Candesartan (CV-11974) dissociates slowly from the angiotensin AT1 receptor

Binding of the antagonist [3H]candesartan to angiotensin II AT1 receptor-transfected [correction of tranfected] Chinese hamster ovary cells

Binding of the non-peptide angiotensin II AT1 antagonist [3H](2-ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]- H-benzimidazoline-7-carboxylic acid ([3H]candesartan) to human angiotensin II AT1 receptor-transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-AT1) cells was inhibited to the same extent by angiotensin II and non-peptide angiotensin II AT1 antagonists. No binding was observed in control CHO-K1 cells. Dissociation was slow (k(-1) = 0.0010+/-0.0001 min(-1)) after removal of the free [3H]candesartan but increased 5-fold upon addition of supramaximal concentrations of angiotensin II AT1 antagonists. Angiotensin II responses recovered equally slow from candesartan-pretreatment. When washed and further incubated, these angiotensin II responses also recovered more rapidly in the presence of 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphen yl-4-yl)methyl]imidazole (losartan), indicating that unlabelled ligands prevented reassociation. [3 H]candesartan saturation binding experiments required a long time to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd = 51+/-8 pM) was calculated from the association and dissociation rate constants. Our findings indicate that the insurmountable nature of candesartan in functional studies is related to its slow dissociation from the receptor.

Distinction between surmountable and insurmountable selective AT1 receptor antagonists by use of CHO-K1 cells expressing human angiotensin II AT1 receptors

1. CHO-K1 cells that were stably transfected with the gene for the human AT1 receptor (CHO-AT1 cells) were used for pharmacological studies of non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonists. 2. In the presence of 10 mM LiCl, angiotensin II caused a concentration-dependent and long-lasting increase of inositol phosphates accumulation with an EC50 of 3.4 nM. No angiotensin II responses are seen in wild-type CHO-K1 cells. 3. [3H]-Angiotensin II bound to cell surface AT1 receptors (dissociates under mild acidic conditions) and is subject to rapid internalization. 4. Non-peptide selective AT1 antagonists inhibited the angiotensin II (0.1 microM) induced IP accumulation and the binding of [3H]-angiotensin II (1 nM) with the potency order: candesartan > EXP3174 > irbesartan > losartan. Their potencies are lower in the presence of bovine serum albumin. 5. Preincubation with the insurmountable antagonist candesartan decreased the maximal angiotensin II induced inositol phosphate accumulation up to 94% and, concomitantly, decreased the maximal binding capacity of the cell surface receptors. These inhibitory effects were half-maximal for 0.6 nM candesartan and were attenuated by simultaneous preincubation with 1 microM losartan indicating a syntopic action of both antagonists. 6. Losartan caused a parallel rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration-response curves and did not affect the maximal binding capacity. EXP3174 (the active metabolite of losartan) and irbesartan showed a mixed-type behavior in both functional and binding studies. 7. Reversal of the inhibitory effect was slower for candesartan as compared with EXP3174 and irbesartan and it was almost instantaneous for losartan, suggesting that the insurmountable nature of selective AT1 receptor antagonists in functional studies was related to their long-lasting inhibition.

Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade on proximal fluid uptake in the rat kidney

Angiotensin II has a well described dose-dependent biphasic action on proximal tubule fluid uptake, although the concentration and effect of endogenous luminal angiotensin II remain controversial. Shrinking split-droplet micropuncture was used to examine the fluid uptake in response to the luminal application of three AT1 antagonists (losartan, EXP3174, candesartan). Addition of losartan at 10(-8) M decreased fluid uptake rate (Jva) by 17.5+/-2.2% (P<0.05). Luminal addition of EXP3174 at concentrations between 10(-9)-10(-5) M caused a dose-dependent decrease in fluid uptake, with a maximum decrease of 41.0+/-9.5% (P<0.01) at 10(-6) M. Candesartan also decreased fluid uptake, by 21.9+/-4.9% (P<0.05) at 10(-8) M and 23.6+/-5.5% (P<0.05) at 10(-5) M. All three antagonists at a low concentration (10(-8) M) decreased fluid uptake. EXP3174 and candesartan at a higher concentration (10(-5) M) also decreased fluid uptake in contrast to the previously reported effect of losartan. We conclude that the endogenous concentration of antiotensin II in the proximal luminal fluid is low and exerts a stimulatory effect on fluid absorption. Losartan at concentrations greater than 10(-6) M may have a non-selective action on fluid uptake.

