Chronic kidney disease and prevalent atrial fibrillation: the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC)

Atrial Fibrillation and Longitudinal Change in Cognitive Function in CKD

Background

Studies in the general population suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) is an independent risk factor for decline in cognitive function, but this relationship has not been examined in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We investigated the association between incident AF and changes in cognitive function over time in this population.

Methods and Results

We studied a subgroup of 3254 adults participating in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study. Incident AF was ascertained by 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained at a study visit and/or identification of a hospitalization with AF during follow-up. Cognitive function was assessed biennially using the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. Linear mixed effects regression was used to evaluate the association between incident AF and longitudinal change in cognitive function. Compared with individuals without incident AF (n = 3158), those with incident AF (n = 96) were older, had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease and hypertension, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate. After median follow-up of 6.8 years, we observed no significant multivariable association between incident AF and change in cognitive function test score.

Conclusion

In this cohort of adults with CKD, incident AF was not associated with a decline in cognitive function.

Thromboembolic and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Role of Anticoagulation Therapy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are strictly related; several independent risk factors of AF are often frequent in CKD patients. AF prevalence is very common among these patients, ranging between 15% and 20% in advanced stages of CKD. Moreover, the results of several studies showed that AF patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) have a higher mortality rate than patients with preserved renal function due to an increased incidence of stroke and an unpredicted elevated hemorrhagic risk. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently contraindicated in patients with ESRD and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), remaining the only drugs allowed, although they show numerous critical issues such as a narrow therapeutic window, increased tissue calcification and an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio with low stroke prevention effect and augmented risk of major bleeding. The purpose of this review is to shed light on the applications of DOAC therapy in CKD patients, especially in ESRD patients.

Elevated Troponin T and Enlarged Left Atrium Are Associated with the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with CKD Stage 4-5

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and CKD are commonly coexisting conditions. However, data on epidemiology of AF in patients with CKD stage 4-5 is scarce.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 210 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4-5 between 2013 and 2017. Follow-up data on AF incidence along with medical history, laboratory tests, and echocardiography at baseline were gathered.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean age was 62 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 12.8 mL/min, and 73/210 (34.8%) participants were female. Altogether, 41/210 (19.5%) patients had a previous diagnosis of AF. After median follow-up of 46 [IQR 27] months, new-onset AF occurred in 33/169 (19.5%) patients (69.9 events/1,000 person-years). In the Cox proportional hazard model, age >60 years (HR 4.27, CI 95% 1.57-11.64, p < 0.01), elevated troponin T (TnT) >50 ng/L (HR 3.61, CI 95% 1.55-8.37, p < 0.01), and left atrial volume index (LAVI) >30 mL/m2 (HR 4.82, CI 95% 1.11-21.00, p = 0.04) were independently associated with the incidence of new-onset AF.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and incidence of AF was markedly high in this prospective study on patients with CKD stage 4-5. Elevated TnT and increased LAVI were independently associated with the occurrence of new-onset AF in patients with severe CKD.

Kidney Function as Risk Factor and Predictor of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality Among Older Adults

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) are associated with cardiovascular events in the general population but their utility among older adults is unclear. We investigated the associations of eGFR and UACR with stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death among older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

1,581 participants (aged≥70 years) in the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) without prior stroke or MI.

EXPOSURES & PREDICTORS

Serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based eGFR, UACR categories, and measured GFR (n=436).

OUTCOMES

Stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

HRs and 95% CIs derived from multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for association analyses. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and C statistic differences comparing the predictive benefit of kidney measures with a traditional cardiovascular risk model.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 8.2 years, 193 strokes, 125 MIs, and 531 deaths occurred. Independent of UACR, when GFR was estimated using the creatinine- and cystatin C-based BIS equation, eGFR of 45 to 59mL/min/1.73m² (vs eGFR>60mL/min/1.73m²) was associated with stroke (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.55-3.21) but not MI or all-cause mortality. For those with eGFR<45mL/min/1.73m², the HRs were 1.99 (95% CI, 1.23-3.20) for stroke, 1.38 (95% CI, 0.81-2.36) for MI, and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.20-2.06) for mortality. Compared with UACR<30mg/g, UACR of 30 to 300mg/g was not associated with stroke (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.63-1.33) but was associated with MI (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.09-2.51) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.34-1.98). Prediction analysis for stroke showed significant positive NRI for eGFR calculated using the cystatin C-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and the creatinine- and cystatin C-based BIS and Full Age Spectrum equations. UACR demonstrated significant positive NRIs for MI and mortality.

LIMITATIONS

eGFR and UACR categorization based on single assessments; lack of cause-specific death data.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR of 45 to 59mL/min/1.73m² without albuminuria was associated with stroke but not MI or all-cause mortality in older adults. In contrast, UACR of 30 to 300mg/g was associated with MI and all-cause mortality but not with stroke. Furthermore, cystatin C-based eGFR improved risk prediction for stroke in this cohort of older adults.

[How to anticoagulate elderly and fragile patients?]

Risks of thrombosis, bleeding and renal impairment are increasing with age. The efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in fragile patients (age > 75 years and/or creatinine clearance levels < 50 ml/min and/or body weight below 50 kg) with indication for anticoagulation is one of the most challenging topic in cardiovascular medicine. New registry data from subgroup analyses of landmark studies and registries point towards to superiority of DOACs. This article summarizes new insights and describes pathways for anticoagulation in fragile patients.

Interatrial block, P terminal force or fragmented QRS do not predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with severe chronic kidney disease

Background

The prevalence of left atrial enlargement (LAE) and fragmented QRS (fQRS) diagnosed using ECG criteria in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Furthermore, there is limited data on predicting new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) with LAE or fQRS in this patient group.

Methods

We enrolled 165 consecutive non-dialysis patients with CKD stage 4–5 without prior AF diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 in a prospective follow-up cohort study. LAE was defined as total P-wave duration ≥120 ms in lead II ± > 1 biphasic P-waves in leads II, III or aVF; or duration of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 40 ms or depth of terminal negative portion of P-wave > 1 mm in lead V₁ from a baseline ECG, respectively. fQRS was defined as the presence of a notched R or S wave or the presence of ≥1 additional R waves (R’) or; in the presence of a wide QRS complex (> 120 ms), > 2 notches in R or S waves in two contiguous leads corresponding to a myocardial region, respectively.

