Mitotic retention of gene expression patterns by the cell fate-determining transcription factor Runx2

Organization, integration, and assembly of genetic and epigenetic regulatory machinery in nuclear microenvironments: implications for biological control in cancer

There is growing awareness that the fidelity of gene expression necessitates coordination of transcription factor metabolism and organization of genes and regulatory proteins within the three-dimensional context of nuclear architecture. The regulatory machinery that governs genetic and epigenetic control of gene expression is compartmentalized in nuclear microenvironments. Temporal and spatial parameters of regulatory complex organization and assembly are functionally linked to biological control and are compromised with the onset and progression of tumorigenesis. High throughput imaging of cells, tissues, and tumors, including live cell analysis, is expanding research's capabilities toward translating components of nuclear organization into novel strategies for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Epigenetic control

Epigenetics refers to mitotically and/or meiotically heritable variations in gene expression that are not caused by changes in DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms regulate all biological processes from conception to death, including genome reprogramming during early embryogenesis and gametogenesis, cell differentiation and maintenance of a committed lineage. Key epigenetic players are DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications, which interplay with each other, with regulatory proteins and with non-coding RNAs, to remodel chromatin into domains such as euchromatin, constitutive or facultative heterochromatin and to achieve nuclear compartmentalization. Besides epigenetic mechanisms such as imprinting, chromosome X inactivation or mitotic bookmarking which establish heritable states, other rapid and transient mechanisms, such as histone H3 phosphorylation, allow cells to respond and adapt to environmental stimuli. However, these epigenetic marks can also have long-term effects, for example in learning and memory formation or in cancer. Erroneous epigenetic marks are responsible for a whole gamut of diseases including diseases evident at birth or infancy or diseases becoming symptomatic later in life. Moreover, although epigenetic marks are deposited early in development, adaptations occurring through life can lead to diseases and cancer. With epigenetic marks being reversible, research has started to focus on epigenetic therapy which has had encouraging success. As we witness an explosion of knowledge in the field of epigenetics, we are forced to revisit our dogma. For example, recent studies challenge the idea that DNA methylation is irreversible. Further, research on Rett syndrome has revealed an unforeseen role for methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) in neurons.

Mitotic bookmarking of formerly active genes: keeping epigenetic memories from fading

In order for cell lineages to be maintained, daughter cells must have the same patterns of gene expression as the cells from which they were divided so that they can have the same phenotypes. However, during mitosis transcription ceases, chromosomal DNA is compacted, and most sequence-specific binding factors dissociate from DNA, making it difficult to understand how the "memory" of gene expression patterns is remembered and propagated to daughter cells. The process of remembering patterns of active gene expression during mitosis for transmission to daughter cells is called gene bookmarking. Here we discuss current knowledge concerning the factors and mechanisms involved in mediating gene bookmarking, including recent results on the mechanism by which the general transcription factor TBP participates in the mitotic bookmarking of formerly active genes.

Assessment of transmission distortion on chromosome 6p in healthy individuals using tagSNPs

The best-documented example for transmission distortion (TD) to normal offspring are the t haplotypes on mouse chromosome 17. In healthy humans, TD has been described for whole chromosomes and for particular loci, but multiple comparisons have presented a statistical obstacle in wide-ranging analyses. Here we provide six high-resolution TD maps of the short arm of human chromosome 6 (Hsa6p), based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 60 trio families belonging to two ethnicities that are available through the International HapMap Project. We tested all approximately 70,000 previously genotyped SNPs within Hsa6p by the transmission disequilibrium test. TagSNP selection followed by permutation testing was performed to adjust for multiple testing. A statistically significant evidence for TD was observed among male parents of European ancestry, due to strong and wide-ranging skewed segregation in a 730 kb long region containing the transcription factor-encoding genes SUPT3H and RUNX2, as well as the microRNA locus MIRN586. We also observed that this chromosomal segment coincides with pronounced linkage disequilibrium (LD), suggesting a relationship between TD and LD. The fact that TD may be taking place in samples not selected for a genetic disease implies that linkage studies must be assessed with particular caution in chromosomal segments with evidence of TD.

