101
|
Hong L, Dumond M, Zhu M, Tsugawa S, Li CB, Boudaoud A, Hamant O, Roeder AHK. Heterogeneity and Robustness in Plant Morphogenesis: From Cells to Organs. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY 2018; 69:469-495. [PMID: 29505739 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Development is remarkably reproducible, producing organs with the same size, shape, and function repeatedly from individual to individual. For example, every flower on the Antirrhinum stalk has the same snapping dragon mouth. This reproducibility has allowed taxonomists to classify plants and animals according to their morphology. Yet these reproducible organs are composed of highly variable cells. For example, neighboring cells grow at different rates in Arabidopsis leaves, sepals, and shoot apical meristems. This cellular variability occurs in normal, wild-type organisms, indicating that cellular heterogeneity (or diversity in a characteristic such as growth rate) is either actively maintained or, at a minimum, not entirely suppressed. In fact, cellular heterogeneity can contribute to producing invariant organs. Here, we focus on how plant organs are reproducibly created during development from these highly variable cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilan Hong
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science; Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA; , ,
| | - Mathilde Dumond
- Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 69364 Lyon CEDEX 07, France; , ,
- Current affiliation: Department for Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland;
| | - Mingyuan Zhu
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science; Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA; , ,
| | - Satoru Tsugawa
- Theoretical Biology Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan;
| | - Chun-Biu Li
- Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Arezki Boudaoud
- Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 69364 Lyon CEDEX 07, France; , ,
| | - Olivier Hamant
- Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 69364 Lyon CEDEX 07, France; , ,
| | - Adrienne H K Roeder
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science; Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA; , ,
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Truskina J, Vernoux T. The growth of a stable stationary structure: coordinating cell behavior and patterning at the shoot apical meristem. CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY 2018; 41:83-88. [PMID: 29073502 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Plants are characterized by their ability to produce new organs post-embryonically throughout their entire life cycle. In particular development of all above-ground organs relies almost entirely on the function of the shoot apical meristem (SAM). The SAM performs a dual role by maintaining a pool of undifferentiated cells and simultaneously driving cell differentiation to initiate organogenesis. Both processes require strict coordination between individual cells which leads to formation of reproducible morphological and molecular patterns within SAM. The patterns are formed and maintained in large part due to spatio-temporal variation in signaling of plant hormones auxin and cytokinin resulting in tissue-specific transcriptional regulation. Integration of these mechanisms into computational models further identifies the key regulatory interactions involved in SAM function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jekaterina Truskina
- Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, F-69342 Lyon, France; Centre for Plant Integrative Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Teva Vernoux
- Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, F-69342 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Pavelescu I, Vilarrasa-Blasi J, Planas-Riverola A, González-García MP, Caño-Delgado AI, Ibañes M. A Sizer model for cell differentiation in Arabidopsis thaliana root growth. Mol Syst Biol 2018; 14:e7687. [PMID: 29321184 PMCID: PMC5787709 DOI: 10.15252/msb.20177687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Plant roots grow due to cell division in the meristem and subsequent cell elongation and differentiation, a tightly coordinated process that ensures growth and adaptation to the changing environment. How the newly formed cells decide to stop elongating becoming fully differentiated is not yet understood. To address this question, we established a novel approach that combines the quantitative phenotypic variability of wild‐type Arabidopsis roots with computational data from mathematical models. Our analyses reveal that primary root growth is consistent with a Sizer mechanism, in which cells sense their length and stop elongating when reaching a threshold value. The local expression of brassinosteroid receptors only in the meristem is sufficient to set this value. Analysis of roots insensitive to BR signaling and of roots with gibberellin biosynthesis inhibited suggests distinct roles of these hormones on cell expansion termination. Overall, our study underscores the value of using computational modeling together with quantitative data to understand root growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Pavelescu
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain.,Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Vilarrasa-Blasi
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ainoa Planas-Riverola
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mary-Paz González-García
