101
|
Matsuo K, Machida H, Stone RL, Soliman PT, Thaker PH, Roman LD, Wright JD. Risk of Subsequent Ovarian Cancer After Ovarian Conservation in Young Women With Stage I Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:403-410. [PMID: 28697110 PMCID: PMC7523225 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the cumulative incidence of subsequent ovarian cancer among young women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer who had ovarian conservation at surgical treatment. METHODS This retrospective study examined the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to identify women aged younger than 50 years who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation for stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1983 and 2013. Time-dependent risk of ovarian cancer diagnosed during the follow-up after endometrial cancer diagnosis was examined. RESULTS Among 1,322 women in the study cohort, 16 women developed subsequent ovarian cancer with 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences of 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively. Median time to develop subsequent ovarian cancer was 2.4 years, and the majority of subsequent ovarian cancer was diagnosed within the first 3 years from the diagnosis of endometrial cancer (68.8%). The majority of subsequent ovarian cancer was endometrioid type (81.3%) and stage I disease (75.0%). With a median follow-up time of 11.6 years, there were no ovarian cancer deaths. Younger age at endometrial cancer diagnosis was significantly associated with increased risk of subsequent ovarian cancer (10-year cumulative incidences: age younger than 40 compared with 40-49 years, 2.6% compared with 0.4%, hazard ratio 5.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-15.7, P=.002). CONCLUSION Young women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer have an approximately 1% risk of developing subsequent ovarian cancer after ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy that was associated with favorable tumor factors resulting in good ovarian cancer-specific survival. Our results endorse the importance of genetic testing and close follow-up when counseling about this procedure, especially for those who are younger than 40 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, John Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; the Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
102
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women with gynecologic malignancies will be cured or may become long-term survivors. Management of menopausal symptoms is important in addressing their quality of life. We review the benefit and safety of hormone therapy use in these patients. METHODS MEDLINE was searched for studies on menopause management published in English through December of 2016. RESULTS Available data suggest that short-term use of hormone therapy in gynecologic cancer patients who do not have an estrogen-dependent malignancy do not adversely impact oncologic outcome and results in improvement of menopausal vasomotor and genitourinary symptoms. Evidence regarding safety of hormone therapy use in women with estrogen-dependent gynecologic malignances is currently lacking. CONCLUSIONS Candidates for hormone therapy in gynecologic oncology include women with menopausal symptoms diagnosed with low-grade, early-stage endometrial cancer, cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer, and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela G Del Carmen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Laurel W Rice
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129:139-151. [PMID: 27926642 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of ovarian conservation at hysterectomy and to examine the association of ovarian conservation and survival of young women with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to identify hysterectomy-based surgically treated patients with stage I cervical cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=16,511). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors associated with ovarian conservation. Among the subgroup of 9,419 women younger than 50 years of age with stage I disease, survival outcomes and causes of death were examined for 3,908 (41.5%) women who underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy without radiotherapy. RESULTS On multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, stage IA disease, and squamous histology were independent factors associated with ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). Among 5,526 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IA disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy, overall survival was significantly higher in patients undergoing ovarian conservation than in those undergoing oophorectomy (20-year rate, 93.5% compared with 86.8%, P<.001); cervical cancer-specific survival was similar between the patients who underwent ovarian conservation and those who underwent oophorectomy (98.8% compared with 97.8%, P=.12). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.82, P=.001) and was independently associated with lower cumulative risks of death resulting from cardiovascular disease (20-year cumulative rate, 1.2% compared with 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.86, P=.014) and other chronic disease (0.5% compared with 1.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65, P=.005) compared with oophorectomy. Both cervical cancer-specific survival (20-year rate, 93.1% compared with 92.0%, P=.37) and overall survival (86.7% compared with 84.6%, P=.12) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,893 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IB disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Among young women with stage IA cervical cancer, ovarian conservation at hysterectomy is associated with decreased all-cause mortality including death resulting from cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases.
Collapse
|
104
|
Ovarian Conservation and Overall Survival in Young Women With Early-Stage Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 128:761-70. [PMID: 27607873 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000001647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize contributing factors for ovarian conservation during surgical treatment for endometrial cancer and to examine the association of ovarian conservation on survival of young women with early-stage, low-grade tumors. METHODS This was a population-based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify surgically treated stage I type I (grade 1-2 endometrioid histology) endometrial cancer cases diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=86,005). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors for ovarian conservation. Survival outcomes and cause of death were examined for women aged younger than 50 with stage I type I endometrial cancer who underwent ovarian conservation (1,242 among 12,860 women [9.7%]). RESULTS On multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, grade 1 endometrioid histology, and tumor size 2.0 cm or less were noted to be independent factors for ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). For 9,110 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 1 tumors, cause-specific survival was similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy cases (20-year rates 98.9% compared with 97.7%, P=.31), whereas overall survival was significantly higher in ovarian conservation cases than oophorectomy cases (88.8% compared with 82.0%, P=.011). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.98, P=.036) and was independently associated with a lower cumulative risk of death resulting from cardiovascular disease compared with oophorectomy (20-year rates, 2.3% compared with 3.7%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, P=.029). Contrary, cause-specific survival (20-year rates 94.6% compared with 96.1%, P=.68) and overall survival (81.0% compared with 80.6%, P=.91) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,750 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 2 tumors. CONCLUSION Ovarian conservation is performed in less than 10% of young women with stage I type I endometrial cancer. Ovarian conservation is associated with decreased mortality in young women with stage I grade 1 tumors.
