IFCC educational materials on selected analytical and clinical applications of high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays

Trial design for assessing analytical and clinical performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays in the United States: The HIGH-US study

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays have been developed that quantify lower cTnI concentrations with better precision versus earlier generation assays. hs-cTnI assays allow improved clinical utility for diagnosis and risk stratification in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute myocardial infarction. We describe the High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assays in the United States (HIGH-US) study design used to conduct studies for characterizing the analytical and clinical performance of hs-cTnI assays, as required by the US Food and Drug Administration for a 510(k) clearance application. This study was non-interventional and therefore it was not registered at clinicaltrials.gov.

METHODS

We conducted analytic studies utilizing Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidance that included limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, linearity, within-run and between run imprecision and reproducibility as well as potential interferences and high dose hook effect. A sample set collected from healthy females and males was used to determine the overall and sex-specific cTnI 99th percentile upper reference limits (URL). The total coefficient of variation at the female 99th percentile URL and a universally available American Association for Clinical Chemistry sample set (AACC Universal Sample Bank) from healthy females and males was used to examine high-sensitivity (hs) performance of the cTnI assays. Clinical diagnosis of enrolled subjects was adjudicated by expert cardiologists and emergency medicine physicians. Assessment of temporal diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were determined at presentation and collection times thereafter. The prognostic performance at one-year after presentation to the emergency department was also performed. This design is appropriate to describe analytical characterization and clinical performance, and allows for acute myocardial infarction diagnosis and risk assessment.

Sample matrix and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays

Background

Manufacturers of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have restricted use of what sample types or matrices are acceptable to use for measurement. Our goal was to evaluate the comparability of the Siemens ADVIA Centaur hs-cTnI assay across different matrices and under different storage conditions.

Methods

Three different QC-plasma matrices were evaluated for imprecision <10 ng/L. Passing-Bablok regression and difference plots were determined for cTnI concentrations spanning the reference interval (limit of quantification to male 99th-percentile: 2.5 ng/L to <60 ng/L) between serum and lithium heparin plasma, lithium heparin and EDTA plasma and between the Siemens and Abbott hs-cTnI assays. Stability at room temperature (RT) and 2–8 °C was also assessed across the three matrices.

Results

Over 16-weeks the SDs were ≤1.0 ng/L for QCs ranging from 5.0 to 8.3 ng/L. Across the reference interval there was excellent agreement between lithium heparin plasma and serum for the Siemens hs-cTnI assay (slope=0.98/intercept=–0.1), however, cTnI concentrations were proportionally lower in EDTA as compared to lithium heparin plasma (slope=0.90, 95% CI: 0.88–0.92). In lithium heparin plasma the Siemens hs-cTnI concentrations were higher than the Abbott hs-cTnI concentrations (slope=1.26/intercept=–0.2). Stability of cTnI in lithium heparin plasma as compared in serum and EDTA plasma appeared more labile, with decreases ≥20% in concentrations evident as early as 1-day in storage at RT.

Conclusions

There is excellent agreement in concentrations between lithium heparin plasma and serum with the Siemens ADVIA Centaur hs-cTnI assay; however, cTnI concentrations in EDTA plasma are lower. Reference intervals and clinical studies in EDTA plasma for the Centaur hs-cTnI assay are required before clinical use.

Determination of age- and sex-specific 99th percentiles for high-sensitive troponin T from patients: an analytical imprecision- and partitioning-based approach

BACKGROUND

Detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is mainly based on a rise of cardiac troponin with at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit (99th URL). However, circulating high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentrations depend on age, sex and renal function. Using an analytical imprecision-based approach, we aimed to determine age- and sex-specific hs-cTnT 99th URLs for patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

A 3.8-year retrospective analysis of a hospital laboratory database allowed the selection of adult patients with concomitant plasma hs-cTnT (<300 ng/L) and creatinine concentrations, both assayed twice within 72 h with at least 3 h between measurements. Absence of AMI was assumed when the variation between serial hs-cTnT values was below the adjusted-analytical change limit calculated according to the inverse polynomial regression of analytical imprecision. Specific URLs were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods, and partitioning was tested using the proportion method, after adjustment for unequal prevalences.

RESULTS

After outlier removal (men: 8.7%; women: 6.6%), 1414 men and 1082 women with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were assumed as non-AMI. Partitioning into age groups of 18-50, 51-70 and 71-98 years, the hs-cTnT 99th URLs adjusted on French prevalence were 18, 33, 66 and 16, 30, 84 ng/L for men and women, respectively. Age-partitioning was clearly required. However, sex-partitioning was not justified for subjects aged 18-50 and 51-70 years for whom a common hs-cTnT 99th URLs of about 17 and 31 ng/L could be used.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a laboratory approach, this study supports the need for age-specific hs-cTnT 99th URLs.