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana I Caño-Delgado
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Center for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB, Campus UAB Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ibañes
- Departament de Física de la Matèria Condensada, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain .,Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Complex Systems (UBICS) Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Tsugawa S, Hervieux N, Kierzkowski D, Routier-Kierzkowska AL, Sapala A, Hamant O, Smith RS, Roeder AHK, Boudaoud A, Li CB. Clones of cells switch from reduction to enhancement of size variability in Arabidopsis sepals. Development 2017; 144:4398-4405. [PMID: 29183944 PMCID: PMC5769632 DOI: 10.1242/dev.153999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Organs form with remarkably consistent sizes and shapes during development, whereas a high variability in growth is observed at the cell level. Given this contrast, it is unclear how such consistency in organ scale can emerge from cellular behavior. Here, we examine an intermediate scale, the growth of clones of cells in Arabidopsis sepals. Each clone consists of the progeny of a single progenitor cell. At early stages, we find that clones derived from a small progenitor cell grow faster than those derived from a large progenitor cell. This results in a reduction in clone size variability, a phenomenon we refer to as size uniformization. By contrast, at later stages of clone growth, clones change their growth pattern to enhance size variability, when clones derived from larger progenitor cells grow faster than those derived from smaller progenitor cells. Finally, we find that, at early stages, fast growing clones exhibit greater cell growth heterogeneity. Thus, cellular variability in growth might contribute to a decrease in the variability of clones throughout the sepal. Summary: Growth analyses of Arabidopsis sepals identify a tipping point in organ development, at which clones of cells change their growth pattern from size uniformization to size variability enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Tsugawa
- Theoretical Biology Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan
| | - Nathan Hervieux
- Laboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Universiteé de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 46 Allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Daniel Kierzkowski
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Köln, Germany
| | - Anne-Lise Routier-Kierzkowska
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Köln, Germany
| | - Aleksandra Sapala
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Köln, Germany
| | - Olivier Hamant
- Laboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Universiteé de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 46 Allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Richard S Smith
- Department of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Köln, Germany
| | - Adrienne H K Roeder
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Arezki Boudaoud
- Laboratoire de Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Universiteé de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INRA, CNRS, 46 Allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France
| | - Chun-Biu Li
- Department of Mathematics, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
The phenomenology of cell size control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2017; 49:53-58. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
106
|
Carter R, Sánchez-Corrales YE, Hartley M, Grieneisen VA, Marée AFM. Pavement cells and the topology puzzle. Development 2017; 144:4386-4397. [PMID: 29084800 PMCID: PMC5769637 DOI: 10.1242/dev.157073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
D'Arcy Thompson emphasised the importance of surface tension as a potential driving force in establishing cell shape and topology within tissues. Leaf epidermal pavement cells grow into jigsaw-piece shapes, highly deviating from such classical forms. We investigate the topology of developing Arabidopsis leaves composed solely of pavement cells. Image analysis of around 50,000 cells reveals a clear and unique topological signature, deviating from previously studied epidermal tissues. This topological distribution is established early during leaf development, already before the typical pavement cell shapes emerge, with topological homeostasis maintained throughout growth and unaltered between division and maturation zones. Simulating graph models, we identify a heuristic cellular division rule that reproduces the observed topology. Our parsimonious model predicts how and when cells effectively place their division plane with respect to their neighbours. We verify the predicted dynamics through in vivo tracking of 800 mitotic events, and conclude that the distinct topology is not a direct consequence of the jigsaw piece-like shape of the cells, but rather owes itself to a strongly life history-driven process, with limited impact from cell-surface mechanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross Carter
- Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
| | | | - Matthew Hartley
- Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
107
|
|
108
|
