101
|
Ponsiglione AM, Ricciardi C, Improta G, Orabona GD, Sorrentino A, Amato F, Romano M. A Six Sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for Health Technology Assessment of two antibiotics. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING : MBE 2021; 18:3469-3490. [PMID: 34198396 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2021174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Six Sigma (SS) have largely proved their reliability in the healthcare context. The former focuses on the assessment of health technologies to be introduced in a healthcare system. The latter deals with the improvement of the quality of services, reducing errors and variability in the healthcare processes. Both the approaches demand a detailed analysis, evidence-based decisions, and efficient control plans. In this paper, the SS is applied as a support tool for HTA of two antibiotics with the final aim of assessing their clinical and organizational impact in terms of postoperative Length Of Stay (LOS) for patients undergoing tongue cancer surgery. More specifically, the SS has been implemented through its main tool, namely the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) cycle. Moreover, within the DMAIC cycle, a modelling approach based on a multiple linear regression analysis technique is introduced, in the Control phase, to add complementary information and confirm the results obtained by the statistical analysis performed within the other phases of the SS DMAIC. The obtained results show that the proposed methodology is effective to determine the clinical and organizational impact of each of the examined antibiotics, when LOS is taken as a measure of performance, and guide the decision-making process. Furthermore, our study provides a systematic procedure which, properly combining different and well-assessed tools available in the literature, demonstrated to be a useful guidance for choosing the right treatment based on the available data in the specific circumstance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Ricciardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Improta
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
- Interdepartmental Center for Research in Healthcare Management and Innovation in Healthcare (CIRMIS), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona
- Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Hospital of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Alfonso Sorrentino
- Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Hospital of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Amato
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
- Interdepartmental Center for Research in Healthcare Management and Innovation in Healthcare (CIRMIS), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Romano
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Realising the broader value of vaccines in the UK. Vaccine X 2021; 8:100096. [PMID: 33997762 PMCID: PMC8099625 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2021.100096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Many health technology assessment (HTA) agencies limit their assessments of vaccines to the health benefits for the vaccinated individual, the costs associated with vaccine administration and the disease avoided. However, because the value of vaccines tends to accrue to a large extent beyond the vaccinated individual, they are systematically undervalued in many current HTA processes. This is also the case in the UK, where the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is in charge of assessing preventative vaccines, while therapeutic vaccines fall in the realm of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). To contribute to a forward-looking perspective, we designed a framework to capture the broader value of vaccination. We reviewed the current state of the global vaccines pipeline and selected seven preventative and three therapeutic vaccines that are likely to enter the UK market within five years. We assessed on which value elements the selected vaccines would potentially generate value, and compared those against the novel broader value framework. A review of the current value elements considered by the JCVI and NICE allowed identifying the critical gaps between potential value generation and value recognition. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the broader value of vaccination has been pro-actively assessed for pipeline vaccinations. Our findings show that the existing narrow evaluation frameworks are likely to systematically undervalue the value of potential future vaccines coming to the UK market. This is particularly relevant, where their impact on AMR and other health interventions, and on the productivity of the workforce is of concern. Recommendations to overcome this include an explicit and more consistent inclusion of, and data collection on, the impact of vaccines on AMR and other health interventions by JCVI and NICE; the consideration of a societal perspective and the fiscal impact of vaccines to societies.
Collapse
|
103
|
Sarri G, Freitag A, Szegvari B, Mountian I, Brixner D, Bertelsen N, Kaló Z, Upadhyaya S. The Role of Patient Experience in the Value Assessment of Complex Technologies - Do HTA Bodies Need to Reconsider How Value is Assessed? Health Policy 2021; 125:593-601. [PMID: 33814201 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Neil Bertelsen
- HTAi Interest Group on Patient & Citizen Involvement; Neil Bertelsen Consulting, Germany
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary; Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sheela Upadhyaya
- Centre for Health Technology Evaluation, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Kalf RRJ, Vreman RA, Delnoij DMJ, Bouvy ML, Goettsch WG. Bridging the gap: Can International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement standard sets align outcomes accepted for regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making of oncology medicines. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2021; 9:e00742. [PMID: 33749172 PMCID: PMC7982865 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Standard outcome sets developed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) facilitate value-based health care in healthcare practice and have gained traction from regulators and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies that regularly assess the value of new medicines. We aimed to assess the extent to which the outcomes used by regulators and HTA agencies are patient-relevant, by comparing these to ICHOM standard sets. We conducted a cross-sectional comparative analysis of ICHOM standard sets, and publicly available regulatory and HTA assessment guidelines. We focused on oncology due to many new medicines being developed, which are accompanied by substantial uncertainty regarding the relevance of these treatments for patients. A comparison of regulatory and HTA assessment guidelines, and ICHOM standard sets showed that both ICHOM and regulators stress the importance of disease-specific outcomes. On the other hand, HTA agencies have a stronger focus on generic outcomes in order to allow comparisons across disease areas. Overall, similar outcomes are relevant for market access, reimbursement, and in ICHOM standard sets. However, some differences are apparent, such as the acceptability of intermediate outcomes. These are recommended in ICHOM standard sets, but regulators are more likely to accept intermediate outcomes than HTA agencies. A greater level of alignment in outcomes accepted may enhance the efficiency of regulatory and HTA processes, and increase timely access to new medicines. ICHOM standard sets may help align these outcomes. However, some differences in outcomes used may remain due to the different purposes of regulatory and HTA decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel R J Kalf
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Diemen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rick A Vreman
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Diemen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Diana M J Delnoij
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Diemen, the Netherlands.,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel L Bouvy
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wim G Goettsch
- Zorginstituut Nederland, Diemen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Wettstein DJ, Boes S. Assessing social preferences in reimbursement negotiations for new Pharmaceuticals in Oncology: an experimental design to analyse willingness to pay and willingness to accept. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:234. [PMID: 33726735 PMCID: PMC7968195 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06231-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Price negotiations for specialty pharmaceuticals take place in a complex market setting. The determination of the added value of new treatments and the related societal willingness to pay are of increasing importance in policy reform debates. From a behavioural economics perspective, potential cognitive biases and other-regarding concerns affecting outcomes of reimbursement negotiations are of interest. An experimental setting to investigate social preferences in reimbursement negotiations for novel, oncology pharmaceuticals was used. Of interest were differences in social preferences caused by incremental changes of the patient outcome. Methods An online experiment was conducted in two separate runs (n = 202, n = 404) on the Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) platform. Populations were split into two (run one) and four (run two) equally sized treatment groups for hypothetical reimbursement decisions. Participants were randomly assigned to the role of a public price regulator for pharmaceuticals (buyer) or a representative of a pharmaceutical company (seller). In run two, role groups were further split into two different price magnitude framings (“real world” vs unconverted “real payoff” prices). Decisions had real monetary effects on other participants (in the role of premium payers or investors) and via charitable donations to a patient organisation (patient benefit). Results 56 (run one) and 59 (run two) percent of participants stated strictly monotone preferences for incremental patient benefit. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) against standard of care (SoC) was higher than the initial ICER of the SoC against no care. Regulators stated lower reservation prices in the “real world” prices group compared to their colleagues in the unconverted payoff group. No price group showed any reluctance to trade. Overall, regulators rated the relevance of the patient for their decision higher and the relevance of their own role lower compared to sellers. Conclusions The price magnitude of current oncology treatments affects stated preferences for incremental survival, and assigned responsibilities lead to different opinions on the relevance of affected stakeholders. The design is useful to further assess effects of reimbursement negotiations on societal outcomes like affordability (cost) or availability (access) of new pharmaceuticals and test behavioural policy interventions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06231-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik J Wettstein
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, CH-6002, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | - Stefan Boes
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, CH-6002, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Kent S, Burn E, Dawoud D, Jonsson P, Østby JT, Hughes N, Rijnbeek P, Bouvy JC. Common Problems, Common Data Model Solutions: Evidence Generation for Health Technology Assessment. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:275-285. [PMID: 33336320 PMCID: PMC7746423 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00981-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in using observational data to assess the safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of medical technologies, but operational, technical, and methodological challenges limit its more widespread use. Common data models and federated data networks offer a potential solution to many of these problems. The open-source Observational and Medical Outcomes Partnerships (OMOP) common data model standardises the structure, format, and terminologies of otherwise disparate datasets, enabling the execution of common analytical code across a federated data network in which only code and aggregate results are shared. While common data models are increasingly used in regulatory decision making, relatively little attention has been given to their use in health technology assessment (HTA). We show that the common data model has the potential to facilitate access to relevant data, enable multidatabase studies to enhance statistical power and transfer results across populations and settings to meet the needs of local HTA decision makers, and validate findings. The use of open-source and standardised analytics improves transparency and reduces coding errors, thereby increasing confidence in the results. Further engagement from the HTA community is required to inform the appropriate standards for mapping data to the common data model and to design tools that can support evidence generation and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seamus Kent
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Burn
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pall Jonsson
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nigel Hughes
- Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Peter Rijnbeek
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacoline C Bouvy
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
The use of ‘added benefit’ to determine the price of new anti-cancer drugs in France, 2004–2017. Eur J Cancer 2021; 145:11-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
108
|
Boucaud-Maitre D, Berdaï D, Salvo F. Added Therapeutic Value of Medicinal Products for French and German Health Technology Assessment Organizations: A Systematic Comparison. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:346-352. [PMID: 33641768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Determining the price and reimbursement of a new medicine is a national competence within the Member States of the European Union that is carried out by health technology authorities and is based mainly on the added therapeutic value (ATV). The primary objective of this study was to compare the ATVs granted by the French (Haute Autorité de Santé, HAS) and the German (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWIG) authorities. The secondary objective was to analyze the reasons for the discrepancies observed. METHODS Retrospective cohort of all ATVs assigned by HAS and IQWIG for the period 2011 to 2017. ATV assessments were classified as major, considerable, minor, no benefit, or not quantifiable. The concordance between the authorities was evaluated, and a qualitative analysis of highly discordant assessments was performed. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-one drugs were evaluated by both agencies. The overall percentage of agreement was 50.3%. It was 73.1% for no benefit of ATVs, 37.5% for minor ATVs, 31.2% for considerable ATVs, and 5% for major ATVs. Highly conflicting assessments (n = 35) mainly concerned antineoplastic drugs (n = 14) and anti-infectives (n = 14). The main reasons for inconsistency concerned the following: a different appreciation of the subgroup analysis of efficacy data (n = 15), the appropriateness of comparators (n = 15), the surrogate endpoints (n = 10), methodological differences (n = 8), and the benefit/risk criteria that were used (n = 6). CONCLUSION In the context of the common assessment of ATVs promoted by the European Commission, the harmonization between member states regarding the way evaluation criteria are assessed deserves to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Boucaud-Maitre
- Department of Research and Biostatistics, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, LAMIA (EA4540), French West Indies University, Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe.