Results

Mean age of the patients was 59 (SD 14) years, 56/165 (33.9%) were female and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12.8 ml/min/1.73m². Altogether 29/165 (17.6%) patients were observed with new-onset AF within median follow-up of 3 [IQR 3, range 2–6] years. At baseline, 137/165 (83.0%) and 144/165 (87.3%) patients were observed with LAE and fQRS, respectively. Furthermore, LAE and fQRS co-existed in 121/165 (73.3%) patients. Neither findings were associated with the risk of new-onset AF within follow-up.

Conclusion

The prevalence of LAE and fQRS at baseline in this study on CKD stage 4–5 patients not on dialysis was very high. However, LAE or fQRS failed to predict occurrence of new-onset AF in these patients.

Association Between Serum Albumin Level and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The association between serum albumin and all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is presently unclear.

METHODS

The study subjects included 201 patients diagnosed with CKD, eliminating those with end-stage renal disease, who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to serum albumin level (Q1: 1.60-3.88 g/dL; Q2: 3.89-4.13 g/dL; Q3: 4.14-4.43 g/dL, and Q4: 4.44-5.51 g/dL). The clinical outcome was ACM, and the difference was compared using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 1480 days, 32 patients died (15.92%). The ACM was found to be 28.00%, 20.00%, 8.00%, and 7.84% in the 4 groups (P = 0.012). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive association between the serum albumin level and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (r = 0.22, P = 0.001). Once the potential confounding factors were adjusted, the results indicated that decreased serum albumin was a risk factor for ACM (Q2 vs Q1: OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.17-1.47; Q3 vs Q1: OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.03-0.48; Q4 vs Q1: OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.98). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that the optimum threshold of serum albumin to predict ACM was 4 g/dL, and the area under the curve was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased serum albumin is a risk factor for ACM in patients with CKD, with the optimal threshold being 4 g/dL.

Pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely related conditions with shared risk factors. The growing prevalence of both AF and CKD indicates that more patients will suffer from concurrent conditions. There are various complex interlinking mechanisms with important implications for the management of these patients. Furthermore, there is uncertainty regarding the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in AF and CKD that is reflected by a lack of consensus between international guidelines. Therefore, the importance of understanding the implications of co-existing AF and CKD should not be underestimated. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology and association between AF and CKD, including the underlying mechanisms, risk of thrombo-embolic and bleeding complications, influence on stroke management, and evidence surrounding the use of OAC for stroke prevention.

The Contribution of Kidney Disease to Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the relationships between diabetes, cognitive impairment, and the contribution of kidney disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the independent contributions of parameters of kidney disease, including albuminuria, glomerular filtration, bone/mineral metabolism, and vitamin D synthesis, on cognitive performance in patients with diabetes. Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying these associations are discussed highlighting gaps in existing knowledge. Finally, effects of the dialysis procedure on the brain and cognitive performance are considered. Emphasis is placed on novel non-invasive screening tools with the potential to preserve cerebral perfusion during hemodialysis and limit cognitive decline in patients with diabetic ESKD. Patients with type 2 diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease suffer a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment. This is particularly true in patients with diabetes and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

Exercise E/e' Is a Determinant of Exercise Capacity and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the relationship between E/e' and exercise capacity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and evaluate its prognostic role.

BACKGROUND

Patients with CKD have diastolic dysfunction, reduced physical fitness, and elevated risk of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

Patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD without previous cardiac disease underwent resting and exercise stress echocardiograms with assessment of exercise E/e'. Patients were compared to age-, sex-, and risk factor-matched control individuals and were followed annually for 5 years for cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiovascular event(s) (MACE). Exercise capacity was assessed as metabolic equivalents (METs), with reduced exercise capacity defined as METs of ≤7. Raised exercise E/e' was defined as >13.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients with CKD (age 62.8 ± 10.6 years; male: 62%) were compared to 156 matched control individuals. Patients with CKD were more likely to be anemic (p < 0.01) and had increased left ventricular mass (p < 0.01), larger left atrial volumes (p < 0.01), and higher resting (p < 0.01) and exercise E/e' (p < 0.01). Patients with CKD achieved lower exercise METs (p < 0.01), and more patients with CKD had METs of ≤7 (p < 0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed exercise E/e' (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.95; p < 0.01) as the strongest predictor of reduced exercise capacity in patients with CKD. Over a follow-up period of 41.4 months, a raised exercise E/e' of >13 was an independent predictor of cardiovascular death and MACE on unadjusted and adjusted hazard models.

CONCLUSION

E/e' is a strong predictor of exercise capacity and METs achieved by patients with CKD. Exercise capacity was reduced in patients with CKD, presumably consequent to diastolic dysfunction. Elevated exercise E/e' in patients with CKD is an independent predictor of cardiovascular death and MACE.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Background and Purpose:

The comparative effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants, compared with warfarin, for risks of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death have not been studied in Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation and nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease.

Methods:

Medicare data from 2011 to 2017 were used to identify patients with stages 3, 4, or 5 chronic kidney disease and new atrial fibrillation who received a new prescription for warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran. We estimated marginal hazard ratios with 95% CIs for the association of each direct-acting oral anticoagulant, compared with warfarin, for the outcomes of interest using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models in as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses.

Results:

A total of 22 739 individuals met criteria (46.3% warfarin, 29.6% apixaban, 17.2% rivaroxaban, 6.9% dabigatran). Across the groups of anticoagulant users, mean age was 78.4 to 79.0 years; 50.3% to 51.4% were women, and 80.3% to 82.8% had stage 3 chronic kidney disease. In the as-treated analysis, for stroke/systemic embolism, hazard ratios, all compared with warfarin, were 0.70 (0.51–0.96) for apixaban, 0.80 (0.54–1.17) for rivaroxaban, and 1.15 (0.69–1.94) for dabigatran. For major bleeding, analogous hazard ratios were 0.47 (0.37–0.59) for apixaban, 1.05 (0.85–1.30) for rivaroxaban, and 0.95 (0.70–1.31) for dabigatran. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between the direct-acting oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Results of the intention-to-treat analysis were similar.

Conclusions:

Apixaban, compared with warfarin, was associated with decreased risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding; risks for both outcomes with rivaroxaban and dabigatran did not differ from risks with warfarin.

The Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulantsin Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: From the Database of A Single-Center Registry

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes (major bleeding [MB] and thromboembolic events [TEEs]) of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)who receiveddirect oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy.

