Four-year study of intermittent cyclic etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: three years of blinded therapy followed by one year of open therapy

Clinical effect of etidronate on alveolar pyorrhoea associated with chronic marginal periodontitis: report of four cases

Etidronate 200 mg daily was administered to four female patients with periodontitis and resultant alveolar pyorrhoea for periods of 2 weeks, followed by off-periods of 10 weeks or more, for 2-3 years. The macroscopic appearance of gingival mobility of the teeth, depth of periodontal pockets, and X-ray findings of alveolar bones improved markedly during this time. The effects were first observed after 6-12 months of treatment. These findings indicate that bisphosphonates may be effective in the treatment of periodontitis and resultant alveolar pyorrhoea. The effect may be mediated by the inhibitory action on bone resorption and the anti-inflammatory action of etidronate. Concomitant conventional dental management is also required.

How to prevent fractures in the individual with osteoporosis

The high rate of osteoporotic fracture in Western populations has resulted in a significant burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and health care costs. The use of DXA has made the diagnosis of osteoporosis easier and identified a subgroup of individuals who are at a higher risk of fracture. It is a useful tool in determining therapy in those at greatest risk of fracture. However, widespread use of such treatments is low and greater uptake remains an elusive goal. There are now many different treatments that reduce fracture rate, and can accompany lifestyle measures such as smoking cessation, diet and exercise. Dietary supplementation with calcium has been shown to reduce the risk of vertebral fracture, and the combination of calcium with vitamin D has been shown to reduce fracture at non-vertebral sites, including the hip. Although ERT, SERMs and tibolone all retard bone loss, prospective fracture prevention has only been shown for SERMs and then only at the spine. Bisphosphonates represent a class of potent anti-resorptive agents, which have been shown to reduce fracture rate at vertebral and non-vertebral sites. Other agents such as calcitonin, PTH and fluoride are of less certain benefit in preventing fracture.

The effect of clodronate and antioestrogens on bone loss associated with oestrogen withdrawal in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

In this study we report bone mineral density (BMD) changes during clodronate and antioestrogen treatment in women with breast cancer having discontinued hormone replacement therapy (HRT) at the time of operation compared to women who had not used HRT immediately before the operation. 61 postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer were treated with the adjuvant antioestrogen tamoxifen 20 mg or toremifene 60 mg daily for 3 years. All patients were randomized to clodronate (1.6 g daily orally) or control groups for 3 years. 23 patients had recently (recent users) and 38 never or not for at least 1 year before operation used HRT (non-users). BMD of lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured before antiresorptive therapy (antioestrogens and clodronate) and at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years thereafter. All patients were disease-free at the time of BMD measurements. Patients who had recently used HRT had more significant bone loss as compared to HRT non-users at 3 years in lumbar spine - 3.0% vs. + 1.2% (P< 0.001), but not in femoral neck - 0.4% vs. + 1.7% (P = 0.27). Adding 3-year clodronate treatment to antioestrogen therapy improved BMD marginally at 3 years: lumbar spine + 1.0% vs. -1.7% (P = 0.01) and femoral neck + 2.4% vs. -0.4% (P = 0.12). This was also seen at 5 years of follow-up, 2 years after termination of the antiresorptive therapy: HRT recent users vs. HRT non-users in lumbar spine -6.5% vs. +0.5% (P< 0.0001) and in femoral neck -4.8% vs. -1.5% (P = 0.38); and clodronate vs. controls in lumbar spine -1.0% vs. -3.2% (P = 0.06) and in femoral neck -0.1% vs. -5.2% (P = 0.001, respectively). The type of endocrine therapy (tamoxifen and toremifene) had no significant influence on BMD changes. We conclude from this study that postmenopausal women who have recently discontinued HRT experience more rapid bone loss than HRT non-users. Neither 3-year antioestrogen therapy alone nor antioestrogen together with clodronate could totally prevent the bone loss related to HRT withdrawal in lumbar spine, even though clodronate seemed to retard it.

Evidence-based medicine: putting theory into practice

Evidence-based medicine is an essential tool to ensure the effective and efficient management of patients. A practical and unbiased assessment of clinical evidence can be achieved by asking simple questions about the data. Undertaking this process can reveal a new perspective on traditional treatment approaches.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are safe and effective agents for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Alendronate and risedronate are the best studied of all agents for osteoporosis in terms of efficacy and safety. They increase bone mass. In patients who have established osteoporosis, they reduce the risk of vertebral fractures. They are the only agents shown in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. They are approved by the US FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for management of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Other bisphosphonates (e.g., etidronate for oral use, pamidronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off-label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Bisphosphonates combined with estrogen produce greater gains in bone mass compared with either agent used alone; whether there is a greater benefit of combination therapy on fracture risk is not clear. Combining a bisphosphonate with raloxifene or calcitonin is probably safe, although data on effectiveness are lacking.

Osteoporosis therapies for rheumatoid arthritis patients: minimizing gastrointestinal side effects

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript identifies characteristics that put people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at high risk for osteoporosis or gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances. The manuscript then reviews therapies available for osteoporosis in the United States and makes recommendations about choosing therapies that minimize GI adverse effects in RA patients at high risk for such events.

DATA SOURCES

References identified through MEDLINE, abstracts, and prescribing information for individual drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION

Characteristics that predispose patients to osteoporosis and GI problems were identified. Data on individual osteoporosis therapies were assessed by risk-benefit analysis and appropriateness for use in patients at risk for GI disturbances.

DATA SYNTHESIS

High risk of osteoporosis in people with RA is caused by disease activity, medication effects, physical inactivity, and standard risk factors such as postmenopausal status and increased age. Patients with RA are frequently at high GI risk if they are receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids. Because of the high potential for erosive esophagitis and other upper GI disorders with alendronate, caution is warranted in prescribing alendronate to RA patients with high GI risk. In such patients, estrogen replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators, or calcitonin should be considered for treatment, and either estrogen replacement therapy or selective estrogen receptor modulators should be considered for osteoporosis prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of GI risk is important in patients with RA and osteoporosis. Risk factors should be considered when choosing osteoporosis therapies.

