The barrier function of an insulator couples high histone acetylation levels with specific protection of promoter DNA from methylation

The CELO adenovirus Gam1 protein enhances transient and stable recombinant protein expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells

The Gam1 protein of the avian CELO adenovirus activates transcription through inhibition of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1). We investigated the effect of Gam1 on both transient and stable transgene expression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, one of the most commonly used mammalian hosts for the large-scale production of recombinant proteins. Transient expression of Gam1 increased reporter protein levels up to 4-fold in suspension cultures of CHO DG44 cells co-transfected with a reporter gene and up to 20-fold in recombinant CHO DG44-derived cell lines. The highest levels of activation were observed when the transgene was under the control of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) immediate early promoter/enhancer. Increases in recombinant protein expression in the presence of Gam1 were not accompanied by an enhancement of cell growth or viability. We conclude that Gam1 may serve as a useful genetic tool for increasing recombinant protein expression in CHO DG44 cells.

Chromatin domain boundaries: insulators and beyond

The eukaryotic genome is organized into functionally and structurally distinct domains, representing regulatory units for gene expression and chromosome behavior. DNA sequences that mark the border between adjacent domains are the insulators or boundary elements, which are required in maintenance of the function of different domains. Some insulators need others enable to play insulation activity. Chromatin domains are defined by distinct sets of post-translationally modified histones. Recent studies show that these histone modifications are also involved in establishment of sharp chromatin boundaries in order to prevent the spreading of distinct domains. Additionally, in some loci, the high-order chromatin structures for long-range looping interactions also have boundary activities, suggesting a correlation between insulators and chromatin loop domains. In this review, we will discuss recent progress in the field of chromatin domain boundaries.

Tal1/SCL binding to pericentromeric DNA represses transcription

Tal1/SCL is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor critical for normal hematopoiesis. To understand the mechanisms underlying transcriptional regulation by Tal1/SCL, we combined an in vitro DNA binding strategy and an in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis to search for Tal1/SCL target regions in K562 erythroleukemia cells. A 0.4-kb genomic DNA clone containing two Tal1/SCL binding E-boxes and GATA- and SATB1-binding motifs (EEGS) was identified that localized to the pericentromeric region with high homology to satellite 2 DNA. Pericentric DNA is related to heterochromatin and gene inactivation. We found that Tal1/SCL could complex with the histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9)-specific methyltransferase Suv39H1. Binding of Tal1/SCL to EEGS chromatin correlated with hypermethylation of H3K9 and the association of heterochromatin protein HP1 to this region. In Rep4 reporter gene assays, EEGS affected repression in a manner dependent on the expression level of Tal1/SCL that was accompanied by increased H3K9 methylation in chromatin associated with EEGS and a linked promoter. A specific histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, relieved Tal1/SCL-mediated repression by EEGS. In addition, SATB1 bound EEGS chromatin and promoted Tal1/SCL EEGS-dependent repression. We expand the list of potential interacting partners for Tal1/SCL by demonstrating direct associations of Tal1/SCL with SATB1 and with Suv39H1. These results reveal a novel mechanism of action for Tal1/SCL and implicate heterochromatin-like silencing via a cis-acting binding motif for transcriptional repression.

How to keep V(D)J recombination under control

Breaking apart chromosomes is not a matter to be taken lightly. The possible negative outcomes are obvious: loss of information, unstable chromosomes, chromosomal translocations, tumorigenesis, or cell death. Utilizing DNA rearrangement to generate the desired diversity in the antigen receptor loci is a risky business, and it must be carefully controlled. In general, the regulation is so precise that the negative consequences are minimal or not apparent. They are visible only when the process of V(D)J recombination goes awry, as for example in some chromosomal translocations associated with lymphoid tumors. Regulation is imposed not only to prevent the generation of random breaks in the DNA, but also to direct rearrangement to the appropriate locus or subregion of a locus in the appropriate cell at the appropriate time. Antigen receptor rearrangement is regulated essentially at four different levels: expression of the RAG1/2 recombinase, intrinsic biochemical properties of the recombinase and the cleavage reaction, the post-cleavage /DNA repair stage of the process, and accessibility of the substrate to the recombinase. Within each of these broad categories, multiple mechanisms are used to achieve the desired aims. The major focus of this review is on accessibility control and the role of chromatin and nuclear architecture in achieving this regulation, although other issues are touched upon.

Sleeping Beauty Transposon‐Mediated Gene Therapy for Prolonged Expression

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system represents a new vector for non-viral gene transfer that melds advantages of viruses and other forms of naked DNA transfer. The transposon itself is comprised of two inverted terminal repeats of about 340 base pairs each. The SB system directs precise transfer of specific constructs from a donor plasmid into a mammalian chromosome. The excision of the transposon from a donor plasmid and integration into a chromosomal site is mediated by Sleeping Beauty transposase, which can be delivered to cells vita its gene or its mRNA. As a result of its integration in chromosomes, and its lack of viral sequences that are often detected by poorly understood cellular defense mechanisms, a gene in a chromosomally integrated transposon can be expressed over the lifetime of a cell. SB transposons integrate nearly randomly into chromosomes at TA-dinucleotide base pairs although the sequences flanking the TAs can influence the probability of integration at a given site. Although random integration of vectors into human genomes is often thought to raise significant safety issues, evidence to date does not indicate that random insertions of SB transposons represent risks that are equal to those of viral vectors. Here we review the activities of the SB system in mice used as a model for human gene therapy, methods of delivery of the SB system, and its efficacy in ameliorating disorders that model human disease.

