Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax

Conservative management of traumatic pneumothoraces: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic pneumothoraces (T-PTXs) are traditionally managed with an intercostal catheter (ICC), despite little evidence for this. Success with conservative management of primary spontaneous PTX has been demonstrated, and our ED has adopted a conservative approach where safe for all PTX.

METHODS

We reviewed all T-PTXs at our institution over a 7-year period to assess outcomes of those conservatively managed and compare with those who received an ICC. A total of 144 cases were identified, 65 managed conservatively and 79 invasively. Each was individually reviewed and variables including demographics, aetiology, smoking/lung disease history, T-PTX size (apical interpleural distance and hemithorax percentage), length of stay, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score and delayed intervention/complications were recorded. Chi-squared, Z-score, Mann-Whitney U and t-tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The mean apical interpleural distance was 26.8 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.1-29.7 mm) in the conservative group and 49.1 mm (95% CI 41.2-57.0 mm) in the ICC group (P < 0.05 for difference between groups). Mean T-PTX percentage 25.9% (95% CI 22.1-29.7%) in the conservative group versus 45.9% (95% CI 39.7-50.5%) in the ICC group (P < 0.05 for difference between two groups) and mean Revised Trauma Score 7.4 (conservative) versus 6.8 (invasive) (P < 0.05). No conservatively managed patient required a delayed intervention for their T-PTX, and 2 of 79 (3%) patients in the ICC group had a complication (one infection, one haemothorax).

CONCLUSION

Our data support conservative management of selected T-PTXs and shows a need for a prospective randomised trial to further examine this intervention.

[Update on primary spontaneous pneumothorax - conservative or primarily surgical therapy?]

Spontaneous pneumothorax is a potentially life-threatening situation. Therefore, it is mandatory to treat it safely. The incidence is approximately 10 out of 100 000 residents per year. It occurs through an immediate disruption of the visceral pleura that results in an accumulation of air in the pleural space. According to its etiology, spontaneous pneumothorax is divided into 2 groups. Whereas primary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in healthy individuals without any detectable lung disease, secondary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in patients with preexisting. Diagnosis of pneumothorax is typically made by chest x-ray. After diagnosis pneumothorax is traditionally treated by an insertion of a thoracic tube.Recently, thoracic ultrasound gained influence in diagnosis of pneumothorax and primarily conservative treatment strategies have been shown to be safe and equally effective in particular groups of patients. This article aims to present and discuss these upcoming strategies.

Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a time to re-evaluate management

Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) is defined as the presence of air in the pleural cavity and remains a significant health problem. Secondary SP (SSP) is associated with underlying lung diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (ILD), and is associated with poor outcomes. The current guidelines in the management of SSP have not been updated since the last decade; therefore, new protocols focused on the management of SSP should be evaluated. We present two cases of patients admitted with SSP who were treated conservatively due to haemodynamic stability. In both cases, the pneumothoraces resolved without further complications.

Percutaneous transthoracic catheter drainage for lung abscess: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of patients receiving image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) for lung abscesses in terms of treatment success, major complications, and mortality as well as the predictors of those outcomes.

METHODS

Embase and OVID-MEDLINE databases were searched to identify studies on lung abscesses treated with PCD that had extractable outcomes. The outcomes were pooled using a random-intercept logistic regression model. Multivariate Firth's bias-reduced penalised-likelihood logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of treatment success and complications. Methodological quality was assessed by summing scores of binary responses to items regarding selection, ascertainment of exposure and outcome, causality of follow-up duration, and reporting.