Rapid use of high-sensitive cardiac troponin I for ruling-in and ruling-out of acute myocardial infarction (RACING-MI): study protocol

Introduction

The European Society of Cardiology has suggested an accelerated algorithm for ruling-in and ruling-out myocardial infarction (MI) with high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) measured at admission (0 hour) and after 1 hour (1 hour) as an alternative to standard measurements at 0 hour and 3 hours. However, the 0 hour/1 hour algorithm has only been tested in a limited amount of patient cohorts and not for all hs-cTn assays. Moreover, it is unknown if MI can be ruled-out faster than 1 hour. In this single-centre, clinical trial, we will investigate whether MI safely can be ruled-in or ruled-out after 30 min and 1 hour.

Methods and analysis

Patients with chest pain suggestive of MI admitted to the emergency department will be subjected to hs-cTn measurements at the following time points: 0 hour, 30 min, 1 hour and 3 hours. Chest pain characteristics will be recorded. In total, 1000 patients with all four blood samples will be included. The diagnostic algorithms will be derived based on the first 500 patients and validated in the subsequent 500 patients. The primary endpoint is the negative predictive value of the 0 hour/30 min and the 0 hour/1 hour algorithms. Secondary endpoints include positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. Results will be compared with the standard 0 hour/3 hour algorithm.

Ethics and dissemination

Oral and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. The trial is approved by The Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics and the Danish Data Protection Agency. Data will be disseminated and submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals and meetings irrespective of study outcome.

Trial registration number

NCT03634384

Novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays enable the early risk stratification of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome to identify those at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. We evaluated the performance of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay in early rule out pathways.

METHODS

In 1920 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, cardiac troponin was measured using the Siemens Atellica high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay (99th centile: 34 ng/L women, 53 ng/L men). We evaluated three pathways which use either low risk-stratification thresholds of cardiac troponin (High-SensitivityTroponin in the Evaluation of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (High-STEACS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 1 hour pathway) or the 99th centile diagnostic threshold (ESC 3 hour pathway) to rule out myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days occurred in 14.4% (277/1920). The High-STEACS pathway ruled out 63% of patients (1218/1920), with five missed events for a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% (95% CI (CI) 99.1% to 99.8%). Similar performance was observed for the ESC 1 hour pathway with an NPV of 99.0% (97.6% to 99.8%). In contrast, the ESC 3 hour pathway ruled out 65% of patients (1248/1920), but missed 25 events for an NPV of 98.0% (97.1% to 98.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay can safely identify patients at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death. Diagnostic pathways that use low cardiac troponin concentrations for risk stratification miss fewer events than those that rely on the 99th centile to rule out myocardial infarction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT1852123.

Role of High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for an emergency room (ER) visit in the US, with almost 6 million ER visits annually. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hscTn) assays have the ability to rapidly rule in or rule out acute coronary syndrome with improved sensitivity, and they are increasingly being used. Though hscTn assays have been approved for use in European, Australian, and Canadian guidelines since 2010, the FDA only approved their use in 2017. There is no consensus on how to compare the results from various hscTn assays. A literature review was performed to analyze the advantages and limitations of using hscTn as a standard biomarker to evaluate patients with suspected ACS in the emergency setting.

Sex-Specific Cut-Offs for High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Is Less More?

Management of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain is continuously evolving. In the setting of acute coronary syndrome, the availability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays (hs-cTn) has allowed for the development of algorithms aimed at rapidly assessing the risk of an ongoing myocardial infarction. However, concerns were raised about the massive application of such a simplified approach to heterogeneous real-world populations. As a result, there is a potential risk of underdiagnosis in several clusters of patients, including women, for whom a lower threshold for hs-cTn was suggested to be more appropriate. Implementation in clinical practice of sex-tailored cut-off values for hs-cTn represents a hot topic due to the need to reduce inequality and improve diagnostic performance in females. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on sex-specific cut-off values of hs-cTn and their application and usefulness in clinical practice. We also offer an extensive overview of thresholds reported in literature and of the mechanisms underlying such differences among sexes, suggesting possible explanations about debated issues.

Assessment of Access hsTnI 99th percentiles upper reference limits following IFCC recommendations

BACKGROUND

The detection of an increase and/or decrease of cardiac troponin (cTnI) values, with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit (URL) have a central role in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis. The employment of sex specific 99th percentile URLs and High-sensitivity (Hs) assays are recommended. We assessed sex specific 99th percentile URL for Access Hs-cTnI and AccuTnI3+ (Beckman Coulter) using European donor reference population following recent International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommendations.

METHODS

300 males and 300 females plasma samples were collected. Both chemiluminescent immunoenzymatic assays were performed on UniCel DxI 800 platform (Beckman Coulter).

RESULTS

For Access hsTnI, the observed sex-specific 99th percentile URLs were 5.5 (90% CI: 4.4-7.6) for females and 13.9 ng/L (90% CI: 7.4-17.4) for males. For AccuTnI+3 we could not establish them because the assay couldn't report detectable values of troponin for most of the analyzed samples.

CONCLUSION

The sex-specific 99th percentile URLs established for Access hsTnI assay were significantly lower than those declared by the manufacturer caused by the different choice of population selection, age groups and sample types: for those reasons, we maintain the 99th URLs provided by manufacturer.