Collapse
|
105
|
Jia P, Zhang Y. Ovarian preservation improves overall survival in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:59940-59949. [PMID: 28938695 PMCID: PMC5601791 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database, the Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database, the Chinese Journal Full-text Database, and the Wanfang Database to collect observational studies on the effects of ovary-saving surgery in comparison to bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in young patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). The literature search included studies up to March 2017, and 10 retrospective cohort studies met our selection criteria. Random and fixed effect models revealed that ovarian preservation (OP) was associated with better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.99, P = 0.044), and was not associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) in pre-menopausal patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.32–4.72, P = 0.648; risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% CI 0.59–2.10, P = 0.745). Preservation of the ovaries appears to be a safe option with significant benefit for this low risk population after a thorough preoperative evaluation and extensive intraoperative exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Jia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Affiliation(s)
- Avital Porter
- Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tiqva, and The Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
- Intermediate ICCU and The Women’s Heart Clinic, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tiqca, Israel; The Sakler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Therapeutic Targeting of Cellular Stress to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: A Review of the Evidence. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2017; 17:83-95. [PMID: 27778192 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-016-0199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The availability of effective drugs targeting the major risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has reduced morbidity and mortality. Cumulative relative risk of CVD events can be reduced by 75 % with a combination of aspirin, a β-adrenoceptor antagonist (β-blocker), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin), and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. The principal pharmacodynamics of these drugs cannot explain the entirety of their cardioprotective action, as other drugs with similar pharmacologic targets have not been associated with favorable clinical effects. This raises the possibility that the cardioprotective drugs have a unique pleiotropic activity that contributes to their clinical efficacy. Recent data suggest that reducing cellular stress such as oxidative, inflammatory, and endoplasmic reticulum stress, might be a common denominator of the drugs with proven efficacy in reducing CVD risk. In this communication, the evidence in favor of this hypothesis is discussed, and ongoing trials with therapeutic agents targeting cellular stresses are reviewed.
Collapse
|
108
|
Chen CY, Yang YH, Lee CP, Wang TY, Cheng BH, Huang YC, Chen PC, Liang SHY, Dewey M, Chen VCH. Risk of depression following uterine cancer: A nationwide population-based study. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1770-1776. [PMID: 28029721 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Revised: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Yu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi and College of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| | - Yao-Hsu Yang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, and School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, College of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
- Center of Excellence for Chang Gung Research Datalink; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Chiayi Taiwan
- Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene; National Taiwan University College of Public Health; Taipei Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Pin Lee
- Center of Excellence for Chang Gung Research Datalink; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; Chiayi Taiwan
| | - Ting-Yao Wang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi and College of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| | - Bi-Hua Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi and College of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| | - Yin-Cheng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi and College of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| | - Pau-Chung Chen
- Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene; National Taiwan University College of Public Health; Taipei Taiwan
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine; National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine; Taipei Taiwan
| | - Sophie Hsin-Yi Liang
- Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, and School of Medicine; Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| | - Michael Dewey
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience; King's College London; London UK
| | - Vincent Chin-Hung Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, and School of Medicine, Chang Gung University; Taoyuan Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Fantasia HC. A Nonhormonal Treatment for Moderate to Severe Vasomotor Symptoms of Menopause. Nurs Womens Health 2016; 20:511-518. [PMID: 27719781 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Revised: 06/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
It is estimated that up to 80% of women experience symptoms related to declining estrogen levels that occur with menopause. The most common bothersome symptoms reported by women during and after this transition are vasomotor symptoms, which can include hot flashes, flushing, night sweats, and sleep disturbances. These symptoms are the most common reason women seek care during menopause. Until recently, the mainstay of treatment and symptom relief has been estrogen supplementation. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved paroxetine, a low-dose selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, as the first nonhormonal treatment for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms of menopause. This article provides an overview of the use of paroxetine to treat vasomotor symptoms of menopause, including potential adverse reactions, special considerations for use, and implications for nursing practice.
