Effects of bazedoxifene on BMD and bone turnover in postmenopausal women: 2-yr results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled study

The role of bone turnover markers in monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bone metabolism is assessed using biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM). BTM reflect the metabolic effect of drugs on bone turnover, help to establish the lowest dose inducing the largest change in the BTM, predict treatment-related reduction in fracture risk, and are helpful in bridging studies. Changes in BTM during anti-osteoporotic therapy depend on the cellular mechanism of action of the drug, degree of change in bone turnover rate and route of administration. BTM help to establish the optimal dose of anti-osteoporotic drugs because treatment-related changes in BTM are more rapid compared with change in BMD. A greater decrease in BTM levels during the first year of tantiresorptive treatment is associated with greater antifracture efficacy over 3 years. According to preliminary data, measurement of BTM can improve persistence with anti-resorptive treatment. The use of BTM to monitor anti-osteoporotic therapy in "real life" is limited at this stage.

Bazedoxifene: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bazedoxifene (Conbriza®, Viviant®) is the first third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and it is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in the EU and Japan. Bazedoxifene contains an indole-based core binding domain that binds with high affinity to estrogen receptors and exhibits favourable effects on bone and lipid profiles, with no clinically relevant endometrial or breast stimulation. Oral bazedoxifene once daily reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a large, well designed trial of 3 years' duration; both bazedoxifene and raloxifene were significantly more effective than placebo. Neither bazedoxifene nor raloxifene reduced the incidence of nonvertebral fractures in the overall study population; however, bazedoxifene, but not raloxifene, reduced the rate of nonvertebral fractures in high-risk patients. Moreover, data from patients who continued to receive the drug during a 2-year extension phase of this trial indicate that bazedoxifene continues to provide protection against new vertebral fractures for up to 5 years. Bazedoxifene also increases bone mineral density and reduces the levels of bone turnover markers. Bazedoxifene was generally well tolerated and did not detrimentally affect the reproductive tract or breast tissue in clinical trials, thereby demonstrating a favourable risk-benefit profile. A pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted from an EU perspective predicted bazedoxifene to be cost effective in some EU countries. Therefore, bazedoxifene presents another useful option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, especially in those at high risk for osteoporotic fracture.

Sustained efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study

In this 2-year extension of a 3-year study, bazedoxifene showed sustained efficacy in preventing new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and in preventing non-vertebral fractures in higher-risk women. Bazedoxifene significantly increased bone mineral density and reduced bone turnover versus placebo and was generally safe and well tolerated.

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis over 5 years.

METHODS

A total of 4,216 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were enrolled in this 2-year extension of a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. In the core study (N = 7,492), subjects received bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo. The raloxifene arm was discontinued after 3 years; subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned to bazedoxifene 20 mg after 4 years. Five-year findings are reported for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg and placebo. Endpoints included incidence of new vertebral fractures (primary) and non-vertebral fractures, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers.

RESULTS

At 5 years, the incidence of new vertebral fractures in the intent-to-treat population was significantly lower with bazedoxifene 20 mg (4.5%) and 40/20 mg (3.9%) versus placebo (6.8%; P < 0.05), with relative risk reductions of 35% and 40%, respectively. Non-vertebral fracture incidence was similar among groups. In a subgroup of higher-risk women (n = 1,324; femoral neck T-score ≤-3.0 and/or ≥ 1 moderate or severe or ≥ 2 mild vertebral fracture[s]), bazedoxifene 20 mg reduced non-vertebral fracture risk versus placebo (37%; P = 0.06); combined data for bazedoxifene 20 and 40/20 mg reached statistical significance (34% reduction; P < 0.05). Bazedoxifene significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover versus placebo (P < 0.05) and was generally safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings support a sustained anti-fracture effect of bazedoxifene on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and on non-vertebral fractures in the higher-risk subgroup of women.

Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Bazedoxifene Acetate in the Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Many pharmacological agents are available for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, including estrogen and the selective modulators of estrogen receptor (SERMS). Bazedoxifene is a third-generation SERM, which acts as estrogen agonist in bone and lipid metabolism and as an antagonist in the breast and endometrium. Studies demonstrated that bazedoxifene reduced significantly the risk of vertebral fractures. In a subgroup of patients at high risk (post-hoc analysis), a reduction of nonvertebral fractures risk was reported. Moreover, the combination of conjugated estrogens with bazedoxifene seems to offer an alternative to classical hormone therapy, improving the vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy, without the use of a progestin. Bazedoxifene is a promising drug for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women; however a safety concern regarding venous thromboembolic events is needed before starting treatment.

An update on selective estrogen receptor modulators for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Several selective estrogen receptor modulators are in clinical development for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bazedoxifene has shown significant reductions in vertebral and non-vertebral (in higher-risk women) fracture risk, with no evidence of breast or endometrial stimulation. Lasofoxifene has demonstrated significant reductions in vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk, but has been associated with endometrial/uterine effects. Both selective estrogen receptor modulators were generally safe and well tolerated but have been associated with some "class effects" (e.g., hot flushes, venous thromboembolic events). A tissue selective estrogen complex partnering bazedoxifene with conjugated estrogens is under clinical investigation for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis prevention. Future directions in selective estrogen receptor modulator research include ospemifene and RAD 1901.