High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays in Clinical Diagnostics of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Nowadays, measurement of cardiac troponins (cTn) in patient plasma is central for diagnosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). High-sensitivity (hs) immunoassays have been developed that can very precisely record slightly elevated and rising plasma concentrations of cTn very early after onset of clinical symptoms. Algorithms integrate measurements of hs-cTn at onset of clinical symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and 1 or 3 h after onset, to rule-in and rule-out AMI patients. More and more point-of-care (POC) cTn assays conquer the diagnostic market, but thorough clinical validation studies are required before potential implementation of such POC tests into hospital settings. This review provides an overview of the technical aspects, as well as diagnostic and prognostic use of cardiac troponins in AMI patients and in the healthy population.

Implementation of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: Challenges From the International Experience

OBJECTIVE

Implementation of the newly approved high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) in the United States presents a challenge for clinical practice. Sex-specific cutoffs, clinical protocols, and workflows will likely require modifications before implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of international physicians and laboratorians already utilizing hs-cTn for the evaluation of acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 54 (41%) eligible participants completed the survey, representing 9 countries and 18 hospitals. All reported successful hs-cTn implementation and diagnostic utility (mean 8.6 + 1.2 out of 10 for best implementation). The major perceived benefit was more rapid evaluation of acute myocardial infarction (14/19, 74%), and the most frequently cited limitation was an increase in the number of measurable hs-cTn values that required further evaluation (8/18, 44%). Institutions using the hs-cTnI assay favored sex-specific cutoffs (5/6, 83%), whereas institutions employing the hs-cTnT assay favored a combined cutoff (12/12, 100%). Timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varied, with 0-3 hours (8/17, 47%) most frequent, followed by 0-2 hours (4/17, 24%), 0-1 hour (3/17, 18%), and other (2/17, 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey of hs-cTn implementation at international institutions reveals satisfaction with new assays but reflects important variations in clinical practice. The use of sex-specific vs. combined cutoffs and timing of serial hs-cTn measurements varies across institutions and are subjects that United States centers must define without consensus from international practices.

Cardiac Troponin - diagnostic problems and impact on cardiovascular disease

The definition of a high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin (cTn) assay describes the ability to quantify a cardiac biomarker level in at least 50% of healthy individuals. This advance in analytic sensitivity has come with a perceived loss of specificity in the most classic application - chest pain triage and the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As cardiac Troponin can no longer be used as a dichotomous test, the medical field is increasingly moving towards a more granular interpretation. However, rapid rule-out/rule-in algorithms for AMI still rely on concrete thresholds for efficient triage, irrespective of the patient's comorbidities. Owing to a slightly elevated cTn value, evermore patients appear to fall into an indeterminate risk zone of diagnostic uncertainty. The reasons are manifold, spanning biological variation, analytical issues, increased plasma membrane permeability and the potential cytosolic release of cTn. This review provides a contemporary overview of the literature concerning the use of cardiac Troponin in chronic and acute cardiovascular care. Key messages High-sensitivity cardiac Troponin assays have transformed the assessment of cardiovascular disease. Rapid rule-out algorithms for chest pain triage have become increasingly complicated, but enable safe rule-out. Cardiac Troponin tracks mid- to long-term risk in patients with hyperlipidaemia, heart failure and renal dysfunction.

Clinical use of cardiac troponin for acute cardiac care and emerging opportunities in the outpatient setting

Cardiac troponin (cTn) testing has evolved significantly in recent times. Because of increased sensitivity, its use has shifted from a marker used to help diagnose acute myocardial infarction (MI) to a marker than can be used in the outpatient setting, as well as for both detection of myocardial injury and risk-stratification. Its main role remains in the diagnosis of acute MI and the risk-stratification of patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The analytical improvements in assays leading to precise high-sensitivity cTn assays have contributed to the development of numerous strategies to identify patients at both low- and high-risk for acute MI within a few hours. These approaches should reduce overcrowding in the emergency room and expedite triaging. The ability of measuring cTn in most patients using high-sensitivity (hs) assays has allowed for the opportunity to examine its use in the detection of cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing chemotherapy, as well as exploring the application in both primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. This particular field of research has become increasingly complex, partly due to the numerous cTn assays available (I and T; point-of-care, contemporary, hs) and an array of approaches in which one can use the test. The purpose of this document is to summarize the analytical and clinical information relevant to cTn assays, in particular, hs-cTn assays, and describe present and future opportunities for use of cTn in acute cardiac care and in the outpatient setting.