Additive effects of combined treatment with etidronate and alfacalcidol on bone mass and mechanical properties in ovariectomized rats

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of combined treatment with intermittent cyclical etidronate and daily alfacalcidol on the mass and the mechanical properties of bone in ovariectomized rats, and to compare the effects with those of single treatments. Seventy 14-week-old female rats underwent ovariectomy (ovx) or sham operation, and were assigned to seven groups (n = 10 each): sham-operated; ovx; ovx treated with etidronate; ovx treated with 0.1 microg/kg alfacalcidol; ovx treated with 0.2 microg/kg alfacalcidol; ovx treated with etidronate and 0.1 microg/kg alfacalcidol; and ovx treated with etidronate and 0.2 microg/kg alfacalcidol. One week after the operation, etidronate (4 mg/kg per day) was intermittently injected into rats for 2 weeks followed by a 10 week period of no treatment, and alfacalcidol was administered orally every day. After 24 weeks of treatment, all single and combined treatments increased the bone mineral densities (BMDs) of the proximal tibiae, midfemurs, and the fourth and fifth vertebral bodies, which had been decreased by ovx. Combined treatment groups showed higher BMDs than single treatment groups, and the effects were almost equal to the addition of those of respective single treatment groups. The combined treatment also showed additive effects on the mechanical properties of both midfemurs and L4 vertebral bodies. The increases in mechanical properties were proportional to those in BMDs. Analyses of microcomputed tomography images and histology confirmed the strong effects of combined treatments on both trabecular and cortical bone mass without impairment of mineralization or connectivity. We conclude that the combined treatment with etidronate and alfacalcidol additively increases the mass of bone with normal quality, resulting in bone strengthening in ovx rats.

Preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A review of recent controlled trials of antiresorptive agents

The evidence from randomised, controlled trials of the ability of antiresorptive treatments to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is reviewed and summarised. The aminobisphosphonates, alendronic acid and risedronic acid, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene have all been shown to reduce the incidence of radiographic vertebral fractures. Only alendronic acid and risedronic acid have been shown to reduce the incidence of non-spine fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is evidence of antifracture efficacy for calcium plus vitamin D, primarily in a nursing home setting or in people with low intakes of these nutrients. Furthermore, since both the placebo and active treatment groups received calcium and vitamin D in most controlled trials of antiresorptive agents, it appears that the other agents provide benefits beyond those of calcium and vitamin D alone. There is insufficient published evidence from randomised controlled trials to convincingly support the antifracture efficacy of other agents, including calcitonin, estrogen and etidronic acid, at this time. Data from observational studies suggest, however, that estrogen and etidronic acid may have antifracture efficacy in this population.

Alendronate administration and skeletal response during chronic alcohol intake in the adolescent male rat

Alendronate is an aminobisphosphonate that inhibits bone resorption in osteoporotic humans and rats but does not induce osteomalacia. Several bisphosphonates, including alendronate, also have direct positive actions on osteoblasts, bone formation, and mineralization. We studied the effects of alendronate on skeletal development in adolescent male rats during chronic alcohol intake. Four groups of age- and weight-matched male Sprague-Dawley rats (35 days of age) were fed the Lieber-DeCarli diet containing 36% of calories as EtOH (E), the EtOH diet plus 60 mg/kg alendronate (EA) every other day intraperitoneally (ip), an isocaloric diet (I), or the isocaloric diet plus 60 mg/kg alendronate (IA) every other day ip. Body weight, femur length, serum levels of osteocalcin (OC), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), testosterone, and luteinizing hormone (LH); femur distal metaphyseal and middiaphyseal bone mineral density (BMD) and tibial metaphyseal gene expression for alpha-1-type I collagen (Col I), OC, and bone alkaline phosphatase (AP); and femur strength by four-point bending to failure were measured after 28 days of feeding and alendronate injections. Serum alcohol levels at death were 156 +/- 13 mg/dl (E) and 203 +/- 40 mg/dl (EA). Alendronate given to alcohol-fed rats increased metaphyseal BMD by more than 3-fold over rats fed alcohol alone. Alendronate given to isocaloric pair-fed rats increased metaphyseal BMD by more than 2.5-fold over rats fed the isocaloric diet alone. Cortical BMD was reduced by alcohol but was increased by alendronate. Alcohol consumption reduced serum IGF-1 levels, and alendronate increased IGF-1 levels in alcohol-fed rats. Serum OC, testosterone, and LH were unaffected by alcohol and alendronate. Quantitative dot blot hybridization using rat complementary DNA (cDNA) probes and normalization against 18S subunit ribosomal RNA (rRNA) levels revealed no changes in tibial metaphyseal gene expression for type I collagen, osteocalcin, or alkaline phosphatase. Alcohol significantly reduced the biomechanical properties of the femurs that were partially compensated by alendronate. Chronic alcohol consumption uncouples formation from ongoing resorption, and resorption is inhibited by alendronate. However, alendronate's positive effects on osteoblast-mediated mineralization during chronic alcohol consumption point to the potential use of bisphosphonates in the treatment of decreased bone formation secondary to alcohol-induced diminished osteoblast function.

Management of osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Osteoporosis is not a significant problem in the majority of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, substantial bone-related morbidity may occur in patients with advanced disease, in particular after liver transplantation. The cause of osteoporosis in PBC is multifactorial, and pathophysiological mechanisms specifically related to PBC have not been defined. In general, the principles of management followed in post-menopausal osteoporosis also apply in chronic liver disease. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is currently the method of choice for monitoring bone mineral density. Avoidance of conditions with potential negative effects on bone mass, and maintaining adequate serum vitamin D levels and calcium intake form the cornerstone in preventing osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are the most logical choice when specific medical treatment of PBC-associated osteoporosis is indicated, as well as for preventing bone loss during glucocorticoid treatment and after liver transplantation. Recent studies suggest that active vitamin D analogues are effective alternatives in the post-transplant setting.

