101
|
Flies CM, van Leuken KH, Ten Voorde M, Verhoeff JJC, De Vos FYF, Seute T, Robe PA, Witkamp TD, Hendrikse J, Dankbaar JW, Snijders TJ. Conventional MRI Criteria to Differentiate Progressive Disease From Treatment-Induced Effects in High-Grade (WHO Grade 3-4) Gliomas. Neurology 2022; 99:e77-e88. [PMID: 35437259 PMCID: PMC9259090 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Posttreatment radiologic deterioration of an irradiated high-grade (WHO grade 3-4) glioma (HGG) may be the result of true progressive disease or treatment-induced effects (TIE). Differentiation between these entities is of great importance but remains a diagnostic challenge. This study assesses the diagnostic value of conventional MRI characteristics to differentiate progressive disease from TIE in HGGs. METHODS In this single-center, retrospective, consecutive cohort study, we included adults with a HGG who were treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy and subsequently developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion on conventional follow-up MRI. TIE and progressive disease were defined radiologically as stable/decreased for ≥6 weeks or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology progression and histologically as TIE without viable tumor or progressive disease. Two neuroradiologists assessed 21 preselected MRI characteristics of the progressive lesions. The statistical analysis included logistic regression to develop a full multivariable model, a diagnostic model with model reduction, and a Cohen kappa interrater reliability (IRR) coefficient. RESULTS A total of 210 patients (median age 61 years, interquartile range 54-68, 189 male) with 284 lesions were included, of whom 141 (50%) had progressive disease. Median time to progressive disease was 2 (0.7-6.1) and to TIE 0.9 (0.7-3.5) months after radiotherapy. After multivariable modeling and model reduction, the following determinants prevailed: radiation dose (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93), longer time to progression (TTP; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.84-6.88), marginal enhancement (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.09-3.83), soap bubble enhancement (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.39-4.98), and isointense apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) signal (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.05-4.24). ORs >1 indicate higher odds of progressive disease. The Hosmer & Lemeshow test showed good calibration (p = 0.947) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.722 (95% CI 0.66-0.78). In the glioblastoma subgroup, TTP, marginal enhancement, and ADC signal were significant. IRR analysis between neuroradiologists revealed moderate to near perfect agreement for the predictive items but poor agreement for others. DISCUSSION Several characteristics from conventional MRI are significant predictors for the discrimination between progressive disease and TIE. However, IRR was variable. Conventional MRI characteristics from this study should be incorporated into a multimodal diagnostic model with advanced imaging techniques. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with irradiated HGGs, radiation dose, longer TTP, marginal enhancement, soap bubble enhancement, and isointense ADC signal distinguish progressive disease from TIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Flies
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Karlijn H van Leuken
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Marlies Ten Voorde
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Filip Y F De Vos
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Tatjana Seute
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Pierre A Robe
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Theodoor D Witkamp
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Jeroen Hendrikse
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.)
| | - Tom J Snijders
- From the Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.M.F., K.H.v.L., M.t.V., T.S., P.A.R., T.J.S.), and Departments of Radiation Oncology (J.J.C.V.), Medical Oncology (F.Y.F.D.V.), and Radiology (T.D.W., J.H., J.W.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts (K.H.v.L.), the Netherlands; and Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations in Guinea (Conakry) (M.t.V.).
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Chawla S, Bukhari S, Afridi OM, Wang S, Yadav SK, Akbari H, Verma G, Nath K, Haris M, Bagley S, Davatzikos C, Loevner LA, Mohan S. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4719. [PMID: 35233862 PMCID: PMC9203929 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Pseudoprogression (PsP) refers to treatment-related clinico-radiologic changes mimicking true progression (TP) that occurs in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), predominantly within the first 6 months after the completion of surgery and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with temozolomide. Accurate differentiation of TP from PsP is essential for making informed decisions on appropriate therapeutic intervention as well as for prognostication of these patients. Conventional neuroimaging findings are often equivocal in distinguishing between TP and PsP and present a considerable diagnostic dilemma to oncologists and radiologists. These challenges have emphasized the need for developing alternative imaging techniques that may aid in the accurate diagnosis of TP and PsP. In this review, we encapsulate the current state of knowledge in the clinical applications of commonly used metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques such as diffusion and perfusion imaging and proton spectroscopy in distinguishing TP from PsP. We also showcase the potential of promising imaging techniques, such as amide proton transfer and amino acid-based positron emission tomography, in providing useful information about the treatment response. Additionally, we highlight the role of "radiomics", which is an emerging field of radiology that has the potential to change the way in which advanced MR techniques are utilized in assessing treatment response in GBM patients. Finally, we present our institutional experiences and discuss future perspectives on the role of multiparametric MR imaging in identifying PsP in GBM patients treated with "standard-of-care" CCRT as well as novel/targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sultan Bukhari
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Omar M. Afridi
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sumei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Santosh K. Yadav
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gaurav Verma
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammad Haris
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Stephen Bagley
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laurie A. Loevner
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Sun R, Henry T, Laville A, Carré A, Hamaoui A, Bockel S, Chaffai I, Levy A, Chargari C, Robert C, Deutsch E. Imaging approaches and radiomics: toward a new era of ultraprecision radioimmunotherapy? J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:e004848. [PMID: 35793875 PMCID: PMC9260846 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Strong rationale and a growing number of preclinical and clinical studies support combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes. However, several critical questions remain, such as the identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy and the identification of the best modalities of treatment to optimize patient response. Imaging biomarkers and radiomics have recently emerged as promising tools for the non-invasive assessment of the whole disease of the patient, allowing comprehensive analysis of the tumor microenvironment, the spatial heterogeneity of the disease and its temporal changes. This review presents the potential applications of medical imaging and the challenges to address, in order to help clinicians choose the optimal modalities of both radiotherapy and immunotherapy, to predict patient's outcomes and to assess response to these promising combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Théophraste Henry
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Adrien Laville
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandre Carré
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Anthony Hamaoui
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Sophie Bockel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Chaffai
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1030, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Galijasevic M, Steiger R, Mangesius S, Mangesius J, Kerschbaumer J, Freyschlag CF, Gruber N, Janjic T, Gizewski ER, Grams AE. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Gliomas: State-of-the-Art. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3197. [PMID: 35804969 PMCID: PMC9264890 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Preoperative grade prediction is important in diagnostics of glioma. Even more important can be follow-up after chemotherapy and radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. In this review we provide an overview of MR-spectroscopy (MRS), technical aspects, and different clinical scenarios in the diagnostics and follow-up of gliomas in pediatric and adult populations. Furthermore, we provide a recap of the current research utility and possible future strategies regarding proton- and phosphorous-MRS in glioma research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malik Galijasevic
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ruth Steiger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stephanie Mangesius
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Johannes Kerschbaumer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (J.K.); (C.F.F.)
| | | | - Nadja Gruber
- VASCage-Research Centre on Vascular Ageing and Stroke, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tanja Janjic
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Elke Ruth Gizewski
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Astrid Ellen Grams
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; (M.G.); (R.S.); (T.J.); (E.R.G.); (A.E.G.)
- Neuroimaging Research Core Facility, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Baek HJ, Heo YJ, Kim D, Yun SY, Baek JW, Jeong HW, Choo HJ, Lee JY, Oh SI. Usefulness of Wave-CAIPI for Postcontrast 3D T1-SPACE in the Evaluation of Brain Metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:857-863. [PMID: 35618423 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE High-resolution postcontrast 3D T1WI is a widely used sequence for evaluating brain metastasis, despite the long scan time. This study aimed to compare highly accelerated postcontrast 3D T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolution by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-T1-SPACE) with the commonly used standard high-resolution postcontrast 3D T1-SPACE for the evaluation of brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among the 387 patients who underwent postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE and standard SPACE, 56 patients with suspected brain metastases were retrospectively included. Two neuroradiologists assessed the number of enhancing lesions according to lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratiolesion/parenchyma, contrast-to-noise ratiowhite matter/gray matter, contrast ratiolesion/parenchyma, and overall image quality for the 2 different sequences. RESULTS Although there was no significant difference in the evaluation of larger enhancing lesions (>5 mm) between the 2 different sequences (P = .66 for observer 1, P = .26 for observer 2), wave-T1-SPACE showed a significantly lower number of smaller enhancing lesions (<5 mm) than standard SPACE (1.61 [SD, 0.29] versus 2.84 [SD, 0.47] for observer 1; 1.41 [SD, 0.19] versus 2.68 [SD, 0.43] for observer 2). Furthermore, mean contrast-to-noise ratiolesion/parenchyma and overall image quality of wave-T1-SPACE were significantly lower than those in standard SPACE. CONCLUSIONS Postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE showed comparable diagnostic performance for larger enhancing lesions (>5 mm) and marked scan time reduction compared with standard SPACE. However, postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE showed underestimation of smaller enhancing lesions (<5 mm) and lower image quality than standard SPACE. Therefore, postcontrast wave-T1-SPACE should be interpreted carefully in the evaluation of brain metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Baek
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J.B.), Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Y J Heo
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - D Kim
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - S Y Yun
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - J W Baek
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - H W Jeong
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - H J Choo
- Department of Radiology (Y.J.H., D.K., S.Y.Y., J.W.B., H.W.J., H.J.C.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - J Y Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine (J.Y.L), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - S-I Oh
- Department of Neurology (S.-I.O.), Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Wu C, Lorenzo G, Hormuth DA, Lima EABF, Slavkova KP, DiCarlo JC, Virostko J, Phillips CM, Patt D, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Integrating mechanism-based modeling with biomedical imaging to build practical digital twins for clinical oncology. BIOPHYSICS REVIEWS 2022; 3:021304. [PMID: 35602761 PMCID: PMC9119003 DOI: 10.1063/5.0086789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Digital twins employ mathematical and computational models to virtually represent a physical object (e.g., planes and human organs), predict the behavior of the object, and enable decision-making to optimize the future behavior of the object. While digital twins have been widely used in engineering for decades, their applications to oncology are only just emerging. Due to advances in experimental techniques quantitatively characterizing cancer, as well as advances in the mathematical and computational sciences, the notion of building and applying digital twins to understand tumor dynamics and personalize the care of cancer patients has been increasingly appreciated. In this review, we present the opportunities and challenges of applying digital twins in clinical oncology, with a particular focus on integrating medical imaging with mechanism-based, tissue-scale mathematical modeling. Specifically, we first introduce the general digital twin framework and then illustrate existing applications of image-guided digital twins in healthcare. Next, we detail both the imaging and modeling techniques that provide practical opportunities to build patient-specific digital twins for oncology. We then describe the current challenges and limitations in developing image-guided, mechanism-based digital twins for oncology along with potential solutions. We conclude by outlining five fundamental questions that can serve as a roadmap when designing and building a practical digital twin for oncology and attempt to provide answers for a specific application to brain cancer. We hope that this contribution provides motivation for the imaging science, oncology, and computational communities to develop practical digital twin technologies to improve the care of patients battling cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengyue Wu
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kalina P. Slavkova
- Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | | | - Caleb M. Phillips
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - Debra Patt
- Texas Oncology, Austin, Texas 78731, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
107
|
Yao J, Hagiwara A, Oughourlian TC, Wang C, Raymond C, Pope WB, Salamon N, Lai A, Ji M, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of pH- and Oxygen-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma: A Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2520. [PMID: 35626127 PMCID: PMC9139712 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of hypoxia and tissue acidosis could advance the understanding of glioma biology and improve patient management. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a pH- and oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to differentiate glioma genotypes, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, and investigated its prognostic value. A total of 159 adult glioma patients were scanned with pH- and oxygen-sensitive MRI at 3T. We quantified the pH-sensitive measure of magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and oxygen-sensitive measure of R2’ within the tumor region-of-interest. IDH mutant gliomas showed significantly lower MTRasym × R2’ (p < 0.001), which differentiated IDH mutation status with sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% and 71.9%. Within IDH mutants, 1p/19q codeletion was associated with lower tumor acidity (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 91.3%), while IDH wild-type, EGFR-amplified gliomas were more hypoxic (R2’ p = 0.024, sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 76.9%). Both R2’ and MTRasym × R2’ were significantly associated with patient overall survival (R2’: p = 0.045; MTRasym × R2’: p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (R2’: p = 0.010; MTRasym × R2’: p < 0.0001), independent of patient age, treatment status, and IDH status. The pH- and oxygen-sensitive MRI is a clinically feasible and potentially valuable imaging technique for distinguishing glioma subtypes and providing additional prognostic value to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Talia C. Oughourlian