| | - Driss Berdaï
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francesco Salvo
- CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, Bordeaux, France; Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
O'Hara J, Martin AP, Nugent D, Witkop M, Buckner TW, Skinner MW, O'Mahony B, Mulhern B, Morgan G, Li N, Sawyer EK. Evidence of a disability paradox in patient-reported outcomes in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2021; 27:245-252. [PMID: 33595148 PMCID: PMC8048516 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with inherited and long-term conditions such as haemophilia have been shown to adapt to their levels of disability, often reporting better quality of life (QoL) than expected from the general population (the disability paradox). AIM To investigate the disability paradox in people with haemophilia in the United States by examining preference differences in health state valuations versus the general population. METHODS We conducted a discrete choice experiment including duration to capture valuations of health states based on patient-reported preferences. Participants indicated their preferences for hypothetical health states using the EQ-5D-5L, where each participant completed 15 of the 120 choice tasks. Response inconsistencies were evaluated with dominated and repeated scenarios. Conditional-logit regressions with random sampling of the general population responses were used to match the sample of patients with haemophilia. We compared model estimates and derived preferences associated with EQ-5D-5L health states. RESULTS After removing respondents with response inconsistencies, 1327/2138 (62%) participants remained (177/283 haemophilia; 1150/1900 general population). Patients with haemophilia indicated higher preference value for 99% of EQ-5D-5L health states compared to the general population (when matched on age and gender). The mean health state valuation difference of 0.17 indicated a meaningful difference compared to a minimal clinically important difference threshold of 0.07. Results were consistent by haemophilia type and severity. CONCLUSION Our findings indicated the presence of a disability paradox among patients with haemophilia, who reported higher health states than the general population, suggesting the impact of haemophilia may be underestimated if general population value sets are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie O'Hara
- HCD Economics, Daresbury, UK.,Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Chester, UK
| | | | - Diane Nugent
- Department of Pediatrics and Division of Hematology at CHOC Children's Hospital, Center for Inherited Blood Disorders, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Tyler W Buckner
- Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mark W Skinner
- Institute for Policy Advancement, Ltd, Washington, DC, USA.,McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Brian O'Mahony
- Irish Haemophilia Society, Dublin, UK.,Trinity College, Dublin, UK
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
Wang T, McAuslane N, Liberti L, Gardarsdottir H, Goettsch W, Leufkens H. Companies' Health Technology Assessment Strategies and Practices in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain: An Industry Metrics Study. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:594549. [PMID: 33390978 PMCID: PMC7775670 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) has increased in importance in supporting payer decision making by assessing the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of new medicines. Thus, pharmaceutical companies need to address the HTA requirements early during development to improve reimbursement outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of research to assess the impact of HTA on development and jurisdictional outcome from companies’ perspectives. This study aimed to assess companies’ HTA strategy and characterise HTA practice in seven jurisdictions. Methods: A multi-year, annual study collected information for individual products, focusing on development activities regarding inclusion of HTA requirements and selection of global comparators. The generation of local contextual information, submission strategies and predictability of HTA outcomes was examined jurisdictionally in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The study questionnaire was built into a secure online data collection platform and data were provided annually by participating companies. Results: Data for 169 compounds were provided by nine international companies between 2014 and 2018. HTA requirements were implemented in evidence generation plan for 63% of products during development. Global comparators were accepted by HTA bodies for more than half of studied products; Spain showed the highest acceptance rate (85%). Companies took advantages of parallel process in Australia and Canada to shorten product rollout time. Australia demonstrated general consistency in HTA review time, and England had the longest variation (interquartile range, 216 days). Requirements for additional information after submission occurred at all HTA bodies. Germany and Italy showed the highest percentage of products being reimbursed as per regulatory label (80 and 68%, respectively). Canada was the most predictable jurisdiction, with the highest proportion of review outcome (90%) that met companies’ expectations. Conclusion: Companies are addressing HTA requirements during development for many products; however, they are challenged by varying requirements and practices and product success ultimately depends on how HTA organisations and payers assess added value in the context of the national healthcare systems. This ongoing study created a baseline to help capture fact-based changes for company HTA strategies and HTA body practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wang
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Neil McAuslane
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom
| | - Lawrence Liberti
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wim Goettsch
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute, Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Hubert Leufkens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Multiple criteria decision analysis for medicine reimbursement in the Lebanese context. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462321000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this exploratory analysis is to reflect and discuss which criteria of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) would be relevant as part of value determination when appraising healthcare interventions in the Lebanese context.
Methods
A workshop was conducted as part of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Lebanon Chapter and included the two frameworks: Evidence and Value: Impact on Decision Making (EVIDEM) and Advance Value Framework. Thirty-seven participants expressed their individual preferences through a qualitative and a quantitative exercise.
Results
In the qualitative analysis of both frameworks, participants unanimously agreed on the relevance of comparative efficacy, safety, and impact of medical costs. In EVIDEM, disease severity and unmet needs were also considered to be important criteria by more than 90 percent of the participants. In the quantitative analysis of both frameworks, disease severity ranked first (a mean normalized weight of .1 in EVIDEM and .27 in Advance Value Framework), followed by the size of the population (.09), the type of therapeutic benefit at the patient level (.09) and population level (.08), and the efficacy (.07) in EVIDEM. In the Advance Value Framework, the combined unmet need/disease severity criteria were followed by direct and meaningful end points (.15), safety (.12), contraindications (.08), and indirect surrogate end points (.07).
Conclusions
The results were concordant with those reported in countries that have conducted similar surveys such as France, Italy, and Spain. The MCDA methodology could be used as a cornerstone to enhance evidence-based discussions among Lebanese stakeholders involved in evaluation and decision-making purposes.
Collapse
|
112
|
Vanness DJ, Lomas J, Ahn H. A Health Opportunity Cost Threshold for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:25-32. [PMID: 33136426 DOI: 10.7326/m20-1392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-effectiveness analysis is an important tool for informing treatment coverage and pricing decisions, yet no consensus exists about what threshold for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained indicates whether treatments are likely to be cost-effective in the United States. OBJECTIVE To estimate a U.S. cost-effectiveness threshold based on health opportunity costs. DESIGN Simulation of short-term mortality and morbidity attributable to persons dropping health insurance due to increased health care expenditures passed though as premium increases. Model inputs came from demographic data and the literature; 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were constructed. SETTING Population-based. PARTICIPANTS Simulated cohort of 100 000 individuals from the U.S. population with direct-purchase private health insurance. MEASUREMENTS Number of persons dropping insurance coverage, number of additional deaths, and QALYs lost from increased mortality and morbidity, all per increase of $10 000 000 (2019 U.S. dollars) in population treatment cost. RESULTS Per $10 000 000 increase in health care expenditures, 1860 persons (95% UI, 1080 to 2840 persons) were simulated to become uninsured, causing 5 deaths (UI, 3 to 11 deaths), 81 QALYs (UI, 40 to 170 QALYs) lost due to death, and 15 QALYs (UI, 6 to 32 QALYs) lost due to illness; this implies a cost-effectiveness threshold of $104 000 per QALY (UI, $51 000 to $209 000 per QALY) in 2019 U.S. dollars. Given available evidence, there is about 14% probability that the threshold exceeds $150 000 per QALY and about 48% probability that it lies below $100 000 per QALY. LIMITATIONS Estimates were sensitive to inputs, most notably the effects of losing insurance on mortality and of premium increases on becoming uninsured. Health opportunity costs may vary by population. Nonhealth opportunity costs were excluded. CONCLUSION Given current evidence, treatments with ICERs above the range $100 000 to $150 000 per QALY are unlikely to be cost-effective in the United States. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Vanness
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (D.J.V., H.A.)
| | - James Lomas
- University of York, York, United Kingdom (J.L.)