Cyclical etidronate versus sodium fluoride in established postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized 3 year trial

To compare the effects of sodium fluoride and etidronate in severe postmenopausal osteoporosis, we conducted a 3 year, prospective, trial in 118 postmenopausal osteoporotic women with at least one vertebral fracture, who were randomly assigned to receive sodium fluoride (25 mg twice daily, as enteric-coated tablets) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) or intermittent etidronate (400 mg/day for 14 days) followed by calcium (1000 mg/day for 76 days). Lateral spine X-ray films and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at enrollment and yearly. Nonvertebral fractures were recorded every 6 months. Thirty-one women in the fluoride group and 47 in the etidronate group completed the trial. At 36 months, the mean change from baseline of the lumbar bone density in the fluoride group was 8.5 +/- 2.04% (p = 0.001) and in the etidronate group was of 3.6 +/- 0. 84% (p < 0.001). The changes in the fluoride group were significantly higher than in the etidronate group (p = 0.01). Both groups showed nonsignificant changes in femoral neck bone density. There was no significant difference between groups in the cumulative proportion of women with new vertebral fractures, with an incidence in the fluoride group of 16% vs. 17% in the etidronate group. However, the number of new vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the fluoride group (6 fractures) than in the etidronate group (19 fractures) (p = 0.05). The number of patients with nonvertebral fractures was similar in both groups. A high incidence of side effects, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms and lower extremity pain syndrome, was observed in the fluoride group. Etidronate was well tolerated. We conclude that, in women with severe osteoporosis, although sodium fluoride is more favorable than cyclical etidronate for increasing lumbar bone mass, no differences were observed in the incidence of fractures.

Effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

In clinical practice, a large proportion of patients have bone mass values for which a therapeutic intervention is considered necessary, but the accepted aim might be the sole preservation or marginal increases of the actual bone mass. These goals might be achieved with lower or intermittent doses of a powerful agent for the purpose of fewer side effects and improved compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred twenty-four postmenopausal women (age range 52-75 years, at least 7 years since last menopause) with a bone mineral density (BMD) at either the femoral neck or lumbar spine of 2 SD below the mean values of young healthy individuals, and without a history of previous osteoporotic fracture, were randomly assigned either to calcium/vitamin D supplements, alone or associated with two different intermittent oral alendronate regimens: 20 mg once a week (weekly alendronate group) or 10 mg daily (orally) for 1 month out of 3 (cyclical alendronate group). After 1 year, in both groups given intermittent alendronate, we observed significant increases in BMD at both the spine (+2.2 +/- 2.6 and +2.5 +/- 2.9) and femoral neck (+1.6 +/- 4.8 and +1.5 +/- 2.2) for the weekly and cyclical regimens, respectively. This was associated with a significant diminution of both serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary N-telopeptides of collagen type I excretion. In the patients in the control group BMD decreased significantly at the lumbar spine, with a slight decline of serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Compliance with treatment and drug tolerability were good in both alendronate groups. In conclusion, intermittent alendronate administration at cumulative doses (and costs) three times lower than those currently recommended for osteoporosis treatment is very well accepted, and is able to significantly increase BMD at the spine and femoral neck and to decrease the markers of bone turnover. These regimens can be clinically useful in the long-term treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis without prevalent osteoporotic fractures, particularly in women with lower compliance for continuous administration.

Clodronate increases mineralization of callus after Colles' fracture: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective trial in 32 patients

In a randomized study of 32 postmenopausal women with a Colles' fracture, we studied whether 8 weeks of treatment with clodronate, a bisphosphonate, could prevent posttraumatic osteopenia. The patients were treated with a plaster splint for 4 weeks. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm bones was measured at 2 levels with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) 2, 6 and 12 months after the fracture. At 2 months, in the clodronate group, there was a median 53% higher BMD in the fracture region of the radius than in the uninjured radius. In the placebo group, we found a 33% higher BMD in the fractured radius at that level than in the uninjured radius. This increase in BMD of the fractured radius, caused by clodronate, was statistically significant. At 12 months, the BMD of the fracture side had been reduced by 17% and 12%, respectively, at that time it was still significantly increased in the clodronate group alone. In the ulna at the same level, we found no significant changes in BMD in either group on either side at any time. At 2 months, at the level between the distal and middle thirds, in the fractured radius, the median BMD was 7% lower in the clodronate group and 6% lower in the placebo group than in the uninjured radius. Although the reduction in BMD at that level was significant, there was no difference between the two treatment groups. At this level, the ulna on the fractured side showed a similar pattern, with a 5% lower BMD in the clodronate group and a 4% lower BMD in the placebo group. This osteopenia showed a small but significant progression on the fractured side after 6 and 12 months.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.

Evaluation of a problem-based learning workshop using pre- and post-test objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a health care issue in which family physicians play a major role. Although awareness of osteoporosis is high, recent studies suggest that application of recent advances in its treatment to the clinical setting may be low. We have developed a problem-based learning intervention for osteoporosis in which paired rheumatologists and family physicians developed nine problem-solving clinical scenarios. An educational matrix was used to link specific case scenarios with individual teaching objectives, developed via a previous needs assessment. Family physicians participated in the workshop, developing best practice responses to the clinical scenarios with a trained facilitator and content expert.

METHODS

To assess the impact of this intervention, family physicians participated in a pre- and post-test evaluation, using objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients. Objective structured clinical examination stations tested knowledge, skills, and judgment relating to osteoporosis with respect to risk factors, use of appropriate investigations including bone mineral densitometry (BMD), strategies for the prevention of osteoporosis (both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic), treatment options for established osteoporosis (bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy), and management of recent osteoporosis fracture. Participants were evaluated using a predetermined score generated by their responses to objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients (max. score = 101). Evaluations were conducted anonymously, although participants had access to their own pre- and post-test results for personal feedback. The impact of the workshop was assessed by comparing pre- and post-test responses by group, by individual, and by station.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated a significant improvement in their post-workshop scores. Of 40 participants, 26 showed improvement in score (> +10), 13 showed modest change (+1 to +10), and 1 showed a marked decrease (> -10). The greatest improvements were seen in the management of the male osteoporosis patient, determination of risk factors for osteoporosis, and the use and interpretation of bone mineral densitometry. Family physicians reported general satisfaction with the content and format of both the workshop and the evaluation process.

IMPLICATIONS

We conclude that this type of problem-based learning intervention workshop results in improved knowledge, skills, and judgment in the management of osteoporosis by family physicians as objectively assessed using a pre- and post-test format including objective structured clinical examinations and standardized patients.