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Matthew Ji
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Phioanh L. Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Linda M. Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA;
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J, Iacoban CG, Alykova O, Schülke C, Gerdes M, Kugel H, Neduvakkattu S, Bösenberg H, Mathys C. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 1-3D Acquisitions, Dixon Techniques and Artefact Reduction. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1100-1108. [PMID: 35545104 DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently introduced MRI techniques offer improved image quality and facilitate examinations of patients even when artefacts are expected. They pave the way for novel diagnostic imaging strategies in neuroradiology. These methods include improved 3D imaging, movement and metal artefact reduction techniques as well as Dixon techniques. METHODS Narrative review with an educational focus based on current literature research and practical experiences of different professions involved (physicians, MRI technologists/radiographers, physics/biomedical engineering). Different hardware manufacturers are considered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 3D FLAIR is an example of a versatile 3D Turbo Spin Echo sequence with broad applicability in routine brain protocols. It facilitates detection of smaller lesions and more precise measurements for follow-up imaging. It also offers high sensitivity for extracerebral lesions. 3D techniques are increasingly adopted for imaging arterial vessel walls, cerebrospinal fluid spaces and peripheral nerves. Improved hybrid-radial acquisitions are available for movement artefact reduction in a broad application spectrum. Novel susceptibility artefact reduction techniques for targeted application supplement previously established metal artefact reduction sequences. Most of these techniques can be further adapted to achieve the desired diagnostic performances. Dixon techniques allow for homogeneous fat suppression in transition areas and calculation of different image contrasts based on a single acquisition. KEY POINTS · 3D FLAIR can replace 2 D FLAIR for most brain imaging applications and can be a cornerstone of more precise and more widely applicable protocols.. · Further 3D TSE sequences are increasingly replacing 2D TSE sequences for specific applications.. · Improvement of artefact reduction techniques increase the potential for effective diagnostic MRI exams despite movement or near metal implants.. · Dixon techniques facilitate homogeneous fat suppression and simultaneous acquisition of multiple contrasts.. CITATION FORMAT · Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J et al. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 1-3D Acquisitions, Dixon Techniques and Artefact Reduction. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Sundermann
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Benoit Billebaut
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany.,School for Radiologic Technologists, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Jochen Bauer
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Catalin George Iacoban
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Olga Alykova
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Maike Gerdes
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Harald Kugel
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | | | - Holger Bösenberg
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Mathys
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Malik DG, Rath TJ, Urcuyo Acevedo JC, Canoll PD, Swanson KR, Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Schmainda KM, Burns TC, Hu LS. Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2022; 2:809373. [PMID: 37492687 PMCID: PMC10365126 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2022.809373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
In the follow-up treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), differentiating true tumor progression from treatment-related effects, such as pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis, presents an ongoing clinical challenge. Conventional MRI with and without intravenous contrast serves as the clinical benchmark for the posttreatment surveillance imaging of HGG. However, many advanced imaging techniques have shown promise in helping better delineate the findings in indeterminate scenarios, as posttreatment effects can often mimic true tumor progression on conventional imaging. These challenges are further confounded by the histologic admixture that can commonly occur between tumor growth and treatment-related effects within the posttreatment bed. This review discusses the current practices in the surveillance imaging of HGG and the role of advanced imaging techniques, including perfusion MRI and metabolic MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dania G. Malik
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Tanya J. Rath
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Javier C. Urcuyo Acevedo
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Peter D. Canoll
- Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research & Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics & Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Terry C. Burns
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery and Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Silva M, Vivancos C, Duffau H. The Concept of «Peritumoral Zone» in Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas: Oncological and Functional Implications for a Connectome-Guided Therapeutic Attitude. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12040504. [PMID: 35448035 PMCID: PMC9032126 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse low-grade gliomas (DLGGs) are heterogeneous and poorly circumscribed neoplasms with isolated tumor cells that extend beyond the margins of the lesion depicted on MRI. Efforts to demarcate the glioma core from the surrounding healthy brain led us to define an intermediate region, the so-called peritumoral zone (PTZ). Although most studies about PTZ have been conducted on high-grade gliomas, the purpose here is to review the cellular, metabolic, and radiological characteristics of PTZ in the specific context of DLGG. A better delineation of PTZ, in which glioma cells and neural tissue strongly interact, may open new therapeutic avenues to optimize both functional and oncological results. First, a connectome-based “supratotal” surgical resection (i.e., with the removal of PTZ in addition to the tumor core) resulted in prolonged survival by limiting the risk of malignant transformation, while improving the quality of life, thanks to a better control of seizures. Second, the timing and order of (neo)adjuvant medical treatments can be modulated according to the pattern of peritumoral infiltration. Third, the development of new drugs specifically targeting the PTZ could be considered from an oncological (such as immunotherapy) and epileptological perspective. Further multimodal investigations of PTZ are needed to maximize long-term outcomes in DLGG patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Silva
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal;
| | - Catalina Vivancos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Hugues Duffau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, 34295 Montpellier, France
- Team “Plasticity of Central Nervous System, Stem Cells and Glial Tumors”, Institute of Functional Genomics, National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1191, University of Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Determining the applicability of the RSNA radiology lexicon (RadLex) in high-grade glioma MRI reporting-a preliminary study on 20 consecutive cases with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:53. [PMID: 35331160 PMCID: PMC8944106 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The implementation of a collective terminology in radiological reporting such as the RSNA radiological lexicon (RadLex) yields many benefits including unambiguous communication of findings, improved education, and fostering data mining for research purposes. While some fields in general radiology have already been evaluated so far, this is the first exploratory approach to assess the applicability of the RadLex terminology to glioblastoma (GBM) MRI reporting.
Methods Preoperative brain MRI reports of 20 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM (mean age 68.4 ± 10.8 years; 12 males) between January and October 2010 were retrospectively identified. All terms related to the tumor as well as their frequencies of mention were extracted from the MRI reports by two independent neuroradiologists. Every item was subsequently analyzed with respect to an equivalent RadLex representation and classified into one of four groups as follows: 1. verbatim RadLex entity, 2. synonymous/multiple equivalent(s), 3. combination of RadLex concepts, or 4. no RadLex equivalent. Additionally, verbatim entities were categorized using the hierarchical RadLex Tree Browser. Results A total of 160 radiological terms were gathered. 123/160 (76.9%) items showed literal RadLex equivalents, 9/160 (5.6%) items had synonymous (non-verbatim) or multiple counterparts, 21/160 (13.1%) items were represented by means of a combination of concepts, and 7/160 (4.4%) entities could not eventually be transferred adequately into the RadLex ontology. Conclusions Our results suggest a sufficient term coverage of the RadLex terminology for GBM MRI reporting. If applied extensively, it may improve communication of radiological findings and facilitate data mining for large-scale research purposes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00776-8.
Collapse
|
112
|
Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part A: Concept, Differential Diagnosis and Tumor Grading. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061432. [PMID: 35326580 PMCID: PMC8946242 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffuse gliomas are the most common primary malignant intracranial neoplasms. Aside from the challenges pertaining to their treatment-glioblastomas, in particular, have a dismal prognosis and are currently incurable-their pre-operative assessment using standard neuroimaging has several drawbacks, including broad differentials diagnosis, imprecise characterization of tumor subtype and definition of its infiltration in the surrounding brain parenchyma for accurate resection planning. As the pathophysiological alterations of tumor tissue are tightly linked to an aberrant vascularization, advanced hemodynamic imaging, in addition to other innovative approaches, has attracted considerable interest as a means to improve diffuse glioma characterization. In the present part A of our two-review series, the fundamental concepts, techniques and parameters of hemodynamic imaging are discussed in conjunction with their potential role in the differential diagnosis and grading of diffuse gliomas. In particular, recent evidence on dynamic susceptibility contrast, dynamic contrast-enhanced and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging are reviewed together with perfusion-computed tomography. While these techniques have provided encouraging results in terms of their sensitivity and specificity, the limitations deriving from a lack of standardized acquisition and processing have prevented their widespread clinical adoption, with current efforts aimed at overcoming the existing barriers.
Collapse
|
113
|
Goldman J, Hagiwara A, Yao J, Raymond C, Ong C, Bakhti R, Kwon E, Farhat M, Torres C, Erickson LG, Curl BJ, Lee M, Pope WB, Salamon N, Nghiemphu PL, Ji M, Eldred BS, Liau LM, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Chung C, Ellingson BM. Paradoxical Association Between Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Dynamics Following Chemoradiation and Increased Progression-Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed IDH Wild-Type MGMT Promoter Methylated Glioblastoma With Measurable Disease. Front Oncol 2022; 12:849993. [PMID: 35371980 PMCID: PMC8964348 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.849993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE While relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) may be diagnostic and prognostic for survival in glioblastoma (GBM), changes in rCBV during chemoradiation in the subset of newly diagnosed GBM with subtotal resection and the impact of MGMT promoter methylation status on survival have not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the association between rCBV response, MGMT methylation status, and progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed GBM with measurable enhancing lesions. METHODS 1,153 newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM patients were screened and 53 patients (4.6%) had measurable post-surgical tumor (>1mL). rCBV was measured before and after patients underwent chemoradiation. Patients with a decrease in rCBV >10% were considered rCBV Responders, while patients with an increase or a decrease in rCBV <10% were considered rCBV Non-Responders. The association between change in enhancing tumor volume, change in rCBV, MGMT promotor methylation status, and PFS or OS were explored. RESULTS A decrease in tumor volume following chemoradiation trended towards longer OS (p=0.12; median OS=26.8 vs. 16.3 months). Paradoxically, rCBV Non-Responders had a significantly improved PFS compared to Responders (p=0.047; median PFS=9.6 vs. 7.2 months). MGMT methylated rCBV Non-Responders exhibited a significantly longer PFS compared to MGMT unmethylated rCBV Non-Responders (p<0.001; median PFS=0.5 vs. 7.1 months), and MGMT methylated rCBV Non-Responders trended towards longer PFS compared to methylated rCBV Responders (p=0.089; median PFS=20.5 vs. 13.8 months). CONCLUSIONS This preliminary report demonstrates that in newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM with measurable enhancing disease after surgery (5% of patients), an enigmatic non-response in rCBV was associated with longer PFS, particularly in MGMT methylated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Goldman
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Christian Ong
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Rojin Bakhti
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Kwon
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carlo Torres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lily G. Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brandon J. Curl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maggie Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Phioanh L. Nghiemphu
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Matthew Ji
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Blaine S. Eldred
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Linda M. Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Albert Lai
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Corr F, Grimm D, Saß B, Pojskić M, Bartsch JW, Carl B, Nimsky C, Bopp MHA. Radiogenomic Predictors of Recurrence in Glioblastoma—A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030402. [PMID: 35330402 PMCID: PMC8952807 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, as the most aggressive brain tumor, is associated with a poor prognosis and outcome. To optimize prognosis and clinical therapy decisions, there is an urgent need to stratify patients with increased risk for recurrent tumors and low therapeutic success to optimize individual treatment. Radiogenomics establishes a link between radiological and pathological information. This review provides a state-of-the-art picture illustrating the latest developments in the use of radiogenomic markers regarding prognosis and their potential for monitoring recurrence. Databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched. Inclusion criteria were defined as diagnosis of glioblastoma with histopathological and radiological follow-up. Out of 321 reviewed articles, 43 articles met these inclusion criteria. Included studies were analyzed for the frequency of radiological and molecular tumor markers whereby radiogenomic associations were analyzed. Six main associations were described: radiogenomic prognosis, MGMT status, IDH, EGFR status, molecular subgroups, and tumor location. Prospective studies analyzing prognostic features of glioblastoma together with radiological features are lacking. By reviewing the progress in the development of radiogenomic markers, we provide insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for clinical routine use eventually enabling early identification of glioblastoma recurrence and therefore supporting a further personalized monitoring and treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Corr
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- EDU Institute of Higher Education, Villa Bighi, Chaplain’s House, KKR 1320 Kalkara, Malta
- Correspondence:
| | - Dustin Grimm
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- EDU Institute of Higher Education, Villa Bighi, Chaplain’s House, KKR 1320 Kalkara, Malta
| | - Benjamin Saß
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
| | - Mirza Pojskić
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
| | - Jörg W. Bartsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Carl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Christopher Nimsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Miriam H. A. Bopp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany; (D.G.); (B.S.); (M.P.); (J.W.B.); (B.C.); (C.N.); (M.H.A.B.)
