Effects of celecoxib and rofecoxib on blood pressure and edema in patients > or =65 years of age with systemic hypertension and osteoarthritis

Cardiovascular disease in patients with spondyloarthropathies

Spondyloarthropathies are associated with a greater cardiovascular risk than expected based on the cardiac lesions known to occur in these diseases. The prevalence of several conventional risk factors is high in spondyloarthropathy patients, and chronic inflammation also contributes to premature plaque formation. In addition, susceptibility genes for spondyloarthropathies may be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Finally, several drugs used to treat spondyloarthropathies may contribute to the occurrence of cardiovascular events. A careful evaluation of the cardiovascular risk profile is a key component of the management of patients with spondyloarthropathies.

Cardiovascular effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders are highly prevalent and management often involves the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitors are newer selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs that purport to exhibit less gastrointestinal toxicity than traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Cardiotoxicity has been an adverse outcome of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and this article will critically review the evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although there is less than perfect evidence, both traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, with the possible exception of naproxen, and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are associated with increased thrombotic cardiovascular risk. There is strong evidence supporting the cardiotoxicity of rofecoxib and valdecoxib, but less compelling evidence for the other cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Observational studies have been helpful in providing confirmatory and complimentary evidence about this cardiotoxicity. The thrombotic cardiovascular risk begins upon drug introduction, continues throughout exposure and is greatest in patients with a high baseline cardiac risk profile. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are also associated with other nonthrombotic cardiovascular risks.

SUMMARY

The totality of the evidence suggests that all cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are associated with increased cardiotoxicity. The cardiovascular risks of the different cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are not homogeneous, however, and are likely influenced not only by a class effect, but also by individual drug, dosage and patient characteristics.

Risk of myocardial infarction associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs).

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using a fixed-effect model to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for risk of MI associated with coxibs compared against placebo, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other coxibs.

RESULTS

Fifty-five trials (99 087 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled OR for MI risk for any coxib compared against placebo was 1.46 (95%CI: 1.02, 2.09). We found celecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib, valdecoxib and lumiracoxib were associated with higher MI risks compared against placebo. The pooled OR for any coxib compared against other NSAIDs was 1.45 (95%CI: 1.09, 1.93). Rofecoxib had a significantly higher risk of MI than naproxen (OR: 5.39; 95%: 2.08, 14.02) and valdecoxib had lower MI risk than diclofenac (OR: 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03, 0.73). There were no significant differences identified in the risk of MI from the available head-to-head comparisons of coxibs.

CONCLUSIONS

Coxibs were associated with increased risks of MI when compared against placebo or non-selective NSAIDs. Differences in MI risk were also apparent between comparisons of individual NSAIDs. Future work should consider using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to explore differences in MI risk between different subgroups of patients.

Patient perception of the burden of weight gain and blood pressure increase among RA patients using celecoxib, rofecoxib, and non-specific NSAIDs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) may be accompanied by clinically important renal side effects. We compared the rate of reported side effects from celecoxib, rofecoxib, and nonspecific (NS) NSAIDs and their burden in RA patients. Patients on rofecoxib were more likely to report a problem with weight gain (P < 0.05) and an increase in blood pressure (P < 0.001). In addition, rofecoxib users were 28% more likely to be in a more severe category for being bothered by unintentional weight gain (OR = 1.28, P < 0.05) and 53% more likely to state that they were in a more severe category for blood pressure increase (OR = 1.53, P < 0.000), compared with patients receiving celecoxib. Weight gain and blood pressure were also increased by coexisting cardiovascular disease. Clinicians should be aware that patient-reported weight gain and increases in blood pressure can occur with all NSAIDs, and may be particularly increased with rofecoxib. Existing cardiovascular disease is also an independent predictor of weight gain and increased blood pressure.

Cardiovascular risk, hypertension, and NSAIDs

During the past 2 years, a great deal of evaluation has been conducted on the cardiovascular (CV) effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. This review focuses on the effects of the NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors on blood pressure and CV events. Clinical trial databases for NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors have shown varying levels of destabilization of blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients as well as variable incident rates of the development of arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Nonselective and COX-2 selective NSAIDs can be used carefully in arthritis patients with hypertension and stable CV disorders (excluding congestive heart failure and moderate to severe kidney dysfunction) when the individual clinical benefit of anti-inflammatory therapy outweighs the CV and gastrointestinal risk.

Cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident

AIM

To assess degree of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selectivity of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA).

METHODS

Prescription fill data were linked to medical records of a merged VA-Medicare dataset. NSAIDs were categorized by Cox-2 selectivity. Incidence of CVA and MI within 180 days of index prescription was assessed using Cox-proportional hazards models adjusted for gender, race, cardiovascular and pharmacological risk factors and propensity for prescription of highly COX-2 selective NSAIDs.

RESULTS

Of 384,322 patients (97.5% men and 85.4% white), 79.4% were prescribed a poorly selective, 16.4% a moderately selective and 4.2% a highly selective NSAID. There were 985 incident cases of MI and 586 cases of CVA in >145 870 person-years. Highly selective agents had the highest rate of MI (12.3 per 1000 person-years; [95% CI: 12.2-12.3]) and CVA (8.1 per 1000 person-years; [95% CI: 8.0-8.2]). Periods without NSAID exposure were associated with lowest risk. In adjusted models, highly selective COX-2 selective NSAIDs were associated with a 61% increase in CVA and a 47% increase in MI, when compared with poorly selective NSAIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of MI and CVA increases with any NSAID. Highly COX-2 selective NSAIDs confer the greatest risk.