Etridronate therapy in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis

Etidronate disodium is an oral bisphosphonate compound known to reduce bone resorption through the inhibition of osteoclastic activity. This article is a review of its efficacy and safety in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. In general, studies of cyclical etidronate therapy (400 mg daily for 2 wk every 3 mo) have found a significant improvement in bone density. These studies have not been powered to study fracture incidence, but a reduced fracture rate has been found in some of the studies reviewed. Studies examining cyclical etidronate in the prevention of osteoporosis indicate it prevents early menopausal bone loss and is free of significant side effects. In both prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and treatment of patients who have been on long-term corticosteroid therapy, cyclical etidronate appears to increase bone density and prevent further loss of bone. In summary, a review of available literature pertaining to the use of etidronate in prevention and treatment of primary and secondary osteoporosis has been presented. This review suggests etidronate, used as a cyclical therapy, is a safe and effective therapy. The weight of evidence suggests it is capable of reducing fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. Increases in bone density at the spine and hip are not as pronounced as with some other bisphosphonates, particularly alendronate, but no direct clinical comparison trials of significant size or duration have been undertaken.

Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: efficacy of combination of hormone replacement therapy with other antiresorptive agents

Osteoporosis is a debilitating disease characterized by decreased bone mineral density (BMD) leading to fractures. It primarily affects postmenopausal women and elderly men. Prevention of osteoporosis is very important because present therapies do not have the potential to mend damage to the bone microarchitecture caused by osteoporosis. The first line of prevention and treatment of osteoporosis is hormone replacement therapy (HRT). All of the approved drugs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis act as inhibitors of bone resorption; these drugs include HRT, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, and bisphosphonates. The latter two drugs have also been shown to prevent fractures. This article discusses data from nine controlled prospective clinical studies. Study 1 was designed to assess the efficacy of combined HRT and bisphosphonate in preventing osteoporosis during the early stages of menopause. This combined therapy increased the lumbar spine BMD by 10.9% and femoral BMD by 7.3% over 4 yr, compared with 6.8 and 4.0% with HRT alone, and 6.8 and 1.2% with bisphosphonate alone. Study 2 was conducted on postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. These results showed a 10.4 and 7.0% increase in BMD in vertebrae and femora, respectively, compared with 7.3 and 4.8% increases in the HRT group, and 6.8 and 0.9% in the bisphosphonate group. Data from study 3 demonstrated similar findings in that the combination of alendronate and HRT also enhanced BMD values. Studies 4 and 5 assessed the efficacy of the combined therapy of HRT and calcitonin in the prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss. Both studies demonstrated a significant increase in BMD over and above that observed with either HRT or calcitonin alone. Studies 6, 7, and 8 demonstrated that the addition of testosterone to estrogen therapy further increased BMD when compared to estrogen therapy alone, and also prevented the expected decreases in markers of bone formation in early postmenopausal women. Study 9 demonstrated a synergistic effect on BMD in postmenopausal women, when HRT was coadministered with monofluorophosphate. Other combination therapies may also enhance BMD (e.g., the combination of alendronate and parathyroid hormone [PTH]). However, some agents either lose their efficacy or have no added effects on BMD when they are coadministered (e.g., tiludronate and PTH, calcitonin and PTH, calcitonin and anabolic steroids). These studies illustrate that in a subgroup of patients (i.e., patients with high bone turnover and/or severe osteoporosis), specific combination treatments such as HRT with bis-phosphonates, calcitonin, or androgens (and perhaps also with PTH, fluoride, nitric oxide donors) provide additional beneficial effects over a single-drug therapy. Whether these combination therapies are more effective than individual drugs in reducing fractures still needs to be determined.

Weekly administration of alendronate: rationale and plan for clinical assessment

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the rationale and supporting data for once-weekly dosing of alendronate.

BACKGROUND

Alendronate sodium, a bisphosphonate that potently inhibits bone resorption, has been shown to increase bone mass and substantially reduce the incidence of osteoporotic fractures, including fractures of the hip. The standard regimen of daily administration has generally been well tolerated. However, weekly administration may provide greater convenience to patients without compromising efficacy or tolerability. The pharmacokinetics of alendronate and bone remodeling theory predict similar efficacy for weekly and daily administration if the cumulative dose is the same. Bone resorption in individual remodeling units normally proceeds for approximately 2 weeks; alendronate inhibits the rate and extent of resorption. Because the half-life of residence on bone surfaces is several weeks, weekly administration of alendronate should inhibit bone resorption to an overall extent similar to that of daily dosing, thereby producing similar effects on bone mass and strength. Animal studies demonstrate that both weekly and daily parenteral administration of alendronate effectively increase bone mass and strength, but confirmation of efficacy is needed for weekly oral dosing in humans. Although daily bisphosphonates (alendronate and risedronate) elicited esophageal irritation in a canine model of gastroesophageal reflux, weekly dosing with alendronate at a higher unit dose did not. Thus, the lower frequency of weekly dosing with a higher unit dose may actually reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal irritation compared with daily administration of a lower dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Current safety and efficacy data justify further investigation of once-weekly dosing of alendronate. Two positive-control, double-blind, randomized trials of osteoporosis treatment and prevention are currently being performed to assess the comparability of weekly, biweekly, and daily dosing of alendronate with regard to effects on bone density, safety, and tolerability.

Outpatient costs of osteoporosis in a national health insurance population

There are few valid data on the outpatient diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Germany, despite the high prevalence of this disease and the high costs associated with its complications. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the prevalence of documented osteoporosis and the use of health care resources in its outpatient treatment in a representative random sample of 7490 patients from the Dresden area who were insured under the national health insurance program for a 1-year period from the 3rd quarter of 1993 to the 2nd quarter of 1994. Documented cases of osteoporosis were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnostic codes M80 to M82, and the costs of diagnostic services for osteoporosis were calculated using a uniform fee schedule. Specific and nonspecific osteoporosis medications were classified using a published anatomic-therapeutic-chemical code, and their costs were calculated on the basis of pharmacy sales prices. Three age- and sex-matched controls without documented osteoporosis (n = 705) were assigned for each case patient in estimating the net use of resources. Data for the region, as well as age-standardized information for the overall German national health insurance system, were calculated. The 1-year prevalence of documented osteoporosis in the region was 3.14% (5.20% in women, 0.89% in men), and the age-standardized prevalence in the German national health insurance system was 2.25%. During the study period, 51.1% of the cases and 2.1% of the controls were examined by osteodensitometry. Patients received 106 defined daily doses of osteoporosis medications during the year; 37.0% of the prescribed daily doses were for sodium fluorophosphate/calcium combinations, 4.3% were for sodium fluoride, and 7.7% were for calcium alone. Sex hormones and calcitonin each accounted for 7.7% of the prescribed daily doses. Only a fraction of epidemiologically expected cases of osteoporosis have been identified and documented in the outpatient sector. Only approximately 50% of these receive osteoporosis-specific therapy, and compliance with therapy is low. To reduce osteoporosis-associated fracture rates, which are extremely cost intensive and greatly impair patients' quality of life, more consistent treatment is needed.