RESULTS

From 26 studies with acceptable methodological quality (median score, 4; range, 3-5), 194 patients were included. The pooled rates of treatment success and major complications were 86.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.5-91.8%; I² = 23%) and 8.1% (95% CI, 4.1-15.3%; I² = 26%), respectively. Four patients eventually died from uncontrolled lung abscesses (pooled rate, 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.2-11.1%; I² = 36%). Malignancy-related abscess (odds ratio [OR], 0.129; 95% CI, 0.024-0.724; p = .022) and the occurrence of a major complication (OR, 0.065; 95% CI, 0.02-0.193; p < .001) were significant predictors of treatment failure. Traversing normal lung parenchyma was the only significant risk factor for major complications (OR, 27.69; 95% CI, 7.196-123.603; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

PCD under imaging guidance was effective for lung abscess treatment, with a low complication rate. Traversal of normal lung parenchyma was the sole risk factor for complications, and malignancy-related abscesses and the occurrence of major complications were predictors of treatment failure.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled treatment success rate of PCD for lung abscess was reasonably high (86.5%); malignancy-related abscesses and the occurrence of a major complication were predictors of treatment failure. • The pooled rate of percutaneous transthoracic catheter drainage-related major complications was 8.1% and traversing normal lung parenchyma by the catheter was the only risk factor. • The pooled mortality rate from uncontrolled lung abscesses with percutaneous transthoracic catheter drainage was low.

Ambulatory pneumothorax management in a district general hospital

BACKGROUND

The pleural vent (PV) is a new drain and valve device enabling ambulatory pneumothorax management. This study analysed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with pneumothorax treated with a PV.

METHODS

The characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with pneumothorax treated with a PV between 1 March 2018 and 1 February 2021 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The mean number of days the PV remained in situ for all patients was 5.6 days, range 0-25, IQR 3-7. Forty patients were managed completely in the ambulatory setting. The total number of days with the PVs in situ was 248. Approximate inpatient bed days saved are 240-320 days. Complications requiring a change in management occurred in nine (18.3%) cases.

CONCLUSION

This single-centre study shows that ambulatory pneumothorax management with the PV is feasible and associated with inpatient bed savings. Complication rates are less than previously described.

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

The management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is currently being debated. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines [1] are over a decade old and recent European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidance [2] summarises more up-to-date evidence. Needle aspiration, intercostal drain insertion (ICD) and observation are all advocated. Ambulatory pneumothorax management has been described for decades [3]. A systematic review of underpowered and nonrandomised trials suggested a need for high quality data to support the use of ambulatory devices in pneumothorax management [3]. Thus, the Randomised Ambulatory Management of Primary Pneumothorax (RAMPP) trial was devised [4]. The trial aimed to compare the length of hospitalisation and safety of ambulatory management with standard care (needle aspiration±ICD insertion) [5]. We aim to describe the outcomes of RAMPP. We discuss its general relevance and in the context of the recent trial favouring conservative management over an interventional approach in PSP [6].

Ambulatory pneumothorax management in primary spontaneous pneumothorax is safe and feasiblehttps://bit.ly/39w3EfD

Requirement of interventional treatment in a patient being conservatively managed for persistent pneumothorax over a prolonged period

An 85-year-old ex-smoker being managed conservatively over 2 years for a small right apical pneumothorax presented to the respiratory clinic with suddenly worsening shortness of breath and chest pain. A chest radiograph demonstrated sudden deterioration in the size of his pneumothorax. Previous CT scans had found emphysematous cystic changes within the lungs, and his new presentation warranted definitive surgical intervention with a right bullectomy and talc pleurodesis through a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery procedure. The patient made a good recovery and was discharged from clinic a year later. This case demonstrates the importance of follow-up in patients with unresolved pneumothoraces due to the potential for sudden deterioration, and highlights the significance of respecting patient involvement and autonomy in the decision-making process.

An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a relatively common problem in emergency medicine. The incidence of PSP peaks in adolescence and is most common in tall, thin males. Recent advances in the care of patients with PSP have called into question traditional approaches to management. This clinical review highlights the changing management strategies for PSP and concludes with a proposed evidence-based pathway to guide the care of adolescents with PSP.

Epidemiology of Adult Pleural Disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive US epidemiologic data for adult pleural disease are not available.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the epidemiologic measures related to adult pleural disease in the United States?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using Healthcare Utilization Project databases (2007-2016). Adults (≥ 18 years of age) with malignant pleural mesothelioma, malignant pleural effusion, nonmalignant pleural effusion, empyema, primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, iatrogenic pneumothorax, and pleural TB were studied.

