Partial surgical removal of growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors enhances the response to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

Does first-line surgery still have its place in the treatment of acromegaly?

Transsphenoidal surgery is currently the first-line treatment of acromegaly. Remission is observed in 80 to 90% microadenomas, 50 to 60% non-invasive macroadenomas, and less than 20% invasive macroadenomas. Predictive factors include age, maximal size of the adenoma, cavernous sinus invasion, initial hormone levels and neurosurgeon's experience. Complications are rare, with about 5% definitive diabetes insipidus and 10% of new anterior pituitary hormone deficits. Somatostatin agonist pretreatment can be proposed as it decreases tumor volume in about 25% cases and might reduce the rate of immediate postsurgical complications; however, there is no obvious difference in surgical remission rate whether patients are pretreated or not. Debulking surgery can also be proposed in very large macroadenomas incompletely controlled by somatostatin agonists or resistant to medical treatment, as it was shown to facilitate somatostatin agonist efficacy in more than 50% cases.

Octreotide LAR for the treatment of acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs previously considered as adjuvant therapy in acromegaly are increasingly used as a first-line therapy in selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To review the octreotide LAR pharmacological and clinical data, and discuss the impact of this agent on current treatment regimens.

METHODS

We reviewed PubMed publications since the first use of octreotide LAR in acromegaly, and historical articles related to the discovery and development of this molecule. We chose, for efficacy and safety data, reviews, clinical and randomized controlled trials that included >or=10 patients.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR controls acromegaly in approximately 50-60% of patients by inhibiting GH and IGF-I secretion, and by reducing tumor size. This drug is well tolerated in most patients.

Growth hormone-secreting tumor shrinkage after 3 months of octreotide-long-acting release therapy predicts the response at 12 months

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether tumor shrinkage or GH and IGF-I levels achieved after 3 months predicted tumor shrinkage after 12 months of octreotide-long-acting release (LAR) treatment.

PATIENTS

Patients included 67 patients with de novo acromegaly (33 women, 34 men; aged 20-82 yr) receiving LAR at a dose of 20 mg every 28 d for 3 months. Final LAR dose was 10 mg every 28 d in 4, 30 mg every 28 d in 39, 20 mg every 28 d in 24 patients.

DESIGN

The design of the study was analytical, observational, open, and retrospective.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Percent change in GH and IGF-I levels and tumor volume after 3 and 12 months of therapy was measured. Stepwise regression and receiving-operator characteristics analysis were used to calculate the optimal cutoff to predict 12 months tumor shrinkage at 12 months.

RESULTS

The percent tumor shrinkage after 12 months was significantly correlated with GH, IGF-I, and tumor volume at 3 months and with the dose of LAR administered between 3 and 12 months. There was no correlation with gender, age, baseline GH levels and tumor volume. In a stepwise regression analysis, percent tumor shrinkage after 3 months was the best predictor of tumor shrinkage after 12 months (t = 5.92; P < 0.0001), followed by GH levels after 3 months (t = 2.86; P = 0.0056). To predict 50% or greater tumor shrinkage after 12 months, the best cutoff point of tumor shrinkage at 3 months was 22.1% [sensitivity (95% confidence interval) = 85.5% (71.2-95.4); specificity = 83.3% (65.3-94.3)], whereas that of GH levels after 3 months was 7.8 microg/liter [sensitivity = 70.3% (53.0-84.1); specificity = 93.3% (79.0-99.0)].

CONCLUSION

Tumor shrinkage achieved after 3 months of LAR treatment at 20 mg/28 d predicted tumor shrinkage at 12 months, provided that dosages were changed according to individual patients requirement.

Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, expert surgery is curative in only about 60% of patients. Postoperative radiation therapy is associated with a high incidence of hypopituitarism and its effect on growth hormone (GH) production is slow, so that adjuvant medical treatment becomes of importance in the management of many patients.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the role of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

Search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies of lanreotide in acromegaly.

