Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by concomitant paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea chemoradiotherapy: curative and organ-preserving therapy for advanced head and neck cancer

The challenging integration of platinum compounds, taxanes, and molecular-targeted therapies in the multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

There have been important advances in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). For patients with unresectable disease, the use of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy has improved the 3-year survival rate from 15-20% to 35-50%. The results of recent studies involving sequential therapy of induction chemotherapy including taxanes and chemoradiation have shown encouraging survival rates, near to 60-70%. Moreover, progress in the understanding of the molecular changes that lead to the development of these tumors is bringing novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches into clinical practice, promising new hope to patients with a devastating and lethal disease.

Curative and organ-preserving treatment with intra-arterial carboplatin induction followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: single-center five-year results

Background

This study evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, response rate and survival of neoadjuvant superselective intra-arterial infusion of high dose carboplatin in advanced head and neck cancer.

Methods

Forty-six patients with primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma received 3 cycles of intra-arterial carboplatin (300 to 350 mg/m² per cycle every 2 weeks), followed by radiotherapy or surgery plus radiotherapy.

Results

No complications or severe toxicity occurred. Sixteen patients (35%) were complete responders, 20 (43%) partial responders while 10 (22%) did not respond to treatment. After completion of the multimodality treatment, 38/46 patients (83%) were complete responders. After a 5-year follow-up period, 18/46 patients (39%) are alive and disease-free, 3 (6,5%) have died of a second primary tumor and 25 (54,5%) have died of the disease.

Conclusion

Intra-arterial carboplatin induction chemotherapy is a safe, well-tolerated technique that discriminates between responders and non-responders and so may have prognostic significance in planning further integrated treatments aimed to organ preservation for advanced head and neck carcinomas.

Induction chemotherapy of docetaxel and Cisplatin for the elderly patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been considered as a standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), this treatment is associated with increased toxicities such as mucositis and dermatitis. As a result, the dose intensity can be reduced and interruptions of radiotherapy are more common for CCRT than for sequential treatment, especially for the elderly patients. This prospective study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of the induction chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin for elderly patients with locally advanced SCCHN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients over 65 years of age with locally advanced SCCHN were treated with docetaxel (70 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) every 21 days. The chemotherapy consisted of two cycles with a third cycle that was administered to the responding patients. Patients who did not respond to initial chemotherapy underwent radiotherapy as a definitive local treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in this study and 44 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate was 88%, 16 patients (36%) achieved a complete response and 23 patients (52%) achieved a partial response. After a median follow-up of 24 months (range: 9 approximately 38 months) the median disease free period and overall survival period had not yet been reached. The one year and two year survival rates were 89% and 70%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 33 patients (75%) and 4 patients had febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy of docetaxel and cisplatin is an effective regimen with an acceptable safety profile as the induction treatment for elderly patients suffering with SCCHN.

The chemoradiation paradigm in head and neck cancer

In this article, we use the example of head and neck cancer to show how concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used to treat a cancer where locoregional control is central for treatment success. The advent of concurrent chemoradiation has significantly contributed to the curability of head and neck cancer, including locoregionally advanced disease. Preserving organ function and reducing toxic effects are increasingly the focus of clinical trials. We review the available chemoradiotherapy platforms used for head and neck cancer, with initial discussions focused on single-agent cytotoxic-based regimens. We then assess the literature on multiagent-based regimens and include a discussion of the integration of novel agents, such as EGFR inhibitors, and antiangiogenic drugs into treatment platforms. Although single-agent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is still widely used as a standard therapy, we propose that evidence increasingly shows that multiagent-based chemoradiotherapy, and EGFR-inhibitor-based treatments, offer distinct advantages. We provide guidance for clinicians based on current clinical trial evidence on how to choose appropriate treatment platforms for their patients.

Current surgical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Historically treatment of head and neck cancers involved surgical resection followed by radiation therapy for advanced tumors. Concurrent chemoradiation therapies have shown equal survival to surgical resection with better preservation of function. However, concurrent therapy does entail significant morbidity, and recent advances have been used to minimize that morbidity. Newer tumor specific medical therapies are anticipated to be less toxic while maintaining a high degree of efficacy. For resectable cancer, transoral laser microsurgery is a new trend in surgery for complete resection of tumors with preservation of function. Advanced reconstructive techniques that allow free transfer of soft tissue and bone from all over the body improve the functional and aesthetic outcomes following major ablative surgery. With successful surgical reconstruction, dental and prosthetic rehabilitation choices are enhanced. Advances in rehabilitation of speech following removal of the larynx have improved the quality of life post-laryngectomy patients. With these newer therapies and methods of reconstruction, each patient needs to be carefully evaluated to maximize the possibility of cure and level of function, and minimize the morbidity associated with treatment. Combined chemotherapy and radiation protocols are associated with increased acute and chronic toxicities that may affect the quality of life due to the impact upon oral disease and oral function. Oral care providers must be aware of advances in cancer management and implications for patient care to effectively care for these patients.

Relationship between swallow motility disorders on videofluorography and oral intake in patients treated for head and neck cancer with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Current research demonstrates that swallow function is impaired after treatment with organ-sparing chemoradiotherapy. Few studies, however, have related observed swallowing disorders with the patient's oral intake and diet in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Swallowing function was examined using the modified barium swallow (MBS) procedure in 170 patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for cancer of the head and neck at 5 evaluation points: pretreatment and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the relationship between swallow motility disorders and oral intake or diet consistencies.

RESULTS

Limitations in oral intake and diet during the first year after cancer treatment were significantly related to reduced laryngeal elevation, reduced cricopharyngeal opening, and rating of nonfunctional swallow on at least 1 swallow of any bolus type.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallow motility disorders had a significant impact on the eating ability of patients after treatment for head and neck cancer with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy: an alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck?