RESULTS

In 2016, ED treat-and-discharge (T&D) visits totaled 42,215, accounting for charges of $286.7 million. In 2016, a total of 361,270 hospitalizations occurred, resulting in national costs of $10.1 billion. A total of 64,174 readmissions contributed $1.16 billion in additional national costs. Nonmalignant pleural effusion constituted 85.5% of ED T&D visits, 63.5% of hospitalizations, and 66.3% of 30-day readmissions. Contemporary sex distribution (male to female ratio) in primary spontaneous pneumothorax (2.1:1) differs from older estimates (6.2:1). Decadal analyses of annual hospitalization rates/100,000 adult population (2007 vs 2016) showed a significant (P < .001) decrease for malignant pleural mesothelioma (1.3 vs 1.09, respectively), malignant pleural effusion (33.4 vs 31.9, respectively), iatrogenic pneumothorax (17.9 vs 13.9, respectively), and pleural TB (0.20 vs 0.09, respectively) and an increase for empyema (8.1 vs 11.1, respectively) and nonmalignant pleural effusion (78.1 vs 100.1, respectively). Empyema hospitalizations have high costs per case ($38,591) and length of stay (13.8 days). The mean proportion of readmissions attributed to a pleural cause varied widely: malignant pleural mesothelioma, 49%; malignant pleural effusion, 45%; nonmalignant pleural effusion, 31%; empyema, 27%; primary spontaneous pneumothorax, 27%; secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, 27%; and iatrogenic pneumothorax, 20%.

INTERPRETATION

Significant epidemiologic trends and changes in various pleural disease were observed. The analysis identifies multiple opportunities for improvement in management of pleural disease.

Spontaneous pneumothorax-When do we need to intervene?

BACKGROUND

Pneumothorax can be classified as traumatic, iatrogenic or spontaneous (SP), which can be subdivided into primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), a condition without preexisting lung disease, or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) a complication of a preexisting lung disease. Recurrence rate of PSP is 30% whereas for SSP rate is unknown. This article explores the experience of a tertiary center over 20 years.

METHODS

A retrospective case review of patients hospitalized with pneumothorax to investigate the natural history and treatment of SP in a young population in a single tertiary center was conducted. A search of the digital archive (going back to 01/01/1995) of Sheba Medical Center identified hospitalized patients below the age of 40.

RESULTS

The database was composed of the records of 750 patients (612 males, 138 females) who were hospitalized. The recurrence risk for SP after nonoperative treatment was significantly higher. Women were found to have an increased risk of SSP when having SP (OR 2.78). Asthma was the most prevalent disease causing SSP in young people.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, we found that operative procedure has clear protective effect from recurrence in SP, so surgery should be positively considered when treating SP in hospitalized patients. Among young people and particularly in pediatric patients, when females have a SP, we strongly recommend looking for primary lung disease. More studies are needed to determine the risk factors and produce clear guidelines regarding surgery as first treatment.

Conservative versus invasive management of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective cohort study

Aim

Hospitalization, often with intervention, is the recommended management algorithm by multiple international respiratory societies for management of a secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP). Over recent years we adopted a conservative approach to SSPs. We undertook a retrospective cohort study of SSP to establish the safety profile of a conservative approach for these previously unstudied patients.

Methods

We reviewed all cases of SSP presenting to our institution from 2012 to 2019 using the 2010 British Thoracic Society definition of an SSP. Age, gender, smoking status, underlying lung disease, pneumothorax size estimate (using the Collins method), nature of intervention, inpatient duration, and any additional complications were recorded. The χ²‐test and Mann–Whitney U‐test were used for comparison of categorical variables and categorical/continuous variables, respectively.