RESULTS

Treatment with lanreotide slow release and lanreotide Autogel((R)) normalized GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations in about 50% of patients. The efficacy of 120 mg lanreotide Autogel((R)) on GH and IGF-I levels was comparable with that of 20 mg octreotide LAR. There were no differences in improvement of cardiac function, decrease in pancreatic beta-cell function, or occurrence of side effects, including cholelithiasis, between octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(R). When postoperative treatment with somatostatin analogs does not result in normalization of serum IGF-I and GH levels after noncurative surgery, pegvisomant alone or in combination with somatostatin analogs can control these levels in a substantial number of patients.

Guidelines for the treatment of growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency in adults

The V Consensus Group Meeting on 'Guidelines for Treatment of GH Excess and GH Deficiency in the Adult' was an international workshop held on February 20-22, 2006 in Santa Monica, California, USA. The principal aim of this meeting was to provide guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of adults with either form of abnormal GH secretion: GH excess or GH deficiency. The workshop included debates as to the choice of primary treatment, discussions of the targets for adequate treatment, and concluded with presentations on open issues germane to adult GH treatment including the role of GH in malignancies, the impact of longterm treatment on bone, and a cost-benefit analysis. The meeting was comprised of 66 delegates representing 13 different countries.

Surgical debulking of pituitary macroadenomas causing acromegaly improves control by lanreotide

BACKGROUND

Macroadenomas causing acromegaly are cured surgically in only around 50% of patients. Primary medical treatment with somatostatin analogues has been suggested to be a means of treating patients with a potentially poor surgical outcome. Previous retrospective studies have also suggested that surgical debulking of pituitary tumours causing acromegaly improves control by somatostatin analogues. No prospective study using lanreotide has been carried out thus far to assess whether this is the case.

OBJECTIVE

We carried out a prospective study to assess whether surgical debulking of pituitary macroadenomas causing acromegaly improved the subsequent control of acromegaly by the somatostatin analogue lanreotide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated 26 consecutive patients [10 males and 16 females--median age 53.5 years (range 22-70)] with macroadenoma causing acromegaly unselected for somatostatin response for 16 weeks with lanreotide, maximizing GH and IGF-I suppression, if necessary, by incremental dosing. Surgical resection was carried out and the patients were re-assessed off medical treatment at 16 weeks following surgery. Those with nadir GH > 2 mU/l in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and a mean GH in the GH day curve (GHDC) > 5 mU/l were subsequently restarted on lanreotide and the responses were assessed at the same time points as during the preoperative lanreotide treatment.

RESULTS

GH values fell on lanreotide treatment and prior to surgery they were considered 'safe' (mean GH in GHDC < 5 mU/l) in eight patients (30.7%). After surgery, they were 'safe' in 18 patients (69.2%). The figures for normal IGF-I were 11 (42.3%) before surgery and 23 (88.5%) after surgery. After surgery, six patients had nadir GH > 2 mU/l in the OGTT and 'unsafe' GH levels (mean GH in GHDC > 5 mU/l); on re-exposure to lanreotide, GH levels fell in all patients and at the end of 16 weeks postsurgery, they were 'safe' in three of them (50%) (P < 0.05). Pituitary tumour volume was also assessed prospectively, preoperatively on lanreotide and showed a mean fall of 33.1%. Eighty-three percent of patients had > 20% shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first prospective study using lanreotide, surgical debulking of pituitary tumours causing acromegaly improved subsequent postoperative control by the somatostatin analogue lanreotide. Surgery should, therefore, be considered in patients with macroadenoma causing acromegaly, even if there is little prospect of surgical cure. Lanreotide causes significant pituitary tumour shrinkage in the majority of patients.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by growth hormone hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving insulin-like growth factor 1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities; and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved; hence, their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and growth hormone receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

Medical consequences of acromegaly: what are the effects of biochemical control?

This chapter discusses the effects of biochemical control of acromegaly on cardiovascular diseases, metabolic complications, respiratory abnormalities, malignancies and bone alterations. Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality for cardiovascular and respiratory complications, whereas neoplasms seem to be a minor cause of increased risk of death. Other associated diseases are osteoarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, fatigue, visual abnormalities and reproductive disorders. Acromegaly results in premature death because of prolonged elevation of GH an IGF-I levels, and a strong biochemical control improves well-being and restores life expectancy to normal. The main goals of medical treatment of acromegaly include normalization of biochemical markers of disease activity, improvement in signs and symptoms of the disease, removal or reduction of tumor mass and preservation of pituitary function.

