Quality of life in survivors of oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1366 patients

Quality of life after microvascular mandibular reconstruction for osteoradionecrosis-A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Reconstructive surgery for mandibular osteoradionecrosis is increasing; however, evidence regarding the impact on health-related quality of life is lacking. The current exploratory study prospectively investigates whether resection with reconstruction is associated with changes in HRQoL parameters for these patients.

METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent microvascular reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis between 2012 and 2015, and 16 completed the EORTC quality of life questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 1 month before and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Increases in emotional (P = 0.01) and social functioning (P = 0.004) were observed, together with improvements in the fatigue (P = 0.04), appetite loss (P = 0.02) and pain (P = 0.02) scores, as evaluated by the QLQ-C30. Pain reduction was further confirmed by the QLQ-H&N35 (P = 0.04), which also showed improved scores for feeling ill (P = 0.001) and sexual difficulties (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study suggests that microvascular reconstruction after mandibular osteoradionecrosis may improve HRQoL, with an emphasis on pain reduction; however, further studies are needed.

Variations in HPV function are associated with survival in squamous cell carcinoma

Incidence of HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been increasing dramatically. Although long-term survival rates for these patients are high, they often suffer from permanent radiotherapy-related morbidity. This has prompted the development of de-escalation clinical protocols to reduce morbidity. However, a subset of patients do not respond even to standard therapy and have poor outcomes. It is unclear how to properly identify and treat the high- and low-risk HPV+ OPSCC patients. Since HPV positivity drives radiotherapy sensitivity, we hypothesized that variations in HPV biology may cause differences in treatment response and outcome. By analyzing gene expression data, we identified variations in HPV-related molecules among HPV+ OPSCC. A subset of tumors presented a molecular profile distinct from that of typical HPV+ tumors and exhibited poor treatment response, indicating molecular and clinical similarities with HPV- tumors. These molecular changes were also observed in vitro and correlated with radiation sensitivity. Finally, we developed a prognostic biomarker signature for identification of this subgroup of HPV+ OPSCC and validated it in independent cohorts of oropharyngeal and cervical carcinomas. These findings could translate to improved patient stratification for treatment deintensification and new therapeutic approaches for treatment-resistant HPV-related cancer.

Comparison of psychosocial factors over time among HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer and tobacco-related oral cavity cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

The role of human papilloma virus (HPV) in the pathogenesis of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is well documented, as is the excellent prognosis of patients with HPV-associated disease; in contrast, oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is associated with tobacco and alcohol use and has a worse prognosis. While causative factors, staging, and treatment guidelines differ between these cancer subsets, few studies have compared psychosocial factors in these groups.

OBJECTIVE

To explore differences in psychosocial factors between HPV+ OPSCC patients versus OCSCC smokers.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study at a single multidisciplinary, tertiary care HNC center was completed with recruitment from 2010 to 2013 using self-administered questionnaires before treatment and at 12 months. Patients were included with a diagnosis of HPV+ OPSCC or OCSCC with a smoking history. 38 (21 HPV+ OPSCC/17 OCSCC) met criteria. The main outcomes included self-efficacy, symptom severity, cancer worry, and depression.

RESULTS

A total of 38 (21 HPV+ OPSCC/17 OCSCC) patients (mean age: 57 [32-76], 73.7% male, 78.9% Caucasian, 71% stage IV) met inclusion criteria. OPSCC patients tended to be of male sex, Caucasian race, and single. Furthermore, OPSCC patients were more likely than OCSCC patients to have private insurance, be employed, and use alcohol and tobacco less frequently. Regarding psychosocial factors, HPV+ OPSCC patients reported lower symptom severity (2.7 versus 3.3), depression (12.0 versus 14.0) and cancer worry (2.8 versus 3.2) at baseline compared to OCSCC patients. Depression decreased significantly over time in OPSCC patients (12.0 to 9.9; effect size: -3.2 (95% CI: -5.9 to -0.4)). Although not statistically significant, cancer worry decreased in both groups (2.8 to 2.4 and 3.2 to 2.7, respectively, effect sizes: -0.3 (95% CI: -0.7-0.08) and -0.6 (95% CI: -1.2-0.05), respectively). No statistically significant differences in patterns of change over time were noted between groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This pilot study highlighted a pattern of reduced quality of life parameters in OCSCC patients at baseline with similar improvements over time compared to the OPSCC cohort. Although different in cancer etiology and treatment plans, HPV+ OPSCC and tobacco-related OCSCC patients both require multidisciplinary cancer care plans that address psychosocial concerns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2B.

