1
|
Aleksander SA, Anagnostopoulos AV, Antonazzo G, Arnaboldi V, Attrill H, Becerra A, Bello SM, Blodgett O, Bradford YM, Bult CJ, Cain S, Calvi BR, Carbon S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Cherry JM, Cho J, Crosby MA, De Pons JL, D’Eustachio P, Diamantakis S, Dolan ME, dos Santos G, Dyer S, Ebert D, Engel SR, Fashena D, Fisher M, Foley S, Gibson AC, Gollapally VR, Gramates LS, Grove CA, Hale P, Harris T, Hayman GT, Hu Y, James-Zorn C, Karimi K, Karra K, Kishore R, Kwitek AE, Laulederkind SJF, Lee R, Longden I, Luypaert M, Markarian N, Marygold SJ, Matthews B, McAndrews MS, Millburn G, Miyasato S, Motenko H, Moxon S, Muller HM, Mungall CJ, Muruganujan A, Mushayahama T, Nash RS, Nuin P, Paddock H, Pells T, Perrimon N, Pich C, Quinton-Tulloch M, Raciti D, Ramachandran S, Richardson JE, Gelbart SR, Ruzicka L, Schindelman G, Shaw DR, Sherlock G, Shrivatsav A, Singer A, Smith CM, Smith CL, Smith JR, Stein L, Sternberg PW, Tabone CJ, Thomas PD, Thorat K, Thota J, Tomczuk M, Trovisco V, Tutaj MA, Urbano JM, Van Auken K, Van Slyke CE, Vize PD, Wang Q, Weng S, Westerfield M, Wilming LG, Wong ED, Wright A, Yook K, Zhou P, Zorn A, Zytkovicz M. Updates to the Alliance of Genome Resources central infrastructure. Genetics 2024; 227:iyae049. [PMID: 38552170 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The Alliance of Genome Resources (Alliance) is an extensible coalition of knowledgebases focused on the genetics and genomics of intensively studied model organisms. The Alliance is organized as individual knowledge centers with strong connections to their research communities and a centralized software infrastructure, discussed here. Model organisms currently represented in the Alliance are budding yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila, zebrafish, frog, laboratory mouse, laboratory rat, and the Gene Ontology Consortium. The project is in a rapid development phase to harmonize knowledge, store it, analyze it, and present it to the community through a web portal, direct downloads, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Here, we focus on developments over the last 2 years. Specifically, we added and enhanced tools for browsing the genome (JBrowse), downloading sequences, mining complex data (AllianceMine), visualizing pathways, full-text searching of the literature (Textpresso), and sequence similarity searching (SequenceServer). We enhanced existing interactive data tables and added an interactive table of paralogs to complement our representation of orthology. To support individual model organism communities, we implemented species-specific "landing pages" and will add disease-specific portals soon; in addition, we support a common community forum implemented in Discourse software. We describe our progress toward a central persistent database to support curation, the data modeling that underpins harmonization, and progress toward a state-of-the-art literature curation system with integrated artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Giulia Antonazzo
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Valerio Arnaboldi
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Helen Attrill
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Andrés Becerra
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute , Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD , UK
| | - Susan M Bello
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Olin Blodgett
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | | | - Carol J Bult
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Scott Cain
- Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, ON M5G0A3 , Canada
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University , Bloomington, IN 47408 , USA
| | - Seth Carbon
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA
| | - Juancarlos Chan
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Wen J Chen
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - J Michael Cherry
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Jaehyoung Cho
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Madeline A Crosby
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Jeffrey L De Pons
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | | | - Stavros Diamantakis
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute , Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD , UK
| | - Mary E Dolan
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Gilberto dos Santos
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Sarah Dyer
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute , Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD , UK
| | - Dustin Ebert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033 , USA
| | - Stacia R Engel
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - David Fashena
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Malcolm Fisher
- Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 , USA
| | - Saoirse Foley
- Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15203
| | - Adam C Gibson
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Varun R Gollapally
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - L Sian Gramates
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Christian A Grove
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Paul Hale
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Todd Harris
- Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, ON M5G0A3 , Canada
| | - G Thomas Hayman
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Yanhui Hu
- Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute , Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 , USA
| | - Christina James-Zorn
- Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 , USA
| | - Kamran Karimi
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary , 507 Campus Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4V8 , Canada
| | - Kalpana Karra
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Ranjana Kishore
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Anne E Kwitek
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Stanley J F Laulederkind
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Raymond Lee
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Ian Longden
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Manuel Luypaert
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute , Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD , UK
| | - Nicholas Markarian
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Steven J Marygold
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Beverley Matthews
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Monica S McAndrews
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Gillian Millburn
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Stuart Miyasato
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Howie Motenko
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Sierra Moxon
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA
| | - Hans-Michael Muller
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Christopher J Mungall
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA
| | - Anushya Muruganujan
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033 , USA
| | - Tremayne Mushayahama
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033 , USA
| | - Robert S Nash
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Paulo Nuin
- Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, ON M5G0A3 , Canada
| | - Holly Paddock
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Troy Pells
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary , 507 Campus Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4V8 , Canada
| | - Norbert Perrimon
- Department of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute , Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115 , USA
| | - Christian Pich
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Mark Quinton-Tulloch
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute , Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD , UK
| | - Daniela Raciti
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | | | | | - Susan Russo Gelbart
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Leyla Ruzicka
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Gary Schindelman
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - David R Shaw
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Gavin Sherlock
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Ajay Shrivatsav
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Amy Singer
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Constance M Smith
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Cynthia L Smith
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Jennifer R Smith
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Lincoln Stein
- Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, ON M5G0A3 , Canada
| | - Paul W Sternberg
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Christopher J Tabone
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Paul D Thomas
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90033 , USA
| | - Ketaki Thorat
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Jyothi Thota
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Monika Tomczuk
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Vitor Trovisco
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Marek A Tutaj
- Medical College of Wisconsin—Rat Genome Database, Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering , Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 , USA
| | - Jose-Maria Urbano
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience , University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY , UK
| | - Kimberly Van Auken
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Ceri E Van Slyke
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403
| | - Peter D Vize
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary , 507 Campus Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4V8 , Canada
| | - Qinghua Wang
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Shuai Weng