Wide variation in surgical outcomes for acromegaly in the UK

OBJECTIVE

Unsuccessful surgery for acromegaly has major consequences for the patient as well as financial consequences for the National Health Service (NHS). Surgical expertise affects the outcome. We have used the UK National Acromegaly Register to assess surgical outcomes in different centres to investigate whether these match the previously published case series.

DESIGN

Retrospective and prospective observational study by analysis of anonymized national computer register records derived from individual clinical case records from 22 UK endocrine units and their associated pituitary surgical services.

PATIENTS

Cases of acromegaly, presenting in 1970-2004, with levels of GH or IGF-1 (785 and 430 cases, respectively) recorded prior to transsphenoidal adenomectomy and in the 12 months postsurgery, before any subsequent pituitary surgery or radiotherapy. GH-lowering pharmacological therapy was permitted only if suspended for biochemical testing.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of cases with 'safe' mean postoperative GH levels (< 5 mU/l) and/or IGF-1 in the age- and sex-adjusted normal range.

RESULTS

'Safe' GH, normal IGF-1, or both was achieved for 26%, 29% and 20% of extrasellar macroadenomas (> 1 cm), respectively, 39%, 39% and 29% of intrasellar macroadenomas, 56%, 51% and 37% of microadenomas (< 1 cm) and 39%, 39% and 28% of cases overall. In centres contributing more than 10 patients' data, rates of safe GH levels ranged from 20% to 68% and IGF-1 from 19% to 55%. Success rates in attaining safe postsurgical levels of GH improved only slightly in the UK between 1974 and 1999 but markedly thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes for acromegaly in UK centres vary widely and historically have not, except in a few centres, matched those of large published series, which mostly have a success rate around 60%. Results have, however, improved substantially since 2000 and in the most successful units match those of the best published series. Experience is an important determinant of surgical success in acromegaly and the very recent improvement in surgical results in the UK coincides with a trend to concentrate pituitary surgery in the hands of a smaller number of specialists. Therefore, patients should be offered surgery by a dedicated pituitary surgeon with a caseload sufficient to offer the prospect of safe postsurgical GH and IGF-1 levels for the majority of cases.

An audit of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients attending our center at Bergamo, Italy

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a chronic disease impacting on morbidity and mortality. Increased mortality is reverted after the achievement of hormonal targets. The relative role of treatment options is still matter of debate.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all the acromegalic patients attending our center along the last 20 years.

RESULTS

Data about 159 patients (83 F) were retrieved and analyzed: 18% had been lost to follow-up, while follow-up was >5 years in 79%. Growth hormone (GH) at diagnosis was 24 microg/L (median, range 3-239). Pituitary MRI showed a macro-, micro-adenoma or no lesion in 73.6, 22.9, and 3.5%, respectively. Hyperprolactinemia (hyperPRL) was present in 20.8%. Ninety-six and 29 patients had been treated by neurosurgery (NS) and irradiated (RT), respectively. Drugs had been employed in 149 patients (in 58 as the only treatment). At the last evaluation, 22% of patients were cured (hypopituitarism and GH deficiency in 6.3%), 37.1% were controlled by ongoing pharmacological treatment, 22.6% had discordant GH and Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) values, and 18.2% had still active disease (median follow-up in this last group was 9 months). By evaluating the outcome with a multimodal approach, safe GH and normal IGF-I had been achieved in 78 and 63.5% of the whole series, 80.5 and 59.7% in patients submitted to NS (and adjuvantly treated with drugs), 95.8 and 91.7% in those submitted to NS + RT (and drugs as well), 70.2 and 55.2% in those treated only with drugs (increased to 82.2 and 60.9% if considering only patients treated with modern long-acting drugs). Hypopituitarism had occurred in 25, 66.6, and 13.8% in the three groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, previous RT and NS were significant positive predictors of cure, whereas previous NS, follow-up, and year of diagnosis were significant positive predictors of control. Diabetes was a negative predictor both of cure and control. Sex, age, baseline GH levels, hyperPRL, tumor size, extrasellar extension, and invasiveness were not independent predictors of either cure or control.