"Ultra-sensitive" cardiac troponins: Requirements for effective implementation in clinical practice

The measurement of cardiac troponins, either cardiac troponin I or T, has become the culprit of clinical decision making in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), especially in those with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The leading analytical mainstays of cardiac troponin immunoassays include the limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), functional sensitivity, the 99th percentile of a healthy reference population, along with the percentage of "ostensibly healthy" subjects displaying measurable values < 99th percentile. The latest generation of cardiac troponin immunoassays, conventionally defined as "high-sensitive" (HS), is characterized by a LoD over 100-fold lower compared to the first commercialized techniques and a percentage of measurable values consistently > 50% in the general healthy population. The very recent commercialization of methods with further improved analytical sensitivity (i.e., "ultra-sensitive" assays), which allow to measure cardiac troponin values in the vast majority of healthy subjects, is now challenging the diagnostic paradigm based on early rule-out of subjects with cardiac troponin values comprised between the 99th percentile and LoD. New diagnostic strategies, entailing assay-specific cut-offs, must hence be developed and validated in large multicenter studies. The aim of this article is to provide an update on commercially available HS and "ultra"-sensitive techniques for measuring cardiac troponins, along with possible implications of increasingly enhanced analytical sensitivity on diagnostic algorithms for evaluating patients with suspected ACS.

Clinical Validation of a Novel High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay for Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Clinical performance of the novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur) assay is unknown. We aimed to clinically validate the Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur assay and develop 0/1-h and 0/2-h algorithms.

METHODS

We enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Final diagnoses were centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists including all clinical information twice: first, using serial hs-cTnT (Roche-Elecsys, primary analysis); second, using hs-cTnI (Abbott-Architect, secondary analysis) measurements in addition to the clinically applied (hs)-cTn. Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur was measured at presentation, 1 h, and 2 h. The primary objective was a direct comparison of diagnostic accuracy, quantified by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), of Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur vs the 2 established hs-cTn assays (Roche-hs-cTnT-Elecsys, Abbott-hs-cTnI-Architect). Secondary objectives included the development of Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur-specific 0/1-h and 0/2-h algorithms.

RESULTS

AMI was the final diagnosis in 318 of 1755 (18%) patients (using Roche-hs-cTnT-Elecsys for adjudication). The AUC at presentation for Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92–0.96) and comparable with 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93–0.97) for Roche-hs-cTnT-Elecsys and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90–0.96) for Abbott-hs-cTnI-Architect. Applying the derived Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur 0/1-h algorithm to the validation cohort, 46% of patients were ruled out (sensitivity, 99.1%; 95% CI, 95.3–100), and 18% of patients were ruled in (specificity, 94.1%; 95% CI, 91.8–95.9). The Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur 0/2-h algorithm ruled out 55% of patients (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 94.1–100), and ruled in 18% of patients (specificity, 96.0%; 95% CI, 93.1–97.9). Findings were confirmed in the secondary analyses using serial measurements of Abbott-hs-cTnI-Architect for adjudication.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the novel Siemens-hs-cTnI-Centaur assay are high and comparable with the established hs-cTn assays. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00470587

Validation of high-sensitivity performance for a United States Food and Drug Administration cleared cardiac troponin I assay

BACKGROUND

High-Sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) assays are categorized by two criteria: (i) cTn values above the limit of detection (LoD) for >50% of male and female healthy cohorts of ≥300 individuals; (ii) imprecision ≤10% total %CV for sex-specific 99th-percentile clinical decision values (CDVs). No documented hs-Tn assay has yet been FDA-cleared.

METHODS

The PATHFAST cTnI-II assay's LoD was 2.3 ng/L using CLSI EP-17. The AACC Universal Sample Bank of 847 healthy men (50.6%) and women (49.4%) was used to determine 99th-percentile CDVs with Nonparametric, Harrell-Davis and Robust modeling. Health/Medication questionnaires and Amino-terminal proBNP, Hemoglobin A_1c and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate surrogates excluded underlying health conditions.

RESULTS

The cTnI-II test's total CV was 6.1% at 29 ng/L and 7.1% at 22 ng/L; the LoD was 2.3 ng/L. Of the full 847-member healthy cohort, 113 (13.3%) were excluded by abnormal surrogate biomarkers. The final 734-member healthy population had the following (% > LoD): overall, 487 (66.3%); women, 186 (52.8%); and men, 301 (78.8%). 99th-percentile CDVs by Nonparametric modeling were: 28 ng/L (90% CI: 20-30), overall final 732-member healthy population; 20 ng/L (90% CI: 13-30), 352 women; and 30 ng/L (90% CI: 21-37), 382 men. Differences between sex-specific CDVs were not significantly different (p > .05) with Nonparametric or Harrell-Davis modeling; however, Robust Modeling did show significance (<0.05), with lower CDVs at 11 ng/L (90% CI: 9-12) and 16 ng/L (90% CI: 15-18) for the female and male cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

cTnI-II is the only FDA-cleared assay that has demonstrated high-sensitivity cTn assay. Use of recommended modeling in >300 healthy subjects for determining sex-specific 99th-percentile CDVs did not show statistically significant differences except with the Robust modeling.

