101
|
Gomez DR, Rimner A, Simone CB, Cho BCJ, de Perrot M, Adjei AA, Bueno R, Gill RR, Harpole DH, Hesdorffer M, Hirsch FR, Jackson AA, Pass HI, Rice DC, Rusch VW, Tsao AS, Yorke E, Rosenzweig K. The Use of Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Expert Opinion from the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:1172-1183. [PMID: 31125736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Detailed guidelines regarding the use of radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are currently lacking because of the rarity of the disease, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and the paucity of high-level data on individual treatment approaches. METHODS In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was cosponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Research, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Among the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. RESULTS Here we present consensus recommendations on the use of radiation therapy for MPM in three discrete scenarios: (1) hemithoracic radiation therapy to be used before or after extrapleural pneumonectomy; (2) hemithoracic radiation to be used as an adjuvant to lung-sparing procedures (i.e., without pneumonectomy); and (3) palliative radiation therapy for focal symptoms caused by the disease. We discuss appropriate simulation techniques, treatment volumes, dose fractionation regimens, and normal tissue constraints. We also assess the role of particle beam therapy, specifically, proton beam therapy, for MPM. CONCLUSION The recommendations provided in this consensus statement should serve as important guidelines for developing future clinical trials of treatment approaches for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B C John Cho
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Harpole
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Quantification of global lung inflammation using volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a comparison of photon and proton radiation therapy. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:618-625. [PMID: 31095527 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation pneumonitis is a major dose-limiting complication in thoracic radiation therapy (RT) and presents clinically in the first few months after RT. We evaluated the feasibility of quantifying pulmonary parenchymal glycolysis (PG) as a surrogate of global lung inflammation and radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity using a novel semiautomatic lung segmentation technique in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and compared PG in patients treated with photon or proton RT. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 18 consecutive locally advanced NSCLC patients who underwent pretreatment and post-treatment F-FDG PET/CT treated with definitive (median: 66.6 Gy; 1.8 Gy fractions) photon or proton RT between 2010 and 2014. Lung volume segmentation was conducted using 3D Slicer by performing simple thresholding. Pulmonary PG was calculated by summing F-FDG uptake in the whole lung. RESULTS In nine patients treated with photon RT, significant increases in PG in both ipsilateral (mean difference: 1400±510; P=0.02) and contralateral (mean difference: 1200±450; P=0.03) lungs were noted. In nine patients treated with proton therapy, no increase in pulmonary PG was observed in either the ipsilateral (P=0.30) or contralateral lung (P=0.98). CONCLUSION We observed a significant increase in global lung inflammation bilaterally as measured by quantification of PG. However, no significant change in global lung inflammation was noted after proton therapy. Future larger studies are needed to determine whether this difference correlates with lower risks of radiation pneumonitis in NSCLC patients treated with proton therapy.
Collapse
|
103
|
Kavanaugh J, Hugo G, Robinson CG, Roach MC. Anatomical Adaptation-Early Clinical Evidence of Benefit and Future Needs in Lung Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 29:274-283. [PMID: 31027644 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Definitive treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with radiation is challenging. During the course of treatment, anatomical changes such as tumor regression, tumor displacement/deformation, pleural effusion, and/or atelectasis can result in a deviation of the administered radiation dose from the intended prescribed treatment and thereby worsen local control and toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy can help correct for these changes and can be generally categorized into 3 philosophical paradigms: (1) maintenance of prescribed dose to the initially defined target volume; (2) dose reduction to healthy organs while maintaining initial prescribed dose to a regressing tumor volume; or (3) dose escalation to a regressing tumor volume with isotoxicity to healthy organs. Numerous single institution studies have investigated these methods, and results from large prospective clinical trials will hopefully provide consensus on the method, utility, and efficacy of implementing adaptive radiation therapy (ART) in a clinical setting. Additional development into standardization and automation of the ART workflow, specifically in identifying when ART is warranted and in reducing the manual clinical effort needed to produce an adaptive plan, will be paramount to making ART feasible for the broader radiation therapy community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Geoffrey Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Cliff G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Michael C Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Green OL, Henke LE, Hugo GD. Practical Clinical Workflows for Online and Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 29:219-227. [PMID: 31027639 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy emerged over 20 years ago and is now an established clinical practice in a number of organ sites. No one solution for adaptive therapy exists. Rather, adaptive radiotherapy is a process which combines multiple tools for imaging, assessment of need for adaptation, treatment planning, and quality assurance of this process. Workflow is therefore a critical aspect to ensure safe, effective, and efficient implementation of adaptive radiotherapy. In this work, we discuss the tools for online and offline adaptive radiotherapy and introduce workflow concepts for these types of adaptive radiotherapy. Common themes and differences between the workflows are introduced and controversies and areas of active research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga L Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Wu X, Udupa JK, Tong Y, Odhner D, Pednekar GV, Simone CB, McLaughlin D, Apinorasethkul C, Apinorasethkul O, Lukens J, Mihailidis D, Shammo G, James P, Tiwari A, Wojtowicz L, Camaratta J, Torigian DA. AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases. Med Image Anal 2019; 54:45-62. [PMID: 30831357 PMCID: PMC6499546 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Contouring (segmentation) of Organs at Risk (OARs) in medical images is required for accurate radiation therapy (RT) planning. In current clinical practice, OAR contouring is performed with low levels of automation. Although several approaches have been proposed in the literature for improving automation, it is difficult to gain an understanding of how well these methods would perform in a realistic clinical setting. This is chiefly due to three key factors - small number of patient studies used for evaluation, lack of performance evaluation as a function of input image quality, and lack of precise anatomic definitions of OARs. In this paper, extending our previous body-wide Automatic Anatomy Recognition (AAR) framework to RT planning of OARs in the head and neck (H&N) and thoracic body regions, we present a methodology called AAR-RT to overcome some of these hurdles. AAR-RT follows AAR's 3-stage paradigm of model-building, object-recognition, and object-delineation. Model-building: Three key advances were made over AAR. (i) AAR-RT (like AAR) starts off with a computationally precise definition of the two body regions and all of their OARs. Ground truth delineations of OARs are then generated following these definitions strictly. We retrospectively gathered patient data sets and the associated contour data sets that have been created previously in routine clinical RT planning from our Radiation Oncology department and mended the contours to conform to these definitions. We then derived an Object Quality Score (OQS) for each OAR sample and an Image Quality Score (IQS) for each study, both on a 1-to-10 scale, based on