Daniel R Boué
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Vincent Magrini
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Scott L Coven
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Jonathan L Finlay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplantation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Catherine E Cottrell
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Peter White
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Julie M Gastier-Foster
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Richard K Wilson
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Jeffrey Leonard
- Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA
| | - Elaine R Mardis
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1156
|
Schuh A, Dreau H, Knight SJL, Ridout K, Mizani T, Vavoulis D, Colling R, Antoniou P, Kvikstad EM, Pentony MM, Hamblin A, Protheroe A, Parton M, Shah KA, Orosz Z, Athanasou N, Hassan B, Flanagan AM, Ahmed A, Winter S, Harris A, Tomlinson I, Popitsch N, Church D, Taylor JC. Clinically actionable mutation profiles in patients with cancer identified by whole-genome sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 2018; 4:a002279. [PMID: 29610388 PMCID: PMC5880257 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a002279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) efforts have established catalogs of mutations relevant to cancer development. However, the clinical utility of this information remains largely unexplored. Here, we present the results of the first eight patients recruited into a clinical whole-genome sequencing (WGS) program in the United Kingdom. We performed PCR-free WGS of fresh frozen tumors and germline DNA at 75× and 30×, respectively, using the HiSeq2500 HTv4. Subtracted tumor VCFs and paired germlines were subjected to comprehensive analysis of coding and noncoding regions, integration of germline with somatically acquired variants, and global mutation signatures and pathway analyses. Results were classified into tiers and presented to a multidisciplinary tumor board. WGS results helped to clarify an uncertain histopathological diagnosis in one case, led to informed or supported prognosis in two cases, leading to de-escalation of therapy in one, and indicated potential treatments in all eight. Overall 26 different tier 1 potentially clinically actionable findings were identified using WGS compared with six SNVs/indels using routine targeted NGS. These initial results demonstrate the potential of WGS to inform future diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment choice in cancer and justify the systematic evaluation of the clinical utility of WGS in larger cohorts of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schuh
- Oxford Molecular Diagnostics Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Helene Dreau
- Oxford Molecular Diagnostics Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha J L Knight
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Ridout
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Tuba Mizani
- Oxford Molecular Diagnostics Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitris Vavoulis
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Colling
- Oxford Molecular Diagnostics Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Pavlos Antoniou
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Erika M Kvikstad
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa M Pentony
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Hamblin
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Protheroe
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 7LE, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Parton
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Kingston NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| | - Ketan A Shah
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Zsolt Orosz
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Kingston NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Athanasou
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
| | - Bass Hassan
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom
| | - Adrienne M Flanagan
- University College London, Cancer Institute and Royal National Orthopaedic NHS Hospital, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Ahmed
- Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Winter
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat-Head and Neck Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Harris
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Niko Popitsch
- The Children's Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - David Church
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny C Taylor
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX4 2PG, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1157
|
Analyzing the Genetic Spectrum of Vascular Anomalies with Overgrowth via Cancer Genomics. J Invest Dermatol 2018; 138:957-967. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
1158
|
Alfares A, Aloraini T, subaie LA, Alissa A, Qudsi AA, Alahmad A, Mutairi FA, Alswaid A, Alothaim A, Eyaid W, Albalwi M, Alturki S, Alfadhel M. Whole-genome sequencing offers additional but limited clinical utility compared with reanalysis of whole-exome sequencing. Genet Med 2018; 20:1328-1333. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
1159
|
Fumagalli C, Vacirca D, Rappa A, Passaro A, Guarize J, Rafaniello Raviele P, de Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Casadio C, Viale G, Barberis M, Guerini-Rocco E. The long tail of molecular alterations in non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience of next-generation sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostics. J Clin Pathol 2018. [PMID: 29535211 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiling of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) is essential to identify patients who may benefit from targeted treatments. In the last years, the number of potentially actionable molecular alterations has rapidly increased. Next-generation sequencing allows for the analysis of multiple genes simultaneously. AIMS To evaluate the feasibility and the throughput of next-generation sequencing in clinical molecular diagnostics of advanced NSCLC. METHODS A single-institution cohort of 535 non-squamous NSCLC was profiled using a next-generation sequencing panel targeting 22 actionable and cancer-related genes. RESULTS 441 non-squamous NSCLC (82.4%) harboured at least one gene alteration, including 340 cases (63.6%) with clinically relevant molecular aberrations. Mutations have been detected in all but one gene (FGFR1) of the panel. Recurrent alterations were observed in KRAS, TP53, EGFR, STK11 and MET genes, whereas the remaining genes were mutated in <5% of the cases. Concurrent mutations were detected in 183 tumours (34.2%), mostly impairing KRAS or EGFR in association with TP53 alterations. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the feasibility of targeted next-generation sequencing in clinical setting. The majority of NSCLC harboured mutations in clinically relevant genes, thus identifying patients who might benefit from different targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Fumagalli
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Vacirca
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Rappa
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Passaro
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Juliana Guarize
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Filippo de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Casadio
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Barberis
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Guerini-Rocco
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1160
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:1242-1253. [PMID: 29504834 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0901-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE.— Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. METHODS.— An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including preanalytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. RESULTS.— The literature search identified 1338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. CONCLUSIONS.— The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens, and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity or clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, reevaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1161
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1631-1641. [PMID: 29504847 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.8671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 586] [Impact Index Per Article: 97.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1162
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:321-346. [PMID: 29355391 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0388-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 515] [Impact Index Per Article: 85.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT - In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE - To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN - The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS - Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS - The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes ( ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Lindeman and Sholl) and Medicine (Dr Kwiatkowski), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Cancer Center (Dr Bernicker) and the Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Dr Cagle); the Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver (Dr Aisner); the Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory (Dr Arcila) and the Molecular Diagnostics Service (Dr Ladanyi), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; the Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York (Dr Beasley); the Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Mss Colasacco and Ventura); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Dacic); the Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver (Dr Hirsch); the Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland (Dr Kerr); the Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York (Dr Nowak); the Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Temple-Smolkin); the Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Solomon); the Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Thunnissen); the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Tsao); Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Wynes); and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan (Dr Yatabe). Dr Souter is in private practice in Wellanport, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1163