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Booth TC, Wiegers EC, Warnert EAH, Schmainda KM, Riemer F, Nechifor RE, Keil VC, Hangel G, Figueiredo P, Álvarez-Torres MDM, Henriksen OM. High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics. Front Oncol 2022; 11:811425. [PMID: 35340697 PMCID: PMC8948428 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.811425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and to highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods The current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers was reviewed and individual modalities of metabolism and/or chemical composition imaging discussed. Perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging were similarly analyzed in Part 1 of this two-part review article and are valuable reading as background to this article. We appraise the clinic readiness of all the individual modalities and consider methodologies involving machine learning (radiomics) and the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging). Results The biochemical composition of high-grade gliomas is markedly different from healthy brain tissue. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows the simultaneous acquisition of an array of metabolic alterations, with choline-based ratios appearing to be consistently discriminatory in treatment response assessment, although challenges remain despite this being a mature technique. Promising directions relate to ultra-high field strengths, 2-hydroxyglutarate analysis, and the use of non-proton nuclei. Labile protons on endogenous proteins can be selectively targeted with chemical exchange saturation transfer to give high resolution images. The body of evidence for clinical application of amide proton transfer imaging has been building for a decade, but more evidence is required to confirm chemical exchange saturation transfer use as a monitoring biomarker. Multiparametric methodologies, including the incorporation of nuclear medicine techniques, combine probes measuring different tumor properties. Although potentially synergistic, the limitations of each individual modality also can be compounded, particularly in the absence of standardization. Machine learning requires large datasets with high-quality annotation; there is currently low-level evidence for monitoring biomarker clinical application. Conclusion Advanced MRI techniques show huge promise in treatment response assessment. The clinical readiness analysis highlights that most monitoring biomarkers require standardized international consensus guidelines, with more facilitation regarding technique implementation and reporting in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C. Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Neuroradiology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Evita C. Wiegers
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Frank Riemer
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ruben E. Nechifor
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Vera C. Keil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Gilbert Hangel
- Department of Neurosurgery & High-Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrícia Figueiredo
- Department of Bioengineering and Institute for Systems and Robotics - Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Otto M. Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Carrete LR, Young JS, Cha S. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Gliomas. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:787755. [PMID: 35281485 PMCID: PMC8904563 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of gliomas following initial diagnosis requires thoughtful presurgical planning followed by regular imaging to monitor treatment response and survey for new tumor growth. Traditional MR imaging modalities such as T1 post-contrast and T2-weighted sequences have long been a staple of tumor diagnosis, surgical planning, and post-treatment surveillance. While these sequences remain integral in the management of gliomas, advances in imaging techniques have allowed for a more detailed characterization of tumor characteristics. Advanced MR sequences such as perfusion, diffusion, and susceptibility weighted imaging, as well as PET scans have emerged as valuable tools to inform clinical decision making and provide a non-invasive way to help distinguish between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression. Furthermore, these advances in imaging have extended to the operating room and assist in making surgical resections safer. Nevertheless, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment continue to make the interpretation of MR changes difficult for glioma patients. As analytics and machine learning techniques improve, radiomics offers the potential to be more quantitative and personalized in the interpretation of imaging data for gliomas. In this review, we describe the role of these newer imaging modalities during the different stages of management for patients with gliomas, focusing on the pre-operative, post-operative, and surveillance periods. Finally, we discuss radiomics as a means of promoting personalized patient care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis R. Carrete
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jacob S. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Jacob S. Young,
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Tang PLY, Méndez Romero A, Jaspers JPM, Warnert EAH. The potential of advanced MR techniques for precision radiotherapy of glioblastoma. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:127-143. [PMID: 35129718 PMCID: PMC8901515 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00997-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
As microscopic tumour infiltration of glioblastomas is not visible on conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, an isotropic expansion of 1-2 cm around the visible tumour is applied to define the clinical target volume for radiotherapy. An opportunity to visualize microscopic infiltration arises with advanced MR imaging. In this review, various advanced MR biomarkers are explored that could improve target volume delineation for radiotherapy of glioblastomas. Various physiological processes in glioblastomas can be visualized with different advanced MR techniques. Combining maps of oxygen metabolism (CMRO2), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), vessel size imaging (VSI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) or amide proton transfer (APT) can provide early information on tumour infiltration and high-risk regions of future recurrence. Oxygen consumption is increased 6 months prior to tumour progression being visible on conventional MR imaging. However, presence of the Warburg effect, marking a switch from an infiltrative to a proliferative phenotype, could result in CMRO2 to appear unaltered in high-risk regions. Including information on biomarkers representing angiogenesis (rCBV and VSI) and hypercellularity (ADC) or protein concentration (APT) can omit misinterpretation due to the Warburg effect. Future research should evaluate these biomarkers in radiotherapy planning to explore the potential of advanced MR techniques to personalize target volume delineation with the aim to improve local tumour control and/or reduce radiation-induced toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick L Y Tang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap P M Jaspers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A H Warnert
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Ryu K, Baek H, Skare S, Cho E, Nam I, Kim T, Sprenger T. Clinical Feasibility of Ultrafast Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted 3D-EPI for Evaluating Intracranial Enhancing Lesions in Oncology Patients: Comparison with Standard 3D MPRAGE Sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:195-201. [PMID: 35027347 PMCID: PMC8985684 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Contrast-enhanced 3D T1WI is a preferred sequence for brain tumor imaging despite the long scan time. This study investigated the clinical feasibility of ultrafast contrast-enhanced T1WI by 3D echo-planar imaging compared with a standard contrast-enhanced 3D MPRAGE sequence for evaluating intracranial enhancing lesions in oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-one patients in oncology underwent brain MR imaging including both contrast-enhanced T1WI, 3D-EPI and 3D MPRAGE, in a single examination session for evaluating intracranial tumors. Two neuroradiologists evaluated image quality, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, number and size of the lesions, and contrast-to-noise ratio measurements from the 2 different sequences. RESULTS Ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI did not reveal significant differences in diagnostic confidence, contrast-to-noise ratiolesion/parenchyma, and the number of enhancing lesions compared with MPRAGE (P > .05). However, ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI revealed inferior image quality, inferior anatomic delineation and greater susceptibility artifacts with fewer motion artifacts than images obtained with MPRAGE. The mean contrast-to-noise ratioWM/GM and visual conspicuity of the lesion on ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI were lower than those of MPRAGE (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI showed comparable diagnostic performance with sufficient image quality and a 7-fold reduction in scan time for evaluating intracranial enhancing lesions compared with standard MPRAGE, even though it was limited by an inferior image quality and frequent susceptibility artifacts. Therefore, we believe that ultrafast 3D-EPI T1WI may be a viable option in oncology patients prone to movement during imaging studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K.H. Ryu
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.)
| | - H.J. Baek
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.),Department of Radiology (H.J.B.), Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - S. Skare
- Department of Neuroradiology (S.S.),Clinical Neuroscience (S.S., T.S.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E. Cho
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.)
| | - I.C. Nam
- From the Departments of Radiology (K.H.R., H.J.B., E.C., I.C.N.)
| | - T.H. Kim
- Internal Medicine (T.H.K.), Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - T. Sprenger
- Clinical Neuroscience (S.S., T.S.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden,MR Applied Science Laboratory Europe (T.S.), GE Healthcare, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Stumpo V, Sebök M, van Niftrik CHB, Seystahl K, Hainc N, Kulcsar Z, Weller M, Regli L, Fierstra J. Feasibility of glioblastoma tissue response mapping with physiologic BOLD imaging using precise oxygen and carbon dioxide challenge. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:29-44. [PMID: 34874499 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00980-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Innovative physiologic MRI development focuses on depiction of heterogenous vascular and metabolic features in glioblastoma. For this feasibility study, we employed blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI with standardized and precise carbon dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) modulation to investigate specific tumor tissue response patterns in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven newly diagnosed untreated patients with suspected glioblastoma were prospectively included to undergo a BOLD study with combined CO2 and O2 standardized protocol. %BOLD signal change/mmHg during hypercapnic, hypoxic, and hyperoxic stimulus was calculated in the whole brain, tumor lesion and segmented volumes of interest (VOI) [contrast-enhancing (CE) - tumor, necrosis and edema] to analyze their tissue response patterns. RESULTS Quantification of BOLD signal change after gas challenges can be used to identify specific responses to standardized stimuli in glioblastoma patients. Integration of this approach with automatic VOI segmentation grants improved characterization of tumor subzones and edema. Magnitude of BOLD signal change during the 3 stimuli can be visualized at voxel precision through color-coded maps overlayed onto whole brain and identified VOIs. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary investigation shows good feasibility of BOLD with standardized and precise CO2 and O2 modulation as an emerging physiologic imaging technique to detail specific glioblastoma characteristics. The unique tissue response patterns generated can be further investigated to better detail glioblastoma lesions and gauge treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Stumpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. .,Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Martina Sebök
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Seystahl
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolin Hainc
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zsolt Kulcsar
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jorn Fierstra
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.,Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Hagiwara A, Yao J, Raymond C, Cho NS, Everson R, Patel K, Morrow DH, Desousa BR, Mareninov S, Chun S, Nathanson DA, Yong WH, Andrei G, Divakaruni AS, Salamon N, Pope WB, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. "Aerobic glycolytic imaging" of human gliomas using combined pH-, oxygen-, and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 32:102882. [PMID: 34911188 PMCID: PMC8609049 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Aerobic glycolytic imaging combines pH-, oxygen-, and perfusion-weighted MRI. Aerobic glycolytic imaging depicts abnormal glucose metabolism of gliomas. IDH wild-type gliomas show higher aerobic glycolytic index compared with mutants. Aerobic glycolytic index in IDH wild-type glioma is correlated with glucose uptake. Aerobic glycolytic index in IDH mutant glioma is correlated to lactate transporters.