quality grades assigned to each OAR sample following 9 key quality criteria. Only studies with high IQS and high OQS for all of their OARs were selected for model building. IQS and OQS were employed for evaluating AAR-RT's performance as a function of image/object quality. (ii) In place of the previous hand-crafted hierarchy for organizing OARs in AAR, we devised a method to find an optimal hierarchy for each body region. Optimality was based on minimizing object recognition error. (iii) In addition to the parent-to-child relationship encoded in the hierarchy in previous AAR, we developed a directed probability graph technique to further improve recognition accuracy by learning and encoding in the model "steady" relationships that may exist among OAR boundaries in the three orthogonal planes. Object-recognition: The two key improvements over the previous approach are (i) use of the optimal hierarchy for actual recognition of OARs in a given image, and (ii) refined recognition by making use of the trained probability graph. Object-delineation: We use a kNN classifier confined to the fuzzy object mask localized by the recognition step and then fit optimally the fuzzy mask to the kNN-derived voxel cluster to bring back shape constraint on the object. We evaluated AAR-RT on 205 thoracic and 298 H&N (total 503) studies, involving both planning and re-planning scans and a total of 21 organs (9 - thorax, 12 - H&N). The studies were gathered from two patient age groups for each gender - 40-59 years and 60-79 years. The number of 3D OAR samples analyzed from the two body regions was 4301. IQS and OQS tended to cluster at the two ends of the score scale. Accordingly, we considered two quality groups for each gender - good and poor. Good quality data sets typically had OQS ≥ 6 and had distortions, artifacts, pathology etc. in not more than 3 slices through the object. The number of model-worthy data sets used for training were 38 for thorax and 36 for H&N, and the remaining 479 studies were used for testing AAR-RT. Accordingly, we created 4 anatomy models, one each for: Thorax male (20 model-worthy data sets), Thorax female (18 model-worthy data sets), H&N male (20 model-worthy data sets), and H&N female (16 model-worthy data sets). On "good" cases, AAR-RT's recognition accuracy was within 2 voxels and delineation boundary distance was within ∼1 voxel. This was similar to the variability observed between two dosimetrists in manually contouring 5-6 OARs in each of 169 studies. On "poor" cases, AAR-RT's errors hovered around 5 voxels for recognition and 2 voxels for boundary distance. The performance was similar on planning and replanning cases, and there was no gender difference in performance. AAR-RT's recognition operation is much more robust than delineation. Understanding object and image quality and how they influence performance is crucial for devising effective object recognition and delineation algorithms. OQS seems to be more important than IQS in determining accuracy. Streak artifacts arising from dental implants and fillings and beam hardening from bone pose the greatest challenge to auto-contouring methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingyu Wu
- Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Rm 602W, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Jayaram K Udupa
- Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Rm 602W, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Yubing Tong
- Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Rm 602W, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Dewey Odhner
- Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Rm 602W, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Gargi V Pednekar
- Quantitative Radiology Solutions, 3624 Market Street, Suite 5E, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, School of Medicine, University of Maryland 850W, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States
| | - David McLaughlin
- Quantitative Radiology Solutions, 3624 Market Street, Suite 5E, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Chavanon Apinorasethkul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Ontida Apinorasethkul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - John Lukens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Dimitris Mihailidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Geraldine Shammo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Paul James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Akhil Tiwari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Lisa Wojtowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Joseph Camaratta
- Quantitative Radiology Solutions, 3624 Market Street, Suite 5E, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Drew A Torigian
- Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, 6th Floor, Rm 602W, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Cai W, Oesten H, Clasie B, Winey B, Jee KW. Semi-automated IGRT QA using a cone-shaped scintillator screen detector for proton pencil beam scanning treatments. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:085004. [PMID: 30736026 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab056d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
To promote accurate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) system, a new quality assurance (QA) procedure employing a cone-shaped scintillator detector has been developed for multiple QA tasks in a semi-automatic manner. The cone-shaped scintillator detector (XRV-124, Logos Systems, CA) is sensitive to both x-ray and proton beams. It records scintillation on the cone surface as a 2D image, from which the geometry of the radiation field that enters and exits the cone can be extracted. Utilizing this feature, QA parameters that are essential to PBS IGRT treatment were measured and analyzed. The first applications provided coincidence checks of laser, imaging and radiation isocenters, and dependencies on gantry angle and beam energies. The analysis of the Winston-Lutz test was made available by combining the centricity measurements of the x-ray beam and the pencil beam. The accuracy of the gantry angle was validated against console readings provided by the digital encoder and an agreement of less than 0.2° was found. The accuracy of the position measurement was assessed with a robotic patient positioning system (PPS) and an agreement of less than 0.5 mm was obtained. The centricity of the two onboard x-ray imaging systems agreed well with that from the routinely used Digital Imaging Positioning System (DIPS), up to a consistent small shift of (-0.5 mm, 0.0 mm, -0.3 mm). The pencil beam spot size, in terms of σ of Gaussian fitting, agreed within 0.2 mm for most energies when compared to the conventional measurements by a 2D ion-chamber array (MatriXX-PT, IBA Dosimetry, Belgium). The cone-shaped scintillator system showed advantages in making multi-purpose measurements with a single setup. The in-house algorithms were successfully implemented to measure and analyze key QA parameters in a semi-automatic manner. This study presents an alternative and more efficient approach for IGRT QA for PBS and potentially for linear accelerators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weixing Cai
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 500 Westchester Avenue, West Harrison, NY 10604, United States of America. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America. These authors have contributed equally to this paper
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
107
|
Value of Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems for Image-Guided Carbon Ion Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11030297. [PMID: 30832346 PMCID: PMC6468538 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11030297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) allows excellent dose distribution because of the Bragg Peak. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, it delivers a higher dose with a smaller field. However, the dose distribution is sensitive to anatomical changes. Imaging technologies are necessary to reduce uncertainties during treatment, especially for hypofractionated and adaptive radiotherapy (ART). In-room computed tomography (CT) techniques, such as cone-beam CT (CBCT) and CT-on-rails are routinely used in photon centers and play a key role in improving treatment accuracy. For C-ion RT, there is an increasing demand for a three-dimensional (3D) image-guided system because of the limitations of the present two-dimensional (2D) imaging verification technology. This review discusses the current imaging system used in carbon ion centers and the potential benefits of a volumetric image-guided system.
