Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: a practical framework for treatment optimization - systematic review and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group

Vulvar hidradenitis suppurativa: Clinical cross-sectional study of 25 patients

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) involving the vulva is seldom reported in the gynecological or dermatological literature. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of HS with vulvar affectation (VHS) and to compare it with patients without vulvar involvement. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary academic referral centre in Spain from May 1, 2015 to October 1, 2019. This study included 230 women with HS diagnosed in our hospital, 25 of them had vulvar involvement. In order to clinically characterize patients, demographic factors, comorbidities, clinical features, prescribed treatments and complications were recorded. The VHS group presented later median age of onset and lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.048), they mainly belonged to latent class 2 (LC2) and LC3 phenotypes involving groins, perineal and pubic area. A higher incidence of psychiatric disease was found in VHS (32% vs 10.7%). Significant positive association with fistula (P < 0.001), LC2 phenotype (P = 0.014), acne (P = 0.021) and thyroid disease (P = 0.006), and negative association with axillar lesions (P = 0.001) were noted. Ultrasonographical study of vulvar lesions demonstrated that most of them were fistulas with high Doppler signal suggestive of high inflammatory load. In conclusion, VHS is mostly seen in women with later onset and lower BMI and higher incidence of psychiatric disease compared to those without vulvar involvement. It is clinically characterized by the presence of fistulas and barely absent axillary involvement. Early diagnosis and treatment could be essential to prevent complications and quality of life impairment.

Baseline Characteristics of a National French E-Cohort of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in ComPaRe and Comparison with Other Large Hidradenitis Suppurativa Cohorts

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition substantially impacting patients' quality of life; the pathogenesis remains unclear, and treatment is complex and not yet standardized. Observational data are increasingly being used to evaluate therapeutics in "real-life" interventions, and the development of e-cohorts is offering new tools for epidemiological studies at the population level.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and treatment history of HS participants in the Community of Patients for Research (ComPaRe) cohort and to compare these to other cohorts.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of the baseline data of HS participants in ComPaRe, an e-cohort of patients with chronic diseases. Data were collected using patient-reported questionnaires about clinical-dem-ographic aspects, quality of life, and treatment history.

RESULTS

A total of 396 participants (339 females, 57 males) were included (mean age 38 years); 83 (21%) had a family history of HS, 227 (57.3%) were current smokers, and 241 (60.9%) were overweight or obese. Most of the participants declared a Hurley stage II (n = 263, 66.4%) or III (n = 76, 20.3%). The breast was more frequently affected in women than men (37.5 vs. 5.3%, p < 0.0001), whereas the dorsal region was more frequently affected in men (39.5 vs. 10.9%, p < 0.0001). Increased disease stage was associated with obesity (25.9 vs. 33.8 vs. 51.3%, p = 0.02) and some HS localizations (genital [p < 0.005], pubis [p < 0.007], gluteal fold [p = 0.02], and groin [p < 0.0001]). The most frequently prescribed treatments were oral antibiotics (n = 362, 91.4%), especially amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cyclins. Less than 10% of participants received biologics. Most of these results were consistent with previously published cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment of participants by such a web platform can be a faster way to get relevant scientific data for a wide variety of patients that could be used for epidemiological studies and to evaluate therapeutics in "real-life" interventions.

Implications of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Phenotypes in Cardiovascular Risk and Treatment Decisions: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

New integrative hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) lesion pattern phenotypes have been proposed, an inflammatory phenotype (IP) and a follicular phenotype (FP). They are characterized by different lesion patterns, symptoms, and risks of disease progression.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether lesion pattern phenotypes (1) have a different cardiovascular risk factor profile, and (2) are associated with a different therapeutic approach in the setting of an HS clinic.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 233 patients with HS. They were classified according to lesion pattern phenotype criteria. Data regarding cardiovascular risk factors and treatment decisions were gathered.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen HS patients (50.21%) were classified as FP and 112 (48.07%) as IP. IP was associated with more severe disease and greater impairment of quality of life. Regardless of disease severity, patients with IP may have a higher cardiovascular risk, assessed according to higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (12.75 vs. 5.89, p = 0.059). The lesion pattern phenotype also influenced treatment decisions regardless of disease severity. Patients with IP were more likely to be treated with systemic corticosteroids and adalimumab, showing that lesion pattern phenotypes are associated with different therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

IP is associated with higher CRP values, suggesting a greater cardiovascular risk in these patients and also a different therapeutic approach. This information could help guide dermatologists in the management of HS patients and help to determine future treatment recommendations.