Collapse
|
110
|
|
111
|
Allen C, Evans G, Sutton EL. Pharmacologic Therapies in Women's Health: Contraception and Menopause Treatment. Med Clin North Am 2016; 100:763-89. [PMID: 27235614 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Female hormones play a significant role in the etiology and treatment of many women's health conditions. This article focuses on the common uses of hormonal therapy. When prescribing estrogen-containing regimens throughout the span of a woman's life, the risks are similar (ie, cardiovascular risk and venous thromboembolism), but the degree of risk varies significantly depending on a woman's particular set of risk factors and the details of the hormone regimen. In addition to estrogens and progestogens, this article also touches on the use of selective steroid receptor modulators in emergency contraception and in treatment of menopause symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Allen
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 5120 MFCB, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| | - Ginger Evans
- Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, 1660 South Columbian Way, S-123-PCC, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
| | - Eliza L Sutton
- Department of Medicine, Women's Health Care Center, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way Northeast, Box 354765, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Stopping systemic menopausal hormone therapy: Why, when and how. Maturitas 2016; 89:3-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
113
|
Alhurani RE, Chahal CAA, Ahmed AT, Mohamed EA, Miller VM. Sex hormone therapy and progression of cardiovascular disease in menopausal women. Clin Sci (Lond) 2016; 130:1065-74. [PMID: 27215679 PMCID: PMC5316470 DOI: 10.1042/cs20160042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
One of the most controversial health decisions facing women is deciding upon the use of hormonal treatments for symptoms of menopause. This brief review focuses on the historical context of use of menopausal hormone treatments (MHT), summarizes results of major observational, primary and secondary prevention studies of MHT and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, provides evidence for how sex steroids modulate CV function and identifies challenges for future research. As medicine enters an era of personalization of treatment options, additional research into sex differences in the aetiology of CV diseases will lead to better risk identification for CV disease in women and identify whether a woman might receive CV benefit from specific formulations and doses of MHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabe E Alhurani
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A
| | - C Anwar A Chahal
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A
| | - Ahmed T Ahmed
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A. Division of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A
| | - Essa A Mohamed
- Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A
| | - Virginia M Miller
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Moyer AM, Miller VM, Faubion SS. Could personalized management of menopause based on genomics become a reality? Pharmacogenomics 2016; 17:659-62. [PMID: 27142773 DOI: 10.2217/pgs.16.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Moyer
- Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Virginia M Miller
- Departments of Surgery & Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, Women's Health Research Center, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Stephanie S Faubion
- Departments of General Internal Medicine, Women's Health Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Bassuk SS, Manson JE. The timing hypothesis: Do coronary risks of menopausal hormone therapy vary by age or time since menopause onset? Metabolism 2016; 65:794-803. [PMID: 27085786 PMCID: PMC4834454 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI), a landmark randomized trial of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) for prevention of chronic disease in postmenopausal women aged 50-79, established that such therapy neither prevents coronary heart disease (CHD) nor yields a favorable balance of benefits and risks in such women as a whole. However, a nuanced look at the data from this trial, considered alongside other evidence, suggests that timing of HT initiation affects the relation between such therapy and coronary risk, as well as its overall benefit-risk balance. Estrogen may have a beneficial effect on the heart if started in early menopause, when a woman's arteries are likely to be relatively healthy, but a harmful effect if started in late menopause, when those arteries are more likely to show signs of atherosclerotic disease. However, even if HT-associated relative risks are constant across age or time since menopause onset, the low absolute risk of CHD in younger or recently menopausal women translates into low attributable risks in this group. Thus, HT initiation for relief of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in early menopausal patients who have a favorable coronary profile remains a viable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shari S Bassuk
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Merz CNB, Buring JE, Manson JE. Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives. Circ Res 2016; 118:1273-93. [PMID: 27081110 PMCID: PMC4834856 DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.116.307547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 661] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of death among women in the United States, accounting for ≈1 of every 3 female deaths. Sex-specific data focused on cardiovascular disease have been increasing steadily, yet is not routinely collected nor translated into practice. This comprehensive review focuses on novel and unique aspects of cardiovascular health in women and sex differences as they relate to clinical practice in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. This review also provides current approaches to the evaluation and treatment of acute coronary syndromes that are more prevalent in women, including myocardial infarction associated with nonobstructive coronary arteries, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and stress-induced cardiomyopathy (Takotsubo Syndrome). Other cardiovascular disease entities with higher prevalence or unique considerations in women, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, peripheral arterial disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysms, are also briefly reviewed. Finally, recommendations for cardiac rehabilitation are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Garcia
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.G., S.L.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (C.N.B.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.)
| | - Sharon L Mulvagh
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.G., S.L.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (C.N.B.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.)
| | - C Noel Bairey Merz
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.G., S.L.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (C.N.B.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.)
| | - Julie E Buring
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.G., S.L.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (C.N.B.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.)
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- From the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.G., S.L.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (C.N.B.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (J.E.B., J.E.M.).
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rogerio Lobo
- Department of Obstetrics &Gynecology, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|