Pharmacokinetics of raloxifene and its clinical application

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) administered to postmenopausal women relieves climacteric symptoms, prevents loss of bone mass, and counteracts the development of coronary artery disease. However, whereas all the benefits associated with HRT are achieved only following long-term therapy, the long-term compliance to the regimen is poor. The most common reasons for discontinuance are uterine bleeding, breast pains, and a fear of breast cancer. Long-term HRT may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Consequently, there is a need for an "ideal estrogen", designed to pinpoint desired target tissues for estrogen, such as the bone and liver, while acting as an antiestrogen in uterus and breast tissues. Raloxifene belongs to a new class of compounds, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). It binds to and interacts with estrogen receptors, acting as an estrogen agonist in bone and liver, but as an estrogen antagonist in breast and uterus. Therefore, raloxifene represents a potentially important alternative to HRT in postmenopausal women for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Clinical studies regarding the drug's long term benefits are still required.

Etidronate and alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of etidronate and alendronate in the treatment of established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE search was performed (from 1966 through September 1998) using the search terms bisphosphonates, etidronate, alendronate, and postmenopausal osteoporosis. English-language articles were considered for review.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials using fracture as an end point were selected to review the efficacy of etidronate and alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Results for the outcomes of bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture are summarized.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Etidronate and alendronate increase spinal BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In one study, etidronate decreased the number of women sustaining new radiographic vertebral fractures over two years, but this effect was lost after three years of treatment. Alendronate reduces the number of radiographic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with a low bone mass. In women with preexisting fractures, alendronate decreases the number of patients with radiographic vertebral fractures, clinical (i.e., symptomatic vertebral and nonvertebral) fractures, and hip fractures. A significant reduction in the overall number of nonvertebral fractures has not been demonstrated in clinical trials evaluating either alendronate or etidronate.

CONCLUSIONS

No studies have directly compared the efficacy of alendronate and etidronate and the results of long-term clinical trials (i.e., >5 y) have not been published. Based on the results obtained in clinical trials using fracture as an end point, alendronate appears to be the bisphosphonate of choice. Safety profiles and cost should also be considered in the choice of etidronate or alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

Although vertebral deformities are known to predict future vertebral deformities, little is known about their ability to predict other osteoporotic fractures. We examined the association between prevalent vertebral deformities and incident osteoporotic fractures in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures, a prospective study of 9704 women aged 65 years and older. Prevalent vertebral deformities were determined morphometrically from spinal radiographs at baseline and incident deformities from repeat spinal radiographs after a mean of 3.7 years. Appendicular fractures were collected by postcard every 4 months for a mean of 8.3 years. During follow-up, 389 women with new vertebral deformities, 464 with hip fractures, and 574 with wrist fractures were identified. Prevalent vertebral deformities were associated with a 5-fold increased risk (relative risk 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4, 6.6) of sustaining a further vertebral deformity; the risk increased dramatically with both the number and severity of the prevalent deformities. Similarly, the risks of hip and any nonvertebral fractures were increased with baseline prevalent deformity, with relative risks of 2.8 (95% CI 2.3, 3.4) and 1.9 (95% CI 1.7, 2.1), respectively. Risk increased with number and severity of deformities. These associations remained significant after adjustment for age and calcaneal bone mineral density (BMD). Although there was a small increased risk of wrist fracture, this was not significant after adjusting for age and BMD. In conclusion, the presence of prevalent morphometrically defined vertebral deformities predicts future vertebral and nonvertebral fractures, including hip but not wrist fractures. Spinal radiographs identifying prevalent vertebral deformities may be a useful additional measurement to classify further a woman's risk of future fracture.

Osteoporotic fracture complicating Guillain-Barré syndrome

Guillain–Barré syndrome is an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy often associated with a prolonged period of immobilization. Between 71 and 80% of patients make a full or near full recovery, but there is a 5–11% mortality and the remainder have an incomplete recovery (Rees, 1995; The Italian Guillain–Barré Study Group, 1996). The paralysed patient with Guillain–Barré is susceptible to the complications of immobility: venous thromboembolism, hypostatic pneumonia and contractures. Osteoporosis is a silent, poorly recognized risk and contributes to significant morbidity and increased hospital stay.

Intramuscular clodronate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Long-term daily administration of oral bisphosphonates has been effective in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but the duration, mode and cost of the therapy may sometimes affect patient compliance. In Italy, the bisphosphonate clodronate is also available via the intramuscular (i.m.) route of administration, and the present study was performed to test its efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ninety osteoporotic postmenopausal women were enrolled in a randomized, controlled 3 year study. The diet of all patients was adjusted to provide 1200-1300 mg of calcium daily, eventually by administration of supplements. Patients were randomly assigned to no therapy (30 patients) or to receive clodronate 100 mg i.m. either every 2 weeks (30 patients) or 1 week (30 patients). The i.m. injection caused substantial pain at the site of injection, which led to treatment withdrawal in almost 50% of the patients receiving weekly dosing. In control patients, a progressive, slow decline in spine and femoral bone mineral density (BMD), which became statistically significant at the end of the second year of observation, was observed. In the patients given weekly i.m. clodronate, spinal BMD rose by 3.8% (+/-7.3 SD) within 6 months. A slight, nonsignificant increase was observed thereafter, such that, at the completion of 3 years of observation, the mean gain was 4.5% (+/-6.3). In the patients treated with injections of 100 mg of clodronate every two weeks the increase in BMD was somewhat lower and slower, becoming significant only at month 24 (2.9+/-4.6%). In none of the two active groups was the femoral neck BMD changed significantly during the 3 years of the study. A significant increase in trochanter and Ward's triangle BMD was observed at month 12 only in the patients on the highest dose of clodronate. In both groups treated, the hip BMD changes were significantly different from those observed in control patients. The biochemical markers of bone turnover were suppressed in both clodronate groups. These results indicate that intermittent i.m. clodronate administration can provide clinically relevant benefits to skeletal bone density in osteoporotic postmenopausal women, but the in situ pain may limit its extensive use.

