101
|
Audit B, Zaghloul L, Baker A, Arneodo A, Chen CL, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Thermes C. Megabase replication domains along the human genome: relation to chromatin structure and genome organisation. Subcell Biochem 2013; 61:57-80. [PMID: 23150246 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4525-4_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
In higher eukaryotes, the absence of specific sequence motifs, marking the origins of replication has been a serious hindrance to the understanding of (i) the mechanisms that regulate the spatio-temporal replication program, and (ii) the links between origins activation, chromatin structure and transcription. In this chapter, we review the partitioning of the human genome into megabased-size replication domains delineated as N-shaped motifs in the strand compositional asymmetry profiles. They collectively span 28.3% of the genome and are bordered by more than 1,000 putative replication origins. We recapitulate the comparison of this partition of the human genome with high-resolution experimental data that confirms that replication domain borders are likely to be preferential replication initiation zones in the germline. In addition, we highlight the specific distribution of experimental and numerical chromatin marks along replication domains. Domain borders correspond to particular open chromatin regions, possibly encoded in the DNA sequence, and around which replication and transcription are highly coordinated. These regions also present a high evolutionary breakpoint density, suggesting that susceptibility to breakage might be linked to local open chromatin fiber state. Altogether, this chapter presents a compartmentalization of the human genome into replication domains that are landmarks of the human genome organization and are likely to play a key role in genome dynamics during evolution and in pathological situations.
Collapse
|
102
|
Di Paola D, Rampakakis E, Chan MK, Zannis-Hadjopoulos M. Differential chromatin structure encompassing replication origins in transformed and normal cells. Genes Cancer 2012; 3:152-76. [PMID: 23050047 DOI: 10.1177/1947601912457026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2012] [Accepted: 07/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the chromatin structure encompassing replication origins in transformed and normal cells. Analysis of the global levels of histone H3 acetylated at K9&14 (open chromatin) and histone H3 trimethylated at K9 (closed chromatin) revealed a higher ratio of open to closed chromatin in the transformed cells. Also, the trithorax and polycomb group proteins, Brg-1 and Bmi-1, respectively, were overexpressed and more abundantly bound to chromatin in the transformed cells. Quantitative comparative analyses of episomal and in situ chromosomal replication origin activity as well as chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays, using specific antibodies targeting members of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) as well as open/closed chromatin markers encompassing both episomal and chromosomal origins, revealed that episomal origins had similar levels of in vivo activity, nascent DNA abundance, pre-RC protein association, and elevated open chromatin structure at the origin in both cell types. In contrast, the chromosomal origins corresponding to 20mer1, 20mer2, and c-myc displayed a 2- to 3-fold higher activity and pre-RC protein abundance as well as higher ratios of open to closed chromatin and of Brg-1 to Bmi-1 in the transformed cells, whereas the origin associated with the housekeeping lamin B2 gene exhibited similar levels of activity, pre-RC protein abundance, and higher ratios of open to closed chromatin and of Brg-1 to Bmi-1 in both cell types. Nucleosomal positioning analysis, using an MNase-Southern blot assay, showed that all the origin regions examined were situated within regions of inconsistently positioned nucleosomes, with the nucleosomes being spaced farther apart from each other prior to the onset of S phase in both cell types. Overall, the results indicate that cellular transformation is associated with differential epigenetic regulation, whereby chromatin structure is more open, rendering replication origins more accessible to initiator proteins, thus allowing increased origin activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenic Di Paola
- Goodman Cancer Center and Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
103
|
McConnell KH, Dixon M, Calvi BR. The histone acetyltransferases CBP and Chameau integrate developmental and DNA replication programs in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells. Development 2012; 139:3880-90. [PMID: 22951641 DOI: 10.1242/dev.083576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication origin activity changes during development. Chromatin modifications are known to influence the genomic location of origins and the time during S phase that they initiate replication in different cells. However, how chromatin regulates origins in concert with cell differentiation remains poorly understood. Here, we use developmental gene amplification in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells as a model to investigate how chromatin modifiers regulate origins in a developmental context. We find that the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) Chameau (Chm) binds to amplicon origins and is partially required for their function. Depletion of Chm had relatively mild effects on origins during gene amplification and genomic replication compared with previous knockdown of its ortholog HBO1 in human cells, which has severe effects on origin function. We show that another HAT, CBP (Nejire), also binds amplicon origins and is partially required for amplification. Knockdown of Chm and CBP together had a more severe effect on nucleosome acetylation and amplicon origin activity than knockdown of either HAT alone, suggesting that these HATs collaborate in origin regulation. In addition to their local function at the origin, we show that Chm and CBP also globally regulate the developmental transition of follicle cells into the amplification stages of oogenesis. Our results reveal a complexity of origin epigenetic regulation by multiple HATs during development and suggest that chromatin modifiers are a nexus that integrates differentiation and DNA replication programs.
Collapse
|
104
|
Papior P, Arteaga-Salas JM, Günther T, Grundhoff A, Schepers A. Open chromatin structures regulate the efficiencies of pre-RC formation and replication initiation in Epstein-Barr virus. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 198:509-28. [PMID: 22891264 PMCID: PMC3514025 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201109105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Studies of EBV replication origins demonstrate an excess of pre-replication
complexes that are formed at flexible MNase-sensitive sites in the genome. Whether or not metazoan replication initiates at random or specific but flexible
sites is an unsolved question. The lack of sequence specificity in origin
recognition complex (ORC) DNA binding complicates genome-scale chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-based studies. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) persists as
chromatinized minichromosomes that are replicated by the host replication
machinery. We used EBV to investigate the link between zones of pre-replication
complex (pre-RC) assembly, replication initiation, and micrococcal nuclease
(MNase) sensitivity at different cell cycle stages in a genome-wide fashion. The
dyad symmetry element (DS) of EBV’s latent origin, a well-established and
very efficient pre-RC assembly region, served as an internal control. We
identified 64 pre-RC zones that correlate spatially with 57 short nascent strand
(SNS) zones. MNase experiments revealed that pre-RC and SNS zones were linked to
regions of increased MNase sensitivity, which is a marker of origin strength.
Interestingly, although spatially correlated, pre-RC and SNS zones were
characterized by different features. We propose that pre-RCs are formed at
flexible but distinct sites, from which only a few are activated per single
genome and cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peer Papior
- DNA Replication and Epigenetics group, Research Unit Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 81377 München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
105
|
Unraveling cell type-specific and reprogrammable human replication origin signatures associated with G-quadruplex consensus motifs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:837-44. [PMID: 22751019 DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 295] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2012] [Accepted: 06/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is highly regulated, ensuring faithful inheritance of genetic information through each cell cycle. In metazoans, this process is initiated at many thousands of DNA replication origins whose cell type-specific distribution and usage are poorly understood. We exhaustively mapped the genome-wide location of replication origins in human cells using deep sequencing of short nascent strands and identified ten times more origin positions than we expected; most of these positions were conserved in four different human cell lines. Furthermore, we identified a consensus G-quadruplex-forming DNA motif that can predict the position of DNA replication origins in human cells, accounting for their distribution, usage efficiency and timing. Finally, we discovered a cell type-specific reprogrammable signature of cell identity that was revealed by specific efficiencies of conserved origin positions and not by the selection of cell type-specific subsets of origins.
Collapse
|
106
|
Abstract
Prevention and repair of DNA damage is essential for maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival. DNA replication during S-phase can be a source of DNA damage if endogenous or exogenous stresses impair the progression of replication forks. It has become increasingly clear that DNA-damage-response pathways do not only respond to the presence of damaged DNA, but also modulate DNA replication dynamics to prevent DNA damage formation during S-phase. Such observations may help explain the developmental defects or cancer predisposition caused by mutations in DNA-damage-response genes. The present review focuses on molecular mechanisms by which DNA-damage-response pathways control and promote replication dynamics in vertebrate cells. In particular, DNA damage pathways contribute to proper replication by regulating replication initiation, stabilizing transiently stalled forks, promoting replication restart and facilitating fork movement on difficult-to-replicate templates. If replication fork progression fails to be rescued, this may lead to DNA damage and genomic instability via nuclease processing of aberrant fork structures or incomplete sister chromatid separation during mitosis.