Purpose To quantify abnormal metabolism of diffuse gliomas using “aerobic glycolytic imaging” and investigate its biological correlation. Methods All subjects underwent a pH-weighted amine chemical exchange saturation transfer spin-and-gradient-echo echoplanar imaging (CEST-SAGE-EPI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Relative oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) was estimated as the ratio of reversible transverse relaxation rate R2′ to normalized relative cerebral blood volume. An aerobic glycolytic index (AGI) was derived by the ratio of pH-weighted image contrast (MTRasym at 3.0 ppm) to rOEF. AGI was compared between different tumor types (N = 51, 30 IDH mutant and 21 IDH wild type). Metabolic MR parameters were correlated with 18F-FDG uptake (N = 8, IDH wild-type glioblastoma), expression of key glycolytic proteins using immunohistochemistry (N = 38 samples, 21 from IDH mutant and 17 from IDH wild type), and bioenergetics analysis on purified tumor cells (N = 7, IDH wild-type high grade). Results AGI was significantly lower in IDH mutant than wild-type gliomas (0.48 ± 0.48 vs. 0.70 ± 0.48; P = 0.03). AGI was strongly correlated with 18F-FDG uptake both in non-enhancing tumor (Spearman, ρ = 0.81; P = 0.01) and enhancing tumor (ρ = 0.81; P = 0.01). AGI was significantly correlated with glucose transporter 3 (ρ = 0.71; P = 0.004) and hexokinase 2 (ρ = 0.73; P = 0.003) in IDH wild-type glioma, and monocarboxylate transporter 1 (ρ = 0.59; P = 0.009) in IDH mutant glioma. Additionally, a significant correlation was found between AGI derived from bioenergetics analysis and that estimated from MRI (ρ = 0.79; P = 0.04). Conclusion AGI derived from molecular MRI was correlated with glucose uptake (18F-FDG and glucose transporter 3/hexokinase 2) and cellular AGI in IDH wild-type gliomas, whereas AGI in IDH mutant gliomas appeared associated with monocarboxylate transporter density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas S Cho
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Richard Everson
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kunal Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle H Morrow
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brandon R Desousa
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sergey Mareninov
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Saewon Chun
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David A Nathanson
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William H Yong
- Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gafita Andrei
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ajit S Divakaruni
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Hagiwara A, Tatekawa H, Yao J, Raymond C, Everson R, Patel K, Mareninov S, Yong WH, Salamon N, Pope WB, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Visualization of tumor heterogeneity and prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status for human gliomas using multiparametric physiologic and metabolic MRI. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1078. [PMID: 35058510 PMCID: PMC8776874 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05077-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to differentiate isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status with the voxel-wise clustering method of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to discover biological underpinnings of the clusters. A total of 69 patients with treatment-naïve diffuse glioma were scanned with pH-sensitive amine chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging at 3 T. An unsupervised two-level clustering approach was used for feature extraction from acquired images. The logarithmic ratio of the labels in each class within tumor regions was applied to a support vector machine to differentiate IDH status. The highest performance to predict IDH mutation status was found for 10-class clustering, with a mean area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.94, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.91, respectively. Targeted biopsies revealed that the tissues with labels 7-10 showed high expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, glucose transporter 3, and hexokinase 2, which are typical of IDH wild-type glioma, whereas those with labels 1 showed low expression of these proteins. In conclusion, A machine learning model successfully predicted the IDH mutation status of gliomas, and the resulting clusters properly reflected the metabolic status of the tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akifumi Hagiwara
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.258269.20000 0004 1762 2738Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.261445.00000 0001 1009 6411Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jingwen Yao
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Richard Everson
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Kunal Patel
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Sergey Mareninov
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - William H. Yong
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Phioanh L. Nghiemphu
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Linda M. Liau
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.19006.3e0000 0000 9632 6718Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Untapped Neuroimaging Tools for Neuro-Oncology: Connectomics and Spatial Transcriptomics. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030464. [PMID: 35158732 PMCID: PMC8833690 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain imaging, specifically magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), plays a key role in the clinical and research aspects of neuro-oncology. Novel neuroimaging techniques enable the transformation of a brain MRI into a so-called average brain. This allows projects using already acquired brain MRIs to perform group analyses and draw conclusions. Once the data are in this average brain, several types of analyses can be performed. For example, determining the most vulnerable locations for certain tumor types or perhaps even the underlying circuitry and gene expression that might cause predisposition to tumor growth. This information may further our understanding of tumor behavior, leading to better patient counseling, surgery timing, and treatment monitoring. Abstract Neuro-oncology research is broad and includes several branches, one of which is neuroimaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is instrumental for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of patients with brain tumors. Most commonly, structural and perfusion MRI sequences are acquired to characterize tumors and understand their behaviors. Thanks to technological advances, structural brain MRI can now be transformed into a so-called average brain accounting for individual morphological differences, which enables retrospective group analysis. These normative analyses are uncommonly used in neuro-oncology research. Once the data have been normalized, voxel-wise analyses and spatial mapping can be performed. Additionally, investigations of underlying connectomics can be performed using functional and structural templates. Additionally, a recently available template of spatial transcriptomics has enabled the assessment of associated gene expression. The few published normative analyses have shown relationships between tumor characteristics and spatial localization, as well as insights into the circuitry associated with epileptogenic tumors and depression after cingulate tumor resection. The wide breadth of possibilities with normative analyses remain largely unexplored, specifically in terms of connectomics and imaging transcriptomics. We provide a framework for performing normative analyses in oncology while also highlighting their limitations. Normative analyses are an opportunity to address neuro-oncology questions from a different perspective.
Collapse
|
123
|
Kunikowska J, Czepczyński R, Pawlak D, Koziara H, Pełka K, Królicki L. Expression of glutamate carboxypeptidase II in the glial tumor recurrence evaluated in vivo using radionuclide imaging. Sci Rep 2022; 12:652. [PMID: 35027580 PMCID: PMC8758702 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04613-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCP), also known as prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been found to be expressed in glioma vasculature in in-vitro studies. GCP expression can be traced with the use of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT used routinely for prostate cancer imaging. The aim of this paper was to analyze GCP expression in the recurrent glial tumors in vivo. 34 patients (pts.) aged 44.5 ± 10.3 years with suspicion of recurrence of histologically confirmed glioma grade III (6 pts.) and grade IV (28 pts.) were included in the study. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced MR and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. No radiopharmaceutical-related adverse events were noted. PET/CT was positive in all the areas suspected for recurrence at MR in all the patients. The recurrence was confirmed by histopathological examinations or follow-up imaging in all cases. The images showed a very low background activity of the normal brain. Median maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the tumors was 6.5 (range 0.9–15.6) and mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) was 3.5 (range 0.9–7.5). Target-to-background (TBR) ratios varied between 15 and 1400 with a median of 152. Target-to-liver background ratios (TLR) ranged from 0.2 to 2.6, the median TLR was 1.3. No significant difference of the measured parameters was found between the subgroups according to the glioma grade. High GCP expression in the recurrent glioma was demonstrated in-vivo with the use of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. As the treatment options in recurrent glioma are limited, this observation may open new therapeutic perspectives with the use of radiolabeled agents targeting the GCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanta Kunikowska
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rafał Czepczyński
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355, Poznań, Poland.
| | - Dariusz Pawlak
- Radioisotope Centre POLATOM, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock, Poland
| | - Henryk Koziara
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kacper Pełka
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Methodology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Leszek Królicki
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Fu Q, Cheng QG, Kong XC, Liu DX, Guo YH, Grinstead J, Zhang XY, Lei ZQ, Zheng CS. Comparison of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging using DANTE-SPACE, PETRA, and MPRAGE: a clinical evaluation of brain tumors at 3 Tesla. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:592-607. [PMID: 34993104 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background We aimed to compare the performance of three contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) sequences to detect brain tumors at 3 Tesla. The three sequences were: (I) delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution (DANTE-SPACE), (II) pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA), and (III) magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE). Methods This study involved 77 consecutive patients, including 34 patients with known primary brain tumors and 43 patients suspected of intracranial metastases. All patients underwent each of the three sequences with comparable spatial resolution and acquisition time post-injection. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for lesion/GM, lesion/WM, and GM/WM were quantitatively compared. Two radiologists determined the total number of enhancing lesions by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the two radiologists for metastases presence, qualitative ratings for image quality, and acoustic noise level of each sequence were assessed. Results Among the three sequences, SNRs and CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were highest using DANTE-SPACE, but CNRWM/GM was the lowest with DANTE-SPACE. SNRs for PETRA images were significantly higher than those for MPRAGE (P<0.001). CNRs between lesions and surrounding parenchyma were similar for PETRA and MPRAGE (P>0.05). Significantly more brain metastases were detected with DANTE-SPACE (n=94) compared with MPRAGE (n=71) and PETRA (n=72). The ICCs were 0.964 for MPRAGE, 0.975 for PETRA, and 0.973 for DANTE-SPACE. Qualitative scores for lesion imaging using DANTE-SPACE were significantly higher than those obtained with PETRA and MPRAGE (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The acoustic noise level for PETRA (64.45 dB) was significantly lower than that for MPRAGE (78.27 dB, P<0.01) and DANTE-SPACE (80.18 dB, P<0.01). Conclusions PETRA achieves comparable detection of brain tumors with MPRAGE and is preferred for depicting osseous metastases and meningeal enhancement. DANTE-SPACE with blood vessel suppression showed improved detection of cerebral metastases compared with MPRAGE and PETRA, which could be helpful for the differential diagnosis of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Fu
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Qi-Guang Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiang-Chuang Kong
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Ding-Xi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi-Hao Guo
- MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | - Zi-Qiao Lei
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Chuan-Sheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Hoff BA, Lemasson B, Chenevert TL, Luker GD, Tsien CI, Amouzandeh G, Johnson TD, Ross BD. Parametric Response Mapping of FLAIR MRI Provides an Early Indication of Progression Risk in Glioblastoma. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:1711-1720. [PMID: 32928633 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Glioblastoma image evaluation utilizes Magnetic Resonance Imaging contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted, and noncontrast T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) acquisitions. Disease progression assessment relies on changes in tumor diameter, which correlate poorly with survival. To improve treatment monitoring in glioblastoma, we investigated serial voxel-wise comparison of anatomically-aligned FLAIR signal as an early predictor of GBM progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed longitudinal normalized FLAIR images (rFLAIR) from 52 subjects using voxel-wise Parametric Response Mapping (PRM) to monitor volume fractions of increased (PRMrFLAIR+), decreased (PRMrFLAIR-), or unchanged (PRMrFLAIR0) rFLAIR intensity. We determined response by rFLAIR between pretreatment and 10 weeks posttreatment. Risk of disease progression in a subset of subjects (N = 26) with stable disease or partial response as defined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria was assessed by PRMrFLAIR between weeks 10 and 20 and continuously until the PRMrFLAIR+ exceeded a defined threshold. RANO defined criteria were compared with PRM-derived outcomes for tumor progression detection. RESULTS Patient stratification for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was achieved at week 10 using RANO criteria (PFS: p <0.0001; OS: p <0.0001), relative change in FLAIR-hyperintense volume (PFS: p = 0.0011; OS: p <0.0001), and PRMrFLAIR+ (PFS: p <0.01; OS: p <0.001). PRMrFLAIR+ also stratified responding patients' progression between weeks 10 and 20 (PFS: p <0.05; OS: p = 0.01) while changes in FLAIR-volume measurements were not predictive. As a continuous evaluation, PRMrFLAIR+ exceeding 10% stratified patients for PFA after 5.6 months (p<0.0001), while RANO criteria did not stratify patients until 15.4 months (p <0.0001). CONCLUSION PRMrFLAIR may provide an early biomarker of disease progression in glioblastoma.