Recruitment of histone modifications by USF proteins at a vertebrate barrier element

The chicken beta-globin 5'HS4 insulator element acts as a barrier to the encroachment of chromosomal silencing. Endogenous 5'HS4 sequences are highly enriched with histone acetylation and H3K4 methylation regardless of neighboring gene expression. We report here that 5'HS4 elements recruit these histone modifications when protecting a reporter transgene from chromosomal silencing. Deletion studies identified a single protein binding site within 5'HS4, footprint IV, that is necessary for the recruitment of histone modifications and for barrier activity. We have determined that USF proteins bind to footprint IV. USF1 is present in complexes with histone modifying enzymes in cell extracts, and these enzymes specifically interact with the endogenous 5'HS4 element. Knockdown of USF1 expression leads to a loss of histone modification recruitment and subsequent encroachment of H3K9 methylation. We propose that barrier activity requires the constitutive recruitment of H3K4 methylation and histone acetylation at multiple residues to counteract the propagation of condensed chromatin structures.

cis-Acting determinants of heterochromatin formation on Drosophila melanogaster chromosome four

The heterochromatic domains of Drosophila melanogaster (pericentric heterochromatin, telomeres, and the fourth chromosome) are characterized by histone hypoacetylation, high levels of histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 (H3-mK9), and association with heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1). While the specific interaction of HP1 with both H3-mK9 and histone methyltransferases suggests a mechanism for the maintenance of heterochromatin, it leaves open the question of how heterochromatin formation is targeted to specific domains. Expression characteristics of reporter transgenes inserted at different sites in the fourth chromosome define a minimum of three euchromatic and three heterochromatic domains, interspersed. Here we searched for cis-acting DNA sequence determinants that specify heterochromatic domains. Genetic screens for a switch in phenotype demonstrate that local deletions or duplications of 5 to 80 kb of DNA flanking a transposon reporter can lead to the loss or acquisition of variegation, pointing to short-range cis-acting determinants for silencing. This silencing is dependent on HP1. A switch in transgene expression correlates with a switch in chromatin structure, judged by nuclease accessibility. Mapping data implicate the 1360 transposon as a target for heterochromatin formation. We propose that heterochromatin formation is initiated at dispersed repetitive elements along the fourth chromosome and spreads for approximately 10 kb or until encountering competition from a euchromatic determinant.

Insulator dynamics and the setting of chromatin domains

The early discovery of cis-regulatory elements able to promote transcription of genes over large distances led to the postulate that elements, termed insulators, should also exist that would limit the action of enhancers, LCRs and silencers to defined domains. Such insulators were indeed found during the past fifteen years in a wide range of organisms, from yeast to humans. Recent advances point to an important role of transcription factors in insulator activity and demonstrate that the operational observation of an insulator effect relies on a delicate balance between the "efficiency" of the insulator and that of the element to be counteracted. In addition, genuine insulator elements now appear less common than initially envisaged, and they are only found at loci displaying a high density of coding or regulatory information. Where this is not the case, chromatin domains of opposing properties are thought to confront each other at "fuzzy" boundaries. In this article, we propose models for both fixed and fuzzy boundaries that incorporate probabilistic and dynamic parameters.

Sea urchin insulator protects lentiviral vector from silencing by maintaining active chromatin structure

Suppressed expression of transgenes in vivo is the major obstacle in the gene therapy. For the long-term expression, we utilized a chromatin insulator from sea urchin arylsulfatase (Ars) gene locus (Ars insulator, ArsI), which has been shown to epigenetically regulate gene expression across species. ArsI was able to prevent silencing of the transgene in a myeloid cell line, HL-60, and a murine embryonic stem cell line, CCE, in an orientation-dependent manner, but not in Huh-7, K562 and MCF-7 cells, indicating that the effect of ArsI on gene silencing was cell type dependent. Although anti-silencing effect of ArsI was almost equivalent to that of chicken beta-globin insulator, incorporation of ArsI into lentiviral vector had little effect on the virus titer compared with chicken beta-globin insulator. Clonal analysis of transduced HL-60 cells revealed that ArsI protects the lentiviral vector from position effects regardless of its orientation. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that a high acetylation level was observed in the promoter of the insulated vector, whereas that of ArsI was independent of its anti-silencing capacity. In addition to it having little deteriorative effect on the virus titer, the identified anti-silencing effect of ArsI suggested its possibility for application in gene therapy.

Promoter-dependent mechanism leading to selective hypomethylation within the 5' region of gene MAGE-A1 in tumor cells

Several male germ line-specific genes, including MAGE-A1, rely on DNA methylation for their repression in normal somatic tissues. These genes become activated in many types of tumors in the course of the genome-wide demethylation process which often accompanies tumorigenesis. We show that in tumor cells expressing MAGE-A1, the 5' region is significantly less methylated than the other parts of the gene. The process leading to this site-specific hypomethylation does not appear to be permanent in these tumor cells, since in vitro-methylated MAGE-A1 sequences do not undergo demethylation after being stably transfected. However, in these cells there is a process that inhibits de novo methylation within the 5' region of MAGE-A1, since unmethylated MAGE-A1 transgenes undergo remethylation at all CpGs except those located within the 5' region. This local inhibition of methylation appears to depend on promoter activity. We conclude that the site-specific hypomethylation of MAGE-A1 in tumor cells relies on a transient process of demethylation followed by a persistent local inhibition of remethylation due to the presence of transcription factors.