Recurrence of vertebral fracture with cyclical etidronate therapy in osteoporosis: histomorphometry and X-Ray microanalysis evaluation

In an open prospective study, we evaluated differences between patients with (wRVF group) and without recurrence of vertebral fracture (woRVF group) during cyclical etidronate therapy for osteoporosis. Thirty-two patients (age 64 +/- 1.8 years) characterized by at least one osteoporotic VF were treated during 1 year. At baseline, body mass index was significantly lower (23.3 +/- 0.6 vs. 26.9 +/- 1.0 kg/m2, p< 0.05), the number of previous VFs was higher (4.0 +/- 0. 4 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4, NS), and patients were older in the wRVF group as compared with the woRVF group (67.8 +/- 3 vs. 62.6+/- 2.2 year, NS). Trabecular bone volume (11.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 15 +/- 0.9%, p< 0.05) and trabecular number (1.06 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.05, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in the wRVF group. None of the baseline resorptive variables differed, whereas the bone formation rate (BFR) was 2-fold lower in the wRVF group (p< 0. 05). After 1 year of treatment, osteoclast number, active eroded surfaces, and resorption depth dramatically decreased in both groups (p< 0. 01). To a lesser extent, the mineral apposition rate and serum alkaline phosphatase level were significantly reduced (p< 0.05). No impaired mineralization was observed. Using X-ray microanalysis, we found no abnormality in bone mineral but a significant increase of the calcium/phosphorus ratio during treatment in the wRVF group. Our results demonstrate that recurrence of VFs within the first year of cyclical etidronate therapy was related neither to a lack of histologic response to the treatment nor induction of an abnormality of mineralization. VFs were more likely in the presence of a decreased BFR and lower trabecular connectivity, providing support for treating osteoporotic patients with etidronate early in the course of the disease.

Alendronate increases spine and hip bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who failed to respond to intermittent cyclical etidronate

In a U.S. multicenter study of intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, approximately 20% of patients were nonresponders, defined as failure to increase spine bone mineral density. In contrast, essentially all patients who received 10 mg of alendronate daily in U.S. phase III trials showed some increase in spine bone mineral density. The current study was undertaken to determine the response to alendronate therapy in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were nonresponders to intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy. Twenty-five women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (mean +/- SD: 65.1+/-1.9 years of age), previously treated with intermittent cyclical etidronate with no increase of spine bone mineral density, and who agreed to be changed to alendronate, were recruited from a university out-patient clinic specializing in the treatment of osteoporosis for a prospective observational study. Measurements included bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and proximal femur (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and biochemical markers of bone remodeling (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by immunoassay and urine deoxypyridinoline by high-pressure liquid chromatography). Patients had received intermittent cyclical etidronate for 3.3+/-0.4 years, during which time their bone density declined at spine and hip sites. They were then changed to alendronate 10 mg/day, which they received for 1.3+/-0.1 years; after treatment with alendronate, bone mineral density increased significantly at the lumbar spine (4.4+/-0.7% annualized,p < 0.0001) and at all hip sites. Bone markers also changed significantly after alendronate treatment: urine deoxypyridinoline fell from 6.8+/-0.8 to 5.5+/-0.6 micromol/mol creatinine (p < 0.0001) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase rose from 4.6+/-0.5 to 11.9+/-1.0 ng/mL (p < 0.0001). Upper gastrointestinal side effects forced 4 of 25 patients (16%) to discontinue alendronate. Alendronate increases bone density at the spine and hip in patients who have not responded to intermittent cyclical etidronate therapy. Changes in bone markers suggest that alendronate causes more complete suppression of bone resorption and less inhibition (or stimulation) of bone formation.

A review of clinical trials of therapies for osteoporosis using fracture as an end point

As the population ages, fragility fractures grow in importance as a public health problem. The principal goal of osteoporosis therapy is primary and secondary fracture prevention. A growing choice of therapies is now available for the treatment of osteoporosis. In this article, we review their efficacy using fracture prevention as an end point. The considerable heterogeneity among studies with regard to patient age, past fracture history, fracture site, and analytical methods precludes the possibility of performing a meaningful meta-analysis. Fracture outcomes have been reported in clinical trials with calcium supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), calcitonin, etidronate, alendronate, sodium fluoride (NaF), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and raloxifene. Compelling evidence for fracture prevention has been provided for calcium and vitamin D supplementation and alendronate treatment. Evidence of fracture prevention exists for ERT, raloxifene, calcitonin, etidronate, and PTH. Data on NaF are inconsistent. Across agents, there is a trend toward greater efficacy for patients at greatest risk of fracture.

Bisphosphonates in bone diseases

Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs which are strongly attracted to the bone where they influence the calcium metabolism, mainly by inhibition of the osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. This property makes these compounds suited for the treatment of several diseases of the bone. In Paget's disease, several bisphosphonates can reduce bone pain and decrease the bone turnover 60-70%. Cyclical oral etidronate and daily oral alendronate both proved to reduce the vertebral fracture rate for postmenopausal osteoporotic woman, while most investigated bisphosphonates can increase spinal bone mass in osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates can help lowering serum calcium and reverse skeletal complications in malignancy mediated bone diseases. Oral and intravenous administration of therapeutic doses is relatively safe. In general, gastrointestinal disturbances are described most often and the oldest, least potent, bisphosphonate etidronate can induce osteomalacia. The various characteristics of bisphosphonates: physicochemical, biological, therapeutic and toxicological, vary greatly depending on the structure of the individual bisphosphonate. Even small changes in the structure can lead to enormous differences in potency. Overall, this class of drugs offers several prospects for the future.