Collapse
|
107
|
Moriyama K, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Obuse C, Tsurimoto T, Masai H. Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1)-dependent recruitment of origin recognition complex (Orc) on oriP of Epstein-Barr virus with purified proteins: stimulation by Cdc6 through its direct interaction with EBNA1. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:23977-94. [PMID: 22589552 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.368456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Origin recognition complex (Orc) plays an essential role in directing assembly of prereplicative complex at selective sites on chromosomes. However, Orc from vertebrates is reported to bind to DNA in a sequence-nonspecific manner, and it is still unclear how it selects specific genomic loci and how Cdc6, another conserved AAA(+) factor known to interact with Orc, participates in this process. Replication from oriP, the latent origin of Epstein-Barr virus, provides an excellent model system for the study of initiation on the host chromosomes because it is known to depend on prereplicative complex factors, including Orc and Mcm. Here, we show that Orc is recruited selectively at the essential dyad symmetry element in nuclear extracts in a manner dependent on EBNA1, which specifically binds to dyad symmetry. With purified proteins, EBNA1 can recruit both Cdc6 and Orc independently on a DNA containing EBNA1 binding sites, and Cdc6 facilitates the Orc recruitment by EBNA1. Purified Cdc6 directly binds to EBNA1, whereas association of Orc with EBNA1 requires the presence of the oriP DNA. Nuclease protection assays suggest that Orc associates with DNA segments on both sides adjacent to the EBNA1 binding sites and that this process is stimulated by the presence of Cdc6. Thus, EBNA1 can direct localized assembly of Orc in a process that is facilitated by Cdc6. The possibility of similar modes of recruitment of Orc/Cdc6 at the human chromosomal origins will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Moriyama
- Genome Dynamics Project, Department of Genome Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 2-1-6 Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
108
|
Chandok GS, Patel MP, Mirkin SM, Krasilnikova MM. Effects of Friedreich's ataxia GAA repeats on DNA replication in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:3964-74. [PMID: 22262734 PMCID: PMC3351192 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2011] [Revised: 12/20/2011] [Accepted: 01/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA) is a common hereditary degenerative neuro-muscular disorder caused by expansions of the (GAA)n repeat in the first intron of the frataxin gene. The expanded repeats from parents frequently undergo further significant length changes as they are passed on to progeny. Expanded repeats also show an age-dependent instability in somatic cells, albeit on a smaller scale than during intergenerational transmissions. Here we studied the effects of (GAA)n repeats of varying lengths and orientations on the episomal DNA replication in mammalian cells. We have recently shown that the very first round of the transfected DNA replication occurs in the lack of the mature chromatin, does not depend on the episomal replication origin and initiates at multiple single-stranded regions of plasmid DNA. We now found that expanded GAA repeats severely block this first replication round post plasmid transfection, while the subsequent replication cycles are only mildly affected. The fact that GAA repeats affect various replication modes in a different way might shed light on their differential expansions characteristic for FRDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurangad S. Chandok
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 and Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Mayank P. Patel
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 and Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Sergei M. Mirkin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 and Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Maria M. Krasilnikova
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802 and Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Lee KY, Bang SW, Yoon SW, Lee SH, Yoon JB, Hwang DS. Phosphorylation of ORC2 protein dissociates origin recognition complex from chromatin and replication origins. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:11891-8. [PMID: 22334659 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.338467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
During the late M to the G(1) phase of the cell cycle, the origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to the replication origin, leading to the assembly of the prereplicative complex for subsequent initiation of eukaryotic chromosome replication. We found that the cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of human ORC2, one of the six subunits of ORC, dissociates ORC2, -3, -4, and -5 (ORC2-5) subunits from chromatin and replication origins. Phosphorylation at Thr-116 and Thr-226 of ORC2 occurs by cyclin-dependent kinase during the S phase and is maintained until the M phase. Phosphorylation of ORC2 at Thr-116 and Thr-226 dissociated the ORC2-5 from chromatin. Consistent with this, the phosphomimetic ORC2 protein exhibited defective binding to replication origins as well as to chromatin, whereas the phosphodefective protein persisted in binding throughout the cell cycle. These results suggest that the phosphorylation of ORC2 dissociates ORC from chromatin and replication origins and inhibits binding of ORC to newly replicated DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Yong Lee
- Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
The chromatin backdrop of DNA replication: lessons from genetics and genome-scale analyses. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2012; 1819:794-801. [PMID: 22342530 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2011] [Revised: 01/27/2012] [Accepted: 01/31/2012] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The entire cellular genome must replicate during each cell cycle, but it is yet unclear how replication proceeds along with chromatin condensation and remodeling while ensuring the fidelity of the replicated genome. Mapping replication initiation sites can provide clues for the coordination of DNA replication and transcription on a whole-genome scale. Here we discuss recent insights obtained from genome-scale analyses of replication initiation sites and transcription in mammalian cells and ask how transcription and chromatin modifications affect the frequency of replication initiation events. We also discuss DNA sequences, such as insulators and replicators, which modulate replication and transcription of target genes, and use genome-wide maps of replication initiation sites to evaluate possible commonalities between replicators and chromatin insulators. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin in time and space.
Collapse
|
111
|
Valenzuela MS. Initiation of DNA Replication in the Human Genome. HEREDITARY GENETICS : CURRENT RESEARCH 2012; Suppl 1:4903. [PMID: 24511453 PMCID: PMC3915928 DOI: 10.4172/2161-1041.s1-003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Replication of the human genome relies on the presence of thousands of origins distributed along each of the chromosomes. The activation of these origins occurs in a highly regulated manner to ensure that chromosomes are faithfully duplicated only once during each cell cycle. Failure in this regulation can lead to abnormal cell proliferation, or/and genomic instability, the hallmarks of cancer cells. The mechanisms determining how, when, and where origins are activated remains still a mystery. However recent technological advances have facilitated the study of DNA replication in a genome-wide scale, and have provided a wealth of information on several features of this process. Here we present an overview of the current progress on our understanding of the initiation step of DNA replication in human cells, and its relationship to abnormal cell proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel S. Valenzuela
- Department of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, 1005 D.B. Todd Jr. Boulevard, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) was first discovered in the baker's yeast in 1992. Identification of ORC opened up a path for subsequent molecular level investigations on how eukaryotic cells initiate and control genome duplication each cell cycle. Twenty years after the first biochemical isolation, ORC is now taking on a three-dimensional shape, although a very blurry shape at the moment, thanks to the recent electron microscopy and image reconstruction efforts. In this chapter, we outline the current biochemical knowledge about ORC from several eukaryotic systems, with emphasis on the most recent structural and biochemical studies. Despite many species-specific properties, an emerging consensus is that ORC is an ATP-dependent machine that recruits other key proteins to form pre-replicative complexes (pre-RCs) at many origins of DNA replication, enabling the subsequent initiation of DNA replication in S phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huilin Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA, And, Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA, , Tel: 631-344-2931, Fax: 631-344-3407
| | - Bruce Stillman
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA, , Tel: 516-367-8383
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Liachko I, Tanaka E, Cox K, Chung SCC, Yang L, Seher A, Hallas L, Cha E, Kang G, Pace H, Barrow J, Inada M, Tye BK, Keich U. Novel features of ARS selection in budding yeast Lachancea kluyveri. BMC Genomics 2011; 12:633. [PMID: 22204614 PMCID: PMC3306766 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2011] [Accepted: 12/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The characterization of DNA replication origins in yeast has shed much light on the mechanisms of initiation of DNA replication. However, very little is known about the evolution of origins or the evolution of mechanisms through which origins are recognized by the initiation machinery. This lack of understanding is largely due to the vast evolutionary distances between model organisms in which origins have been examined. RESULTS In this study we have isolated and characterized autonomously replicating sequences (ARSs) in Lachancea kluyveri - a pre-whole genome duplication (WGD) budding yeast. Through a combination of experimental work and rigorous computational analysis, we show that L. kluyveri ARSs require a sequence that is similar but much longer than the ARS Consensus Sequence well defined in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Moreover, compared with S. cerevisiae and K. lactis, the replication licensing machinery in L. kluyveri seems more tolerant to variations in the ARS sequence composition. It is able to initiate replication from almost all S. cerevisiae ARSs tested and most Kluyveromyces lactis ARSs. In contrast, only about half of the L. kluyveri ARSs function in S. cerevisiae and less than 10% function in K. lactis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate a replication initiation system with novel features and underscore the functional diversity within the budding yeasts. Furthermore, we have developed new approaches for analyzing biologically functional DNA sequences with ill-defined motifs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Liachko
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Sequeira-Mendes J, Gómez M. On the opportunistic nature of transcription and replication initiation in the metazoan genome. Bioessays 2011; 34:119-25. [PMID: 22086495 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Cellular identity and its response to external or internal signalling variations are encoded in a cell's genome as regulatory information. The genomic regions that specify this type of information are highly variable and degenerated in their sequence determinants, as it is becoming increasingly evident through the application of genome-scale methods to study gene expression. Here, we speculate that the same scenario applies to the regulatory regions controlling where DNA replication starts in the metazoan genome. We propose that replication origins cannot be defined as unique genomic features, but rather that DNA synthesis initiates opportunistically from accessible DNA sites, making cells highly robust and adaptable to environmental or developmental changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Sequeira-Mendes