Clinical Laboratory Practice Recommendations for the Use of Cardiac Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Expert Opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

This document is an essential companion to the third iteration of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry [NACB,8 now the American Association for Clinical Chemistry (AACC) Academy] Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines (LMPG) on cardiac markers. The expert consensus recommendations were drafted in collaboration with the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Task Force on Clinical Applications of Bio-Markers (IFCC TF-CB). We determined that there is sufficient clinical guidance on the use of cardiac troponin (cTn) testing from clinical practice groups. Thus, in this expert consensus document, we focused on clinical laboratory practice recommendations for high-sensitivity (hs)-cTn assays. This document utilized the expert opinion class of evidence to focus on the following 10 topics: (a) quality control (QC) utilization, (b) validation of the lower reportable analytical limits, (c) units to be used in reporting measurable concentrations for patients and QC materials, (d) 99th percentile sex-specific upper reference limits to define the reference interval; (e) criteria required to define hs-cTn assays, (f) communication with clinicians and the laboratory's role in educating clinicians regarding the influence of preanalytic and analytic problems that can confound assay results, (g) studies on hs-cTn assays and how authors need to document preanalytical and analytical variables, (h) harmonizing and standardizing assay results and the role of commutable materials, (i) time to reporting of results from sample receipt and sample collection, and (j) changes in hs-cTn concentrations over time and the role of both analytical and biological variabilities in interpreting results of serial blood collections.

Effect of Acute Coronary Syndrome Probability on Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin

BACKGROUND

There is concern that high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) may have low diagnostic accuracy in patients with low acute coronary syndrome (ACS) probability.

METHODS

We prospectively stratified patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department (ED) into 3 groups according to their probability for ACS as assessed by the treating ED physician using a visual analog scale: ≤10%, 11% to 79%, and ≥80%, reviewing all information available at 90 min. hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations were determined in a blinded fashion. Two independent cardiologists adjudicated the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 3828 patients eligible for analysis, 1189 patients had low (≤10%) probability for ACS. The incidence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) increased from 1.3% to 12.2% and 54.8% in patients with low, intermediate, and high ACS probability, respectively. The positive predictive value of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI was low in patients with low ACS probability and increased with the incidence of NSTEMI, whereas the diagnostic accuracy of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI for NSTEMI as quantified by the area under the curve (AUC) was very high and comparable among all 3 strata, e.g., AUC hs-cTnI, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94–0.97); 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85–0.89); and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87–0.92), respectively. Findings were validated using bootstrap analysis as an alternative methodology to define ACS probability. Similarly, higher hs-cTnT/I concentrations independently predicted all-cause mortality within 2 years (e.g., hs-cTnT hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.27–1.52), irrespective of ACS probability.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy and utility of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI remain high in patients with acute chest discomfort and low ACS probability.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00470587.

Renal Dysfunction Influences the Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I

Measures of cardiac troponin (cTn) may have lower specificity for myocardial infarction in patients with CKD. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of baseline and serial high-sensitivity cTnI (hs-cTnI) measurements for myocardial infarction and 30- and 180-day mortality according to renal function. hs-cTnI was measured (Abbott assay) using sex-specific 99th percentiles (women, 16 ng/L; men, 34 ng/L) in 1555 adults presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggesting ischemia (NCT02060760). Myocardial infarction was adjudicated along universal definition classification. Renal function did not significantly affect sensitivity or negative predictive values. Specificity decreased with impaired renal function from 93%-95% with normal function (eGFR≥90 ml/min per 1.73 m2; n=722) to 57%-61% with severely impaired renal function (eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2; n=81) and 40%-41% on dialysis (n=78). Positive predictive values decreased with decreasing renal function from 51%-57% with normal function to 27%-42% with severely impaired function and 15%-32% on dialysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve areas trended lower at baseline and 3 hours with renal impairment. Mortality increased significantly with increasing hs-cTnI tertile (1.3%, 6.0%, and 10.4%, respectively). Patients with hs-cTnI concentration exceeding concentrations in the 99th percentiles had a mortality rate (11.7%) significantly higher than that of patients with concentrations between 99th percentile concentrations and limit of detection (6.2%) or below limit of detection (1.1%). Renal dysfunction and dialysis reduced the rule-in performance but not the rule-out performance of hs-cTnI for myocardial infarction, and mortality increased in patients with higher hs-cTnI concentrations and any level of renal dysfunction.

High sensitivity troponins in contemporary cardiology practice: are we turning a corner?

INTRODUCTION

Troponin is considered to be the gold standard biomarker for ruling out MI. There has been a drive to improve the diagnostic speed, and as such the high sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have been introduced into clinical practice and are now part of international guidelines. Their novel value in clinical practice more generally is becoming apparent. Areas covered: In this review we will evaluate the evidence for the use of hs-cTn assays in clinical practice, the issues with the assay and how the hs-cTn can be utilized in the future as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk. Expert commentary: The use of the hs-cTn assays as a 'rule out' test for MI is compelling, as a 'rule in' there are significant issues relating the specificity of the assay for MI. The future of the assay may lie in population screening and risk modeling.

