101
|
Abstract
The first in vivo tumor models were developed in the mid-1960s. These models were mouse leukemia models grown as ascites. The growth pattern was like that of bacteria in vivo and therefore it was possible to apply similar mathematics of growth and response to these tumors as had been worked out for bacteria. Since the development of the murine leukemia models, investigators have devoted a large effort to modeling solid tumors in mice. There are now a variety of models including syngeneic mouse tumors and human tumor xenografts grown as s.c. nodules, syngeneic mouse tumors and human tumor xenografts grown in orthotopic sites, models of disseminated disease, "labeled" tumor models that can be visualized using varied technologies, and transgenic tumor models. Each of these types of models has advantages and disadvantages to the "drug hunter" searching for improved treatments.
Collapse
|
102
|
Castellone MD, Teramoto H, Gutkind JS. Cyclooxygenase-2 and colorectal cancer chemoprevention: the beta-catenin connection. Cancer Res 2007; 66:11085-8. [PMID: 17145847 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer poses a major clinical challenge in the developed world where this disease is common. Recent findings suggest that the prostaglandin E(2), the proinflammatory product of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 activity in colon cancer, stimulates cancer cell growth through a G protein-dependent signaling pathway coupling the prostaglandin EP2 receptor to beta-catenin control. These findings provide new insights into the molecular framework needed to evaluate chemopreventive strategies for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Domenica Castellone
- Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4340, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
103
|
Liby K, Rendi M, Suh N, Royce DB, Risingsong R, Williams CR, Lamph W, Labrie F, Krajewski S, Xu X, Kim H, Brown P, Sporn MB. The combination of the rexinoid, LG100268, and a selective estrogen receptor modulator, either arzoxifene or acolbifene, synergizes in the prevention and treatment of mammary tumors in an estrogen receptor-negative model of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:5902-9. [PMID: 17020999 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We tested whether a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and a rexinoid are active for prevention and treatment in the mouse mammary tumor virus-neu mouse model of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN For prevention, mice were fed a powdered control diet, the SERM arzoxifene (Arz, 20 mg/kg diet), the rexinoid LG100268 (268, 30 mg/kg diet), or the combination for 60 weeks. In a second prevention study, mice were fed Arz (6 mg/kg diet), 268 (30 mg/kg diet), the combination of Arz and 268, the SERM acolbifene (Acol, 3 mg/kg diet), or the combination of Acol and 268 for 52 weeks. For the treatment studies, mice with tumors were fed combinations of a SERM and 268 for 4 weeks. RESULTS The rexinoid 268 and the SERMs Arz and Acol, as individual drugs, delayed the development of estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Moreover, the combination of a SERM and 268 was strikingly synergistic, as no tumors developed in any mouse fed the combination of 268 and a SERM. Moreover, this drug combination also induced significant tumor regression when used therapeutically. These drugs did not inhibit transgene expression in vitro or in vivo, and the combination of Arz and 268 inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in the tumors. CONCLUSION The combination of a rexinoid and SERM should be considered for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Liby
- Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
104
|
Singh A, Misra V, Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Ames S, Hoque MO, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Sidransky D, Gabrielson E, Brock MV, Biswal S. Dysfunctional KEAP1-NRF2 interaction in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS Med 2006; 3:e420. [PMID: 17020408 PMCID: PMC1584412 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 833] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2006] [Accepted: 08/04/2006] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nuclear factor erythroid-2 related factor 2 (NRF2) is a redox-sensitive transcription factor that positively regulates the expression of genes encoding antioxidants, xenobiotic detoxification enzymes, and drug efflux pumps, and confers cytoprotection against oxidative stress and xenobiotics in normal cells. Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) negatively regulates NRF2 activity by targeting it to proteasomal degradation. Increased expression of cellular antioxidants and xenobiotic detoxification enzymes has been implicated in resistance of tumor cells against chemotherapeutic drugs. METHODS AND FINDINGS Here we report a systematic analysis of the KEAP1 genomic locus in lung cancer patients and cell lines that revealed deletion, insertion, and missense mutations in functionally important domains of KEAP1 and a very high percentage of loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.2, suggesting that biallelic inactivation of KEAP1 in lung cancer is a common event. Sequencing of KEAP1 in 12 cell lines and 54 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples revealed somatic mutations in KEAP1 in a total of six cell lines and ten tumors at a frequency of 50% and 19%, respectively. All the mutations were within highly conserved amino acid residues located in the Kelch or intervening region domain of the KEAP1 protein, suggesting that these mutations would likely abolish KEAP1 repressor activity. Evaluation of loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.2 revealed allelic losses in 61% of the NSCLC cell lines and 41% of the tumor samples. Decreased KEAP1 activity in cancer cells induced greater nuclear accumulation of NRF2, causing enhanced transcriptional induction of antioxidants, xenobiotic metabolism enzymes, and drug efflux pumps. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate that biallelic inactivation of KEAP1 is a frequent genetic alteration in NSCLC. Loss of KEAP1 function leading to constitutive activation of NRF2-mediated gene expression in cancer suggests that tumor cells manipulate the NRF2 pathway for their survival against chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy
- Adenocarcinoma/genetics
- Adenocarcinoma/metabolism
- Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology
- Carcinoma, Large Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Large Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Large Cell/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics
- Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism
- Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1
- Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Lung Neoplasms/genetics
- Lung Neoplasms/metabolism
- Mutation
- NF-E2-Related Factor 2/genetics
- NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anju Singh
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Vikas Misra
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Rajesh K Thimmulappa
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hannah Lee
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Stephen Ames
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Mohammad O Hoque
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Stephen B Baylin
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - David Sidransky
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Edward Gabrielson
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Malcolm V Brock
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shyam Biswal
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Kelloff GJ, Lippman SM, Dannenberg AJ, Sigman CC, Pearce HL, Reid BJ, Szabo E, Jordan VC, Spitz MR, Mills GB, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Lotan R, Aggarwal BB, Bresalier RS, Kim J, Arun B, Lu KH, Thomas ME, Rhodes HE, Brewer MA, Follen M, Shin DM, Parnes HL, Siegfried JM, Evans AA, Blot WJ, Chow WH, Blount PL, Maley CC, Wang KK, Lam S, Lee JJ, Dubinett SM, Engstrom PF, Meyskens FL, O'Shaughnessy J, Hawk ET, Levin B, Nelson WG, Hong WK. Progress in chemoprevention drug development: the promise of molecular biomarkers for prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer--a plan to move forward. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:3661-97. [PMID: 16778094 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews progress in chemopreventive drug development, especially data and concepts that are new since the 2002 AACR report on treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia. Molecular biomarker expressions involved in mechanisms of carcinogenesis and genetic progression models of intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed and analyzed for how they can inform mechanism-based, molecularly targeted drug development as well as risk stratification, cohort selection, and end-point selection for clinical trials. We outline the concept of augmenting the risk, mechanistic, and disease data from histopathologic intraepithelial neoplasia assessments with molecular biomarker data. Updates of work in 10 clinical target organ sites include new data on molecular progression, significant completed trials, new agents of interest, and promising directions for future clinical studies. This overview concludes with strategies for accelerating chemopreventive drug development, such as integrating the best science into chemopreventive strategies and regulatory policy, providing incentives for industry to accelerate preventive drugs, fostering multisector cooperation in sharing clinical samples and data, and creating public-private partnerships to foster new regulatory policies and public education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary J Kelloff
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20852, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
Sporn MB. Dichotomies in cancer research: some suggestions for a new synthesis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 3:364-73. [PMID: 16826217 DOI: 10.1038/ncponc0536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2006] [Accepted: 04/27/2006] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Continuing high cancer incidence and mortality raise concern about the prevailing overall approach to the control of this disease. The purpose of this article is to elaborate on fundamental dichotomies between traditional and revisionist viewpoints and then to attempt a synthesis of these contrasting perspectives. Topics considered include the importance of controlling carcinogenesis in its earliest stages; consideration of epigenetic, as well as genetic, factors in cancer; development of appropriate genetic animal models of carcinogenesis; the need for multifunctional agents to prevent and treat cancer; and the limits of reductionism. The need for development of new preventive and therapeutic measures that will maintain quality of life, not merely extend life, is stressed. Finally, the importance of context in cancer biology is emphasized, as epitomized in Walt Whitman's famous quotation that "Nothing out of its place is good and nothing in its place is bad."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Sporn
- Department of Pharmacology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
| |
Collapse
|