101
|
Gallitto E, Faggioli G, Vacirca A, Lodato M, Cappiello A, Logiacco A, Feroldi F, Pini R, Gargiulo M. Superior mesenteric artery-related outcomes in fenestrated/branched endografting for complex aortic aneurysms. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1252533. [PMID: 37771670 PMCID: PMC10526822 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1252533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim Early/follow-up durability of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stent-grafts is crucial after fenestrated/branched endografting (FB-EVAR) in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The study aimed to report early/midterm outcomes of SMA incorporated during FB-EVAR procedures. Methods FB-EVAR procedures performed between 2016 and 2021 in a single institution were reviewed. Anatomical SMA characteristics were analyzed. The SMA configuration was classified into three types according to the angle between the SMA main trunk and the aorta: (A) perpendicular, (B) downward, and (C) upward. SMA-related technical success (SMA-TS: cannulation and stenting, patency at completion angiography without endoleak, stenosis/kinking, dissection, bleeding, and 24-h mortality) and SMA-adverse events (SMA-AEs: one among bowel ischemia, stenosis, occlusion, endoleak, reinterventions, or SMA-related mortality) were assessed. Results Two hundred FB-EVAR procedures with SMA as the target artery were performed. The indication for FB-EVAR was CAAAs and TAAAs in 99 (49%) and 101 (51%) cases, respectively. The SMA configuration was A, B, and C in 132 (66%), 63 (31%), and 5 (3%) cases, respectively. SMA was incorporated with fenestrations and branches in 131 (66%) and 69 (34%) cases, respectively. Directional branch (P < .001), aortic diameter ≥35 mm at the SMA level (P < .001), and ≥2 SMA bridging stent-grafts (P = .001) were more frequent in TAAAs. Relining of the SMA stent-graft with a bare metal stent was necessary in 41 (21%) cases to correct an acute angle between the stent-graft and native artery (39), stent-graft stenosis (1), or SMA dissection (1). Relining was associated with type A or C SMA configuration (OR: 17; 95% CI: 1.8-157.3; P = .01). SMA-TS was achieved in all cases. Overall, 15 (7.5%) patients had SMA-AEs [early: 9 (60%), follow-up: 6 (40%)] due to stenosis (2), endoleak (8), and bowel ischemia (5). Aortic diameter ≥35 mm at the SMA level was an independent risk factor for SMA-AEs (OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.4-13.8; P = .01). Fourteen (7%) patients died during hospitalization with 10 (5%) events within the 30-postoperative day. Emergency cases (OR: 33; 95% CI: 5.7-191.3; P = .001), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (OR: 14; 95% CI: 2.3-88.8; P = .004), and bowel ischemia (OR: 41; 95% CI: 1.9-87.9; P = .01) were risk factors for 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The mean follow-up was 32 ± 24 months; estimated 3-year survival was 81%, with no case of late SMA-related mortality or occlusion. The estimated 3-year freedom from overall and SMA-related reinterventions was 74% and 95%, respectively. Conclusion SMA orientation determines the necessity of stent-graft relining. Aortic diameter ≥35 mm at the SMA level is a predictor of SMA-AEs. Nevertheless, SMA-related outcomes of FB-EVAR are satisfactory, with excellent technical success and promising clinical outcomes during the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - A. Vacirca
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Lodato
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
| | - A. Cappiello
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
| | - A. Logiacco
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
| | - F. Feroldi
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
| | - R. Pini
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna—DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
- Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Nana P, Jama K, Kölbel T, Spanos K, Panuccio G, Jakimowicz T, Rohlffs F. Sex-Comparative Outcomes of the T-Branch Device for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5811. [PMID: 37762752 PMCID: PMC10531663 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Females are at increased risk of mortality compared to males after complex endovascular aortic repair. This study aims to examine sex-related peri-operative and follow-up outcomes in patients managed with the t-Branch device. METHODS A two-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with the off-the-shelf t-Branch device (Cook Medical Inc., Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 1 January 2014 and 30 September 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes were sex-comparative 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs) and spinal cord ischemia (SCI). RESULTS A total of 542 patients were included; 28.0% were females. Urgent repair and type I-III thoracoabdominal aneurysms were more common among females (52.6% vs. 34%, p = 0.01, and 57.1% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.004). Technical success was similar (97.4% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.755), as well as early mortality (16.2% in females vs. 10.8% in males; p = 0.084). SCI rates were similar between groups (13.6% vs. 9.2% p = 0.183). MAEs were more common in females; 33.7% vs. 21.4% (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis did not identify sex as an independent predictor of adverse events. The 12-month survival rate was 75.7% (SE 0.045) for females and 84.1% (SE 0.026) for males (log rank, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS Sex was not detected as an independent factor of mortality, MAEs and SCI within patients managed with the t-Branch device. Feasibility was high in both groups. No significant difference was shown in survival during the 12-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; (K.J.); (T.J.)
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
- Vascular Surgery Department, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland; (K.J.); (T.J.)
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany; (T.K.); (K.S.); (G.P.); (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Katsargyris A, Hasemaki N, Marques de Marino P, Abu Jiries M, Gafur N, Verhoeven ELG. Editor's Choice - Long Term Outcomes of the Advanta V12 Covered Bridging Stent for Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in 1 675 Target Vessels. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:313-321. [PMID: 37406878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report outcomes of the Advanta V12 as a covered bridging stent in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). METHODS Patients treated with F/BEVAR and followed in a single centre receiving the Advanta V12 as a covered bridging stent between January 2010 and May 2020 were included. RESULTS A total of 636 patients (543 men) were analysed. A total of 1 675 target vessels (TVs) were bridged with the Advanta V12. Estimated TV patency at one, five, and eight years was 99.1% ± 0.2%, 96.9% ± 0.5% and 96.2% ± 0.7%, respectively. Estimated patency at eight years was 98.1% ± 0.5% for fenestrations and 87.3% ± 2.9% for branches (p < .001). Estimated patency of renal arteries was statistically significantly lower for those targeted with branches compared with fenestrations (p = .001). Multivariable analysis showed that targeting a TV with a branch compared with a fenestration was the only independent risk factor for occlusion during follow up (hazard ratio 6.41, 95% CI 3.4 - 11.9; p < .001). Estimated freedom from endoleak at one, five, and eight years was 99.4% ± 0.2%, 96.4% ± 0.6%, and 95.4% ± 0.8%, respectively. Estimated freedom from target vessel instability (TVI) at one, five, and eight years was 98.5% ± 0.3%, 93.0% ± 0.8%, and 91.3% ± 1%, respectively. Estimated freedom from TVI at eight years was 93.2% ± 0.9% for fenestrations and 82.7% ± 3.5% for branches (p < .001). Estimated freedom from TVI was statistically significantly lower for renal arteries targeted with branches compared with those targeted with fenestrations (p < .001) CONCLUSION: The Advanta V12 shows excellent technical success rates as a covered bridging stent in F/ΒEVAR. Late outcomes remain good with low rates of TV occlusion, endoleak, and re-intervention. Renal arteries targeted with branches demonstrated a higher risk of occlusion and instability compared with those targeted with fenestrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Natasha Hasemaki
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Pablo Marques de Marino
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Melad Abu Jiries
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Nargis Gafur
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Eric L G Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, General Hospital & Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
DiBartolomeo AD, Pyun AJ, Ding L, O'Donnell K, Paige JK, Magee GA, Weaver FA, Han SM. Comparative outcomes of physician-modified fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of post-dissection and degenerative complex abdominal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:565-574.e2. [PMID: 37187413 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated-branched endovascular repair has become a favorable treatment strategy for patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) who are high risk for open repair. Compared with degenerative aneurysms, post-dissection aneurysms can pose additional challenges for endovascular repair. Literature on physician-modified fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (PM-FBEVAR) for post-dissection aortic aneurysms is sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PM-FBEVAR for degenerative and post-dissection cAAAs or TAAAs. METHODS A single-center institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients that underwent PM-FBEVAR between 2015 and 2021. Infected aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms were excluded. Patient characteristics, intraoperative details, and clinical outcomes were compared between degenerative and post-dissection cAAAs or TAAAs. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes included technical success, major complications, endoleak, target vessel instability, and reintervention. RESULTS Of the 183 patients who underwent PM-FBEVAR in the study, 32 had aortic dissections, and 151 had degenerative aneurysms. There was one 30-day death (3.1%) in the post-dissection group and eight 30-day deaths (5.3%) in the degenerative aneurysm group (P = .99). Technical success, fluoroscopy time, and contrast usage were similar between the post-dissection and degenerative groups. Reintervention during follow-up (28% vs 35%; P = .54) and major complications were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Endoleak was the most common reason for reintervention, with the post-dissection group having a higher rate of type IC, II, and IIIA endoleaks (31% vs 3%; P < .0001; 59% vs 26%; P = .0002; and 16% vs 4%; P = .03). During the mean follow-up of 14 months, all-cause mortality was similar between the groups (12.5% vs 21.9%; P = .23). CONCLUSIONS PM-FBEVAR is a safe treatment for post-dissection cAAAs and TAAAs with high technical success. However, endoleaks requiring reintervention were more frequent in post-dissection patients. The impact of these reinterventions on long-term durability will be assessed with continued follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D DiBartolomeo
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alyssa J Pyun
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kathleen O'Donnell
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jacquelyn K Paige
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Gregory A Magee
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fred A Weaver
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sukgu M Han
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Zuccon G, D'Oria M, Gonçalves FB, Fernandez-Prendes C, Mani K, Caldeira D, Koelemay M, Bissacco D, Trimarchi S, Van Herzeele I, Wanhainen A. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prognostic Impact of Type Ib Endoleak Following Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Scoping Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:352-361. [PMID: 37356703 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objectives of this scoping review were to assess the rate of and risk factors for type Ib endoleak and to evaluate the extent of the evidence base that links type Ib endoleak to short and long term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS Potentially eligible studies were searched in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO Citation Index, Russian Science Citation Index, and KCI-Korean Journal Database. A scoping review was performed according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. RESULTS A total of 27 articles (four prospective registries and 23 retrospective cohort studies) dealing with type Ib endoleak were included in the final analysis. The number of patients reported on was 7 197, with follow up ranging between 12 months and 93 months. The reported frequency of type Ib endoleak in patients treated with EVAR ranged from 0% to 8%, Patient and or procedure related factors associated with risk of type Ib endoleak were (1) common iliac artery (CIA) diameter ˃ 18 mm requiring use of flared stent graft limbs (FLs) ˃ 20 mm, (2) length of CIA landing zone ˂ 20 mm, (3) marked iliac tortuosity, and (4) large initial AAA diameter. Depending on the study, 50 - 100% of type Ib endoleaks were corrected by endovascular means, with a reported immediate technical success of 100% in the studies providing this information. CONCLUSION Type Ib endoleak after EVAR has been reported to occur in 0 - 8% of cases. Several anatomical features, including CIA diameter ˃ 18 mm or requiring the use of FLs ˃ 20 mm, length of CIA landing zone ˂ 20 mm, marked iliac tortuosity, and large initial AAA diameter, could increase the risk of type Ib endoleak and may require alternative therapeutic options and or more stringent follow up. Therefore, this updated scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of the frequency, risk factors, prognosis, and treatment of type Ib endoleaks, and has identified knowledge gaps in the literature to guide further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Zuccon
- Vascular Division, Cardiovascular Department, HPG23 Hospital, Bergamo, Italy. http://www.twitter.com/MarioDoria14
| | - Mario D'Oria
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy.
