Anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies associated with antibody mediated rejection in donor HLA antibody negative patients. Transplantation. 2010;90:1473-1477. [PMID: 21030904 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181fd97f1]

Isolated De Novo Antiendothelial Cell Antibodies and Kidney Transplant Rejection

BACKGROUND

Studies analyzing the role of antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in large series of kidney transplant recipients are scarce, and HLA, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-related chain A (MICA), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor have not been formally excluded as targets.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

324 kidney transplant recipients who were negative for anti-HLA, anti-MICA, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies were tested for AECAs in pre- and posttransplantation serum samples.

PREDICTORS

AECA-positive (preformed [pre⁺/post⁺] vs de novo [pre^-/post⁺]) versus AECA-negative (pre^-/post^-) before or after transplantation.

OUTCOMES

Patient mortality, transplant loss, and acute rejection events.

RESULTS

66 (20%) patients were AECA positive (39 [12%] preformed, 27 [8%] de novo) and 258 (80%) were AECA negative. During a follow-up of 10 years, 7 (18%) AECA pre⁺/post⁺ patients had rejections compared with 14 (52%) AECA pre^-/post⁺ and 57 (22%) AECA pre^-/post^- recipients (OR, 3.80; P=0.001). AECA pre^-/post⁺ status emerged as an independent risk factor for transplant rejection compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- group (OR, 5.17; P<0.001). However, AECA pre⁺/post⁺ and AECA pre^-/post⁺ patients did not show higher risk for either patient death (ORs of 1.49 [P=0.7] and 1.06 [P=0.9], respectively) or transplant loss (ORs of 1.22 and 0.86, respectively; P for both = 0.8) compared to the AECA pre^-/post^- population.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study. Posttransplantation sera were collected before or after rejection, entailing a nearly cross-sectional relationship between the exposure and outcome. Lack of identification of precise antigens for AECAs.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo AECAs may be associated with rejection. These antibodies might serve as biomarkers of endothelium damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Advances in Pretransplant Donor-Specific Antibody Testing in Solid Organ Transplantation: From Bench to Bedside

Immunological risk stratification has a central role in determining both the feasibility of solid organ transplantation and the type (and amount) of induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Currently there is poor consensus on how to exactly estimate the global immunological risk, and most transplant centers adopt complicated internal guidelines for risk stratification. Here we systematically review published evidences that should drive appropriateness in risk stratification, focusing on donor-specific antibodies against HLA and other antigens.

The importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

The development of post-transplantation antibodies against non-HLA autoantigens is associated with rejection and decreased long-term graft survival. Although our knowledge of non-HLA antibodies is incomplete, compelling experimental and clinical findings demonstrate that antibodies directed against autoantigens such as angiotensin type 1 receptor, perlecan and collagen, contribute to the process of antibody-mediated acute and chronic rejection. The mechanisms that underlie the production of autoantibodies in the setting of organ transplantation is an important area of ongoing investigation. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury, surgical trauma and/or alloimmune responses can result in the release of organ-derived autoantigens (such as soluble antigens, extracellular vesicles or apoptotic bodies) that are presented to B cells in the context of the transplant recipient's antigen presenting cells and stimulate autoantibody production. Type 17 T helper cells orchestrate autoantibody production by supporting the proliferation and maturation of autoreactive B cells within ectopic tertiary lymphoid tissue. Conversely, autoantibody-mediated graft damage can trigger alloimmunity and the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies that can act in synergy to promote allograft rejection. Identification of the immunologic phenotypes of transplant recipients at risk of non-HLA antibody-mediated rejection, and the development of targeted therapies to treat such rejection, are sorely needed to improve both graft and patient survival.

Pathogenesis of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: Where do we stand?

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcome. Pathogenic alloantibodies are usually directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Histological findings suggestive of ABMR usually demonstrate an anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA)-mediated injury, while a small subset of patients develop acute dysfunction with histological lesions suggestive of ABMR in the absence of anti-HLA DSAs. Although this non-HLA ABMR is not well recognized by current diagnostic classifications, it is associated with graft dysfunction and allograft loss. These clinical descriptions suggest a pathogenic role for non-HLA anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Diverse antigenic targets have been described during the last decade. This review discusses recent findings in the field and addresses the clinical relevance of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs).

Pretransplant angiotensin II type 1-receptor antibodies are a risk factor for earlier detection of de novo HLA donor-specific antibodies

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1Rabs) have been associated with significantly reduced graft survival. Earlier graft loss has been observed in patients who had pretransplant AT1Rabs and posttransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA).

METHODS

The main goal of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between AT1Rabs and the time period to detection of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DSA) posttransplantation in living donor kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The analysis included 141 KTRs. Pretransplant frozen serum samples were tested for AT1Rabs by ELISA and HLA-DSA by SAB (Luminex) at both the pre- and post-KT time points.

RESULTS

The median AT1Rab level was 9.13 U (interquartile range 5.22-14.33). After a mean follow-up period of 3.55 years, 48 patients were found to harbour de novo HLA-DSAs. The presence of AT1Rabs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.01, P = 0.010], male-to-male transplantation (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.42-4.67, P = 0.002) and antecedent borderline changes or acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.29-4.75, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with de novo DSA detection. A dose-dependent association between AT1Rab levels (<10 U, 10.1-16.9 U, 17-29.9 U and >30 U) and de novo DSA detection was observed (log-rank P = 0.0031). After multivariate analysis of AT1Rab levels (continuous variable), AT1Rabs >30 U, male-to-male transplantation, donor age, higher class I percentage of Panel Reactive Antibody and antecedent borderline changes or ACR remained as independent significant risk factors for the detection of de novo DSAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that higher levels of pretransplant circulating antibodies against AT1R (>30 U) in kidney graft recipients constitute an independent risk factor for earlier de novo HLA-DSA detection during the posttransplant period.

Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets bridging allo- and autoimmunity

Detrimental actions of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) directed against both major histocompatibility antigens (human leukocyte antigen [HLA]) and specific non-HLA antigens expressed on the allograft endothelium are a flourishing research area in kidney transplantation. Newly developed solid-phase assays enabling detection of functional non-HLA antibodies targeting G protein-coupled receptors such as angiotensin type I receptor and endothelin type A receptor were instrumental in providing long-awaited confirmation of their broad clinical relevance. Numerous recent clinical studies implicate angiotensin type I receptor and endothelin type A receptor antibodies as prognostic biomarkers for earlier occurrence and severity of acute and chronic immunologic complications in solid organ transplantation, stem cell transplantation, and systemic autoimmune vascular disease. Angiotensin type 1 receptor and endothelin type A receptor antibodies exert their pathophysiologic effects alone and in synergy with HLA-DSA. Recently identified antiperlecan antibodies are also implicated in accelerated allograft vascular pathology. In parallel, protein array technology platforms enabled recognition of new endothelial surface antigens implicated in endothelial cell activation. Upon target antigen recognition, non-HLA antibodies act as powerful inducers of phenotypic perturbations in endothelial cells via activation of distinct intracellular cell-signaling cascades. Comprehensive diagnostic assessment strategies focusing on both HLA-DSA and non-HLA antibody responses could substantially improve immunologic risk stratification before transplantation, help to better define subphenotypes of antibody-mediated rejection, and lead to timely initiation of targeted therapies. Better understanding of similarities and dissimilarities in HLA-DSA and distinct non-HLA antibody-related mechanisms of endothelial damage should facilitate discovery of common downstream signaling targets and pave the way for the development of endothelium-centered therapeutic strategies to accompany intensified immunosuppression and/or mechanical removal of antibodies.

C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection with high anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies in absence of donor-specific antibodies

AIMS

Acute antibody-mediated rejection can occur in absence of circulating donor-specific antibodies. Agonistic antibodies targeting the anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1 R) are emerging as important non-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. Elevated levels of anti-angiotensin II receptor antibodies were first observed in kidney transplant recipients with malignant hypertension and allograft rejection. They have now been studied in three separate kidney transplant populations and associate to frequency of rejection, severity of rejection and graft failure.

METHODS

We report 11 cases of biopsy-proven, Complement 4 fragment d (C4d)-negative, acute rejection occurring without circulating donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. In eight cases, anti-angiotensin receptor antibodies were retrospectively examined. The remaining three subjects were identified from our centre's newly instituted routine anti-angiotensin receptor antibody screening.

RESULTS

All subjects fulfilled Banff 2013 criteria for antibody-mediated rejection and all responded to anti-rejection therapy, which included plasma exchange and angiotensin receptor blocker therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases support the routine assessment of anti-AT1 R antibodies in kidney transplant recipients to identify subjects at risk. Further studies will need to determine optimal assessment protocol and the effectiveness of pre-emptive treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers.

Probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies

We report a case of probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies. A 44 year-old male was admitted to our hospital for a kidney transplant. The donor, his wife, was an ABO minor mismatch (blood type O to A) and had Gitelman syndrome. Graft function was delayed; his serum creatinine level was 10.1 mg/dL at 3 days after transplantation. Open biopsy was performed immediately; no venous thrombosis was observed during surgery. Histology revealed moderate peritubular capillaritis and mild glomerulitis without C4d immunoreactivity. Flow cytometric crossmatching was positive, but no panel-reactive antibodies against HLA or donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) were detected. Taken together, we diagnosed him with probable C4d-negative accelerated antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA, non-MICA antibodies, the patient was treated with steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 3 days), plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin (40 g/body), and rituximab (200 mg/body) were performed. Biopsy at 58 days after transplantation, at which time S-Cr levels were 1.56 mg/dL, found no evidence of rejection. This case, presented with a review of relevant literature, demonstrates that probable C4d-negative accelerated acute AMR can result from non-HLA antibodies.

Immune mechanisms of acute and chronic rejection

With the currently available immunosuppression, severe T-cell mediated rejection has become a rare event. With the introduction of modern antibody-detection techniques, such as the L-SAB technology, acute or hyperacute antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney are also seen infrequently. In contrast, chronic antibody-mediated rejection is considered to be a major contributor to graft loss in the late posttransplant phase. Problems in the management of chronic antibody-mediated rejection are effective prevention of the development of alloantibodies against donor HLA and the early identification of patients at risk for this entity. Finally, today there is still noeffective strategy to treat this indolent and slowly progressing form of antibody-mediated rejection. Herein, we review the pathomechanisms of the different forms of rejection and the clinical significance of these entities in human kidney transplantation.

Clinical relevance of circulating antibodies and B lymphocyte markers in allograft rejection

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody precipitating acute vascular rejection in kidney transplantation

Atypical non HLA antibodies are increasingly recognised as causes of immunological injury in allotransplantation. In this report we describe a non HLA sensitized male renal allograft recipient who developed acute vascular rejection on a "for cause" biopsy (Banff v2, g2, ptc 3) at day 4 post first renal allograft in the presence of elevated angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab level 14.1). The acute rejection was treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG × 6), plasma exchange (1.5 plasma volume replacement x6) and oral candesartan. Serum creatinine improved and follow up biopsy confirmed resolution of rejection following treatment. AT1R-Ab should be considered when rejection is diagnosed in the absence of HLA antibodies.