Bisphosphonates and osteoporosis treatment in Italy

A treatment against osteoporosis can be considered efficacious only when its beneficial effects on bone remodeling, bone mass, and osteoporotic fracture incidence are proven. As for any treatment, proven efficacy must be combined with proven safety. This review analyzes published data on efficacy and safety of alendronate, clodronate and etidronate, the bisphosphonates currently marketed in Italy for osteoporosis treatment. Different studies have shown that alendronate, clodronate and etidronate reduce bone turnover, and increase bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Prospective, double blind, multicenter studies reported a reduction in osteoporotic fracture incidence for alendronate and etidronate. Fracture incidence reduction by clodronate, on the other hand, was shown only in an open label study. Finally, a reduction in fracture incidence by etidronate was shown in a large retrospective postmarketing study. Postmarketing surveillance evidenced that osteomalacia, a suspected side effect of etidronate treatment, does not occur at the currently used dose regimens. Postmarketing surveillance of alendronate has recently raised some concern regarding possible severe esophageal damage during alendronate treatment, especially when the drug is not taken according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The interpretation of preclinical data in predicting bisphosphonate response in the treatment of osteoporosis

Individual bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis are often compared on the basis of preclinical variables such as potency, selectivity, therapeutic index, and effects on fracture healing. The present review examines the methodology and results of preclinical studies providing these types of data for the bisphosphonate etidronate and compares them with the available preclinical data for other bisphosphonates. Analysis of the preclinical data in relation to the results of long-term clinical trials reveals that widely reported differences in preclinical variables for the different bisphosphonates are not significant once dosages and treatment regimens have been optimized for therapeutic use in the clinic.

Pharmacological management of osteoporosis

Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of fractures in patients with osteoporosis aim mainly at correcting the bone remodelling imbalance by either reducing bone resorption and bone turnover, or stimulating bone formation. A number of agents are currently available but only a few were evaluated under controlled conditions in clinical trials whose primary efficacy end-point was the prevention of fractures. In addition, this information was obtained in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis mainly with prevalent vertebral fractures, and most studies published to date had the occurrence of new vertebral rather than peripheral fractures as their primary efficacy end-point. The majority of data was obtained with inhibitors of bone turnover, but the level of evidence of the antifracture efficacy of these agents varies markedly. Results of carefully performed studies are, however, available allowing rational therapeutical choices. Adequate knowledge of the benefits and side effects of pharmacological interventions combined with other measures which improve bone health and reduce complaints and risks are essential for the management of the osteoporotic patient.

Effects of cyclical etidronate combined with calcitriol versus cyclical etidronate alone on spine and femoral neck bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporotic women

OBJECTIVES

Few data are available on the effects of combination therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intermittent cyclical etidronate (E) therapy alone with a combination of cyclical etidronate and calcitriol (E + C) on spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) at one year.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women with at least one non-traumatic vertebral fracture or z score < -1.5 were randomly allocated to an E group (each cycle = oral etidronate 400 mg daily for 14 days followed by calcium 500 mg daily for 76 days) or an E + C group (as for E plus oral calcitriol 0.5 microgram daily). Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMDs were measured by dual energy x ray absorptiometry at baseline and at one year. The study design did not contain a placebo group.

RESULTS

The mean % increase in lumbar spine BMD was 5.2% (95% CI = 3.4 to 7.0) in the E + C group (n = 24), which was significantly greater than the 2.7% (95% CI = 1.3 to 4.1) increase in the E group (n = 23) (p < 0.05). The femoral neck BMD in the E + C group increased by 2.0% (95% CI = 0.8 to 3.2), which was significantly different from the E group where there was a -0.4% (95% CI = -2.4 to 1.6) change (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that a combination of cyclical etidronate and calcitriol is better than cyclical etidronate alone in terms of changes in BMD at both spine and femoral neck sites. Although further data are needed on fracture efficacy, this study suggests that combination therapies have additive therapeutic potential that may exceed that expected from their theoretical mode of action.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Several bisphosphonates are effective for preventing bone loss associated with estrogen deficiency, glucocorticoid treatment, and immobilization, and for at least partially reversing bone loss in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and steroid-induced osteoporosis. The most promising of these agents are etidronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate. These drugs should have an important role in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis; however, more research is needed regarding optimal doses and regimens (continuous versus intermittent, oral versus parenteral), comparisons with other agents, and their use in combination with other agents.

Changes in biochemical markers and bone mass after withdrawal of ibandronate treatment: prediction of bone mass changes during treatment

The study was a 1 year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ibandronate treatment in postmenopausal, osteopenic women. Participants were followed for 1 year after withdrawal of treatment. All women were at least 10 years past menopause and had a baseline bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal forearm at least 1.5 standard deviations below the premenopausal mean peak value. A total of 141 women (78%) completed the first year, and 119 women (66%) the second year of the study. The dose-response data of the first year have been published previously (Ravn et al. Bone 19:527-533;1996). In this study, we analyzed the biochemical markers as predictors of response in bone mass during ibandronate treatment, and report withdrawal data from the last year of the study, when ibandronate was discontinued. The relative change in the biochemical markers was significantly correlated to the response in BMD. At 12 months, the r values ranged from -0.29 to -0.47 (p < 0.01) and were highest for CrossLaps (uCL) and osteocalcin (OC(N-MID)). The quartiles of women with the most reduced concentrations of uCL and OC(N-MID) during treatment showed a 360-430% higher response in BMD compared to quartiles with less reduced concentrations (p < 0.01). During the withdrawal period, uCL and alkaline phosphatase (AP) returned to baseline values 12 months after discontinuation of treatment in all groups, whereas OC(N-MID) and bone-specific AP were still reduced 10%-25% in the groups previously treated with the highest doses of ibandronate (1.0-5.0 mg) (p < 0.01). In the withdrawal period, BMD decreased equally in all groups (analysis of variance; not significant); with a linear rate of 2%/year on average (p < 0.05 to < 0.001) at the spine and femur. In conclusion, uCL and OC(N-MID) can be used to predict the response in bone mass during ibandronate treatment. The bone loss that resumes after withdrawal of ibandronate treatment is of a magnitude similar to that of normal postmenopausal bone loss.

Antiresorptive therapy in asthmatic patients receiving high-dose inhaled steroids: a prospective study for 18 months

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroid therapy is an effective and well tolerated mode of therapy for asthma. Although systemic side-effects of inhaled steroids are much less common than those found with systemic steroids, the drugs may be absorbed through mucosal surfaces. Inhaled steroids have been reported to disturb normal bone metabolism, and they are associated with a decrease in bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this study to investigate bone density in asthmatic subjects receiving long-term high-dose inhaled steroids and the effects of supplementation with oral calcium with or without etidronate.