| | - Frederico Bastos Gonçalves
- NOVA Medical School - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel Caldeira
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria - CHULN, Portugal; Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), CAML, CEMBE, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mark Koelemay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniele Bissacco
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabelle Van Herzeele
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Peri-operative and Surgical Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Fargion AT, Esposito D, Speziali S, Pulli R, Gallitto E, Faggioli G, Gargiulo M, Bertoglio L, Melissano G, Chiesa R, Simonte G, Isernia G, Lenti M, Pratesi C. Fate of target visceral vessels in fenestrated and branched complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:584-592.e2. [PMID: 37187414 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess branch vessel outcomes after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms analyzing possible factors influencing early and long-term results. METHODS The Italian Multicentre Fenestrated and Branched registry enrolled 596 consecutive patients treated with fenestrated and branched endografts for complex aortic disease from January 2008 to December 2019 by four Italian academic centers. The primary end points of the study were technical success (defined as target visceral vessel [TVV] patency and absence of bridging device-related endoleak at final intraoperative control), and freedom from TVV instability (defined as the combined results of type IC/IIIC endoleaks and patency loss) during follow-up. Secondary end points were overall survival and TVV-related reinterventions. RESULTS We excluded 591 patients (3 patients with a surgical debranching and 2 patients who died before completion from the study cohort) were treated for a total of 1991 visceral vessels targeted by either a directional branch or a fenestration. The overall technical success rate was 98.4%. Failure was related to the use of an off-the-shelf (OTS) device (custom-made device vs OTS, HR, 0.220; P = .007) and a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% (HR, 12.460; P < .001). The mean follow-up time was 25.1 months (interquartile range, 3-39 months). The overall estimated survival rates were 87%, 77.4%, and 67.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (standard error [SE], 0.015, 0.022, and 0.032). During follow-up, TVV branch instability was observed in 91 vessels (5%): 48 type IC/IIIC endoleaks (2.6%) and 43 stenoses-thromboses (2.4%). The extent of aneurysm disease (thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm [TAAA] types I-III vs TAAA type IV/juxtarenal aortic aneurysm/pararenal aortic aneurysm) was the only independent predictor for developing a TVV-related type IC/IIIC endoleak (HR, 3.899; 95% confidence interval [CI]:, 1.924-7.900; P < .001). Risk of patency loss was independently associated with branch configuration (HR, 8.883; P < .001; 95% CI, 3.750-21.043) and renal arteries (HR, 2.848; P = .030; 95% CI, 1.108-7.319). Estimated rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of freedom from TVV instability and freedom from TVV-related reintervention were 96.6%, 93.8%, and 90% (SE, 0.005, 0.007, and 0.014) and 97.4%, 95.0%, and 91.6% (SE, 0.004, 0.007, and 0.013), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative failure to bridge a TVV was associated with a preoperative TVV stenosis of >50% and the use of OTS devices. Midterm outcomes were satisfying, with an estimated 5-year freedom from TVV instability and reintervention of 90.0% and 91.6%, respectively. During follow-up, the larger extent of aneurysm disease was associated with an increased risk of TVV-related endoleaks, whereas a branch configuration and renal arteries were more prone to patency loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Thomas Fargion
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Teaching Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Davide Esposito
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Teaching Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Speziali
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Teaching Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pulli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Teaching Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS, University Hospital Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Germano Melissano
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gioele Simonte
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Massimo Lenti
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlo Pratesi
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Careggi University Teaching Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Kölbel T, Panuccio G, Jama K, Jakimowicz T, Rohlffs F. Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Females Treated with t-Branch off the Shelf Device. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 95:32-41. [PMID: 37268105 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female sex has been characterized as a risk factor of increased mortality in patients managed for complex aortic aneurysm using endovascular means. This study aimed to present the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of females managed electively or urgently with the t-Branch device and investigate factors affecting the early outcomes. METHODS A 2-center retrospective observational study was conducted including elective and urgent female patients managed with the t-Branch device (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2020. Primary early outcomes included technical success and 30-day mortality and morbidity [spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and acute kidney injury]. Follow-up survival and freedom from reintervention rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS In total, 153 females were included; 81 (52.9%) treated urgently. Urgent patients were older (73.2 ± 8.6 vs. 68.5 ± 6.8 years; P < 0.001) and presented higher previous coronary angioplasty/stenting (16.0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.005) and lower double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, 46.3% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.04) rates. Technical success was 97.4%. Early mortality was 16.3% (22% in urgent; 12% in elective; P = 0.2) and SCI and acute kidney injury were diagnosed in 13.7% (11% in urgent; 16% in elective; P = 0.2) and 18.3% (22.2% in urgent; 13.9% in elective; P = 0.18), respectively. Multivariate regression analyses showed that DAPT and b-blockers were related to lower 30-day mortality. DAPT was also preventive for SCI. Survival rates were 68.4% [standard error (SE) 0.07] at 12 months for the urgent and 75.6% (SE 0.09) at 24 months for the elective group (P = 0.14). Freedom from reintervention rates were 81.4% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 64.7% (SE 0.09) at 18 months for the urgent and 81.7% (SE 0.06) at 6 months and 75.4% (SE 0.081) at 18 months for the elective group (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS Female patients managed with the t-Branch device for thoracoabdominal and pararenal aneurysms in elective and urgent setting presented similar 30-day mortality and SCI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jama
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Jakimowicz
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Vacirca A, Wong J, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Tenorio ER, Huang Y, Mirza A, Saqib N, Sulzer T, Mesnard T, Mendes BC, Oderich GS. Outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in patients with or without prior history of abdominal endovascular or open surgical repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:278-288.e3. [PMID: 37080442 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in patients with or without prior history of abdominal open surgical (OSR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS The clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR for treatment of CAAAs and TAAAs was reviewed. Clinical outcomes were analyzed in patients with no previous aortic repair (Controls), prior EVAR (Group 1), and prior abdominal OSR (Group 2), including 30-day mortality and major adverse events (MAEs), patient survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), secondary interventions, any type II endoleak, sac enlargement (≥5 mm), and new-onset permanent dialysis. RESULTS There were 506 patients (69% male; mean age, 72 ± 9 years) treated by FB-EVAR, including 380 controls, 54 patients in Group 1 (EVAR), and 72 patients in Group 2 (abdominal OSR). FB-EVAR was performed on average 7 ± 4 and 12 ± 6 years after the index EVAR and abdominal OSR, respectively (P < .001). All three groups had similar clinical characteristics, except for less coronary artery disease in controls and more TAAAs and branch stent graft designs in Group 2 (P < .05). Aneurysm extent was CAAA in 144 patients (28%) and TAAA in 362 patients (72%). Overall technical success, mortality, and MAE rate were 96%, 1%, and 14%, respectively, with no difference between groups. Mean follow up was 30 ± 21 months. Patient survival was significantly lower in Group 2 (P = .03), but there was no difference in freedom from ARM and secondary interventions at 5 years between groups. Group 1 patients had lower freedom from any type II endoleak (P = .02) and sac enlargement (P < .001), whereas Group 2 patients had lower freedom from new-onset permanent dialysis (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR was performed with high technical success, low mortality, and similar risk of MAEs, regardless of prior history of abdominal aortic repair. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients who had previous abdominal OSR, but freedom from ARM and secondary interventions were similar among groups. Patients with prior EVAR had lower freedom from type II endoleak and sac enlargement. Patients with prior OSR had lower freedom from new-onset dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vacirca
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Aleem Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Titia Sulzer
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Katsargyris A, Marques de Marino P, Hasemaki N, Nagel S, Botos B, Wilhelm M, Verhoeven ELG. Editor's Choice - Single Centre Midterm Experience with Primary Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair for Short Neck, Juxtarenal, and Suprarenal Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:160-166. [PMID: 36842460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of fenestrated stent grafts to treat short neck, juxta- and suprarenal aortic aneurysms is increasing worldwide, but midterm outcome reports are scarce. This study aimed to report peri-operative results and midterm outcomes after five years from a single centre. METHODS Patients treated with primary fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) for short neck, juxta- or suprarenal aortic aneurysms within the period January 2010 to May 2020 with follow up in the centre were included. Early (technical success, operative mortality, spinal cord ischaemia) and five year outcomes (cumulative survival, freedom from aortic related death, target vessel patency, target vessel instability [TVI], re-interventions) were analysed. RESULTS A total of 349 patients (313 male, mean age 72.3 ± 7.7 years) were included in the study. Technical success was 98% (342/349). The thirty day mortality rate was 0.9% (3/349). Estimated survival at five years was 69.3 ± 3.1%. Freedom from aneurysm related death at five years was 98.8% ± 0.7%. Estimated target vessel patency at five years was 98.7 ± 0.4%. Estimated freedom from TVI at five years was 97.2 ± 0.6%. Estimated freedom from re-intervention at five years was 86.5 ± 2.3%. Survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without re-interventions (p = .088). CONCLUSION Midterm results of FEVAR remain good as indicated by sustained target vessel patency and low aortic related mortality rates. An important proportion of patients require re-interventions, which do not have a negative impact on midterm survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - Pablo Marques de Marino
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Natasha Hasemaki
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Nagel
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Balazs Botos
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Manuela Wilhelm
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Eric L G Verhoeven
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Tsilimparis N, Bosiers M, Resch T, Torsello G, Austermann M, Rohlffs F, Coates B, Yeh C, Kölbel T. Two-year target vessel-related outcomes following use of off-the-shelf branched endografts for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:289-298. [PMID: 37044318 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes and target vessel patency through 2 years following thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) repair with the off-the-shelf Zenith t-Branch Thoracoabdominal Endovascular Graft (William Cook Europe). METHODS This post-market observational study was conducted at three European sites with ambispective enrollment from 2012 to 2017. Patients underwent endovascular TAAA repair with the t-Branch graft and bridging stent grafts (BSGs) for the celiac (CA), superior mesenteric (SMA), left renal (LRA), and/or right renal (RRA) arteries. Follow-up was through 2 years, per sites' standard of care. Procedural and 1-year results were reported previously. RESULTS Eighty patients (mean age, 71.0±7.4 years; 70.0% men) were enrolled; six patients had symptomatic TAAAs, and 15 patients had contained ruptures. Technical success was achieved in 98.8% of patients (79/80). Median follow-up was 22.2 months (interquartile range, 9.2-25.1 months). At 24 months, Kaplan-Meier (KM) freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality were 78.5% and 98.6%, respectively. Beyond 12 months, 38 adverse events occurred in 20 patients, including two aortic ruptures (one study aneurysm and one non-study aneurysm) and six deaths (none aneurysm-related, as reported by the site). Compared with postprocedure, maximum aneurysm diameter decreased (>5 mm) in 84.6% (44/52), remained unchanged in 3.8% (2/52), and increased (>5 mm) in 11.5% (6/52) of patients with imaging follow-up after 12 months. No conversions to open repair, and no t-Branch graft or other endograft component migration or integrity issues were reported. No loss of patency was reported in the t-Branch or iliac limb grafts throughout the study. Throughout study duration, four patients had five imaging-reported BSG compressions, none of which required secondary intervention. KM freedom from secondary intervention was 76.3% at 24 months. Fourteen target vessel-related secondary interventions were performed, primarily consisting of stent placement for endoleak, stenosis, or occlusion. KM freedom from loss of primary patency was 94.8%, 100%, 91.3%, and 89.3% for the CA, SMA, LRA, and RRA, respectively, at 24 months. KM freedom from loss of secondary patency in the CA, SMA, LRA, and RRA were 96.3%, 100%, 98.2%, and 98.3% at 24 months, respectively. A total of 298 vessels were targeted, of which 12 were occluded over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Primary and secondary target vessel patency rates through 2 years demonstrated durable repair with the t-Branch graft in patients treated for symptomatic or asymptomatic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- University Heart and Vascular Surgery Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Vascular Surgery Department, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
| | - Michel Bosiers
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Timothy Resch
- Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giovanni Torsello
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Martin Austermann
- Department of Vascular Surgery, St Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- Department of Vascular Medicine, German Aortic Center Hamburg, University Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Chyon Yeh
- Cook Research Incorporated, West Lafayette, IN
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- University Heart and Vascular Surgery Center, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Wu L, Li F, Sun X, Liu Z, Zhou J, Zheng W, Chen Y, Zheng Y. Long Term Outcomes and Potential Risk Factors for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Pseudoaneurysms in Vascular Behçet's Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:169-177. [PMID: 37068704 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyse long term outcomes and risk factors for endovascular repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms in patients with vascular Behçet's disease (BD). METHODS Medical records of 26 aortic vascular BD patients who underwent endovascular treatment at the vascular department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2002 and December 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein were used to assess BD activity. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was obtained pre- and post-operatively for almost all patients. Univariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyse risk factors for endovascular repair, such as inflammatory indicators, drug usage, and stent graft parameters. RESULTS The abdominal aorta (n = 17) was the most common site of 27 vascular BD pseudoaneurysms in this study. CTA also revealed one aortic arch pseudoaneurysm, seven descending thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysms, one thoraco-abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm, and one pseudoaneurysm at the aortic bifurcation. Most of the pseudoaneurysms were treated with covered stent grafts. The technical success rate was 96% and no deaths occurred during hospital stay. The mean follow up was 5.8 ± 5.5 years and 31% (8/26) experienced post-operative complications. Overall one, three, and five year event free survival rates were 87%, 78%, and 74%, respectively. Univariable logistic regression analysis revealed that pre-operative ESR ≥ 16.0 mm/h (p = .040), pre-operative glucocorticoid (GC) use ≤ 11.5 days (p = .024), pre-operative immunosuppressant use ≤ 15.5 days (p = .028), and length of proximal landing zone ≤ 1.95 cm (p = .034) were associated with a worse prognoses following endovascular treatment. Proximal oversize ≥ 9.5% (p = .074) was also regarded as a risk factor, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION This study further confirmed the feasibility of endovascular repair for aortic vascular BD patients. Risk factors predicting poor prognoses included elevated pre-operative ESR, insufficient pre-operative GC use or immunosuppressant use, inadequate proximal landing zone, and larger proximal oversize percentage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianglin Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fangda Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoning Sun
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhili Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingya Zhou
- Department of Medical Record, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Zheng
- Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Centre for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC-DID), The Ministry of Education Key Laboratory, Beijing, China
| | - Yuexin Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuehong Zheng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Verhagen M, Eefting D, van Rijswijk C, van der Meer R, Hamming J, van der Vorst J, van Schaik J. Increased Aortic Exclusion in Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4921. [PMID: 37568323 PMCID: PMC10420108 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative risk assessments for complex aneurysms are based on the anatomical extent of the aneurysm and do not take the length of the aortic exclusion into account, as it was developed for open repair. Nevertheless, in the endovascular repair (ER) of complex aortic aneurysms, additional segments of healthy aorta are excluded compared with open repair (OR). The aim of this study was to assess differences in aortic exclusion between the ER and OR of complex aortic aneurysms, to subsequently assess the current classification for complex aneurysm repair. METHODS This retrospective observational study included patients that underwent complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair by means of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), fenestrated and branched EVAR (FBEVAR), or branched EVAR (BEVAR). The length of aortic exclusion and the number of patent segmental arteries were determined and compared per case in ER and hypothetical OR, using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS A total of 71 patients were included, who were treated with FEVAR (n = 44), FBEVAR (n = 8), or BEVAR (n = 19) for Crawford types I (n = 5), II (n = 7), III (n = 6), IV (n = 7), and V (n = 2) thoracoabdominal or juxtarenal (n = 44) aneurysms. There was a significant increase in the median exclusion of types I, II, III, IV, and juxtarenal aneurysms (p < 0.05) in ER, compared with hypothetical OR. The number of patent segmental arteries in the ER of type I-IV and juxtarenal aneurysms was significantly lower than in hypothetical OR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION There are significant differences in the length of aortic exclusion between ER and hypothetical OR, with the increased exclusion in ER resulting in a lower number of patent segmental arteries. The ER and OR of complex aortic aneurysms should be regarded as distinct modalities, and as each approach deserves a particular risk assessment, future efforts should focus on reporting on the extent of exclusion per treatment modality, to allow for appropriate comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Verhagen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.V.); (D.E.); (J.H.); (J.v.d.V.)
| | - Daniel Eefting
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.V.); (D.E.); (J.H.); (J.v.d.V.)
| | - Carla van Rijswijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (C.v.R.); (R.v.d.M.)
| | - Rutger van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (C.v.R.); (R.v.d.M.)
| | - Jaap Hamming
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.V.); (D.E.); (J.H.); (J.v.d.V.)
| | - Joost van der Vorst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.V.); (D.E.); (J.H.); (J.v.d.V.)