[CME Dermatology 23: Hidradenitis suppurativa]

CME Dermatology 23: Hidradenitis suppurativa Abstract. Hidradenitis suppurativa (Acne inversa) is a chronic skin disease characterized by recurrent inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and scarring mainly in the intertriginous areas. The prevalence is estimated to be 0.05 to 4.1 % worldwide, with women being more commonly affected. The exact pathogenesis remains unknown, but hair follicle occlusion and inflammation seem to be the initiating events. Several epidemiological correlations with smoking and obesity as well as mutations in gamma secretase genes were described. The therapy depends on the extension of the disorder and should respect the current guidelines. Topical clindamycin is suitable for mild forms of the disease whereas moderate to severe disease requires systemic anti-inflammatory treatment. Surgical intervention is currently the only definitive treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa.

Trends in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa in the Middle East region: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful, and severely debilitating inflammatory disease that affects apocrine gland-bearing skin. There is no universal consensus on the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Current available guidelines are from western countries, which may be of limited use in other parts of the world. In this study, we aim to identify trends in the management of HS in the Middle East (ME) and its differences with the West.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies in HS management performed by experts in the ME from database inception to June 2020 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Only original articles published in English language were included. Guidelines from western countries were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Fifty-four eligible studies comprising 7649 HS patients from the ME region and nine guidelines from the West were included. No established guidelines were found for the management of HS in the ME. Sex ratio of HS patients in the ME is different in that men reported to be affected at a higher rate than in the West. Different antibiotic regimens were recommended in the ME, and the experts in the ME tend to be more procedure intensive than experts in the West.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing a guideline for HS management in the ME is recommended to address unique considerations in the countries in this region.

Treatment strategies for hidradenitis suppurativa: real-life data from a tertiary Greek hospital

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a difficult-to-treat chronic relapsing skin disease, which greatly impacts the quality of life. To bring forward real-life challenges in the decision-making process regarding HS treatment. A retrospective observational study was performed with treatment-related data derived from the HS archive of tertiary hospital-based First Department of Dermatology and Venereology of Aristotle University, Greece. Data were available for 121 patients, 63 men (52.7%) and 58 women (47.93%) with a mean age of 38 years. Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 1-2 weeks and then once daily for up to a total of 12 weeks was the most popular treatment choice (80 patients, 66.12%), administered for mild-to-moderate disease. Biologics were the second most frequently prescribed treatment, reserved for moderate-to-severe disease (adalimumab: 26 patients, 14.88%, infliximab: 2 patients, 1.65%). All in all, a wide variety of treatment regimens were implemented, with various combinations of topical and systemic agents. Real-life practice reflects the relative paucity of high-quality evidence regarding HS treatment and the absence of a unanimously preferable therapeutic option, leaving both dermatologists and patients defenceless against disease progress and sequelae.

Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic therapy remains the first-line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on its comparative clinical efficacy and safety are limited.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of tetracycline (lymecycline 300 mg daily) vs. the combination therapy clindamycin and rifampicin (600 mg plus 600 mg daily) by evaluating and comparing the clinical response at the end of antibiotic treatment (10 weeks).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analysed 52 patients divided in two groups of 26 patients: Group A received lymecycline and Group B received clindamycin plus rifampicin for 10 weeks. Subjects had mild, moderate and severe HS. The clinical and ultrasonography extent of disease was measured by the Hurley Score, Sonographic Score of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), pain visual analogue scale (pain VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The primary outcome was the clinical response at the end of the antibiotic treatment period, according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant improvement in IHS4, pain VAS and DLQI from baseline, but this was more marked in Group A. Reductions in nodule counts were similar between the two groups, whereas the number of abscesses and draining tunnels decreased more in Group B. Disease-free survival was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Lymecycline monotherapy and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination are both effective treatments for patients with moderate-severe HS. Nodular-type HS seems to respond better to lymecycline, whereas the abscess/tunnel type seems to respond better to clindamycin plus rifampicin.