METHODS

We evaluated thirty-eight Chinese subjects (24 men and 14 premenopausal women; 28 patients and 10 healthy control subjects) in this prospective study. Patients were randomized into three arms: those receiving no supplement, those receiving 1000 mg/day calcium supplement, and those receiving 400 mg/day cyclical sodium etidronate with 1000 mg/day calcium, respectively. The patients and control subjects were matched for age, sex, and dose of inhaled steroids. Bone density at lumbar spine and hip region was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry with a densitometer at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months for the asthmatic groups and at baseline and at 12 and 18 months for the control group. Serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and urinary hydroxyproline/creatine were measured simultaneous to bone density assessments.

RESULTS

There were 10 control subjects, 10 asthmatic subjects receiving no supplement, eight asthmatic subjects receiving calcium supplement, and 10 asthmatic subjects receiving calcium and etidronate therapy, respectively. The mean (+/- SEM) dosages of beclomethasone or budesonide for the three groups of asthmatic subjects were 2.2 +/- 0.3, 2.0 +/- 0.2, and 2.0 +/- 0.2 mg/day, respectively. Mean dietary calcium intake of the study subjects was 766 +/- 39 mg/day. At baseline, bone mineral density of the spine in the group receiving no supplement was significantly lower than that found in the control group (p < 0.05). At 18 months, patients receiving no supplement had significantly greater bone loss at the lumbar spine than patients receiving etidronate plus calcium lactate-gluconate (CaLG) or CaLG alone (p < 0.05). The increase in bone mineral density versus baseline observed in patients receiving CaLG with or without etidronate (p < 0.05) probably did not result from increased bone formation because serum osteocalcin levels showed a significant reduction in all three groups of patients (p < 0.05). An increase in mean serum calcium (p < 0.05) was seen in patients receiving CaLG with or without etidronate.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that long-term administration of high-dose inhaled steroid (>1.5 mg/day) induces bone loss that is preventable with calcium supplementation with or without cyclical etidronate. Long-term studies involving more patients should follow to confirm these preliminary findings.

A four-year randomized controlled trial of hormone replacement and bisphosphonate, alone or in combination, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

PURPOSE

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with estrogen and treatment with bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. This 4-year prospective randomized study was carried out to assess the effectiveness of the combined HRT plus etidronate on BMD in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-two postmenopausal women (mean age 64.9+/-0.5 years) attending metabolic bone disease outpatient clinics with established osteoporosis were randomly allocated into one of four treatment groups and monitored for 4 years. All patients enrolled in this study including the control group (n=18) received 1.0 g elemental calcium and 400 units vitamin D per day. The HRT group (n=18) received cyclical estrogen and progesterone; the etidronate group (n=17) received intermittent cyclical etidronate; and the combined therapy group (n=19) received both HRT and etidronate. BMD was measured in the lumbar spine and the hip before treatment and at 2 and 4 years after treatment. Changes in height were recorded, and the occurrence of new vertebral fractures were documented in comparison with the baseline radiographic evaluation. In 40 patients (10 patients per group), analysis of bone histomorphometry was carried out after 4 years of treatment.

RESULTS

In patients who received the combined therapy, BMD increased in the lumbar spine by 10.4% (P <0.001) and in the hip by 7.0% (P <0.001) at 4 years. For patients treated with ICE, these increases were 7.3% (P <0.001) and 0.9% (P <0.05), and with HRT, the increases were 7.0% (P <0.001) and 4.8% (P <0.01) in the vertebrae and femora, respectively. The group treated with calcium and vitamin D lost 2.5% (P <0.05) and 4.4% (P <0.01) of BMD in the vertebrae and femora, respectively, after 4 years. Patients who received combined therapy had significantly higher BMD in both the vertebrae and in the femora (P <0.05) in comparison with patients who were treated with HRT or etidronate alone after 4 years. In comparison with patients in the control group, there was a trend toward a lower rate of new vertebral fractures in the treatment groups. Height loss was significantly less in all three active treatment groups (HRT [P <0.001], etidronate [P <0.02], and combined therapy group [P <0.0001]), in comparison with the control group. The combined therapy group did not have a significant height loss, in comparison with the HRT (P <0.02) and the etidronate (P <0.001) groups. None of the patients had histomorphometric evidence of osteomalacia.

CONCLUSION

This 4-year randomized study showed an additive effect of etidronate and HRT on hip and spine BMD in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.

Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Long-term estrogen therapy can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. At present, however, these beneficial effects are not separable from undesirable stimulation of breast and endometrial tissues.

METHODS

We studied the effect of raloxifene, a nonsteroidal benzothiophene, on bone mineral density, serum lipid concentrations, and endometrial thickness in 601 postmenopausal women. The women were randomly assigned to receive 30, 60, or 150 mg of raloxifene or placebo daily for 24 months.

RESULTS

The women receiving each dose of raloxifene had significant increases from base-line values in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, whereas those receiving placebo had decreases in bone mineral density. For example, at 24 months, the mean (+/-SE) difference in the change in bone mineral density between the women receiving 60 mg of raloxifene per day and those receiving placebo was 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the lumbar spine, 2.4+/-0.4 percent for the total hip, and 2.0+/-0.4 percent for the total body (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Serum concentrations of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in all the raloxifene groups, whereas serum concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides did not change. Endometrial thickness was similar in the raloxifene and placebo groups at all times during the study. The proportion of women receiving raloxifene who reported hot flashes or vaginal bleeding was not different from that of the women receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily therapy with raloxifene increases bone mineral density, lowers serum concentrations of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and does not stimulate the endometrium.

Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: does the future belong to hormone replacement therapy?

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) after menopause prevents the development of osteoporosis and reduces the risk of fracture. Other potential benefits are cardioprotection--probably related to the effects of estrogen on lipid profile and fibrinogen levels--and a delay in the onset of Alzheimer's disease and perhaps amelioration of the disease. ERT, however, increases the risk of endometriosis and endometrial cancer unless given with a progestin for at least 10 days per menstrual cycle. It also results in a small but real increase in breast cancer. Alendronate, a bisphosphonate, is the first serious competitor of conjugated equine estrogen for the treatment of osteoporosis. Nearing FDA approval are so-called designer estrogens (e.g., raloxifene), which may selectively prevent osteoporosis with little or no effects on endometrial and breast tissue.