- Centro de Biología Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
115
|
Liu J, McConnell K, Dixon M, Calvi BR. Analysis of model replication origins in Drosophila reveals new aspects of the chromatin landscape and its relationship to origin activity and the prereplicative complex. Mol Biol Cell 2011; 23:200-12. [PMID: 22049023 PMCID: PMC3248898 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e11-05-0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A study of model DNA replication origins in Drosophila reveals a codependence between histone acetylation and pre-RC assembly and leads to a chromatin switch model for the coordination of origin and promoter activity during development. Epigenetic regulation exerts a major influence on origins of DNA replication during development. The mechanisms for this regulation, however, are poorly defined. We showed previously that acetylation of nucleosomes regulates the origins that mediate developmental gene amplification during Drosophila oogenesis. Here we show that developmental activation of these origins is associated with acetylation of multiple histone lysines. Although these modifications are not unique to origin loci, we find that the level of acetylation is higher at the active origins and quantitatively correlated with the number of times these origins initiate replication. All of these acetylation marks were developmentally dynamic, rapidly increasing with origin activation and rapidly declining when the origins shut off and neighboring promoters turn on. Fine-scale analysis of the origins revealed that both hyperacetylation of nucleosomes and binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) occur in a broad domain and that acetylation is highest on nucleosomes adjacent to one side of the major site of replication initiation. It was surprising to find that acetylation of some lysines depends on binding of ORC to the origin, suggesting that multiple histone acetyltransferases may be recruited during origin licensing. Our results reveal new insights into the origin epigenetic landscape and lead us to propose a chromatin switch model to explain the coordination of origin and promoter activity during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
116
|
Thomae AW, Baltin J, Pich D, Deutsch MJ, Ravasz M, Zeller K, Gossen M, Hammerschmidt W, Schepers A. Different roles of the human Orc6 protein in the replication initiation process. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68:3741-56. [PMID: 21461783 PMCID: PMC11114885 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0675-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2010] [Revised: 02/25/2011] [Accepted: 03/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
In eukaryotes, binding of the six-subunit origin recognition complex (ORC) to DNA provides an interactive platform for the sequential assembly of pre-replicative complexes. This process licenses replication origins competent for the subsequent initiation step. Here, we analyze the contribution of human Orc6, the smallest subunit of ORC, to DNA binding and pre-replicative complex formation. We show that Orc6 not only interacts with Orc1-Orc5 but also with the initiation factor Cdc6. Biochemical and imaging experiments reveal that this interaction is required for licensing DNA replication competent. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Orc6 contributes to the interaction of ORC with the chaperone protein HMGA1a (high mobility group protein A1a). Binding of human ORC to replication origins is not specified at the level of DNA sequence and the functional organization of origins is poorly understood. We have identified HMGA1a as one factor that might direct ORC to AT-rich heterochromatic regions. The systematic analysis of the interaction between ORC and HMGA1a revealed that Orc6 interacts with the acidic C-terminus of HMGA1a and also with its AT-hooks. Both domains support autonomous replication if targeted to DNA templates. As such, Orc6 functions at different stages of the replication initiation process. Orc6 can interact with ORC chaperone proteins such as HMGA1a to facilitate chromatin binding of ORC and is also an essential factor for pre-RC formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas W. Thomae
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Adolf-Butenandt-Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Schillerstraße 44, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Baltin
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Dagmar Pich
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Manuel J. Deutsch
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Máté Ravasz
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Krisztina Zeller
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Manfred Gossen
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité, BCRT, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Föhrer Straße 15, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hammerschmidt
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Aloys Schepers
- Department of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Marchioninistr. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Casas-Delucchi CS, van Bemmel JG, Haase S, Herce HD, Nowak D, Meilinger D, Stear JH, Leonhardt H, Cardoso MC. Histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain late replication timing of constitutive heterochromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 40:159-69. [PMID: 21908399 PMCID: PMC3245938 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The replication of the genome is a spatio-temporally highly organized process. Yet, its flexibility throughout development suggests that this process is not genetically regulated. However, the mechanisms and chromatin modifications controlling replication timing are still unclear. We made use of the prominent structure and defined heterochromatic landscape of pericentric regions as an example of late replicating constitutive heterochromatin. We manipulated the major chromatin markers of these regions, namely histone acetylation, DNA and histone methylation, as well as chromatin condensation and determined the effects of these altered chromatin states on replication timing. Here, we show that manipulation of DNA and histone methylation as well as acetylation levels caused large-scale heterochromatin decondensation. Histone demethylation and the concomitant decondensation, however, did not affect replication timing. In contrast, immuno-FISH and time-lapse analyses showed that lowering DNA methylation, as well as increasing histone acetylation, advanced the onset of heterochromatin replication. While dnmt1−/− cells showed increased histone acetylation at chromocenters, histone hyperacetylation did not induce DNA demethylation. Hence, we propose that histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain normal heterochromatin duplication dynamics. We speculate that a high histone acetylation level might increase the firing efficiency of origins and, concomitantly, advances the replication timing of distinct genomic regions.
Collapse
|
118
|
Ding Q, MacAlpine DM. Defining the replication program through the chromatin landscape. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2011; 46:165-79. [PMID: 21417598 DOI: 10.3109/10409238.2011.560139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is an essential cell cycle event required for the accurate and timely duplication of the chromosomes. It is essential that the genome is replicated accurately and completely within the confines of S-phase. Failure to completely copy the genome has the potential to result in catastrophic genomic instability. Replication initiates in a coordinated manner from multiple locations, termed origins of replication, distributed across each of the chromosomes. The selection of these origins of replication is a dynamic process responding to both developmental and tissue-specific signals. In this review, we explore the role of the local chromatin environment in regulating the DNA replication program at the level of origin selection and activation. Finally, there is increasing molecular evidence that the DNA replication program itself affects the chromatin landscape, suggesting that DNA replication is critical for both genetic and epigenetic inheritance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Queying Ding
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
119
|
Ghosh S, Vassilev AP, Zhang J, Zhao Y, DePamphilis ML. Assembly of the human origin recognition complex occurs through independent nuclear localization of its components. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:23831-41. [PMID: 21555516 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.215988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Initiation of eukaryotic genome duplication begins when a six-subunit origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to DNA. However, the mechanism by which this occurs in vivo and the roles played by individual subunits appear to differ significantly among organisms. Previous studies identified a soluble human ORC(2-5) complex in the nucleus, an ORC(1-5) complex bound to chromatin, and an Orc6 protein that binds weakly, if at all, to other ORC subunits. Here we show that stable ORC(1-6) complexes also can be purified from human cell extracts and that Orc6 and Orc1 each contain a single nuclear localization signal that is essential for nuclear localization but not for ORC assembly. The Orc6 nuclear localization signal, which is essential for Orc6 function, is facilitated by phosphorylation at its cyclin-dependent kinase consensus site and by association with Kpna6/1, nuclear transport proteins that did not co-purify with other ORC subunits. These and other results support a model in which Orc6, Orc1, and ORC(2-5) are transported independently to the nucleus where they can either assemble into ORC(1-6) or function individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soma Ghosh
- NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2753, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
120
|
Dorn ES, Cook JG. Nucleosomes in the neighborhood: new roles for chromatin modifications in replication origin control. Epigenetics 2011; 6:552-9. [PMID: 21364325 DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The importance of local chromatin structure in regulating replication initiation has become increasingly apparent. Most recently, histone methylation and nucleosome positioning have been added to the list of modifications demonstrated to regulate origins. In particular, the methylation states of H3K4, H3K36 and H4K20 have been associated with establishing active, repressed or poised origins depending on the timing and extent of methylation. The stability and precise positioning of nucleosomes has also been demonstrated to affect replication efficiency. Although it is not yet clear how these modifications alter the behavior of specific replication factors, ample evidence establishes their role in maintaining coordinated replication. This review will summarize recent advances in understanding these aspects of chromatin structure in DNA replication origin control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Suzanne Dorn
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
121
|
Structural analysis of human Orc6 protein reveals a homology with transcription factor TFIIB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:7373-8. [PMID: 21502537 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013676108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) is a six-subunit protein important for the initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Orc6 is the smallest and the least conserved among ORC subunits. It is required for the DNA replication but also has a function in cytokinesis in metazoan species, however, the mechanisms of Orc6 action in these processes are not clear. Here we report a structure of the middle domain of human Orc6. This domain has an overall fold similar to the corresponding helical domain of transcription factor TFIIB. Based on these findings, a model of Orc6 binding to DNA is produced. We have identified amino acids of Orc6 which are directly involved in DNA binding. Alterations of these amino acids abolish DNA binding ability of Orc6 and also result in reduced levels of DNA replication in vitro and in cultured cells. Our data indicate that Orc6 is one of the DNA binding subunits of ORC in metazoan species. We propose that Orc6 may participate in positioning of ORC at the origins of DNA replication similar to the role of TFIIB in positioning transcription preinitiation complex at the promoter.