Results

Eighty‐two cases were included in the final analysis. Of them, 64 had an interpleural distance at the hilum of 1cm or greater, meeting British Thoracic Society criteria for a pleural intervention. Of these 64 patients, 25 (39%) were managed conservatively. No patient managed conservatively required a subsequent intervention. When stratified for conservative or invasive management, there was no significant difference in age, gender, smoking status, or presence of underlying lung disease between the groups. There was a significant difference in size of the pneumothorax with conservative management having smaller pneumothoraces (37% versus 54%, P < 0.001) and a shorter inpatient stay (conservative, 7.9 days; intercostal catheter, 9 days; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

We have demonstrated success with conservative management of SSPs where a significant proportion of them met accepted criteria for a pleural intervention.

Prevalence of Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome Determined Through Epidemiological Data on Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Bayes Theorem

Background: Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by cutaneous fibrofolliculomas, multiple pulmonary cysts, recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax (SP), and renal tumors. More than 40 years after its description, the prevalence of BHD in the general population remains unknown. This study aimed at determining the prevalence of BHD by applying the Bayes theorem of conditional probability to epidemiological data on SP. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published data on: (1) the probability of having BHD among patients with apparent primary SP (4 studies), (2) the incidence rate of primary SP in the general population (9 studies), and (3) the probability of experiencing a SP in BHD (16 studies). Results were corrected for SP relapses, stratified by gender and year of study publication (before and after 2000), and computed with the Bayes equation. Results: The probability of having BHD among patients with apparent primary SP was 0.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.07, 0.11) or 9%. It was 0.20 (0.14, 0.27) in women and 0.05 (0.04, 0.07) in men. The incidence rate of primary SP in the general population was 8.69 (6.58, 11.46) per 100,000 person-years (p-y). It was 3.44 (2.36, 4.99) per 100,000 p-y in women and 13.96 (10.72, 18.18) per 100,000 p-y in men, and was about 2 times higher in studies published after 2000 than in those published before 2000. The probability of experiencing at least one SP among patients with BHD was 0.43 (0.31, 0.54) or 43%, without gender difference. By combining these data in the Bayes equation, we found a prevalence of BHD in the general population of 1.86 (1.16, 3.00) per million, with values of 1.86 (1.02, 3.39) per million in men, and 1.88 (0.97, 3.63) per million in women. Conclusion: The prevalence of BHD in the general population is about 2 cases per million, without difference between genders.

New insights into spontaneous pneumothorax: A review

A spontaneous pneumothorax is a pneumothorax that does not arise from trauma or an iatrogenic cause. Although the traditional classification of either primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax based on the absence or presence of overt underlying lung disease is still widely used, it is now well recognised that primary spontaneous pneumothorax is associated with underlying pleuropulmonary disease. Current evidence indicates that computed tomography screening for underlying disease should be considered in patients who present with spontaneous pneumothorax. Recent evidence suggests that conservative management has similar recurrence rates, less complications and shorter hospital stay compared with invasive interventions, even in large primary spontaneous pneumothoraces of >50%. A more conservative approach which is based on clinical assessment rather than pneumothorax size can thus be followed during the acute management in selected stable patients. The purpose of this review is to revisit the aetiology of spontaneous pneumothorax, identify which patients should be investigated for secondary causes and to give an overview of the management strategies at initial presentation as well as secondary prevention.

The Natural History and Treatment of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Associated Pneumothorax-A 10-Year Single-Centre Experience

Background

Pneumothorax is a common complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures. There is a paucity of data on the natural history and management of a CIED-associated pneumothorax.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective study of all consecutive patients with a CIED-associated pneumothorax between March 2010 and March 2020. Pneumothorax size was determined on all chest x-rays after device implantation and before chest tube insertion (if placed). Changes in pneumothorax size on serial chest x-rays were reported. Clinical outcomes in patients with a severe-sized pneumothorax treated with a chest tube were compared with those treated conservatively.