Patients' quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Patients' quality of life has become a major objective of care in oncology. At the same time, it has become the object of increasing interest by researchers, working with both quantitative and qualitative methods. Progress in oncology has enabled more patients to survive longer, so that cancer is increasingly often a chronic disease that requires long-term treatment that can have negative effects on patients' quality of daily life. Nonetheless, no qualitative study has explored what patients report affects their quality of daily life during the treatment period. This study is intended to fill this gap.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter qualitative study based on 30 semi-structured interviews. Participants, purposively selected until data saturation, had diverse types of cancer and had started treatment at least 6 months before interview. Data were examined by thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Our analysis found two themes: (1) what negatively affected for patient's quality of daily life during the treatment period, a question to which patients responded by talking only about the side effects of treatment; and (2) what positively affected their quality of daily life during the treatment period with three sub-themes: (i) The interest in having -investing in - a support object that can be defined as an object, a relationship or an activity particularly invested by the patients which makes them feel good and makes the cancer and its treatment bearable, (ii)The subjective perception of the efficacy of the antitumor treatment and (iii) the positive effects of relationships, with friends and family, and also with their physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients must be involved in their care if they are to be able to bear their course of treatment and find ways to endure the difficult experience of cancer care. The support object represents an important therapeutic lever that can be used by their oncologists. They should be interested in their support objects, in order to support the patients in this investment and to help them to maintain it throughout the health care pathway. Furthermore, showing interest in this topic, important to the patient, could improve the physician-patient relation without using up very much of the physician's time.

Treatment preferences in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

The population of survivors with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) is rising. The improved prognosis of this etiologic subset is reflected in new staging guidelines as well as ongoing deintensification trials aiming to preserve excellent survival while decreasing treatment-related toxicities. However, as staging criteria and treatment standards evolve in the era of transoral surgery and deintensification, little is known regarding the needs and treatment preferences of patients with HPV-OPSCC. Herein, the current knowledge regarding treatment preferences and priorities, quality of life and concerns among patients with HPV-OPSCC is reviewed.

The impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) status on functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after surgical treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma with free-flap reconstruction

Background

To determine the impact of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status on speech, swallowing, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after surgical treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC).

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all patients with OPSCC diagnosed and treated from 1998 to 2009. Speech, swallowing, and quality of life data were gathered at 3 different evaluation points. HPV status was determined using p16 positivity as a surrogate marker. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify whether p16 status is a significant predictor of functional outcome and QOL.

Results

One hundred twelve patients with OPSCC and known p16 status were treated with primary surgery between 1998 and 2009, with mean age of 56 years. Out of those patients 63 (56%) were p16 positive. Speech intelligibility remained high at 1-year post operation (95.4%). Only 11.5% of the patients required a feeding tube at 1 year after surgery to maintain their daily caloric requirements and the risk of aspiration after surgery was not significant (p = 0.097). There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in speech, swallowing ability, swallowing safety and QOL outcomes between p16-positive and negative OPSCC.

Conclusions

Surgically treated OPSCC patients demonstrate excellent swallowing function and can achieve excellent speech perception. P16 status may not be predictive of functional outcomes or QOL in surgically treated OPSCC.

Gold nanoparticles enhance X-ray irradiation-induced apoptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro

Enhancing the antitumor effect of radiation, while reducing damage to organs, is a significant challenge in radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies. One promising radiosensitizer is gold. The present study aimed to determine whether gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have the potential to enhance the effects of X-ray irradiation on head and neck cancer cells. The human head and neck carcinoma cell line HSC-3 was used. Total cell number and the levels of cell proliferation and apoptosis were compared between control cells and cells treated with 5-nm AuNPs alone at four concentrations (0.1, 0.4, 1.0 and 10.0 nM), X-ray irradiation alone at three doses (2, 4 and 8 Gy), or a combination of 4 Gy X-ray irradiation and 1.0 nM AuNPs. Analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer testing were performed to compare the different groups. The total number of cells significantly decreased following 4 and 8 Gy X-ray irradiation, compared with in the control group (control vs. 4Gy, P=2.19×10^-4; control vs. 8Gy, P=1.28×10^-6). The combination of 4 Gy X-ray irradiation and 1.0 nM AuNPs significantly reduced the total number of cells compared with 4 Gy X-ray irradiation alone (P=2.95×10^-4). Cell proliferation was not affected by AuNP treatment alone, 4 Gy X-ray irradiation alone or the combination of X-ray irradiation and AuNPs. The combination of 4 Gy irradiation and 1.0 nM AuNPs significantly increased the number of apoptotic cells compared with 4 Gy irradiation alone (P=0.0261). In conclusion, AuNPs combined with X-ray irradiation enhanced the cytotoxic effect on human head and neck cancer cells in vitro, through the induction of apoptosis, but not inhibition of cell proliferation.