Thromboembolic cardiovascular risk among arthritis patients using cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor or nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors have been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic cardiovascular (CV) events. Prior studies have found that rofecoxib has a destabilizing effect on blood pressure; however, whether this translates to an increased risk of thromboembolic CV events is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk of thromboembolic CV events among hypertensive and nonhypertensive patients treated with rofecoxib or celecoxib, nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs), or no NSAIDs (nonusers). This was a retrospective cohort study of 31,743 adult arthritis patients enrolled in a Blue Cross/Blue Shield health insurance plan in the northeastern United States. The main outcome measure was incident acute myocardial infarction and stroke. A clinically significant channeling effect was observed where selective COX-2 inhibitor users had a more severe CV risk profile. Among normotensive patients, the hazard ratio (HR) of CV events for ns-NSAIDs, rofecoxib, or celecoxib versus nonusers was 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.21), 1.05 (0.61-1.80), and 1.19 (0.86-1.66), respectively. Among hypertensive patients, the risk of CV events for ns-NSAIDs users was not significantly different versus nonusers (HR=1.21; 0.88-1.67). However, rofecoxib was associated with a significant 2-fold increase in CV risk versus nonusers of NSAIDs (HR=2.16; 1.51-3.09), whereas celecoxib was not (HR=1.18; 0.89-1.57). These data support the hypothesis that elevated CV risk is not a drug class effect of selective COX-2 inhibitors. That this effect was specific to hypertensive patients indicates that blood pressure destabilization is likely an important contributing mechanism.

Paracetamol: new vistas of an old drug

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is one of the most popular and widely used drugs for the treatment of pain and fever. It occupies a unique position among analgesic drugs. Unlike NSAIDs it is almost unanimously considered to have no antiinflammatory activity and does not produce gastrointestinal damage or untoward cardiorenal effects. Unlike opiates it is almost ineffective in intense pain and has no depressant effect on respiration. Although paracetamol has been used clinically for more than a century, its mode of action has been a mystery until about one year ago, when two independent groups (Zygmunt and colleagues and Bertolini and colleagues) produced experimental data unequivocally demonstrating that the analgesic effect of paracetamol is due to the indirect activation of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. In brain and spinal cord, paracetamol, following deacetylation to its primary amine (p-aminophenol), is conjugated with arachidonic acid to form N-arachidonoylphenolamine, a compound already known (AM404) as an endogenous cannabinoid. The involved enzyme is fatty acid amide hydrolase. N-arachidonoylphenolamine is an agonist at TRPV1 receptors and an inhibitor of cellular anandamide uptake, which leads to increased levels of endogenous cannabinoids; moreover, it inhibits cyclooxygenases in the brain, albeit at concentrations that are probably not attainable with analgesic doses of paracetamol. CB(1) receptor antagonist, at a dose level that completely prevents the analgesic activity of a selective CB(1) receptor agonist, completely prevents the analgesic activity of paracetamol. Thus, paracetamol acts as a pro-drug, the active one being a cannabinoid. These findings finally explain the mechanism of action of paracetamol and the peculiarity of its effects, including the behavioral ones. Curiously, just when the first CB(1) agonists are being introduced for pain treatment, it comes out that an indirect cannabino-mimetic had been extensively used (and sometimes overused) for more than a century.

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or coxibs, designed to provide comparable pain relief to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with reduced risk of gastrointestinal complications, have come under substantial recent scrutiny because of an increased likelihood of adverse cardiovascular events associated with their use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data concerning the cardiovascular risk associated with coxibs comes from three main sources: basic research demonstrating the potential for inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme to promote a prothrombotic state; observational data suggesting an increased risk associated with the use of certain cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and randomized trial data suggesting an increased risk associated with a variety of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors compared with either a traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or placebo.

SUMMARY

An increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events has been demonstrated with multiple cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and this increased risk has led to the withdrawal from the market of all but one of these agents in the US. While several questions regarding the safety of coxibs remain, especially the role of dose in the increased risk and whether increased cardiovascular risk extends to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as well, clinicians should be cautioned about an increased possibility of adverse cardiovascular events in patients requiring therapy with coxibs.

The impact of NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor use on the initiation of antihypertensive therapy

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to quantify the associations between NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors and risk for initiating antihypertensive therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based case-control study in a large, integrated health system in the Midwestern United States. Cases (N = 23 562) were new users of antihypertensive therapy from 1, July 1997, through 31, January 2003. Controls (N = 23 562) were randomly selected and matched to cases on age, copay, medical care utilization, sex, and index date. The main outcome measures were exposure to NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

Recent prescription NSAID use was associated with an increased risk for initiation of antihypertensive therapy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95%CI 1.5, 1.7) as were selective COX-2 inhibitors (OR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.6, 2.1). After adjusting for age, sex, co-payment, race, and exposure to other NSAIDs/COX-2, each non-selective NSAID (diclofenac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, oxaprozin) was associated with an increased risk of antihypertensive therapy initiation, with ORs ranging from 1.4 to 1.8. Recent users of COX-2 inhibitors had an increased risk of initiating antihypertensive therapy, regardless of specific drug (celecoxib adjusted OR = 1.7 (95%CI 1.3, 2.1); rofecoxib adjusted OR = 1.7 (95%CI 1.4, 1.9)).

CONCLUSIONS

A consistent increased risk of initiation of antihypertensive therapy was observed among recent users of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Unlike previous studies, the results indicate that the effects of rofecoxib and celecoxib are equivalent.

Rheumatic Disease in the Elderly: Rheumatoid Arthritis

This article summarizes the different aspects of rheumatoid arthritis and the spectrum of diseases that can present as rheumatoid arthritis in the elderly population. With the ageing of the western population, different forms of inflammatory arthritis' prevalence and incidence are increasing in elderly persons. Difficulties in establishing the diagnosis and introducing new treatment modalities in this patient group pose a great challenge for clinicians. The management of inflammatory arthritis in the elderly requires special consideration in regard to the comorbidities and increased frequency of adverse events. There is substantial need for improving aspects of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that will reduce the impact of inflammatory arthritis in the growing elderly population.