Results

A total of 86 CIED-associated pneumothoraxes were identified, with 55 (63.9%) patients having a pneumothorax severe in size. Thirty-seven patients with a severe pneumothorax received a chest tube, whereas 18 were managed conservatively. Chest tube use was associated with a higher rate of admission to hospital (100% vs 63%, P = 0.02) for patients undergoing outpatient procedure, longer length of stay (6.3 ± 3.9 vs 2.7 ± 2.9 days, P = 0.04), but fewer chest x-rays (1.9 ± 0.7 vs 4.1 ± 2.5, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

An initial strategy of conservative management of a CIED-associated pneumothorax in select patients may be feasible and safe.

Spontaneous Pneumothorax: New Horizons

Spontaneous pneumothorax can be divided into two categories: primary and secondary. The management of each one depends on resource availability, physician preference, and procedural capability, and is broadly based on guidelines that are over a decade old. Emerging evidence from three recent randomized controlled trials on ambulatory pneumothorax pathways are exciting and herald a new era for management of spontaneous pneumothorax. These three trials and their implications are discussed.

[Pneumothorax]

A pneumothorax is defined by the presence of free air between the pleura visceralis and the pleura partietalis. The lung separates from the chest wall, which then, depending on several parameters, leads to a slight or clinically threatening impairment of lung function. Non-specific signs such as thoracic pain or coughing are common and do not correlate with the extent of the pneumothorax. Almost without exception, the cause of this accumulation of air is a leakage in the lung's surface, which then results in air escaping into the pleural space. Depending on the cause of the "lung leakage", a distinction is made between a primary (idiopathic) spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) that can be triggered without direct cause, and a secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) in case of an underlying known lung disease. Further between an iatrogenic pneumothorax in connection with a lung injury caused by medical measures, and a traumatic pneumothorax in the case of an accident-related lung tear. The relevant therapeutic goals are the elimination of the acute symptoms, the reliable achievement of re-expansion of the lungs, and, after appropriate information gathering about the probability and clinical significance of a pneumothorax recurrence and depending on the patient's wish, avoiding a recurrence by means of surgical measures. The therapy options range from a "wait-and-see" procedure, that merely monitors the findings, to a primary video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical therapy with detection and resection of the superficial lung lesion, as well as a measurement to obliterate the pleural cavity that prevents relapse. Regarding "follow-up care" or even behavioral recommendations after a pneumothorax, there are no recommendations that reduce the risk of recurrence.

Research, kindness and the antifragility of emergency medicine

Antifragility is a property of things that benefit from shocks, randomness and uncertainty and love adventure and risk. This describes emergency medicine. Improving evidence-based medicine requires a learning health system, where the whole system is constructed to advance patient care via research driven excellence. So we need to develop our own evidence base by embedding research into everyday practice. Clinical research is messy but the repeated stress testing of clinical practice via research enhances our antifragility. This is even more important because our world is complex, as are humans. Unfortunately, the human brain is hard wired for simplicity, making us disinclined to challenge the status quo. Yet probably <10% of our practice is supported by high-level evidence. Research is altruistic and a form of kindness for our patients, which includes having a culture of research within a learning health system, so that we can be thoughtful!

Conservative versus interventional treatment for spontaneous pneumothorax

For a primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) (in a person with no underlying lung disease) with a visible rim of >2 cm between the lung margin and the chest wall (at the level of the hilum) on a chest radiograph, current guidelines recommend aspiration with a 16–18-gauge cannula and insertion of a small-bore chest drain (8–14 French) if the pneumothorax size cannot successfully be reduced below the 2 cm rim or the patient remains breathless [1]. As interventional management of PSP is associated with potential complications and a patient with a chest drain needs to be admitted to hospital, evaluation of conservative management as a potential alternative to interventional management of larger PSPs is desirable. Before the current trial, there were a few observational studies suggesting that moderate to large sized PSPs can potentially be successfully managed without intervention but evidence from randomised trials was lacking [2]. The PSP trial aimed to determine whether conservative management is an acceptable alternative to interventional management for uncomplicated, moderate-to-large PSP [3].

