Rationale, design and recruitment characteristics of a large, simple international trial of diabetes prevention: the DREAM trial

Diabetes mellitus-associated atherosclerosis: mechanisms involved and potential for pharmacological invention

While diabetes mellitus is most often associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, these factors do not fully account for the increased burden of cardiovascular disease in patients with the disease. This strengthens the need for comprehensive studies investigating the underlying mechanisms mediating diabetic cardiovascular disease and, more specifically, diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. In addition to the recognized metabolic abnormalities associated with diabetes mellitus, upregulation of putative pathological pathways such as advanced glycation end products, the renin-angiotensin system, oxidative stress, and increased expression of growth factors and cytokines have been shown to play a causal role in atherosclerotic plaque formation and may explain the increased risk of macrovascular complications. This review discusses the methods used to assess the development of atherosclerosis in the clinic as well as addressing novel biomarkers of atherosclerosis, such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-1. Experimental models of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis are discussed, such as the streptozocin-induced diabetic apolipoprotein E knockout mouse. Results of major clinical trials with inhibitors of putative atherosclerotic pathways are presented. Other topics covered include the role of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibric acid derivatives with respect to their lipid-altering ability, as well as their emerging pleiotropic anti-atherogenic actions; the effect of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system by either ACE inhibition or angiotensin II receptor antagonism; the effect of glycemic control and, in particular, the promising role of thiazolidinediones with respect to their direct anti-atherogenic actions; and newly emerging mediators of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis, such as advanced glycation end products, vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. Overall, this review aims to highlight the observation that various pathways, both independently and in concert, appear to contribute toward the pathology of diabetes-associated atherosclerosis. Furthermore, it reflects the need for combination therapy to combat this disease.

Impact of rosiglitazone on beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and adiponectin concentrations: results from a double-blind oral combination study with glimepiride

Addition of rosiglitazone to sulfonylurea has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes previously treated with sulfonylurea monotherapy alone. This investigation was performed to assess the specific impact of rosiglitazone on insulin resistance, beta-cell function, cardiovascular risk markers, and adiponectin secretion in this treatment concept. One hundred two patients from a double-blind, 3-arm comparator trial (group 0, glimepiride + placebo, n = 30; group 4, glimepiride + 4 mg rosiglitazone, n = 31; group 8, glimepiride + 8 mg rosiglitazone, n = 41; 48 women, 54 men; age [mean +/- SD], 62.8 +/- 9.1 years; body mass index, 28.7 +/- 4.5 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 6.4 +/- 4.8 years; HbA1c, 8.1% +/- 1.5%) were analyzed after 0 and 16 weeks of treatment. Observation parameters were HbA1c, glucose, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance score, insulin, intact proinsulin, and adiponectin. Insulin resistance was defined by elevated intact proinsulin values or homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance score of more than 2. All parameters were comparable in the 3 groups at baseline. Substantial and significant dose-dependent improvements were observed after addition of rosiglitazone for fasting glucose (group 0, -9 +/- 48 mg/dL; group 4, -38 +/- 47 mg/dL; group 8, -46 +/- 53 mg/dL), HbA1c (-0.1% +/- 0.7%, -1.1% +/- 1.2%, -1.3% +/- 1.2%), insulin (1.4 +/- 6.2, -1.2 +/- 5.3, -3.7 +/- 9.9 microU/mL), intact proinsulin (1.6 +/- 7.1, -2.0 +/- 4.6, -3.1 +/- 6.1 pmol/L), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (0.2 +/- 2.6, -1.7 +/- 3.5, -2.1 +/- 3.5 mg/L). After adjustment for changes in body weight, significant increases in adiponectin were detected with rosiglitazone, whereas glimepiride alone did not induce a comparable effect (-0.5 +/- 5.8, 8.8 +/- 22.9, 14.3 +/- 19.9 mg/L). The number of insulin-resistant patients decreased in both rosiglitazone treatment groups, whereas no change was seen with glimepiride alone. Next to the reported effects on glucose control, rosiglitazone provided an additional beneficial effect on insulin resistance, beta-cell function, and cardiovascular risk markers. In conclusion, our short-term investigation of rosiglitazone action provides further experimental support for the rationale of combining rosiglitazone with sulfonylurea drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Thiazolidinediones

Our knowledge and understanding of the role played by peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma receptors in physiology and pathophysiology has expanded dramatically over the past 5 years. Originally described as having important functions in adipogenesis and glucose homeostasis, their pharmacologic agonists, the thiazolidinediones, were introduced as antihyperglycemic, insulin-sensitizing agents for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, it was to some degree inevitable that the thiazolidinediones would be rapidly recognized as having vasculoprotective properties beyond glycemic control that might also be beneficial. First, diabetic complications are vascular in nature, the earliest feature of these is endothelial dysfunction. Second, it is being increasingly appreciated that these complications develop through inflammatory and procoagulant pathways in which increased oxidative stress is considered a major etiologic mechanism, and which are closely linked to the presence of insulin resistance, visceral obesity, and hyperglycemia. Early appreciation that the thiazolidinediones have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-procoagulant, and antiproliferative properties in addition to their insulin-sensitizing, anti-lipotoxic properties created a marriage of investigative pathways that has not only led to a very large body of literature on the pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones, but also to the development of new understandings of the connections between insulin resistance, obesity, and hyperglycemia and the onset of vascular disease. Understandably, most of the focus has been directed at the macrovascular complications of diabetes, since these are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in this population. However, there is evidence that these agents may have benefits for the microvascular complications as well, and their potential role for cardiovascular disease prevention in non-diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome is a logical extension of the work performed in diabetes. The recently reported results of the effects of pioglitazone versus placebo on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes support the contention that these agents have vasculoprotective effects.