COX-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk

The development of drugs that selectively inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) demonstrates translational research from bench to bedside based on underlying knowledge of micro-cellular structure and function. However, theoretical concerns about potentially prothrombotic effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors coupled with observations of increased cardiovascular risk have produced significant consternation and lead to the withdrawal of two of these agents from the market. A number of questions remain unanswered. It appears clear that both selective and non-selective COX inhibitors are associated with increases in blood pressure. In addition, blood pressure is often increased after starting nonsteroidal therapy, and we know that even small increases in blood pressure in subjects with pre-existing vascular disease are associated with substantial increases in the risk of cardiovascular morbidity. Given this line of reasoning, one might hypothesize that the observed increases in the risk of cardiovascular events associated with COX-inhibitors are largely due to increases in blood pressure in populations of subjects who are already at high risk. But can we generalize that the adverse cardiovascular effects observed for rofecoxib and valdecoxib are sufficient to indict the entire class of COX-2 inhibitors, or is this not a class effect, but dependent upon the degree of COX-2 selectivity? In either case, it seems prudent to recommend that subjects who are at higher risk for a cardiovascular event and receiving a COX-inhibitor should also be treated with low dose ASA with close follow up of blood pressure and efficacious use of anti-hypertensive medications. Finally, modest dietary salt restriction may help lessen the effects of COX-inhibitors on blood pressure.

Cardiovascular risk of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Since selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) entered the market, there has been concern about the cardiovascular safety of coxibs. In addition, recent data suggest that classical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have a similar cardiovascular risk. Importantly, all of the clinical trials with NSAIDs and coxibs so far were not purpose-designed to specifically and prospectively address cardiovascular safety and were clearly underpowered to detect any meaningful differences. In this current uncertainty about safety of NSAIDs and coxibs, the definitive answer as to the net effect of coxibs and NSAIDs on cardiovascular events can only be provided by well designed adequately powered, long-term clinical trials, which is now under way.

Cardiovascular effects of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

The data that have accumulated in recent years underscore the importance of carefully weighing the risks and benefits of traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 selective inhibitors before making therapeutic decisions for the management of chronic arthritis. In clinical practice, the majority of patients with moderate to severe arthritis who might benefit from NSAID or COX-2 therapy are likely to be elderly and, therefore, at higher risk for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events than younger persons. Thus, these patients are more likely to be taking low-dose aspirin and using over-the-counter NSAIDs for pain. Selecting a combination of therapies that provides relief from arthritis-related symptoms, minimizes cardiovascular risk, and preserves the gastrointestinal mucosa is complex. Factors to consider include the interference of certain NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen or naproxen, with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin; direct effects of non-selective NSAIDs and of COX-2 selective inhibitors on fluid retention and blood pressure; emerging data about cardiovascular risks associated with these drugs; differences between these agents with regard to associated gastrointestinal adverse event rates; and the feasibility of coadministration of anti-inflammatory therapies with gastro-protective agents.

Do selective COX-2 inhibitors increase the risk of cerebrovascular events? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) associated with selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs).

METHOD

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A fixed-effect model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for risk of CVE associated with coxibs compared against placebo, non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other coxibs.

RESULTS

Forty trials (88 116 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled OR for CVE for any coxib against placebo was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.50). Comparing individual coxibs against placebo, we found that celecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib and lumiracoxib were associated with higher CVE risks and valdecoxib was associated with a lower CVE risk, although there were no significant differences detected. There was also no significant difference in risk of CVE when comparing coxibs against any non-selective NSAIDs; the corresponding pooled OR was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.16).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of a detailed analysis of available RCTs, there does not appear to be any significant difference in risk of CVEs associated with coxibs when compared against placebo or non-selective NSAIDs. It is likely that the increased risk of thrombotic vascular events associated with coxibs is largely attributable to an increased risk of myocardial infarction, rather than CVEs.

Blood pressure effects of COX-2 inhibitors

There has been significant recent interest in the cardiovascular effects of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors. Whereas much attention has been focused on the putative prothrombotic effect of these agents, their cardiorenal and blood pressure elevating actions may be of equal if not greater importance to cardiovascular risk. COX-2 is widely expressed throughout the kidney, and inhibition of this enzyme is contributory to reduced glomerular filtration, salt and water retention, and blood pressure elevation. The key issues in relation to COX-2 inhibitors and blood pressure are whether these blood pressure-elevating effects are similar to or differ from nonselective nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, whether differences exist among COX-2 inhibitors in regard to blood pressure regulation, and if so, possible mechanisms underlying blood pressure differences between COX-2 inhibitors. With regard to the last issue, possible mechanisms include greater COX-2 selectivity of certain agents such as rofecoxib, the differing half-life of these agents, the carbonic anhydrase activity of celecoxib (which may offset renal-induced salt and water retention), and possible aldosterone modulation by rofecoxib. Finally, and perhaps most important, the issue arises as to whether blood pressure elevation may contribute in whole or in part to the increase in cardiovascular events observed with these agents in some but not all studies. Ultimately, adequately powered, prospective randomized clinical trials assessing relevant cardiovascular endpoints are required to address many of these outstanding questions. Such studies have recently been announced and will commence soon.

COX-2 and the kidney

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for the treatment of pain and inflammation. Nonselective NSAIDs inhibit both cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2. Nephrotoxicity of nonselective NSAIDs has been well documented. The effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors on renal function and blood pressure are attracting increasing attention. In the kidney, COX-2 is constitutively expressed and is highly regulated in response to alterations in intravascular volume. COX-2 metabolites have been implicated in the mediation of renin release, regulation of sodium excretion, and maintenance of renal blood flow. Similar to nonselective NSAIDs, inhibition of COX-2 may cause edema and modest elevations in blood pressure in a minority of subjects. COX-2 inhibitors may also exacerbate preexisting hypertension or interfere with other antihypertensive drugs. Occasional acute renal failure has also been reported. Caution should be taken when COX-2 inhibitors are prescribed, especially in high-risk patients (including elderly patients and patients with volume depletion).

