1
|
Chen B, MacAlpine HK, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Spatiotemporal kinetics of CAF-1-dependent chromatin maturation ensures transcription fidelity during S-phase. Genome Res 2023; 33:gr.278273.123. [PMID: 38081658 PMCID: PMC10760526 DOI: 10.1101/gr.278273.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Proper maintenance of epigenetic information after replication is dependent on the rapid assembly and maturation of chromatin. Chromatin Assembly Complex 1 (CAF-1) is a conserved histone chaperone that deposits (H3-H4)2 tetramers as part of the replication-dependent chromatin assembly process. Loss of CAF-1 leads to a delay in chromatin maturation, albeit with minimal impact on steady-state chromatin structure. However, the mechanisms by which CAF-1 mediates the deposition of (H3-H4)2 tetramers and the phenotypic consequences of CAF-1-associated assembly defects are not well understood. We used nascent chromatin occupancy profiling to track the spatiotemporal kinetics of chromatin maturation in both wild-type (WT) and CAF-1 mutant yeast cells. Our results show that loss of CAF-1 leads to a heterogeneous rate of nucleosome assembly, with some nucleosomes maturing at near WT kinetics and others showing significantly slower maturation kinetics. The slow-to-mature nucleosomes are enriched in intergenic and poorly transcribed regions, suggesting that transcription-dependent assembly mechanisms can reset the slow-to-mature nucleosomes following replication. Nucleosomes with slow maturation kinetics are also associated with poly(dA:dT) sequences, which implies that CAF-1 deposits histones in a manner that counteracts resistance from the inflexible DNA sequence, promoting the formation of histone octamers as well as ordered nucleosome arrays. In addition, we show that the delay in chromatin maturation is accompanied by a transient and S-phase-specific loss of gene silencing and transcriptional regulation, revealing that the DNA replication program can directly shape the chromatin landscape and modulate gene expression through the process of chromatin maturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boning Chen
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen B, MacAlpine HK, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Spatiotemporal kinetics of CAF-1-dependent chromatin maturation ensures transcription fidelity during S-phase. bioRxiv 2023:2023.05.25.541209. [PMID: 37292814 PMCID: PMC10245875 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.25.541209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Proper maintenance of epigenetic information after replication is dependent on the rapid assembly and maturation of chromatin. Chromatin Assembly Complex 1 (CAF-1) is a conserved histone chaperone that deposits (H3-H4)2 tetramers as part of the replication-dependent chromatin assembly process. Loss of CAF-1 leads to a delay in chromatin maturation, albeit with minimal impact on steady-state chromatin structure. However, the mechanisms by which CAF-1 mediates the deposition of (H3-H4)2 tetramers and the phenotypic consequences of CAF-1-associated assembly defects are not well understood. We used nascent chromatin occupancy profiling to track the spatiotemporal kinetics of chromatin maturation in both wild-type (WT) and CAF-1 mutant yeast cells. Our results show that loss of CAF-1 leads to a heterogeneous rate of nucleosome assembly, with some nucleosomes maturing at near WT kinetics and others exhibiting significantly slower maturation kinetics. The slow-to-mature nucleosomes are enriched in intergenic and poorly transcribed regions, suggesting that transcription-dependent assembly mechanisms can reset the slow-to-mature nucleosomes following replication. Nucleosomes with slow maturation kinetics are also associated with poly(dA:dT) sequences, which implies that CAF-1 deposits histones in a manner that counteracts resistance from the inflexible DNA sequence, promoting the formation of histone octamers as well as ordered nucleosome arrays. In addition, we demonstrate that the delay in chromatin maturation is accompanied by a transient and S-phase specific loss of gene silencing and transcriptional regulation, revealing that the DNA replication program can directly shape the chromatin landscape and modulate gene expression through the process of chromatin maturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boning Chen
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | - Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| | | | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Y, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Cell-Cycle-Dependent Chromatin Dynamics at Replication Origins. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12121998. [PMID: 34946946 PMCID: PMC8701747 DOI: 10.3390/genes12121998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Origins of DNA replication are specified by the ordered recruitment of replication factors in a cell-cycle–dependent manner. The assembly of the pre-replicative complex in G1 and the pre-initiation complex prior to activation in S phase are well characterized; however, the interplay between the assembly of these complexes and the local chromatin environment is less well understood. To investigate the dynamic changes in chromatin organization at and surrounding replication origins, we used micrococcal nuclease (MNase) to generate genome-wide chromatin occupancy profiles of nucleosomes, transcription factors, and replication proteins through consecutive cell cycles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During each G1 phase of two consecutive cell cycles, we observed the downstream repositioning of the origin-proximal +1 nucleosome and an increase in protected DNA fragments spanning the ARS consensus sequence (ACS) indicative of pre-RC assembly. We also found that the strongest correlation between chromatin occupancy at the ACS and origin efficiency occurred in early S phase, consistent with the rate-limiting formation of the Cdc45–Mcm2-7–GINS (CMG) complex being a determinant of origin activity. Finally, we observed nucleosome disruption and disorganization emanating from replication origins and traveling with the elongating replication forks across the genome in S phase, likely reflecting the disassembly and assembly of chromatin ahead of and behind the replication fork, respectively. These results provide insights into cell-cycle–regulated chromatin dynamics and how they relate to the regulation of origin activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulong Li
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
| | - Alexander J. Hartemink
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
- Correspondence: (A.J.H.); (D.M.M.)
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Correspondence: (A.J.H.); (D.M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoffman RA, MacAlpine HK, MacAlpine DM. Disruption of origin chromatin structure by helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication. Genes Dev 2021; 35:1339-1355. [PMID: 34556529 PMCID: PMC8494203 DOI: 10.1101/gad.348517.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Prior to initiation of DNA replication, the eukaryotic helicase, Mcm2-7, must be activated to unwind DNA at replication start sites in early S phase. To study helicase activation within origin chromatin, we constructed a conditional mutant of the polymerase α subunit Cdc17 (or Pol1) to prevent priming and block replication. Recovery of these cells at permissive conditions resulted in the generation of unreplicated gaps at origins, likely due to helicase activation prior to replication initiation. We used micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-based chromatin occupancy profiling under restrictive conditions to study chromatin dynamics associated with helicase activation. Helicase activation in the absence of DNA replication resulted in the disruption and disorganization of chromatin, which extends up to 1 kb from early, efficient replication origins. The CMG holohelicase complex also moves the same distance out from the origin, producing single-stranded DNA that activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint. Loss of the checkpoint did not regulate the progression and stalling of the CMG complex but rather resulted in the disruption of chromatin at both early and late origins. Finally, we found that the local sequence context regulates helicase progression in the absence of DNA replication, suggesting that the helicase is intrinsically less processive when uncoupled from replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Hoffman
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mitra S, Zhong J, Tran TQ, MacAlpine DM, Hartemink AJ. RoboCOP: jointly computing chromatin occupancy profiles for numerous factors from chromatin accessibility data. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:7925-7938. [PMID: 34255854 PMCID: PMC8373080 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromatin is a tightly packaged structure of DNA and protein within the nucleus of a cell. The arrangement of different protein complexes along the DNA modulates and is modulated by gene expression. Measuring the binding locations and occupancy levels of different transcription factors (TFs) and nucleosomes is therefore crucial to understanding gene regulation. Antibody-based methods for assaying chromatin occupancy are capable of identifying the binding sites of specific DNA binding factors, but only one factor at a time. In contrast, epigenomic accessibility data like MNase-seq, DNase-seq, and ATAC-seq provide insight into the chromatin landscape of all factors bound along the genome, but with little insight into the identities of those factors. Here, we present RoboCOP, a multivariate state space model that integrates chromatin accessibility data with nucleotide sequence to jointly compute genome-wide probabilistic scores of nucleosome and TF occupancy, for hundreds of different factors. We apply RoboCOP to MNase-seq and ATAC-seq data to elucidate the protein-binding landscape of nucleosomes and 150 TFs across the yeast genome, and show that our model makes better predictions than existing methods. We also compute a chromatin occupancy profile of the yeast genome under cadmium stress, revealing chromatin dynamics associated with transcriptional regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Mitra
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Jianling Zhong
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Trung Q Tran
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.,Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Alexander J Hartemink
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.,Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tran TQ, MacAlpine HK, Tripuraneni V, Mitra S, MacAlpine DM, Hartemink AJ. Linking the dynamics of chromatin occupancy and transcription with predictive models. Genome Res 2021; 31:1035-1046. [PMID: 33893157 PMCID: PMC8168580 DOI: 10.1101/gr.267237.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Though the sequence of the genome within each eukaryotic cell is essentially fixed, it exists within a complex and changing chromatin state. This state is determined, in part, by the dynamic binding of proteins to the DNA. These proteins—including histones, transcription factors (TFs), and polymerases—interact with one another, the genome, and other molecules to allow the chromatin to adopt one of exceedingly many possible configurations. Understanding how changing chromatin configurations associate with transcription remains a fundamental research problem. We sought to characterize at high spatiotemporal resolution the dynamic interplay between transcription and chromatin in response to cadmium stress. Whereas gene regulatory responses to environmental stress in yeast have been studied, how the chromatin state changes and how those changes connect to gene regulation remain unexplored. By combining MNase-seq and RNA-seq data, we found chromatin signatures of transcriptional activation and repression involving both nucleosomal and TF-sized DNA-binding factors. Using these signatures, we identified associations between chromatin dynamics and transcriptional regulation, not only for known cadmium response genes, but across the entire genome, including antisense transcripts. Those associations allowed us to develop generalizable models that predict dynamic transcriptional responses on the basis of dynamic chromatin signatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trung Q Tran