METHODS

Data prospectivelycollected from a single-center registry containing 2,272 patients with DOAC prescription for AF (apixaban [n=1,014], edoxaban [n=267], rivaroxaban [n=498], and dabigatran[n=493]) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were monitored for two years and classified into the CKD (n=1460) andnon-CKD groups(n=812). MB and TEEs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72±10 years, with the CHADS2,CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores being 1.95±1.32, 3.21±1.67, and 1.89±0.96,respectively.Incidence rates of MB and TEEs were 2.3%/year and 2.1%/year, respectively. The CKD groupwasolderand had lower body weight and higher CHADS2,CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scoresthanthe non-CKD group.Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that the incidence of MB and TEEs was higher in the CKD group. Multiple logistic regression analysis in the CKD group revealed thatage andstroke history were independent determinants of TEEs, and low body weighttended to be a determinant of MB.The inappropriate low dose use was higher for apixaban than other DOACs in the CKD group. Consequently, for apixaban, the incidence of stroke was significantly higherin the CKD group than in the non-CKD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKDwere characterized by factors that predisposed them to MB and TEEs, such as older age and low body weight. In a single-center registry, only treatment with apixaban in the CKD group led to a higher incidence of TEEs.

Increased Incident Ischemic Stroke Risk in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Large-Scale Real-World Data Study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence using real-world data is sparse regarding the effects of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with kidney disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of kidney disease on ischemic stroke (IS) or systemic embolism (SE) among patients taking OAC, using large-scale real-world data in Japan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using claims data and health checkup data from health insurance associations in Japan, from January 2005 to June 2017. We enrolled 21,581 patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). Of the total population, 11,848 (54.9%) patients were taking OAC. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the effect of kidney disease on IS/SE with or without OAC.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 208 participants who were not taking OAC (mean follow-up 2.6 years) and 200 who were taking OAC (mean follow-up 3.0 years) experienced IS/SE. The % IS/SE incidence rates with and without kidney disease were 2.42/person-year and 0.63/person-year in the total population, 3.66/person-year and 0.76/person-year in the group without OAC use, and 1.52/person-year and 0.55/person-year in patients with OAC use, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of kidney disease for IS/SE were high, irrespective of OAC, even after adjustment: adjusted HR 2.62 (95% CI: 1.72-3.99) without OAC and adjusted HR 2.03 (95% CI: 1.20-3.44) with OAC; p = 0.193 for interaction between no OAC and OAC. Although bleeding risk was also high for kidney disease irrespective of OAC use (HR 2.93 [95% CI: 2.27-3.77] in the total population, HR 3.08 [95% CI: 2.15-4.43] in the group without OAC, and HR 2.73 [95% CI: 1.90-3.91] in the group with OAC use), net clinical benefit indicated that the benefit of OAC use exceeded the risk of bleeding: HR 4.50 (95% CI: 0.76-8.23) among those with kidney disease and HR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.04-0.66) among those without kidney disease.

CONCLUSION

Although we found that OAC use was effective and recommended for patients with AF, advanced kidney disease is still an independent risk factor for IS/SE, even in patients taking OAC. Physicians should be aware of this risk and strictly control modifiable risk factors, regardless of OAC use.

Chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk factor

: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health threat with impact in cardiovascular risk. All forms of cardiovascular disease and mortality are more common in CKD. Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes is essential for cardiovascular and kidney protection. CKD is a marker of high or very high cardiovascular risk and its presence require early treatment and specific goals. Lifestyle is a pivotal factor, stopping smoking, reducing weight in the overweight or obese, starting regular physical exercise and healthy dietary pattern are recommended. Office BP should be lowered towards 130/80 mmHg or even lower if tolerated with sodium restriction and single pill combination, including angiotensin system blocker. Out-of-office BP monitoring, mainly 24-h assessment, is recommended. Diabetes requires treatment from the moment of diagnosis, but prediabetes benefits with lifestyle changes and metformin in patients stage 2 and 3a. iSGLT2 and GLP-1RA are initially recommended in T2D patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk. Concerning dyslipidemia, for patients in stage 4, LDL-C 55 mg/dl or less (1.4 mmol/l) and an LDL-C reduction of 50% or less from baseline is recommended. In stage 3, LDL-C goal is 70 mg/dl or less (1.8 mmol/l) and an LDL-C. reduction of at least 50% from baseline. Statins are the lipid-lowering therapy of choice with or without ezetimibe. Higher doses of statins are required as GFR declines. Available evidence suggests that combined PCSK9 inhibitors with maximally tolerated dose of statins may have an emerging role in treatment of dyslipidemia in CKD patients.

Drivers of hospitalization in atrial fibrillation: A contemporary review

Atrial fibrillation (AF)-related hospitalization has risen over the last 2 decades and is the most influential determinant of total disease-related expenditure. In this review article, we describe several identified drivers of hospitalization from several registries and large-scale clinical trials, including key cardiovascular and non-traditional risk factors. We also discuss available assessment tools for discerning overall risk of hospitalization, including AF symptom scores, thrombosis and bleeding disposition, and non-invasive cardiac structural assessment. Finally, we highlight the different treatment paradigms that have been proven to reduce AF burden, progression, and hospitalization in the literature.

Impact of Glomerular Filtration Rate on the Incidence and Prognosis of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is associated with a worse prognosis. Patients with chronic kidney disease are more likely to develop AF. Whether the association between AF and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is also true in AMI has never been investigated. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 2445 AMI patients. New-onset AF was recorded during hospitalization. Estimated GFR was estimated at admission, and patients were grouped according to their GFR (group 1 (n = 1887): GFR >60; group 2 (n = 492): GFR 60–30; group 3 (n = 66): GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²). The primary endpoint was AF incidence. In-hospital and long-term (median 5 years) mortality were secondary endpoints. Results: The AF incidence in the population was 10%, and it was 8%, 16%, 24% in groups 1, 2, 3, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the overall population, AF was associated with a higher in-hospital (5% vs. 1%; p < 0.0001) and long-term (34% vs. 13%; p < 0.0001) mortality. In each study group, in-hospital mortality was higher in AF patients (3.5% vs. 0.5%, 6.5% vs. 3.0%, 19% vs. 8%, respectively; p < 0.0001). A similar trend was observed for long-term mortality in three groups (20% vs. 9%, 51% vs. 24%, 81% vs. 50%; p < 0.0001). The higher risk of in-hospital and long-term mortality associated with AF in each group was confirmed after adjustment for major confounders. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that new-onset AF incidence during AMI, as well as the associated in-hospital and long-term mortality, increases in parallel with GFR reduction assessed at admission.

Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Background:

Compared with the general population, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease have a >10-fold higher burden of atrial fibrillation. Limited data are available guiding the use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in this population.