Collapse
|
126
|
Fathi Kazerooni A, Bagley SJ, Akbari H, Saxena S, Bagheri S, Guo J, Chawla S, Nabavizadeh A, Mohan S, Bakas S, Davatzikos C, Nasrallah MP. Applications of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in High-Grade Gliomas in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235921. [PMID: 34885031 PMCID: PMC8656630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiomics and radiogenomics offer new insight into high-grade glioma biology, as well as into glioma behavior in response to standard therapies. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the role of radiomics in providing more accurate diagnoses, prognostication, and surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma, and on the potential application of radiomics in clinical practice, with the overarching goal of advancing precision medicine for optimal patient care. Abstract Machine learning (ML) integrated with medical imaging has introduced new perspectives in precision diagnostics of high-grade gliomas, through radiomics and radiogenomics. This has raised hopes for characterizing noninvasive and in vivo biomarkers for prediction of patient survival, tumor recurrence, and genomics and therefore encouraging treatments tailored to individualized needs. Characterization of tumor infiltration based on pre-operative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) scans may allow prediction of the loci of future tumor recurrence and thereby aid in planning the course of treatment for the patients, such as optimizing the extent of resection and the dose and target area of radiation. Imaging signatures of tumor genomics can help in identifying the patients who benefit from certain targeted therapies. Specifying molecular properties of gliomas and prediction of their changes over time and with treatment would allow optimization of treatment. In this article, we provide neuro-oncology, neuropathology, and computational perspectives on the promise of radiomics and radiogenomics for allowing personalized treatments of patients with gliomas and discuss the challenges and limitations of these methods in multi-institutional clinical trials and suggestions to mitigate the issues and the future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Stephen J. Bagley
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saxena
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sina Bagheri
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Jun Guo
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - Spyridon Bakas
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (A.F.K.); (H.A.); (S.S.); (J.G.); (A.N.); (S.M.); (S.B.); (C.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.B.); (S.C.)
| | - MacLean P. Nasrallah
- Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Esmaeili M, Vettukattil R, Banitalebi H, Krogh NR, Geitung JT. Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Human-Machine Interaction in Brain Tumor Localization. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111213. [PMID: 34834566 PMCID: PMC8618183 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary malignancies in adult brains are globally fatal. Computer vision, especially recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI), have created opportunities to automatically characterize and diagnose tumor lesions in the brain. AI approaches have provided scores of unprecedented accuracy in different image analysis tasks, including differentiating tumor-containing brains from healthy brains. AI models, however, perform as a black box, concealing the rational interpretations that are an essential step towards translating AI imaging tools into clinical routine. An explainable AI approach aims to visualize the high-level features of trained models or integrate into the training process. This study aims to evaluate the performance of selected deep-learning algorithms on localizing tumor lesions and distinguishing the lesion from healthy regions in magnetic resonance imaging contrasts. Despite a significant correlation between classification and lesion localization accuracy (R = 0.46, p = 0.005), the known AI algorithms, examined in this study, classify some tumor brains based on other non-relevant features. The results suggest that explainable AI approaches can develop an intuition for model interpretability and may play an important role in the performance evaluation of deep learning models. Developing explainable AI approaches will be an essential tool to improve human–machine interactions and assist in the selection of optimal training methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morteza Esmaeili
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; (H.B.); (N.R.K.); (J.T.G.)
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
- Correspondence:
| | - Riyas Vettukattil
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway;
- Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hasan Banitalebi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; (H.B.); (N.R.K.); (J.T.G.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Nina R. Krogh
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; (H.B.); (N.R.K.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Jonn Terje Geitung
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway; (H.B.); (N.R.K.); (J.T.G.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Rosen J, Stoffels G, Lohmann P, Bauer EK, Werner JM, Wollring M, Rapp M, Felsberg J, Kocher M, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Prognostic value of pre-irradiation FET PET in patients with not completely resectable IDH-wildtype glioma and minimal or absent contrast enhancement. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20828. [PMID: 34675225 PMCID: PMC8531450 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00193-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In glioma patients, complete resection of the contrast-enhancing portion is associated with improved survival, which, however, cannot be achieved in a considerable number of patients. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET in not completely resectable glioma patients with minimal or absent contrast enhancement before temozolomide chemoradiation. Dynamic FET PET scans were performed in 18 newly diagnosed patients with partially resected (n = 8) or biopsied (n = 10) IDH-wildtype astrocytic glioma before initiation of temozolomide chemoradiation. Static and dynamic FET PET parameters, as well as contrast-enhancing volumes on MRI, were calculated. Using receiver operating characteristic analyses, threshold values for which the product of paired values for sensitivity and specificity reached a maximum were obtained. Subsequently, the prognostic values of FET PET parameters and contrast-enhancing volumes on MRI were evaluated using univariate Kaplan–Meier and multivariate Cox regression (including the MTV, age, MGMT promoter methylation, and contrast-enhancing volume) survival analyses for progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). On MRI, eight patients had no contrast enhancement; the remaining patients had minimal contrast-enhancing volumes (range, 0.2–5.3 mL). Univariate analyses revealed that smaller pre-irradiation FET PET tumor volumes were significantly correlated with a more favorable PFS (7.9 vs. 4.2 months; threshold, 14.8 mL; P = 0.012) and OS (16.6 vs. 9.0 months; threshold, 23.8 mL; P = 0.002). In contrast, mean tumor-to-brain ratios and time-to-peak values were only associated with a longer PFS (P = 0.048 and P = 0.045, respectively). Furthermore, the pre-irradiation FET PET tumor volume remained significant in multivariate analyses (P = 0.043), indicating an independent predictor for OS. Our results suggest that pre-irradiation FET PET parameters have a prognostic impact in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurij Rosen
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena K Bauer
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Wollring
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Rapp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Parent EE, Johnson DR, Gleason T, Villanueva-Meyer JE. Neuro-Oncology Practice Clinical Debate: FDG PET to differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from treatment-related changes. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:518-525. [PMID: 34594566 PMCID: PMC8475205 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to accurately differentiate treatment-related changes (ie, pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis) from recurrent glioma remains a critical diagnostic problem in neuro-oncology. Because these entities are treated differently and have vastly different outcomes, accurate diagnosis is necessary to provide optimal patient care. In current practice, this diagnostic quandary commonly requires either serial imaging or histopathologic tissue confirmation. In this article, experts in the field debate the utility of 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as an imaging tool to distinguish tumor recurrence from treatment-related changes in a patient with glioblastoma and progressive contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance (MR) following chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ephraim E Parent
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tyler Gleason
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Mikic N, Poulsen FR, Kristoffersen KB, Laursen RJ, Guldberg TL, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Wong ET, Møller S, Dahlrot RH, Sørensen JCH, Korshøj AR. Study protocol for OptimalTTF-2: enhancing Tumor Treating Fields with skull remodeling surgery for first recurrence glioblastoma: a phase 2, multi-center, randomized, prospective, interventional trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1010. [PMID: 34503460 PMCID: PMC8427888 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OptimalTTF-2 is a randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator-initiated, interventional study aiming to test skull remodeling surgery in combination with Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) and best physicians choice medical oncological therapy for first recurrence in glioblastoma patients. OptimalTTF-2 is a phase 2 trial initiated in November 2020. Skull remodeling surgery consists of five burrholes, each 15 mm in diameter, directly over the tumor resection cavity. Preclinical research indicates that this procedure enhances the effect of Tumor Treating Fields considerably. We recently concluded a phase 1 safety/feasibility trial that indicated improved overall survival and no additional toxicity. This phase 2 trial aims to validate the efficacy of the proposed intervention. METHODS The trial is designed as a comparative, 1:1 randomized, minimax two-stage phase 2 with an expected 70 patients to a maximum sample size of 84 patients. After 12-months follow-up of the first 52 patients, an interim futility analysis will be performed. The two trial arms will consist of either a) TTFields therapy combined with best physicians choice oncological treatment (control arm) or b) skull remodeling surgery, TTFields therapy and best practice oncology (interventional arm). Major eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, 1st recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma, Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70, focal tumor, and lack of significant co-morbidity. Study design aims to detect a 20% increase in overall survival after 12 months (OS12), assuming OS12 = 40% in the control group and OS12 = 60% in the intervention group. Secondary endpoints include hazard rate ratio of overall survival and progression-free survival, objective tumor response rate, quality of life, KPS, steroid dose, and toxicity. Toxicity, objective tumor response rate, and QoL will be assessed every 3rd month. Endpoint data will be collected at the end of the trial, including the occurrence of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs), unacceptable serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawal of consent, or loss-to-follow-up. DISCUSSION New treatment modalities are highly needed for first recurrence glioblastoma. Our proposed treatment modality of skull remodeling surgery, Tumor Treating Fields, and best practice medical oncological therapy may increase overall survival significantly. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0422399 , registered 13. January 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mikic
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 165, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - F R Poulsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 47, 5000, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Institute BRIDGE (Brain Research InterDisciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - K B Kristoffersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R J Laursen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - T L Guldberg
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - J Skjøth-Rasmussen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, København Ø, Denmark
| | - E T Wong
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - S Møller
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, København Ø, Denmark
| | - R H Dahlrot
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - J C H Sørensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 165, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A R Korshøj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 165, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Tatekawa H, Uetani H, Hagiwara A, Bahri S, Raymond C, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Pope WB, Salamon N, Ellingson BM. Worse prognosis for IDH wild-type diffuse gliomas with larger residual biological tumor burden. Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:1022-1029. [PMID: 34121166 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01637-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The association of overall survival (OS) with tumor burden, including contrast enhanced (CE) volume on CE T1-weighted images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense volume, and 3, 4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) hypermetabolic volume, in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between biological tumor burden in pre- and post-operative status and OS in IDH wild-type gliomas, and evaluated which volume was the best predictor of OS. METHODS Thirty-four patients with treatment-naïve IDH wild-type gliomas (WHO grade II 6, III 15, IV 13) were retrospectively included. Three pre-operative tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented based on the CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic regions. Resected ROIs were segmented from the post-operative images. Residual CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic ROIs were created by subtracting resected ROIs from pre-operative ROIs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association of OS with the volume of each ROI, and Akaike information criterion was used to assess the fitness. RESULTS Residual CE volume had a significant association with OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26, p = 0.039], but this effect disappeared when controlling for tumor grade. Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic volume best fit the regression model and was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.18, p = 0.008), even when controlling for tumor grade. FLAIR hyperintense volume showed no significant association with OS. CONCLUSION Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic burden predicted OS for IDH wild-type gliomas, regardless of the tumor grade. Furthermore, removing hypermetabolic and CE regions may improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Uetani
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Shadfar Bahri