CONCLUSION

This series seems to indicate that a multimodal approach can achieve control of disease in most patients.

Preliminary data on biochemical remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogs withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

It is still unknown whether prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSTa) may cause a long-lasting disease remission in GH-secreting adenomas after drug discontinuation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the evolution of GH/IGF-I secretion and tumor mass after SSTa withdrawal in patients affected by acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

A total of 27 patients with acromegaly (12 de novo and 15 previously operated) were treated with SSTa for a median period of 48 months and considered optimally controlled in hormonal and neuroradiological terms. None of them were previously irradiated.

METHODS

Basal GH, post-glucose GH nadir, IGF-I, clinical signs/symptoms, and metabolic parameters were evaluated after 12-16 weeks from drug withdrawal. Only patients who met the current criteria for disease remission remained in drug suspension being periodically re-evaluated for biochemical/clinical data and neuroradiological imaging.

RESULTS

After 12-16 weeks withdrawal, 15 of the 27 patients had disease relapse and restarted SSTa, while 12 were considered 'in disease remission' (44% of total). Glucose metabolism improved in both euglycemic and diabetic patients after short-term SSTa discontinuation. Only one of the ten patients who reached 24 weeks withdrawal showed biochemical disease recurrence. On the whole, five of the patients still in remission after 6 months have already prolonged the follow-up over 12 months (median: 24 months), without clinical and biochemical/neuroradiological evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data indicate a successful withdrawal of SSTa at least in a subset of well-responsive patients with acromegaly and challenge the previously held concept that medical therapy is always a lifelong requirement.

Absence of hypogonadism in a male patient with a giant prolactinoma: a clinical paradox

BACKGROUND

Impotence and decreased libido are the cardinal features of prolactinomas in males. We describe the unusual clinical, pathological and biochemical features in a male patient with a giant prolactinoma and normal gonadal function.

CASE REPORT

A 57 year-old man presented with visual symptoms related to a 30x25x60mm tumor of the sella and skull base. Biopsy revealed a pituitary adenoma and subsequent hormone profiles demonstrated grossly elevated serum prolactin (131,412ng/ml), LH at the upper limit of normal and normal testosterone. The patient had no symptoms of decreased libido or impotence related to this giant prolactinoma. Immunohistochemistry revealed a tumor that was positive for prolactin, alpha-subunit and LH. Cabergoline greatly reduced prolactin levels but these remained above normal. LH, testosterone and alpha-subunit levels were decreased in parallel. Loss of libido and impotence became apparent when testosterone fell below normal, a situation that resolved with further cabergoline treatment and prolactin inhibition and testosterone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual dysfunction is a hallmark of prolactinomas in males. Tumors that co-secrete prolactin and LH are extremely rare and this is the first such case reported in an adult male. In this case, normal testosterone was maintained by intact LH levels even in the face of the highest prolactin level reported to date.

Long-term efficacy and safety of combined treatment of somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the efficacy of a combined treatment of active acromegaly with both long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) and pegvisomant (PEG-V).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess long-term efficacy and safety in a larger group of acromegalic patients after a period of 138 (35-149) wk [median (range)].

DESIGN

PEG-V was added to high-dose SSA treatment in 32 subjects (13 females) who had not shown a normalization in serum IGF-I concentrations during SSA monotherapy. PEG-V dosage was increased until IGF-I concentration normalized. The maximal dose was 80 mg twice weekly.

RESULTS

After dose finding, IGF-I remained within the normal range in all subjects with PEG-V administered once (n = 24) or twice (n = 8) weekly, on a total weekly dose of 60 (40-160) mg. Baseline IGF-I levels were positively correlated with the required dosage of PEG-V (r = 0.48; P = 0.006). PEG-V-dependent liver enzyme disturbances were observed in 11 (6 diabetic) subjects, of which symptomatic gallstones explained two cases. These liver enzyme disturbances were transient in all subjects without discontinuation or dose adaptation of PEG-V. In our series, diabetic patients had a 5.1 times (odds ratio) (confidence interval, 1.02-25.54; P < 0.05) higher risk for developing liver enzyme disturbances. These liver enzyme disturbances seemed to occur earlier. Pituitary adenoma size decreased in four patients. No increase in tumor size was observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term combined treatment with long-acting SSA and (twice) weekly PEG-V for active acromegaly seems to be effective and safe. Patients with acromegaly and diabetes seem to have a higher risk of developing transient liver enzyme disturbances.