Cardiac troponins: 25 years on the stage and still improving their clinical value

Twenty-five years ago, non-isotopic immunoassays for measuring the cardiac specific isoforms of troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT) were developed. Both biomarkers radically changed the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy indication of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and, particularly, of myocardial infarction (MI). However, cardiac troponins (cTn) rapidly demonstrated their usefulness in other cardiac and non-cardiac conditions, a part of the ischemic coronary diseases. Consequently, the number of patients to be tested for cTn and the number of tests requested to clinical laboratories sharply increased. Though the manufacturers continuously improved the analytical characteristics of the first cTn assays and produced different cTn assay "generations", the universal definition of myocardial infarction required less-than-available analytical imprecision at the cTn concentration used to assess MI (i.e. the 99th reference percentile). To address the clinical requirements, manufacturers developed the high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays that allow to measure the 99th reference percentile with adequate precision, to detect cTn in many healthy subjects and, hence, to calculate the hs-cTn biological variation and especially to observe in very short time intervals serial differences in hs-cTn attributable to cardiac ischemia. Since the number of patients attending the emergency departments (ED) for a suspected ACS or MI is increasing, the improved properties of hs-cTn assays, allowing faster and safer patient assessment, will help to alleviate the sometimes overcrowded EDs. However, there are many biological, analytical, and clinical factors that can influence the true hs-cTn values of a patient. Clinicians and laboratory professionals should know about them for the best interpretation of the otherwise largely useful hs-cTn measurements. In conclusion, 25 years after their introduction for clinical use, "cTn are still on the stage and improving their clinical value".

Contemporary Emergency Department Management of Patients with Chest Pain: A Concise Review and Guide for the High-Sensitivity Troponin Era

This article synthesizes current best evidence for the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using high-sensitivity troponin assays, enabling physicians to effectively incorporate them into practice. Unlike conventional assays, high-sensitivity assays can precisely measure blood cardiac troponin concentrations in the vast majority of healthy individuals, facilitating the creation of rapid diagnostic algorithms. Very low troponin concentrations on presentation accurately rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and enable the discharge of approximately 20% of patients after a single test, whereas an additional 30%-40% of patients can be safely discharged after short-interval serial sampling in as little as 1 or 2 hours. In contrast, highly abnormal troponin concentrations on presentation (more than 5 times the upper reference limit) or rapidly rising levels on serial testing can rapidly rule in AMI with high specificity. However, approximately one-third of patients remain in a biomarker-indeterminate "observation zone" even after serial sampling. These patients pose a disposition challenge to clinicians because although the differential diagnosis of elevated troponin concentrations is broad, these patients have an increased risk for short-term major adverse cardiac events. Use of repeated serial troponin sampling and structured clinical prediction tools may assist disposition for these patients, because no validated pathways currently exist to guide clinicians. Ongoing research to tailor diagnostic thresholds to individual patient characteristics may enable improved diagnostic accuracy and usher in a new era of personalized medicine in the evaluation of suspected ACS.

Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T for Acute Cardiac Care

The recent approval of the fifth-generation cardiac troponin T assay, which has characteristics clinically of a high-sensitivity assay, has led to concern that the problems of increased sensitivity will be greater than the benefits. This will not be the case if cardiology, emergency medicine, and laboratory medicine combine to develop procedures for use of the assay. We advocate sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit values of 15 ng/L for men and 10 ng/L for women. We suggest a 2-hour rule-out strategy, including a value less than the 99th percentile upper reference limit and the lack of a change in values of <4 ng/L. Those with values >100 ng/L and or a changing pattern of values ≥10 ng/L are a population much more likely to have acute myocardial infarction. Most of the increment in elevated values will occur not in those with acute coronary problems but in those with primary cardiac disease like heart failure and those with primary noncardiac problems. The former belong on a cardiac service because they are at high risk. The latter should have therapy on the service most apt to provide optimal care for their primary diagnosis, with cardiac consultation as needed.

High sensitivity troponin T and I reflect left atrial function being assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Left atrial function (LAF) plays an interactive role between pulmonary and systemic circulation. Cardiac biomarkers, such as amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponins, might reflect cardiac function. This study aims to evaluate the association between high sensitivity troponins (hsTn) and left atrial function in patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Methods

Patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) were enrolled prospectively. Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (<50%) were excluded. Blood samples for measurements of hsTn and NT-proBNP were collected at the time of cMRI.

Results

Eighty-four patients were included. Median LVEF was 59% (IQR 51–64%). HsTn correlated inversely with LAF within multivariable linear regression models (hsTnI: Beta −0.46; T −4.44; P = 0.0001; hsTnT: Beta −0.29; T −3.06; P = 0.003). High sensitivity troponins increased significantly according to decreasing stages of impaired LAF ( P = 0.0001). High sensitivity troponins discriminated patients with impaired LAF < 55% (hsTnT: AUC = 0.80; P = 0.0001; hsTnI: AUC = 0.74; P = 0.0001) and <45% (hsTnT: AUC = 0.75; P = 0.0001; hsTnI: AUC = 0.73; P = 0.001) and were still significantly associated in multivariable logistic regression models (LAF < 55%: hsTnT: OR = 21.78; P = 0.0001; hsTnI: OR = 5.96; P = 0.009; LAF < 45%: hsTnT: OR = 10.27; P = 0.0001; hsTnI: OR = 12.56; P = 0.001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that hsTn are able to reflect LAF being assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