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Vinay Tripuraneni
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Sneha Mitra
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.,Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Alexander J Hartemink
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.,Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tripuraneni V, Memisoglu G, MacAlpine HK, Tran TQ, Zhu W, Hartemink AJ, Haber JE, MacAlpine DM. Local nucleosome dynamics and eviction following a double-strand break are reversible by NHEJ-mediated repair in the absence of DNA replication. Genome Res 2021; 31:775-788. [PMID: 33811083 PMCID: PMC8092003 DOI: 10.1101/gr.271155.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
We interrogated at nucleotide resolution the spatiotemporal order of chromatin changes that occur immediately following a site-specific double-strand break (DSB) upstream of the PHO5 locus and its subsequent repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). We observed the immediate eviction of a nucleosome flanking the break and the repositioning of adjacent nucleosomes away from the break. These early chromatin events were independent of the end-processing Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX) complex and preceded the MRX-dependent broad eviction of histones and DNA end-resectioning that extends up to ∼8 kb away from the break. We also examined the temporal dynamics of NHEJ-mediated repair in a G1-arrested population. Concomitant with DSB repair by NHEJ, we observed the redeposition and precise repositioning of nucleosomes at their originally occupied positions. This re-establishment of the prelesion chromatin landscape suggests that a DNA replication-independent mechanism exists to preserve epigenome organization following DSB repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Tripuraneni
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Gonen Memisoglu
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Trung Q Tran
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Wei Zhu
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | - James E Haber
- Department of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitra S, Zhong J, MacAlpine DM, Hartemink AJ. RoboCOP: Multivariate State Space Model Integrating Epigenomic Accessibility Data to Elucidate Genome-Wide Chromatin Occupancy. Res Comput Mol Biol 2020; 12074:136-151. [PMID: 34386808 PMCID: PMC8356533 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45257-5_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Chromatin is the tightly packaged structure of DNA and protein within the nucleus of a cell. The arrangement of different protein complexes along the DNA modulates and is modulated by gene expression. Measuring the binding locations and level of occupancy of different transcription factors (TFs) and nucleosomes is therefore crucial to understanding gene regulation. Antibody-based methods for assaying chromatin occupancy are capable of identifying the binding sites of specific DNA binding factors, but only one factor at a time. On the other hand, epigenomic accessibility data like ATAC-seq, DNase-seq, and MNase-seq provide insight into the chromatin landscape of all factors bound along the genome, but with minimal insight into the identities of those factors. Here, we present RoboCOP, a multivariate state space model that integrates chromatin information from epigenomic accessibility data with nucleotide sequence to compute genome-wide probabilistic scores of nucleosome and TF occupancy, for hundreds of different factors at once. RoboCOP can be applied to any epigenomic dataset that provides quantitative insight into chromatin accessibility in any organism, but here we apply it to MNase-seq data to elucidate the protein-binding landscape of nucleosomes and 150 TFs across the yeast genome. Using available protein-binding datasets from the literature, we show that our model more accurately predicts the binding of these factors genome-wide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneha Mitra
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Jianling Zhong
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Alexander J Hartemink
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
- Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The environmental carcinogen urethane exhibits a profound specificity for pulmonary tumors driven by an oncogenic Q61L/R mutation in the gene Kras. Similarly, the frequency, isoform, position, and substitution of oncogenic RAS mutations are often unique to human cancers. To elucidate the principles underlying this RAS mutation tropism of urethane, we adapted an error-corrected, high-throughput sequencing approach to detect mutations in murine Ras genes at great sensitivity. This analysis not only captured the initiating Kras mutation days after urethane exposure, but revealed that the sequence specificity of urethane mutagenesis, coupled with transcription and isoform locus, to be major influences on the extreme tropism of this carcinogen. Why the carcinogen urethane causes only lung tumours driven by a specific oncogenic mutation in just one Ras gene in mice is unclear. Here, the authors capture mutations immediately after urethane exposure and show that the sequence specificity of mutagenesis, transcriptional status, and Ras genetic loci may all contribute to this specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Christopher M Counter
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gutiérrez MP, MacAlpine HK, MacAlpine DM. Nascent chromatin occupancy profiling reveals locus- and factor-specific chromatin maturation dynamics behind the DNA replication fork. Genome Res 2019; 29:1123-1133. [PMID: 31217252 PMCID: PMC6633257 DOI: 10.1101/gr.243386.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Proper regulation and maintenance of the epigenome is necessary to preserve genome function. However, in every cell division, the epigenetic state is disassembled and then reassembled in the wake of the DNA replication fork. Chromatin restoration on nascent DNA is a complex and regulated process that includes nucleosome assembly and remodeling, deposition of histone variants, and the re-establishment of transcription factor binding. To study the genome-wide dynamics of chromatin restoration behind the DNA replication fork, we developed nascent chromatin occupancy profiles (NCOPs) to comprehensively profile nascent and mature chromatin at nucleotide resolution. Although nascent chromatin is inherently less organized than mature chromatin, we identified locus-specific differences in the kinetics of chromatin maturation that were predicted by the epigenetic landscape, including the histone variant H2AZ, which marked loci with rapid maturation kinetics. The chromatin maturation at origins of DNA replication was dependent on whether the origin underwent initiation or was passively replicated from distal-originating replication forks, suggesting distinct chromatin assembly mechanisms surrounding activated and disassembled prereplicative complexes. Finally, we identified sites that were only occupied transiently by DNA-binding factors following passage of the replication fork, which may provide a mechanism for perturbations of the DNA replication program to shape the regulatory landscape of the genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica P Gutiérrez
- University Program in Genetics and Genomics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- University Program in Genetics and Genomics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.,Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Foss EJ, Gatbonton-Schwager T, Thiesen AH, Taylor E, Soriano R, Lao U, MacAlpine DM, Bedalov A. Sir2 suppresses transcription-mediated displacement of Mcm2-7 replicative helicases at the ribosomal DNA repeats. PLoS Genet 2019; 15:e1008138. [PMID: 31083663 PMCID: PMC6532929 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive DNA sequences within eukaryotic heterochromatin are poorly transcribed and replicate late in S-phase. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone deacetylase Sir2 is required for both transcriptional silencing and late replication at the repetitive ribosomal DNA arrays (rDNA). Despite the widespread association between transcription and replication timing, it remains unclear how transcription might impinge on replication, or vice versa. Here we show that, when silencing of an RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II)-transcribed non-coding RNA at the rDNA is disrupted by SIR2 deletion, RNA polymerase pushes and thereby relocalizes replicative Mcm2-7 helicases away from their loading sites to an adjacent region with low nucleosome occupancy, and this relocalization is associated with increased rDNA origin efficiency. Our results suggest a model in which two of the major defining features of heterochromatin, transcriptional silencing and late replication, are mechanistically linked through suppression of polymerase-mediated displacement of replication initiation complexes. Eukaryotic genomes typically contain large regions of repetitive DNA, referred to as heterochromatin, that are both transcriptionally silent and late replicating. We provide a possible explanation for the association between transcriptional silencing and late replication. Budding yeast contains a histone deacetylase called SIR2 that was originally identified as a transcriptional repressor, but was later also found to ensure late replication of repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences. We show that the transcription that occurs in the absence of SIR2 directly displaces the helicase required for replication initiation at the rDNA. This work represents an important advance in understanding the interplay between transcription and replication at repetitive sequences by directly linking transcription with replication machinery in heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Foss
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | | | - Adam H Thiesen
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Erin Taylor
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Rafael Soriano
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Uyen Lao
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Antonio Bedalov