Does partial surgical tumour removal influence the response to octreotide-LAR in acromegalic patients previously resistant to the somatostatin analogue?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intrapatient response to the same dose of slow-release octreotide (OCT-LAR) before and after noncurative surgery in acromegalic patients who did not attain disease control after primary treatment with OCT-LAR.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

PATIENTS

Eleven acromegalic patients (eight men, aged 42.45 +/- 11.15 years, 10 macroadenomas) received OCT-LAR (20 mg, n = 1; 30 mg, n = 10) every 28 days as the primary treatment (1stOCT-LAR) for 11.3 +/- 4.2 months, without IGF-I normalization. They were subsequently submitted to surgery without cure and were then treated with the same dose of OCT-LAR for 8.0 +/- 6.5 months (2ndOCT-LAR).

MEASUREMENTS

GH and IGF-I serum concentrations were obtained under basal conditions as well as during treatment. Pituitary tumour volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sella. IGF-I was also expressed as a percentage of the upper limit of the normal age- and sex-matched range (%ULNR IGF-I).

RESULTS

After 1stOCT-LAR, there was a decrease in GH levels (P = 0.003) and %ULNR IGF-I (P = 0.009) compared to baseline (B), but no IGF-I normalization. Tumour shrinkage was observed in eight of 10 patients with macroadenomas (median 63.7%, range 24.5-75.5%). After surgery, mean levels of GH and %ULNR IGF-I were lower than those at baseline (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.003, respectively), but not when compared to values during 1stOCT-LAR (P = 1.000 and P = 0.957, respectively). MRI confirmed surgical tumour removal (median 64%, range 4.9-96.6%) in eight of the 10 patients. Comparing the 2ndOCT-LAR results with postsurgical results, there were no significant decrease in %ULNR IGF-I (P = 0.061) and GH levels (P = 0.414). Nine patients (82%) achieved IGF-I normalization. The degree of surgical tumour reduction did not correlate with IGF-I normalization (P = 0.794). When comparing the results between 1stOCT-LAR and 2ndOCT-LAR, there was a decrease, albeit not statistically significant, in serum GH levels (P = 0.059) and a significant decrease in %ULNR IGF-I (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Using strict criteria (same patient, same drug, same dose) our results strongly suggest that the surgical reduction of tumour mass can improve the outcome of OCT-LAR treatment in acromegalic patients resistant to primary therapy with SA.

Long-term (up to 18 years) effects on GH/IGF-1 hypersecretion and tumour size of primary somatostatin analogue (SSTa) therapy in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenoma responsive to SSTa

CONTEXT

The role of somatostatin analogues (SSTa) in the treatment of acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the antihormonal and antitumour efficacy of long-term (up to 18 years) primary treatment with SSTa in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenoma responsive to SSTa.

DESIGN

An open, prospective, single-centre, clinical study.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six acromegalic patients, aged 17-75 years (postoral glucose tolerance test GH > 1 microg/l, increased IGF-1 for age and sex), were monitored in a single centre and treated with SSTa as first-line therapy. The mean pretreatment GH level was 13.5 +/- 3.1 microg/l, and IGF-1 (as a percentage of the value over the normal range) was 302 +/- 26%. The patients had macroadenoma (n = 25), microadenoma (n = 8) or empty sella turcica (n = 3). The mean duration of treatment was 8 years (range 3-18 years). Hormonal and morphological monitoring was undertaken after 6 months, and then the patients were followed annually.