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Wang C, Van Dyk K, Cho N, Raymond C, Choi J, Salamon N, Pope WB, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Ellingson BM. Characterization of cognitive function in survivors of diffuse gliomas using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 16:239-251. [PMID: 34350525 PMCID: PMC8825610 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00497-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
As treatments for diffuse gliomas have advanced, survival for patients with gliomas has also increased. However, there remains limited knowledge on the relationships between brain connectivity and the lasting changes to cognitive function that glioma survivors often experience long after completing treatment. This resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) study explored functional connectivity (FC) alterations associated with cognitive function in survivors of gliomas. In this pilot study, 22 patients (mean age 43.8 ± 11.9) with diffuse gliomas who completed treatment within the past 10 years were evaluated using rs-fMRI and neuropsychological measures. Novel rs-fMRI analysis methods were used to account for missing brain in the resection cavity. FC relationships were assessed between cognitively impaired and non-impaired glioma patients, along with self-reported cognitive impairment, non-work daily functioning, and time with surgery. In the cognitively non-impaired patients, FC was stronger in the medial prefrontal cortex, rostral prefrontal cortex, and intraparietal sulcus compared to the impaired survivors. When examining non-work daily functioning, a positive correlation with FC was observed between the accumbens and the intracalcarine cortices, while a negative correlation with FC was observed between the parietal operculum cortex and the cerebellum. Additionally, worse self-reported cognitive impairment and worse non-work daily functioning were associated with increased FC between regions involved in cognition and sensorimotor processing. These preliminary findings suggest that neural correlates for cognitive and daily functioning in glioma patients can be revealed using rs-fMRI. Resting-state network alterations may serve as a biomarker for patients’ cognition and functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen Van Dyk
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas Cho
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Justin Choi
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. .,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, Semel Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Lee EQ, Selig W, Meehan C, Bacha J, Barone A, Bloomquist E, Chang SM, de Groot JF, Galanis E, Hassan I, Kalidas C, Khasraw M, Kvedar JC, Lassman AB, Puduvalli V, Sahebjam S, Schwamm LH, Tamir S, Welch M, Yung WKA, Zadeh G, Arons D, Wen PY. Report of National Brain Tumor Society roundtable workshop on innovating brain tumor clinical trials: building on lessons learned from COVID-19 experience. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1252-1260. [PMID: 33822177 PMCID: PMC8083574 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
On July 24, 2020, a workshop sponsored by the National Brain Tumor Society was held on innovating brain tumor clinical trials based on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience. Various stakeholders from the brain tumor community participated including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and community clinicians, researchers, industry, clinical research organizations, patients and patient advocates, and representatives from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the National Cancer Institute. This report summarizes the workshop and proposes ways to incorporate lessons learned from COVID-19 to brain tumor clinical trials including the increased use of telemedicine and decentralized trial models as opportunities for practical innovation with potential long-term impact on clinical trial design and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Clair Meehan
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bacha
- Edison Oncology Holding Corp., Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Amy Barone
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products at the Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Erik Bloomquist
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Islam Hassan
- Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Departments of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph C Kvedar
- Department of Dermatology at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New-York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vinay Puduvalli
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Solmaz Sahebjam
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Lee H Schwamm
- Department of Neurology at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sharon Tamir
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary Welch
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New-York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - W K Alfred Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Arons
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Brendle C, Maier C, Bender B, Schittenhelm J, Paulsen F, Renovanz M, Roder C, Castaneda-Vega S, Tabatabai G, Ernemann U, la Fougère C. Impact of 18F-FET PET/MR on clinical management of brain tumor patients. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:522-527. [PMID: 34353870 PMCID: PMC8973289 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric PET/MRI with the amino-acid analog O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) enables the simultaneous assessment of molecular, morphologic, and functional brain tumor characteristics. Although it is considered the most accurate noninvasive approach in brain tumors, its relevance for patient management is still under debate. Here, we report the diagnostic performance of 18F-FET PET/MRI and its impact on clinical management in a retrospective patient cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed brain tumor patients who underwent 18F-FET PET/MRI between 2017 and 2018. 18F-FET PET/MRI examinations were indicated clinically because of equivocal standard imaging results or the clinical course. Histologic confirmation or clinical and standard imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. We evaluated 18F-FET PET/MRI accuracy in identifying malignancy in untreated suspected lesions (category, new diagnosis) and true progression during adjuvant treatment (category, detection of progression) in a clinical setting. Using multiple regression, we also estimated the contribution of single modalities to produce an optimal PET/MRI outcome. We assessed the recommended and applied therapies before and after 18F-FET PET/MRI and noted whether the treatment changed on the basis of the 18F-FET PET/MRI outcome. Results: We included 189 patients in the study. 18F-FET PET/MRI allowed the identification of malignancy at new diagnosis with an accuracy of 85% and identified true progression with an accuracy of 93%. Contrast enhancement, 18F-FET PET uptake, and tracer kinetics were the major contributors to an optimal PET/MRI outcome. In the previously equivocal patients, 18F-FET PET/MRI changed the clinical management in 33% of the untreated lesions and 53% of the cases of tumor progression. Conclusion: Our results suggest that 18F-FET PET/MRI helps clarify equivocal conditions and profoundly supports the clinical management of brain tumor patients. The optimal modality setting for 18F-FET PET/MRI and the clinical value of a simultaneous examination need further exploration. At a new diagnosis, multiparametric 18F-FET PET/MRI might help prevent unnecessary invasive procedures by ruling out malignancy; however, adding static 18F-FET PET to an already existing MRI examination seems to be of equal value. At detection of progression, multiparametric 18F-FET PET/MRI may increase therapy effectiveness by distinguishing between tumor progression and therapy-related imaging alterations.
Collapse
|
135
|
Barajas RF, Politi LS, Anzalone N, Schöder H, Fox CP, Boxerman JL, Kaufmann TJ, Quarles CC, Ellingson BM, Auer D, Andronesi OC, Ferreri AJM, Mrugala MM, Grommes C, Neuwelt EA, Ambady P, Rubenstein JL, Illerhaus G, Nagane M, Batchelor TT, Hu LS. Consensus recommendations for MRI and PET imaging of primary central nervous system lymphoma: guideline statement from the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1056-1071. [PMID: 33560416 PMCID: PMC8248856 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon F Barajas
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Oregon, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Knight Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Letterio S Politi
- Humanitas University and Humanitas Research and Clinical Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicoletta Anzalone
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher P Fox
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | - C Chad Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research & Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dorothee Auer
- Versus Arthritis Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andres J M Ferreri
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward A Neuwelt
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Prakash Ambady
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - James L Rubenstein
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Clinic of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Nuessle NC, Behling F, Tabatabai G, Castaneda Vega S, Schittenhelm J, Ernemann U, Klose U, Hempel JM. ADC-Based Stratification of Molecular Glioma Subtypes Using High b-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3451. [PMID: 34441747 PMCID: PMC8397197 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10163451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the diagnostic performance of in vivo ADC-based stratification of integrated molecular glioma grades. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-seven patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent pre-interventional MRI-examination including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with implemented b-values of 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500 s/mm2. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Mean Kurtosis (MK), and Mean Diffusivity (MD) maps were generated. The average values were compared among the molecular glioma subgroups of IDH-mutant and IDH-wildtype astrocytoma, and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma. One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Games-Howell correction compared average ADC, MD, and MK values between molecular glioma groups. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Two b-value-dependent ADC-based evaluations presented statistically significant differences between the three molecular glioma sub-groups (p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS High-b-value ADC from preoperative DWI may be used to stratify integrated molecular glioma subgroups and save time compared to diffusion kurtosis imaging. Higher b-values of up to 2500 s/mm2 may present an important step towards increasing diagnostic accuracy compared to standard DWI protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils C. Nuessle
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.E.); (U.K.); (J.-M.H.)
| | - Felix Behling
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
- Departments of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Departments of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Salvador Castaneda Vega
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Institute of Neuropathology, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| | - Ulrike Ernemann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.E.); (U.K.); (J.-M.H.)
| | - Uwe Klose
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.E.); (U.K.); (J.-M.H.)
| | - Johann-Martin Hempel
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; (U.E.); (U.K.); (J.-M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Avula S, Peet A, Morana G, Morgan P, Warmuth-Metz M, Jaspan T. European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) MRI guidelines for imaging patients with central nervous system tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:2497-2508. [PMID: 33973057 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05199-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Standardisation of imaging acquisition is essential in facilitating multicentre studies related to childhood CNS tumours. It is important to ensure that the imaging protocol can be adopted by centres with varying imaging capabilities without compromising image quality. MATERIALS AND METHOD An imaging protocol has been developed by the Brain Tumour Imaging Working Group of the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) based on consensus among its members, which consists of neuroradiologists, imaging scientists and paediatric neuro-oncologists. This protocol has been developed to facilitate SIOPE led studies and regularly reviewed by the imaging working group. RESULTS The protocol consists of essential MRI sequences with imaging parameters for 1.5 and 3 Tesla MRI scanners and a set of optional sequences that can be used in appropriate clinical settings. The protocol also provides guidelines for early post-operative imaging and surveillance imaging. The complementary use of multimodal advanced MRI including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), MR spectroscopy and perfusion imaging is encouraged, and optional guidance is provided in this publication. CONCLUSION The SIOPE brain tumour imaging protocol will enable consistent imaging across multiple centres involved in paediatric CNS tumour studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivaram Avula
- Department of Radiology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, East Prescot Road, Liverpool, L14 5AB, UK.
| | - Andrew Peet
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Giovanni Morana
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paul Morgan
- Department of Medical Physics, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Monika Warmuth-Metz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tim Jaspan
- Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
138
|
Abstract
The central role of MRI in neuro-oncology is undisputed. The technique is used, both in clinical practice and in clinical trials, to diagnose and monitor disease activity, support treatment decision-making, guide the use of focused treatments and determine response to treatment. Despite recent substantial advances in imaging technology and image analysis techniques, clinical MRI is still primarily used for the qualitative subjective interpretation of macrostructural features, as opposed to quantitative analyses that take into consideration multiple pathophysiological features. However, the field of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarker development is maturing. The European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (EIBALL) and Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) are setting standards for biomarker development, validation and implementation, as well as promoting the use of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarkers by demonstrating their clinical value. In parallel, advanced imaging techniques are reaching the clinical arena, providing quantitative, commonly physiological imaging parameters that are driving the discovery, validation and implementation of quantitative imaging and imaging biomarkers in the clinical routine. Additionally, computational analysis techniques are increasingly being used in the research setting to convert medical images into objective high-dimensional data and define radiomic signatures of disease states. Here, I review the definition and current state of MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology, and discuss the clinical potential of quantitative image analysis techniques.