Methods:

We compared the safety of apixaban with warfarin in 269 patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced chronic kidney disease (defined as creatinine clearance [CrCl] 25 to 30 mL/min) enrolled in the ARISTOTLE trial (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation). Cox proportional models were used to estimate hazard ratios for major bleeding and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. We characterized the pharmacokinetic profile of apixaban by assessing differences in exposure using nonlinear mixed effects models.

Results:

Among patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min, apixaban caused less major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14–0.80]) and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17–0.72]) compared with warfarin. Patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min randomized to apixaban demonstrated a trend toward lower rates of major bleeding when compared with those with CrCl >30 mL/min ( P interaction=0.08) and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding ( P interaction=0.05). Median daily steady-state areas under the curve for apixaban 5 mg twice daily were 5512 ng/(mL·h) and 3406 ng/(mL·h) for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min or >30 mL/min, respectively. For apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily, the median exposure was 2780 ng/(mL·h) for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min. The area under the curve values for patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min fell within the ranges demonstrated for patients with CrCl >30 mL/min.

Conclusions:

Among patients with atrial fibrillation and CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min, apixaban caused less bleeding than warfarin, with even greater reductions in bleeding than in patients with CrCl >30 mL/min. We observed substantial overlap in the range of exposure to apixaban 5 mg twice daily for patients with or without advanced chronic kidney disease, supporting conventional dosing in patients with CrCl 25 to 30 mL/min. Randomized, controlled studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban are urgently needed in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, including those receiving dialysis.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00412984.

Systematic DOACs oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: the nephrologist's perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and also associated with unfavorable outcome. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstep of management in such patients, aimed at reducing the high risk of systemic thromboembolism and especially of ischemic stroke, which is reportedly associated with increased mortality in CKD patients. Even though new direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) proved to be effective in patients with non valvular chronic AF, and are therefore recommended by recent guidelines for their treatment, warfarin is currently used in more than one-half of subjects needing oral anticoagulation, and only 30% of them are converted from a vitamin K antagonist- to a DOAC-based regimen. The main reason for not prescribing DOACs is often a reduction in renal function, even if mild. Aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the impact of DOAC therapy in the setting of CKD, from a nephrological perspective, by comparing available evidence on the role of DOACs in patients with CKD and AF with that emerging from traditional warfarin-based therapy. Both the pathogenesis of AF in CKD, and available findings of renal, cardiovascular and bone effects of DOACs in CKD are discussed, leading to the conclusion that DOAC therapy should be considered as the first line therapy for non valvular AF in patients with mild and moderate reduction of renal function, and could also be adopted for patients with severe CKD not on hemodialysis treatment, whereas there is insufficient evidence for ESRD patients on dialysis.

Factors Associated with a Large Decline in Renal Function or Progression to Renal Insufficiency in Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Early-Stage CKD

Clinicians must consider renal function when administering anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF). Determination of risk factors for renal function decline may enable identification of patients who require closer monitoring. We investigated the characteristics associated with renal function decline in patients with AF. The study cohort consisted of 631 AF patients who had at least one readmission during the follow-up period and stages 1-3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary outcome measure was large renal function decline (≥30% decrease from baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]). The secondary outcome measure was a final eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m² for those with a baseline eGFR above this level. The mean eGFR was 74.4 ± 18.5 mL/minute/1.73 m², and the mean follow-up time was 30.2 ± 13.2 months. The primary outcome occurred in 155 patients (24.6%) and was associated with congestive heart failure (CHF), proteinuria, type of AF, and left atrial diameter (LAD) ≥ 45 mm. Among 478 patients with a baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m², 137 (28.7%) progressed to renal failure (eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²). A decreasing eGFR was associated with age ≥ 75 years, CHF, lower baseline eGFR, and LAD ≥ 45 mm. CHF, proteinuria, type of AF, and LAD ≥ 45 mm were associated with eGFR decline ≥ 30% in AF patients with CKD stages 1-3. Advanced age, CHF, lower baseline eGFR, and LAD ≥ 45 mm were associated with progression to renal insufficiency. These results should be considered when identifying patients who require more frequent monitoring of eGFR.

Differences in anticoagulation strategy and outcome in atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease: a CODE-AF registry study

Purpose

Dose reduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with renal impairment. This study investigated anticoagulation patterns and outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Materials and methods

In a prospective observational registry (CODE-AF), 3445 patients with non-valvular AF including 1129 with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60 mL min−1 1.73 m−2) were identified between June 1, 2016, and July 3, 2017.

Results

Compared with patients with no-CKD, patients with CKD more frequently had a high stroke risk (94.9% vs. 67.0%, p < 0.001) and higher NOAC usage rate (61.1% vs. 47.8%, p < 0.001). Among 718 patients with renal indication for dose reduction (RIDR), 7.5% were potentially overdosed. Among 2587 patients with no-RIDR, 79% were potentially underdosed. Compared with patients with no-RIDR, the underdose rates of dabigatran (0% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.001) and rivaroxaban (0% vs. 79.5%, p = 0.001) were lower in patients with RIDR. However, the underdose rate of apixaban was not different (62.5% vs. 53.9%, p = 0.089). The overdose rate of dabigatran (7.5% vs. 0%) and rivaroxaban (13.7% vs. 0%) was higher in RIDR than in no-RIDR patients. Stroke/transient ischemic attack was significantly higher in CKD patients (1.4 vs. 0.6 per 100 person-years, p = 0.045). Aspirin significantly increased minor bleeding in CKD patients compared with controls (p = 0.037).

Conclusion

CKD patients might have a high stroke risk and NOAC usage rate. The underdose rate of NOACs decreased in CKD patients, except for apixaban. Aspirin significantly increased minor bleeding in CKD patients.

The Difference in the Changes of Indoxyl Sulfate after Catheter Ablation among Atrial Fibrillation Patients with and without Kidney Dysfunction

Indoxyl sulfate (IS), a protein-bound uremic toxin, induces chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation (CA) of AF improves the renal function. However, the transition of uremic toxins is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the transition of the serum IS level in AF patients with and without CKD after CA. A total of 138 consecutive AF patients who underwent CA and maintained sinus rhythm were prospectively enrolled (paroxysmal AF 67.4%). The patients were divided into 4 groups (non-CKD/low-IS:68, non-CKD/high-IS:28, CKD/low-IS:13, and CKD/high-IS:29). The plasma IS levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were determined before and 1-year after CA. CKD was defined as CKD stage III and a high-IS according to the mean IS (IS ≥ 1.1 μg/ml). CA significantly improved the eGFR in CKD patients (p < 0.001). The serum IS level in the non-CKD/high-IS group was significantly decreased (from 1.7 ± 0.7 to 1.1 ± 0.6 μg/ml, p < 0.001). However, the serum IS level in the CKD/high-IS group did not improve (from 1.9 ± 0.9 to 1.7 ± 0.7 μg/ml, p = 0.22). The change in the IS in the CKD patients significantly differed from that in those without CKD. In the CKD patients, CA did not significantly decrease the IS, a risk factor of CKD, regardless of an improved eGFR.