Pain management in hidradenitis suppurativa and a proposed treatment algorithm

Pain contributes substantially to reduced quality of life in individuals living with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although improved understanding of HS pathogenesis and treatment has resulted in improved evidence-based HS management guidelines, comprehensive pain management guidelines have yet to be developed. Few HS-specific data exist to guide pharmacologic analgesia; however, recognizing HS pain as either acute or chronic and predominantly nociceptive (aching and gnawing pain due to tissue damage) versus neuropathic (burning-type pain due to somatosensory nervous system dysfunction) provides a conceptual framework for applying outside pain management practices to HS management. This article incorporates the best available evidence from the HS and pain literature to propose an HS pain algorithm that integrates psychological, pharmacologic, and complementary and alternative treatment modalities.

Clinical selection criteria in new clinical trials of hidradenitis suppurativa: External validity and implications on the daily clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

There are an increasing number of biologic drugs in the pipeline for treating hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Clinical trials for these drugs usually share the same clinical selection criteria.

OBJECTIVES

(a) To describe the clinical profile of HS patients receiving first-line biologic treatment in an HS clinic setting, (b) to assess how this population would meet clinical criteria to participate in a clinical trial, and (c) to assess treatment effectiveness at week 16 in eligible vs non-eligible patients.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Patients were grouped according to their eligibility for clinical trials. The effectiveness of adalimumab was assessed by HiSCR, IHS4-category-change and a-50%-reduction on IHS4 at week 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in the study: eight (21.05%) were eligible for clinical trials and 30 (78.95%) were not. The main reason for non-eligibility was not having an AN count ≥5. Both groups presented similar number of draining tunnels. Effectiveness at week 16 was lower in non-eligible than eligible patients when evaluated by HiSCR-response but similar if evaluated by the IHS4-category-change or the 50%-reduction in IHS4.

CONCLUSION

In our population, the external validity of current eligibility criteria for clinical trials is low. Most patients receiving adalimumab in real-life setting would not be eligible for clinical trials.

Ultrasound-assisted intralesional corticosteroid infiltrations for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa

Corticosteroid infiltrations of lesions in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) appear to be beneficial to acute flares. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-assisted intralesional corticosteroid infiltrations to HS lesions. Prospective cohort study between February 2017 and February 2019 on patients with mild to severe HS and one or more inflammatory lesions. The study intervention was ultrasound-assisted intralesional infiltration of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/ml. The main outcome was the complete response rate of infiltrated lesions versus non-infiltrated lesions. Two hundred and forty-seven infiltrated inflammatory lesions and 172 non-infiltrated lesions were included. At week 12, 81.1% (30/37) of nodules, 72.0% (108/150) of abscesses and 53.33% (32/60) of draining fistulas presented complete response versus 69.1% (47/68), 54.3% (38/70) and 35.3% (12/34) respectively for the non-infiltrated lesions. The Hurley stage negatively correlated with complete response for abscesses and draining fistulas at - 0.17 (SD 0.06) p < 0.01 and - 0.30 (SD 0.13) p < 0.02 respectively. Ultrasound-assisted corticosteroid infiltration is a useful technique for the treatment of inflammatory HS lesions, with high and sustained response rates, especially for abscesses and small to medium-size simple draining fistulas. The likelihood of response correlates negatively with the Hurley stage.

Irrelevance of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in hidradenitis suppurativa: results from a pilot, observational study

Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) appears to be a virulence factor which, among others, can exacerbate the pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus infections, especially inducing severe necrotic, deep-seated skin infections, abscesses, and recurrences. These peculiarities have some overlaps with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Our main aim was to assess if S. aureus producing PVL could have some role in influencing clinical features and/or course of HS, specifically in the suppuration and recurrence of lesions. This pilot, mono-centric, observational study included all adult subjects affected with HS consecutively referring to our HS clinic over a 3-month period. Clinically evident suppuration and at least 2 weeks wash out from any antibiotic were the main inclusion criteria. Purulent material from HS skin lesions was collected with swabs in order to isolate micro-organisms, with specific regard to S. aureus. Detection of PVL was performed by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). We also analyzed purulent material from suppurative skin lesions other than HS, as a control. Thirty HS patients were included; 29 purulent lesions (96.7%) harbored at least one bacterial species. Five (16.7%) swab samples were positive for S. aureus, none of which was positive for PVL genes. Among the 30 purulent disorders included as controls, 8 (26.3%) were positive for S. aureus; of these, 4 strains (50%) expressed LPV. The study results seem to exclude the pathogenetic involvement of S. aureus producing PVL in HS; as a result, PVL does not seem to represent a potential target in the future development of HS treatments.