| | - Hannah Ahn
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania (D.J.V., H.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Malhan S, Öksüz E, Antmen B, Ar MC, Balkan C, Kavaklı K. Cost of hemophilia A in Turkey: an economic disease burden analysis. J Med Econ 2021; 24:1052-1059. [PMID: 34355649 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1965388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hemophilia A is the second most common bleeding disorder causing patients to have lifelong follow-up and treatment. Despite being a rare disease, hemophilia A has a high economic burden on individuals and the public. The purpose of this study was to estimate the total disease cost of hemophilia A in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data used in this analysis were collected through literature review, including studies conducted in Turkey in December 2018. A disease burden analysis was performed by modeling hemophilia A-related costs among patients, their relatives, and the social security system. Two expert panels were held to evaluate real-world data sources and to provide further information. All direct medical and non-medical costs were calculated annually from the Social Security Institution of the Republic of Turkey perspective, while indirect costs were estimated from the patient and community perspective. RESULTS For the calendar year of 2018, the number of hemophilia A patients in Turkey were estimated to be 5,055, with an average weight of 64.7 kg. The average annual direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs of hemophilia A were calculated as €93,268 ($109,286; ₺502,717), €2,533 ($2,968; ₺13,655), and €7,957 ($9,323; ₺42,888) per patient, respectively, with a total annual cost of €103,759 ($121,578; ₺559,259). For the management of patients with inhibitors (4.9%), the average annual total cost was calculated to be €325,439 ($381,330; ₺1,754,117) per patient. The total annual disease burden of hemophilia A in 2018 was estimated to be about €524 million ($614 million; ₺2.82 billion), which corresponded to 1.6% of the total health expenditure in Turkey. CONCLUSION The most important reason hemophilia A has a significant economic burden in Turkey is that replacement therapy is expensive. The major cost contributor was identified as factor replacement therapy. With inhibitor development, the average annual cost increased more than 3-fold.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simten Malhan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Care Management, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ergün Öksüz
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bülent Antmen
- Acibadem Hospital, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hemophilia Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Muhlis Cem Ar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Can Balkan
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Kaan Kavaklı
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Taylor DG. The political economics of cancer drug discovery and pricing. Drug Discov Today 2020; 25:2149-2160. [PMID: 32920059 PMCID: PMC7483036 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Drug discoveries can, when used appropriately, save lives. Since 1970, cancer death rates among people aged under 65 have halved in countries such as the USA and the UK. Despite pharmaceutical market imperfections and fears about the prices of new treatments, further progress should be possible during the 2020s. Anticancer medicine outlays account for 0.1-0.2% of the gross domestic product (GDP) of developed countries. Total cancer service spending typically stands at ∼0.8% of GDP. The affordability of these sums is a political calculation. Improvements in the efficiency of drug development and global access to effective therapies are desirable. However, from a public interest perspective, these goals should not be pursued in ways that understate the value of better treatment outcomes and threaten the funding available for ongoing innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Taylor
- UCL School of Pharmacy Offices, University College London, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Access to medicines in Turkey: Evaluation of the process of medicines brought from abroad. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:585-591. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTurkey's health reforms started in 2003 with providing changes in regulatory, financing, and healthcare services. Access to health care and pharmaceuticals increased rapidly, and this resulted with an increase in public pharmaceutical expenditures. Our study aims to quantify and to evaluate the impact of a specific process within the Turkish system called “Medicines Brought From Abroad" (MBFA).MethodsWe reviewed the general reimbursement legislations of Social Security Institution (SSI), the guideline on MBFA, the SSI reimbursement list, the list of MBFA published by the Ministry of Health to describe the current supply mechanism of medicines and, in particular, the role of MBFA.ResultsTotal costs of the of MBFA medicines over the period 2011–17 went up to more than $520 million, which takes 7.5 percent of total public pharmaceutical expenditure for 2017. Our results showed that MBFA provides access to many orphan drugs and in total, forty-two orphan drugs listed in MBFA accounted for 83 percent of all MBFA budget in the year 2017. Nine of the top ten MBFA medicines were orphan drugs and total costs were $408 million. The highest budget impact was for eculizumab for “paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria” (PNH), covering 31 percent of total MBFA costs and 2.3 percent of overall drug costs in 2017.ConclusionsTurkey faced significant challenges for creating an access pathway for innovative medicines while continuing the sustainability of the public pharmaceutical budget like many other countries. Therefore, it may be argued that Turkey needs to create an independent health technology assessment organization to provide sustainable access to medicines in the future.
Collapse
|
116
|
Angelis A, Naci H, Hackshaw A. Recalibrating Health Technology Assessment Methods for Cell and Gene Therapies. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:1297-1308. [PMID: 32960434 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00956-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Recently licensed cell and gene therapies have promising but highly uncertain clinical benefits. They are entering the market at very high prices, with the latest entrants costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. The significant long-term uncertainty posed by these therapies has already complicated the use of conventional economic evaluation approaches such as cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, which are widely used for assessing the value of new health interventions. Cell and gene therapies also risk jeopardising healthcare systems' financial sustainability. As a result, there is a need to recalibrate the current health technology assessment methods used to measure and compensate their value. In this paper, we outline a set of technical adaptations and methodological refinements to address key challenges in the appraisal of cell and gene therapies' value, including the assessment of efficiency and affordability. We also discuss the potential role of alternative financing mechanisms. Ultimately, uncertainties associated with cell and gene therapies can only be meaningfully addressed by improving the evidence base supporting their approval and adoption in healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aris Angelis
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Cowdray House, Portugal Street, London, UK.
| | - Huseyin Naci
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Cowdray House, Portugal Street, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Cacciatore P, Visser LA, Buyukkaramikli N, van der Ploeg CPB, van den Akker-van Marle ME. The Methodological Quality and Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations of Newborn Screening: A Scoping Review. Int J Neonatal Screen 2020; 6:ijns6040094. [PMID: 33238605 PMCID: PMC7712813 DOI: 10.3390/ijns6040094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cost-effectiveness (CEA) and cost-utility analyses (CUA) have become popular types of economic evaluations (EE) used for evidence-based decision-making in healthcare resource allocation. Newborn screening programs (NBS) can have significant clinical benefits for society, and cost-effectiveness analysis may help to select the optimal strategy among different screening programs, including the no-screening option, on different conditions. These economic analyses of NBS, however, are hindered by several methodological challenges. This study explored the methodological quality in recent NBS economic evaluations and analyzed the main challenges and strategies adopted by researchers to deal with them. METHODS A scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA methodology to identify CEAs and CUAs of NBS. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was assessed quantitatively using a specific guideline for the quality assessment of NBS economic evaluations, by calculating a general score for each EE. Challenges in the studies were then explored using thematic analysis as a qualitative synthesis approach. RESULTS Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative analysis showed that the methodological quality of NBS economic evaluations was heterogeneous. Lack of clear description of items related to results, discussion, and discounting were the most frequent flaws. Methodological challenges in performing EEs of neonatal screenings include the adoption of a long time horizon, the use of quality-adjusted life years as health outcome measure, and the assessment of costs beyond the screening interventions. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review can support future economic evaluation research, aiding researchers to develop a methodological guidance to perform EEs aimed at producing solid results to inform decisions for resource allocation in neonatal screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Cacciatore
- Sezione di Igiene, Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Laurenske A. Visser
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.A.V.); (N.B.)
| | - Nasuh Buyukkaramikli
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.A.V.); (N.B.)