EMAS clinical guide: selective estrogen receptor modulators for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis and the resulting fractures are major public health issues as the world population is ageing. Various therapies such as bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate and more recently denosumab are available. This clinical guide provides the evidence for the clinical use of selective estrogen modulators (SERMs) in the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Tissue-selective estrogen complex bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens for the treatment of menopausal vasomotor symptoms

Menopause occurs on average at age 51.4 years. Most, but not all, women who undergo menopause experience significant vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Although single agent estrogen therapy can relieve VMS, over time estrogen can stimulate the endometrial lining leading to an increased risk for endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Although a progestin has traditionally been given in combination with estrogen to 'protect' the endometrium, a new and innovative approach to this traditional combination hormone therapy is to substitute the progestin with an alternative agent. One such alternative agent is bazedoxifene, an estrogen agonist-antagonist. Based on data from randomized trials, when bazedoxifene is given in combination with oral conjugated estrogens to post-menopausal women, the risk of estrogen-associated endometrial stimulation is significantly reduced. The combination of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens has also been shown to relieve menopause-associated VMS and vaginal atrophy, and has been shown to be safe for short-term use. Long-term studies of this combination are needed to determine if the combination of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene can be used for >3 years without increasing the risk of breast cancer, stroke, cognitive deficit, pulmonary embolism or coronary heart disease. Short-term data regarding this combination has been submitted to the FDA and is currently under review for clinical use, with the relief of VMS as its primary indication. Data regarding the effects of combination conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene therapy on bone are promising in terms of the prevention and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Prevention of osteoporosis: one step forward, two steps back

For many years, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was the mainstay for osteoporosis prevention in postmenopausal women until a large randomized clinical trial raised serious safety concerns. This resulted in a big drop in HRT use and its demotion by regulatory authorities to second-line treatment. Many clinicians now feel that HRT is not safe to use, and recommend various alternatives for the treatment of osteoporosis. But how effective are these alternative therapies, are they any safer than HRT, and how do their costs compare? This review questions the validity of the safety concerns about HRT, and highlights the safety concerns about alternative therapies. It concludes that HRT is as safe as the other treatment options, and its efficacy and low cost demand that it be restored as a first-line treatment for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Other therapies are available for use in osteoporosis, and the bisphosphonates are particularly effective for the treatment of the established disease. However, they must be used selectively and with caution, and are best restricted to those patients who are elderly or have severe disease. New treatments are emerging, but again caution must be taken until any long-term adverse effects have been identified.

Bazedoxifene: a new selective estrogen receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis

An ongoing need for safe and effective pharmacological therapies exists for postmenopausal osteoporosis, which imposes a significant burden on both women and the health-care system. Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator with a unique tissue-selectivity profile. In phase 3 clinical trials of nearly 10,000 postmenopausal women, bazedoxifene was shown to significantly reduce the risk of new vertebral fracture versus placebo, with favourable effects on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and the lipid profile. Moreover, in a subgroup of women at increased risk of fracture, bazedoxifene significantly decreased non-vertebral fracture risk versus both placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene has been shown to be safe and well tolerated, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. These data suggest that bazedoxifene may offer significant clinical benefit for postmenopausal women with or at risk of developing osteoporosis, which may subsequently lessen the medical and economic burden of this disease.

Progress in endocrine approaches to the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

Tamoxifen had been the only available hormonal option for the systemic treatment for breast cancer from 1973 to 2000. Enormous efforts have led to the development of potent and selective third generation aromatase inhibitors including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane. Due to their superior efficacy to tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors are presently approved as first line agents for the treatment of advanced estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and adjuvant therapy in early ER positive early breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Selective ER Modulators (SERMS), tamoxifen and raloxifene are the only agents presently used in breast cancer prevention in high risk women and their use has increased substantially over the last decade. Third generations SERMS, lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene have shown significant reduction in bone loss compared to placebo in postmenopausal women and are currently approved in the European Union for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This review outlines the current strategies employed in the use of endocrine therapy in the management and prevention of breast cancer.

Skeletal effects of bazedoxifene paired with conjugated estrogens in ovariectomized rats

A novel approach to menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) that partners bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE). We examined the effects of daily treatment with BZA 0.3mg/kg, CE 2.5mg/kg, or combined BZA/CE (BZA 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0mg/kg with CE 2.5mg/kg) over 12months on bone mass, bone architecture and strength, and biochemical markers of bone turnover in ovariectomized (OVX) female Sprague-Dawley rats vs OVX control rats. Total cholesterol and uterine weights were also evaluated. All BZA/CE dose combinations prevented ovariectomy-induced increases in bone turnover and significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and tibia compared with OVX controls. All BZA/CE doses evaluated also prevented many of the ovariectomy-induced changes of the static and dynamic parameters of the cortical compartment of the tibia and the cancellous compartment of the L1 and L2 vertebrae. All BZA/CE doses increased biomechanical strength at the lumbar spine (L4) compared with OVX animals. The co-administration of BZA 0.3 and 1.0mg/kg/day with CE 2.5mg/kg/day showed a dose-dependent reduction in uterine wet weight compared with administration of CE alone. All BZA/CE doses significantly lowered total cholesterol levels compared with OVX controls. In conclusion, 12months of treatment with BZA/CE in OVX rats effectively maintained BMD, bone microstructure, and bone quality; and the pairing of BZA with CE prevented CE-induced uterine stimulation.