Association of selective and conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with acute renal failure: A population-based, nested case-control analysis

Conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with acute renal failure, but cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been comparatively evaluated. The authors conducted a nested case-control study to assess the association between exposure to NSAIDs, including cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and hospitalization for acute renal failure. They identified 121,722 new NSAID users older than age 65 years from the administrative health care databases of Quebec, Canada, in 1999-2002. Data for 4,228 cases and 84,540 controls matched on age and follow-up time were analyzed by using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for sex, age, health status, health care utilization measures, exposure to contrast agents, and nephrotoxic medications. The risk of acute renal failure for all NSAIDs combined was highest within 30 days of treatment initiation (adjusted rate ratio (RR) = 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.61, 2.60) and receded thereafter. The association with acute renal failure within 30 days of therapy initiation was comparable for rofecoxib (RR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.73, 3.08), naproxen (RR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.52, 3.85), and nonselective, non-naproxen NSAIDs (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.60, 3.32) but was borderline lower for celecoxib (RR =1.54, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.09; test for interaction comparing celecoxib with rofecoxib, p = 0.057). There was a significant association for both selective and nonselective NSAIDs with acute renal failure, but confirmatory studies are required.

Effect of celecoxib on cardiovascular events and blood pressure in two trials for the prevention of colorectal adenomas

BACKGROUND

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce colorectal adenomas but have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Adenoma Prevention With Celecoxib (APC) trial studied celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and 400 mg twice daily and the Prevention of Spontaneous Adenomatous Polyps (PreSAP) trial used 400 mg once daily totest the efficacy and safety of celecoxib against placebo in reducing colorectal adenoma recurrence after polypectomy. An independent safety committee for both studies adjudicated and categorized serious cardiovascular events and then combined individual patient data from these long-term trials to improve the estimate of the cardiovascular risk and blood pressure changes associated with celecoxib compared with placebo. For adjudicated cardiovascular events, 77% and 54% in APC and PreSAP, respectively, had 37 months of follow-up. For APC and PreSAP combined, 83 patients experienced cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or heart failure. The hazard ratio for this prespecified composite end point was 2.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 6.1) in patients taking 200 mg twice daily, 3.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 7.9) in patients taking 400 mg twice daily in APC, and 1.3 (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.6) in patients taking 400 mg once daily in PreSAP (P for heterogeneity = 0.13 comparing the combined doses in APC with the dose in PreSAP). The overall hazard ratio for this composite end point was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1). Both dose groups in APC showed significant systolic blood pressure elevations at 1 and 3 years (200 mg twice daily: 1 year, 2.0 mm Hg; 3 years,2.6 mm Hg; 400 mg twice daily: 1 year, 2.9 mm Hg; 3 years, 5.2 mm Hg); however, the 400 mg once daily group inPreSAP did not (P0.0001 between studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib at 200 or 400 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily showed a nearly 2-fold-increased cardiovascular risk. The trend for a dose-related increase in cardiovascular events and blood pressure raises the possibility that lower doses or other dose intervals may be associated with less cardiovascular risk.

Effects of the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor analgesic celecoxib on renal carbonic anhydrase enzyme activity: a randomized, controlled trial

Rofecoxib and celecoxib were the first cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibitors to be marketed as effective anti inflammatory agents. The results of several recent trials and a meta analysis of currently available studies all demonstrate a greater incidence of increased blood pressure, edema, and cardiovascular events in subjects treated with rofecoxib compared with celecoxib. As an approach to the assessment of molecular mechanisms that may contribute to these cardiorenal differences, this study investigated the inhibitory effects of celecoxib on renal carbonic anhydrase enzyme activity in human hypertensive subjects because in vitro enzyme studies demonstrate such an effect. Ten subjects with stable, treated hypertension were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment sequences, which included, in differing order, 200 mg celecoxib twice a day, 250 mg acetazolamide twice a day, or placebo twice a day. Whereas acetazolamide caused a bicarbonate diuresis and a hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, celecoxib appeared to have no detectable effect on renal carbonic anhydrase or acid-base homeostasis. Thus, in this short-term study of human subjects, therapeutic doses of celecoxib did not appear to have a clinically significant inhibitory action on renal carbonic anhydrase.

Cardiorenal effects of celecoxib as compared with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac and ibuprofen

The cardiorenal safety database from the Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study (CLASS) was analyzed to examine whether supratherapeutic doses of celecoxib are associated with decreased renal function and blood pressure (BP) effects compared with standard doses of diclofenac and ibuprofen in osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.In total, 8059 patients were enrolled; 7968 received at least one dose of study drug (RA: N = 2183; OA: N = 5785). Patients received celecoxib, 400 mg twice a day (b.i.d.). (N = 3987); ibuprofen, 800 mg three times a day. (N = 1985); or diclofenac, 75 mg b.i.d. (N = 1996). Effects measured included: investigator-reported hypertension, edema or congestive heart failure, clinically important BP elevations, incidence of patients starting new antihypertensive medication, and increases in serum creatinine or reductions in creatinine clearance. Celecoxib was associated with a similar incidence of hypertension or edema to diclofenac but significantly lower than ibuprofen. The celecoxib group had significantly fewer initiations of antihypertensives versus ibuprofen. Systolic BP increases of >20 mmHg and above 140 mmHg occurred significantly less often with celecoxib compared with ibuprofen or diclofenac. Changes in serum creatinine or estimated creatinine clearance occurred in a similar percentage of patients taking celecoxib or ibuprofen; modest differences were evident against diclofenac. In patients with mild prerenal azotemia, significantly fewer patients taking celecoxib exhibited clinically important reductions in renal function (3.7%), compared with diclofenac (7.3%; P < 0.05) and ibuprofen (7.3%; P < 0.05). A supratherapeutic dose of celecoxib was associated with an improved cardiorenal safety profile compared with standard doses of either ibuprofen or diclofenac.

