MyoD and the regulation of myogenesis by helix-loop-helix proteins

Expression of a chimeric helix-loop-helix gene, Id-SCL, in K562 human leukemic cells is associated with nuclear segmentation

We have designed a chimeric gene, Id-SCL, in which the 3' helix-loop-helix encoding portion of the presumptive oncogene SCL/tal is joined to the 5' coding portion of Id, an inhibitory helix-loop-helix gene. The predicted protein product of this chimeric gene contains the helix-loop-helix dimerization domain of SCL/tal, but, lacking a basic DNA binding domain, is predicted to have the inhibitory function of the Id product. Expression of the Id-SCL fusion gene in stably transfected K562 cells reproducibly resulted in nuclear segmentation and depressed growth rates; both of these phenotypic effects demonstrated a dosage dependence on the levels of Id-SCL mRNA and protein expressed in the various clones. Electron microscopy of cells expressing high levels of Id-SCL mRNA showed a significant increase in cytoplasmic perinuclear thin filaments and diminution of marginal heterochromatin in the nuclei. No other changes in hematopoietic differentiation status were observed in association with Id-SCL expression. Expression of intact Id and SCL/tal genes, as well as deletion mutants of Id and SCL/tal, independently transfected into K562 cells, indicated that the nuclear segmentation effect is dependent on the presence of a protein possessing a helix-loop-helix domain but lacking a basic domain. Our studies suggest that the balance of transcriptional inhibitory and stimulatory helix-loop-helix proteins in cells may be important determinants of proliferation and of structural organization within cells.

The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression

MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.

Different E-box regulatory sequences are functionally distinct when placed within the context of the troponin I enhancer

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) regulatory proteins are known to bind to a single DNA consensus sequence referred to as an E-box. The E-box is present in the regulatory elements of many developmentally controlled genes, including most muscle-specific genes such as troponin I (TnI). Although the E-box consensus is minimally defined as CANNTG, the adjacent nucleotides of functional E-boxes are variable for genes regulated by the bHLH proteins. In order to examine how E-box regulatory regions containing different internal and flanking nucleotides function when placed within the context of a single regulatory element, the E-box region (14 bp) present within the TnI enhancer was substituted with the corresponding E-box sequences derived from the muscle-specific M-creatine kinase (MCK) and cardiac alpha-actin regulatory elements as well as from the immunoglobulin kappa (Ig kappa) enhancer. Within the TnI enhancer, the E-box sequence derived from cardiac alpha-actin was inactive whereas the corresponding sequence from the MCK right E-box efficiently restored wild-type enhancer activity in muscle cells. Intermediate levels of gene activity were observed for TnI enhancers containing E-boxes derived from the MCK left E-box site or from the Ig kappa E2 E-box. DNA binding studies of MyoD:E12 protein complexes with each substituted TnI enhancer confirmed that DNA binding activity in vitro mimics the relative strength of the enhancers in vivo. These studies demonstrate that the specific nucleotide composition of individual E-boxes, which are contained within the regulatory elements of most if not all muscle-specific genes, contributes to the complex regulatory mechanisms governing bHLH-mediated gene expression.

The MRF4 activation domain is required to induce muscle-specific gene expression

MRF4 is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor family that also includes MyoD, myogenin, and Myf-5. Overexpression of MRF4 or the other muscle regulatory factors in fibroblasts converts the cells to differentiated muscle fibers and transcriptionally activates expression of endogenous and cotransfected muscle genes. Although these factors induce a similar phenotype, they also exhibit some distinct biological activities. For example, MyoD trans activates alpha-actin and troponin I reporter genes to very high levels, whereas MRF4 efficiently activates only alpha-actin expression. Since these proteins have a common basic helix-loop-helix domain, it is likely that portions of the proteins outside of this region impart some specificity to the activity of each muscle regulatory factor. As an initial step in determining the mechanism by which MRF4 and MyoD activate gene transcription, the transcriptional activation domain of MRF4 has been characterized. Experiments utilizing chimeric proteins containing the yeast GAL4 DNA-binding domain and portions of the MRF4 protein indicate that the MRF4 activation domain is located within amino acids 10 to 30. This amino terminus is both necessary and sufficient to elicit a transcriptional response in transfected cells. The MRF4 activation domain and the related amino-terminal MyoD activation domain are capable of substituting for one another in converting fibroblasts to a myogenic phenotype and in activating expression of an alpha-actin reporter gene, although the MRF4 and MyoD activation domains on these chimeric proteins also dictate the specificity of transcriptional activation. The different primary amino acid sequences of these regions leave open the possibility that different coregulator proteins interact with the muscle regulatory factors to elicit their correct transcriptional activity during skeletal muscle development.