Conservative management (with a treatment escalation plan in case the patient deteriorates) is a safe alternative to interventional management of a primary spontaneous pneumothoraxhttps://bit.ly/3fIN4uh

Improving care through standardized treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax

PURPOSE

The objective of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to implement a standardized clinical treatment protocol for patients presenting with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) in order to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS), diagnostic radiation exposure, and related cost.

METHODS

Baseline data from patients admitted with PSP from January 1, 2016 to July 31, 2018 were compared to data from patients managed using a newly developed evidence-based treatment pathway from August 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Standard QI methodology was used to track results.

RESULTS

Fifty-six episodes of PSP were observed during the baseline period and 40 episodes of PSP following initiation of the PSP protocol. The average LOS decreased from 4.5 days to 2.9 days. Patients underwent an average of 8.8 X-rays per admission preintervention versus 5.9 postintervention. The rate of CT scans decreased from 45% to 15% (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the rates of 30-day recurrence between the preintervention (13%) and postintervention (10%) groups (p = 0.7). Average admission costs per patient decreased by $1322 after adoption of the pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of a standardized treatment protocol for PSP led to a reduction in LOS, diagnostic imaging utilization, and cost without increasing clinical recurrence.

TYPE OF STUDY

Quality improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

The outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is still debated. The risk of a tension pneumothorax is used to justify active treatment like chest-tube drainage, although outpatient management can reduce both the time in hospital and the cost of treatment. It is also likely to be the patient's choice. This report is a reappraisal of the situations for which outpatient management, by monitoring alone, or using minimally invasive techniques, can be considered.

Pediatric Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Does Initial Treatment Affect Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) commonly occurs in adolescents, most commonly in males, and has recurrence rates between 20% and 60%. Surgical therapy has long been debated regarding its role in preventing recurrence, with no current consensus on guidelines for care. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of treatment type on recurrence rates in pediatric PSP.

METHODS

This is a single-institution, institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of patients aged 1 to 18 diagnosed with their first occurrence of PSP between 2009 and 2017. Patient demographics, hospital course, and outcomes over a 2-y period were collected. Patients were divided into nonoperative (oxygen therapy only) management, chest tube placement, and surgical management. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients diagnosed with PSP met inclusive criteria. The mean age was 15.5, and 48 (75%) of patients were men. Twenty-one patients (33%) underwent nonoperative treatment, 24 patients (37.5%) underwent operative treatment with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or open thoracotomy, and 19 patients (30%) underwent chest tube or pigtail placement alone. Fifteen patients (23.4%) experienced a recurrence within 2 y: 6 patients (29%) from the nonoperative treatment group, 4 (21%) who were treated with the chest tube only, and 5 (21%) who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or open thoracotomy. No statistically significant difference in recurrence rates was found between treatment groups. Pneumothorax size was found to differ between treatment type; larger pneumothoraces were more likely to undergo surgical intervention (P = 0.0003). Smaller pneumothoraces were associated with higher rates of recurrence on multivariate logistic regression analysis (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of PSP in adolescents was found to be 23.4% after 2-y follow-up. Smaller-sized pneumothoraces were associated with higher rates of recurrence, but treatment type did not significantly affect recurrence rates.

Chest Tube Drainage Versus Conservative Management as the Initial Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare chest tube drainage and conservative management as the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Methods: Studies including PSP patients who received tube drainage or conservative management as the initial treatment were searched in OVID-MEDLINE and Embase through 14 February 2020. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of PSP recurrence, and secondary outcomes were RRs of PSP resolution and adverse events during treatment. A random-effect model using the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to pool RRs. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate significant predictors of PSP recurrence. Results: In total, 11,922 PSP cases from eight studies were analysed, of which 6344 were treated with tube drainage and 5578 were treated with conservative management. The pooled RR of PSP recurrence for conservative management against tube drainage was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–1.28; p = 0.894). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that study design (p = 0.816), allocation of the PSP amount in each management group (p = 0.191), and assessment time for recurrence had no significant impact on PSP recurrence (p = 0.816). There was no publication bias (p = 0.475). The risk of adverse events of conservative management was significantly lower than that of tube drainage (pooled RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08–1.15; p = 0.003). However, no difference was found between the two groups in terms of PSP resolution (pooled RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.9–1.15; p = 0.814). Conclusions: As the initial treatment for PSP, conservative management is comparable to chest tube drainage in terms of PSP recurrence and resolution after treatment, with fewer adverse events during treatment.