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.,Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Armstrong RL, Penke TJR, Strahl BD, Matera AG, McKay DJ, MacAlpine DM, Duronio RJ. Chromatin conformation and transcriptional activity are permissive regulators of DNA replication initiation in Drosophila. Genome Res 2018; 28:1688-1700. [PMID: 30279224 PMCID: PMC6211642 DOI: 10.1101/gr.239913.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin structure has emerged as a key contributor to spatial and temporal control over the initiation of DNA replication. However, despite genome-wide correlations between early replication of gene-rich, accessible euchromatin and late replication of gene-poor, inaccessible heterochromatin, a causal relationship between chromatin structure and replication initiation remains elusive. Here, we combined histone gene engineering and whole-genome sequencing in Drosophila to determine how perturbing chromatin structure affects replication initiation. We found that most pericentric heterochromatin remains late replicating in H3K9R mutants, even though H3K9R pericentric heterochromatin is depleted of HP1a, more accessible, and transcriptionally active. These data indicate that HP1a loss, increased chromatin accessibility, and elevated transcription do not result in early replication of heterochromatin. Nevertheless, a small amount of pericentric heterochromatin with increased accessibility replicates earlier in H3K9R mutants. Transcription is de-repressed in these regions of advanced replication but not in those regions of the H3K9R mutant genome that replicate later, suggesting that transcriptional repression may contribute to late replication. We also explored relationships among chromatin, transcription, and replication in euchromatin by analyzing H4K16R mutants. In Drosophila, the X Chromosome gene expression is up-regulated twofold and replicates earlier in XY males than it does in XX females. We found that H4K16R mutation prevents normal male development and abrogates hyperexpression and earlier replication of the male X, consistent with previously established genome-wide correlations between transcription and early replication. In contrast, H4K16R females are viable and fertile, indicating that H4K16 modification is dispensable for genome replication and gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin L Armstrong
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Taylor J R Penke
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Brian D Strahl
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - A Gregory Matera
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Department of Genetics.,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Daniel J McKay
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Department of Genetics.,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Robert J Duronio
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.,Department of Genetics.,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Y, Khan A, Marks AB, Smith OK, Giri S, Lin YC, Creager R, MacAlpine DM, Prasanth KV, Aladjem MI, Prasanth SG. Temporal association of ORCA/LRWD1 to late-firing origins during G1 dictates heterochromatin replication and organization. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:2490-2502. [PMID: 27924004 PMCID: PMC5389698 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication requires the recruitment of a pre-replication complex facilitated by Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) onto the chromatin during G1 phase of the cell cycle. The ORC-associated protein (ORCA/LRWD1) stabilizes ORC on chromatin. Here, we evaluated the genome-wide distribution of ORCA using ChIP-seq during specific time points of G1. ORCA binding sites on the G1 chromatin are dynamic and temporally regulated. ORCA association to specific genomic sites decreases as the cells progressed towards S-phase. The majority of the ORCA-bound sites represent replication origins that also associate with the repressive chromatin marks H3K9me3 and methylated-CpGs, consistent with ORCA-bound origins initiating DNA replication late in S-phase. Further, ORCA directly associates with the repressive marks and interacts with the enzymes that catalyze these marks. Regions that associate with both ORCA and H3K9me3, exhibit diminished H3K9 methylation in ORCA-depleted cells, suggesting a role for ORCA in recruiting the H3K9me3 mark at certain genomic loci. Similarly, DNA methylation is altered at ORCA-occupied sites in cells lacking ORCA. Furthermore, repressive chromatin marks influence ORCA's binding on chromatin. We propose that ORCA coordinates with the histone and DNA methylation machinery to establish a repressive chromatin environment at a subset of origins, which primes them for late replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yating Wang
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Abid Khan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Anna B Marks
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Owen K Smith
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Sumanprava Giri
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Yo-Chuen Lin
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Rachel Creager
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Kannanganattu V Prasanth
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Mirit I Aladjem
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Supriya G Prasanth
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601S Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
In this review, Prioleau and MacAlpine summarize recent advances in our understanding of how primary sequence, chromatin environment, and nuclear architecture contribute to the dynamic selection and activation of replication origins across diverse cell types and developmental stages. For more than three decades, investigators have sought to identify the precise locations where DNA replication initiates in mammalian genomes. The development of molecular and biochemical approaches to identify start sites of DNA replication (origins) based on the presence of defining and characteristic replication intermediates at specific loci led to the identification of only a handful of mammalian replication origins. The limited number of identified origins prevented a comprehensive and exhaustive search for conserved genomic features that were capable of specifying origins of DNA replication. More recently, the adaptation of origin-mapping assays to genome-wide approaches has led to the identification of tens of thousands of replication origins throughout mammalian genomes, providing an unprecedented opportunity to identify both genetic and epigenetic features that define and regulate their distribution and utilization. Here we summarize recent advances in our understanding of how primary sequence, chromatin environment, and nuclear architecture contribute to the dynamic selection and activation of replication origins across diverse cell types and developmental stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Noëlle Prioleau
- Institut Jacques Monod, UMR7592, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite Paris Diderot, Equipe Labellisee Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, Paris 75013, France
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Azmi IF, Watanabe S, Maloney MF, Kang S, Belsky JA, MacAlpine DM, Peterson CL, Bell SP. Nucleosomes influence multiple steps during replication initiation. eLife 2017; 6. [PMID: 28322723 PMCID: PMC5400510 DOI: 10.7554/elife.22512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic replication origin licensing, activation and timing are influenced by chromatin but a mechanistic understanding is lacking. Using reconstituted nucleosomal DNA replication assays, we assessed the impact of nucleosomes on replication initiation. To generate distinct nucleosomal landscapes, different chromatin-remodeling enzymes (CREs) were used to remodel nucleosomes on origin-DNA templates. Nucleosomal organization influenced two steps of replication initiation: origin licensing and helicase activation. Origin licensing assays showed that local nucleosome positioning enhanced origin specificity and modulated helicase loading by influencing ORC DNA binding. Interestingly, SWI/SNF- and RSC-remodeled nucleosomes were permissive for origin licensing but showed reduced helicase activation. Specific CREs rescued replication of these templates if added prior to helicase activation, indicating a permissive chromatin state must be established during origin licensing to allow efficient origin activation. Our studies show nucleosomes directly modulate origin licensing and activation through distinct mechanisms and provide insights into the regulation of replication initiation by chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishara F Azmi
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
| | - Shinya Watanabe
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
| | - Michael F Maloney
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
| | - Sukhyun Kang
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States.,Center for Genomic Integrity, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Jason A Belsky
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States.,Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, United States
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
| | - Craig L Peterson
- Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
| | - Stephen P Bell
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li Y, Armstrong RL, Duronio RJ, MacAlpine DM. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 by PR-Set7 ensures the integrity of late replicating sequence domains in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:7204-18. [PMID: 27131378 PMCID: PMC5009726 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The methylation state of lysine 20 on histone H4 (H4K20) has been linked to chromatin compaction, transcription, DNA repair and DNA replication. Monomethylation of H4K20 (H4K20me1) is mediated by the cell cycle-regulated histone methyltransferase PR-Set7. PR-Set7 depletion in mammalian cells results in defective S phase progression and the accumulation of DNA damage, which has been partially attributed to defects in origin selection and activation. However, these studies were limited to only a handful of mammalian origins, and it remains unclear how PR-Set7 and H4K20 methylation impact the replication program on a genomic scale. We employed genetic, cytological, and genomic approaches to better understand the role of PR-Set7 and H4K20 methylation in regulating DNA replication and genome stability in Drosophila cells. We find that deregulation of H4K20 methylation had no impact on origin activation throughout the genome. Instead, depletion of PR-Set7 and loss of H4K20me1 results in the accumulation of DNA damage and an ATR-dependent cell cycle arrest. Coincident with the ATR-dependent cell cycle arrest, we find increased DNA damage that is specifically limited to late replicating regions of the Drosophila genome, suggesting that PR-Set7-mediated monomethylation of H4K20 is critical for maintaining the genomic integrity of late replicating domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulong Li
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Robin L Armstrong
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Robert J Duronio