|
Kohno T. Implementation of "clinical sequencing" in cancer genome medicine in Japan. Cancer Sci 2018; 109:507-512. [PMID: 29285848 PMCID: PMC5834803 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 12/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In oncology, actionable mutations (alterations) in cancer-associated genes are critical in terms of the selection of therapeutic approaches. Next-generation sequencing of tumor sample DNA (ie, clinical sequencing) can guide clinical management by providing diagnostic or prognostic data, and facilitating the identification of potential treatment regimens, such as molecular-targeted and immune checkpoint blockade therapies. In the USA, a variety of tumor-profiling multiplex gene panels have been developed and implemented for this purpose. In Japan, several academic institutions have now carried out detailed investigations of the feasibility and value of clinical sequencing, and cancer societies have issued consensus clinical practice guidance for next-generation sequencing-based gene panel tests. These efforts will facilitate the implementation of cancer genome medicine in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kohno
- Division of Genome BiologyNational Cancer Center Research InstituteTokyoJapan
- Division of Translational GenomicsExploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial CenterNational Cancer CenterTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
1164
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 13:323-358. [PMID: 29396253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 337] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Philip T Cagle
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Dara L Aisner
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, New York
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary Beth Beasley
- Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Carol Colasacco
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Sanja Dacic
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, New York
| | - Keith Kerr
- Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | | - Marc Ladanyi
- Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Erik Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ming S Tsao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Murry W Wynes
- Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
1165
|
Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Aisner DL, Arcila ME, Beasley MB, Bernicker EH, Colasacco C, Dacic S, Hirsch FR, Kerr K, Kwiatkowski DJ, Ladanyi M, Nowak JA, Sholl L, Temple-Smolkin R, Solomon B, Souter LH, Thunnissen E, Tsao MS, Ventura CB, Wynes MW, Yatabe Y. Updated Molecular Testing Guideline for the Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for Treatment With Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn 2018; 20:129-159. [PMID: 29398453 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal I Lindeman
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Philip T Cagle
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Dara L Aisner
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Diagnostic and Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mary Beth Beasley
- Department of Pathology & Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Eric H Bernicker
- Cancer Research Program, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Carol Colasacco
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Sanja Dacic
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Keith Kerr
- Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | | | - Marc Ladanyi
- Molecular Diagnostics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jan A Nowak
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robyn Temple-Smolkin
- Clinical and Scientific Affairs Division, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Molecular Therapeutics and Biomarkers Laboratory, Peter Maccallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Erik Thunnissen
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ming S Tsao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christina B Ventura
- Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| | - Murry W Wynes
- Scientific Affairs, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yasushi Yatabe
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
1166
|
Identification of a Rare Germline Heterozygous Deletion Involving the Polycistronic miR-17-92 Cluster in Two First-Degree Relatives from a BRCA 1/2 Negative Chilean Family with Familial Breast Cancer: Possible Functional Implications. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19010321. [PMID: 29361751 PMCID: PMC5796264 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19010321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as novel gene expression regulators. Recent evidence strongly suggests a role for miRNAs in a large variety of cancer-related pathways. Different studies have shown that 18.7 to 37% of all human miRNA genes are clustered. miR-17–92 polycistronic cluster overexpression is associated with human hematolymphoid and solid malignancies including breast cancer (BC). Here, we report the identification of rs770419845, a rare 6 bp deletion located within the polycistronic miR-17–92 cluster, in two first-degree relatives from a Chilean family with familial BC and negative for point mutations in BRCA 1/2 genes. The deletion was identified by Sanger sequencing when 99 BRCA1/2 mutation-negative BC cases with a strong family history were initially screened. In silico analysis predicts that rs770419845 affects the secondary structure and stability of the pre-miR-17–pre-miR-18 region and the entire 17–92 cluster. The deletion was screened in 458 high-risk BRCA1/2-negative Chilean families and 480 controls. rs770419845 was not detected in any control but identified in a single family with two cases of BC and other cancers. Both BC cases, the mother and her daughter, carried the deletion. Based on bioinformatic analyses, the location of the deletion and its low frequency, we presume rs770419845 may be a pathogenic variant. Functional studies are needed to support this hypothesis.
Collapse
|
1167
|
Roy S, Coldren C, Karunamurthy A, Kip NS, Klee EW, Lincoln SE, Leon A, Pullambhatla M, Temple-Smolkin RL, Voelkerding KV, Wang C, Carter AB. Standards and Guidelines for Validating Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines. J Mol Diagn 2018; 20:4-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
1168
|
Veldore VH, Choughule A, Routhu T, Mandloi N, Noronha V, Joshi A, Dutt A, Gupta R, Vedam R, Prabhash K. Validation of liquid biopsy: plasma cell-free DNA testing in clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. LUNG CANCER (AUCKLAND, N.Z.) 2018; 9:1-11. [PMID: 29379323 PMCID: PMC5757203 DOI: 10.2147/lctt.s147841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Plasma cell-free tumor DNA, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), from liquid biopsy is a potential source of tumor genetic material, in the absence of tissue biopsy, for EGFR testing. Our validation study reiterates the clinical utility of ctDNA next generation sequencing (NGS) for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 163 NSCLC cases were included in the validation, of which 132 patients had paired tissue biopsy and ctDNA. We chose to validate ctDNA using deep sequencing with custom designed bioinformatics methods that could detect somatic mutations at allele frequencies as low as 0.01%. Benchmarking allele specific real time PCR as one of the standard methods for tissue-based EGFR mutation testing, the ctDNA NGS test was validated on all the plasma derived cell-free DNA samples. We observed a high concordance (96.96%) between tissue biopsy and ctDNA for oncogenic driver mutations in Exon 19 and Exon 21 of the EGFR gene. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the assay were 91.1%, 100% 100%, 95.6%, and 97%, respectively. A false negative rate of 3% was observed. A subset of mutations was also verified on droplet digital PCR. Sixteen percent EGFR mutation positivity was observed in patients where only liquid biopsy was available, thus creating options for targeted therapy. This is the first and largest study from India, demonstrating successful validation of circulating cell-free DNA as a clinically useful material for molecular testing in NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Amit Joshi
- Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Amit Dutt
- The Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Center, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ravi Gupta
- MedGenome Labs Private Ltd,, Bangalore, India
| | - Ramprasad Vedam
- MedGenome Labs Private Ltd,, Bangalore, India
- Ramprasad Vedam, MedGenome Labs Private Ltd., 3 Floor, Narayana Netralaya Building, NH City, 258/A, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bommasandra, Bangalore 560099, India, Email
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, India
- Correspondence: Kumar Prabhash, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India, Email
| |
Collapse
|
1169
|
Madhavan S, Ritter D, Micheel C, Rao S, Roy A, Sonkin D, Mccoy M, Griffith M, Griffith OL, Mcgarvey P, Kulkarni S. ClinGen Cancer Somatic Working Group - standardizing and democratizing access to cancer molecular diagnostic data to drive translational research. PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING. PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2018; 23:247-258. [PMID: 29218886 PMCID: PMC5728662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