RESULTS

After 1 year, the mean GH and IGF-1 levels had reduced considerably (GH: 2.4 +/- 0.3 microg/l; IGF-1; 174 +/- 14%, P < 0.01), and they continued to decrease over 10 years, with a mean GH level of 1.6 +/- 0.1 microg/l and IGF-1 of 123 +/- 18% (P = 0.02). GH < 2 microg/l, normal IGF-1, or both were observed in 25 (70%), 24 (67%) and 21 (58%) patients, respectively. The mean reduction in tumour volume was 43% (range 13-97%) and shrinkage > 20% was obtained in 21 patients (72%). SSTa treatment was well tolerated with few digestive or metabolic side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Long-term (up to 18 years) treatment with SSTa used as first-line therapy is effective from both an antihormonal and antitumour perspective, and is well tolerated in acromegalic patients.

The role of lanreotide Autogel® in the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, but all clinicians have to be aware of the diagnosis in order to minimize the negative consequences of increased levels of growth hormone and IGF-I, and the possible impact of a pituitary macroadenoma. Surgery remains the first-line therapy and may alleviate both hormonal excess and symptoms due to tumor mass effects. Postoperatively, however, many patients may need adjunctive therapy. Somatostatin analogs were marketed for clinical use in the 1980s. The depot formulations of the synthetic somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, octreotide acetate long-acting repeatable and lanreotide sustained release, were developed by incorporating the analogs into microspheres. The advantage of the new formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel^®, is the prefilled syringe of lanreotide and water. The choice of analog should be individualized for each patient based on level of efficacy, adverse event profile and preferred mode of administration. Approximately a third of acromegalic patients are resistant to the currently available somatostatin analogs. Monotherapy using cabergoline or pegvisomant is clinically available. Adding cabergoline to a somatostatin analog may be advantageous in selected patients and promising data exist regarding combination therapy with pegvisomant. Radiotherapy is still an option; however, although treating comorbidities and avoiding hypopituitarism is very important, radiotherapy should only be used for selected patients where treatment targets cannot be achieved by using the other therapies.

Octreotide for acromegaly

Octreotide has dramatically changed the results of medical treatment of acromegaly. It is the reference drug for the pharmacological treatment of acromegaly, owing to its impressive efficacy in suppressing growth hormome secretion, and excellent compliance. Safe growth hormone and normal insulin-like growth factor I values are reached in 50-60% of unselected patients. Octreotide arrests the growth of the tumor and shrinks tumor in over half of all patients (namely, up to 88% of naive patients and to complete disappearance in anecdotic cases). The safety profile of octreotide is excellent, but in some patients, glucose metabolism worsens and cholelythiasis occurs. This review will address the primary treatment and the relative roles of pharmacological and surgical treatment, as well as the predictivity of octreotide results.

Two hour mean GH is not superior to basal GH for the follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with Octreotide LAR

BACKGROUND

GH secretion, in acromegaly, is characterized by increased basal levels, as well as by increased frequency and amplitude of pulses. Evaluation of disease activity during follow-up of treated patients is frequently done with mean GH levels, although there is no established protocol for sample collection.

OBJECTIVE

Determine mean GH value of 5 blood samples collected 30 min apart for 2 consecutive hours in the follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with octreotide LAR.

METHODS

Ninety-one GH curves of 44 patients (25 women) were evaluated as were the respective IGF-I values (basal). Normal IGF-I for age and sex was considered standard for control of disease activity. Correlations between basal and mean GH were studied as were correlations between both values and %IGF-I above the upper limit of reference values (%ULRV).

RESULTS

Median age of the group was 45.5 years (range 28-73). Twenty-five patients (56.8%) had previous surgery and 7 (15.9%) had both surgery and radiotherapy. A positive correlation was found between mean and basal GH (r=0.953; p<0.001). Both basal and mean GH were correlated to %ULRV (r=0.645 and 0.661; p<0.001 for both). In only 3 of the 91 curves (3.3%) there were discordances between basal GH and IGF-I, however the latter was concordant with mean GH. In 3 other curves there was concordance between basal GH and IGF-I although the latter was discordant with mean GH.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit to perform GH curves with the present protocol. It may be due to our established outpatient follow up protocol. The use of more complex protocols and the cost of multiple GH assays should be acknowledged, and probably reserved for patients with basal GH levels between 1 and 5 microg/L with discordant GH and IGF-I.