| | - Jan van Schaik
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.V.); (D.E.); (J.H.); (J.v.d.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Becker D, Ali A, Prendes C, Stavroulakis K, Stana J, Tsilimparis N. Physician Modification of a Custom-Made Fenestrated Endograft By Closure of a Fenestration With Bovine Patch. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231187749. [PMID: 37464749 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231187749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ruptured mycotic pararenal aortic aneurysms are rare and serious condition that requires prompt treatment. Open surgery with aortic resection and in-situ or extra-anatomic reconstruction is the standard treatment. The aim of this technical note is to report urgent endovascular treatment using a readily available custom-made device (created for another patient), with a back-table modification using pericardium patch and a new fenestration. TECHNIQUE In preoperative measurements on centerline-based workstation, aortic diameter in proximal and distal landing zone and target vessel position matched the measurements of graft plan of custom-made device (CMD) besides left renal artery. To address current patient`s anatomy, closure of the nonsuitable fenestration with pericardial patch and creation of new fenestration (1 cm above and 1:15 hours posterior to original fenestration) for the respective target vessel have been performed. Postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan showed complete exclusion of aneurysm, perfused target vessels, and no endoleak. Under resistance-based antibiotic therapy, the patient was asymptomatic and showed normal infection parameters in blood samples postoperatively. CONCLUSION In the hands of an experienced endovascular aortic surgeon modification of a custom-made device is a quick and feasible technique in this emergency situation. Long-term follow-up must confirm the durability and reliability of this new technique. CLINICAL IMPACT The described technique of modification of a custom-made endograft can provide an alternative endovascular treatment option for urgent complex abdominal aortic pathologies. Compared to the current available treatment modalities, like physician modified endografts, off-the-shelf branched devices, parallel grafts and in-situ fenestration, it can save considerable time and provides reasonable sealing in ruptured cases. The technique offers a valuable add-on to the armamentarium of experienced endovascular physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Becker
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Ali
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Prendes
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - K Stavroulakis
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Stana
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery-Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Chan HL, Papazoglou DD, Jungi S, Weiss S, Becker D, Kotelis D, Makaloski V. Fenestrated Physician-Modified Endografts for Preservation of Main and Accessory Renal Arteries in Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4708. [PMID: 37510822 PMCID: PMC10416159 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of reporting outcomes of complex aortic aneurysm treatment such as juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, where additional techniques to preserve renal artery perfusion are required. METHODS Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent emergent and elective aortic repair with fenestrated PMEGs between March 2019 and January 2023. Endpoints were technical success, reinterventions, secondary reinterventions and target vessel patency. RESULTS Forty-seven target vessels in 37 patients (23 male, median age 75 years) were targeted, of which 44 were renal arteries (RAs) with a mean diameter of 5.4 ± 1.0 mm. Thirteen were accessory RAs and six had a diameter ≤ 4 mm. Technical success rate was 87% overall; 97% for main and 62% for accessory RAs respectively. Target vessel patency and freedom from secondary reintervention was 100% and 97% at 30 days and 96% and 91% at one year, respectively. There was no 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION Fenestrated physician-modified endografts are safe and effective for the treatment of patients with juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms when incorporating main renal arteries. Limited technical success may be expected when targeting accessory renal arteries, especially when small in diameter. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm durability of PMEGs for renal artery preservation.
Collapse
|
115
|
Tenorio ER, Mirza AK, Lima GBB, Marcondes GB, Wong J, Mendes BC, Saqib N, Khan S, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Characterization of Secondary Interventions After Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms and Its Effect on Quality of Life and Patient Survival. Ann Surg 2023; 278:140-147. [PMID: 35801701 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of secondary intervention (SI) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. BACKGROUND The effect of SI after FB-EVAR on physical and mental HR-QOL has not been described. METHODS A cohort of 430 consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR (2013-2020) was assessed with 1325 short-form 36 HR-QOL questionnaires preoperatively and during follow-up visits. SIs were classified as major or minor procedures. Endpoints included patient survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), freedom from SIs, and changes in HR-QOL physical component score (PCS) and mental component score. RESULTS There were 302 male with mean age 74±8 years treated by FB-EVAR for 133 complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and 297 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. After a mean follow up of 26±20 months, 97 patients (23%) required 137 SIs. At 5 years, freedom from any SI was 64%±4%, including freedom from minor SIs of 77%±4% and major SIs of 87%±3%. There was no difference in patient survival and freedom from ARM at same interval. On adjusted analysis, minor SIs correlated with improved survival. SIs had a negative correlation with PCS ( r =-0.8). There were no significant changes in mental component score with SIs. Predictors for SIs were fluoroscopy time, graft design, and aneurysm sac change. CONCLUSION SIs were needed in nearly 1 out of 4 patients treated by FB-EVAR with no effect on patient survival or ARM. SI resulted in decline in PCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Aleem K Mirza
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Guilherme B B Lima
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Giulianna B Marcondes
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Joshua Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN
| | - Naveed Saqib
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Sophia Khan
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Eleshra A, Haulon S, Bertoglio L, Lindsay T, Rohlffs F, Dias N, Tsilimparis N, Panuccio G, Kölbel T. Custom Made Candy Plug for Distal False Lumen Occlusion in Aortic Dissection: International Experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:50-56. [PMID: 36958480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate early and midterm outcomes of the Candy Plug (CP) technique for distal false lumen (FL) occlusion in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic dissection (AD) in a more real world cohort of patients from an international multicentre registry. METHODS A multicentre retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive patients from the contributing centres with subacute and chronic AD treated with the CP technique from October 2013 to April 2020 at 18 centres. RESULTS A custom made CP was used in 155 patients (92 males, mean age 62 ± 11 years). Fourteen (9%) presented with ruptured false lumen aneurysms. Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 138 patients (89%). The median hospital stay was 7 days (1 - 77). The 30 day mortality rate was 3% (n = 5). Stroke occurred in four patients (3%). Spinal cord ischaemia occurred in three patients (2%). The 30 day computed tomography angiogram (CTA) confirmed successful CP placement at the intended level in all patients. Early complete FL occlusion was achieved in 120 patients (77%). Early (30 day) CP related re-intervention was required in four patients (3%). The early (30 day) stent graft related re-intervention rate was 8% (n = 12). Follow up CTA was available in 142 patients (92%), with a median follow up of 23 months (6 - 87). Aneurysmal regression was achieved in 68 of 142 patients (47%); the aneurysm diameter remained stable in 69 of 142 patients (49%) and increased in five of 142 patients (4%). A higher rate of early FL occlusion was detected in the largest volume centre patients (50 [88%] vs. 70 [71%] from other centres; p = .019). No other differences in outcome were identified regarding volume of cases or learning curve. CONCLUSION This international CP technique experience confirmed its feasibility and low mortality and morbidity rates. Aortic remodelling and false lumen thrombosis rates were high and support the concept of distal FL occlusion in AD using the CP technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eleshra
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
| | | | - Luca Bertoglio
- San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Sperimental and Clinical Sciences (DSCS), University and ASST Spedali Civili Hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nuno Dias
- Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Centre, University Heart & Vascular Centre, University Medical Centre Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
O'Donnell TFX, Patel PB, Marcaccio CL, Dansey KD, Swerdlow NJ, Rastogi V, Patel VI, Beck AW, Zettervall SL, Schermerhorn ML. Outcomes of Complex Endovascular Treatment of Post-Dissection Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:58-66. [PMID: 37087065 PMCID: PMC10524097 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reports of endovascular treatment of chronic post-dissection aneurysms are limited to high volumes centres, posing questions about generalisability. METHODS All endovascular repairs of intact pararenal and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2021 were studied, and peri-operative and long term outcomes were compared between repairs of degenerative and post-dissection aneurysms. Peri-operative outcomes were compared using mixed effects logistic regression, and long term outcomes using Medicare linkage. RESULTS There were 123 patients who completed treatment for post-dissection aneurysms and 3 635 for degenerative aneurysms, with 36% of post-dissection repairs and 6.7% of degenerative repairs performed in a staged fashion (p < .001). The majority (84%) of post-dissection aneurysms were extensive thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAAs: Crawford Type 1, 2, 3, 5), compared with 22% of degenerative aneurysms (p < .001). Physician modified endografts were the primary repair type for post-dissection (73%), while commercially available fenestrated grafts were the dominant repair for degenerative (48%). The first stage of staged procedures was associated with a 2.8% peri-operative mortality rate, 5.1% spinal cord ischaemia, and 8.9% thoraco-abdominal life altering events (the composite of peri-operative death, stroke, permanent spinal cord ischaemia, and dialysis). Th final stage procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar, but technical success was lower in post-dissection repairs (75% vs. 83%, p = .018), both due to issues with the main endograft or bridging vessels (11% vs. 6.6%, p = .055), and types 1and 3 endoleak at completion (17% vs. 10%, p = .035). In addition, high volume surgeons had two fold higher odds of technical success than their low volume counterparts. Adjusted peri-operative outcomes were similar between pathology types, including when comparisons were restricted to extensive TAAAs. Crude and adjusted three year survival were similar, but three year re-interventions were significantly higher following post-dissection repairs (p < .001). CONCLUSION Complex endovascular repair of chronic post-dissection aneurysms is feasible but is associated with high rates of re-interventions and non-trivial rates of lack of technical success. More data are needed to evaluate the long term durability of these procedures, and the utility of centralising these complex procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F X O'Donnell
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Centre/Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priya B Patel
- Division of General Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Christina L Marcaccio
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kirsten D Dansey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas J Swerdlow
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vinamr Rastogi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Virendra I Patel
- Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Centre/Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Sara L Zettervall
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marc L Schermerhorn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Spath P, Pasqui E, Angiletta D, Spinazzola A, Chegai F, Isernia G, Lepidi S, Silingardi R, de Donato G, Gargiulo M. Penumbra Indigo Percutaneous Aspiration Thrombectomy System in the treatment of Aortic Endograft Iliac Limb Occlusion: Results from an Italian Multicentre Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:77-84. [PMID: 37084878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Penumbra Indigo percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy (PAT) system in the clinical presentation of iliac limb occlusion (ILO) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS A retrospective, observational, multicentre study conducted in eight Italian vascular centres. Consecutive patients presenting with ILO after EVAR were eligible. To assess vessel revascularisation, Thrombo-aspiration In Peripheral Ischaemia (TIPI) classification (score 0-3) was used at presentation (t1), after PAT (t2), and after adjunctive procedures (t3). Successful revascularisation was considered TIPI 2-3 (near complete or complete). Primary intra-operative outcomes were technical success (TS) of Indigo PAT and combined TS of PAT associated with adjunctive procedures when needed. Primary follow up outcomes were safety and effectiveness at one, six, and 12 months. RESULTS From September 2019 to December 2021, there were 48 ILO and 17 patients (35%) [median age 75 years, IQR 71, 83 years; male, 14 (82%); urgent, 8 (47%)] were treated and enrolled. The median time after primary EVAR was 24 months (IQR 0, 42 months). The median clot age from ILO diagnosis to PAT was three days (IQR 1, 12 days). Ten patients (59%) presented with limb threatening ischaemia. At t1, TIPI 0 and 1 was present in 13 (76%) and four (24%) cases, respectively. At t2, primary TS (TIPI 2-3) was achieved in 14 cases (82%) after Indigo PAT (p < .001). Fifteen patients (88%) required adjunctive procedures (14 re-linings, one surgical patch angioplasty). At t3, combined TS was achieved in 16 cases (94%). Intra-operative complication included one (6%) distal embolisation, treated successfully. The 30 day mortality was one case (6%) due to pneumonia. At one, six, and 12 months, clinical success was 100% without ILO recurrence. The median follow up was 23 months (IQR 11, 41 months): at 18 months, survival and freedom from re-intervention were 91 ± 8% and 90 ± 9%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study reports for the first time the efficacy and safety of Penumbra Indigo PAT for ILO after EVAR, with promising technical and clinical success up to one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital "Infermi" Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
| | - Edoardo Pasqui
- Vascular Surgery, University of Siena, DSMCN, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Spinazzola
- Interventional Radiology, Unit of Radiology, ASST-Crema, Crema, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Chegai
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Unit of Radiology, Hospital Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Department Vascular Surgery of Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Bologna Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Tenorio ER, Schanzer A, Timaran CH, Schneider DB, Mendes BC, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA, Parodi FE, Gasper WJ, Beck AW, Sweet MP, Zettervall SL, Huang Y, Oderich GS. Effect of bridging stent graft selection for directional branches on target artery outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair in the United States Aortic Research Consortium. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:10-28.e3. [PMID: 36948277 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of directional branches (DBs) bridging stent choice on target artery (TA) outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS Patients enrolled in nine prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies in the United States between 2005 and 2020 were analyzed. All patients who had at least one TA incorporated by DB using either self-expandable (SESGs), balloon-expandable (BESGs), or hybrid stent graft combinations (HSGs). Endpoints were TA patency and freedom from TA endoleak, instability, and reintervention. RESULTS There were 800 patients with 2426 renal-mesenteric arteries incorporated by DBs. DB stent selection was SESGs in 1205 TAs (50%), BESGs in 1095 TAs (45%), and HSGs in 126 TAs (5%). SESGs were predominantly used in the first three quartiles of the study period, whereas BESGs comprised 75% of all stents between 2017 and 2020. The median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 6-35 months). At 5 years, BESGs had significantly lower freedom from TA instability (78% ± 4% vs 88% ± 1% vs 96% ± 2%; log-rank P =.010), freedom from TA endoleaks (87% ± 3% vs 97% ± 1% vs 99% ± 1%; log-rank P < .001), and freedom from TA reintervention (83% ± 4% vs 95% ± 1% vs 99% ± 2%; log-rank P <.001) compared with SESGs or HSGs, respectively. For renal arteries, there was no difference in freedom from TA instability for BESGs, SESGs, or HSGs. However, freedom from TA endoleaks and reintervention were lower for renal arteries targeted by BESGs compared with DBs targeted by SESGs and HSGs (83% ± 6% vs 98% ± 1% vs 100%; log-rank P < .001; and 70% ± 10% vs 92% ± 1% vs 96% ± 4%; log-rank P = .022). For mesenteric arteries, DBs targeted by BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, endoleak, and reintervention than SESGs or HSGs. In stent-specific analysis, iCAST BESGs had the lowest freedom from TA instability either for renal or mesenteric arteries, primarily due to higher rates of TA endoleaks. There was no difference in patency in any scenario. Independent predictors of TA instability were age (+1-year: hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.99), stent diameter (+1 mm: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80), and BESG (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9). CONCLUSIONS DBs incorporated using BESGs had lower freedom from TA instability, TA endoleak, and TA reintervention compared with SESGs and HSGs. The patency of DBs was not affected by the type of stent construction. The observed performance disadvantage associated with BESGs appears to have largely been driven by iCAST usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Carlos H Timaran
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matthew J Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - F Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Warren J Gasper