| | | | - M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle
- Unit Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Datasciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Ofori-Asenso R, Hallgreen CE, De Bruin ML. Improving Interactions Between Health Technology Assessment Bodies and Regulatory Agencies: A Systematic Review and Cross-Sectional Survey on Processes, Progress, Outcomes, and Challenges. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:582634. [PMID: 33178721 PMCID: PMC7596325 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.582634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The need to optimize drug development and facilitate faster access for patients has ignited discussions around the importance of improving interactions between health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and regulatory agencies. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to examine processes, progress, outcomes, and challenges of harmonization/interaction initiatives between HTA bodies and regulatory agencies. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts database were searched up to 21 October 2019. Searches for gray literature (working papers, commissioned reports, policy documents, etc.) were performed via Google scholar and several institutional websites. An online cross-sectional survey was also conducted among HTA (n = 22) and regulatory agencies (n = 6) across Europe to supplement the systematic review. Overall, we found that while there are areas of divergence, there has been progress over time in narrowing the gap in evidentiary requirements for HTA bodies and regulatory agencies. Most regulatory agencies (4/6; 67%) and half (11/22, 50%) of the HTA bodies reported having a formal link for “collaborating” with the other. Several mechanisms such as early tripartite dialogues, parallel submissions (reviews), adaptive licensing pathways, and postauthorization data generation have been explored as avenues for improving collaboration. A number of pilot initiatives have shown positive effects of these models to reduce the time between regulatory and HTA decisions, which may translate into faster access for patients to life-saving therapies. Thus, future approaches aimed at improving harmonization/interaction between HTA bodies and regulatory agencies should build on these existing models/mechanisms while examining their long-term impacts. Several barriers including legal, organizational, and resource-related factors were also identified, and these need to be addressed to achieve greater alignment in the current regulatory and reimbursement landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ofori-Asenso
- Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christine E Hallgreen
- Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise De Bruin
- Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Walter E, Hausberger SC, Groß E, Siebert U. Health-related quality of life, work productivity and costs related to patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Austria. J Med Econ 2020; 23:1061-1071. [PMID: 32713223 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1801187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease (IBD) is a lifelong illness with significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The disease-burden causes work productivity impairment, such as sick-leave and restriction of leisure time activities. From a societal perspective, productivity loss often contributes significantly to the total costs. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of disease-burden on work productivity, daily activities, and HRQoL. METHODS We performed a survey among Austrian patients with IBD to assess general questions about demography and disease pattern, impaired work productivity and reduced daily activities using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire and HRQoL utilizing the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Associations were assessed employing linear regressions. The questionnaire was circulated by the Austrian Crohn's Disease/Ulcerative Colitis Association. RESULTS In total, 510 patients with median age of 40 years completed the questionnaire. Patients had a median disease-duration of 9 years, 46% were treated with biologics and 64% were employed. The median SIBDQ score was 45 (16-69). Patients in self-assessed remission (n = 319) and relapse (n = 96) differed by 18 points on the SIBDQ score (p value < 0.0001). Mean work productivity reduction amounted to 7 h 17 min (95% CI 6:05-8:29) during the last 7 days. Work absenteeism accounted for 4 h 28 min (95% CI 3:25-5:31) and reduced productivity at the workplace (presenteeism) for 2 h 49 min (95% CI 2:31-3:07). During a relapse, 12 h 9 min were lost (p value < 0.0001). Productivity reduction correlated with HRQoL (r = 0.3964). In total, 143 €per patient per week (95% CI 119-167) were lost (7,411 €per year). On average, patients lost 4 h (95% CI 3:44-4:16) of unpaid daily activities; 3 h 17 min the employed subgroup and 5 h 19 min the not employed. CONCLUSION IBD leads to a substantial burden of disease, which is associated with indirect costs for society related to work ability reduction. HRQoL significantly influences loss of work productivity. Improving HRQoL should be a key factor to reduce disease burden and societal costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Walter
- IPF GmbH Institute for Pharmaeconomic Research, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Public Health, Medical Decision Making und Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | | | - Evelyn Groß
- OMCCV Austrian Crohn's Disease/Ulcerative Colitis Association, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute for Public Health, Medical Decision Making und Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Newbold A, Warren FC, Taylor RS, Hulme C, Burnett S, Aas B, Botella C, Burkhardt F, Ehring T, Fontaine JRJ, Frost M, Garcia-Palacios A, Greimel E, Hoessle C, Hovasapian A, Huyghe VEI, Lochner J, Molinari G, Pekrun R, Platt B, Rosenkranz T, Scherer KR, Schlegel K, Schulte-Korne G, Suso C, Voigt V, Watkins ER. Promotion of mental health in young adults via mobile phone app: study protocol of the ECoWeB (emotional competence for well-being in Young adults) cohort multiple randomised trials. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:458. [PMID: 32962684 PMCID: PMC7510072 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02857-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Promoting well-being and preventing poor mental health in young people is a major global priority. Building emotional competence (EC) skills via a mobile app may be an effective, scalable and acceptable way to do this. However, few large-scale controlled trials have examined the efficacy of mobile apps in promoting mental health in young people; none have tailored the app to individual profiles. METHOD/DESIGN The Emotional Competence for Well-Being in Young Adults cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) involves a longitudinal prospective cohort to examine well-being, mental health and EC in 16-22 year olds across 12 months. Within the cohort, eligible participants are entered to either the PREVENT trial (if selected EC scores at baseline within worst-performing quartile) or to the PROMOTE trial (if selected EC scores not within worst-performing quartile). In both trials, participants are randomised (i) to continue with usual practice, repeated assessments and a self-monitoring app; (ii) to additionally receive generic cognitive-behavioural therapy self-help in app; (iii) to additionally receive personalised EC self-help in app. In total, 2142 participants aged 16 to 22 years, with no current or past history of major depression, bipolar disorder or psychosis will be recruited across UK, Germany, Spain, and Belgium. Assessments take place at baseline (pre-randomisation), 1, 3 and 12 months post-randomisation. Primary endpoint and outcome for PREVENT is level of depression symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at 3 months; primary endpoint and outcome for PROMOTE is emotional well-being assessed on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale at 3 months. Depressive symptoms, anxiety, well-being, health-related quality of life, functioning and cost-effectiveness are secondary outcomes. Compliance, adverse events and potentially mediating variables will be carefully monitored. CONCLUSIONS The trial aims to provide a better understanding of the causal role of learning EC skills using interventions delivered via mobile phone apps with respect to promoting well-being and preventing poor mental health in young people. This knowledge will be used to develop and disseminate innovative evidence-based, feasible, and effective Mobile-health public health strategies for preventing poor mental health and promoting well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( www.clinicaltrials.org ). Number of identification: NCT04148508 November 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Newbold
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4LN UK
| | - F. C. Warren
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - R. S. Taylor
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK ,grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - C. Hulme
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - S. Burnett
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4LN UK
| | - B. Aas
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C. Botella
- grid.9612.c0000 0001 1957 9153Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - T. Ehring
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J. R. J. Fontaine
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M. Frost
- Monsenso ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A. Garcia-Palacios
- grid.9612.c0000 0001 1957 9153Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - E. Greimel
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C. Hoessle
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A. Hovasapian
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - VEI Huyghe
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Work, Organization and Society, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J. Lochner
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany ,grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - G. Molinari
- grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427CIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - R. Pekrun
- grid.411958.00000 0001 2194 1270Department of Psychology, University of Essex, UK, and Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - B. Platt
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - T. Rosenkranz
- grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - K. R. Scherer
- grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K. Schlegel
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G. Schulte-Korne
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - C. Suso
- grid.9612.c0000 0001 1957 9153Universitat Jaume I, Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - V. Voigt
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - E. R. Watkins
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Mood Disorders Centre, School of Psychology, Sir Henry Wellcome Building for Mood Disorders Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4LN UK
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Novaes HMD, Soárez PCD. [Health Technologies Assessment: origins, development, and current challenges. In the international and Brazilian scenarios]. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2020; 36:e00006820. [PMID: 32901662 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00006820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
122
|
Sismondo S. Access to Medicines, Access to Markets. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2020; 5:58. [PMID: 33869464 PMCID: PMC8022690 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This article explores some uses by the pharmaceutical industry of language from the "access to medicines" movement in global health, sometimes for goals almost completely opposite to those of the movement. Important in the context of extremely expensive treatments, the industry draws on the idealistic discourse around access to medicines to create a very specific continuity between the needs of the Global South and its own marketing needs. By focusing on "access," the industry can promote the opening up of markets in relatively wealthy countries with important public or highly regulated payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Sismondo
- Department of Philosophy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Cardoso F, Wilking N, Bernardini R, Biganzoli L, Espin J, Miikkulainen K, Schuurman S, Spence D, Spitz S, Ujupan S, Zernik N, Gordon J. A multi-stakeholder approach in optimising patients' needs in the benefit assessment process of new metastatic breast cancer treatments. Breast 2020; 52:78-87. [PMID: 32450470 PMCID: PMC7487948 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a growing understanding as science evolves that different cancer types require different approaches to treatment evaluation, especially in the metastatic stages. The introduction of new metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatments may be hindered by several elements, including the availability of relevant evidence related to disease-specific outcomes, the benefit assessment process around the evaluation of the clinical benefit and the patients' need of new treatments. The Steering Committee (SC) found that not all issues relevant to MBC patients are consistently considered in the current benefit assessment process of new treatments. Among these are overall survival, time-to-event endpoints (e.g. progression-free survival), patients' priorities, burden of disease, MBC-specific quality of life, value in delaying chemotherapy, route of administration, side effects and toxicities, treatment adherence and the benefit of real-world evidence. This paper calls on decision makers to (1) Include MBC-specific patient priorities and outcomes in the overall benefit assessments of new MBC treatments; (2) Enhance multi-stakeholder collaboration in order to improve MBC patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | | | | | - Laura Biganzoli
- Hospital of Prato and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists, Florence, Italy
| | - Jaime Espin
- Andalusian School of Public Health, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública / CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Sabine Spitz
- Europa Donna, Vienna, Austria and European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI)
| | | | | | - Jenn Gordon
- Canadian Breast Cancer Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Angelis A, Thursz M, Ratziu V, O’Brien A, Serfaty L, Canbay A, Schiefke I, Costa JBE, Lecomte P, Kanavos P. Early Health Technology Assessment during Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Drug Development: A Two-Round, Cross-Country, Multicriteria Decision Analysis. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:830-845. [PMID: 32845234 PMCID: PMC7457462 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20940672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background. The assessment of value along the clinical development of new biopharmaceutical compounds is a challenging task. Complex and uncertain evidence has to be analyzed, considering a multitude of value preferences from different stakeholders. Objective. To investigate the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support decision making during drug development while considering payer and health technology assessment (HTA) value concerns, by applying the Advance Value Framework in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and testing for the consistency of the results. Design. A multiattribute value theory methodology was applied and 2 rounds of decision conferences (DCs) were organized in 3 countries (England, France, and Germany), with the participation of national key experts and stakeholders using the MACBETH questioning protocol and algorithm. A total of 51 health care professionals, patient advocates, and methodologists, including (ex-) committee members or assessors from national HTA bodies, participated in 6 DCs in the study countries. Target Population. NASH patients in fibrosis stages F2 to 3 were considered. Interventions. The value of a hypothetical product profile was assessed against 3 compounds under development using their phase 2 results. Outcome Measures. DC participants' value preferences were elicited involving criteria selection, options scoring, and criteria weighting. Results. Highly consistent valuation rankings were observed in all DCs, always favoring the same compound. Highly consistent rankings of criteria clusters were observed, favoring therapeutic benefit criteria, followed by safety profile and innovation level criteria. Limitations. There was a lack of comparative treatment effects, early evidence on surrogate endpoints was used, and stakeholder representativeness was limited in some DCs. Conclusions. The use of MCDA is promising in supporting early HTA, illustrating high consistency in results across countries and between study rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aris Angelis
- Department of Health Policy and LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Mark Thursz
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Vlad Ratziu
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie and the Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière Medical School, Paris, France
| | - Alastair O’Brien
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, London, UK
| | - Lawrence Serfaty
- Hautepierre Hospital, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ali Canbay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ingolf Schiefke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | | | - Panos Kanavos
- Department of Health Policy and LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Angelis A, Kanavos P, Phillips LD. ICER Value Framework 2020 Update: Recommendations on the Aggregation of Benefits and Contextual Considerations. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1040-1048. [PMID: 32828216 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) in the United States recently published a 2020 update to its value assessment framework. We are commenting on the method by which the benefits of health interventions are integrated, relating to contextual considerations and other factors relevant to an intervention's value. We start by discussing the theoretical foundations of decision analysis and its extension to multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Then we provide a detailed, evidence-based response to some of the claims made by ICER with regard to the use of MCDA methods and stakeholder engagement. Finally, we provide a number of recommendations on the use of quantitative decision analysis and decision conferencing that could be of relevance to the ICER methodology. Overall, we agree that some of the proposed changes by ICER are moving in the right direction toward improving transparency in the value assessment process, but these changes are probably inadequate. We advocate that more serious attention should be paid to the use of quantitative decision analysis together with decision conferencing for the construction of value preferences via group processes for the integration of an intervention's various benefit components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aris Angelis
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, England, UK.