Miettinen TP, Caldez MJ, Kaldis P, Björklund M. Cell size control - a mechanism for maintaining fitness and function. Bioessays 2017; 39. [PMID: 28752618 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The maintenance of cell size homeostasis has been studied for years in different cellular systems. With the focus on 'what regulates cell size', the question 'why cell size needs to be maintained' has been largely overlooked. Recent evidence indicates that animal cells exhibit nonlinear cell size dependent growth rates and mitochondrial metabolism, which are maximal in intermediate sized cells within each cell population. Increases in intracellular distances and changes in the relative cell surface area impose biophysical limitations on cells, which can explain why growth and metabolic rates are maximal in a specific cell size range. Consistently, aberrant increases in cell size, for example through polyploidy, are typically disadvantageous to cellular metabolism, fitness and functionality. Accordingly, cellular hypertrophy can potentially predispose to or worsen metabolic diseases. We propose that cell size control may have emerged as a guardian of cellular fitness and metabolic activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teemu P Miettinen
- MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, UK.,Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Matias J Caldez
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Philipp Kaldis
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Björklund
- Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Jackson MD, Xu H, Duran-Nebreda S, Stamm P, Bassel GW. Topological analysis of multicellular complexity in the plant hypocotyl. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 28682235 PMCID: PMC5499946 DOI: 10.7554/elife.26023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Multicellularity arose as a result of adaptive advantages conferred to complex cellular assemblies. The arrangement of cells within organs endows higher-order functionality through a structure-function relationship, though the organizational properties of these multicellular configurations remain poorly understood. We investigated the topological properties of complex organ architecture by digitally capturing global cellular interactions in the plant embryonic stem (hypocotyl), and analyzing these using quantitative network analysis. This revealed the presence of coherent conduits of reduced path length across epidermal atrichoblast cell files. The preferential movement of small molecules along this cell type was demonstrated using fluorescence transport assays. Both robustness and plasticity in this higher order property of atrichoblast patterning was observed across diverse genetic backgrounds, and the analysis of genetic patterning mutants identified the contribution of gene activity towards their construction. This topological analysis of multicellular structural organization reveals higher order functions for patterning and principles of complex organ construction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Db Jackson
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hao Xu
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Petra Stamm
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - George W Bassel
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Bucksch A, Atta-Boateng A, Azihou AF, Battogtokh D, Baumgartner A, Binder BM, Braybrook SA, Chang C, Coneva V, DeWitt TJ, Fletcher AG, Gehan MA, Diaz-Martinez DH, Hong L, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Klein LL, Leiboff S, Li M, Lynch JP, Maizel A, Maloof JN, Markelz RJC, Martinez CC, Miller LA, Mio W, Palubicki W, Poorter H, Pradal C, Price CA, Puttonen E, Reese JB, Rellán-Álvarez R, Spalding EP, Sparks EE, Topp CN, Williams JH, Chitwood DH. Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2017; 8:900. [PMID: 28659934 PMCID: PMC5465304 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The geometries and topologies of leaves, flowers, roots, shoots, and their arrangements have fascinated plant biologists and mathematicians alike. As such, plant morphology is inherently mathematical in that it describes plant form and architecture with geometrical and topological techniques. Gaining an understanding of how to modify plant morphology, through molecular biology and breeding, aided by a mathematical perspective, is critical to improving agriculture, and the monitoring of ecosystems is vital to modeling a future with fewer natural resources. In this white paper, we begin with an overview in quantifying the form of plants and mathematical models of patterning in plants. We then explore the fundamental challenges that remain unanswered concerning plant morphology, from the barriers preventing the prediction of phenotype from genotype to modeling the movement of leaves in air streams. We end with a discussion concerning the education of plant morphology synthesizing biological and mathematical approaches and ways to facilitate research advances through outreach, cross-disciplinary training, and open science. Unleashing the potential of geometric and topological approaches in the plant sciences promises to transform our understanding of both plants and mathematics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bucksch
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
- Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
| | | | - Akomian F. Azihou
- Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-CalaviCotonou, Benin
| | - Dorjsuren Battogtokh
- Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgVA, United States
| | - Aly Baumgartner
- Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, WacoTX, United States
| | - Brad M. Binder
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | | | - Cynthia Chang