Collapse
|
108
|
Meijers A, Jakobi A, Stützer K, Guterres Marmitt G, Both S, Langendijk JA, Richter C, Knopf A. Log file-based dose reconstruction and accumulation for 4D adaptive pencil beam scanned proton therapy in a clinical treatment planning system: Implementation and proof-of-concept. Med Phys 2019; 46:1140-1149. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - A. Jakobi
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technische Universität Dresden; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
| | - K. Stützer
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
| | - G. Guterres Marmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - S. Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - J. A. Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - C. Richter
- Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology; Technische Universität Dresden; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Dresden Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology; Faculty of Medicine; University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus; Technische Universität Dresden; Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf; Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay; Dresden Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| | - A. Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Landry G, Hansen D, Kamp F, Li M, Hoyle B, Weller J, Parodi K, Belka C, Kurz C. Comparing Unet training with three different datasets to correct CBCT images for prostate radiotherapy dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:035011. [PMID: 30523998 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Image intensity correction is crucial to enable cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) based radiotherapy dose calculations. This study evaluated three different deep learning based correction methods using a U-shaped convolutional neural network architecture (Unet) in terms of their photon and proton dose calculation accuracy. CT and CBCT imaging data of 42 prostate cancer patients were included. For target ground truth data generation, a CBCT correction method based on CT to CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) was used. The method yields a deformed CT called (i) virtual CT (vCT) which is used to generate (ii) corrected CBCT projections allowing the reconstruction of (iii) a final corrected CBCT image. The single Unet architecture was trained using these three different datasets: (Unet1) raw and corrected CBCT projections, (Unet2) raw CBCT and vCT image slices and (Unet3) raw and reference corrected CBCT image slices. Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) single field uniform dose (SFUD) plans were optimized on the reference corrected image and recalculated on the obtained Unet-corrected CBCT images. The mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE) for Unet1/2/3 were [Formula: see text] Hounsfield units (HU) and [Formula: see text] HU. The 1% dose difference pass rates were better than 98.4% for VMAT for 8 test patients not seen during training, with little difference between Unets. Gamma evaluation results were even better. For protons a gamma evaluation was employed to account for small range shifts, and [Formula: see text] mm pass rates for Unet1/2/3 were better than [Formula: see text] and 91%. A 3 mm range difference threshold was established. Only for Unet3 the 5th and 95th percentiles of the range difference distributions over all fields, test patients and dose profiles were within this threshold. A single Unet architecture was successfully trained using both CBCT projections and CBCT image slices. Since the results of the other Unets were poorer than Unet3, we conclude that training using corrected CBCT image slices as target data is optimal for PBS SFUD proton dose calculations, while for VMAT all Unets provided sufficient accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Landry
- Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
Rice SR, Li YR, Busch TM, Kim MM, McNulty S, Dimofte A, Zhu TC, Cengel KA, Simone CB. A Novel Prospective Study Assessing the Combination of Photodynamic Therapy and Proton Radiation Therapy: Safety and Outcomes When Treating Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Photochem Photobiol 2019; 95:411-418. [PMID: 30485442 PMCID: PMC6778401 DOI: 10.1111/php.13065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma remains difficult to treat, with high failure rates despite optimal therapy. We present a novel prospective trial combining proton therapy (PT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) and the largest-ever mesothelioma PT experience (n = 10). PDT photosensitizers included porfimer sodium (2 mg·kg-1 ; 24 h drug-light interval) or 2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) (4 mg·m-2 ;48 h) with wavelengths of 630 nm to 60J·cm-2 and 665 nm to 15-45J·cm-2 , respectively. With a median age of 69 years, patients were predominantly male (90%) with epithelioid histology (100%) and stage III-IV disease (100%). PT was delivered to a median of 55.0 CGE/1.8-2.0 CGE (range 50-75 CGE) adjuvantly (n = 8) or as salvage therapy (n = 2) following extended pleurectomy/decortication (ePD)/PDT. Two-year local control was 90%, with distant and regional failure rates of 50% and 30%, respectively. All patients received chemotherapy, and four received immunotherapy. Surgical complications included atrial fibrillation (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 2). Median survival from PT completion was 19.5 months (30.3 months from diagnosis), and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58% and 29%. No patient experienced CTCAEv4 grade ≥2 acute or late toxicity. Our prolonged survival in very advanced-stage patients compares favorably to survival for PT without PDT and photon therapy with PDT, suggesting possible spatial or systemic cooperativity and immune effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie R. Rice
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yun R. Li
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Theresa M. Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michele M. Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sally McNulty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrea Dimofte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Timothy C. Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A. Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Botas P, Kim J, Winey B, Paganetti H. Online adaption approaches for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck patients based on cone beam CTs and Monte Carlo simulations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 64:015004. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf30b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
112
|
Landry G, Hua CH. Current state and future applications of radiological image guidance for particle therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1086-e1095. [PMID: 30421805 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review paper, we first give a short overview of radiological image guidance in photon radiotherapy, placing emphasis on the fact that linac based radiotherapy has outpaced particle therapy in the adoption of volumetric image guidance. While cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been an established technique in linac treatment rooms for almost two decades, the widespread adoption of volumetric image guidance in particle therapy, whether by means of CBCT or in-room CT imaging, is recent. This lag may be attributable to the bespoke nature and lower number of particle therapy installations, as well as the differences in geometry between those installations and linac treatment rooms. In addition, for particle therapy the so called shift invariance of the dose distribution rarely applies. An overview of the different volumetric image guidance solutions found at modern particle therapy facilities is provided, covering gantry, nozzle, C-arm, and couch-mounted CBCT as well different in-room CT configurations. A summary of the use of in-room volumetric imaging data beyond anatomy-based positioning is also presented as well as the necessary corrections to CBCT images for accurate water equivalent thickness calculation. Finally, the use of non-ionizing imaging modalities is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Landry
- Faculty of Physics, Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), 85748, Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Zou W, Dong L, Kevin Teo BK. Current State of Image Guidance in Radiation Oncology: Implications for PTV Margin Expansion and Adaptive Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:238-247. [PMID: 29933883 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Image guidance technology has evolved and seen widespread application in the past several decades. Advancements in the diagnostic imaging field have found new applications in radiation oncology and promoted the development of therapeutic devices with advanced imaging capabilities. A recent example is the development of linear accelerators that offer magnetic resonance imaging for real-time imaging and online adaptive planning. Volumetric imaging, in particular, offers more precise localization of soft tissue targets and critical organs which reduces setup uncertainty and permit the use of smaller setup margins. We present a review of the status of current imaging modalities available for radiation oncology and its impact on target margins and use for adaptive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Shepherd A, James SS, Rengan R. The Practicality of ICRU and Considerations for Future ICRU Definitions. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:201-206. [PMID: 29933880 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) volumes are standardized volume definitions used in radiation oncology practice that have evolved over time to account for advancements in technology and radiation planning. The current definitions have strengths but also practical limitations. The main limitation is related to the process of accounting for tumor motion during treatment. As radiotherapeutic techniques become more precise, motion interplay effects and anatomical changes during treatment must be taken into account to ensure accurate and safe delivery of treatment. Adaptive replanning can help to mitigate the effect of these uncertainties and widen the therapeutic ratio by maximizing dose to the tumor and protecting critical normal structures. As adaptive replanning becomes more common, standardization of how adaptive therapy is implemented and reported will become necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemarie Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Sara St James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Mori S, Knopf A, Umegaki K. Motion management in particle therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:e994-e1010. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichiro Mori