Co-stimulation of the bone-related Runx2 P1 promoter in mesenchymal cells by SP1 and ETS transcription factors at polymorphic purine-rich DNA sequences (Y-repeats)

Transcriptional control of Runx2 gene expression through two alternative promoters (P1 and P2) is critical for the execution of its function as an osteogenic cell fate determining factor. In all vertebrates examined to date, the bone related P1 promoter contains a purine-rich region (-303 to -128 bp in the rat) that separates two regulatory domains. The length of this region differs dramatically between species even within the same order. Using deletion analysis, we show that part of this purine-rich region (-200 to -128) containing a duplicated element (Y-repeat) positively regulates Runx2 P1 transcription. Electrophoretic mobility assays and chromatin immunoprecipitations reveal that Y-repeat binds at least two different classes of transcription factors related to GC box binding proteins (e.g. SP1 and SP7/Osterix) and ETS-like factors (e.g. ETS1 and ELK1). Forced expression of SP1 increases Runx2 P1 promoter activity through the Y-repeats, and small interfering RNA depletion of SP1 decreases Runx2 expression. Similarly, exogenous expression of wild type ELK1, but not a defective mutant that cannot be phosphorylated, enhances Runx2 gene expression. SP1 is most abundant in proliferating cells, and ELK1 is most abundant in postconfluent cells; during MC3T3-E1 osteoblast differentiation, both proteins are transiently co-expressed when Runx2 expression is enhanced. Taken together, our data suggest that basal Runx2 gene transcription is regulated by dynamic interactions between SP1 and ETS-like factors during progression of osteogenesis.

Subnuclear targeting of the Runx3 tumor suppressor and its epigenetic association with mitotic chromosomes

Runx proteins are tissue-specific transcriptional scaffolds that organize and assemble regulatory complexes at strategic sites of target gene promoters and at intranuclear foci to govern activation or repression. During interphase, fidelity of intranuclear targeting supports the biological activity of Runx1 and Runx2 proteins. Both factors regulate genes involved in cell cycle control and cell growth (e.g., rRNA genes), as well as lineage commitment. Here, we have examined the subcellular regulatory properties of the third Runx member, the tumor suppressor protein Runx3, during interphase and mitosis. Using in situ cellular and biochemical approaches we delineated a subnuclear targeting signal that directs Runx3 to discrete transcriptional foci that are nuclear matrix associated. Chromatin immunoprecipitation results show that Runx3 occupies rRNA promoters during interphase. We also find that Runx3 remains associated with chromosomes during mitosis and localizes with nucleolar organizing regions (NORs), reflecting an interaction with epigenetic potential. Taken together, our study establishes that common mechanisms control the subnuclear distribution and activities of Runx1, Runx2, and Runx3 proteins to support RNA polymerase I and II mediated gene expression during interphase and mitosis.

Intricate gene regulatory networks of helix-loop-helix (HLH) proteins support regulation of bone-tissue related genes during osteoblast differentiation

Helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factors are key regulators of neurogenesis, myogenesis and osteogenesis. Here the relative contributions of multiple classes of HLH factors to the expression of bone related genes during osteoblast maturation were compared. We examined the expression of a panel of HLH proteins (e.g., Twist1/2, USF1/2, c-Myc, Id1 approximately 4, E12/47, Stra13) and one Zn finger protein (Snail which recognizes a subset of E-boxes), during osteoblast differentiation and their functional contributions to bone phenotypic gene regulation. While expression of Twist1, Stra13, E12/47 and Snail transcripts remains relatively constant, expression of Twist2 as well as the inhibitory factors Id1, Id2, Id3, and Id4 decreases and USF1 is up-regulated during osteoblastic differentiation of MC3T3 cells. Forced expression of selected HLH transcription factors shows that Myc, Snail and USF factors increase expression of the bone markers osteocalcin (OC) and/or alkaline phosphatase (AP), while E12/47, Twist and Id factors decrease their expression. None of these factors affect Runx2 gene expression. Interestingly, Snail enhances expression of osteoblast markers, while Twist1 and Twist2 factors are cross-regulated and inhibit bone specific gene expression and other HLH proteins (e.g., Id) indirectly. Thus, our data suggest that the integrated activities of negative and positive E-box related regulatory factors control osteoblast differentiation.