- Division of Biology, University of Washington, BothellWA, United States
| | - Viktoirya Coneva
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States
| | - Thomas J. DeWitt
- Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences–Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College StationTX, United States
| | - Alexander G. Fletcher
- School of Mathematics and Statistics and Bateson Centre, University of SheffieldSheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Malia A. Gehan
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States
| | | | - Lilan Hong
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States
| | - Anjali S. Iyer-Pascuzzi
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West LafayetteIN, United States
| | - Laura L. Klein
- Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. LouisMO, United States
| | - Samuel Leiboff
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States
| | - Mao Li
- Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States
| | - Jonathan P. Lynch
- Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkPA, United States
| | - Alexis Maizel
- Center for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg UniversityHeidelberg, Germany
| | - Julin N. Maloof
- Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States
| | - R. J. Cody Markelz
- Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States
| | - Ciera C. Martinez
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyCA, United States
| | - Laura A. Miller
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNC, United States
| | - Washington Mio
- Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States
| | - Wojtek Palubicki
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hendrik Poorter
- Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, JülichGermany
| | | | - Charles A. Price
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | - Eetu Puttonen
- Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey of FinlandMasala, Finland
- Centre of Excellence in Laser Scanning Research, National Land Survey of FinlandMasala, Finland
| | - John B. Reese
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | - Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
- Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV)Irapuato, Mexico
| | - Edgar P. Spalding
- Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin–Madison, MadisonWI, United States
| | - Erin E. Sparks
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, NewarkDE, United States
| | | | - Joseph H. Williams
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
111
|
|
112
|
Bucksch A, Atta-Boateng A, Azihou AF, Battogtokh D, Baumgartner A, Binder BM, Braybrook SA, Chang C, Coneva V, DeWitt TJ, Fletcher AG, Gehan MA, Diaz-Martinez DH, Hong L, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Klein LL, Leiboff S, Li M, Lynch JP, Maizel A, Maloof JN, Markelz RJC, Martinez CC, Miller LA, Mio W, Palubicki W, Poorter H, Pradal C, Price CA, Puttonen E, Reese JB, Rellán-Álvarez R, Spalding EP, Sparks EE, Topp CN, Williams JH, Chitwood DH. Morphological Plant Modeling: Unleashing Geometric and Topological Potential within the Plant Sciences. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2017. [PMID: 28659934 DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88945-297-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The geometries and topologies of leaves, flowers, roots, shoots, and their arrangements have fascinated plant biologists and mathematicians alike. As such, plant morphology is inherently mathematical in that it describes plant form and architecture with geometrical and topological techniques. Gaining an understanding of how to modify plant morphology, through molecular biology and breeding, aided by a mathematical perspective, is critical to improving agriculture, and the monitoring of ecosystems is vital to modeling a future with fewer natural resources. In this white paper, we begin with an overview in quantifying the form of plants and mathematical models of patterning in plants. We then explore the fundamental challenges that remain unanswered concerning plant morphology, from the barriers preventing the prediction of phenotype from genotype to modeling the movement of leaves in air streams. We end with a discussion concerning the education of plant morphology synthesizing biological and mathematical approaches and ways to facilitate research advances through outreach, cross-disciplinary training, and open science. Unleashing the potential of geometric and topological approaches in the plant sciences promises to transform our understanding of both plants and mathematics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bucksch
- Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
- Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, AthensGA, United States
| | | | - Akomian F Azihou
- Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-CalaviCotonou, Benin
| | - Dorjsuren Battogtokh
- Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgVA, United States
| | - Aly Baumgartner
- Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, WacoTX, United States
| | - Brad M Binder
- Department of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | | | - Cynthia Chang
- Division of Biology, University of Washington, BothellWA, United States
| | - Viktoirya Coneva
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States
| | - Thomas J DeWitt
- Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences-Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College StationTX, United States
| | - Alexander G Fletcher