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Ying Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Marecki HL, Finnesgard EJ, Nuvvula S, Nguyen TT, Boitano LT, Jones DW, Schanzer A, Simons JP. Characterization and management of type II and complex endoleaks after fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2023; 78:29-37. [PMID: 36889609 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoleaks are more common after fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) than infrarenal EVAR secondary to the length of aortic coverage and number of component junctions. Although reports have focused on type I and III endoleaks, less is known regarding type II endoleaks after F/B-EVAR. We hypothesized that type II endoleaks would be common and often complex (associated with additional endoleak types), given the potential for multiple inflow and outflow sources. We sought to describe the incidence and complexity of type II endoleaks after F/B-EVAR. METHODS F/B-EVAR data prospectively collected at a single institution in an investigational device exemption clinical trial (G130210) were retrospectively analyzed (2014-2021). Endoleaks were characterized by type, time to detection, and management. Primary endoleaks were defined as those present on completion imaging or at first postoperative imaging, and secondary were those on subsequent imaging. Recurrent endoleaks were those that developed after a successfully resolved endoleak. Reinterventions were considered for type I or III endoleaks or any endoleak associated with sac growth >5 mm. Technical success defined as the absence of flow in the aneurysm sac at procedure conclusion and methods of intervention were captured. RESULTS Among 335 consecutive F/B-EVARs (mean ± standard deviation follow-up: 2.5 ± 1.5 years), 125 patients (37%) experienced 166 endoleaks (81 primary, 72 secondary, and 13 recurrent). Of these 125 patients, 50 (40% of patients) underwent 71 interventions for 60 endoleaks. Type II endoleaks were the most frequent (n = 100, 60%), with 20 identified during the index procedure, 12 (60%) of which resolved before 30-day follow-up. Of the 100 type II endoleaks, 20 (20%; 12 primary, 5 secondary, and 3 recurrent) were associated with sac growth; 15 (75%) of those with associated sac growth underwent intervention. At intervention, 6 (40%) were reclassified as complex, with a concomitant type I or type III endoleak. Initial technical success for endoleak treatment was 96% (68 of 71). There were 13 recurrences, all of which were associated with complex endoleaks. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of the patients who underwent F/B-EVAR experienced an endoleak. The majority were classified as type II, with nearly a fifth associated with sac expansion. Interventions for a type II endoleak frequently led to reclassification as complex, with a concomitant type I or III endoleak not appreciated on computed tomography angiography and/or duplex. Further study is needed to determine if the primary treatment goal for complex aneurysm repair is sac stability or sac regression, as this would inform both the importance of properly classifying endoleaks noninvasively and the intervention threshold for managing type II endoleaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hazel L Marecki
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA; Baystate Vascular Services, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Baystate Campus, Springfield, MA
| | - Eric J Finnesgard
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Sri Nuvvula
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Tammy T Nguyen
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Laura T Boitano
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Douglas W Jones
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Andres Schanzer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Jessica P Simons
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Mario D, Alessandro G, Giovanni P, Gianbattista P, Rocco G, Mauro G, Nicola M, Roberto C, Sandro L, Luca B. Total Transfemoral Branched Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair (TORCH2): Short-term and 1-Year Outcomes From a National Multicenter Registry. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179864. [PMID: 37326371 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of steerable sheaths to allow total transfemoral access (TFA) of branched endovascular repair (BEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms has been proposed as an alternative to upper extremity access (UEA); however, multicenter results from high-volume aortic centers are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Total Transfemoral Branched Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Repair (TORCH2) study is a physician-initiated, national, multicenter, retrospective, observational registry (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04930172) of patients undergoing BEVAR with a TFA for the cannulation of reno-visceral target vessels (TV). The study endpoints, classified according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards, were (1) technical success; (2) 30-day peri-operative major adverse events; (3) 30-day and midterm clinical success; (4) 30-day and midterm branch instability and TV-related adverse events (reinterventions, type I/III endoleaks). RESULTS Sixty-eight patients (42 males; median age: 72 years) were treated through a TFA. All the centers included their entire experience with TFA: 18 (26%) used a homemade steerable sheath, and in 28 cases (41%), a stabilizing guidewire was employed. Steerable technical success was achieved in 66 patients (97%) with an overall in-hospital mortality of 6 patients (9%, 3 elective cases [3/58, 5%] and 3 urgent/emergent cases [3/12, 25%]) and major adverse event rate of 18% (12 patients). Overall, 257 bridging stents were implanted; of these, 225 (88%) were balloon-expandable and 32 (12%) were self-expanding. No strokes were observed among the patient completing the procedure from a TFA. One patient (2%) who failed to be treated completely from a TFA and needed a bailout UEA suffered an ischemic stroke on postoperative day 2. There were 10 (15%) major access-site complications. At 1-year follow-up, overall survival was 80%, and the rate of branch instability was 6%. CONCLUSIONS A TFA for TV cannulation is a safe and feasible option with high technical success preventing the stroke risk of UEA. Primary patency at midterm seems comparable to historical controls, and future larger studies will be needed to assess potential differences with alternative options. CLINICAL IMPACT Using a transfemoral approach for retrograde cannulation of reno-visceral branches is feasiable, safe and effective, thereby representing a reliable alternative for BEVAR interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D'Oria Mario
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Grandi Alessandro
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pratesi Giovanni
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Parlani Gianbattista
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Giudice Rocco
- UOC di Chirurgia Vascolare, Dipartimento Cardiovascolare, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni-Addolorata, Rome, Italy
| | - Gargiulo Mauro
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), S. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mangialardi Nicola
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale San Camillo-Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiesa Roberto
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lepidi Sandro
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital of Trieste ASUGI, Trieste, Italy
| | - Bertoglio Luca
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical and Clinical Sciences, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Kapalla M, Busch A, Lutz B, Nebelung H, Wolk S, Reeps C. Single-center initial experience with inner-branch complex EVAR in 44 patients. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1188501. [PMID: 37396572 PMCID: PMC10309562 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1188501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The use of inner-branch aortic stent grafts in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies aims at broad applicability and stable bridging stent sealing compared to other endovascular technologies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes with a single manufacturer custom-made and off-the-shelf inner-branched endograft in a mixed patient cohort. Methods This retrospective, monocentric study between 2019 and 2022 included 44 patients treated with inner-branched aortic stent grafts (iBEVAR) as custom-made device (CMD) or off-the-shelf device (E-nside) with at least four inner branches. The primary endpoints were technical and clinical success. Results Overall, 77% (n = 34) and 23% (n = 10) of the patients (mean age 77 ± 6.5 years, n = 36 male) were treated with a custom-made iBEVAR with at least four inner branches and an off-the-shelf graft, respectively. Treatment indications were thoracoabdominal pathologies in 52.2% (n = 23), complex abdominal aneurysms in 25% (n = 11), and type Ia endoleaks in 22.7% (n = 10). Preoperative spinal catheter placement was performed in 27% (n = 12) of patients. Implantation was entirely percutaneous in 75% (n = 33). Technical success was 100%. Target vessel success manifested at 99% (178/180). There was no in-hospital mortality. Permanent paraplegia developed in 6.8% (n = 3) of patients. The mean follow-up was 12 months (range 0-52 months). Three late deaths (6.8%) occurred, one related to an aortic graft infection. Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year survival manifested at 95% and branch patency at 98% (177/180). Re-intervention was necessary for a total of six patients (13.6%). Conclusions Inner-branch aortic stent grafts provide a feasible option for the treatment of complex aortic pathologies, both elective (custom-made) and urgent (off-the-shelf). The technical success rate is high with acceptable short-term outcomes and moderate re-intervention rates comparable to existing platforms. Further follow-up will evaluate long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marvin Kapalla
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Albert Busch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Brigitta Lutz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Heiner Nebelung
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Wolk
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Reeps
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Gouveia E Melo R, Fernández Prendes C, Khanafer A, Wanhainen A, Mani K, Rouhani G, Chao V, Tay KH, Chong TT, Adam D, Dias N, Agaev A, Tsilimparis N. Common Designs of Custom-Made Fenestrated Arch Devices and Applicability of an Off-the-Shelf Design. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179593. [PMID: 37300282 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze device designs, similarities and overlaps of custom-made fenestrated arch endografts intended for mid/distal arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter cross-sectional study analyzing custom-made anonymized graft plans was performed. Graft plans were included from a cohort of mid/distal aortic arch repairs using custom-made fenestrated aortic endografts treated at 8 centers. Grafts targeting >2 arteries were excluded. No patient/clinical data were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed followed by an analysis of overlap of the designs to reach a common design in which the greatest number of grafts would overlap. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one graft plans were included. All grafts were custom-made grafts from the COOK Medical Fenestrated arch platform. Ninety-four (71.8%) had a scallop-and-single-fenestration design, 33 (25.2%) had a single fenestration and 4 (4.3%) a single scallop. For analysis purposes, these latter 4 grafts were excluded. Two main graft plans (Plans 1 and 2) were proposed after analysis with similar configuration (1 scallop with 30 mm width, 20 mm height, 12:00 position; 1 preloaded fenestration with 8 mm diameter, 26 mm from the top of the graft and 12:00 position; tapered, with a 193 mm length and 32 mm distal diameter) but with 2 different proximal diameters of 38 mm (Plan 1) and 44 mm (Plan 2), reaching an overall feasibility of 85.8% (n=109), being 47.2% (n=60) and 38.6% (n=49) for each design, respectively. CONCLUSION The degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) graft designs was high. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility. CLINICAL IMPACT In a multicenter study analyzing 127 fenestrated aortic arch endograft plans from 9 aortic centers, we found that the degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped arch graft designs was high and that 2 proposed graft designs would be theoretically applicable in 85.8% of cases. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Adib Khanafer
- University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Guido Rouhani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Donald Adam
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center Malmö, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Arzou Agaev
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Colacchio EC, Berton M, Grego F, Piazza M, Menegolo M, Squizzato F, Antonello M. Post-Operative and Mid-Term Renal Function Impairment Following Elective Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Incidence and Risk Factors Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111955. [PMID: 37296807 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of two post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) stages according to the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End-stage (RIFLE) criteria in patients undergoing fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) for complex aortic aneurysms. Furthermore, we analyzed predictors of post-operative AKI and mid-term renal function deterioration and mortality. Methods. We included all patients who underwent elective FEVAR for abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms between January 2014 and September 2021, independently from their preoperative renal function. We registered cases of post-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) both at risk (R-AKI) and injury stage (I-AKI) according to the RIFLE criteria. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was noted preoperatively, at the 48th post-operative hour, at the maximum post-operative peak, at discharge, and then during follow-up approximately every six months. Predictors of AKI were analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Predictors of mid-term chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stage ≥ 3) onset and mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results. Forty-five patients were included in the present study. Mean age was 73.9 ± 6.1 years and 91% of patients were males. Thirteen patients (29%) presented with a preoperative CKD (stage ≥ 3). Post-operative I-AKI was detected in five patients (11.1%). The aneurysm diameter, thoracoabdominal aneurysms and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were identified as predictors of AKI in univariate analysis (OR 1.05, 95% CI [1.005-1.20], p = 0.030; OR 6.25, 95% CI [1.03-43.97], p = 0.046; OR 7.43, 95% CI [1.20-53.36], p = 0.031; respectively), yet none of these factors were significative on multivariate analysis. Predictors of CKD onset (stage ≥3) during follow-up on multivariate analysis were age (HR 1.16, 95% CI [1.02-1.34], p = 0.023), post-operative I-AKI (HR 26.82, 95% CI [4.18-218.10], p < 0.001) and renal artery occlusion (HR 29.87, 95% CI [2.33-309.05], p = 0.013), while aortic-related reinterventions where not significantly associated with this outcome in univariate analysis (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.07-2.77], p = 0.615). Mortality was influenced by preoperative CKD (stage ≥3) (HR 5.68, 95% CI [1.63-21.80], p = 0.006) and post-operative AKI (HR 11.60, 95% CI [1.70-97.51], p = 0.012). R-AKI did not represent a risk factor for CKD (stage ≥ 3) onset (HR 1.35, 95% CI [0.45-3.84], p = 0.569) or for mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI [0.59-4.19], p = 0.339) during follow-up. Conclusions. In-hospital post-operative I-AKI represented the main major adverse event in our cohort, influencing CKD (≥ stage 3) onset and mortality during follow-up, which were not influenced by post-operative R-AKI and aortic-related reinterventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elda Chiara Colacchio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Mariagiovanna Berton
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Franco Grego
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Piazza
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Mirko Menegolo
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Squizzato
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Antonello
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Section, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Smeltz AM, Farber MA, Parodi FE, An X, Kirsch RJ, Hipp JS, Kumar PA, Arora H. Comparison of Landmark-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Cerebrospinal Fluid Drain-Related Complications After Aortic Repairs. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023:S1053-0770(23)00358-0. [PMID: 37328307 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) are efficacious in preventing spinal cord injury after thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with extensive coverage. Increasingly, fluoroscopy is used to guide placement instead of the traditional landmark-based approach, but it is unknown which approach is associated with fewer complications. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING In the operating room. PARTICIPANTS Patients having undergone thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair with a CSFD over a 7-year period at a single center. INTERVENTIONS No intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Groups were reviewed and statistically compared with respect to baseline characteristics, ease of CSFD placement, and major and minor complications directly related to placement. A total of 150 CSFDs were placed with landmark guidance as opposed to 95 with fluoroscopy guidance. Compared to the landmark group, patients with fluoroscopy-guided CSFDs were older (p < 0.008), had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores (p = 0.008), required fewer CSFD placement attempts (p = 0.011), had the CSFD in place for longer duration (p < 0.001), and had a similar incidence of CSFD-related complications (p > 0.999). Composites of both major (4.5% of cases) and minor CSFD-related complications (6.1% of cases), the primary outcomes of the study, occurred with similar incidences between the 2 groups (p > 0.999 for both comparisons) after adjusting potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repairs, there were no significant differences in the risk of major and minor CSFD-related complications between fluoroscopic guidance and the landmark approach. Although the authors' institution is a high-volume center for this type of procedure, the study was limited by a small sample size. Hence, regardless of the technique used for the placement of CSFD, the risks related to the placement should be balanced carefully against the potential benefits resulting from spinal cord injury prevention. Fluoroscopy-aided insertion of CSFD requires fewer attempts and, hence, may be better tolerated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan M Smeltz
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Mark A Farber
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - F Ezequiel Parodi
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Xinming An
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rachel J Kirsch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - John S Hipp
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Priya A Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH
| | - Harendra Arora