Cohesinopathies: One ring, many obligations

Over 75 years ago, two human genetic disorders were initially described and named for their founding physicians: Cornelia de Lange (CdLS) and Roberts syndrome (RBS)/SC Phocomelia (SC). In the past 4 years, genetic studies of patients have revealed the primary genes involved in these disorders are the essential, evolutionarily conserved components of the cohesin pathway. This pathway serves to facilitate cohesion between replicated sister chromatids, thereby enabling proper chromosome segregation. As a result of these findings, these disorders now represent a novel class of human genetic disorders known as cohesinopathies. Over 60% of CdLS patients examined have de novo mutations in either: SCC2/NIPBL, SMC1, or SMC3, whereas the causative gene in Roberts syndrome and SC Phocomelia has been identified as ESCO2. Now modern genetic, biochemical, and cell biological approaches may be applied to determine the underlying mechanism of these genetic disorders.

Modulation of Runx2 activity by estrogen receptor-alpha: implications for osteoporosis and breast cancer

The transcription factors Runx2 and estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) are involved in numerous normal and disease processes, including postmenopausal osteoporosis and breast cancer. Using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy and pull-down techniques, we found them to colocalize and form complexes in a ligand-dependent manner. Estradiol-bound ERalpha strongly interacted with Runx2 directly through its DNA-binding domain and only indirectly through its N-terminal and ligand-binding domains. Runx2's amino acids 417-514, encompassing activation domain 3 and the nuclear matrix targeting sequence, were sufficient for interaction with ERalpha's DNA-binding domain. As a consequence of the interaction, Runx2's transcriptional activation activity was strongly repressed, as shown by reporter assays in COS7 cells, breast cancer cells, and late-stage MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures. Metaanalysis of gene expression in 779 breast cancer biopsies indicated negative correlation between the expression of ERalpha and Runx2 target genes. Selective ER modulators (SERM) induced ERalpha-Runx2 interactions but led to various functional outcomes. The regulation of Runx2 by ERalpha may play key roles in osteoblast and breast epithelial cell growth and differentiation; hence, modulation of Runx2 by native and synthetic ERalpha ligands offers new avenues in selective ER modulator evaluation and development.

A Runx2 threshold for the cleidocranial dysplasia phenotype

Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) in humans is an autosomal-dominant skeletal disease that results from mutations in the bone-specific transcription factor RUNX2 (CBFA1/AML3). However, distinct RUNX2 mutations in CCD do not correlate with the severity of the disease. Here we generated a new mouse model with a hypomorphic Runx2 mutant allele (Runx2(neo7)), in which only part of the transcript is processed to full-length (wild-type) Runx2 mRNA. Homozygous Runx2(neo7/neo7) mice express a reduced level of wild-type Runx2 mRNA (55-70%) and protein. This mouse model allowed us to establish the minimal requirement of functional Runx2 for normal bone development. Runx2(neo7/neo7) mice have grossly normal skeletons with no abnormalities observed in the growth plate, but do exhibit developmental defects in calvaria and clavicles that persist through post-natal growth. Clavicle defects are caused by disrupted endochondral bone formation during embryogenesis. These hypomorphic mice have altered calvarial bone volume, as observed by histology and microCT imaging, and decreased expression of osteoblast marker genes. The bone phenotype of the heterozygous mice, which have 79-84% of wild-type Runx2 mRNA, is normal. These results show there is a critical gene dosage requirement of functional Runx2 for the formation of intramembranous bone tissues during embryogenesis. A decrease to 70% of wild-type Runx2 levels results in the CCD syndrome, whereas levels >79% produce a normal skeleton. Our findings suggest that the range of bone phenotypes in CCD patients is attributable to quantitative reduction in the functional activity of RUNX2.