Screening for human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancer: Considerations for feasibility and strategies for research

The incidence and burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐driven oropharyngeal cancer is expected to increase for decades, thus motivating discussions regarding possibilities for screening. This article addresses issues related to the validity and timeliness of screening for HPV‐driven oropharyngeal cancer, and raises important questions, highlights deficits and confusion in the existing literature, and proposes needed steps in the research agenda.

Visualizing the effects of metformin on tumor growth, vascularity, and metabolism in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The antidiabetic drug metformin (Met) is believed to inhibit tumor proliferation by altering the metabolism of cancer cells. In this study, we examined the effects of Met on tumor oxygenation, metabolism, and growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using non-invasive multimodal imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice bearing orthotopic FaDu HNSCC xenografts were treated with Met (200 mg/kg, ip) once daily for 5 days. Tumor oxygen saturation (%sO₂ ) and hemoglobin concentration (HbT) were measured using photoacoustic imaging (PAI). Fluorescence imaging was employed to measure intratumoral uptake of 2-deoxyglucosone (2-DG) following Met treatment while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was utilized to measure tumor volume. Correlative immunostaining of tumor sections for markers of proliferation (Ki67) and vascularity (CD31) was also performed.

RESULTS

At 5 days post-Met treatment, PAI revealed a significant increase (P < .05) in %sO₂ and HbT levels in treated tumors compared to untreated controls. Fluorescence imaging at this time point revealed a 46% decrease in mean 2-DG uptake compared to controls. No changes in hemodynamic parameters were observed in mouse salivary gland tissue. A significant decrease in Ki-67 staining (P < .001) and MR-based tumor volume was also observed in Met-treated tumors compared to controls with no change in CD31 + vessel count following Met therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide, for the first time, direct in vivo evidence of Met-induced changes in tumor microenvironmental parameters in HNSCC xenografts. Our findings highlight the utility of multimodal functional imaging for non-invasive mapping of the effects of Met in HNSCC.

Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1/2 Trial (MESRIX)

BACKGROUND

Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia are major complications to head and neck radiotherapy. This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ASC) therapy for radiation-induced xerostomia.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial included 30 patients, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ultrasound-guided transplantation of ASCs or placebo to the submandibular glands. Patients had previously received radiotherapy for a T1-2, N0-2A, human papillomavirus-positive, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. The primary outcome was the change in unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, measured before and after the intervention. All assessments were performed one month prior (baseline) and one and four months following ASC or placebo administration.

RESULTS

No adverse events were detected. Unstimulated whole salivary flow rates significantly increased in the ASC-arm at one (33%; P = .048) and four months (50%; P = .003), but not in the placebo-arm (P = .6 and P = .8), compared to baseline. The ASC-arm symptom scores significantly decreased on the xerostomia and VAS questionnaires, in the domains of thirst (-22%, P = .035) and difficulties in eating solid foods (-2%, P = .008) after four months compared to baseline. The ASC-arm showed significantly improved salivary gland functions of inorganic element secretion and absorption, at baseline and four months, compared to the placebo-arm. Core-needle biopsies showed increases in serous gland tissue and decreases in adipose and connective tissues in the ASC-arm compared to the placebo-arm (P = .04 and P = .02, respectively). MRIs showed no significant differences between groups in gland size or intensity (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ASC therapy for radiation-induced hypofunction and xerostomia was safe and significantly improved salivary gland functions and patient-reported outcomes. These results should encourage further exploratory and confirmatory trials.

Long-term quality of life and psycho-social outcomes after oropharyngeal cancer surgery and radial forearm free-flap reconstruction: A GETTEC prospective multicentric study

OBJECTIVE

To assess long-term quality of life (QoL) and psycho-social outcomes, and to determine their predictive factors after oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) surgery and radial forearm free-flap (RFFF) reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone OPC surgery and RFFF reconstruction who were still alive and disease-free at least 1 year after surgery were enrolled in this prospective multicentric study. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core (QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck Cancer (QLQ-H&N35) QoL questionnaires, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The level of dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) and the Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS). Predictive factors of these clinical outcomes were determined in univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were included in this study. Long-term QoL and functioning scales scores were well-preserved (all superior to 70%). Main persistent symptoms were fatigue, reduced sexuality and oral function-related disorders (swallowing, teeth, salivary and mouth-opening problems). HADS anxiety and depression scores were 7.2 and 5.4, respectively. Twenty-one (36%) patients presented an anxiodepressive disorder (HADS global score ≥ 15). Among the 21 patients who were still working before surgery, 11 (52%) had returned to work at the time of our study. The HADS global score (p < 0.001) was the main predictor of QoL, VHI-10 and DOSS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological distress is the main determinant of long-term QoL and is therefore of critical importance in the multidisciplinary management of OPC patients.