Changing paradigms in the surgical and medical management of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a serious, but rare, form of pituitary tumor. This review will discuss recent progress in surgical and medical care, highlight data on choosing the order for primary and secondary therapy and preview emerging drugs. Several controversial areas will be discussed, including the role of preselecting subjects for drug responsiveness, whether or not a brief course of medical therapy before surgery improves outcomes, and trials of combination drug therapy. It is hoped that earlier diagnosis, referral of patients to dedicated pituitary surgeons or neuroendocrinology teams, development of more effective and affordable drugs, and further advances in surgery and radiotherapy will continue to improve the morbidity and mortality from acromegaly.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of acromegaly

Active acromegaly can be treated effectively by transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment in the form of somatostatin analogs and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Many patients will require a combination of treatment modalities to normalize growth hormone excess and associated increased mortality, and to improve comorbidity. Following postoperative radiotherapy, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels gradually decrease and normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I is achieved in 50% of patients after 5 years and 75% after 10 years. Disadvantages of radiotherapy include the long interval until hormone levels have sufficiently decreased and the high incidence of radiation-induced hypopituitarism. Radiotherapy was associated with increased mortality in some but not other studies. Limitations in the design and confounding factors, such as years spent with active disease and changing treatment strategies, make it impossible to draw conclusions on this topic. Gamma knife radiosurgery may combine faster decline of growth hormone excess with a lower incidence of hypopituitarism in eligible cases, but long-term results of this radiation technique are lacking. At present, patients will preferentially be treated by primary surgery and/or somatostatin analog treatment, followed, if necessary, by growth hormone receptor antagonist treatment, while radiotherapy is reserved for selected cases only. The indications for radiotherapy and radiosurgery need to be revisited in the near future, when longer follow-up results for medical treatment and radiosurgery have become available. This review summarizes the recent literature on efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly and discusses the place of radiation treatment in the treatment algorithm of acromegaly.

Medical treatment of acromegaly: comorbidities and their reversibility by somatostatin analogs

Relief of symptoms can be achieved following surgery for growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas, as well as after pharmacological therapy with somatostatin analogs. Recently, long-acting somatostatin analog depot formulations, octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR have become available. Somatostatin analogs control GH/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 excess, induce tumor shrinkage in a high proportion of patients, improve symptoms of acromegaly with relatively limited side effects and are successfully administered in patients not suitable for surgery. Furthermore, preoperative somatostatin analogs have been suggested to improve outcome for tumors with limited invasiveness, while surgical tumor debulking in cases that are, at least partially, somatostatin resistant, increases the achievement of normal IGF-1 levels by postoperative somatostatin analog treatment. Effective control of hypertension, as well as diabetes, is mandatory in order to reduce the increased vascular morbidity/mortality. Control of GH/IGF-1 excess generally improves glucose metabolism. Somatostatin analogs improve insulin sensitivity, exerting, however, a concomitant direct inhibitory effect on insulin secretion, with a net balance leaning towards a deterioration in glucose homeostasis. As a result, oral insulin secretagogues (and/or insulin) should probably be preferred to insulin sensitizers in acromegalic patients developing diabetes while on somatostatin analogs. Nevertheless, glucose tolerance remains normal in most of the nondiabetic acromegalic patients, while diabetic acromegalic patients on insulin are at risk for hypoglycemia during initiation of somatostatin analog therapy. Although successful management of acromegaly has been associated with improvement in morphological and functional parameters of cardiomyopathy, limited and conflicting information is available regarding the effect on blood pressure control. Contradictory results have also been reported regarding sleep hypopnea or apnea in treated acromegalic patients. As acromegalic skeletal abnormalities are rather irreversible, apneic episodes may persist after normalization of hormonal levels. Aggressive therapy, including surgery, pharmacological treatment and, in some cases, pituitary irradiation, aiming at normalization of IGF-1 levels, is required for arthropathy management. Some improvement in pain, crepitus and range of motion has been observed after treatment with somatostatin analogs. Information on the impact of disease control, either by surgery or somatostatin analog treatment, on gonadal function is limited. Finally, the link between the hormonal/biochemical and the psychiatric/psychological features of acromegaly, as well as a potential basis for positive effects of somatostatin analog therapy remain unclear.