Collapse
|
139
|
Ellingson BM, Sampson J, Achrol AS, Aghi MK, Bankiewicz K, Wang C, Bexon M, Brem S, Brenner A, Chowdhary S, Floyd JR, Han S, Kesari S, Randazzo D, Vogelbaum MA, Vrionis F, Zabek M, Butowski N, Coello M, Merchant N, Merchant F. Modified RANO, Immunotherapy RANO, and Standard RANO Response to Convection-Enhanced Delivery of IL4R-Targeted Immunotoxin MDNA55 in Recurrent Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3916-3925. [PMID: 33863808 PMCID: PMC8282697 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The current study compared the standard response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO), immunotherapy RANO (iRANO), and modified RANO (mRANO) criteria as well as quantified the association between progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in an immunotherapy trial in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 47 patients with rGBM were enrolled in a prospective phase II convection-enhanced delivery of an IL4R-targeted immunotoxin (MDNA55-05, NCT02858895). Bidirectional tumor measurements were created by local sites and centrally by an independent radiologic faculty, then standard RANO, iRANO, and mRANO criteria were applied. RESULTS A total of 41 of 47 patients (mean age 56 ± 11.7) were evaluable for response. PFS was significantly shorter using standard RANO compared with iRANO (log-rank, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.3) and mRANO (P < 0.0001; HR = 0.3). In patients who died and had confirmed progression on standard RANO, no correlation was observed between PFS and OS (local, P = 0.47; central, P = 0.34). Using iRANO, a weak association was observed between confirmed PFS and OS via local site measurements (P = 0.017), but not central measurements (P = 0.18). A total of 24 of 41 patients (59%) were censored using iRANO and because they lacked confirmation of progression 3 months after initial progression. A strong correlation was observed between mRANO PFS and OS for both local (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.0001) and centrally determined reads (R2 = 0.57, P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS No correlation between radiographic PFS and OS was observed for standard RANO or iRANO, but a correlation was observed between PFS and OS using the mRANO criteria. Also, the iRANO criteria was difficult to implement due to need to confirm progression 3 months after initial progression, censoring more than half the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- UCLA Neuro Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - John Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Achal Singh Achrol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California
- Department of Translational Neurosciences and Neurotherapeutics, Pacific Neurosciences Institute, Santa Monica, California
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Krystof Bankiewicz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mazovian Brodnowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Glioblastoma Translational Center of Excellence, Penn Brain Tumor Center, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrew Brenner
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Sajeel Chowdhary
- Marcus Neuroscience Institute and Neuro-Oncology Program, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - John R Floyd
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Seunggu Han
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Santosh Kesari
- Department of Translational Neurosciences and Neurotherapeutics, Pacific Neurosciences Institute, Santa Monica, California
| | - Dina Randazzo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Frank Vrionis
- Marcus Neuroscience Institute and Neuro-Oncology Program, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Miroslaw Zabek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mazovian Brodnowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Nicholas Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Abstract
Clinical trials play a critical role in discovering new treatments, but the path to regulatory approval can be cumbersome and time consuming. Efforts to increase the efficiency and interpretability of clinical trials within the neuro-oncology community have focused on standardization of response assessment, development of consensus guidelines for clinical trial conduct, decentralization of clinical trials, removal of barriers to clinical trial accrual, and re-examination of patient eligibility criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Ramesh K, Gurbani SS, Mellon EA, Huang V, Goryawala M, Barker PB, Kleinberg L, Shu HKG, Shim H, Weinberg BD. The Longitudinal Imaging Tracker (BrICS-LIT):A Cloud Platform for Monitoring Treatment Response in Glioblastoma Patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:93-100. [PMID: 32548285 PMCID: PMC7289246 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a common and aggressive form of brain cancer affecting up to 20,000 new patients in the US annually. Despite rigorous therapies, current median survival is only 15-20 months. Patients who complete initial treatment undergo follow-up imaging at routine intervals to assess for tumor recurrence. Imaging is a central part of brain tumor management, but MRI findings in patients with brain tumor can be challenging to interpret and are further confounded by interpretation variability. Disease-specific structured reporting attempts to reduce variability in imaging results by implementing well-defined imaging criteria and standardized language. The Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) is one such framework streamlined for clinical workflows and includes quantitative criteria for more objective evaluation of follow-up imaging. To facilitate accurate and objective monitoring of patients during the follow-up period, we developed a cloud platform, the Brain Imaging Collaborative Suite's Longitudinal Imaging Tracker (BrICS-LIT). BrICS-LIT uses semiautomated tumor segmentation algorithms of both T2-weighted FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI to assist clinicians in quantitative assessment of brain tumors. The LIT platform can ultimately guide clinical decision-making for patients with glioblastoma by providing quantitative metrics for BT-RADS scoring. Further, this platform has the potential to increase objectivity when measuring efficacy of novel therapies for patients with brain tumor during their follow-up. Therefore, LIT will be used to track patients in a dose-escalated clinical trial, where spectroscopic MRI has been used to guide radiation therapy (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03137888), and compare patients to a control group that received standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.,Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Saumya S Gurbani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.,Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | - Vicki Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.,Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Hui-Kuo G Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.,Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology & Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.,Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Brent D Weinberg
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Ellingson BM, Patel K, Wang C, Raymond C, Brenner A, de Groot JF, Butowski NA, Zach L, Campian JL, Schlossman J, Rizvi S, Cohen YC, Lowenton-Spier N, Minei TR, Shmueli SF, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF. Validation of diffusion MRI as a biomarker for efficacy using randomized phase III trial of bevacizumab with or without VB-111 in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab082. [PMID: 34377989 PMCID: PMC8350152 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence from single and multicenter phase II trials have suggested diffusion MRI is a predictive imaging biomarker for survival benefit in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with anti-VEGF therapy. The current study confirms these findings in a large, randomized phase III clinical trial. Methods Patients with rGBM were enrolled in a phase III randomized (1:1), controlled trial (NCT02511405) to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) versus BV in combination with ofranergene obadenovec (BV+VB-111), an anti-cancer viral therapy. In 170 patients with diffusion MRI available, pretreatment enhancing tumor volume and ADC histogram analysis were used to phenotype patients as having high (>1.24 µm2/ms) or low (<1.24 µm2/ms) ADCL, the mean value of the lower peak of the ADC histogram, within the contrast enhancing tumor. Results Baseline tumor volume (P = .3460) and ADCL (P = .2143) did not differ between treatment arms. Univariate analysis showed patients with high ADCL had a significant survival advantage in all patients (P = .0006), as well as BV (P = .0159) and BV+VB-111 individually (P = .0262). Multivariable Cox regression accounting for treatment arm, age, baseline tumor volume, and ADCL identified continuous measures of tumor volume (P < .0001; HR = 1.0212) and ADCL phenotypes (P = .0012; HR = 0.5574) as independent predictors of OS. Conclusion Baseline diffusion MRI and tumor volume are independent imaging biomarkers of OS in rGBM treated with BV or BV+VB-111.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Neuro Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kunal Patel
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andrew Brenner
- University of Texas Health San Antonio Cancer Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - John F de Groot
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicholas A Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leor Zach
- Oncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel
| | - Jian L Campian
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jacob Schlossman
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shan Rizvi
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Yang F, Xie Y, Tang J, Liu B, Luo Y, He Q, Zhang L, Xin L, Wang J, Wang S, Zhang S, Cao Q, Wang L, He L, Zhang L. Uncovering a Distinct Gene Signature in Endothelial Cells Associated With Contrast Enhancement in Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:683367. [PMID: 34222002 PMCID: PMC8245778 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal type of brain tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been commonly used for GBM diagnosis. Contrast enhancement (CE) on T1-weighted sequences are presented in nearly all GBM as a result of high vascular permeability in glioblastomas. Although several radiomics studies indicated that CE is associated with distinct molecular signatures in tumors, the effects of vascular endothelial cells, the key component of blood brain barrier (BBB) controlling vascular permeability, on CE have not been thoroughly analyzed. Methods Endothelial cell enriched genes have been identified using transcriptome data from 128 patients by a systematic method based on correlation analysis. Distinct endothelial cell enriched genes associated with CE were identified by analyzing difference of correlation score between CE-high and CE–low GBM cases. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on in-house patient cohort to validate the selected genes associated with CE. Moreover, a survival analysis was conducted to uncover the relation between CE and patient survival. Results We illustrated that CE is associated with distinct vascular molecular imprints characterized by up-regulation of pro-inflammatory genes and deregulation of BBB related genes. Among them, PLVAP is up-regulated, whereas TJP1 and ABCG2 are down-regulated in the vasculature of GBM with high CE. In addition, we found that the high CE is associated with poor prognosis and GBM mesenchymal subtype. Conclusion We provide an additional insight to reveal the molecular trait for CE in MRI images with special focus on vascular endothelial cells, linking CE with BBB disruption in the molecular level. This study provides a potential new direction that may be applied for the treatment optimization based on MRI features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro-injury Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuan Xie
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jiefu Tang
- Trauma Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China
| | - Boxuan Liu
- Precision Medicine Center, The Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua, China
| | - Yuancheng Luo
- School of Life Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Qiyuan He
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lingxue Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lele Xin
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jianhao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro-injury Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin, China
| | - Sinan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shuqiang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qingze Cao
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University (Air Force Medical University of PLA), Xi'an, China
| | - Liqun He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Key Laboratory of Post-Neuro-injury Neuro-Repair and Regeneration in Central Nervous System, Ministry of Education and Tianjin City, Tianjin, China.,Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Medicinal Plant Resource and Natural Pharmaceutical Chemistry, National Engineering Laboratory for Resource Developing of Endangered Chinese Crude Drugs in Northwest of China, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.,Precision Medicine Center, The Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua, China
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Kommers I, Bouget D, Pedersen A, Eijgelaar RS, Ardon H, Barkhof F, Bello L, Berger MS, Conti Nibali M, Furtner J, Fyllingen EH, Hervey-Jumper S, Idema AJS, Kiesel B, Kloet A, Mandonnet E, Müller DMJ, Robe PA, Rossi M, Sagberg LM, Sciortino T, van den Brink WA, Wagemakers M, Widhalm G, Witte MG, Zwinderman AH, Reinertsen I, Solheim O, De Witt Hamer PC. Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging-Reporting and Data System: Standardized Reporting of Tumor Volume, Location, and Resectability Based on Automated Segmentations. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2854. [PMID: 34201021 PMCID: PMC8229389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment decisions for patients with presumed glioblastoma are based on tumor characteristics available from a preoperative MR scan. Tumor characteristics, including volume, location, and resectability, are often estimated or manually delineated. This process is time consuming and subjective. Hence, comparison across cohorts, trials, or registries are subject to assessment bias. In this study, we propose a standardized Glioblastoma Surgery Imaging Reporting and Data System (GSI-RADS) based on an automated method of tumor segmentation that provides standard reports on tumor features that are potentially relevant for glioblastoma surgery. As clinical validation, we determine the agreement in extracted tumor features between the automated method and the current standard of manual segmentations from routine clinical MR scans before treatment. In an observational consecutive cohort of 1596 adult patients with a first time surgery of a glioblastoma from 13 institutions, we segmented gadolinium-enhanced tumor parts both by a human rater and by an automated algorithm. Tumor features were extracted from segmentations of both methods and compared to assess differences, concordance, and equivalence. The laterality, contralateral infiltration, and the laterality indices were in excellent agreement. The native and normalized tumor volumes had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Multifocality, but not the number of foci, had good agreement and equivalence. The location profiles of cortical and subcortical structures were in excellent agreement. The expected residual tumor volumes and resectability indices had excellent agreement, consistency, and equivalence. Tumor probability maps were in good agreement. In conclusion, automated segmentations are in excellent agreement with manual segmentations and practically equivalent regarding tumor features that are potentially relevant for neurosurgical purposes. Standard GSI-RADS reports can be generated by open access software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivar Kommers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (I.K.); (R.S.E.); (D.M.J.M.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Bouget
- Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway; (D.B.); (A.P.); (I.R.)
| | - André Pedersen
- Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway; (D.B.); (A.P.); (I.R.)
| | - Roelant S. Eijgelaar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (I.K.); (R.S.E.); (D.M.J.M.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilko Ardon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Twee Steden Hospital, 5042 AD Tilburg, The Netherlands;
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (L.B.); (M.C.N.); (M.R.); (T.S.)
| | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (M.S.B.); (S.H.-J.)
| | - Marco Conti Nibali
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (L.B.); (M.C.N.); (M.R.); (T.S.)