A point mutation in the MyoD basic domain imparts c-Myc-like properties

MyoD and c-Myc, members of the large "basic-helix-loop-helix" family of proteins, regulate diverse aspects of both normal and neoplastic growth and specific gene regulation. These two proteins differ at 9 of the 14 amino acids that comprise the basic domains necessary for DNA binding and transcriptional control. Individual amino acids in the MyoD basic domain were mutated to those found at the analogous positions in c-Myc. Four classes of mutants were obtained: (i) those with no effects on MyoD-site binding or activation of MyoD-responsive genes, (ii) those with no effect on MyoD-site binding but with a loss of activation potential, (iii) those with a loss of both DNA binding and activation potential, and (iv) one mutant (mut 9, Leu122----Arg) that left MyoD-site binding unaffected but imparted a new c-Myc-site binding capability. mut 9 competed with wild-type protein for the activation of MyoD-responsive reporter genes but could, like c-Myc, also suppress the adenovirus major-late promoter, which contains a c-Myc binding site. Our studies thus identify specific amino acid residues in the MyoD basic domain that are important for its activity as a DNA-binding transcriptional activator. Most significantly, our results with mut 9 indicate that Leu122 of MyoD is a critical determinant of specific DNA binding and that mutation at this residue can alter this specificity.

Analysis of the myogenin promoter reveals an indirect pathway for positive autoregulation mediated by the muscle-specific enhancer factor MEF-2

Transcriptional cascades that specify cell fate have been well described in invertebrates. In mammalian development, however, gene hierarchies involved in determination of cell lineage are not understood. With the recent cloning of the MyoD family of myogenic regulatory factors, a model system has become available with which to study the dynamics of muscle determination in mammalian development. Myogenin, along with other members of the MyoD gene family, possesses the apparent ability to redirect nonmuscle cells into the myogenic lineage. This ability appears to be due to the direct activation of an array of subordinate or downstream genes which are responsible for formation and function of the muscle contractile apparatus. Myogenin-directed transcription has been shown to occur through interaction with a DNA consensus sequence known as an E box (CANNTG) present in the control regions of numerous downstream genes. In addition to activating the transcription of subordinate genes, members of the MyoD family positively regulate their own expression and cross-activate one another's expression. These autoregulatory interactions have been suggested as a mechanism for induction and maintenance of the myogenic phenotype, but the molecular details of the autoregulatory circuits are undefined. Here we show that the myogenin promoter contains a binding site for the myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor, MEF-2, which can function as an intermediary of myogenin autoactivation. Since MEF-2 can be induced by myogenin, these results suggest that myogenin and MEF-2 participate in a transcriptional cascade in which MEF-2, once induced by myogenin, acts to amplify and maintain the myogenic phenotype by acting as a positive regulator of myogenin expression.