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | | | - Laurens G Wilming
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genomics, Bar Harbor , ME 04609 , USA
| | - Edith D Wong
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University , Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Adam Wright
- Informatics and Bio-computing Platform, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, ON M5G0A3 , Canada
| | - Karen Yook
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering 140-18, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125 , USA
| | - Pinglei Zhou
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| | - Aaron Zorn
- Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 , USA
| | - Mark Zytkovicz
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University , 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herriage HC, Calvi BR. Premature endocycling of Drosophila follicle cells causes pleiotropic defects in oogenesis. Genetics 2024; 226:iyae009. [PMID: 38302115 PMCID: PMC10990429 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Endocycling cells grow and repeatedly duplicate their genome without dividing. Cells switch from mitotic cycles to endocycles in response to developmental signals during the growth of specific tissues in a wide range of organisms. The purpose of switching to endocycles, however, remains unclear in many tissues. Additionally, cells can switch to endocycles in response to conditional signals, which can have beneficial or pathological effects on tissues. However, the impact of these unscheduled endocycles on development is underexplored. Here, we use Drosophila ovarian somatic follicle cells as a model to examine the impact of unscheduled endocycles on tissue growth and function. Follicle cells normally switch to endocycles at mid-oogenesis. Inducing follicle cells to prematurely switch to endocycles resulted in the lethality of the resulting embryos. Analysis of ovaries with premature follicle cell endocycles revealed aberrant follicular epithelial structure and pleiotropic defects in oocyte growth, developmental gene amplification, and the migration of a special set of follicle cells known as border cells. Overall, these findings reveal how unscheduled endocycles can disrupt tissue growth and function to cause aberrant development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter C Herriage
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herriage HC, Huang YT, Calvi BR. The antagonistic relationship between apoptosis and polyploidy in development and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2024; 156:35-43. [PMID: 37331841 PMCID: PMC10724375 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
One of the important functions of regulated cell death is to prevent cells from inappropriately acquiring extra copies of their genome, a state known as polyploidy. Apoptosis is the primary cell death mechanism that prevents polyploidy, and defects in this apoptotic response can result in polyploid cells whose subsequent error-prone chromosome segregation are a major contributor to genome instability and cancer progression. Conversely, some cells actively repress apoptosis to become polyploid as part of normal development or regeneration. Thus, although apoptosis prevents polyploidy, the polyploid state can actively repress apoptosis. In this review, we discuss progress in understanding the antagonistic relationship between apoptosis and polyploidy in development and cancer. Despite recent advances, a key conclusion is that much remains unknown about the mechanisms that link apoptosis to polyploid cell cycles. We suggest that drawing parallels between the regulation of apoptosis in development and cancer could help to fill this knowledge gap and lead to more effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter C Herriage
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Yi-Ting Huang
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang YT, Hesting LL, Calvi BR. An unscheduled switch to endocycles induces a reversible senescent arrest that impairs growth of the Drosophila wing disc. bioRxiv 2024:2024.03.14.585098. [PMID: 38559130 PMCID: PMC10980049 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.14.585098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
A programmed developmental switch to G / S endocycles results in tissue growth through an increase in cell size. Unscheduled, induced endocycling cells (iECs) promote wound healing but also contribute to cancer. Much remains unknown, however, about how these iECs affect tissue growth. Using the D. melanogasterwing disc as model, we find that populations of iECs initially increase in size but then subsequently undergo a heterogenous arrest that causes severe tissue undergrowth. iECs acquired DNA damage and activated a Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway, but, unlike other stressed cells, were apoptosis-resistant and not eliminated from the epithelium. Instead, iECs entered a JNK-dependent and reversible senescent-like arrest. Senescent iECs promoted division of diploid neighbors, but this compensatory proliferation did not rescue tissue growth. Our study has uncovered unique attributes of iECs and their effects on tissue growth that have important implications for understanding their roles in wound healing and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ting Huang
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Lauren L. Hesting
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herriage HC, Calvi BR. Premature endocycling of Drosophila follicle cells causes pleiotropic defects in oogenesis. bioRxiv 2024:2023.10.10.561736. [PMID: 37873193 PMCID: PMC10592765 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.10.561736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Endocycling cells grow and repeatedly duplicate their genome without dividing. Cells switch from mitotic cycles to endocycles in response to developmental signals during the growth of specific tissues in a wide range of organisms. The purpose of switching to endocycles, however, remains unclear in many tissues. Additionally, cells can switch to endocycles in response to conditional signals, which can have beneficial or pathological effects on tissues. However, the impact of these unscheduled endocycles on development is underexplored. Here, we use Drosophila ovarian somatic follicle cells as a model to examine the impact of unscheduled endocycles on tissue growth and function. Follicle cells normally switch to endocycles at mid-oogenesis. Inducing follicle cells to prematurely switch to endocycles resulted in lethality of the resulting embryos. Analysis of ovaries with premature follicle cell endocycles revealed aberrant follicular epithelial structure and pleiotropic defects in oocyte growth, developmental gene amplification, and the migration of a special set of follicle cells known as border cells. Overall, these findings reveal how unscheduled endocycles can disrupt tissue growth and function to cause aberrant development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aleksander SA, Anagnostopoulos AV, Antonazzo G, Arnaboldi V, Attrill H, Becerra A, Bello SM, Blodgett O, Bradford YM, Bult CJ, Cain S, Calvi BR, Carbon S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Michael Cherry J, Cho J, Crosby MA, De Pons JL, D’Eustachio P, Diamantakis S, Dolan ME, Santos GD, Dyer S, Ebert D, Engel SR, Fashena D, Fisher M, Foley S, Gibson AC, Gollapally VR, Sian Gramates L, Grove CA, Hale P, Harris T, Thomas Hayman G, Hu Y, James-Zorn C, Karimi K, Karra K, Kishore R, Kwitek AE, Laulederkind SJF, Lee R, Longden I, Luypaert M, Markarian N, Marygold SJ, Matthews B, McAndrews MS, Millburn G, Miyasato S, Motenko H, Moxon S, Muller HM, Mungall CJ, Muruganujan A, Mushayahama T, Nash RS, Nuin P, Paddock H, Pells T, Perrimon N, Pich C, Quinton-Tulloch M, Raciti D, Ramachandran S, Richardson JE, Gelbart SR, Ruzicka L, Schindelman G, Shaw DR, Sherlock G, Shrivatsav A, Singer A, Smith CM, Smith CL, Smith JR, Stein L, Sternberg PW, Tabone CJ, Thomas PD, Thorat K, Thota J, Tomczuk M, Trovisco V, Tutaj MA, Urbano JM, Auken KV, Van Slyke CE, Vize PD, Wang Q, Weng S, Westerfield M, Wilming LG, Wong ED, Wright A, Yook K, Zhou P, Zorn A, Zytkovicz M. Updates to the Alliance of Genome Resources Central Infrastructure Alliance of Genome Resources Consortium. bioRxiv 2023:2023.11.20.567935. [PMID: 38045425 PMCID: PMC10690154 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.20.567935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
The Alliance of Genome Resources (Alliance) is an extensible coalition of knowledgebases focused on the genetics and genomics of intensively-studied model organisms. The Alliance is organized as individual knowledge centers with strong connections to their research communities and a centralized software infrastructure, discussed here. Model organisms currently represented in the Alliance are budding yeast, C. elegans, Drosophila, zebrafish, frog, laboratory mouse, laboratory rat, and the Gene Ontology Consortium. The project is in a rapid development phase to harmonize knowledge, store it, analyze it, and present it to the community through a web portal, direct downloads, and APIs. Here we focus on developments over the last two years. Specifically, we added and enhanced tools for browsing the genome (JBrowse), downloading sequences, mining complex data (AllianceMine), visualizing pathways, full-text searching of the literature (Textpresso), and sequence similarity searching (SequenceServer). We enhanced existing interactive data tables and added an interactive table of paralogs to complement our representation of orthology. To support individual model organism communities, we implemented species-specific "landing pages" and will add disease-specific portals soon; in addition, we support a common community forum implemented in Discourse. We describe our progress towards a central persistent database to support curation, the data modeling that underpins harmonization, and progress towards a state-of-the art literature curation system with integrated Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML).