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria;
| | - Even H. Fyllingen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; (M.S.B.); (S.H.-J.)
| | - Albert J. S. Idema
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwest Clinics, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands;
| | - Barbara Kiesel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria; (B.K.); (G.W.)
| | - Alfred Kloet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands;
| | - Emmanuel Mandonnet
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France;
| | - Domenique M. J. Müller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (I.K.); (R.S.E.); (D.M.J.M.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre A. Robe
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Marco Rossi
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (L.B.); (M.C.N.); (M.R.); (T.S.)
| | - Lisa M. Sagberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7030 Trondheim, Norway;
| | - Tommaso Sciortino
- Neurosurgical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy; (L.B.); (M.C.N.); (M.R.); (T.S.)
| | | | - Michiel Wagemakers
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Georg Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna, 1090 Wien, Austria; (B.K.); (G.W.)
| | - Marnix G. Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Aeilko H. Zwinderman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ingerid Reinertsen
- Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway; (D.B.); (A.P.); (I.R.)
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, NO-7030 Trondheim, Norway;
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Philip C. De Witt Hamer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (I.K.); (R.S.E.); (D.M.J.M.)
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Brain Tumor Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Krebs S, Barasch JG, Young RJ, Grommes C, Schöder H. Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in primary central nervous system lymphoma-a narrative review. ANNALS OF LYMPHOMA 2021; 5. [PMID: 34223561 PMCID: PMC8248935 DOI: 10.21037/aol-20-52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This review addresses the challenges of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma diagnosis, assessment of treatment response, and detection of recurrence. Primary CNS lymphoma is a rare form of extra-nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can involve brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges, and eyes. Primary CNS lymphoma lesions are most commonly confined to the white matter or deep cerebral structures such as basal ganglia and deep periventricular regions. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard diagnostic modality employed by neuro-oncologists. MRI often shows common morphological features such as a single or multiple uniformly well-enhancing lesions without necrosis but with moderate surrounding edema. Other brain tumors or inflammatory processes can show similar radiological patterns, making differential diagnosis difficult. [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has selected utility in cerebral lymphoma, especially in diagnosis. Primary CNS lymphoma can sometimes present with atypical findings on MRI and FDG PET, such as disseminated disease, non-enhancing or ring-like enhancing lesions. The complementary strengths of PET and MRI have led to the development of combined PET-MR systems, which in some cases may improve lesion characterization and detection. By highlighting active developments in this field, including advanced MRI sequences, novel radiotracers, and potential imaging biomarkers, we aim to spur interest in sophisticated imaging approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Krebs
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia G Barasch
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Neuroradiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christian Grommes
- Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Steidl E, Langen KJ, Hmeidan SA, Polomac N, Filss CP, Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Keil F, Filipski K, Mottaghy FM, Shah NJ, Steinbach JP, Hattingen E, Maurer GD. Sequential implementation of DSC-MR perfusion and dynamic [ 18F]FET PET allows efficient differentiation of glioma progression from treatment-related changes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1956-1965. [PMID: 33241456 PMCID: PMC8113145 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05114-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET are both applied to discriminate tumor progression (TP) from treatment-related changes (TRC) in patients with suspected recurrent glioma. While the combination of both methods has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy, the performance of a sequential implementation has not been further investigated. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic value of consecutive PWI and [18F]FET PET. METHODS We evaluated 104 patients with WHO grade II-IV glioma and suspected TP on conventional MRI using PWI and dynamic [18F]FET PET. Leakage corrected maximum relative cerebral blood volumes (rCBVmax) were obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast PWI. Furthermore, we calculated static (i.e., maximum tumor to brain ratios; TBRmax) and dynamic [18F]FET PET parameters (i.e., Slope). Definitive diagnoses were based on histopathology (n = 42) or clinico-radiological follow-up (n = 62). The diagnostic performance of PWI and [18F]FET PET parameters to differentiate TP from TRC was evaluated by analyzing receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS Across all patients, the differentiation of TP from TRC using rCBVmax or [18F]FET PET parameters was moderate (AUC = 0.69-0.75; p < 0.01). A rCBVmax cutoff > 2.85 had a positive predictive value for TP of 100%, enabling a correct TP diagnosis in 44 patients. In the remaining 60 patients, combined static and dynamic [18F]FET PET parameters (TBRmax, Slope) correctly discriminated TP and TRC in a significant 78% of patients, increasing the overall accuracy to 87%. A subgroup analysis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant tumors indicated a superior performance of PWI to [18F]FET PET (AUC = 0.8/< 0.62, p < 0.01/≥ 0.3). CONCLUSION While marked hyperperfusion on PWI indicated TP, [18F]FET PET proved beneficial to discriminate TP from TRC when PWI remained inconclusive. Thus, our results highlight the clinical value of sequential use of PWI and [18F]FET PET, allowing an economical use of diagnostic methods. The impact of an IDH mutation needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eike Steidl
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sarah Abu Hmeidan
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nenad Polomac
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christian P Filss
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fee Keil
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Katharina Filipski
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Aachen, Germany
- Dept. of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Medical Imaging Physics (INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine, Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), JARA, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Dept. of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- JARA - BRAIN - Translational Medicine, Aachen, Germany
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Schleusenweg 2-16, Frankfurt am Main, 60528, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriele D Maurer
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Lobinger D, Gempt J, Sievert W, Barz M, Schmitt S, Nguyen HT, Stangl S, Werner C, Wang F, Wu Z, Fan H, Zanth H, Shevtsov M, Pilz M, Riederer I, Schwab M, Schlegel J, Multhoff G. Potential Role of Hsp70 and Activated NK Cells for Prediction of Prognosis in Glioblastoma Patients. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:669366. [PMID: 34079819 PMCID: PMC8165168 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.669366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite rapid progress in the treatment of many cancers, glioblastoma remains a devastating disease with dismal prognosis. The aim of this study was to identify chaperone- and immune-related biomarkers to improve prediction of outcome in glioblastoma. Depending on its intra- or extracellular localization the major stress-inducible heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) fulfills different tasks. In the cytosol Hsp70 interferes with pro-apoptotic signaling pathways and thereby protects tumor cells from programmed cell death. Extracellular Hsp70 together with pro-inflammatory cytokines are reported to stimulate the expression of activatory NK cell receptors, recognizing highly aggressive human tumor cells that present Hsp70 on their cell surface. Therefore, intra-, extracellular and membrane-bound Hsp70 levels were assessed in gliomas together with activatory NK cell receptors. All gliomas were found to be membrane Hsp70-positive and high grade gliomas more frequently show an overexpression of Hsp70 in the nucleus and cytosol. Significantly elevated extracellular Hsp70 levels are detected in glioblastomas with large necrotic areas. Overall survival (OS) is more favorable in patients with low Hsp70 serum levels indicating that a high Hsp70 expression is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. The data provide a first hint that elevated frequencies of activated NK cells at diagnosis might be associated with a better clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Lobinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Sievert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Barz
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Huyen Thie Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Stangl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Caroline Werner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Zhiyuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hengyi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hannah Zanth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maxim Shevtsov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Mathias Pilz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Riederer
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Melissa Schwab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schlegel
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Multhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
A Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis to Efficiently Classify Tumor Subregions of Glioblastoma: A Pilot Study in Machine Learning. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10092030. [PMID: 34068528 PMCID: PMC8126019 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10092030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) carries a poor prognosis and usually presents with heterogenous regions of a necrotic core, solid part, peritumoral tissue, and peritumoral edema. Accurate demarcation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between the active tumor region and perifocal edematous extension is essential for planning stereotactic biopsy, GBM resection, and radiotherapy. We established a set of radiomics features to efficiently classify patients with GBM and retrieved cerebral multiparametric MRI, including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE), T2-weighted, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and apparent diffusion coefficient images from local patients with GBM. A total of 1316 features on the raw MR images were selected for each annotated area. A leave-one-out cross-validation was performed on the whole dataset, the different machine learning and deep learning techniques tested; random forest achieved the best performance (average accuracy: 93.6% necrosis, 90.4% solid part, 95.8% peritumoral tissue, and 90.4% peritumoral edema). The features from the enhancing tumor and the tumor shape elongation of peritumoral edema region for high-risk groups from T1-CE. The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model showed the efficient classification of tumor subregions of GBM and suggests that prognostic radiomic features from a routine MRI exam may also be significantly associated with key biological processes that affect the response to chemotherapy in GBM.
Collapse
|
149
|
Choi YS, Bae S, Chang JH, Kang SG, Kim SH, Kim J, Rim TH, Choi SH, Jain R, Lee SK. Fully automated hybrid approach to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas via deep learning and radiomics. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:304-313. [PMID: 32706862 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioma prognosis depends on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. We aimed to predict the IDH status of gliomas from preoperative MR images using a fully automated hybrid approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and radiomics. METHODS We reviewed 1166 preoperative MR images of gliomas (grades II-IV) from Severance Hospital (n = 856), Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH; n = 107), and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA; n = 203). The Severance set was subdivided into the development (n = 727) and internal test (n = 129) sets. Based on T1 postcontrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, a fully automated model was developed that comprised a CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) and CNN-based classifier for IDH status prediction (Model 2) that uses a hybrid approach based on 2D tumor images and radiomic features from 3D tumor shape and loci guided by Model 1. The trained model was tested on internal (a subset of the Severance set) and external (SNUH and TCIA) test sets. RESULTS The CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) achieved a dice coefficient of 0.86-0.92 across datasets. Our hybrid model achieved accuracies of 93.8%, 87.9%, and 78.8%, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.86 and areas under the precision-recall curves of 0.88, 0.82, and 0.81 in the internal test, SNUH, and TCIA sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our fully automated hybrid model demonstrated the potential to be a highly reproducible and generalizable tool across different datasets for the noninvasive prediction of the IDH status of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Seong Choi
- Duke-NUS Medical School, RADSC ACP, Singapore.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sohi Bae
- Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinna Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tyler Hyungtaek Rim
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Seung Hong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Rajan Jain
- Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Seung-Koo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Ellingson BM, Brown MS, Boxerman JL, Gerstner ER, Kaufmann TJ, Cole PE, Bacha JA, Leung D, Barone A, Colman H, van den Bent MJ, Wen PY, Alfred Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Goldin JG. Radiographic read paradigms and the roles of the central imaging laboratory in neuro-oncology clinical trials. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:189-198. [PMID: 33130879 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Determination of therapeutic benefit in intracranial tumors is intimately dependent on serial assessment of radiographic images. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria were established in 2010 to provide an updated framework to better characterize tumor response to contemporary treatments. Since this initial update a number of RANO criteria have provided some basic principles for the interpretation of changes on MR images; however, the details of how to operationalize RANO and other criteria for use in clinical trials are ambiguous and not standardized. In this review article designed for the neuro-oncologist or treating clinician, we outline essential steps for performing radiographic assessments by highlighting primary features of the Imaging Charter (referred to as the Charter for the remainder of this article), a document that describes the clinical trial imaging methodology and methods to ensure operationalization of the Charter into the workings of a clinical trial. Lastly, we provide recommendations for specific changes to optimize this methodology for neuro-oncology, including image registration, requirement of growing tumor for eligibility in trials of recurrent tumor, standardized image acquisition guidelines, and hybrid reader paradigms that allow for both unbiased measurements and more comprehensive interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew S Brown
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,MedQIA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Leung
- Bristol Myers Squibb, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amy Barone
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - W K Alfred Yung
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan G Goldin
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,MedQIA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|