The selective estrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene inhibits hormone-independent breast cancer cell growth and down-regulates estrogen receptor α and cyclin D1

Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that has been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. It has antitumor activity; however, its mechanism of action remains unclear. In the present study, we characterized the effects of BZA and several other SERMs on the proliferation of hormone-dependent MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells and hormone-independent MCF-7:5C and MCF-7:2A cells and examined its mechanism of action in these cells. We found that all of the SERMs inhibited the growth of MCF-7, T47D, and MCF-7:2A cells; however, only BZA and fulvestrant (FUL) inhibited the growth of hormone-independent MCF-7:5C cells. Cell cycle analysis revealed that BZA and FUL induced G(1) blockade in MCF-7:5C cells; however, BZA down-regulated cyclin D1, which was constitutively overexpressed in these cells, whereas FUL suppressed cyclin A. Further analysis revealed that small interfering RNA knockdown of cyclin D1 reduced the basal growth of MCF-7:5C cells, and it blocked the ability of BZA to induce G(1) arrest in these cells. BZA also down-regulated estrogen receptor-α (ERα) protein by increasing its degradation and suppressing cyclin D1 promoter activity in MCF-7:5C cells. Finally, molecular modeling studies demonstrated that BZA bound to ERα in an orientation similar to raloxifene; however, a number of residues adopted different conformations in the induced-fit docking poses compared with the experimental structure of ERα-raloxifene. Together, these findings indicate that BZA is distinct from other SERMs in its ability to inhibit hormone-independent breast cancer cell growth and to regulate ERα and cyclin D1 expression in resistant cells.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator, has been developed to have favorable effects on bone and the lipid profile while minimizing stimulation of uterine or breast tissues. Two large Phase III clinical trials showed that bazedoxifene, as well as raloxifene, increased bone mineral density, decreased levels of bone turnover markers, and significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women compared with placebo. Although the incidence of nonvertebral fractures with bazedoxifene or raloxifene did not differ significantly from that with placebo, a post hoc analysis of a subgroup of women at higher fracture risk revealed that bazedoxifene significantly reduced the nonvertebral fracture risk relative to placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene also improved the lipid profile by reducing the serum concentrations of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, with an increase in the serum level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The incidences of vasodilatation (hot flushes), leg cramps, and venous thromboembolic events were significantly higher with bazedoxifene and raloxifene compared with placebo. There was no evidence of endometrial and breast stimulation with bazedoxifene. Taking advantage of the favorable effects of bazedoxifene on the breast and endometrium, the pairing of bazedoxifene with conjugated estrogens is under investigation for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A Phase III trial showed that combination therapy of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens significantly increased bone mineral density and decreased bone turnover markers, with relief of hot flushes and improvement of vaginal atrophy. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Combined treatment with dexamethasone and raloxifene totally abrogates osteoporosis and joint destruction in experimental postmenopausal arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Postmenopausal patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often treated with corticosteroids. Loss of estrogen, the inflammatory disease and exposure to corticosteroids all contribute to the development of osteoporosis. Therefore, our aim was to investigate if addition of the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene, or estradiol, could prevent loss of bone mineral density in ovariectomized and dexamethasone treated mice with collagen-induced arthritis (CIA).

METHODS

Female DBA/1-mice were ovariectomized or sham-operated, and CIA was induced. Treatment with dexamethasone (Dex) (125 μg/d), estradiol (E2) (1 μg/d) or raloxifene (Ral) (120 μg/day) alone, or the combination of Dex + E2 or Dex + Ral, was started after disease onset, and continued until termination of the experiments. Arthritic paws were collected for histology and one of the femoral bones was used for measurement of bone mineral density.

RESULTS

Dex-treatment alone protected against arthritis and joint destruction, but had no effect on osteoporosis in CIA. However, additional treatment with either Ral or E2 resulted in completely preserved bone mineral density.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of raloxifene or estradiol to dexamethasone-treatment in experimental postmenopausal polyarthritis prevents generalized bone loss.

New approaches to the treatment of osteoporosis

Although safe and effective agents are currently available to treat osteoporosis, fragility fractures remain a significant problem worldwide. Recent improvements in the understanding of the cellular, biochemical, and molecular pathways of bone biology have led to the development of newer agents to treat osteoporosis, which may lead to further improvements in outcomes. In this review, we summarize the most recent advances in the field, including new modes of administration of existing drug classes, various approaches to combination therapy, and drugs with novel mechanisms of action to treat osteoporosis.

Estrogens in rheumatoid arthritis; the immune system and bone

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that is more common in women than in men. The peak incidence in females coincides with menopause when the ovarian production of sex hormones drops markedly. RA is characterized by skeletal manifestations where production of pro-inflammatory mediators, connected to the inflammation in the joint, leads to bone loss. Animal studies have revealed distinct beneficial effects of estrogens on arthritis, and a positive effect of hormone replacement therapy has been reported in women with postmenopausal RA. This review will focus on the influence of female sex hormones in the pathogenesis and progression of RA.

Effects of bazedoxifene on bone mineral density, bone turnover, and safety in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response late phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Japanese women 85 years of age or younger with osteoporosis. Eligible subjects received daily treatment with oral doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg or placebo for 2 years. Efficacy assessments included bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and other skeletal sites, bone turnover marker levels, lipid parameters, and incidence of new fractures. Of 429 randomized subjects, 387 were evaluable for efficacy, and 423 were included in the safety analyses (mean age, 64 years). At 2 years, the mean percent changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMD were significantly greater with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg (2.43% and 2.74%, respectively) than with placebo (-0.65%, p < .001 for both). Both bazedoxifene doses significantly improved BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, and greater trochanter compared with placebo (p < .001 for all). Decreases in bone turnover markers were observed with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg as early as 12 weeks (p < .05 for all) and were sustained throughout the study. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly decreased from baseline with both bazedoxifene doses compared with placebo (p < .05 for all). Incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were similar among the bazedoxifene and placebo groups. Overall, the incidence of adverse events with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg was similar to that with placebo. Bazedoxifene significantly improved BMD, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Safety and tolerability of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Findings from this 5-year phase 3 study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis showed that bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Overall, the results at 5 years were consistent with those seen at 3 years.

INTRODUCTION

We report safety and tolerability findings from a 5-year randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

In the core study, healthy postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N=7,492; mean age, 66.4 years) were randomized to daily doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo for 3 years. During the 2-year study extension, the raloxifene 60-mg treatment arm was discontinued after the 3-year database was finalized, and subjects receiving bazedoxifene 40 mg were transitioned in a blinded manner to bazedoxifene 20 mg (bazedoxifene 40-/20-mg group) after 4 years. Safety and tolerability data are reported for subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-/20-mg and placebo groups; efficacy findings are reported elsewhere.