Collapse
|
7
|
Mukherjee S, Calvi BR, Hundley HA, Sokol NS. MicroRNA mediated regulation of the onset of enteroblast differentiation in the Drosophila adult intestine. Cell Rep 2022; 41:111495. [DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
8
|
Ariyapala IS, Buddika K, Hundley HA, Calvi BR, Sokol NS. The RNA binding protein Swm is critical for Drosophila melanogaster intestinal progenitor cell maintenance. Genetics 2022; 222:6619166. [PMID: 35762963 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The regulation of stem cell survival, self-renewal, and differentiation is critical for the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Although the involvement of signaling pathways and transcriptional control mechanisms in stem cell regulation have been extensively investigated, the role of post-transcriptional control is still poorly understood. Here we show that the nuclear activity of the RNA-binding protein Second Mitotic Wave Missing (Swm) is critical for Drosophila melanogaster intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and their daughter cells, enteroblasts (EBs), to maintain their progenitor cell properties and functions. Loss of swm causes ISCs and EBs to stop dividing and instead detach from the basement membrane, resulting in severe progenitor cell loss. swm loss is further characterized by nuclear accumulation of poly(A)+ RNA in progenitor cells. Swm associates with transcripts involved in epithelial cell maintenance and adhesion, and the loss of swm, while not generally affecting the levels of these Swm-bound mRNAs, leads to elevated expression of proteins encoded by some of them, including the fly ortholog of Filamin. Taken together, this study indicates a nuclear role for Swm in adult stem cell maintenance, raising the possibility that nuclear post-transcriptional regulation of mRNAs encoding cell adhesion proteins ensures proper attachment of progenitor cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kasun Buddika
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Heather A Hundley
- Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Nicholas S Sokol
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Agapite J, Albou LP, Aleksander SA, Alexander M, Anagnostopoulos AV, Antonazzo G, Argasinska J, Arnaboldi V, Attrill H, Becerra A, Bello SM, Blake JA, Blodgett O, Bradford YM, Bult CJ, Cain S, Calvi BR, Carbon S, Chan J, Chen WJ, Michael Cherry J, Cho J, Christie KR, Crosby MA, Davis P, da Veiga Beltrame E, De Pons JL, D’Eustachio P, Diamantakis S, Dolan ME, dos Santos G, Douglass E, Dunn B, Eagle A, Ebert D, Engel SR, Fashena D, Foley S, Frazer K, Gao S, Gibson AC, Gondwe F, Goodman J, Sian Gramates L, Grove CA, Hale P, Harris T, Thomas Hayman G, Hill DP, Howe DG, Howe KL, Hu Y, Jha S, Kadin JA, Kaufman TC, Kalita P, Karra K, Kishore R, Kwitek AE, Laulederkind SJF, Lee R, Longden I, Luypaert M, MacPherson KA, Martin R, Marygold SJ, Matthews B, McAndrews MS, Millburn G, Miyasato S, Motenko H, Moxon S, Muller HM, Mungall CJ, Muruganujan A, Mushayahama T, Nalabolu HS, Nash RS, Ng P, Nuin P, Paddock H, Paulini M, Perrimon N, Pich C, Quinton-Tulloch M, Raciti D, Ramachandran S, Richardson JE, Gelbart SR, Ruzicka L, Schaper K, Schindelman G, Shimoyama M, Simison M, Shaw DR, Shrivatsav A, Singer A, Skrzypek M, Smith CM, Smith CL, Smith JR, Stein L, Sternberg PW, Tabone CJ, Thomas PD, Thorat K, Thota J, Toro S, Tomczuk M, Trovisco V, Tutaj MA, Tutaj M, Urbano JM, Van Auken K, Van Slyke CE, Wang Q, Wang SJ, Weng S, Westerfield M, Williams G, Wilming LG, Wong ED, Wright A, Yook K, Zarowiecki M, Zhou P, Zytkovicz M. Harmonizing model organism data in the Alliance of Genome Resources. Genetics 2022; 220:iyac022. [PMID: 35380658 PMCID: PMC8982023 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Alliance of Genome Resources (the Alliance) is a combined effort of 7 knowledgebase projects: Saccharomyces Genome Database, WormBase, FlyBase, Mouse Genome Database, the Zebrafish Information Network, Rat Genome Database, and the Gene Ontology Resource. The Alliance seeks to provide several benefits: better service to the various communities served by these projects; a harmonized view of data for all biomedical researchers, bioinformaticians, clinicians, and students; and a more sustainable infrastructure. The Alliance has harmonized cross-organism data to provide useful comparative views of gene function, gene expression, and human disease relevance. The basis of the comparative views is shared calls of orthology relationships and the use of common ontologies. The key types of data are alleles and variants, gene function based on gene ontology annotations, phenotypes, association to human disease, gene expression, protein-protein and genetic interactions, and participation in pathways. The information is presented on uniform gene pages that allow facile summarization of information about each gene in each of the 7 organisms covered (budding yeast, roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, fruit fly, house mouse, zebrafish, brown rat, and human). The harmonized knowledge is freely available on the alliancegenome.org portal, as downloadable files, and by APIs. We expect other existing and emerging knowledge bases to join in the effort to provide the union of useful data and features that each knowledge base currently provides.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gramates LS, Agapite J, Attrill H, Calvi BR, Crosby MA, dos Santos G, Goodman JL, Goutte-Gattat D, Jenkins VK, Kaufman T, Larkin A, Matthews BB, Millburn G, Strelets VB. FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features. Genetics 2022; 220:6546290. [PMID: 35266522 PMCID: PMC8982030 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 196] [Impact Index Per Article: 98.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
FlyBase provides a centralized resource for the genetic and genomic data of Drosophila melanogaster. As FlyBase enters our fourth decade of service to the research community, we reflect on our unique aspects and look forward to our continued collaboration with the larger research and model organism communities. In this study, we emphasize the dedicated reports and tools we have constructed to meet the specialized needs of fly researchers but also to facilitate use by other research communities. We also highlight ways that we support the fly community, including an external resources page, help resources, and multiple avenues by which researchers can interact with FlyBase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Sian Gramates
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA,Corresponding author: Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge MA 02138, USA.
| | - Julie Agapite
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Helen Attrill
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Madeline A Crosby
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Gilberto dos Santos
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Joshua L Goodman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Damien Goutte-Gattat
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Victoria K Jenkins
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Thomas Kaufman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Aoife Larkin
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Beverley B Matthews
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Gillian Millburn
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Victor B Strelets
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chakravarti A, Thirimanne HN, Brown S, Calvi BR. Drosophila p53 isoforms have overlapping and distinct functions in germline genome integrity and oocyte quality control. eLife 2022; 11:61389. [PMID: 35023826 PMCID: PMC8758136 DOI: 10.7554/elife.61389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
p53 gene family members in humans and other organisms encode a large number of protein isoforms whose functions are largely undefined. Using Drosophila as a model, we find that a p53B isoform is expressed predominantly in the germline where it colocalizes with p53A into subnuclear bodies. It is only p53A, however, that mediates the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation in the germline and soma. In contrast, p53A and p53B are both required for the normal repair of meiotic DNA breaks, an activity that is more crucial when meiotic recombination is defective. We find that in oocytes with persistent DNA breaks p53A is also required to activate a meiotic pachytene checkpoint. Our findings indicate that Drosophila p53 isoforms have DNA lesion and cell type-specific functions, with parallels to the functions of mammalian p53 family members in the genotoxic stress response and oocyte quality control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Savanna Brown
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thurmond J, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, Attrill H, Gramates LS, Marygold SJ, Matthews BB, Millburn G, Antonazzo G, Trovisco V, Kaufman TC, Calvi BR. FlyBase 2.0: the next generation. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 47:D759-D765. [PMID: 30364959 PMCID: PMC6323960 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 484] [Impact Index Per Article: 121.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
FlyBase (flybase.org) is a knowledge base that supports the community of researchers that use the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a model organism. The FlyBase team curates and organizes a diverse array of genetic, molecular, genomic, and developmental information about Drosophila. At the beginning of 2018, ‘FlyBase 2.0’ was released with a significantly improved user interface and new tools. Among these important changes are a new organization of search results into interactive lists or tables (hitlists), enhanced reference lists, and new protein domain graphics. An important new data class called ‘experimental tools’ consolidates information on useful fly strains and other resources related to a specific gene, which significantly enhances the ability of the Drosophila researcher to design and carry out experiments. With the release of FlyBase 2.0, there has also been a restructuring of backend architecture and a continued development of application programming interfaces (APIs) for programmatic access to FlyBase data. In this review, we describe these major new features and functionalities of the FlyBase 2.0 site and how they support the use of Drosophila as a model organism for biological discovery and translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim Thurmond
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
| | - Joshua L Goodman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
| | - Victor B Strelets
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
| | - Helen Attrill
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - L Sian Gramates
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Steven J Marygold
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Beverley B Matthews
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Gillian Millburn
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Giulia Antonazzo