Radiotherapy remains the foundation of current treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). It has been shown that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy, CRT, or chemotherapy-enhanced radiation therapy, CERT) results in improved clinical outcome in terms of both locoregional control and overall survival in some groups of patients. However, CRT is associated with severe, dose-limiting acute toxicities and, in some patients, a higher proportion of late toxicities. In addition, most CRT regimens are platinum-based and there is evidence that the maximum tolerable toxicity has been reached with the dose intensities currently used in bolus cisplatin regimens. Therefore, if we are to further improve outcomes through increased treatment compliance, more effective and more tolerable regimens are needed. Recent results from a phase III randomised study demonstrate that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab (Erbitux)given concomitantly with radiotherapy yields a significant clinical benefit over radiotherapy alone without any increase in radiotherapy-associated toxicity. In this review, we explore the question of the degree to which adding cetuximab improves the efficacy of radiotherapy in locally advanced SCCHN and how the benefits of cetuximab plus radiotherapy compare with those achievable with CRT.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in a concomitant alternating chemoradiotherapy program for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer: a pharmacology-guided schedule

PURPOSE

Administration of gemcitabine together with cisplatin at cytotoxic doses in a chemoradiotherapy regimen is hampered by a high degree of local toxicity. Using the pharmacologic properties of the drug we designed a modified schedule aimed at reducing toxicity while preserving activity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx, bulky T4, and/or N2 to N3 were eligible. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 12 and cisplatin at a dose of 20 mg/m2 on Days 2 to 5, every 21 days for 3 courses. Radiotherapy, delivered with standard fractionation, was given on Days 8 to 12 and 15 to 19 and was repeated 3 times up to a total dose of > or = 60 Gy.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were selected. Grade 3 to 4 stomatitis was recorded in 25 patients (89%). Thirteen patients (46%) experienced Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 patients (29%) and in 2 was complicated by infection and death. The overall complete response rate was 79%. At a median follow up of 71 months, 11 patients had a locoregional relapse (3-year locoregional control, 64%); 6 patients had distant metastases, among whom only 2 were without locoregional recurrence. The 3-year progression-free survival is 39% and 3-year overall survival has been 43%.

CONCLUSION

The schedule modification did not attenuate local toxicity. Moreover, infections and especially pneumonia, were a major problem. The high activity of gemcitabine when combined with radiotherapy would most likely be better exploited in the context of modified radiation schemes.

Induction chemotherapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Platinum-based chemotherapy administered concurrently with radiation has been adopted as the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Historically, randomized trials using induction chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy alone have failed to demonstrate a clear survival advantage, and concurrent chemoradiation has delivered better results than previously obtained with radiation therapy alone, establishing the benefit of adding chemotherapy. This method of treatment, together with new modalities of therapy and novel agents, has reintroduced the question of induction chemotherapy before definitive chemoradiation. Systemic chemotherapy offers a better possibility of reducing systemic metastasis and improving cosmetic appearance. This article reviews developing trends using induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

DNA-Repair Gene Polymorphisms Predict Favorable Clinical Outcome Among Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated With Cisplatin-Based Induction Chemotherapy

Purpose

Cisplatin kills tumor cells through DNA cross linking. Alterations in the function of DNA repair genes may affect DNA repair proficiency and influence cancer patients' response to cisplatin. We studied whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DNA repair genes predict the response to cisplatin or prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

A polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach was used to determine the frequency of the SNPs: XPD-Asp312Asn, XPD-Lys751Gln, ERCC1-C8092A, and XRCC1-Arg399Gln in DNA from peripheral lymphocytes of 103 stage IV SCCHN patients.

Results

The frequencies of the distinct genotypes were, respectively, for the homozygous common allele, heterozygous and homozygous polymorphic variant: 53%, 40%, and 7% for ERCC1; 50%, 42%, and 8% for XPD-312; 35%, 57%, and 8% for XPD751; and 35%, 51%, and 13% for XRCC1. Patients with only common alleles at all the SNPs tested had a median overall survival of 5.1 months (range, 4.3 to 6.0 months) as compared with not reached for patients with at least one polymorphic variant (P < .001). Estimates from Cox's multivariate analysis suggest that the accumulation of each polymorphic variant decreases the probability of dying by a factor of 2.1 (P < .001; the presence of seven polymorphic variants confers a 175-fold protection). The accumulation of polymorphic variants increases by 2.94-fold the probability of achieving a complete response to treatment (P = .041).

Conclusion

Using a multivariate model, the presence of polymorphic variants in DNA-repair genes are powerful prognosis factors and response to cisplatin predictors among SCCHN patients.

Does induction chemotherapy have a role in the management of locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer?

The use of systemic chemotherapy before definitive locoregional management, or induction chemotherapy, has been a theoretically attractive and well-studied approach in the management of squamous cell head and neck cancer. Although a decrease in distant metastases has frequently been observed, an improvement in survival from induction has been difficult to demonstrate. When chemotherapy and radiation are used concomitantly, however, an improvement in both survival and locoregional control can be identified, and this has led to the adoption of concurrent chemoradiotherapy as a standard of care for these patients. With this improvement in locoregional control, distant metastases have become a more frequently recognized cause of treatment failure, suggesting that an intervention, such as induction chemotherapy, directed at improving distant control might now be of some importance in improving overall treatment success. The recent development of taxane-containing, three-drug induction regimens that are capable of producing significantly better response rates than the older cisplatin and fluorouracil combination has also raised the possibility of a new and more important role for induction. The results of phase II investigations using this kind of a sequential schedule of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy have been encouraging, and phase III trials are now underway. This treatment approach remains investigational however, and these phase III studies are critical. The current randomized trials are reviewed and discussed.

Laryngeal preservation in head and neck cancer: multidisciplinary approach

Since the first total laryngectomy was undertaken, efforts have been made to avoid removing the entire larynx. For a long time, partial surgery and radiotherapy were the only options that could preserve the larynx. Development of active chemotherapy regimens has prompted an era of intensive clinical research. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in patients with objective responses has been shown to allow conservation of the larynx in nearly two-thirds of individuals, without any effect on survival; concurrent chemoradiotherapy also provides high rates of laryngeal preservation, again without affecting survival; and induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy is under investigation. In the meantime, partial open surgery and endoscopic carbon dioxide laser procedures are feasible in selected moderately advanced laryngopharyngeal cancers as an alternative to destructive surgery. Altered fractionation radiotherapy can also be used in management of these tumours, and targeted treatments have opened a new area of clinical research. Findings of basic research and modern imaging should provide useful approaches for selection of patients for various strategies.

Dysphagia severity following chemoradiation and postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate dysphagia severity following chemoradiation and postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer, and particularly the aspiration risk because of its potential life-threatening consequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the modified barium swallow (MBS) results in 110 patients who complained of dysphagia following chemoradiation (57) and postoperative radiation (53) of their head and neck cancer. Patients were selected if they were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Patients were grouped according to the dysphagia severity: mild (grades 2-3), moderate (grades 4-5), and severe (grades 6-7).