| | - Panos Kanavos
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, England, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
126
|
Karnon J, Pekarsky B. Should Health Economic Evaluations Undertaken from a Societal Perspective Include Net Government Spending Multiplier Effects? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2020; 18:467-475. [PMID: 32020537 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00556-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The fiscal multiplier represents the ratio of the change in national income to an associated increase in government spending. Fiscal multiplier effects are commonly estimated to justify options for government spending. Multiplier effects are not considered in economic evaluations of healthcare, but alternate forms of healthcare spending are expected to have varying multiplier effects. This paper describes the estimation and application of net government spending multiplier effects to two published economic evaluations. Negative net multiplier effects are estimated for an evaluated pharmaceutical for the treatment of stable cardiovascular disease, with a resulting increase in the published incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from AU$31,244 to 47,311. Positive net multiplier effects are estimated for an evaluated healthcare delivery model for frail older people, with a resulting decrease in the published incremental cost per QALY gained from AU$8129 to 7669. The inclusion of net multiplier effects in economic evaluations undertaken from a societal perspective can have important effects on the estimated value of evaluated health technologies and services. The potential for government spending on healthcare to crowd out existing spending is considered low, but further investigation of crowding-out effects is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Brita Pekarsky
- South Australian Ambulance Service, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Prieto-Pinto L, Garzón-Orjuela N, Lasalvia P, Castañeda-Cardona C, Rosselli D. International Experience in Therapeutic Value and Value-Based Pricing: A Rapid Review of the Literature. Value Health Reg Issues 2020; 23:37-48. [PMID: 32688214 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize at a global level the concept of therapeutic value (TV) and describe the experience of value-based pricing (VBP) policies in 6 reference countries. METHODS We conducted a rapid review of the literature that addressed 2 exploratory research questions. A systematic and exhaustive search was carried out up to July 2018 in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. RESULTS The concepts of TV and VBP are related; value frameworks for medicines should include social preferences, comparative effectiveness, safety, adoption viability, social impact, high quality of evidence, severity of illness, and innovation. The added therapeutic value (ATV) is the manner of measuring the therapeutic advantages of new medicines compared with existing ones in terms of comparative effectiveness and safety. There are variations in the mechanisms of reimbursement and drug pricing regulation between the countries of study. CONCLUSION In a VBP system it is essential to establish the TV and ATV of a new medicine. Although there are no methodological guidelines for the implementation of VBP policies, the process implies from the beginning the definition of TV categories that will be included in the drug pricing and reimbursement systems. Agreements between the pharmaceutical industry and governments have become a useful tool as a negotiating mechanism in most countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pieralessandro Lasalvia
- Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, NeuroEconomix, Bogotá, Colombia; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Diego Rosselli
- Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, NeuroEconomix, Bogotá, Colombia; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Radeva D, Hopkin G, Mossialos E, Borrill J, Osipenko L, Naci H. Assessment of technical errors and validation processes in economic models submitted by the company for NICE technology appraisals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:1-6. [PMID: 32618536 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic models play a central role in the decision-making process of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Inadequate validation methods allow for errors to be included in economic models. These errors may alter the final recommendations and have a significant impact on outcomes for stakeholders. OBJECTIVE To describe the patterns of technical errors found in NICE submissions and to provide an insight into the validation exercises carried out by the companies prior to submission. METHODS All forty-one single technology appraisals (STAs) completed in 2017 by NICE were reviewed and all were on medicines. The frequency of errors and information on their type, magnitude, and impact was extracted from publicly available NICE documentation along with the details of model validation methods used. RESULTS Two STAs (5 percent) had no reported errors, nineteen (46 percent) had between one and four errors, sixteen (39 percent) had between five and nine errors, and four (10 percent) had more than ten errors. The most common errors were transcription errors (29 percent), logic errors (29 percent), and computational errors (25 percent). All STAs went through at least one type of validation. Moreover, errors that were notable enough were reported in the final appraisal document (FAD) in eight (20 percent) of the STAs assessed but each of these eight STAs received positive recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Technical errors are common in the economic models submitted to NICE. Some errors were considered important enough to be reported in the FAD. Improvements are needed in the model development process to ensure technical errors are kept to a minimum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demi Radeva
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- United Health Group, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gareth Hopkin
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elias Mossialos
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Leeza Osipenko
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Huseyin Naci
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Marsh K, van Til JA, Molsen-David E, Juhnke C, Hawken N, Oehrlein EM, Choi YC, Duenas A, Greiner W, Haas K, Hiligsmann M, Hockley KS, Ivlev I, Liu F, Ostermann J, Poder T, Poon JL, Muehlbacher A. Health Preference Research in Europe: A Review of Its Use in Marketing Authorization, Reimbursement, and Pricing Decisions-Report of the ISPOR Stated Preference Research Special Interest Group. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:831-841. [PMID: 32762984 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examines European decision makers' consideration and use of quantitative preference data. METHODS The study reviewed quantitative preference data usage in 31 European countries to support marketing authorization, reimbursement, or pricing decisions. Use was defined as: agency guidance on preference data use, sponsor submission of preference data, or decision-maker collection of preference data. The data could be collected from any stakeholder using any method that generated quantitative estimates of preferences. Data were collected through: (1) documentary evidence identified through a literature and regulatory websites review, and via key opinion leader outreach; and (2) a survey of staff working for agencies that support or make healthcare technology decisions. RESULTS Preference data utilization was identified in 22 countries and at a European level. The most prevalent use (19 countries) was citizen preferences, collected using time-trade off or standard gamble methods to inform health state utility estimation. Preference data was also used to: (1) value other impact on patients, (2) incorporate non-health factors into reimbursement decisions, and (3) estimate opportunity cost. Pilot projects were identified (6 countries and at a European level), with a focus on multi-criteria decision analysis methods and choice-based methods to elicit patient preferences. CONCLUSION While quantitative preference data support reimbursement and pricing decisions in most European countries, there was no utilization evidence in European-level marketing authorization decisions. While there are commonalities, a diversity of usage was identified between jurisdictions. Pilots suggest the potential for greater use of preference data, and for alignment between decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janine A van Til
- Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Y Christy Choi
- University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Economics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ilya Ivlev
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | | - Jiat L Poon
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Axel Muehlbacher
- Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Desai B, Mattingly TJ, van den Broek RWM, Pham N, Frailer M, Yang J, Perfetto EM. Peer Review and Transparency in Evidence-Source Selection in Value and Health Technology Assessment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:689-696. [PMID: 32540225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2019] [Revised: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Value and health technology assessment (V/HTA) is often used in clinical, access, and reimbursement decisions. V/HTA data-source selection may not be transparent, which is a necessary element for stakeholder understanding and trust and for fostering accountability among decision makers. Peer review is considered one mechanism for judging data trustworthiness. Our objective was (1) to use publicly available documentation of V/HTA methods to identify requirements for inclusion of peer-reviewed evidence sources, (2) to compare and contrast US and non-US approaches, and (3) to assess evidence sources used in published V/HTA reports. METHODS Publicly available methods documentation from 11 V/HTA organizations in North America and Europe were manually searched and abstracted for descriptions of requirements and recommendations regarding search strategy and evidence-source selection. The bibliographies of a subset of V/HTA reports published in 2018 were manually abstracted for evidence-source types used in each. RESULTS Heterogeneity in evidence-source retrieval and selection was observed across all V/HTA organizations, with more pronounced differences between US and non-US organizations. Not all documentation of organizations' methods address the evidence-source selection processes (7 of 11), and few explicitly reference peer-reviewed sources (3 of 11). Documentation of the evidence-source selection strategy was inconsistent across reports (6 of 13), and the level of detail provided varied across organizations. Some information on evidence-source selection was often included in confidential documentation and was not publicly available. CONCLUSIONS Disparities exist among V/HTA organizations in requirements and guidance regarding evidence-source selection. Standardization of evidence-source selection strategies and documentation could help improve V/HTA transparency and has implications for decision making based on report findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bansri Desai
- University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | | | - Ngan Pham
- University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Megan Frailer
- University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Yang
- University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eleanor M Perfetto