Collapse
|
122
|
Chandok GS, Kapoor KK, Brick RM, Sidorova JM, Krasilnikova MM. A distinct first replication cycle of DNA introduced in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:2103-15. [PMID: 21062817 PMCID: PMC3064806 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2010] [Revised: 08/30/2010] [Accepted: 09/23/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Many mutation events in microsatellite DNA sequences were traced to the first embryonic divisions. It was not known what makes the first replication cycles of embryonic DNA different from subsequent replication cycles. Here we demonstrate that an unusual replication mode is involved in the first cycle of replication of DNA introduced in mammalian cells. This alternative replication starts at random positions, and occurs before the chromatin is fully assembled. It is detected in various cell lines and primary cells. The presence of single-stranded regions increases the efficiency of this alternative replication mode. The alternative replication cannot progress through the A/T-rich FRA16B fragile site, while the regular replication mode is not affected by it. A/T-rich microsatellites are associated with the majority of chromosomal breakpoints in cancer. We suggest that the alternative replication mode may be initiated at the regions with immature chromatin structure in embryonic and cancer cells resulting in increased genomic instability. This work demonstrates, for the first time, differences in the replication progression during the first and subsequent replication cycles in mammalian cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurangad S. Chandok
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7705 USA
| | - Kalvin K. Kapoor
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7705 USA
| | - Rachel M. Brick
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7705 USA
| | - Julia M. Sidorova
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7705 USA
| | - Maria M. Krasilnikova
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16801 and Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7705 USA
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Cdc45 limits replicon usage from a low density of preRCs in mammalian cells. PLoS One 2011; 6:e17533. [PMID: 21390258 PMCID: PMC3046982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2010] [Accepted: 02/08/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about mammalian preRC stoichiometry, the number of preRCs on chromosomes, and how this relates to replicon size and usage. We show here that, on average, each 100-kb of the mammalian genome contains a preRC composed of approximately one ORC hexamer, 4–5 MCM hexamers, and 2 Cdc6. Relative to these subunits, ∼0.35 total molecules of the pre-Initiation Complex factor Cdc45 are present. Thus, based on ORC availability, somatic cells contain ∼70,000 preRCs of this average total stoichiometry, although subunits may not be juxtaposed with each other. Except for ORC, the chromatin-bound complement of preRC subunits is even lower. Cdc45 is present at very low levels relative to the preRC subunits, but is highly stable, and the same limited number of stable Cdc45 molecules are present from the beginning of S-phase to its completion. Efforts to artificially increase Cdc45 levels through ectopic expression block cell growth. However, microinjection of excess purified Cdc45 into S-phase nuclei activates additional replication foci by three-fold, indicating that Cdc45 functions to activate dormant preRCs and is rate-limiting for somatic replicon usage. Paradoxically, although Cdc45 colocalizes in vivo with some MCM sites and is rate-limiting for DNA replication to occur, neither Cdc45 nor MCMs colocalize with active replication sites. Embryonic metazoan chromatin consists of small replicons that are used efficiently via an excess of preRC subunits. In contrast, somatic mammalian cells contain a low density of preRCs, each containing only a few MCMs that compete for limiting amounts of Cdc45. This provides a molecular explanation why, relative to embryonic replicon dynamics, somatic replicons are, on average, larger and origin efficiency tends to be lower. The stable, continuous, and rate-limiting nature of Cdc45 suggests that Cdc45 contributes to the staggering of replicon usage throughout S-phase, and that replicon activation requires reutilization of existing Cdc45 during S-phase.
Collapse
|
124
|
Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, Landolin JM, Bristow CA, Ma L, Lin MF, Washietl S, Arshinoff BI, Ay F, Meyer PE, Robine N, Washington NL, Di Stefano L, Berezikov E, Brown CD, Candeias R, Carlson JW, Carr A, Jungreis I, Marbach D, Sealfon R, Tolstorukov MY, Will S, Alekseyenko AA, Artieri C, Booth BW, Brooks AN, Dai Q, Davis CA, Duff MO, Feng X, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Henikoff JG, Kapranov P, Li R, MacAlpine HK, Malone J, Minoda A, Nordman J, Okamura K, Perry M, Powell SK, Riddle NC, Sakai A, Samsonova A, Sandler JE, Schwartz YB, Sher N, Spokony R, Sturgill D, van Baren M, Wan KH, Yang L, Yu C, Feingold E, Good P, Guyer M, Lowdon R, Ahmad K, Andrews J, Berger B, Brenner SE, Brent MR, Cherbas L, Elgin SCR, Gingeras TR, Grossman R, Hoskins RA, Kaufman TC, Kent W, Kuroda MI, Orr-Weaver T, Perrimon N, Pirrotta V, Posakony JW, Ren B, Russell S, Cherbas P, Graveley BR, Lewis S, Micklem G, Oliver B, Park PJ, Celniker SE, Henikoff S, Karpen GH, Lai EC, MacAlpine DM, Stein LD, White KP, Kellis M. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010; 330:1787-97. [PMID: 21177974 PMCID: PMC3192495 DOI: 10.1126/science.1198374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 917] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To gain insight into how genomic information is translated into cellular and developmental programs, the Drosophila model organism Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project is comprehensively mapping transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines. We have generated more than 700 data sets and discovered protein-coding, noncoding, RNA regulatory, replication, and chromatin elements, more than tripling the annotated portion of the Drosophila genome. Correlated activity patterns of these elements reveal a functional regulatory network, which predicts putative new functions for genes, reveals stage- and tissue-specific regulators, and enables gene-expression prediction. Our results provide a foundation for directed experimental and computational studies in Drosophila and related species and also a model for systematic data integration toward comprehensive genomic and functional annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sushmita Roy
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Jason Ernst
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Peter V. Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pouya Kheradpour
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Nicolas Negre
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Matthew L. Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jane M. Landolin
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Christopher A. Bristow
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Lijia Ma
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Michael F. Lin
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Stefan Washietl
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Bradley I. Arshinoff
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Ferhat Ay
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Patrick E. Meyer
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP212, Brussels 1050, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Robine
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Luisa Di Stefano
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Eugene Berezikov
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Christopher D. Brown
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rogerio Candeias
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Joseph W. Carlson
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Adrian Carr
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Irwin Jungreis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Daniel Marbach
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Rachel Sealfon
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Michael Y. Tolstorukov
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sebastian Will
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Artyom A. Alekseyenko
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Carlo Artieri
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin W. Booth
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Angela N. Brooks
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Qi Dai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carrie A. Davis
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
| | - Michael O. Duff
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Xin Feng
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Andrey A. Gorchakov
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tingting Gu
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Jorja G. Henikoff
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Renhua Li
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John Malone
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Aki Minoda
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | | | - Katsutomo Okamura
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc Perry
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Sara K. Powell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nicole C. Riddle
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Akiko Sakai
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Anastasia Samsonova
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jeremy E. Sandler
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Noa Sher
- White-head Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Rebecca Spokony
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - David Sturgill
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marijke van Baren
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Kenneth H. Wan
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Charles Yu
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Elise Feingold
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Peter Good
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Mark Guyer
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Rebecca Lowdon
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Kami Ahmad