RESULTS

Mean and median dysphagia grades were 4.84/5 and 4.12/4 for chemoradiation and postoperative radiation respectively. The mean difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p=0.02). Mild dysphagia occurred in 13 patients (22%) of the chemoradiation group and 17 (32%) of the postoperative group. Corresponding number for the moderate group was 25 (43%) and 25 (48%), respectively. Severe dysphagia was significant in the chemoradiation group (34%) compared to the postoperative group (19%). However, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.29). There was a higher proportion of patients with large tumor (T3-T4) in the chemoradiation group who developed severe dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia remained a significant morbidity of chemoradiation and postoperative radiation for head and neck cancer. Dysphagia may be more severe in the chemoradiation group because of the higher proportion of patients with large tumor, the high radiation dose, and a high number of oropharyngeal tumors. Aspiration occurred in both groups. Diagnostic studies such as MBS should be part of future head and neck cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration, as it may be silent.

Reassessment of the role of induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancers are a complex group of diseases defined by variations in histological features, anatomical location, and cause. Once the realm of surgeons and radiation oncologists, the treatment of locally advanced disease now involves medical oncologists. Major developments include primary chemoradiotherapy for unresectable disease and organ preservation, the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy, improvement in surgical and radiation techniques, and biological therapies. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy consistently improves locoregional control. However, control of distant metastases is poor, resulting in an increasing proportion of deaths from systemic recurrence. Given this shift in site of recurrence, therapeutic strategies to suppress distant metastases may be the next goal for further improvement of survival. One approach that merits reassessment is the use of induction chemotherapy in the setting of locally advanced disease--both resectable and unresectable. In this review we summarise data for the use of induction chemotherapy to define better which patients will likely benefit from this approach now and which questions are important in the design of future clinical trials.

Aspiration rate following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer: an underreported occurrence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We would like to assess the prevalence of aspiration before and following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) in 63 patients who underwent concurrent chemotherapy and radiation for head and neck cancer. MBS was performed prior to treatment to determine the need for immediate gastrostomy tube placement. MBS was repeated following treatment to assess the safety of oral feeding prior to removal of tube feeding. All patients were cancer free at the time of the swallowing study. No patient had surgery. Dysphagia severity was graded on a scale of 1-7. Tube feedings were continued if patients were diagnosed to have severe aspiration (grade 6-7) or continued weight loss. Patients with abnormal swallow (grade 3-7) received swallowing therapy following MBS.

RESULTS

Before treatment, there were 18 grade 1, 18 grade 2, 9 grade 3, 8 grade 4, 3 grade 5, 3 grade 6, and 4 grade 7. Following chemoradiation, at a median follow-up of 2 months (1-10 months), one patient had grade 1, eight patients had grade 2, nine patients had grade 3, eight patients had grade 4, 13 patients had grade 5, seven patients had grade 6, and 11 patients had grade 7. Six patients died from aspiration pneumonia (one before, three during, and two post-treatment), and did not have the second MBS. Overall, 37/63 (59%) patients developed aspiration, six of them (9%) fatal. If we excluded the 10 patients who had severe aspiration at diagnosis and the six patients who died from pneumonia, the prevalence of severe aspiration was 33% (21/63).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspiration remained a significant morbidity following chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Its prevalence is underreported in the literature because of its often silent nature. Diagnostic studies such as MBS should be part of future head and neck cancer prospective studies to assess the prevalence of aspiration, and for rehabilitation.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer

Purpose

To develop a clinical practice guideline for treatment of laryngeal cancer with the intent of preserving the larynx (either the organ itself or its function). This guideline is intended for use by oncologists in the care of patients outside of clinical trials.

Methods

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel determined the clinical management questions to be addressed and reviewed the literature available through November 2005, with emphasis given to randomized controlled trials of site-specific disease. Survival, rate of larynx preservation, and toxicities were the principal outcomes assessed. The guideline underwent internal review and approval by the Panel, as well as external review by additional experts, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Results

Evidence supports the use of larynx-preservation approaches for appropriately selected patients without a compromise in survival; however, no larynx-preservation approach offers a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy with rehabilitation as indicated.

Recommendations

All patients with T1 or T2 laryngeal cancer, with rare exception, should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx. For most patients with T3 or T4 disease without tumor invasion through cartilage into soft tissues, a larynx-preservation approach is an appropriate, standard treatment option, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy therapy is the most widely applicable approach. To ensure an optimum outcome, special expertise and a multidisciplinary team are necessary, and the team should fully discuss with the patient the advantages and disadvantages of larynx-preservation options compared with treatments that include total laryngectomy.

Site of disease and treatment protocol as correlates of swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

The relationship between type of chemoradiation treatment, site of disease, and swallowing function has not been sufficiently examined in patients with head and neck cancer treated primarily with chemoradiation.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with advanced-stage head and neck cancer were evaluated before and 3 months after chemoradiation treatment to define their swallowing disorders and characterize their swallowing physiology by site of lesion and chemoradiation protocol. One hundred forty normal subjects were also studied.

RESULTS

The most common disorders at baseline and 3 months after treatment were reduced tongue base retraction, reduced tongue strength, and slowed or delayed laryngeal vestibule closure. Frequency of functional swallow did not differ significantly across disease sites after treatment, although frequency of disorders was different at various sites of lesion. The effects of the chemotherapy protocols were small.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of the lesion affects the frequency of occurrence of specific swallow disorders, whereas chemoradiation protocols have minimal effect on oropharyngeal swallow function.

Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a phase II trial using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with radiation (TFHX).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with locally advanced NPC were treated with CRT consisting of 4-day continuous infusions of paclitaxel (20 mg/m(2)/d) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2)/d), and oral hydroxyurea 500 mg bid for nine doses, every 3 weeks concurrent with radiotherapy (RT). RT consisted of once daily 200cGy fractions 5 times per week to a total of 7000cGy.

RESULTS

Complete response was seen in 86% and 71% of patients at 4 and 12 months after CRT. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients experienced relapse. Sixteen deaths occurred: 13 from progressive disease. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 72% and 54% respectively, with locoregional and distant control rates of 83% and 64% at 3 years respectively. Grade 3 to 4 acute toxicities included oropharyngeal mucositis in 81% of patients treated, dermatitis in 63%, weight loss in 32%, and neutropenia in 22%. Neutropenic fever was seen in 14%. There were no treatment-related deaths from acute toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

TFHX is shown to be feasible in NPC. Non-cross resistant induction chemotherapy should be further studied with this regimen.

Functional outcomes after organ preservation treatment in head and neck cancer: a critical review of the literature

The use of radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer is increasing in popularity, driven by the notion that sparing the organs of speech and swallowing from surgical resection will also spare function. This critical review of the literature considered functional outcomes after organ preservation to assess the impact of such treatment on speech, swallowing and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Literature searches were conducted on several library databases. A total of 50 relevant articles were identified and found to meet the inclusion criteria specified a priori. The majority of reports suggested that organ preservation techniques have the potential to result in swallowing disorders, often related to dysmotility of the oropharyngeal and laryngeal structures, and resulting in frequent episodes of aspiration. This may lead to the need for enteral feeding in the short term for some patients while, in others, this need is life long. Speech does not appear to be affected to the same degree as swallowing. These results suggest that organ preservation does not translate into function preservation for all patients with head and neck cancer.