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Vitor Trovisco
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Thomas C Kaufman
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rotelli MD, Bolling AM, Killion AW, Weinberg AJ, Dixon MJ, Calvi BR. An RNAi Screen for Genes Required for Growth of Drosophila Wing Tissue. G3 (Bethesda) 2019; 9:3087-3100. [PMID: 31387856 PMCID: PMC6778782 DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cell division and tissue growth must be coordinated with development. Defects in these processes are the basis for a number of diseases, including developmental malformations and cancer. We have conducted an unbiased RNAi screen for genes that are required for growth in the Drosophila wing, using GAL4-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA) fly strains made by the Drosophila RNAi Screening Center. shRNA expression down the center of the larval wing disc using dpp-GAL4, and the central region of the adult wing was then scored for tissue growth and wing hair morphology. Out of 4,753 shRNA crosses that survived to adulthood, 18 had impaired wing growth. FlyBase and the new Alliance of Genome Resources knowledgebases were used to determine the known or predicted functions of these genes and the association of their human orthologs with disease. The function of eight of the genes identified has not been previously defined in Drosophila The genes identified included those with known or predicted functions in cell cycle, chromosome segregation, morphogenesis, metabolism, steroid processing, transcription, and translation. All but one of the genes are similar to those in humans, and many are associated with disease. Knockdown of lin-52, a subunit of the Myb-MuvB transcription factor, or βNACtes6, a gene involved in protein folding and trafficking, resulted in a switch from cell proliferation to an endoreplication growth program through which wing tissue grew by an increase in cell size (hypertrophy). It is anticipated that further analysis of the genes that we have identified will reveal new mechanisms that regulate tissue growth during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Rotelli
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 and
| | - Anna M Bolling
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 and
| | - Andrew W Killion
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 and
| | | | - Michael J Dixon
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 and
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 and
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rotelli MD, Policastro RA, Bolling AM, Killion AW, Weinberg AJ, Dixon MJ, Zentner GE, Walczak CE, Lilly MA, Calvi BR. A Cyclin A-Myb-MuvB-Aurora B network regulates the choice between mitotic cycles and polyploid endoreplication cycles. PLoS Genet 2019; 15:e1008253. [PMID: 31291240 PMCID: PMC6645565 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoreplication is a cell cycle variant that entails cell growth and periodic genome duplication without cell division, and results in large, polyploid cells. Cells switch from mitotic cycles to endoreplication cycles during development, and also in response to conditional stimuli during wound healing, regeneration, aging, and cancer. In this study, we use integrated approaches in Drosophila to determine how mitotic cycles are remodeled into endoreplication cycles, and how similar this remodeling is between induced and developmental endoreplicating cells (iECs and devECs). Our evidence suggests that Cyclin A / CDK directly activates the Myb-MuvB (MMB) complex to induce transcription of a battery of genes required for mitosis, and that repression of CDK activity dampens this MMB mitotic transcriptome to promote endoreplication in both iECs and devECs. iECs and devECs differed, however, in that devECs had reduced expression of E2F1-dependent genes that function in S phase, whereas repression of the MMB transcriptome in iECs was sufficient to induce endoreplication without a reduction in S phase gene expression. Among the MMB regulated genes, knockdown of AurB protein and other subunits of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) induced endoreplication, as did knockdown of CPC-regulated cytokinetic, but not kinetochore, proteins. Together, our results indicate that the status of a CycA-Myb-MuvB-AurB network determines the decision to commit to mitosis or switch to endoreplication in both iECs and devECs, and suggest that regulation of different steps of this network may explain the known diversity of polyploid cycle types in development and disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D. Rotelli
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Robert A. Policastro
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Anna M. Bolling
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Andrew W. Killion
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Abraham J. Weinberg
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Michael J. Dixon
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Gabriel E. Zentner
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Claire E. Walczak
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Mary A. Lilly
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Robin M, Issa AR, Santos CC, Napoletano F, Petitgas C, Chatelain G, Ruby M, Walter L, Birman S, Domingos PM, Calvi BR, Mollereau B. Drosophila p53 integrates the antagonism between autophagy and apoptosis in response to stress. Autophagy 2018; 15:771-784. [PMID: 30563404 DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1558001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The tumor suppressor TP53/p53 is a known regulator of apoptosis and macroautophagy/autophagy. However, the molecular mechanism by which TP53 regulates 2 apparently incompatible processes remains unknown. We found that Drosophila lacking p53 displayed impaired autophagic flux, higher caspase activation and mortality in response to oxidative stress compared with wild-type flies. Moreover, autophagy and apoptosis were differentially regulated by the p53 (p53B) and ΔNp53 (p53A) isoforms: while the former induced autophagy in differentiated neurons, which protected against cell death, the latter inhibited autophagy by activating the caspases Dronc, Drice, and Dcp-1. Our results demonstrate that the differential use of p53 isoforms combined with the antagonism between apoptosis and autophagy ensures the generation of an appropriate p53 biological response to stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Robin
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France
| | - Abdul Raouf Issa
- b Genes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology , Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, Labex Memolife, PSL Research University , Paris , France.,e Department of Life Sciences , University of Trieste c/o CIB National Laboratory , Area Science Park , Trieste , Italy
| | - Cristiana C Santos
- c Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica , Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Oeiras , Portugal
| | - Francesco Napoletano
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France.,e Department of Life Sciences , University of Trieste c/o CIB National Laboratory , Area Science Park , Trieste , Italy
| | - Céline Petitgas
- b Genes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology , Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, Labex Memolife, PSL Research University , Paris , France
| | - Gilles Chatelain
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France
| | - Mathilde Ruby
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France
| | - Ludivine Walter
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France
| | - Serge Birman
- b Genes Circuits Rhythms and Neuropathology , Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, Labex Memolife, PSL Research University , Paris , France
| | - Pedro M Domingos
- c Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica , Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Oeiras , Portugal
| | - Brian R Calvi
- d Department of Biology , Indiana University , Bloomington , IN , USA
| | - Bertrand Mollereau
- a Université de Lyon, ENSL, UCBL, CNRS, LBMC, UMS 3444 Biosciences Lyon Gerland , Lyon , France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Howe DG, Blake JA, Bradford YM, Bult CJ, Calvi BR, Engel SR, Kadin JA, Kaufman TC, Kishore R, Laulederkind SJF, Lewis SE, Moxon SAT, Richardson JE, Smith C. Model organism data evolving in support of translational medicine. Lab Anim (NY) 2018; 47:277-289. [PMID: 30224793 DOI: 10.1038/s41684-018-0150-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Model organism databases (MODs) have been collecting and integrating biomedical research data for 30 years and were designed to meet specific needs of each model organism research community. The contributions of model organism research to understanding biological systems would be hard to overstate. Modern molecular biology methods and cost reductions in nucleotide sequencing have opened avenues for direct application of model organism research to elucidating mechanisms of human diseases. Thus, the mandate for model organism research and databases has now grown to include facilitating use of these data in translational applications. Challenges in meeting this opportunity include the distribution of research data across many databases and websites, a lack of data format standards for some data types, and sustainability of scale and cost for genomic database resources like MODs. The issues of widely distributed data and application of data standards are some of the challenges addressed by FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable) data principles. The Alliance of Genome Resources is now moving to address these challenges by bringing together expertly curated research data from fly, mouse, rat, worm, yeast, zebrafish, and the Gene Ontology consortium. Centralized multi-species data access, integration, and format standardization will lower the data utilization barrier in comparative genomics and translational applications and will provide a framework in which sustainable scale and cost can be addressed. This article presents a brief historical perspective on how the Alliance model organisms are complementary and how they have already contributed to understanding the etiology of human diseases. In addition, we discuss four challenges for using data from MODs in translational applications and how the Alliance is working to address them, in part by applying FAIR data principles. Ultimately, combined data from these animal models are more powerful than the sum of the parts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas G Howe
- The Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
| | | | - Yvonne M Bradford
- The Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | | | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Stacia R Engel
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Ranjana Kishore
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Stanley J F Laulederkind
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Suzanna E Lewis
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Sierra A T Moxon