- University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA; National Health Council, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Pollock RF, Colaone F, Guardiola L, Shergill S, Brennan VK. A cost analysis of SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 resin microspheres versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in France, Italy, Spain and the UK. J Med Econ 2020; 23:593-602. [PMID: 32067534 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1731213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background and aims: A wide range of treatment options are available for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including systemic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib and lenvatinib, immunotherapies, locoregional therapies such as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) and treatments with curative intent such as resection, radiofrequency ablation and liver transplantation. Given the substantial economic burden associated with HCC treatment, the aim of the present analysis was to establish the cost of using SIRT with SIR-Spheres yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres versus TKIs from healthcare payer perspectives in France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom (UK).Methods: A cost model was developed to capture the costs of initial systemic treatment with sorafenib (95%) or lenvatinib (5%) versus SIRT in patients with HCC in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages B and C. A nested Markov model was utilized to model transitions between progression-free survival (PFS), progression and death, in addition to transitions between subsequent treatment lines. Cost and resource use data were identified from published sources in each of the four countries.Results: Relative to TKIs, SIRT with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres were found to be cost saving in all four country settings, with the additional costs of the microspheres and the SIRT procedure being more than offset by reductions in drug and drug administration costs, and treatment of adverse events. Across the four country settings, total cost savings with SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres fell within the range 5.4-24.9% and SIRT resulted in more patients ultimately receiving treatments with curative intent (4.6 vs. 1.4% of eligible patients).Conclusion: SIR-Spheres Y-90 resin microspheres resulted in cost savings relative to TKIs in the treatment of unresectable HCC in all four country settings, while increasing the proportion of patients who become eligible for treatments with curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Pollock
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Covalence Research Ltd, London, UK
| | - Fabien Colaone
- Reimbursement and Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Laura Guardiola
- Reimbursement and Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Suki Shergill
- Reimbursement and Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| | - Victoria K Brennan
- Reimbursement and Market Access, Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Evaluation of new medicines in Spain and comparison with other European countries. GACETA SANITARIA 2020; 34:133-140. [PMID: 31027840 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
133
|
Pinto A, Naci H, Neez E, Mossialos E. Association Between the Use of Surrogate Measures in Pivotal Trials and Health Technology Assessment Decisions: A Retrospective Analysis of NICE and CADTH Reviews of Cancer Drugs. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:319-327. [PMID: 32197727 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether using surrogate versus patient-relevant endpoints in pivotal trials of cancer drugs was associated with health technology assessment recommendations in England (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE]) and Canada (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health [CADTH]). METHODS Cancer drug approvals from 2012 to 2016 were categorized by demonstrating benefit on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, disease response, or having no comparator. Approvals were analyzed by benefit category and health technology assessment recommendation. The association between benefit (surrogate vs OS) and recommending a drug was examined using descriptive statistics and linear probability models controlling for unmet need, orphan designation, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS Of 42 cancer indications that NICE recommended, 15 (36%) demonstrated OS benefit. Cancer indications with OS benefit were less likely to receive a recommendation from NICE than those without (P = .04). In linear probability models, availability of OS benefit was no longer associated with a recommendation from NICE (P = .32). Cost-effective cancer drugs had a 55.6% (95% CI: 38.9%-72.3%) higher probability of receiving a recommendation from NICE than those that were not. In Canada, 15 of 37 (41%) cancer indications that were recommended showed OS benefit. There was no detectable association between surrogate measures and CADTH recommendations based on descriptive statistics (P = .62) or in linear probability models (P = .73). CONCLUSION When cost-effectiveness was considered, pivotal trial endpoints were not associated with NICE recommendations. Pivotal trial endpoints, unmet need, orphan status, and cost-effectiveness did not explain CADTH recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlyn Pinto
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Huseyin Naci
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, UK.
| | - Emilie Neez
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Stratil JM, Baltussen R, Scheel I, Nacken A, Rehfuess EA. Development of the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: an overview of systematic reviews of decision criteria for health decision-making. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2020; 18:8. [PMID: 32071560 PMCID: PMC7014604 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-020-0203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Decision-making in public health and health policy is complex and requires careful deliberation of many and sometimes conflicting normative and technical criteria. Several approaches and tools, such as multi-criteria decision analysis, health technology assessments and evidence-to-decision (EtD) frameworks, have been proposed to guide decision-makers in selecting the criteria most relevant and appropriate for a transparent decision-making process. This study forms part of the development of the WHO-INTEGRATE EtD framework, a framework rooted in global health norms and values as reflected in key documents of the World Health Organization and the United Nations system. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of criteria used in or proposed for real-world decision-making processes, including guideline development, health technology assessment, resource allocation and others. Methods We conducted an overview of systematic reviews through a combination of systematic literature searches and extensive reference searches. Systematic reviews reporting criteria used for real-world health decision-making by governmental or non-governmental organization on a supranational, national, or programme level were included and their quality assessed through a bespoke critical appraisal tool. The criteria reported in the reviews were extracted, de-duplicated and sorted into first-level (i.e. criteria), second-level (i.e. sub-criteria) and third-level (i.e. decision aspects) categories. First-level categories were developed a priori using a normative approach; second- and third-level categories were developed inductively. Results We included 36 systematic reviews providing criteria, of which one met all and another eleven met at least five of the items of our critical appraisal tool. The criteria were subsumed into 8 criteria, 45 sub-criteria and 200 decision aspects. The first-level of the category system comprised the following seven substantive criteria: “Health-related balance of benefits and harms”; “Human and individual rights”; “Acceptability considerations”; “Societal considerations”; “Considerations of equity, equality and fairness”; “Cost and financial considerations”; and “Feasibility and health system considerations”. In addition, we identified an eight criterion “Evidence”. Conclusion This overview of systematic reviews provides a comprehensive overview of criteria used or suggested for real-world health decision-making. It also discusses key challenges in the selection of the most appropriate criteria and in seeking to implement a fair decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Stratil
- 1Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - R Baltussen
- 2Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O.Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - I Scheel
- 3Department of Global Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, 0403 Oslo, Norway
| | - A Nacken
- 1Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - E A Rehfuess
- 1Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Pettenkofer School of Public Health, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Zoratti MJ, Xie F, Thorlund K, Allen N, Levine M. An Exploratory Analysis of Predictors of Concordance between Canadian Common Drug Review Reimbursement Recommendations and the Subsequent Decisions by Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Healthc Policy 2020; 15:90-101. [PMID: 32176613 PMCID: PMC7075445 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concordance between Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations and provincial plans has been studied previously. However, no study has, to the best of the authors' knowledge, examined the characteristics of CDR recommendations that may be associated with concordance. METHODS Recommendation-decision pairs were collected from the CDR and the provincial plans of Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Concordance was evaluated by province. Characteristics of each CDR recommendation were collected, and associations with concordance were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS Recommendation-listing concordance was high. Positive references to cost and clinical outcomes compared to placebo were statistically associated with concordance. Negative references to cost and to the consistency and certainty of economic evidence were statistically associated with discordance. However, these findings were inconsistent across the jurisdictions studied. CONCLUSION Although concordance was high, the ability of recommendation characteristics to explain the relationship between province and CDR listing decisions was limited. This exploratory study highlights the complexity of the reimbursement process and possible reasons for drug listing differences across jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Zoratti
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - Feng Xie
- Professor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Program for Health Economics and Outcome Measures (PHENOM), Hamilton, ON
| | - Kristian Thorlund
- Vice-President of Real-World Analytics, Cytel Canada, Associate Professor (Part-Time), Department of , Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | | | - Mitchell Levine
- Professor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Garattini L, Padula A. HTA for pharmaceuticals in Europe: will the mountain deliver a mouse? THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2020; 21:1-5. [PMID: 31440857 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01103-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Livio Garattini
- CESAV, Centre for Health Economics, Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri IRCCS, 24020, Ranica, Italy.
| | - Anna Padula
- CESAV, Centre for Health Economics, Institute for Pharmacological Research Mario Negri IRCCS, 24020, Ranica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
International Strategy for Sustainable Growth in Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12030867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Although it is generally agreed that the pharmaceutical industry is in a state of rapid internationalization, there is no clear comprehensive explanation of the current state and effectiveness of an international strategy. There are many studies about internationalization but they neither focus on the pharmaceutical industry nor evaluate the effectiveness of an international strategy with a control. Therefore, we investigate the current state of internationalization with a sample of the 30 multinational pharmaceutical companies, as well as the effectiveness of an international strategy by comparing two international strategies. In this study, we define an international strategy as a strategy that controls the geographic distribution of sales across regions to maximize total sales. The results show that 33% of the companies are still home-region-oriented, and we did not find any evidence of the effectiveness of an international strategy that pursues a balanced geographic distribution across regions in terms of total sales and adjusted total sales. The results provide the practical implication that pharmaceutical companies should weigh up the specific markets to secure higher sales through the advantage of adapting to customers’ needs. This paper contributes to the research on sustainable growth by empirically providing results of comparisons of different international strategies in the pharmaceutical industry.