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy National Institute of Radiological Sciences Chiba 263‐8555Japan
| | - Antje‐Christin Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen 9713 GZ The Netherlands
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Faculty of Engineering Division of Quantum Science and Engineering Hokkaido University Sapporo 060‐8628 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Qin A, Gersten D, Liang J, Liu Q, Grill I, Guerrero T, Stevens C, Yan D. A clinical 3D/4D CBCT-based treatment dose monitoring system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:166-176. [PMID: 30306710 PMCID: PMC6236849 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To monitor delivered dose and trigger plan adaptation when deviation becomes unacceptable, a clinical treatment dose (Tx‐Dose) reconstruction system based on three‐dimensional (3D)/four‐dimensional (4D)‐cone beam computed tomograpy (CBCT) images was developed and evaluated on various treatment sites, particularly for lung cancer patient treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This system integrates with our treatment planning system (TPS), Linacs recording and verification system (R&V), and CBCT imaging system, consisting of three modules: Treatment Schedule Monitoring module (TSM), pseudo‐CT Generating module (PCG), and Treatment Dose Reconstruction/evaluation module (TDR). TSM watches the treatment progress in the R&V system and triggers the PCG module when new CBCT is available. PCG retrieves the CBCTs and performs planning CT to CBCT deformable registration (DIR) to generate pseudo‐CT. The 4D‐CBCT images are taken for target localization and correction in lung cancer patient before treatment. To take full advantage of the valuable information carried by 4D‐CBCT, a novel phase‐matching DIR scheme was developed to generate 4D pseudo‐CT images for 4D dose reconstruction. Finally, TDR module creates TPS scripts to automate Tx‐Dose calculation on the pseudo‐CT images. Both initial quantitative commissioning and patient‐specific qualitative quality assurance of the DIR tool were utilized to ensure the DIR quality. The treatment doses of ten patients (six SBRT‐lung, two head and neck (HN), one breast and one prostate cancer patients) were retrospectively constructed and evaluated. The target registration error (mean ± STD: 1.05 ± 1.13 mm) of the DIR tool is comparable to the interobserver uncertainty (0.88 ± 1.31 mm) evaluated by a publically available lung‐landmarks dataset. For lung SBRT patients, the D99 of the final cumulative Tx‐Dose of GTV is 93.8 ± 5.5% (83.7–100.1%) of the originally planned D99. CTV D99 decreases by 3% and mean ipsilateral parotid dose increases by 11.5% for one of the two HN patients. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of a treatment dose verification system in our clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - David Gersten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Jian Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Inga Grill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Thomas Guerrero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Craig Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Di Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Sun B, Yang D, Lam D, Zhang T, Dvergsten T, Bradley J, Mutic S, Zhao T. Toward adaptive proton therapy guided with a mobile helical CT scanner. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:479-485. [PMID: 30314717 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of image-guided adaptive proton therapy (IGAPT) with a mobile helical-CT without rails. METHOD CT images were acquired with a 32-slice mobile CT (mCT) scanning through a 6 degree-of-freedom robotic couch rotated isocentrically 90 degrees from an initial setup position. The relationship between the treatment isocenter and the mCT imaging isocenter was established by a stereotactic reference frame attached to the treatment couch. Imaging quality, geometric integrity and localization accuracy were evaluated according to AAPM TG-66. Accuracy of relative stopping power ratio (RSPR) was evaluated by comparing water equivalent distance (WED) and dose calculations on anthropomorphic phantoms to that of planning CT (pCT). Feasibility of image-guided adaptive proton therapy was demonstrated on fractional images acquired with the mCT scanner. RESULTS mCT images showed slightly lower spatial resolution and a higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared to pCT images from the standard helical CT scanner. The geometric accuracy of the mCT was <1 mm. Localization accuracy was <0.4 mm and <0.3° with respect to 2DkV/kV matching. WED differences between mCT and pCT images were negligible, with discrepancies of 0.8 ± 0.6 mm and 1.3 ± 0.9 mm for brain and lung phantoms respectively. 3D gamma analysis (3% and 3 mm) passing rate was >95% on dose computed on mCT, with respect to dose calculation on pCT. CONCLUSION Our study has demonstrated that the geometric integrity, image quality and RSPR accuracy of the mCT are sufficient for IGAPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baozhou Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States.
| | - Deshan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Dao Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Thomas Dvergsten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Kaplan LP, Elstrøm UV, Møller DS, Hoffmann L. Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 7:45-50. [PMID: 33458404 PMCID: PMC7807659 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose The limited image quality in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) stemming primarily from scattered radiation hinders accurate CBCT based dose calculation in radiotherapy. We investigated the use of a stoichiometric calibration for dose calculation on CBCT images of lung cancer patients. Materials and methods CBCT calibrations were performed with thorax scan protocols, using a phantom with approximately the diameter of an average human thorax and a central cavity simulating the thoracic cavity. Thus scatter conditions resembling those in clinical thorax CBCT scans were simulated. A published stoichiometric parametrization was used. A treatment plan was simulated on CBCT and CT scans of an anthropomorphic phantom, the dose distributions were calculated, and clinically relevant DVH parameters were compared. Twelve lung cancer patients had surveillance CT scans (s-CT) taken twice during their treatment course in addition to daily setup CBCTs. Dose calculations were performed on the s-CTs and the corresponding CBCTs taken on the same day, and DVH parameters were compared. Results Eighty percent of CBCT DVH parameters found for the phantom were within ±1% of CT doses, and 98% were within ±3%. For patients, the median CT/CBCT dose difference was within ±2%, and 98% of DVH parameters were within ±4%. Minimum dose to the tumor was underestimated (median 1.9%) on CBCT, while maximum doses to most organs at risk were slightly overestimated. Conclusion Direct dose calculations on CBCTs of lung cancer patients were feasible within ∼4% accuracy using a simple calibration method, which is easily implemented in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Patricia Kaplan
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.,Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ditte Sloth Møller
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Paganelli C, Meschini G, Molinelli S, Riboldi M, Baroni G. “Patient-specific validation of deformable image registration in radiation therapy: Overview and caveats”. Med Phys 2018; 45:e908-e922. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
| | - Giorgia Meschini
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
| | | | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen; Munich 80539 Germany
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria; Politecnico di Milano; Milano 20133 Italy
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica; Pavia 27100 Italy
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Molitoris JK, Diwanji T, Snider JW, Mossahebi S, Samanta S, Badiyan SN, Simone CB, Mohindra P. Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S2437-S2450. [PMID: 30206490 PMCID: PMC6123191 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The development of advanced radiation technologies, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and proton therapy, has resulted in increasingly conformal radiation treatments. Recent evidence for the importance of minimizing dose to normal critical structures including the heart and lungs has led to incorporation of these advanced treatment modalities into radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While such technologies have allowed for improved dose delivery, implementation requires improved target accuracy with treatments, placing increasing importance on evaluating tumor motion at the time of planning and verifying tumor position at the time of treatment. In this review article, we describe issues and updates related both to motion management and image guidance in the treatment of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason K. Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James W. Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Santanu Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahed N. Badiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Wang G, Wang P, Li Y, Su T, Liu X, Wang H. A Motion Artifact Reduction Method in Cerebrovascular DSA Sequence Images. INT J PATTERN RECOGN 2018. [DOI: 10.1142/s0218001418540228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) can be used for diagnosing the pathologies of vascular system including systemic vascular disease, coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, valvular disease and congenital heart disease. Previous studies have provided some image enhancement algorithms for DSA images. However, these studies are not suitable for automated processes in huge amounts of data. Furthermore, few algorithms solved the problems of image contrast corruption after artifact removal. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic method for cerebrovascular DSA sequence images artifact removal based on rigid registration and guided filter. The guided filtering method is applied to fuse the original DSA image and registered DSA image, the results of which preserve clear vessel boundary from the original DSA image and remove the artifacts by the registered procedure. The experimental evaluation with 40 DSA sequence images shows that the proposed method increases the contrast index by 24.1% for improving the quality of DSA images compared with other image enhancement methods, and can be implemented as a fully automatic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanglei Wang