RESULTS

A total of 3,146 subjects in the bazedoxifene 20- and 40-mg and placebo groups were enrolled in the extension study (years 4 and 5). Overall, the 5-year incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs were similar among groups. The incidence of hot flushes and leg cramps was higher with bazedoxifene compared with placebo. Venous thromboembolic events, primarily deep vein thrombosis, were more frequently reported in the bazedoxifene groups compared with the placebo group. Reports of cardiac disorders and cerebrovascular events were few and evenly distributed among groups. Bazedoxifene showed a neutral effect on the breast and endometrium.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene was associated with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis over 5 years of therapy, consistent with findings at 3 years.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women

This 6-month study examined the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene 20 mg in postmenopausal Asian women. Bazedoxifene showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in bone mineral density at all skeletal sites evaluated. Bazedoxifene significantly reduced bone turnover and had favorable effects on lipid parameters. Bazedoxifene was safe and well tolerated.

INTRODUCTION

This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in China, Korea, and Taiwan evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women.

METHODS

Generally, healthy postmenopausal Asian women (N=487; mean age, 57.2 years; mean lumbar spine bone mineral density [BMD], -1.1) were randomized to daily therapy with bazedoxifene 20 mg or placebo; all subjects received daily supplemental calcium carbonate 600 mg. The changes from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (primary end point) and at other skeletal sites, bone turnover markers, and lipid parameters were evaluated at 6 months. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting and physical/gynecologic examination.

RESULTS

At 6 months, women who received bazedoxifene 20 mg had significantly greater BMD compared with those receiving placebo at the lumbar spine (0.41% vs -0.32%, P<0.01), femoral neck (-0.08% vs -0.69%, P=0.014), trochanter (0.50% vs -0.23%, P=0.010), and total hip (-0.03% vs -0.77%, P<0.001), respectively. Bazedoxifene 20 mg was also associated with significant differences from placebo in median percent reductions from baseline in serum C-telopeptide (-21.8%, P<0.001) and osteocalcin (-12.9%, P<0.001) levels and total (-5.0%, P<0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-9.5%, P<0.001) levels. The incidence of AEs was not different between subjects treated with bazedoxifene and those who received placebo.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene was generally safe and effective in preventing bone loss in this short-term study of postmenopausal Asian women.

SERMs and SERMs with estrogen for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bone loss with aging places postmenopausal women at a higher risk for osteoporosis and its consequences such as fractures, pain, disability, and increased morbidity and mortality. Approximately 200 million patients worldwide are affected. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) estimated that up to 18% of US women aged 50 and older have osteoporosis and up to 50% have osteopenia. Greater than 2 million osteoporotic related fractures occurred in the United States with direct healthcare costs exceeding $17 billion. Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) was a popular option for postmenopausal women before the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Several agents are available in the U.S., including bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, calcitonin, parathyroid hormone and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene. There are concerns about long term safety and compliance. Therefore, other agents are under investigation. SERMs are a diverse group of agents that bind to the estrogen receptor and each SERM appears to have a unique set of clinical responses, which are not always consistent with the typical responses seen with other SERMs. This article will discuss the SERMs approved in the United States, tamoxifene and raloxifene, and investigational SERMs. The ideal SERM would include the beneficial effects of estrogen in bone, heart and the central nervous system, with neutral or antagonistic effects in tissues where estrogen effects are undesirable(breast and endometrium). A new target in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis is the tissue estrogen complex or the pairing of a SERM with a conjugated estrogen known as a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC). This novel approach is currently being evaluated with bazodoxifene which could yield the beneficial effects of estrogens and SERMS, while potentially being more tolerable and safer than either therapy alone.

What is the best balance of benefits and risks among anti-resorptive therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Pharmacologic osteoporosis therapy, particularly anti-resorptives, is recommended in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture. Treatment decisions should be made based on the relative benefit-risk profile in different patient populations. Emerging options [e.g., selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and denosumab] may hold promise for providing protection from bone loss and for fracture risk reduction.Osteoporosis, the most common clinical disorder of bone metabolism, is characterized by low bone mineral density, deterioration of microarchitecture, and a consequent increase in bone fragility and risk of fracture. Pharmacologic therapy is recommended in postmenopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture and includes anti-resorptive agents such as bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, SERMs, and calcitonin. The anabolic agent teriparatide (parathyroid hormone) is usually reserved for high-risk patients or those with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Strontium ranelate, available outside the USA, has both anti-resorptive and anabolic properties. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D is recommended for all women aged 50 years and older. Bisphosphonates are often considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis and have the largest base of clinical trial data showing efficacy for global fracture risk reduction. Low-dose hormone therapy is appropriate for younger women who are experiencing other menopausal symptoms. In women for whom bisphosphonates are not appropriate or not tolerated or in younger postmenopausal women who have a low risk for hip fracture, SERMs are a suitable treatment option. Calcitonin is designated for patients who are unable or unwilling to tolerate other osteoporosis agents. Emerging options, including newer SERMs (e.g., bazedoxifene and lasofoxifene) and the monoclonal antibody denosumab, may hold promise for providing protection from bone loss and for fracture risk reduction. Because no single agent is appropriate for all patients, treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, taking into account the relative benefits and risks in different patient populations.