- The Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang C, Montooth KL, Calvi BR. Incompatibility between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes during oogenesis results in ovarian failure and embryonic lethality. Development 2017; 144:2490-2503. [PMID: 28576772 DOI: 10.1242/dev.151951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction can cause female infertility. An important unresolved issue is the extent to which incompatibility between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes contributes to female infertility. It has previously been shown that a mitochondrial haplotype from D. simulans (simw501 ) is incompatible with a nuclear genome from the D. melanogaster strain Oregon-R (OreR), resulting in impaired development, which was enhanced at higher temperature. This mito-nuclear incompatibility is between alleles of the nuclear-encoded mitochondrial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (Aatm) and the mitochondrial-encoded tyrosyl-tRNA that it aminoacylates. Here, we show that this mito-nuclear incompatibility causes a severe temperature-sensitive female infertility. The OreR nuclear genome contributed to death of ovarian germline stem cells and reduced egg production, which was further enhanced by the incompatibility with simw501 mitochondria. Mito-nuclear incompatibility also resulted in aberrant egg morphology and a maternal-effect on embryonic chromosome segregation and survival, which was completely dependent on the temperature and mito-nuclear genotype of the mother. Our findings show that maternal mito-nuclear incompatibility during Drosophila oogenesis has severe consequences for egg production and embryonic survival, with important broader relevance to human female infertility and mitochondrial replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyang Zhang
- Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
| | - Kristi L Montooth
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen S, Stout JR, Dharmaiah S, Yde S, Calvi BR, Walczak CE. Transient endoreplication down-regulates the kinesin-14 HSET and contributes to genomic instability. Mol Biol Cell 2016; 27:2911-23. [PMID: 27489338 PMCID: PMC5042578 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e16-03-0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 07/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Polyploid cancer cells exhibit chromosomal instability (CIN), which is associated with tumorigenesis and therapy resistance. The mechanisms that induce polyploidy and how these mechanisms contribute to CIN are not fully understood. Here we evaluate CIN in human cells that become polyploid through an experimentally induced endoreplication cycle. When these induced endoreplicating cells (iECs) returned to mitosis, it resulted in aneuploidy in daughter cells. This aneuploidy resulted from multipolar divisions, chromosome missegregation, and failure in cytokinesis. The iECs went through several rounds of division, ultimately spawning proliferative cells of reduced ploidy. iECs have reduced levels of the kinesin-14 HSET, which likely accounts for the multipolar divisions, and overexpression of HSET reduced spindle multipolarity. However, HSET overexpression had only mild effects on CIN, suggesting that additional defects must contribute to genomic instability in dividing iECs. Overall our results suggest that transient endoreplication cycles generate a diverse population of proliferative aneuploid cells that have the potential to contribute to tumor heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyao Chen
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Jane R Stout
- Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | | | - Sarah Yde
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Claire E Walczak
- Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Qi S, Calvi BR. Different cell cycle modifications repress apoptosis at different steps independent of developmental signaling in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell 2016; 27:1885-97. [PMID: 27075174 PMCID: PMC4907722 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e16-03-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic manipulations of the cell cycle repress apoptosis independent of developmental signaling. The findings have broader relevance to understanding the coordination of cell proliferation and apoptosis in development and disease. Apoptotic cell death is important for the normal development of a variety of organisms. Apoptosis is also a response to DNA damage and an important barrier to oncogenesis. The apoptotic response to DNA damage is dampened in specific cell types during development. Developmental signaling pathways can repress apoptosis, and reduced cell proliferation also correlates with a lower apoptotic response. However, because developmental signaling regulates both cell proliferation and apoptosis, the relative contribution of cell division to the apoptotic response has been hard to discern in vivo. Here we use Drosophila oogenesis as an in vivo model system to determine the extent to which cell proliferation influences the apoptotic response to DNA damage. We find that different types of cell cycle modifications are sufficient to repress the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation independent of developmental signaling. The step(s) at which the apoptosis pathway was repressed depended on the type of cell cycle modification—either upstream or downstream of expression of the p53-regulated proapoptotic genes. Our findings have important implications for understanding the coordination of cell proliferation with the apoptotic response in development and disease, including cancer and the tissue-specific responses to radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suozhi Qi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu J, Zimmer K, Rusch DB, Paranjape N, Podicheti R, Tang H, Calvi BR. DNA sequence templates adjacent nucleosome and ORC sites at gene amplification origins in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:8746-61. [PMID: 26227968 PMCID: PMC4605296 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic origins of DNA replication are bound by the origin recognition complex (ORC), which scaffolds assembly of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) that is then activated to initiate replication. Both pre-RC assembly and activation are strongly influenced by developmental changes to the epigenome, but molecular mechanisms remain incompletely defined. We have been examining the activation of origins responsible for developmental gene amplification in Drosophila. At a specific time in oogenesis, somatic follicle cells transition from genomic replication to a locus-specific replication from six amplicon origins. Previous evidence indicated that these amplicon origins are activated by nucleosome acetylation, but how this affects origin chromatin is unknown. Here, we examine nucleosome position in follicle cells using micrococcal nuclease digestion with Ilumina sequencing. The results indicate that ORC binding sites and other essential origin sequences are nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs). Nucleosome position at the amplicons was highly similar among developmental stages during which ORC is or is not bound, indicating that being an NDR is not sufficient to specify ORC binding. Importantly, the data suggest that nucleosomes and ORC have opposite preferences for DNA sequence and structure. We propose that nucleosome hyperacetylation promotes pre-RC assembly onto adjacent DNA sequences that are disfavored by nucleosomes but favored by ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Kurt Zimmer
- School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Douglas B Rusch
- Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Neha Paranjape
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Ram Podicheti
- School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Haixu Tang
- School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang B, Rotelli M, Dixon M, Calvi BR. The function of Drosophila p53 isoforms in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 2015; 22:2058-67. [PMID: 25882045 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2015.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Revised: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The p53 protein is a major mediator of the cellular response to genotoxic stress and is a crucial suppressor of tumor formation. In a variety of organisms, p53 and its paralogs, p63 and p73, each encode multiple protein isoforms through alternative splicing, promoters, and translation start sites. The function of these isoforms in development and disease are still being defined. Here, we evaluate the apoptotic potential of multiple isoforms of the single p53 gene in the genetic model Drosophila melanogaster. Most previous studies have focused on the p53A isoform, but it has been recently shown that a larger p53B isoform can induce apoptosis when overexpressed. It has remained unclear, however, whether one or both isoforms are required for the apoptotic response to genotoxic stress. We show that p53B is a much more potent inducer of apoptosis than p53A when overexpressed. Overexpression of two newly identified short isoforms perturbed development and inhibited the apoptotic response to ionizing radiation. Analysis of physiological protein expression indicated that p53A is the most abundant isoform, and that both p53A and p53B can form a complex and co-localize to sub-nuclear compartments. In contrast to the overexpression results, new isoform-specific loss-of-function mutants indicated that it is the shorter p53A isoform, not full-length p53B, that is the primary mediator of pro-apoptotic gene transcription and apoptosis after ionizing radiation. Together, our data show that it is the shorter p53A isoform that mediates the apoptotic response to DNA damage, and further suggest that p53B and shorter isoforms have specialized functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Zhang
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - M Rotelli
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - M Dixon