Hypertension Curriculum Review Donald G. Vidt, MD, Section Editor. Drug Interactions and Drugs That Affect Blood Pressure

Many antihypertensive drugs have important interactions with drugs used for different purposes; when these are used concomitantly, adverse effects on blood pressure can result. Fortunately, in recent years, the drug development process has generally discouraged the approval and marketing of antihypertensive drugs with this problem, although some anomalies still exist (eg, telmisartan + digoxin). Physicians who work in emergency departments are more familiar with illicit or unregulated drugs that affect blood pressure; chief among these are cocaine and other opioids, and methylphenidate and its congeners. The most important prescription drugs that affect blood pressure are the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including selective inhibitors of the second isoform of cyclooxygenase) and steroids. Phenylpropanolamines, some antidepressants, and sibutramine can often be avoided, as they raise blood pressure in a significant proportion of those who take them. Conversely, the hypertensive effects of calcineurin inhibitors and erythropoietin are most commonly overcome by increasing the intensity of antihypertensive drug treatment, since these drugs are essentially unavoidable in most patients who receive them.

Aging associated with mild dyslipidemia reveals that COX-2 preserves dilation despite endothelial dysfunction

The endothelial function declines with age, and dyslipidemia (DL) has been shown to hasten this process by favoring the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) can be induced by ROS, but its contribution to the regulation of the endothelial function is unknown. Since COX-2 inhibitors may be deleterious to the cardiovascular system, we hypothesized that DL leads to ROS-dependent endothelial damage and a protective upregulation of COX-2. Dilations to acetylcholine (ACh) of renal arteries isolated from 3-, 6-, and 12-mo-old wild-type (WT) and DL mice expressing the human ApoB-100 were recorded with or without COX inhibitors and the antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cystein (NAC). Nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) were inhibited using N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA) and a depolarizing solution, respectively. In WT mice, the dilation to ACh declined at 12 mo but was insensitive to COX-1/2 inhibition alone or with NAC. DL led to an early endothelial dysfunction at 6 mo, normalized, however, by NAC. At 12 mo, vascular sensitivity to ACh was further reduced by DL. At this age, selective COX-2 inhibition reduced the dilation, whereas addition of NAC improved it. In 3- and 6-mo-old WT mice, l-NNA significantly reduced the dilation, whereas it limited the dilation only in 3-mo-old DL mice. EDHF-dependent dilation remains identical in both groups. These data suggest that COX-2 activity confers endothelium-dependent vasodilatory function in aged DL mice in the face of a pro-oxidative environment. Upregulation of this pathway compensates for the early loss of the contribution of NO in DL mice.

Que connaît-on de la toxicité cardiovasculaire des AINS?

Following the arterial thrombotic risk of rofecoxib (myocardial infarct and cerebral ischemic accidents) that led to its withdrawal from the market, the other coxibs then the NSAIDs have also been blacklisted. The factors responsible for the cardiovascular risk associated with the ingestion of the NSAIDs, selective or not, are not clearly identified. The objective of this review was to collect the available data from the literature, which would allow a better evaluation of the risk and its causes, principally on the basis of the results of randomised studies, but also of case reports and meta-analyses. There is an increase in the risk of arterial thrombotic events under coxibs and traditional NSAIDs, however the risk is variable in the both classes. The cardiovascular risk linked to celecoxib seems variable and modest, and at a standard dose and for usual treatment durations, the risk is probably inexistant. While the real risk of classical NSAIDs is difficult to appreciate from the available results, it can be concluded that the cardiovascular risk of naproxen is low. While part of the cardiovascular consequences of rofecoxib could be associated with increased arterial pressure, these effects are not exclusive to the coxibs since they have been observed with the conventional NSAIDs. However the increase in arterial pressure cannot probably explain everything. Similarly the cardiac insufficiency associated more particularly with rofecoxib, especially in some groups of patients (very old subjects) is not a new type of complication and does not seem to be more frequent with coxibs than with classical NSAIDs. No short-term arterial thrombotic risk of the coxibs and NSAIDs has been clearly demonstrated.

Cardiovascular Risks of Cyclooxygenase Inhibition

Millions of patients use nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for relief of arthritic pain. Although NSAIDs reduce pain, their use has been linked to gastroduodenal complications. Selective inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzyme appeared to offer patients similar pain relief with an improved adverse-effect profile. However, accumulating experiences have raised concerns regarding the cardiovascular toxicities of the selective COX-2 inhibitors. Although selective COX inhibitors provide more gastrointestinal protection than NSAIDs, the unbalanced inhibition of prostaglandins may promote cardiovascular complications. Variability in study designs and inconsistency in results have made the evaluation of NSAID and COX-2 inhibitor safety very difficult, creating confusion among health care practitioners. We examine the pharmacologic and clinical evidence that defines the cardiovascular risk associated with COX inhibition.

Rofecoxib 12.5 mg, rofecoxib 25 mg, and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of symptomatic osteoarthritis: results of two similarly designed studies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of rofecoxib and celecoxib for the treatment of knee or hip OA over 6 weeks.

METHODS

Two similarly designed, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Patients were randomly assigned 3:3:3:1 in Study 1 to once daily (QD) rofecoxib 12.5 mg (N = 456), rofecoxib 25 mg (N = 459), celecoxib 200 mg (N = 456), or placebo (N = 150) and 3:3:1 in Study 2 to QD rofecoxib 25 mg (N = 471), celecoxib 200 mg (N = 460), or placebo (N = 151). There was no rofecoxib 12.5 mg arm in Study 2. The primary outcome measure of both studies was pain at night over 6 weeks for rofecoxib 25 mg vs. celecoxib 200 mg. Efficacy comparisons with rofecoxib 12.5 mg in Study 1 were included as pre-specified study objectives but not as pre-specified study hypotheses. Secondary endpoints included Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART) over 6 weeks and over 1 week. Safety was evaluated through the assessment of spontaneously reported adverse experiences (AEs), evaluation of vital signs, and laboratory data reported by investigators and patients.