Analysis of the myogenin promoter reveals an indirect pathway for positive autoregulation mediated by the muscle-specific enhancer factor MEF-2

Transcriptional cascades that specify cell fate have been well described in invertebrates. In mammalian development, however, gene hierarchies involved in determination of cell lineage are not understood. With the recent cloning of the MyoD family of myogenic regulatory factors, a model system has become available with which to study the dynamics of muscle determination in mammalian development. Myogenin, along with other members of the MyoD gene family, possesses the apparent ability to redirect nonmuscle cells into the myogenic lineage. This ability appears to be due to the direct activation of an array of subordinate or downstream genes which are responsible for formation and function of the muscle contractile apparatus. Myogenin-directed transcription has been shown to occur through interaction with a DNA consensus sequence known as an E box (CANNTG) present in the control regions of numerous downstream genes. In addition to activating the transcription of subordinate genes, members of the MyoD family positively regulate their own expression and cross-activate one another's expression. These autoregulatory interactions have been suggested as a mechanism for induction and maintenance of the myogenic phenotype, but the molecular details of the autoregulatory circuits are undefined. Here we show that the myogenin promoter contains a binding site for the myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor, MEF-2, which can function as an intermediary of myogenin autoactivation. Since MEF-2 can be induced by myogenin, these results suggest that myogenin and MEF-2 participate in a transcriptional cascade in which MEF-2, once induced by myogenin, acts to amplify and maintain the myogenic phenotype by acting as a positive regulator of myogenin expression.

Transforming growth factor beta induces myoblast differentiation in the presence of mitogens

Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) added to L6E9 rat skeletal myoblasts in mitogen-rich medium induces a rapid decrease in c-myc expression and delays progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This growth inhibitory response is followed by cell commitment to terminal differentiation with elevated expression of myogenin muscle determination genes, induction of muscle-specific proteins, and formation of multinucleated myotubes. These results suggest that TGF-beta 1 may act as a physiological inducer of myogenic differentiation in mitogen-rich environments, and its otherwise reversible growth inhibitory effect may become permanent if coupled to induction of terminal differentiation.

The basic region of myogenin cooperates with two transcription activation domains to induce muscle-specific transcription

Myogenin is a skeletal muscle-specific transcription factor that can activate myogenesis when introduced into a variety of nonmuscle cell types. Activation of the myogenic program by myogenin is dependent on its binding to a DNA sequence known as an E box, which is associated with numerous muscle-specific genes. Myogenin shares homology with MyoD and other myogenic regulatory factors within a basic region and a helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif that mediate DNA binding and dimerization, respectively. Here we show that the basic region-HLH motif of myogenin alone lacks transcriptional activity and is dependent on domains in the amino and carboxyl termini to activate transcription. Analysis of these N- and C-terminal domains through creation of chimeras with the DNA-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor GAL4 revealed that they act as strong transcriptional activators. These transcription activation domains are dependent for activity on a specific amino acid sequence within the basic region, referred to as the myogenic recognition motif (MRM), when an E box is the target for DNA binding. However, the activation domains function independent of the MRM when DNA binding is mediated through a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The activation domain of the acidic coactivator VP16 can substitute for the myogenin activation domains and restore strong myogenic activity to the basic region-HLH motif. Within a myogenin-VP16 chimera, however, the VP16 activation domain also relies on the MRM for activation of the myogenic program. These findings reveal that DNA binding and transcriptional activation are separable functions, encoded by different domains of myogenin, but that the activity of the transcriptional activation domains is influenced by the DNA-binding domain. Activation of muscle-specific transcription requires collaboration between the DNA-binding and activation domains of myogenin and is dependent on events in addition to DNA binding.

The regulation of the human beta myosin heavy-chain gene

The human myosin heavy-chain (MHC) genes for cardiac and skeletal muscle exist as a multigene family with eight or more non-allelic genes. Two of them code for the cardiac alpha and beta myocin HCs. They are located on chromosome 14. The skeletal muscle myosin HC genes are on chromosome 17. The cardiac MHCs coexist in the heart, however, with a distinct distribution within cardiac tissue of the human adult. alpha-MHC is predominantly found in the atria and beta-MHC is found in the ventricles. Both genes are also expressed in certain types of skeletal muscle fibers. We have sequenced the beta-gene in its entire length and have further studied in detail its expression in muscle cells. Promoter activities were tested using DNA-mediated gene transfer in cultured chicken embryonic myoblasts. By deletion mapping of the 5' flanking region of the beta-gene a candidate signal sequence was identified in a region which stimulates the promoter in a tissue specific and differentiation dependent mode. The presumed signal was located about 210 bp 5' to the basic promoter which, by itself, is almost inactive, even in muscle cells. The sequence of the signal (CAGCTG) has homology to known E-box sequences. E-boxes (consensus sequence CANNTG) constitute a family of transcription control sites frequently found upstream of muscle genes. In nuclear extracts of cardiac and skeletal muscle (of rabbit) a protein was identified which binds to the region containing the E-box like motif of the beta-gene. Since this protein was present in both types of muscle, overlapping expression control patterns are assumed to operate in these tissues.