The leukemogenic t(8;21) fusion protein AML1-ETO controls rRNA genes and associates with nucleolar-organizing regions at mitotic chromosomes

RUNX1/AML1 is required for definitive hematopoiesis and is frequently targeted by chromosomal translocations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The t(8;21)-related AML1-ETO fusion protein blocks differentiation of myeloid progenitors. Here, we show by immunofluorescence microscopy that during interphase, endogenous AML1-ETO localizes to nuclear microenvironments distinct from those containing native RUNX1/AML1 protein. At mitosis, we clearly detect binding of AML1-ETO to nucleolar-organizing regions in AML-derived Kasumi-1 cells and binding of RUNX1/AML1 to the same regions in Jurkat cells. Both RUNX1/AML1 and AML1-ETO occupy ribosomal DNA repeats during interphase, as well as interact with the endogenous RNA Pol I transcription factor UBF1. Promoter cytosine methylation analysis indicates that RUNX1/AML1 binds to rDNA repeats that are more highly CpG methylated than those bound by AML1-ETO. Downregulation by RNA interference reveals that RUNX1/AML1 negatively regulates rDNA transcription, whereas AML1-ETO is a positive regulator in Kasumi-1 cells. Taken together, our findings identify a novel role for the leukemia-related AML1-ETO protein in epigenetic control of cell growth through upregulation of ribosomal gene transcription mediated by RNA Pol I, consistent with the hyper-proliferative phenotype of myeloid cells in AML patients.

Mitotic partitioning of transcription factors

Mitosis is a highly orchestrated process involving numerous protein kinases and phosphatases. At the onset of mitosis, the chromatin condensation into metaphase chromosomes is correlated with global phosphorylation of histone H3. The bulk of transcription is silenced while many of the transcription-associated proteins, including transcription and chromatin remodeling factors, are excluded from chromatin, typically as a consequence of their phosphorylation. Components of the transcription machinery and regulatory proteins are recycled and equally partitioned between newly divided cells by mechanisms that may involve microtubules, microfilaments or intermediate filaments. However, as demonstrated in the case of Runx2, a subset of transcription factors involved in lineage-specific control, likely remain associated with their target genes to direct the deposition or removal of epigenetic marks. The displacement and re-entry into daughter cells of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors are temporally defined and regulated. Reformation of daughter nuclei is a critical time to re-establish the proper gene expression pattern. The mechanisms involved in the marking and re-establishment of gene expression has been elucidated for few genes. The elucidation of how the memory of a programmed expression profile is transmitted to daughter cells represents a challenge.

Differential parental transmission of markers in RUNX2 among cleft case-parent trios from four populations

Isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is among the most common human birth defects, with a prevalence around 1 in 700 live births. The Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) gene has been suggested as a candidate gene for CL/P based largely on mouse models; however, no human studies have focused on RUNX2 as a risk factor for CL/P. This study examines the association between markers in RUNX2 and isolated, nonsyndromic CL/P using a case-parent trio design, while considering parent-of-origin effects. Case-parent trios from four populations (77 from Maryland, 146 from Taiwan, 35 from Singapore, and 40 from Korea) were genotyped for 24 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the RUNX2 gene. We performed the transmission disequilibrium test on individual SNPs. Parent-of-origin effects were assessed using the transmission asymmetry test and the parent-of-origin likelihood ratio test (PO-LRT). When all trios were combined, the transmission asymmetry test revealed a block of 11 SNPs showing excess maternal transmission significant at the P<0.01 level, plus one SNP (rs1934328) showing excess paternal transmission (P=0.002). For the 11 SNPs showing excess maternal transmission, odds ratios of being transmitted to the case from the mother ranged between 3.00 and 4.00. The parent-of-origin likelihood ratio tests for equality of maternal and paternal transmission were significant for three individual SNPs (rs910586, rs2819861, and rs1934328). Thus, RUNX2 appears to influence risk of CL/P through a parent-of-origin effect with excess maternal transmission.