- School of Mathematics and Statistics and Bateson Centre, University of SheffieldSheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Malia A Gehan
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. LouisMO, United States
| | | | - Lilan Hong
- Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology and Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States
| | - Anjali S Iyer-Pascuzzi
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West LafayetteIN, United States
| | - Laura L Klein
- Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. LouisMO, United States
| | - Samuel Leiboff
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, IthacaNY, United States
| | - Mao Li
- Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States
| | - Jonathan P Lynch
- Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkPA, United States
| | - Alexis Maizel
- Center for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg UniversityHeidelberg, Germany
| | - Julin N Maloof
- Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States
| | - R J Cody Markelz
- Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, United States
| | - Ciera C Martinez
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyCA, United States
| | - Laura A Miller
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNC, United States
| | - Washington Mio
- Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, TallahasseeFL, United States
| | - Wojtek Palubicki
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of CambridgeCambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hendrik Poorter
- Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, JülichGermany
| | | | - Charles A Price
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | - Eetu Puttonen
- Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey of FinlandMasala, Finland
- Centre of Excellence in Laser Scanning Research, National Land Survey of FinlandMasala, Finland
| | - John B Reese
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | - Rubén Rellán-Álvarez
- Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV)Irapuato, Mexico
| | - Edgar P Spalding
- Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, United States
| | - Erin E Sparks
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, NewarkDE, United States
| | | | - Joseph H Williams
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, KnoxvilleTN, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
113
|
Kucypera K, Lipowczan M, Piekarska-Stachowiak A, Nakielski J. A method to generate the surface cell layer of the 3D virtual shoot apex from apical initials. PLANT METHODS 2017; 13:110. [PMID: 29238397 PMCID: PMC5725887 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0262-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The development of cell pattern in the surface cell layer of the shoot apex can be investigated in vivo by use of a time-lapse confocal images, showing naked meristem in 3D in successive times. However, how this layer is originated from apical initials and develops as a result of growth and divisions of their descendants, remains unknown. This is an open area for computer modelling. A method to generate the surface cell layer is presented on the example of the 3D paraboloidal shoot apical dome. In the used model the layer originates from three apical initials that meet at the dome summit and develops through growth and cell divisions under the isotropic surface growth, defined by the growth tensor. The cells, which are described by polyhedrons, divide anticlinally with the smallest division plane that passes depending on the used mode through the cell center, or the point found randomly near this center. The formation of the surface cell pattern is described with the attention being paid to activity of the apical initials and fates of their descendants. RESULTS The computer generated surface layer that included about 350 cells required about 1200 divisions of the apical initials and their derivatives. The derivatives were arranged into three more or less equal clonal sectors composed of cellular clones at different age. Each apical initial renewed itself 7-8 times to produce the sector. In the shape and location and the cellular clones the following divisions of the initial were manifested. The application of the random factor resulted in more realistic cell pattern in comparison to the pure mode. The cell divisions were analyzed statistically on the top view. When all of the division walls were considered, their angular distribution was uniform, whereas in the distribution that was limited to apical initials only, some preferences related to their arrangement at the dome summit were observed. CONCLUSIONS The realistic surface cell pattern was obtained. The present method is a useful tool to generate surface cell layer, study activity of initial cells and their derivatives, and how cell expansion and division are coordinated during growth. We expect its further application to clarify the question of a number and permanence or impermanence of initial cells, and possible relationship between their shape and oriented divisions, both on the ground of the growth tensor approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Kucypera
- Department of Biophysics and Morphogenesis of Plants, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Marcin Lipowczan
- Department of Biophysics and Morphogenesis of Plants, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Jerzy Nakielski
- Department of Biophysics and Morphogenesis of Plants, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|