A growing number of academic and community clinics are conducting genomic testing to inform treatment decisions for cancer patients (1). In the last 3-5 years, there has been a rapid increase in clinical use of next generation sequencing (NGS) based cancer molecular diagnostic (MolDx) testing (2). The increasing availability and decreasing cost of tumor genomic profiling means that physicians can now make treatment decisions armed with patient-specific genetic information. Accumulating research in the cancer biology field indicates that there is significant potential to improve cancer patient outcomes by effectively leveraging this rich source of genomic data in treatment planning (3). To achieve truly personalized medicine in oncology, it is critical to catalog cancer sequence variants from MolDx testing for their clinical relevance along with treatment information and patient outcomes, and to do so in a way that supports large-scale data aggregation and new hypothesis generation. One critical challenge to encoding variant data is adopting a standard of annotation of those variants that are clinically actionable. Through the NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) (4), in collaboration with NLM's ClinVar database and >50 academic and industry based cancer research organizations, we developed the Minimal Variant Level Data (MVLD) framework to standardize reporting and interpretation of drug associated alterations (5). We are currently involved in collaborative efforts to align the MVLD framework with parallel, complementary sequence variants interpretation clinical guidelines from the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP) for clinical labs (6). In order to truly democratize access to MolDx data for care and research needs, these standards must be harmonized to support sharing of clinical cancer variants. Here we describe the processes and methods developed within the ClinGen's Somatic WG in collaboration with over 60 cancer care and research organizations as well as CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited clinical testing labs to develop standards for cancer variant interpretation and sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subha Madhavan
- Innovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1170
|
Mahmood ASMA, Rao S, McGarvey P, Wu C, Madhavan S, Vijay-Shanker K. eGARD: Extracting associations between genomic anomalies and drug responses from text. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0189663. [PMID: 29261751 PMCID: PMC5738129 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor molecular profiling plays an integral role in identifying genomic anomalies which may help in personalizing cancer treatments, improving patient outcomes and minimizing risks associated with different therapies. However, critical information regarding the evidence of clinical utility of such anomalies is largely buried in biomedical literature. It is becoming prohibitive for biocurators, clinical researchers and oncologists to keep up with the rapidly growing volume and breadth of information, especially those that describe therapeutic implications of biomarkers and therefore relevant for treatment selection. In an effort to improve and speed up the process of manually reviewing and extracting relevant information from literature, we have developed a natural language processing (NLP)-based text mining (TM) system called eGARD (extracting Genomic Anomalies association with Response to Drugs). This system relies on the syntactic nature of sentences coupled with various textual features to extract relations between genomic anomalies and drug response from MEDLINE abstracts. Our system achieved high precision, recall and F-measure of up to 0.95, 0.86 and 0.90, respectively, on annotated evaluation datasets created in-house and obtained externally from PharmGKB. Additionally, the system extracted information that helps determine the confidence level of extraction to support prioritization of curation. Such a system will enable clinical researchers to explore the use of published markers to stratify patients upfront for 'best-fit' therapies and readily generate hypotheses for new clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. S. M. Ashique Mahmood
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Shruti Rao
- Innovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America
| | - Peter McGarvey
- Innovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America
- Protein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C, United States of America
| | - Cathy Wu
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America
- Protein Information Resource, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C, United States of America
- Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America
| | - Subha Madhavan
- Innovation Center For Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, United States of America
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington D.C, United States of America
| | - K. Vijay-Shanker
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
1171
|
|
1172
|
Li MM, Datto M, Duncavage EJ, Kulkarni S, Lindeman NI, Roy S, Tsimberidou AM, Vnencak-Jones CL, Wolff DJ, Younes A, Nikiforova MN. Authors' Reply. J Mol Diagn 2017; 20:125-126. [PMID: 29249244 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Montgomery et al (Identification of Germline Variants in Tumor Genomic Sequencing Analysis. J Mol Diagn 2017, 19:XXXX-XXXX).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn M Li
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Michael Datto
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric J Duncavage
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Shashikant Kulkarni
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Baylor Genetics, Houston, Texas
| | - Neal I Lindeman
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Somak Roy
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cindy L Vnencak-Jones
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Daynna J Wolff
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Anas Younes
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marina N Nikiforova
- Interpretation of Sequence Variants in Somatic Conditions Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, Maryland; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
1173
|
Lalonde E, Wertheim G, Li MM. Clinical Impact of Genomic Information in Pediatric Leukemia. Front Pediatr 2017; 5:263. [PMID: 29312903 PMCID: PMC5735078 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2017.00263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric leukemia remains a significant contributor to childhood lethality rates. However, recent development of new technologies including next-generation sequencing (NGS) has increased our understanding of the biological and genetic underpinnings of leukemia, resulting in novel diagnostic and treatment paradigms. The most prevalent pediatric leukemias include B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These leukemias are highly heterogeneous, both clinically and genetically. There are multiple genetic subgroups defined by the World Health Organization, each with distinct clinical management. Clinical laboratories have started adopting genomic testing strategies to include high-throughput sequencing assays which, together with conventional cytogenetic techniques, enable optimal patient care. This review summarizes genetic and genomic techniques used in clinical laboratories to support management of pediatric leukemia, highlighting technical, biological, and clinical advances. We illustrate clinical utilities of comprehensive genomic evaluation of leukemia genomes through clinical case examples, which includes the interrogations of hundreds of genes and multiple mutation mechanisms using NGS technologies. Finally, we provide a future perspective on clinical genomics and precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Lalonde
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gerald Wertheim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Marilyn M. Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Center for Childhood Cancer Research, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
1174
|
Development of the CNS TAP tool for the selection of precision medicine therapies in neuro-oncology. J Neurooncol 2017; 137:155-169. [PMID: 29235051 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2708-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The number of targeted therapies utilized in precision medicine are rapidly increasing. Neuro-oncology offers a unique challenge due to the varying blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration of each agent. Neuro-oncologists face a difficult task weighing the growing number of potential targeted therapies and their likelihood of BBB penetration. We developed the CNS TAP Working Group and performed an extensive literature review for the evidence-based creation of the CNS TAP tool, which was retrospectively validated by analyzing brain tumor patients who underwent therapy targeted based on genomic results from an academic sequencing study (MiOncoseq, n = 17) or private molecular profiling (Foundation One, n = 7). The CNS TAP tool scores relevant targeted agents by applying multiple variables (i.e., pre-clinical data, clinical data, BBB permeability) to patient specific genomic information and clinical trial availability. In the Michigan cohort, the CNS TAP tool predicted the selected agent 85.7% of the time. The CNS TAP tool predicted the agent independently selected by pediatric neuro-oncologists in the Colorado cohort 50% of the time. Patients with recurrent brain tumors treated with agents predicted by the CNS TAP tool demonstrated a median progression-free survival of 4 months and four patients with recurrent high-grade glioma maintained ongoing partial responses of at least 6 months. The CNS TAP tool is a formalized algorithm to assist clinicians select the optimal targeted therapy for neuro-oncology patients. The CNS TAP tool has relatively high concordance with selected therapies and clinical outcomes in patients receiving targeted therapy in this heterogeneous retrospective cohort were promising.