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Justen Andrews
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Bonnie Berger
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Steven E. Brenner
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Michael R. Brent
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Lucy Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Sarah C. R. Elgin
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Thomas R. Gingeras
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA
| | - Robert Grossman
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Roger A. Hoskins
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Thomas C. Kaufman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - William Kent
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Mitzi I. Kuroda
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Norbert Perrimon
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - James W. Posakony
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Steven Russell
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Peter Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Brenton R. Graveley
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Suzanna Lewis
- Genome Sciences Division, LBNL, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Gos Micklem
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Brian Oliver
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Peter J. Park
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Susan E. Celniker
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Eric C. Lai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Lincoln D. Stein
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Kevin P. White
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Manolis Kellis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Eaton ML, Prinz JA, MacAlpine HK, Tretyakov G, Kharchenko PV, MacAlpine DM. Chromatin signatures of the Drosophila replication program. Genome Res 2010; 21:164-74. [PMID: 21177973 DOI: 10.1101/gr.116038.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication initiates from thousands of start sites throughout the Drosophila genome and must be coordinated with other ongoing nuclear processes such as transcription to ensure genetic and epigenetic inheritance. Considerable progress has been made toward understanding how chromatin modifications regulate the transcription program; in contrast, we know relatively little about the role of the chromatin landscape in defining how start sites of DNA replication are selected and regulated. Here, we describe the Drosophila replication program in the context of the chromatin and transcription landscape for multiple cell lines using data generated by the modENCODE consortium. We find that while the cell lines exhibit similar replication programs, there are numerous cell line-specific differences that correlate with changes in the chromatin architecture. We identify chromatin features that are associated with replication timing, early origin usage, and ORC binding. Primary sequence, activating chromatin marks, and DNA-binding proteins (including chromatin remodelers) contribute in an additive manner to specify ORC-binding sites. We also generate accurate and predictive models from the chromatin data to describe origin usage and strength between cell lines. Multiple activating chromatin modifications contribute to the function and relative strength of replication origins, suggesting that the chromatin environment does not regulate origins of replication as a simple binary switch, but rather acts as a tunable rheostat to regulate replication initiation events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
126
|
Lubelsky Y, Sasaki T, Kuipers MA, Lucas I, Le Beau MM, Carignon S, Debatisse M, Prinz JA, Dennis JH, Gilbert DM. Pre-replication complex proteins assemble at regions of low nucleosome occupancy within the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase initiation zone. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 39:3141-55. [PMID: 21148149 PMCID: PMC3082903 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-scale mapping of pre-replication complex proteins has not been reported in mammalian cells. Poor enrichment of these proteins at specific sites may be due to dispersed binding, poor epitope availability or cell cycle stage-specific binding. Here, we have mapped sites of biotin-tagged ORC and MCM protein binding in G1-synchronized populations of Chinese hamster cells harboring amplified copies of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) locus, using avidin-affinity purification of biotinylated chromatin followed by high-density microarray analysis across the DHFR locus. We have identified several sites of significant enrichment for both complexes distributed throughout the previously identified initiation zone. Analysis of the frequency of initiations across stretched DNA fibers from the DHFR locus confirmed a broad zone of de-localized initiation activity surrounding the sites of ORC and MCM enrichment. Mapping positions of mononucleosomal DNA empirically and computing nucleosome-positioning information in silico revealed that ORC and MCM map to regions of low measured and predicted nucleosome occupancy. Our results demonstrate that specific sites of ORC and MCM enrichment can be detected within a mammalian intitiation zone, and suggest that initiation zones may be regions of generally low nucleosome occupancy where flexible nucleosome positioning permits flexible pre-RC assembly sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Lubelsky
- Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
Abstract
Hox proteins are well-known as developmental transcription factors controlling cell and tissue identity, but recent findings suggest that they are also part of the cell replication machinery. Hox-mediated control of transcription and replication may ensure coordinated control of cell growth and differentiation, two processes that need to be tightly and precisely coordinated to allow proper organ formation and patterning. In this review we summarize the available data linking Hox proteins to the replication machinery and discuss the developmental and pathological implications of this new facet of Hox protein function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Miotto
- UMR7216 Epigénétique et Destin Cellulaire, CNRS, Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
128
|
Burns JA, Dreij K, Cartularo L, Scicchitano DA. O6-methylguanine induces altered proteins at the level of transcription in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:8178-87. [PMID: 20702424 PMCID: PMC3001077 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2010] [Revised: 07/20/2010] [Accepted: 07/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
O(6)-Methylguanine (O(6)-meG), which is produced in DNA following exposure to methylating agents, instructs human RNA polymerase II to mis-insert bases opposite the lesion during transcription. In this study, we examined the effect of O(6)-meG on transcription in human cells and investigated the subsequent effects on protein function following translation of the resulting mRNA. In HEK293 cells, O(6)-meG induced incorporation of uridine or cytidine in nascent RNA opposite the adduct. In cells containing active O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), which repairs O(6)-meG, 3% misincorporation of uridine was observed opposite the lesion. In cells where AGT function was compromised by addition of the AGT inhibitor O(6)-benzylguanine, ∼ 58% of the transcripts contained a uridine misincorporation opposite the lesion. Furthermore, the altered mRNA induced changes to protein function as demonstrated through recovery of functional red fluorescent protein (RFP) from DNA coding for a non-fluorescent variant of RFP. These data show that O(6)-meG is highly mutagenic at the level of transcription in human cells, leading to an altered protein load, especially when AGT is inhibited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David A. Scicchitano
- Department of Biology, New York University, 1009 Silver Center, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Shen Z, Sathyan KM, Geng Y, Zheng R, Chakraborty A, Freeman B, Wang F, Prasanth KV, Prasanth SG. A WD-repeat protein stabilizes ORC binding to chromatin. Mol Cell 2010; 40:99-111. [PMID: 20932478 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2010] [Revised: 05/28/2010] [Accepted: 08/27/2010] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Origin recognition complex (ORC) plays critical roles in the initiation of DNA replication and cell-cycle progression. In metazoans, ORC associates with origin DNA during G1 and with heterochromatin in postreplicated cells. However, what regulates the binding of ORC to chromatin is not understood. We have identified a highly conserved, leucine-rich repeats and WD40 repeat domain-containing protein 1 (LRWD1) or ORC-associated (ORCA) in human cells that interacts with ORC and modulates chromatin association of ORC. ORCA colocalizes with ORC and shows similar cell-cycle dynamics. We demonstrate that ORCA efficiently recruits ORC to chromatin. Depletion of ORCA in human primary cells and embryonic stem cells results in loss of ORC association to chromatin, concomitant reduction of MCM binding, and a subsequent accumulation in G1 phase. Our results suggest ORCA-mediated association of ORC to chromatin is critical to initiate preRC assembly in G1 and chromatin organization in post-G1 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Shen
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
130
|
Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:728-38. [DOI: 10.1038/nrm2976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 310] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
131
|
Abstract
Mechanisms regulating where and when eukaryotic DNA replication initiates remain a mystery. Recently, genome-scale methods have been brought to bear on this problem. The identification of replication origins and their associated proteins in yeasts is a well-integrated investigative tool, but corresponding data sets from multicellular organisms are scarce. By contrast, standardized protocols for evaluating replication timing have generated informative data sets for most eukaryotic systems. Here, I summarize the genome-scale methods that are most frequently used to analyse replication in eukaryotes, the kinds of questions each method can address and the technical hurdles that must be overcome to gain a complete understanding of the nature of eukaryotic replication origins.