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly have impaired renal function. The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated and compared the safety outcomes of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF and concomitant CKD. Patients in our health system with AF prescribed oral anticoagulants during 2010 to 2017 were identified. All-cause mortality, bleeding and hemorrhagic, and ischemic stroke were evaluated based on degree of renal impairment and method of anticoagulation. There were 21,733 patients with a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of ≥2 included in this analysis. Compared with warfarin, DOAC use in patients with impaired renal function was associated with lower risk of mortality with a hazard ratio (HR): 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.84, p value <0.001) in patients with eGFR >60, HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.81, p value <0.001) in patients with eGFR >30 to 60, and HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.92, p value <0.001) in patients with eGFR ≤30 or on dialysis. Bleeding requiring hospitalization was also less in the DOAC group with a HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.04, p value 0.209) in patients with eGFR >60, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.94, p value 0.003) in patients with eGFR >30 to 60, and HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.93, p value 0.017) in patients with eGFR ≤30 or on dialysis. In conclusion, in comparison to warfarin, DOACs appear to be safe and effective with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and lower bleeding across all levels of CKD.

Role of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with kidney disease

The anticoagulation field is experiencing a renaissance that began with regulatory approval of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), in 2010. The DOAC medication class has rapidly evolved to include the additional approval of 4 direct factor Xa inhibitors. Commensurately, DOAC use has increased and collectively account for the majority of new anticoagulant prescriptions. Despite exclusion of patients with moderate-to-severe kidney disease from most pivotal DOAC trials, DOACs are increasingly used in this setting. An advantage of DOACs is similar or improved antithrombotic efficacy with less bleeding risk when compared with traditional agents. Several post hoc analyses, retrospective studies, claims data studies, and meta-analyses suggest that these benefits extend to patients with kidney disease. However, the lack of randomized controlled trial data in specific kidney disease settings, with their unique pathophysiology, should be a call to action for the kidney community to systematically study these agents, especially because early data suggest that DOACs may pose less risk of anticoagulant-related nephropathy than do vitamin K antagonists. Most DOACs are renally cleared and are significantly protein bound in circulation; thus, the pharmacokinetics of these drugs are influenced by reduced renal function and proteinuria. DOACs are susceptible to altered metabolism by P-glycoprotein inhibitors and inducers, including drugs commonly used for the management of kidney disease comorbidities. We summarize the currently available literature on DOAC use in kidney disease and illustrate knowledge gaps that represent important opportunities for prospective investigation.

Impact of prior stroke on major clinical outcome in chronic kidney disease: the Salford kidney cohort study

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for stroke in the general population. The impact of prior stroke on major clinical outcomes in CKD populations is poorly characterised.

Methods

The Salford Kidney Study is a UK prospective cohort of more than 3000 patients recruited since 2002 and followed until March 2018. Multivariable Cox regression examined associations of stroke at two time points; cohort inception, and at dialysis initiation, with risks of death, non-fatal cardiovascular events (NFCVE) and end stage renal disease (ESRD).

Results

277 (9.1%) of 3060 patients suffered a prior stroke and this was associated with mortality, ESRD and future NFCVE after cardiovascular risk factor adjustments. Median survival for prior stroke patients was 40 months vs 77 months in patients without a stroke. Prior stroke was independently associated with mortality (HR 1.20 95%CI 1.0–1.43, p = 0.05). Of 579 patients who reached ESRD and commenced dialysis, a prior stroke (N = 48) was independently associated with mortality. Median survival for the prior stroke group was 29 months compared with 50 months for the non-stroke group. Only 70 and 75% of patients who had suffered an ischaemic stroke were prescribed antiplatelets or statins respectively.

Conclusions

A diagnosis of stroke is strongly and independently associated with several adverse clinical outcomes for patients with CKD. Prior stroke profoundly alters cardiovascular risk in CKD patients. Greater attention to primary and secondary preventive strategies is warranted which may improve these outcomes.

The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation

The current manuscript is the second update of the original Practical Guide, published in 2013 [Heidbuchel et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-651; Heidbuchel et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2015;17:1467-1507]. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and have emerged as the preferred choice, particularly in patients newly started on anticoagulation. Both physicians and patients are becoming more accustomed to the use of these drugs in clinical practice. However, many unresolved questions on how to optimally use these agents in specific clinical situations remain. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) set out to coordinate a unified way of informing physicians on the use of the different NOACs. A writing group identified 20 topics of concrete clinical scenarios for which practical answers were formulated, based on available evidence. The 20 topics are as follows i.e., (1) Eligibility for NOACs; (2) Practical start-up and follow-up scheme for patients on NOACs; (3) Ensuring adherence to prescribed oral anticoagulant intake; (4) Switching between anticoagulant regimens; (5) Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of NOACs; (6) NOACs in patients with chronic kidney or advanced liver disease; (7) How to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs; (8) NOAC plasma level measurement: rare indications, precautions, and potential pitfalls; (9) How to deal with dosing errors; (10) What to do if there is a (suspected) overdose without bleeding, or a clotting test is indicating a potential risk of bleeding; (11) Management of bleeding under NOAC therapy; (12) Patients undergoing a planned invasive procedure, surgery or ablation; (13) Patients requiring an urgent surgical intervention; (14) Patients with AF and coronary artery disease; (15) Avoiding confusion with NOAC dosing across indications; (16) Cardioversion in a NOAC-treated patient; (17) AF patients presenting with acute stroke while on NOACs; (18) NOACs in special situations; (19) Anticoagulation in AF patients with a malignancy; and (20) Optimizing dose adjustments of VKA. Additional information and downloads of the text and anticoagulation cards in different languages can be found on an EHRA website (www.NOACforAF.eu).