Genetic and epigenetic regulation in nuclear microenvironments for biological control in cancer

The regulatory machinery that governs genetic and epigenetic control of gene expression is compartmentalized in nuclear microenvironments. Temporal and spatial parameters of regulatory complex organization and assembly are functionally linked to biological control and are compromised with the onset and progression of tumorigenesis providing a novel platform for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Runx2 regulates G protein-coupled signaling pathways to control growth of osteoblast progenitors

Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) controls lineage commitment, proliferation, and anabolic functions of osteoblasts as the subnuclear effector of multiple signaling axes (e.g. transforming growth factor-beta/BMP-SMAD, SRC/YES-YAP, and GROUCHO/TLE). Runx2 levels oscillate during the osteoblast cell cycle with maximal levels in G(1). Here we examined what functions and target genes of Runx2 control osteoblast growth. Forced expression of wild type Runx2 suppresses growth of Runx2(-/-) osteoprogenitors. Point mutants defective for binding to WW domain or SMAD proteins or the nuclear matrix retain this growth regulatory ability. Hence, key signaling pathways are dispensable for growth control by Runx2. However, mutants defective for DNA binding or C-terminal gene repression/activation functions do not block proliferation. Target gene analysis by Affymetrix expression profiling shows that the C terminus of Runx2 regulates genes involved in G protein-coupled receptor signaling (e.g. Rgs2, Rgs4, Rgs5, Rgs16, Gpr23, Gpr30, Gpr54, Gpr64, and Gna13). We further examined the function of two genes linked to cAMP signaling as follows: Gpr30 that is stimulated and Rgs2 that is down-regulated by Runx2. RNA interference of Gpr30 and forced expression of Rgs2 in each case inhibit osteoblast proliferation. Notwithstanding its growth-suppressive potential, our results surprisingly indicate that Runx2 may sensitize cAMP-related G protein-coupled receptor signaling by activating Gpr30 and repressing Rgs2 gene expression in osteoblasts to increase responsiveness to mitogenic signals.

Expression of Runx2 transcription factor in non-skeletal tissues, sperm and brain

Runx2 is a master transcription factor for chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. However expression of Runx2 (by RT-PCR), has been reported in non-skeletal tissues such as breast, T cells and testis. To better define Runx2 activity in non-skeletal tissues, we examined transgenic (Tg) mice expressing LacZ gene under control of 3.0 kb (3 kb Tg) or 1.0 kb (1 kb Tg) of the Runx2 distal (P1) promoter, Runx2 LacZ knock-in (Runx2(+/LacZ)) and Runx2/P1 LacZ knock-in (Runx2/P1(+/LacZ)). In the Runx2 3 kb Tg mouse, beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) expression appeared in various non-skeletal tissues including testis, skin, adrenal gland and brain. beta-gal expression from both 3 kb and 1 kb Tg, reflecting activity of the Runx2 promoter, was readily detectable in seminiferous tubules of the testis and the epididymis. At the single cell level, beta-gal was detected in spermatids and mature sperms not in sertoli or Leydig cells. We also detected a positive signal from the Runx2(+/LacZ) and Runx2/P1(+/LacZ) mice. Indeed, Runx2 expression was observed in isolated mature sperms, which was confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Runx2, however, was not related to sex determination and sperm motility. Runx2 mediated beta-gal activity is also found robustly in the hippocampus and frontal lobe of the brain in Runx2(+/LacZ). Collectively, these results indicate that Runx2 is expressed in several non-skeletal tissues particularly sperms of testis and hippocampus of brain. It suggests that Runx2 may play an important role in male reproductive organ testis and brain.

Insights into the transcriptional and chromatin regulation of mesenchymal stem cells in musculo-skeletal tissues

Utilizing adult stem cells for regenerative medicine of skeletal tissues requires the development of molecular and biochemical tools that will allow isolation of these cells and direction of their differentiation towards a desired lineage and tissue formation. Stem cell commitment and fate decision into specialized functional cells involve coordinated activation and silencing of lineage-specific genes. Transcription factors and chromatin-remodeling proteins are key players in the control process of lineage commitment and differentiation during embryogenesis and adulthood. Transcription factors act in cooperation with co-regulator proteins to generate tissue-specific responses that elicits the tissue specific gene expression. Consequently, one of the main challenges of today's research is to characterize molecular pathways that coordinate the lineage-specific differentiation. Epigenetic regulation includes chromatin remodeling that control structural changes of DNA required for the binding of transcription factors to promoter regions. Revealing the mechanisms of action of such factors will provide understanding of how transcription and chromatin regulatory factors function together to regulate stem cell lineage fate decision.