Collapse
|
1175
|
Del Vecchio F, Mastroiaco V, Di Marco A, Compagnoni C, Capece D, Zazzeroni F, Capalbo C, Alesse E, Tessitore A. Next-generation sequencing: recent applications to the analysis of colorectal cancer. J Transl Med 2017; 15:246. [PMID: 29221448 PMCID: PMC5723063 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the establishment of the Sanger sequencing method, scientists around the world focused their efforts to progress in the field to produce the utmost technology. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a revolutionary step and promises to lead to massive improvements in our understanding on the role of nucleic acids functions. Cancer research began to use this innovative and highly performing method, and interesting results started to appear in colorectal cancer (CRC) analysis. Several studies produced high-quality data in terms of mutation discovery, especially about actionable or less frequently mutated genes, epigenetics, transcriptomics. Analysis of results is unveiling relevant perspectives aiding to evaluate the response to therapies. Novel evidences have been presented also in other directions such as gut microbiota or CRC circulating tumor cells. However, despite its unquestioned potential, NGS poses some issues calling for additional studies. This review intends to offer a view of the state of the art of NGS applications to CRC through examination of the most important technologies and discussion of recent published results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Del Vecchio
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD UK
| | - Valentina Mastroiaco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| | - Antinisca Di Marco
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| | - Chiara Compagnoni
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| | - Daria Capece
- Department of Medicine, Centre for Cell Signaling and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN UK
| | - Francesca Zazzeroni
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| | - Carlo Capalbo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome, 00161 Italy
| | - Edoardo Alesse
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| | - Alessandra Tessitore
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1176
|
Broutier L, Mastrogiovanni G, Verstegen MM, Francies HE, Gavarró LM, Bradshaw CR, Allen GE, Arnes-Benito R, Sidorova O, Gaspersz MP, Georgakopoulos N, Koo BK, Dietmann S, Davies SE, Praseedom RK, Lieshout R, IJzermans JNM, Wigmore SJ, Saeb-Parsy K, Garnett MJ, van der Laan LJ, Huch M. Human primary liver cancer-derived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening. Nat Med 2017; 23:1424-1435. [PMID: 29131160 PMCID: PMC5722201 DOI: 10.1038/nm.4438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 856] [Impact Index Per Article: 122.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Human liver cancer research currently lacks in vitro models that can faithfully recapitulate the pathophysiology of the original tumor. We recently described a novel, near-physiological organoid culture system, wherein primary human healthy liver cells form long-term expanding organoids that retain liver tissue function and genetic stability. Here we extend this culture system to the propagation of primary liver cancer (PLC) organoids from three of the most common PLC subtypes: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and combined HCC/CC (CHC) tumors. PLC-derived organoid cultures preserve the histological architecture, gene expression and genomic landscape of the original tumor, allowing for discrimination between different tumor tissues and subtypes, even after long-term expansion in culture in the same medium conditions. Xenograft studies demonstrate that the tumorogenic potential, histological features and metastatic properties of PLC-derived organoids are preserved in vivo. PLC-derived organoids are amenable for biomarker identification and drug-screening testing and led to the identification of the ERK inhibitor SCH772984 as a potential therapeutic agent for primary liver cancer. We thus demonstrate the wide-ranging biomedical utilities of PLC-derived organoid models in furthering the understanding of liver cancer biology and in developing personalized-medicine approaches for the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Broutier
- The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Gianmarco Mastrogiovanni
- The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Hayley E. Francies
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | - Lena Morrill Gavarró
- Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - George E Allen
- The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Olga Sidorova
- The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Marcia P. Gaspersz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nikitas Georgakopoulos
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bon-Kyoung Koo
- Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Sabine Dietmann
- Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan E. Davies
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raaj K. Praseedom
- Department of Hepato Pancreato Biliary Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruby Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan N. M. IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kourosh Saeb-Parsy
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mathew J. Garnett
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
| | | | - Meritxell Huch
- The Wellcome Trust/CRUK Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, UK
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1177
|
Friedlander TW, Pritchard CC, Beltran H. Personalizing Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: The Role of Solid and Liquid Tumor Biopsies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017; 37:358-369. [PMID: 28561699 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_175510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Although biopsies of metastatic prostate cancer are rarely undertaken in the clinical setting, there is increasing interest in developing personalized approaches to therapy by taking into account the genetic and phenotypic changes in an individual tumor. Indeed, analysis of metastatic prostate tumors can predict sensitivity to agents that inhibit DNA repair and resistance to novel hormonal agents, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, and identify phenotypic changes, such as neuroendocrine differentiation, that have important clinical implications. Although obtaining metastatic tumor tissue is necessary for this genomic and molecular profiling, knowing when to biopsy, selecting the appropriate metastatic lesion, and interpreting the results are major challenges facing clinicians today. In this article, we discuss the rationale for obtaining metastatic tumor tissue, review the bioinformatic approach to analyzing these specimens, discuss the timing and approach to solid and liquid tumor biopsies, review the challenges associated with obtaining and acting on clinically relevant results, and discuss opportunities for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence W Friedlander
- From the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- From the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Himisha Beltran
- From the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
1178
|
Kalchiem-Dekel O, Paulk A, Kligerman SJ, Burke AP, Shah NG, Dixon RK. Development of pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis in a patient with established adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:E1079-E1083. [PMID: 29312770 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Newly-appearing lung nodules on surveillance imaging in patients with pre-existing lung cancer can present a diagnostic dilemma when attempting to differentiate between metastatic disease, infection, and other inflammatory conditions. Here we report a case of an EGFR-/ALK-/BRAF+ metastatic adenocarcinoma patient who underwent lung biopsy for evaluation of upper-lobe predominant lung nodules revealed to represent pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH). The patient was a heavy smoker and admitted to increase her smoking habit after initially learning about her diagnosis with lung cancer. Interestingly, despite the association of both lung adenocarcinoma and PLCH with the BRAFV600E mutation in smokers, pyrosequencing of the patient's PLCH lesions was negative for this mutation. Co-occurrence of PLCH with lung cancer is extremely rare. While most reported cases of PLCH tend to precede the occurrence of lung cancer, a minority of cases appear after a diagnosis of lung cancer has already been established and are thought to represent a local immunologic reaction to the tumor. It is therefore postulated that the appearance of PLCH lesions in this patient's lungs is a result of her increase in cigarette smoking, possibly augmented by co-existence of adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Or Kalchiem-Dekel
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adina Paulk
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Seth J Kligerman
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Allen P Burke
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nirav G Shah
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Renee K Dixon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1179
|