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA Departments of Biology and Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Belsky JA, MacAlpine HK, Lubelsky Y, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Genome-wide chromatin footprinting reveals changes in replication origin architecture induced by pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev 2015; 29:212-24. [PMID: 25593310 PMCID: PMC4298139 DOI: 10.1101/gad.247924.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Start sites of DNA replication are marked by the origin recognition complex (ORC), which coordinates Mcm2–7 helicase loading to form the prereplicative complex (pre-RC). Belsky et al. “footprinted” nucleosomes, transcription factors, and replication proteins at multiple points during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. This revealed a precise ORC-dependent footprint at 269 origins in G2. A separate class of inefficient origins exhibited protein occupancy only in G1. The local chromatin environment restricts the loading of the Mcm2–7 double hexamer either upstream of or downstream from the ACS. Start sites of DNA replication are marked by the origin recognition complex (ORC), which coordinates Mcm2–7 helicase loading to form the prereplicative complex (pre-RC). Although pre-RC assembly is well characterized in vitro, the process is poorly understood within the local chromatin environment surrounding replication origins. To reveal how the chromatin architecture modulates origin selection and activation, we “footprinted” nucleosomes, transcription factors, and replication proteins at multiple points during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Our nucleotide-resolution protein occupancy profiles resolved a precise ORC-dependent footprint at 269 origins in G2. A separate class of inefficient origins exhibited protein occupancy only in G1, suggesting that stable ORC chromatin association in G2 is a determinant of origin efficiency. G1 nucleosome remodeling concomitant with pre-RC assembly expanded the origin nucleosome-free region and enhanced activation efficiency. Finally, the local chromatin environment restricts the loading of the Mcm2–7 double hexamer either upstream of or downstream from the ARS consensus sequence (ACS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Belsky
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA;
| | - Yoav Lubelsky
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Alexander J Hartemink
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA; Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA; Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
DNA replication is a dynamic process that occurs in a temporal order along each of the chromosomes. A consequence of the temporally coordinated activation of replication origins is the establishment of broad domains (>100 kb) that replicate either early or late in S phase. This partitioning of the genome into early and late replication domains is important for maintaining genome stability, gene dosage, and epigenetic inheritance; however, the molecular mechanisms that define and establish these domains are poorly understood. The modENCODE Project provided an opportunity to investigate the chromatin features that define the Drosophila replication timing program in multiple cell lines. The majority of early and late replicating domains in the Drosophila genome were static across all cell lines; however, a small subset of domains was dynamic and exhibited differences in replication timing between the cell lines. Both origin selection and activation contribute to defining the DNA replication program. Our results suggest that static early and late replicating domains were defined at the level of origin selection (ORC binding) and likely mediated by chromatin accessibility. In contrast, dynamic domains exhibited low ORC densities in both cell types, suggesting that origin activation and not origin selection governs the plasticity of the DNA replication program. Finally, we show that the male-specific early replication of the X chromosome is dependent on the dosage compensation complex (DCC), suggesting that the transcription and replication programs respond to the same chromatin cues. Specifically, MOF-mediated hyperacetylation of H4K16 on the X chromosome promotes both the up-regulation of male-specific transcription and origin activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Lubelsky
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Joseph A Prinz
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Leyna DeNapoli
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Yulong Li
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Jason A Belsky
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Powell SK, MacAlpine HK, Prinz JA, Li Y, Belsky JA, MacAlpine DM. Dynamic loading and redistribution of the Mcm2-7 helicase complex through the cell cycle. EMBO J 2015; 34:531-43. [PMID: 25555795 DOI: 10.15252/embj.201488307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic replication origins are defined by the ORC-dependent loading of the Mcm2-7 helicase complex onto chromatin in G1. Paradoxically, there is a vast excess of Mcm2-7 relative to ORC assembled onto chromatin in G1. These excess Mcm2-7 complexes exhibit little co-localization with ORC or replication foci and can function as dormant origins. We dissected the mechanisms regulating the assembly and distribution of the Mcm2-7 complex in the Drosophila genome. We found that in the absence of cyclin E/Cdk2 activity, there was a 10-fold decrease in chromatin-associated Mcm2-7 relative to the levels found at the G1/S transition. The minimal amounts of Mcm2-7 loaded in the absence of cyclin E/Cdk2 activity were strictly localized to ORC binding sites. In contrast, cyclin E/Cdk2 activity was required for maximal loading of Mcm2-7 and a dramatic genome-wide reorganization of the distribution of Mcm2-7 that is shaped by active transcription. Thus, increasing cyclin E/Cdk2 activity over the course of G1 is not only critical for Mcm2-7 loading, but also for the distribution of the Mcm2-7 helicase prior to S-phase entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara K Powell
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Heather K MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph A Prinz
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yulong Li
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jason A Belsky
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pershing NLK, Lampson BL, Belsky JA, Kaltenbrun E, MacAlpine DM, Counter CM. Rare codons capacitate Kras-driven de novo tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest 2014; 125:222-33. [PMID: 25437878 DOI: 10.1172/jci77627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The KRAS gene is commonly mutated in human cancers, rendering the encoded small GTPase constitutively active and oncogenic. This gene has the unusual feature of being enriched for rare codons, which limit protein expression. Here, to determine the effect of the rare codon bias of the KRAS gene on de novo tumorigenesis, we introduced synonymous mutations that converted rare codons into common codons in exon 3 of the Kras gene in mice. Compared with control animals, mice with at least 1 copy of this Kras(ex3op) allele had fewer tumors following carcinogen exposure, and this allele was mutated less often, with weaker oncogenic mutations in these tumors. This reduction in tumorigenesis was attributable to higher expression of the Kras(ex3op) allele, which induced growth arrest when oncogenic and exhibited tumor-suppressive activity when not mutated. Together, our data indicate that the inherent rare codon bias of KRAS plays an integral role in tumorigenesis.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
The size of a eukaryotic genome presents a unique challenge to the cell: package and organize the DNA to fit within the confines of the nucleus while at the same time ensuring sufficient dynamics to allow access to specific sequences and features such as genes and regulatory elements. This is achieved via the dynamic nucleoprotein organization of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin. The basic unit of chromatin, the nucleosome, comprises a core particle with 147 bp of DNA wrapped 1.7 times around an octamer of histones. The nucleosome is a highly versatile and modular structure, both in its composition, with the existence of various histone variants, and through the addition of a series of posttranslational modifications on the histones. This versatility allows for both short-term regulatory responses to external signaling, as well as the long-term and multigenerational definition of large functional chromosomal domains within the nucleus, such as the centromere. Chromatin organization and its dynamics participate in essentially all DNA-templated processes, including transcription, replication, recombination, and repair. Here we will focus mainly on nucleosomal organization and describe the pathways and mechanisms that contribute to assembly of this organization and the role of chromatin in regulating the DNA replication program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lampson BL, Pershing NLK, Prinz JA, Lacsina JR, Marzluff WF, Nicchitta CV, MacAlpine DM, Counter CM. Rare codons regulate KRas oncogenesis. Curr Biol 2012; 23:70-5. [PMID: 23246410 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2012] [Revised: 10/30/2012] [Accepted: 11/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Oncogenic mutations in the small Ras GTPases KRas, HRas, and NRas render the proteins constitutively GTP bound and active, a state that promotes cancer. Ras proteins share ~85% amino acid identity, are activated by and signal through the same proteins, and can exhibit functional redundancy. Nevertheless, manipulating expression or activation of each isoform yields different cellular responses and tumorigenic phenotypes, even when different ras genes are expressed from the same locus. We now report a novel regulatory mechanism hardwired into the very sequence of RAS genes that underlies how such similar proteins impact tumorigenesis differently. Specifically, despite their high sequence similarity, KRAS is poorly translated compared to HRAS due to enrichment in genomically underrepresented or rare codons. Converting rare to common codons increases KRas expression and tumorigenicity to mirror that of HRas. Furthermore, in a genome-wide survey, similar gene pairs with opposing codon bias were identified that not only manifest dichotomous protein expression but also are enriched in key signaling protein classes and pathways. Thus, synonymous nucleotide differences affecting codon usage account for differences between HRas and KRas expression and function and may represent a broader regulation strategy in cell signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Lampson
- Department of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lubelsky Y, MacAlpine HK, MacAlpine DM. Genome-wide localization of replication factors. Methods 2012; 57:187-95. [PMID: 22465279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2011] [Revised: 03/12/2012] [Accepted: 03/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is a powerful tool for the identification and characterization of protein-DNA interactions in vivo. ChIP has been utilized to study diverse nuclear processes such as transcription regulation, chromatin modification, DNA recombination and DNA replication at specific loci and, more recently, across the entire genome. Advances in genomic approaches, and whole genome sequencing in particular, have made it possible and affordable to comprehensively identify specific protein binding sites throughout the genomes of higher eukaryotes. The dynamic nature of the DNA replication program and the transient occupancy of many replication factors throughout the cell cycle present additional challenges that may not pertain to the mapping of site specific transcription factors. Here we discuss the specific considerations that need to be addressed in the application of ChIP to the genome-wide location analysis of protein factors involved in DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Lubelsky
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
