Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on pioglitazone therapy to failing monotherapy compared with addition of gliclazide or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes

Pioglitazone plus glimepiride: a promising alternative in metabolic control

Current approaches to pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes focus on two key aspects of hyperglycaemia - insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance. Combining drugs that target both these defects via different mechanisms of action improves long-term glycaemic control and offers a number of additional benefits. A fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in a single tablet is now available in the US (Duetact(TM)). Both pioglitazone and glimepiride are glucose-lowering agents with distinct mechanisms of action. Pioglitazone is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that improves whole-body insulin sensitivity and augments hepatic glucose uptake. On the other hand, glimepiride acts by releasing insulin from pancreatic beta-cells and improves both first and second phases of insulin secretion. These two therapies have been shown to act synergistically to treat type 2 diabetes - glimepiride therapy achieves rapid reductions in glycated haemaglobin (HbA(1c)), whereas pioglitazone sustains glycaemic control in the longer term. Furthermore, pioglitazone and glimepiride affect a number of pleiotropic markers. In particular, pioglitazone has beneficial effects on the atherogenic diabetic dyslipidaemia that are greater than those seen with rosiglitazone and other oral glucose-lowering agents. This advantage is also seen when comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in combination with glimepiride. In addition, pioglitazone also improves a number of atherosclerotic risk markers that appear to translate into clinical benefits on macrovascular outcomes. Glimepiride may also improve several atherosclerotic risk markers and lipoproteins. This review discusses the potential benefits of combining pioglitazone plus glimepiride on patient compliance, targeting the dual effects of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction and affecting a number of metabolic and cardiovascular parameters.

Rosiglitazone RECORD study: glucose control outcomes at 18 months

AIMS

To compare glucose control over 18 months between rosiglitazone oral combination therapy and combination metformin and sulphonylurea in people with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

RECORD, a multicentre, parallel-group study of cardiovascular outcomes, enrolled people with an HbA(1c) of 7.1-9.0% on maximum doses of metformin or sulphonylurea. If on metformin they were randomized to add-on rosiglitazone or sulphonylurea (open label) and if on sulphonylurea to rosiglitazone or metformin. HbA(1c) was managed to < or = 7.0% by dose titration. A prospectively defined analysis of glycaemic control on the first 1122 participants is reported here, with a primary outcome assessed against a non-inferiority margin for HbA(1c) of 0.4%.

RESULTS

At 18 months, HbA(1c) reduction on background metformin was similar with rosiglitazone and sulphonylurea [difference 0.07 (95% CI -0.09, 0.23)%], as was the change when rosiglitazone or metformin was added to sulphonylurea [0.06 (-0.09, 0.20)%]. At 6 months, the effect on HbA(1c) was greater with add-on sulphonylurea, but was similar whether sulphonylurea was added to rosiglitazone or metformin. Differences in fasting plasma glucose were not statistically significant at 18 months [rosiglitazone vs. sulphonylurea -0.36 (-0.74, 0.02) mmol/l, rosiglitazone vs. metformin -0.34 (-0.73, 0.05) mmol/l]. Increased homeostasis model assessment insulin sensitivity and reduced C-reactive protein were greater with rosiglitazone than metformin or sulphonylurea (all P < or = 0.001). Body weight was significantly increased with rosiglitazone compared with sulphonylurea [difference 1.2 (0.4, 2.0) kg, P = 0.003] and metformin [difference 4.3 (3.6, 5.1) kg, P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In people with diabetes, rosiglitazone in combination with metformin or sulphonylurea was demonstrated to be non-inferior to the standard combination of metformin + sulphonylurea in lowering HbA(1c) over 18 months, and produces greater improvements in C-reactive protein and basal insulin sensitivity but is also associated with greater weight gain.

Fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by impaired insulin sensitivity and disturbances in β-cell function. While glimepiride stimulates β-cell secretion and leads to a reduction of blood glucose levels, pioglitazone activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and improves insulin resistance. Combining these two modes of action has been shown to improve glucose and lipid metabolism, and to improve the overall cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The combination of glimepiride and pioglitazone is generally well tolerated and a fixed combination may lead to an improved compliance in patients. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the clinical data that has been published on this combination, appearing to represent a convenient way to obtain therapeutic targets in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction: results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) Study

OBJECTIVES

This analysis from the PROactive (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events) study assesses the effects of pioglitazone on mortality and macrovascular morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes and a previous myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

People with type 2 diabetes have an increased incidence of MI compared with the general population. Those with diabetes and MI have a worse prognosis than nondiabetic patients with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The PROactive study was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 5,238 patients with type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease. Patients were randomized to either pioglitazone or placebo in addition to their other glucose-lowering and cardiovascular medication. Treatment of diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension was encouraged according to the International Diabetes Federation guidelines. Patients were followed for a mean of 2.85 years. The primary end point was the time to first occurrence of macrovascular events or death. Of the total cohort, the subgroup of patients who had a previous MI (n = 2,445 [46.7%]; n = 1,230 in the pioglitazone group and n = 1,215 in the placebo group) was evaluated using prespecified and post-hoc analyses.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone had a statistically significant beneficial effect on the prespecified end point of fatal and nonfatal MI (28% risk reduction [RR]; p = 0.045) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (37% RR; p = 0.035). There was a 19% RR in the cardiac composite end point of nonfatal MI (excluding silent MI), coronary revascularization, ACS, and cardiac death (p = 0.033). The difference in the primary end point defined in the main PROactive study did not reach significance in the MI population (12% RR; p = 0.135). The rates of heart failure requiring hospitalization were 7.5% (92 of 1,230) with pioglitazone and 5.2% (63 of 1,215) with placebo. Fatal heart failure rates were similar (1.4% [17 of the 92] with pioglitazone versus 0.9% [11 of the 63] with placebo).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and previous MI, pioglitazone significantly reduced the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal MI and ACS. (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00174993?order = 1; ISRCTN NCT00174993).

Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control over 24 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin, a new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, added to metformin during 24 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel group study of a 24-week treatment with 50 mg vildagliptin daily (n = 177), 100 mg vildagliptin daily (n = 185), or placebo (n = 182) in patients continuing a stable metformin dose regimen (> or =1,500 mg/day) but achieving inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5-11%).

RESULTS

The between-treatment difference (vildagliptin-placebo) in adjusted mean change (AMDelta) +/- SE in A1C from baseline to end point was -0.7 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001) and -1.1 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.001) in patients receiving 50 or 100 mg vildagliptin daily, respectively. The between-treatment difference in the AMDelta fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was -0.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (P = 0.003) and -1.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (P < 0.001) in patients receiving 50 or 100 mg vildagliptin daily, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 63.3, 65.0, and 63.5% of patients receiving 50 mg vildagliptin daily, 100 mg vildagliptin daily, or placebo, respectively. Gastrointestinal AEs were reported by 9.6 (P = 0.022 vs. placebo), 14.8, and 18.2% of patients receiving 50 mg vildagliptin daily, 100 mg vildagliptin daily, or placebo, respectively. One patient in each treatment group experienced one mild hypoglycemic event.

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin is well tolerated and produces clinically meaningful, dose-related decreases in A1C and FPG as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin.

Vildagliptin in combination with pioglitazone improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing thiazolidinedione monotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin in combination with the thiazolidinedione (TZD) pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

METHODS

This was a 24-week, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the effects of vildagliptin (50 or 100 mg daily) with placebo as an add-on therapy to pioglitazone (45 mg daily) in 463 patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by prior TZD monotherapy. Between-treatment comparisons of efficacy parameters were made by analysis of covariance model.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean change (AM Delta) in haemoglobin A(1c) from baseline to endpoint was -0.8 +/- 0.1% (p = 0.001 vs. placebo) and -1.0 +/- 0.1% (p < 0.001 vs. placebo), respectively, in patients receiving vildagliptin 50 or 100 mg daily. Relative to baseline, vildagliptin added to pioglitazone also reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (AM Delta FPG =-0.8 +/- 0.2 mmol/l and -1.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; not significant (NS) vs. placebo) and postprandial glucose (PPG) [AM Delta PPG =-1.9 +/- 0.6 mmol/l and -2.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l (p = 0.008 vs. placebo)] for 50 and 100 mg daily respectively. Relative to placebo, both doses of vildagliptin significantly increased the insulin secretory rate/glucose by more than threefold. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 55.5, 50.0 and 48.7% in patients receiving vildagliptin 50 mg, 100 mg daily or placebo respectively. Serious AEs were experienced by 6.8, 1.3 and 5.7% of patients receiving vildagliptin 50 mg, 100 mg daily or placebo respectively. Mild hypoglycaemia was reported by 0, 0.6 and 1.9% of patients, respectively, receiving vildagliptin 50 mg, 100 mg daily or placebo.