Elevated Transglutaminase Activity Triggers Angiotensin Receptor Activating Autoantibody Production and Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia (PE) is a life-threatening hypertensive disorder of pregnancy associated with autoantibodies, termed AT1-AA, that activate the AT1 angiotensin receptor. Although the pathogenic nature of these autoantibodies has been extensively studied, little is known about the molecular cause of their generation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we show that tissue transglutaminase (TG2), an enzyme that conducts posttranslational modification of target proteins, directly modified the 7-amino acid (7-aa) epitope peptide that localizes to the second extracellular loop of the AT1 receptor. These findings led us to further discover that plasma transglutaminase activity was induced and contributed to the production of AT1-AA and disease development in an experimental model of PE induced by injection of LIGHT, a tumor necrosis factor superfamily member. Key features of PE were regenerated by adoptive transfer of purified IgG from LIGHT-injected pregnant mice and blocked by the 7-amino acid epitope peptide. Translating our mouse research to humans, we found that plasma transglutaminase activity was significantly elevated in PE patients and was positively correlated with AT1-AA levels and PE features.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we provide compelling mouse and human evidence that elevated transglutaminase underlies AT1-AA production in PE and highlight novel pathogenic biomarkers and innovative therapeutic possibilities for the disease.

The impact of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on post-heart transplantation outcome in Heart Mate II bridged recipients

OBJECTIVES

Antibodies targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) have been associated with malignant hypertension, autoimmune diseases and acute rejection and graft loss in solid organ transplantation. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of anti-AT1R antibodies on survival and incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and pathology antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR) in a population of heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with a durable mechanical assist device Heart Mate II.

METHODS

Sera of 69 consecutive heart transplant recipients transplanted between October 2008 and August 2014 were tested for the presence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies before Heart Mate II device implantation and at the time of transplantation. Overall survival and post-transplant rejection-free survival were compared between antibody-negative and antibody-positive recipients using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Anti-AT1R antibodies were present in 8 patients (11.6%) before Heart Mate II implantation. During the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridging, 44 patients (63.8%) who were initially anti-AT1R antibody-negative became positive, leaving 17 (24.6%) anti-AT1R antibody-negative patients at the time of transplantation for all comparisons. One- and 5-year survival was 88 ± 8 and 76 ± 10% for anti-AT1R antibody-negative and 87 ± 5 and 81 ± 7% for anti-AT1R antibody-positive patients, respectively (P = 0.582). Freedom from ACR at 1 year was 68 ± 12% for anti-AT1R-negative and 75 ± 6% for anti-AT1R-positive recipients (P = 0.218). None of the anti-AT1R-negative patients developed AMR 1 year post-transplantation, whereas freedom from pAMR in anti-AT1R-positive recipients was 98 ± 2% (P = 0.198).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed no difference in the overall post-heart transplant survival and freedom from acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection between anti-AT1R-negative and anti-AT1R-positive recipients. Further research is needed to assess the role of anti-AT1R antibodies in the risk stratification of LVAD-bridged recipients on the post-heart transplantation outcomes.

Anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies associated with antibody-mediated rejection in patients without preformed HLA-donor-specific antibody

INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin II is a peptide hormone involved in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Anti-angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1R) antibodies are implicated in stimulating RAS and are suspected to have some adverse impacts on renal transplantation outcome.

METHODS

From November 2009 to February 2012, 37 remaining sera from renal transplantation recipients with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (n = 6), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (n = 23), and AMR + ACR (n = 8) without preformed human leukocyte antigeon (HLA) antibodies were tested with anti-AT1R antibody assay. Forty-two control patients without rejection also were analyzed.

RESULTS

The frequency of elevated anti-AT1R antibodies was higher in patients with AMR (n = 14) compared to controls (28.6% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 8.0). It was also higher in patients with AMR + ACR (n=8) (37.5% vs 4.9%, P = .03, OR = 12.0). There was no difference in frequencies of elevated anti-AT1R antibody in patients with ACR.

CONCLUSION

Anti-AT1R antibodies were suspected to be associated with occurrence of AMR without preformed HLA antibodies in renal transplantation. Further studies in a larger number of patients are needed.

Accelerated rejection, thrombosis, and graft failure with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been implicated in renal transplant rejection and failure; however, the mechanism of allograft damage, patterns of clinical presentation, and response to desensitization of AT1R-Abs have not been clearly established.

CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We present the case of a 7-year-old boy with preformed AT1R-Abs who developed accelerated vascular and cellular rejection and renal allograft thrombosis despite desensitization and treatment with angiotensin receptor blockade. Although an association between AT1R-Abs and microvascular occlusion has been previously described, we are the first to describe an association between AT1R-Abs and renal artery thrombosis, leading to devastating early allograft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the risk of allograft thrombosis associated with AT1R-Abs and illustrates that previous treatments utilized for AT1R-Abs may not always be effective. Further studies are needed to better characterize the mechanisms of AT1R-Ab pathogenesis and to establish safe levels of AT1R-Abs both pre- and post-transplantation. Given the outcome of this patient and the evidence of pro-coagulatory effects of AT1R-Abs, we suggest that the presence of AT1R-Ab may be a risk factor for thrombosis. The role of treatment with anti-coagulation and novel immunomodulatory agents such as tocilizumab and bortezomib require further investigation.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Presence of MICA-DSA and Successful Renal Re-Transplant with Negative-MICA Virtual Crossmatch

The presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs) against the MICA antigen results in high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of a transplanted kidney, especially in patients receiving a re-transplant. We describe the incidence of acute C4d+ AMR in a patient who had received a first kidney transplant with a zero HLA antigen mismatch. Retrospective analysis of post-transplant T and B cell crossmatches were negative, but a high level of MICA alloantibody was detected in sera collected both before and after transplant. The DSA against the first allograft mismatched MICA*018 was in the recipient. Flow cytometry and cytotoxicity tests with five samples of freshly isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells demonstrated the alloantibody nature of patient’s MICA-DSA. Prior to the second transplant, a MICA virtual crossmatch and T and B cell crossmatches were used to identify a suitable donor. The patient received a second kidney transplant, and allograft was functioning well at one-year follow-up. Our study indicates that MICA virtual crossmatch is important in selection of a kidney donor if the recipient has been sensitized with MICA antigens.

Humoral Immune Response and Allograft Function in Kidney Transplantation

HLA antibodies can damage a kidney transplant. In January 2013, consensus guidelines from The Transplantation Society were published regarding technical aspects of HLA antibody determination, as well as their potential significance in the pre- and posttransplantation periods. During the past 2 years, new studies have been reported, but controversies remain. In this article, these new data related to HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation are reviewed and compared to relevant prior research. Pretransplantation sensitization issues are discussed, including the new more sensitive assays (flow cytometry and solid-phase immunoassays such as Luminex single-antigen bead assays). A positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch remains an absolute contraindication to transplantation, although a positive flow cytometry crossmatch is only a relative contraindication. Positivity only by solid-phase assays increases the risk for acute rejection and transplant loss, but acceptable cutoffs are not defined. The sensitizing effect of red blood cell transfusions is substantiated. Following allograft failure, continued immunosuppression decreases the risk of sensitization, whereas overall, the effect of nephrectomy remains uncertain. Regarding the posttransplantation period, new data are available concerning the timing and significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whereas some centers report DSA appearance after years, others detect DSA within months. The prominence of class II DSA, especially DQ, in the posttransplantation period is noted. The relevance of non-HLA antibodies is discussed, including anti-endothelial cell antibodies, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A antibodies, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies.

Investigation of Serum Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies at the Time of Renal Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is responsible for cardiovascular effects mediated by angiotensin II. This study aimed to investigate the impact of antibodies directed against AT1R (anti-AT1R) in renal allograft rejection.

METHODS

We evaluated 53 patients who had biopsy-proven rejection including antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (N=22), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (N=29), and mixed AMR and TCMR (N=2). Donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and anti-AT1Rs were simultaneously determined.

RESULTS

Anti-AT1Rs were detected in 9.4% (5/53) of rejection patients (one with acute AMR, two with chronic active AMR, one with acute TCMR, and one with mixed acute AMR & TCMR). HLA antibodies and DSA were detected in 75.5% (40/53) and 49.1% (26/53) of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in transplant characteristics between anti-AT1R(+) and anti-AT1R(-) patients except for the association of HLA class-I DSA(+) and anti-AT1R(+). Four of five anti-AT1R(+) patients had DSA and were also found to have AMR. A single anti-AT1R(+)/DSA(-) patient developed acute TCMR. Detection rates of DSA, HLA antibodies, or anti-AT1R were not different between AMR and TCMR. However, DSA(+)/anti-AT1R(+) was more frequently found in AMR than in TCMR (P=0.036). Patients with anti-AT1R showed a greater tendency to develop high-grade rejection as Banff IIA/IIB or AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anti-AT1R was significantly associated with HLA class-I DSA in renal allograft rejection patients. Both anti-AT1R and DSA positivity was associated with AMR in patients with renal allograft rejection.

Better understanding of transplant glomerulopathy secondary to chronic antibody-mediated rejection

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is generally accepted to result from repeated episodes of endothelial activation, injury and repair, leading to pathological abnormalities of double contouring or multi-layering of the glomerular basement membrane. TG is a major sequel of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR), from pre-existing or de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Hepatitis C infection, thrombotic microangiopathy or other factors may also contribute to TG development. TG prevalence is 5-20% in most series, reaching 55%, in some high-risk cohorts, and is associated with worse allograft outcomes. Despite its prevalence and clinical significance, few well-studied treatment options have been proposed. Similar to desensitization protocols, plasmapheresis with or without immunoabsorption, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, bortezomib and eculizumab have been proposed in the treatment of TG due to cABMR individually or in various combinations. Robust clinical trials are urgently needed to address this major cause of allograft loss. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the epidemiology, etiology, pathology, and the preventive and treatment options for TG secondary to cABMR.

Circulating donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and complement C4d deposition are associated with the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) continues to be a limiting factor in long-term survival of heart transplant recipients (HTRs). Pathophysiologic and immunologic factors affecting CAV are complex, and criteria for early diagnosis remain elusive.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the relationship between donor-specific antibody (DSA), C4d immunofluorescence, and the development of CAV.

RESULTS

We evaluated 330 endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens from 112 cardiac grafts. Twenty-four (21%) of 112 grafts developed CAV, and 18 (75%) of 24 were positive for C4d. Patients with DSA (n = 51) against human leukocyte antigen class I (n = 5), II (n = 26), or both (n = 20) developed CAV at a rate of 40%, 38%, and 20% and a mean time to CAV of 89, 47, and 25 months, respectively. Of 61 grafts without DSA, only 13% developed CAV, with a mean time to CAV of 116 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the general HTR population, patients with graft dysfunction and DSA or positive C4d on EMB show a statistically significant increased incidence of CAV and allograft failure, suggesting an antibody-mediated injury. The presence of pre- and posttransplant DSA, even in the absence of positive C4d immunofluorescence, may identify a group of HTRs at increased risk of developing CAV.