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| | - Pengyu Wang
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| | - Yan Li
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| | - Tianqi Su
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| | - Xiuling Liu
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| | - Hongrui Wang
- College of Electronic and Information Engineering, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
The technological basis for adaptive ion beam therapy at MedAustron: Status and outlook. Z Med Phys 2018; 28:196-210. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 09/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
123
|
Cole AJ, Veiga C, Johnson U, D’Souza D, Lalli NK, McClelland JR. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for lung patients: feasibility study on deforming planning CT to CBCT to assess the impact of anatomical changes on dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:155014. [PMID: 29978832 PMCID: PMC6329444 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad1bb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Changes in lung architecture during a course of radiotherapy can alter the planned dose distribution to the extent that it becomes clinically unacceptable. This study aims to validate a quantitative method of determining whether a replan is required during the course of conformal radiotherapy. The proposed method uses deformable image registration (DIR) to flexibly map planning CT (pCT) data to the anatomy of online CBCT images. The resulting deformed CT (dCT) images are used as a basis for assessing the effect of anatomical change on dose distributions. The study used retrospective data from a sample of seven replanned lung patients. The settings of an in-house, open-source DIR algorithm were first optimised for CT-to-CBCT registrations of the anatomy of the thorax. Using these optimised parameters, each patient's pCT was deformed to the CBCT acquired immediately before the replan. Registration accuracy was rigorously validated both geometrically and dosimetrically to confirm that the dCTs could reliably be used to inform replan decisions. A retrospective evaluation of the changes in dose delivered over time was then carried out for a single patient to demonstrate the clinical application of the proposed method. The geometric analysis showed good agreement between deformed structures and those same structures manually outlined on the CBCT images. Results were consistently better than those achieved with rigid-only registration. In the dosimetric analysis, dose distributions derived from the dCTs were found to match closely to the 'gold standard' replan CT (rCT) distributions across dose volume histogram and absolute dose difference measures. The retrospective analysis of serial CBCTs of a single patient produced reliable quantitative assessment of the dose delivery. Had the proposed method been available at the time of treatment, it would have enabled a more objective replan decision. DIR is a valuable clinical tool for dose recalculation in adaptive radiotherapy protocols for lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Cole
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, United Kingdom
- St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | - C Veiga
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - U Johnson
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - D D’Souza
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - N K Lalli
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - J R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Takemura A, Nagano A, Kojima H, Ikeda T, Yokoyama N, Tsukamoto K, Noto K, Isomura N, Ueda S, Kawashima H. An uncertainty metric to evaluate deformation vector fields for dose accumulation in radiotherapy. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 6:77-82. [PMID: 33458393 PMCID: PMC7807581 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background and purpose In adaptive radiotherapy, deformable image registration (DIR) is used to propagate delineations of tumors and organs into a new therapy plan and to calculate the accumulated total dose. Many DIR accuracy metrics have been proposed. An alternative proposed here could be a local uncertainty (LU) metric for DIR results. Materials and methods The LU represented the uncertainty of each DIR position and was focused on deformation evaluation in uniformly-dense regions. Four cases demonstrated LU calculations: two head and neck cancer cases, a lung cancer case, and a prostate cancer case. Each underwent two CT examinations for radiotherapy planning. Results LU maps were calculated from each DIR of the clinical cases. Reduced fat regions had LUs of 4.6 ± 0.9 mm, 4.8 ± 1.0 mm, and 4.5 ± 0.7 mm, while the shrunken left parotid gland had a LU of 4.1 ± 0.8 mm and the shrunken lung tumor had a LU of 3.7 ± 0.7 mm. The bowels in the pelvic region had a LU of 10.2 ± 3.7 mm. LU histograms for the cases were similar and 99% of the voxels had a LU < 3 mm. Conclusions LU is a new uncertainty metric for DIR that was demonstrated for clinical cases. It had a tolerance of <3 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Takemura
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institution of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan
| | - Akira Nagano
- Division of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
| | - Hironori Kojima
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.,Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ikeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-115 Yatsuyamada, Koriyama-City, Fukushima-Pref. 963-8563, Japan
| | - Noriomi Yokoyama
- Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan
| | - Kosuke Tsukamoto
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
| | - Kimiya Noto
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
| | - Naoki Isomura
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
| | - Shinichi Ueda
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kawashima
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institution of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920-0942, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Oliver JA, Zeidan O, Meeks SL, Shah AP, Pukala J, Kelly P, Ramakrishna NR, Willoughby TR. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:149-158. [PMID: 29682879 PMCID: PMC5978963 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe the commissioning of AIRO mobile CT system (AIRO) for adaptive proton therapy on a compact double scattering proton therapy system. Methods A Gammex phantom was scanned with varying plug patterns, table heights, and mAs on a CT simulator (CT Sim) and on the AIRO. AIRO‐specific CT‐stopping power ratio (SPR) curves were created with a commonly used stoichiometric method using the Gammex phantom. A RANDO anthropomorphic thorax, pelvis, and head phantom, and a CIRS thorax and head phantom were scanned on the CT Sim and AIRO. Clinically realistic treatment plans and nonclinical plans were generated on the CT Sim images and subsequently copied onto the AIRO CT scans for dose recalculation and comparison for various AIRO SPR curves. Gamma analysis was used to evaluate dosimetric deviation between both plans. Results AIRO CT values skewed toward solid water when plugs were scanned surrounded by other plugs in phantom. Low‐density materials demonstrated largest differences. Dose calculated on AIRO CT scans with stoichiometric‐based SPR curves produced over‐ranged proton beams when large volumes of low‐density material were in the path of the beam. To create equivalent dose distributions on both data sets, the AIRO SPR curve's low‐density data points were iteratively adjusted to yield better proton beam range agreement based on isodose lines. Comparison of the stoichiometric‐based AIRO SPR curve and the “dose‐adjusted” SPR curve showed slight improvement on gamma analysis between the treatment plan and the AIRO plan for single‐field plans at the 1%, 1 mm level, but did not affect clinical plans indicating that HU number differences between the CT Sim and AIRO did not affect dose calculations for robust clinical beam arrangements. Conclusion Based on this study, we believe the AIRO can be used offline for adaptive proton therapy on a compact double scattering proton therapy system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omar Zeidan
- Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Amish P Shah
- Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Jason Pukala
- Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Patrick Kelly
- Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
126
|