Collapse
|
138
|
Strzebonska K, Wasylewski MT, Zaborowska L, Riedel N, Wieschowski S, Strech D, Waligora M. Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034666. [PMID: 31974090 PMCID: PMC7044990 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To establish the rates of publication and reporting of results for interventional clinical trials across Polish academic medical centres (AMCs) completed between 2009 and 2013. We aim also to compare the publication and reporting success between adult and paediatric trials. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING AMCs in Poland. PARTICIPANTS AMCs with interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and publishing via journal publication. RESULTS We identified 305 interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, completed between 2009 and 2013 and affiliated with at least one AMC. Overall, 243 of the 305 trials (79.7%) had been published as articles or posted their summary results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results were posted within a year of study completion and/or published within 2 years of study completion for 131 trials (43.0%). Dissemination by both posting and publishing results in a timely manner was achieved by four trials (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS Our cross-sectional analysis revealed that Polish AMCs fail to meet the expectation for timely disseminating the findings of all interventional clinical trials. Delayed dissemination and non-dissemination of trial results negatively affects decisions in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Strzebonska
- REMEDY, Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group, Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Mateusz T Wasylewski
- REMEDY, Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group, Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Lucja Zaborowska
- REMEDY, Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group, Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Nico Riedel
- QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Wieschowski
- Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Strech
- QUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcin Waligora
- REMEDY, Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group, Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Oliva-Moreno J, Puig-Junoy J, Trapero-Bertran M, Epstein D, Pinyol C, Sacristán JA. Economic Evaluation for Pricing and Reimbursement of New Drugs in Spain: Fable or Desideratum? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:25-31. [PMID: 31952669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The economic evaluation of healthcare technologies has become in many countries a basic tool for reimbursement, pricing and purchasing decisions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to examine the institutional, legal, and political factors that have impeded the application of economic evaluation and the criterion of efficiency in the process of pricing and reimbursement of new medicines in Spain. METHODS Narrative description of the current institutional framework for the use of economic evaluation in pricing and reimbursement in Spain, legal and policy framework in the field of evaluation of new medicines, and stakeholder initiatives and policies related to the use of economic evaluation outside of the pricing and reimbursement process. RESULTS Spain has an institutional framework created and established over the last years that could have facilitated a formal use of economic evaluation in the process of pricing and reimbursement. Nevertheless, the real use of economic evaluation at the central or regional level is still unknown, although application of the efficiency criterion, linking to cost-effectiveness, has been clearly required by Spanish laws and regulations at the national level. We highlight a certain degree of moral hazard from the central government that is not directly responsible for the budget impact of reimbursement and pricing decisions. There are currently a number of ongoing initiatives in the field of economic evaluation by various agents, but they remain uncoordinated. CONCLUSIONS Poor governance at the highest level of decision making is the main reason for the lack of interest in economic evaluation. A profound political change, supported by transparency and accountability, is required before the criterion of efficiency can be fully considered in the process of pricing and reimbursement of new medicines in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Oliva-Moreno
- Department of Economic Analysis and Finance, Universidad de Castilla La-Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
| | - Jaume Puig-Junoy
- Barcelona School of Management, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Trapero-Bertran
- Institut de Recerca en Avaluació i Polítiques Públiques, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Epstein
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Carme Pinyol
- Market Access Department, Pierre Fabre Ibérica, Barcelona, Spain; ISPOR Spain Chapter, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Antonio Sacristán
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Medical Department, Lilly, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Access to medicines - a systematic review of the literature. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019; 16:1166-1176. [PMID: 31839584 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Budgetary constraints and the rising cost of new innovative medicines are the key challenges for access to medicines. Multiple research studies explored diverse dimensions of this topic, however, a thorough and detailed review of existing literature on access to medicines in United Kingdom is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review of literature was to critically review and analyse the literature pertaining to original research on access to medicines issue in the United Kingdom. This review includes two types of studies: (a) UK centric studies (b) studies comparing UK with the other countries. METHODS A systematic search of articles published between Jan 2008 and October 12, 2018 was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and specific journals including BMJ, Lancet, Value in Health, Pharmacoeconomics, Pharmacoeconomics Open, Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, Health Policy. RESULTS The searches across all databases and journals resulted in 53 relevant articles. The data extracted from the 53 articles generated key themes. These themes included: Access to Medicines, Health technology assessment (HTA), Pricing and Health technology assessment, Risk Sharing Agreements & Stakeholders involvement/views on reimbursement Process. Subthemes were added under the key themes where applicable. CONCLUSIONS This review systematically evaluated the current literature and identified variability in access to medicines across countries in UK &EU and across different categories of medicines. Medicine licensing and reimbursement environment is continuously evolving and there are challenges as well as opportunities for learning and collaboration among countries which are at different stages of advancement in their systems.
Collapse
|
141
|
Blüher M, Saunders SJ, Mittard V, Torrejon Torres R, Davis JA, Saunders R. Critical Review of European Health-Economic Guidelines for the Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 6:278. [PMID: 31850356 PMCID: PMC6895571 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Health-technology assessment (HTA) is a recognized mechanism to determine the relative benefits of innovative medical technologies. One aspect is their health-economic impact. While the process and methodology for pharmaceuticals is well-established, guidance for medical devices is sparse. Aim: To provide an overview of the health-economic aspect in current European HTA guidelines concerning medical devices and identifying issues raised and potential improvements proposed in recent literature. Methodology: Available guidelines by European agencies were each reviewed and summarized. To complement this, a full systematic review of current literature concerning potential improvements to existing HTA practices for medical devices, from PubMed and EMBASE, was conducted; the focus was on health economics. Authors could only review documents in English, French, or German. The systematic review yielded 518 unique articles concerning HTA for medical devices, 32 of which were considered for full-text review after screening of all abstracts. Results: There is very limited consensus in—and mostly a complete lack of—guidance specific to medical devices in official HTA guidelines, for both clinical and economic analyses. Twenty two of 41 European countries had published official HTA guidance in English, French, or German. Among these only 4 (England, France, the Netherlands, and Sweden) dedicated a chapter or separate document to medical devices. In the literature, there is sufficient evidence to suggest medical devices need to be addressed separately from pharmaceuticals. However, mostly challenges are discussed rather than implementable solutions offered. We present the following set of frequently discussed issues and summarize any solutions that pertain to them: a weak evidence base, learning-curve effects, organizational impact, incremental innovation, diversity of devices, dynamic pricing, and transferability. We further combine reviewed information to suggest a set of possible best practices for health-economic assessment of medical devices. Conclusion: For greater efficiency in medical-device innovation, European agencies should look to (re-)address the specific requirements of medical devices in their HTA guidelines. When both the health-economic and data requirements for the HTA of medical devices are defined, the development of practical solutions will likely follow.
Collapse
|
142
|
Wasir R, Irawati S, Makady A, Postma M, Goettsch W, Feenstra T, Buskens E. The implementation of HTA in medicine pricing and reimbursement policies in Indonesia: Insights from multiple stakeholders. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225626. [PMID: 31774854 PMCID: PMC6881021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to improve the use of health technology assessment (HTA) for the selection of medicines listed in the e-Catalogue and the national formulary in Indonesia. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data. Purposive sampling was used to recruit the stakeholders consisting of policymakers, a pharmaceutical industry representative, healthcare providers, and patients. The data were analyzed using directed content analysis and following the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative studies (COREQ). Results The twenty-five participants interviewed agreed with the use of HTA for supporting the e-Catalogue and the national formulary and perceived the advantages of HTA implementation outweighed the disadvantages. Barriers mentioned were a lack of capability of local human resources, financial incentives, a clear framework and insufficient data. Strategies suggested to overcome the barriers were establishing (inter)national networks to build up capacity, setting up departments of HTA in several universities in Indonesia, and introducing a clear HTA framework. Facilitators mentioned were the ambition to achieve universal health coverage, the presence of legal frameworks to implement HTA in the e-Catalogue and the national formulary, and the demands for appropriate medicine policies. Conclusions Several barriers are currently hampering broad implementation of HTA in medicine pricing and reimbursement policy in Indonesia. Solutions to these issues appear feasible and important facilitators exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riswandy Wasir
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Farmasi Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Sylvi Irawati
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Center for Medicines Information and Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Amr Makady
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Postma
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Wim Goettsch
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Talitha Feenstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Buskens
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Operations, Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Teramae F, Yamaguchi N, Makino T, Sengoku S, Kodama K. Holistic cost-effectiveness analysis of anticancer drug regimens in Japan. Drug Discov Today 2019; 25:269-273. [PMID: 31782999 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Japan officially introduced cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in 2019, whereas some countries, such as England, Sweden, Canada, and Australia, have experience with health technology assessment (HTA). Therefore, there are few reports that comprehensively examine the situation of health economic evaluation in Japan. In this paper, we review the health economic evaluation systems among those countries. We also conducted a case study that investigated the time-trend of cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for anticancer drug regimens in Japan. We found a time-trend ICER for breast cancer (BC). Additionally, molecular targeting drugs for BC had a positive effect on the ICER, and both small molecular-targeting drugs and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) had a higher ICER for BC compared with conventional drugs. Finally, we discuss a possible way to implement a health economic evaluation system in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumio Teramae
- Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan; Eli Lilly Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naoya Yamaguchi
- Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan; Novartis Pharma, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Makino
- Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shintaro Sengoku
- School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kota Kodama