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

In a Phase I/II trial, we investigated concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after induction chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III/IV and were treated initially with induction chemotherapy using cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil (PF), carboplatinum-5-FU, or docetaxel-PF. Patients then received docetaxel four times weekly with concomitant boost (CB) radiation (1.8 Gy once-daily X20, 1.8/1.5 Gy twice a day). Fifteen patients each received 20 mg/M2 and 25 mg/M2.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 30 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 27-63 months). Primary sites were: oropharynx 19, oral cavity 2, larynx/hypopharynx 5, and unknown primary 4. Eighty-seven percent of patients had N2/N3 disease; 60% had T3/T4 disease. Twenty percent of patients had a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. After chemoradiotherapy, 21 of 30 patients had a CR, 2 had progressive disease, and 7 had partial response (PR). Nineteen of 26 patients presenting with neck disease had neck dissections, and 7 of 19 were positive. Ninety-three percent of all patients were rendered disease-free after all planned therapy. Treatment failed in 8 patients, and 7 have died of disease. An additional patient died with no evidence of disease. Twenty-one patients (70%) are currently alive with no evidence of disease. No acute dose-limiting toxicity was observed at either dose level.

CONCLUSIONS

This intensive treatment regimen of concurrent docetaxel/concomitant boost radiation and surgery after induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients yields good local regional control and survival. Docetaxel/CB chemoradiotherapy represents an aggressive alternative regimen to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy or surgery in patients who have a poor response to induction chemotherapy.

Phase I trial of concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel when administered concomitantly with radical hyperfractionated radiotherapy and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III-IV tumors received radical radiotherapy of 74.4 Gy given in two daily fractions of 1.2 Gy for 6 weeks. Cisplatin was given once weekly on day 1 at a constant dose of 15 mg/m2. The starting dose of docetaxel was 10 mg/m2 once weekly on day 3, with planned escalation steps of 5 mg/m2. Main endpoints of the study were the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel, acute toxicities, and the preliminary efficacy results.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 15 months (range: 4-40 months). Two of three patients presented with dose-limiting toxicities at the 15-mg/m2 dose of docetaxel (one patient presented with multiple grade 3-4 toxicities requiring hospitalization for management and another presented with multiple toxicities including life-threatening bronchoaspiration). Thus, the weekly docetaxel dose of 10 mg/m2 was considered the maximum tolerated dose. Nineteen patients were then treated with the maximum tolerated dose and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Radiotherapy was completed in all patients except one (median dose: 74.4; range: 73.2-74.4), and at least 80% of the scheduled cisplatin and docetaxel doses were given in 92% of the patients. Acute toxicities were dominated by grade 3 mucositis (92%) and grade 3-4 dysphagia (68%). The 2.5 year actuarial local control rate was 87.5%, and the disease-free survival rate was 75%. At the time of last follow-up, 23 patients were alive and two had died from cancer. No distant metastases were observed.

DISCUSSION

In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, this study determined the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel to be 10 mg/m2 administered once weekly when given concurrently with 74.4 Gy hyperfractionated radiotherapy and a weekly 15-mg/m2 dose of cisplatin. The toxicity profile and the encouraging results suggest that this new combination merits further investigation in a multi-institutional phase II trial.

Advances in the treatment of locally advanced non-nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region

Over the past decade important advances have been made in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Traditionally, chemotherapy has been incorporated in the treatment of SCCHN either before local treatment as induction, concomitantly with radiation, or following local treatment as adjuvant therapy. A number of randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (usually based on the combination of cisplatin and 5-d continuous infusion of fluorouracil) followed by local treatment or concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) each prolongs survival and results in organ preservation in a significant number of patients. Survival rates appear to be higher when CCRT with cisplatin is used. Furthermore, accelerated fractionation radiation regimens have shown improved local control rates in randomized trials. Recently, new therapeutic strategies such as induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT or the incorporation of newer agents such as taxanes are under intense investigation and preliminary results are promising. Advances in molecular biology have led to the elucidation of molecular mechanisms that initiate and maintain the malignant phenotype in SCCHN. The identification of molecular targets has revolutionized our approach to cancer therapy and resulted in the introduction of novel targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinases, the tumor suppressor p53 gene, and epidermal growth factor receptor are some of the molecular targets of such therapies in patients with SCCHN.

Radical Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of Prognostic and Therapeutic Factors

AIMS

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) continues to be a leading cancer in developing countries. Definitive radiation therapy either primary or as postoperative adjuvant is offered to most patients. We aimed to identify prognostic and therapeutic factors that affect locoregional control and survival in patients undergoing radical radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 568 previously untreated patients with squamous head and neck cancers, who received radical radiotherapy between 1990 and 1996, using local control, locoregional control and disease-free survival (DFS) as outcome measures.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 18 months for living patients, the 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS for all 568 patients were 53%, 45% and 41%, respectively, for all stages combined. The 5-year local control, locoregional control and DFS as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping were 78%, 70% and 70%; 64%, 59% and 57%; 51%, 42% and 37%; and 40%, 27% and 22% from stages I to IV, respectively, with highly significant P values. Patients receiving higher doses (> or = 66 Gy) had a significantly better outcome compared with lower doses. The 5-year local control (59% vs 48%, P = 0.0015), locoregional control (47% vs 41%; P = 0.0043) and DFS (44% vs 37%; P = 0.0099) were significantly better in patients receiving > or = 66 Gy. Site of primary also affected outcome significantly, with oral cavity lesions faring badly.

CONCLUSION

Tumour stage remains the most important factor affecting outcome in radical radiotherapy of HNSCC. A definite dose-response relationship exists with higher total doses, leading to better local control, locoregional control and DFS in all stages. Site of primary affects outcome too, with laryngeal primaries doing well and oral cavity cancers faring the worst.

Partial horizontal laryngectomy and epiglottiplasty

In order to evaluate the availability of the lateral horizontal laryngectomy and anaplasty of epiglottis to treat some patients with specific supraglottic carcinomas and hypopharyngeal carcinomas, 17 cases of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas were retrospectively analyzed, whose tumors were located at the lateral margin of epiglottis, aryepiglottic fold, medial wall of piriform fossa and were treated by the lateral horizontal laryngectomy and anaplasty of epiglottis. The results showed that all cases took food by mouth in postoperative 9-14 days and subjected to decannulation in postoperative 9-15 days. Three cases had postoperative hoarse voice. The free-disease survival rate of 3 years was 71.4% in 14 cases followed up after the first surgical therapy, and the overall free-disease survival rate of 3 years was 85.7% after the second surgical therapy. It was concluded that the manipulations of the lateral horizontal laryngectomy and epiglottiplasty were simple. It could alleviate the postoperative symptoms of aspiration and bucking remarkably and shorten their postoperative recovery time, yet does not lower the survival rate of patients if laryngocarcinoma or hypopharyngeal carcinoma cases were properly selected.