Collapse
|
132
|
Human origin recognition complex is essential for HP1 binding to chromatin and heterochromatin organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:15093-8. [PMID: 20689044 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009945107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) is a DNA replication initiator protein also known to be involved in diverse cellular functions including gene silencing, sister chromatid cohesion, telomere biology, heterochromatin localization, centromere and centrosome activity, and cytokinesis. We show that, in human cells, multiple ORC subunits associate with hetereochromatin protein 1 (HP1) alpha- and HP1beta-containing heterochromatic foci. Fluorescent bleaching studies indicate that multiple subcomplexes of ORC exist at heterochromatin, with Orc1 stably associating with heterochromatin in G1 phase, whereas other ORC subunits have transient interactions throughout the cell-division cycle. Both Orc1 and Orc3 directly bind to HP1alpha, and two domains of Orc3, a coiled-coil domain and a mod-interacting region domain, can independently bind to HP1alpha; however, both are essential for in vivo localization of Orc3 to heterochromatic foci. Direct binding of both Orc1 and Orc3 to HP1 suggests that, after the degradation of Orc1 at the G1/S boundary, Orc3 facilitates assembly of ORC/HP1 proteins to chromatin. Although depletion of Orc2 and Orc3 subunits by siRNA caused loss of HP1alpha association to heterochromatin, loss of Orc1 and Orc5 caused aberrant HP1alpha distribution only to pericentric heterochromatin-surrounding nucleoli. Depletion of HP1alpha from human cells also shows loss of Orc2 binding to heterochromatin, suggesting that ORC and HP1 proteins are mutually required for each other to bind to heterochromatin. Similar to HP1alpha-depleted cells, Orc2 and Orc3 siRNA-treated cells also show loss of compaction at satellite repeats, suggesting that ORC together with HP1 proteins may be involved in organizing higher-order chromatin structure and centromere function.
Collapse
|
133
|
Regulation of DNA replication by chromatin structures: accessibility and recruitment. Chromosoma 2010; 120:39-46. [DOI: 10.1007/s00412-010-0287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2010] [Revised: 06/22/2010] [Accepted: 07/17/2010] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
134
|
Rampakakis E, Gkogkas C, Di Paola D, Zannis-Hadjopoulos M. Replication initiation and DNA topology: The twisted life of the origin. J Cell Biochem 2010; 110:35-43. [PMID: 20213762 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Genomic propagation in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes is tightly regulated at the level of initiation, ensuring that the genome is accurately replicated and equally segregated to the daughter cells. Even though replication origins and the proteins that bind onto them (initiator proteins) have diverged throughout the course of evolution, the mechanism of initiation has been conserved, consisting of origin recognition, multi-protein complex assembly, helicase activation and loading of the replicative machinery. Recruitment of the multiprotein initiation complexes onto the replication origins is constrained by the dense packing of the DNA within the nucleus and unusual structures such as knots and supercoils. In this review, we focus on the DNA topological barriers that the multi-protein complexes have to overcome in order to access the replication origins and how the topological state of the origins changes during origin firing. Recent advances in the available methodologies to study DNA topology and their clinical significance are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Rampakakis
- Goodman Cancer Centre, Department of Biochemistry, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1Y6
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
135
|
Sun J, Kong D. DNA replication origins, ORC/DNA interaction, and assembly of pre-replication complex in eukaryotes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2010; 42:433-9. [PMID: 20705581 DOI: 10.1093/abbs/gmq048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotic cells is highly complicated and sophisticatedly regulated. Owing to its large size, a typical eukaryotic genome contains hundreds to tens of thousands of initiation sites called DNA replication origins where DNA synthesis takes place. Multiple initiation sites remove the constraint of a genome size because only a certain amount of DNA can be replicated from a single origin in a limited time. The activation of these multiple origins must be coordinated so that each segment of chromosomal DNA is precisely duplicated only once per cell cycle. Although DNA replication is a vital process for cell growth and its mechanism is highly conserved, recent studies also reveal significant diversity in origin structure, assembly of pre-replication complex (pre-RC) and regulation of replication initiation along evolutionary lines. The DNA replication origins in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe are found to contain a second essential element that is bound by Sap1 protein besides the essential origin recognition complex-binding site. Sap1 is recently demonstrated to be a novel replication initiation protein that plays an essential role in loading the initiation protein Cdc18 to origins and thus directly participates in pre-RC formation. In this review, we summarize the recent advance in understanding how DNA replication origins are organized, how pre-RC is assembled and how DNA replication is initiated and regulated in yeast and metazoans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingya Sun
- Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan City, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
136
|
Müller P, Park S, Shor E, Huebert DJ, Warren CL, Ansari AZ, Weinreich M, Eaton ML, MacAlpine DM, Fox CA. The conserved bromo-adjacent homology domain of yeast Orc1 functions in the selection of DNA replication origins within chromatin. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1418-33. [PMID: 20595233 PMCID: PMC2895200 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1906410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2010] [Accepted: 05/11/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to the specific positions on chromosomes that serve as DNA replication origins. Although ORC is conserved from yeast to humans, the DNA sequence elements that specify ORC binding are not. In particular, metazoan ORC shows no obvious DNA sequence specificity, whereas yeast ORC binds to a specific DNA sequence within all yeast origins. Thus, whereas chromatin must play an important role in metazoan ORC's ability to recognize origins, it is unclear whether chromatin plays a role in yeast ORC's recognition of origins. This study focused on the role of the conserved N-terminal bromo-adjacent homology domain of yeast Orc1 (Orc1BAH). Recent studies indicate that BAH domains are chromatin-binding modules. We show that the Orc1BAH domain was necessary for ORC's stable association with yeast chromosomes, and was physiologically relevant to DNA replication in vivo. This replication role was separable from the Orc1BAH domain's previously defined role in transcriptional silencing. Genome-wide analyses of ORC binding in ORC1 and orc1bahDelta cells revealed that the Orc1BAH domain contributed to ORC's association with most yeast origins, including a class of origins highly dependent on the Orc1BAH domain for ORC association (orc1bahDelta-sensitive origins). Orc1bahDelta-sensitive origins required the Orc1BAH domain for normal activity on chromosomes and plasmids, and were associated with a distinct local nucleosome structure. These data provide molecular insights into how the Orc1BAH domain contributes to ORC's selection of replication origins, as well as new tools for examining conserved mechanisms governing ORC's selection of origins within eukaryotic chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Müller
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Sookhee Park
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Erika Shor
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Dana J. Huebert
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Christopher L. Warren
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Aseem Z. Ansari
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Michael Weinreich
- Laboratory for Chromosome Replication, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, USA
| | - Matthew L. Eaton
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Catherine A. Fox
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Masai H, Matsumoto S, You Z, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Oda M. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem 2010; 79:89-130. [PMID: 20373915 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.103205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 370] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication is central to cell proliferation. Studies in the past six decades since the proposal of a semiconservative mode of DNA replication have confirmed the high degree of conservation of the basic machinery of DNA replication from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. However, the need for replication of a substantially longer segment of DNA in coordination with various internal and external signals in eukaryotic cells has led to more complex and versatile regulatory strategies. The replication program in higher eukaryotes is under a dynamic and plastic regulation within a single cell, or within the cell population, or during development. We review here various regulatory mechanisms that control the replication program in eukaryotes and discuss future directions in this dynamic field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisao Masai
- Genome Dynamics Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
138
|
Lee TJ, Pascuzzi PE, Settlage SB, Shultz RW, Tanurdzic M, Rabinowicz PD, Menges M, Zheng P, Main D, Murray JAH, Sosinski B, Allen GC, Martienssen RA, Hanley-Bowdoin L, Vaughn MW, Thompson WF. Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 replicates in two phases that correlate with chromatin state. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000982. [PMID: 20548960 PMCID: PMC2883604 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2010] [Accepted: 05/12/2010] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication programs have been studied extensively in yeast and animal systems, where they have been shown to correlate with gene expression and certain epigenetic modifications. Despite the conservation of core DNA replication proteins, little is known about replication programs in plants. We used flow cytometry and tiling microarrays to profile DNA replication of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 (chr4) during early, mid, and late S phase. Replication profiles for early and mid S phase were similar and encompassed the majority of the euchromatin. Late S phase exhibited a distinctly different profile that includes the remaining euchromatin and essentially all of the heterochromatin. Termination zones were consistent between experiments, allowing us to define 163 putative replicons on chr4 that clustered into larger domains of predominately early or late replication. Early-replicating sequences, especially the initiation zones of early replicons, displayed a pattern of epigenetic modifications specifying an open chromatin conformation. Late replicons, and the termination zones of early replicons, showed an opposite pattern. Histone H3 acetylated on lysine 56 (H3K56ac) was enriched in early replicons, as well as the initiation zones of both early and late replicons. H3K56ac was also associated with expressed genes, but this effect was local whereas replication time correlated with H3K56ac over broad regions. The similarity of the replication profiles for early and mid S phase cells indicates that replication origin activation in euchromatin is stochastic. Replicon organization in Arabidopsis is strongly influenced by epigenetic modifications to histones and DNA. The domain organization of Arabidopsis is more similar to that in Drosophila than that in mammals, which may reflect genome size and complexity. The distinct patterns of association of H3K56ac with gene expression and early replication provide evidence that H3K56ac may be associated with initiation zones and replication origins. During growth and development, all plants and animals must replicate their DNA. This process is regulated to ensure that all sequences are completely and accurately replicated and is limited to S phase of the cell cycle. In the cell, DNA is packaged with histone proteins into chromatin, and both DNA and histones are subject to epigenetic modifications that affect chromatin state. Euchromatin and heterochromatin are chromatin states marked by epigenetic modifications specifying open and closed conformations, respectively. Using the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, we show that the time at which a DNA sequence replicates is influenced by the epigenetic modifications to the surrounding chromatin. DNA replication occurs in two phases, with euchromatin replicating in early and mid S phase and heterochromatin replicating late. DNA replication time has been linked to gene expression in other organisms, and this is also true in Arabidopsis because more genes are active in euchromatin when compared to heterochromatin. The earliest replicating DNA sequences are associated with acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56 (H3K56ac). H3K56ac is also abundant in active genes, but the patterns of association of H3K56ac with gene expression and DNA replication are distinct, suggesting that H3K56ac is independently linked to both processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Jin Lee
- Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Pete E. Pascuzzi
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Sharon B. Settlage
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Randall W. Shultz
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Milos Tanurdzic
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - Pablo D. Rabinowicz
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - Margit Menges
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Ping Zheng
- Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America
| | - Dorrie Main
- Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America
| | - James A. H. Murray
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Bryon Sosinski
- Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - George C. Allen
- Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Robert A. Martienssen
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
- Department of Molecular and Structural Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Matthew W. Vaughn
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - William F. Thompson
- Departments of Plant Biology, Genetics, and Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Kusic J, Tomic B, Divac A, Kojic S. Human initiation protein Orc4 prefers triple stranded DNA. Mol Biol Rep 2010; 37:2317-22. [PMID: 19690980 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9735-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2009] [Accepted: 08/04/2009] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In higher eukaryotes mechanism of DNA replication origin recognition and binding by origin recognition complex (ORC) is still unknown. Origin transfer studies have shown that origin sites are genetically determined, containing functionally interchangeable modules. One of such modules from the human lamin B2 origin of replication has the ability to adopt unorthodox structure partly composed of intramolecular triplex. Sequences involved in triplex formation coincide with ORC binding sites both in vitro and in vivo. To explore potential significance of unorthodox DNA structures in origin recognition by ORC, we tested DNA binding properties of human ORC subunit 4 (HsOrc4) which has independent DNA binding activity in vitro and similar binding characteristics as ORC holocomplex. Our results demonstrated that DNA binding activity of HsOrc4 depends on length and structure of DNA with triplex being the protein's preferred binding target. Such feature could play part in origin selection through directing ORC to DNA sequence prone to adopt unorthodox structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kusic
- Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 444a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Falaschi A, Abdurashidova G, Biamonti G. DNA replication, development and cancer: a homeotic connection? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2010; 45:14-22. [PMID: 19919294 DOI: 10.3109/10409230903365608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The homeotic proteins are transcription factors, highly conserved in metazoan organisms, exerting a pivotal role in development and differentiation. They individually display a loose specificity for the DNA sequence they can bind, but operate mainly in multi-molecular associations that assure their target and function specificity. Homeotic proteins are known to play a role in the positive or negative regulation of cell proliferation. Furthermore, many homeotic proteins are actually proto-oncogenes, since different translocations involving their genes cause tumors, particularly in the hematopoietic system. A one-hybrid screen to detect proteins with affinity for the lamin B2 replication origin identified three homeotic proteins, namely HoxA13, HoxC10 and HoxC13. Recent data demonstrate that the HoxC13 oncoprotein specifically associates with replication foci and binds in vitro and in vivo to several human DNA replication origins. Moreover, Hox proteins interact with geminin, a regulator of cell cycle progression, and control the interaction of this protein with the DNA replication licensing factor Ctd1. Thus, the homeotic proteins, by participating directly in the function of DNA replication origins, may provide a direct link between the accurate regulation of DNA replication required by the morphogenetic program and the deregulation of this process typical of cancer.
Collapse
|
141
|
Maric C, Prioleau MN. Interplay between DNA replication and gene expression: a harmonious coexistence. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010; 22:277-83. [PMID: 20363609 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2010] [Revised: 03/11/2010] [Accepted: 03/12/2010] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Multicellular organisms have evolved highly sophisticated machinery to that their genomes are accurately duplicated and that the various gene expression programs are established correctly. Recent large-scale studies have shed light on how these fundamental processes interact. Although the machinery mediating these processes share similar cis-regulatory elements, they are not strictly coregulated. Furthermore, studies of the replisome show that highly transcribed genes present a major obstacle to its operation. Further studies will be needed to identify key regulators of the spatio-temporal program of DNA replication, for the elucidation of the complex interplay between replication and transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrystelle Maric
- Institut Jacques Monod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris 7, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
142
|
Eaton ML, Galani K, Kang S, Bell SP, MacAlpine DM. Conserved nucleosome positioning defines replication origins. Genes Dev 2010; 24:748-53. [PMID: 20351051 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1913210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) specifies replication origin location. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORC recognizes the ARS (autonomously replicating sequence) consensus sequence (ACS), but only a subset of potential genomic sites are bound, suggesting other chromosomal features influence ORC binding. Using high-throughput sequencing to map ORC binding and nucleosome positioning, we show that yeast origins are characterized by an asymmetric pattern of positioned nucleosomes flanking the ACS. The origin sequences are sufficient to maintain a nucleosome-free origin; however, ORC is required for the precise positioning of nucleosomes flanking the origin. These findings identify local nucleosomes as an important determinant for origin selection and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
143
|
MacAlpine HK, Gordân R, Powell SK, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Drosophila ORC localizes to open chromatin and marks sites of cohesin complex loading. Genome Res 2010; 20:201-11. [PMID: 19996087 PMCID: PMC2813476 DOI: 10.1101/gr.097873.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2009] [Accepted: 11/23/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) is an essential DNA replication initiation factor conserved in all eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ORC binds to specific DNA elements; however, in higher eukaryotes, ORC exhibits little sequence specificity in vitro or in vivo. We investigated the genome-wide distribution of ORC in Drosophila and found that ORC localizes to specific chromosomal locations in the absence of any discernible simple motif. Although no clear sequence motif emerged, we were able to use machine learning approaches to accurately discriminate between ORC-associated sequences and ORC-free sequences based solely on primary sequence. The complex sequence features that define ORC binding sites are highly correlated with nucleosome positioning signals and likely represent a preferred nucleosomal landscape for ORC association. Open chromatin appears to be the underlying feature that is deterministic for ORC binding. ORC-associated sequences are enriched for the histone variant, H3.3, often at transcription start sites, and depleted for bulk nucleosomes. The density of ORC binding along the chromosome is reflected in the time at which a sequence replicates, with early replicating sequences having a high density of ORC binding. Finally, we found a high concordance between sites of ORC binding and cohesin loading, suggesting that, in addition to DNA replication, ORC may be required for the loading of cohesin on DNA in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Raluca Gordân
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Sara K. Powell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
|
145
|
The DNA unwinding element binding protein DUE-B interacts with Cdc45 in preinitiation complex formation. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:1495-507. [PMID: 20065034 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00710-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Template unwinding during DNA replication initiation requires the loading of the MCM helicase activator Cdc45 at replication origins. We show that Cdc45 interacts with the DNA unwinding element (DUE) binding protein DUE-B and that these proteins localize to the DUEs of active replication origins. DUE-B and Cdc45 are not bound at the inactive c-myc replicator in the absence of a functional DUE or at the recently identified ataxin 10 (ATX10) origin, which is silent before disease-related (ATTCT)(n) repeat length expansion of its DUE sequence, despite the presence of the origin recognition complex (ORC) and MCM proteins at these origins. Addition of a heterologous DUE to the ectopic c-myc origin, or expansion of the ATX10 DUE, leads to origin activation, DUE-B binding, and Cdc45 binding. DUE-B, Cdc45, and topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1) form complexes in cell extracts and when expressed from baculovirus vectors. During replication in Xenopus egg extracts, DUE-B and Cdc45 bind to chromatin with similar kinetics, and DUE-B immunodepletion blocks replication and the loading of Cdc45 and a fraction of TopBP1. The coordinated binding of DUE-B and Cdc45 to origins and the physical interactions of DUE-B, Cdc45, and TopBP1 suggest that complexes of these proteins are necessary for replication initiation.