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - B R Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang B, Mehrotra S, Ng WL, Calvi BR. Low levels of p53 protein and chromatin silencing of p53 target genes repress apoptosis in Drosophila endocycling cells. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004581. [PMID: 25211335 PMCID: PMC4161308 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Apoptotic cell death is an important response to genotoxic stress that prevents oncogenesis. It is known that tissues can differ in their apoptotic response, but molecular mechanisms are little understood. Here, we show that Drosophila polyploid endocycling cells (G/S cycle) repress the apoptotic response to DNA damage through at least two mechanisms. First, the expression of all the Drosophila p53 protein isoforms is strongly repressed at a post-transcriptional step. Second, p53-regulated pro-apoptotic genes are epigenetically silenced in endocycling cells, preventing activation of a paused RNA Pol II by p53-dependent or p53-independent pathways. Over-expression of the p53A isoform did not activate this paused RNA Pol II complex in endocycling cells, but over-expression of the p53B isoform with a longer transactivation domain did, suggesting that dampened p53B protein levels are crucial for apoptotic repression. We also find that the p53A protein isoform is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome in endocycling cells. In mitotic cycling cells, p53A was the only isoform expressed to detectable levels, and its mRNA and protein levels increased after irradiation, but there was no evidence for an increase in protein stability. However, our data suggest that p53A protein stability is regulated in unirradiated cells, which likely ensures that apoptosis does not occur in the absence of stress. Without irradiation, both p53A protein and a paused RNA pol II were pre-bound to the promoters of pro-apoptotic genes, preparing mitotic cycling cells for a rapid apoptotic response to genotoxic stress. Together, our results define molecular mechanisms by which different cells in development modulate their apoptotic response, with broader significance for the survival of normal and cancer polyploid cells in mammals. In order to maintain genome integrity, eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple ways to respond to DNA damage stress. One of the major cellular responses is apoptosis, during which the cell undergoes programmed cell death in order to prevent the propagation of the damaged genome to daughter cells. Although clinical observations and other studies have shown that tissues can differ in their apoptotic response, the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences are largely unknown. We have shown in our model system, Drosophila, that endocycling cells do not initiate cell death in response to DNA damage. The endocycle is a cell cycle variation that is widely found in nature and conserved from plant to animals. During the endocycle, cells duplicate their genomic DNA but do not enter mitosis to segregate chromosomes, resulting in a polyploid genome content. In this study, we investigate how the apoptotic response to DNA damage is repressed in endocycling cells. We find that the Drosophila ortholog of the human p53 tumor suppressor protein is expressed at very low levels in endocycling cells. Moreover, the downstream pro-apoptotic genes that are regulated by p53 are epigenetically silenced in endocycling cells. Our results provide important insights into tissue-specific apoptotic responses in development, with possible broader impact on understanding radiation therapy response and cancer of different tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingqing Zhang
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Sonam Mehrotra
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Wei Lun Ng
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Calvi
- Department of Biology; Indiana University; Bloomington, IN USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hassel C, Zhang B, Dixon M, Calvi BR. Induction of endocycles represses apoptosis independently of differentiation and predisposes cells to genome instability. Development 2013; 141:112-23. [PMID: 24284207 DOI: 10.1242/dev.098871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The endocycle is a common developmental cell cycle variation wherein cells become polyploid through repeated genome duplication without mitosis. We previously showed that Drosophila endocycling cells repress the apoptotic cell death response to genotoxic stress. Here, we investigate whether it is differentiation or endocycle remodeling that promotes apoptotic repression. We find that when nurse and follicle cells switch into endocycles during oogenesis they repress the apoptotic response to DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation, and that this repression has been conserved in the genus Drosophila over 40 million years of evolution. Follicle cells defective for Notch signaling failed to switch into endocycles or differentiate and remained apoptotic competent. However, genetic ablation of mitosis by knockdown of Cyclin A or overexpression of fzr/Cdh1 induced follicle cell endocycles and repressed apoptosis independently of Notch signaling and differentiation. Cells recovering from these induced endocycles regained apoptotic competence, showing that repression is reversible. Recovery from fzr/Cdh1 overexpression also resulted in an error-prone mitosis with amplified centrosomes and high levels of chromosome loss and fragmentation. Our results reveal an unanticipated link between endocycles and the repression of apoptosis, with broader implications for how endocycles may contribute to genome instability and oncogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Hassel
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
McConnell KH, Dixon M, Calvi BR. The histone acetyltransferases CBP and Chameau integrate developmental and DNA replication programs in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells. Development 2012; 139:3880-90. [PMID: 22951641 DOI: 10.1242/dev.083576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
DNA replication origin activity changes during development. Chromatin modifications are known to influence the genomic location of origins and the time during S phase that they initiate replication in different cells. However, how chromatin regulates origins in concert with cell differentiation remains poorly understood. Here, we use developmental gene amplification in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells as a model to investigate how chromatin modifiers regulate origins in a developmental context. We find that the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) Chameau (Chm) binds to amplicon origins and is partially required for their function. Depletion of Chm had relatively mild effects on origins during gene amplification and genomic replication compared with previous knockdown of its ortholog HBO1 in human cells, which has severe effects on origin function. We show that another HAT, CBP (Nejire), also binds amplicon origins and is partially required for amplification. Knockdown of Chm and CBP together had a more severe effect on nucleosome acetylation and amplicon origin activity than knockdown of either HAT alone, suggesting that these HATs collaborate in origin regulation. In addition to their local function at the origin, we show that Chm and CBP also globally regulate the developmental transition of follicle cells into the amplification stages of oogenesis. Our results reveal a complexity of origin epigenetic regulation by multiple HATs during development and suggest that chromatin modifiers are a nexus that integrates differentiation and DNA replication programs.
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu J, McConnell K, Dixon M, Calvi BR. Analysis of model replication origins in Drosophila reveals new aspects of the chromatin landscape and its relationship to origin activity and the prereplicative complex. Mol Biol Cell 2011; 23:200-12. [PMID: 22049023 PMCID: PMC3248898 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e11-05-0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A study of model DNA replication origins in Drosophila reveals a codependence between histone acetylation and pre-RC assembly and leads to a chromatin switch model for the coordination of origin and promoter activity during development. Epigenetic regulation exerts a major influence on origins of DNA replication during development. The mechanisms for this regulation, however, are poorly defined. We showed previously that acetylation of nucleosomes regulates the origins that mediate developmental gene amplification during Drosophila oogenesis. Here we show that developmental activation of these origins is associated with acetylation of multiple histone lysines. Although these modifications are not unique to origin loci, we find that the level of acetylation is higher at the active origins and quantitatively correlated with the number of times these origins initiate replication. All of these acetylation marks were developmentally dynamic, rapidly increasing with origin activation and rapidly declining when the origins shut off and neighboring promoters turn on. Fine-scale analysis of the origins revealed that both hyperacetylation of nucleosomes and binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC) occur in a broad domain and that acetylation is highest on nucleosomes adjacent to one side of the major site of replication initiation. It was surprising to find that acetylation of some lysines depends on binding of ORC to the origin, suggesting that multiple histone acetyltransferases may be recruited during origin licensing. Our results reveal new insights into the origin epigenetic landscape and lead us to propose a chromatin switch model to explain the coordination of origin and promoter activity during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Maqbool SB, Mehrotra S, Kolpakas A, Durden C, Zhang B, Zhong H, Calvi BR. Dampened activity of E2F1-DP and Myb-MuvB transcription factors in Drosophila endocycling cells. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:4095-106. [PMID: 21045111 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.064519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The endocycle is a variant cell cycle comprised of alternating gap (G) and DNA synthesis (S) phases (endoreplication) without mitosis (M), which results in DNA polyploidy and large cell size. Endocycles occur widely in nature, but much remains to be learned about the regulation of this modified cell cycle. Here, we compared gene expression profiles of mitotic cycling larval brain and disc cells with the endocycling cells of fat body and salivary gland of the Drosophila larva. The results indicated that many genes that are positively regulated by the heterodimeric E2F1-DP or Myb-MuvB complex transcription factors are expressed at lower levels in endocycling cells. Many of these target genes have functions in M phase, suggesting that dampened E2F1 and Myb activity promote endocycles. Many other E2F1 target genes that are required for DNA replication were also repressed in endocycling cells, an unexpected result given that these cells must duplicate up to thousands of genome copies during each S phase. For some EF2-regulated genes, the lower level of mRNA in endocycling cells resulted in lower protein concentration, whereas for other genes it did not, suggesting a contribution of post-transcriptional regulation. Both knockdown and overexpression of E2F1-DP and Myb-MuvB impaired endocycles, indicating that transcriptional activation and repression must be balanced. Our data suggest that dampened transcriptional activation by E2F1-DP and Myb-MuvB is important to repress mitosis and coordinate the endocycle transcriptional and protein stability oscillators.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mehrotra S, Maqbool SB, Kolpakas A, Murnen K, Calvi BR. Endocycling cells do not apoptose in response to DNA rereplication genotoxic stress. Genes Dev 2009; 22:3158-71. [PMID: 19056894 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1710208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Initiation of DNA replication at origins more than once per cell cycle results in rereplication and has been implicated in cancer. Here we use Drosophila to examine the checkpoint responses to rereplication in a developmental context. We find that increased Double-parked (Dup), the Drosophila ortholog of Cdt1, results in rereplication and DNA damage. In most cells, this rereplication triggers caspase activation and apoptotic cell death mediated by both p53-dependent and -independent pathways. Elevated Dup also caused DNA damage in endocycling cells, which switch to a G/S cycle during normal development, indicating that rereplication and the endocycling DNA reduplication program are distinct processes. Unexpectedly, however, endocycling cells do not apoptose regardless of tissue type. Our combined evidence suggests that endocycling apoptosis is repressed in part because proapoptotic gene promoters are silenced. Normal endocycling cells had DNA lesions near heterochromatin, which increased after rereplication, explaining why endocycling cells must constantly repress the genotoxic apoptotic response. Our results reveal a novel regulation of apoptosis in development and new insights into the little-understood endocycle. Similar mechanisms may operate during vertebrate development, with implications for cancer predisposition in certain tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonam Mehrotra
- Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Cyclin E/Cdk2 is necessary for replication-dependent histone mRNA biosynthesis, but how it controls this process in early development is unknown. We show that in Drosophila embryos the MPM-2 monoclonal antibody, raised against a phosphoepitope from human mitotic cells, detects Cyclin E/Cdk2-dependent nuclear foci that colocalize with nascent histone transcripts. These foci are coincident with the histone locus body (HLB), a Cajal body-like nuclear structure associated with the histone locus and enriched in histone pre-mRNA processing factors such as Lsm11, a core component of the U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein. Using MPM-2 and anti-Lsm11 antibodies, we demonstrate that the HLB is absent in the early embryo and occurs when zygotic histone transcription begins during nuclear cycle 11. Whereas the HLB is found in all cells after its formation, MPM-2 labels the HLB only in cells with active Cyclin E/Cdk2. MPM-2 and Lsm11 foci are present in embryos lacking the histone locus, and MPM-2 foci are present in U7 mutants, which cannot correctly process histone pre-mRNA. These data indicate that MPM-2 recognizes a Cdk2-regulated protein that assembles into the HLB independently of histone mRNA biosynthesis. HLB foci are present in histone deletion embryos, although the MPM-2 foci are smaller, and some Lsm11 foci are not associated with MPM-2 foci, suggesting that the histone locus is important for HLB integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brian R. Calvi
- Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244
| | - William F. Marzluff
- *Department of Biology
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, and
- Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and
| | - Robert J. Duronio
- *Department of Biology
- Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
May NR, Thomer M, Murnen KF, Calvi BR. Levels of the origin-binding protein Double parked and its inhibitor Geminin increase in response to replication stress. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:4207-17. [PMID: 16141238 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The regulation of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) at origins ensures that the genome is replicated only once per cell cycle. Cdt1 is an essential component of the pre-RC that is rapidly degraded at G1-S and also inhibited by Geminin (Gem) protein to prevent re-replication. We have previously shown that destruction of the Drosophila homolog of Cdt1, Double-parked (Dup), at G1-S is dependent upon cyclin-E/CDK2 and important to prevent re-replication and cell death. Dup is phosphorylated by cyclin-E/Cdk2, but this direct phosphorylation was not sufficient to explain the rapid destruction of Dup at G1-S. Here, we present evidence that it is DNA replication itself that triggers rapid Dup destruction. We find that a range of defects in DNA replication stabilize Dup protein and that this stabilization is not dependent on ATM/ATR checkpoint kinases. This response to replication stress was cell-type specific, with neuroblast stem cells of the larval brain having the largest increase in Dup protein. Defects at different steps in replication also increased Dup protein during an S-phase-like amplification cell cycle in the ovary, suggesting that Dup stabilization is sensitive to DNA replication and not an indirect consequence of a cell-cycle arrest. Finally, we find that cells with high levels of Dup also have elevated levels of Gem protein. We propose that, in cycling cells, Dup destruction is coupled to DNA replication and that increased levels of Gem balance elevated Dup levels to prevent pre-RC reformation when Dup degradation fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah R May
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 415 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bandura JL, Beall EL, Bell M, Silver HR, Botchan MR, Calvi BR. humpty dumpty is required for developmental DNA amplification and cell proliferation in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2005; 15:755-9. [PMID: 15854909 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2005] [Revised: 02/23/2005] [Accepted: 02/24/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The full complement of proteins required for the proper regulation of genome duplication are yet to be described. We employ a genetic DNA-replication model system based on developmental amplification of Drosophila eggshell (chorion) genes [1]. Hypomorphic mutations in essential DNA replication genes result in a distinct thin-eggshell phenotype owing to reduced amplification [2]. Here, we molecularly identify the gene, which we have named humpty dumpty (hd), corresponding to the thin-eggshell mutant fs(3)272-9 [3]. We confirm that hd is essential for DNA amplification in the ovary and show that it also is required for cell proliferation during development. Mosaic analysis of hd mutant cells during development and RNAi in Kc cells reveal that depletion of Hd protein results in severe defects in genomic replication and DNA damage. Most Hd protein is found in nuclear foci, and some may traverse the nuclear envelope. Consistent with a role in DNA replication, expression of Hd protein peaks during late G1 and S phase, and it responds to the E2F1/Dp transcription factor. Hd protein sequence is conserved from plants to humans, and published microarrays indicate that expression of its putative human ortholog also peaks at G1/S [4]. Our data suggest that hd defines a new gene family likely required for cell proliferation in all multicellular eukaryotes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Bandura
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Thomer M, May NR, Aggarwal BD, Kwok G, Calvi BR. Drosophila double-parked is sufficient to induce re-replication during development and is regulated by cyclin E/CDK2. Development 2004; 131:4807-18. [PMID: 15342466 DOI: 10.1242/dev.01348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
It is important that chromosomes are duplicated only once per cell cycle. Over-replication is prevented by multiple mechanisms that block the reformation of a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) onto origins in S and G2 phase. We have investigated the developmental regulation of Double-parked (Dup) protein, the Drosophila ortholog of Cdt1, a conserved and essential pre-RC component found in human and other organisms. We find that phosphorylation and degradation of Dup protein at G1/S requires cyclin E/CDK2. The N terminus of Dup, which contains ten potential CDK phosphorylation sites, is necessary and sufficient for Dup degradation during S phase of mitotic cycles and endocycles. Mutation of these ten phosphorylation sites, however, only partially stabilizes the protein, suggesting that multiple mechanisms ensure Dup degradation. This regulation is important because increased Dup protein is sufficient to induce profound rereplication and death of developing cells. Mis-expression has different effects on genomic replication than on developmental amplification from chorion origins. The C terminus alone has no effect on genomic replication, but it is better than full-length protein at stimulating amplification. Mutation of the Dup CDK sites increases genomic re-replication, but is dominant negative for amplification. These two results suggest that phosphorylation regulates Dup activity differently during these developmentally specific types of DNA replication. Moreover, the ability of the CDK site mutant to rapidly inhibit BrdU incorporation suggests that Dup is required for fork elongation during amplification. In the context of findings from human and other cells, our results indicate that stringent regulation of Dup protein is critical to protect genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Thomer
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
It is widely believed that DNA replication in multicellular animals (metazoa) begins at specific origins to which a pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) binds. Nevertheless, a consensus sequence for origins has yet to be identified in metazoa. Origin identity can change during development, suggesting that there are epigenetic influences. A notable example of developmental specificity occurs in Drosophila, where somatic follicle cells of the ovary transition from genomic replication to exclusive re-replication at origins that control amplification of the eggshell (chorion) protein genes. Here we show that chromatin acetylation is critical for this developmental transition in origin specificity. We find that histones at the active origins are hyperacetylated, coincident with binding of the origin recognition complex (ORC). Mutation of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) Rpd3 induced genome-wide hyperacetylation, genomic replication and a redistribution of the origin-binding protein ORC2 in amplification-stage cells, independent of effects on transcription. Tethering Rpd3 or Polycomb proteins to the origin decreased its activity, whereas tethering the Chameau acetyltransferase increased origin activity. These results suggest that nucleosome acetylation and other epigenetic changes are important modulators of origin activity in metazoa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhagwan D Aggarwal
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 415 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian R Calvi