Role of carboplatin in multi-modality treatment of canine tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma - a case series of five dogs

Canine tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. A retrospective study was undertaken of all dogs that were presented between January 1999 and January 2004 to the Animal Health Trust for the treatment of tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Five cases were identified, and their median survival time was 211 days (95 per cent confidence interval 80 to 352) with two of the five dogs remaining alive at the end of the study, 826 and 1628 days from diagnosis with no clinical signs of disease. The protocol was well tolerated with only one of the five dogs showing toxicity associated with carboplatin and all dogs that started radiotherapy completing it. Compared with results of previous studies, these cases suggest that surgical cytoreduction followed by coarse fractionated radiotherapy together with carboplatin may be a useful way to treat this tumour. Carboplatin alone caused partial remission in the two cases where it was used as neo-adjunctive therapy.

Recent new approaches to the treatment of head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world and affects 50,000 Americans annually. During the past 20 years, treatments for HNSCC have changed dramatically due largely to the advent of novel approaches such as combined modality therapy, as well as improvements in surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques. Ongoing advances in the multidisciplinary management of this complex and multivariate disease process are resulting in improved function, quality of life and survival. Here, we review state-of-the-art therapy and presents selected advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

The length and quality of head and neck cancer survivorship continues to improve. Radiotherapy has been central to this process through advances in treatment technology, fractionation schemas, radiosensitizing chemotherapy, and surgical technique. The future of head and neck radiotherapy looks brighter still with progress in radiosensitizing biologic therapy, molecular characterization, functional imaging, and rehabilitative strategies fast approaching. Head and neck cancer, a disease once fraught with nihilism and failure, is evolving into a major success story of multidisciplinary solid tumor management. Continued dedication and work on the part of provider and patient alike will be required to make this promise a reality.

Planned post-chemoradiation neck dissection: significance of radiation dose

OBJECTIVE

The increasing prominence of multimodality therapy for patients with advanced head and neck cancer reflects its high survival and functional preservation rates. We report the pathologic data on patients undergoing neck dissection (ND) after induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (IC-CRT) in three similar protocols utilizing decreasing doses of radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases of 221 patients who underwent IC-CRT between 1999 and 2002 were reviewed. Based on posttreatment residual or pretreatment N2a or greater neck disease, 73 patients without pretreatment neck surgery were eligible for analysis (1 N1, 3 N2a, 26 N2b, 20 N2c, 23 N3). Three additional subgroups were also analyzed with respect to outcome: Undissected patients with less than N2 disease, patients who had neck surgery prior to IC-CRT, and patients with N2a or greater neck disease who did not have post-IC-CRT ND.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients underwent unilateral or bilateral selective neck dissection. Six patients had modified or radical ND. There were no wound healing complications. Pathologic analysis revealed viable cancer in 15 of 73 patients (20.5%): 1 had N1, 3 had N2b, 4 had N2c, and 7 had N3 neck disease. The incidence of viable cancer in the neck dissection specimen increased as radiation dose decreased. Complete response induction chemotherapy predicted negative pathology (P = .003). In the subgroup analysis, patients who had pretreatment surgery had a lower risk of dying from the primary cancer

CONCLUSIONS

1) The incidence of positive pathology after IC-CRT increases as radiation dose decreases. 2) Selective neck dissection after CRT has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe; the complication rate of ND after IC-CRT is acceptably low. 3) There is viable posttreatment cancer in 20.5% of patients, indicating necessity of ND in these patients.

Paradigm shift in the treatment of head and neck cancer: the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is an integral component of the management of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, though the optimal use of chemotherapy remains to be defined. The combination of a platinum agent and 5-fluorouracil has been used as the standard neoadjuvant treatment and has been shown to permit organ preservation in operable patients and improve long-term survival outcomes in operable and inoperable patients. Recently, the addition of a taxane, docetaxel or paclitaxel, to standard platinum plus 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy has been shown to further improve response rates and survival outcomes. Phase III data are emerging to support combinations of docetaxel or paclitaxel with a platinum plus 5-fluorouracil as a new, more effective and less toxic standard for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sequential treatment regimens, incorporating a combination of induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation, are also under study in efforts to further improve long-term survival outcomes. Induction regimens incorporating docetaxel or paclitaxel with a platinum plus 5-fluorouracil are under evaluation in this setting. Randomized trials comparing a sequential treatment approach with standard therapies are also being undertaken and will likely define a new treatment paradigm for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, leucovorin, and continuous infusion fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study

The primary objective of this phase II study was to access the complete response (CR) rate to a new innovative induction regimen in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC). From October 2000 until October 2003 a total of 38 eligible patients (33 men and 5 women) entered the study. The large majority of them presented with a performance status of 0-1 and with clinical stage IV disease. Treatment consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on d 1, leucovorin (LV) 200 mg/m2 over 20 min immediately followed by FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and then 600 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion on d 1 and 2 and a cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1-h infusion on d 2 every 3 wk. This was then followed by radiation (70 Gy) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. After the completion of IC, 6/38 (16%) patients had CR. The CR rate was increased to 66% post-concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Neutropenia (37.5%), pain (62%), nausea/vomiting (21%), and alopecia (79%) were the most frequent side effects during IC. The most pronounced toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were stomatitis (62.5%) and xerostomia (53%). Median time to progression was 11.0 mo and median survival 16.7 mo. One- and 2-yr survival rates were 73% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, this novel induction regimen is active, is well tolerated, and can be successfully followed by CCRT with weekly cisplatin. CCRT should remain standard treatment for patients with LA-HNC. Novel induction combinations, such as that reported in the present study, should be evaluated in combination with CCRT only in the context of clinical trials.

Phase II clinical trial of parenteral hydroxyurea and hyperfractionated, accelerated external beam radiation therapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Toxicity and efficacy with continuous ribonucleoside reductase inhibition

BACKGROUND

Almost all concurrent chemoradiation regimens for head and neck are platinum based; however, cisplatin is associated with severe renal, oto-, and neurotoxicity. Hydroxyurea (HU) has been associated with fewer irreversible toxicities. We obtained HU in parenteral form to be administered continually during the radiation treatment. Intravenous HU promised better pharmacokinetics and cell cycle blockade.