Office-Based Surgical Intervention for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS): A Focused Review for Dermatologists

Easily accessible office-based procedures that require minimal resources may facilitate timely surgical management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This review focuses on excision and unroofing as two surgical HS treatments that can be tailored to the outpatient setting. Fifty-five articles were included in our review, representing 3914 patients. The majority were retrospective studies (58%, n = 32), and the studies reported data both across patients and by number of treated lesions. Recurrence rates for unroofing (14.5%) were found to be half that of excision (30%) across patients (p = 0.015) and slightly lower across lesions [20% recurrence vs 26% for excision (p = 0.023)]. Complication rates at the lesion level were also significantly associated with procedure, with rates after excision more than double those after roofing (26% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). The complication rate after combined medical and surgical therapy did not differ between procedures. Studies also suggest that continuing medical therapy in the perioperative period may be associated with improved recurrence rates, although delayed wound healing with biologic therapy has been reported. The existing data are limited by low-quality uncontrolled studies with small sample sizes, variable reporting of outcomes, and lack of uniform definitions for recurrence and remission. Further systematic prospective studies are needed to better compare complication and recurrence rates across these procedures in HS, especially in the context of concomitant medical therapy.

Hidradenitis Suppurative: Our Experience with a Surgical Case Management Team

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018.

RESULTS

Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up.

Medical and Surgical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Review of International Treatment Guidelines and Implementation in General Dermatology Practice

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic painful skin disease that severely impairs patients' quality of life. While high-quality trials of HS therapies remain limited, medical knowledge of best treatment practices is rapidly evolving, leading to the recent publication of multiple international treatment guidelines for HS.

SUMMARY

This review compares international HS treatment guidelines, describes evidence for effectiveness of common and emerging HS therapies, and provides guidance for integrating evidence-based HS care into practice. Although over 50 medical and procedural treatments are mentioned across international HS guidelines, only adalimumab and infliximab have grade B/weak recommendation or higher across all major guidelines. This review describes the appropriate patient selection and effectiveness of the most commonly used medical and procedural treatments for HS. It also includes recommendations for counseling, dosing, and duration of medical therapies as well as procedure videos for the practicing dermatologist.

Lipidomics Profiling of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Skin Lesions Reveals Lipoxygenase Pathway Dysregulation and Accumulation of Proinflammatory Leukotriene B4

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurring inflammatory dermatosis characterized by abscesses, deep-seated nodules, sinus tracts, and fibrosis in skin lesions around hair follicles of the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. Whereas the exact pathogenesis remains poorly defined, clear evidence suggests that HS is a multifactorial inflammatory disease characterized by innate and adaptive immune components. Bioactive lipids are important regulators of cutaneous homeostasis, inflammation, and resolution of inflammation. Alterations in the lipid mediator profile can lead to malfunction and cutaneous inflammation. We used targeted lipidomics to analyze selected omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in skin of patients with HS and of healthy volunteers. Lesional HS skin displayed enrichment of 5-lipoxygenase (LO)‒derived metabolites, especially leukotriene B4. In addition, 15-LO‒derived metabolites were underrepresented in HS lesions. Changes in the lipid mediator profile were accompanied by transcriptomic dysregulation of the 5-LO and 15-LO pathways. Hyperactivation of the 5-LO pathway in lesional macrophages identified these cells as potential sources of leukotriene B4, which may cause neutrophil influx and activation. Furthermore, leukotriene B4-induced mediators and pathways were elevated in HS lesions, suggesting a contribution of this proinflammatory lipid meditator to the pathophysiology of HS.