Comparison of incidence of acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease between atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: real-world evidences from a propensity score-matched national cohort analysis

We investigated the adverse renal outcomes in patients affected by either atrial fibrillation (Afib) or atrial flutter (AFL). Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance research database, both cohorts were 1:1 propensity score matched based on age, sex, index year, and comorbidity using logistic regression model. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) between the two cohorts were obtained using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Competing-risks regression models were applied to calculate the subhazard ratios (SHRs) and corresponding 95% CIs of the adverse renal outcomes. Afib patients were 1.15 and 1.33 times more likely to experience CKD and ESRD, respectively, than AFL patients (incidence rate per 10,000 person-years (IR): CKD, 10.8 vs 9.41; ESRD, 4.44 vs 3.34), with the adjusted HRs of 1.18 and 1.32 (CKD, 95% CI = 1.07-1.30; ESRD, 95% CI = 1.12-1.55). Afib patients were 1.08 times (95% CI = 1.01-1.16) more likely to have AKI than AFL patients after adjusting for confounding covariates. Competing risk analysis showed that Afib patients were 1.08 (95% CI = 1.01-1.15), 1.18 (95% CI = 1.07-1.30) and 1.32 (95% CI = 1.12-1.55) times more likely to experience AKI, CKD and ESRD than AFL subjects. This study showed that Afib conferred worse renal events of AKI, CKD and ESRD than AFL.

Effect of anticoagulation therapy in older patients with chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in older atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy in this population.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies reporting the effect of anticoagulation therapy in older patients with AF and CKD. The risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were regarded as the risk estimates. A random-effects model selected was to evaluate the treatment outcomes. The presentations were based on the Preferred Reporting Items for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies with 24,794 older patients with AF and CKD were included. The follow-up of the included studies ranged from 0.9 to 9.0 years. In older patients with no dialysis, compared with nonanticoagulants, anticoagulants reduced the risk of all-cause death (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.79), but had comparable risks of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.46-1.79) and bleeding (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.86-1.60). In older patients with dialysis, compared with nonanticoagulants, anticoagulants increased the risk of bleeding (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.74), but had similar risks of ischemic stroke/TIA (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.88-1.58) and death (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60-1.27).

CONCLUSION

Compared with nonanticoagulation, anticoagulation therapy is associated with a reduced risk of death in older AF patients with nondialysis, but an increased risk of bleeding in older patients with dialysis.

Atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant recipients: is there a place for the novel drugs?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia of high clinical importance, occurring in 2% of the general population and in 19-24% in patients with chronic kidney disease. It is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Kidney transplant recipients with a history of AF were associated with significantly higher rate of ischaemic strokes, graft failure and post-transplant mortality. AF occurs in over 7% of kidney transplant recipients in the first 3 years after transplantation and is associated with reduced graft and patient survival. The incidence of stroke in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx) is higher than the general population, but markedly lower than those on dialysis. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is recommended in AF patients at high risk of stroke. There are no randomized studies assessing OAC in patients after KTx and there are no specific recommendations and guidelines on therapeutic strategies in these patients. KTx recipients are a vulnerable population, exposed to variations in renal function, being at higher risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications, with possible interactions with immunosuppression. Surely, there is a place for novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in this group of patients as long as the summary of product characteristics is followed, as they are a valuable anticoagulation therapy. On one hand, they are at least as effective as warfarin; on the other hand NOACs are safer, especially when it comes to intracranial haemorrhages. However, NOACs seem to be underused in this population as they are excreted via kidney, may interact with immunosuppressive therapy and physicians need more experience and confidence in their administration. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedure may also be considered as an opportunity for this group of patients, in particular in the presence of contraindications to anticoagulation.

Long-term outcomes of dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease and new-onset atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with substantial cardiovascular morbidity. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent arrhythmia that increases the risk of both stroke and cardiovascular mortality. Information about the mortality risk among patients with advanced CKD and new-onset AF (NAF) in the presence and absence of dialysis is important. However, the association between advanced CKD and NAF in patients with and without dialysis is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term outcomes of the association between advanced CKD and NAF in patients with and without dialysis.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study based on the National Health Insurance Program in Taiwan. Each participant aged 20 years and older who had CKD with dialysis from 2000 to 2013 was assigned to the dialysis group, whereas sex-, age-, CKD duration-, and index date-matched participants without dialysis were randomly selected and assigned to the non-dialysis group. We used the Cox regression model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for mortality in CKD patients with combined dialysis and NAF. Patients with neither NAF nor dialysis served as the reference group.

RESULTS

We identified 3,673 dialysis cases and 7,346 Non-dialysis matched controls for enrolment in the study. The crude mortality rates were 3.3 (95% CI: 3.1-3.5), 10.98 (95% CI: 9.3-13.0), 9.2 (95% CI: 8.7-10.0), and 18.0 (95% CI: 15.4-21.2) in the [Non-dialysis, non-NAF], [Non-dialysis, NAF], [Dialysis, non-NAF], and [Dialysis, NAF] groups, respectively. After adjustment for age, gender, and co-morbidities, the aHRs were 2.0 (95% CI: 1.7-2.3), 2.7 (95% CI: 2.5-2.9), and 3.5 (95% CI: 2.9-4.1) in the [Non-Dialysis, NAF], [Dialysis, non-NAF], and [Dialysis, NAF] groups compared with the [Non-Dialysis, non-NAF] group, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed the highest mortality risk in the [Dialysis, NAF] group among the study groups. Patients with concurrent peritoneal dialysis and AF had the highest mortality risk: aHR = 4.3 (95% CI: 2.3-8.0). However, there was a relatively lower effect of NAF on mortality in patients on dialysis than in patients who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced CKD and NAF had a significantly increased risk of mortality. Dialysis is not risky for patients with concurrent CKD and NAF. Dialysis offers a sufficient survival benefit to be considered as a standard treatment, as indicated by the superior physical status of patients on dialysis.

Safety of Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease

The purpose of this review is to examine the possibilities and prospects for the use of direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease and more rapid progression of existing renal pathology. The presence of chronic kidney disease in atrial fibrillation on the one hand leads to an increased risk of thromboembolism, and on the other to an increased risk of bleeding when using anticoagulants. The standard for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation, including those with concomitant renal pathology, was considered warfarin for many years. However, modern studies have shown that the use of warfarin may enhance vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease, which in turn may lead to an increased risk of ischemic strokes.