A new approach to menopausal therapy: the tissue selective estrogen complex

A new approach to menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex or the pairing of a selective estrogen receptor modulator with estrogens. The clinical profile of a tissue selective estrogen complex will result from the blended tissue-selective activities of its components. An appropriate tissue selective estrogen complex may provide the therapeutic benefits of estrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators with better tolerability and safety than either therapy alone. An ideal menopausal therapy would reduce the number and severity of hot flashes, effectively treat vulvar-vaginal atrophy and its symptoms, prevent and treat menopausal osteoporosis, and have favorable effects on lipoprotein profiles, while at the same time would not stimulate the endometrium, not cause uterine bleeding, not increase the risk of vascular events, not be associated with breast pain or tenderness, and potentially reduce breast cancer incidence. Here, we introduce the concept of a tissue selective estrogen complex and the rationale for its development as a next generation menopausal therapy.

New selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in development

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or estrogen agonists/antagonists have shown promise in osteoporosis in that they have the potential to reduce the risk of fracture, and also reduce the risk of breast cancer. SERMs maybe classified according to their core structure, which is typically a variation of the 17 beta-estradiol template and subclassified according to the side chain at the helix 12 affector region. The best known are the triphenylethylenes such as tamoxifen, used in the management of breast cancer. However, the clinical application of this class of SERMs has been limited due to endometrial stimulation. A second class is the benzothiophenes such as raloxifene and arzoxifene, which have skeletal benefit with little, if any, uterine stimulation. Indole-based SERMs such as bazedoxifene have a 2-phenyl ring system that serves as a core binding unit. Other classes include benzopyrans and naphthalenes (eg, lasofoxifene). In this review article, I will discuss raloxifene and three new SERMs--arzoxifene, bazedoxifene, and lasofoxifene--that have been recently studied. I will discuss their effect on bone, breast, and the cardiovascular system, as well as on safety.

Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis represents a weakening of bone tissue due to an imbalance in the dynamic processes of bone formation and bone resorption that are continually ongoing within bone tissue. Most currently available osteoporosis therapies are antiresorptive agents. Over the past decade, bisphosphonates, notably alendronate and risedronate, have become the dominant agents with newer bisphosphonates such as ibandronate and zoledronic acid following a trend of less frequent dosing regimens. Synthetic estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) continue to be developed as drugs that maintain the bone-protective effects of estrogen while avoiding its associated adverse side effects. Currently available agents of this class include raloxifene, the only SERM available in the United States (US), and lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene, available in Europe. Calcitonin, usually administered as a nasal spray, completes the list of currently approved antiresorptive agents, while parathyroid hormone analogs represent the only anabolic agents currently approved in both the US and Europe. Strontium ranelate is an additional agent available in Europe but not the US that has both anabolic and antiresorptive activity. New agents expected to further expand therapeutic options include denosumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of the resorptive enzyme cathepsin K, which is in the final stages of Food and Drug Administration approval. Other agents in preclinical development include those targeting specific molecules of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway involved in stimulating bone formation by osteoblast cells. This review discusses the use of currently available agents as well as highlighting emerging agents expected to bring significant changes to the approach to osteoporosis therapy in the near future.

Hot flushes: are there effective alternatives to estrogen?

Hot flushes are the most common indication for the prescription of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) since it is effective in over 80% of cases. In 1995, 37% of American women took HRT, principally for this purpose. However, over the last five years, publications such as those from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) have caused concern among women since they perceive that the risks outweigh the benefits. Following this publication, half of the women taking HRT in the UK, USA and New Zealand discontinued HRT. With the discontinuation of estrogen many women re-developed hot flushes; however only a small number (18%) of women report restarting hormone therapy. The majority of these (76%) for the recurrence of severe hot flushes or night sweats. Alternatives are available, but limited knowledge on aetiology and mechanisms of hot flushing represents a major obstacle for the development of new, targeted, non-hormonal treatments, and no current alternatives are as effective as estrogen.

Bazedoxifene: a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Several new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are currently under clinical development for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, with the goal of optimizing the estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist activity in target tissues. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM under clinical investigation for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Emerging clinical data have shown that bazedoxifene is effective in preventing bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, with no evidence of breast or endometrial stimulation. Two large, prospective, international phase 3 studies have been completed. In postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has been shown to preserve bone mineral density and to reduce bone turnover. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant protection against new vertebral fractures and against non-vertebral fractures in women at higher fracture risk. The treatment effects of bazedoxifene were supported by findings from independent re-analyses using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), which showed that bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of all clinical and morphometric vertebral fracture and of non-vertebral fracture in women at or above a FRAX-based threshold. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well tolerated in the phase 3 studies and showed neutral effects on the breast and an excellent endometrial safety profile; such attributes allow for the partnering of bazedoxifene with conjugated estrogens for menopausal symptom relief. Collectively, these results suggest that bazedoxifene may be a promising new therapy for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis as a monotherapy or in combination with conjugated estrogens in menopausal hormone therapy.

Treating postmenopausal osteoporosis in women at increased risk of fracture - critical appraisal of bazedoxifene: a review

Several categories of drugs to treat osteoporosis exist in the form of bisphosphonates, strontium, parathyroid hormone, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM). Advantages and disadvantages exist for each category as some patients may, for example, not tolerate bisphosphonates for gastrointestinal side effects, and especially in women in whom osteoporosis is frequent, several options for treatment are needed. The objectives of this review were to critically appraise the effects of bazedoxifene on risk of fractures especially in women at high risk of fractures. A systematic literature search was conducted for studies, especially randomized controlled trials with fractures as end-points. Bazedoxifene is a new member of the SERM group. The literature search identified one randomized controlled trial with fractures as end-point. This was a 3-year randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial in which 7492 postmenopausal women aged 55 to 85 years were randomly allocated to 1) bazedoxifene (20 [n = 1886] or 40 [n = 1872] mg/day); 2) raloxifene (60 mg/day, n = 1849); or 3) placebo (n = 1885). The risk of vertebral fractures decreased with both 20 (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89) and 40 (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96) mg of bazedoxifene per day compared to placebo. There was no reduction in non-vertebral fractures. A subgroup of women with a priori high risk of fractures was identified post hoc. In this subgroup there was a reduction in the risk of non-vertebral fractures with the 20 mg dose of bazedoxifene compared to placebo (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.90). In the 40 mg bazedoxifene group no significant reduction in non-vertebral fractures was seen in this subgroup (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.20). In general post-hoc defined subgroup analyses should be interpreted with caution. However, the results indicate that bazedoxifene may be effective in preventing vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Long-term safety and efficacy of raloxifene in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an update