METHODS

Participants had biopsy-proven, untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx (stage IV) and hypopharynx (stages II-IV). Radiation therapy consisted initially of 74.4 Gy administered in twice daily 1.2-Gy fractions. After 20 patients, the radiation dose was reduced to 60.0 Gy, and another 16 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

Patients received HU by Continuous Ambulatory Drug Delivery (CADD) pump on a daily x5 schedule during radiation therapy. Because of persistent long-term dysphagia, after 20 patients, the dose of external beam radiation therapy was reduced from 74 to 60 Gy, and the duration of concurrent HU was correspondingly reduced. The new regimen was much better tolerated. The median survival for the group as a whole was 30 months. Within this small study, there were no significant differences in survival, regional control, or local control between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of concurrent parenteral HU and hyper-fractionated radiation therapy are tolerable and promising.

Complete hypopharyngeal obstruction by mucosal adhesions: A complication of intensive chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Severe swallowing dysfunction is the dominant long-term complication observed in patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with treatment protocols using intensive concurrent chemotherapy with radiation therapy (chemo/XRT). We identified a subset of these patients, who were seen with complete obstruction of the hypopharynx distal to the site of the primary cancer, and in whom we postulate that the obstruction was caused by separable mucosal adhesions rather than obliteration by a mature fibrous stricture.

METHODS

Seven patients were referred to the senior author with a diagnosis of complete hypopharyngeal obstruction between 1992 and 2001. The diagnosis was confirmed by barium swallow imaging and/or endoscopy before referral in all patients. Patients underwent recanalization by passing a Jesberg esophagoscope under general anesthesia, followed by serial dilations and intensive swallowing therapy. Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively after institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

All seven patients were successfully recanalized. No patient had a perforation or other significant complication related to the recanalization procedure or subsequent dilations. Five of the seven patients showed improvement in swallowing at some point after the initial procedure, but just two patients recovered sufficiently to have their gastrostomy tube removed permanently.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that complete hypopharyngeal obstruction secondary to mucosal adhesions is one cause of gastrostomy tube dependence in patients who have been treated with chemo/XRT for HNSCC. It is a difficult problem to treat, but most patients can recover useful swallowing function without undergoing laryngectomy or major surgical reconstruction. The postulated pathophysiology has implications for prevention as well as treatment.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of paclitaxel and concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy with or without amifostine in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Amifostine was developed to protect normal tissues from radiation exposure. The current study was undertaken to determine whether amifostine would allow the delivery of greater numbers of weekly paclitaxel treatments with concomitant, hyperfractionated radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients received radiation therapy twice daily using 1.6-gray (Gy) fractions up to a total of 70.4 Gy over an elapsed time of 6.5 weeks. All patients received paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) once weekly starting on Day 1. The number of doses of paclitaxel was escalated from three to a maximum of six in groups of three patients. For the patients who received amifostine, a dose of 400 mg/m(2) was given intravenously over 15 minutes on Days 1-5, 8, 29-33, and 36. Patients underwent surgery for persistent tumor after radiotherapy. The plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were characterized during treatment with the first weekly dose to determine the effect of concurrently administered amifostine.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for this study. In the absence of amifostine, a maximum of four doses of paclitaxel were tolerated in combination with the radiotherapy. With amifostine, up to five doses of paclitaxel could be given. Generally, the treatment resulted in Grade 2 and 3 stomatitis. Overall, 69% of patients had a complete remission, and 29% had a partial remission. Both progression-free survival and overall survival were 66% at 30 months. Amifostine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of amifostine allowed the authors to give an additional dose of paclitaxel to patients who were undergoing hyperfractionated radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. This treatment regimen resulted in a high frequency of complete remissions and an excellent progression-free survival pattern without compromising the plasma kinetics of paclitaxel.

Epidermal growth factor receptor directed therapy in head and neck cancer

Squamous cell head and neck cancer (SCCHN) is the seventh most common cause of cancer death worldwide and its incidence is rising rapidly in developing countries. Despite recent advances in managing locally advanced SCCHN, patients with recurrent and metastatic SCCHN have a poor prognosis and little progress has been made its management. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of SCCHN and is a marker of poor prognosis. Recent advances in targeted therapeutics against EGFR are being investigated clinically. In this article, we review the different modalities utilized to inhibit EGFR signaling in SCCHN, including small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, anti-sense therapy and immunotoxin conjugates. Monotherapy with EGFR inhibitors has demonstrated response rates between 5 and 15% in advanced SCCHN. However, combining EGFR inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy appears to augment response rates and survival. With the foundation for the use of EGFR inhibitors laid in these studies, future studies will need to optimize the delivery of these agents in combination with conventional therapies.

Phase I and initial phase II results from a trial investigating weekly docetaxel and carboplatin given neoadjuvantly and then concurrently with concomitant boost radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The current Phase I/II study assessed induction docetaxel/carboplatin given weekly for 4 weeks, followed by weekly docetaxel/carboplatin and concomitant boost radiotherapy (CB-XRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty patients with Stage III or IV (M0) disease of the oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled. Patients initially received docetaxel 20 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 weekly x 4. Patients with stable (SD) or responding disease subsequently received dose-escalated docetaxel (10-20 mg/m2 in sequential patient cohorts) and carboplatin AUC 1 weekly x 5 with CB-XRT (1.8 gray [Gy] every day x 15 days, followed by 1.8/1.5 Gy twice per day x 13 days).

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable, and 15 patients (5 patients with Stage III disease, 10 patients with Stage IV disease) completed all planned therapy. The target docetaxel dose level of 20 mg/m(2) weekly with radiotherapy was achieved with no dose-limiting toxicities. The most frequent maximum toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were Grade 3 mucositis, dysphagia, and/or pain. Primary site responses after induction included 4 patients with partial responses, 11 patients with SD, and 5 patients with disease progression. Fifteen patients (75%) continued to receive chemoradiotherapy, with 14 patients attaining a complete response (CR). Overall, a clinicopathologic neck CR after chemoradiotherapy was achieved in 9 of 10 patients. One patient had persistent primary disease and underwent salvage surgery, whereas another died of unrelated causes before neck assessment. Thirteen patients remain free of any disease event, with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 3-29 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen was feasible, safe, and particularly well tolerated. Early Phase II outcomes revealed promising activity in patients completing all treatment. Initial induction response results suggested that further investigation of this regimen with more aggressive induction therapy is warranted.