Effects of pioglitazone on lipoproteins, inflammatory markers, and adipokines in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the short-term effects of pioglitazone (PIO) on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and other metabolic parameters in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty nondiabetic adults with low HDL-C and MetSyn were randomized to PIO or matching placebo for 12 weeks. PIO increased HDL-C by 15% and 14% at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, compared with placebo (P<0.001). Changes in HDL-C were correlated to changes in adiponectin (r=0.34; P=0.01) but not to changes in insulin resistance. PIO did not affect serum triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations but reduced the number of small LDL particles by 18% (P<0.001). PIO reduced median C-reactive protein levels by 31% (P<0.001) and mean resistin levels by 10% (P=0.02) while increasing mean serum levels of adiponectin by 111% (P<0.001) compared with placebo. PIO did not affect weight and modestly decreased insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In nondiabetic patients with low HDL-C and MetSyn, PIO significantly raised HDL-C and favorably affected lipoprotein particle size, markers of inflammation, and adipokines without changes in triglycerides, LDL-C, or weight. These results suggest that PIO has direct effects on HDL, which may contribute to its antiatherogenic effects.

Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome in obesity

The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of interrelated abnormalities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and progression to type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of this syndrome is increasing because of the 'obesity epidemic'. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III defined practical criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome and established the basic principles for its management. Also, the International Diabetes Federation recently proposed another definition. The metabolic syndrome is a secondary target for cardiovascular risk reduction. Clinicians should identify individuals with this condition, assess their cardiovascular risk and treat them by an aggressive and multifaceted approach. The most effective therapeutic intervention in patients with the metabolic syndrome should focus on modest weight reduction and regular physical activity. Adoption of a healthier diet and smoking cessation are necessary. Drug therapy may be needed to achieve recommended goals if therapeutic lifestyle changes are not sufficient. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is the primary target of therapy (new aggressive goals should be achieved). Statins are probably the drugs of choice. Fibrates and nicotinic acid are also useful options. Hypertension should be managed aggressively probably starting with an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system or a calcium channel blocker and adding a low dose of a thiazide diuretic if necessary. Aspirin should be administered if the cardiovascular risk is high. In the future acarbose, metformin, meglitinides and thiazolidinediones may be used in patients with the metabolic syndrome to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and reduce cardiovascular risk. Such an intense and multifactorial approach is likely to reverse the bad prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Rosiglitazone Attenuates Atherosclerosis in a Model of Insulin Insufficiency Independent of Its Metabolic Effects

Objectives— Recent studies have demonstrated a role for thiazolidinediones in attenuating atherosclerosis. However, these studies were performed in insulin-resistant animal models in association with reductions in insulin and glucose levels. To assess the vascular effects of thiazolidinediones, independent of their metabolic effects, we observed the effect of rosiglitazone on diabetes-associated atherosclerosis in a model of insulin insufficiency.

Methods and Results— Control and diabetic apolipoprotein E–deficient mice received rosiglitazone or placebo. Diabetic mice demonstrated a 3-fold increase in plaque area, which was attenuated by rosiglitazone. There was no significant difference in glucose, insulin, or cholesterol levels between treated and untreated diabetic animals. Rosiglitazone attenuated the increase in superoxide production observed in diabetic mice. A 4-fold increase in the reverse cholesterol transport marker ABCA1 was observed in treated diabetic mice. Rosiglitazone reduced angiotensin II receptor gene expression in control and diabetic mice, and macrophage accumulation was increased in diabetic mice compared with controls and was attenuated by rosiglitazone.

Conclusions— These findings suggest peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ ligands such as rosiglitazone confer vascular protection independent of their effects on metabolic control. These antiatherosclerotic effects may have important clinical ramifications not only in insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes and also in type 1 diabetes.

Antihypertensive drugs and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Evidence and implications for clinical practice

The major antihypertensive drug classes appear to exert differing effects on glycemic control and diabetes incidence. Thiazide diuretic and beta-blockers are potentially diabetogenic, whereas calcium channel blockers appear neutral. Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system are associated with improvements in glycemic control and may lower diabetes incidence, but it is not clear if this represents a truly preventive effect. Also, it should be noted that previous studies have reported inconsistent results, and the data to date are not definitive. We suggest that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system be used as first-line agents in uncomplicated hypertensive patients who are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Thiazides and beta-blockers should not be avoided in patients with compelling indications for these drugs. Many hypertensive patients (particularly those who are obese or have prediabetes) require several agents to achieve target blood pressure levels. Therefore, the choice of initial agent is far less important than ensuring that target blood pressure goals are reached.