DNA replication is an essential cell cycle event required for the accurate and timely duplication of the chromosomes. It is essential that the genome is replicated accurately and completely within the confines of S-phase. Failure to completely copy the genome has the potential to result in catastrophic genomic instability. Replication initiates in a coordinated manner from multiple locations, termed origins of replication, distributed across each of the chromosomes. The selection of these origins of replication is a dynamic process responding to both developmental and tissue-specific signals. In this review, we explore the role of the local chromatin environment in regulating the DNA replication program at the level of origin selection and activation. Finally, there is increasing molecular evidence that the DNA replication program itself affects the chromatin landscape, suggesting that DNA replication is critical for both genetic and epigenetic inheritance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Queying Ding
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Roy S, Ernst J, Kharchenko PV, Kheradpour P, Negre N, Eaton ML, Landolin JM, Bristow CA, Ma L, Lin MF, Washietl S, Arshinoff BI, Ay F, Meyer PE, Robine N, Washington NL, Di Stefano L, Berezikov E, Brown CD, Candeias R, Carlson JW, Carr A, Jungreis I, Marbach D, Sealfon R, Tolstorukov MY, Will S, Alekseyenko AA, Artieri C, Booth BW, Brooks AN, Dai Q, Davis CA, Duff MO, Feng X, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Henikoff JG, Kapranov P, Li R, MacAlpine HK, Malone J, Minoda A, Nordman J, Okamura K, Perry M, Powell SK, Riddle NC, Sakai A, Samsonova A, Sandler JE, Schwartz YB, Sher N, Spokony R, Sturgill D, van Baren M, Wan KH, Yang L, Yu C, Feingold E, Good P, Guyer M, Lowdon R, Ahmad K, Andrews J, Berger B, Brenner SE, Brent MR, Cherbas L, Elgin SCR, Gingeras TR, Grossman R, Hoskins RA, Kaufman TC, Kent W, Kuroda MI, Orr-Weaver T, Perrimon N, Pirrotta V, Posakony JW, Ren B, Russell S, Cherbas P, Graveley BR, Lewis S, Micklem G, Oliver B, Park PJ, Celniker SE, Henikoff S, Karpen GH, Lai EC, MacAlpine DM, Stein LD, White KP, Kellis M. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010; 330:1787-97. [PMID: 21177974 PMCID: PMC3192495 DOI: 10.1126/science.1198374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 899] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To gain insight into how genomic information is translated into cellular and developmental programs, the Drosophila model organism Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (modENCODE) project is comprehensively mapping transcripts, histone modifications, chromosomal proteins, transcription factors, replication proteins and intermediates, and nucleosome properties across a developmental time course and in multiple cell lines. We have generated more than 700 data sets and discovered protein-coding, noncoding, RNA regulatory, replication, and chromatin elements, more than tripling the annotated portion of the Drosophila genome. Correlated activity patterns of these elements reveal a functional regulatory network, which predicts putative new functions for genes, reveals stage- and tissue-specific regulators, and enables gene-expression prediction. Our results provide a foundation for directed experimental and computational studies in Drosophila and related species and also a model for systematic data integration toward comprehensive genomic and functional annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sushmita Roy
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Jason Ernst
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Peter V. Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pouya Kheradpour
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Nicolas Negre
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Matthew L. Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jane M. Landolin
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Christopher A. Bristow
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Lijia Ma
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Michael F. Lin
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Stefan Washietl
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Bradley I. Arshinoff
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, 27 King’s College Circle, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Ferhat Ay
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Patrick E. Meyer
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Machine Learning Group, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP212, Brussels 1050, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Robine
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Luisa Di Stefano
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Eugene Berezikov
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Christopher D. Brown
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rogerio Candeias
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Joseph W. Carlson
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Adrian Carr
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Irwin Jungreis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Daniel Marbach
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Rachel Sealfon
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Michael Y. Tolstorukov
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sebastian Will
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Artyom A. Alekseyenko
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Carlo Artieri
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Benjamin W. Booth
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Angela N. Brooks
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Qi Dai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Carrie A. Davis
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
| | - Michael O. Duff
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Xin Feng
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Andrey A. Gorchakov
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tingting Gu
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Jorja G. Henikoff
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - Renhua Li
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John Malone
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Aki Minoda
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | | | - Katsutomo Okamura
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Marc Perry
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Sara K. Powell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nicole C. Riddle
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Akiko Sakai
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Anastasia Samsonova
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jeremy E. Sandler
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Yuri B. Schwartz
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Noa Sher
- White-head Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Rebecca Spokony
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - David Sturgill
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marijke van Baren
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Kenneth H. Wan
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Charles Yu
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Elise Feingold
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Peter Good
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Mark Guyer
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Rebecca Lowdon
- Division of Extramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Bethesda, MD 20892–9305, USA
| | - Kami Ahmad
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Justen Andrews
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Bonnie Berger
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| | - Steven E. Brenner
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Michael R. Brent
- Center for Genome Sciences, Washington University, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA
| | - Lucy Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Sarah C. R. Elgin
- Department of Biology CB-1137, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Thomas R. Gingeras
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA
- Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA
| | - Robert Grossman
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Roger A. Hoskins
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Thomas C. Kaufman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - William Kent
- Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
| | - Mitzi I. Kuroda
- Department of Medicine and Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Norbert Perrimon
- Department of Genetics and Drosophila RNAi Screening Center, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vincenzo Pirrotta
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - James W. Posakony
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Bing Ren
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Steven Russell
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Peter Cherbas
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, 1001 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN 47405–7005, USA
| | - Brenton R. Graveley
- Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, University of Connecticut Stem Cell Institute, 263 Farmington, CT 06030–6403, USA
| | - Suzanna Lewis
- Genome Sciences Division, LBNL, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Gos Micklem
- Department of Genetics and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK
| | - Brian Oliver
- Section of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Peter J. Park
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Susan E. Celniker
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Steven Henikoff
- Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Gary H. Karpen
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Eric C. Lai
- Sloan-Kettering Institute, 1275 York Avenue, Box 252, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Lincoln D. Stein
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, 101 College Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Kevin P. White
- Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, 900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Manolis Kellis
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