Guy CL, Weiss E, Christensen GE, Jan N, Hugo GD. CALIPER: A deformable image registration algorithm for large geometric changes during radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Med Phys 2018; 45:2498-2508. [PMID: 29603277 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients may experience dramatic changes in anatomy during radiotherapy and could benefit from adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Deformable image registration (DIR) is necessary to accurately accumulate dose during plan adaptation, but current algorithms perform poorly in the presence of large geometric changes, namely atelectasis resolution. The goal of this work was to develop a DIR framework, named Consistent Anatomy in Lung Parametric imagE Registration (CALIPER), to handle large geometric changes in the thorax. METHODS Registrations were performed on pairs of baseline and mid-treatment CT datasets of NSCLC patients presenting with atelectasis at the start of treatment. Pairs were classified based on atelectasis volume change as either full, partial, or no resolution. The evaluated registration algorithms consisted of several combinations of a hybrid intensity- and feature-based similarity cost function to investigate the ability to simultaneously match healthy lung parenchyma and adjacent atelectasis. These components of the cost function included a mass-preserving intensity cost in the lung parenchyma, use of filters to enhance vascular structures in the lung parenchyma, manually delineated lung lobes as labels, and several intensity cost functions to model atelectasis change. Registration error was quantified with landmark-based target registration error and post-registration alignment of atelectatic lobes. RESULTS The registrations using both lobe labels and vasculature enhancement in addition to intensity of the CT images were found to have the highest accuracy. Of these registrations, the mean (SD) of mean landmark error across patients was 2.50 (1.16) mm, 2.80 (0.70) mm, and 2.04 (0.13) mm for no change, partial resolution, and full atelectasis resolution, respectively. The mean (SD) atelectatic lobe Dice similarity coefficient was 0.91 (0.08), 0.90 (0.08), and 0.89 (0.04), respectively, for the same groups. Registration accuracy was comparable to healthy lung registrations of current state-of-the-art algorithms reported in literature. CONCLUSIONS The CALIPER algorithm developed in this work achieves accurate image registration for challenging cases involving large geometric and topological changes in NSCLC patients, a requirement for enabling ART in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Guy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - Gary E Christensen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Nuzhat Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Badiyan SN, Molitoris JK, Zhu M, Glass E, Diwanji T, Simone CB. Proton beam therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:189-198. [PMID: 29876318 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.04.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Surgical techniques have made incremental improvements over the last few decades while new systemic therapies, including immunotherapies, show promise as potentially effective novel therapies. Radiation therapy has historically been used only in the palliative setting or as adjuvant therapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy, but recent advances in treatment planning and delivery techniques utilizing intensity-modulated radiation therapy and more recently pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy, have enabled the delivery of radiation therapy as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy after an extended pleurectomy and decortication or as definitive therapy for patients with recurrent or unresectable disease. In particular, PBS proton therapy has the potential to deliver high doses of irradiation to the entire effected pleura while significantly reducing doses to nearby organs at risk. This article describes the evolution of radiation therapy for MPM and details how whole-pleural PBS proton therapy is delivered to patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mingyao Zhu
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Glass
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
128
|
van Elmpt W. Quantitative computed tomography in radiation therapy: A mature technology with a bright future. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 6:12-13. [PMID: 33458382 PMCID: PMC7807762 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Dr. Tanslaan 12, NL-6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Verma V, Choi JI, Simone CB. Proton therapy for small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:134-140. [PMID: 29876312 PMCID: PMC5960657 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.04.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The prognosis of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) continues to improve and is now roughly comparable to that of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This shift, taken together with the decreased toxicities of modern radiotherapy (RT) for LS-SCLC compared with those reported in historical trials, necessitates further evaluation of whether proton beam therapy (PBT) could further reduce both acute and late toxicities for patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LS-SCLC. These notions are discussed theoretically, with an emphasis on cardiac events. This is followed by a review of the published evidence to date demonstrating improved dosimetry with PBT over intensity-modulated RT and encouraging safety and efficacy profiles seen in early clinical reports. In addition to covering technical aspects of PBT for LS-SCLC such as intensity-modulated PBT, image-guidance for PBT, and adaptive planning, this review also discusses the need for increased data on intensity-modulated PBT for LS-SCLC, economic and quality of life analyses for future PBT SCLC studies, careful categorization of cardiac events in these patients, and the role for immunotherapy combined with photon- or proton-based RT for LS-SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Abstract
Proton therapy is a promising but challenging treatment modality for the management of lung cancer. The technical challenges are due to respiratory motion, low dose tolerance of adjacent normal tissue and tissue density heterogeneity. Different imaging modalities are applied at various steps of lung proton therapy to provide information on target definition, target motion, proton range, patient setup and treatment outcome assessment. Imaging data is used to guide treatment design, treatment delivery, and treatment adaptation to ensure the treatment goal is achieved. This review article will summarize and compare various imaging techniques that can be used in every step of lung proton therapy to address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
MacKay RI. Image Guidance for Proton Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:293-298. [PMID: 29551567 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Image-guided radiotherapy has an established role in all forms of radiotherapy treatment delivery. Proton therapy seeks to deliver superior dose distributions through utilising the Bragg peak to target tumour and avoid sensitive normal tissue. The Bragg peak and sharp falloff in dose delivered by proton therapy necessitate careful treatment planning and treatment delivery. The dose distribution delivered by proton therapy is particularly sensitive to uncertainty in the prediction of proton range during treatment planning and deviations from the planned delivery during the course of the fractionated treatment. Realising the superior dose distribution of proton therapy requires increased diligence and image guidance has a key role in ensuring that treatments are planned and delivered. This article will outline the current status of image guidance for proton therapy, particularly highlighting differences with regard to high-energy X-ray therapy, and will look at a number of future improvements in image-guided proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R I MacKay
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre (MCRC), The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Uh J, Krasin MJ, Hua CH. Technical Note: Feasibility of MRI-based estimation of water-equivalent path length to detect changes in proton range during treatment courses. Med Phys 2018; 45:1677-1683. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jinsoo Uh
- Department of Radiation Oncology; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN 38105-3678 USA
| | - Matthew J. Krasin
- Department of Radiation Oncology; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN 38105-3678 USA
| | - Chia-ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology; St. Jude Children's Research Hospital; Memphis TN 38105-3678 USA
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Yao W, Krasin MJ, Farr JB, Merchant TE. Feasibility study of range-based registration using daily cone beam CT for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Med Phys 2018; 45:1191-1203. [PMID: 29360157 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton dose coverage is sensitive to proton beam range. The current practice of CT number-based registration for patient positioning focuses on matching the target and is not sufficient for proton therapy because the proton range depends on the medium traversed by the beam. Patient body deformations and anatomical changes result in range deviation in the target. We propose proton range-based registration to minimize the range deviation. METHODS The range was calculated from cone beam-computed tomography (CBCT) of the patient on couch, and the range deviation was the difference of the calculated range from that on the initial (day 1) CBCT. In the investigated prostate cases in which the main cause of range deviation was the rotation of femur bones, and in the investigated abdomen cases in which the main cause of range deviation was body growth and anatomic change, our range-based registration was used to obtain the optimal beam angle by minimizing the range deviation. The new angle was limited to be ±5° from that planned to prevent potentially increased dose to the organs at risk. To demonstrate the benefit of range-based registration, we investigated the range at the voxels on the surface of the target volume. The calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was investigated by using solid water phantoms with different thicknesses. Range-based registration using both CBCTs and CTs was performed in cases of two patients with pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma and one patient with upper abdominal tumor. The range was represented by the water-equivalent thickness to shorten the computation for online application purposes. RESULTS In the phantom study, the calculation error of range deviation due to CBCT scatter was within 2 mm for a 1-cm thickness change (the mean range deviation was 0.8 mm). In the CT study of the prostate cases, the range deviation (mean ± root-mean-square deviation) on the contour in each slice was efficiently reduced from 3.6 ± 2.8 mm to 2.1 ± 1.4 mm, with most slices being within 3 mm; in the CT study of the abdomen cases, the range deviation of the whole set was reduced from 4.4 ± 1.9 mm to 3.5 ± 2.1 mm. Both the mean and root-mean-square deviation of the range deviation on each treatment day were decreased. The dose coverage on the target was improved and the dose on the OARs was only slightly changed. CONCLUSION Range-based registration can efficiently mitigate range deviation due to patient positioning and anatomical changes. It can shorten patient positioning time and reduce the patient's dose from CBCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiguang Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Matthew J Krasin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Jonathan B Farr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Vyfhuis MA, Onyeuku N, Diwanji T, Mossahebi S, Amin NP, Badiyan SN, Mohindra P, Simone CB. Advances in proton therapy in lung cancer. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2018; 12:1753466618783878. [PMID: 30014783 PMCID: PMC6050808 DOI: 10.1177/1753466618783878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (US) and worldwide. Radiation therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and serves as an excellent alternative for early stage patients who are medically inoperable or who decline surgery. Proton therapy has been shown to offer a significant dosimetric advantage in NSCLC patients over photon therapy, with a decrease in dose to vital organs at risk (OARs) including the heart, lungs and esophagus. This in turn, can lead to a decrease in acute and late toxicities in a population already predisposed to lung and cardiac injury. Here, we present a review on proton treatment techniques, studies, clinical outcomes and toxicities associated with treating both early stage and locally advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A.L. Vyfhuis