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Piazza M, Squizzato F, Pratesi G, Tshomba Y, Gaggiano A, Gatta E, Simonte G, Piffaretti G, Frigatti P, Veraldi GF, Silingardi R, Antonello M. Editor's Choice - Early Outcomes of a Novel Off the Shelf Preloaded Inner Branch Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies in the ItaliaN Branched Registry of E-nside EnDograft (INBREED). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:811-817. [PMID: 36871927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the early outcomes of a novel off the shelf pre-loaded inner branched thoraco-abdominal endograft (E-nside) in the treatment of aortic pathologies. METHODS Data from a physician initiated national multicentre registry on patients treated with the E-nside endograft, were prospectively collected and analysed. Pre-operative clinical and anatomical characteristics, procedural data, and early outcomes (90 days) were recorded in a dedicated electronic data capture system. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints were early mortality (90 days), procedural metrics, target vessel patency, endoleak rate, and major adverse events (MAEs) at 90 days. RESULTS In total, 116 patients from 31 Italian centres were included. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) patient age was 73 ± 8 years and 76 (65.5%) were male. Aortic pathologies included degenerative aneurysm in 98 (84.5%), post-dissection aneurysm in five (4.3%), pseudoaneurysm in six (5.2%), penetrating aortic ulcer or intramural haematoma in four (3.4%), and subacute dissection in three (2.6%). Mean ± SD aneurysm diameter was 66 ± 17 mm; aneurysm extent was Crawford I - III in 55 (50.4%), IV in 21 (19.2%), pararenal in 29 (26.7%), and juxtarenal in four (3.7%). The procedure setting was urgent in 25 (21.5%) patients. Median procedural time was 240 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 195, 303), with a median contrast volume of 175 mL (IQR 120, 235). The endograft's technical success rate was 98.2% and the 90 day mortality rate was 5.2% (n = 6; 2.1% for elective repair and 16% for urgent repair). The 90-days cumulative MAE rate was 24.1% (n = 28). At 90 days, there were 10 (2.3%) target vessel related events (nine occlusions and one type IC endoleak) and one type 1A endoleak requiring re-intervention. CONCLUSION In this real life, non-sponsored registry, the E-nside endograft was used for the treatment of a broad spectrum of aortic pathologies, including urgent cases and different anatomies. The results showed excellent technical implantation safety and efficacy, as well as early outcomes. Longer term follow up is needed to better define the clinical role of this novel endograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Piazza
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Francesco Squizzato
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pratesi
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Yamume Tshomba
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli I.R.C.C.S., Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Gaggiano
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Emanuele Gatta
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Gioele Simonte
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gabriele Piffaretti
- Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, ASST Settelaghi University Teaching Hospital, University of Insubria School of Medicine, Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Frigatti
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, S. Maria della Misericordia University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Silingardi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Baggiovara (MO), Italy
| | - Michele Antonello
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Spath P, Cardona-Gloria Y, Torsello G, Gallitto E, Öz T, Beropoulis E, Stana J, Gargiulo M, Tsilimparis N. Use of Secondary Iliac Branch Devices after Previous Endovascular Abdominal and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:819-826. [PMID: 36707020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of iliac branch devices (IBDs), as secondary procedure, for the treatment of type Ib endoleak or evolution of iliac artery disease after prior endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for thoraco-abdominal (TAAAs) or abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS A multicentre observational study of three European centres. The study included 75 patients (age 71 ± 9 years, 96% men) with previous EVAR (n = 64, 85%) or fenestrated or branched (FB) EVAR (n = 11, 15%). Overall, 88 IBDs were implanted to treat aneurysmal iliac artery evolution in 40 (53%) and type Ib endoleak in 35 (47%) cases, respectively. Thirteen (17%) patients received bilateral IBDs. Internal iliac artery (IIA) catheterisation was done through a transaxillary access (n = 82, 93%) or up and over (n = 6, 7%) technique. The primary endpoint was technical success. Secondary endpoints were 30 day major adverse event, early and long term freedom from re-intervention and target vessel instability. RESULTS All procedures were technically successful (100%). During hospitalisation, there were four (5%) major adverse events and three (4%) early re-interventions, but no death, stroke, or damage to previous endografts. The median follow up was 47 (interquartile range 42) months, and the five year survival rate was 78 ± 6% with no aortic related death. Cox's regression analysis showed pre-operative renal function impairment (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 - 10.1; p = .033), and primary TAAA repair (HR 6.1; 95% CI 1.6-22.3; p = .006) as independent factors for long term mortality. Freedom from re-interventions was 85 ± 4% at five years with 11 (12%) cases (five endoleaks, four IBD thromboses, two stenoses). IIA instability was reported in three (3%) limbs and freedom from IIA instability was 95 ± 3% after 60 months. CONCLUSION Secondary IBD after EVAR is a safe and effective procedure with high technical success and low complication rates. The technique of choice to revascularise the IIA seems not to affect early and follow up results. Long term durability of IBD repair is acceptable with low rates of IIA re-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Vascular Surgery, DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Yamel Cardona-Gloria
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Institute for Vascular Research, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Giovanni Torsello
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Institute for Vascular Research, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Tugce Öz
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Efthymios Beropoulis
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Institute for Vascular Research, St. Franziskus Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Metropolitan Unit of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Yazar O, Pilz da Cunha G, de Haan MW, Mees BM, Schurink GW. Impact of stent-graft complexity on mid-term results in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair of juxtarenal and suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 64:268-278. [PMID: 36106397 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12311-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of stent-graft complexity on clinical outcome after fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FEVAR) has been conflicting in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare mid-term results of stent-grafts with renal fenestrations alone with more complex stent-grafts including mesenteric fenestrations. METHODS A single center retrospective study was conducted on 154 patients, who underwent FEVAR from 2006 to 2020 at our institution. RESULTS There were 54 (35.1%) patients in the renal FEVAR group and 100 (64.9%) patients in the complex FEVAR group. Median follow-up of the total group was 25 months (IQR 7-45). There were no significant differences in technical success and perioperative mortality. Intraoperative complications (4% vs. 18%, P=0.001), operative time (145 min vs. 191 min, P=0.001), radiation dose (119372 mGy*cm2 vs. 159573 mGy*cm2, P=0.004) and fluoroscopy time (39 min vs. 54 min, P=0.007) were significantly lower in the renal FEVAR group. During follow-up target vessel instability, endoleaks and reinterventions were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In this single center retrospective study, renal FEVAR was a safe and effective treatment for patients with juxtarenal AAA demonstrating fewer intraoperative complications and similar mid-term outcomes as complex FEVAR. If the anatomy is compatible for renal FEVAR, it might be unnecessary to expose patients to potentially more complications by choosing a complex FEVAR strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozan Yazar
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel W de Haan
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Barend M Mees
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W Schurink
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands -
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Zlatanovic P, Mascia D, Ancetti S, Yeung KK, Graumans MJ, Jongkind V, Viitala H, Venermo M. Short Term and Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular versus Open Repair for Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching: Results from Juxta- and pararenal aortic Aneurysm Multicentre European Study (JAMES). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:828-836. [PMID: 36858252 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the short and long term clinical outcomes of endovascular (EVAR) vs. open surgical repair (OSR) of juxtarenal (JAAAs) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs) in five high volume European academic centres. METHODS This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of five high volume European academic centres (> 50 open or 50 endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs annually) including 834 consecutive patients who were operated on and prospectively followed. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each patient who underwent OSR was matched with one patient who underwent EVAR in a 1:1 ratio (145 patients per group). The primary endpoint was long term all cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was freedom from aortic related re-intervention. RESULTS After a follow up of 87 months, no difference in overall survival between the two groups was observed (38.6% for EVAR vs. 42.1% for OSR; p = .88). Patients undergoing EVAR underwent aortic related re-interventions more frequently (24.1% vs. 6.9%; p < .001). Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred more frequently in patients in the OSR group (40.7% vs. 24.8%; p = .006). However, most patients who suffered from AKI recovered without further progression to renal failure. In hospital (3.4% for EVAR vs. 4.1% for OSR; p = 1.0) and 30 day (4.1% for EVAR vs. 5.5% for OSR; p = .80) mortality rates did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Both open and endovascular treatment can be performed in high volume aortic centres with low short term mortality and morbidity rates, and good long term outcomes. These data provide useful information to help patients choose between the two procedures when both are feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petar Zlatanovic
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
| | - Daniele Mascia
- Vascular Surgery Unit at the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Kak Khee Yeung
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Jaap Graumans
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Jongkind
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Vascular Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Viitala
- Vascular Surgery at the Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maarit Venermo
- Vascular Surgery at the Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Bertoglio L, Grandi A, Veraldi GF, Pulli R, Antonello M, Bonvini S, Isernia G, Bellosta R, Buia F, Silingardi R. Midterm results on a new self-expandable covered stent combined with branched stent grafts: Insights from a multicenter Italian registry. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1598-1606.e3. [PMID: 36822256 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the technical periprocedural and midterm outcomes of endovascular repairs with multibranched endovascular repair or iliac branch devices combined with a new self-expanding covered stent. METHODS The COvera in BRAnch registry is a physician-initiated, multicenter, ambispective, observational registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04598802) enrolling patients receiving a multibranched endovascular repair or iliac branch devices procedure mated with Bard Covera Plus (Tempe, AZ) covered stent, designed to evaluate the outcomes of the covered stent mated with patient-specific and off-the-shelf branched stent graft. Primary end points were technical success, branch instability, and freedom from aortic and branch-related reintervention within 30 days and at follow-up. Preoperative characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes definitions were graded according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-four patients (76 years; range, 70-80 years; 79% males) in 24 centers were enrolled for a total of 708 target vessels treated. The covered stents were mated with an off-the-shelf graft in 556 vessels (79%) and a custom-made graft in 152 (21%). Three hundred seven adjunctive relining stents in 277 vessels (39%) were deployed, of which 116 (38%) were proximal, 66 (21%) intrastent, and 125 (41%) distal. Adjunctive relining stent placement was more frequent when landing in a vessel branch instead of the main trunk (59% vs 39%; P = .031), performing a percutaneous access (49% vs 35%; P < .001), using a stent with a diameter of 8 mm or greater (44% vs 36%; P = .032) and a length of 80 mm or greater (65% vs 55%; P = .005), when a post-dilatation was not performed (45% vs 29%; P < .001) and when an inner branch configuration was used (55% vs 35%; P < .001). Perioperative technical bridging success was 98%. Eight patients (3%) died in the perioperative period. Two deaths (1%) were associated with renal branch occlusion followed by acute kidney injury and paraplegia. Follow-up data were available for 638 vessels (90%) at a median of 32 months (Q1, Q3, 21, 46). Branch instability was reported in 1% of branches. Forty-six patients (17%) died during follow-up, nine (3%) of them owing to aortic-related causes. Primary patency rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 99% (581/587), 99% (404/411), and 97% (272/279), respectively. Branch instability was associated with patient-specific devices (9% vs 4%; P = .014) and intrastent adjunctive stent placement (12% vs 2%; P = .003), especially when a bare metal balloon-expandable stent was used (25% vs 3%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The use of this new self-expanding covered stent mated with branched endografts proved to be safe and feasible with high technical procedural success rates. Low rates of branch instability were observed at midterm follow-up. Comparative studies with other commercially available covered stents are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Grandi
- Division of vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Division Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pulli
- Division Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Bari School of Medicine, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Antonello
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Bonvini
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Raffaello Bellosta
- Division of vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, Poliambulanza Foundation, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Buia
- Pediatric and Adult Cardio-Thoracovascular, Onchoematologic and Emergencies Radiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Division of vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Cortolillo NS, Guerra A, Murphy E, Hoel AW, Eskandari MK, Tomita TM. Outcomes of the Gore ® Excluder ® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis Using Self Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Stent Grafts for the Internal Iliac Artery Component. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231169177. [PMID: 37148192 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231169177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The GORE® EXCLUDER® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona) was developed to be used in combination with a self-expanding stent graft (SESG) for the internal iliac artery (IIA) bridging stent. Balloon-expandable stent grafts (BESGs) are an alternative for the IIA, offering advantages in sizing, device tracking, precision, and lower profile delivery. We compared the performance of SESG and BESG when used as the IIA bridging stent in patients undergoing EVAR with IBE. METHODS This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent EVAR with IBE implantation at a single center from October 2016 to May 2021. Anatomic and procedural characteristics were recorded via chart review and computed tomography (CT) postprocessing software (Vitrea® v7.14). Devices were assigned to SESG vs. BESG groups based on the type of device landing into the most distal IIA segment. Analysis was performed per device to account for patients undergoing bilateral IBE. The primary endpoint was IIA patency, and secondary endpoint was IBE-related endoleak. RESULTS During the study period, 48 IBE devices were implanted in 41 patients (mean age 71.1 years). All IBE devices were implanted in conjunction with an infrarenal endograft. There were 24 devices in each of the self-expanding internal iliac component (SE-IIC) and balloon-expandable internal iliac component (BE-IIC) groups. The BE-IIC group had smaller diameter IIA target vessels (11.6±2.0 mm vs. 8.4±1.7 mm, p<0.001). Mean follow-up was 525 days. Loss of IIA patency occurred in 2 SESG devices (8.33%) at 73 and 180 days postprocedure, and in zero BESG devices, however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.16). There was 1 IBE-related endoleak requiring reintervention during the study period. A BESG device required reintervention due to Type 3 endoleak at 284 days. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant differences in outcomes between SESG and BESG when used for the IIA bridging stent in EVAR with IBE. The BESGs were associated with using 2 IIA bridging stents and were more often deployed in smaller IIA target arteries. Retrospective study design and small sample size may limit the generalizability of our findings. CLINICAL IMPACT This series compares postoperative and midterm outcomes of self expanding stent grafts and balloon expandable stent grafts (BESG) when used as the internal iliac stent graft as part of a Gore® Excluder® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE). With similar outcomes between the two stent-grafts, our series suggests that some of the advantages of BESG, device sizing, tracking, deployment, and profile, may be able to be leveraged without impacting the mid-term performance of the IBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S Cortolillo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andres Guerra
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Eric Murphy
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrew W Hoel
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark K Eskandari
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tadaki M Tomita