Vascular endothelium as a target of immune response in renal transplant rejection

This review of clinical and experimental studies aims at analyzing the interplay between graft endothelium and host immune system in renal transplantation, and how it affects the survival of the graft. Graft endothelium is indeed the first barrier between self and non-self that is encountered by host lymphocytes upon reperfusion of vascularized solid transplants. Endothelial cells (EC) express all the major sets of antigens (Ag) that elicit host immune response, and therefore represent a preferential target in organ rejection. Some of the Ag expressed by EC are target of the antibody-mediated response, such as the AB0 blood group system, the human leukocyte antigens (HLA), and MHC class I related chain A antigens (MICA) systems, and the endothelial cell-restricted Ag; for each of these systems, the mechanisms of interaction and damage of both preformed and de novo donor-specific antibodies are reviewed along with their impact on renal graft survival. Moreover, the rejection process can force injured EC to expose cryptic self-Ag, toward which an autoimmune response mounts, overlapping to the allo-immune response in the damaging of the graft. Not only are EC a passive target of the host immune response but also an active player in lymphocyte activation; therefore, their interaction with allogenic T-cells is analyzed on the basis of experimental in vitro and in vivo studies, according to the patterns of expression of the HLA class I and II and the co-stimulatory molecules specific for cytotoxic and helper T-cells. Finally, as the response that follows transplantation has proven to be not necessarily destructive, the factors that foster graft endothelium functioning in spite of rejection, and how they could be therapeutically harnessed to promote long-term graft acceptance, are described: accommodation that is resistance of EC to donor-specific antibodies, and endothelial cell ability to induce Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells, that are crucial mediators of tolerance.

Clinical relevance of HLA antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation

In kidney transplantation, antibody-mediated allograft injury caused by donor HLA-specific antibodies (DSA) has recently been identified as one of the major causes of late graft loss. This paper gives a brief overview on the impact of DSA development on graft outcome in organ transplantation with a focus on risk factors for de novo alloantibody induction and recently published guidelines for monitoring of DSA during the posttransplant phase.

Impact of donor-specific antibodies on the outcomes of kidney graft: Pathophysiology, clinical, therapy

Allo-antibodies, particularly when donor specific, are one of the most important factors that cause both early and late graft dysfunction. The authors review the current state of the art concerning this important issue in renal transplantation. Many antibodies have been recognized as mediators of renal injury. In particular donor-specific-Human Leukocyte Antigens antibodies appear to play a major role. New techniques, such as solid phase techniques and Luminex, have revealed these antibodies from patient sera. Other new techniques have uncovered alloantibodies and signs of complement activation in renal biopsy specimens. It has been acknowledged that the old concept of chronic renal injury caused by calcineurine inhibitors toxicity should be replaced in many cases by alloantibodies acting against the graft. In addition, the number of patients on waiting lists with preformed anti-human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibodies is increasing, primarily from patients with a history of renal transplant failure already been sensitized. We should distinguish early and late acute antibody-mediated rejection from chronic antibody-mediated rejection. The latter often manifets late during the course of the post-transplant period and may be difficult to recognize if specific techniques are not applied. Different therapeutic strategies are used to control antibody-induced damage. These strategies may be applied prior to transplantation or, in the case of acute antibody-mediated rejection, after transplantation. Many new drugs are appearing at the horizon; however, these drugs are far from the clinic because they are in phase I-II of clinical trials. Thus the pipeline for the near future appears almost empty.

Increased negative impact of donor HLA-specific together with non-HLA-specific antibodies on graft outcome

BACKGROUND

De novo donor HLA-specific (dnDSA) and non-HLA antibodies including antiangiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-abs) have been associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and decreased graft survival as well as cellular-mediated rejection (CMR) and early onset of microvasculopathy in heart transplantation. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of anti-AT1R-ab and anti-donor HLA-specific antibody (DSA) on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Pretransplant and posttransplant sera from 200 recipients transplanted between May 2007 and August 2011 were tested for DSA (Luminex-based single antigen bead assay) and AT1R-ab (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Two cutoff levels (≥ 17 and ≥ 12 units) were used to define high and intermediate binding of AT1R-ab. Clinical parameters examined were 5-year AMR/CMR (≥ grade 2), coronary artery vasculopathy, and survival.

RESULTS

At 2 years after transplant, freedom from AMR and/or CMR was 95.4% for those with no DSA (n=175), 66.9% for those with dnDSA (n=19), and 25% for those with DSA at transplant (n=6) (P<0.0001). Neither ≥ 17 nor ≥ 12 units of pretransplant levels indicated a significant difference in freedom from AMR and/or CMR. When both dnDSA and AT1R-ab ≥ 17 or ≥ 12 units were considered, freedom from AMR and/or CMR decreased to 50% and 45% (P<0.0001), respectively. Coronary artery vasculopathy and survival were not significantly impacted.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show the increased negative impact of dnDSA and AT1R-ab on freedom from AMR and/or CMR and an increased hazard ratio when both parameters are considered. Both HLA- and non-HLA-specific antibodies seem to impact graft outcome in heart transplantation.