Christensen PA, Ni Y, Bao F, Hendrickson HL, Greenwood M, Thomas JS, Long SW, Olsen RJ. Houston Methodist Variant Viewer: An Application to Support Clinical Laboratory Interpretation of Next-generation Sequencing Data for Cancer. J Pathol Inform 2017; 8:44. [PMID: 29226007 PMCID: PMC5719586 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_48_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Next-generation-sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used in clinical and research protocols for patients with cancer. NGS assays are routinely used in clinical laboratories to detect mutations bearing on cancer diagnosis, prognosis and personalized therapy. A typical assay may interrogate 50 or more gene targets that encompass many thousands of possible gene variants. Analysis of NGS data in cancer is a labor-intensive process that can become overwhelming to the molecular pathologist or research scientist. Although commercial tools for NGS data analysis and interpretation are available, they are often costly, lack key functionality or cannot be customized by the end user. Methods To facilitate NGS data analysis in our clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory, we created a custom bioinformatics tool termed Houston Methodist Variant Viewer (HMVV). HMVV is a Java-based solution that integrates sequencing instrument output, bioinformatics analysis, storage resources and end user interface. Results Compared to the predicate method used in our clinical laboratory, HMVV markedly simplifies the bioinformatics workflow for the molecular technologist and facilitates the variant review by the molecular pathologist. Importantly, HMVV reduces time spent researching the biological significance of the variants detected, standardizes the online resources used to perform the variant investigation and assists generation of the annotated report for the electronic medical record. HMVV also maintains a searchable variant database, including the variant annotations generated by the pathologist, which is useful for downstream quality improvement and research projects. Conclusions HMVV is a clinical grade, low-cost, feature-rich, highly customizable platform that we have made available for continued development by the pathology informatics community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Christensen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yunyun Ni
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA.,Helix, San Carlos, California 94070, USA
| | - Feifei Bao
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Heather L Hendrickson
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Greenwood
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jessica S Thomas
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S Wesley Long
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Randall J Olsen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1180
|
Soltani M, Tabatabaiefar MA, Mohsenifar Z, Pourreza MR, Moridnia A, Shariati L, Razavi SM. Genetic study of the BRAF gene reveals new variants and high frequency of the V600E mutation among Iranian ameloblastoma patients. J Oral Pathol Med 2017. [PMID: 28650588 DOI: 10.1111/jop.12610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ameloblastoma is a benign, slow-growing and locally invasive tumor. It is one of the most prevalent odontogenic tumors, with an incidence rate of 1% of all oral tumors and approximately 18% of odontogenic tumors. A group of genes have been investigated in patients with ameloblastoma. The BRAF V600E mutation has been implicated as the most common mutation in ameloblastoma. The presence or absence of this mutation has been associated with several clinicopathological properties, including location, age at diagnosis, histology, and prognosis. Although some populations have been investigated so far, little data are available on the Iranian population. The current research was launched to study the BRAF V600E mutation among a cohort of Iranian patients with ameloblastoma. METHODS In this clinicopathological and molecular biology study, a total of 19 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were studied. DNA extraction was performed, followed by PCR-sequencing of exons 10 and 15 of the BRAF gene to identify mutations. In silico analysis was performed for the identified variants. Results were analyzed by T test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Totally, 12 of 19 samples (63%) harbored the p. V600E hotspot mutation. In addition, we identified several variants, two of which were novel. The c.1769T>G (p. V590G) and c.1751C>T (p.L584F) as the novel variants showed a possible damaging effect by in silico analysis. No variant was found within exon 10. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms the role of BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma in the Iranian patients studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Soltani
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Tabatabaiefar
- Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Pediatric Inherited Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Noncommunicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Zhaleh Mohsenifar
- Department of General Pathology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Pourreza
- Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Abbas Moridnia
- Department of Immunology, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
| | - Laleh Shariati
- Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Seyyed Mohammad Razavi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Dental Implant Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
1181
|
Liu L, Liu J, Shao D, Deng Q, Tang H, Liu Z, Chen X, Guo F, Lin Y, Mao M, Kristiansen K, Ye M, He J. Comprehensive genomic profiling of lung cancer using a validated panel to explore therapeutic targets in East Asian patients. Cancer Sci 2017; 108:2487-2494. [PMID: 28949084 PMCID: PMC5715245 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
People of East Asian ethnicity have a different prevalence of and show unique clinical characteristics and tumor histology of oncogenic mutations. However, only limited studies have explored the landscape of genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinoma derived from Asian patients thus far. In this single‐center study, with an aim to elucidate the mutational profile of lung cancer in people of Chinese ethnicity and to use the obtained information to guide decision‐making for treatment, we employed a well‐validated assay to perform comprehensive genomic characterization of tumor specimens from 306 Chinese lung cancer patients. A total of 845 individual genomic alterations were found in 145 tumor‐related genes with a median of 2.8 alterations (range: 1–18) per sample. The most frequently mutated genes were EGFR (46.7%), TP53 (21.2%), ALK (12.1%; 8.8% of mutation and 3.3% of rearrangement) and KRAS (10.1%). Upon comparison with the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset, we found that EGFR was mutated at a much higher frequency in our cohort than in Caucasians, whereas KRAS was only found in 10.1% of our Chinese patients. Clinically relevant genomic alterations were identified in 185 (60.5%) patients, including 50% in adenocarcinoma patients and 14% in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Our findings suggest that the Asian ethnicity is significantly different from the Caucasian ethnicity with regard to the presence of somatic driver mutations. Furthermore, we showed that the use of a comprehensive genotyping approach could help identify actionable genomic alterations that have potential impact on therapeutic decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,The Translational Medicine Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Di Shao
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.,Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Qiuhua Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,The Translational Medicine Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hailing Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,The Translational Medicine Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zu Liu
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xuewei Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | - Yongping Lin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mao Mao
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Karsten Kristiansen
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.,Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mingzhi Ye
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.,Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jianxing He
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
1182
|
Worthey EA. Analysis and Annotation of Whole-Genome or Whole-Exome Sequencing Derived Variants for Clinical Diagnosis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 95:9.24.1-9.24.28. [PMID: 29044471 DOI: 10.1002/cphg.49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 10 years, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has transformed genomic research through substantial advances in technology and reduction in the cost of sequencing, and also in the systems required for analysis of these large volumes of data. This technology is now being used as a standard molecular diagnostic test in some clinical settings. The advances in sequencing have come so rapidly that the major bottleneck in identification of causal variants is no longer the sequencing or analysis (given access to appropriate tools), but rather clinical interpretation. Interpretation of genetic findings in a complex and ever changing clinical setting is scarcely a new challenge, but the task is increasingly complex in clinical genome-wide sequencing given the dramatic increase in dataset size and complexity. This increase requires application of appropriate interpretation tools, as well as development and application of appropriate methodologies and standard procedures. This unit provides an overview of these items. Specific challenges related to implementation of genome-wide sequencing in a clinical setting are discussed. © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collapse
|
1183
|