CONCLUSION

Vildagliptin is effective and well tolerated when added to a maximum dose of pioglitazone, without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Traitement médicamenteux du diabète de type 2 (première partie)

Drug treatment of 2 diabetes is intended to normalize glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA(1c)<6.5%) and thereby prevent the development of micro- and macrovascular complications. Oral antidiabetic agents target the metabolic abnormalities that cause diabetes. The two principal families of oral antidiabetic agents - insulin sensitizers and insulin secretagogues - can be taken together. Thiazolidinediones or glitazones (insulin sensitizers) improve peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin. Metformin (an insulin sensitizer) reduces hepatic glucose production. Sulfonylureas and meglitinides (insulin secretagogues) stimulate insulin secretion and can cause hypoglycemia. GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1) analogs and DPP-IV (dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV) inhibitors are new drug classes currently under development.

Chronic treatment with pioglitazone does not protect obese patients with diabetes mellitus type II from free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance

CONTEXT

Thiazolidinediones increase peripheral insulin sensitivity and decrease plasma free fatty acids (FFA). However, their exact mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the protective effect of pioglitazone on FFA-induced insulin resistance and the effects on intramyocellular glycosphingolipids.

DESIGN

We studied glucose metabolism in the basal state and during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp by using stable isotopes. Studies were performed at baseline and after 4 months of treatment with pioglitazone. Patients were then studied on a third occasion during infusion of a lipid emulsion to increase plasma FFA to pretreatment levels. All studies were combined with muscle biopsies to measure intramyocellular ceramide and glycosphingolipids.

PATIENTS

Patients were obese with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with 30 mg pioglitazone once daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The change in peripheral insulin sensitivity after treatment with pioglitazone and during the infusion of the lipid emulsion was the main outcome measure.

RESULTS

Peripheral glucose uptake (Rd) increased significantly, but returned to baseline levels after increasing plasma FFA to pretreatment levels. Insulin-mediated suppression of FFA was increased significantly. Intramyocellular ceramide concentrations were higher during the hyperinsulinemic clamp after treatment with pioglitazone, but not in the basal state. The intramyocellular content of glycosphingolipids and plasma concentrations of ceramide and glycosphingolipids did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone increases Rd and insulin-mediated suppression of plasma FFA, but does not protect patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from FFA-induced insulin resistance. This effect of pioglitazone is not attained via a decrease in intramyocellular concentrations of ceramide or glycosphingolipids.

Blood Pressure Control and Inflammatory Markers in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated with Pioglitazone or Rosiglitazone and Metformin

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of the combination of metformin plus pioglitazone or rosiglitazone on glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome, as well as its tolerability in those patients. In this 12-month, multicentric, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial, all patients began with metformin. Patients were randomized for self-administration of either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone for 12 months. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels [FPG, PPG, FPI and PPI, respectively] and homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] index) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment, as well as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), nitrites/nitrates and adiponectin (ADN) at baseline and at 12 months of treatment. Significant HbA(1c) decreases were obtained after 9 (p<0.05) and 12 (p<0.01) months in both groups. After 9 and 12 months, mean FPG and PPG levels were decreased in both groups (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). We observed decreases in FPI and PPI at 9 and 12 months (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) compared to the baseline values in both groups. Furthermore, HOMA index improvement over the baseline value was obtained only at 12 months (p<0.05) in both groups. SBP and DBP improved significantly (p<0.05, for each) in both groups after 12 months. hs-CRP decreased significantly (p<0.05) in both groups after 12 months; nitrites/nitrates and ADN increased significantly (p<0.05, for each) in both groups after 12 months. The combination of thiazolinediones and metformin is associated with a slight but significant improvement in the long-term blood pressure control of these patients, and with an improvement in the anti-inflammatory state, both of which are related to a similar reduction in insulin-resistance.

Pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes has long been recognised as a strong, independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a problem which accounts for approximately 70% of all mortality in people with diabetes. Prospective studies show that compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, the relative risk of cardiovascular mortality for men with diabetes is two to three and for women with diabetes is three to four. The two biggest trials in type 2 diabetes, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP) study did not reveal a reduction of cardiovascular endpoints through improved metabolic control. Theoretical benefits of the newer peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) activators like pioglitazone on endothelial function and cardiovascular risk factors might result in fewer macrovascular disease events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. The last search was conducted in August 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials in adult people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a trial duration of at least 24 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis could be performed for adverse events only.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials which randomised approximately 6200 people to pioglitazone treatment were identified. Longest duration of therapy was 34.5 months. Published studies of at least 24 weeks pioglitazone treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus did not provide convincing evidence that patient-oriented outcomes like mortality, morbidity, adverse effects, costs and health-related quality of life are positively influenced by this compound. Metabolic control measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a surrogate endpoint did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences to other oral antidiabetic drugs. Occurrence of oedema was significantly raised. The results of the single trial with relevant clinical endpoints (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial In Macrovascular Events--PROactive study) have to be regarded as hypothesis-generating and need confirmation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Until new evidence becomes available, the benefit-risk ratio of pioglitazone remains unclear. Different therapeutic indications for pioglitazone of the two big U.S. and European drug agencies should be clarified to reduce uncertainties amongst patients and physicians.

Closing the gap between clinical research and clinical practice: can outcome studies with thiazolidinediones improve our understanding of type 2 diabetes?

Recent clinical research has provided a wealth of information to support optimal management strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In particular, outcome studies appropriately have had an increasingly important impact on clinical decision-making. Additional, new data are required, however, to close the current gaps in clinical knowledge and improve patient outcomes in T2DM. These outcome studies are particularly important in assessing the long-term benefit of newer agents for which data are available for short-term glycaemic control, effects on lipids and some data on non-traditional cardiovascular risk markers, but outcome data for harder end points relevant to the natural history of T2DM, particularly beta-cell function, are lacking. Outcome studies such as ADOPT and DREAM are investigating the impact of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on beta-cell function and disease progression in T2DM and impaired glucose tolerance, respectively, the results of which are eagerly anticipated. The primary focus of this article is on TZD outcome studies evaluating beta-cell function and disease progression.

Glycemic control and treatment failure with pioglitazone versus glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 42-month, open-label, observational, primary care study

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance and declining beta-cell function are the core defects in type 2 diabetes mellitus. It has been suggested that deteriorating glycemic control is related to baseline hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) values and remaining beta-cell function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report glycemic data from a 3.5-year, open-label, observational, primary care study comparing 30 mg/day pioglitazone with 3.5 mg/day glibenclamide add-on to stable metformin monotherapy in 500 patients with type 2 diabetes. Insulin commencement was considered for patients with HbA(1c) > or = 8.0% or when vascular complications occurred. The change in HbA(1c) compared with baseline and the difference in time to failure to maintain glycemic control were calculated.

RESULTS

At endpoint, HbA(1c) had decreased by 1.0% in the pioglitazone group (p < 0.005) and by 0.6% in the glibenclamide group (p < 0.05). Annual progression rates to insulin treatment were 6.6% (pioglitazone) and 16.4% (glibenclamide; p < 0.001 between-group difference). Mean weight increases of 3.5 +/- 0.42 kg in the pioglitazone group and 3.3 +/- 0.38 kg in the glibenclamide group were noted. Overall, both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone add-on to metformin revealed significant benefits in long-term glycemic control compared with glibenclamide. This difference may be explained by a large between-group difference in HOMA-S, which was shown to correlate significantly to the change in HbA(1c). This suggests that a strategy to reduce insulin resistance to lower the burden of the beta-cell is superior to treatment with glibenclamide.

Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pioglitazone is an antihyperglycaemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. Pioglitazone is generally well tolerated, weight gain and oedema are the most common emergent adverse events, and there are no known drug interactions between pioglitazone and other drugs. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone as monotherapy, or in combination with metformin, repaglinide, insulin or a sulphonylurea, induced both long- and short-term improvements in glycaemic control and serum lipid profiles. Pioglitazone was also effective in reducing some measures of cardiovascular risk and arteriosclerosis. Pioglitazone thus offers an effective treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pioglitazone/Metformin

A fixed-dose pioglitazone/metformin tablet is approved in the US and the EU for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who currently have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy. In the US, the combination tablet is also approved for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes who currently have inadequate glycaemic control with pioglitazone monotherapy and for those already receiving a combination of pioglitazone and metformin. Bioequivalence, based on absorption and bioavailability parameters, has been established between the fixed-dose tablets and equivalent doses of pioglitazone and metformin coadministered as separate agents. Combination therapy with pioglitazone plus metformin was significantly more effective at improving both glycaemic and lipid control than metformin plus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes in a 16-week, well designed trial. Pioglitazone plus metformin demonstrated similar antihyperglycaemic efficacy to that of rosiglitazone plus metformin in a well designed 12-month trial; however, pioglitazone plus metformin was the superior combination in terms of lipid control. In several comparative trials of 1-3.5 years' duration, pioglitazone plus metformin was at least as effective as combination therapy with a sulphonylurea plus metformin in terms of antihyperglycaemic efficacy, but provided superior lipidaemic control with regard to levels of triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Pioglitazone plus metformin was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes, with adverse events common to metformin monotherapy observed at a similar incidence to that with metformin plus placebo.

Metformin and pioglitazone: Effectively treating insulin resistance

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance has a complex etiology, with multiple manifestations across the organ systems involved in glucose homeostasis. Glucose-lowering drug therapies that target insulin resistance can therefore utilize different mechanistic approaches. Two key classes of insulin-sensitizing agents--the biguanides (principally metformin) and thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone)--have distinct molecular mechanisms of action and differing effects on metabolic dysfunction. This provides an opportunity for complementary beneficial effects in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and on the potential consequences of insulin resistance, such as dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis.

SCOPE

This review (based upon EMBASE and MEDLINE searches from January 1990 to April 2006) highlights the mechanistic distinctions and clinical data that support the rationale for thiazolidinedione/metformin combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

FINDINGS

The different insulin-sensitizing mechanisms of metformin and the thiazolidinediones are manifest in partially distinct effects on hepatic and peripheral glucose homeostasis, and clinical studies show improved glucose control with combination therapy. Both metformin and thiazolidinediones may also have pancreatic beta-cell preserving properties. Furthermore, they have different beneficial effects on several other metabolic risk markers and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Whereas the thiazolidinediones (particularly pioglitazone) have greater effects on multiple aspects of dyslipidemia, metformin has anorexigenic properties. They also have distinct effects on levels of mediators involved in inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, and outcome studies suggest that either pioglitazone or metformin may reduce the risk of macrovascular events.

CONCLUSION

The distinct, but complementary, mechanisms of action of the thiazolidinediones and metformin provide the opportunity for effective combination therapy with two insulin-sensitizing agents. Such an approach has consequences, not only for improved glucose control, but also for reducing metabolic risk and potentially improving major cardiovascular disease outcomes.

Spotlight on Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus1

Pioglitazone (Actos(trade mark)) is an antihyperglycemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. Pioglitazone is generally well tolerated, weight gain and edema are the most common emergent adverse events, and there are no known drug interactions between pioglitazone and other drugs. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone as monotherapy, or in combination with metformin, repaglinide, insulin, or a sulfonylurea, induced both long- and short-term improvements in glycemic control and serum lipid profiles. Pioglitazone was also effective in reducing some measures of cardiovascular risk and arteriosclerosis. Pioglitazone thus offers an effective treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pioglitazona. Revisión de sus efectos metabólicos y sistémicos

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has become a true epidemic and significant growth is expected in the next decades. Thus it could be expected that the impact it may have on the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity-mortality will have considerable magnitudes. It has been demonstrated that adequate metabolic control (glycemic and lipid) of these patients, beginning with diet and exercise programs and then with drug measures, decreases the risk of complications. However, several studies have shown that metabolic control deteriorates over time regardless of the treatment used. In recent years, a new drug family has been incorporated into the therapeutic armamentarium to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. These are thiazolidinediones or glitazones, which have differential aspects regarding other drugs. In this article, the metabolic and systemic effects of pioglitazone, that have recently demonstrated a positive effect in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular episodes in the PROactive study have been reviewed.