DNA replication initiates from thousands of start sites throughout the Drosophila genome and must be coordinated with other ongoing nuclear processes such as transcription to ensure genetic and epigenetic inheritance. Considerable progress has been made toward understanding how chromatin modifications regulate the transcription program; in contrast, we know relatively little about the role of the chromatin landscape in defining how start sites of DNA replication are selected and regulated. Here, we describe the Drosophila replication program in the context of the chromatin and transcription landscape for multiple cell lines using data generated by the modENCODE consortium. We find that while the cell lines exhibit similar replication programs, there are numerous cell line-specific differences that correlate with changes in the chromatin architecture. We identify chromatin features that are associated with replication timing, early origin usage, and ORC binding. Primary sequence, activating chromatin marks, and DNA-binding proteins (including chromatin remodelers) contribute in an additive manner to specify ORC-binding sites. We also generate accurate and predictive models from the chromatin data to describe origin usage and strength between cell lines. Multiple activating chromatin modifications contribute to the function and relative strength of replication origins, suggesting that the chromatin environment does not regulate origins of replication as a simple binary switch, but rather acts as a tunable rheostat to regulate replication initiation events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kharchenko PV, Alekseyenko AA, Schwartz YB, Minoda A, Riddle NC, Ernst J, Sabo PJ, Larschan E, Gorchakov AA, Gu T, Linder-Basso D, Plachetka A, Shanower G, Tolstorukov MY, Luquette LJ, Xi R, Jung YL, Park RW, Bishop EP, Canfield TK, Sandstrom R, Thurman RE, MacAlpine DM, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Kellis M, Elgin SCR, Kuroda MI, Pirrotta V, Karpen GH, Park PJ. Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 2010; 471:480-5. [PMID: 21179089 PMCID: PMC3109908 DOI: 10.1038/nature09725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 647] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2010] [Accepted: 12/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin is composed of DNA and a variety of modified histones and non-histone proteins, which have an impact on cell differentiation, gene regulation and other key cellular processes. Here we present a genome-wide chromatin landscape for Drosophila melanogaster based on eighteen histone modifications, summarized by nine prevalent combinatorial patterns. Integrative analysis with other data (non-histone chromatin proteins, DNase I hypersensitivity, GRO-Seq reads produced by engaged polymerase, short/long RNA products) reveals discrete characteristics of chromosomes, genes, regulatory elements and other functional domains. We find that active genes display distinct chromatin signatures that are correlated with disparate gene lengths, exon patterns, regulatory functions and genomic contexts. We also demonstrate a diversity of signatures among Polycomb targets that include a subset with paused polymerase. This systematic profiling and integrative analysis of chromatin signatures provides insights into how genomic elements are regulated, and will serve as a resource for future experimental investigations of genome structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter V Kharchenko
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
To ensure genomic integrity, the genome must be duplicated exactly once per cell cycle. Disruption of replication licensing mechanisms may lead to re-replication and genomic instability. Cdt1, also known as Double-parked (Dup) in Drosophila, is a key regulator of the assembly of the pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) and its activity is strictly limited to G1 by multiple mechanisms including Cul4-Ddb1 mediated proteolysis and inhibition by geminin. We assayed the genomic consequences of disregulating the replication licensing mechanisms by RNAi depletion of geminin. We found that not all origins of replication were sensitive to geminin depletion and that heterochromatic sequences were preferentially re-replicated in the absence of licensing mechanisms. The preferential re-activation of heterochromatic origins of replication was unexpected because these are typically the last sequences to be duplicated in a normal cell cycle. We found that the re-replication of heterochromatin was regulated not at the level of pre-RC activation, but rather by the formation of the pre-RC. Unlike the global assembly of the pre-RC that occurs throughout the genome in G1, in the absence of geminin, limited pre-RC assembly was restricted to the heterochromatin by elevated cyclin A-CDK activity. These results suggest that there are chromatin and cell cycle specific controls that regulate the re-assembly of the pre-RC outside of G1. Catastrophic consequences may occur if the cell fails to either completely copy the genome or if it duplicates some regions of the genome more than once in a cell cycle. The cell must coordinate thousands of DNA replication start sites (origins) to ensure that the entire genome is copied and that no replication origin is activated more than once in a cell cycle. The cell accomplishes this coordination by confining the selection and activation of replication origins to discrete phases of the cell cycle. Start sites can only be selected or ‘licensed’ for DNA replication in G1 and similarly, they can only be activated for the initiation of DNA replication in S phase. Disruption of the mechanisms that regulate this ‘licensing’ process have been shown to result in extensive re-replication, genomic instability and tumorigenesis in a variety of eukaryotic systems. Here we use genomic approaches in Drosophila to identify which origins of replication are susceptible to re-initiation of DNA replication in the absence of replication licensing controls. Unexpectedly, we find that sequences in the heterochromatin, which were thought to contain only inefficient origins of replication, are preferentially re-replicated. These results provide insights into how origins of replication are selected and regulated in distinct chromatin environments to maintain genomic stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Queying Ding
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Müller P, Park S, Shor E, Huebert DJ, Warren CL, Ansari AZ, Weinreich M, Eaton ML, MacAlpine DM, Fox CA. The conserved bromo-adjacent homology domain of yeast Orc1 functions in the selection of DNA replication origins within chromatin. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1418-33. [PMID: 20595233 PMCID: PMC2895200 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1906410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2010] [Accepted: 05/11/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to the specific positions on chromosomes that serve as DNA replication origins. Although ORC is conserved from yeast to humans, the DNA sequence elements that specify ORC binding are not. In particular, metazoan ORC shows no obvious DNA sequence specificity, whereas yeast ORC binds to a specific DNA sequence within all yeast origins. Thus, whereas chromatin must play an important role in metazoan ORC's ability to recognize origins, it is unclear whether chromatin plays a role in yeast ORC's recognition of origins. This study focused on the role of the conserved N-terminal bromo-adjacent homology domain of yeast Orc1 (Orc1BAH). Recent studies indicate that BAH domains are chromatin-binding modules. We show that the Orc1BAH domain was necessary for ORC's stable association with yeast chromosomes, and was physiologically relevant to DNA replication in vivo. This replication role was separable from the Orc1BAH domain's previously defined role in transcriptional silencing. Genome-wide analyses of ORC binding in ORC1 and orc1bahDelta cells revealed that the Orc1BAH domain contributed to ORC's association with most yeast origins, including a class of origins highly dependent on the Orc1BAH domain for ORC association (orc1bahDelta-sensitive origins). Orc1bahDelta-sensitive origins required the Orc1BAH domain for normal activity on chromosomes and plasmids, and were associated with a distinct local nucleosome structure. These data provide molecular insights into how the Orc1BAH domain contributes to ORC's selection of replication origins, as well as new tools for examining conserved mechanisms governing ORC's selection of origins within eukaryotic chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Müller
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Sookhee Park
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Erika Shor
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Dana J. Huebert
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Christopher L. Warren
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Aseem Z. Ansari
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - Michael Weinreich
- Laboratory for Chromosome Replication, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, USA
| | - Matthew L. Eaton
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Catherine A. Fox
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) specifies replication origin location. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ORC recognizes the ARS (autonomously replicating sequence) consensus sequence (ACS), but only a subset of potential genomic sites are bound, suggesting other chromosomal features influence ORC binding. Using high-throughput sequencing to map ORC binding and nucleosome positioning, we show that yeast origins are characterized by an asymmetric pattern of positioned nucleosomes flanking the ACS. The origin sequences are sufficient to maintain a nucleosome-free origin; however, ORC is required for the precise positioning of nucleosomes flanking the origin. These findings identify local nucleosomes as an important determinant for origin selection and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Eaton
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
MacAlpine HK, Gordân R, Powell SK, Hartemink AJ, MacAlpine DM. Drosophila ORC localizes to open chromatin and marks sites of cohesin complex loading. Genome Res 2010; 20:201-11. [PMID: 19996087 PMCID: PMC2813476 DOI: 10.1101/gr.097873.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2009] [Accepted: 11/23/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The origin recognition complex (ORC) is an essential DNA replication initiation factor conserved in all eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ORC binds to specific DNA elements; however, in higher eukaryotes, ORC exhibits little sequence specificity in vitro or in vivo. We investigated the genome-wide distribution of ORC in Drosophila and found that ORC localizes to specific chromosomal locations in the absence of any discernible simple motif. Although no clear sequence motif emerged, we were able to use machine learning approaches to accurately discriminate between ORC-associated sequences and ORC-free sequences based solely on primary sequence. The complex sequence features that define ORC binding sites are highly correlated with nucleosome positioning signals and likely represent a preferred nucleosomal landscape for ORC association. Open chromatin appears to be the underlying feature that is deterministic for ORC binding. ORC-associated sequences are enriched for the histone variant, H3.3, often at transcription start sites, and depleted for bulk nucleosomes. The density of ORC binding along the chromosome is reflected in the time at which a sequence replicates, with early replicating sequences having a high density of ORC binding. Finally, we found a high concordance between sites of ORC binding and cohesin loading, suggesting that, in addition to DNA replication, ORC may be required for the loading of cohesin on DNA in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather K. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Raluca Gordân
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - Sara K. Powell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Srivatsan A, Tehranchi A, MacAlpine DM, Wang JD. Co-orientation of replication and transcription preserves genome integrity. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000810. [PMID: 20090829 PMCID: PMC2797598 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2009] [Accepted: 12/10/2009] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