Analyzing clinical recommendations, randomized studies, meta-analyzes and a systematic review on the use of anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal pathology, revealed the advantage of using direct oral anticoagulants over warfarin at stage 1-3 of chronic kidney disease. Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants with a more pronounced renal dysfunction and in patients on dialysis is limited due to the lack of a sufficient number of large randomized studies. Due to the presence of renal clearance in all oral anticoagulants, their pharmacokinetics changes to some extent with a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, which requires dose adjustment of drugs depending on creatinine clearance. Therefore, the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of thromboembolic complications during atrial fibrillation requires special attention in patients with chronic kidney disease.

[Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease]

Patients with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with the increased prevalence of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmia being an important factor. The underlying pathomechanisms are diverse and mainly cause increasing atrial and ventricular fibrosis with so-called cardiac remodeling. In particular, patients with advanced kidney disease were excluded from many pioneering clinical trials, so there are no clear guidelines in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia for these patients. The potential benefits of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death or the benefits of anticoagulation for prevention of thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation should therefore be evaluated individually for each patient with advanced kidney disease, taking comorbidities and the prognosis into account. When using antiarrhythmic drugs, a dose adjustment may be necessary depending on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Although atrial fibrillation treatment by means of pulmonary vein isolation can lead to an improvement in kidney function, the success rate seems to be significantly reduced in the presence of advanced kidney disease. Overall, an individual therapy and treatment concept for each patient with advanced chronic kidney disease is advisable.

Five-Year Change in the Renal Function After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Although it has been reported that renal function can improve after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), long‐term changes in renal function and its relationship to rhythm outcomes have not yet been evaluated. We explored the 5‐year change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in AF patients depending on medical therapy and catheter ablation.

Methods and Results

Among 1963 patients who underwent AF catheter ablation and 14 056 with AF under medical therapy in the National Health Insurance Service database, we compared 571 with AF catheter ablation (59±10 years old, 72.3% male, and 66.5% paroxysmal AF) and 1713 with medical therapy after 1:3 propensity‐score matching. All participants had 5 years of serial eGFR data (Chronic Kidney Disease‐Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD‐EPI] method). Catheter ablation improved eGFR_5 yrs (P<0.001), but medical therapy did not. In 2284 matched patients, age (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.98 [0.97–0.99]; P<0.001) and AF catheter ablation (adjusted OR, 2.02 [1.67–2.46]; P<0.001) were independently associated with an improved eGFR_5 yrs. Among 571 patients who underwent AF ablation, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after the last AF ablation procedure was independently associated with an improved eGFR_5 yrs (adjusted OR, 1.44 [1.01–2.04]; P=0.043), especially in patients without diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR, 1.78 [1.21–2.63]; P=0.003, P for interaction=0.012). Although underlying renal dysfunction (<60 mL/min/1.73m²) was associated with atrial structural remodeling (adjusted OR, 1.05 [1.00–1.11]; P=0.046), it did not affect the AF ablation rhythm outcome.

Conclusions

AF catheter ablation significantly improved renal function over a 5‐year follow‐up, especially in patients maintaining sinus rhythm without preexisting diabetes mellitus.

See Editorial Wehner

Chronic Kidney Disease is Associated with Intracranial Artery Stenosis Distribution in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Population

Aims: To investigate the association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS), as well as its effects on ICAS distribution in the middle-aged and elderly population.

Methods: Data from the China Hypertension Survey in Beijing was analyzed. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was used to evaluate CKD, and ICAS was assessed by transcranial doppler. Clinical and biochemical variables were compared between the ICAS group and the non-ICAS group, as well as in different vascular distribution groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were introduced to demonstrate the association between CKD and ICAS.

Results: A total of 3678 subjects were included in this study, with a mean age of 62 years old. Of which, 19.2% presented with decreased eGFR (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²) and 17.4% for ICAS. The percentage of anterior circulation ICAS was 3.5 times than that of posterior circulation (10.9% vs. 3.1%). In multivariable regression analysis, eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m² was independently associated with ICAS after correction for covariates, odds ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.08, 2.65); in particular, this association had a preference for posterior circulation but not anterior circulation ICAS with OR = 2.29, 95% CI (1.28, 4.07) and OR = 1.44, 95%CI (0.89, 2.33), respectively.

Conclusion: Severe eGFR decline is associated with ICAS in the middle-aged and elderly population, and this correlation is more related to posterior circulation ICAS.

Benefits and Harms of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Effects of oral anticoagulation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are uncertain.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in adults with CKD stages 3 to 5, including those with dialysis-dependent end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

DATA SOURCES

English-language searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (inception to February 2019); review bibliographies; and ClinicalTrials.gov (25 February 2019).

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials evaluating VKAs or NOACs for any indication in patients with CKD that reported efficacy or bleeding outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and rated certainty of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Forty-five trials involving 34 082 participants who received anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) (11 trials), venous thromboembolism (VTE) (11 trials), thromboprophylaxis (6 trials), prevention of dialysis access thrombosis (8 trials), and cardiovascular disease other than AF (9 trials) were included. All but the 8 trials involving patients with ESKD excluded participants with creatinine clearance less than 20 mL/min or estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. In AF, compared with VKAs, NOACs reduced risks for stroke or systemic embolism (risk ratio [RR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93]; high-certainty evidence) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR, 0.48 [CI, 0.30 to 0.76]; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared with VKAs, the effects of NOACs on recurrent VTE or VTE-related death were uncertain (RR, 0.72 [CI, 0.44 to 1.17]; low-certainty evidence). In all trials combined, NOACs seemingly reduced major bleeding risk compared with VKAs (RR, 0.75 [CI, 0.56 to 1.01]; low-certainty evidence).

LIMITATION

Scant evidence for advanced CKD or ESKD; data mostly from subgroups of large trials.

CONCLUSION

In early-stage CKD, NOACs had a benefit-risk profile superior to that of VKAs. For advanced CKD or ESKD, there was insufficient evidence to establish benefits or harms of VKAs or NOACs.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None. (PROSPERO: CRD42017079709).

Cardiac Biomarkers and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Kidney Disease: The CRIC Study

Background

We tested associations of cardiac biomarkers of myocardial stretch, injury, inflammation, and fibrosis with the risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in a prospective study of chronic kidney disease patients.