Diabetes, prediabetes, and cardiovascular risk: shifting the paradigm

As the prevalence of diabetes continues to increase worldwide, diabetes-related macrovascular morbidity and mortality are becoming major health care problems. Epidemiologic evidence suggests this relationship begins early in the progression from normal glucose tolerance to frank diabetes. This report reviews this epidemiologic evidence linking early stages of glucose dysregulation with cardiovascular disease and discusses the results of major clinical trials demonstrating that lifestyle or pharmacologic intervention can reduce the incidence of diabetes in high-risk individuals. These observations indicate that early identification and aggressive treatment of subjects with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance have the potential to reduce both the incidence of diabetes and its related cardiovascular disease. Three clinical trials are being conducted to test whether early pharmacotherapy can reduce or delay the incidence of diabetes, and their results may well begin to shift the treatment paradigm toward earlier intervention.

Antihypertensive treatment and new-onset diabetes mellitus

The various antihypertensive regimens have varying effects on glucose metabolism and the development of diabetes mellitus. Recent large hypertension trials have shown great differences in the development of new-onset diabetes among antihypertensive drug therapies. The incidence of diabetes is unchanged or increased by thiazide diuretics and b-adrenergic blockers, and unchanged or decreased by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-receptor blockers. The differences in new-onset diabetes mellitus have not influenced the outcome of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in all of the large clinical trials, but drug-induced diabetes among hypertensive patients is known to carry the same cardiovascular risk as that seen in patients with previously known diabetes; however, it might take years for the increased risk to become apparent.

Effects of Candesartan on the Development of a New Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus in Patients With Heart Failure

Background— Diabetes is a risk factor for heart failure, and both conditions are increasing. Identifying treatments that prevent both conditions will be clinically important. We previously reported that candesartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker) reduces cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in heart failure patients (CHARM: C andesartan in H eart Failure— A ssessment of R eduction in M ortality and Morbidity Program).

Methods and Results— We assessed the impact of candesartan versus placebo on the development of diabetes, a predefined secondary outcome in a randomized, controlled, double-blind study involving 5436 of the 7601 patients with heart failure, irrespective of ejection fraction, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes at entry into the trial. Patients received candesartan (target of 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo for 2 to 4 years. One hundred sixty-three (6.0%) individuals in the candesartan group developed diabetes, as compared with 202 (7.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.64 to 0.96; P =0.020). The composite end point of death or diabetes occurred in 692 (25.2%) and 779 (28.6%), respectively, in the candesartan and placebo groups (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P =0.004). The results were not statistically heterogeneous in the various subgroups examined, although the apparent magnitude of benefit appeared to be smaller among those treated concomitantly with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at trial entry (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.20) compared with those not receiving these drugs (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.93; P for heterogeneity, 0.28).

Conclusions— The angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan appears to prevent diabetes in heart failure patients, suggesting that the renin-angiotensin axis is implicated in glucose regulation.

Prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: trials on the horizon

There has been an explosion of interest in CVD and diabetes mellitus because of the epidemic nature of the diseases and their tight epidemiologic link. Clinical trials over the past decade have built substantial evidence for the role of lipid management, blood pressure control, and antiplatelet therapy in managing risk for CVD in patients who have diabetes mellitus. The many clinical trials underway will not only hone existing recommendations by establishing appropriate targets and techniques for lipid and blood pressure management, but also should demonstrate the role and most appropriate techniques for management of glycemia, flow-limiting coronary lesions, and obesity.

Potential cardiovascular benefits of insulin sensitizers

A multiple risk factor approach is needed in patients who have type 2 diabetes. Because many risk factors are linked with IR, treatment with insulin sensitizers has the potential to modulate these risk factors favorably. TZDs 'have many important effects beyond lowering blood glucose. By targeting IR, they improve many cardiovascular risk factors that are associated with the IR syndrome. In particular, they increase HDL-C, have anti-inflammatory effects, improve endothelial function and fibrinolysis, and decrease carotid intimal thickness; however, no evidence-based studies on cardiovascular outcomes are available to substantiate the potential cardioprotective effects of TZDs. Several clinical trials that were designed to investigate the effect that these agents have on reducing cardiovascular events are well under way.

Thiazolidinediones: a review of their mechanisms of insulin sensitization, therapeutic potential, clinical efficacy, and tolerability

The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are newer additions to the antidiabetic armamentarium and are indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the United States. The TZDs are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) agonists that provide clinically effective glycemic control and unique pharmacologic effects on multiple risk factors for T2DM-related morbidity, including improvement of insulin sensitivity and endothelial dysfunction, reduction of blood pressure, and amelioration of dyslipidemia. Weight gain and fluid retention occur with TZD therapy, especially when they are administered in higher doses and in combination with insulin. Although fluid retention associated with the use of TZDs is generally mild and reversible, these agents should not be used in patients with New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure symptoms. The findings of ongoing, long-term, prospective studies will clarify the role of the TZDs in the treatment of T2DM, particularly in terms of the durability of improvements in glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, pancreatic beta- cell function, and cardiovascular health.