Specific residues of RUNX2 are obligatory for formation of BMP2-induced RUNX2-SMAD complex to promote osteoblast differentiation

BMP2 signaling and RUNX2 regulatory pathways converge for transcriptional control of bone formation in vivo. SMAD proteins are recruited to RUNX2 regulatory complexes via an overlapping nuclear matrix targeting signal/Smad interacting domain sequence (391-432) in Runx2. To establish the contribution of RUNX2-SMAD interaction to osteoblastogenesis, we characterized a number of point mutants. Only a triple mutation of amino acids 426-428 (HTY-AAA) results in loss of RUNX2 interactions with either BMP2- or TGF-beta- responsive SMADs and fails to integrate the BMP2/TGF-beta signal on target gene promoters. In a Runx2 null cell reconstitution assay, the HTY mutant did not activate the program of osteoblast differentiation (alkaline phosphatase, collagen type 1, osteopontin, bone sialoprotein and osteocalcin) in response to BMP2 signaling. Thus, subnuclear targeting function and formation of a RUNX2-SMAD osteogenic complex are functionally inseparable. Taken together, these studies provide direct evidence that RUNX2 is essential for execution and completion of BMP2 signaling for osteoblast differentiation.

Molecular switches involving homeodomain proteins, HOXA10 and RUNX2 regulate osteoblastogenesis

The osteoinductive BMP2 signal facilitates commitment to the osteoblast phenotype by inducing several classes of early response genes. Among these are bone-related HOX factors, homeodomain, RUNX and OSTERIX proteins. Here we demonstrate molecular events among BMP2-induced transcription factors that constitute a network of molecular switches on promoters of bone-related genes to coordinate their temporal expression during cellular differentiation. Our studies provide evidence for (1) selective association of HOXA10, MSX2, DLX3 and DLX5 homeodomain transcription factors on Runx2 and OC genes at stages of osteoblast maturation as well as (2) participation of these factors with RUNX2 in chromatin remodeling of bone-specific genes for repression, activation and attenuation of transcription. These findings reveal the requirement for multiple levels of control for the appropriate timing of osteoblast-related gene expression.

Chromatin dynamics during the plant cell cycle

Cell cycle progression depends on a highly regulated series of events of which transcriptional control plays a major role. In addition, during the S-phase not only DNA but chromatin as a whole needs to be faithfully duplicated. Therefore, both nucleosome dynamics as well as local changes in chromatin organization, including introduction and/or removal of covalent DNA and histone modifications, at genes with a key role in cell proliferation, are of primary relevance. Chromatin duplication during the S-phase and the chromosome segregation during mitosis are cell cycle stages critical for maintenance of epigenetic marks or for allowing the daughter products to acquire a distinct epigenetic landscape and, consequently, a unique cell fate decision. These aspects of chromatin dynamics together with the strict coupling of cell proliferation, cell differentiation and post-embryonic organogenesis have a profound impact on plant growth, development and response to external signals.

Prostate carcinoma and radiation therapy: therapeutic treatment resistance and strategies for targeted therapeutic intervention

Adenocarcinoma of the prostate remains a significant public health problem and a prevalent cancer in men. Prostate-specific antigen used as a biomarker has established a clear migration of patients towards earlier-stage disease at presentation. However, in spite of process improvements in traditional therapies including surgery, radiation therapy, and hormone management, there remains a significant cohort of patients with intermediate- to high-risk features for poor outcome in spite of optimal use of traditional management. This paper focuses on future treatment strategies integrating new therapeutic options with traditional management, specifically to pinpoint new radiation therapy strategies.