The basic region of myogenin cooperates with two transcription activation domains to induce muscle-specific transcription

Myogenin is a skeletal muscle-specific transcription factor that can activate myogenesis when introduced into a variety of nonmuscle cell types. Activation of the myogenic program by myogenin is dependent on its binding to a DNA sequence known as an E box, which is associated with numerous muscle-specific genes. Myogenin shares homology with MyoD and other myogenic regulatory factors within a basic region and a helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif that mediate DNA binding and dimerization, respectively. Here we show that the basic region-HLH motif of myogenin alone lacks transcriptional activity and is dependent on domains in the amino and carboxyl termini to activate transcription. Analysis of these N- and C-terminal domains through creation of chimeras with the DNA-binding domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factor GAL4 revealed that they act as strong transcriptional activators. These transcription activation domains are dependent for activity on a specific amino acid sequence within the basic region, referred to as the myogenic recognition motif (MRM), when an E box is the target for DNA binding. However, the activation domains function independent of the MRM when DNA binding is mediated through a heterologous DNA-binding domain. The activation domain of the acidic coactivator VP16 can substitute for the myogenin activation domains and restore strong myogenic activity to the basic region-HLH motif. Within a myogenin-VP16 chimera, however, the VP16 activation domain also relies on the MRM for activation of the myogenic program. These findings reveal that DNA binding and transcriptional activation are separable functions, encoded by different domains of myogenin, but that the activity of the transcriptional activation domains is influenced by the DNA-binding domain. Activation of muscle-specific transcription requires collaboration between the DNA-binding and activation domains of myogenin and is dependent on events in addition to DNA binding.

Regulation of muscle cell growth and differentiation by the MyoD family of helix-loop-helix proteins

The skeletal muscle cell system provides a powerful model for exploring the mechanistic basis for the antagonism between cell growth and differentiation. The recent identification of the MyoD family of muscle-specific transcription factors now offers opportunities to dissect at the molecular level of the mechanisms through which defined cell type-specific transcription factors can activate an entire differentiation program as well as to unravel the mechanisms through which growth factor and oncogenic signals can disrupt cellular differentiation. Because the mechanisms for growth factor signaling and induction of cell proliferation are conserved in diverse cell types, it is tempting to speculate that the molecular mechanisms responsible for the antagonism between cell proliferation and differentiation in muscle cells are also operative in other cell types. Resolution of this question, however, must await identification of the regulatory factors that specify cell fate in other lineages.

Domains outside of the DNA-binding domain impart target gene specificity to myogenin and MRF4

Myogenin and MRF4 belong to the MyoD family of muscle-specific transcription factors, which can activate myogenesis when introduced into nonmyogenic cells. These proteins share homology within a basic-helix-loop-helix motif that mediates DNA binding and dimerization, but they are divergent in their amino and carboxyl termini. Although myogenin and MRF4 bind the same sequence within the muscle creatine kinase enhancer, only myogenin efficiently transactivates this enhancer. By creating chimeras of myogenin and MRF4, we show that the specificities of these factors for transactivation of the muscle creatine kinase enhancer can be interchanged by swapping their amino and carboxyl termini. Within these chimeras, strong cooperation between the amino and carboxyl termini was observed. These findings suggest that myogenin and MRF4 discriminate between muscle-specific enhancers and that target gene specificity is determined by domains surrounding the basic-helix-loop-helix region.