CTCF Elements Direct Allele-Specific Undermethylation at the Imprinted H19 Locus

The H19 imprinted gene locus is regulated by an upstream 2 kb imprinting control region (ICR) that influences allele-specific expression, DNA methylation, and replication timing. This ICR becomes de novo methylated during late spermatogenesis in the male but emerges from oogenesis in an unmethylated form, and this allele-specific pattern is then maintained throughout early development and in all tissues of the mouse. We have used a genetic approach involving transfection into embryonic stem (ES) cells in order to decipher how the maternal allele is protected from de novo methylation at the time of implantation. Our studies show that CCCTC binding factor (CTCF) boundary elements within the ICR have the ability to prevent de novo methylation on the maternal allele. Since CTCF does not recognize its binding sequence when methylated, this reaction does not occur on the paternal allele, thus preserving the gamete-derived, allele-specific pattern. These results suggest that CTCF may play a general role in the maintenance of differential methylation patterns in vivo.

Both CTCF-dependent and -independent Insulators Are Found between the Mouse T Cell Receptor α and Dad1 Genes

The T cell rearrangement of the T cell receptor (TCR) genes TCRalpha and delta is specifically regulated by a complex interplay between enhancer elements and chromatin structure. The alpha enhancer is active in T cells and drives TCRalpha recombination in collaboration with a locus control region-like element located downstream of the Calpha gene on mouse chromosome 14. Twelve kb further down-stream lies another gene, Dad1, with a program of expression different from that of TCRalpha. The approximately 6-kb locus control region element lying between them contains multiple regulatory sites with a variety of roles in regulating the two genes. Previous evidence has indicated that among these there are widely distributed regions with enhancer blocking (insulating) activity. We have shown in this report that one of these sites, not previously examined, strongly binds the insulator protein CCTC-binding factor (CTCF) in vitro and in vivo and can function in an enhancer blocking assay. However, other regions within the 6-kb element that also can block enhancers clearly do not harbor CTCF sites and thus must reflect the presence of a previously undetected and distinct vertebrate insulator activity.

Partition of distinct chromosomal regions: negotiable border and fixed border

Chromosomes are partitioned into distinct functional regions. For example, heterochromatin regions consist of condensed chromatin and contain few transcriptionally active genes, whereas euchromatin regions are less condensed and majority of active genes reside in the euchromatin regions. Because distinct regions reside in each chromosome, borders are accordingly established between these regions. A prevailing view of the borders is that they are 'walls' that actively inhibit communication between distinct regions on chromosomes. Although little is known about the molecular bases of these walls, specific DNA elements are considered to recruit these walls to define the positions of the borders. We call the borders established with this mechanism as 'fixed borders'. Past studies have identified various insulators (boundary DNA elements) that have been suggested to recruit fixed borders to them. Another mechanism, which we introduce and focus on in this review, does not require walls recruited by specific DNA elements at the chromosomal borders. Instead, the borders are defined by a balance of opposing enzymatic activities located at the opposite sides of the resultant borders. We name these borders 'negotiable borders'. Here we review some of the recent progress in the field that offer valuable insight into mechanisms of establishing structural and functional borders on chromosomes.

Regulatory elements of the EKLF gene that direct erythroid cell-specific expression during mammalian development

Erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF) plays an essential role in enabling β-globin expression during erythroid ontogeny. It is first expressed in the extraembryonic mesoderm of the yolk sac within the morphologically unique cells that give rise to the blood islands, and then later within the hepatic primordia. The BMP4/Smad pathway plays a critical role in the induction of EKLF, and transient transfection analyses demonstrate that sequences located within less than 1 kb of its transcription initiation site are sufficient for high-level erythroid-specific transcription. We have used transgenic analyses to verify that 950 bp located adjacent to the EKLF start site of transcription is sufficient to generate lacZ expression within the blood islands as well as the fetal liver during embryonic development. Of particular importance are 3 regions, 2 of which overlap endogenous erythroid-specific DNase hypersensitive sites, and 1 of which includes the proximal promoter region. The onset of transgene expression mimics that of endogenous EKLF as it begins by day 7.5 (d7.5) to d8.0. In addition, it exhibits a strict hematopoietic specificity, localized only to these cells and not to the adjacent vasculature at all stages examined. Finally, expression is heterocellular, implying that although these elements are sufficient for tissue-specific expression, they do not shield against the position effects of adjacent chromatin. These analyses demonstrate that a surprisingly small DNA segment contains all the information needed to target a linked gene to the hematopoietic compartment at both early and later stages of development, and may be a useful cassette for this purpose.