Human pregnancy and generation of anti-angiotensin receptor and anti-perlecan antibodies

Non-HLA antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R) and the C-terminal fragment of perlecan (i.e., LG3) are associated with the development of renal allograft rejection. It is currently unknown how humans develop anti-AT1 R or anti-LG3 antibodies. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pregnancy-as a model of sensitization to polymorphic proteins-induces anti-AT1 R and/or anti-LG3 antibodies. We included 104 samples from women obtained after physiologic full-term pregnancy and 80 samples from healthy nonsensitized controls (40 women and 40 men). Both anti-AT1 R and anti-LG3 antibody levels were lower in pregnancy samples than in controls (both P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, male gender was an independent predictor for high anti-AT1 R antibody levels (OR 3.66, P = 0.04) and pregnancy was predictive for low anti-LG3 antibody levels (OR 6.53, P = 0.0001). There was no correlation of anti-AT1 R with anti-LG3 antibody levels, either in the pregnancy or in the control samples (r(2) ≤ 0.03, P ≥ 0.26). In conclusion, physiologic full-term pregnancy does not induce anti-AT1 R or anti-LG3 antibodies and may even lower their levels. Therefore, anti-AT1 R and anti-LG3 antibodies are likely not caused by allosensitization. The lack of correlation of anti-AT1 R with anti-LG3 antibodies suggests different mechanisms of generation, which remain to be elucidated.

Molecular imaging of urogenital diseases

There is an expanding and exciting repertoire of PET imaging radiotracers for urogenital diseases, particularly in prostate cancer, renal cell cancer, and renal function. Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. With growing therapeutic options for the treatment of metastatic and advanced prostate cancer, improved functional imaging of prostate cancer beyond the limitations of conventional CT and bone scan is becoming increasingly important for both clinical management and drug development. PET radiotracers, apart from ¹⁸F-FDG, for prostate cancer are ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride, ¹¹C-choline, and ¹⁸F-fluorocholine, and (¹¹C-acetate. Other emerging and promising PET radiotracers include a synthetic l-leucine amino acid analogue (anti-¹⁸F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid), dihydrotestosterone analogue (¹⁸F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone), and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based PET radiotracers (eg, N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-¹⁸F-fluorobenzyl-l-cysteine, ⁸⁹Zr-DFO-J591, and ⁶⁸Ga [HBED-CC]). Larger prospective and comparison trials of these PET radiotracers are needed to establish the role of PET/CT in prostate cancer. Although renal cell cancer imaging with FDG-PET/CT is available, it can be limited, especially for detection of the primary tumor. Improved renal cell cancer detection with carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)-based antibody (¹²⁴I-girentuximab) and radioimmunotherapy targeting with ¹⁷⁷Lu-cG250 appear promising. Evaluation of renal injury by imaging renal perfusion and function with novel PET radiotracers include p-¹⁸F-fluorohippurate, hippurate m-cyano-p-¹⁸F-fluorohippurate, and rubidium-82 chloride (typically used for myocardial perfusion imaging). Renal receptor imaging of the renal renin-angiotensin system with a variety of selective PET radioligands is also becoming available for clinical translation.

The detection of antibodies to the Angiotensin II-type 1 receptor in transplantation

The detection of auto-antibodies detection is a major aspect of patient's immunomonitoring. Antibodies directed against the heart and kidney Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) play a major role in antibody mediated rejection after heart and kidney transplantation and in obliterative vasculopathy of autoimmune diseases. Here, a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the reliable tool for the detection of auto-antibodies targeting AT1R.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of pediatric renal diseases in 2013

Therapeutic plasma exchange is an extracorporeal treatment modality that removes systemic circulating pathologic factors or replaces absent plasma components and plays a role in many nephrologic conditions. It presents a number of technical challenges in the pediatric population but has become an increasingly common practice in pediatric nephrology over the past several decades. While prospective evidence is often lacking, our increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis underlying many pediatric renal diseases provides sound reasoning for the use of plasma exchange in treating these conditions. This review will present the currently accepted indications for plasma exchange in children, the technical aspects of the procedure and its potential complications.

Pretransplant sensitization against angiotensin II type 1 receptor is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is an emerging target of functional non-HLA antibodies (Ab). We examined the potential of determining the degree of presensitization against AT1R as a risk factor for graft survival and acute rejection (AR). The study included 599 kidney recipients between 1998 and 2007. Serum samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion for anti-AT1R antibodies (AT1R-Abs) using a quantitative solid-phase assay. A threshold of AT1R-Ab levels was statistically determined at 10 U based on the time to graft failure. An extended Cox model determined risk factors for occurrence of graft failure and a first AR episode. AT1R-Abs >10 U were detected in 283 patients (47.2%) before transplantation. Patients who had a level of AT1R-Abs >10 U had a 2.6-fold higher risk of graft failure from 3 years posttransplantation onwards (p = 0.0005) and a 1.9-fold higher risk of experiencing an AR episode within the first 4 months of transplantation (p = 0.0393). Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) accounted for 1/3 of AR, whereby 71.4% of them were associated with >10 U of pretransplant AT1R-Abs. Pretransplant anti-AT1R-Abs are an independent risk factor for long-term graft loss in association with a higher risk of early AR episodes.

Higher risk of kidney graft failure in the presence of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies

Reports have associated non-HLA antibodies, specifically those against angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT1R), with antibody-mediated kidney graft rejection. However, association of anti-AT1R with graft failure had not been demonstrated. We tested anti-AT1R and donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in pre- and posttransplant sera from 351 consecutive kidney recipients: 134 with biopsy-proven rejection and/or lesions (abnormal biopsy group [ABG]) and 217 control group (CG) patients. The ABG's rate of anti-AT1R was significantly higher than the CG's (18% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Moreover, 79% of ABG patients with anti-AT1R lost their grafts (vs. 0%, CG), anti-AT1R levels in 58% of those failed grafts increasing posttransplant. With anti-AT1R detectable before DSA, time to graft failure was 31 months-but 63 months with DSA detectable before anti-AT1R. Patients with both anti-AT1R and DSA had lower graft survival than those with DSA alone (log-rank p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that de novo anti-AT1R was an independent predictor of graft failure in the ABG, alone (HR: 6.6), and in the entire population (HR: 5.4). In conclusion, this study found significant association of anti-AT1R with graft failure. Further study is needed to establish causality between anti-AT1R and graft failure and, thus, the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting.