Domains outside of the DNA-binding domain impart target gene specificity to myogenin and MRF4

Myogenin and MRF4 belong to the MyoD family of muscle-specific transcription factors, which can activate myogenesis when introduced into nonmyogenic cells. These proteins share homology within a basic-helix-loop-helix motif that mediates DNA binding and dimerization, but they are divergent in their amino and carboxyl termini. Although myogenin and MRF4 bind the same sequence within the muscle creatine kinase enhancer, only myogenin efficiently transactivates this enhancer. By creating chimeras of myogenin and MRF4, we show that the specificities of these factors for transactivation of the muscle creatine kinase enhancer can be interchanged by swapping their amino and carboxyl termini. Within these chimeras, strong cooperation between the amino and carboxyl termini was observed. These findings suggest that myogenin and MRF4 discriminate between muscle-specific enhancers and that target gene specificity is determined by domains surrounding the basic-helix-loop-helix region.

Myogenin induces the myocyte-specific enhancer binding factor MEF-2 independently of other muscle-specific gene products

The myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor MEF-2 is a nuclear factor that interacts with a conserved element in the muscle creatine kinase and myosin light-chain 1/3 enhancers (L. A. Gossett, D. J. Kelvin, E. A. Sternberg, and E. N. Olson, Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:5022-5033, 1989). We show in this study that MEF-2 is regulated by the myogenic regulatory factor myogenin and that mitogenic signals block this regulatory interaction. Induction of MEF-2 by myogenin occurs in transfected 10T1/2 cells that have been converted to myoblasts by myogenin, as well as in CV-1 kidney cells that do not activate the myogenic program in response to myogenin. Through mutagenesis of the MEF-2 site, we further defined the binding site requirements for MEF-2 and identified potential MEF-2 sites within numerous muscle-specific regulatory regions. The MEF-2 site was also found to bind a ubiquitous nuclear factor whose binding specificity was similar to but distinct from that of MEF-2. Our results reveal that MEF-2 is controlled, either directly or indirectly, by a myogenin-dependent regulatory pathway and suggest that growth factor signals suppress MEF-2 expression through repression of myogenin expression or activity. The ability of myogenin to induce MEF-2 activity in CV-1 cells, which do not activate downstream genes associated with terminal differentiation, also demonstrates that myogenin retains limited function within cell types that are nonpermissive for myogenesis and suggests that MEF-2 is regulated independently of other muscle-specific genes.

Myogenin induces the myocyte-specific enhancer binding factor MEF-2 independently of other muscle-specific gene products

The myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor MEF-2 is a nuclear factor that interacts with a conserved element in the muscle creatine kinase and myosin light-chain 1/3 enhancers (L. A. Gossett, D. J. Kelvin, E. A. Sternberg, and E. N. Olson, Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:5022-5033, 1989). We show in this study that MEF-2 is regulated by the myogenic regulatory factor myogenin and that mitogenic signals block this regulatory interaction. Induction of MEF-2 by myogenin occurs in transfected 10T1/2 cells that have been converted to myoblasts by myogenin, as well as in CV-1 kidney cells that do not activate the myogenic program in response to myogenin. Through mutagenesis of the MEF-2 site, we further defined the binding site requirements for MEF-2 and identified potential MEF-2 sites within numerous muscle-specific regulatory regions. The MEF-2 site was also found to bind a ubiquitous nuclear factor whose binding specificity was similar to but distinct from that of MEF-2. Our results reveal that MEF-2 is controlled, either directly or indirectly, by a myogenin-dependent regulatory pathway and suggest that growth factor signals suppress MEF-2 expression through repression of myogenin expression or activity. The ability of myogenin to induce MEF-2 activity in CV-1 cells, which do not activate downstream genes associated with terminal differentiation, also demonstrates that myogenin retains limited function within cell types that are nonpermissive for myogenesis and suggests that MEF-2 is regulated independently of other muscle-specific genes.