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Spath P, Tsilimparis N, Furlan F, Hamwi T, Prendes CF, Stana J. Additional Aortic Coverage With an Off The Shelf, Multibranched Endograft Compared With Custom Made Devices For Endovascular Repair of Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:710-718. [PMID: 36707021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (p-AAA) require complex endovascular aortic repair or open surgical repair with suprarenal clamping. Custom made devices (CMD), including fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) or off the shelf (OTS) multibranched devices, are available treatment options. The aim of this study was to determine the additional healthy aortic coverage using an OTS multibranched endograft vs. a CMD for the treatment of p-AAAs. METHODS This was a retrospective single centre analysis of prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients with p-AAAs requiring a proximal landing zone above the coeliac artery (CA), planned and treated with CMDs (Zenith Fenestrated) between January 2017 and December 2021 were included in this study. Treatment with supracoeliac coverage using available OTS multibranched devices was simulated using available pre-operative images: T-Branch; E-nside; and TAMBE. Study endpoints included the need for additional proximal aortic coverage, and the number of the segmental arteries additionally covered proximally from the CA for OTS devices compared with CMDs. RESULTS Eighty three patients with p-AAAs were treated with CMDs (all FEVAR), including juxtarenal AAAs (n = 46; 56%), suprarenal AAAs (n = 20; 24%), and short neck AAAs (n = 17; 20%). In this study, treatment with 249 (3 × 83) OTS endografts was simulated. When compared with CMDs, OTS devices required a mean of 74 ± 19 mm of additional proximal healthy aortic coverage from the CA (CMD: 33 ± 19 mm vs. OTS: 108 ± 6 mm; p ≤ .001), as well as an average sacrifice of 2.5 additional segmental arteries (CMD: 1.3 ± 0.8 vs. OTS: 3.8 ± 0.9; p ≤ .001). In 94% of patients, at least one of the available multibranched endografts could have been implanted in accordance with instructions for use. CONCLUSION Despite not requiring customisation time, OTS endografts for the treatment of p-AAA lead to more extensive healthy aortic coverage, as well as an average sacrifice of 2.5 additional segmental arteries, compared with CMDs. When compared with OTS devices, CMDs appear to limit the extent of unnecessary aortic coverage and the theoretical subsequent risk of spinal cord ischaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - Federico Furlan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Tarek Hamwi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlota F Prendes
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Bontinis V, Bontinis A, Chorti A, Schoretsanitis N, Giannopoulos A, Ktenidis K. Single branched endografts for the preservation of left subclavian artery in the treatment of zone II thoracic aortic lesions a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2023:S0890-5096(23)00240-6. [PMID: 37121340 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the safety and feasibility of single branched endografts in the treatment of zone II thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS We performed a systematic research on Medline, Scopus and EMBASE for articles published up to February 2023. Primary endpoints included technical success, thirty-day mortality, stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI) as well as unassisted left subclavian artery (LSA) branch patency by the end of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included early thirty-day and persistent endoleaks, new onset dissection and reintervention by the end of follow-up. RESULTS Fourteen studies, three prospective case series and eleven retrospective case series comprised of 727 patients were finally included. The pooled technical success and thirty-day mortality rates were 94.86 % (95% CI: 90.95-97.86) and 0.14% (95% CI: 0.00-0.87). The thirty-day stroke and SCI rates were 0.45% (95% CI: 0.00-1.39) and 0.08% (95% CI: 0.00-0.99) respectively, while the unassisted LSA branch patency estimate was 99.12% (95% CI: 97.97-99.86). The early thirty-day and persistent endoleak rates were 5.19% (95% CI: 2.45-8.65) and 2.57% (95% CI: 0.36-6.02), whereas new onset dissections and reinterventions estimates were 0.94% (95% CI: 0.17-2.11) and 2.40% (95% CI: 0.41-5.42). CONCLUSION While we have displayed the safety and feasibility of single branched endografts in the treatment of zone II thoracic aortic lesions, physicians should be aware of the persistency displayed by early type I endoleaks eventually requiring re-intervention. The variations in device and lesion characteristics accompanied by the short-term follow-up presented in our review do not allow for definite conclusions to be drawn, necessitating further research through high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vangelis Bontinis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Alkis Bontinis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Angeliki Chorti
- Department of Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Argirios Giannopoulos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kiriakos Ktenidis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Hostalrich A, Porterie J, Boisroux T, Marcheix B, Ricco JB, Chaufour X. Outcomes of Secondary Endovascular Aortic Repair After Frozen Elephant Trunk. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231169172. [PMID: 37125426 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231169172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by means of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS This single-center prospective study was conducted in a tertiary aortic center on consecutive patients having undergone TEVAR with an endograft covering most of the 10 cm FET module with 2 to 4 mm oversizing. All patients were monitored by computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at sixth month and yearly thereafter. RESULTS From January 2015 to July 2022, among 159 patients who received FET, 30 patients (18.8%) underwent a TEVAR procedure (13 for a thoracoabdominal aneurysm, 11 for a chronic aortic dissection and 6 for an emergency procedure). All connections were successfully achieved with 2 postoperative deaths (6.6%) and 1 paraplegia (3.3%). At a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-34.7), 5 patients (25%) required a fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) extension followed by 4 patients with 5 reinterventions, 3 for a Type 3 endoleak due to disconnection between FET and TEVAR endograft, and 2 unrelated to the FET for a secondary Type 1C endoleak. All reinterventions were successful, without mortality or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS In this series, FET connection with a TEVAR endograft was effective with low postoperative morbidity but with a risk of aortic reintervention related to disconnection between the FET and TEVAR endograft. These results suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit in patients following connection of the FET with a TEVAR endograft. CLINICAL IMPACT In this series of 30 patients, midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) showed 3 disconnections (10%) with a Type 3 endoleak between FET and TEVAR. These findings suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit. But so far, only a few studies provide some information after one year while the risk of disconnection increases over time and becomes a concern after 3 years. This is the new message brought by our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Hostalrich
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Porterie
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Thibaut Boisroux
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Bertrand Marcheix
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Baptiste Ricco
- Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Xavier Chaufour
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Bertoglio L, Melloni A, Bugna C, Grignani C, Bucci D, Foglia E, Chiesa R, Odone A. In-hospital cost-effectiveness analysis of open versus staged fenestrated/branched endovascular elective repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023:S0741-5214(23)01034-0. [PMID: 37076108 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare costs and effectiveness of elective open (OR) versus fenestrated/branched endovascular (ER) repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) in a high-volume center. METHODS This single-center retrospective observational study (PRO-ENDO TAAA Study, NCT05266781) was designed as part of a larger Health Technology Assessment analysis. All electively treated TAAAs between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed and propensity-matched. Endpoints were clinical success, major adverse events (MAE), hospital direct costs, and freedom from all causes and aneurysm-related mortality and reinterventions. Risk factors and outcomes were homogeneously classified according to the Society of Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Cost-effectiveness value (CEV) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) were calculated, considering the absence of MAEs as a measure of effectiveness. RESULTS Propensity matching identified 102 pairs of patients out of 789 TAAAs. Mortality, MAE, permanent spinal cord ischemia rates, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, and renal injury were higher for OR (13% vs 5%, p=.048; 60% vs 17%, p<.001; 10% vs 3%, p=.045; 91% vs 18%, p<.001; 16% vs 6%, p=.024; 27% vs 6%, p<.001; respectively). Access complication rate (6% vs 27%; p<.001) was higher in the ER group. Intensive Care Unit stay was longer (p<.001) for OR and ER patients were discharged home more frequently (3% vs 94%; p<.001). No differences in mid-term endpoints were observed at 2 years. Despite ER reducing all the hospital cost items (-42% to -88%, p<.001), the higher expenses (p<.001) of the endovascular devices increased the overall cost of ER by 80%. CEV for ER was favorable to OR (56 365 vs 64 903 €/patient) with an ICER of 48 409 € per MAE saved. CONCLUSIONS ER of TAAA reduces perioperative mortality and morbidity compared to OR, with no differences in reinterventions and survival rates at midterm follow-up. Despite the expenses for endovascular grafts, ER resulted more cost-effective in preventing MAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Melloni
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlotta Bugna
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Grignani
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daria Bucci
- School of Public Health, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- School of Industrial Engineering, Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC University and LIUC Business School, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Schanzer A, Beck AW, Gargiulo M, Farber MA, Modarai B, Jakimowicz T, Bertoglio L, Chiesa R, Gallitto E, Marcondes GB, Parodi FE, Motta F, Gkoutzios P, Jama K. Endovascular repair of intercostal and visceral aortic patch aneurysms following open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:1261-1271.e5. [PMID: 34030882 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reoperative open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR) for the treatment of intercostal or visceral aortic patch aneurysms after OSR of TAAAs. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients treated at 8 academic centers by F-BEVAR for visceral and intercostal aortic patch aneurysms after OSR of TAAAs (2011-2019). All patients had involvement of at least one target vessel requiring incorporation by a fenestration or directional branch. End points were technical success, 30-day and/in-hospital mortality, major adverse events, patient survival, target vessel patency/instability, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS There were 29 patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range, 63-74) years. Seven patients (24%) had connective tissue disorders. Technical success was 100%. There were no 30-day/in-hospital mortalities. Major adverse events occurred in 5 patients (17%), including estimated blood loss >1 L in 3 patients (10%), acute kidney injury and respiratory failure in 2 patients (7%) each, and transient paraparesis in 1 patient (3%). Median follow-up was 14 (interquartile range, 7-37) months. At 2 years, primary and secondary patency, freedom from target artery instability, freedom from reintervention, and patient survival were 95%, 100%, 83%, 61%, and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS F-BEVAR could be considered as an alternative to reoperative OSR in patients with visceral or intercostal aortic patch aneurysms. This series showed no mortality and a low rate of major adverse events, but a significant need for reintervention.
Collapse
|
137
|
Zlatanovic P, Jovanovic A, Tripodi P, Davidovic L. Chimney Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Juxta/Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Short-term Results. World J Surg 2023; 47:803-823. [PMID: 36418552 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06829-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare the short-term results of fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR), chimney endovascular repair (ChEVAR), and open surgery (OS) for patients with juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAA/PAAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 1 July 2022. Any comparative studies investigating the results of two or three treatment strategies (ChEVAR, FEVAR, or OS) on clinical outcomes for patients with JAAA/PAAA were included. Analysed outcomes were 30-day mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bowel ischaemia (BI). RESULTS A total of 22 studies with 8853 patients were included in the analysis. FEVAR (OR = 0.58, 95%CrI 0.36-0.82) and ChEVAR (OR = 0.56, 95%CrI 0.28-1.02) were associated with lower 30-day mortality than OS. FEVAR (OR = 0.54, 95%CrI 0.33-0.85) was associated with lower risk of AKI than OS. FEVAR (OR = 0.43, 95%CrI 0.20-0.89) and ChEVAR (OR = 0.34, 95%CrI 0.10-0.93) compared to OS were associated with lower rates of BI. FEVAR (OR = 0.67, 95%CrI 0.49-0.90) and ChEVAR (OR = 0.61, 95%CrI 0.35-1.02) were associated with lower 30-day MACE risk than OS. FEVAR was associated with a higher rate of SCI compared to OS (OR = 4.90, 95%CrI 1.55-19.17). CONCLUSION We found a clear benefit for FEVAR and ChEVAR versus OS in terms of reduced 30-day mortality, BI, and MACE, as well as AKI for FEVAR. This suggests that higher-risk patients might benefit from endovascular treatment of JAAA/PAAA; however, should be applied in clinical practice with caution, since long-term outcomes were outside of the scope of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petar Zlatanovic
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
| | - Aleksa Jovanovic
- Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Paolo Tripodi
- Vascular Surgery Division, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lazar Davidovic
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Mahmood DN, Forbes SM, Rocha R, Tan K, Ouzounian M, Chung JCY, Lindsay TF. Outcomes in octogenarians after thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated-branched devices justifies treatment. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:694-703.e3. [PMID: 36441071 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair and juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair using branched and/or fenestrated endovascular devices (F/BEVAR) and compare octogenarian survival to population survival statistics from Ontario, Canada. METHODS Patients who underwent F/BEVAR at a single institution between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed with a median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range, 1.6-5.3). The median survival of an average 84-year-old Ontarian from Canada, adjusted for a male:female ratio of 4:1, was retrieved from publicly available Statistics Canada data. RESULTS In total, 68 octogenarians (25.8%) and 196 nonoctogenarians (74.2%) were included (mean age, 83.5 ± 3.0 vs 71.9 ± 5.8 years; P ≤ .001). The maximum aneurysm size was significantly larger in octogenarians (68.9 ± 11.4 mm vs 65.4 ± 10.0 mm; P = .017). No differences in the number of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (29.4% vs 38.3%; P = .19) or operative technical success (92.6% vs 85.7%; P = .136) were observed between the two cohorts. Postoperatively, no significant differences in overall in-hospital mortality (7.3% vs 5.1%; P = .49), elective in-hospital mortality (6.1% vs 4.4%; P = .49), stroke (1.5% vs 3.6%; P = .384), or spinal cord ischemia (2.9% vs 9.2%; P = .094) were seen between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians. There was no difference in survival at 4 years between the two cohorts (62.9% vs 71.1%; P = .22), however, survival at 6 years was significantly lower for octogenarians (44.5% vs 64.1%; hazard ratio, 1.96; P = .02). The cumulative rate of reintervention (44.1% vs 41.3%; P = .84) and freedom from branch instability (67.6% vs 73.5%; P = .33) at 6 years were not different between the two groups. When comparing octogenarians who survived to discharge from index hospitalization after F/BEVAR with 84-year-old Ontarians unmatched for comorbidities, a survival difference of 4.8% and 11.1% was noted at 4 and 6 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS F/BEVAR in octogenarians is associated with no differences in technical success or postoperative adverse outcomes when compared with their younger counterparts. Octogenarians had increased mortality after 4 years and their survival at 4 years was comparable with that of an 84-year-old Ontarian. F/BEVAR was safe and effective in octogenarians deemed fit for intervention. Further research into preoperative patient selection and improving perioperative outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniyal N Mahmood
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha M Forbes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rodolfo Rocha
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - KongTeng Tan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maral Ouzounian
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer C-Y Chung
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas F Lindsay
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Chen Z, Liu Z, Cai J, Liu C, Li Z, Liu H, Mamateli S, Lv X, Liu C, Ran F, Wang W, Zhang M, Li X, Qiao T. Risk factors for target vessel endoleaks after physician-modified fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair for postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:685-693.e2. [PMID: 36270559 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) have been more likely to develop endoleaks than those with degenerative TAAAs after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors for target vessel (TV)-related endoleaks after visceral segment F/BEVAR for postdissection TAAAs. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with degenerative and postdissection TAAAs treated with F/BEVAR between 2017 and 2021. All the patients had undergone computed tomography angiography before and 3 months, 6 months, and annually after discharge. Two experienced vascular surgeons had used data from computed tomography angiography and vascular angiography to judge the presence of endoleaks. The study end points were mortality, aneurysm rupture, and the emergence of and reintervention for TV-related endoleaks. RESULTS A total of 195 patients (mean age, 66 ± 10 years; 69% men) had undergone F/BEVAR for 99 postdissection TAAAs and 96 degenerative TAAAs. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 12 months, we found that the patients with postdissection TAAAs were younger (age, 64 ± 10 years vs 69 ± 9 years; P = .001), had required more prior aortic repairs (58% vs 40%; P = .012), and had had a higher body mass index (26.1 ± 3.4 kg/m2 vs 24.8 ± 3 kg/m2; P = .008), a larger visceral segment aortic diameter (47.1 ± 7.5 mm vs 44.5 ± 7.5 mm; P = .016), and more TV-related endoleaks (18% vs 7%; P = .023) compared with those with degenerative TAAAs. Of the 99 patients with postdissection TAAAs, 327 renal-mesenteric arteries were revascularized using 12 scallops, 141 fenestrations, and 174 inner or outer branch stents. A total of 25 TV-related endoleaks were identified among 18 patients during follow-up, including 6 type Ic (retrograde from the distal end of the branch), 3 type IIIb (bridging stent fabric tear), and 16 type IIIc endoleaks (detachment or loose connection of the bridging stent). The patients with an endoleak had had a larger visceral aortic diameter (52.7 ± 6.4 mm vs 45.8 ± 7.2 mm; P < .001) and had undergone revascularization of more TVs (3.7 ± 0.7 vs 3.2 ± 0.9; P = .032). In contrast, true lumen compression did not seem to affect the occurrence of TV endoleaks (39% vs 27%; P = .323). The use of presewn branch stents in the fenestration position was associated with a lower risk of TV-related endoleaks (5% vs 11%; P = .025). In addition, TVs derived entirely or partially from the false lumen were more prone to the development of endoleaks after reconstruction (19% vs 4% [P < .001]; and 15% vs 4% [P = .047], respectively). CONCLUSIONS We found that patients with postdissection TAAAs were more likely to have TV-related endoleaks after F/BEVAR in the visceral region than those with degenerative TAAAs. Additionally, patients with a larger aortic diameter and a greater number of fenestrations in the visceral region were more likely to have experienced TV-related endoleaks. Branch vessels deriving from the false lumen were also more likely to develop endoleaks after reconstruction, and prefabricated branch stents were related to a lower possibility of TV-related endoleaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhao Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Cheng Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhigao Li