Putative intestine-specific enhancers located in 5' sequence of the CDX1 gene regulate CDX1 expression in the intestine

CDX1 is a homeobox transcription factor that plays a critical role in intestinal epithelial cell growth and differentiation. CDX1 gene expression is tightly regulated in a temporal and cell-type specific manner. However, very little is known about the regulatory mechanisms that direct CDX1 gene expression in the intestine. To elucidate these mechanisms, we employed a series of transgenic mouse studies using the 5' flanking sequences of the human CDX1 gene. Transgenic mice containing nucleotides between -5667 and +68 relative to the transcription start site of the CDX1 gene demonstrated ectopic expression of the transgene in the brain and gastric smooth muscle. However, transgenic expression of the nucleotides -15601 to +68 of the CDX1 gene was restricted to the intestinal epithelium, which was identical to endogenous CDX1 gene expression. Taken together, the upstream sequences between -15601 and -5667 contain regulatory elements that direct transgene expression specifically to the intestinal epithelium. Furthermore, DNase I hypersensitivity assays revealed two active chromatin regions in the CDX1 gene (hypertensive sites 1 and 2) located at approximately -5.8 and -6.8 kb upstream of the CDX1 gene, respectively, which may function as potential intestine-specific enhancers.

Site-selective in vivo targeting of cytosine-5 DNA methylation by zinc-finger proteins

Cytosine-5 DNA methylation is a critical signal defining heritable epigenetic states of transcription. As aberrant methylation patterns often accompany disease states, the ability to target cytosine methylation to preselected regions could prove valuable in re-establishing proper gene regulation. We employ the strategy of targeted gene methylation in yeast, which has a naturally unmethylated genome, selectively directing de novo DNA methylation via the fusion of C5 DNA methyltransferases to heterologous DNA-binding proteins. The zinc-finger proteins Zif268 and Zip53 can target DNA methylation by M.CviPI or M.SssI 5-52 nt from single zinc-factor binding sites. Modification at specific GC (M.CviPI) or CG (M.SssI) sites is enhanced as much as 20-fold compared with strains expressing either the free enzyme or a fusion protein with the zinc-finger protein moiety unable to bind to DNA. Interestingly, methylation is also selectively targeted as far as 353 nt from the zinc-finger protein binding sites, possibly indicative of looping, nucleosomes or higher-order chromatin structure. These data demonstrate that methylation can be targeted in vivo to a potentially broad range of sequences using specifically engineered zinc-finger proteins. Further more, the selective targeting of methylation by zinc-finger proteins demonstrates that binding of distinct classes of factors can be monitored in living cells.

Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub

Developmental and tissue-specific expression of higher eukaryotic genes involves activation of transcription at the appropriate time and place and keeping it silent otherwise. Unlike housekeeping genes, tissue-specific genes generally do not cluster on the chromosomes. They can be found in gene-dense regions of chromosomes as well as in regions of repressive chromatin. Depending on the location, shielding against positive or negative regulatory effects from neighboring chromatin may be required and hence insulator and boundary models were proposed. They postulate that chromosomes are partitioned into physically distinct expression domains, each containing a gene or gene cluster with its cis-regulatory elements. Specialized elements at the borders of such domains are proposed to prevent cross-talk between domains, and thus to be crucial in establishing independent expression domains. However, genes and associated cis-acting sequences often do not occupy physically distinct domains on the chromosomes. Rather, genes can overlap and cis-acting sequences can be found tens or hundreds of kilobases away from the target gene, sometimes with unrelated genes in between. Therefore the ability of a gene to communicate with positive cis-regulatory elements rather than the presence of specialized boundary elements appears to be key to establishing an independent expression profile. Our recent finding that active beta-globin genes physically interact in the nuclear space with multiple cis-regulatory elements, with inactive genes looping out, has provided a potential mechanistic framework for this model. We refer to such a spatial unit of regulatory DNA elements as an active chromatin hub (ACH). We propose that productive ACH formation underlies correct gene expression, requiring the presence of protein factors with the appropriate affinities for each other bound to their cognate DNA sequences. Proximity and specificity determines which cis-acting sequences and promoter(s) form an ACH, and thus which gene will be expressed. Other regulatory sequences can interfere with transcription by blocking the appropriate physical interaction between an enhancer and promoter in the ACH. Possible mechanisms by which distal DNA elements encounter each other in the 3D nuclear space will be discussed.

Barrier proteins remodel and modify chromatin to restrict silenced domains

Transcriptionally active and inactive domains are frequently found adjacent to one another in the eukaryotic nucleus. To better understand the underlying mechanisms by which domains maintain opposing transcription patterns, we performed a systematic genomewide screen for proteins that may block the spread of silencing in yeast. This analysis identified numerous proteins with efficient silencing blocking activities, and some of these have previously been shown to be involved in chromatin dynamics. We isolated subunits of Swi/Snf, mediator, and TFIID, as well as subunits of the Sas-I, SAGA, NuA3, NuA4, Spt10p, Rad6p, and Dot1p complexes, as barrier proteins. We demonstrate that histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling occurred at the barrier and correlated with a block to the spread of silencing. Our data suggest that multiple overlapping mechanisms were involved in delimiting silenced and active domains in vivo.