Methods and Results

The study sample was 3053 participants with chronic kidney disease in the multicenter CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) study who were not identified as having AF at baseline. Cardiac biomarkers, measured at baseline, were NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide), high‐sensitivity troponin T, galectin‐3, growth differentiation factor‐15, and soluble ST‐2. Incident AF (“AF event”) was defined as a hospitalization for AF. During a median follow‐up of 8 years, 279 (9%) participants developed a new AF event. In adjusted models, higher baseline log‐transformed NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) was associated with incident AF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per SD higher concentration: 2.11; 95% CI, 1.75, 2.55), as was log‐high‐sensitivity troponin T (HR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20, 1.68). These associations showed a dose–response relationship in categorical analyses. Although log‐soluble ST‐2 was associated with AF risk in continuous models (HR per SD higher concentration 1.35; 95% CI, 1.16, 1.58), this association was not consistent in categorical analyses. Log‐galectin‐3 (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91, 1.22) and log‐growth differentiation factor‐15 (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 0.96, 1.40) were not significantly associated with incident AF.

Conclusions

We found strong associations between higher NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) and high‐sensitivity troponin T concentrations, and the risk of incident AF in a large cohort of participants with chronic kidney disease. Increased atrial myocardial stretch and myocardial cell injury may be implicated in the high burden of AF in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Anticoagulation in chronic kidney disease: from guidelines to clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global public health problem, being closely connected to cardiovascular disease. CKD involves an elevated thromboembolic risk and requires anticoagulation, but the high rates of hemorrhage render it quite challenging.

HYPOTHESIS

There are no consensus recommendations regarding anticoagulation in CKD. Due to the currently limited data, clinicians need practical clues for monitoring and optimizing the treatment.

METHODS

Based on the available data, this review outlines the benefit-risk ratio of all types of anticoagulants in each stage of CKD and provides practical recommendations for accurate dosage adjustment, reversal of antithrombotic effect, and monitoring of renal function on a regular basis.

RESULTS

Evidence from randomized controlled trials supports the efficient and safe use of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in mild and moderate CKD. On the contrary, the data are poor and controversial for advanced stages. DOACs are preferred in CKD stages 1 to 3. In patients with stage 4 CKD, the choice of warfarin vs DOACs will take into consideration the pharmacokinetics of the drugs and patient characteristics. Warfarin remains the first-line treatment in end-stage renal disease, although in this case the decision to use or not to use anticoagulation is strictly individualized. Anticoagulation with heparins is safe in nondialysis-dependent CKD, but remains a challenge in the hemodialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a need for cardiorenal consensus regarding anticoagulation in CKD, adequate selection of the anticoagulant type and careful monitoring are some extremely useful indications for overcoming management challenges.

Anticoagulation in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Walking the Fine Line Between Benefit and Harm

Chronic kidney disease affects more than 3 million Canadians and is highly associated with cardiovascular diseases that require anticoagulation, such as atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Patients with chronic kidney disease are at a problematic crossroads; they are at high risk of thrombotic conditions requiring anticoagulation and bleeding complications due to anticoagulation. The limited high-quality clinical evidence to guide decision-making in this area further compounds the dilemma. In this review, we discuss the physiology and epidemiology of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with kidney disease. We specifically focus on patients with advanced kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min) or who are receiving dialysis and focus on the nephrologist perspective regarding these issues. We summarize the existing evidence for anticoagulation use in the prevention of stroke with atrial fibrillation and provide practical clinical recommendations for considering anticoagulation use in this population. Last, we examine specific scenarios such as the use of a glomerular filtration rate estimating equation and dosing, the use of existing prediction tools for stroke and hemorrhage risk, current patterns of anticoagulation use (including during the dialysis procedure), and vascular calcification with vitamin K antagonist use in patients with chronic kidney disease.

New-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome may be associated with worse prognosis and future heart failure

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

A total 648 of consecutive ACS patients were divided into non-AF and all-AF groups. The all-AF group was further subdivided into new-onset AF and pre-existing AF groups. We compared prognosis among these groups using the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 1.4 ± 1.2 years. Overall patient numbers were 538 in non-AF and 110 in all-AF groups (67 in new-onset AF and 43 in pre-existing AF). Seventy-eight all-cause deaths and 42 cardiac deaths were observed. New-onset AF had a worse prognosis than the other groups in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.025) after observation. Cox regression analysis indicated no significant difference for all-cause death among the three groups. The hazard ratio of congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization was significantly higher in the all-AF and new-onset AF group than in the non-AF group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that renal dysfunction, peripheral arterial disease, Killip classification ≥2, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were independent predictors of all-cause death. The new-onset AF group had the highest prevalence of Killip classification ≥2 and the lowest LVEF.

CONCLUSION

In our study, AF was not an independent predictor of all-cause death, but new-onset AF may be associated with worse prognosis and future heart failure.

Rates of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities in Patients with CKD and Diabetes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cardiac arrhythmias increase mortality and morbidity in CKD. We evaluated the rates of subclinical arrhythmias in a population with type 2 diabetes and patients with moderate to severe CKD who were not on dialysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS & MEASUREMENTS

This is a prospective observational study, using continuous ambulatory cardiac monitors to determine the rate of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, as well as conduction abnormalities in this group.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (34% women), with mean eGFR of 38±13 ml/min per 1.73 m², underwent ambulatory cardiac monitoring for 11.2±3.9 days. The overall mean rate of any cardiac arrhythmia was 88.8 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 27.1 to 184.6) episodes per person-year (PY). A history of cardiovascular disease was associated with a higher rate of detected arrhythmia (rate ratio, 5.87; 95% CI, 1.37 to 25.21; P<0.001). The most common arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation, which was observed in two participants with known atrial fibrillation and was a new diagnosis in four patients (11%), none of whom experienced symptoms. Overall, atrial fibrillation episodes occurred at a rate of 37.6 (95% CI, 2.4 to 112.3) per PY. Conduction abnormalities were found in eight patients (21%), a rate of 26.5 (95% CI, 4.2 to 65.5) per PY. Rates of ventricular arrhythmias were low (14.5 per PY; 95% CI, 4.3 to 32.0) and driven by premature ventricular contractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac rhythm abnormalities are common in patients with diabetes with moderate to severe CKD not requiring dialysis. Rates of atrial fibrillation are high and episodes are asymptomatic. Future studies are needed to determine the role of screening and upstream therapy of cardiac arrhythmias in this group.

Cardiac troponins in chronic kidney disease patients with special emphasis on their importance in acute coronary syndrome

Troponin measurement is one of crucial assessments facilitating diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Patients with chronic kidney disease are decimated by cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, elevated concentration of serum troponin is commonly faced in clinical practice creating a challenge to rule out acute cardiac ischaemia in this vulnerable population. This review presents current knowlegde on analytical differences in troponin T and I measurements, their prognostic significance and their application in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome in chronic kidney disease patients. It also points out poorly known aspects and suggests directions for future research.