RESULTS

For the primary endpoint, reduction in pain at night over 6 weeks in Study 1 was not significantly different between active treatments; in Study 2 rofecoxib 25 mg significantly (p = 0.023) reduced pain at night compared with celecoxib 200 mg over 6 weeks. For the secondary endpoints, in both studies, significantly (p < 0.05) more patients treated with rofecoxib 25 mg than celecoxib 200 mg had a good or excellent PGART over 6 weeks, and over the first week (p < 0.01). In both studies, there were no significant differences between active medications in the incidence of reported overall, serious, or drug-related AEs. The reported AE rates with the active treatments were generally similar to those with placebo in the two studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Rofecoxib 25 mg was significantly better than celecoxib 200 mg in relieving night pain at 6 weeks in one study; this was not confirmed in the accompanying study.

Cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of ischemic stroke: a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several randomized trials and a large number of epidemiological studies have provided evidence of an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction associated with the use of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Few data are available concerning the risk of ischemic stroke associated with COX-2 inhibitors.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study in a cohort of 469,674 patients registered within the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD), who had at least 1 prescription of an NSAID between June 1, 2000 and October 31, 2004. A total of 3094 cases with ischemic stroke were identified and 11 859 controls were matched on age, sex, year of cohort entry and general practice. Odds ratios (ORs) of ischemic stroke associated with the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs were calculated by conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Current use of rofecoxib (OR=1.71; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.18), etoricoxib (OR=2.38; 95% CI, 1.10 to 5.13), but not of celecoxib (OR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.44) was associated with a significantly increased risk of ischemic stroke. For rofecoxib and etoricoxib, ORs tended to increase with higher daily dose and longer duration of use and were also elevated in patients without major stroke risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that COX-2 selective NSAIDs differ in their potential to cause ischemic cerebrovascular events. An increased risk of ischemic stroke may be influenced by additional pharmacological properties of individual COX-2 inhibitors.

Clinical implications of nonopioid analgesia for relief of mild-to-moderate pain in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease

Nonopioid analgesics, which include acetaminophen, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibitors (coxibs), are frequently used for the relief of mild-to-moderate pain. Although all of these agents are effective at controlling pain, inhibition of prostaglandins (PGs) by NSAIDs may result in untoward cardiorenal effects, including hypertension, fluid and electrolyte abnormalities, congestive heart failure, acute renal failure, and nephrotic syndrome. Individuals with an increased risk for cardiorenal effects from NSAIDs (eg, the elderly, and those with hypertension, cardiac disease, or gouty nephropathy) should be monitored for early onset of edema, destabilization of blood pressure control, and/or onset of congestive heart failure when started on NSAID therapy. Because acetaminophen has a different mechanism of action from the conventional NSAIDs, it does not inhibit peripheral PGs at recommended dosing and therefore appears to have a more favorable cardiovascular and gastrointestinal safety profile. This review discusses the effects of acetaminophen, traditional NSAIDs, and coxibs on fluid and electrolytes, blood pressure, congestive heart failure, and renal function, as well as their consequences in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). It also summarizes information on the mechanisms by which NSAID-induced cardiovascular adverse events develop, and it provides recommendations for the use of nonopioid analgesics for relief of mild-to-moderate pain in patients with or at risk for CVD.

Nonnarcotic analgesics and hypertension

In 2004, individuals in the United States spent >$2.5 billion on over-the-counter (OTC) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and filled >100 million NSAID prescriptions. The most commonly used OTC analgesics include aspirin, acetaminophen, and nonaspirin NSAIDs. Nonnarcotic analgesics are generally considered safe when used as directed but do have the potential to increase blood pressure in patients with hypertension treated with antihypertensives. This is important because hypertension alone has been correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease or stroke. Small increases in blood pressure in patients with hypertension also have been shown to increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, when nonnarcotic analgesics are taken by patients with hypertension, there may be important implications. This review explores the potential connection among analgesic agents, blood pressure, and hypertension, and discusses possible mechanisms by which analgesics might cause increases in blood pressure. This is followed by a summary of data on the relation between analgesics and blood pressure from both observational and randomized trials.

COVALENT BINDING OF RADIOACTIVITY FROM [14C]ROFECOXIB, BUT NOT [14C]CELECOXIB OR [14C]CS-706, TO THE ARTERIAL ELASTIN OF RATS

Rofecoxib is a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor that has been withdrawn from the market because of an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. With a special focus on the arteries, the distribution profiles of radioactivity in rats orally administered [14C]rofecoxib were investigated in comparison with two other COX-2 inhibitors, [14C]celecoxib and [14C]CS-706 (2-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-4-methyl 1-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)-1H-pyrrole), a novel selective COX-2 inhibitor. Whole-body autoradioluminography and quantitative determination of the tissue concentrations showed that considerable radioactivity is retained by and accumulated in the thoracic aorta of rats after oral administration of [14C]rofecoxib, but not [14C]celecoxib or [14C]CS-706. Acid, organic solvent, and proteolytic enzyme treatments of aorta retaining high levels of radioactivity from [14C]rofecoxib demonstrated that most of the radioactivity is covalently bound to elastin. In agreement with this result, the radioactivity was found to be highly localized on the elastic fibers in the aorta by microautoradiography. The retention of radioactivity on the elastic fibers was also observed in the aortic arch and the coronary artery. These findings indicate that [14C]rofecoxib and/or its metabolite(s) are covalently bound to elastin in the arteries. These data are consistent with the suggestion of modified arterial elasticity leading to an increased risk of CV events after long-term treatment with rofecoxib.

Cardiovascular risk with cyclooxygenase inhibitors: general problem with substance specific differences?