Candesartan cilexetil. A review of its use in essential hypertension

Candesartan cilexetil is completely converted to the nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan during absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Candesartan selectively blocks and dissociates slowly from the angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor which mediates most of the known activities of angiotensin II. When administered once daily, oral candesartan cilexetil 8 to 32 mg dose-dependently and effectively reduces blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In comparative studies, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg/day was as effective as usual therapeutic dosages of enalapril, losartan potassium, hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine. One study showed candesartan cilexetil 16 mg/day to be more effective than losartan potassium 50 mg/day. Furthermore, the combination of candesartan cilexetil with either hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine resulted in additive antihypertensive effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that the blood pressure-lowering effects of candesartan cilexetil are associated with the prevention or improvement of end-organ damage in patients with hypertension. However, this requires further confirmation in clinical studies. Candesartan cilexetil improves insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension and does not affect glucose homeostasis or the serum lipid profile in those with coexisting type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Candesartan cilexetil is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. Pooled data indicate that the tolerability profile of the drug is not significantly different from that of placebo, with headache being the most commonly reported event. Adverse events are not dose related and are mostly mild to moderate in severity. Candesartan cilexetil is better tolerated than enalapril, primarily because of a reduced incidence of cough, and was not associated with the hypokalaemia or hyperuricaemia seen with hydrochlorothiazide in a study in patients aged > or = 75 years. The drug has an adverse events profile similar to that of losartan potassium in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

once daily candesartan cilexetil is effective and well tolerated when used once daily (as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents) in patients with mild, moderate or severe hypertension. Initially, however, the drug is likely to be used as an alternative to other agents in patients not responding to or intolerant of their current drug therapy.

Antihypertensive treatment with candesartan cilexetil does not affect glucose homeostasis or serum lipid profile in patients with mild hypertension and type II diabetes

This multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of candesartan cilexetil (cand.cil.), a novel angiotensin II antagonist selective for the AT1 receptor with long-lasting antihypertensive activity, compared to placebo on glucose homeostasis and serum lipid profile in mild hypertensives with type II diabetes. A total of 161 men and women, 30-75 years old, with mild hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure 90-100 mmHg) and type II diabetes (HbA1c 5.5-9.0%), both measured after a 4-week placebo run-in period, were randomized to double-blind treatment with cand.cil. 8 mg o.i.d. (n = 83) or placebo (n = 78). Dose was increased to 16 mg o.i.d. if diastolic blood pressure remained >90 mmHg. At randomization and after 12 weeks of treatment HbA1c (primary effect variable), blood glucose and the serum lipid profile (including total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides) were assessed. The statistical analysis of the differences between treatments was based on changes from randomization to the end of the study. Cand.cil. had no significant effect on HbA1c, blood glucose and serum lipids compared to placebo. The median HbA1c both at baseline and after 12 weeks was 7.1% in patients on cand.cil., and 7.2% and 7.1% in patients on placebo. The 95% confidence interval for the median difference in change between the groups was narrow (-0.25; 0.16), including zero, which excluded any clinically important difference. The same held true for blood glucose (-1.10; 0.20), total cholesterol (-0.40; 0.20) and the other lipid parameters. More than 60% of the patients reached a diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg; adverse events and withdrawals were similar in both groups. Thus, in patients with mild hypertension and type II diabetes, cand.cil. 8-16 mg o.i.d. for 12 weeks does not affect glucose homeostasis and serum lipids. Blood pressure was controlled in most patients, and cand.cil. was well tolerated.

The antihypertensive effect and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, a new generation angiotensin II antagonist, in comparison with losartan

This multicentre study compared the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of the novel angiotensin II antagonist candesartan cilexetil with those of losartan and placebo. Men and women aged 20-80 years, with primary hypertension and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-114 mm Hg after a 4-week placebo run-in period, were randomized to once daily double-blind treatment with candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (n=82), candesartan cilexetil 16 mg (n=84), losartan 50 mg (n=83) or placebo (n=85) for 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured 6 and 24 h after dose, i.e. at peak and trough. Differences between treatments were analysed by analysis of covariance, and the primary effect variable was reduction in trough sitting DBP. Compared with placebo treatment, trough DBP was significantly reduced by a mean (95% CI) of 8.9 (6.0; 11.8) mm Hg with 8 mg and 10.3 (7.4; 13.2) mm Hg with 16 mg candesartan cilexetil. The 8 mg dose was as effective as losartan 50 mg, while 16 mg candesartan cilexetil was significantly more effective, with a difference between treatments of 3.7 (0.8; 6.7) mm Hg (p=0.013). The placebo corrected trough/peak ratio was 0.9-1.1 with candesartan cilexetil and 0.7 with losartan. Candesartan cilexetil was similarly well tolerated as placebo. In conclusion, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg or 16 mg once daily is an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive treatment. Candesartan cilexetil 16 mg is significantly more effective than losartan 50 mg once daily.