Review of current treatment practices for carcinoma of the head and neck

The past two decades have witnessed a paradigm shift in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Innovation in chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery has led to the assimilation of these modalities into our treatment algorithms. This modern multipart treatment plan has led to improved survival; however, this has come at the cost of increased toxicity. New and future therapies will be more tumour specific and, ideally, less toxic. Current research centres on these tumour-specific therapies with the anticipation of improved survival with decreased toxicity. This article will review the standard of care, recent advances and unfulfilled needs in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

State-of-the-art management of locally advanced head and neck cancer

During the past 20 years, treatments for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have changed dramatically owing largely to the advent of novel approaches such as combined modality therapy as well as improvements in surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques. Locally advanced disease in particular, which engendered very high recurrence and mortality rates, is now associated with long-term disease-free survival in the majority of cases. This article will focus on locally advanced HNSCC, which frequently remains a clinical challenge, review state-of-the-art therapy, and introduce promising novel therapies. The field continues to evolve rapidly with new evidence during the past year clearly establishing the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), as well as early evidence showing improved survival with the use of an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor in combination with radiotherapy. There are varied regimens in use for patients with locally advanced disease, but at the same time the multitude of options can plague the clinician when trying to select the most appropriate one. This article will attempt to put the various approaches into perspective and propose an evidence-based treatment algorithm.

Alteration of radiotherapy fractionation and concurrent chemotherapy: a new frontier in head and neck oncology?

Despite recent advances in multimodality management of patients with stage III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, the prognosis in these patients remains disappointing. In an attempt to improve treatment outcome, several teams recently investigated the role of altered fractionation radiotherapy in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy. The controlled trials that investigated this combined approach indicate that, although the magnitude of its effect was less marked for survival indices than for local-regional control, the addition of chemotherapy to altered fractionation regimens results in a clear improvement for these endpoints compared with hyperfractionated or accelerated regimens alone. The key challenge now is to optimize the synergism of these regimens in order to increase their therapeutic ratio in terms of both local-regional and systemic outcomes. This review is a critical appraisal of the real opportunities offered by the application of treatments aimed at increasing the dose intensity of radiotherapy delivered concurrently with cytotoxic drugs.

Phase I study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and twice-daily radiation in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

We previously demonstrated high locoregional control, in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer (HNC), using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy. In the present phase I trial, gemcitabine, a novel antimetabolite with strong radiation-enhancing activity, replaces hydroxyurea. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose and clinical efficacy in poor-prognosis HNC patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Seventy-two patients enrolled. Eligibility criteria included recurrent or second primary HNC, metastases or expected 2-year survival <20%. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m(2)/d, for 5 days; paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) on Day 1; and concurrent 1.5 Gy twice-daily radiation for 5 days. Gemcitabine was dose escalated, 50-300 mg/m(2) on day 1. Cycles repeated every 14 days until the completion of chemoradiation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: neutropenic fever; grade > or =4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for >4 days; grade > or =4 mucositis or dermatitis for >7 days; or grade 3 toxicity necessitating chemotherapy dose reductions. Non-DLT dose reductions in 5-fluorouracil and/or paclitaxel were allowed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of assessable patients experienced a clinical response. Five-year actuarial survival is 33.0%, and locoregional control is 61.4%. The recommended phase II dose of gemcitabine in this regimen is 100 mg/m(2) during cycles 1-5 (1 of 7 patients with DLT) or 200 mg/m(2) delivered only during cycles 3-5 (3 of 19 with DLT). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis (56 and 21%, respectively) and dermatitis (25 and 21%, respectively) were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and twice-daily radiation, delivered on alternating weeks, is active in patients with poor-prognosis HNC, although severe mucositis limits the clinical applicability of this regimen. Refinements in radiotherapy, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, may improve the tolerance for this regimen.

Concomitant radiation therapy and paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer: Results from two consecutive Phase I/II trials

PURPOSE

The management of unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (ULABC) remains a major challenge because of the necessity both to treat local disease and to prevent distant disease. Two consecutive Phase I/II trials of concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) were performed to attempt to address both local and distant disease control in ULABC. This analysis focuses on rates of locoregional control and radiation-associated acute and late complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with unresectable locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancers (T4N0-3M0-1) or locally recurrent disease were treated with CRT on two consecutive Phase I/II trials. Radiotherapy consisted of 60-70 Gy to the breast or chest wall and 60 Gy to draining lymphatics in a week-on/week-off (WO/WO) schedule. Chemotherapy consisted of either continuous infusion or bolus paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine. A subset analysis of 16 patients with nonmetastatic ULABC Stage IIIB-C (T4N0-3M0) was performed. Among this cohort, 13 patients (81%) underwent planned mastectomy after CRT.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients with Stage IIIB-C disease, acute toxicity included moist desquamation (n = 8) and Grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 3). Late toxicity included breast reconstruction loss, decreased range of arm motion, lymphedema, and skin toxicity, although none was life-threatening. Of 15 assessable patients, 14 had a clinical response, 7 had a pathologic complete response (pCR) including 6 of 13 patients undergoing mastectomy. With a median follow-up for living patients of 43.8 months, the 4-year actuarial locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 83%, 33%, and 56% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent WO/WO radiation therapy and paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine is effective locoregional therapy for ULABC with an acceptable toxicity profile. Further investigation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in ULABC is warranted.

Phase I Study of Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy with Irinotecan, 5-FU., and Hydroxyurea for Patients with Advanced and/or Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE

We sought to investigate CPT-11 as a promising agent to our established regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients included patients with poor prognosis advanced head and neck cancer who required radiation therapy. All patients were treated on a 14-day cycle. Each patient received 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/d), hydroxyurea (500 mg orally every 12 hours), radiation therapy twice daily (150 cGy each fraction), and CPT-11 at a starting dose of 5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 consecutive days followed by a 9-day break. CPT-11 was escalated in five mg/m(2)/d increments. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity, persistent grade 4 dermatitis and mucositis, grade 4 diarrhea despite maximal pharmacologic intervention, and inability to receive full-dose chemotherapy with the next cycle of treatment. Fourteen patients were treated at maximum tolerated dose to verify the recommended phase II dose.

RESULTS

Between August 1998 and August 2001, 31 patients with advanced and/or recurrent head and neck cancer were enrolled. Cohorts of nine, four, three, and 14 patients were treated at 5-, 10-, 15-, and 10-mg/m(2)/d dose levels of CPT-11. The 5- and 10-mg/m(2)/d dose levels were well tolerated All three patients treated at 15 mg/m(2)/d experienced neutropenic dose-limiting toxicity during cycles 1-2.

DISCUSSION

The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of CPT-11 with hyperfractionated radiation therapy is 10 mg/m(2)/d.