Ustekinumab in the treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: multicenter case series and systematic review

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating autoinflammatory skin disease. Adalimumab is the only biologic agent available to treat HS, but lack of response is observed in some patients. Ustekinumab may be useful to treat patients with HS who do not respond to adalimumab.Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) to retrospectively evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of ustekinumab in a multicenter series of patients with HS and (2) to assess all published scientific evidence on its utilization in patients with HS.Methods: We evaluated the therapeutic outcomes of 10 patients with HS treated with ustekinumab and conducted a systematic review of published epidemiological studies on ustekinumab-treated patients with HS.Results: In the case series, an improvement in the Physician Global Assessment score was observed in 70% (7/10) patients and an improvement in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale in 80% (8/10). In the systematic review, clinical improvement in disease severity was reported in 76% (34/45) patients and symptomatic improvement in 84% (38/45). No severe ustekinumab-related adverse event was recorded.Conclusion: These findings suggest that ustekinumab may be an effective and safe option for patients with HS who fail to respond to first-line therapies.

Paradoxical Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Patients Receiving TNF-α Inhibitors: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Case Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

TNF-α inhibitors represent the most advanced approved therapeutic option for moderate and severe forms of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, in recent years, cases of paradoxical HS secondary to the use of these biological drugs have been described, with very few cases reported in the literature. The aims of this study are (1) to present 2 new cases of paradoxical HS and (2) to perform a systematic review of scientific evidence regarding paradoxical HS with TNF-α inhibitors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study in which we searched all the cases of paradoxical HS secondary to the use of TNF-α inhibitors published in the literature and included two additional cases observed in our clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients under TNF-α inhibitor treatment were included (adalimumab = 21; infliximab = 9; etanercept = 4). The median delay from exposure to TNF-α inhibitor and the development of paradoxical HS was 12 months (range 1-72). The majority of patients were Hurley stage II (58.8%). Clinical improvement and complete remission were more frequent when the TNF-α inhibitor was stopped or switched to another biological agent with a different therapeutic target rather than maintenance or change to another TNF-α inhibitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradoxical HS is an unusual adverse effect of TNF-α inhibitors. When this adverse effect appears, interruption or substitution of treatment is associated with a better clinical outcome.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Current Understanding of Pathogenic Mechanisms and Suggestion for Treatment Algorithm

Hidradenitis suppurativa is one of the most distressing dermatological conditions and has a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life. However, the exact pathogenic mechanisms remain incompletely understood and-therefore-efficient therapies are still lacking. The current manuscript focuses on new findings on its pathogenic mechanisms and aims to provide practical therapy recommendations.

The patient journey: a voyage from diagnosis to hidradenitis suppurativa multidisciplinary unit

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory, recurrent and debilitating chronic skin disease that is often worsened by comorbidities, with a destructive impact on the social and working life of the patient. The low awareness of patients and clinicians regarding HS, together with weak coordination between specialists who manage the clinical care of these patients, may result in a burdening diagnostic and therapeutic delay, lowering efficacy of therapies and worsening prognosis and patients' QoL.

OBJECTIVES

To rule out these critical aspects, a HS-Multidisciplinary Unit with a hierarchical organization is proposed.

METHODS

Based on previously published models of a multidisciplinary unit, a hierarchical structure of a HS-dedicated multidisciplinary unit was designed.

RESULTS

In this model, an operational core constituted by four healthcare professionals constantly working as team, is supported by a large panel of consultants, local dermatologists and general practitioners, helping in HS patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

This standardization would imply an optimization of professional resources, an amelioration of patient's quality of life, and a shortening of patient journey.

Tuscan consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

A rationalized model of clinical and therapeutic management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) should place the patients at the heart of the process, facilitating their access to diagnostic tests and treatments, providing the appropriate care for each grade of disease severity and optimizing the use of healthcare resources, both in economic and human terms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This paper reports the results of a Consensus of the Tuscany HS working group for a rationalized model of diagnosis and management of HS.

RESULTS

The diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, the available technological equipments and the management models, are presented in the light of today's scientific evidence.

CONCLUSION

The goal of the Consensus is to bring the issue of HS management to the attention of the Tuscan regional government, in order to create unanimously accepted diagnostic and therapeutic protocols.