Genomic domains and regulatory elements operating at the domain level

The sequencing of the complete genomes of several organisms, including humans, has so far not contributed much to our understanding of the mechanisms regulating gene expression in the course of realization of developmental programs. In this so-called "postgenomic" era, we still do not understand how (if at all) the long-range organization of the genome is related to its function. The domain hypothesis of the eukaryotic genome organization postulates that the genome is subdivided into a number of semiindependent functional units (domains) that may include one or several functionally related genes, with these domains having well-defined borders, and operate under the control of special (domain-level) regulatory systems. This hypothesis was extensively discussed in the literature over the past 15 years. Yet it is still unclear whether the hypothesis is valid or not. There is evidence both supporting and questioning this hypothesis. The most conclusive data supporting the domain hypothesis come from studies of avian and mammalian beta-globin domains. In this review we will critically discuss the present state of the studies on these and other genomic domains, paying special attention to the domain-level regulatory systems known as locus control regions (LCRs). Based on this discussion, we will try to reevaluate the domain hypothesis of the organization of the eukaryotic genome.

CTCF tethers an insulator to subnuclear sites, suggesting shared insulator mechanisms across species

Insulators can block an enhancer of one gene from activating a promoter on another nearby gene. Almost all described vertebrate insulators require binding of the regulatory protein CTCF for their activity. We show that CTCF copurifies with the nucleolar protein nucleophosmin and both are present at insulator sites in vivo. Furthermore, exogenous insulator sequences are tethered to the nucleolus in a CTCF-dependent manner. These interactions, quite different from those of the gypsy insulator element in Drosophila, may generate similar loop structures, suggesting a common theme and model for enhancer-blocking insulator action.

The c-myc insulator element and matrix attachment regions define the c-myc chromosomal domain

Insulator elements and matrix attachment regions are essential for the organization of genetic information within the nucleus. By comparing the pattern of histone modifications at the mouse and human c-myc alleles, we identified an evolutionarily conserved boundary at which the c-myc transcription unit is separated from the flanking condensed chromatin enriched in lysine 9-methylated histone H3. This region harbors the c-myc insulator element (MINE), which contains at least two physically separable, functional activities: enhancer-blocking activity and barrier activity. The enhancer-blocking activity is mediated by CTCF. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that CTCF is constitutively bound at the insulator and at the promoter region independent of the transcriptional status of c-myc. This result supports an architectural role of CTCF rather than a regulatory role in transcription. An additional higher-order nuclear organization of the c-myc locus is provided by matrix attachment regions (MARs) that define a domain larger than 160 kb. The MARs of the c-myc domain do not act to prevent the association of flanking regions with lysine 9-methylated histones, suggesting that they do not function as barrier elements.

Prospects and implications of using chromatin insulators in gene therapy and transgenesis

Gene therapy has emerged from the idea of inserting a wild-type copy of a gene in order to restore the proper expression and function of a damaged gene. Initial efforts have focused on finding the proper vector and delivery method to introduce a corrected gene to the affected tissue or cell type. Even though these first attempts are clearly promising, several problems remain unsolved. A major problem is the influence of chromatin structure on transgene expression. To overcome chromatin-dependent repressive transgenic states, researchers have begun to use chromatin regulatory elements to drive transgene expression. Insulators or chromatin boundaries are able to protect a transgene against chromatin position effects at their genomic integration sites, and they are able to maintain transgene expression for long periods of time. Therefore, these elements may be very useful tools in gene therapy applications for ensuring high-level and stable expression of transgenes.

A panorama of lineage-specific transcription in hematopoiesis

The hematopoietic system consists of more than ten differentiated cell types, all of which are derived from a single type of hematopoietic stem cell. The accessibility and interest of this system have made it a model for understanding normal and abnormal differentiation of mammalian cells. Newer techniques have generated a mass of data that requires integrative approaches for analysis and interpretation. The traditional view of the differentiation program holds that a small number of regulators are involved in each stage of cell specification. However, this may not be the case. Recent analyses have shown that almost all substantial subsets of genes, including the set of broadly expressed transcription factors, are expressed in patterns that are unique for each lineage. Further, much of this difference between lineages can be captured in two-dimensional graphs. Understanding the biologic significance, mechanisms and constraints underlying these differences is a challenge for experimentalists and computational biologists alike.

Silencing of transgene transcription precedes methylation of promoter DNA and histone H3 lysine 9

Transgenes stably integrated into cells or animals in many cases are silenced rapidly, probably under the influence of surrounding endogenous condensed chromatin. This gene silencing correlates with repressed chromatin structure marked by histone hypoacetylation, loss of methylation at H3 lysine 4, increase of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation as well as CpG DNA methylation at the promoter. However, the order and the timing of these modifications and their impact on transcription inactivation are less well understood. To determine the temporal order of these events, we examined a model system consisting of a transgenic cassette stably integrated in chicken erythroid cells. We found that histone H3 and H4 hypoacetylation and loss of methylation at H3 lysine 4 all occurred during the same window of time as transgene inactivation in both multicopy and low-copy-number lines. These results indicate that these histone modifications were the primary events in gene silencing. We show that the kinetics of silencing exclude histone H3 K9 and promoter DNA methylation as the primary causative events in our transgene system.