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Heqian Liu
- Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Subinur Mamateli
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaochen Lv
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Ran
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Tong Qiao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Alslaim H, Sanampudi S, Raissi D, Fu W, Behr AY, Issa M, Sheppard MB, Weintraub NL, Winkler M. A Comprehensive Research Schema for the Characterization of Aortic Aneurysms. Int J Angiol 2023; 32:34-42. [PMID: 36727146 PMCID: PMC9886451 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
A robust, accurate, and standardized approach to measurement of the aorta is critical to improve the predictive accuracy of these aortic measurements, and to investigate other aortic imaging biomarkers. Developing a comprehensive and generic schema for characterization of the aorta to enable investigators to standardize data that are collected across all aorta research. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify and assess schemata of aortic measurement and description. The schemata were reported and discussed to guide the synthesis of a comprehensive schema. We propose the International College of Angiology Aortic Research Schema as a comprehensive design that fills the gaps left behind by previously reported schemata. It is intended to be applicable for all clinically relevant purposes, including endograft development for aneurysm repair and for the accurate characterization of the aortic anatomy. This schema divides the aorta into 14 segments and 2 sections (thoracic and abdominal aortas). The segmentation proposed can be used in addition to specific measurements taken for any aneurysm including the neck, and maximal and minimal diameters of the aneurysm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossam Alslaim
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Sreeja Sanampudi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Driss Raissi
- Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Weibo Fu
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Amanda Y. Behr
- Department of Medical Illustration, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Mohamed Issa
- Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mary B. Sheppard
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Neal L. Weintraub
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- Vascular Biology Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Michael Winkler
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
- School of Art and Visual Studies, College of Fine Arts, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Rogers RT, Lemmens CC, Tenorio ER, Schurink GWH, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mees BME, Mendes BC. Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair using unilateral femoral access in patients with iliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:722-730. [PMID: 36372375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) in patients with occluded iliac arteries is challenging owing to limited access for branch vessel catheterization and increased risk for leg and spinal ischemic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze technical strategies and outcomes of F/BEVAR in patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated by F/BEVAR in two institutions (2003-2021). Patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease were included in the analysis. All patients had one patent iliac artery that was used for advancement of the fenestrated-branch component. Preloaded catheter/guidewire systems or steerable sheaths were used as adjuncts to facilitate catheterization. Primary endpoints were technical success, mortality, major adverse events (stroke, spinal cord injury, dialysis or decrease in the glomerular filtration rate of more than 50%, bowel ischemia, myocardial infarction, or respiratory failure), primary iliac patency, and freedom from reinterventions. RESULTS There were 959 patients treated with F/BEVAR. Of these, 15 patients (1.56%; mean age, 74 years; 80% male) had occluded iliac arteries and 1 patent iliofemoral access and were treated for a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 8) or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 7). Brachial access was used in 14 of the 15 patients and preloaded systems in 7 of the 15 patients (47%). The remaining 53% had staggered deployment of stent grafts. There were seven physician-modified endovascular grafts, seven custom-made devices, and one off-the-shelf device used. Thirteen patients (87%) had distal seal using aortouni-iliac stent grafts and two (13%) had distal seal in the infrarenal aorta. Concomitant femoral crossover bypass (FCB) was performed in two patients and six patients had a prior FCB. Technical success was 100%. There were no intraoperative complications or early lower extremity ischemic complications, and all FCB were preserved. There was one mortality (7%) within 30 days owing to retrograde type A dissection. Major adverse events occurred in 20% of patients. The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 0-85 months). Two patients (13%) required three reinterventions. One patient required proximal stent graft extension for an acute type B dissection (3 months) and another required iliac extension for type Ib endoleak of an aortouni-iliac graft (21 months) and thrombolysis of that extension (50 months). At last follow-up, all patients had primary graft patency except one with secondary graft patency without new claudication. One patient had a single renal artery stent occlusion at follow-up with no r-intervention. The overall survival rate was 60%, without aortic-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS Although challenging, F/BEVAR with unilateral femoral/brachial approach is feasible in patients with occluded iliac limbs, with an important rate of ischemic complications, but satisfactory outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Rogers
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Charlotte C Lemmens
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Geert Willem H Schurink
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Gennai S, Simonte G, Mattia M, Leone N, Isernia G, Fino G, Farchioni L, Lenti M, Silingardi R. Analysis of predisposing factors for type III endoleaks from directional branches after branched endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:677-684. [PMID: 36332806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mid-term durability of branches has already been established, and BF-branched and fenestrated endovascular repair has shown comparable results with open repair in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Nevertheless, target vessel instability remains the most frequent adverse event after complex endovascular aortic repair. Type III endoleaks from directional branches have been reported with a low incidence, but risk factors for this complication have not been investigated yet. METHODS This was a dual-center observational retrospective cohort study. Data were collected prospectively for each patient treated with branched endovascular repair between April 2008 and December 2019. The primary outcome was to assess potential risk factors for branch disconnection and fracture. A logistic regression analysis was performed, including preoperative and postoperative measurements as well as intraoperative details. A Cox regression hazard analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of preoperative aneurysm diameter and target vessel angulation on the outcome during follow-up. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-five target visceral vessels (TVVs) in 91 patients were considered suitable for cannulation. Technical success was 96.9% (286/295 TVVs). The median follow-up was 32.5 months (interquartile range, 14.2-50.1 months). Twelve type III endoleaks from directional branches were detected (4.2%; 5 bridging stent graft fractures and 7 disconnections). Five type III endoleaks involved the celiac trunk (one fracture and four disconnections), five the superior mesenteric artery (four fractures and one disconnection), and two the renal arteries (both disconnections). The median time to type III endoleak was 22.2 months (interquartile range, 10.9-37.6 months). Preoperative TAAA diameter (P = .028), preoperative TVV angulation (P = .037), the use of a BeGraft stent graft as bridging stent graft (P = .001), and different stent types on the same vessel (P = .048) were associated with type III endoleak at univariable analysis. Using a BeGraft stent graft (P = .010) was the only significant factor predisposing to type III endoleak at multiple logistic regression. The Cox regression analysis showed a two-fold increased risk for type III endoleak for every 10-mm increase in preoperative TAAA diameter (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.72; P = .028) and a 1.5 increased risk every 12° increase of preoperative TVV angulation (hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.10; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS Type III endoleaks from directional branches are a non-negligible complication after branched endovascular repair, with a relevant incidence. They tended to be clustered on specific patients, and aneurysm diameter and TVV angulation are strictly associated with the outcome. Different stent types on the same vessel should be avoided whenever possible. An intensified follow-up should be adopted for patients with large aneurysms, implanted with first-generation BeGraft, or who have been already diagnosed with type III endoleaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Gennai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gioele Simonte
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Migliari Mattia
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Nicola Leone
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Fino
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luca Farchioni
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Massimo Lenti
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Wong J, Tenorio ER, Lima G, Dias-Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Mendes B, Kratzberg J, Ocasio L, Macedo TA, Oderich GS. Early Feasibility of Endovascular Repair of Distal Aortic Arch Aneurysms Using Patient-Specific Single Retrograde Left Subclavian Artery Branch Stent Graft. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46:249-254. [PMID: 36319711 PMCID: PMC9628377 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03304-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the feasibility and outcomes of endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with a pre-loaded single retrograde left subclavian artery (LSA) branch stent graft. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of consecutive patients enrolled in an ongoing prospective, non-randomized physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular aortic arch repair using patient-specific arch branch stent grafts (William Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) between 2019 and 2022. All patients received a design with triple-wide scallop and a single retrograde LSA branch with a pre-loaded catheter. RESULTS There were five male patients with median age of 77 years old (72-80) treated using the single LSA branch stent graft. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Median operating time, fluoroscopy time, and total radiation dose area product were 103 (78-134) minutes, 26 (19-39) minutes, and 123 (71-270) mGy.cm2, respectively. There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortality, neurological or other major adverse events (MAEs). During median follow-up of 21 (20-27) months, all patients were alive with patent LSA branches, except for one who died of COVID-19 complications. There was no branch instability or secondary interventions. CONCLUSION This early feasibility study demonstrates successful endovascular repair of distal aortic arch aneurysms using a patient-specific stent graft with single retrograde LSA branch without technical failures, mortality or neurological events. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed to determined effectiveness of this approach in patients who need endovascular repair with proximal extension into Zone 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Wong
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilherme Lima
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marina Dias-Neto
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidin Baghbani-Oskouei
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jarin Kratzberg
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Laura Ocasio
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thanila A Macedo
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Advanced Aortic Research Program, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
- Texas Medical Center, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6400 Fannin, Suite 2850, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Simonte G, Isernia G, Gatta E, Neri E, Parlani G, Candeloro L, Schiavon S, Pagliariccio G, Cini M, Lenti M, Carbonari L, Ricci C. Inner branched complex aortic repair outcomes from a national multicenter registry using the E-xtra design platform. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:338-346. [PMID: 36070846 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex aortic pathology still represents an open issue in contemporary endovascular management, with continuous technological advancement being introduced in practice over time aiming to improve outcomes. Thus far, the dualism between the fenestrated and branched configuration for visceral artery revascularization is yet unsolved, with each approach having its own pros and cons. The inner branched technology for endovascular aneurysm repair (iBEVAR) aims to take the best out of both strategies, offering wide applicability and stable bridging stent sealing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes obtained with a single manufacturer custom-made inner-branched endograft in a multicenter Italian experience. METHODS All patients consecutively treated with E-xtra design devices in three Italian facilities were enrolled. Anatomic characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed. The main objective was to asses technical and clinical success after iBEVAR. Secondary end points were overall survival, aortic-related mortality, target visceral vessel (TVV) patency, and freedom from target vessel instability during follow-up. RESULTS From 2016 to 2021, 45 patients were treated with an E-xtra design device revascularizing at least one visceral vessel through an inner branch. The mean age at the time of the procedure was 71.1 ± 9.3 years and 77.8% were males. The total number of target visceral arteries to be bridged with an inner branch was 159. The extent of aortic repair was thoracoabdominal in 91.1% of the cases. Technical success was achieved in 93.3% of the procedures (42/45) with all failures owing to a type I endoleak at final angiography. Each TVV was successfully connected to the graft's main body as planned without complications. Following their intervention, five patients developed spinal cord ischemia and in three of these cases symptoms persisted after discharge (6.7%). At 30 days clinical success was 93.3% (42/45). No death as well as no TVV thrombosis occurred within 30 days from the primary procedures. The mean follow-up was 22.8 ± 14.2 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and TVV patency at 36 months were 83.9% and 95.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Inner branches seem to be a promising technology in the complex aortic repair landscape, with an applicability ranging from type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm to type I endoleak repair after infrarenal endografting. Whether iBEVAR could offer results comparable with those provided by fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair in terms of target vessel patency and stent stability is yet to be established and further studies are, therefore, needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gioele Simonte
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Isernia
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Emanuele Gatta
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Eugenio Neri
- Cardiac and Great Vessels Surgery Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Gianbattista Parlani
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Laura Candeloro
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Sara Schiavon
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Marco Cini
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Massimo Lenti
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luciano Carbonari
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Carmelo Ricci
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Chait J, Tenorio ER, Hofer JM, DeMartino RR, Oderich GS, Mendes BC. Five-year outcomes of physician-modified endografts for repair of complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:374-385.e4. [PMID: 36356675 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is paucity of data on the durability of physician modified endografts (PMEGs) for complex abdominal (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) despite widespread use. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the early and long-term outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for CAAAs and TAAAs using PMEGs. METHODS We reviewed clinical data and outcomes of patients treated by FB-EVAR using PMEGs for CAAAs (defined as short-neck infrarenal, juxtarenal, and pararenal AAAs) and TAAAs between 2007 and 2019. All patients were treated by a dedicated team with extensive manufactured device experience. Endpoints included 30-day mortality and major adverse events, patient survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), freedom from secondary intervention, target artery (TA) patency, and freedom from TA endoleak and TA instability. RESULTS Of 645 patients undergoing FB-EVAR, 156 patients (24%) treated with PMEG (121 males; mean age, 75 ± 8 years) were included. There were 89 CAAAs, 33 extent IV TAAAs and 34 extent I to III TAAAs. A total of 452 renal-mesenteric targets (3.1 ± 1.0 vessels/patient) were incorporated. Patients with TAAAs had significantly (P < .05) larger aneurysms (73 ± 11 vs 68 ± 14 mm), more TAs incorporated (3.4 ± 0.9 vs 2.8 ± 1.0), and more often had previous aortic repair (54% vs 27%). Technical success was higher in patients treated for CAAAs (99% vs 91%; P = .04). Thirty-day and/or in-hospital mortality was 5.7% and was significantly lower for CAAAs compared with TAAAs (2% vs 10%; P = .04), with three of nine early mortalities (33%) among patients treated emergently. After a mean follow-up of 49 ± 38 months, there were 12 aortic-related deaths (7.6%), including nine early deaths (5.7%) from perioperative complications and three late deaths (1.9%) from rupture. At 5 years, patient survival was 41%. Patients treated for CAAAs had higher 5-year freedom from ARM (P = .016), TA instability (P = .05), TA endoleak (P = .01), and TA secondary interventions (P = .05) with a higher, but non-significant, freedom from sac enlargement ≥5 mm (P = .11). Primary and secondary TA patency was 91% ± 2% and 99% ± 1%, respectively. Sac regression ≥5 mm occurred in 67 patients (43%) and was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.80) compared with those without sac regression. CONCLUSIONS FB-EVAR using PMEGs was performed with acceptable long-term outcomes. Overall patient survival was low due to significant underlying comorbidities. Patients treated for CAAAs had higher freedom from ARM, TA instability, TA endoleak, TA secondary interventions, and a trend towards higher freedom from sac enlargement compared with patients treated for TAAAs. Sac regression was associated with improved patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Chait