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nasarachi Onyeuku
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Neha P. Amin
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahed N. Badiyan
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, 850 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Holloway SM, Holloway MD, Thomas SJ. A method for acquiring random range uncertainty probability distributions in proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 63:01NT02. [PMID: 29053110 PMCID: PMC5802333 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In treatment planning we depend upon accurate knowledge of geometric and range uncertainties. If the uncertainty model is inaccurate then the plan will produce under-dosing of the target and/or overdosing of OAR. We aim to provide a method for which centre and site-specific population range uncertainty due to inter-fraction motion can be quantified to improve the uncertainty model in proton treatment planning. Daily volumetric MVCT data from previously treated radiotherapy patients has been used to investigate inter-fraction changes to water equivalent path-length (WEPL). Daily image-guidance scans were carried out for each patient and corrected for changes in CTV position (using rigid transformations). An effective depth algorithm was used to determine residual range changes, after corrections had been applied, throughout the treatment by comparing WEPL within the CTV at each fraction for several beam angles. As a proof of principle this method was used to quantify uncertainties for inter-fraction range changes for a sample of head and neck patients of [Formula: see text] mm, [Formula: see text] mm and overall [Formula: see text] mm. For prostate [Formula: see text] mm, [Formula: see text] mm and overall [Formula: see text] mm. The choice of beam angle for head and neck did not affect the inter-fraction range error significantly; however this was not the same for prostate. Greater range changes were seen using a lateral beam compared to an anterior beam for prostate due to relative motion of the prostate and femoral heads. A method has been developed to quantify population range changes due to inter-fraction motion that can be adapted for the clinic. The results of this work highlight the importance of robust planning and analysis in proton therapy. Such information could be used in robust optimisation algorithms or treatment plan robustness analysis. Such knowledge will aid in establishing beam start conditions at planning and for establishing adaptive planning protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Holloway
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
136
|
Gorgisyan J, Munck af Rosenschold P, Perrin R, Persson GF, Josipovic M, Belosi MF, Engelholm SA, Weber DC, Lomax AJ. Feasibility of Pencil Beam Scanned Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy in Breath-hold for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:1121-1128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
137
|
Cubillos-Mesías M, Baumann M, Troost EGC, Lohaus F, Löck S, Richter C, Stützer K. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:190. [PMID: 29183377 PMCID: PMC5706329 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0931-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton beam therapy is promising for the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), but it is sensitive to uncertainties in patient positioning and particle range. Studies have shown that the planning target volume (PTV) concept may not be sufficient to ensure robustness of the target coverage. A few planning studies have considered irradiation of unilateral HNC targets with protons, but they have only taken into account the dose on the nominal plan, without considering anatomy changes occurring during the treatment course. METHODS Four pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy plans were calculated for 8 HNC patients with unilateral target volumes: single-field (SFO) and multi-field optimized (MFO) plans, either using the PTV concept or clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization. The dose was recalculated on computed tomography (CT) scans acquired during the treatment course. Doses to target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were compared for the nominal plans, cumulative doses considering anatomical changes, and additional setup and range errors in each fraction. If required, the treatment plan was adapted, and the dose was compared with the non-adapted plan. RESULTS All nominal plans fulfilled the clinical specifications for target coverage, but significantly higher doses on the ipsilateral parotid gland were found for both SFO approaches. MFO PTV-based plans had the lowest robustness against range and setup errors. During the treatment course, the influence of the anatomical variation on the dose has shown to be patient specific, mostly independent of the chosen planning approach. Nine plans in four patients required adaptation, which led to a significant improvement of the target coverage and a slight reduction in the OAR dose in comparison to the cumulative dose without adaptation. CONCLUSIONS The use of robust MFO optimization is recommended for ensuring plan robustness and reduced doses in the ipsilateral parotid gland. Anatomical changes occurring during the treatment course might degrade the target coverage and increase the dose in the OARs, independent of the chosen planning approach. For some patients, a plan adaptation may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Cubillos-Mesías
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Kurz C, Landry G, Resch AF, Dedes G, Kamp F, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Raaymakers BW, Parodi K. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 62:8470-8482. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa8de9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
139
|
Hua C, Yao W, Kidani T, Tomida K, Ozawa S, Nishimura T, Fujisawa T, Shinagawa R, Merchant TE. A robotic C-arm cone beam CT system for image-guided proton therapy: design and performance. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170266. [PMID: 28830239 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A ceiling-mounted robotic C-arm cone beam CT (CBCT) system was developed for use with a 190° proton gantry system and a 6-degree-of-freedom robotic patient positioner. We report on the mechanical design, system accuracy, image quality, image guidance accuracy, imaging dose, workflow, safety and collision-avoidance. METHODS The robotic CBCT system couples a rotating C-ring to the C-arm concentrically with a kV X-ray tube and a flat-panel imager mounted to the C-ring. CBCT images are acquired with flex correction and maximally 360° rotation for a 53 cm field of view. The system was designed for clinical use with three imaging locations. Anthropomorphic phantoms were imaged to evaluate the image guidance accuracy. RESULTS The position accuracy and repeatability of the robotic C-arm was high (<0.5 mm), as measured with a high-accuracy laser tracker. The isocentric accuracy of the C-ring rotation was within 0.7 mm. The coincidence of CBCT imaging and radiation isocentre was better than 1 mm. The average image guidance accuracy was within 1 mm and 1° for the anthropomorphic phantoms tested. Daily volumetric imaging for proton patient positioning was specified for routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION Our novel gantry-independent robotic CBCT system provides high-accuracy volumetric image guidance for proton therapy. Advances in knowledge: Ceiling-mounted robotic CBCT provides a viable option than CT on-rails for partial gantry and fixed-beam proton systems with the added advantage of acquiring images at the treatment isocentre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiaho Hua
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Weiguang Yao
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Takao Kidani
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Kazuo Tomida
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Saori Ozawa
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Takenori Nishimura
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Fujisawa
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Ryousuke Shinagawa
- 2 Proton Therapy Systems Design Department, Hitachi Ltd, Hitachi-shi, Japan