Non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: recent concepts and clinical relevance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Humoral responses beyond major histocompatibility antigens continue to receive the attention of the transplantation community. We report on clinical studies testing clinical relevance of non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens in solid organ transplantation and provide an update on novel experimental findings. A conceptual framework on the role of graft microenvironment during initiation of non-HLA-related humoral immunity is addressed as well.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical relevance of antibodies targeting angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R-Abs) is broadly confirmed in renal and cardiac transplantation, where in addition antibodies against endothelin type A receptor (ETAR-Abs) were found. Obliterative lesions in lung allografts occur more commonly in the presence of antibodies directed against K-α 1 tubulin and collagen-V. Anti-perlecan antibodies are newly identified as accelerators of obliterative vascular lesions. Changes in the intragraft microenvironment, ischemia and alloimmunity seem to represent important permissive factors for non-HLA antibody responses.

SUMMARY

Confirmed clinical relevance of non-HLA humoral responses in solid organ transplantation emphasizes the need for revision of classical diagnostic approaches based solely on detection of HLA-donor-specific antibodies (DSA). A better understanding of intersections of HLA- and non-HLA-related mechanisms and identification of common effector mechanisms would represent an important step towards targeted therapies.

Assessing immunologic risk factors in transplantation

The innate and adaptive immune systems, together, represent the largest impediment to good and long-lasting graft function. Although improved immunosuppressive agents and expanded and enhanced diagnostic tools have led to better prevention and treatment of acute rejection, chronic rejection remains a serious threat to long-term graft survival. Immunologic heterogeneity among patients, variability in treatment protocols and unforeseen events following transplantation translate into different levels of risk among patients. While one cannot predict with certainty the short- and long-term outcomes of a particular transplant, it is possible to identify immunologic risk factors that can affect outcome.

Endothelial injury in renal antibody-mediated allograft rejection: a schematic view based on pathogenesis

Circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA) cause profound changes in endothelial cells (EC) of the allograft microvasculature. EC injury ranges from rapid cellular necrosis to adaptive changes allowing for EC survival, but with modifications of morphology and function resulting in obliteration of the microvasculature.Lytic EC injury: Lethal exposure to DSA/complement predominates in early-acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and presents with EC swelling, cell necrosis, denudation of the underlying matrix and platelet aggregation, thrombotic microangiopathy, and neutrophilic infiltration.Sublytic EC injury: Sublethal exposure to DSA with EC activation predominates in late-chronic AMR. Sublytic injury presents with (a) EC shape and proliferative-reparative alterations: ongoing cycles of cellular injury and repair manifested with EC swelling/loss of fenestrations and expression of growth and mitogenic factors, leading to proliferative changes and matrix remodeling (transplant glomerulopathy and capillaropathy); (b) EC procoagulant changes: EC activation and disruption of the endothelium integrity is associated with production of procoagulant factors, platelet aggregation, and facilitation of thrombotic events manifested with acute and chronic thrombotic microangiopathy; and (c) EC proinflammatory changes: increased EC expression of adhesion molecules including monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and complement and platelet-derived mediators attract inflammatory cells, predominantly macrophages manifested as glomerulitis and capillaritis.Throughout the course of AMR, lytic and sublytic EC injury coexist, providing the basis for the overwhelming morphologic and clinical heterogeneity of AMR. This can be satisfactorily explained by correlating the ultrastructural EC changes and pathophysiology.The vast array of EC responses provides great opportunities for intervention but also represents a colossal challenge for the development of universally successful therapies.

Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor-activating antibodies in solid organ transplantation

Angiotensin type I receptor (AT1R) mediates physiologic and pathophysiologic actions of its ligand, angiotensin II. Overactivity of the AT1R and angiotensin II interaction results in hypertension and vascular remodeling. Antibodies to AT1R have been implicated in several vascular pathologies. In renal transplantation, elevated levels of anti-AT1R antibodies have been associated with antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in the absence of donor HLA specific antibodies. In heart transplantation, increased levels of anti-AT1R antibodies have been associated with cellular and AMR as well as an early onset of microvasculopathy. This review summarizes the current investigations regarding the impact of anti-AT1R antibodies in solid organ transplantation and provides insight into the humoral response in the presence of non-HLA and HLA specific antibodies.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the Achilles' heel of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), most commonly manifest as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), continues to be highly prevalent and is the major limitation to long-term survival. The pathogenesis of BOS is complex and involves alloimmune and nonalloimmune pathways. Clinically, BOS manifests as airway obstruction and dyspnea that are classically progressive and ultimately fatal; however, the course is highly variable, and distinguishable phenotypes may exist. There are few controlled studies assessing treatment efficacy, but only a minority of patients respond to current treatment modalities. Ultimately, preventive strategies may prove more effective at prolonging survival after lung transplantation, but their remains considerable debate and little data regarding the best strategies to prevent BOS. A better understanding of the risk factors and their relationship to the pathological mechanisms of chronic lung allograft rejection should lead to better pharmacological targets to prevent or treat this syndrome.