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Janet M Hofer
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Gustavo S Oderich
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Dias-Neto M, Tenorio ER, Huang Y, Jakimowicz T, Mendes BC, Kölbel T, Sobocinski J, Bertoglio L, Mees B, Gargiulo M, Dias N, Schanzer A, Gasper W, Beck AW, Farber MA, Mani K, Timaran C, Schneider DB, Pedro LM, Tsilimparis N, Haulon S, Sweet M, Ferreira E, Eagleton M, Yeung KK, Khashram M, Varcica A, Lima GB, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Jama K, Panuccio G, Rohlffs F, Chiesa R, Schurink GW, Lemmens C, Gallitto E, Faggioli G, Karelis A, Parodi E, Gomes V, Wanhainen A, Dean A, Colon JP, Pavarino F, E Melo RG, Crawford S, Garcia R, Ribeiro T, Kappe KO, van Knippenberg SEM, Tran BL, Gormley S, Oderich GS. Comparison of single- and multistage strategies during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1588-1597.e4. [PMID: 36731757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of single or multistage approach during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for extent I to III TAAAs in 24 centers (2006-2021). All patients received a single brand manufactured patient-specific or off-the-shelf fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Staging strategies included proximal thoracic aortic repair, minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization, temporary aneurysm sac perfusion and combinations of these techniques. Endpoints were analyzed for elective repair in patients who had a single- or multistage approach before and after propensity score adjustment for baseline differences, including the composite 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia, major adverse event, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality. RESULTS A total of 1947 patients (65% male; mean age, 71 ± 8 years) underwent FB-EVAR of 155 extent I (10%), 729 extent II (46%), and 713 extent III TAAAs (44%). A single-stage approach was used in 939 patients (48%) and a multistage approach in 1008 patients (52%). A multistage approach was more frequently used in patients undergoing elective compared with non-elective repair (55% vs 35%; P < .001). Staging strategies were proximal thoracic aortic repair in 743 patients (74%), temporary aneurysm sac perfusion in 128 (13%), minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization in 10 (1%), and combinations in 127 (12%). Among patients undergoing elective repair (n = 1597), the composite endpoint of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia rate occurred in 14% of single-stage and 6% of multistage approach patients (P < .001). After adjustment with a propensity score, multistage approach was associated with lower rates of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia (odds ratio, 0.466; 95% confidence interval, 0.271-0.801; P = .006) and higher patient survival at 1 year (86.9±1.3% vs 79.6±1.7%) and 3 years (72.7±2.1% vs 64.2±2.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.714; 95% confidence interval, 0.528-0.966; P = .029), compared with a single stage approach. CONCLUSION Staging elective FB-EVAR of extent I to III TAAAs was associated with decreased risk of mortality and/or permanent paraplegia at 30 days or within hospital stay, and with higher patient survival at 1 and 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Dias-Neto
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Emanuel R Tenorio
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Ying Huang
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bernardo C Mendes
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- University Medical Center Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Sobocinski
- Vascular Surgery, Aortic Centre, Université de Lille, CHU Lille, France; Université de Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Barend Mees
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Warren Gasper
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA
| | - Adam W Beck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Mark A Farber
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Carlos Timaran
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Darren B Schneider
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luis Mendes Pedro
- Department of Vascular Surgery of the Hospital Santa Maria (CHULN) and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Matt Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Emília Ferreira
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Matthew Eagleton
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kak Khee Yeung
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manar Khashram
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrea Varcica
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Guilherme B Lima
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Fiona Rohlffs
- University Medical Center Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Geert Willem Schurink
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Lemmens
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelos Karelis
- Vascular Centre, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University hospital and Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ezequiel Parodi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Vivian Gomes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anastasia Dean
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Division of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jesus Porras Colon
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Felipe Pavarino
- Clinical Heart and Vascular Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery of the Hospital Santa Maria (CHULN) and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Sean Crawford
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Rita Garcia
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tiago Ribeiro
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Kaj Olav Kappe
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bich Lan Tran
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, location VU medical center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sinead Gormley
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gustavo S Oderich
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
| | | |
Collapse
|
147
|
Karelis A, Sonesson B, Gallitto E, Tsilimparis N, Forsell C, Leone N, Silingardi R, Mesnard T, Sobocinski J, Isernia G, Resch T, Gargiulo M, Dias NV. Iliac Branch Devices in the Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: A Multicenter Study. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028221149922. [PMID: 36683380 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221149922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of preserving the internal iliac artery (IIA) with iliac branched devices (IBDs) during acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a multicenter retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing acute endovascular repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysm with an IBD at 8 aortic centers between December 2012 and June 2020. A control group was used where the IIA was intentionally occluded from the same study period. The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, major adverse events, technical success, and clinical success. Secondary outcomes were buttock claudication, primary patency, primary-assisted and secondary patency of the IBD, occurrence of endoleak types I/III, and reintervention. Values are presented as numbers and percentages or interquartile range in parenthesis. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were included in the study: 24 with IBD and 24 with IIA occlusion. There was no difference in demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent. Twenty (83%) of them were hemodynamically stable during the procedure as opposed to 14 (58%, p=.23) with the IIA occlusion. Technical success was achieved in all cases with a procedure time of 180 (133-254) minutes, 45 (23-65) of which were from IBD. There were 2 (8%) deaths during the first 30 days and 2 (8%) major complications unrelated to the IBD, whereas in the IIA occlusion, the figures were 10 (42%) and 7 (29%), respectively. No patient in the IBD group developed buttock claudication compared to 8 (57%, p<.0001) in the IIA occlusion group; 1 (4%) patient developed bowel ischemia on both groups, with 1 in the IIA occlusion group needing resection. The median follow-up duration was 17 months (interquartile range 2-39) for the IBD group, with a primary patency of 60±14% at 3 years that went up to 92±8% with reinterventions (8 reinterventions in 6 patients). When the first 90 days were disregarded, there were no differences in survival between the groups. CONCLUSION IBD is a valid alternative for maintaining the pelvic circulation for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. The technical success and midterm outcomes are very satisfactory but require patient selection particularly regarding hemodynamic stability. The reintervention rate is considerable, mandating continuous follow-up. CLINICAL IMPACT This multicenter study demonstrates that ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms do not necessarily require mandatory occlusion of hypogastric arteries. Iliac branch devices are shown to be a valid alternative in highly selected cases, with good midterm results, even if reinterventions are required in a significant proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos Karelis
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Björn Sonesson
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claes Forsell
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nicola Leone
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Silingardi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Thomas Mesnard
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Aortic Centre, CHU Lille, Lille, France
- Inserm, CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Giacomo Isernia
- Unit of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Timothy Resch
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nuno V Dias
- Vascular Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Li S, Wang W, Sun X, Liu Z, Zeng R, Shao J, Liu B, Chen Y, Ye W, Zheng Y. Monocentric Evaluation of Physician-Modified Fenestrations or Parallel Endografts for Complex Aortic Diseases. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028221149918. [PMID: 36647195 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221149918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the demographic and anatomic characteristics, as well as perioperative and follow-up results of fenestration and parallel techniques for the endovascular repair of complex aortic diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 67 consecutive patients underwent endovascular treatment for complex aortic diseases including abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA), aortic dissection, or prior endovascular repair with either fenestrated and parallel endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR or ch-EVAR) at a single institute from 2013 to 2021. Choices of intervention were made by the disease' emergency, patients' general condition, the anatomic characteristics, as well as following the recommendation from the devices' guidelines. Patients' clinical demographics, aortic disease characteristics, perioperative details, and disease courses were discussed. Short- and mid-term follow-up results were obtained and analyzed. Endpoints were aneurysm-related and unrelated mortality, branch instability, and renal function deterioration. RESULTS Totally, 34 and 27 patients received f-EVAR and ch-EVAR, while 6 patients received a combination of both. Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair was conducted mainly in AAA affecting visceral branches and TAAA, whereas ch-EVAR was normally utilized for infrarenal AAA. Regarding the average number of reconstructed arteries per patient, there was a significant difference among f-EVAR, ch-EVAR, and the combination group (mean = 2.3 ± 0.9, 1.4 ± 0.6, 3.5 ± 0.5, p<0.001). Primary technical success was achieved in 28 (82.4%), 22 (81.5%), and 3 (50.0%) patients for each group. Besides operational time (5.77 ± 2.58, 4.47 ± 1.44, p=0.033), no significant difference was observed for blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital stay, blood creatinine level, 30-day complications, or follow-up complications between patients undergoing f-EVAR or ch-EVAR. Patients receiving combination of both techniques had a higher rate of blood transfusion (p=0.044), longer operational time (p=0.008) or hospital stay (p=0.017), as well as more stent occlusion (p=0.001), endoleak (p=0.004) at short-term and a higher rate of endoleak (p=0.023) at mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSION In conclusion, this study demonstrated that f-EVAR and ch-EVAR techniques had acceptable perioperative and follow-up results and should be considered viable alternatives when encountering complex aortic diseases. CLINICAL IMPACT This study sought to investigate the baseline and pathological characteristics, as well as perioperative and follow-up results of f-EVAR and ch-EVAR at a single Chinese institution. F-EVAR (mostly physician-modified f-EVAR) was applied in patients with a wide range of etiologies and disease types, while ch-EVAR was preferred for AAA in older patients with an average higher ASA grade. Our experience suggested acceptable safety and efficacy both for techniques, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding any short or mid-term adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siting Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoning Sun
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Zhili Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Rong Zeng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Jiang Shao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Bao Liu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yuexin Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Wei Ye
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Yuehong Zheng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
- Department of State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Reinterventions after physician-modified endovascular grafts for treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms are non-detrimental to long-term survival. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1367-1374.e2. [PMID: 36626956 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reintervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is common. However, their frequency and impact on mortality after physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) is unknown. This study aims to describe reinterventions after PMEG for treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms and their effect on survival. METHODS Data from a prospective investigational device exemption clinical trial (Identifier #NCT01538056) from 2011 to 2022 were used. Reinterventions after PMEG were categorized as open or percutaneous and major or minor by Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards and as high or low magnitude based on physiologic impact. Reinterventions were also categorized by timing, based on whether they occurred within 30 days of PMEG as well as within 1 week of PMEG. Survival was compared between patients who did and did not undergo reintervention and between reintervention subcategories. RESULTS A total of 170 patients underwent PMEG, 50 (29%) of whom underwent a total of 91 reinterventions (mean reinterventions/patient, 1.8). Freedom from reintervention was 84% at 1 year and 60% at 5 years. Reinterventions were most often percutaneous (80%), minor (55%), and low magnitude (77%), and the most common reintervention was renal stenting (26%). There were 10 early reinterventions within 1 week of PMEG. Two aortic-related mortalities occurred after reintervention. There were no differences in survival between patients who underwent reintervention and those who did not. However, survival differed based on the timing of reintervention. After adjusted analysis, reintervention within one week of PMEG was associated with an increased risk of mortality both compared with late reintervention (hazard ratio, 11.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-46.5) and no reintervention (hazard ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-16.8). CONCLUSIONS Reinterventions after PMEG were most commonly percutaneous, minor, and low magnitude procedures, and non-detrimental to long-term survival. However, early reinterventions were associated with increased mortality risk. These data suggest that a modest frequency of reinterventions should be expected after PMEG, emphasizing the critical importance of lifelong surveillance.
Collapse
|
150
|
Hyun S, Kim H, Mok SK, Yun SS, Park SC, Kim JY. Anatomical feasibility of fenestrated stent graft to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysms from a Korean single institute database. Ann Surg Treat Res 2023; 104:34-42. [PMID: 36685774 PMCID: PMC9830046 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.1.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to investigate the feasibility of Zenith Fenestrated AAA Endovascular Graft (Z-FEN, Cook Medical) from a single Korean institution database by evaluating the vascular anatomy of Korean abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients with hostile aortic neck. Methods This is a retrospective study on patients with AAA who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open surgery repair between January 2012 and December 2021 (n = 211). The anatomic characteristics of the aortic neck were evaluated using 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomographic scans. For the juxtarenal AAA patients (n = 39), feasibility of fenestrated stent graft was evaluated under the protocol of fenestrated EVAR. For those who were not suitable for the application of Z-FEN, the reasons for unsuitability were analyzed. Results Among 211 AAA patients, 108 patients (51.2%) had complex aortic neck, and 39 (18.5%) had insufficient aortic neck length (<15 mm) for conventional EVAR. Of the 39 patients with juxtarenal AAAs, 13 (33.3%) were determined feasible for Z-FEN. Twenty-six patients (66.7%) were noncandidate for Z-FEN due to severe neck angulation, short aortic neck length, inadequate iliac artery anatomy, large aortic neck diameter, and severe calcification and thrombosis. Proximal aortic neck length of the non-feasible group was significantly shorter than that of the feasible group (P = 0.002). Conclusion Z-FEN was applicable to 33.3% of the juxtarenal AAA patients. As recent studies confirm, the effectiveness and safety of fenestrated EVAR, Z-FEN can be an option for AAA patients with short aortic neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangho Hyun
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hojung Kim
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Kyun Mok
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Seob Yun
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Cheol Park
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jang Yong Kim
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|