The integrity of bone tissue and its remodeling that occurs throughout life requires a coordinated activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The decreased estrogen circulating level during postmenopausal transition, with a prevalence of osteoclastic activity over osteoblastic activity, represents the main cause of bone loss and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy and it is important to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatments over several years, as the fear of health risks is a common reason for discontinuing therapy. Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) leading to estrogen-agonist effects in some tissues and estrogen-antagonist effects in others. Raloxifene is effective to prevent and treat postmenopausal vertebral osteoporosis, with reduction of spine fractures and, in post-hoc analyses, non-spine fractures in high-risk subjects. Moreover, raloxifene reduces the risk of invasive breast cancer and improves the levels of serum lipoprotein but with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and fatal stroke, without significant change in the incidence of coronary events. For these reasons the overall risk-benefit profile is favorable. Therefore, when considering the use of raloxifene in a postmenopausal woman, we should take into account the osteoporosis-related individual risk and weigh the potential benefits, skeletal and extra-skeletal, against the health risks.

Endometrial safety: a key hurdle for selective estrogen receptor modulators in development

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have the ability to provide mixed functional estrogen receptor (ER) agonist or antagonist activity, depending on the target tissue. Tamoxifen, the first SERM available for clinical use, is regarded as a highly effective agent for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. However, tamoxifen exhibits ER agonist activity in the uterus and is associated with an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and malignancy. Endometrial safety has been an important consideration in the clinical development of SERMs, with improved benefit-risk profiles. Raloxifene, which is currently approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and for the prevention of breast cancer, seems to have neutral effects on the uterus. Promising results have been observed with the targeted development of newer and more tissue-specific SERMs, many of which are under investigation for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Of the newer SERMs in development, lasofoxifene has been shown to reduce fracture risk and decrease the incidence of breast cancer but has been associated with an increased incidence of vaginal bleeding, endometrial thickening, and endometrial polyps. Lasofoxifene and ospemifene have shown beneficial effects on the vaginal epithelium. Phase 3 clinical data have shown that bazedoxifene is effective in preventing and treating postmenopausal osteoporosis, without adverse effects on the endometrium or breast. Arzoxifene has been evaluated in phase 3 trials for postmenopausal osteoporosis and has been studied for the treatment of uterine malignancies but is no longer in clinical development. Further investigation of newer SERMs is warranted to more clearly define the endometrial safety of these agents.

Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis as a common chronic disease is challenging human health. Although different therapeutic options are routinely used for prevention/treatment of osteoporosis, their side effects and benefits are under question. Increasing our knowledge about signaling pathways in bone and osteocytes as well as osteoblasts and osteoclasts will help us in designing new therapeutic modalities for osteoporosis. In the present study, all new therapeutic measures of osteoporosis have been reviewed. For this purpose, search engines like Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar were searched and all relevant articles were found. The study was limited to the year 1998-2010. Bisphosphonates are the cornerstone of osteoporosis treatment, but there are not enough relevant studies that investigated their equivalencies in comparison with each other or the other medications. Therefore, medication selection is empirical and subjective. Furthermore, no eminent study has compared certain combinations. There are new hopes for treatment of osteoporosis, which are more specific with less harm. Our results show that new and emerging therapies are more potent and target specified which more individualize osteoporosis treatment; however, more investigations on their safety and efficacy in comparison with current medications are highly recommended.

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis affects millions of individuals, particularly postmenopausal women, and imposes a severe burden on patients and the healthcare system. Several therapeutic options are commercially available for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, including bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), raloxifene. Because each of these agents has its own individual risk-benefit profile, their use should be tailored to specific patient populations. While many agents are approved for osteoporosis, new therapies are needed that maximize efficacy outcomes and minimize safety concerns. Several new SERMs are being evaluated in an effort to achieve an ideal tissue selectivity profile, with beneficial effects on bone without negative effects on the endometrium and breast. Bazedoxifene is a novel SERM that was recently approved in the European Union and is undergoing regulatory review in the United States for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and safety data for bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with or at risk for osteoporosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database and relevant congress abstract databases were searched to identify all pertinent literature on bazedoxifene for the prevention and/or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In phase 3 clinical studies, bazedoxifene has demonstrated significant reduction in the risk of new vertebral fracture versus placebo and positive effects on bone mineral density and bone turnover. Moreover, in a subgroup analysis of women at high risk for fracture, bazedoxifene significantly reduced the risk of nonvertebral fracture versus both placebo and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene was generally safe and well-tolerated in women with and at risk for osteoporosis, with no evidence of endometrial or breast stimulation. Data inclusion for this review article was limited by what was available in the public domain.

CONCLUSION

The available clinical data suggest that bazedoxifene may offer a favorable risk-benefit profile for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Safety of bazedoxifene in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled Phase 3 study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

Background

We report the safety findings from a 3-year phase 3 study (NCT00205777) of bazedoxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator under development for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

Healthy postmenopausal osteoporotic women (N = 7,492; mean age, 66.4 years) were randomized to daily doses of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo for 3 years. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting and routine physical, gynecologic, and breast examination.