Comparison of efficiency and safety of conservative versus interventional management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing opinion that primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) patients without hemodynamic compromise could be safely and successfully managed with observation alone. The aims of this meta-analysis were to estimate the safety and effectiveness of conservative treatment compared with that of interventional management as the initial treatment option for patients with PSP.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (prospective or retrospective) until April 25, 2020, that compared conservative treatment and interventional treatment as the initial treatment for patients with PSP. The primary outcomes were success rates and recurrence rates. The secondary outcome was complication rates. Data extraction and quality assessment from eligible studies were independently conducted by two reviewers.

RESULTS

8 trials with a total of 1342 patients were identified. The success rates of conservative management were similar with interventional treatment, with a risk ratio 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.17, I2 = 69.1%). There was no significant difference of recurrence rates between these two type managements. (RR, 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 4.55, I2 = 86.7%). Complication rates were lower in conservative treatment group (13 of 215 [6.05%]) than in interventional treatment group (57 of 212, [26.89%]), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (RR, 0.15, 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.13, I2 = 56.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the meta-analysis suggest that conservative treatment offers a safe and effective alternative as compared with interventional management as the initial treatment approach for patients with PSP. However, more randomized clinical trials are need to provide more strong evidence to confirm our results.

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in otherwise healthy young patients. Optimal management is not defined and often results in prolonged hospitalisation. Data on efficacy of ambulatory options are poor. We aimed to describe the duration of hospitalisation and safety of ambulatory management compared with standard care.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, adults (aged 16-55 years) with symptomatic primary spontaneous pneumothorax were recruited from 24 UK hospitals during a period of 3 years. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either an ambulatory device or standard guideline-based management (aspiration, standard chest tube insertion, or both). The primary outcome was total length of hospital stay including re-admission up to 30 days after randomisation. Patients with available data were included in the primary analysis and all assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. The trial was prospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Clinical Trials Number, ISRCTN79151659.

FINDINGS

Of 776 patients screened between July, 2015, and March, 2019, 236 (30%) were randomly assigned to ambulatory care (n=117) and standard care (n=119). At day 30, the median hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the 114 patients with available data who received ambulatory treatment (0 days [IQR 0-3]) than in the 113 with available data who received standard care (4 days [IQR 0-8]; p<0·0001; median difference 2 days [95% CI 1-3]). 110 (47%) of 236 patients had adverse events, including 64 (55%) of 117 patients in the ambulatory care arm and 46 (39%) of 119 in the standard care arm. All 14 serious adverse events occurred in patients who received ambulatory care, eight (57%) of which were related to the intervention, including an enlarging pneumothorax, asymptomatic pulmonary oedema, and the device malfunctioning, leaking, or dislodging.

INTERPRETATION

Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax significantly reduced the duration of hospitalisation including re-admissions in the first 30 days, but at the expense of increased adverse events. This data suggests that primary spontaneous pneumothorax can be managed for outpatients, using ambulatory devices in those who require intervention.

FUNDING

UK National Institute for Health Research.