Histone deacetylases in control of skeletogenesis

Skeletogenesis occurs continuously during the lifespan of vertebrate organisms. In development, the skeleton is patterned and modeled until each bone achieves its optimal shape and full size. During adults, the skeleton is remodeled to maintain strength and release calcium. The bone-resorbing and bone-forming activities of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, respectively, are tightly coupled to maintain optimal skeletal health; however, during aging and disease, these cells can become uncoupled, adversely affecting skeletal health and strength. Histone deacetylases have emerged as important regulators of endochondral bone formation, osteoblast maturation and osteoclast survival. Histone deacetylases are inhibited by small molecules that are approved and/or in clinical trials as cancer therapeutic drugs or anti-epileptic agents. In this article, the roles of histone deacetylases and effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors on bone and cartilage cells are reviewed.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays: application of ChIP-on-chip for defining dynamic transcriptional mechanisms in bone cells

Normal cell growth and differentiation of bone cells requires the sequential expression of cell type specific genes to permit lineage specification and development of cellular phenotypes. Transcriptional activation and repression of distinct sets of genes support the anabolic functions of osteoblasts and the catabolic properties of osteoclasts. Furthermore, metastasis of tumors to the bone environment is controlled by transcriptional mechanisms. Insights into the transcriptional regulation of genes in bone cells may provide a conceptual basis for improved therapeutic approaches to treat bone fractures, genetic osteopathologies, and/or cancer metastases to bone. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a powerful technique to establish in vivo binding of transcription factors to the promoters of genes that are either activated or repressed in bone cells. Combining ChIP with genomic microarray analysis, colloquially referred to as "ChIP-on-chip," has become a valuable method for analysis of endogenous protein/DNA interactions. This technique permits assessment of chromosomal binding sites for transcription factors or the location of histone modifications at a genomic scale. This chapter discusses protocols for performing chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, with a focus on ChIP-on-chip analysis. The information presented is based on the authors' experience with defining interactions of Runt-related (RUNX) transcription factors with bone-related genes within the context of the native nucleosomal organization of intact osteoblastic cells.

Runx2 deficiency and defective subnuclear targeting bypass senescence to promote immortalization and tumorigenic potential

The osteogenic Runt-related (Runx2) transcription factor negatively regulates proliferation and ribosomal gene expression in normal diploid osteoblasts, but is up-regulated in metastatic breast and prostate cancer cells. Thus, Runx2 may function as a tumor suppressor or an oncogene depending on the cellular context. Here we show that Runx2-deficient primary osteoblasts fail to undergo senescence as indicated by the absence of beta-gal activity and p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor expression. Primary Runx2-null osteoblasts have a growth advantage and exhibit loss of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and p19(ARF) expression. Reintroduction of WT Runx2, but not a subnuclear targeting-defective mutant, induces both p21(WAF/CIP1) and p19(ARF) mRNA and protein resulting in cell-cycle inhibition. Accumulation of spontaneous phospho-H2A.X foci, loss of telomere integrity and the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 DNA repair complex, and a delayed DNA repair response all indicate that Runx2 deficiency leads to genomic instability. We propose that Runx2 functions as a tumor suppressor in primary diploid osteoblasts and that subnuclear targeting contributes to Runx2-mediated tumor suppression.

Agonist-mediated docking of androgen receptor onto the mitotic chromatin platform discriminates intrinsic mode of action of prostate cancer drugs

This study documents the analysis of a hitherto unreported dynamic behavior of androgen receptor (AR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Employing GFP-tagged AR, we observed agonist-mediated docking of AR onto the mitotic chromatin during all the stages of mitosis. When bound to therapeutic drugs with intrinsically absolute or partial agonistic properties, AR concomitantly associated with the mitotic chromatin. Conversely, pure antagonists known to bind and subsequently translocate unliganded AR from cytoplasm to nuclear compartment did not provoke such association. The agonist-mediated docking of AR could not be competed with other transcription factors that constitutively preoccupied the chromosomal docking sites. Amongst the previously reported proteins, AR is first example of a transcription factor whose response on mitotic chromatin platform can be modulated in a ligand-specific manner. However, data from live cell imaging revealed that co-activators of agonist-activated receptor that are recruited into "nuclear foci" of interphase chromatin are dislodged from the mitotic chromatin during cell division. This implies that in absence of critical co-activators, AR transverses mitotic phase in transcriptionally silenced state. Finally, our results indicate that ligand-mediated dynamic relationship of nuclear receptors with mitotic chromatin can be effectively exploited to study, analyze and authenticate therapeutic ligands.