Chronic rejection: a significant role for Th17-mediated autoimmune responses to self-antigens

Despite progress in the field of organ transplantation for improvement in graft survival and function, long-term graft function is still limited by the development of chronic allograft rejection. Various immune-mediated and nonimmune-mediated processes have been postulated in the pathogenesis of chronic rejection. In this review, the authors discuss the important role of alloimmune responses to donor-specific antigens and autoimmune responses to tissue restricted self-antigens in the immunopathogenesis of chronic rejection following solid organ transplantation. In particular, the authors discuss the role of induction of Th17-type autoimmune responses and the crosstalk between autoimmune and alloimmune responses. These self-perpetuate each other leading to activation of profibrotic and proinflammatory cascades that ultimately result in the development of chronic rejection.

Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of solid-phase immunoassay (SPI) technology for the detection and characterization of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in transplantation while providing greater sensitivity than was obtainable by complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) assays has resulted in a new paradigm with respect to the interpretation of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Although the SPI assay performed on the Luminex instrument (hereafter referred to as the Luminex assay), in particular, has permitted the detection of antibodies not detectable by CDC, the clinical significance of these antibodies is incompletely understood. Nevertheless, the detection of these antibodies has led to changes in the clinical management of sensitized patients. In addition, SPI testing raises technical issues that require resolution and careful consideration when interpreting antibody results.

METHODS

With this background, The Transplantation Society convened a group of laboratory and clinical experts in the field of transplantation to prepare a consensus report and make recommendations on the use of this new technology based on both published evidence and expert opinion. Three working groups were formed to address (a) the technical issues with respect to the use of this technology, (b) the interpretation of pretransplantation antibody testing in the context of various clinical settings and organ transplant types (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestinal, and islet cells), and (c) the application of antibody testing in the posttransplantation setting. The three groups were established in November 2011 and convened for a "Consensus Conference on Antibodies in Transplantation" in Rome, Italy, in May 2012. The deliberations of the three groups meeting independently and then together are the bases for this report.

RESULTS

A comprehensive list of recommendations was prepared by each group. A summary of the key recommendations follows. Technical Group: (a) SPI must be used for the detection of pretransplantation HLA antibodies in solid organ transplant recipients and, in particular, the use of the single-antigen bead assay to detect antibodies to HLA loci, such as Cw, DQA, DPA, and DPB, which are not readily detected by other methods. (b) The use of SPI for antibody detection should be supplemented with cell-based assays to examine the correlations between the two types of assays and to establish the likelihood of a positive crossmatch (XM). (c) There must be an awareness of the technical factors that can influence the results and their clinical interpretation when using the Luminex bead technology, such as variation in antigen density and the presence of denatured antigen on the beads. Pretransplantation Group: (a) Risk categories should be established based on the antibody and the XM results obtained. (b) DSA detected by CDC and a positive XM should be avoided due to their strong association with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. (c) A renal transplantation can be performed in the absence of a prospective XM if single-antigen bead screening for antibodies to all class I and II HLA loci is negative. This decision, however, needs to be taken in agreement with local clinical programs and the relevant regulatory bodies. (d) The presence of DSA HLA antibodies should be avoided in heart and lung transplantation and considered a risk factor for liver, intestinal, and islet cell transplantation. Posttransplantation Group: (a) High-risk patients (i.e., desensitized or DSA positive/XM negative) should be monitored by measurement of DSA and protocol biopsies in the first 3 months after transplantation. (b) Intermediate-risk patients (history of DSA but currently negative) should be monitored for DSA within the first month. If DSA is present, a biopsy should be performed. (c) Low-risk patients (nonsensitized first transplantation) should be screened for DSA at least once 3 to 12 months after transplantation. If DSA is detected, a biopsy should be performed. In all three categories, the recommendations for subsequent treatment are based on the biopsy results.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of recommendations is provided covering the technical and pretransplantation and posttransplantation monitoring of HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. The recommendations are intended to provide state-of-the-art guidance in the use and clinical application of recently developed methods for HLA antibody detection when used in conjunction with traditional methods.

Antiperlecan antibodies are novel accelerators of immune-mediated vascular injury

Acute vascular rejection (AVR) is characterized by immune-mediated vascular injury and heightened endothelial cell (EC) apoptosis. We reported previously that apoptotic ECs release a bioactive C-terminal fragment of perlecan referred to as LG3. Here, we tested the possibility that LG3 behaves as a neoantigen, fuelling the production of anti-LG3 antibodies of potential importance in regulating allograft vascular injury. We performed a case-control study in which we compared anti-LG3 IgG titers in kidney transplant recipients with AVR (n=15) versus those with acute tubulo-interstitial rejection (ATIR) (n=15) or stable graft function (n=30). Patients who experienced AVR had elevated anti-LG3 titers pre and posttransplantation compared to subjects with ATIR or stable graft function (p<0.05 for both mediators). Elevated pretransplant anti-LG3 titers (OR: 4.62, 95% CI: 1.08-19.72) and pretransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (OR 4.79, 95% CI: 1.03-22.19) were both independently associated with AVR. To address the functional role of anti-LG3 antibodies in AVR, we turned to passive transfer of anti-LG3 antibodies in an animal model of vascular rejection based on orthotopic aortic transplantation between fully MHC-mismatched mice. Neointima formation, C4d deposition and allograft inflammation were significantly increased in recipients of an ischemic aortic allograft passively transferred with anti-LG3 antibodies. Collectively, these data identify anti-LG3 antibodies as novel accelerators of immune-mediated vascular injury and obliterative remodeling.