Pleural effusions and pneumothorax: Beyond simple plumbing: Expert opinions on knowledge gaps and essential next steps

Pleural diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Pleural infection, malignant pleural diseases and pneumothorax are common clinical challenges. A large number of recent clinical trials have provided an evidence-based platform to evaluate conventional and novel methods to drain pleural effusions/air which reduce morbidity and unnecessary interventions. These successes have generated significant enthusiasm and raised the profile of pleural medicine as a new subspecialty. The ultimate goal of pleural research is to prevent/stop development of pleural effusions/pneumothorax. Current research studies mainly focus on the technical aspects of pleural drainage. Significant knowledge gaps exist in many aspects such as understanding of the pathobiology of the underlying pleural diseases, pharmacokinetics of pleural drug delivery, etc. Answers to these important questions are needed to move the field forward. This article collates opinions of leading experts in the field in highlighting major knowledge gaps in common pleural diseases to provoke thinking beyond pleural drainage. Recognizing the key barriers will help prioritize future research in the quest to ultimately cure (rather than just drain) these pleural conditions.

Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Associated factors

INTRODUCTION

Determining the risk of recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a risk assessment model to predict the probability of recurrence in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of all episodes of pneumothorax diagnosed in the last 12 years in a hospital, in patients not initially submitted to surgery. Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of recurrence. Based on a set of variables, a predictive model was built with its corresponding ROC curve to determine its discrimination power and diagnostic precision.

RESULTS

Of the 253 patients included, 128 (50.6%) experienced recurrence (37% within the first year). Recurrence was detected within 110 days in 25% of patients. The median of time to recurrence for the whole population was 1120 days. The presence of blebs/bullae was found to be a risk factor of recurrence (OR: 5.34; 95% CI: 2.81-10.23; p=0.000), whereas chest drainage exerted protective effect (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08-0.40; p=0.000). The variables included in the regression model constructed were hemoglobin and leukocyte count in blood, treatment received, and presence of blebs/bullae, with a fair discriminative power to predict recurrence [AUC=0.778 (95% CI: 0.721-0.835)].

CONCLUSION

The overall recurrence rate was high and was associated with the presence of blebs/bullae, failure to perform an active intervention (chest drainage) and low levels of hemoglobin and leukocytes in blood. Recurrence rarely occurs later than three years after the first episode. Once validated, this precision model could be useful to guide therapeutic decisions.

Pleural manometry: techniques, applications, and pitfalls

Pleural manometry (PM) is a novel tool that allows direct measurement of the pressure in the pleural space in the presence of either a pleural effusion or a pneumothorax. Originally it was used to guide therapy for tuberculosis (TB) before the development of anti-TB medications. It was relegated to highly specialized centers for thoracoscopies until Light used it to investigate pleural effusions in the 1980s. However, there remains lack of robust data to support the routine use of PM. Recently additional published studies have generated renewed interest supporting the use of PM in specialized cases of complex pleural disorders. In this paper we summarize the current different techniques, applications, and pitfalls for the use of PM.

Research capacity of Australian and New Zealand emergency medicine departments

BACKGROUND

Large, multicentre studies are required in emergency medicine to advance clinical care and improve patient outcomes. The Australasian College for Emergency Medicine clinical trials network is available to researchers to assist with facilitating large, multicentre research. However, there is no current information about the research capacity of emergency departments (EDs) in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

All EDs accredited for emergency medicine training in Australia and New Zealand were eligible to participate. Research leads or ED directors were invited via email and telephone to complete a survey. Data were collected regarding the presence of a research lead; their research experience; available research resources including colleagues, funding, departmental paid research time; publications; and research culture.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve responses were received on behalf of 122 (84%) sites (10 satellite plus main) from a possible 143 sites with all types of hospitals and regions represented. Research leads were identified at 66 (59%) sites; 32 (29%) had a director of emergency medicine research. A wide range of research was underway. Ninety-six sites (66%) contributed data to multicentre projects. Twenty-one centres (17%) were highly productive with multiple resources (skilled colleagues, funding, staffing), a positive research culture and high-volume output. Sixty to seventy centres (50-58%) had limited resources, experienced an unsupportive research culture and authored manuscripts infrequently. Paid time for research directors was associated with increased research outputs.

DISCUSSION

ACEM sites have the capacity to undertake large multicentre studies with a varied network of sites and researchers. While some sites are well equipped for research, the majority of EDs had minimal research output.