Results

Overall, the incidence of AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs in the bazedoxifene groups was not different from that seen in the placebo group. The incidence of hot flushes and leg cramps was higher with bazedoxifene or raloxifene compared with placebo. The rates of cardiac disorders and cerebrovascular events were low and evenly distributed among groups. Venous thromboembolic events, primarily deep vein thromboses, were more frequently reported in the active treatment groups compared with the placebo group; rates were similar with bazedoxifene and raloxifene. Bazedoxifene showed a neutral effect on the breast and an excellent endometrial safety profile. The incidence of fibrocystic breast disease was lower with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg versus raloxifene or placebo. Reductions in total and low-density lipoprotein levels and increases in high-density lipoprotein levels were seen with bazedoxifene versus placebo; similar results were seen with raloxifene. Triglyceride levels were similar among groups.

Conclusion

Bazedoxifene showed a favorable safety and tolerability profile in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Trial Registration

Trial registration number: NCT00205777; Trial registration date: September 16, 2005

Developing drugs to treat osteoporosis: lessons learned?

BACKGROUND

Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) are drugs that act as estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists depending on the target tissue. Theoretically this class of agents would be an ideal substitute for hormone replacement therapy (HRT), if their effects on the skeleton matched those of estrogen while their actions on other tissues were either neutral or beneficial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a Phase III trial of a new SERM, arzoxefine, for prevention of osteoporosis in younger postmenopausal women.

METHODS/RESULTS

Arzoxifene induced modest but significant increases in bone mineral density versus a control group during 2 years of therapy, with minor adverse events. However, fracture efficacy and other patient-specific outcomes were not evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Despite a positive study of surrogate end points (bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover), arzoxifene was withdrawn from further FDA evaluation, principally because of long-term side effects and lack of non-vertebral fracture efficacy in the companion Phase III fracture study. Each SERM has a unique profile on bone and other tissues. Regulatory approval of this class of agents may remain problematic for the immediate future.

Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To update the evidence-based position statement published by The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) in 2006 regarding the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

NAMS followed the general principles established for evidence-based guidelines to create this updated document. A panel of clinicians and researchers expert in the field of metabolic bone diseases and/or women's health was enlisted to review the 2006 NAMS position statement, compile supporting statements, and reach consensus on recommendations. The panel's recommendations were reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis, which is especially prevalent among older postmenopausal women, increases the risk of fractures. Hip and spine fractures are associated with particularly high morbidity and mortality in this population. Given the health implications of osteoporotic fractures, the primary goal of osteoporosis therapy is to prevent fractures, which is accomplished by slowing or stopping bone loss, maintaining bone strength, and minimizing or eliminating factors that may contribute to fractures. The evaluation of postmenopausal women for osteoporosis risk requires a medical history, physical examination, and diagnostic tests. Major risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis (as defined by bone mineral density) include advanced age, genetics, lifestyle factors (such as low calcium and vitamin D intake, smoking), thinness, and menopause status. The most common risk factors for osteoporotic fracture are advanced age, low bone mineral density, and previous fracture as an adult. Management focuses first on nonpharmacologic measures, such as a balanced diet, adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, adequate exercise, smoking cessation, avoidance of excessive alcohol intake, and fall prevention. If pharmacologic therapy is indicated, government-approved options are bisphosphonates, selective estrogen-receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone, estrogens, and calcitonin.

CONCLUSIONS

Management strategies for postmenopausal women involve identifying those at risk for fracture, followed by instituting measures that focus on reducing modifiable risk factors through dietary and lifestyle changes and, if indicated, pharmacologic therapy.

Effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens on quality of life in postmenopausal women with symptoms of vulvar/vaginal atrophy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) pairing bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE) on sexual function and quality of life in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In this 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, postmenopausal, non-hysterectomized women (n = 652) with symptoms of moderate to severe vulvar/vaginal atrophy were randomized to once-daily treatment with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg, BZA 20 mg, or placebo. The Arizona Sexual Experiences (ASEX) Scale, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire, and Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ) were secondary measures used to assess the effects of BZA/CE on sexual function, menopausal symptoms, and satisfaction with treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

At week 12, both BZA/CE doses were associated with significant improvement in ease of lubrication score from baseline compared with placebo (p < 0.05) on the ASEX scale, although there was no difference in the change in total score. The MENQOL questionnaire results at week 12 showed significant improvements in vasomotor function, sexual function and total scores with both BZA/CE doses vs. placebo or BZA 20 mg (p < 0.001). The MS-TSQ results showed that BZA/CE-treated subjects reported significantly greater overall satisfaction with treatment, as well as satisfaction with control of hot flushes during the day and night, effect on quality of sleep, and effect on mood or emotions, compared with subjects treated with placebo or BZA 20 mg (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with BZA/CE for 12 weeks was shown to significantly improve sexual function and quality-of-life measures in symptomatic postmenopausal women.

SERMs in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an update

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have the ability to bind the estrogen receptor (ER) and are known to confer ER agonist or antagonist effects depending on the target tissue. A number of newer SERMs, including bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene and ospemifene, are currently under clinical development for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and for other indications. Although the possibility of developing a single agent that has all of the desired characteristics of an ideal SERM seems to be unlikely, progress in the clinical development of SERMs targeted to the ER suggests that these newer compounds may have attributes that represent an improvement relative to existing SERMs. A new approach to menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex or the pairing of a selective estrogen receptor modulator with estrogens. Further investigation will help to clarify relative benefits/risks of novel SERMs in development within specific indications.