Functional dissection of the mouse tyrosinase locus control region identifies a new putative boundary activity

Locus control regions (LCRs) are complex high-order chromatin structures harbouring several regulatory elements, including enhancers and boundaries. We have analysed the mouse tyrosinase LCR functions, in vitro, in cell lines and, in vivo, in transgenic mice and flies. The LCR-core (2.1 kb), located at -15 kb and carrying a previously described tissue-specific DNase I hypersensitive site, operates as a transcriptional enhancer that efficiently transactivates heterologous promoters in a cell-specific orientation-independent manner. Furthermore, we have investigated the boundary activity of these sequences in transgenic animals and cells. In mice, the LCR fragment (3.7 kb) rescued a weakly expressed reference construct that displays position effects. In Drosophila, the LCR fragment and its core insulated the expression of a white minigene reporter construct from chromosomal position effects. In cells, sequences located 5' from the LCR-core displayed putative boundary activities. We have obtained genomic sequences surrounding the LCR fragment and found a LINE1 repeated element at 5'. In B16 melanoma and L929 fibroblast mouse cells, this element was found heavily methylated, supporting the existence of putative boundary elements that could prevent the spreading of condensed chromatin from the LINE1 sequences into the LCR fragment, experimentally shown to be in an open chromatin structure.

The rise of DNA methylation and the importance of chromatin on multidrug resistance in cancer

In recent years, the different classes of drugs and regimens used clinically have provided an improvement in tumour management. However, treatment is often palliative for the majority of cancer patients. Transformed cells respond poorly to chemotherapy mainly due to the development of the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype. Response to treatment does not generally result in complete remission and disease cure is uncommon for patients presenting with advanced stage cancer. Successful treatment of cancer requires a clearer understanding of chemotherapeutic resistance. Here, we examine what is known of one of the most extensively studied mechanisms of cellular drug resistance. The human multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) is associated with expression of p-glycoprotein (Pgp). A transmembrane protein, Pgp acts as an efflux pump and reduces intracellular drug levels and thus its effectiveness as an antitumor agent. The precise mechanism of transcriptional regulation has been unclear due to the complex regulatory nature of the gene. It has become increasingly apparent that trans-activation or genetic amplification is by no means the only mechanism of activation. Consequently, alternative pathways have received more attention in the area of epigenetics to help explain transcriptional competence at a higher level of organization. The goal of this article is to highlight important findings in the field of methylation and explain how they impinge on MDR1 gene regulation. In this review, we cover the current information and postulate that epigenetic modification of MDR1 chromatin influences gene transcription in leukaemia. Finally, we explore transcriptional regulation and highlight recent progress with engineered ZFP's (zinc finger proteins).

Epigenetic variability and the evolution of human cancer

Although the leading dogma for the origin of the diversity in cancer cell subpopulations is based on a stepwise selection and accumulation of genetic changes that allow uncontrollable malignant growth, there is an emerging understanding that the variability of heritable phenotypes in cancer and cancer-prone cells may also involve epigenetic mechanisms. We discuss here experimental data that allow us to postulate that the genome is organized into epigenetic territories with lineage-specific differences in the stringencies of the active and inactive states. Low-stringency epigenetic states are predicted to be closer to mosaicism, or chaos, than high-stringency states. In pathological situations, the result is an epigenetic variability upon which selection mechanisms can act during tumor progression. This view may have significant implications on clinical assessment and prognosis, and also suggests that major factors involved in the resetting and/or maintenance of epigenetic states may serve as new attractive targets for therapeutic interventions.

Retrovirus silencer blocking by the cHS4 insulator is CTCF independent

Silencing of retrovirus vectors poses a significant obstacle to genetic manipulation of stem cells and their use in gene therapy. We describe a mammalian silencer blocking assay using insulator elements positioned between retrovirus silencer elements and an LCRbeta-globin reporter transgene. In transgenic mice, we show that retrovirus silencers are blocked by the cHS4 insulator. Silencer blocking is independent of the CTCF binding site and is most effective when flanking the internal reporter transgene. These data distinguish silencer blocking activity by cHS4 from its enhancer blocking activity. Retrovirus vectors can be created at high titer with one but not two internal dimer cHS4 cores. cHS4 in the LTRs has no effect on expression in transduced F9 cells, suggesting that position effect blocking is not sufficient to escape silencing. The Drosophila insulators gypsy and Scs fail to block silencing in transgenic mice, but gypsy stimulates vector expression 2-fold when located in the LTRs of an infectious retrovirus. The silencer blocking assay complements existing insulator assays in mammalian cells, provides new insight into mechanisms of insulation and is a valuable tool to identify additional silencer blocking insulators that cooperate with cHS4 to improve stem cell retrovirus vector design.

Rationally designed insulator-like elements can block enhancer action in vitro

Insulators are DNA sequences that are likely to be involved in formation of chromatin domains, functional units of gene expression in eukaryotes. Insulators can form domain boundaries and block inappropriate action of regulatory elements (such as transcriptional enhancers) in eukaryotic nuclei. Using an in vitro system supporting enhancer action over a large distance, the enhancer-blocking insulator activity has been recapitulated in a highly purified system. The insulator-like element was constructed using a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein making stable DNA loops (lac repressor). The insulation was entirely dependent on formation of a DNA loop that topologically isolates the enhancer from the promoter. This rationally designed, inducible insulator-like element recapitulates many key properties of eukaryotic insulators observed in vivo. The data suggest novel mechanisms of enhancer and insulator action.