Clinical Characteristics of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients from a Reference Centre in Kaunas, Lithuania

INTRODUCTION

Clinical data on hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) derived mainly from studies in Western Europe and the USA, raising the risk of potential selection bias. According to the official data, during 2006-2015 the incidence of HS in Lithuania was 23.5 cases per 100,000 population with a female-to-male ratio of 2:1. A more fine-grained data set would however be of great relevance to further understanding this disease. Collection of standardized data enables the comparison of populations of patients across samples.

OBJECTIVES

To present a cohort of HS patients with uniformly collected data according to European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation/European Reference Network-Skin recommendations.

METHODS

The demographic and clinical data of a total of 37 HS patients, included over a 3-year period (from 2016 to January 2019) in a local database of the reference centre of Rare Skin Diseases in the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, were analysed. Non-parametric tests such as χ2 and Mann-Whitney were used for assessing interdependence between qualitative data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the factors statistically related with significant diagnostic delay.

RESULTS

The mean duration of diagnosis delay was 5.5 (±5.9) years in females and 6.6 (±8.2) years in males. A significant delay (>2 years) was reported in 29/37 (78.4%) cases and was not related with sex, age at HS diagnosis or disease severity. The groin area was more affected in females than in males. There was no statistically significant difference between sex and Hurley stage, HS Physician Global Assessment, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System, visual analogue scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Combined (medical and surgery) HS treatment was applied to 46.0% and monotherapy (medical or surgery) to 54.0% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized collection of epidemiological and clinical data is required to improve the quality of HS patient data and allow for international comparisons and pooling of data for research purposes.

Hidradenitis suppurativa in a patient with Warkany syndrome: Sustainability of adalimumab treatment

Mental retardation is a potential limitation to self-administration of innovative biologic treatment, which is otherwise very effective for devastating chronic inflammatory conditions, such as hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). We report our successful experience with a 34-year-old woman, who was genetically affected by Warkany syndrome, which causes intellectual disability. This patient was unable to maintain long-term antibiotic regimen and was disappointed by the limited results in her 12 years' history of painful draining fistulae and abscesses; however, she enthusiastically adhered to adalimumab 40 mg/once weekly treatment. After 52 weeks, treatment compliance is excellent, the patient is satisfied with the HS improvements, and no adverse effects have been reported.

A Comparison of International Management Guidelines for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis that imparts a significant burden on patients and presents a management challenge for healthcare providers. As attention to this debilitating condition has grown over recent years, our understanding of HS pathogenesis and optimal treatment approaches continues to evolve. Nine HS treatment guidelines developed by various expert organizations have been published, encompassing therapeutic modalities ranging from topical agents to systemic therapies to procedural interventions. These guidelines demonstrate significant overlap in treatment recommendations and have all been published within the last 5 years. Therefore, we aim to compare and synthesize the recommendations of international HS treatment guidelines and to encourage inter-organizational communication for the development of consensus or staggered publication of recommendations for HS management.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: Current and emerging treatments

The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has remained challenging because of the many knowledge gaps regarding etiology. However, recent studies into the pathogenesis of HS have enabled the investigation of newer therapies. The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the evidence for established therapies for HS, including anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, and surgery. New and emerging therapies that specifically target cytokines involved in HS pathogenesis will be covered. The potential therapeutic roles of anticytokine therapies, including both the expanded application of existing molecules as well as the specific development of novel therapies for HS are discussed. With increased attention on HS and with numerous clinical trials currently underway, we hope that the variety of treatment options for HS will be expanded.

Could Residents Adequately Assess the Severity of Hidradenitis Suppurativa? Interrater and Intrarater Reliability Assessment of Major Scoring Systems