The diagnostic evaluation of acute chest pain has been augmented in recent years by advances in the sensitivity and precision of cardiac troponin assays, new biomarkers, improvements in imaging modalities, and release of new clinical decision algorithms. This progress has enabled physicians to diagnose or rule-out acute myocardial infarction earlier after the initial patient presentation, usually in emergency department settings, which may facilitate prompt initiation of evidence-based treatments, investigation of alternative diagnoses for chest pain, or discharge, and permit better utilization of healthcare resources. A non-trivial proportion of patients fall in an indeterminate category according to rule-out algorithms, and minimal evidence-based guidance exists for the optimal evaluation, monitoring, and treatment of these patients. The Cardiovascular Round Table of the ESC proposes approaches for the optimal application of early strategies in clinical practice to improve patient care following the review of recent advances in the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The following specific 'indeterminate' patient categories were considered: (i) patients with symptoms and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin <99th percentile; (ii) patients with symptoms and high-sensitivity troponin <99th percentile but above the limit of detection; (iii) patients with symptoms and high-sensitivity troponin >99th percentile but without dynamic change; and (iv) patients with symptoms and high-sensitivity troponin >99th percentile and dynamic change but without coronary plaque rupture/erosion/dissection. Definitive evidence is currently lacking to manage these patients whose early diagnosis is 'indeterminate' and these areas of uncertainty should be assigned a high priority for research.

The continuing evolution of cardiac troponin I biomarker analysis: from protein to proteoform

INTRODUCTION

The troponin complex consists of three proteins that fundamentally couple excitation with contraction. Circulating cardiac-specific Troponin I (cTnI) serves as diagnostic biomarker tools for risk stratification of acute coronary syndromes and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Within the heart, cTnI oscillates between inactive and active conformations to either block or disinhibit actinomyosin formation. This molecular mechanism is fine-tuned through extensive protein modifications whose profiles are maladaptively altered with co-morbidities including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, diabetes, and heart failure. Technological advances in analytical platforms over the last decade enable routine baseline cTnI analysis in patients without cardiovascular complications, and hold potential to expand cTnI readouts that include modified cTnI proteoforms. Areas covered: This review covers the current state, advances, and prospects of analytical platforms that now enable routine baseline cTnI analysis in patients. In parallel, improved mass spectrometry instrumentation and workflows already reveal an array of modified cTnI proteoforms with promising diagnostic implications. Expert commentary: New analytical capabilities provide clinicians and researchers with an opportunity to address important questions surrounding circulating cTnI in the improved diagnosis of specific patient cohorts. These techniques also hold considerable promise for new predictive and prescriptive applications for individualized profiling and improve patient care.

High sensitivity troponin T and I reflect mitral annular plane systolic excursion being assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the association between high sensitivity troponins (hsTn) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Methods

Patients undergoing cMRI were prospectively enrolled. Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (< 50%) were excluded. Blood samples for measurements of hsTn and amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were collected at the time of cMRI.

Results

84 patients were included. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 59% (IQR 51–64%). HsTn were correlated inversely with MAPSE within multivariable linear regression models (hsTnI: Beta − 0.19; T − 1.96; p = 0.05; hsTnT: Beta − 0.26; T − 3.26; p = 0.002). HsTn increased significantly according to decreasing stages of impaired MAPSE (p < 0.003). HsTn discriminated patients with impaired MAPSE < 11 mm (hsTnT: AUC = 0.67; p = 0.008; hsTnI: AUC = 0.64; p = 0.03) and < 8 mm (hsTnT: AUC = 0.79; p = 0.0001; hsTnI: AUC = 0.75; p = 0.001) and were still significantly associated in multivariable logistic regression models with impaired MAPSE < 11 mm (hsTnT: OR = 4.71; p = 0.002; hsTnI: OR = 4.22; p = 0.009).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that hsTn are able to reflect MAPSE being assessed by cMRI.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40001-017-0281-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Variability and Error in Cardiac Troponin Testing: An ACLPS Critical Review

OBJECTIVES

To provide a comprehensive overview of the complexities associated with cardiac troponin (cTn) testing. An emphasis is placed on the sources of error, organized into the preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical phases of the testing pathway. Controversial areas are also explored.

METHODS

A case scenario and review of the relevant literature describing laboratory considerations involving cTn testing are described.

RESULTS

Advanced comprehension of the specific assay used in a given laboratory is necessary for optimal reporting, utilization, and quality monitoring of cTn.

CONCLUSIONS

cTn assays are reliable diagnostic tests for acute myocardial infarction, but understanding their limitations is required for appropriate result interpretation.