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Mohan R, Das IJ, Ling CC. Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:304-316. [PMID: 28871980 PMCID: PMC5651132 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Considering the clinical potential of protons attributable to their physical characteristics, interest in proton therapy has increased greatly in this century, as has the number of proton therapy installations. Until recently, passively scattered proton therapy was used almost entirely. Notably, the overall clinical results to date have not shown a convincing benefit of protons over photons. A rapid transition is now occurring with the implementation of the most advanced form of proton therapy, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). IMPT is superior to passively scattered proton therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetrically. However, numerous limitations exist in the present IMPT methods. In particular, compared with IMRT, IMPT is highly vulnerable to various uncertainties. In this overview we identify three major areas of current limitations of IMPT: treatment planning, treatment delivery, and motion management, and discuss current and future efforts for improvement. For treatment planning, we need to reduce uncertainties in proton range and in computed dose distributions, improve robust planning and optimization, enhance adaptive treatment planning and delivery, and consider how to exploit the variability in the relative biological effectiveness of protons for clinical benefit. The quality of proton therapy also depends on the characteristics of the IMPT delivery systems and image guidance. Efforts are needed to optimize the beamlet spot size for both improved dose conformality and faster delivery. For the latter, faster energy switching time and increased dose rate are also needed. Real-time in-room volumetric imaging for guiding IMPT is in its early stages with cone beam computed tomography (CT) and CT-on-rails, and continued improvements are anticipated. In addition, imaging of the proton beams themselves, using, for instance, prompt γ emissions, is being developed to determine the proton range and to reduce range uncertainty. With the realization of the advances described above, we posit that IMPT, thus empowered, will lead to substantially improved clinical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Indra J Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Clifton C Ling
- Varian Medical Systems and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Systematic assessment of clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for reirradiation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:21-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
142
|
|
143
|
Stützer K, Jakobi A, Bandurska-Luque A, Barczyk S, Arnsmeyer C, Löck S, Richter C. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:104-113. [PMID: 28921843 PMCID: PMC5689930 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Evaluation of dose degradation by anatomic changes for head‐and‐neck cancer (HNC) intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) relative to intensity‐modulated photon therapy (IMRT) and identification of potential indicators for IMPT treatment plan adaptation. Methods For 31 advanced HNC datasets, IMPT and IMRT plans were recalculated on a computed tomography scan (CT) taken after about 4 weeks of therapy. Dose parameter changes were determined for the organs at risk (OARs) spinal cord, brain stem, parotid glands, brachial plexus, and mandible, for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the healthy tissue outside planning target volume (PTV). Correlation of dose degradation with target volume changes and quality of rigid CT matching was investigated. Results Recalculated IMPT dose distributions showed stronger degradation than the IMRT doses. OAR analysis revealed significant changes in parotid median dose (IMPT) and near maximum dose (D1ml) of spinal cord (IMPT, IMRT) and mandible (IMPT). OAR dose parameters remained lower in IMPT cases. CTV coverage (V95%) and overdose (V107%) deteriorated for IMPT plans to (93.4 ± 5.4)% and (10.6 ± 12.5)%, while those for IMRT plans remained acceptable. Recalculated plans showed similarly decreased PTV conformity, but considerable hotspots, also outside the PTV, emerged in IMPT cases. Lower CT matching quality was significantly correlated with loss of PTV conformity (IMPT, IMRT), CTV homogeneity and coverage (IMPT). Target shrinkage correlated with increased dose in brachial plexus (IMRT, IMPT), hotspot generation outside the PTV (IMPT) and lower PTV conformity (IMRT). Conclusions The study underlines the necessity of precise positioning and monitoring of anatomy changes, especially in IMPT which might require adaptation more often. Since OAR doses remained typically below constraints, IMPT plan adaptation will be indicated by target dose degradations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Jakobi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anna Bandurska-Luque
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carolin Arnsmeyer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Bautzner Landstr. 400, 01328, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69192, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Consensus Guidelines for Implementing Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies on Behalf of the PTCOG Thoracic and Lymphoma Subcommittee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:41-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
145
|
Dedes G, De Angelis L, Rit S, Hansen D, Belka C, Bashkirov V, Johnson RP, Coutrakon G, Schubert KE, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Landry G. Application of fluence field modulation to proton computed tomography for proton therapy imaging. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 62:6026-6043. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
146
|
Bradley JA, Ho MW, Li Z, Liang X, Rutenberg M, Dagan R, Mendenhall NP. A Technical Guide for Passive Scattering Proton Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2017; 3:473-484. [PMID: 31772997 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-16-00025.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Most patients treated with proton therapy have had eye tumors, sarcomas, or, more recently, pediatric, or prostate cancers. As more proton centers have developed globally, increased capacity will permit exploration of other potential indications for proton therapy, including for the treatment of breast cancer. The rationale for proton therapy in the treatment of breast cancer is reduced inadvertent radiation dose to the heart and lung, as well as improved target coverage. As with any new technology, multiple technical parameters require optimization to deliver safe and effective radiation therapy and to maximize the benefits of the new technology. The purpose of this report is to provide a technical guide for the treatment of breast cancer with passive-scattering proton therapy and an algorithm for selecting patients with breast cancer who would benefit from proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Meng Wei Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Michael Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nancy P Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Rwigema JCM, Verma V, Lin L, Berman AT, Levin WP, Evans TL, Aggarwal C, Rengan R, Langer C, Cohen RB, Simone CB. Prospective study of proton-beam radiation therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2017; 123:4244-4251. [PMID: 28678434 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing data supporting the use of proton-beam therapy (PBT) for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) are limited to a single 6-patient case series. This is the first prospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LS-SCLC. METHODS This study prospectively analyzed patients with primary, nonrecurrent LS-SCLC definitively treated with PBT and concurrent chemotherapy from 2011 to 2016. Clinical backup intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient and were compared with PBT plans. Outcome measures included local control (LC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates and toxicities. RESULTS Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median dose was 63.9 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 45-66.6 cobalt gray equivalents) in 33 to 37 fractions delivered daily (n = 18 [60.0%]) or twice daily (n = 12 [40.0%]). The concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/etoposide (n = 21 [70.0%]) or carboplatin/etoposide (n = 9 [30.0%]). In comparison with the backup IMRT plans, PBT allowed statistically significant reductions in the cord, heart, and lung mean doses and the volume receiving at least 5 Gy but not in the esophagus mean dose or the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the 1-/2-year LC and RFS rates were 85%/69% and 63%/42%, respectively. The median OS was 28.2 months, and the 1-/2-year OS rates were 72%/58%. There was 1 case each (3.3%) of grade 3 or higher esophagitis, pneumonitis, anorexia, and pericardial effusion. Grade 2 pneumonitis and esophagitis were seen in 10.0% and 43.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the first prospective registry study and largest analysis to date of PBT for LS-SCLC, PBT was found to be safe with a limited incidence of high-grade toxicities. Cancer 2017;123:4244-4251. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Claude M Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tracey L Evans
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Corey Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Abe Y, Kadoya N, Arai K, Takayama Y, Kato T, Kimura K, Ono T, Nakamura T, Wada H, Kikuchi Y, Jingu K. Effect of DIR uncertainty on prostate passive-scattering proton therapy dose accumulation. Phys Med 2017. [PMID: 28625473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
149
|
Dionisi F, Amichetti M, Algranati C, Giacomelli I, Barbareschi M, Recla M, Grandi C. Unresectable Ameloblastoma Successfully Treated with Definitive Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2017; 4:7-13. [PMID: 31773001 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-17-00008.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
We report the case of an 87-year-old man affected by an unresectable ameloblastoma of the right jaw that was successfully treated by definitive proton therapy up to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. Treatment was well tolerated, and there were no interruptions due to toxicity. At follow-up visits, the patient experienced complete response to treatment with no evidence of disease and complete recovery from acute side effects. In this report, we discuss the potential and possible pitfalls of proton therapy in the treatment of specific settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Dionisi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Maurizio Amichetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Carlo Algranati
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Medical Physics, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Irene Giacomelli
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Recla
- Department of Radiology Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Cesare Grandi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Zöllner C, Rit S, Kurz C, Vilches-Freixas G, Kamp F, Dedes G, Belka C, Parodi K, Landry G. Decomposing a prior-CT-based cone-beam CT projection correction algorithm into scatter and beam hardening components. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2017.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|