Current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is an asymptomatic skeletal disease that is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Osteoporotic fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and impaired quality of life-socially, emotionally, and financially. Considering the growing burden of osteoporotic fractures worldwide, there remains an ongoing need for progress in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, identification of individuals at high fracture risk, and treatment to prevent fractures. Adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D is recommended as baseline therapy for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Available pharmacological agents for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis may not be appropriate for all women. Oral bisphosphonates are generally considered first-line therapy for patients with osteoporosis, but their use may be limited by gastrointestinal side effects. Other agents include hormone therapy, the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) raloxifene, salmon calcitonin, teriparatide (human recombinant parathyroid hormone), and strontium ranelate (in some countries). Factors that may contribute to poor compliance and persistence with current osteoporosis therapies include drug intolerance, complexity of dosing regimens, and poor understanding of the relative benefit and risk with treatment. Emerging therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis include novel SERMs (bazedoxifene, lasofoxifene, ospemifene, arzoxifene) and denosumab. Because SERMs can display mixed functional estrogen receptor agonist or antagonist activity depending on the target tissue, they may confer beneficial effects on bone with limited stimulation of other tissues (e.g., breast, endometrium). Clinical investigation of these promising new agents is ongoing to evaluate efficacy and safety, with the goal of developing effective strategies to maximize long-term tolerance, compliance, and persistence with therapy.

Bazedoxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator: effects on the endometrium, ovaries, and breast from a randomized controlled trial in osteoporotic postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the endometrial, ovarian, and breast safety of bazedoxifene used as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

Healthy women (aged 55-85 y) with osteoporosis were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Participants were randomized to treatment with bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, or placebo daily for 3 years. Endometrial and ovarian safety was assessed by periodic transvaginal ultrasonography and endometrial biopsy through 24 months. Gynecologic and breast-related adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Among 753 participants with available transvaginal ultrasonography data, there were no significant between-group differences in overall endometrial thickness or in the percentage of participants with endometrial thickness greater than 5 mm at 12 or 24 months. Changes in the mean endometrial thickness (+/-SE) from baseline were -0.07 +/- 0.11 mm (bazedoxifene 20 mg), 0.10 +/- 0.11 mm (bazedoxifene 40 mg), 0.16 +/- 0.12 mm (raloxifene 60 mg), and -0.08 +/- 0.11 mm (placebo) at 24 months. There was one report of endometrial hyperplasia in each group, and there were zero, two, two, and three reports of endometrial carcinoma with bazedoxifene 20 and 40 mg, raloxifene 60 mg, and placebo, respectively. There were no clinically important changes from baseline in the number or size of ovarian cysts among groups. There was a significantly lower incidence of fibrocystic breast disease (P <or= 0.05) with bazedoxifene compared with raloxifene 60 mg.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene was associated with a favorable endometrial, ovarian, and breast safety profile in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Relief of vasomotor symptoms with the tissue-selective estrogen complex containing bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of bazedoxifene (BZA)/conjugated estrogens (CE) treating moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in the Selective Estrogen Menopause and Response to Therapy 2 trial.

METHODS

This was an outpatient, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in the United States. Healthy postmenopausal women (N = 332; aged 40-65 y) with moderate to severe hot flushes (>or=7/d or 50/wk) were randomized to BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in the average daily number of moderate and severe hot flushes and daily severity score were assessed at weeks 4 and 12; adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

BZA/CE significantly reduced the number and severity of hot flushes at weeks 4 and 12 (P < 0.001). At week 12, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg reduced hot flushes from baseline by 74% (10.3 hot flushes [baseline] vs 2.8 [week 12]) and 80% (10.4 vs 2.4), respectively, compared with 51% (10.5 vs 5.4) for placebo. More participants at week 12 had at least a 75% decrease in hot flushes with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg (61%) and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg (73%) versus placebo (27%; P < 0.001). The safety profile was similar between BZA/CE and placebo, and no unexpected safety findings were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

BZA 20 mg paired with CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg is effective, with short-term safety, for treating vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

Assessing fracture risk and effects of osteoporosis drugs: bone mineral density and beyond

Although there have been numerous advances in the assessment of bone strength and fracture risk, the majority of these techniques can only be performed in research laboratories, making them largely unavailable to practicing clinicians. Prospective epidemiologic studies have identified risk factors that can be assessed within the clinic and combined with bone mineral density to allow clinicians to better identify untreated individuals at heightened risk for fracture and to make informed treatment decisions based on 10-year absolute fracture risk. This article discusses the assessment of fracture risk in clinical practice, reviews currently and soon-available bone measurement tools, and details the impacts of osteoporosis therapies on fracture risk.

Undertreatment of menopausal symptoms and novel options for comprehensive management

OBJECTIVE

There is currently a gap in treatment options for menopausal symptoms and a need for comprehensive therapies that are safe and effective for postmenopausal women. This review discusses challenges in the management of menopausal symptoms and the effect of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study findings on current treatment patterns. It also examines present and future therapies.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline, the Cochrane Database, and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute WHI website with the following search terms: primary care, menopause, vasomotor symptoms, hormone therapy, osteoporosis, and vaginal atrophy. Searches were limited to articles published between 1995 and 2009.

RESULTS

Comprehensive therapies that target several aspects of menopause, such as vasomotor symptoms and chronic disease prevention, are currently hormone based. These hormone-based approaches are considered more effective than currently available nonhormonal therapies for the relief of menopausal symptoms. However, hormone therapy is not recommended for women at high risk for venous thromboembolic events, cardiovascular disease, and/or breast cancer. A need exists for novel therapies that mitigate menopausal symptoms, provide protection from osteoporosis, and encourage patient compliance without promoting cancer, heart disease, or stroke. Emerging modalities and strategies, such as the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), Org 50081, MF101, and desvenlafaxine, may provide improved options for postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Several new menopausal therapies that may help to address the ongoing unmet need for safe and effective therapies for postmenopausal women are currently in development. In particular, the TSEC, which provides the benefits of both a selective estrogen receptor modulator and conjugated estrogens with an improved tolerability profile, may offer advantages over currently available treatment options. Limitations of this review include the narrow search criteria and limited search period.