A wide variety of assessment tools have been proposed for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) until now, but none of them meets the criteria for an ideal score. Because there is no gold standard scoring system, the choice of the measure instrument depends on the purpose of use and even on the physician’s experience in the subject of HS. The aim of this study was to assess the intrarater and interrater reliability of 6 scoring systems commonly used for grading severity of HS: the Hurley Staging System, the Refined Hurley Staging, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), the Sartorius Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician’s Global Assessment Scale (HS-PGA). On the scoring day, 9 HS patients underwent a physical examination and disease severity assessment by a group of 16 dermatology residents using all evaluated instruments. Then, intrarater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and interrater variability was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV). In all 6 scorings the ICCs were >0.75, indicating high intrarater reliability of all presented scales. The study has also demonstrated moderate agreement between raters in most of the evaluated measure instruments. The most reproducible methods, according to CVs, seem to be the Hurley staging, IHS4, and HSSI. None of the 6 evaluated scoring systems showed a significant advantage over the other when comparing ICCs, and all the instruments seem to be very reliable methods. The interrater reliability was usually good, but the most repeatable results between researchers were obtained for the easiest scales, including Hurley scoring, IHS4 and HSSI.

Undergarment and Fabric Selection in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition manifesting as recurrent and exquisitely painful nodules in intertriginous regions. The role of mechanical stress in HS pathogenesis is gaining attention, as factors including intertriginous distribution of lesions, obesity, sweating, and suboptimal clothing contribute to increased friction and exacerbation of disease. Undergarment and clothing selection are often-overlooked components of HS management and should be addressed with patients as practical lifestyle changes that can decrease the frequency of disease flares and reduce symptoms of pain and irritation at involved sites. Selection of breathable and absorbent fabrics can also aid in reducing microbial colonization, sweat retention, and odor. This discussion is based on expert recommendations and aims to provide practitioners with the rationale for appropriate undergarment and clothing selection for HS patients. We propose practical principles for choosing undergarment design and fabrics for breathability, absorbency, and skin pressure reduction.

Ustekinumab with Intravenous Infusion: Results in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Adalimumab is the only approved biological therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). The last published recommendations support the use of other off-label biologic therapies. We report on a multicentric retrospective review of patients with HS treated with an ustekinumab dosing schedule of intravenous infusion adjusted by weight, followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose of 90 mg every 8 weeks, as recently approved for Crohn's disease. The minimal follow-up period required for inclusion was 16 weeks. A total of 14 patients from six hospitals were included. In 50% of the treated patients, therapeutic outcomes, measured by means of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and decrease of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and visual analog scale (VAS) of pain, were reached at week 16. In 71.42% of patients DLQI and VAS of pain improved, irrespective of achievement of HiSCR. Two patients abandoned treatment due to lack of efficacy or patient preferences. No ustekinumab-related adverse effects were reported. The results are limited by the retrospective nature of the study, the short follow-up period, and the small patient number. This therapeutic regime proved to be safe and showed moderate efficacy in treating HS with failure to previous biologic therapy. Ideally, the efficacy of ustekinumab in HS should be tested in randomized and controlled clinical trials.

An Integrated Approach to Unravel Hidradenitis Suppurativa Etiopathogenesis

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving hair follicles that presents with painful nodules, abscesses, fistulae, and hypertrophic scars, typically occurring in apocrine gland bearing skin. Establishing a diagnosis of HS may take up to 7 years after disease onset. HS severely impairs the quality of life of patients and its high frequency causes significant costs for health care system. HS patients have an increased risk of developing associated diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases and spondyloarthropathies, thereby suggesting a common pathophysiological mechanism. Familial cases, which are around 35% of HS patients, have allowed the identification of susceptibility genes. HS is perceived as a complex disease where environmental factors trigger chronic inflammation in the skin of genetically predisposed individuals. Despite the efforts made to understand HS etiopathogenesis, the exact mechanisms at the basis of the disease need to be still unraveled. In this review, we considered all OMICs studies performed on HS and observed that OMICs contribution in the context of HS appeared as not clear enough and/or rich of useful clinical information. Indeed, most studies focused only on one aspect—genome, transcriptome, or proteome—of the disease, enrolling small numbers of patients. This is quite limiting for the genetic studies, from different geographical areas and looking at a few aspects of HS pathogenesis without any integration of the findings obtained or a comparison among different studies. A strong need for an integrated approach using OMICs tools is required to discover novel actors involved in HS etiopathogenesis. Moreover, we suggest the constitution of consortia to enroll a higher number of patients to be analyzed following common and consensus OMICs strategies. Comparison and integration with the findings present in the OMICs repositories are mandatory. In a theoretic pipeline, the Skin-OMICs profile obtained from each HS patient should be compared and integrated with repositories and literature data by using appropriate InterOMICs approach. The final goal is not only to improve the knowledge of HS etiopathogenesis but also to provide novel tools to the clinicians with the eventual aim of offering a tailored treatment for HS patients.