In many bacteria, there is a genome-wide bias towards co-orientation of replication and transcription, with essential and/or highly-expressed genes further enriched co-directionally. We previously found that reversing this bias in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis slows replication elongation, and we proposed that this effect contributes to the evolutionary pressure selecting the transcription-replication co-orientation bias. This selection might have been based purely on selection for speedy replication; alternatively, the slowed replication might actually represent an average of individual replication-disruption events, each of which is counter-selected independently because genome integrity is selected. To differentiate these possibilities and define the precise forces driving this aspect of genome organization, we generated new strains with inversions either over ∼1/4 of the chromosome or at ribosomal RNA (rRNA) operons. Applying mathematical analysis to genomic microarray snapshots, we found that replication rates vary dramatically within the inverted genome. Replication is moderately impeded throughout the inverted region, which results in a small but significant competitive disadvantage in minimal medium. Importantly, replication is strongly obstructed at inverted rRNA loci in rich medium. This obstruction results in disruption of DNA replication, activation of DNA damage responses, loss of genome integrity, and cell death. Our results strongly suggest that preservation of genome integrity drives the evolution of co-orientation of replication and transcription, a conserved feature of genome organization. An important feature of genome organization is that transcription and replication are selectively co-oriented. This feature helps to avoid conflicts between head-on replication and transcription. The precise consequences of the conflict and how it affects genome organization remain to be understood. We previously found that reversing the transcription bias slows replication in the Bacillus subtilis genome. Here we engineered new inversions to avoid changes in other aspects of genome organization. We found that the reversed transcription bias is sufficient to decrease replication speed, and it results in lowered fitness of the inversion strains and a competitive disadvantage relative to wild-type cells in minimal medium. Further, by analyzing genomic copy-number snapshots to obtain replication speed as a function of genome position, we found that inversion of the strongly-transcribed rRNA genes obstructs replication during growth in rich medium. This confers a strong growth disadvantage to cells in rich medium, turns on DNA damage responses, and leads to cell death in a subpopulation of cells, while the surviving cells are more sensitive to genotoxic agents. Our results strongly support the hypothesis that evolution has favored co-orientation of transcription with replication, mainly to avoid these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjana Srivatsan
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ashley Tehranchi
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jue D. Wang
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bell O, Wirbelauer C, Hild M, Scharf AND, Schwaiger M, MacAlpine DM, Zilbermann F, van Leeuwen F, Bell SP, Imhof A, Garza D, Peters AHFM, Schübeler D. Localized H3K36 methylation states define histone H4K16 acetylation during transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. EMBO J 2007; 26:4974-84. [PMID: 18007591 DOI: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2007] [Accepted: 10/24/2007] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Post-translational modifications of histones are involved in transcript initiation and elongation. Methylation of lysine 36 of histone H3 (H3K36me) resides promoter distal at transcribed regions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is thought to prevent spurious initiation through recruitment of histone-deacetylase activity. Here, we report surprising complexity in distribution, regulation and readout of H3K36me in Drosophila involving two histone methyltransferases (HMTases). Dimethylation of H3K36 peaks adjacent to promoters and requires dMes-4, whereas trimethylation accumulates toward the 3' end of genes and relies on dHypb. Reduction of H3K36me3 is lethal in Drosophila larvae and leads to elevated levels of acetylation, specifically at lysine 16 of histone H4 (H4K16ac). In contrast, reduction of both di- and trimethylation decreases lysine 16 acetylation. Thus di- and trimethylation of H3K36 have opposite effects on H4K16 acetylation, which we propose enable dynamic changes in chromatin compaction during transcript elongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Bell
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Maulbeerstrasse, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Georlette D, Ahn S, MacAlpine DM, Cheung E, Lewis PW, Beall EL, Bell SP, Speed T, Manak JR, Botchan MR. Genomic profiling and expression studies reveal both positive and negative activities for the Drosophila Myb MuvB/dREAM complex in proliferating cells. Genes Dev 2007; 21:2880-96. [PMID: 17978103 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1600107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Myb-MuvB (MMB)/dREAM is a nine-subunit complex first described in Drosophila as a repressor of transcription, dependent on E2F2 and the RBFs. Myb, an integral member of MMB, curiously plays no role in the silencing of the test genes previously analyzed. Moreover, Myb plays an activating role in DNA replication in Drosophila egg chamber follicle cells. The essential functions for Myb are executed as part of MMB. This duality of function lead to the hypothesis that MMB, which contains both known activator and repressor proteins, might function as part of a switching mechanism that is dependent on DNA sites and developmental context. Here, we used proliferating Drosophila Kc tissue culture cells to explore both the network of genes regulated by MMB (employing RNA interference and microarray expression analysis) and the genomic locations of MMB following chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and tiling array analysis. MMB occupied 3538 chromosomal sites and was promoter-proximal to 32% of Drosophila genes. MMB contains multiple DNA-binding factors, and the data highlighted the combinatorial way by which the complex was targeted and utilized for regulation. Interestingly, only a subset of chromatin-bound complexes repressed genes normally expressed in a wide range of developmental pathways. At many of these sites, E2F2 was critical for repression, whereas at other nonoverlapping sites, Myb was critical for repression. We also found sites where MMB was a positive regulator of transcript levels that included genes required for mitotic functions (G2/M), which may explain some of the chromosome instability phenotypes attributed to loss of Myb function in myb mutants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Georlette
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tanny RE, MacAlpine DM, Blitzblau HG, Bell SP. Genome-wide analysis of re-replication reveals inhibitory controls that target multiple stages of replication initiation. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2415-23. [PMID: 16525018 PMCID: PMC1446079 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA replication must be tightly controlled during each cell cycle to prevent unscheduled replication and ensure proper genome maintenance. The currently known controls that prevent re-replication act redundantly to inhibit pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) assembly outside of the G1-phase of the cell cycle. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been a useful model organism to study how eukaryotic cells prevent replication origins from reinitiating during a single cell cycle. Using a re-replication-sensitive strain and DNA microarrays, we map sites across the S. cerevisiae genome that are re-replicated as well as sites of pre-RC formation during re-replication. Only a fraction of the genome is re-replicated by a subset of origins, some of which are capable of multiple reinitiation events. Translocation experiments demonstrate that origin-proximal sequences are sufficient to predispose an origin to re-replication. Origins that reinitiate are largely limited to those that can recruit Mcm2-7 under re-replicating conditions; however, the formation of a pre-RC is not sufficient for reinitiation. Our findings allow us to categorize origins with respect to their propensity to reinitiate and demonstrate that pre-RC formation is not the only target for the mechanisms that prevent genomic re-replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn E Tanny
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Recent advances in DNA microarray technology have enabled eukaryotic replication to be studied at whole-chromosome and genome-wide levels. These studies have provided new insights into the mechanisms that influence origin selection and the temporally co-ordinated activation of replication initiation from these sites. Here we describe multiple microarray-based approaches that have been used to study DNA replication in both S. cerevisiae and higher eukaryotes. We have also compiled the data from the yeast microarray-based replication studies to generate a comprehensive list of origins that has been verified in three independent studies. The comprehensive nature of the microarray-based studies has revealed clear connections between chromosome organization and the pattern of replication. For example, in yeast, the centromeric proximal sequences are consistently early replicating and telomeric regions are consistently late replicating. The metazoan studies reveal a recurring theme of gene-dense transcriptionally active regions of the genome replicating before gene-sparse regions. In addition to the insights they have provided already, microarray-based replication assays combined with genetic analysis will provide a powerful new approach to define the mechanisms that regulate replication origin function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M MacAlpine
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The mechanisms by which metazoan origins of DNA replication are defined, regulated, and influenced by chromosomal events remain poorly understood. To gain insights into these mechanisms, we developed a systematic approach using a Drosophila high-resolution genomic microarray to determine replication timing, identify replication origins, and map protein-binding sites along a chromosome arm. We identify a defined temporal pattern of replication that correlates with the density of active transcription. These data indicate that the influence of transcription status on replication timing is exerted over large domains (>100 kb) rather than at the level of individual genes. We identify 62 early activating replication origins across the chromosome by mapping sites of nucleotide incorporation during hydroxyurea arrest. Using genome-wide location analysis, we demonstrate that the origin recognition complex (ORC) is localized to specific chromosomal sites, many of which coincide with early activating origins. The molecular attributes of ORC-binding sites include increased AT-content and association with a subset of RNA Pol II-binding sites. Based on these findings, we suggest that the distribution of transcription along the chromosome acts locally to influence origin selection and globally to regulate origin activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M MacAlpine