de la Morena‐Barrio ME, López‐Gálvez R, Martínez‐Martínez I, Asenjo S, Sevivas TS, López MF, Wypasek E, Entrena L, Vicente V, Corral J. Defects of splicing in antithrombin deficiency. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2017; 1:216-222. [PMID: 30046692 PMCID: PMC6058262 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence supporting the relevance of aberrant splicing in multiple disorders. In antithrombin deficiency only 22 intronic mutations affecting splicing sites (7% of SERPINC1 mutations) are considered as splicing mutations. METHODS SERPINC1 was analyzed by Sanger sequencing and MLPA in 141 unrelated cases with antithrombin deficiency. Plasma antithrombin was studied by functional and western blot assays, purified by FPLC and characterized by proteomic analysis. In silico predictions on splicing was done with the Human Splicing Finder software. RESULTS We detected 89 different SERPINC1 defects, 13 with potential effect on splicing. Ten cases presented 9 mutations disturbing splicing sites, 5 new. Three gross or small gene defects also disturbed a correct splicing. Interestingly, the first duplication of a single exon ever described (c.1154-13_1218+115dup), caused mild deficiency (75%). A deeper intronic mutation (c.1154-14G>A), identified in three unrelated patients with traces of disulphide dimers of antithrombin in plasma, created a cryptic splicing site that might generate a variant with 4 additional in frame residues according to in silico predictions. This aberrant splicing was confirmed by proteomic analysis of the dimer purified from plasma. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of cases with antithrombin deficiency (up to 13%) may be explained by an aberrant splicing. Up to 15% of mutations in SERPINC1: splicing site variations, gross gene defects and deep intronic mutations, may affect a correct splicing with three potential consequences type I, type II, and even moderate antithrombin deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María E. de la Morena‐Barrio
- Servicio de Hematología y Oncología MédicaHospital Universitario Morales MeseguerCentro Regional de HemodonaciónUniversidad de MurciaIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
- CIBERERMadridSpain
| | - Raquel López‐Gálvez
- Servicio de Hematología y Oncología MédicaHospital Universitario Morales MeseguerCentro Regional de HemodonaciónUniversidad de MurciaIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
| | - Irene Martínez‐Martínez
- Servicio de Hematología y Oncología MédicaHospital Universitario Morales MeseguerCentro Regional de HemodonaciónUniversidad de MurciaIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
- CIBERERMadridSpain
| | - Susana Asenjo
- Servicio de HematologíaHospital Clínico San CarlosMadridSpain
| | - Teresa S. Sevivas
- Serviço de Hematologia do Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
| | - María F. López
- Servicio de Hematología Hospital Juan CanalejoA CoruñaSpain
| | - Ewa Wypasek
- The John Paul II HospitalKrakówPoland
- Institute of CardiologyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakówPoland
| | - Laura Entrena
- Servicio de HematologíaHospital Virgen de las NievesGranadaSpain
| | - Vicente Vicente
- Servicio de Hematología y Oncología MédicaHospital Universitario Morales MeseguerCentro Regional de HemodonaciónUniversidad de MurciaIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
- CIBERERMadridSpain
| | - Javier Corral
- Servicio de Hematología y Oncología MédicaHospital Universitario Morales MeseguerCentro Regional de HemodonaciónUniversidad de MurciaIMIB‐ArrixacaMurciaSpain
- CIBERERMadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
1184
|
Aldoss I, Pham A, Li SM, Gendzekhadze K, Afkhami M, Telatar M, Hong H, Padeganeh A, Bedell V, Cao T, Khaled SK, Malki MMA, Salhotra A, Ali H, Aribi A, Palmer J, Aoun P, Spielberger R, Stein AS, Snyder D, O'Donnell MR, Murata-Collins J, Senitzer D, Weisenburger D, Forman SJ, Pullarkat V, Marcucci G, Pillai R, Nakamura R. Favorable impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with therapy-related myelodysplasia regardless of TP53 mutational status. Haematologica 2017; 102:2030-2038. [PMID: 28971906 PMCID: PMC5709102 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome is a long-term complication of cancer treatment in patients receiving cytotoxic therapy, characterized by high-risk genetics and poor outcomes. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is the only potential cure for this disease, but the prognostic impact of pre-transplant genetics and clinical features has not yet been fully characterized. We report here the genetic and clinical characteristics and outcomes of a relatively large cohort of patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (n=67) who underwent allogeneic transplantation, comparing these patients to similarly treated patients with de novo disease (n=199). The 5-year overall survival was not different between patients with therapy-related and de novo disease (49.9% versus 53.9%; P=0.61) despite a higher proportion of individuals with an Intermediate-2/High International Prognostic Scoring System classification (59.7% versus 43.7%; P=0.003) and high-risk karyotypes (61.2% versus 30.7%; P<0.01) among the patients with therapy-related disease. In mutational analysis, TP53 alteration was the most common abnormality in patients with therapy-related disease (n=18: 30%). Interestingly, the presence of mutations in TP53 or in any other of the high-risk genes (EZH2, ETV6, RUNX1, ASXL1: n=29: 48%) did not significantly affect either overall survival or relapse-free survival. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is, therefore, a curative treatment for patients with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, conferring a similar long-term survival to that of patients with de novo disease despite higher-risk features. While TP53 alteration was the most common mutation in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, the finding was not detrimental in our case-series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Aldoss
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Anh Pham
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sierra Min Li
- Department of Information Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Hao Hong
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Thai Cao
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Samer K Khaled
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Monzr M Al Malki
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Amandeep Salhotra
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Haris Ali
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ahmed Aribi
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Joycelynne Palmer
- Department of Information Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Patricia Aoun
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ricardo Spielberger
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Anthony S Stein
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - David Snyder
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Margaret R O'Donnell
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Stephen J Forman
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Vinod Pullarkat
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Guido Marcucci
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Raju Pillai
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ryotaro Nakamura
- Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1185
|
The evolving role of genomic testing in assessing prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2017; 30:295-300. [PMID: 29156198 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The introduction into routine hematology-oncology clinical practice of molecular genetic testing assays based on next-generation sequencing platforms is prompting reassessment of the importance of molecular assay results in comparison to existing disease-specific risk stratification tools based on clinical assessment and light microscopy. For patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the most commonly used tools for prognostication currently include the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the Revised IPSS (IPSS-R), which are based on marrow blast proportion, number and degree of cytopenias, and the metaphase karyotype. Integration of DNA sequencing data into an existing evidence-based practice approach inclusive of the IPSS or IPSS-R may be challenging, but the additional information provided by molecular genetic testing clearly can influence clinical decisions, such as determining patients' eligibility for clinical trials of novel targeted agents or helping assess which patients should be referred for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This review discusses the prognostic and predictive value of mutation testing in the context of current clinical care of patients with MDS.
Collapse
|
1186
|
Hughes KS, Ambinder EP, Hess GP, Yu PP, Bernstam EV, Routbort MJ, Clemenceau JR, Hamm JT, Febbo PG, Domchek SM, Chen JL, Warner JL. Identifying Health Information Technology Needs of Oncologists to Facilitate the Adoption of Genomic Medicine: Recommendations From the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Omics and Precision Oncology Workshop. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:3153-3159. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.1744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
At the ASCO Data Standards and Interoperability Summit held in May 2016, it was unanimously decided that four areas of current oncology clinical practice have serious, unmet health information technology needs. The following areas of need were identified: 1) omics and precision oncology, 2) advancing interoperability, 3) patient engagement, and 4) value-based oncology. To begin to address these issues, ASCO convened two complementary workshops: the Omics and Precision Oncology Workshop in October 2016 and the Advancing Interoperability Workshop in December 2016. A common goal was to address the complexity, enormity, and rapidly changing nature of genomic information, which existing electronic health records are ill equipped to manage. The subject matter experts invited to the Omics and Precision Oncology Workgroup were tasked with the responsibility of determining a specific, limited need that could be addressed by a software application (app) in the short-term future, using currently available genomic knowledge bases. Hence, the scope of this workshop was to determine the basic functionality of one app that could serve as a test case for app development. The goal of the second workshop, described separately, was to identify the specifications for such an app. This approach was chosen both to facilitate the development of a useful app and to help ASCO and oncologists better understand the mechanics, difficulties, and gaps in genomic clinical decision support tool development. In this article, we discuss the key challenges and recommendations identified by the workshop participants. Our hope is to narrow the gap between the practicing oncologist and ongoing national efforts to provide precision oncology and value-based care to cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S. Hughes