Consensus on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic immune mediated disease of universal distribution that causes great damage to the quality of life of the affected individual, whose prevalence is estimated at 0.41% in the Brazilian population. The objective of this work was update on physiopathogenesis, diagnosis and classification of hidradenitis suppurativa and to establish therapeutic recommendations in the Brazilian reality. It was organized as a work group composed of eight dermatologists from several institutions of the country with experience in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa and carried out review on the topic. Recommendations were elaborated and voted by modified Delphi system and statistical analysis of the results was performed. The Brazilian consensus on the clinical approach of hidradenitis suppurativa had the support of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology.

Topical, systemic and biologic therapies in hidradenitis suppurativa: pathogenic insights by examining therapeutic mechanisms

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin, manifesting in chronic, recurrent painful pustules, nodules, boils and purulent draining abscesses. Our current understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease is incomplete. This review aims to identify available treatment options in HS and discuss the pharmacological mechanisms through which such agents function. Identifying common pathways may inform our understanding of the pathogenesis of HS as well as identify future therapeutic targets. The pharmacological mechanisms implicated in topical therapies, antibiotic, hormonal, systemic immunomodulatory and biologic therapies for HS are discussed. Significant differences exist between agents and implicated pathways in therapy for mild and severe disease. This is an expression of the possible dichotomy in inflammatory pathways (and treatment responses) in HS. Studies involving monoclonal antibodies provide the greatest insight into what these specific mechanisms may be. Their variable levels of clinical efficacy compared with placebo bolsters the suggestion that differential inflammatory pathways may be involved in different presentations and severity of disease. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and other innate immune mechanisms are strongly represented in treatments which are effective in mild to moderate disease in the absence of scarring or draining fistulae, however complex feed-forward mechanisms in severe disease respond to interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition but are less likely to respond to innate immune inhibition (through NF-κB or TNF-α) alone. It is unclear whether IL-17 inhibition will parallel TNF-α or IL-1 inhibition in effect, however it is plausible that small molecule targets (Janus kinase1 and phosphodiesterase 4) may provide effective new strategies for treatment of HS.

Apremilast for moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: no significant change in lesional skin inflammatory biomarkers

Background

Treatment with apremilast has recently demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

Objective

To evaluate the change in expression of inflammatory markers in lesional skin of HS patients receiving apremilast 30 mg twice daily (n = 15) for 16 weeks compared with placebo (n = 5).

Methods

At baseline, 5‐mm punch biopsies were obtained from an index lesion (HSL) and non‐lesional (HSN) skin in the same anatomical area. Subsequent HSL samples were taken as close as possible to the previously biopsied site at week 4 and week 16. After sampling, biopsies were split; one half was processed for in vivo mRNA analysis using real‐time quantitative PCR; the other half was cultured for ex vivo protein analysis using a proximity extension assay (Olink). Linear mixed effects models were calculated to compare the levels of inflammatory markers in HSL skin between apremilast and placebo over time.

Results

At baseline, 17 proteins with a fold change >2 in HSL vs. HSN skin were identified in 20 patients. The top five were IL‐17A (5), S100A12, CST5, IL‐12/23p40, CD6 (1) with fold changes ranging from 6.6 to 1638, respectively (FDR <0.044). Linear mixed effects models for 75 assays were calculated. Protein levels of S100A12 decreased during treatment in the apremilast group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.014, FDR = 0.186). None of the 14 genes exhibited significant changes in expression over time. However, an evident downward trend in relative mRNA expression of IL‐17A and IL‐17F was demonstrated in patients receiving apremilast.

Conclusion

We did not detect statistically significant changes in inflammatory markers in HSL skin of HS patients receiving apremilast compared with placebo, despite clinical improvement in the apremilast group. Nonetheless, S100A12 and IL‐17A were significantly elevated in HSL skin and showed a decrease in response to apremilast. The translational model in clinical trials involving HS clearly needs further improvement.