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02319, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schübeler D, MacAlpine DM, Scalzo D, Wirbelauer C, Kooperberg C, van Leeuwen F, Gottschling DE, O'Neill LP, Turner BM, Delrow J, Bell SP, Groudine M. The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. Genes Dev 2004; 18:1263-71. [PMID: 15175259 PMCID: PMC420352 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1198204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 633] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The covalent modification of nucleosomal histones has emerged as a major determinant of chromatin structure and gene activity. To understand the interplay between various histone modifications, including acetylation and methylation, we performed a genome-wide chromatin structure analysis in a higher eukaryote. We found a binary pattern of histone modifications among euchromatic genes, with active genes being hyperacetylated for H3 and H4 and hypermethylated at Lys 4 and Lys 79 of H3, and inactive genes being hypomethylated and deacetylated at the same residues. Furthermore, the degree of modification correlates with the level of transcription, and modifications are largely restricted to transcribed regions, suggesting that their regulation is tightly linked to polymerase activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Schübeler
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Chorion gene amplification in the ovaries of Drosophila melanogaster is a powerful system for the study of metazoan DNA replication in vivo. Using a combination of high-resolution confocal and deconvolution microscopy and quantitative realtime PCR, we found that initiation and elongation occur during separate developmental stages, thus permitting analysis of these two phases of replication in vivo. Bromodeoxyuridine, origin recognition complex, and the elongation factors minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM)2-7 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen were precisely localized, and the DNA copy number along the third chromosome chorion amplicon was quantified during multiple developmental stages. These studies revealed that initiation takes place during stages 10B and 11 of egg chamber development, whereas only elongation of existing replication forks occurs during egg chamber stages 12 and 13. The ability to distinguish initiation from elongation makes this an outstanding model to decipher the roles of various replication factors during metazoan DNA replication. We utilized this system to demonstrate that the pre-replication complex component, double-parked protein/cell division cycle 10-dependent transcript 1, is not only necessary for proper MCM2-7 localization, but, unexpectedly, is present during elongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie M Claycomb
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Wild-type yeast mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited biparentally, whereas mtDNA of hypersuppressive petite mutants is inherited uniparentally in crosses to strains with wild-type mtDNA. Genomes of hypersuppressive petites contain a conserved ori sequence that includes a promoter, but it is unclear whether the ori confers a segregation or replication advantage. Fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of wild-type and petite mtDNAs in crosses reveals no preferential segregation of hypersuppressive petite mtDNA to first zygotic buds. We identify single-stranded DNA circles and RNA-primed DNA replication intermediates in hypersuppressive petite mtDNA that are absent from non-hypersuppressive petites. Mutating the promoter blocks hypersuppressiveness in crosses to wild-type strains and eliminates the distinctive replication intermediates. We propose that promoter-dependent RNA-primed replication accounts for the uniparental inheritance of hypersuppressive petite mtDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. MacAlpine
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9148, USA
Present address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Present address: Institut für Physiologische Chemie der Universität München, Goethestrasse 33, D-80336 München, Germany Corresponding author e-mail:
| | | | - Koji Okamoto
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9148, USA
Present address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Present address: Institut für Physiologische Chemie der Universität München, Goethestrasse 33, D-80336 München, Germany Corresponding author e-mail:
| | | | - Philip S. Perlman
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9148, USA
Present address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Present address: Institut für Physiologische Chemie der Universität München, Goethestrasse 33, D-80336 München, Germany Corresponding author e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
MacAlpine DM, Perlman PS, Butow RA. The numbers of individual mitochondrial DNA molecules and mitochondrial DNA nucleoids in yeast are co-regulated by the general amino acid control pathway. EMBO J 2000; 19:767-75. [PMID: 10675346 PMCID: PMC305615 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.4.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited as a protein-DNA complex (the nucleoid). We show that activation of the general amino acid response pathway in rho(+) and rho(-) petite cells results in an increased number of nucleoids without an increase in mtDNA copy number. In rho(-) cells, activation of the general amino acid response pathway results in increased intramolecular recombination between tandemly repeated sequences of rho(-) mtDNA to produce small, circular oligomers that are packaged into individual nucleoids, resulting in an approximately 10-fold increase in nucleoid number. The parsing of mtDNA into nucleoids due to general amino acid control requires Ilv5p, a mitochondrial protein that also functions in branched chain amino acid biosynthesis, and one or more factors required for mtDNA recombination. Two additional proteins known to function in mtDNA recombination, Abf2p and Mgt1p, are also required for parsing mtDNA into a larger number of nucleoids, although expression of these proteins is not under general amino acid control. Increased nucleoid number leads to increased mtDNA transmission, suggesting a mechanism to enhance mtDNA inheritance under amino acid starvation conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M MacAlpine
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9148, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
MacAlpine DM, Perlman PS, Butow RA. The high mobility group protein Abf2p influences the level of yeast mitochondrial DNA recombination intermediates in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:6739-43. [PMID: 9618482 PMCID: PMC22617 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abf2p is a high mobility group (HMG) protein found in yeast mitochondria that is required for the maintenance of wild-type (rho+) mtDNA in cells grown on fermentable carbon sources, and for efficient recombination of mtDNA markers in crosses. Here, we show by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis that Abf2p promotes or stabilizes Holliday recombination junction intermediates in rho+ mtDNA in vivo but does not influence the high levels of recombination intermediates readily detected in the mtDNA of petite mutants (rho-). mtDNA recombination junctions are not observed in rho+ mtDNA of wild-type cells but are elevated to detectable levels in cells with a null allele of the MGT1 gene (Deltamgt1), which codes for a mitochondrial cruciform-cutting endonuclease. The level of recombination intermediates in rho+ mtDNA of Deltamgt1 cells is decreased about 10-fold if those cells contain a null allele of the ABF2 gene. Overproduction of Abf2p by >/= 10-fold in wild-type rho+ cells, which leads to mtDNA instability, results in a dramatic increase in mtDNA recombination intermediates. Specific mutations in the two Abf2p HMG boxes required for DNA binding diminishes these responses. We conclude that Abf2p functions in the recombination of rho+ mtDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M MacAlpine
- Department of Molecular Biology and Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75235-9148, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
MacAlpine DM, Zhang Z, Kapler GM. Type I elements mediate replication fork pausing at conserved upstream sites in the Tetrahymena thermophila ribosomal DNA minichromosome. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:4517-25. [PMID: 9234709 PMCID: PMC232305 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was used to study replication of the Tetrahymena thermophila ribosomal DNA (rDNA) minichromosome. During vegetative growth, the rDNA is replicated exclusively from origins in the 5' nontranscribed spacer (NTS). Whereas replication fork movement through the rest of the chromosome appears to be continuous, movement through the 5' NTS is not. Replication forks arrest transiently at three prominent replication fork pausing sites (RFPs) located in or immediately adjacent to nucleosome-free regions of the 5' NTS. Pausing at these sites is dramatically diminished during replication in Escherichia coli, suggesting that chromatin organization or Tetrahymena-specific proteins may be required. A conserved tripartite sequence was identified at each pausing site. Mutations in type I elements diminish pausing at proximal RFPs. Hence, type I elements, previously shown to control replication initiation, also regulate elongation of existing replication forks. Studies with rDNA transformants revealed a strong directional bias for fork pausing. Strong pausing only occurred in forks moving toward the rRNA-coding region. We propose that fork pausing in the 5' NTS evolved to synchronize replication and transcription of the downstream rRNA genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M MacAlpine
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Genetics, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-1114, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Andrews DL, MacAlpine DM, Johnson JR, Kelley PM, Cobb BG, Drew MC. Differential induction of mRNAs for the glycolytic and ethanolic fermentative pathways by hypoxia and anoxia in maize seedlings. Plant Physiol 1994; 106:1575-82. [PMID: 7846162 PMCID: PMC159700 DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.4.1575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Fructose-1,6-biphosphate aldolase (ALD) and enolase (ENO) from the glycolytic pathway and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) and alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH2) from the ethanolic fermentative pathway, are enzymes previously identified as among those synthesized selectively in O2-deficient roots of maize (Zea mays L.). The present study measured levels of transcripts representing these two pathways in 5-mm root tips, root axes (the remainder of the primary seminal root), and shoots of maize seedlings to determine how closely both pathways were co-induced and how they were modulated by changes in O2 concentration. In hypoxic seedlings with the roots in solution sparged with 5% (v/v) O2 (balance N2) and the shoots in the same gaseous atmosphere, mRNAs for Pdc1 and Adh2 in root tips both increased about 15-fold during the first 12 h, followed by a decline toward initial levels by 18 to 24h. Message levels for Ald1 and Eno1 showed only small changes during hypoxia. When expression was examined under anoxia, the extent to which all four mRNAs increased in different tissues depended on whether the seedlings had been previously acclimated to hypoxia or were anoxically shocked. The results show that although all the genes examined increased expression during hypoxia and/or anoxia, they differed in the rapidity and magnitude of the response and in the time to reach maximal message levels: there was no common pattern of change of message levels for the glycolytic or for the fermantative enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Andrews
- Department of Horticultural Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2133, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|