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Edward P. Ambinder
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Gregory P. Hess
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Peter Paul Yu
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Elmer V. Bernstam
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Mark J. Routbort
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Jean Rene Clemenceau
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - John T. Hamm
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Phillip G. Febbo
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Susan M. Domchek
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - James L. Chen
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Kevin S. Hughes, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Edward P. Ambinder, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Peter Paul Yu, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Gregory P. Hess, Symphony Health, Conshohocken; Gregory P. Hess and Susan M. Domchek, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Peter Paul Yu, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT; Elmer V. Bernstam, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston; Mark J. Routbort,
| | | |
Collapse
|
1187
|
Tsang H, Addepalli K, Davis SR. Resources for Interpreting Variants in Precision Genomic Oncology Applications. Front Oncol 2017; 7:214. [PMID: 28975082 PMCID: PMC5610688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision genomic oncology-applying high throughput sequencing (HTS) at the point-of-care to inform clinical decisions-is a developing precision medicine paradigm that is seeing increasing adoption. Simultaneously, new developments in targeted agents and immunotherapy, when informed by rich genomic characterization, offer potential benefit to a growing subset of patients. Multiple previous studies have commented on methods for identifying both germline and somatic variants. However, interpreting individual variants remains a significant challenge, relying in large part on the integration of observed variants with biological knowledge. A number of data and software resources have been developed to assist in interpreting observed variants, determining their potential clinical actionability, and augmenting them with ancillary information that can inform clinical decisions and even generate new hypotheses for exploration in the laboratory. Here, we review available variant catalogs, variant and functional annotation software and tools, and databases of clinically actionable variants that can be used in an ad hoc approach with research samples or incorporated into a data platform for interpreting and formally reporting clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsinyi Tsang
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Gaithersburg, MD, United States
- Attain, LLC, McLean, VA, United States
| | - KanakaDurga Addepalli
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Gaithersburg, MD, United States
- Attain, LLC, McLean, VA, United States
| | - Sean R. Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
1188
|
Gupta S, Zhang J, Milosevic D, Mills JR, Grebe SK, Smith SC, Erickson LA. Primary Renal Paragangliomas and Renal Neoplasia Associated with Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma: Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDHX) and Transmembrane Protein 127 (TMEM127). Endocr Pathol 2017. [PMID: 28646318 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-017-9489-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Alterations of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), succinate dehydrogenase (SDHX), and TMEM127 have been associated with the development of pheochromocytomas (PCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) and are also associated with the development of renal neoplasms. This study involved 2 primary renal PGL and 12 cases of PC/PGL with associated renal neoplasia with a mean follow up of 74 months. Germline VHL and SDHX mutation status was obtained from the medical record. Immunohistochemistry for SDHB and mutation analysis for TMEM127 was performed, in addition to analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets for SDHX and TMEM127 mutated renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The spectrum of renal neoplasia included clear cell and tubulocystic and papillary RCC, as well as a case of multiple papillary adenomas. Three patients had metastatic PC/PGL and three patients had VHL syndrome. Previously unreported TMEM127 alterations were identified in two patients, both without evidence of VHL syndrome or SDH-deficiency, and were classified as variants of uncertain significance. Primary renal PGL and neoplasia was associated with about 2% of 710 cases of PC/PGL. These were diagnosed concurrently or on average 27 months prior to the PC/PGL, and most were low-grade, low-stage clear cell RCCs. Up to half of patients with PC/PGL and renal neoplasia had VHL syndrome, SDH deficiency, or alterations in TMEM127. One (of three) case of metastatic PC/PGL had SDHB mutation and loss of SDHB by immunohistochemistry. The other two cases had retained SDHB expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sounak Gupta
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Dragana Milosevic
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John R Mills
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Stefan K Grebe
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Steven C Smith
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Lori A Erickson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1189
|
Dubuc AM, Ligon AH. From Prognostication to Personalized Medicine: Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS) Using Chromosomal Microarrays. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-017-0127-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
1190
|
Yohe S, Thyagarajan B. Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:1544-1557. [PMID: 28782984 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0501-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 203] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT - Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a technology being used by many laboratories to test for inherited disorders and tumor mutations. This technology is new for many practicing pathologists, who may not be familiar with the uses, methodology, and limitations of NGS. OBJECTIVE - To familiarize pathologists with several aspects of NGS, including current and expanding uses; methodology including wet bench aspects, bioinformatics, and interpretation; validation and proficiency; limitations; and issues related to the integration of NGS data into patient care. DATA SOURCES - The review is based on peer-reviewed literature and personal experience using NGS in a clinical setting at a major academic center. CONCLUSIONS - The clinical applications of NGS will increase as the technology, bioinformatics, and resources evolve to address the limitations and improve quality of results. The challenge for clinical laboratories is to ensure testing is clinically relevant, cost-effective, and can be integrated into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Yohe
- From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Bharat Thyagarajan
- From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
1191
|
Holch JW, Metzeler KH, Jung A, Riedmann K, Jost PJ, Weichert W, Kirchner T, Heinemann V, Westphalen CB. Universal Genomic Testing: The next step in oncological decision-making or a dead end street? Eur J Cancer 2017. [PMID: 28648701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The concept of 'personalised medicine' aims at allocating patients to different treatment options based on individual characteristics to optimise treatment benefit and side effects. In oncology, personalised treatments coupled to biomarkers have led to the approval of targeted agents with high anti-tumour activity. However, these therapies are often limited to narrow, molecularly defined subsets of patients with a specific morphomolecular tumour profile. Recently, it became obvious that the same molecular alteration might drive oncogenesis in many different tumours, and it might be beneficial to target the alteration in a histology informed but entity-overarching way. Consequently, Universal Genomic Testing (UGT) of tumours encompassing panel sequencing to whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing is propagated to revolutionise oncology. This article will describe the developments leading to identification and application of potential biomarkers using UGT. On this basis, it will review the clinical evidence of this approach and summarise recommendations for the ongoing evaluation of UGT as the next step in oncological decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Walter Holch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Hans Metzeler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Jung
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchnerstr. 36, 80337 Munich, Germany.
| | - Kristina Riedmann
- III. Medical Department, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
| | - Philipp Jakob Jost
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; III. Medical Department, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
| | - Wilko Weichert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute for Pathology and Pathological Anatomy, Technische Universität München, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany.
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Thalkirchnerstr. 36, 80337 Munich, Germany.