Diagnostic Performance of High Sensitivity Compared with Contemporary Cardiac Troponin I for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

We examined the diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) vs contemporary cTnI with use of the 99th percentile alone and with a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) to rule out acute myocardial infarction (MI) and serial changes (deltas) to rule in MI.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients presenting to a US emergency department with serial cTnI onclinical indication. Diagnostic performance for acute MI, including MI subtypes, and 30-day outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Among 1631 patients, MI was diagnosed in 12.9% using the contemporary cTnI assay and in 10.4% using the hs-cTnI assay. For ruling out MI, contemporary cTnI ≤99th percentile at 0, 3, and 6 h and a normal ECG had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% (95% CI, 98.6–100) and a sensitivity of 99.1% (95% CI, 97.4–100) for diagnostic and safety outcomes. Serial hs-cTnI measurements ≤99th percentile at 0 and 3 h and a normal ECG had an NPV and sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 100–100) for diagnostic and safety outcomes. For ruling in MI, contemporary cTnI measurements had specificities of 84.4% (95% CI, 82.5–86.3) at presentation and 78.7% (95% CI, 75.4–82.0) with serial testing at 0, 3, and 6 h, improving to 89.2% (95% CI, 87.1–91.3) by using serial cTnI changes (delta, 0 and 6 h) &gt;150%. hs-cTnI had specificities of 86.9% (95% CI, 85.1–88.6) at presentation and 85.7% (95% CI, 83.5–87.9) with serial testing at 0 and 3 h, improving to 89.3% (95% CI, 87.3–91.2) using a delta hs-cTnI (0 and 3 h) &gt;5 ng/L.

CONCLUSIONS

hs-cTnI and contemporary cTnI assays are excellent in ruling out MI following recommendations predicated on serial testing and the 99th percentile with a normal ECG. For ruling in MI, deltas improve the specificity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02060760

Utility of the 0-hour/1-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T algorithm in Asian patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

A rapid rule-out or rule-in protocol based on the 0-hour/1-hour algorithm using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology. However, Asian data are not available.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 413 patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 3 hospitals in Japan and Taiwan from November 2014 to April 2017. Patients were divided into 3groups-rule-out, observe, and rule-in-according to the algorithm. Major adverse cardiovascular events were evaluated at the 30-dayfollow-up.

RESULTS

The algorithm ruled out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 171 patients with a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 100% (95% confidential interval [CI], 96.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI, 88.0%-100%), respectively, in the rule-out group. None of the patients were diagnosed with AMI. Among the 127 patients classified into the rule-in group, 47 were diagnosed as having AMI. The positive predictive value and specificity were 33.1% (95% CI, 25.1%-41.9%) and 66.3% (95% CI, 60.2%-72.0%), respectively. Elective catheter intervention was required in 13 patients (5 in the rule-out group, 8 in the observe group) by the 30-dayfollow-up. The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) identified moderate risk in 5 patients and high risk in 8, while the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) 2.0 risk score identified low risk in 6 patients and moderate risk in 7.

CONCLUSION

The ESC0-hour/1-hour algorithm could be sufficient in Asian patients. The combination with FRS may be more precise than that with the GRACE 2.0 risk score.

Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

This study examined the performance of single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurement strategies to rule out acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department (n = 1631) in whom cTnI measurements were obtained using an investigational hs-cTnI assay. The goals of the study were to determine 1) negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, type 1 myocardial infarction, and type 2 myocardial infarction; and 2) safety outcome of acute myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days using hs-cTnI less than the limit of detection (LoD) (<1.9 ng/L) or the High-STEACS threshold (<5 ng/L) alone and in combination with normal electrocardiogram (ECG).

RESULTS

Acute myocardial infarction occurred in 170 patients (10.4%), including 68 (4.2%) type 1 myocardial infarction and 102 (6.3%) type 2 myocardial infarction. For hs-cTnI<LoD (27%), the NPV and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction were 99.6% (95% confidence interval 98.9%-100%) and 98.8 (97.2%-100%). For hs-cTnI<5 ng/L (50%), the NPV and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction were 98.9% (98.2%-99.6%) and 94.7% (91.3%-98.1%). In combination with a normal ECG, 1) hs-cTnI<LoD had an NPV of 99.6% (98.9%-100%) and sensitivity of 99.4% (98.3%-100%); and 2) hs-cTnI<5 ng/L had an NPV of 99.5% (98.8%-100%) and sensitivity of 98.8% (97.2%-100%). The NPV and sensitivity for the safety outcome were excellent for hs-cTnI<LoD alone or in combination with a normal ECG, and for hs-cTnI<5 ng/L in combination with a normal ECG.

CONCLUSION

Strategies using a single hs-cTnI alone or in combination with a normal ECG allow the immediate identification of patients unlikely to have acute myocardial infarction and who are at very low risk for adverse events at 30 days.

Biological Markers in Nursing Research

INTRODUCTION

Biobehavioral research requires the ability to objectively measure the presence and/or severity of disease, symptoms and their burden, or to determine the effect of treatment on outcomes. Biomarker research has advanced care for patients across the lifespan. There have been significant advancements in biological marker use for nursing research in recent years. The purposes of this article are to define the characteristics of a valid biomarker; review common biological sources of genetic, hormonal, and proteomic biomarkers with attention to practical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for specimen selection and quality; and discuss potential use of biomarkers in clinical and research settings.

METHODS

Authors draw on the literature and research experiences to address the issues relevant to incorporating biomarkers into nursing research.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

An overview of the practical aspects of incorporating biomarkers into nursing research, and the resultant actual and potential clinical applications, are discussed.