Insulation of the chicken beta-globin chromosomal domain from a chromatin-condensing protein, MENT

Active genes are insulated from developmentally regulated chromatin condensation in terminally differentiated cells. We mapped the topography of a terminal stage-specific chromatin-condensing protein, MENT, across the active chicken beta-globin domain. We observed two sharp transitions of MENT concentration coinciding with the beta-globin boundary elements. The MENT distribution profile was opposite to that of acetylated core histones but correlated with that of histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 9 (H3me2K9). Ectopic MENT expression in NIH 3T3 cells caused a large-scale and specific remodeling of chromatin marked by H3me2K9. MENT colocalized with H3me2K9 both in chicken erythrocytes and NIH 3T3 cells. Mutational analysis of MENT and experiments with deacetylase inhibitors revealed the essential role of the reaction center loop domain and an inhibitory affect of histone hyperacetylation on the MENT-induced chromatin remodeling in vivo. In vitro, the elimination of the histone H3 N-terminal peptide containing lysine 9 by trypsin blocked chromatin self-association by MENT, while reconstitution with dimethylated but not acetylated N-terminal domain of histone H3 specifically restored chromatin self-association by MENT. We suggest that histone H3 modification at lysine 9 directly regulates chromatin condensation by recruiting MENT to chromatin in a fashion that is spatially constrained from active genes by gene boundary elements and histone hyperacetylation.

Visualization of chromatin domains created by the gypsy insulator of Drosophila

Insulators might regulate gene expression by establishing and maintaining the organization of the chromatin fiber within the nucleus. Biochemical fractionation and in situ high salt extraction of lysed cells show that two known protein components of the gypsy insulator are present in the nuclear matrix. Using FISH with DNA probes located between two endogenous Su(Hw) binding sites, we show that the intervening DNA is arranged in a loop, with the two insulators located at the base. Mutations in insulator proteins, subjecting the cells to a brief heat shock, or destruction of the nuclear matrix lead to disruption of the loop. Insertion of an additional gypsy insulator in the center of the loop results in the formation of paired loops through the attachment of the inserted sequences to the nuclear matrix. These results suggest that the gypsy insulator might establish higher-order domains of chromatin structure and regulate nuclear organization by tethering the DNA to the nuclear matrix and creating chromatin loops.

Identification of an insulator in AAVS1, a preferred region for integration of adeno-associated virus DNA

In latent adeno-associated virus (AAV) infection, the viral genome is integrated preferentially into the human chromosome 19 q arm at a specific region designated AAVS1, which has an open chromatin conformation as indicated by the presence of a DNase I-hypersensitive site (DHS-S1). We examined whether an insulator, which defines the domain of gene expression by directionally blocking the action of enhancers and by preventing the spread of heterochomatin, is present near the DHS-S1 in the middle of a 2.6-kbp AAVS1-related DNA fragment used in this study. The fragment, cloned into an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-based eukaryotic episomal plasmid, was introduced into HEK293 cells. The DHS-S1 on the plasmid replicating in the nuclei was hypersensitive to DNase I digestion, and thus, the EBV plasmid system was used in an enhancer-blocking assay with the 2.6-kbp DNA and two shortened DNAs, of 1.6 kbp and 336 bp, containing DHS-S1. The three DNA fragments, when inserted in the proper direction between the cytomegalovirus immediate-early enhancer and minimal promoter, repressed the expression of a reporter gene. Thus, the enhancer-blocking activity was located within the 336-bp DNA containing the entire region (300 bp) of DHS-S1. To investigate the prevention of repression caused by heterochromatin, a transgene-expressing cassette flanked by the two 336-bp DNAs placed in the enhancer-blocking direction was introduced into HEK293 and HeLa cells. All the cell clones examined with the cassette integrated into cell DNA continued to express the transgene, which indicates that the pair of 336-bp DNA apparently prevented the spread of heterochromatin. The results show that an insulator lies between nucleotides 17 and 354 near the DHS-S1 in AAVS1. In a gel shift test, the 336-bp DNA did not bind an in vitro-prepared CCCTC-binding factor that binds to the chicken beta-globin insulator, suggesting that the AAVS1 insulator requires an as yet unidentified binding protein. The newly identified AAVS1 insulator is likely to contribute to the maintenance of an open chromatin conformation that affects the life cycle of AAV.

Increasedin vitroandin vivotransgene expression levels mediated throughcis-acting elements

BACKGROUND

Gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases depends critically on the vector system to direct sustained and stable expression of the transgene. It is, however, a commonly observed phenomenon that transgene expression from currently available vectors is down-regulated following ex vivo gene transfer to the central nervous system (CNS). In an attempt to circumvent this problem, we have systematically evaluated the potential of different cis-acting elements to increase and stabilize transgene expression in vitro and after grafting of engineered cell lines to the CNS.

METHODS

Plasmid vector constructs incorporating Woodchuck hepatitis post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE), cHS4 insulator elements and/or the translational enhancer element SP163 were produced. Stable, polyclonal cultures of HiB5 cells were generated by transfection with reporter constructs, and in vitro transgene mRNA and protein levels were determined. Finally, HiB5 clones engineered to express the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) were grafted to the rat striatum and expression levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

Inserting the WPRE element downstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of a reporter gene and flanking the transcriptional unit with cHS4 insulator elements significantly increased protein and mRNA expression levels. Surprisingly, the SP163 element, previously reported to be a translational enhancer, apparently did not promote any translational enhancing activity. Furthermore, the SP163 element exerted a negative effect on transcription. The ability of cHS4 and WPRE elements to stabilize in vivo transgene expression was demonstrated by transplantation of HiB5 clones containing expression constructs into the rat striatum.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that incorporating cis-acting elements in gene therapy vectors may result in improvements to currently available therapeutic vectors.