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
1192
|
Tao DL, Bailey S, Beer TM, Foss E, Beckett B, Fung A, Foster BR, Guimaraes A, Cetnar JP, Graff JN, Eilers KM, Small EJ, Corless CL, Thomas GV, Alumkal JJ. Molecular Testing in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Its Impact on Clinical Decision Making. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 1:PO.16.00067. [PMID: 31650098 PMCID: PMC6812573 DOI: 10.1200/po.16.00067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the lethal form of the disease. Many groups have performed mutational or immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing in metastatic CRPC to identify treatment targets. However, the frequency with which mutational or IHC data have an impact on clinical decision making and the outcomes of molecularly guided therapy in CRPC are largely unknown. We report our institution's experience with mutational and IHC testing in patients with metastatic CRPC and its impact on clinical decision making and patient outcomes. METHODS Between 2012 and 2015, 59 patients with CRPC underwent metastatic tissue biopsies and were genotyped with a 37-cancer gene panel in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory. PTEN expression by IHC testing was also measured in 35 of these samples. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine whether the genomic information was acted upon and the outcome of patients whose treatment was guided by molecular testing. RESULTS Forty-six of 59 patients with CRPC (78.0%) had biopsies with adequate tumor for mutational testing. Thirty-one of 46 subjects (67.4%) had mutations identified by sequencing. Of the 35 patients with CRPC whose biopsies were evaluated for PTEN expression by IHC testing, 13 had PTEN loss. Two patients had treatment on the basis of molecular testing, and one of these subjects had greater tumor control with molecularly guided therapy than his immediate prior therapy. CONCLUSION Targeted sequencing and IHC can identify clinically informative molecular abnormalities in CRPC. Despite this, a small minority of patients in our series underwent therapies guided by mutational or IHC testing. Actionability of abnormalities identified in metastatic CRPC may be improved with access to clinical trials, insurance approval for unapproved uses of existing anticancer drugs, and larger gene sequencing panels that include more frequently mutated genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick L. Tao
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Shawna Bailey
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tomasz M. Beer
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Erik Foss
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Brooke Beckett
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alice Fung
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Bryan R. Foster
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alexander Guimaraes
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeremy P. Cetnar
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Julie N. Graff
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kristine M. Eilers
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric J. Small
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Christopher L. Corless
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - George V. Thomas
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joshi J. Alumkal
- Derrick L. Tao, Shawna Bailey, Tomasz M. Beer, Erik Foss, Brooke Beckett, Alice Fung, Bryan R. Foster, Alexander Guimaraes, Jeremy P. Cetnar, Julie N. Graff, Kristine M. Eilers, Christopher L. Corless, George V. Thomas, and Joshi J. Alumkal, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; and Eric J. Small, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
1193
|
Abstract
Molecular tumor profiling is now a routine part of patient care, revealing targetable genomic alterations and molecularly distinct tumor subtypes with therapeutic and prognostic implications. The widespread adoption of next-generation sequencing technologies has greatly facilitated clinical implementation of genomic data and opened the door for high-throughput multigene-targeted sequencing. Herein, we discuss the variability of cancer genetic profiling currently offered by clinical laboratories, the challenges of applying rapidly evolving medical knowledge to individual patients, and the need for more standardized population-based molecular profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Nguyen
- The Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christopher D Gocke
- The Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. .,The Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. .,Johns Hopkins Genomics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1812 Ashland Ave, Suite 200, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1194
|
Implementation and utilization of the molecular tumor board to guide precision medicine. Oncotarget 2017; 8:57845-57854. [PMID: 28915716 PMCID: PMC5593688 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With rapid advances in genomic medicine, the complexity of delivering precision medicine to oncology patients across a university health system demanded the creation of a Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) for patient selection and assessment of treatment options. The objective of this report is to analyze our progress to date and discuss the importance of the MTB in the implementation of personalized medicine. Materials and Methods Patients were reviewed in the MTB for appropriateness for comprehensive next generation sequencing (NGS) cancer gene set testing based on set criteria that were in place. Because profiling of stage IV lung cancer, colon cancer, and melanoma cancers were standard of care, these cancer types were excluded from this process. We subsequently analyzed the types of cases referred for testing and approved with regards to their results. Results 191 cases were discussed at the MTB and 132 cases were approved for testing. Forty-six cases (34.8%) had driver mutations that were associated with an active targeted therapeutic agent, including BRAF, PIK3CA, IDH1, KRAS, and BRCA1. An additional 56 cases (42.4%) had driver mutations previously reported in some type of cancer. Twenty-two cases (16.7%) did not have any clinically significant mutations. Eight cases did not yield adequate DNA. 15 cases were considered for targeted therapy, 13 of which received targeted therapy. One patient experienced a near complete response. Seven of 13 had stable disease or a partial response. Conclusions MTB at University of Alabama-Birmingham is unique because it reviews the appropriateness of NGS testing for patients with recurrent cancer and serves as a forum to educate our physicians about the pathways of precision medicine. Our results suggest that our detection of actionable mutations may be higher due to our careful selection. The application of precision medicine and molecular genetic testing for cancer patients remains a continuous educational process for physicians.
Collapse
|
1195
|
Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders. Blood 2017; 130:460-465. [PMID: 28600340 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-01-734558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
As our technological capacities improve, genomic testing is increasingly integrating into patient care. The field of clinical hematology is no exception. Genomic testing carries great promise, but several ethical issues must be considered whenever such testing is performed. This review addresses these ethical considerations, including issues surrounding informed consent and the uncertainty of the results of genomic testing; the challenge of incidental findings; and possible inequities in access to and benefit from such testing. Genomic testing is likely to transform the practice of both benign and malignant hematology, but clinicians must carefully consider these core ethical issues in order to make the most of this exciting and evolving technology.
Collapse
|
1196
|
The relative utilities of genome-wide, gene panel, and individual gene sequencing in clinical practice. Blood 2017; 130:433-439. [PMID: 28600338 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-734533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in technology that have transpired over the past 2 decades have enabled the analysis of cancer samples for genomic alterations to understand their biologic function and to translate that knowledge into clinical practice. With the power to analyze entire genomes in a clinically relevant time frame and with manageable costs comes the question of whether we ought to and when. This review focuses on the relative merits of 3 approaches to molecular diagnostics in hematologic malignancies: indication-specific single gene assays, gene panel assays that test for genes selected for their roles in cancer, and genome-wide assays that broadly analyze the tumor exomes or genomes. After addressing these in general terms, we review specific use cases in myeloid and lymphoid malignancies to highlight the utility of single gene testing and/or larger panels.
Collapse
|
1197
|
Younes A. Clinical applications of genome studies. Hematol Oncol 2017; 35 Suppl 1:67-69. [PMID: 28591424 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Younes
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1198
|
Janeway KA. Molecular profiling in the clinic: Moving from feasibility assessment to evaluating clinical impact. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64. [PMID: 28233398 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Janeway
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
1199
|
Smith M. DNA Sequence Analysis in Clinical Medicine, Proceeding Cautiously. Front Mol Biosci 2017; 4:24. [PMID: 28516087 PMCID: PMC5413496 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Delineation of underlying genomic and genetic factors in a specific disease may be valuable in establishing a definitive diagnosis and may guide patient management and counseling. In addition, genetic information may be useful in identification of at risk family members. Gene mapping and initial genome sequencing data enabled the development of microarrays to analyze genomic variants. The goal of this review is to consider different generations of sequencing techniques and their application to exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing and their clinical applications. In recent decades, exome sequencing has primarily been used in patient studies. Discussed in some detail, are important measures that have been developed to standardize variant calling and to assess pathogenicity of variants. Examples of cases where exome sequencing has facilitated diagnosis and led to improved medical management are presented. Whole genome sequencing and its clinical relevance are presented particularly in the context of analysis of nucleotide and structural genomic variants in large population studies and in certain patient cohorts. Applications involving analysis of cell free DNA in maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis of specific autosomal trisomies are reviewed. Applications of DNA sequencing to diagnosis and therapeutics of cancer are presented. Also discussed are important recent diagnostic applications of DNA sequencing in cancer, including analysis of tumor derived cell free DNA and exosomes that are present in body fluids. Insights gained into underlying pathogenetic mechanisms of certain complex common diseases, including schizophrenia, macular degeneration, neurodegenerative disease are presented. The relevance of different types of variants, rare, uncommon, and common to disease pathogenesis, and the continuum of causality, are addressed. Pharmogenetic variants detected by DNA sequence analysis are gaining in importance and are particularly relevant to personalized and precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moyra Smith
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1200
|
Prawira A, Pugh T, Stockley T, Siu L. Data resources for the identification and interpretation of actionable mutations by clinicians. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:946-957. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|