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schwed G, May N, Pechersky Y, Calvi BR. Drosophila minichromosome maintenance 6 is required for chorion gene amplification and genomic replication. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:607-20. [PMID: 11854416 PMCID: PMC65653 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.01-08-0400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Duplication of the eukaryotic genome initiates from multiple origins of DNA replication whose activity is coordinated with the cell cycle. We have been studying the origins of DNA replication that control amplification of eggshell (chorion) genes during Drosophila oogenesis. Mutation of genes required for amplification results in a thin eggshell phenotype, allowing a genetic dissection of origin regulation. Herein, we show that one mutation corresponds to a subunit of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex of proteins, MCM6. The binding of the MCM complex to origins in G1 as part of a prereplicative complex is critical for the cell cycle regulation of origin licensing. We find that MCM6 associates with other MCM subunits during amplification. These results suggest that chorion origins are bound by an amplification complex that contains MCM proteins and therefore resembles the prereplicative complex. Lethal alleles of MCM6 reveal it is essential for mitotic cycles and endocycles, and suggest that its function is mediated by ATP. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of MCMs in the coordination of DNA replication during the cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Schwed
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
It is critical to discover the mechanisms of normal cell cycle regulation if we are to fully understand what goes awry in cancer cells. The normal eukaryotic cell tightly regulates the activity of origins of DNA replication so that the genome is duplicated exactly once per cell cycle. Over the last ten years much has been learned concerning the cell cycle regulation of origin activity. It is now clear that the proteins and cell cycle mechanisms that control origin activity are largely conserved from yeast to humans. Despite this conservation, the composition of origins of DNA replication in higher eukaryotes remains ill defined. A DNA consensus for predicting origins has yet to emerge, and it is of some debate whether primary DNA sequence determines where replication initiates. In this review we outline what is known about origin structure and the mechanism of once per cell cycle DNA replication with an emphasis on recent advances in mammalian cells. We discuss the possible relevance of these regulatory pathways for cancer biology and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Bandura
- Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6145, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
It remains unclear how certain regions on metazoan chromosomes are selected to initiate DNA replication. In recent years a number of origins of DNA replication have been mapped, but there is still no DNA consensus for predicting where replication will initiate. Evidence suggests that the higher order structure of the nucleus and chromosome influences origin activity. Chromosomal DNA replication is proposed to occur in special compartments in the nucleus called replication foci. Foci in different regions of the nucleus initiate replication at different times of S-phase, suggesting nuclear position may contribute to where and when replication begins. Here we test the contribution of nuclear compartments for well-defined origins, those involved in amplification of the chorion (eggshell) genes during Drosophila oogenesis. The results of three-dimensional confocal microscopy indicate that chorion DNA replication origins are highly active in diverse positions within the nucleus. We also find that chorion replication origins inserted at ectopic chromosomal sites can amplify highly in diverse nuclear locations distinct from the endogenous loci, including when they are buffered against genomic position effects. We used fluorescence in situ hybridization to analyze chromosome structure during amplification. Contrary to the replication factory model, we find no evidence for spooling of DNA toward a replication center. We discuss the implications of these results for understanding the role of higher order structure in amplification and chromosome duplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Calvi
- Carnegie Institution of Washington/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
The mechanisms controlling duplication of the metazoan genome are only beginning to be understood. It is still unclear what organization of DNA sequences constitutes a chromosomal origin of DNA replication, and the regulation of origin activity during the cell cycle has not been fully revealed. We review recent results that indicate that chorion gene amplification in follicle cells of the Drosophila ovary is a model for investigating metazoan replication. Evaluation of cis sequence organization and function suggests that chorion loci share attributes with other replicons and provides insights into metazoan origin structure. Moreover, recent results indicate that chorion origins respond to S-phase control, but escape mechanisms that inhibit other origins from firing more than once in a cell cycle. Several identified genes that mediate amplification are critical for the cell cycle control of replication initiation. It is likely that further genetic screens for mutations that disrupt amplification will identify the cadre of proteins associated with origins and the regulatory pathways that control their activity. Furthermore, the recent development of methods to detect amplification in situ has uncovered new aspects of its developmental control. Examining this control will reveal links between developmental pathways and the cell cycle machinery. Visualization of amplifying chorion genes with high resolution also represents an opportunity to evaluate the influence of nuclear and chromosome structure on origin activity. The study of chorion amplification in Drosophila, therefore, provides great potential for the genetic and molecular dissection of metazoan replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Calvi
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Laboratories, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, Maryland 21210, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Over-replication of two clusters of chorion genes in Drosophila ovarian follicle cells is essential for rapid eggshell biosynthesis. The relationship of this amplification to the follicle cell cycles has remained unclear. To investigate the regulation of amplification, we developed a technique to detect amplifying chorion genes in individual follicle cells using BrdU incorporation and FISH. Amplification occurs in two developmental phases. One of the gene clusters begins to amplify periodically during S phases of follicle cell endocycles. Subsequently, after endocycles have ceased, both clusters amplify continuously during the remainder of oogenesis. In contrast to the early phase, late amplification commences synchronously among follicle cells. The pattern of Cyclin E expression mirrors these two phases. We present evidence that Cyclin E is required positively for amplification. We suggest that Cyclin E also acts negatively to inhibit refiring of most origins within a cycle, and that specific factors at chorion origins allow them to escape this negative rereplication control. Our findings suggest that chorion amplification is a model for understanding metazoan replicons and the controls that restrict replication to once per cell cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Calvi
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Laboratories, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Baltimore, Maryland 21210, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Previous results suggested that the hobo transposable element is active predominantly in the germline of Drosophila. We investigate germline restriction of hobo transposition by testing in vitro modified elements for their ability to mobilize marked elements in vivo. Although intact hobo elements are germline specific, an hsp70 promoter-hobo transposase fusion is active in the soma. Analysis of the hsp70-promoted transcript does not provide evidence for splicing. Moreover, the hobo promoter confers germline bias to a highly sensitive reporter, delta 2-3 P transposase. These results indicate that hobo transposition is germline specific due to regulation of transposase production at the level of transcription. Thus, although hobo is similar to the P transposable element in organization and tissue specificity, it differs in the underlying mechanism governing germline specific activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Calvi
- Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Smith D, Wohlgemuth J, Calvi BR, Franklin I, Gelbart WM. hobo enhancer trapping mutagenesis in Drosophila reveals an insertion specificity different from P elements. Genetics 1993; 135:1063-76. [PMID: 8307323 PMCID: PMC1205738 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/135.4.1063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
P element enhancer trapping has become an indispensable tool in the analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. However, there is great variation in the mutability of loci by these elements such that some loci are relatively refractory to insertion. We have developed the hobo transposable element for use in enhancer trapping and we describe the results of a hobo enhancer trap screen. In addition, we present evidence that a hobo enhancer trap element has a pattern of insertion into the genome that is different from the distribution of P elements in the available database. Hence, hobo insertion may facilitate access to genes resistant to P element insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Smith
- Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Calvi BR, Hong TJ, Findley SD, Gelbart WM. Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of inverted repeat transposons in Drosophila and plants: hobo, Activator, and Tam3. Cell 1991; 66:465-71. [PMID: 1651170 DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90010-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We have sequenced HFL1 from D. melanogaster, the only cloned hobo element shown to have transposase activity. The 2959 bp HFL1 sequence predicts a 2.0 kb open reading frame (ORF1) with substantial amino acid similarity to the transposases of Activator (Ac) from maize (Zea mays) and Tam3 from snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus). Mutational analysis of a C-terminal region of ORF1 conserved with Ac and Tam3 indicates that it is essential for hobo transposase activity. This is an example of extensive amino acid sequence identity between short inverted repeat elements in different kingdoms. We discuss the possibility that the conservation of hobo, Ac, and Tam3 transposases represents an example of horizontal transmission of genetic information between plants and animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Calvi
- Department of Cellular and Developmental Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2097
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|