Randomised clinical trials and observational studies have shown an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, hypertension and heart failure during treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Adverse cardiovascular effects occurred mainly, but not exclusively, in patients with concomitant risk factors. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors cause complex changes in renal, vascular and cardiac prostanoid profiles thereby increasing vascular resistance and fluid retention. The incidence of cardiovascular adverse events tends to increase with the daily dose and total exposure time. A comparison of individual selective and unselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors suggests substance-specific differences, which may depend on differences in pharmacokinetic parameters or inhibitory potency and may be contributed by prostaglandin-independent effects. Diagnostic markers such as N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or high-sensitive C-reactive protein might help in the early identification of patients at risk, thus avoiding the occurrence of serious cardiovascular toxicity.

COX isoforms in the cardiovascular system: understanding the activities of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the formation of prostanoids by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX). Work in the past 15 years has shown that COX exists in two forms: COX1, which is largely associated with physiological functions, and COX2, which is largely associated with pathological functions. Heated debate followed the introduction of selective COX2 inhibitors around 5 years ago: do these drugs offer any advantages over the traditional NSAIDs theywere meant to replace, particularly in regard to gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects? Here we discuss the evidence and the latest recommendations for the use of selective inhibitors of COX2 as well as the traditional NSAIDs.

The safety of rofecoxib

Like all COX-2 inhibitors, rofecoxib has been developed based on the hypothesis that at comparable therapeutic efficacy, it would have a better safety and tolerability profile than conventional NSAIDs. The Vioxx GI Outcomes Research trial has demonstrated that rofecoxib is indeed safer for the gastrointestinal tract than NSAIDs. However, this study has also raised questions regarding the cardiovascular safety of rofecoxib. Thereafter, several epidemiological and case-control studies have reinforced the association between rofecoxib and a higher risk of cardiovascular events. However, at this time, no prospective controlled study is available to conclude definitively on this issue. Several pathogenic mechanisms are evoked to explain why rofecoxib increases the cardiovascular risk. These include the development of a prothrombotic state, a sodium retention and an increase in systemic blood pressure. Recently, new evidence have become available indicating that rofecoxib indeed increases the number of thrombo-embolic events. These data have resulted in the complete withdrawal of rofecoxib from the market. Was it scientifically reasonable to withdraw rofecoxib rather than to adapt its label? Is the safety profile of rofecoxib really much worse than that of aspirin or other traditional NSAIDs? The main consequence of this withdrawal is a considerable threat on the entire class of selective COX-2 inhibitors without a clear evaluation of the balance between the risks and benefits of these compounds.

Update on cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs represent the most commonly used medications for the treatment of pain and inflammation, but numerous well-described side effects can limit their use. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors were initially touted as a therapeutic strategy to avoid not only the gastrointestinal but also the renal and cardiovascular side effects of nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, in the kidney, COX-2 is constitutively expressed and is highly regulated in response to alterations in intravascular volume. COX-2 metabolites have been implicated in mediation of renin release, regulation of sodium excretion, and maintenance of renal blood flow. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about both renal and cardiovascular side effects that are attributed to COX-2 selective inhibitors.

Subgroup analyses in therapeutic cardiovascular clinical trials: are most of them misleading?

BACKGROUND

Treatment decisions in clinical cardiology are directed by results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We studied the appropriateness of the use and interpretation of subgroup analysis in current therapeutic cardiovascular RCTs.

METHODS

We reviewed main reports of phase 3 cardiovascular RCTs with at least 100 patients, published in 2002 and 2004, and from major journals (Circulation, J Am Coll Cardiol, Am Heart J, Am J Cardiol, N Engl J Med, Lancet, JAMA, BMJ, Ann Intern Med). Information on subgroups included prespecification, number, interaction test use, significant subgroups found, and emphasis on findings. We examined appropriateness of reporting and differences according to sample size, overall trial result, and CONSORT adoption.

RESULTS

We selected 63 RCTs, with a median of 496 (range 100-15,245) patients. Thirty-nine RCTs were reported with subgroup analyses and 26 with > 5 subgroups. No trial was specifically powered to detect subgroup effects, and only 14 RCTs were reported with fully prespecified subgroups. Only 11 RCTs were reported with interaction tests. Furthermore, 21 RCTs were reported with claims of significant subgroups and 15 with equal or more emphasis to subgroups than to the overall results. Subgroup analyses in large RCTs (> 500 patients) were reported more often than in small ones (24/30 vs 15/33, P = .005). No differences were found according to overall result (positive/negative) or CONSORT adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroup analyses in recent cardiovascular RCTs were reported with several shortcomings, including a lack of prespecification and testing of a large number of subgroups without the use of the statistically appropriate test for interaction. Reporting of subgroup analysis needs to be substantially improved because emphasis on these secondary results may mislead treatment decisions.

Clinical implications of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for acute dental pain management: benefits and risks

BACKGROUND; Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2i) demonstrate analgesic efficacy for patients who require gastrointestinal safety. The authors discuss the potential benefits and risks of these novel, but expensive, analgesics when used in dentistry.

METHODS

The authors conducted a MEDLINE search focused on the subject headings of common analgesic drugs and COX-2i, using peer-reviewed journals limited to the English language. They selected for review 127 articles that met the criteria. They also tried to identify any randomized controlled trials pertinent to dentistry and indicative of evidence-based medicine. RESULTS. When comparing COX isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2), the authors found that overlapping and mutually exclusively properties coexist. COX-2i originally were developed to minimize interference with the gastroprotective properties of the COX-1 isoform, while selectively preventing prostanoid synthesis expressed solely at sites of bodily trauma or other inflammation. COX-2i were found to provide pain relief equal to or slightly exceeding that offered by many mild narcotics. They may avoid some of the serious side effects that can occur with even short-term use of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacodynamics of COX-2i reveal an agent that includes analgesic, anti-inflammatory and gastroprotective properties but also allows for an undesirable disruption of the delicate hemodynamic balance.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Symptomatic and asymptomatic gastroparietic patients who do not have severe cardiovascular, cerebral or renal ischemic disease benefit from use of COX-2i. Long-term use of these agents in medically compromised patients may prove disastrous.