- Graduate School of Technology Management, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Welie AG, Gebretekle GB, Stolk E, Mukuria C, Krahn MD, Enquoselassie F, Fenta TG. Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 22:7-14. [PMID: 31683254 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a growing interest in health technology assessment and economic evaluations in developing countries such as Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from the Ethiopian general population to facilitate cost utility analysis. METHODS A nationally representative sample (N = 1050) was recruited using a stratified multistage quota sampling technique. Face-to-face, computer-assisted interviews using the EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology (EQ-PVT) protocol of composite time trade-off (c-TTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were undertaken to elicit preference scores. The feasibility of the EQ-PVT protocol was pilot tested in a sample of the population (n = 110). A hybrid regression model combining c-TTO and DCE data was used to estimate the final value set. RESULTS In the pilot study, the acceptability of the tasks was good, and there were no special concerns with undertaking the c-TTO and DCE tasks. The coefficients generated from a hybrid model were logically consistent. The predicted values for the EQ-5D-5L ranged from -0.718 to 1. Level 5 anxiety/depression had the largest impact on utility decrement (-0.458), whereas level 5 self-care had the least impact (-0.222). The maximum predicted value beyond full health was 0.974 for the 11112 health state. CONCLUSIONS This is the first EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Africa using international valuation methods (c-TTO and DCE) and also the first using the EQ-PVT protocol to derive a value set. We expect that the availability of this value set will facilitate health technology assessment and health-related quality-of-life research and inform policy decision making in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham G Welie
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
| | | | - Elly Stolk
- Executive Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fikre Enquoselassie
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Teferi Gedif Fenta
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Baltussen R, Marsh K, Thokala P, Diaby V, Castro H, Cleemput I, Garau M, Iskrov G, Olyaeemanesh A, Mirelman A, Mobinizadeh M, Morton A, Tringali M, van Til J, Valentim J, Wagner M, Youngkong S, Zah V, Toll A, Jansen M, Bijlmakers L, Oortwijn W, Broekhuizen H. Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Benefits, Limitations, and the Way Forward. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:1283-1288. [PMID: 31708065 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent years have witnessed an increased interest in the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support health technology assessment (HTA) agencies for setting healthcare priorities. However, its implementation to date has been criticized for being "entirely mechanistic," ignoring opportunity costs, and not following best practice guidelines. This article provides guidance on the use of MCDA in this context. METHODS The present study was based on a systematic review and consensus development. We developed a typology of MCDA studies and good implementation practice. We reviewed 36 studies over the period 1990 to 2018 on their compliance with good practice and developed recommendations. We reached consensus among authors over the course of several review rounds. RESULTS We identified 3 MCDA study types: qualitative MCDA, quantitative MCDA, and MCDA with decision rules. The types perform differently in terms of quality, consistency, and transparency of recommendations on healthcare priorities. We advise HTA agencies to always include a deliberative component. Agencies should, at a minimum, undertake qualitative MCDA. The use of quantitative MCDA has additional benefits but also poses design challenges. MCDA with decision rules, used by HTA agencies in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom and typically referred to as structured deliberation, has the potential to further improve the formulation of recommendations but has not yet been subjected to broad experimentation and evaluation. CONCLUSION MCDA holds large potential to support HTA agencies in setting healthcare priorities, but its implementation needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Baltussen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Vakaramoko Diaby
- Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Georgi Iskrov
- Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria; Institute for Rare Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | | | | | - Alec Morton
- University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Agnes Toll
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Jansen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Bijlmakers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wija Oortwijn
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
146
|
Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy in Orthopedics—Health Policy, Regulatory and Clinical Development, and Market Access. Tech Orthop 2019. [DOI: 10.1097/bto.0000000000000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
147
|
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for HTA across four EU Member States: Piloting the Advance Value Framework. Soc Sci Med 2019; 246:112595. [PMID: 31874372 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has emerged as a methodology for Health Technology Assessment (HTA). However, limited empirical evidence is available on its use by decision-makers; where available, it only comes from single-setting exercises, while cross-country comparative studies are unavailable. This study applies the Advance Value Framework (AVF), an MCDA methodology for HTA based on multi-attribute value theory, through a series of case studies with decision-makers in four countries, to explore its feasibility and compare decision-makers' value preferences and results. The AVF was applied in the evaluation of three drugs for metastatic, castrate resistant, prostate cancer (abiraterone, cabazitaxel and enzalutamide) in the post-chemotherapy indication. Decision conferences were organised in four European countries in collaboration with their HTA or health insurance organisations by involving relevant assessors and experts: Sweden (TLV), Andalusia/Spain (AETSA), Poland (AOTMiT) and Belgium (INAMI-RIZIV). Participants' value preferences, including performance scoring and criteria weighting, were elicited through a facilitated decision-analysis modelling approach using the MACBETH technique. Between 6 and 11 criteria were included in each jurisdiction's value model, allocated across four criteria domains; Therapeutic Benefit criteria consistently ranked first in relative importance across all countries. Consistent drug rankings were observed in all settings, with enzalutamide generating the highest overall weighted preference value (WPV) score, followed by abiraterone and cabazitaxel. Dividing drugs' overall WPV scores by their costs produced the lowest "cost per unit of value" for enzalutamide, followed by abiraterone and cabazitaxel. These results come in contrast with the actual country HTA recommendations and pricing decisions. Overall, although some differences in value preferences were observed between countries, drug rankings remained the same. The MCDA methodology employed could act as a decision support tool in HTA, due to the transparency in the construction of value preferences in a collaborative manner.
Collapse
|
148
|
van der Pol S, de Jong LA, Vemer P, Jansen DEMC, Postma MJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Germany: An Application of the Efficiency Frontier. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:1119-1127. [PMID: 31563254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the cost-effectiveness of new treatments in Germany, the efficiency frontier (EF) method has been developed. We compared the cost-effectiveness analysis using international standards and the German methodology, using the heart failure drug sacubitril/valsartan as an example. METHODS A previously developed Markov model was adapted to include 4 treatment options: no treatment, enalapril, candesartan, and sacubitril/valsartan. The internationally used incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, as well as cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Additionally, EFs, net monetary benefits (NMBs), and price-acceptability curves were created according to German guidelines. All analyses were performed from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance. RESULTS The base-case ICER for sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril is €19 300/quality-adjusted life-year. On the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, sacubitril/valsartan is most likely to be cost-effective, out of all included comparators, from a hypothetical willingness-to-pay threshold of €18 250/quality-adjusted life-year onward. No EF could be constructed for the base case. Taking the uncertainty of the input parameters into account for the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, a NMB of around -€14 000 was calculated, depending on the outcome considered, with the NMB being zero at a daily price for sacubitril/valsartan ranging from €1.52 to €1.67. CONCLUSION We calculated an ICER for Germany, comparable to previously published cost-effectiveness analyses for Europe, which widely concluded sacubitril/valsartan to be cost-effective. Using the German EF approach, a considerable discount needs to be applied before sacubitril/valsartan can be considered cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon van der Pol
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lisa A de Jong
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn Vemer
- Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle E M C Jansen
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Sociology, Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Postma
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Institute of Science in Healthy Aging and Healthcare (SHARE), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Abstract
Objectives: Theoretically, willingness-to-pay (WTP) for quality-adjusted life years (QALY) can vary depending on social and personal preferences and on ex-ante and ex-post settings. However, empirical investigations into the theoretical differences are lacking. In Japan, setting the threshold has been controversial since a pilot project to implement health technology assessments (HTA) launched in 2016. The study aim is to estimate WTP values for one additional QALY from different perspectives, health statuses, and contexts to confirm the difficulty in setting a uniform price threshold using WTP. Methods: More than 1,000 respondents representing a cross-section of the Japanese population answered each of nine questionnaire decks in an online panel. WTP values were estimated on three different perspectives (personal, social, and socially inclusive) and on two contexts (ex-ante and ex-post). This study primarily used the non-parametric spike model based on double-bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) settings to obtain the conditional WTP values. Results: WTP per QALY was higher in the severe health status than in the moderate health status from all perspectives. Respondents from the socially inclusive perspective estimated the highest WTP value for a new drug. Respondents were also asked about life-threatening diseases in ex-post and ex-ante. The WTP value in ex-ante was higher than in ex-post, and demographic factors affecting the WTP were different in both situations. The various WTP values were obtained from these surveys. Limitations: The analysis was based on data collected from an internet panel, which could be biased. There is also a risk that respondents answered the questionnaire differently if asked in everyday situations. Conclusion: Use of a uniform price threshold may not be appropriate in policy settings, because it may not reflect diverse preferences based on different situations, such as disease type and severity. Setting a price threshold as Japan institutes an HTA system requires further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rei Goto
- Keio University , Yokohama , Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
150
|
Shedding light on the HTA consultancy market: Insights from Poland. Health Policy 2019; 123:1237-1243. [PMID: 31466804 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Research on health technology assessment (HTA) from a policy perspective typically examines public HTA bodies, with little attention devoted to how manufacturers develop their evidence submissions. Taking Poland as a crucial case, we explored the market of HTA consultancy firms which assist drug manufacturers in developing these submissions, called HTA reports. We reviewed 318 HTA reports from 2012 to 2015, data from the Polish National Company Registry, the content of HTA consulting firms' websites, and appraisal reports developed by the Polish HTA body. We identified HTA consultancy firms which developed 96-98% HTA reports. We found that the transparency of information about the authors of HTA reports provided by the HTA body had improved between 2012 and 2015. Six companies with market shares from 10 to 30% dominated the market. The market size was estimated to be 5-6 million EUR annually. HTA consultancies had a broad service portfolio related to preparation of HTA reports. Over 90% of HTA reports did not meet the official minimum quality requirements, and only half of the resubmissions took into account remarks made by the HTA body. Our study provides insights into the structure, evolution and role of the for-profit HTA consultancy market as a crucial part of the public HTA system. This raises important policy points about transparency and regulation at the intersection of public and private sectors in HTA.
Collapse
|