Amifostine (ETHYOL) protects rats from mucositis resulting from fractionated or hyperfractionated radiation exposure

PURPOSE

The cytoprotective drug amifostine (Ethyol) protects rats from oral mucositis resulting from a single dose of gamma-irradiation. We expanded earlier studies to determine whether multiple doses of amifostine protect against fractionated or hyperfractionated radiation and whether the active metabolite of amifostine (WR-1065) accumulates in tissues upon repeated administration.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Rats received amifostine daily for 5 days in conjunction with a 1-week fractionated radiation schedule and were evaluated for oral mucositis. Rats also received amifostine before the am or pm exposure or b.i.d. in conjunction with hyperfractionated radiation. To determine the pharmacokinetics of WR-1065 after repeated dosing, amifostine was given 5 days a week for 1 or 3 weeks, and rat tissue and plasma were collected at intervals during and after treatment and analyzed for WR-1065.

RESULTS

Amifostine protected rats from mucositis resulting from fractionated or hyperfractionated radiation. When the number of days of amifostine administration was reduced, protection was diminished. A dose of 100 mg/kg given in the morning or 2 doses at 50 mg/kg provided the best protection against hyperfractionated radiation. WR-1065 did not accumulate in tissues or tumor upon repeated administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Amifostine prevented radiation-induced mucositis in a rat model; protection was dose and schedule dependent.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: evolution of the sequential treatment approach

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF regimen) induction chemotherapy (IC) has been studied over the last two decades and has proven to be a durable and effective therapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Although randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that PF-based IC improves survival, reduces systemic metastases, and permits organ preservation, the effect on overall survival has been less robust than the results seen with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens. Differences in trial design, scheduling, and surgical interventions account for some of the variation in results. As studies have evolved, it has become evident that there are advantages to both approaches. This perception has led to the concept of sequential therapy (ST), the combination of IC, CRT, and surgery. ST programs are being studied intently in many centers. Phase II and III trials of ST regimens have reported unprecedented survival results in patients with locally advanced disease. In addition, the hypothesis that PF plus a taxane may result in an improved survival, compared to PF alone, for patients with locally advanced SCCHN on ST treatments is being tested in phase III trials. Although ST has not been compared head to head with CRT, early results support the use of this treatment paradigm in patients with poor prognosis SCCHN and should lead to definitive phase III trials in the near future. ST may represent the cutting edge of therapy for patients with curable, locally advanced SCCHN.

Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT?

PURPOSE

To identify the anatomic structures whose damage or malfunction cause late dysphagia and aspiration after intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancer, and to explore whether they can be spared by intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) without compromising target RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 26 patients receiving RT concurrent with gemcitabine, a regimen associated with a high rate of late dysphagia and aspiration, underwent prospective evaluation of swallowing with videofluoroscopy (VF), direct endoscopy, and CT. To assess whether the VF abnormalities were regimen specific, they were compared with the VF findings of 6 patients presenting with dysphagia after RT concurrent with high-dose intra-arterial cisplatin. The anatomic structures whose malfunction was likely to cause each of the VF abnormalities common to both regimens were determined by literature review. Pre- and posttherapy CT scans were reviewed for evidence of posttherapy damage to each of these structures, and those demonstrating posttherapy changes were deemed dysphagia/aspiration-related structures (DARS). Standard three-dimensional (3D) RT, standard IMRT (stIMRT), and dysphagia-optimized IMRT (doIMRT) plans in which sparing of the DARS was included in the optimization cost function, were produced for each of 20 consecutive patients with advanced head-and-neck cancer.

RESULTS

The posttherapy VF abnormalities common to both regimens included weakness of the posterior motion of the base of tongue, prolonged pharyngeal transit time, lack of coordination between the swallowing phases, reduced elevation of the larynx, and reduced laryngeal closure and epiglottic inversion, contributing to a high rate of aspiration. The anatomic structures whose malfunction was the likely cause of each of these abnormalities, and that also demonstrated anatomic changes after RT concurrent with gemcitabine doses associated with dysphagia and aspiration, were the pharyngeal constrictor muscles (median thickness near midline 2.5 mm before therapy vs. 7 mm after therapy; p = 0.001), the supraglottic larynx (median thickness, 2 mm before therapy vs. 4 mm after therapy; p < 0.001), and, similarly, the glottic larynx. The constrictors and the glottic and supraglottic larynx were, therefore, deemed the DARS. The lowest maximal dose delivered to a stricture volume was 50 Gy. Reducing the volumes of the DARS receiving > or =50 Gy (V(50)) was, therefore, a planning and evaluation goal. Compared with the 3D plans, stIMRT reduced the V(50) of the pharyngeal constrictors by 10% on average (range, 0-36%, p < 0.001), and doIMRT reduced these volumes further, by an additional 10% on average (range, 0-38%; p <0.001). The V(50) of the larynx (glottic + supraglottic) was reduced marginally by stIMRT compared with 3D (by 7% on average, range, 0-56%; p = 0.054), and doIMRT reduced these volumes by an additional 11%, on average (range, 0-41%; p = 0.002). doIMRT reduced laryngeal V(50) compared with 3D, by 18% on average (range 0-61%; p = 0.001). Certain target delineation rules facilitated sparing of the DARS by IMRT. The maximal DARS doses were not reduced by IMRT because of their partial overlap with the targets. stIMRT and doIMRT did not differ in target doses, parotid gland mean dose, spinal cord, or nonspecified tissue maximal dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The structures whose damage may cause dysphagia and aspiration after intensive chemotherapy and RT are the pharyngeal constrictors and the glottic and supraglottic larynx. Compared with 3D-RT, moderate sparing of these structures was achieved by stIMRT, and an additional benefit, whose extent varied among the patients, was gained by doIMRT, without compromising target doses. Clinical validation is required to determine whether the dosimetric gains are translated into clinical ones.

Current treatments and promising investigations in a multidisciplinary setting

The care of the patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) requires a multidisciplinary approach. For many years, radiotherapy following surgery was considered the standard approach to the treatment of locally advanced resectable disease. Data from randomized trials have confirmed the benefits of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) in this setting and this is now the gold standard for treatment. Chemoradiotherapy is also the recommended approach for unresectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been useful in resectable disease where organ preservation is desirable, but a concomitant approach is superior. Although survival benefits have not been consistently demonstrated, the theoretical potential of this approach has lead to continued investigations using newer agents, such as the taxanes. Novel targeted agents, such as antagonists of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), are showing promise in the treatment of patients with both locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic SCCHN. Treatment issues that require immediate attention include identifying optimal chemoradiotherapy regimens, clarifying the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, defining the optimal integration of targeted therapies into combined modality approaches and identifying useful prognostic and predictive factors.