Adverse interactions of rofecoxib with lisinopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and arthritis are frequent comorbidities. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well known to produce hypertension or attenuate the effects of antihypertensive agents in a few patients. The influence of selective NSAIDs on blood pressure and the cardiovascular and renal effects of coxibs have still to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that rofecoxib interferes with antihypertensive activity and cardiorenal protective effects of lisinopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).

METHODS

Twenty-one unanaesthetised, male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), 16 weeks old, were randomized to receive lisinopril (LS) 15 mg/kg/d or rofecoxib (RF) 20 mg/kg/d or combination of lisinopril (LS) and rofecoxib (RF) for 2 weeks. The arterial blood pressure changes were recorded each week. The Sodium Hydrogen Exchange (NHE) activity of erythrocytes was determined 2 weeks after the study. The surviving animals were sacrificed 24 h after the last dose, and the sections of their hearts and kidneys were assessed histologically for injury by a pathologist masked to the treatment.

RESULTS

RF completely prevented the hypotensive effects of LS during the first week of treatment but the antihypertensive efficacy of LS was restored during the second week of treatment. The NHE in erythrocytes of 18-week-old SHRs was found to be significantly lower than the age-matched Wistar rats (P < 0.05), and LS treatment reversed these values to Wistar control in SHRs. RF was devoid of any effect on NHE of erythrocytes. The histological examination revealed that the myocardial and renal protection induced by LS was attenuated by concomitant RF therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that COX-2 inhibitors should be used judiciously in patients with history of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or chronic renal failure.

The cardiovascular safety of celecoxib

Ever since the VIoxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research (VIGOR) trial first suggested that rofecoxib may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and especially since it was withdrawn from the market based on mounting evidence of this risk, celecoxib has had to bear intense scrutiny regarding its own potential cardiovascular effects. This article reviews the current body of evidence regarding the cardiovascular effects of celecoxib, considered under two distinct, but non-mutually exclusive, headings: cardiorenal and thromboembolic. In terms of cardiorenal effects, celecoxib appears to cause a slight increase in blood pressure, and probably to the same extent as nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NS NSAIDs) but less than rofecoxib. Limited observational data suggest that celecoxib is not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, but clinical studies are required. The current body of evidence regarding the thromboembolic effects of celecoxib is equivocal. If an increased risk of thromboembolic events is present at all, then it would seem to be small. This contrasts with the situation for rofecoxib, for which the evidence of an increased thromboembolic risk is much more consistent. There are emerging data that suggest that NS NSAIDs may also elevate the risk of thromboembolic events. If true, then switching patients from coxibs to NS NSAIDs for reasons of cardiovascular safety would be flawed. Certainly it would not appear at this stage that celecoxib poses any more thromboembolic risk than NS NSAIDs. A limitation of the current body of evidence regarding the cardiovascular safety of celecoxib is that most of it has only been drawn from observational studies and noncardiovascular clinical trials. A definitive answer to whether or not celecoxib increases cardiovascular risk can really only be derived from purpose-designed, adequately-powered, prospective randomized trials that include appropriate cardiovascular end points and comparators.

Celecoxib and cardiovascular risks

In a very short time, COX-2 enzyme inhibitors have gone from the darlings to the pariahs of the pharmaceutical industry. These drugs were developed based on the hypothesis whereby selective inhibition of the COX enzyme would lead to reduction in pain and inflammation without associated gastrointestinal and bleeding risks. However, in September 2004, rofecoxib was voluntarily removed from the market for increased cardiovascular risk and in April 2005, valdecoxib was also withdrawn, at least in part, due to excess cardiovascular risk. Celecoxib was the first COX-2 inhibitor introduced and the only remaining one on the US market. There is consequently a justified concern that cardiovascular toxicity is a class effect of all COX-2 inhibitors. This article systematically reviews the evidence surrounding COX-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk. Although the evidence suggests a fairly consistent cardiovascular risk with rofecoxib, the evidence for cardiovascular risk with celecoxib is more equivocal. Although isolated studies have suggested some cardiovascular risk for celecoxib, the totality of the evidence suggests that any risk is likely to be small and comparable to traditional NSAIDs. The cardiovascular risks of COX-2 inhibitors appear heterogeneous, influenced not only by the drug class, but also individual drug, dosage and patient characteristics. Specific modifying factors of the cardiovascular risk of COX-2 inhibitors including dose, concomitant drugs, individual cardiac and genetic risk profiles, will require further study.

COX-2 inhibitors and arterial hypertension: an analysis of spontaneous case reports in the Pharmacovigilance database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the main characteristics of case reports of arterial hypertension (AH) related to COX-2 inhibitor (coxib) use in real-life practice.

METHODS

This study was based on spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) submitted to the French Pharmacovigilance system. Associations between AH and the different groups of those using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs: rofecoxib, celecoxib and non-selective NSAIDs) were compared using calculation of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In France, between 1 April 2000 and 30 November 2003, 34 AH cases related to coxibs were reported. Case reports include predominantly patients older than 65 years, with a previous story of essential AH. Most AH (60%) occurred during the first 15 days of treatment. The AH was reported significantly more frequently for rofecoxib than celecoxib. The OR for development of AH with rofecoxib versus celecoxib was 3.3 (1.6-6.9). The AH was also reported more frequently with coxib (2.8%) than with non-selective NSAID (0.5%) use, OR = 5.9 (3.8-9.0).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that coxibs are associated with a risk of AH in real-life practice. More spontaneous reports of AH to the French Pharmacovigilance system concern rofecoxib than celecoxib (and coxibs than non-selective NSAIDs). This ADR is of special epidemiological importance due to both the risks of AH and the large use of coxibs.