Variegated expression from the murine band 3 (AE1) promoter in transgenic mice is associated with mRNA transcript initiation at upstream start sites and can be suppressed by the addition of the chicken beta-globin 5' HS4 insulator element

The anion exchanger protein 1 (AE1; band 3) is an abundant erythrocyte transmembrane protein that regulates chloride-bicarbonate exchange and provides an attachment site for the erythrocyte membrane skeleton on the cytoplasmic domain. We analyzed the function of the erythroid AE1 gene promoter by using run-on transcription, RNase protection, transient transfection, and transgenic mouse assays. AE1 mRNA was transcribed at a higher level and maintained at a higher steady-state level than either ankyrin or beta-spectrin in mouse fetal liver cells. When linked to a human gamma-globin gene, two different AE1 promoters directed erythroid-specific expression of gamma-globin mRNA in 18 of 18 lines of transgenic mice. However, variegated expression of gamma-globin was observed in 14 of 18 lines. While there was a significant correlation between transgene copy number and the amount of gamma-globin mRNA in all 18 lines, the transgene mRNAs initiated upstream of the start site of the endogenous AE1 mRNA. Addition of the insulator element from 5'HS4 of the chicken beta-globin cluster to the AE1/gamma-globin transgene allowed position-independent, copy-number-dependent expression at levels similar to the AE1 transcription rate in six of six lines of transgenic mice. The mRNA from the insulated AE1/gamma-globin transgene mapped to the start site of the endogenous AE1 mRNA, and gamma-globin protein was expressed in 100% of erythrocytes in all lines. We conclude that the chicken beta-globin 5'HS4 element is necessary for full function of the AE1 promoter and that position effect variegation is associated with RNA transcription from the upstream start sites.

Communication over a large distance: enhancers and insulators

Enhancers are regulatory DNA sequences that can work over a large distance. Efficient enhancer action over a distance clearly requires special mechanisms for facilitating communication between the enhancer and its target. While the chromatin looping model can explain the majority of the observations, some recent experimental findings suggest that a chromatin scanning mechanism is used to establish the loop. These new findings help to understand the mechanism of action of the elements that can prevent enhancer-promoter communication (insulators).

The many roles of the transcriptional regulator CTCF

The nuclear factor CTCF was first identified as one of the factors binding to the regulatory regions of the c-myc gene. Further study of this protein revealed roles in transcriptional repression, insulator function, and imprinting genetic information. Recent studies have provided new insight into the mechanism through which this factor acts at various levels of gene regulation.

Histone and chromatin cross-talk

Chromatin is the physiologically relevant substrate for all genetic processes inside the nuclei of eukaryotic cells. Dynamic changes in the local and global organization of chromatin are emerging as key regulators of genomic function. Indeed, a multitude of signals from outside and inside the cell converges on this gigantic signaling platform. Numerous post-translational modifications of histones, the main protein components of chromatin, have been documented and analyzed in detail. These 'marks' appear to crucially mediate the functional activity of the genome in response to upstream signaling pathways. Different layers of cross-talk between several components of this complex regulatory system are emerging, and these epigenetic circuits are the focus of this review.

Hemoglobin switching: new insights

During the past year, many interesting advances have been made regarding molecular mechanisms controlling beta-like globin gene switching. Throughout the beta locus, -acting elements exist that are dynamically bound by trans-acting proteins, including transcription factors, coactivators, repressors, and chromatin modifiers. Characterization of transcription factors, their interaction with one another, and an ever-increasing role for chromatin structure in gene expression have enhanced understanding of the mechanism of globin gene switching. The studies reviewed here contribute new insights on the interplay between -acting elements, transcription factors, and chromatin modifiers that underlie globin gene switching during development.

Memory by modification: the influence of chromatin structure on gene expression during vertebrate development

Multicellular development is programmed by regulated interactions between transcription factors and target genes. Target genes function as nucleosomal arrays whose higher order structure, composition and accessibility to transcription machinery are strictly and dynamically controlled. Several classes of chromatin-associated proteins generate or remove localized, covalent chromatin modifications that signify gene expression status, whereas others modulate nucleosome organization and so regulate template availability for transcription. In vertebrates, covalent modification of the DNA template itself also has dramatic impacts on gene expression and development. Here I review recent discoveries that improve our understanding of the influence of chromatin structure on gene expression and I discuss their relevance to mechanisms of vertebrate development.

Controlling the double helix

Chromatin is the complex of DNA and proteins in which the genetic material is packaged inside the cells of organisms with nuclei. Chromatin structure is dynamic and exerts profound control over gene expression and other fundamental cellular processes. Changes in its structure can be inherited by the next generation, independent of the DNA sequence itself.

Setting the boundaries of chromatin domains and nuclear organization

The nuclear architecture of the interphase nucleus is established by laying down an intricate three-dimensional framework of higher-order chromatin structure. This arrangement is essential for the integration of complex biological processes such as DNA replication, RNA processing, and transcription. Boundary or insulator elements are emerging as key players in the establishment and maintenance of this organization.