Collapse
|
146
|
Karnani N, Taylor CM, Malhotra A, Dutta A. Genomic study of replication initiation in human chromosomes reveals the influence of transcription regulation and chromatin structure on origin selection. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 21:393-404. [PMID: 19955211 PMCID: PMC2814785 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-08-0707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication in metazoans initiates from multiple chromosomal loci called origins. This study identifies 150 new origins of replication that were confirmed by two methods of nascent strand purification. We discern the role of transcription initiation and regulation, as well as chromatin signatures in determining origin selection in human genome. DNA replication in metazoans initiates from multiple chromosomal loci called origins. Currently, there are two methods to purify origin-centered nascent strands: lambda exonuclease digestion and anti-bromodeoxyuridine immunoprecipitation. Because both methods have unique strengths and limitations, we purified nascent strands by both methods, hybridized them independently to tiling arrays (1% genome) and compared the data to have an accurate view of genome-wide origin distribution. By this criterion, we identified 150 new origins that were reproducible across the methods. Examination of a subset of these origins by chromatin immunoprecipitation against origin recognition complex (ORC) subunits 2 and 3 showed 93% of initiation peaks to localize at/within 1 kb of ORC binding sites. Correlation of origins with functional elements of the genome revealed origin activity to be significantly enriched around transcription start sites (TSSs). Consistent with proximity to TSSs, we found a third of initiation events to occur at or near the RNA polymerase II binding sites. Interestingly, ∼50% of the early origin activity was localized within 5 kb of transcription regulatory factor binding region clusters. The chromatin signatures around the origins were enriched in H3K4-(di- and tri)-methylation and H3 acetylation modifications on histones. Affinity of origins for open chromatin was also reiterated by their proximity to DNAse I-hypersensitive sites. Replication initiation peaks were AT rich, and >50% of the origins mapped to evolutionarily conserved regions of the genome. In summary, these findings indicate that replication initiation is influenced by transcription initiation and regulation as well as chromatin structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neerja Karnani
- Departments of *Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics and Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
147
|
Cadoret JC, Prioleau MN. Genome-wide approaches to determining origin distribution. Chromosome Res 2009; 18:79-89. [DOI: 10.1007/s10577-009-9094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
148
|
Gao M, Skolnick J. A threading-based method for the prediction of DNA-binding proteins with application to the human genome. PLoS Comput Biol 2009; 5:e1000567. [PMID: 19911048 PMCID: PMC2770119 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2009] [Accepted: 10/16/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Diverse mechanisms for DNA-protein recognition have been elucidated in numerous atomic complex structures from various protein families. These structural data provide an invaluable knowledge base not only for understanding DNA-protein interactions, but also for developing specialized methods that predict the DNA-binding function from protein structure. While such methods are useful, a major limitation is that they require an experimental structure of the target as input. To overcome this obstacle, we develop a threading-based method, DNA-Binding-Domain-Threader (DBD-Threader), for the prediction of DNA-binding domains and associated DNA-binding protein residues. Our method, which uses a template library composed of DNA-protein complex structures, requires only the target protein's sequence. In our approach, fold similarity and DNA-binding propensity are employed as two functional discriminating properties. In benchmark tests on 179 DNA-binding and 3,797 non-DNA-binding proteins, using templates whose sequence identity is less than 30% to the target, DBD-Threader achieves a sensitivity/precision of 56%/86%. This performance is considerably better than the standard sequence comparison method PSI-BLAST and is comparable to DBD-Hunter, which requires an experimental structure as input. Moreover, for over 70% of predicted DNA-binding domains, the backbone Root Mean Square Deviations (RMSDs) of the top-ranked structural models are within 6.5 A of their experimental structures, with their associated DNA-binding sites identified at satisfactory accuracy. Additionally, DBD-Threader correctly assigned the SCOP superfamily for most predicted domains. To demonstrate that DBD-Threader is useful for automatic function annotation on a large-scale, DBD-Threader was applied to 18,631 protein sequences from the human genome; 1,654 proteins are predicted to have DNA-binding function. Comparison with existing Gene Ontology (GO) annotations suggests that approximately 30% of our predictions are new. Finally, we present some interesting predictions in detail. In particular, it is estimated that approximately 20% of classic zinc finger domains play a functional role not related to direct DNA-binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mu Gao
- Center for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Skolnick
- Center for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Audit B, Zaghloul L, Vaillant C, Chevereau G, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Thermes C, Arneodo A. Open chromatin encoded in DNA sequence is the signature of 'master' replication origins in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:6064-75. [PMID: 19671527 PMCID: PMC2764438 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
For years, progress in elucidating the mechanisms underlying replication initiation and its coupling to transcriptional activities and to local chromatin structure has been hampered by the small number (approximately 30) of well-established origins in the human genome and more generally in mammalian genomes. Recent in silico studies of compositional strand asymmetries revealed a high level of organization of human genes around 1000 putative replication origins. Here, by comparing with recently experimentally identified replication origins, we provide further support that these putative origins are active in vivo. We show that regions approximately 300-kb wide surrounding most of these putative replication origins that replicate early in the S phase are hypersensitive to DNase I cleavage, hypomethylated and present a significant enrichment in genomic energy barriers that impair nucleosome formation (nucleosome-free regions). This suggests that these putative replication origins are specified by an open chromatin structure favored by the DNA sequence. We discuss how this distinctive attribute makes these origins, further qualified as 'master' replication origins, priviledged loci for future research to decipher the human spatio-temporal replication program. Finally, we argue that these 'master' origins are likely to play a key role in genome dynamics during evolution and in pathological situations.
Collapse
|
150
|
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) is a 6-subunit complex required for the initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotic organisms. ORC is also involved in other cell functions. The smallest Drosophila ORC subunit, Orc6, is important for both DNA replication and cytokinesis. To study the role of Orc6 in vivo, the orc6 gene was deleted by imprecise excision of P element. Lethal alleles of orc6 are defective in DNA replication and also show abnormal chromosome condensation and segregation. The analysis of cells containing the orc6 deletion revealed that they arrest in both the G(1) and mitotic stages of the cell cycle. Orc6 deletion can be rescued to viability by a full-length Orc6 transgene. The expression of mutant transgenes of Orc6 with deleted or mutated C-terminal domain results in a release of mutant cells from G(1) arrest and restoration of DNA replication, indicating that the DNA replication function of Orc6 is associated with its N-terminal domain. However, these mutant cells accumulate at mitosis, suggesting that the C-terminal domain of Orc6 is important for the passage through the M phase. In a cross-species complementation experiment, the expression of human Orc6 in Drosophila Orc6 mutant cells rescued DNA replication, suggesting that this function of the protein is conserved among metazoans.
Collapse
|