Worming out the biology of Runx

Runx family transcription factors have risen to prominence over the last few years because of the increasing evidence implicating them as key regulators of the choice between cell proliferation and differentiation during development and carcinogenesis. Runx factors have been found to be involved in diverse developmental processes, ranging from hematopoiesis to neurogenesis, and are increasingly being linked with various human cancers. In this review, we examine the case for Runx factors as key regulators of cell proliferation in various developmental situations, a role that predisposes Runx mutations as causative agents in oncogenesis. We discuss the evidence that Runx factors regulate, and are regulated by, core components of the cell cycle machinery, and focus our attention on the solo Runx gene, rnt-1, in Caenorhabditis elegans, an organism that we feel has much to offer the Runx field.

Cell cycle related modulations in Runx2 protein levels are independent of lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor 1 (Lef1) in proliferating osteoblasts

Runt-related transcription factor Runx2 regulates osteogenic phenotype commitment and attenuates osteoblast growth. Runx2 levels are cell cycle regulated and maximal in the G1 phase of proliferating osteoblasts and during quiescence. The Wnt/Lrp5-Frizzled/beta-catenin/Lef-Tcf signaling cascade also controls progression along the osteogenic lineage with a net anabolic effect that promotes bone formation. However, Lef1 opposes the osteoblast maturation promoting activity of Runx2. Here we examined whether Lef1 controls Runx2 expression during the cell cycle or onset of quiescence in osteoblasts. We inhibited Lef1 expression using short hairpin (sh) RNA interference in stably transfected MC3T3-E1 cells. In asynchronously growing osteoblasts, expression of Lef1 shRNA diminishes Lef1 protein levels, but does not affect Runx2 levels. Cells arrested in different cell cycle stages using mimosine (late G1), hydroxyurea or aphidicolin (S phase) or nocodazole (mitosis) exhibit expected reductions in Runx2 protein levels despite reductions in Lef1. Serum deprived MC3T3-E1 cells normally upregulate Runx2 protein regardless of Lef1 deficiency, although loss of Lef1 reduces cyclin A and increases cyclin D1 expression upon serum withdrawal. Thus, Runx2 protein levels during the cell cycle and onset of quiescence are regulated independently of Lef1, one of the major transcriptional inducers of Wnt signaling in proliferating cells.

Cohesin-dependent regulation of Runx genes

Runx transcription factors determine cell fate in many lineages. Maintaining balanced levels of Runx proteins is crucial, as deregulated expression leads to cancers and developmental disorders. We conducted a forward genetic screen in zebrafish for positive regulators of runx1 that yielded the cohesin subunit rad21. Zebrafish embryos lacking Rad21, or cohesin subunit Smc3, fail to express runx3 and lose hematopoietic runx1 expression in early embryonic development. Failure to develop differentiated blood cells in rad21 mutants is partially rescued by microinjection of runx1 mRNA. Significantly, monoallelic loss of rad21 caused a reduction in the transcription of runx1 and of the proneural genes ascl1a and ascl1b, indicating that downstream genes are sensitive to Rad21 dose. Changes in gene expression were observed in a reduced cohesin background in which cell division was able to proceed, indicating that cohesin might have a function in transcription that is separable from its mitotic role. Cohesin is a protein complex essential for sister chromatid cohesion and DNA repair that also appears to be essential for normal development through as yet unknown mechanisms. Our findings provide evidence for a novel role for cohesin in development, and indicate potential for monoallelic loss of cohesin subunits to alter gene expression.

Nuclear microenvironments in biological control and cancer

Nucleic acids and regulatory proteins are compartmentalized in microenvironments within the nucleus. This subnuclear organization may support convergence and the integration of physiological signals for the combinatorial control of gene expression, DNA replication and repair. Nuclear organization is modified in many cancers. There are cancer-related changes in the composition, organization and assembly of regulatory complexes at intranuclear sites. Mechanistic insights into the temporal and spatial organization of machinery for gene expression within the nucleus, which is compromised in tumours, provide a novel platform for diagnosis and therapy.